MENU

Where the world comes to study the Bible

Appendix One: Introduction to Hebrew Poetry

I. INTRODUCTION

A. This type of literature makes up 1/3 of the Old Testament.  It is especially common in the "Prophets" (all but Haggai and Malachi contain poetry) and "Writings" sections of the Hebrew canon.

B. It is very different from English poetry. English poetry is developed from Greek and Latin poetry, which is primarily sound-based. Hebrew poetry has much in common with Canaanite poetry. It is basically thought-based in balanced, parallel lines.

C. The archaeological discovery north of Israel at Ugarit (Ras Shamra) has helped scholars understand OT poetry. This poetry from the 15th century b.c. has obvious literary connections with biblical poetry. 

II. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF POETRY

A. It is very compact.

B. It tries to express truth, feelings or experiences in imagery.

C. It is primarily written not oral. It is highly structured. This structure is expressed in:

1. balanced lines (parallelism)

2. word plays

3. sound plays 

III. THE STRUCTURE (R. K. Harrison, Introduction to the Old Testament, pp.965-975)

A. Bishop Robert Lowth in his book, Lectures on the Sacred Poetry of the Hebrews (1753) was the first to characterize biblical poetry as balanced lines of thought.  Most modern English translations are formatted to show the lines of poetry.

1. synonymous – the lines express the same thought in different words:

a. Psalm 3:1; 49:1; 83:14; 103:13

b. Proverbs 19:5; 20:1

c. Isaiah 1:3,10

d. Amos 5:24; 8:10

2. antithetical – the lines express opposite thoughts by means of contrast or stating the positive and the negative:

a. Psalm 1:6; 90:6

b. Proverbs 1:29; 10:1,12; 15:1; 19:4

3. synthetic – the next two or three lines develop the thought – Ps. 19:7-9

4. chiasmic – a pattern of poetry expressing the message in a descending and ascending order.  The main point is found in the middle of the pattern.

B. Charles A. Briggs in his book, General Introduction to the Study of Holy Scripture (1899) developed the next stage of analysis of Hebrew poetry:

1. emblematic – one clause literal and the second metaphorical, Ps. 42:1; 103:3

2. climatic or stair-like – the clauses reveal truth in an ascending fashion, Ps. 19:7-14; 29:1-2; 103:20-22

3. introverted – a series of clauses, usually at least four are related by the internal structure of line 1 to 4 and 2 to 3 – Ps. 30:8-10a

C. G. B. Gray in his book, The Forms of Hebrew Poetry (1915), developed the concept of balanced clauses further by:

1. complete balance – where every word in line one is repeated or balanced by a word in line two – Psalm 83:14 and Isaiah 1:3

2. incomplete balance where the clauses are not the same length - Ps. 59:16; 75:6

D. Today there is a growing recognition of literary structural pattern in Hebrew called a chiasm, which usually denotes a number of parallel lines (a.b,b,a; a,b,c,b,a) forming an hour glass shape, often the central line(s) is emphasized.

E. Type of sound patterns found in poetry in general, but not often in eastern poetry

1. play on alphabet (acrostic, cf. Ps. 9,34,37,119; Pro. 31:10ff; Lamentations 1-4)

2. play on consonants (alliteration, cf. Ps. 6:8; 27:7; 122:6; Isa. 1:18-26)

3. play on vowels (assonance, cf. Gen. 49:17; Exod. 14:14; Ezek. 27:27)

4. play on repetition of similar sounding words with different meanings (paronomasia)

5. play on words which, when pronounced, sound like the thing they name (onomatopoeia)

6. special opening and close (inclusive)

F. There are several types of poetry in the Old Testament.  Some are topic related and some are form related.

1. dedication song – Num. 21:17-18

2. work songs – (alluded to but not recorded in Jdgs. 9:27); Isa. 16:10; Jer. 25:30; 48:33

3. ballads – Num. 21:27-30; Isa. 23:16

4. drinking songs – negative, Isa. 5:11-13; Amos 6:4-7 and positive, Isa. 22:13

5. love poems – Song of Songs, wedding riddle - Jdgs. 14:10-18, wedding song - Psalm 45

6. laments/dirge – (alluded to but not recorded in II Sam. 1:17 and II Chr. 35:25) II Sam. 3:33; Ps. 27, 28; Jer. 9:17-22; Lam.; Ezek. 19:1-14; 26:17-18; Nah. 3:15-19)

7. war songs – Gen. 4:23-24; Exod. 15:1-18,20; Num. 10:35-36; 21:14-15; Josh. 10:13; Jdgs. 5:1-31; 11:34; I Sam. 18:6; II Sam. 1:18; Isa. 47:1-15; 37:21

8. special benedictions or blessing of leader – Genesis 49; Num. 6:24-26; Deuteronomy 32; II Sam. 23:1-7

9. magical texts – Balaam, Num. 24:3-9

10. sacred poems – Psalms

11. acrostic poems – Ps. 9,34,37,119; Prov. 31:10ff and Lamentations 1-4

12. curses – Num. 21:22-30

13. taunt poems – Isa. 14:1-22; 47:1-15; Ezek. 28:1-23

14. a book of war poems (Jashar) – Num. 21:14-15; Josh. 10:12-13; II Sam. 1:18 

IV. GUIDELINE TO INTERPRETING HEBREW POETRY

A. Look for the central truth of the stanza or strophe (this is like a paragraph in prose.)  The RSV was the first modern translation to identify poetry by stanzas. Compare modern translations for helpful insights.

B. Identify the figurative language and express it in prose.  Remember this type of literature is very compact, much is left for the reader to fill in.

C. Be sure to relate the longer issue-oriented poems to their literary context (often the whole book) and historical setting.  Try to express the central truth in your own words.

D. Judges 4 & 5 are very helpful in seeing how poetry expresses history.  Judges 4 is prose and Judges 5 is poetry of the same event (also compare Exodus 14 & 15).

E. Attempt to identify the type of parallelism involved, whether synonymous, antithetical, or synthetic. This is very important.

 

Copyright © 2012 Bible Lessons International

 

Related Topics: Introductions, Arguments, Outlines

Appendix Two: Introduction to Old Testament Prophecy

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Opening Statements

1. The believing community does not agree on how to interpret prophecy. Other truths have been established as to an orthodox position throughout the centuries, but not this one.

2. There are several well defined stages of OT prophecy

a. premonarchial

(1) individuals called prophets

(a) Abraham – Gen. 20:7

(b) Moses – Num. 12:6-8; Deut. 18:15; 34:10

(c) Aaron – Exod. 7:1 (spokesman for Moses)

(d) Miriam – Exod. 15:20

(e) Medad and Eldad – Num. 11:24-30

(f) Deborah – Jdgs. 4:4

(g) unnamed – Jdgs. 6:7-10

(h) Samuel – I Sam. 3:20

(2) references to prophets as a group – Deut. 13:1-5; 18:20-22

(3) prophetic group or guild – I Sam. 10:5-13; 19:20; I Kgs. 20:35,41; 22:6,10-13; II Kgs. 2:3,7; 4:1,38; 5:22; 6:1, etc.

(4) Messiah called prophet – Deut. 18:15-18

b. non-writing monarchial (they address the king):

(1) Gad – I Sam. 22:5; II Sam. 24:11; I Chr. 29:29

(2) Nathan – II Sam. 7:2; 12:25; I Kgs. 1:22

(3) Ahijah – I Kgs. 11:29

(4) Jehu – I Kgs. 16:1,7,12

(5) unnamed – I Kgs. 18:4,13; 20:13,22

(6) Elijah – I Kings 18 - II Kings 2

(7) Milcaiah – I Kings 22

(8) Elisha – II Kgs. 2:8,13

c. classical writing prophets (they address the nation as well as the king): Isaiah – Malachi (except Daniel) 

B. Biblical Terms

1. Ro'eh = "seer," I Sam. 9:9. This reference itself shows the transition to the term nabi. Ro'eh is from the general term "to see." This person understood God's ways and plans and was consulted to ascertain God's will in a matter.

2. Hozeh = "seer," II Sam. 24:11. It is basically a synonym of Ro'eh. It is from a rarer term "to see." The participled form is used most often to refer to prophets (i.e., "to behold").

3. Nabi' = "prophet," cognate of Akkadian verb Nabu = "to call" and Arabic Naba'a = "to announce."  This is the most common term in the Old Testament to designate a prophet. It is used over 300 times. The exact etymology is uncertain but "to call" at present seems the best option.  Possibly the best understanding comes from YHWH's description of Moses' relationship to Pharaoh through Aaron (cf. Exod. 4:10-16; 7:1; Deut. 5:5). A prophet is someone who speaks for God to His people (Amos 3:8; Jer. 1:7,17; Ezek. 3:4.)

4. All three terms are used of the prophet's office in I Chr. 29:29; Samuel – Ro'eh; Nathan – Nabi' and Gad – Hozeh.

5. The phrase, 'ish ha – 'elohim, "Man of God," is also a broader designation for a speaker for God.  It is used some 76 times in the OT in the sense of "prophet."

6. The term "prophet" is Greek in origin.  It comes from: (1) pro = "before" or "for" and (2) phemi = "to speak."

II. DEFINITION OF PROPHECY

A. The term "prophecy" had a wider semantic field in Hebrew than in English. The history books of Joshua through Kings (except Ruth) are labeled by the Jews as "the former prophets."  Both Abraham (Gen. 20:7; Ps. 105:15) and Moses (Deut. 18:18) are designated as prophets (also Miriam, Exod. 15:20). Therefore, beware of an assumed English definition!

B. "Propheticism may legitimately be defined as that understanding of history which accepts meaning only in terms of divine concern, divine purpose, divine participation," Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, vol. 3, p. 896.

C. "The prophet is neither a philosopher nor a systematic theologian, but a covenant mediator who delivers the word of God to His people in order to shape their future by reforming their present," Prophets and Prophecy, Encyclopedia Judaica vol. 13 p. 1152.

III. PURPOSE OF PROPHECY

A. Prophecy is a way for God to speak to His people, providing guidance in their current setting and hope in His control of their lives and world events. Their message was basically corporate. It is meant to rebuke, encourage, engender faith and repentance, and inform God's people about Himself and His plans. They hold God's people to fidelity to God's covenants.  To this must be added that often it is used to clearly reveal God's choice of a spokesman (Deut. 13:1-3; 18:20-22). This, taken ultimately, would refer to the Messiah.

B. Often, the prophet took a historical or theological crisis of his day and projected this into an eschatological setting. This end-time view of history is unique in Israel and its sense of divine election and covenant promises.

C. The office of prophet seems to balance (Jer. 18:18) and usurp the office of High Priest as a way to know God's will.  The Urim and Thummim transcend into a verbal message from God's spokesman.  The office of prophet seems to also have passed away in Israel after Malachi.  It does not reappear until 400 years later with John the Baptist.  It is uncertain how the New Testament gift of "prophecy" relates to the Old Testament.  New Testament prophets (Acts 11:27-28; 13:1; 15:32; I Cor. 12:10,28-29; 14:29,32,37; Eph. 4:11) are not revealers of new revelation or Scripture, but forth-tellers and foretellers of God's will in covenant situations.

D. Prophecy is not exclusively or primarily predictive in nature. Prediction is one way to confirm his office and his message, but it must be noted "less than 2% of OT prophecy is Messianic.  Less than 5% specifically describes the New Covenant Age.  Less than 1% concerns events yet to come." (Fee and Stuart, How to Read the Bible For All Its Worth, p. 166) 

E. Prophets represent God to the people, while Priests represent the people to God.  This is a general statement.  There are exceptions like Habakkuk, who addresses questions to God.

F. One reason it is difficult to understand the prophets is because we do not know how their books were structured.  They are not chronological.  They seem to be thematic but not always the way one would expect. Often there is no obvious historical setting, time frame or clear division between oracles. These books are difficult

1.    to read through in one sitting

2.    to outline by topic

3.    to ascertain the central truth or authorial intent in each oracle

IV. CHARACTERISTICS OF PROPHECY

A. In the Old Testament there seems to be a development of the concept of "prophet" and "prophecy."  In early Israel there developed a fellowship of prophets, led by a strong charismatic leader such as Elijah or Elisha.  Sometimes the phrase, "the sons of the prophets," was used to designate this group (II Kings 2).  The prophets were characterized by forms of ecstasy (I Sam. 10:10-13; 19:18-24).

B. However, this period passed rapidly into individuals prophets. There were those prophets (both true and false) who identified with the King, and lived at the palace (Gad, Nathan).  Also, there were those who were independent, sometimes totally unconnected with the status quo of Israeli society (Amos).  They are both male and female (II Kgs. 22:14.)

C. The prophet was often a revealer of the future, conditioned on man's immediate response.  Often the prophet's task was an unfolding of God's universal plan for His creation which is not affected by human response.  This universal eschatological plan is unique among the prophets of the Ancient Near East.  Prediction and Covenant fidelity are twin foci of the prophetic messages (cf. Fee and Stuart, p. 150).  This implies that the prophets are primarily corporate in focus. They usually, but not exclusively, address the nation.

D. Most prophetic material was orally presented. It was later combined by means of theme, chronology or other patterns of Near Eastern Literature which are lost to us.  Because it was oral it is not as structured as written prose. This makes the books difficult to read straight through and difficult to understand without a specific historical setting.

E. The prophets use several patterns to convey their messages.

1. Court Scene – God takes His people to court, often it is a divorce case where YHWH rejects his wife (Israel) for her unfaithfulness (Hosea 4; Micah 6).

2. Funeral dirge – the special meter of this type of message and its characteristic "woe" sets it apart as a special form (Isaiah 5; Habakkuk 2).

3. Covenant Blessing Pronouncement – the conditional nature of the Covenant is emphasized and the consequences, both positively and negatively, are spelled out for the future (Deuteronomy 27-28).

V. HELPFUL GUIDELINES FOR INTERPRETING PROPHECY

A. Find the intent of the original prophet (editor) by noting the historical setting and the literary context of each oracle. Usually it will involve Israel breaking the Mosaic Covenant in some way.

B. Read and interpret the whole oracle, not just a part; outline it as to content. See how it relates to surrounding oracles. Try to outline the whole book.

C. Assume a literal interpretation of the passage until something in the text itself points you to figurative usage; then put the figurative language into prose.

D. Analyze symbolic action in light of historical setting and parallel passages.  Be sure to remember this Ancient Near Eastern literature is not western or modern literature. 

E. Treat prediction with care.

1. Are they exclusively for the author's day?

2. Were they subsequently fulfilled in Israel's history?

3. Are they yet future events?

4. Do they have a contemporary fulfillment and yet a future fulfillment?

5. Allow the authors of the Bible, not modern authors, to guide your answers.

F. Special concerns

1. Is the prediction qualified by conditional response?

2. Is it certain to whom the prophecy is addressed (and why)?

3. Is there a possibility both biblically and/or historically for multiple fulfilment?

4. The NT authors under inspiration were able to see the Messiah in many places in the OT that are not obvious to us.  They seem to use typology or word play.  Since we are not inspired we best leave this approach to them.

VI. HELPFUL BOOKS

A. A Guide to Biblical Prophecy by Carl E. Amending and W. Ward Basque

B. How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth by Gordon Fee and Douglas Stuart

C. My Servants the Prophets by Edward J. Young

D. Plowshares and Pruning Hooks: Rethinking the Language of Biblical Prophecy and Apocalyptic by D. Brent Sandy

E. New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology and Exegesis, vol. 4, pp. 1067-1078 

 

Copyright © 2012 Bible Lessons International

 

Related Topics: Introductions, Arguments, Outlines

Appendix Three: A Brief Historical Survey of the Powers of Mesopotamia

(using dates based primarily on John Bright’s A History of Israel, p. 462ff.)

I. Assyrian Empire (Gen.10:11)

A. Religion and culture were greatly influenced by the Sumerian/Babylonian Empire.

B. Tentative list of rulers and approximate dates:

 

  1.   1354-1318   — Asshur-Uballit I:
      (a) conquered the Hittite city of Carchemish
(b) began to remove Hittite influence and allowed Assyria to develop
  2.   1297-1266  —  Adad-Nirari I (powerful king)
  3.   1265-1235  —  Shalmaneser I (powerful king)
  4.   1234-1197  —  Tukulti-Ninurta I
         —  first conquest of Babylonian empire to the south
  5.   1118-1078  —  Tiglath-Pileser I
         —  Assyria becomes a major power in Mesopotamia
  6.   1012-972  —  Ashur-Rabi II
  7.   972-967  —  Ashur-Resh-Isui II
  8.   966-934  —  Tiglath-Pileser II
  9.   934-912  —  Ashur-Dan II
  10.   912-890  —  Adad-Nirari II
  11.   890-884  —  Tukulti-Ninurta II
  12.   883-859  —  Asshur-Nasir-Apal II
  13.   859-824  —  Shalmaneser III
              —  Battle of Qarqar in 853
  14.   824-811  —  Shamashi-Adad V
  15.   811-783  —  Adad-Nirari III
  16.   781-772  —  Shalmaneser IV
  17.   772-754  —  Ashur-Dan III
  18.   754-745  —  Ashur-Nirari V
  19.   745-727  — Tiglath-Pileser III:

a. called by his Babylonian throne name, Pul, in II Kings 15:19

b. very powerful king

c. started the policy of deporting conquered peoples

d. In 735 b.c.. there was the formation of the “Syro-Ephramatic League” which was an attempt to unify all the available military resources of the transjordan nations from the head waters of the Euphrates to Egypt for the purpose of neutralizing the rising military power of Assyria. King Ahaz of Judah refused to join and was invaded by Israel and Syria. He wrote to Tiglath-Pileser III for help against the advise of Isaiah (cf. II Kgs. 16; Isa. 7-12).

e. In 732 Tiglath-Pileser III invades and conquers Syria and Israel and places a vassal king on the throne of Israel, Hoshea (732-722). Thousands of Jews from the Northern Kingdom were exiled to Media (cf. II Kings 15).

20. 727-722 —  Shalmaneser V

a. Hoshea forms an alliance with Egypt and is invaded by Assyria (cf. II Kgs.17)

b. besieged Samaria in 724 b.c.

21. 722-705 —  Sargon II:

a. After a three year siege started by Shalmaneser V, his successor Sargon II conquers the capital of Israel, Samaria. Over 27,000 are deported to Media.

b. The Hittite empire is also conquered.

c. In 714-711 another coalition of transjordan nations and Egypt rebelled against Assyria. This coalition is known as “the Ashdad Rebellion.” Even Hezekiah of Judah originally was involved. Assyria invaded and destroyed several Philistine cities.

22. 705-681  — Sennacherib:

a. In 705 another coalition of transjordan nations and Egypt rebelled after the death of Sargon II. Hezekiah fully supported this rebellion. Sennacherib invaded in 701. The rebellion was crushed but Jerusalem was spared by an act of God (cf. Isa. 36-39 and II Kgs. 18-19).

b. Sennacherib also put down the rebellion in Elam and Babylon.

23. 681-669 —  Esarhaddon:

a. first Assyrian ruler to attack and conquer Egypt

b. had great sympathy with Babylon and rebuilt its capital city

24. 669-633 —  Ashurbanipal:

a. also called Osnappar in Ezra 4:10

b. His brother Shamash-shum-ukin was made king of Babylon (later demoted to viceroy). This brought several years of peace between Assyria and Babylon, but there was an undercurrent of independence which broke out in 652 led by his brother (who had been demoted to Viceroy).

c. fall of Thebes, 663 b.c.

d. defeated Elam, 653, 645 b.c.

25. 633-629 —  Asshur-Etil-Ilani

26. 629-612 —  Sin-Shar-Ishkun

27. 612-609 —  Asshur-Uballit II:

a. enthroned king in exile in Haran

b. the fall of Assher in 614 b.c. and Nineveh in 612 b.c.

 

II. Neo-Babylon Empire:

A. 703-? — Merodach-Baladan

 —  Started several revolts against Assyrian rule

B. 652 Shamash-shum-ukin:

1. Esarhaddon’s son and Asshurbanipal’s brother

2. he started a revolt against Assyria but was defeated

C. 626-605 Nabopolassar:

1. was the first monarch of the Neo-Babylonian Empire

2. he attacked Assyria from the south while Cyaxares of Media attacked from the northeast

3. the old Assyrian capital of Asshur fell in 614 and the powerful new capital of Ninevah fell in 612 b.c.

4. the remnant of the Assyrian army retreated to Haran. They even installed a king.

5. In 608 Pharaoh Necho II (cf. II Kings 23:29) marched north to help the remnant of the Assyrian army for the purpose of forming a buffer zone against the rising power of Babylon. Josiah, the godly king of Judah (cf. II Kings 23), opposed the movement of the Egyptian army through Palestine. There was a minor skirmish at Megiddo. Josiah was wounded and died (II Kgs. 23:29-30). His son, Jehoakaz, was made king. Pharaoh Necho II arrived too late to stop the destruction of the Assyrian forces at Haran. He engaged the Babylonian forces commanded by the crown prince Nebuchadnezzar II and was soundly defeated in 605 b.c. at Carchemesh on the Euphrates River.

        On his way back to Egypt Pharaoh Necho stopped at Jerusalem and sacked the city. He replaced and deported Jehoahaz after only three months. He put another son of Josiah, Jehoiakim, on the throne (cf. II Kings 23:31-35).

6. Nebuchadnezzar II chased the Egyptian army south through Palestine but he received word of his father’s death and returned to Babylon to be crowned. Later, in the same year, he returned to Palestine. He left Jehoiakim on the throne of Judah but exiled several thousand of the leading citizens and several members of the royal family. Daniel and his friends were part of this deportation.

D. 605-562  —  Nebuchadnezzar II:

1. From 597-538 Babylon was in complete control of Palestine.

2. In 597 another deportation from Jerusalem occurred because of Jehoakim’s alliance with Egypt (II Kings 24). He died before the arrival of Nebuchadnezzar II. His son Jehoiachin was only king for three months when he was exiled to Babylon. Ten thousand citizens, including Ezekiel, were resettled close to the City of Babylon by the Canal Kebar.

3. In 586, after continued flirtation with Egypt, the City of Jerusalem was completely destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar (II Kgs. 25) and a mass deportation occurred. Zedekiah, who replaced Jehoiachin, was exiled and Gedaliah was appointed governor.

4. Gedaliah was killed by Jewish renegade military forces. These forces fled to Egypt and forced Jeremiah to go with them. Nebuchadnezzar invaded a fourth time (605, 596, 586, 582) and deported all remaining Jews that he could find.

E. 562-560  —  Evil-merodach, Nebuchadnezzar’s son, was also known as Amel-Marduk (Akkadian, “Man of Marduk”)

  —  He released Jehoiachin from prison but he had to remain in Babylon (cf. II Kings 25:27-30; Jer. 52:31).

F. 560-556  —  Neriglissar

 —  He assassinated Evil-merodach, who was his brother-in-law

 —  He was previously Nebuchadnezzar’s general who destroyed Jerusalem (cf. Jer. 39:3,13)

G. 556 —  Labaski-Marduk

 —  He was Neriglissar’s son who assumed kingship as a boy, but was assassinated after only nine months (Berossos).

H. 556-539  —  Nabonidus (Akkadian, “Nebo is exalted”):

1. Nabonidus was not related to the royal house so he possibly (Herodotus) married a daughter (Nitocris) of Nebuchadnezzar (Nitocris was one of his Egyptian wives).

2. He spent most of the time building a temple to the moon god “Sin” in Tema. He was the son of the high priestess of this goddess. This earned him the enmity of the priests of Marduk, chief god of Babylon.

3. He spent most of his time trying to put down revolts (in Syria and north Africa) and stabilize the kingdom.

4. He moved to Tema and left the affairs of state to his son, Belshazzar, in the capital, Babylon (cf. Dan.5).

I. ? - 539  —  Belshazzar (co-reign)

 —  The city of Babylon fell very quickly to the Persian Army under Gobryas of Gutium by diverting the waters of the Euphrates and entering the city unopposed. The priests and people of the city saw the Persians as liberators and restorers of Marduk. Gobryas was made Governor of Babylon by Cyrus II. Gobryas may have been the Darius the Mede of Dan. 5:31; 6:1. “”Darius”“ means “”royal one.”“

 

III. Medio-Persian Empire: Survey of the Rise of Cyrus II (Isa. 41:2,25;44:28-45:7; 46:11; 48:15):

A. 625-585  — Cyaxares was the king of Media who helped Babylon defeat Assyria.

B. 585-550  — Astyages was king of Media (capital was Ecbatana). Cyrus II was his grandson by CambysesI (600-559, Persian) and Mandane (daughter of Astyages, Median).

C. 550-530  — Cyrus II of Ansham (eastern Elam) was a vassal king who revolted:

1. Nabonidus, the Babylonian king, supported Cyrus.

2. Astyages’ general, Harpagus, led his army to join Cyrus’ revolt

3. Cyrus II dethroned Astyages.

4. Nabonidus, in order to restore a balance of power, made an alliance with:

a. Egypt

b. Croesus, King of Lydia (Asia Minor)

5. 547  — Cyrus II marched against Sardis (capital of Lydia) and it fell in 546 b.c.

6. 539  — In mid-October the general Ugbaru and Gobryas, both of Gutium, with Cyrus' army, took Babylon without resistance. Ugbaru was made governor, but died of war wounds within weeks, Gobryas was then made governor of Babylon.

7. 539  — In late October Cyrus II "the Great" personally entered as liberator. His policy of kindness to national groups reversed years of deportation as a national policy.

8. 538  —  Jews and others (cf. the Cyrus Cylinder) were allowed to return home and rebuild their native temples (cf. II Chr. 36:22,23; Ezra 1:1-4). He also restored the vessels from YHWH’s temple which Nebuchadnezzar had taken to Marduk’s temple in Babylon (cf. Ezra 1:7-11; 6:5).

9. 530  — Cyrus’ son, Cambyses II, succeeded him briefly as co-regent, but later the same year Cyrus died while in a military campaign.

D. 530-522  — reign of Cambyses II

1. added Egyptian empire in 525 b.c. to the Medo-Persian Empire;

2. he had a short reign:

a. some say he committed suicide;

b. Heroditus said he cut himself with his own sword while mounting his horse and died of the resulting infection.

3. brief usurpation of the throne by Pseudo-Smerdis (Gaumata) - 522

E. 522-486  —  Darius I (Hystapes) came to rule

1. He was not of the royal line but a military general.

2. He organized the Persian Empire using Cyrus’ plans for Satraps (cf. Ezra 5-6; also during Haggai’s and Zechariah’s time).

3. He set up coinage like Lydia.

4. He attempted to invade Greece, but was repulsed.

F. 486-465  — Reign of Xerxes I:

1. put down Egyptian revolt

2. intended to invade Greece and fulfill Persian dream but was defeated in the battle of Thermopoly in 480 b.c. and Salamis in 479 b.c.

3. Esther's husband, who is called Ahasuerus in the Bible, was assassinated in 465 b.c.

G. 465-424  —  Artaxerxes I (Longimanus) reigned (cf Ezra 7-10; Nehemiah; Malachi):

1. Greeks continued to advance until confronted with the Pelopanisian Civil Wars

2. Greece divides (Athenian - Pelopanisian)

3. Greek civil wars lasted about 20 years

4. during this period the Jewish community is strengthened

5. brief reign of Xerxes II and Sekydianos - 423

H. 423-404  — Darius II (Nothos) reigned

I. 404-358  — Artaxerxes II (Mnemon) reigned

J. 358-338  —  Artaxerxes III (Ochos) reigned

K. 338-336  — Arses reigned

L. 336-331  —  Darius III (Codomannus) reigned until the Battle of Issus 331 and was defeated by Greece

 

IV. Survey of Egypt:

A. Hyksos (Shepherd Kings - Semitic rulers)-1720/10-1550

B. 18th Dynasty (1570-1310):

1. 1570-1546  — Amosis

a. made Thebes the capital

b. invaded southern Canaan

2. 1546-1525  —  Amenophis I (Amenhotep I)

3. 1525-1494  —  Thutmosis I

4. 1494-1490  —  Thutmosis II - married Thutmosis I’s daughter, Hatshepsut

5. 1490-1435  —  Thutmosis III (nephew of Hatshepsut)

6. 1435-1414  —  Amenophis II (Amenhotep II)

7. 1414-1406  —  Thutmosis IV

8. 1406-1370  —  Amenophis III (Amenhotep III)

9. 1370-1353  —  Amenophis IV (Akhenaten)

a. worshiped the Sun, Aten

b. instituted a form of high-god worship (monotheism)

c. Tel-El-Amarna letters are in this period

10. ? Smenhkare

11. ? Tutankhamun (Tutankhaten)

12. ? Ay (Aye-Eye)

13. 1340-1310  —  Haremhab

C. 19th Dynasty (1310-1200):

1. ?  Rameses I (Ramses)

2. 1309-1290  — Seti I (Sethos)

3. 1290-1224  —  Ramesses II (Ramses II)

a. from archaeological evidence most likely Pharaoh of the exodus

b. built the cities of Avaris, Pithom and Ramses by Habaru (possibly Semites or Hebrew) slaves

4. 1224-1216  — Marniptah (Merenptah)

5. ? Amenmesses

6. ? Seti II

7. ? Siptah

8. ? Tewosret

D. 20th Dynasty (1180-1065)

1. 1175-1144  — Rameses III

2. 1144-1065  — Rameses IV  —  XI

E. 21st Dynasty (1065-935):

1. ? Smendes

2. ? Herihor

F. 22nd Dynasty (935-725  — Libyan):

1. 935-914  —  Shishak (Shosenk I or Sheshong I)

a. protected Jeroboam I until Solomon’s death

b. conquered Palestine about 925 (cf. I Kgs. 14-25; II Chr. 12)

2. 914-874  — Osorkon I

3. ? Osorkon II

4. ? Shoshnek II G. 23rd Dynasty (759-715  — Libyan)

H. 24th Dynasty (725-709)

I. 25th Dynasty (716/15-663  — Ethiopian/Nubian):

1. 710/09-696/95  —  Shabako (Shabaku)

2. 696/95-685/84  —  Shebteko (Shebitku)

3. 690/689, 685/84-664  —  Tirhakah (Taharqa)

4. ?   Tantamun

J. 26th Dynasty (663-525  — Saitic):

1. 663-609  —  Psammetichus I (Psamtik)

2. 609-593  —  Neco II (Necho)

3. 593-588  —  Psammetichus II (Psamtik)

4. 588-569  —  Apries (Hophra)

5. 569-525  —  Amasis

6. ?              —  Psammetichus III (Psamtik)

K. 27th Dynasty (525-401  —  Persian):

1. 530-522  —  Cambyses II (Cyrus II’‘s son)

2. 522-486  —  Darius I

3. 486-465  —  Xerxes I

4. 465-424  —  Artaxerxes I

5. 423-404  —  Darius II

L. Several brief dynasties (404-332)

1. 404-359  —  Artaxerxes II

2. 559/8 - 338/7  —  Artaxerxes III

3. 338/7 - 336/7  —  Arses

4. 336/5 - 331  —  Darius III

 

*for a differing chronology see Zondervan’s Pictorial Bible Encyclopedia, vol. 2 p. 231.

V. Survey of Greece:

A. 359-336  —  Philip II of Macedon:

1. built up Greece

2. assassinated in 336 b.c.

B. 336-323  — Alexander II “the Great” (Philip’s son):

1. routed Darius III, the Persian king, at the battle of Isus

2. died in 323 b.c. in Babylon of a fever at 32/33 yrs. of age

3. Alexander’s generals divided his empire at his death:

a. Cassender  —  Macedonia and Greece

b. Lysimicus  —  Thrace

c. Seleucus I  —  Syria and Babylon

d. Ptolemy  —  Egypt and Palestine

e. Antigonus  —  Asia Minor (He did not last long)

C. Seleucids vs. Ptolemies struggle for control of Palestine:

1. Syria (Seleucid Rulers):

a. 312-280  —  Seleucus I

b. 280-261  —  Antiochus I Soter

c. 261-246  —  Antiochus II Theus

d. 246-226  —  Seleucus II Callinicus

e. 226-223  —  Seleucus III Ceraunus

f. 223-187  —  Antiochus III the Great

g. 187-175  —  Seleucus IV Philopator

h. 175-163  —  Antiochus IV Epiphanes

i. 163-162  —  Antiochus V

j. 162-150  —  Demetrius I

2. Egyptian (Ptolemaic Rulers):

a. 327-285  —  Ptolemy I Soter

b. 285-246  —  Ptolemy II Philadelphus

c. 246-221  —  Ptolemy III Evegetes

d. 221-203  —  Ptolemy IV Philopator

e. 203-181  —  Ptolemy V Epiphanes

f. 181-146  —  Ptolemy VI Philometor

3. Brief Survey:

a. 301  — Palestine under Ptolemy rule for 181 years.

b. 175-163  — Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the eighth Seleucid ruler, wanted to Hellenize Jews by force, if necessary:

(1) constructed gymnasiums

(2) constructed pagan altars of Zeus Olympius in the Temple

c. 168  —  December 13  —  hog slain on the altar in Jerusalem by Antiochus IV Epiphanes. Some consider this to be “the abomination of desolation” in Daniel 9 & 11.

d. 167  —  Mattathias, priest in Modin, and sons rebel. The best known of his sons was Judas Maccabeas, “Judas the Hammer.”

e. 165  —  December 25  —  Temple rededicated. This is called Hanukkah or “Festival of Lights.”

 

For a good discussion of the dating problems, procedures and presuppositions see The Expositors Bible Commentary, vol. 4, pp. 10-17.

Related Topics: History

Appendix Four: Kings and Events of the Babylonian, Persian, and Greek Dynasties

612 b.c.   Nineveh falls to neo-Babylonian army (Nebuchadnezzar)
608   Pharaoh Necho II marched to Carchemesh to halt expansion of neo-Babylonian power
    Josiah, King of Judah, tries to stop him
    Death of Josiah and assumption of throne by his son, Jehoahaz
    Jehoiakim, another son of Josiah, replaced Jehoahaz on the authority of Pharaoh Necho II within 3 months
    Palestine and Syria under Egyptian rule
    Josiah’s reforms dissipate
605   Nabopolassar sends troops to fight remaining Assyrian army and the Egyptians at Carchemesh
    Nebuchadnezzar chased them all the way to the plains of Palestine
    Nebuchadnezzar got word of the death of his father (Nabopolassar) so he returned to Babylon to receive the crown
    On the way back he takes Daniel and other members of the royal family into exile
605 - 538   Babylon in control of Palestine, 597; 10,000 exiled to Babylon
586   Jerusalem and the temple destroyed and large deportation
582   Because Jewish guerilla fighters killed Gedaliah another last large deportation occurred

SUCCESSORS OF NEBUCHADNEZZAR

562 - 560   Evil-Merodach released Jehoiakim (true Messianic line) from custody
560 - 556   Neriglissar
556   Labaski-Marduk reigned
556 - 539   Nabonidus:
    Spent most of the time building a temple to the mood god, Sin. This earned enmity of the priests of Marduk.
    Spent the rest of his time trying to put down revolts and stabilize the kingdom.
    He moved to Tema and left the affairs of state to his son, Belshazzar
    Belshazzar:
    Spent most of his time trying to restore order.
    Babylonia’s great threat was Media.
     
    Rise of Cyrus
585 - 550   Astyages was king of Media (Cyrus II was his grandson by Mandane)
550   Cyrus II, a vassal king, revolted
    Nabonidus, to restore balance of power, made alliances with:
    1. Egypt
2. Crecus, King of Lydia
547   Cyrus marched against Sardis (capital Lydia) and captured all of Asia Minor
539   Gobiyas took Babylon without resistance (Dan. 5; Belshazzar Nabonidus’ co-regent; also Gobiyas possibly Darius the Mede, Dan. 5:31).
Oct. 11, 539   Cyrus entered as liberator from Nabonidus’ moon goddess, Zin
    Cyrus’ Successors
530   Cyrus’ son succeeded him (Cambyses II)
530 - 522   Reign of Cambyses (Elephantine Papyri)
    Added Egypt in 525 to the Medo-Persian Empire
522 - 486   Darius I came to rule
    He organized the Persian Empire along Cyrus’ plan of satraps
    He set up coinage like Lydia’s
486 - 465   Xerxes I (Esther)
    Put down Egyptian revolt
    Intended to invade Greece, but was defeated in the Battle of Thermopoly in 480
    Xerxes I was assassinated in 465
480   Battle of Thermopoly
465 - 424   Artaxerxes I Longimanus (Ezra 7-10, Nehemiah, and Malachi)
    Greeks continued to advance until confronted with Pelopanisian Wars
    Wars lasted about 20 years
    During this period the Jewish community is reconstructed
423 - 404   Darius II
    Authorized the feast of unleavened bread in the Elephantine Temple
404 - 358   Artaxerxes II
358 - 338   Artaxerxes III
338 - 336    Arses
336 - 331   Darius III

 GREECE

359 - 336   Philip II of Macedon built up Greece
    He was assassinated in 336
336 - 323   Alexander the Great (Philip’s son)
    Routed Darius II at battle of ISUS
    He died in 323 in Babylon of a fever after conquering the eastern Mediterranean and the Near East
    Alexander’s generals divided his empire at his death:
    1. Cassander - Macedonia and Greece
2. Lysimicus - Thrace
3. Selects I - Syria and Babylon
4. Ptolemy - Egypt and Palestine
5. Antigonus - small part of Asia Minor
    Seleucids vs. Ptolemies
301   Palestine was under Ptolemy’s rule for 100 years
175 - 163   Antiochus Epiphanes
    Wanted to Hellenize Jews, constructed gymnasium
    Constructed pagan altars; priests were mistreated
Dec. 13, 168   Hog was slain on the altar by Antiochus Epiphanies. Some consider this to be the abomination of desolation.
167   Mattathias and sons rebel. Mattathias killed. Judas took control.
    Judas Maccabeaus wages successful guerilla warfare
Dec. 25, 165   Temple rededicated

 RULERS

BABYLON MEDIA
626 - 605 Nabopolassar dies (“Nabu, Protect the Sun”)
625 - 585
  Cyrzares
605 - 562 Nebuchadnezzar II
(“Nebo, Protect the Boundary”)
585 - 550
 Astyages
562 - 560 Evil Merodack 550
Cyrus II
556 Labaski Marduk
556 - 539 Nabonidus
  Belshazzar
539 - Gobiyas

MEDO-PERSIAN

550 - 530   Cyrus II (538 Medo-Persian dominate power called Achaemenian Empire)
530 - 522   Cambyses II (Egypt added and Cyprus)
522   Gaumata or Pseudo, Smerdis (reign 6 months)
522 - 486   Darius I (Hystaspes)
486 - 465   Xerxes I (Esther’s husband)
 465 - 424   Artaxerxes I (Ezra and Nehemiah in Palestine)
423 -   Xerxes II
424 - 404   Darius II Nothus
404 - 359    Artaxerxes II Mnemon
359 - 338   Artaxerxes III Ochus
338 - 336   Arses
336 - 331   Darius III Codomannus

 GREEK

359 - 336   Philip II of Macedon
336 - 323   Alexander the Great
323 -   Generals divide Empire
    1. Cassander - Macedonia
2. Lysimicus - Syria
3. Seleucus I - Syria and Babylon
4. Ptolemy - Egypt
5. Antigonus - Asia Minor (killed in 301 b.c.)
The Ptolemies controlled Palestine, but in 175 - 163 control passed to the Seleucids
175 - 163   Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the eighth Seleucid ruler
     
*Dates and names have been mostly taken from A History of Israel by John Bright, pp. 461-471.

Related Topics: History

Appendix Five: Kings of the Divided Kingdom

KINGS OF THE DIVIDED KINGDOM

Judah’s Kings (I Chr. 3:1-16; Matt. 1:6-11)

Israel’s Kings

Names & Dates

Bright

Young

Harrison

Bible Texts

Names & Dates

Bright

Young

Harrison

Bible Texts

Rehoboam

922-915

933-917

931/30-913

I Kgs. 11:43-12:27; 14:21- 31

II Chr. 9:31-12:16

Jeroboam I

922-901

933-912

931/30-910/09

I Kgs. 11:26-40; 12:12- 14:20

Abijah (Abijam)

915-914

916-914

913-911/10

I Kgs. 14:31-15:8

II Chr. 11:20,22

 

 

 

 

 

Asa

913-873

913-873

911/10-870/69

I Kgs. 15:8-30; 16:8,10, 23,29; 22:41,43,46

Jer. 41:9

Nadab

Baasha

901-900

900-877

912-911

911-888

910/09-909/08

909/08-886/85

I Kgs. 14:20; 15:25-31

I Kgs.15:16-16:7; II Kgs..9:9

II Chr. 16:1-6

Jer. 41:9

Jehoshaphat

873-849

873-849

870/69-848

I Kgs. 15:24; 22:1-51

II Kgs. 3:1-12; 8:16-19

I Chr. 3:10

II Chr. 17:1-21:1

Elah

877-876

888-887

886/85-885/84

I Kgs. 16:8-14

(Jehoram Co- regent)

------------

-----------

853-848

I Kgs. 22:50

II Kgs. 1:17; 8:16; 12:18

Zimri

(Army General)

Omri

(Army General)

876

876-869

887

887-877

885/84

885/84-874/73

I Kgs. 16:9-20

II Kgs. 9:31

I Kgs. 16:15-28

II Kgs. 8:26

Micah 6:16

Jehoram (Joram)

849-842

849-842

848-841

I Chr. 221:1-20

Matthew 1:8

 

 

 

 

 

Ahaziah

842

842

-------------

II Kgs. 8:24-9:29

II Chr. 22:1-9

Ahab

869-850

876-854

874/73-853

I Kgs. 16:29-22:40

 

 

 

 

 

Ahaziah

850-849

854-853

853-852

I Kgs. 22:40,41,49,51-53

II Chr. 18:1-3,19

Athaliah

(Queen)

842-337

842-836

841-835

II Kgs. 8:26; 11:1-20

II Chr. 22:2-23:21

Jehoram (Joram)

849-842

853-842

852-841

II Kgs. 1:17; 3:1-27; 8:16- 9:29

Joash (Jehoash)

837-800

836-797

835-796

II Kgs. 11:2-3; 12:1-21

II Chr. 22:11-12; 24:1-27

Jehu

(Army General)

842-815

842-815

841-814/13

I Kgs. 19:16-17

II Kgs. 9:1-10:36; 15:12

II Chr. 22:7-9

Hosea 1:4

 

Judah’s Kings (I Chr. 3:1-16; Matt. 1:6-11) [Con’t.]

Israel’s Kings (Con’t.)

Names &Dates

Bright

Young

Harrison

Bible Texts

Names &Dates

Bright

Young

Harrison

Bible Texts

Amaziah

800-783

797-779

796-767

II Kgs. 12:21; 14:1-22

II Chr. 25:1-28

 

 

 

 

 

(Uzziah Co- regent)

-----------

----------

791/90-767

II Kgs. 14:21; 15:1-7

Jehoahaz

815-801

814-798

814/13-798

II Kgs. 10:35; 13:1-9

Uzziah (Azariah)

783-742

779-740

767-740/39

II Chr. 26:1-23

Hosea 1:1; Amos 1:1

Zechariah 14:5

Jehosah

801-786

798-783

798-782/81

II Kgs. 13:9-13,25

II Chr. 25:17-25

Hosea 1:1; Amos 1:1

(Jotham Co- regent)

750-742

----------

750-740/39

II Kgs.15:7,32-38

(Jer. II Co- regent)

---------

-----------

793/92-782/81

II Kgs. 13:13; 14:16,23-29

Hosea 1:1

Jotham

742-735

740-736

740/39-732/31

I Chr. 5:17

II Chr. 26:23-27:9

Isa. 1:1; 7:1

Hosea 1:1; Micah 1:1

Jeroboam II

Zechariah

786-746

746-745

783-743

743

782/81-753

753-752

Amos 1:1; 7:9-11

II Kgs.15:8-12

(Ahaz Co-regent)

-----------

----------

744/43-732/31

II Kgs. 15:30-16:20

II Chr. 27:9-28:27

Shallum

745

743

752

II Kgs. 15:10,13-15

Ahaz

735-715

736-728

732/31-716/15

Isa. 1:1; 7:1ff; 14:28; 38:8

Hosea 1:1; Micah 1:1

Menahem

745-738

743-737

752-742/41

II Kgs. 15:14,16-22

(Hezekiah Co-regent)

-----------

----------

729-716/15

II Kgs. 16:20; 18:1-20,21

II Chr. 28:27-32:33

Prov. 25:1

Pekahiah

738-737

737-736

742/41-740/39

II Kgs. 15:23-26

Hezekiah

715-687

727-699

716/15-687/86

Isa. 1:1; 36:1-39:8

Hosea 1:1; Micah 1:1

Matt. 1:9-10

Pekah

737-732

736-730

740/39-732/31

II Kgs. 15:27-31; 16:5

II Chr. 28:6; Isa. 7:1

(Manaseh Co- regent)

-----------

----------

696/95-687/86

II Kgs. 20:21-21:18; 23:12,26; 24:2

Hoshea

732-724

730-722

732/31-723/22

II Kgs. 17:1-18

Manasseh

687/86-642

698-643

687/86-642/41

II Chr. 32:33-33:20

Jer. 15:4ff; II Kgs. 21:18-26

Fall of Samaria to Assyria

724 B.C.

722 B.C.

722 B.C.

 

Amon

642-640

643-641

642/41-640/39

II Chr. 33:20-25

Jer. 1:2; Zeph. 1:1

I Kgs. 13:2-3

 

 

 

 

 

 

Judah’s Kings (Con’t.)

Israel’s Kings (Con’t.)

Names & Dates

Bright

Young

Harrison

Bible Texts

Names & Dates

Bright

Young

Harrison

Bible Texts

Josiah

610-609

640-609

640/39-609

II Kgs. 21:24; 22:1-23:30

II Chr. 33:25-35:27

Jer. 1:2; Zeph. 1:1

Matt. 1:10-11

 

 

 

 

 

Jehoahaz

609

(3 months)

609

609

II Kgs. 23:30-34

II Chr. 36:1-4

 

 

 

 

 

Jehoiakim

609-598

609-598

609-597

II Kgs. 23:34-24:6,19

II Chr. 36:4-8

Jer. 1:3; 22:18-23; 25:1ff; 26:1ff; 27:1ff; 35:1ff; 36:1ff

Dan. 1:1-2

 

 

 

 

 

Jehoiachin

598/97

(3 months)

598

597

II Kgs. 24:6,8-17; 25:27-30

II Chr. 36:8-9

Jer. 52:31; Ezek. 1:2

 

 

 

 

 

Zedekiah

597-586

598-587

597-587

II Kgs. 24:17-25:7

II Chr. 36:10-11

Jer. 1:3; 21:1-7; 24:8-10; 27:1ff; 32:4-5; 34:1-22; 37:1-39:7; 52:1-11

 

 

 

 

 

Fall of Jerusalem to Babylon

586 B.C.

587 B.C.

587 B.C.

Lamentations

 

 

 

 

 

 

For a good discussion on the problems of dating see E. R. Thiele, The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings.

 

Copyright © 2012 Bible Lessons International

Related Topics: History

Appendix One: The Old Testament as History

Christianity and Judaism are historical faiths. They base their faith on historical events (accompanied by their interpretations). The problem comes in trying to define or describe what is "history" or "historical study."  Much of the problem in modern theological interpretation rests on modern literary or historical assumptions projected back onto Ancient Near Eastern biblical literature.  Not only is there not a proper appreciation of the temporal and cultural differences, but also of the literary differences. As modern western people we simply do not understand the genres and literary techniques of Ancient Near Eastern writings, so we interpreted them in light of western literal genres.

The nineteenth century's approach to biblical studies atomized and depreciated the books of the Old Testament as historical, unified documents.  This historical scepticism has affected hermeneutics and historical investigation of the Old Testament.  The current trend toward "canonical hermeneutics" (Brevard Childs) has helped focus on the current form of the Old Testament text.  This, in my opinion, is a helpful bridge over the abyss of German higher criticism of the nineteenth century.  We must deal with the canonical text that has been given us by an unknown historical process whose inspiration is assumed.

Many scholars are returning to the assumption of the historicity of the OT.  This is surely not meant to deny the obvious editing and updating of the OT by later Jewish scribes, but it is a basic return to the OT as a valid history and the documentation of true events (with their theological interpretations).  A quote from R. K Harrison in The Expositor's Bible Commentary, vol. 1, in the article, "Historical and Literary Criticism of the Old Testament" is helpful.

"Comparative historiographic studies have shown that, along with the Hittites, the ancient Hebrews were the most accurate, objective, and responsible recorders of Near Eastern history. . Form-critical studies of books such as Genesis and Deuteronomy, based on specific types of tablets recovered from sites that include Mari, Nuzu, and Boghazköy, have shown that the canonical material has certain nonliterary counterparts in the cultures of some Near Eastern peoples. As a result, it is possible to view with a new degree of confidence and respect those early traditions of the Hebrews that purport to be historiographic in nature" (p. 232).

I am especially appreciative of R. K. Harrison's work because he makes it a priority to interpret the Old Testament in light of contemporary events, cultures and genres.

In my own classes on early Jewish literature (Genesis – Deuteronomy and Joshua), I try to establish a credible link with other Ancient Near Eastern literature and artifacts.

A. Genesis literary parallels from the Ancient Near East

1. Earliest known literary parallel of the cultural setting of Genesis 1-11 is the Ebla cuneiform tablets from northern Syria dating about 2500 b.c., written in Akkadian.

2. Creation

a. The closest Mesopotamian account dealing with creation, Enuma Elish, dating from about 1900-1700 b.c., was found in Ashurbanipal's library at Nineveh and several other places. There are seven cuneiform tablets written in Akkadian which describe creation by Marduk.

1) the gods, Apsu (fresh water – male) and Tiamat (salt water – female) had unruly, noisy children.  These two gods tried to silence the younger gods.

2) one of the god's children, Marduk, helped defeat Tiamat.  He formed the earth from her body.

3) Marduk formed humanity from another defeated god, Kingu, who was the male consort of Tiamat after the death of Apsu. Humanity came from Kingu's blood.

4) Marduk was made chief of the Babylonian pantheon.

b. "The creation seal" is a cuneiform tablet which is a picture of a naked man and woman beside a fruit tree with a snake wrapped around the tree's trunk and positioned over the woman's shoulder as if talking to her.

3. Creation and Flood – The Atrahasis Epic records the rebellion of the lesser gods because of overwork and the creation of seven human couples to perform the duties of these lesser gods.  Because of (1) over population and (2) noise, human beings were reduced in number by a plague, two famines and finally a flood, planned by Enlil.  These major events are seen in the same order in Genesis 1-8.  This cuneiform composition dates from about the same times as Enuma Elish and the Gilgamesh Epic, about 1900-1700 b.c.  All are in Akkadian. 

4. Noah's flood

a. A Summerian tablet from Nippur, called Eridu Genesis, dating from abut 1600 b.c., tells about Zivsudra and a coming flood.

1) Enka, the water god, warned of a coming flood

2) Zivsudra, a king-priest, saved in a huge boat

3) The flood lasted seven days

4) Zivsudra opened a window on the boat and released several birds to see if dry land had appeared

5) He also offered a sacrifice of an ox and sheep when he left the boat

b. A composite Babylonian flood account from four Summerian tales, known as the Gilgamesh Epic, originally dating from about 2500-2400 b.c., although the written composite form was cuneiform Akkadian, is much later.  It tells about a flood survivor, Utnapishtim, who tells Gilgamesh, the king of Uruk how he survived the great flood and was granted eternal life.

1) Ea, the water god, warns of a coming flood and tells Utnapishtim (Babylonian form of Zivsudra) to build a boat

2) Utnapishtim and his family, along with selected healing plants, survived the flood

3) The flood lasted seven days

4) The boat came to rest in northeast Persia, on Mt. Nisir

5) He sent out three different birds to see if dry land had yet appeared

5. The Mesopotamian literature which describes an ancient flood draws from the same source.  The names often vary, but the plot is the same.  An example is that Zivsudra, Atrahasis, and Utnapishtim are all the same human king.

6. The historical parallels to the early events of Genesis can be explained in light of man's pre-dispersion (Genesis 10-11) knowledge and experience of God. These true historical core memories have been elaborated and mythologicalized into the current flood accounts common throughout the world.  The same can also be said of: creation (Genesis 1-2) and human and angelic unions (Genesis 6).

7. Patriarch's Day (Middle Bronze)

a. Mari tablets – cuneiform legal (Ammonite culture) and personal texts written in Akkadian from about 1700 b.c.

b. Nuzi tablets – cuneiform archives of certain families (Horite or Hurrian culture) written in Akkadian from about 100 miles SE of Nineveh about 1500-1300 b.c.  They record family and business procedures.  For further specific examples, see Walton, pp. 52-58.

c. Alalak tablets – cuneiform texts from Northern Syria from about 2000 b.c.

d. Some of the names found in Genesis are named as place names in the Mari Tablets: Serug, Peleg, Terah, Nahor.  Other biblical names were also common: Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Laban, and Joseph.

8. "Comparative historiographic studies have shown that, along with the Hittites, the ancient Hebrews were the most accurate, objective and responsible recorders of Near Eastern history," R. K Harrison in Biblical Criticism, p. 5.

9. Archaeology has proven to be so helpful in establishing the historicity of the Bible.  However, a word of caution is necessary.  Archaeology is not an absolutely trustworthy guide because of

a. poor techniques in early excavations

b. various, very subjective interpretations of the artifacts that have been discovered

c. no agreed-upon chronology of the Ancient Near East (although one is being developed from tree rings)

B. Egyptian creation accounts can be found in John W. Walton's, Ancient Israelite Literature in Its Cultural Context. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1990. pp. 23-34, 32-34.

1. In Egyptian literature creation began with an unstructured, chaotic, primeval water.  Creation was seen as developing structure out of watery chaos.

2. In Egyptian literature from Memphis, creation occurred by the spoken word of Ptah.

C. Joshua literary parallels from the Ancient Near East

1. Archaeology has shown that most of the large walled cities of Canaan were destroyed and rapidly rebuilt about 1250 b.c.

a. Hazor 

b. Lachish

c. Bethel 

d. Debir (formerly called Kerioth Sepher, 15:15)

Archaeology has not been able to confirm or reject the biblical account of the fall of Jericho (cf. Joshua 6).  This is because the site is in such poor condition:

a. weather/location c. uncertainty as to the dates of the layers

b. later rebuildings on old sites using older materials 

Archaeology has found an altar on Mt. Ebal that might be connected to Joshua 8:30-31 (Deuteronomy. 27:2-9).  It is very similar to a description found in the Mishnah (Talmud).

2. The Ras Shamra texts found at Ugarit show Canaanite life and religion of 1400's b.c.

a. polytheistic nature worship (fertility cult)

b. El was chief deity

c. El's consort was Asherah (later she is consort to Ba'al) who was worshiped in the form of a carved stake or live tree, which symbolized "the tree of life"

d. their son was Ba'al (Haddad), the storm god

e. Ba'al became the "high god" of the Canaanite pantheon.  Anat was his consort

f. ceremonies similar to Isis and Osiris of Egypt

g. Ba'al worship was focused on local "high places" or stone platforms (ritual prostitution)

h. Ba'al was symbolized by a raised stone pillar (phallic symbol)

3. The accurate listing of the names of ancient cities fits a contemporary author, not later editor(s)

a. Jerusalem called Jebus, 15:8; 18:16,28 (15:28 said the Jebusites still remained in part of Jerusalem)

b. Hebron called Kiriath-arba, 14:15; 15:13,54; 20:7; 21:11

c. Kiriath-jearim is called Baalah, 15:9,10

d. Sidon is referred to as the major Phoenician city, not Tyre, 11:8; 13:6; 19:28, which later became the chief city 

 

Copyright © 2012 Bible Lessons International

 

Related Topics: History

Appendix Two: Genre and Interpretation- Old Testament Narrative

I. OPENING STATEMENTS

A. The relationship between the OT and other ways of the chronicling of events

1. Other Ancient Near Eastern literature is mythological

a. polytheistic (usually humanistic gods reflecting the powers of nature but using interpersonal conflict motifs)

b. based on the cycles of nature (dying and rising gods)

2. Greco-Roman is for entertainment and encouragement rather than the recording of historical events per se (Homer in many ways reflects Mesopotamian motifs)

B. Possibly the use of three German terms illustrates the difference in types or definitions of history

1. "Historie," the recording of events (bare facts) 

2. "Geschichte," the interpretation of events showing their significance to mankind

3. "Heilsgeschichte" refers uniquely to God's redemptive plan and activity within the historical process

C. The OT and NT narratives are "Geschichte," which leads to an understanding of Heilgeschichte.  They are selected theologically oriented historical events.

1. selected events only

2. chronology not as significant as theology

3. events shared to reveal truth

D. Narrative is the most common genre in the OT.  It has been estimated that 40% of the OT is narrative. Therefore, this genre is useful to the Spirit in communicating God's message and character to fallen mankind.  But, it is done, not propositionally (like the NT Epistles), but by implication, summation or selected dialog/monolog.  One must continue to ask why this is recorded. What is it trying to emphasize?  What is its theological purpose?

This in no way is meant to depreciate the history.  But, it is history as the servant and channel of revelation. 

II. Biblical Narratives

A. God is active in His world. Inspired Bible authors chose certain events to reveal God. God is the major character of the OT.

B. Every narrative functions in several ways:

1. who is God and what is He doing in His world

2. mankind is revealed through God's dealing with individuals and national entities

3. as an example specifically notice Joshua's military victory linked to covenant performance (cf. 1:7-8; 8:30-35).

C. Often narratives are strung together to make a larger literary unit which reveals a single theological truth. 

III. Interpretive principles of OT narratives

A. The best discussion I have seen about interpreting OT narratives is by Douglas Stuart in How to Read the Bible For All Its Worth, pp. 83-84

1. An OT narrative usually does not directly teach a doctrine.

2. An OT narrative usually illustrates a doctrine or doctrines taught propositionally elsewhere.

3. Narratives record what happened—not necessarily what should have happened or what ought to happen every time.  Therefore, not every narrative has an individual identifiable moral of the story.

4. What people do in narratives is not necessarily a good example for us.  Frequently, it is just the opposite.

5. Most of the characters in OT narratives are far from perfect, and their actions also.

6. We are not always told at the end of a narrative whether what happened was good or bad. We are expected to be able to judge that on the basis of what God has taught us directly and categorically elsewhere in the Scripture. 

7. All narratives are selective and incomplete. Not all the relevant details are always given (cf. John 21:25). What does appear in the narrative is everything that the inspired author thought important for us to know.

8. Narratives are not written to answer all our theological questions.  They have particular, specific, limited purposes and deal with certain issues, leaving others to be dealt with elsewhere, in other ways.

9. Narratives may teach either explicitly (by clearly stating something) or implicitly (by clearly implying something without actually stating it).

10. In the final analysis, God is the hero of all biblical narratives.

B. Another good discussion on interpreting narratives is in Walter Kaiser's Toward Exegetical Theology.

"The unique aspect of the narrative portions of Scripture is that the writer usually allows the words and actions of the people in his narrative to convey the main thrust of his message. Thus, instead of addressing us through direct statements, such as are found in doctrinal or teaching portions of Scripture, the writer tends to remain instead somewhat in the background as far as direct teaching or evaluative statements are concerned. Consequently, it becomes critically important to recognize the larger context in which the narrative fits and to ask why the writer used the specific selection of events in the precise sequence in which he placed them. The twin clues to meaning now will be arrangement of episodes and selection of detail from a welter of possible speeches, persons, or episodes. Furthermore, the divine reaction to and estimate of these people and events must often be determined from the way the author allows one person or a group of people to respond at the climax of the selected sequence of events; that is, if he has not interrupted the narration to give his own (in this instance, God's) estimate of what has taken place" (p. 205).

C. In narratives the truth is found in the whole literary unit and not the details. Beware of proof-texting or using OT narratives as a precedent for your life. 

IV. Two levels of interpretation

A. YHWH's redemptive, revelatory acts for Abraham's seed

B. YHWH's will for every believer's life (in every age)

 C.The first focuses on "knowing God (salvation); the second on serving Him (the Christian life of faith, cf. Rom. 15:4; I Cor. 10:6,11)

 

Copyright © 2012 Bible Lessons International

 

Related Topics: History, Hermeneutics

Appendix Three: Old Testament Historiography Compared with Contemporary Near Eastern Cultures

Mesopotamian sources

1. Like most ancient literature the subject is usually the king or some national hero.

2. The events are often embellished for propaganda purposes.

3. Usually nothing negative is recorded.

4. The purpose was to support current status quo institutions or explain the rise of new regimes.

5. The historical distortions involve

a. embellished claims of great victories

b. earlier achievements presented as current achievements

c. only positive aspects recorded

6. The literature served not only a propagandistic function, but was also a didactic function

Egyptian sources

1. They support a very static view of life, which was not affected by time.

2. The king and his family are the object of much of the literature.

3. It, like Mesopotamian literature, is very propagandistic.

a. no negative aspects 

b. embellished aspects 

Rabbinical sources (later)

1. Attempt to make Scripture relevant by Midrash, which moves from the faith of the interpreter to text and does not focus on authorial intent nor historical setting of the text

a. Halakha deals with truths or rules for life

b. Haggada deals with application and encouragement for life

2. Pesher - later development seen in Dead Sea Scrolls. It used a typological approach to see the prophetic fulfillment of past events in the current setting. The current setting was the prophesied eschaton (coming new age).

It is obvious that Ancient Near Eastern genres and later Jewish literature are different from Old Testament Scripture. In many ways the genres of the Old Testament, though often sharing characteristics of contemporary literature, are unique, especially in their depiction of historical events. The closest to Hebrew historiography is the Hittite literature.

It must be acknowledged how different ancient historiography is from modern, western historiography. Herein lies the problem for interpretation. Modern historiography attempts to be objective (non-propaganda, if this is possible) and to document and record in chronological sequence what "really happened!" It attempts to document "cause and effect" of historical events. It is characterized by details!

Just because Near Eastern histories are not like modern histories does not make them wrong, inferior, or untrustworthy. Western modern histories reflect the biases (presuppositions) of their writers. Biblical history is by its very nature (inspiration) different. There is a sense in which biblical history is seen through the eyes of the faith of the inspired author and for the purposes of theology, but it is still a valid historical account.

This historicity of the Old Testament is important to me as a way of advocating my faith to others. If the Bible can be demonstrated to be historical then its faith claims have stronger appeal to non-believers. My faith does not rest on the historical confirmation of archaeology and anthropology, but these help to introduce the message of the Bible, and to give it a credibility that otherwise it would not have.

To summarize then, historicity does not function in the area of inspiration, but in the area of apologetics and evangelism.

Copyright © 2012 Bible Lessons International

 

Related Topics: History, Apologetics, Hermeneutics

Introduction: The Parallel Gospels In Chronological Order

Contents

Introduction

 

Week One of Twelve

Matthew 1:2; Luke 1:2; John 1:1-18

Week Two of Twelve

Mathew 3:4; 12:1-32; Mark 1:3; Luke 3:6; John 1:19-51; 2:5

Week Three of Twelve

Matthew 5:7

Week Four of Twelve

Matthew 8:1-13; 11; 12:33-50; Luke 7; 8:19-21; 11

Week Five of Twelve

Matthew 8:14-10:42; 13; Mark 4:5; Luke 8:1-18; 22-56

Week Six of Twelve

Matthew 14:1-15:31; Mark 6:7; Luke 9:1-17; John 6

Week Seven of Twelve

Matthew 15:32-18:9; Mark 8:9; Luke 9:18-62

Week Eight of Twelve

Matthew 18:10-35; Luke 10:1-12:12; John 7:10

Week Nine of Twelve

Matthew 19:20; Mark 10; Luke 12:13-19:27

Week Ten of Twelve

Matthew 21:25, Mark 11:13; Luke 19:28-21:38, John 11:1-13:17

Week Eleven of Twelve

Matthew 26:1-46; Mark 14:1-42; Luke 22:1-46; John 13:18-17:26

Week Twelve of Twelve

Matthew 26:47-28:20; Mark 14:43-16:20; Luke 22:47-24:53; John 18:1-21:25

Introduction

The following is a chronological parallel study of the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. The text is grouped into twelve weeks of Sunday - Saturday studies, making it useful for personal daily study or easily adaptable for group weekly discussion and sharing.

Each of the four Gospels is written to a different audience and is intended to address a different element of the Good News of the miraculous birth, life ministry, and sacrificial death of the Son of man, Jesus. Our purpose is to identify the vital threads of both the unique and common themes running concurrently and chronologically through Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

Matthew writes a first-hand account of his experiences and observations while following Jesus, primarily to a Hebrew audience. Mark also writes a first-hand account, primarily to a Greek Gentile audience, to explain the Good News. Luke's text is assembled from collected accounts of the experiences and observations of others, and he primarily writes to non-Jews to clarify and organize the Good News. John writes a first-hand account, primarily to teach and equip Believers for evangelism of the Good News.

Our studies are in common with the motivations of Luke: Prompted by the Lord God, he set out to make the Good News clear and thoroughly documented, that we may "know for certain" (Luke 1:4) the things which we are taught. We have set ourselves about a similar task, that of bringing Truth in plainspoken words and an orderly manner to a new generation; Jesus instructed us to encourage and to teach one another. The reader may find it valuable to visit http://net.bible.org to read the NET Bible translator's notes, which contain a wealth of perspective.

The context of the Gospels within the larger Biblical text.

Malachi, the last Book in the Old Testament Canon, relates in chronological order the events which bring the Old Testament to a conclusion. Malachi reminds Israel how God has set her apart and sustained her. God's faithfulness was disrespected by his people through their sacrilege of priestly service and message - along with rebellion, resistance, and arrogant self-sufficiency. The Word of the Lord concludes with a warning of impending judgment together with the hope of a redeemer, "the sun of righteousness" (Mal. 4:2).

A great deal of time passed in history from the Book of Malachi to the earliest writings of the New Testament. The Gospels pick up history as it transitions from the Old Testament into the New Testament and merges elements of Old Testament Law and New Testament Grace.

It is important that the Bible reader have clear understanding of the meaning of terms the Lord God uses in His Word. The NET translation team and others have wrestled with the meaning of Biblical words in their original context and language. Some terms have historically escaped precise rendering as they were transitioned from the ancient Hebrew or Greek original text-sources to early-English, and later to modern English. Many helpful tools are available to aid in understanding the intended meaning of Biblical words, for example:

Naves Topical Bible Dictionary

Collaborative International Dictionary of English Bible Dictionary

NET Bible Word Study (http://classic.net.bible.org/lexicon.php)

One of the most-valuable tools for clarity is discovered while reading some of the 60,000 translator's notes accompanying the NET Bible, that is, the full context of the Biblical text. When in doubt one may begin with the certainty that no text may contradict any other text. This self-clarifying principle is as unique to the Word of God as it is unique to His perfection.

All Bible text is from the NET unless otherwise indicated - http://bible.org

Note 1: These Studies often rely upon the guidance of the NET Translators from their associated notes. Careful attention has been given to cite that source where it has been quoted directly or closely paraphrased. Feedback is encouraged where credit has not been sufficiently assigned.

Note 2: When NET text is quoted in commentary and discussion all pronouns referring to God are capitalized, though they are lower-case in the original NET text.

Commentary text is from David M. Colburn, D.Min. unless otherwise noted.

Copyright © 2012 by David M. Colburn. This is a BibleSeven Study –“The Parallel Gospels in Chronological Order” – Week 1 of 12 - prepared by David M. Colburn and edited by Merrilee Kell Clark for bible.org in June of 2012. This text may be used for non-profit educational purposes only, with credit; all other usage requires prior written consent of the author.

Related Topics: Devotionals, Curriculum

Pages