MENU

Where the world comes to study the Bible

From the series: Abraham

Incomprehensibility

Definition

“Because God is infinite and we are finite or limited, we can never fully understand God. In this sense God is said to be incomprehensible, where the term incomprehensible is used with an old and less common sense, ‘unable to be fully understood.’ This sense must be clearly distinguished from the more common meaning, ‘unable to be understood.’ It is not true to say that God is unable to be understood, but it is true to say that he cannot be understood fully or exhaustively.”1

Isaiah 40:28b: “The LORD is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth. He does not faint or grow weary; his understanding is unsearchable.”

Isaiah 55:8-9: “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, declares the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.”

Romans 11:33-35: “Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways! ‘For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been his counselor?’ ‘Or who has given a gift to him that he might be repaid?’”

Implications For Apologetics

God Cannot Be Known Unless He Makes Himself Known

God Must Reveal Himself To Be Known

God has made Himself known. All of creation bears the clear, comprehensive, and convincing evidence of his genius and power. The rains, seasons, and food on our table speak of His goodness. The stars speak of his glory. Our conscience reminds us of our accountability to love and obey Him. And His word and words to us in Scripture reveal His person, purpose, and works, and explain for us the nature of reality. Moreover, He created us in His image with the ability to know Him and communicate with Him. Yet, if God did not condescend to reveal Himself to us, we could not know Him. “The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but the things that are revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law” (Deuteronomy 29:29). “No one has ever seen God; the only God, what is at the Father’s side, he has made him known” (John 1:18). All knowledge of God depends upon God condescending to reveal Himself to us.2 Our dependence on God for knowledge of God did not begin with the sin of Adam, but is an implication of God’s incomprehensibility, self-existence, and infinity.3

All Speculation About The Nature Of God Apart From His Revelation Is Worthless

One of the implications of God’s self-existence noted above is God’s independence of human perception and thought. All the thoughts and pronouncements of finite, created, and dependent people can never determine the existence and nature of God. God is completely independent of His creation. Moreover, given His incomprehensibility and our dependence upon Him for all knowledge, one person’s speculation about God is no better than another person’s speculation about God. Apart from God’s revelation, all speculation is guesswork. God is incomprehensible and we lack the ability to know beyond what He has chosen to reveal to us about Himself. Thus, we can be thankful that God has chosen to reveal Himself to us in creation and Scripture. We need not speculate about God, or be shaken by the unjustified speculation of unbelievers about God.

As created in God’s image, we are to pursue science to seek knowledge of God’s world for His glory and the benefit of His creatures. But we should do so with the proper understanding of our status as God’s creatures and God’s status as the incomprehensible source and sustainer of all things. We should be wise in seeking to know what God has given for us to know, and reverent in knowing our limitations before our incomprehensible Creator.

It is not right for man unrestrainedly to search out things that the Lord has willed to be hid in Himself, and to unfold from eternity itself the sublimest wisdom, which he would have us revere but not understand that through this also he should fill us with wonder. He has set forth by His Word the secrets of his will that he has decided to reveal to us. These He decided to reveal in so far as he foresaw that they would concern us and benefit us.4

Speculation about God beyond what He has condescended to reveal to us risks the idolatry of creating false images of God in our minds, according to our finite and fallen perspective. Moreover, to ignore or go beyond God’s revelation concerning His person, works, and will is to exalt our own reason over His revelation and our own authority over His authority.

Logic Alone Is Insufficient To Know God

Logic Is Not The Ultimate Determiner Of Truth As Used By Dependent And Fallible People Of Limited Understanding5

As God created, ordered, and sustains the universe, so He created, ordered, and sustains reason, knowledge, and truth. Created as dependent upon God for all things, God gave us what we need for knowledge of Him and His universe. To that end, God gave us reason and logic to understand, order, and reverently submit to His revelation. And as the entire universe bears the fingerprints of God’s power and genius, so logic reflects the mind of God as He is infinitely rational and coherent in His thinking and knowledge of all things. He does not contradict Himself and in Him are no contradictions.6 And while we may not understand all that God has revealed to us about Himself and His world, our human limitations do not imply contradictions in God. Logic reflects the coherent mind of God, but is limited as used by created, finite, and fallible people.7

For instance, logic is never used in a neutral manner. As used by people to order their thought and knowledge, logic is always used according to the perspective and purpose of the person using it. Believers use logic to affirm God’s existence and attributes, while unbelievers use logic to deny them. One’s relationship to God determines how one interprets God and His creation according to the rules of logic.

Also, logic alone is inadequate to know the attributes of God. We know the nature of God by what He has chosen to reveal to us about Himself in creation and in the word and words of God in Scripture. We know of the person, works, and words of Jesus Christ, and the ultimate interpretation of God’s universe in Scripture. Logic, as vitally important as it is to order our thinking correctly, does not tell us these things. God’s revelation is the ultimate determiner of truth.

A case in point is the well-known “cosmological” argument for the existence of God. Simply stated, one version of the argument says that every effect has a cause, and as an infinite chain of causes and effects is impossible, a first cause or “unmoved mover” (God) must exist. In one sense, the argument is valid because the entire universe gives clear, comprehensive, and convincing evidence of God as its author. The effect that is the universe and everything in it proclaim God as the cause.8 Yet, we cannot conclude from logic alone that God does not have a cause or that an infinite chain of causes and effects is impossible. On the contrary, it logically follows that if “every effect must have a cause” then an infinite chain of causes and effects must exist, for the “first cause” itself must have a cause. Only God’s revelation tells us no infinite chain of causes and effects exists and that God is the self-existent cause of all things. “In the beginning God” limits the authority of logic by itself to determine ultimate truth about God and His existence. In the same way, logic alone cannot tell us that God is a Trinity, or that Christ is both one-hundred percent God and one-hundred percent man at the same time. Logic, apart from revelation, could be used to argue against such Christian doctrines.

Logic Is Used In The Context Of God’s Revelation And Reveals The Existence Of God

Logic is not contrary to Christian doctrine, however. God gave logic to be used by people created in His image in the context of a world that clearly and comprehensively reveals God in all things. And while logic depends upon God’s revelation as the ultimate source of truth concerning God’s existence and attributes, the existence and use of logic itself gives clear evidence of the existence of God. Consider again a godless universe of random chance. What, then, accounts for the uniformity and universality of the laws of logic? Uniform and universal laws could not exist in a universe founded on random chance. That our reasoning functions according to uniform and universal laws of logic9 gives clear evidence of God’s existence. Apart from God, logic would be impossible.

I recently heard an atheist who, in great confidence, believes he refutes the apologetic arguments of Christians. When asked to give an account for the existence of logic he boldly affirmed that it “just is,” assuming that for which he was to give an account. He dodged the question while claiming to answer it because he could not give a reasonable account for anything in the universe as it exists, including logic, apart from God as its source and sustainer. And this should not be surprising, for the same apologists for atheism, while immersed in the clear, comprehensive, and convincing evidence of God’s existence, ask Christians for evidence of God’s existence.

The Beauty Of God’s Excellence In Creation And Scripture Is Known Immediately And Intuitively

Fundamental to properly understanding the nature of belief and unbelief is how we know the existence and excellence of God. In short, evidence for the existence and excellence of God is seen and known immediately and intuitively, and is not the result of a process of logical deduction. This is not to say that the knowledge of God is illogical. As we have seen, God as the source and sustainer of all things is eminently logical and the only reasonable explanation of reality as we know it. Yet, no amount of logical reasoning will convince a heart at enmity with God of the existence and excellence of God.

Edwards likens the knowledge of God to our recognition of the harmony of music, the beauty of a rainbow, or the tasting of honey.10 No explanation of sound waves is needed to prove the disharmony of two musical notes when hearing the dissonance is evidence enough. Explanations of mathematical symmetry and the various locations on the color scale cannot substitute for actually seeing the beauty of a rainbow. Its beauty is known immediately and intuitively. All of the verbal descriptions of honey to one without taste buds are nothing compared to actually tasting it. So it is with the knowledge of God. Edwards writes,

The divine glory and beauty of divine things is in itself a real evidence of their divinity, and the most direct and strong evidence. He that truly sees the divine, transcendent, supreme glory of those things which are divine, does, as it were, know their divinity intuitively.11

No amount of deductive reasoning (valuable as it is) will convince unbelievers of the excellence of God if they lack the spiritual eyes or sense to see His beauty. The evidence is clear, comprehensive, and convincing. “The gospel of the blessed God does not go abroad a-begging for its evidence, so much as some think; it has its highest and most proper evidence in itself.”12 The marks of the excellence of God are conspicuous in the world and in the parts and whole of Scripture. They are so clear in creation that all mankind are without excuse for not worshipping and giving God thanks (Romans 1:18-22). Yet, unbelievers are blind to the beauty of God’s attributes. They are hostile to the God of Scripture and view the excellence of the Gospel as “foolishness” (1 Corinthians 1:18-31). They see and know the truth, but their enmity against God drives them to suppress the truth in unrighteousness. They know truth about God by the clear, comprehensive, and convincing evidence that surrounds them, but are blind to the beauty of God’s excellence from a heart of enmity against God as their creator, lord, and redeemer. Their desire for independence from God drives their erroneous interpretations of God’s world. The same is true of Scripture. Unbelievers can read and understand it, but cannot see its beauty and therefore reject its authority. They suppress the evidence of its divine authorship from a heart of enmity against God.

Thus, the ultimate issue of unbelief is not one of logic (as logical as true belief is), but the nature of one’s heart toward God. The heart at enmity with God will not see the beauty of God’s excellence, and will suppress the knowledge of God at every turn. Until the Spirit of God changes the heart of the unbeliever in removing the hostility and blindness to the beauty of God’s excellence, he or she will not believe. Yet, when the hostility is removed, the knowledge of the existence and excellence of God will be known immediately and intuitively, as the truth will be seen for what it truly is. “For God, who said, ‘Let light shine out of darkness,’ has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ” (2 Corinthians 4:6).

Mystery Is Proper And Reasonable

God’s Being, Knowledge, And Ways Are Infinitely Above Ours

For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways,’ declares the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts (Isaiah 55:8-9).

While we can know God in a personal loving relationship, we can never know Him or His ways exhaustively. God is incomprehensible. God would be no higher than us if we could know Him exhaustively. This fact, though not always sufficiently appreciated by believers, is critical to a proper interpretation of reality in submission to God as He has revealed Himself in Scripture.

Because We Cannot See Or Understand Something Does Not Make It Untrue

Believers are often confronted with arguments against faith in Christ based upon the apparent impossibility of Christian doctrines and biblical events. Many deny the possibility of the Trinity because they cannot understand how God can be one and yet eternally exist as three persons. Atheists are quick to point to the impossibility of Jonah in the belly of a big fish for three days, a universal flood and the salvation of animal life and humanity by an ark, or the sun standing still, etc. Yet, as we noted above, human perception and understanding have no effect on the nature of God and the reality God created and upholds. Because a finite human being does not believe something can happen or exist determines nothing. To deny truth about God because one does not understand it denies God’s incomprehensibility. And to deny God’s incomprehensibility is to claim knowledge about the character of God, something beyond the capacity of a finite person to know apart from the revelation of God. In the end, it makes one’s understanding the ultimate standard of truth, saying, “If I cannot understand something, it cannot be true.” This assumes for the human the authority of God in determining what can or cannot be, all despite the human limitations of five senses, three dimensions, and a few years upon the earth. Finite human understanding can never be the final standard of truth.

That Many Truths About God And His Universe Appear Logically Irreconcilable To Finite Creatures Is Appropriate

Given the nature of God as the creator and sustainer of all things, and our nature as created, limited, and dependent upon God for all things, it necessarily follows from our human perspective that mysteries must exist. If we could understand all things we would be God. It makes perfect sense that people of limited understanding cannot fully understand or logically reconcile many things God has revealed to us about Himself and His universe. Created, finite, and dependent people simply cannot fully comprehend what is and is not possible with a God that transcends all that He created and sustains. God is not constrained by the universe or our limited understanding of it. Moreover, to reject something because we cannot understand it implies that our limited understanding is the ultimate standard of what can and cannot be true concerning God and His universe. The same applies to the so-called “problem of evil” (to be discussed further below). The inability of our finite understanding to fully grasp the existence of evil in a universe created and sustained by a good and all powerful God merely points to our human limitations.

Behind the many problems unbelievers have with the nature of God and reality as revealed in Scripture, among other things, is a failure to acknowledge human limitations in the face of an infinite and incomprehensible God. Mystery concerning God and His universe reflects the infinite gap between God and His creatures, not any irrationality in God.13

Earthly Analogies Cannot Sufficiently Prove Or Explain God

God Transcends All Earthly Analogies, Ultimately

To whom will you liken God? Or what likeness compare with Him…. To whom then will you compare me, that I should be like him? says the Holy One. Lift up your eyes on high and see: who created these? He who brings out their host by number, calling them all by name, by the greatness of his might, and because he is strong in power not one is missing (Isaiah 40:18, 25-26).

While it is true that all things bear the finger prints of God and give clear, comprehensive, and convincing evidence of His existence and nature, the Potter is not the clay. The genius of the Potter is seen in the clay, but forever remains distinct from the clay. The same applies to our being created in God’s image. We bear aspects of God’s divinity but are not divine. When through faith we “become partakers of the divine nature” (2 Peter 1:4), we bear and reflect aspects of the character of Christ by His Spirit within us, but we do not become Christ. All we bear of God’s image is quantitatively and qualitatively different from God.

Notwithstanding, Scripture does provide many earthly analogies of God and spiritual realities. For instance, Christ tells us that if human fathers know how to give good gifts to their children, how much more will God be good to His children (Luke 11:10-13). The relationship of husband and wife is a picture of the relationship of Christ and the church (Ephesians 5:22-33). Many such analogies are taught in Scripture. But while we can learn many things about God by what He has created, no earthly analogy can sufficiently represent an incomprehensible God. If earthly analogies could sufficiently explain God, He would be no higher than earthly things.

God’s Word Is Required To Interpret Created Reality And Earthly Analogies Correctly

Our dependence upon Scripture does not deny that God has clearly revealed Himself in creation, providence, and conscience. But, even before Adam and Eve sinned, they needed God’s special revelation to know their purpose and duties. The supreme test of their fidelity in God’s command to not eat the forbidden fruit required the special revelation of God’s word.

Thus, our fall into sin did not initiate our dependence upon God’s special revelation, but greatly increased it. A corrupted will and understanding require special revelation to interpret reality correctly. A fallen will and understanding will pervert and suppress earthly analogies of God.14 Further, fallen people need the special revelation of the Gospel to know the way of deliverance from the penalty and power of sin, and to know God’s will for their life. General revelation renders irreverence and ignorance of God inexcusable, but cannot reconcile fallen people to God through faith in Christ.

Many Things Are Not Analogous Of God, Such As Sin, Corruption And Death

Sin, corruption, and death affirm Scripture’s account of the reality if sin, its consequences, and the justice of God. But evil is not analogous of God. Without the guidance and correction of Scripture, we would interpret reality according to our finite and corrupt understanding, drawing erroneous conclusions from the existence of evil in the world. God could be seen as both good and evil, with evil as equally ultimate as goodness. We would make God in our own image or the image of created things. And, if earthly analogies are used by Christian apologists as the primary evidence of God’s existence, unbelievers will merely point to evil in the world and dismiss the existence of the holy God of Scripture. Thus, while earthly analogies are often helpful in leading unbelievers to the knowledge of God in Christ, Scripture is required for them to be used correctly.

Created, Finite People Are Unqualified To Deny What God Has Revealed In Scripture

As created and sustained by our self-existent and incomprehensible God, we humbly depend on Scripture to know and proclaim His excellence and rightly understand His universe. God alone created all things, knows all things, and possesses ultimate authority to properly interpret and explain all things. Created and dependent people of five senses, three dimensions, and a few years on earth do not possess the knowledge and outside perspective to question God’s explanation of Himself or the universe He created and sustains. For good reason God tells us that “whoever trusts in his own mind is a fool” (Proverbs 28:26). We simply lack the perspective and knowledge of God to determine truth, or to deny what God has revealed to us as truth. To what higher authority than Scripture can one appeal to deny the truth of Scripture? If we say science, on what basis does science deny the truth of Scripture? Science is conducted by human scientists, subject to the same limitations of all people. To deny the truthfulness of Scripture, one would need to deny the existence of its author, God Himself. And on what basis can a scientist, subject to human limitations, say that the transcendent God of the universe does not exist? To justifiably deny the existence of God requires knowledge about the entire universe and beyond. The omniscience of God is required to legitimately deny God. As God is incomprehensible, scientists are simply incapable of explaining His nature and existence apart from what God Himself has revealed. And no higher authority exists to which they can appeal to deny the truthfulness of Scripture (miracles will be discussed below). Apart from Scripture, atheistic scientists (as contrasted with believing scientists) merely describe how God governs the universe, even as they deny Him.

“Unless otherwise indicated, all Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®), copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.”


1 Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1994), 149.

2 Citing Augustine, Calvin notes that God condescends to speak to us on our level as a mother speaks to her child. Calvin, Institutes, 3.21.4.

3 To be discussed below.

4 Calvin, Institutes, 2.22.1.

5 Logic can only be the ultimate standard of truth in the sense that God is the standard of truth and God’s “mind” is perfectly coherent and logical. Finite human reasoning, including our use of logic, cannot be the final standard of truth. God has revealed many truths that we cannot reconcile according to our human use of logic, that are ultimately reconcilable to God in His infinite knowledge.

6 Frame writes, “Scripture teaches that God himself is logical. In the first place, His Word is truth (John 17:17), and truth means nothing if it is not opposed to falsehood. Therefore His Word is noncontradictory. Furthermore, God does not break His promises (2 Cor. 1:20); He does not deny himself (2 Tim. 2:13); He does not lie (Heb. 6:18; Tit. 1:2). At the very least, those expressions mean that God does not do, say, or believe the contradictory of what He says to us. The same conclusion follows from the biblical teaching concerning the holiness of God. Holiness means that there is nothing in God that contradicts his perfection (including His truth). Frame, Doctrine of the Knowledge of God, 253.

7 The question sometimes arises as to whether logic is created and therefore limited and unable to be the ultimate standard of truth or uncreated as it is a reflection of the coherence of God’s thought. The question, as I have phrased it, however, poses an unnecessary dichotomy. “Christians see the laws of logic as expressions of God’s thinking, His own consistent personal nature, not as principles outside of God to which He must measure up. The laws of logic reflect the nature of God, for in Him we find perfect coherence….the laws of logic reflect His nature, the way He is in Himself. They are, therefore, eternal expressions of the unchanging character of God (Num. 23:19; Mal. 3:6; James 1:17).” Gary DeMar, ed., Pushing the Antithesis: The Apologetic Methodology of Greg L. Bahnsen (Powder Springs, GA: American Vision, 2007) 210. See also 200-202, 154, 264-266. Yet, logic is used in the reasoning of finite and fallen creatures. Thus, in speaking of logic as used by finite and fallen creatures, Richard Pratt is correct in saying that “logic is not above the Creator-creature distinction,” that “logic is a part of creation,” “has limitations,” and that it is not the ultimate standard of truth, as “truth is found at the judgment seat of God, not the court of logic.” Richard Pratt, Every Thought Captive (Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 1979), 24-25. Pratt and Bahnsen, both adherents and expositors of the apologetic of Cornelius Van Til, agree that God’s thought is perfectly rational and coherent, that the laws of logic are reflective of God’s mind as perfectly rational and coherent, but that logic as used by created, finite, and fallible humans cannot be the ultimate standard of truth. Frame states it this way, “Human logic is fallible, even though God’s logic is infallible.” Frame, Doctrine of the Knowledge of God, 255. See also Cornelius Van Til, Introduction to Systematic Theology, 10-12.

8 “God’s revelation is everywhere, and everywhere perspicuous [clear]. Hence, the theistic proofs are absolutely valid. They are but the restatement of the revelation of God.” Van Til, quoted in Bahnsen, 616.

9 Or, at least, it should.

10 Edwards, Religious Affections; BT, 224; Yale, 207-208.

11 Ibid., BT, 224; Yale, 298.

12 Ibid., BT, 233; Yale, 307.

13 See Van Til, Introduction to Systematic Theology, 12.

14 See Romans 1:18-22.

From the series: Abraham

Related Topics: Apologetics, Character of God

From the series: Abraham

Truthfulness

Definition

“He is the true God, and that all his knowledge and words are both true and the final standard of truth.”1 Or, “That perfection of His being by virtue of which He fully answers to the idea of the Godhead, is perfectly reliable in His revelation, and sees things as they really are.”2

Numbers 23:19: “God is not man, that he should lie, or a son of man, that he should change his mind. Has he said, and will he not do it? Or has he spoken, and will he not fulfill it?”

Psalm 33:4: “For the word of the LORD is upright, and all his work is done in faithfulness.”

Psalm 119:151: “But you are near, O LORD, and all your commandments are true.”

John. 14:6: “Jesus said to him, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”

John 17:17: “Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth.”3

Implications For Apologetics

Apologetics Defends The God Of Scripture, Not “a god” Or Unknown Higher Power4

Christian apologetics is not about arguing for an undefined higher power while granting the unbeliever the ultimate authority to define its nature. Such would merely confirm the unbeliever’s idolatry or allow for the substitution of one idol for another, leaving the essence of unbelief unchallenged. At the heart of unbelief is both a denial of the obvious in what God has clearly revealed about Himself, while exerting one’s own opinion and will as ultimate. Sin presumes the place and prerogative of God in thought and deed. To admit of a “higher power” does nothing to challenge the presumed independence and authority of unbelief, as unbelievers remain free to define it to suit their presumed independence and authority. The apologetic challenge to unbelief is to repent of both the worship of false gods, and the false presumption of independence from God, and ultimate authority to define such gods. Idols are “worthless” and “a work of delusion” (Jeremiah 10:15).

Do you not know? Do you not hear? Has it not been told you from the beginning? Have you not understood from the foundations of the earth? It is he who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers; who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to dwell in; who brings princes to nothing, and makes the rulers of the earth as emptiness.

Scarcely are they planted, scarcely sown, scarcely has their stem taken root in the earth, when he blows on them, and they wither, and the tempest carries them off like stubble.

To whom then will you compare me, that I should be like him? Says the Holy One. Lift up your eyes on high and see: who created these? He who brings out their host by number, calling them all by name, by the greatness of his might, and because he is strong in power not one is missing (Isaiah 40:18-26).

Further,

It is he who made the earth by his power, who established the world by his wisdom, and by his understanding stretched out the heavens. When he utters his voice, there is a tumult of waters in the heavens, and he makes the mist rise from the ends of the earth. He makes lightning for the rain, and he brings forth the wind from his storehouses. Every man is stupid and without knowledge; every goldsmith is put to shame by his idols, for his images are false, and there is no breath in them. They are worthless, a work of delusion; at the time of their punishment they shall perish. Not like these is he who is the portion of Jacob, for he is the one who formed all things, and Israel is the tribe of his inheritance; the LORD of hosts is his name (Jeremiah 10:12-16).

As a created work of God immersed in a sea of the works of God, unbelievers should know better. Idolatry and unbelief are without excuse.

For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things (Romans 1:18-23).

Unbelief is sin and worthy of condemnation precisely because unbelievers know better. Unbelief denies the obvious.

The only true definition of God is what He has revealed about Himself in Scripture. As we have seen, apart from God’s specific revelation of Himself, finite people are incapable of knowing the nature of an infinite, transcendent God. Attempts by fallen people to define God apart from Scripture result in as many definitions as there are people, each no more authoritative than another. No “true” and authoritative definition of God would be possible. Yet, God has revealed Himself. “And this is eternal life, that they know you the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent” (John 17:3). “And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know him who is true; and we are in him who is true, in his Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life” (1 John 5:20). For they themselves report concerning us the kind of reception we had among you, and how you turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God” (1 Thessalonians 1:9). We worship, proclaim, and defend the God of Scripture, not an unknown higher power.

Only God’s Revelation Is Absolutely True And Worthy To Be Trusted Fully

As God Is True, So The Words And Word Of God Are True

“I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6). Had Christ said, “I am not the way, and the truth, and the life,” the entire Gospel and meaning of the history of redemption in Scripture would be undone. A single word can make a world of difference. Indeed, the serpent’s temptation of Eve in the garden rested on slight alterations to the words of God, with immense implications. Theologians rightly speak of the inspiration of Scripture as verbal, applying to the very words of Scripture, and plenary, applying to the entirety of Scripture. As our brief illustrations show, statements of “truth” are untrustworthy when the individual words are untrustworthy.5 And as we have seen, truth and knowledge are determined by God. As created and finite, we depend upon God for ultimate truth and knowledge. And as determined by God who is Himself trustworthy, all God’s revelation is trustworthy. A proper doctrine of the authority and inspiration of Scripture, therefore, is founded upon a proper doctrine of God. God is true and the source of all truth. The words penned by the human writers of Scripture are the very words of God.

Knowing this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone’s own interpretation. For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit (2 Peter 1:20-21).

Indeed, Christ promised the disciples that they would be the instruments of His truth in His giving them a “Helper,” “the Spirit of truth” (John 14:16-17).

When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth, for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you (John 16:13-14).

At issue concerning the doctrine of biblical inerrancy, then, is the same issue with all claims by created, finite, and dependent people: to what higher authority than Scripture can one appeal for the ultimate explanation concerning God and the universe He created? As we have seen, no such higher authority exists. To what or whom, then, do those who deny the orthodox doctrine of the verbal and plenary inspiration of Scripture appeal? If to human opinion, we are left with the same problem of billions of ultimate authorities, none of whom are equipped to speak of ultimate truth. Truth is therefore lost in a sea of opinions.

Yet, this is exactly the case with those who deny the verbal and plenary inspiration of Scripture. For instance, many who deny the historical nature of certain Old Testament events, such as the flood or the creation and temptation of Adam and Eve in the garden, at the same time affirm certain New Testament doctrines and history. Yet, having already established the principle that they are personally adequate to determine what is historical and not historical in the Old Testament, even if such events are spoken of as historical in the New Testament, they nonetheless want to maintain the authority of the New Testament. But why? If such interpreters can assume the authority to question Old Testament historical events, why not New Testament events? Possibly because one can seemingly deny the historicity of the flood while maintaining the historicity of the life and death of Christ, upon which all of Christianity stands. Yet, the personal authority assumed in interpreting the Old Testament is the same unbelieving assumption of those who deny the historicity of the New Testament. If the ultimate authority of human opinion is the final court of appeal in interpreting the Old Testament, why is it not the final court of appeal in interpreting the New Testament? At least those who deny the truthfulness of all of Scripture are consistent in assuming their own opinion as ultimate authority in interpreting both the New and Old Testaments. But those wanting to profess the authority of Scripture and Christ as Lord and Savior want to have it both ways, to operate in the place of God in determining what is true and acceptable in the Bible according to their own criteria, contrary to the testimony of Scripture itself, while choosing to acknowledge God’s authority wherever they choose, such as in the New Testament. In either case, they act as the final authority as to what they will accept or deny, imitating the sin of Adam and Eve in their presumption of authority to choose between God’s word and the word of the serpent.

Of course, interpreters will appeal to data or certain criteria in making their interpretation. For those holding to verbal and plenary inspiration of Scripture, the criteria are explicitly stated in Scripture. Assumptions include God as truthful and the source of all truth, and God as perfect and unable to do anything in or with error, and able to use the imperfect to accomplish His perfect ends. As the well-known saying goes, God can make a straight line with a bent stick. Christ took upon Himself corruptible human flesh, yet he was without sin and error in all He did and said. As Scripture tells us, God used imperfect apostles to pen his perfect truth.6 Who, then, can deny that the infinite, perfect, and all-powerful and wise God cannot use human writers to pen perfect truth? No authority exists to which one can appeal to deny God’s ability to do so. As with all interpreters of the biblical and extra-biblical data, the data will be interpreted according to either the nature of God as the starting point of all truth and knowledge, or the assumed authority of human opinion.

A more in-depth discussion of the various issues related to biblical inspiration would take us too far afield, but note well that the same issues with respect to ultimate authority concerning knowledge and truth apply to interpreters denying the historicity of parts of Scripture that are written as history. Created, finite, and fallen people are dependent upon God for all knowledge and truth. The proper starting point and foundation for a right doctrine of the inspiration of Scripture is the nature of God as revealed in Scripture. All improper views of inspiration go wrong at this point.

The Only True Interpretation Of Reality Is God’s Interpretation.

God’s knowledge and explanation of Himself and reality correspond to reality perfectly.7 God is perfectly objective and knows things exactly as they are in every respect. He created and sustains all things, while His knowledge “precedes the existence of things”8 and determines all facts. Our knowledge of truth is derived from God, therefore our interpretation of facts is only true when it corresponds to God’s interpretation. Again, this is not to deny that we can know facts truly, but affirms our dependence on God for true knowledge and our need for humility and reverence in approaching Scripture. God has revealed truth and has given us the ability to know it.

Not only are we limited in our capacity for knowledge, lacking the capacity and perspective of God, our perception of facts is influenced by subjective factors of our experience, mood, prejudices, etc., as well as our physical and mental limitations. Moreover, all unbelievers will suppress the truth in unrighteousness and interpret reality to suit their denial of the God of Scripture. Even as believers, in our sinfulness we will also suppress the truth in unrighteousness in our moments of rebellion against God’s lordship. Thus, the only interpretation of reality that can be trusted fully is God’s interpretation.

Truth Is Unaffected By Unbelief

Truth Depends Upon God Alone And Exists Independently Of Human Perception Or Acceptance Of It

As noted concerning God as eternally self-existent and the creator of all things, God’s existence and attributes are unaffected by unbelief. God is independent of His creation. He is who He is regardless of what anyone thinks. In the same way, as God is true and the source of all truth, truth is unaffected by unbelief. Should the whole world deny God and His word, God and His word remain true. And as God does not change, so His truth does not change.

Unbelief Reflects The Sinful Nature Of The Heart, Not Defects In God’s Truth

“Let God be true though every one were a liar” (Romans 3:4). That mankind misunderstands and rejects the truth of God points to defects in the interpreter, not defects in God or His truth. Created reality and Scripture bear the clear marks of the divine Creator and Author such that all people are without excuse for not worshipping and giving Him thanks. Moreover, God and the Gospel are infinitely excellent. To not see, appreciate, and worship God for His excellence reveals the perversity of the fallen human heart. Christ, the perfect revelation of the character of God was no less excellent as God when the crowd shouted for His death. To view the Gospel as foolish or to interpret Scripture according to naturalistic assumptions of unbelief reflects the heart of sin. Such presumes the place of God as the ultimate authority in determining what is true and acceptable concerning God.

God Is True And His Knowledge And Explanation Of All Things Is True, Or He Is Not God

The creator and sustainer of all things is perfectly true and cannot lie or deny Himself, for He is omniscient, immutable, wise, powerful, holy, righteous, and good. As omniscient, He knows everything truly. As immutable, truth does not change because God as the source and sustainer of all things does not change. As wise, He knows what is best and true in every conceivable reality and circumstance. As all-powerful, He determines all things after the counsel of His own will and nothing can stay His hand in doing so; determining all things He determines all truth. As holy, all He says is true for He cannot lie. As infinite, He is perfect and without defect and thus always true. As righteous, all His judgments are correct according to the reality of every case and therefore true. As good, He can only do that which is true, holy, and right.

God’s truthfulness is intimately related to and dependent upon all His attributes, for the denial of God as true and truthful denies all the attributes of God. God would not be God if He were not true and truthful.

Truth Is Impossible Without God

One of the apologetic implications of the self-existence and self-sufficiency of God discussed earlier was the impossibility of God not existing, that God is the only possible explanation of all things as they exist. Apart from God, all would be random chance, and life and reality as we know it would be impossible in such a universe. We noted that truth and language would be impossible in a universe consisting of unrelated and meaningless random chance occurrences interpreting meaningless random occurrences. Truth would be impossible as everything would be unrelated and nothing could be said to be true from one second to the next. Assuming anything would even exist for more than a moment, the uniformity of God’s universe that allows us to think, use language, conduct science, among other things, would not exist.

We noted that the world does not operate that way, because God exists. Science and knowledge are possible because God exists. Uniform and universal laws exist because God exists. We think and reason because God exists. One might imagine that God does not exist, but it is impossible to account for reality as it is apart from Him. We have the pleasure of musing on such things precisely because God created, orders, and sustains all things according to His power and purpose. We can deny Him only because we are not random chance occurrences in a random chance universe.

We also noted that the denial of God’s existence and authority results in pure relativism and the loss of knowledge and truth. Apart from God, no ultimate authority and standard for truth could exist. Absolute truth would be impossible. All “truth” would be reduced to mere opinion, everyone’s best guess. Again, this is not to deny that unbelievers know truth. It is to deny any justification for truth according to a worldview that excludes God. Finite people are incapable of authoritatively explaining the ultimate nature of reality apart from God’s explanation of it, especially if they are themselves mere random chance occurrences. All are limited in their perspective and lack an outside objective perspective. Van Til illustrated the problem as follows.

Suppose we think of a man made of water in an infinitely extended and bottomless ocean of water. Desiring to get out of water, he makes a ladder of water. He sets this ladder upon the water and against the water and then attempts to climb out of the water. So hopeless and senseless a picture must be drawn of the natural man’s methodology based as it is upon the assumption that time or chance is ultimate. On his assumption his own rationality is a product of chance. On his assumption even the laws of logic which he employs are products of chance. The rationality and purpose that he may be searching for are still bound to be products of chance.9

The situation would be hopeless apart from God. Truth exists because God exists.

“Unless otherwise indicated, all Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®), copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.”


1 Grudem, Systematic Theology, 195.

2 Berkhof, Systematic Theology, 69.

3 See also Romans 3:3-4, 2 Timothy 2:13, Titus 1:1-2.

4 For a discussion of God as true as to His essence or being, which in turn is the ground of truth expressed, as in God’s revelation, and truth in knowing intellectually (in the sense that knowledge conforms to that which is known), see Herman Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics, vol. 2, ed. John Bolt, trans. John Vriend (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2004), 207-210. See also Frame’s discussion and interaction with Bavinck, in Frame, Doctrine of God, 475-9.

5 A comprehensive treatment of the nature of biblical inerrancy is beyond the scope of this short work, but the importance of a proper understanding of the attributes of God to the doctrine of the inspiration and authority of Scripture cannot be overstated.

6 Note that the doctrine of inerrancy applies to the original autograph, not the copies. Adherents to the doctrine of biblical inerrancy admit to slight textual issues such as copyist errors and slight differences between some manuscripts. For two excellent treatments of the issue of inerrancy (among many), see John D. Woodbridge, Biblical Authority (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Corporation, 1982), and John Frame, The Doctrine of the Word of God (Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 2010).

7 See Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics, 2:209.

8 Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics, 2:209.

9 Cornelius Van Til, The Defense of the Faith, 4th Edition, Ed. By K. Scott Oliphint (Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing), 124-5.

From the series: Abraham

Related Topics: Apologetics, Character of God

From the series: Abraham

Righteousness (Justice)

Definition

“God always acts in accordance with what is right and is himself the final standard of what is right.”1

“When we regard God as the author of our moral nature, we conceive of Him as holy; when we regard Him in his dealings with his rational creatures, we conceive of Him as righteous. He is a righteous ruler; all his laws are holy, just, and good. In his moral government He faithfully adheres to those laws. He is impartial and uniform in their execution. As a judge he renders unto every man according to his works. He neither condemns the innocent, nor clears the guilty; neither does He ever punish with undue severity. Hence the justice of God is distinguished as…that which is concerned in the imposition of righteous laws and in their impartial execution; and…that which is manifested in the righteous distribution of rewards and punishment. The Bible constantly represents God as a righteous ruler and a just judge.”2

Deuteronomy 32:4: “The Rock, his work is perfect, for all his ways are justice. A God of faithfulness and without iniquity, just and upright is he.”

Psalm 11:7: “For the LORD is righteous; he loves righteous deeds; the upright shall behold his face.”

Psalm 89:14: “Righteousness and justice are the foundation of your throne; steadfast love and faithfulness go before you.”

Psalm 98:9b: “He will judge the world with righteousness, and the peoples with equity.”

Romans 3:23-26: “For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God’s righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins. It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.”

Implications For Apologetics

All Of God’s Judgments Are Just And Must Be Viewed In Light Of Our Limited Understanding

Most of God’s revelation is relatively straight forward and easy to understand, though even the simplest truths can be denied by those hostile to God. At the same time, some things are “hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures” (2 Peter 3:16). Other things are easily understood on a cognitive level, but confront us with profound and difficult implications. For instance, the doctrine of eternal hell is clearly taught in Scripture. Christ spoke of it often as the appropriate penalty for sin. Yet, I suspect that most thoughtful Christians have at some point struggled with the sheer terror of the doctrine, or have questioned the severity of the punishment in light of the crime. And while the most zealous atheist can accept hell for Hitler or Stalin, hell appears to most people, including some professing believers, as unduly cruel and unbecoming of a God of love and justice. Yet Scripture clearly teaches it.

How can we respond to unbelieving attacks or personal doubts concerning the doctrine? To begin, all the implications of God’s attributes we have seen thus far apply here. Created by the eternally self-existent and self-sufficient God, we owe God all love, honor, obedience, and thanks. But what is our response to God?

If we consider how various, innumerable, and vast the benefits we receive from God, how infinitely great and wonderful that grace, which is revealed and offered to them who live under the gospel--in that eternal salvation which is procured by God giving his only-begotten Son to die for sinners--and also how unworthy we are all, deserving...eternal perdition under God’s wrath and curse--how great is the gratitude that would become us, who are the subjects of so many and great benefits!...But ho! what poor returns!--How little the gratitude! How low, how cold and inconstant, the affection in the best, compare with the obligation! And what then shall be said of the gratitude of the generality?3

Our appreciation hardly answers our debt to God for His goodness, while we little understand the degree to which our sin, indifference, and ingratitude insult God’s infinite majesty. If we accurately understood the infinite holiness of God and the depth of our contempt for one so deserving of all love, honor, and obedience, we would not question the justice of hell, even as we cringe at its horrors. Indeed, what can we say of someone who despises the God who suffered infinite wrath for the infinitely unworthy that they might have infinite bliss for eternity? God knows the full extent of such evil and will deal with it justly.

Moreover, as we depend upon God for all knowledge and truth, we can only know what God has chosen to reveal to us. And even what we do know is clouded by sin and self-justification. And should we reject revealed truths because we do not understand them or cannot reconcile them with our finite understanding of logic, we make our own understanding the ultimate standard of truth and of what can and cannot be true or possible. In this we assume the place and prerogative of God and imitate the sin of Adam and Eve. If we assume that created, finite, and dependent people possess the authority to reject one doctrine revealed by God because we do not like it or understand it, why not others? And while those who reject the doctrine of eternal hell may not reject every aspect of the Gospel, they have affirmed the principle by which others will do so.

Additionally, God is infinite, incomprehensible, omniscient, holy, good and righteous. He knows all things perfectly and all that He does is perfect, good, and right. He knows the deepest thoughts and motives of the hearts of all people intimately while we judge by superficial appearances. He sees the whole picture clearly while we see a small part dimly. How, then, from our limited and fallen perspective, can we possibly question a truth revealed to us by such a God? We simply cannot.

As with the mysteries of God and the universe, we must admit our human limitations and trust the perfect character of our infinite God. Whatever we may think about eternal hell, we can rest assured that no one will suffer unjustly and that the punishment will justly fit the crimes. “Shall not the judge of the earth deal justly?” We can take comfort that Christ endured infinite suffering that people might not go there, and rejoice that we have been delivered from its punishment. Our hearts should be moved by love and compassion for those who reject Christ as the remedy for their sin. But we dare not sin in assuming the place of God as the ultimate standard of truth.

In The Face Of Every Difficult Question We Can Rest Assured That God Is Righteous In His Judgments

The principles applied in approaching the difficult doctrine of hell apply to every difficult question of Scripture, though the nature of the difficulty may differ. With respect to hell, our struggle basically stems from the horror of the doctrine and not a lack of biblical support. Other difficulties stem from a lack of specific Bible texts on a topic, or a lack of understanding of how clearly revealed theological principles apply to a topic. And while a list and treatment of difficult theological questions is beyond the scope of this work, the principles presented here can be applied to any theological difficulty. Whatever the difficulty that confronts our limited understanding, God’s righteousness assures us that no one will be condemned who does not deserve it, and no one will be in heaven without the perfection of the imputed righteousness of Christ. The believer need not have answers to every difficult question, but can rest in the perfect righteousness of God. Indeed, when God’s justice is questioned, we need only look to Christ’s work on the cross. And as we have seen, faith ultimately rests in the character of God in the face of our limited understanding and His infinity. We must content ourselves in our status as created, limited in our understanding, and dependent upon God for all truth. In any event, we clearly know God’s justice by the infinite extent He went to uphold it in the saving work of Christ. In Him we can rest.

Whatever the theological difficulty, the foundation for a proper approach to it begins with the perfections of God and their implications for apologetics. God is the proper starting point for all knowledge.

The Righteous Judge Does Not Sit Under The Judgment Of Unrighteous Sinners

Created, finite, and dependent sinners are in no place to sit in judgment of God. As noted with respect to God’s holiness, we have no claims upon a holy God. Moreover, God is the ultimate judge of the universe, as He is the ultimate source and standard of all righteousness. He alone is qualified to judge His creation, and He cannot be judged by it. Such would be an irreverent role reversal. Nonetheless, in our sinfulness we often judge God. As Adam and Eve compared God’s will to the will of the serpent, they sat in judgment of God’s command and subordinated God’s revealed will and authority to their own. They assumed the place of ultimate authority and treated God’s will as below that of the lying serpent. And we do the same when we sit in judgment of God’s revealed will and providence. And while we may question God from a position of humble reverence in seeking greater understanding and clarity regarding His revealed will, we are never justified to sit in judgment over God. In the same way, anger against God is never justified. What right do we have to be angry with our Creator and Redeemer, whose will is perfect?

Distortions Of God’s Justice Distort The Gospel

In defending and proclaiming the Gospel, the true Gospel must be defended and proclaimed. The warning of the first chapter of Galatians should sober us all.

I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel— not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed (Galatians 1:6-9).

The foundation of a proper Gospel is a proper understanding of God’s justice. The justice of God is that which stands in the way of the sinner’s reconciliation with God, demands condemnation for sin, and requires satisfaction of its requirement of perfect obedience for eternal life. The nature of God’s justice, therefore, shapes the nature of Christ’s redeeming work in meeting its demands in order that sinners might be saved in a manner consistent with God’s justice. In short, the perfection and penalty for sin required by God’s justice can only be satisfied by the perfection and payment of Christ as our substitute. The requirement of Adam’s perfect obedience as the representative of his posterity went unfulfilled in his disobedience and is only fulfilled by Christ. The penalty for the sin of Adam and his posterity could only be paid by Christ, an infinite payment for an infinite debt. And so it is that Christ is the only way, for no other could satisfy the strict and unchanging requirements of God’s justice.

One of the great marvels of the Gospel is that God remains just in justifying the ungodly, as His justice is satisfied by Christ on behalf of believers, and the law of God is upheld because its strict requirements were never abrogated or diminished. Christ fulfilled them perfectly. And so we read, “Do we then overthrow the law by this faith? By no means! On the contrary, we uphold the law” (Romans 3:31). United to Christ through faith, the righteousness of Christ that satisfied God’s just requirements for eternal life is legally imputed or credited to the believer. The requirements of God’s law are satisfied in the salvation of sinners through faith in Christ, upholding the requirements of God’s justice.

The strict and inflexible nature of God’s justice cannot allow for salvation any other way. For God to save a single sinner apart from the satisfaction of His strict and unchanging justice would render God unrighteous. He would not be God in such a case. Moreover, the road to a salvation by the works of sinners is paved by a relaxing of God’s strict justice. But, “if righteousness comes through the Law,” with reference to sinners keeping of the Law, “then Christ died for no purpose” (Galatians 2:21). All distortions and or denials of the Gospel are founded upon error regarding God’s justice, and all religions based on works righteousness compromise God’s perfect justice.

“Unless otherwise indicated, all Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®), copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.”


1 Grudem, Systematic Theology, 203.

2 Hodge, Systematic Theology, 1:416.

3 Jonathan Edwards, Original Sin, ed. By Clyde A. Holbrook, vol. 3 of The Works of Jonathan Edwards (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970), 155.

From the series: Abraham

Related Topics: Apologetics, Character of God

Lesson 6: God Bless All the Missionaries (2 Thessalonians 3:1-5)

Related Media

March 12, 2017

It’s always cute to hear little children say their bedtime prayers. Often, they make sweeping, catch-all prayers that go something like: “God bless mommy and God bless daddy and God bless all my brothers and sisters and God bless all the missionaries. Amen!”

But, maybe your prayers sometimes sound like that, too. It’s a lot of work to get specific. It’s easier just to shoot up blanket prayers and let God sort out the specific needs. But in our text the apostle Paul gives us two specific requests that we can pray on behalf of missionaries, other Christian workers, and for all the Lord’s people. To sum up:

Pray for the word of the Lord to spread and that the Lord’s people, relying on His faithfulness, will stand firm in Him in the spiritual battle.

Paul knew that these new converts were going through intense persecution (1 Thess. 3:3-4; 2 Thess. 1:6-7). Also, false teachers were spreading spiritually damaging teachings in the church (2 Thess. 2:1-3). In light of this, note the flow of Paul’s thoughts here: After commanding them to stand firm (2 Thess. 2:15), he directs them to focus on praying for the gospel to spread through him and others, who also needed God’s protection from evil men; and, he emphasizes the Lord’s faithfulness along with the need for their continuing obedience. Then, he asks the Lord to direct their hearts into God’s love and into the example of Christ’s steadfastness, who obeyed God through the things He suffered (Heb. 2:10; 5:8; 12:3).

That’s a healthy way to deal with your own trials, or to help others who are going through trials. Get your focus off your problem and onto others’ needs. Especially, pray for those who serve the Lord in difficult places, who may be suffering on behalf of the gospel. And, get your focus onto the Lord’s faithfulness, love, and example of steadfast obedience when He suffered.

1. Pray that the word of the Lord will spread and that those who proclaim it will be protected so that the word will continue to spread (2 Thess. 3:1-2).

A. Pray that the word of the Lord will spread through the gospel being received.

2 Thess. 3:1: “Finally, brethren, pray for us that the word of the Lord will spread rapidly and be glorified, just as it did also with you.” Paul’s “finally” is like many preachers’ “finally”: it doesn’t mean that the sermon is almost over! In 1 Thessalonians 4:1, Paul says “finally” and then goes on for two more chapters (see, also, Phil. 3:1). The phrase means, “As far as the rest is concerned,” or, “in addition” (A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, Walter Bauer, William Arndt, Wilbur Gingrich, & Frederick Danker [University of Chicago Press], 2nd ed., p. 480).

In asking for prayer for himself, Paul’s focus was not only for personal safety, but also that the gospel would spread so that God would be glorified, as had happened in Thessalonica. Even though he was a veteran apostle and the Thessalonians were new believers, Paul needed their prayers. He didn’t assume that his impressive spiritual gifts or his past successes would result in future success. Paul knew that he had to depend on the Lord through prayer.

When people respond in faith to the gospel, they glorify the Lord who gave that gospel to us. Verse 1 is really asking these new converts to pray the first part of the Lord’s Prayer on behalf of Paul and his fellow missionaries (Matt. 6:9-10): “Our Father, who is in heaven, hallowed be Your name. Your kingdom come. Your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.” Note several other things about Paul’s request.

1) The gospel is not a message that Paul or the other apostles made up.

Rather, it is “the word of the Lord.” It comes from the Lord and centers on the Lord. It is the message that the eternal Lord of glory (1 Cor. 2:8) came to this earth, took on human flesh, and suffered and died in our place, bearing the punishment that we deserved for our sins. And God raised Him from the dead. The good news is that God offers forgiveness for all our sins and eternal life as a free gift to all who trust in Jesus Christ (John 3:16; Eph. 2:8-9).

2) In whatever culture people respond to the gospel, their lives are demonstrably changed.

Paul could say, “just as it did also with you,” because he saw that these former pagan idolaters had turned from idols to the living and true God (1 Thess. 1:9). If people profess to believe in Jesus but there is no observable change in their lives, they need to examine whether they truly believed.

3) Paul asks for prayer that the word of the Lord will “spread rapidly and be glorified.”

The Greek is literally, “will run and be glorified.” Paul was probably thinking of Psalm 147:15, “He sends forth His command to the earth; His word runs very swiftly.” Paul was writing from Corinth, which hosted the Isthmian Games. So he may have had in mind an athletic contest, where the winning runner received the prize and was honored. Paul wants the gospel to win the hearts of those who hear so that it, and the Lord who sends it forth, will get the honor and glory. For people to respond favorably to the gospel, God has to open their blind eyes and draw them to Christ (2 Cor. 4:4-6; John 6:44, 65). Even a preacher as gifted as Paul knew that if God did not open the hearts of those who heard him preach, they would not respond (Acts 16:14).

4) Paul saw no contradiction between the doctrine of election and the need for evangelism and prayer for the success of the gospel.

Sometimes people object, “If God predestines all who will be saved, then why evangelize? Why pray?” But Paul mentions election, prayer, and evangelism in close proximity (2 Thess. 2:13; 3:1) with no need to explain the seeming tension. The Bible teaches that God ordains the means as well as the ends. He has chosen many to be saved, but they come to salvation through the prayerful proclamation of the gospel. We don’t change God’s mind through our prayers, but in a mysterious way God uses our prayers to accomplish His predetermined will (G. K. Beale, 1-2 Thessalonians [IVP Academic], pp. 242-243).

Paul was in the rough, pagan city of Corinth when he wrote this letter. He was afraid and thinking about leaving there before he suffered another beating or worse. One night the Lord graciously appeared to Paul in a vision and said (Acts 18:9-10), “Do not be afraid any longer, but go on speaking and do not be silent; for I am with you, and no man will attack you in order to harm you, for I have many people in this city.” So Paul settled there for 18 months, teaching the word of God among them (Acts 18:11). Later, he explained to Timothy (2 Tim. 2:10), “For this reason I endure all things for the sake of those who are chosen, so that they also may obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus and with it eternal glory.” God has chosen those who will be saved, but He saves them through our prayers and proclaiming the gospel to them.

5) For the word of the Lord to spread and be glorified, the word that is spread must be the true gospel, not a perversion of it.

From the earliest times, Satan has infiltrated the church with teachers who promote a false “gospel” that is really bad news, not good news. In the churches of Galatia, the Judaizers had come in with the message, “Paul was basically right: we are saved by God’s grace through faith. But, also you must be circumcised and keep the Old Testament law.” Many were being led astray by this seemingly “slight” alteration of the gospel. But Paul forcefully wrote (Gal. 1:8-9), “But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed! As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, he is to be accursed!”

Even so, there are many false “gospels” today: “Believe in Jesus and He will give you wealth and health!” “Believe in Jesus and be baptized, and you will be saved.” “Believe in Jesus and add your good works, so that eventually you will earn enough merit to get out of Purgatory.” So pray that the gospel that is being proclaimed will be the true gospel, not a perversion of it.

B. Pray that the word of the Lord will continue to spread through God’s protection of those who proclaim it.

2 Thess. 3:2: [Pray] “that we will be rescued from perverse and evil men; for not all have faith.” As I said, Paul was not so much trying to save his own skin as he wanted to see the gospel continue to spread. If the messengers are protected from evil men, they have more freedom to proclaim the message. Granted, Paul evangelized the Praetorian Guard while he was a prisoner in Rome. And, the testimonies of many martyrs have resulted in many coming to faith through their deaths. But there is nothing wrong with asking for prayer for protection from persecution for those who take the gospel into hostile areas. The main aim is for the word of the Lord to spread.

Note the prominence of “the Lord” in verses 1-5. In verse 1, it is “the word of the Lord.” In verse 3, “the Lord is faithful.” In verse 4, “We have confidence in the Lord.” In verse 5, “May the Lord direct your hearts ….” In times of trial or persecution for the sake of the gospel, it’s important to remember that Jesus is the Lord, the sovereign of the universe. No one can harm you or kill you unless it is in God’s good and loving purpose for His glory.

Scholars differ over who these perverse and evil men who did not have faith were. Some think that Paul was referring to the unbelieving Jews in Corinth. Acts 18:12-17 reports how they rose up against Paul and brought him before the proconsul, accusing him of persuading people to worship God contrary to the law. When the proconsul wouldn’t listen to them, they took hold of Sosthenes, the leader of the synagogue who had trusted in Christ (1 Cor. 1:1) and began beating him in front of the proconsul, who ignored them. So Paul may have been referring to the unbelieving Jews.

But other scholars (e.g. Beale, pp. 239-242) argue that he was referring primarily to false believers in the church, who were either promoting false doctrine or whose lives did not back up their profession of faith. Often, such people can cause more harm to the church from the inside than those who are outside the church. Jesus warned (Matt. 7:15) about false prophets who come into the flock disguised as sheep, but really are ravenous wolves. Paul warned the Ephesian elders (Acts 20:29-30), “I know that after my departure savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock; and from among your own selves men will arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after them.” He also said (2 Cor. 11:14-15) that even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light, and his servants as servants of righteousness.

So the takeaway application from verses 1 & 2 is, pray for everyone in this church to have opportunities to proclaim the gospel and that God will bless those efforts with genuine conversions. And, pray that God will protect us from those, whether from without or within, who oppose the gospel and seek to harm those who proclaim it. We are not wrestling against flesh and blood, but rather against the spiritual forces of wickedness in heavenly places (Eph. 6:12). Also,

2. Pray that the Lord’s people, relying on His faithfulness, will stand firm in Him in the spiritual battle (2 Thess. 3:3-5).

Paul turns from the faithlessness of men to the faithfulness of the Lord, a theme that he mentions often (cf. 1 Thess. 5:24; 1 Cor. 1:9; 10:13; 2 Cor. 1:18; 2 Tim. 2:13). Since Paul has been asking for prayer for his own protection, you would expect that he would continue, “But the Lord is faithful, and He will strengthen and protect us from the evil one.” But rather, he shifts to “strengthen and protect you.” This reflects his pastor’s heart, which was more concerned about these new believers than he was about himself (John Calvin, Calvin’s Commentaries [Baker], pp. 349-350).

“Evil one” may also be translated, “evil,” but it’s more likely that it refers to the archenemy of our souls, the devil (see, 1 Thess. 2:18; 3:5; 2 Thess. 2:9). As Calvin observes (p. 350), “For it were a small thing to be delivered from the cunning or violence of men, if the Lord did not protect us from all spiritual injury.” Again, it’s a reminder that spreading the gospel engages us in a spiritual battle against satanic forces, which are too powerful for us in our own strength. We must rely on the Lord. Note three things:

A. Relying on God’s faithfulness is the foundation for standing firm in the spiritual battle.

2 Thess. 3:3: “But the Lord is faithful, and He will strengthen and protect you from the evil one.” In 1 Thessalonians 5:24, Paul reminded these new believers who were enduring persecution, “Faithful is He who calls you, and He also will bring it to pass.” Here, he again reminds them of this comforting truth, “the Lord is faithful.” After Jerusalem had been destroyed by the Babylonians, thousands of Jews had been slaughtered, and most of the others were forced into captivity in Babylon, Jeremiah (the most probable author) wrote Lamentations, expressing his overwhelming grief over the tragedy that he had witnessed. In the middle of that sorrowful lament, there is this well-known ray of hope (Lam. 3:22-24):

The Lord’s lovingkindnesses indeed never cease,
For His compassions never fail.
They are new every morning;
Great is Your faithfulness.
“The Lord is my portion,” says my soul,
“Therefore I have hope in Him.”

So when you’re under attack, whether from criticism or slander or outright persecution, rely on God’s faithfulness. Even when the enemy seems to be winning (as in Jeremiah’s situation), God is faithful and He will work it all together for good.

Paul assures us that our faithful Lord will both strengthen and protect us. “Lord” refers to the Lord Jesus. The fact that Jesus is able both to strengthen and protect his people all around the world when they are under attack shows that He is God. But Paul’s word of assurance raises a problem: If the Lord promises to strengthen and protect His people, then why do they suffer terribly under persecution? Why are there martyrs if the Lord is protecting them?

We need to understand that the Lord’s promise for protection is not a guarantee of deliverance from every enemy. In Luke 21:16-18, Jesus says, “But you will be betrayed even by parents and brothers and relatives and friends, and they will put some of you to death, and you will be hated by all because of My name. Yet not a hair of your head will perish.” By saying, “not a hair of your head will perish,” Jesus was not promising immunity from death, which He just said will happen to some. Rather, He means that if we are faithful to the Lord under persecution, even if they kill the body they cannot touch the soul (Luke 12:4-5). God has sovereignly determined the exact number of martyrs, and when that number is fulfilled, He will judge those who shed their blood (Rev. 6:9-11). So we can rely on God’s faithfulness as our foundation for standing firm in the spiritual battle.

B. Relying on the Lord for ongoing obedience is the framework for standing firm in the spiritual battle.

2 Thess. 3:4: “We have confidence in the Lord concerning you, that you are doing and will continue to do what we command.” Paul’s confidence was “in the Lord” regarding the Thessalonians’ continuing obedience. As an apostle, Paul could give commands (not suggestions!) to the churches. We now have those apostolic commands in the New Testament. In verse 4, Paul is laying the framework for what will follow, where three times he gives commands regarding those who were not working and sponging off the rest of the church (2 Thess. 3:6, 10, 12).

In our day, many professing Christians believe that if you teach the need to obey God’s commandments, you’re legalistic. I’ve been accused of that, even when I preface it by saying that God’s grace is the motivation to obey Him. They claim that God’s grace and their feelings exempt them from obedience. A young woman once told me, “My fiancé isn’t a Christian, but I prayed about marrying him and feel such a peace. So it must be God’s will.” She was disobeying the clear command that a believer should not be unequally yoked to an unbeliever (2 Cor. 6:14) to follow her feelings.

That’s like driving on the wrong side of the road and running red lights so that you’ll get somewhere faster. It may work for a while, but at some point, disobeying the traffic laws will result in severe consequences. It’s the same with disobeying God’s laws. You can’t live in disobedience to God and then, when you get into a difficult place, call out to Him to bless and protect you. Ongoing obedience to the Lord is the framework for standing firm in the spiritual battle.

C. Asking God to direct our hearts into His love and Christ’s steadfastness is the fuel for standing firm in the spiritual battle.

2 Thess. 3:5: “May the Lord direct your hearts into the love of God and into the steadfastness of Christ.” By “fuel,” I mean that God’s love and Christ’s steadfastness fuel our desire to stand firm when we’re under attack. Again, keep in mind the context here. These new believers were under attack, both from direct persecution and from dangerous false teaching. In that context of spiritual battle, Paul prays that the Lord will direct their hearts into the love of God and into the steadfastness of Christ. Note three things:

1) In the spiritual battle, ask God to direct your heart.

“To direct” means “to clear away the obstacles” (Thomas Constable, The Bible Knowledge Commentary, ed. by John F. Walvoord & Roy Zuck [Victor Books], p. 723) or “to make a straight path.” Paul used this word in 1 Thessalonians 3:11, where he asked that the Lord would “direct our way to you.” When you’re under spiritual attack, you need God to clear away the obstacles, because it’s easy at such times to get confused, turn away from the Lord, and follow worldly counsel to deal with your situation. God directs our hearts at such times through prayerful understanding and obedience to His word.

2) In the spiritual battle, ask God to direct your heart into His love.

When you’re under spiritual attack, often the enemy will tempt you with thoughts like, “If God really loves you, He wouldn’t allow you to be going through this difficult trial.” At such times, you must rely on the many promises in God’s word that assure us of His great love. Don’t focus on the situation, but rather on the Savior.

3) In the spiritual battle, ask God to direct your heart into the steadfastness of Christ.

The King James Version and a few commentators understand this to mean that we should wait patiently for Christ’s return. But it’s more likely that Paul is praying that the Lord will direct our hearts to focus on the steadfastness that Christ displayed as He faced the cross (Heb. 12:1-3; 1 Pet. 2:21-24). Jesus’ example of enduring the cross for our salvation should encourage us to be steadfast when we’re under attack for the sake of the gospel.

Conclusion

So, rather than just praying, “God bless all the missionaries,” pray that the word of the Lord will spread and be received. Pray that those who proclaim the gospel will be protected so that the gospel will continue to spread. Pray that the Lord’s people will rely on His faithfulness so that they might stand firm in Him in the spiritual battle.

Application Questions

  1. Someone asks you, “If God has predetermined all things, why pray? Why evangelize?” Your response?
  2. Someone asks you, “If God really loves us and if He wants all people to hear the gospel, why does He allow the persecution and martyrdom of His people?” Your reply?
  3. Are we being legalistic to teach the necessity of obedience to God’s commandments? Why/why not? Can obedience be taught in a legalistic manner? If so, how?
  4. Are New Testament Christians required to obey the Old Testament commandments? If so, all? Some? Which ones?

Copyright, Steven J. Cole, 2017, All Rights Reserved.

Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture Quotations are from the New American Standard Bible, Updated Edition © The Lockman Foundation

Related Topics: Christian Life, Evangelism, Prayer

Lição 8: O Perigo de Andar por Vista (Josué 9:1-27)

Related Media

Introdução

Num contexto em que o apóstolo Paulo estivera a falar sobre o seu ministério enquanto embaixador de Cristo (veja Cor. 4:1-5:20), declarou “porque andamos por fé, e não por vista”. Andar por fé é caminhar num espírito de dependência piedosa do Senhor e Sua orientação. Assim, Tiago encoraja-nos: “Se algum de vós tem falta de sabedoria, peça-a a Deus” (Tiago 1:5). Uma vez que necessitamos da Sua orientação omnisciente e soberana, devemos procurar sempre a sabedoria de Deus, independentemente do assunto que enfrentamos. Mais tarde, na sua epístola, Tiago alertar-nos-ia contra o pecado de nos fiarmos no Senhor ou de perseguirmos os nossos próprios sonhos e objectivos independentemente de procurarmos a liderança e vontade de Deus (4:13-17).

Jeremias declarou: “Eu sei, ó Senhor, que não é do homem o seu caminho, nem do homem que caminha o dirigir os seus passos” (Jer. 10:23). O homem não tem a sabedoria, a aptidão nem, com frequência, a vontade de dirigir o seu caminho, pois “Há caminho que ao homem parece direito, mas o fim dele são os caminhos da morte” (Prov. 14:12). A nossa necessidade é entregarmos o nosso caminho, objectivos, buscas e responsabilidades ao Senhor, não só pela Sua vontade e sabedoria, mas também para Sua permissão (veja Prov. 16:1-4, 9). O perigo é o de nos fiarmos na graça de Deus e lançarmo-nos na nossa própria sabedoria, sem realmente procurarmos e inquirirmos o Seu coração e bênção, sem nunca compreendermos a nossa total insuficiência e necessidade da Sua graça.

O perigo da presunção e de andar por vista é amplificado cem vezes quando consideramos o facto de nos encontrarmos num conflito antigo com forças sobrenaturais, extremamente astutas e, muitas vezes, mais poderosas do que nós. Vemos o mundo material, vemos a carne e o sangue e podemos observar a evidência física, pensando: "Consigo lidar com isto... não é assim tão difícil". Devemos ser sempre prudentes, uma vez que, com frequência, não estamos apenas a lidar com carne e sangue. Em vez disso, lidamos com um inimigo insidioso, que usa as pessoas para promover os seus esquemas. Ao considerarmos a nossa fraqueza e o poder, astúcia, ilusão e métodos de acção de Satanás, escutaremos certamente a admoestação de Paulo em Efésios 6:10-20:

6:10 No demais, irmãos meus, fortalecei-vos no Senhor e na força do seu poder. 6:11 Revesti-vos de toda a armadura de Deus, para que possais estar firmes contra as astutas ciladas do diabo. 6:12 Porque não temos que lutar contra a carne e o sangue, mas, sim, contra os principados, contra as potestades, contra os príncipes das trevas deste século, contra as hostes espirituais da maldade, nos lugares celestiais. 6:13 Portanto, tomai toda a armadura de Deus, para que possais resistir no dia mau, e, havendo feito tudo, ficar firmes. 6:14 Estai, pois, firmes, tendo cingidos os vossos lombos com a verdade, e vestida a couraça da justiça, 6:15 E calçados os pés na preparação do evangelho da paz, 6:16 Tomando, sobretudo, o escudo da fé, com o qual podereis apagar todos os dardos inflamados do maligno. 6:17 Tomai, também, o capacete da salvação, e a espada do Espírito, que é a palavra de Deus; 6:18 Orando, em todo o tempo, com toda a oração e súplica no Espírito, e vigiando nisto com toda a perseverança e súplica, por todos os santos, 6:19 E por mim, para que me seja dada, no abrir da minha boca, a palavra com confiança, para fazer notório o mistério do evangelho, 6:20 Pelo qual sou embaixador em cadeias, para que possa falar dele, livremente, como me convém falar.

No capítulo nove, embora algo cauteloso, Josué foi mesmo assim incapaz de consultar o Senhor através da oração. Olhando para as evidências, supôs que poderia discernir sabiamente o que enfrentavam. Estava enganado e, em última análise, foi culpado de presumir do Senhor.

Nas profundezas do Inverno em Valley Forge, George Washington ajoelhou-se em oração, certo de que, a menos que Deus ajudasse o seu exército enlameado e desencorajado, qualquer esperança concernente aos Estados Unidos emergentes estaria perdida.

Durante a Guerra Civil, quando o destino da nação era mais uma vez incerto, Abraham Lincoln confessou a um amigo que se ajoelhava frequentemente em oração, por não ter nenhum outro sítio para onde ir. 1 

Na passagem diante de nós (versículos 9-10), observamos o perigo da incapacidade de entregar o próprio caminho ao Senhor (Prov. 3:5-7; Salmo 37:4-6), a ameaça de não orar e o perigo de andar por vista – tomar decisões com base na aparência das coisas.

Como vimos, o fracasso de Israel em Ai foi, em larga escala, o resultado da incapacidade de consultar o Senhor. Agora, novamente, o facto de os líderes não entregarem o seu caminho ao Senhor estava prestes a originar outra crise. Tal recorda-nos uma vez mais quão susceptíveis somos a agir antes de rezar.

Existe aqui outra questão relacionada – o problema de confiarmos nas nossas vitórias e experiências religiosas. O contexto é bastante significante. O povo havia regressado de uma experiência religiosa no topo de uma montanha, depois de escutar a Palavra de Deus, que lhe fora lida a partir do Monte Ebal e do Monte Gerizím. Havia ouvido as promessas e bênçãos de Deus, afirmando o seu empenho em seguir o Senhor (veja Deut. 27:11-28:14). Fora um período de vitória espiritual, um ponto alto espiritual, mas tal também constituía um tempo importante para caminhar com circunspecção, sabendo tratar-se de um período em que Satanás ataca frequentemente, porque sabe que somos propícios em confiar nas nossas experiências em vez de no Senhor (veja 1 Cor. 10:12). No momento em que baixamos a guarda e pensamos ter êxito assegurado graças às nossas experiências espirituais, estamos mais vulneráveis aos ataques do demónio. O juízo da palavra de Deus sobre este assunto é o de que eles "…não pediram conselho à boca do Senhor" (9:14).

Ao estudarmos esta passagem, deveremos recordar quatro excertos da Escritura – 1 Samuel 12:23; Provérbios 3:5-6; 1 Coríntios 10:12; Efésios 6:10-18. Em conjunto com esta passagem em Josué, tais versículos lembram-nos quatro coisas:

(1) Enquanto cristãos, estamos envolvidos numa guerra espiritual mortal com um poder bastante superior à nossa própria força.

(2) A fim de sermos libertados do nosso oponente e dos seus esquemas iníquos, temos de nos revestir com a nossa armadura espiritual, conforme nos é dada em Cristo.

(3) As armas ofensivas que nos são dadas pelo Senhor são a Palavra de Deus e a oração. Sem elas, somos presas fáceis.

(4) Quando o povo de Deus sai vitorioso ou prospera, parece que Satanás duplica os seus esforços em atacá-lo.

As Alianças Contra Josué e Israel (9:1-2)

1 E souberam disso todos os reis que viviam a oeste do Jordão, nas montanhas, na Sefelá e em todo o litoral do mar Grande, até o Líbano. Eram os reis dos hititas, dos amorreus, dos cananeus, dos ferezeus, dos heveus e dos jebuseus. 2 Eles se ajuntaram para guerrear contra Josué e contra Israel (Nova Versão Internacional).

O registo que aqui se encontra é típico das estratégias de Satanás. Imediatamente, começaram a formar-se alianças poderosas, tanto no Norte como no Sul de Canaã. Num local em que a guerra tribal havia desaparecido há anos, inimigos mortais reuniram-se repentinamente em alianças, unidos contra a invasão da terra pelo povo de Deus.

Quando a justiça se torna agressiva e se debruça sobre um objectivo, tem o potencial de unir as forças da justiça e os inimigos desta. Assim aconteceu quando Jesus Cristo lançou o seu ministério terreno. O seu ministério agressivo de curar, pregar e confrontar o pecado estimulava os seus próprios seguidores – mas também uniu três grupos anteriormente inimigos, os Fariseus, os Saduceus e os Herodianos. A Escritura prediz que a Sua vinda futura terá um efeito similar (veja Salmo 2:2; Rev. 19:19).

Quanto maior for a audácia com que a fé cristã avance, mais vocal e violenta se tornará a oposição. 2

Parece que todas as cidades-estado nas regiões montanhosas uniram forças contra Israel como forma de impedirem Josué e o seu exército de atacarem uma cidade de cada vez, como fora feito com Jericó e Ai.

Talvez estes reis tenham sido encorajados pela derrota inicial de Israel em Ai. Não mais os registos de vitórias prévias os levariam a supor que Israel fosse invencível. Ao resistirem a Israel, porém, resistiam a Deus. A sua teimosa rebelião contra Deus era um testemunho eloquente de que o pecado dos amorreus atingira a quantidade devida (confira Gén. 15:16).3

O Engano dos Gibeonitas (9:3-15)

9:3 E os moradores de Gibeon, ouvindo o que Josué fizera com Jericó e com Ai, 9:4 Usaram de astúcia, e foram e se fingiram embaixadores; e tomaram sacos velhos sobre os seus jumentos, e odres de vinho velhos, e rotos, e remendados; 9:5 E nos seus pés, sapatos velhos e remendados, e vestidos velhos sobre si, e todo o pão que traziam para o caminho era seco e bolorento. 9:6 E vieram a Josué, ao arraial, a Gilgal, e lhe disseram, a ele e aos homens de Israel: Vimos de uma terra distante; fazei, pois, agora, concerto connosco. 9:7 E os homens de Israel responderam aos heveus: Porventura habitais no meio de nós; como, pois, faremos concerto convosco? 9:8 Então disseram a Josué: Nós somos teus servos. E disse-lhes Josué: Quem sois vós, e de onde vindes? 9:9 E lhe responderam: Teus servos vieram de uma terra mui distante, por causa do nome do Senhor, teu Deus; porquanto ouvimos a sua fama, e tudo quanto fez no Egipto; 9:10 E tudo quanto fez aos dois reis dos amorreus, que estavam dalém do Jordão, a Seón, rei de Hesbon, e a Og, rei de Basan, que estava em Astaroth. 9:11 Pelo que os nossos anciãos, e todos os moradores da nossa terra, nos falaram, dizendo: Tomai convosco nas vossas mãos provisão para o caminho, e ide-lhes ao encontro; e dizei-lhes: Nós somos vossos servos; fazei, pois, agora, concerto connosco. 9:12 Este nosso pão tomámos quente das nossas casas, para nossa provisão, no dia em que saímos para vir a vós; e ei-lo aqui, agora, já seco e bolorento: 9:13 E estes odres, que enchemos de vinho, eram novos, e ei-los aqui já rotos: e estes nossos vestidos e nossos sapatos já se têm envelhecido, por causa do mui longo caminho. 9:14 Então aqueles homens tomaram da sua provisão; e não pediram conselho à boca do Senhor. 9:15 E Josué fez paz com eles, e fez um concerto com eles, que lhes daria a vida: e os príncipes da congregação lhes prestaram juramento.

Em vista das vitórias de Israel, nem todos estavam dispostos a avançar tão abertamente contra a nação. Os gibeonitas, que incluíam uma aliança de cidades (veja vs. 17), engendraram um inteligente estratagema, desenhado para iludir os israelitas e esconder a sua verdadeira identidade – uma estratégia típica de Satanás, o enganador. O seu objectivo, que se revelou bem-sucedido, era convencer os israelitas de que eram oriundos de um país fora da terra (vs. 6). Evidentemente, de alguma forma sabiam que Deus ordenara aos israelitas que destruíssem totalmente os habitantes da terra. A sua afirmação era a de que haviam ficado impressionados com as coisas grandiosas que Josué tinha feito, e queriam assim um pacto que lhes permitisse viver, já que não eram da terra de Canaã.

É difícil não admirar os gibeonitas pelo seu esquema. Em vista do versículo 9, parece que realmente acreditavam no poder do Deus de Israel, tal como Raab. Os gibeonitas não eram covardes (confira 10:2). Sabiam que não conseguiriam opor-se ao poder de Deus, e optaram pela segunda melhor alternativa segundo o seu raciocínio; voltaram-se para a ilusão através do disfarce. Tal resultou em duas abordagens principais:

(1) Aproveitaram-se da sua compaixão, ao se apresentarem como viajantes fatigados após uma longa jornada. As suas roupas estavam sujas e com bastante uso, a comida que tinham estava seca e bolorenta (ou dura, quebradiça), os seus odres eram velhos e remendados e as suas sandálias gastas e finas.

(2) Aproveitaram-se do seu ego e sentido de orgulho. Insistiram que haviam vindo de muito longe, a fim de mostrarem o seu respeito pelo poder do Deus dos israelitas, e que desejavam ser autorizados a viver como servos de Israel. Apanhados desprevenidos, Josué e os líderes de Israel deram ouvidos ao ardil dos gibeonitas, tendo cometido dois erros:

(1) Cometeram o erro de permitirem que os gibeonitas se aproveitassem das suas emoções. Aceitaram as evidências, ainda que questionáveis, sem requererem provas em maior número e mais confiáveis. Constatamos aqui o perigo da vista contra a fé e os factos.

(2) Contudo, o principal erro foi a não procura de aconselhamento do Senhor. Deveriam ter procurado orientação da parte do Senhor através do Urim e do Tumim. Observamos aqui o perigo da presunção por falta de oração.

É sempre um erro da nossa parte apoiarmo-nos no nosso próprio juízo ou sabedoria, construindo os nossos próprios planos independentemente da orientação de Deus. Era um erro naquela altura… e continua a ser. A exortação da Palavra de Deus é a seguinte:

Confia no Senhor de todo o teu coração, e não te estribes no teu próprio entendimento. Reconhece-o em todos os teus caminhos, e ele endireitará as tuas veredas. Não sejas sábio aos teus próprios olhos: teme ao Senhor e aparta-te do mal (Provérbios 3:5-7).

Antes de entrar em qualquer aliança – escolher um parceiro na vida, começar um negócio com outro, consentir com qualquer proposta que envolva uma associação com outras pessoas –, assegure-se de pedir o conselho da boca de Deus. Indubitavelmente, Ele irá responder-lhe através de um impulso irresistível – mediante a voz de um amigo; por uma circunstância estranha e inesperada; através de uma passagem da Escritura. Ele escolherá o Seu próprio mensageiro; mas enviará uma mensagem. 4

Ainda que Satanás seguramente saiba que não pode realmente derrotar o Senhor e que constitui um adversário vencido, volta-se para os seus múltiplos truques e artifícios enganadores, de modo a derrotar os propósitos de Deus para com o Seu povo (confira Efésios 4:14; 2 Tim. 2:26).

A Descoberta do Engano (9:16-17)

9:16 E sucedeu que, ao fim de três dias, depois de fazerem concerto com eles, ouviram que eram seus vizinhos, e que moravam no meio deles. 9:17 Porque, partindo os filhos de Israel, chegaram às suas cidades ao terceiro dia: e suas cidades eram Gibeon, e Cefira, e Beeroth, e Quiriath-Jearim.

Em apenas três dias, o engano foi descoberto mas, como costuma acontecer com as consequências do pecado, viveriam com a sua decisão para o resto das suas vidas. Provérbios 12:19b é pertinente neste contexto quando afirma: “O lábio de verdade ficará para sempre, mas a língua mentirosa dura só um momento”. As palavras da verdade são consistentes, resistindo a todos os testes, enquanto as mentiras cedo são descobertas e expostas.5

A Decisão dos Líderes (9:18-27)

9:18 E os filhos de Israel não os feriram; porquanto os príncipes da congregação lhes juraram pelo Senhor, Deus de Israel: pelo que, toda a congregação murmurava contra os príncipes. 9:19 Então todos os príncipes disseram a toda a congregação: Nós jurámos-lhes pelo Senhor, Deus de Israel; pelo que não podemos tocar-lhes. 9:20 Isto, porém, lhes faremos: dar-lhes-emos a vida; para que não haja grande ira sobre nós, por causa do juramento que já lhes temos jurado. 9:21 Disseram-lhes, pois, os príncipes: Vivam, e sejam rachadores de lenha e tiradores de água, para toda a congregação, como os príncipes lhes têm dito.

9:22 E Josué os chamou, e falou-lhes, dizendo: Por que nos enganastes, dizendo: Mui longe de vós habitamos, morando vós no meio de nós? 9:23 Agora, pois, sereis malditos; e de entre vós não deixará de haver servos, nem rachadores de lenha, nem tiradores de água, para a casa do meu Deus. 9:24 Então responderam a Josué, e disseram: Porquanto, com certeza, foi anunciado aos teus servos que o Senhor, teu Deus, ordenou a Moisés, seu servo, que vos desse toda esta terra, e destruisse todos os moradores da terra diante de vós, tememos muito pelas nossas vidas, por causa de vós; por isso fizemos assim. 9:25 E eis que, agora, estamos na tua mão: faze aquilo que te pareça bom e recto que se nos faça. 9:26 Assim, pois, lhes fez; e livrou-os das mãos dos filhos de Israel, e não os mataram. 9:27 E, naquele dia, Josué os deu como rachadores de lenha e tiradores de água para a congregação e para o altar do Senhor, até ao dia de hoje, no lugar que escolhesse.

O texto diz-nos que, uma vez descoberto o ardil, o povo murmurava contra os seus líderes, pois julgava-os responsáveis pelo sucedido. Aparentemente, em vista dos versículos 19-21, o povo também desejava que ignorassem o seu pacto e destruíssem os gibeonitas. Porém, embora tenham errado ao se apoiarem na própria compreensão em vez de consultarem o Senhor, honraram o seu acordo com eles. Não fossem eles homens de honra e integridade, poderiam facilmente ter procurado ocultar o sucedido ao destruírem os gibeonitas, mas honraram o seu compromisso, pois este fora ratificado em nome de Yahweh, o Deus de Israel. Quebrar o pacto desonraria o nome de Deus e atrairia a Sua ira. “De facto, um juízo semelhante de Deus sobreviria mais tarde durante o reinado de David, por Saul ter ignorado este acordo (veja 2 Sam. 21:1-6).”6

Embora não pudessem recuar no seu compromisso, os gibeonitas haviam-nos enganado; portanto, tinha de ser prescrito um castigo adequado ao seu pecado. Primeiramente, Josué repreendeu-os pela sua desonestidade e condenou-os a servidão perpétua. No seu ardil, os gibeonitas tinham-se oferecido para serem súbditos dos israelitas (vss. 8, 11). Com isto, estavam meramente a oferecer-se para serem vassalos de Israel. Em troca, esperavam que Israel, o mais forte dos dois, os protegesse dos seus inimigos (veja 10:6). Tal desejo virou-se contra eles, e tiveram de se tornar servos de Israel. Tornar-se-iam rachadores de lenha e tiradores de água para os israelitas, especialmente em relação com o serviço do tabernáculo. Com a graça de Deus, tal acabou por ser uma grande bênção.

…de modo a impedir que a idolatria dos gibeonitas conspurcasse a fé verdadeira de Israel, o seu trabalho seria desempenhado no tabernáculo, onde estariam expostos à adoração do único Deus verdadeiro.

Em resultado, a coisa que os gibeonitas mais esperavam conservar – a sua liberdade – perdeu-se. Mas a maldição tornou-se eventualmente uma bênção. Foi a favor dos gibeonitas que Deus mais tarde realizou um grande milagre (veja Josué 10:10-14). Algum tempo depois, o tabernáculo do Senhor seria estabelecido em Gibeão (veja 2 Crónicas 1:30), e os gibeonitas (mais tarde conhecidos como netineus) substituiriam os levitas no serviço do templo (veja Esdras 2:43 e 8:20).

Esta é a forma maravilhosa como actua a graça de Deus. Ele É ainda capaz de transformar uma maldição numa bênção. Contanto seja verdade que as consequências naturais do nosso pecado tenham geralmente de seguir o seu curso, Deus, na Sua graça, não apenas perdoa mas, em muitos casos, anula efectivamente os nossos erros, retirando bênção do pecado.7

Lemos no versículo 27: “E, naquele dia, Josué os deu como rachadores de lenha e tiradores de água para a congregação e para o altar do Senhor, até ao dia de hoje, no lugar que escolhesse”. Quão tremendo e gracioso da parte de Deus. Tiveram o privilégio de serem trazidos regularmente para perto do Senhor e das coisas espirituais. É interessante ver que, anos mais tarde, quando os israelitas participassem na idolatria, os gibeonitas manter-se-iam no altar onde o verdadeiro Deus ordenava que se fizessem sacrifícios pelos pecados. Como resultado do que haviam visto Deus fazer por Israel, ficaram convencidos, tal como Raab, de que o Deus de Israel era o Deus verdadeiro. À semelhança de Raab, tornaram-se evidentemente crentes leais.

Durante muitos anos após este incidente, houve guerra entre os cidadãos da terra e os israelitas invasores. Mesmo assim, no registo dessa longa conquista, nem uma só vez ouvimos falar de algum gibeonita ter desertado para a sua facção original.8

Texto original de J. Hampton Keathley, III.

Tradução de C. Oliveira.


1 Campbell/Denny, p. 133.

2 Campbell/Denny, p. 134.

3 Expositors Bible Commentary, Old Testament, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, 1997, versão electrónica.

4 F. B. Meyer, Joshua: And the Land of Promise, Revell, p. 108.

5 Robert Jamieson; A.R. Fausset, e David Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.), 1998.

6 Campbell/Denny, p. 139.

7 Campbell/Denny, pp. 139-140.

8 James Montgomery Boice, Joshua, We Will Serve The Lord, Revell, Old Tappan, New Jersey, p. 105.

እንዴት ሀሰተኛ ነብያትን መለየት ይቻላል?

ማቴዎስ 7፡ 13-23

13 በጠበበው ደጅ ግቡ፤ ወደ ጥፋት የሚወስደው ደጅ ሰፊ፥ መንገዱም ትልቅ ነውና፥ ወደ እርሱም የሚገቡ ብዙዎች ናቸው፤ 14 ወደ ሕይወት የሚወስደው ደጅ የጠበበ፥ መንገዱም የቀጠነ ነውና፥ የሚያገኙትም ጥቂቶች ናቸው። 15 የበግ ለምድ ለብሰው ከሚመጡባችሁ በውሥጣቸው ግን ነጣቂዎች ተኵላዎች ከሆኑ ከሐሰተኞች ነቢያት ተጠንቀቁ።16 ከፍሬያቸው ታውቋቸዋላችሁ። ከእሾህ ወይን ከኩርንችትስ በለስ ይለቀማልን? 17 እንዲሁ መልካም ዛፍ ሁሉ መልካም ፍሬ ያደርጋል፥ ክፉም ዛፍ ክፉ ፍሬ ያደርጋል።18  መልካም ዛፍ ክፉ ፍሬ ማፍራት፥ ወይም ክፉ ዛፍ መልካም ፍሬ ማፍራት አይቻለውም። 19 መልካም ፍሬ የማያደርግ ዛፍ ሁሉ ይቆረጣል ወደ እሳትም ይጣላል። 20  ስለዚህም ከፍሬያቸው ታውቋቸዋላችሁ። 21  በሰማያት ያለውን የአባቴን ፈቃድ የሚያደርግ እንጂ፥ ጌታ ሆይ፥ ጌታ ሆይ፥ የሚለኝ ሁሉ መንግሥተ ሰማያት የሚገባ አይደለም። 22  በዚያ ቀን ብዙዎች፦ ጌታ ሆይ፥ ጌታ ሆይ፥ በስምህ ትንቢት አልተናገርንምን፥ በስምህስ አጋንንትን አላወጣንምን፥ በስምህስ ብዙ ተአምራትን አላደረግንምን? ይሉኛል። 23  የዚያን ጊዜም፦ ከቶ አላወቅኋችሁም፤ እናንተ ዓመፀኞች፥ ከእኔ ራቁ ብዬ እመሰክርባቸዋለሁ።

ሀሰተኛ ነብያት እውነተኛ መስለው ስለሚቀርቡ በጣም አደገኛ ናቸው። የትክክለኛ የነብይነት ስጦታ እና ስልጣን እንዳላቸው አድርገው ራሳቸውን ያቀርባሉ። ይህ የሚመስሉበት ስልጣን ምንድ ነው? ኢየሱስ እንዳለው ራሳቸውን የበግ ለምድ አልብሰው ያቀርባሉ። ማቴ 7 ፡15 ይመለከቱ።

ሀሰተኛ ነቢያት የበግ ለምድ ለብሰው የሚመጡ በውሥጣቸው ግን ነጣቂዎች ተኵላዎች ናቸው ይላቸዋል። እረኛ በኮረብታማ ስፍራ መንጋውን ሲጠብቅ የበግ ለምድ ለብሶ ነው። እረኛም ያልሆነ ሰው ደግሞ የበግ ለምድ ሊለብስ እና እንደ እረኛ ሊያስመስል ይችላል። ነብያቶችም የተለመደ የአለባበስ አውድ ነበራቸው። ነብዩ ኤልያስ መጎናፀፊያ ያደርግ ነበር በዚህም ከሌሎች ይለይ ነበር። 1ኛ ነግስት 19፡13፥19 የግሪክ ፈላስፎች የራሳቸው የአለባበስ ስርዐት እንደነበራቸው ነብያትም የቆዳ መጎናፀፊያ በመልበስ ይታወቁ ነበር። ነገር ግን ይህን መለያ ልብስ ያልተገባቸው ነብያት ያልሆኑ ለብሰውት ሊገኙ ይችላሉ።ለዚህም ነው በነብዩ ዘካሪያስ 13፡4 ላይ እንዲህ የተፃፈው። “በዚያም ቀን ነቢያቱ ሁሉ ትንቢትን ሲናገሩ እያንዳንዱ ስለ ራእዩ ያፍራል ያታልሉም ዘንድ የማቅ ልብስ አይለብሱም።” ዘካሪያስ 13፡4  የነብያትን መጎናፀፊያ እየለበሱ ነብያትን የሚመስሉ ነገር ግን ፈፅመው ያሆኑ ይኖራሉ። ዊሊያም ባርስሌይ፥ የማቲዎስ ወንጌል መፅሀፍ The Gospel of Matthew (Edinburgh: The Saint Andrew Press, 1963), 1, p. 286.]

ሀሰተኛ ነብያቶች በዉጫዊው አቀራረባቸው አንዳንዶችን ያስታሉ እንደታማኝ መሪዎችም ይቆጠራሉ። ይህንንም በልዩ ልዩ አለባበስ ራሳቸውን ለየት ለማድረግ ሊሞክሩ ይችላሉ። እንዲሁም የስም ማዕረጎችን በስማቸው ላይ ይደረድራሉ። በሃይማኖት ስርዓት ዉስጥም ትልልቅ የመሪነትን ስፍራ ተቆናጠው ሊገኙ ይችላሉ። በትምህርትም የስነመለኮት ትምህርት ተምርውም ሊሆን ይችላል። አልፎም ተርፎም በስነመለኮት ትምህርት አስተማሪዎችም ሊሆኑ ይችላል። በነዚህ ሁሉ ሁነታዎች እንደ ታማኝ መሪዎች ቆጥረናቸው ከሆነ ትክክል አይደልም። በየዋህነትም በውጫዊ ማንንተቸው ድምዳሜ ላይ ልንደርስ አይገባም።

ሀሰተኛ ነብያቶች በፍሪያቸው ይታወቃሉ። በውጫዊ ማንነት ላይ ተመስርቶ መደምደም አያዋጣም፤ለዚህም ነው በፊሬያቸው መለየት እጅግ ጠቃሚ እና አስፈላጊ የሚሆነው። የዛፍ የስሩ ምንነት መታወቂያው በፍሬው ነው። መልካም ዛፍ መልካም ፍሬን ይሰጣል። መጥፎ ዛፍ እንድሁ መጥፎ ፍሬን ይሰጣል። ስለዚህም ታምኝ የሆኑ መሪዎችን የመመዘኛ መንገዱ በፍሬዎቻቸው መሆን አልበት። ማቴ 7፡20

ነገር ግን እንዚህ ፍሬዎች ታድያ ምንድን ናቸው? እዚህ ላይ ልብ ማለት ይገባል፤ሀሰተኛ ነብያቶች ሃይማኖታዊ ስርዓቶችን የማይፈፅሙ አይደሉም። ይልቁንም ሀሰተኛ ነብያቶች በሀሰተኛ ምልክቶች እና በሚመስሉ ታዓምራቶች የተሞሉ ናቸው። ይህንንም በማቴዎስ ወንጌል 7፡22 ተጠቅሰው እናገኛለን።

“በዚያ ቀን ብዙዎች፦ ጌታ ሆይ፥ ጌታ ሆይ፥ በስምህ ትንቢት አልተናገርንምን፥ በስምህስ አጋንንትን አላወጣንምን፥ በስምህስ ብዙ ተአምራትን አላደረግንምን? ይሉኛል።” ማቴዎስ ወንጌል 7፡22

ሀሰተኛ ነብያቶች በልዩ ልዩ የበጎ አድራጎት ስራ እና መሰል ተግባራትን ሊፈፅሙ ይችላሉ።

ታዓምራትን የማድረግ ሃይል አላቸው ላማስባል ልዩ ልዩ መሰል በጎ አድራጎትን ያደርጋሉ። የሚደረጉትን ታዓምራቶች በስመ እግዚአብሔር እና ለእርሱ ክብር ነው ሊባልም ይችላል።

“እንደ እነዚህ ያሉ ሰዎች የክርስቶስን ሐዋርያት እንዲመስሉ ራሳቸውን እየለወጡ፥ ውሸተኞች ሐዋርያትና ተንኮለኞች ሠራተኞች ናቸውና። 14 ይህም ድንቅ አይደለም፤ ሰይጣን ራሱ የብርሃንን መልአክ እንዲመስል ራሱን ይለውጣልና። 15 እንግዲህ አገልጋዮቹ ደግሞ የጽድቅን አገልጋዮች እንዲመስሉ ራሳቸውን ቢለውጡ ታላቅ ነገር አይደለም፤ ፍጻሜአቸውም እንደ ሥራቸው ይሆናል።”  2 ቆሮ 11፡ 13-15

ሌላው ልብ ሊባል የሚገባው ነገር ሀሰተኛ ነብያቶች በእግዚአብሔር ስም ለየት ባለ እና አግራሞት ባለበት የሃይማኖት ስርዓቶች ሲታጀቡ ማየት ነው። ሰይጣንም ብዙዎችን እስካሳተ እና ለእርሱ ፍቃድ ሰዎችን እስካአስገዛ ድረስ ክብርን ለእግዚአብሔር መስጠት ችግሩ አይደለም።

ታድያ ጌታ የተናገረው እነዚህ የሃይማኖት ስርዓቶች ናቸው? ከላሁኑ ታድያ ምንድን ናቸው? በምንመለከተው ነገር ምንም ጥርጥር እንዳይገባን መፅሐፍ ቅዱስ በተደጋጋሚ የሀሰተኛ ነብያትን ፍሬዎች ይገልፃል። ይንንም የሃሰተኛ ነብያት ፍሬዎች በሶስት ክፍል ልናስቀምጣቸው እንችላለን።

1. የመጀመሪያው የሀሰተኛ ነብያት ፍሬዎች ከአስተምሮ አንፃር

ሀሰተኛ ነብያት የሚናገሩት በመለኮታዊ ስልጣን ሳይሆን ከራሳቸው ከንቱ ስሜት ነው። ኤርሚያስ 23፡16፥21፡25 ህዝቄል 12፡2

  • የእግዚአብሔርን ቃል አይሰብኩም ወይም አይጠብቁም ይልቁንም ይክዱታል። ኤርሚያስ 23፡17 በተልይም ሊከሰት ይሚችል ሁነታዎች ነገር ግን ደስ ያማያሰኙ ሲሆኑ እውነታውን ይክዳሉ። ኤርሚያስ 6፡14 ፤28፡17 ህዝቄል 13፡1
  • ለልዩ አጣዳፊ እና ወቅታዊ ጉዳዩች ላይ ምላሽ በመስጠት ይታወቃሉ። ኤርሚያስ 8፡11።
  • ሰዎች በጆሮቸው ሊሰሙ የሚወዱትን ይናገራሉ። 1 ነገስት 22፡8 2 ጢሞቲዎስ 4፡3-4
  • በድነት ጉዳይ ላይ የኢየሱስ ማንነት እና ጌትነትም ይክዳሉ። በመስቀል ላይ የተከፈለውን ስራም እንዱሁ ይክዳሉ። 2 ጴጥሮስ 2፡1 1ዮሐንስ 4፡2-3

2. ሁለተኛው የሀሰተኛ ነብያት ፍሬዎች ክፍል ደግሞ ትምህርታቸው በሌሎች ላይ የሚፈጥረው ተፅዕኖ ነው።

  • በተመሳሳይ ሁነታ ትምህርቶቻቸው የሚያመራው የእግዚአብሔርን ቃል መናቅ፥
  • መፅሐፍቅዱስን ስልጣን አለመቀበል፥
  • በቅዱሳን መካከል ልዩነትን መፍጠር፥ ኤርሚያስ 23፡2፤14 ብሎም የስጋዊነት ባህሪያት ናቸው። 2ጴጥሮስ 2፡2።
  • በተቻላቸው ሁኔታ ሰዎችን ከእውነተኛ ወንጌል ለማራቅ ይጥራሉ። የሐዋሪያት 13፡8
  • በተጨማሪም እወንተኛ ክርስቲያኖችንም ጭምር በትምህርታቸው ለማሳት ያላሰለሰ ጥራት ያደርጋሉ።  ማርቆስ 13፡22። ይህም በጳውሎስ ለጢሞቲዮስ በፃፈው መልክቶች  ትክክለኛ እና ጤናማ አስተምህሮ ጥቅሞችን ይገልፃል። 1 ጢሞ 4፡6 ፤2ጢሞ4፡6፥2 ፤2ጢሞ 4፡3 ቲቶ 1፡9፤2፡1

3. በመጨረሻም የሀሰተኛ ነብያት ፍሬዎች መታወቂያ በሚያሳዩት ገፀ ባህርያት እና ጠባይ ነው። በቀላሉ የሚለዩባቸው ገፀባህርያት

  • ትዕብት 2ጴጥሮስ 2፡1
  • ስስትነት ኤርሚያስ 8፡1 ቲቶ 1፡11 2ጵጥሮስ 2፡3፡14
  • ያካሄድ ክፋት ወይም በሃጢአት ልምምዶቻቸው ኤርሚያስ 23፡11፥14፤2ጴጥሮስ 2፡14
  • ስጋዊነት የተጠናወታቸው ናቸው 2 ጴጥሮስ 2፡1 ፥ 12 ፤3፡3
  • በደካምና በጥፋት ውስጥ የሚነዱትን ያድናሉ። 2ጢሞቲዮስ 3፡6-7 ; 2 ጵጥሮስ 2፡14፤13
  • እግዚአብሔር እናውቃለን ይላሉ ነገር ግን በስራቸው ይክዱታል። ማቴዎስ 7፡2-23; 2ጢሞቲዮስ 3፡5 ፥ቲቶ 1፡16
  • ስልጣንን ለስጋቸው ፍቃድ ደስታ ያዉሉታል ደግሞም ለማንም አይታዘዙም 2ጴጥሮስ 2፡10

“ዕውር ዕውርን ሊመራ ይችላልን? ሁለቱ በጕድጓድ አይወድቁምን?” ሉቃስ 6፡39

በሰፊው ጎዳና የሚመሩ ብዙ አምላክ የለሽ መሪዎች አሉ ፍፃሜውም ጥፋት ነው። እነኚ መምህራን ማየት ይማይችሉ  ዕውር ብቻ ሳሆኑ ሌሎችንንም ወደ ጥፋት ይመራሉ። የመጨረሻውን ፍርድ እና ቅጣት የሚሰጣቸው ጌታ እራሱ ነው።

Related Topics: Bible Study Methods, Character Study, Christian Education, Church Discipline, Issues in Church Leadership/Ministry

Daily Reading Plans

Sign up for a daily plan to show up in your email daily (example below). go here  

 

An important part of our daily Christian life is to spend time in God's word.  Here are a few sample reading plans that can help you on your way to a more fulfilled Christian life.

Basic Daily Reading Plan - Read 2-3 chapters a day from Genesis to Revelation

M'Cheyne Daily Reading Plan - The whole Bible will be read through in an orderly manner in the course of a year. - The Old Testament once, the New Testament and Psalms twice.

New Testament, Psalms and Proverbs Daily Reading Plan -Read through the New Testament, Psalms and Proverbs in a year.

Chronological Daily Reading Plan - Read the Bible every day in the order events transpired

Read the Bible in 90 days - Read through the Bible in 90 days. This plan, made popular by another Bible translation publisher is now available in the NET Bible. The plan it self is 88 days long, with two grace days at the end. It repeats every 91 days so you can begin any time and be done in 90 days

Related Topics: NET Bible

NET Bible endorsements

Published reviews of the NET Bible:

Jeff's Thoughts

Review Time blog

You tube video highlighting the notes & maps


“The fact that the NET Bible (NT) explains itself with a wealth of detailed notes discussing matters of accuracy allows the translators to focus more on readability and eloquence in the translation without inadvertently misleading the reader about the original text. Other translations wrestle with the tension between accuracy, readability, and eloquence in the translation alone, but the NET Bible's notes have given the translators a legitimate shot at consistently balancing all three objectives. Detailed notes also ensure that every English reader can profit from reading the NET Bible (NT), regardless of the version he or she presently prefers. The NET Bible (NT) helps the reader understand why other translations read the way they do.”

J. Ed Komoszewski
Christian Research Journal
(Vol. 23, No. 2)


“One of the newest translations of the New Testament, a very ambitious work by twenty anonymous scholars, is called the NET Bible: New English Translation, (1998). It is not to be confused with the New Evangelical Translation, (NET, 1992), or the New English Bible (NEB, 1970). The NET Bible was originally (and still is) available on the Internet, and may be downloaded for free distribution. It is now also available in book form as a beautiful, hefty 843-page paperback volume. Besides containing a ‘translation that explains itself,’ it has an astounding 16,025 footnotes, consisting of ‘textual critical,’ ‘translator’s,’ and ‘study’ notes! A 10-page ‘Detailed Table of Contents’ adds to the usefulness of this unique translation. The Old Testament is presently in process of completion.”

William E. Paul
Editor, Bible Collectors’ World
(Vol. 15, No. 2, April-June 1999)



Praise for the NET-Novum Testamentum Graece New Testament:

 

“The NET Bible - Novum Testamentum Graece New Testament is a markstone in biblical scholarship. I wish this edition to be not only in the hands of scholars but also of all pastors around the world who have a training in New Testament Greek.”

Prof. Dr. Martin Hengel
University of Tuebingen


 

“The publishers of the NET Bible have produced an important contribution to students of New Testament Greek in joining the most recent edition of the Nestle Greek text with their excellent translation. Those familiar with the NET Bible are already aware of the excellent value of its footnotes providing the reader the the translators’ rationale for their English rendering. Now we also have a textual commentary with the NET Bible diglot to explain much of the textual decisions of the Greek text. I highly recommend this book to New Testament students.”

H. Wayne House
Distinguished Professor of Biblical and Theological Studies
Faith Seminary
Tacoma, WA



Endorsements by editors and translators of other Bible translations:

“The translators’ notes, study notes, and text-critical notes (over 60,000 notes altogether) alone are worth the price of the NET Bible. In our work on the fully revised NIV Study Bible of 2002, the TNIV, and the TNIV Study Bible, we consulted the NET Bible notes and were often helped by them. Kudos!”

Kenneth L. Barker
General Editor,
NIV Study Bible and TNIV Study Bible


 

“The extensive and reliable notes in the NET Bible were a wonderful help to our translation team as we worked to prepare the English Standard Version.”

Wayne Grudem
Member, Translation Oversight Committee, ESV
Research Professor of Bible and Theology
Phoenix Seminary
Scottsdale, AZ


 


Endorsements by Christian leaders:

“There are many wonderful things I could say about the NET Bible, but the most important is this: the NET Bible is a Bible you can trust. The translation is clear, accurate, and powerful. And the notes, those wonderful notes! They bring to the layman scholarly insights and discussions that have up till now been accessible only to those trained in the biblical languages. If you are serious about studying Scripture, get a copy of the NET Bible.”

Chuck Swindoll
Chancellor
Dallas Theological Seminary


“The complaint I hear from many Christians is that some of the translations of the Bible are too wooden. They are grammatically correct, but don’t seem to convey the passion of the writer. On the flip side, some paraphrases and translations convey the passion of the writer at the cost of an accurate translation. The NET Bible is the best of both worlds. The notes are helpful to the scholar and the lay person alike. This is the Bible for the next millennium.”

Tony Evans
Senior Pastor, Oak Cliff Bible Fellowship
Dallas, TX


“The NET Bible New Testament is faithful to the original Greek. It is a refreshing and radical departure from previous translations of the Bible into English. It includes extensive translators' notes explaining and defending the translation and showing other options for handling difficult passages. The translators' notes, along with the study notes and textual notes, form an excellent resource for pastors, teachers, and students of the Bible. Yet the translation itself is still easy to read and understand, well suited for pulpit use as well as personal reading and study. Highly recommended!”

Howard G. Hendricks
Distinguished Professor
Chair, Center for Christian Leadership
Dallas Theological Seminary


“The NET Bible is ingenious. Its continuously updated translation, supported by an array of quality footnotes on the original languages, will be an invaluable resource for pastors, missionaries and well-trained laymen. Bringing instant access to the best research with just a few clicks, the NET Bible has truly brought a visionary form to a timeless function. It’s a great step in the Church's preparation for the next millennium.”

Gene Getz
President, Center for Church Renewal
Pastor Emeritus, Fellowship Bible Church North
Plano, TX


 


Endorsements by biblical scholars:

“No other New Testament translation offers more complete explanation of how the English rendition corresponds to the Greek original--most helpful for serious students of the New Testament.”

Raymond E. Brown (1928 - 1998)
formerly Auburn Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Biblical Studies
Union Theological Seminary, NYC


“This Bible is a triumph: a straightforward and accurate translation that is also elegant. The annotations are much fuller and more helpful than in other popular translations, and the production of a constantly-improving electronic text brings Bible reading and Bible study into the new millennium.”

Philip R. Davies
Professor, Department of Biblical Studies
The University of Sheffield


“This is an excellent tool, a model of conciseness. It should be useful for students, translators, and those preparing to teach or preach in the church.”

William R. Farmer
Emeritus Professor of New Testament, Perkins School of Theology, Southern Methodist University
Research Scholar, University of Dallas


“The footnotes of the NET Bible New Testament provide an invaluable resource for people who want to know the main questions of text, translation, and interpretation that scholars discuss. Given the richness of detail on these questions, nobody will agree with all the answers given here; but the answers stay on the map of well-respected positions, and other answers get an eminently fair shake. ‘Take up and read.’ There’s nothing on the market quite like it.”

Robert H. Gundry
Kathleen Smith Professor of Religious Studies
Westmont College


“I am impressed with the quantity and quality of the notes in the NET Bible. Notes in most study Bibles are rather limited, but these in the NET Bible, by contrast, are like having a mini-commentary along with the text itself. …One…project I am working with now is the Haitian Creole Study Bible, and I plan to give these translators copies of the NET Bible as an additional resource to use in preparing the study Bible in their own language. I also intend to make sure that my colleagues working in other parts of the world know about the NET Bible. It can be a valuable resource for us also, as well as the translators with whom we work.”

Roger L. Omanson
Inter-regional Translation Consultant, United Bible Societies;
formerly Associate Professor of New Testament Studies
Southern Baptist Theological Seminary


“The NET Bible NT is both a helpful translation and a significant resource to assist in understanding issues of textual criticism and exegetical importance.”

Klyne Snodgrass
Paul W. Brandel Professor of New Testament Studies
North Park Theological Seminary


“An accurate, easy to understand translation supported by thorough documentation...I find it an excellent translation and I am able to endorse it wholeheartedly.”

John F. Walvoord (1910 - 2002)
former President and Chancellor
Dallas Theological Seminary


“One word that I would use for the NET Bible is ‘accessible.’ The translators have worked hard to make recent biblical scholarship available through a readable translation and extensive notes, and the publisher is serious about making the NET Bible available on the internet for the right price--free.”

Joel F. Williams
Bible Faculty
Columbia International University, Columbia, SC


“I heartily endorse the NET Bible. It is an exciting new way to interface computer technology with biblical scholarship in an attractive and informative style. It is easy to access and user-friendly.”

Ronald D. Witherup, S.S.
formerly Academic Dean and Professor of Sacred Scripture
St. Patrick Seminary, Menlo Park, CA


A translation project which admirably blends the concern for readability, a clear statement of the idea of the passage and careful attention to the details of the original languages. It is a wonderful study Bible for those who want to understand the details of the passage and work with them so as to draw their own conclusions. A valuable translation for any student of the teaching of God’s Word.

Daniel E. Buck
Assistant Professor of NT/Theology
Briercrest Bible College, Carenport, SK
Canada


“This is a very unique contribution for students of the Bible. It provides the non-Greek student with an excellent translation and insight into why the text results in a certain English reading. The specialist is provided with options and the most persuasive evidence for certain difficult decisions. It will be helpful to all who must render into any modern language the ancient biblical text.”

Daniel S. Steffen
Professor of New Testament
Seminario Teologico Centroamericano SETECA
(Central American Theological Seminary)
Guatemala


“I highly recommend The New English Translation New Testament (NET Bible NT) for anyone wishing to understand the New Testament better. It is faithful to the Greek from which it is translated and it is written in natural, readable English. Over 16,000 footnotes provide a wealth of information on the translation itself, the history, culture, geography, grammar, and other aspects of the NT which help to clarify this ancient text for the modern reader. It may be that a more valuable, concise, and accessible resource for understanding the NT is not to be found elsewhere. Oh, yes--and you cannot beat the price!”

Joseph D. Fantin
M.A. in Linguistics, Michigan State University
Th.M., Ph.D. in Biblical Studies (NT), Dallas Theological Seminary
Ph.D. in Biblical Studies, The University of Sheffield


 


Endorsements by pastors and missionaries:

“The NET Bible strikes a delicate balance between being accurate to the original biblical texts and understandable to the modern English reader. The translators have accomplished this both through their choice of words and grammatical structure and through the extensive set of footnotes they have provided. I heartily recommend it to all students of the Bible.”

Clay Porr
Campus Minister
Princeton Evangelical Fellowship
Princeton University


“I highly recommend the NET Bible, especially to missionaries with no tools in the field. In my ministry in India, I came across hundreds of village pastors with a torn Bible in their hands--that was their only tool. They have no commentaries, no concordances, no grammar helps, no cross references. What a change the NET Bible can make in those bare hands. I hope and pray more NET Bibles will be available to those village pastors in India.”

Andrew B. Spurgeon
Missionary
Help for Christian Nationals, Inc.


“Lake Ridge Bible Church continues to enjoy the use of the NET Bible in our Sunday worship services and personal Bible reading. We greatly appreciate the work and effort of so many who are putting together this excellent work.”

Larry Murray
Associate Pastor
Lake Ridge Bible Church
Mesquite, TX


“I find that having people in my congregation that bring the NET Bible to church forces me to make sure I do my homework in the Bible text. Because of the large amount of notes and the complex issues addressed in the notes, I cannot become lazy. People read the NET Bible notes as we go through the Scriptures. When it comes to discussion time, they often ask questions concerning where my conclusion differs from the conclusion presented in the NET Bible notes! The end result is a preacher that is more Biblically-literate and a congregation that is more Biblically-literate.”

Glenn L. Weaver
Pastor
Grace Community Church
Golden Valley, MN


 

 

Endorsements by seminary students:

“I am a student at the Baptist Bible Graduate School of Theology in Springfield, MO. I just wanted to let you know what a tremendous help the NET Bible has been in my Greek and Hebrew studies. The translator’s notes are easy to understand and logical in their conclusions. I have received my copy of the printed version of the NT, and I look forward to getting the OT as well.”

--Brian Longest


“...As a fourth-year seminary student, I am thrilled to have the NET translation. Throughout my education, I have been torn between using two types of Bibles. More literal translations, which seek to accurately portray the actual words and word order of the original Greek and Hebrew, often fail to reflect what the text means in today’s terms. More dynamic translations tend to speak in today’s language, but I often wonder how accurate they really are. The NET Bible offers me the best of both worlds--it is accurate, yet beautifully written in today’s language. And the extensive footnotes give me an honest look at difficult passages and alternate translations...”

--Sarah Bourgeois


“...The NET Bible is a tremendous resource. I have used its notes as a tool...to prepare Sunday school classes, sermons and Bible studies. The philosophy behind the notes is revolutionary and they have blessed my heart and mind deeply. This Bible is a beautiful translation and at the same time easy to understand. As a Hispanic, I can say that this Bible will bless many not only in the English speaking world but also people in the rest of the world whose primary language is not English. It is worth having one in your library!”

--Reinaldo Medina F.


“...This new translation with notes is especially helpful for seminary students like myself who are pressed for time and need a quick overview of the translation and exegetical issues surrounding a particular text. This translation has done a great job of being as faithful to the original text as possible without sacrificing clarity of expression or readability. The notes have gone over and above what one could expect, or even wish for, in a study Bible...”

--Brian Rombough



Endorsements by readers: [look here for more user feedback]


"I appreciate the ministry of bible.org. You're blessing immeasurable numbers of people all over the world and drawing them closer to our Lord Jesus Christ. WHAT AN AWESOME THING!!! Thank you so much."

“I absolutely love your site. I've been studying the bible 18 years. I found your site a couple months ago and it has been so helpful in deepening my understanding of the scriptures. This has become one of my top 3 resources. Kudos and to God be the Glory.”


“The bible studies on the various books of the bible are absolutely wonderful. They have been a great blessing to me while doing bible study and it is the best that I have come across on the Internet…”


“No other site has been as much help and blessing as this great treasure of truth.”


“This is MY Bible! This is the best Bible I have ever read or used. I use it all the time because it is a superior translation and the notes are excellent and the most useful. This Bible surpasses any of the translations I have on my overstuffed shelf and it is never on the shelf because I am constantly reading and pondering it. It's clear, readable, and most scholarly. I cannot thank you people enough for making this translation available”


“The day God led me to your site was indeed a happy day for me! Bible.org is the finest Christian site on the web today.... I could not possibly write a letter like this without praising the NET Bible. I printed out the preliminary version, had it bound and graduated it to my primary reader. It is without a doubt, the most accurate and best commented Bible I’ve seen. Once again my compliments on a job well done.”


“I have just been browsing the NET Bible...I have looking at my favorite, book Romans. It is magnificent, what an outstanding job you all have done on this! It is readible but accurate, scholarly without being to difficult and the notes are great insights for those of us without the advantage of knowing the original languages. I am more than impressed, I am down right anxious to get my little hands on the printed version and bring it to bear in my everyday use and study of the Word. What a blessing it will be, God is just to good.”


“I wanted to compliment those responsible for the NET Bible; I think it’s wonderful... especially a wonderful ‘jumping off point’ for study, even if I (or anyone) doesn’t fully agree with all text or commentary. It’s just GREAT. I find myself using it more and more. I wish I’d have done that! I simply love it!!!”


“...The NET Bible is an exciting development. There is so much that will help us in our walk with God and as we seek his leading to Bible College and into ministry. God Bless you in your work. Be encouraged!”


“...I just wanted to let you know how refreshing it has been to use the NET Bible in teaching the Adult Sunday School lessons at my church. I have enjoyed reading the book of Nehemiah in preparation for the lessons and using portions of it during class.”


“...As a woman’s Bible study teacher for over fifteen years, and a high school Bible teacher for three, I have found the NET Bible to be a tremendous asset to my recent preparations. I appreciate the extensive footnotes that provide pertinent material for in-depth study. The accuracy of the translation and readability of the text makes it a wonderful tool for any Bible student...”


“I have been reading my copy of the The NET Bible New Testament.... I have spent several hours enjoying it, and I must say, to put it simply, I love it! The text is very readable and flows quite nicely. But the gold is in the notes; they are fantastic! It is everything I have always wanted in a study Bible.”


“I’ve just discovered the NET Bible. My first impression was what a silly idea, because the Bible on disk is so common. But when I delved into it, I was really impressed! I’ve bookmarked the NET Bible.... Brilliant! Thank you!”


“...Scripture passages that I committed to memory years ago became more clear to me when I read them in the NET translation. In reading the NET text and the detailed footnotes, it is obvious that a great deal of thought has gone into choosing terminology that conveys appropriate meaning to the average English reader, while also staying true to the original text...”


“...The NET Bible is eminently readable and very understandable. The notes explaining a translator’s choices, and why the NET translators made their particular choice, are very helpful to a student of the Bible who is unschooled in its original languages. I highly recommend it...”


“...As accuracy and readability are so important in Bible Study, we appreciate The Net Bible. The footnotes give added clarity and insight. The Net Bible is a wonderful aid to those who are serious about the study of God’s word.”


“...I recently purchased a NET Bible New Testament, and I just wanted to tell you how wonderful I think it is. It is what I’ve looked for for years: a book full of detailed translation notes for the New Testament. I can’t say enough good about it. Anyway, great, great, great! That’s all I want to say....May the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who GLORIOUSLY raised Christ from the dead by the Holy Spirit bless you all richly in Christ Jesus and reward you for all your hard work in service of the Master!”


“...Today I discovered the NET Bible translation on your web site. It’s very nice and easy to understand, also for people who don’t have English as their native language. God bless you with this project.”


“...I’ve been enjoying reading this translation. It’s easy to read... it actually makes sense. I also enjoy the footnotes which are generously used, and often contain the Greek words. I especially enjoy the use of Greek-related footnotes since I’m currently studying Greek.”


“G’day… I am just writing to tell you that I love the NET Bible. A most worthwhile and interesting project. Thank you to all who are working on it. I love the footnotes...” (from Australia)


“I like the NET Bible and the way that there are footnotes specifying which ancient authorities render a given passage in a given way. I find the many translations which say ‘Other ancient authorities,’ etc., are not very helpful!”


“...I’m happy to know an updated translation is in the works that emphasizes both accuracy and readability. I'm anxiously waiting for its completion!”


“...Many, many thanks for making a Bible available online!”

CLICK HERE FOR MORE USER FEEDBACK.

Related Topics: NET Bible

Additional articles by Donald Curtis (Esther, Song of Solomon, Jeremiah, Lamentations, and Leviticus)

Editor's Note: Because these articles were authored in series' predominately authored by someone else they do not automatically appear in Don's author list. These have been noted here with links for your convenience in viewing a fuller list of his works here on Bible.org.

• 23. Esther - Irony and Providence, in the series From Creation To The Cross
• 29. The Song of Songs, in the series From Creation To The Cross
• 33. Jeremiah: Coming Destruction, in the series From Creation To The Cross
• 34. Jeremiah: The New Covenant, in the series From Creation To The Cross
• 35. Lamentations: The Fall of Jerusalem, in the series From Creation To The Cross

• 6. The Guilt Offering (Leviticus 5:14-6:7; 7:1-6), in the series Leviticus: Sacrifice And Sanctification
• 13. The Boundaries of Godly Sexuality (Leviticus 18:6-29), in the series Leviticus: Sacrifice And Sanctification
• 17. The Lord’s Appointed Times (Leviticus 23), in the series Leviticus: Sacrifice And Sanctification

Lesson 7: Helping Unruly Believers (2 Thessalonians 3:6-15)

Related Media

March 19, 2017

In the early 1960’s there was a popular TV show called “Dobie Gillis.” Dobie’s buddy was an unkept beatnik (this was before the hippies) with a goatee, who always wore a sweatshirt and tennis shoes, named Maynard G. Krebs. Whenever Dobie would forget and say the word “work,” Maynard would get a terrified look on his face and shriek, “Work!” He viewed work as an infectious disease to avoid at all costs!

Apparently the church in Thessalonica had some Maynard G. Krebs types who refused to work. They were probably sponging off the brothers who were working, creating tension in the church. Some translations describe these non-working folks as “idle,” but most scholars agree that the word is better translated “unruly” or “disorderly.” It meant to be “out of step.” They seem to have had a defiant attitude, because they were deliberately disregarding the commands about working that the apostle Paul had given both when he was with them and in his first letter (1 Thess. 4:11-12; 2 Thess. 3:6, 10). They also may have been ignoring other apostolic teaching (“tradition,” 2 Thess. 2:15; 3:6, refers to teaching handed down by the apostles).

In our text, Paul’s main concern was that these unruly brothers were not working, but acting like busybodies (2 Thess. 3:11). Many translate his wordplay as, “they are not busy, but they are busybodies.” He commands them to work to support themselves.

Why weren’t they working? Some think that like Maynard, they avoided work because they were lazy, although Paul doesn’t say that. Others think that these unruly brothers were evangelists who, unlike Paul and his colleagues, were demanding support from the church. But most scholars draw a connection between these non-working brothers and Paul’s teaching about the coming of the Lord. They think that they became so caught up with the idea that Jesus would return soon that they quit working. They didn’t want to “waste time” working, since the end was near. But then they had to rely on those who did work. And, with all their extra time, they were going around spreading gossip and perhaps also false teaching, which is why Paul calls them “busybodies.”

Paul was concerned both with the tension that this created in the church and with the bad witness it gave to outsiders, who would think that Christians are religious hucksters. So he devotes this extended section to deal with this problem. He’s saying:

To help an unruly believer, lovingly exhort him to work, don’t enable his irresponsible lifestyle, and exercise church discipline if he does not respond to correction.

This problem was present in incipient form during Paul’s time in Thessalonica. He mentions a rule that he had given them while he was with them (2 Thess. 3:10), “If anyone is not willing to work, then he is not to eat, either.” But it continued to be a minor problem, because in 1 Thessalonians 4:11-12 he wrote, “… make it your ambition to lead a quiet life and attend to your own business and work with your hands, just as we commanded you, so that you will behave properly toward outsiders and not be in any need.” Now, he deals with it more aggressively, emphasizing his commands in verses 6, 10, and 12.

1. To help an unruly believer, lovingly exhort him to work.

Paul repeatedly uses the words “brethren” or “brother” (vv. 6, 13, 15), to underscore the loving family relationships that should characterize the church. Love should be our motivation in all ministry, including correcting an unruly brother. But biblical love does not mean being nice all the time. Rather, biblical love seeks the highest good of the one loved, namely, that he might be conformed to the image of Jesus Christ. If a person is disobeying God’s commandments, it’s not loving to let him go on without correcting him. If a doctor knows that his patient has cancer, it isn’t loving to hug him and say, “I love you, man!” Love requires gently telling him the truth with the aim of helping him get better.

Not working to provide for your family when you’re able to work is a serious sin! Paul wrote (1 Tim. 5:8), “But if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.” I don’t know of anywhere else, except in the case of the immoral Corinthian man who was having relations with his father’s wife (1 Cor. 5:1), where Paul refers to a sin as being worse than that of unbelievers. Even most unbelievers who have never heard of Christ work to provide for their families. If a professing Christian doesn’t work when he is able, it’s a bad witness to the unbelieving world.

In Galatians 6:1, Paul instructs, “Brethren, even if anyone is caught in any trespass, you who are spiritual, restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness; each one looking to yourself, so that you too will not be tempted.” “You who are spiritual” refers to the spiritually mature, who walk in the Spirit and demonstrate the fruit of the Spirit in their lives (Gal. 5:16, 22, 23). “Restore” has the idea of bringing healing. The process is to be done with gentleness (a fruit of the Spirit), not with harsh scolding or angry rebuke. And, it must always be done in humility, realizing that you, too, easily could fall into temptation. Don’t come down on the person as if you never sin, but come alongside as a fellow sinner offering help.

In order to correct a sinning brother or sister, you have to set an example of godliness. You can’t exhort someone to do something that you’re not doing. In verses 7-10, Paul refers to his own example of working to provide for his own needs when he was in Thessalonica. As an apostle, he had the right to be supported in his gospel labors, as other apostles were (v. 9; cf. 1 Cor. 9:3-14), but he set aside this right to provide an example to these new believers and to squelch any accusations that he was preaching the gospel to bilk people out of their money. In 1 Timothy 5:17, Paul tells churches to support elders who work hard at preaching and teaching. The apostle John encourages churches to support missionaries and evangelists (3 John 5-8). So there’s nothing wrong with a Christian worker receiving support. But Paul went the extra mile to provide an example of hard work to these new converts.

When Paul says that he did not eat anyone’s bread without paying for it, he does not mean that he paid those who invited him over for a meal! Rather, he didn’t presume on the hospitality of these new believers by expecting them to cover his room and board. He was an example to them of financial integrity and thus he had a platform to exhort them to the same level of integrity.

So if you’re aware of someone who is irresponsibly mooching off others and not taking the initiative to get a job, you need to go to him in love, show him what the Bible teaches about working for a living, and exhort him to look for work. But, what if he doesn’t respond to your exhortation?

2. Since work is a God-given responsibility, don’t enable an unruly believer to continue in his irresponsible ways.

2 Thess.3:10: “If anyone is not willing to work, then he is not to eat, either.” He may need temporary assistance to get on his feet. He may need some coaching on how to get a job. But he should make it his full-time job to look for a job until he gets one. If he’s being irresponsible, don’t enable him to continue in his ways by giving him food or money. Don’t let him lay a guilt trip on you: “If you were a Christian, you’d love me and help me out!” Rather, if he refuses to get a job, he should suffer the consequences. This applies even to family members! To enable his irresponsible ways is not loving. Consider three principles here:

A. Work is a God-given responsibility for every able-bodied man.

You may be thinking, “Man? What about women?” The biblical pattern is that men should support their families financially (Gen. 2:15; 3:17-19), while women are to be “workers at home” (Titus 2:5). Yes, this is radically countercultural! Married women may help contribute to the family’s income (Prov. 31:10-31), but when there are young children in the home, her work should not hinder her from rearing them in the Lord. Of course, an unmarried woman needs to support herself (Acts 16:14). Older women may work if they wish or if the family needs the income. But since marriage should provide a picture of Christ and the church (Eph. 5:22-33), and Christ provides for His church, men are responsible to provide for their families.

The Bible extols work as God-given. God assigned work to Adam in the Garden before the fall. After the fall, God didn’t curse work. Rather, He cursed the ground which the fallen man had to work (Gen. 3:17-19). So work became more difficult because of the fall, but it is still God-given. Even slaves are commanded (Col. 3:23-24), “Whatever you do, do your work heartily, as for the Lord rather than for men, knowing that from the Lord you will receive the reward of the inheritance. It is the Lord Christ whom you serve.” The culture of Paul’s day despised manual labor, but the Bible consistently affirms the dignity of such work. It is significant that Jesus worked as a carpenter and He chose fishermen as his disciples. Paul made tents. So we are not to despise or avoid work.

At the same time, we should not be so consumed with work that our main aim is to become a success in our career or to make a lot of money so that we can buy more and more stuff. Jesus commanded all who follow Him not to seek what the Gentiles seek. Then He added (Matt. 6:33): “But seek first His kingdom and His righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.” Besides providing for our families, we should work so that we can help support the Lord’s kingdom work worldwide.

In his book, Life Work ([YWAM Publishing], p. xxi), Darrow Miller writes,

When we see our worth as determined by the marketplace and the amount of money we make, we often sacrifice what matters the most—family, friends, marriages, Christian fellowship—in pursuit of success, prestige, fame, power, and other goals prized by the world. All too often there is a direct relationship between our escalating material prosperity and our increasing moral and spiritual poverty.

So working is a God-given responsibility so that we can provide for ourselves and our families, which means that work is good. But, at the same time we need to keep in mind Paul’s warning (1 Tim. 6:9-10),

But those who want to get rich fall into temptation and a snare and many foolish and harmful desires which plunge men into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is a root of all sorts of evil, and some by longing for it have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs.

Underlying Paul’s command for unruly brothers to work is a character issue:

B. Self-discipline is an important character quality that every believer must develop.

Paul reminds them (2 Thess. 3:7) that he and his fellow-workers “did not act in an undisciplined manner among you.” By way of contrast, he confronts the unruly (2 Thess. 3:11), “For we hear that some among you are leading an undisciplined life, doing no work at all, but acting like busybodies.” Self-control or self-discipline is a fruit of the Holy Spirit (Gal. 5:23), which every believer should be developing. These unruly brothers were not working because they were undisciplined.

Have you ever thought about how self-control affects just about every area of life? A self-controlled person uses his time wisely in line with biblical goals. One key to spending time alone with the Lord each day in the Word and prayer is disciplining yourself to set aside the time to do it. Self-discipline is also required to get to work on time and be faithful to do your job well. Discipline also affects your finances, enabling you to live within your means and stay out of debt. It keeps you from buying stuff on impulse that you can’t afford. It helps you pay your bills on time.

Self-control also affects your relationships. People who lack self-control lose their temper and say things that damage relationships. Those who lack self-control look at pornography and sometimes are unfaithful in their marriages. A lack of self-control is behind drug and alcohol abuse. Self-control also affects your health: you eat properly and in the right amounts; you exercise to stay in shape. So it’s crucial for all believers to develop self-discipline or self-control. (For help in how to develop this quality, see my message, “Learning to Control Yourself,” 12/31/06, on fcfonline.org.)

C. We are not responsible to support an unruly brother who refuses to respond to correction.

Paul says, “If he won’t work, don’t give him food or money. Let him go hungry.” The Book of Proverbs commends hard work and thrift, but it mocks fools who are lazy and who spend their money unwisely (Prov. 6:1-11; 10:4-5; 13:4; 20:4; 21:24; 24:30-34; 26:14-16). While it’s fine to buy a meal for a hungry man, that is not helping him deal with the underlying problem of why he doesn’t have money for food. If he’s using his money for alcohol or drugs, we aren’t obligated to help him with food. The loving thing is to help him face his need for Christ or, if he is a Christian, to develop a self-controlled, responsible way of life.

Sometimes people will cite Jesus’ words (Matt. 5:42), “Give to him who asks of you, and do not turn away from him who wants to borrow from you,” to claim that you should give indiscriminately to anyone who asks or that you should loan money to irresponsible people who will squander it and never pay it back. But in the context, Jesus is speaking against those who selfishly cling to their money, refusing to help people with genuine needs. As 1 John 3:17 rhetorically asks, “But whoever has the world’s goods, and sees his brother in need and closes his heart against him, how does the love of God abide in him?”

But if Jesus and John meant that we are to give indiscriminately to anyone who asks, then Paul in our text (and many other Scriptures) would be contradicting them. To encourage further irresponsibility and sin in someone by giving to him every time he asks for more would be sin. Love seeks to help the person become an obedient, responsible believer. And Paul commands (v. 12, not suggests!) such irresponsible brothers to “work in quiet fashion and eat their own bread.” They should stop being busybodies and get a job.

But, what if a person in the church ignores repeated exhortations to get a job? What if he continues to ask people in the church for money? What if he is a family member? Should you keep giving him more money? No,

3. The church is responsible to discipline an unruly believer who refuses to respond to correction.

Paul mentions this first in verse 6, “Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you keep away from every brother who leads an unruly life and not according to the tradition which you received from us.” He elaborates further in verses 14 & 15: “If anyone does not obey our instruction in this letter, take special note of that person and do not associate with him, so that he will be put to shame. Yet do not regard him as an enemy, but admonish him as a brother.”

What does church discipline look like? First, as we’ve seen, those who are spiritual should seek to restore the unruly brother by admonishing him (Gal. 6:1; Matt. 18:15; 1 Thess. 4:11; 5:14). If after repeated attempts from several individuals, he does not respond, the elders should command him by their authority in Christ to get a job (2 Thess. 3:12), warning him of the consequences if he refuses, namely that the church will not support him or pay his bills (v. 10). He will go hungry and end up homeless.

The practical difficulty, which Paul doesn’t address, is, what if he has a family? Should the church help the family with food and rent? This can be very emotional, because manipulative men will use their wife and children as pawns to elicit sympathy to get money for their needs. In spite of my many objections, for years my parents gave thousands of dollars to a deadbeat guy who used his kids to tug at my parents’ heartstrings. They countered me by saying that they didn’t want the kids to go to foster care, but eventually that is what happened. I think that our text says that in spite of the hardship on the family, we should not support an irresponsible man’s refusal to work.

If the lazy brother still does not respond, the church must be informed and withdraw normal fellowship contingent on his repentance, while continuing to admonish him (2 Thess. 3:14-15). This isn’t the final stage of church discipline, where the church excommunicates the person and treats him as an unbeliever (Matt. 18:17). Paul says not to cut off all contact (v. 15), but rather not to maintain normal friendly, “buddy-buddy” contact, as if nothing were wrong. Don’t invite such a person over for a friendly dinner, where you never mention his sin. Don’t include him in a men’s activity as if he’s part of the fellowship. He should be excluded, except for attempts to bring him to repentance. And, those in the church must be careful not to be wrongly influenced by the unruly man’s attitudes and behavior.

It’s difficult to know how to apply today Paul’s purpose (3:14), “so that he will be put to shame.” In the culture of that time, honor and shame were a big deal. The Thessalonian believers had already been shamed in their pagan society by being identified with the church. If the church rejected them, they would be doubly shamed (Gene L. Green, The Letters to the Thessalonians [Eerdmans/Apollos], p. 355). Many Middle Eastern cultures today are still honor and shame based. But in our Western world today, the concepts of honor and shame are not so strong. The ostracized person would just go find another church to hit up for money.

Carl Laney (A Guide to Church Discipline [Bethany House], p. 80) argues that if the primary objective of the disciplinary action were to shame the offender, Paul could have used another verb that more clearly intends that meaning. The verb that Paul used sometimes means to shame, but also means, “to turn or direct.” Laney argues that the purpose of the church’s breaking off normal fellowship with the unruly brother was to get him to reflect on his sin and turn from it. The goal is restoration, not embarrassment. But, if an unruly man continued in his ways after all of the above steps to help restore him, the final step would be excommunication, in which the church would treat him as an unbeliever (Matt. 18:15-18). He may not be saved.

The gospel promises that we are saved by grace through faith in Christ alone, but genuine saving faith is never alone (Eph. 2:8-10). When God saves us, He changes our hearts, which inevitably results in changed behavior in obedience to God’s word. A man who doesn’t respond to repeated attempts to correct him may not be genuinely saved.

Conclusion

Perhaps Paul adds v. 13, “But as for you, brethren, do not grow weary of doing good,” because dealing with an unruly, lazy man can be exhausting and frustrating. We may quit helping all needy people. But Paul tells us not to stop helping those with legitimate needs, even if we’re frustrated dealing with those who refuse to obey the Lord.

Also, it’s easy to grow weary of the difficult task of exhorting an irresponsible brother. They’re often manipulative and deceptive. They try to play off your emotions. They pit one person against another in an attempt to get their own way. If they would work as hard at getting and keeping a job as they do at trying to pry money out of soft-hearted people, they wouldn’t need the money! But we must not grow weary of doing good.

I hope that we never need to apply these principles as a church. But if we do, I hope that we’ll be faithful for the glory of the Lord, the good of the church, and the good of those who are unruly.

Application Questions

  1. Do you know anyone who fits Paul’s description of an “unruly” brother? Have you tried to talk to him? If he didn’t respond favorably, what else should you do?
  2. Is it wrong for an able-bodied believer to be on welfare or other government assistance? Why? Why not?
  3. Obviously, some jobs are more fulfilling than other jobs. What should a Christian in an unfulfilling job do? Is it okay to seek more satisfying work?
  4. If a believer who refuses to work has a family, should the church help support the family? Why? Why not?

Copyright, Steven J. Cole, 2017, All Rights Reserved.

Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture Quotations are from the New American Standard Bible, Updated Edition © The Lockman Foundation

Related Topics: Christian Life, Church Discipline

Pages