MENU

Where the world comes to study the Bible

13. CATASTROPHE: The Flood And The Fossils, Part 1

Related Media

From the Hebrew: The word for “Flood” (Hebrew mabbul) is only applied to the Noahic Flood; other floods are denoted by a different word in the original. Mabbul is related to an Assyrian word meaning “destruction”; the phrase “a flood of waters” (Genesis 6:17) could properly be translated by “a catastrophe of waters.” Similarly, when the Genesis Flood is referred to in the New Testament, the Greek kataklusmos (“cataclysm”) is uniquely employed. (Dr. Henry Morris, The Beginning of the World, page 107)

While scripture is the infallible Word of God, study notes in your Bible and commentaries are the interpretations (sometimes best guesses) of educated, though fallible, humans. So, the study notes in some Bibles may give confusing or inaccurate information regarding the Flood. Always look to see what the Bible actually says both in the passage and elsewhere in scripture about that passage.

Day One Study

Read Genesis 6:13-7:16.

1. Describe the Ark that Noah is to build, paying attention to the minute details of both exterior and interior layout and all the skills and tools that would be needed to carry out God’s instructions. Be specific! [Note: The ancient cubit ranged from 17.5 to 24 inches, averaging 18 inches.]

2. Now, make a drawing/diagram of how it might have looked, inside and outside.

3. Read “Creation Answers: Just How Big Was That Ark?” at the end of this lesson. Compare the information you learned today to your previous concept of Noah’s Ark and its purpose.

4. Read Gen 6:11-7:16. Compare Genesis 1:21-26 with 7:13-14, 21. God groups the creatures He has made on Days 5 and 6 (living creatures) into specific categories, not all of which were represented on the Ark. Discuss:

·         Why certain creatures were excluded from going on the Ark—

·         How the creatures were to be gathered and brought to the Ark—

5. There is a lapse of time between Genesis 6:22 and 7:1. 1 Peter 3:20 refers to God’s patience during this time, waiting for Noah to construct the Ark (along with the help of his young sons, no doubt).

·         What else did Noah do while building the Ark? See 2 Peter 2:5 and Hebrews 11:7. [Note: a similar description of Noah is found in other ancient documents.]

·         Why would he do this?

·         Why would God be patient?

·         Was the Ark big enough to carry other people as well? Did any others respond?

6. Reread Genesis 7:1-10, 13-16. How many times is the same information repeated? Repetition implies emphasis. What could God be trying to emphasize to us as we read this part of Scripture? [Notice who closed the door.]

Day Two Study

Read Genesis 7:6-12.

A word of caution: While scripture is the infallible Word of God, study notes in your Bible and commentaries are the interpretations (sometimes best guesses) of educated, though fallible, humans. So, the study notes in some Bibles may give confusing or inaccurate information regarding the Flood. The best approach is to study the Scripture first. Look to see what the Bible actually says both in the passage and elsewhere in scripture about that passage. Build a model based on what it says. Ask the question, “If this is true, what would you expect to find?” Then, observe what is found in the world. That’s the approach of this study.

7. Reread verses 11-12. The Flood was brought on by more than just 40 days of rain. Discuss the 2 physical mechanisms that caused the Flood. What physical effects would each have upon the earth?

·         Springs or fountains of the great deep—

·         Floodgates or windows of the heavens—

Scientific Insight: The breaking up (literally “cleaving open”) of the fountains of the great deep is mentioned first and so evidently was the initial action that triggered the rest. These conduits somehow all developed uncontrollable fractures on the same day…Soon a worldwide chain reaction would develop, cleaving open all the fountains of the great deep throughout the world. The volcanic explosions and eruptions which would have accompanied these fractures would have poured great quantities of magma up from the earth’s mantle along with the waters…Immense quantities of volcanic dust would have been blown skyward, along with gigantic sprays of water and turbulent surges of the atmosphere. The combination of atmospheric turbulence, expanding and cooling gases, and a vast supply of dust and other particles to serve as nuclei of condensation would suffice to penetrate the any upper canopy of water vapor and trigger another chain reaction there, causing its waters to being to condense and coalesce and soon to start moving earthward as a torrential global downpour of rain. The phrase “windows of heaven” is very graphic…it certainly is intended to convey the idea of great quantities of water, formerly restrained in the sky, suddenly released to deluge the earth. The downpour continued at full intensity—exactly as God had predicted—for forty days and nights. (Dr. Henry Morris, The Genesis Record, p. 196-197)

Appreciation Application:

8. Consider your daily life and relationships. Or, even long range goals that require some decisions today. Is there something difficult that God is asking you to do? What obstacles stand in your way? Remember that Noah chose to be faithful even when he could not visualize the reason for his labor.

Day Three Study

Appreciation Assignment:

9. Have you thought about the wonderful capability God instilled in mankind to be able to build things? Think about how God has gifted you to be creative, productive in your own way. In prayer now, give praise to Him. Dedicate your skills to Him and to His work.

Deeper Discoveries:

·         Read “Creation Answers: Just How Big Was That Ark?” and “Creation Answers: Raging Waters” following this lesson.

·         Go to www.answersingenesis.org and SEARCH anything related to the Flood. Select an article to read or watch a video. Also visit www.icr.org and search.

Creation Answers: Just How Big Was That Ark? Texas Size!!!

The information below is adapted from articles found on www.icr.org and www.answersingenesis.org.

1. Ark—same word as used in Exodus 2:3. Ancient word for box meant to float upon water.

2. Dimensions—at least 438 feet long, 72.9 feet wide, and 43.8 feet high. (The ancient cubit had a length ranging from 17.5 inches to 24 inches, average 18 inches.

3. Hydrodynamics—exceedingly stable, almost impossible to capsize (determined by hydraulic engineers). When tilted up to just short of 90˚, it would immediately right itself again. Tending to align itself parallel with the direction of major wave advance so subject to minimum pitching.

4. Volumetric capacity—minimum 1.4 million cubic feet = 522 standard railroad livestock cars. Each car holds 240 sheep, so Ark could carry 125,000 sheep-size animals.

5. Decks (17.5 feet high!)—three decks with combined floor area > 20 college basketball courts. 3/4 the size of a modern ocean liner. 1.4 million cubic feet of space. Decks divided into various rooms (literally “nests”). Held 8 humans (with room for many more); plus up to 75,000 air breathing creatures, food for everyone for a year or more. Kind of big for a local flood. No boat of this size was built again until 1884.

6. Gopher wood—unknown but speculated to be either a hard, dense wood similar to oak or a laminated wood product.

7. Pitch—literally as a verb “to cover,” as a noun “a covering.” Same word used for “atonement” in Leviticus 17:11. Probably some resinous substance. Perfect covering for the Ark, keeping out the waters of judgment, just as the blood of the Lamb provides a perfect atonement for the soul.

8. Window—literally “opening for daylight.” Two possibilities for placement: on top of side walls, or on roof.

9 Door—one door. All must enter and leave by the same door. 8 people willingly did so; the rest of humanity did not! Noah preached while he worked on the boat. 1 Peter 3:20; I1 Peter 2:5. (Similar to Jesus stating He is the door in John 10:7-9.) God closed the door in Gen. 7:16, not Noah.

10. Animals—2 of every kind, 7 of some kinds. Most land animals are small. Take twice the known land species today (to account for the extinct ones as well) = ~18,000 species. (Species is not equal to kind, though). Yield ~ 72,000 animals.

·         About 60% of the carrying capacity of the Ark. Probably fewer since the Biblical kind is apparently larger than our division of species.

·         Genesis 8:1 says both wild animals and domesticated ones. Probably took juveniles of the larger animals. Had to spend a year without reproductive activity but needed to be healthy enough to repopulate the earth.

·         God sent them to the Ark—perhaps the migration instinct.

·         Perhaps many hibernated, especially during the dark, stormy times. (From observation of our cat on bad weather days, I know the cats slept!!)

11. Food for animals, Noah’s family, and immediate provision upon embarking from Ark.

12. Noahs family living quarters. Four couples.

13. Where was the manure pile? At the bottom of the boat, or assigned to the insects, or shoveled out the window (that’s what I would do!). Perhaps that’s why we have so much coal today!

Think About It: The Flood began on FEB. 17, 600 A.N. (After Noah’s birth, just a hypothetical date!!) On that day, two things happened— springs of the deep burst forth AND the floodgates of the heavens were opened and rain fell 40 entire days. It wasn’t over until 370 days later!

Sources For Further Study:
  1. Noah’s Ark Q&A at www.answersingenesis.org/Home/area/faq/noah.asp.
  2. Noahs Ark: A Feasibility Study, John Woodmorappe.
  3. The large ships of antiquity, Larry Pierce, Creation 22(3): 46-48, June 2000 www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v22/i3/ships.asp.
  4. Caring for the Animals on the Ark, John Woodmorappe, March 29, 2007 at www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n2/caring-for-the-animals.
  5. Yes, Noah did build an Ark! Bodie Hodge and Jonathan Sarfati, 26 March 2004 http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2004/0324ark.asp)

Creation Answers: Raging Waters

The information below is adapted from articles found on www.icr.org and www.answersingenesis.org plus others sourced at the end.

The most universal of legends is that of a worldwide flood. More than 270 cultures have one. This is unexplainable apart from common experience. Add to that some undeniable observations about our planet that tell us something different happened in the past to change its surface drastically and different from what’s going on today.

·         Cracks on the sea floor circle the globe like seams on a baseball. How did that happen?

·         Oceans today hold more water than they once did. Why?

·         Billions of dead things are buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth.

Is the Flood just legend or was it a real event? What questions should you ask to find out? The best approach is to study the Scripture first. Look to see what the Bible actually says both in the passage and elsewhere in scripture about that passage. Build a model based on what it says. Ask the question, “If this is true, what would you expect to find?” Then, observe what is found in the world.

The Flood Begins

One of the first things you need to forget is the idea that the Genesis Flood was just a 40-day rainstorm. What 2 physical mechanisms are stated in verses 11-12 as causing the Flood to begin? 1) Springs of the great deep burst forth. 2) Floodgates of the heavens were opened. What do those phrases mean?

Springs Of The Great Deep:

How many? All. What are these?

·         “Springs” refers to the places where water issues or bursts out of the earth. Other scriptures refer to them existing since creation. Can also refer to reservoirs, basins.

·         “The great deep” means the deepest water—the ocean and subterranean reservoirs.

·         This would include great amounts of water, entrapped below the crust, building up temperatures and pressures until finally being released.

The Bursting Forth:

·         Great amounts of water and other liquids such as magma were being released from below the crust.

·         “Burst forth” means “to cleave, split, break open, break through, to fault” as in the parting of the Red Sea. See the same thing in Zechariah 14:4 “the Mount of Olives will be split in two from east to west, forming a great valley.” Used in Num. 16:31 for the ground “splitting asunder.” Three times God is said to “split open” rocks or the ground to provide water for His people (2 Kings 8:12; Psalm 74:15; Isaiah 48:21).

·         The earth was split, fractured. You would expect great volcanic explosions and eruptions, accompanying earthquakes, and tsunamis (sometimes called tidal waves).

Floodgates Of The Heavens Opened:

·         Windows/Floodgates of the Heavens refers to the image of a great amount of water previously held back but now being released.

·         Then, there’s the 40 days of rain. Geshem (Hebrew word) is the most violent rain. In Ezekiel 13:11-13, violent rain is described as destroying mortared walls!

So, the water for the Flood came from three sources: (1) Subterranean fountains of water, etc. bursting forth; (2) Violent rain from above; (3) Waters from the existing ocean spilling over the land.

What evidence would there be that such things did occur? Subterranean water sources, splitting and distorting of the crust, and increased amounts of water on the earth today as compared to the past.

Evidence Of Subterranean Water Sources?

·         Ocean floor springs/vents were discovered in the 1960’s. These waters are metal-rich, hot brines (400˚ C). One professor from MIT suggests that water in the amount of 40 cubic miles flows out of springs each year. So, subterranean water is still being released but not to the same degree now as then.

·         Volcanoes, even underwater ones, add tremendous amounts of water to the atmosphere. During 100 days of erupting, a secondary cone of Mt. Etna issued 460 million gallons of steam. One volcanic cone, 4.6 million gallons of water per day.

·         The most natural mechanism to bring down the canopy also would be volcanic activity. In 1883, Krakatoa in East Indies, sent up 3 cubic miles of volcanic dust into the stratosphere. Distributed globally. Caused red sunsets for 10 years and lowered the average temperature of the earth 4˚ F for about 3 years. One volcano affecting the atmosphere for 10 years.

·         What about several hundred volcanoes? Providing a volcanic cloud cover at the top which would cool the canopy and cause it to condense out on the dust particles. Result: torrential rain.

Evidence Of The Bursting Forth?

Look for evidence of Splitting and Distorting of the Earth’s Crust.

·         Cracks in the earth’s crust circling around the globe like the seams on a baseball. It’s a fact. There is no explanation for it. The continents appear to have separated. Perhaps this is associated with the onset of the Flood.

·         Then there’s the associated Volcanism, Earthquake Damage, Tsunamis, Massive Water-Lain Deposits. Did you know that pillow lavas, produced as fluid lava cools underwater, are the most abundant volcanic rock on earth? We’ll cover all these next week.

·         Increased Water on the Earth. Studying the continental shelves and slopes plus drowned canyons extending out from land-based rivers indicate sea level was once several thousand feet lower than it is today. Some parts of the sea bottom have definitely dropped. Lots of “seamounts”–nonvolcanic, flat-topped drowned islands in the middle of the ocean. No explanation. More about that in the next fact sheet.

·         What would happen when that great amount of water and magma was released from below the crust? Most likely, sinking of the land above it.

So, the evidence matches the prediction. The model may be accurate after all. The Flood may have really happened just as the Bible said it did.

Rising Waters

In Genesis 7:17-24, notice the frequent use of the terms “rose” and “increased.” The Hebrew term translated “increased” / “flooded” means “overwhelmingly mighty” and is sometimes translated “prevailed”. What is the author plainly trying to convey to us? This is a global phenomenon!

Skeptics claim that the Genesis Flood must have been confined only to a local area or regional at most (just involving the Mesopotamian river valleys—modern day Iraq). Anyone holding to that view needs to consider several things:

·         No normal meteorological process exists that will produce 40 days of continuous torrential rainfall over any region.

·         The implications of floodwaters covering even a short mountain by 22 feet (which may have been the draft of the Ark). Water seeks its own level. It doesn’t flow uphill. So, for example, to cover a hill such as Pilot Knob in Argyle (~800 feet above sea level), water would be covering most of Texas and the Gulf Coast, the East Coast, and the West Coast except for the mountain ranges. And, that’s a small hill. The Hebrew word kasah translated “covered” in Genesis 7:20 means “overwhelmed to the point of washing away.” Any hill completely covered by raging floodwaters would certainly be overwhelmed like that. Psalm 104:6 refers to this, “You covered it with the deep as with a garment; the waters stood above the mountains.” We talked last time about the land surface probably having fewer and lower mountains, maybe no higher than 5,000 feet.

·         How long did the waters rise and cover the whole earth? 150 days. How many months is that? 5 months. Too long for a local flood.

·         The size of the ark. Ridiculous waste of time and resources when God could have sent Noah and his family to a neighboring region. Also, the animals could have just migrated.

This was no local Flood. You would be better off saying it never happened than to try to make it local.

Conclusion: the water for the Flood came from three sources: (1) Geysers of water lasting 5 months at least; (2) Violent rain from above lasting 1/4 of that time; (3) Waters from the existing ocean rising up and spilling over the land, also lasting for 150 days at least That’s a long time!

Build A Model For The Flood

Based on what the scripture says, creationists have constructed a few models as to what could have been the source for all the rain and water covering the land.

Model 1: Vapor Canopy Collapsed

The splitting open of the earth’s crust created volcanic eruptions that shot into the atmosphere providing dust for condensation of the water vapor into torrential rain. As I mentioned last time, more advanced computer simulations have just about eliminated the possibility of a thick vapor canopy. The heat trapped within would be too great to sustain life. So, the main source of the water was probably not a thick canopy.

Model 2: Subterranean Water Reservoirs Erupted Into Geysers

Vast amounts of hot, pressurized water were stored in interconnected subterranean chambers. Interestingly, scientists have recently discovered that minerals in the mantle may store 5-6 times more water than in the oceans so this is not an unreasonable possibility.

Something started splitting open the earth’s crust. The released water burst through as violent fountain-jets shooting high into the atmosphere then fell back as torrential rain. This would be accompanied by great tectonic activity, as continental blocks would slide away from the rupture zone causing tidal waves and churning of the water. As the reservoirs were emptied, the land above would sink allowing the ocean water to rush over the new basins for massive sediment deposits that were uplifted later as mountains.

What caused the splitting? Some speculate bombardment of the earth by asteroid or comet fragments. No one knows.

Model 3: Hyper-Hurricanes (Hypercanes) Generated Over Hot Ocean Water

The earth split along the lines of the 40,000-mile long mid-ocean ridges spawning thousands of underwater volcanoes. Within hours, the newly formed heat plumes of scalding water would generate thousands of monstrous storms called hypercanes with wind speeds >300 MPH and rainfall up to 10 inches per hour. Although these would remain fairly stationery over the energy source (the “bubble” of hot water), such storms would also loft large volumes of water into the atmosphere, saturating it so that torrential rain falls elsewhere on the continents. Interestingly, oxygen isotope measurements from sea-floor sediments indicate the oceans in the past did experience a 40˚F rise in temperature.

Model 4: Runaway Subduction

This model is called “Catastrophic Plate Tectonics.” It has some similarities to Model 2. The earth has a thin crust made up of lighter continental rock and heavier, colder ocean floor rock. These overlie a layer of hot rock called the mantle. Below this is a molten outer core surrounding a solid, mostly iron inner core. On the earth’s crust, cracks circle around the globe like the seams on a baseball breaking it into individual pieces called “plates.” It also looks like the continents have separated, have moved large distances relative to one another, and are still moving very slowly today. There is no secular explanation for what caused this. Here’s a possible Flood-related scenario to explain what happened:

·         God did something on that first day to “crack” open the ocean floor next to the land, causing the cold, heavy ocean floor rock to start sinking into the upper mantle forming what we call the trenches.

·         As the crack grows, more ocean rock sinks and drags the rest of the ocean floor with it like a conveyor belt, increasing speed as the ocean rock melts. The result is a runaway process that causes the entire pre-Flood ocean floor to sink in a matter of a few weeks or months, pulling apart the plates as this happens.

·         This action displaces hot mantle rock and pushes up to the surface elsewhere forming mid-ocean rift zones and new ocean floor through undersea volcanoes.

·         The liquid rock from the volcanoes vaporizes huge volumes of ocean water to produce steam fountain-jets along the seafloor rift zones. These shoot up large amounts of water into the atmosphere which fall back to the surface as intense global rain. Volcanoes, even underwater ones, add tremendous amounts of water to the atmosphere. During 100 days of erupting, 4.6 million gallons of water per day came out of a secondary cone of Italy’s Mt. Etna.

·         The new “warm” ocean floor rock expands and rises up as much as 6500 feet, displacing sea water that would then sweep onto and over the continental land surfaces, carrying vast quantities of sediments and marine organisms with them. These formed most of the thick, fossil-rich sedimentary rock layers we now find blanketing large portions of today’s continents.

·         Continental plates ramming into each other would distort the layers and push them up forming mountains and plateaus.

The concept of runaway subduction has been in the scientific literature for 40 years, seriously considered in the early 70’s, but then dropped. So, it’s not just made up by creationists. It explains several observations in the geologic record that slow and gradual movement simply does not. Chapter 14 describes those better than I can.

One more interesting note: Superheated water found in magma powers volcanic eruptions anyway. About 2/3 of what comes out of the average volcano is water vapor. Evolutionists believe all the earth’s oceans were filled by the release of volcanic water. It’s not unreasonable to consider that a major source for the floodwater. One more note: there’s still a lot of unmelted ocean floor in the mantle below the trenches. Too much for millions of years.

So, those are the models that give several reasons for the rainwater and the rising water. I like model #4 with hypercanes from #3 and subterranean water chambers from #2 added. The combination of the three seems to best explain the evidence we see.

Picture “geysers of molten rock and scalding water squeezed out of the earth’s crust in a violent, explosive upheaval. These fountains were not stopped until 150 days into the Flood—so the earth was literally churning underneath the waters for about five months! (The New Answers Book, page 131)” Including the time the water started going down, the total duration of the flood was over a year.

Examine The Evidence: What Would We Expect To Find? What Do We Find?

·         Enough water to cover the planet. There’s plenty. Flattening the oceans and land, the existing water would cover the surface by almost 2 miles.

·         Scouring, splitting and deforming of crustal rocks all over the globe. This is evident all over the planet, especially at plate edges.

·         Massive concurrent volcanics — Thick volcanic rocks are found interbedded with sedimentary rocks everywhere. Pillow lavas, produced as fluid lava cools underwater, are the most abundant volcanic rock on earth.

·         Massive water-lain, fossil-rich deposits. There are billions of dead things buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth.

We’ll examine all this evidence in the next Fact Sheet.

Sources For Further Study:

1. Primary Cause of the Flood, Allen Roy, at http://www.tagnet.org/anotherviewpoint/fod.htm

2. Hypercanes: Rainfall Generators during the Flood?, John Woodmorappe, www.answersingenesis.org/Home/area/magazines/TJ/TJv14n2_Hypercanes.pdf

3. Noah’s Flood Q & A, Answers in Genesis website

4. The New Answers Book, Ken Ham

5. Earths Catastrophic Past, Andrew Snelling

6. A Catastrophic Breakup, Andrew Snelling, www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n2/a-catastrophic-breakup

7. The Genesis Flood, Henry Morris and John Whitcomb.

8. The Genesis Record, Henry Morris.

9. In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood, Dr. Walt Brown. Online version at www.creationscience.com/onlinebook.

10. There are a number of excellent videos about the Flood—Evidences: The Record and the Flood; Raging Waters; Fossils and the Flood; The World That Perished

Related Topics: Creation, Evolution

14. CATASTROPHE: The Flood And The Fossils, Part 2

Related Media

Billions of dead things, buried in rock layers, laid down by water, all over the earth!

Day One Study

Read Genesis 7:11-24.

1. Reread Genesis 7:17-20. What information is given to us about the first forty days of the Flood? Notice the frequent use of the terms “increased” / “prevailed.” What is the author plainly trying to convey to us?

2. Skeptics claim that the Flood of Noah must have been only confined to a local area or regional at most (just involving the Mesopotamian river valleys). How would you prove that the Flood was truly global from this passage? For example, think of the implications of having floodwaters covering even a short mountain by ~22.5 feet (which may have been the draft of the Ark).

3. Read Genesis 8:1-5. Up to this point, the Flood narrative has been an account of judgment upon a very wicked world. From this point on, it is a story of REDEMPTION. God “remembered” Noah. To “remember” in the Bible is not merely to recall to mind; it is to express concern for someone, to act with loving care for him. Read the following verses. In what ways did God act with loving care for someone?

·         Genesis 19:29—

·         Exodus 2:24-25—

·         1 Samuel 1:15-20—

After 40 days of heavy rain and water rising from the deep followed by 110 days of it prevailing over the earth…

4. What three specific things did God do (in vs. 1-3) on behalf of Noah and his family and all the animals so that the water stopped rising and began to recede?

5. The water also had to have a place to go. Part of Psalm 104 may be referring to the work of God at this time. What information is given in Psalm 104:6-9?

Scientific Insight: Mountains of Ararat—The Ark rested upon the mountains of Ararat (Greek, Armenia). The mountain known as Mount Ararat is volcanic in origin. It is speculated from studying the glass rocks, salt domes, and volcanic structures found there that the mountain may have been only 6000 feet in height at the time of Noah’s landing. Today Mt. Ararat itself (now 17,000 feet in elevation) abounds in what is known as pillow lava, a dense lava rock formed under great depths of water. The mountain also includes certain sedimentary formations containing marine fossils. It was the highest mountain in the region by far.

The existence of Noah’s Ark in the Ararat region and its exact location is still speculation. A rather large number of reported sightings of the Ark have come from explorers or travelers on this mountain during the past century, as well as during ancient and medieval times. Many books have been written and videos produced about the search for Noah’s Ark, all of them very interesting. A number of modern expeditions have been trying (unsuccessfully so far) to relocate the Ark with adequate documentation. This would surely be the most important archeological discovery of all time, if successful.

6. Discuss Noah’s actions to determine whether or not the ground was dry yet.

7. How many days were involved from the beginning of the Flood until the day Noah knew the earth was completely dry again? [Note: the Hebrew year was 360 days long.] Total = ______ days

8. In the entire passage of Genesis 6:12-8:14, count the number of times (in your translation) the words “all,” “every,” or “everything” are used. Total = _______ times. What is the author plainly trying to convey to the reader?

Think About It: The record of the Flood in Genesis gives every indication of being an eyewitness account, written originally by Noah or his sons. Despite the efforts of many commentators to explain it away as a local flood, it is obvious that the writer intended to tell of a worldwide, uniquely destructive cataclysm. In fact, it would be difficult to imagine how the concept of a universal Flood could be better presented than in the words actually recorded in Genesis. (Dr. Henry Morris, The Beginning of the World, page 116)

Appreciation Application:

9. Regarding the Biblical account of a global flood, scoffers abound. Read 2 Peter 3:3-6. The concept of a local flood, lasting over a year, covering all the local high mountains by a depth of 22 feet but not leaving any destructive evidence or affecting the rest of the planet is illogical.

·         What was the purpose of the Flood?

·         Did God accomplish His purpose?

·         What does this tell you about evaluating scripture that describes future judgment upon the earth?

·         If you have chosen to place your faith in God’s Son Jesus Christ, God has chosen to save (deliver) you from any future judgment upon the earth. How does this make you feel?

Day Two Study

Appreciation Assignment:

10. God lifted huge mountain ranges out of the earth to make the water drain off the land into the newly deepened ocean basins. Spend some time meditating on the beauty and majesty of mountains. Have you traveled to the mountains? What do you like about mountains? Do mountains inspire you? If so, how? Feel free to be creative in expressing your thoughts about mountains in the space on the next page.

Deeper Discoveries:

·         Read “Creation Answers: The Flood Rages On” following this lesson.

·         Consider: If there really was a year-long, worldwide Flood, what would the evidence be?

·         Go to www.answersingenesis.org and SEARCH anything related to the Flood. Select an article to read or watch a video. Also visit www.icr.org and search.

Creation Answers: The Flood Rages On

The information below is adapted from articles found on www.icr.org and www.answersingenesis.org plus others sourced at the end.

Do the stones cry out? Jesus said that if His people stopped praising Him even the stones would cry out in praise to Him. Do the rocks cry out in testimony to God and the Flood He sent upon the earth?

Old earth scientists, whether creationists or evolutionists, say that either the Genesis Flood didn’t happen or that it wasn’t global, or that it left no surviving geological evidence. But, think about it. Scripture says the waters rose greatly, greatly and then prevailed mightily for almost 5 months before it started receding. Then it took another 220 days for the waters to go down completely. A year-long catastrophic world-shaping Flood would have left a massive amount of geological evidence, more than any event before or since.

There is no way that such a lengthy, global flood could have occurred without leaving any evidence! If there had been a year-long worldwide flood, what would the evidence be? Billions of dead things buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth. What do we find? Billions of dead things buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth.

This information sheet attempts to explore the possibility that the physical makeup of the surface of the earth may be related to the work of the Noahic Flood. It does not presume to have answers to the myriad of questions raised anytime this subject is discussed. However, you will be directed to resources if you want more information. Also, let me assure you that neither your salvation nor your spiritual maturity are dependent upon your acceptance of the structure of the earth’s surface as being due to the effects of a year-long flood or millions of years of slow processes.

Question #1: Do You Mean That Most Of The Rock Layers Could Have Been Formed In 1 Year Rather Than Millions? How Could That Be?

Nature Of Water As An Agent For Rapid Erosion And Deposition.

All that soil, sand, and clay plus rock from the fountains breaking up would be scoured from the surface, worked by the water, and deposited elsewhere. Any evidence?? You bet! 400 to 40,000 feet of sedimentary layers cover the surface of the earth. The question is not whether thick sediments exist, but whether they were deposited slowly over millions of years or rapidly. How rapidly can sediments be deposited?

Some geologists say that 1,000 years are needed to accumulate 5 inches of sediment and then deep burial and thousands of years are needed for cementation to take place. Evidence found in the world does not agree, however. Water is a great sorting agent, especially fast-moving water. Particles of rock and organic matter are sorted by size and density so that particles of similar size are deposited together, giving a layered effect. It is now known that beds (sediment layers) form quickly on river floodplains during floods, in shallow marine areas during storms, and in deep water by turbidity currents as well as the result of other catastrophic events (tsunamis and mud flows).

·         River floods—The Waiho River of New Zealand, during a single, high-intensity rainstorm in 1965, deposited about 70 feet of sediment on its bed over several miles. Experiments with fast-moving water carrying sediment show that strata can form laterally and vertically at the same time and are not always a measure of chronology. So, thick sequences of layered rock don’t mean that each layer formed separately. This is a very important difference from what you are normally taught. A lot of water, but not a lot of time! Fast flowing water also carves huge channels into solid bedrock in a matter of hours. A small-scale example from Texas occurred when Canyon Lake poured over its spillway into the Guadalupe River, moving at >100,000 ft3/sec carving a new channel deep into bedrock in just a matter of hours.

·         Tsunamis (tidal waves) are known to attain heights of 130 feet, extend inland several miles, and travel up to 450 miles per hour, eroding and depositing sediments 60 feet thick over vast areas in a matter of hours. Imagine the number of tsunamis occurring as the fountains of the great deep were split open sending repeated pulses of water toward the continents from every direction, bringing sediments and marine fossils to the land.

·         Turbidity Currents are underwater avalanches that carry millions of tons of mud and ooze at express train speeds. These flow downhill under gravity then flow great distances over the ocean floor and sort the grains so the larger grains surpass the smallest ones and settle out most rapidly. The 1929 Grand Banks earthquake generated a turbidity current that ran down the slope at the edge of the North American continent at speeds up to 50 mph, ripping up cables and depositing sorted sediments up to 3 feet in thickness covering 600 miles—in about 13 hours. Lots of sedimentary layers are now being considered fast-forming turbidites. With the upheavals inevitably associated with the breaking up of the ‘fountains of the great deep’ recorded in the Bible, it is no wonder that most of the fossil record consists of buried sea creatures.

·         Mud flows—Within months after the May 18, 1980 Mt. St. Helens explosion, significant deposits of ash and mud resembled layered rock strata, showing how strata in the geologic record could have been rapidly formed. On June 12, 1980, 25 feet of pumice/mud flow were deposited which developed a layered appearance that same day and was cemented. The layering was very precise, micro-thin bedding (called lamination) formed by the power of the surging flow (90 mi/hr). The hurricane-force surge of the volcano sorted out the grains. And volcanic dust and ash are good sources for cement.

The fountains burst forth, not sneaked out, requiring lots of earth movements and massive erosion! Water-laid deposits take a lot of churning, fast-moving water, not necessarily a lot of time!!

Nature Of The Rock Layers Themselves.

You would expect to find and do find thick extensive beds of similar materials.

·         Widespread—Lots of water-sorted sediment extending over wide areas with varying thicknesses. Expect to find thick extensive beds of similar materials. Evidence? Yes. Examples: Dakota Sandstone–one of the most distinctive in the Rockies. No process today forming similar deposit. Also the Morrison Formation, famous for its dinosaurs, covers parts of 11 states! Thick sandstones reach from the Grand Canyon eastward to the Appalachian Mountains. Names change along the way, as does the thickness. But the layer is the same. Once again, the data match the prediction.

·         Redbeds—Great thicknesses of red to reddish brown sediments cover our continent in a continuous sheet that extends west through the Grand Canyon and eastward to the Appalachian Mountains, commonly several thousand feet thick. The color is due to the presence of hematite, an iron mineral, the color of which is so dominant that a very small amount of it will color the rock a faint shade of red. Why so much iron in all these sediments? Volcanic rock contains a wealth of iron minerals. When these are decomposed in water, hematite is formed. Iron comes not only from the weathering of volcanic rock, but also from the associated hot waters released by volcanoes, water that is highly charged with iron. Extensive volcanism during a worldwide flood would release tons of mineral-rich water to mix with sediments as they are deposited. When exposed to oxygen, the iron forms hematite which drops out of solution, creating lenses and concretions in the deposits. The Woodbine Sandstone upon which we live is considered a redbed and contains hematite lenses and concretions.

·         Ripple marks, raindrop impressions, animal tracks, cross beds, mud cracks—Ripple marks form as water moves over a surface. Raindrop marks are probably blisters formed as air bubbles escape from rapidly deposited sediments. Animal tracks are impressions left by a creature on soft sediment. These surface features are preserved in many rock layers. All had to be formed in soft sediment, are very fragile, and require rapid burial by sediment before they had a chance to erode or be destroyed. Crossbedding is caused by rapid sedimentation, requiring strong sheet-flow of sediment over sand waves. In order for it to be preserved, deposition must take place rapidly and then the whole sequence must be buried before it is washed away. Single crossbeds form in the Mississippi River in less than one minute. Deposits over thirty feet thick may have accumulated in only a few days. A lot of water, not a lot of time. Mud cracks are shrinkage cracks resulting from water loss. We often see mud cracks form when a mud puddle dries in the sun. But, mud cracks also form underwater in the muddy bottoms of lakes and in buried mud layers as water is pressed out. The cracks are then filled in with other material, which preserves them. Mud cracks have to be formed in soft sediment, are very fragile, and require rapid burial or cementation before they have a chance to erode or be destroyed.

More Evidence Of Rapid Deposition.

·         Grand CanyonExhibit A used to prove millions of years to form rock strata. Sediments a mile thick; horizontal. They are widespread water-laid deposits, layered with particles sorted by size and preserving crossbeds, ripple marks and animal tracks—all evidence of rapid deposition. Closer examination shows that they could have been laid down quickly with little time delay between formations. Again, a lot of water; not a lot of time. Want to know more? Get the DVD or book Grand Canyon: Monument to Catastrophe by Dr. Steve Austin.

·         Conglomerates and Breccias—Conglomerates are rock deposits composed of pieces of other rock and/or fossil fragments. They may contain everything from rounded boulders to gravel-sized particles. Breccias are similar to conglomerates except the particles are angular, meaning freshly broken pieces from other rock. Both indicate quick deposition after a major upheaval and erosion of other rock. Throughout the rock layers in Colorado are thick layers of conglomerates and breccias. Castle Rock is one noteworthy example because it’s so conveniently located along the interstate highway. There is a conglomerate of oyster shells in the Woodbine formation along Lake Grapevine. Abundant broken fossil shells embedded in dirty sand and silt indicating they were transported away from where the oysters had grown. This also indicates rapid burial, for as shells are long exposed on the sea floor, they suffer abrasion and corrosion or perforation by boring animals.

Either the rock record is the evidence of millions of years, or it is largely the evidence of the Genesis Flood. It can’t be both. I think the evidence weighs heavily on the side of the Flood.

Question #2: Do You Mean That The Fossils We Find In The Rocks Could Have Been Buried By Noah’s Flood?

Rapid Burial—Did It Take Millions Of Years And Evolution?

·         How is a fossil formed? A fossil forms through: (1) rapid burial and (2) burial under deep sediment. A fossil is formed when an animal is trapped and buried very quickly under sediment that seals the organism in and holds its body together. As the sediment turns to rock, so do the creature remains. The soft parts may rot away leaving only hard parts like teeth, bones and shells which are replaced by minerals from the sediments. Or, molds of the original creature are left.

·         Fossils must be buried quickly or they don’t form at all. For example, multitudes of jellyfish are found in the fossil record, but when found stranded on the beach, they turn to formless lumps of jelly within hours. Intricately detailed jellyfish fossils are evidence only of rapid burial. Fish and other animals when they die will float. Such dead animals must be buried rapidly to form fossils in order to protect them from scavengers, bacterial decay, and weather conditions. This holds true with plants as well. They must be buried rapidly and fossilized quickly in order to keep “nature from taking over” and decomposing them. There are also many examples of creatures in the process of eating or giving birth—perfectly preserved—something that can only happen with rapid and complete burial. Flooding is the most likely way for an animal to be buried since floods come by surprise, trapping and burying animals.

Is There Evidence Of Rapid Burial In The Fossil Record?

Everywhere you look is evidence of rapid burial of billions of dead things buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth. Here are some special examples that can only be explained by catastrophic flood conditions:

Incredible Fossils:

·         Glen Rose, TexasA three-foot thick strata composed primarily of millions of closed fossil clams. Normally, clams like to burrow in sand separated from each other, but these are packed together by the millions. To be found closed and whole, a clam would need to be buried alive since only the muscles of a live clam can keep the valves closed. These clams must have been washed into their present position and buried alive. These clams are found throughout Texas in this layer. Clams are not the only fossils found here, just the most prevalent. Also fossilized worms in adobe dirt clods—still round, not squashed! Worms are very difficult to preserve since they have no hard body parts. After cutting open a live worm, it turns to dust quickly. This requires rapid burial and rapid changing to rock to keep the worm from decaying.

·         Eating or Giving Birth—Many examples of creatures in the process of eating or giving birth, perfectly preserved, which can only happen with rapid and complete burial.

·         Gooey Creatures—Thousands of intricately detailed fossil jellyfish are found in rocks. When jellyfish die or get stranded on the beach, they turn to formless lumps of jelly within hours. Terrific evidence of rapid flood-related burial under deep sediment, which turned to rock quickly.

Polystrate Fossils:

Poly = many; strate = strata. A polystrate fossil extends through multiple layers.

·         Kamikaze ichthyosaur—A complete preserved skull of an ichthyosaur (an extinct marine reptile that gave birth to live young) was found buried in a vertical, nose-down position through several layers. Unlike most fossils, the head was preserved in three dimensions, and had not been flattened by the weight of sediment above it. The various layers supposedly span 1 million years. Discuss evolution explanation. It’s impossible except if the layers had been deposited rapidly and deeply to bury the ichthyosaur and keep it from decaying.

·         Tree trunks in coal seams—These penetrate coal plus sandstone layers above and below. One tree in a coal mine in Germany extends vertically 38 feet through the strata. No branches, no roots so did not grow where found. This is evidence of rapid deposition of the strata because the tree didn’t rot and fall over. Some are even upside down. They were carried by water and deposited at the same time as the surrounding sand or coal—over a short period of time.

·         Yellowstones petrified forests—Numerous layers of upright petrified trees supposedly representing the growth and burial of >27 forests over millions of years. However, the lack of roots, bark and branches associated with these trees gives evidence that they were uprooted and transported from one location to another, buried rapidly, and mineralized. A modern example is what happened after the 1980 Mount St. Helens eruption at Spirit Lake. Trees buried in different layers of soil were in position to be petrified in just a few years after the volcano’s eruption.

Unfossilized Bones:

The most sensational, of course are the dinosaur bones.

·         Scientists from the University of Montana found Tyrannosaurus rex bones that were not totally fossilized. Sections were like fresh bone and contained what seems to be blood cells and hemoglobin. If these bones really were millions of years old, then the blood cells and hemoglobin would have totally disintegrated. Also, there should not be ‘fresh’ bone if it were really millions of years old.

·         Unfossilized frozen duck-billed dinosaur bones have been found on the North Slope in Alaska. Evolutionists would not say that these bones had stayed frozen for the many millions of years since these dinosaurs supposedly died out (according to evolutionary theory). Yet the bones could not have survived for the millions of years unmineralized. This is a puzzle to those who believe in an “age of dinosaurs’” millions of years ago, but not to someone who builds his thinking on the Bible.

Fossil Graveyards:

Thousands of marine and land creatures are buried together in great “fossil graveyards,” tightly packed in a jumbled heap, choked with sediments, buried before they had time to decay. Fish, birds, reptiles, mammals, insects, and plants — creatures that don’t live together — have been piled together and preserved.

·         Quarry near LubbockMany dinosaur and other reptile bones. Scientist says they drowned in a major flood.

·         Agate Quarry in NebraskaThousands of rhinoceros, zebra, pig and camel bones in one layer. Whole herds buried at one time.

·         Fossil Butte National MonumentMultitudes of perfectly preserved fish, crocodiles, insects, turtles and palm fronds. No signs of decay so were buried rapidly.

·         Green River FormationThis rock formation consists of finely layered sediment, each layer supposedly like annual tree rings. Yet, it’s full of fish and bird fossils beautifully preserved spanning across the fine layers. The Mount St. Helens eruptions in the 1980s produced the same fine layering in just one afternoon. So, it’s possible the Green River layers represent equally rapid deposition. The traditional view contradicts the fossils amazingly preserved in them.

·         Karoo deposits of southern Africa—The most massive, continuous, fossil deposit known on the planet. 800 billion vertebrate fossils in a 20,000-ft thick deposit of sandstones and shales stretching out for hundreds of miles.

·         Gobi desert—Hundreds of dinosaurs as well as lizards, crocodiles, and small mammals preserved in a huge bone bed that’s been in the news frequently because of various claims that “dinobirds” have been found. Every one of those “dinobird” fossils, by the way, have been verified as completely dinosaur or completely bird. Check the Answers in Genesis website whenever you hear another “dinobird” claim.

·         Florida south of Tampa—One of the richest fossil deposits in the United States, yielding bones of ~70 species of animals, birds, and sea creatures. About 80% of the bones belong to plains animals, such as camels, horses, mammoths, etc. Bears, wolves, large cats, and a bird with an estimated 30-foot wingspan are also represented. Mixed in with all the land animals are sharks’ teeth, turtle shells, and the bones of fresh and saltwater fish. The bones are all smashed and jumbled together, as if by some catastrophe. The big question for scientists is how bones from such different ecological niches—plains, forests, and ocean—came together in the same place.

Evidene Of Rapid Cementation:

It doesn’t take millions of years for a bone to become fossilized. Researchers have found that chicken bones and wood can be petrified, in just five to ten years. Perhaps a dinosaur bone would only take a hundred years to completely mineralize. Besides, not all fossil remains have yet turned to stone. Pieces of the original shell and bone are commonly present in strata as well as soft tissue.

Question #3: What About The Sequence In Which Fossils Are Found? Doesn’t It Prove Evolutionary Development?

The sequence in which fossils are found does not prove evolutionary development. Rather, it is evidence of sorting and differential abilities to escape floodwaters. Let’s consider these:

·         The types of fossils preserved—95% of all fossils are marine creatures, particularly shellfish. That makes sense considering ocean waters swept up from the ocean bottom onto the land. The other 5% is plants and land invertebrates. Less than 1/5% are vertebrates—mostly fish, and most land vertebrate fossils consist of one bone.

·         The order of burial—This is the evidence used for evolution. Burial sequence could definitely be influenced by where the organisms lived. Finding fossils in groups suggests that the rising floodwaters buried different ecological zones. You’d expect that large numbers of various marine organisms would be buried together. Above them are the free-swimming vertebrates. Then, at the higher elevations—birds, mammals, and finally man because the ability to escape would affect burial. Larger creatures can climb or swim; plants can float. Both could be buried later in the process. But, that’s not all…

·         Hydrodynamic sorting—Floodwater sorts out objects according to similar shape and size. Streamlined objects settle out first; larger creatures with arms and tails settle out last. And, based on the nature of churning water and wave action, there is reason to believe that many initial sediment deposits were reworked and deposited elsewhere. So, you can’t go by the way they are found in the layers anyway. Since flood conditions are ideal for forming fossils, finding fossils in groups suggests that the rising floodwaters buried different ecological zones. The geologic column shows the usual sequence in which the rising floodwaters buried plants and animals from their different zones. It would be expected for large quantities and varieties of marine organisms to be buried together. Larger creatures that could climb or swim would be buried later; plants could float and also would be buried later. Again, the evidence matches the prediction. A lot of water; not a lot of time!!

There are over 2000 documented examples of fossils found that don’t fit into the evolutionary sequence, called Out-Of-Place fossils. There are examples of entire rock layers being out of place with “older” fossils overlying “younger” fossils. All of which are explained away without reason.

Conclusion:

The fossil record is best understood as the result of a marine cataclysm that utterly annihilated the continents and land dwellers. Genesis 7:23 “Every living thing on the face of the earth was wiped out.” You would expect to find…Billions of dead things buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth. The evidence matches the prediction.

Was The Flood Regional Or Global?

Here are 7 clues from scripture that the Genesis Flood was global and not just regional or local.

·         Global Flood Clue #1: Size of the Ark. Need for an Ark. Genesis 6:14-16, 19-21. Texas Size!!! Its size, construction, and stocking would be totally unnecessary for a local flood—a lot of work and materials. Why bother? God would have told Noah and his family to move to another area.

·         Global Flood Clue #2: Purpose of the Flood. Genesis 6:17-18. To wipe out wickedness and violence on the earth. If the purpose of destruction was for the punishment of sin on earth, the purpose couldn’t be accomplished if only part of humanity had been affected.

·         Global Flood Clue #3: Depth of the Flood. Genesis 7:17-24. The Flood covered “all the high mountains under the entire heavens” by ~22 feet which may have been the draft of the Ark. It would have taken that much water just to get the Ark floating. All breathing creatures outside the Ark perished. None escaped by swimming, climbing, or flying. The Hebrew translated “covered” is kasah, which means “overwhelmed to the point of washing away.” Psalm 104:6 refers to this part of the Flood, “You covered it with the deep as with a garment; the waters stood above the mountains.”

·         Global Flood Clue #4: Duration of Flood. More than 40 days!! 21 weeks of rising and prevailing; 31 weeks of receding. Total = 371 days. Not a typical local flood. The Hebrew word translated “prevailed” means that the floodwaters were “overwhelmingly mighty.” Job 12:15 refers to this, If he holds back the waters, there is drought; if he lets them loose, they devastate the land.

·         Global Flood Clue #5: Use of universal terms, >30 times—all, every, everything. Wording of entire record— 6:17; 7:4 (every), 19 (all), 21-23 (“everything, all” which God Himself uses). The word God uses for the Genesis Flood is not the same word used for a local flood in the rest of the Old Testament. Also, the phrase “all under the entire (whole) heavens” is a double emphasis in the Hebrew.

·         Global Flood Clue #6: Promise of No More Floods. Genesis 9:15. There have been many floods, even regional foods, even in Mesopotamia since Noah’s day. If this was merely local flood, then God broke His promise, and the rainbow covenant means nothing.

·         Global Flood Clue #7: The Rest of Scripture. Genesis, 2 Peter 2:5; 3:5-6; Isaiah 34:9; Psalm 29:10; 104:6-9; 1 Peter 3:20; Hebrews 11:7. Jesus clearly stated in Luke 17:26-27 that all men were destroyed by the Flood. See also Matthew 24:39. Also, God’s covenant w/Noah after Flood is meaningless if only part of humanity had been involved. The New Testament uses kataklusmos (cataclysm) for the Flood rather than the usual Greek word for flooding.

It had to be universal and it had to have left lots of evidence!!

Sources For Further Study:

1. Noah’s Flood Q & A, Answers in Genesis website

2. The Genesis Flood, Henry Morris and John Whitcomb.

3. The Genesis Record, Henry Morris.

4. There are a number of excellent videos about the Flood—Evidences: The Record and the Flood; Raging Waters; Fossils and the Flood; The World That Perished

5. Double Tragedies Frozen in Time, Dr. Joachim Vetter, www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v12/i4/lime.asp

6. Sensational Dinosaur Blood Report, Carl Wieland, Creation 19(4), September 1997 at /www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v19/i4/blood.asp

7. Florida Fossils Puzzle the Experts, Carol Armstrong, Creation Research Society Quarterly, 21:198, 1985

8. The Yellowstone Petrified Forests, Jonathan Sarfati, Creation 21(2), March 1999 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v21/i2/yellowstone.asp.

9. Dinosaur National Monument: Jurassic Park Or Jurassic Jumble? at http://www.icr.org/article/106.

Related Topics: Creation, Evolution

15. CATASTROPHE: The New World

Related Media

Noah and the other occupants of the Ark stepped out into a very different world from the one they had previously known. Consider some of the implied physical changes to the world after the Flood:

1) The oceans were much more extensive, since they now contained all the Flood waters;

2) The possible thermal vapor blanket had been dissipated, so that strong temperature differentials were inaugurated;

3) Mountain ranges uplifted after the Flood emphasized the more rugged topography of the post-Flood continents;

4) Winds and storms were possible for the first time, as well as rain and snow;

5) The environment was much more hostile to man, especially because of the harmful radiations from space no longer being filtered out by the possible vapor canopy, resulting in gradual reduction in human longevity;

6) Tremendous glaciers, rivers and lakes existed, with the world only gradually approaching its present semi-arid state;

7) The lands were barren, until plant life could be re-established through the sprouting of seeds and cuttings buried near the surface.

(Adapted from The Beginning of the World, by Dr. Henry Morris, page 131)

Day One Study

Read Genesis 8:15-22.

The covenant (promise) God made with Noah before the Flood apparently became the standard for ancient governments and contracts after the Flood between a king and his subjects in which sovereign protection is offered in exchange for faithful obedience.

1. Read Genesis 6:13-22; 7:1-9; 7:13-16. What protection did God offer Noah? What was Noah’s responsibility?

2. During the Flood, God made good on His promise, carrying out His sovereign protection of Noah. After the Flood, how did Noah show his thankfulness to God for this protection? [Note: this is the first mention of an altar in the Bible. The first mention of a concept or practice is always significant to understanding its meaning for the rest of Scripture.]

3. Discuss Genesis 8:21-22.

·         Why and how was God pleased?

·         What did He declare?

·         How does His promise affect us?

4. Read Genesis 9:8-17. (We will cover verses 1-7 later in the lesson.) God establishes a new covenant with Noah that does not depend upon anyone’s faithful obedience. This is an unconditional divine promise. What are the terms of this new covenant, AND what is the sign that God gives that He is keeping His promise?

5. The rainbow as a sign of the new covenant obviously had significant meaning to Noah. [It may have been a new thing for Noah to see.] As a symbol associated with God, it is also found in 3 other Scripture passages. How is it used?

·         Ezekiel 1:28—

·         Revelation 4:1-6—

·         Revelation 10:1—

Day Two Study

6. Read Genesis 9:1-7. Compare 9:1-4 with Genesis 1:28-30. What remains the same? What has changed?

·         SAME—

·         CHANGED—

7. Discuss the meaning of Genesis 9:5-6. Refer to the additional verses for understanding. What does God value? What responsibility does He delegate to man? (See “Deeper Discoveries” at the end of the lesson for an article to read concerning this issue.)

·         Genesis 9:5-6—

·         Exodus 21:12-14, 28-32—

·         Numbers 35:16-32—

CONCLUSION:

Read Genesis 9:18-29.

8. This is a less than noble picture of Noah. What do you think is the reason for this incident to be recorded in Scripture for us?

9. Noah’s sons reacted differently to their father’s drunken state, which revealed their character. Discuss the reactions and character of…

·         Ham—

·         Shem & Japheth—

10. Parents often have great insight into the strengths and weaknesses of their children. What did Noah discern and prophesy about each of his sons?

·         Japheth [the oldest, whose name means enlargement/extension/prosperity]

·         Shem [whose name means honor/authority/character]—

·         Ham [the youngest, whose name means hot/swarthy]

11. Why do you think Noah didn’t curse Ham but instead cursed Canaan, one of Ham’s sons?

12. What is God’s opinion regarding mocking/disrespecting one’s parents? See Exodus 20:12 and Ephesians 6:1-3.

Appreciation Application:

13. Skeptics dismiss the idea of a global flood and claim that Noah’s Flood was merely local. Read Genesis 9:11 again. We still have local and regional floods that are often very destructive and deadly. Does that mean God has broken His promise? Why or why not? What assurance is there for us today that His promised protection is still operating?

Day Three Study

Appreciation Assignment:

14. Can you think of 10 wonderful reasons to honor your parents? Will you tell them? What 10 wonderful reasons do your children have for honoring you? What reasons would you like for them to have?

15. Recall a time when you saw a particularly special rainbow. What did you think about? What do you like about rainbows? What makes them special? Think about what you discovered in this lesson about rainbows. Praise God and thank Him now for His promise. Feel free to use any creative means to do so.

Deeper Discoveries:

Read “Creation Answers: Receding Waters” and “Creation Answers: A Brave New World” following this lesson.

Consider: In what ways was the post-flood world different in physical aspect from the pre-flood world? What evidences of the flood can we still see in the present structure of the earth’s surface?

An excellent article on “Capital Punishment” by Kerby Anderson can be read online at www.probe.org. SEARCH “Capital Punishment.”

Go to www.answersingenesis.org and SEARCH anything related to Noah and his sons, the rainbow. Select an article to read or watch a video. Also visit www.icr.org and search.

Creation Answers: Receding Waters

The information below is adapted from articles found on www.icr.org and www.answersingenesis.org plus others sourced at the end.

Many people seem to think that Noah’s Ark was a product of ancient folklore, a myth. But there is growing evidence that the account cannot be taken lightly. An ever-increasing number of scientists believe that geologic evidence indicates the worldwide Flood as described in the book of Genesis, was an actual historical fact. The formation of the ocean basins is one of the most perplexing questions to geologists. Equally perplexing is the uplifting of the mountains.

God’s Grace Displayed Again

After the first five months, God did three specific things on behalf of Noah, his family, and the animals on the Ark.

1) God closed the ocean geysers and restrained (limited, restricted) the rain so that it was no longer torrential. The waters stopped rising. Genesis 8:3 says the water “decreased”, meaning the height had been reached by then and started falling down at that time.

2) God caused the Ark to come to rest on the mountains of Ararat. This is God’s grace also, to protect the occupants from what happened next.

3) God put forces into place to turn the raging waters into receding waters. Genesis 8:1 says He sent a wind. Psalm 104 gives us other clues about what God did at this time.

The psalmist said in Psalm 104:6-9. “The watery deep covered it [the earth] like a garment; the waters reached above the mountains. Your shout made the waters retreat; at the sound of your thunderous voice they hurried off – as the mountains rose up, and the valleys went down – to the place you appointed for them. You set up a boundary for them that they could not cross, so that they would not cover the earth again.”

“Rebuke” (verse 7) implies the waters were a chaotic force to be calmed and conquered.

Notice that the mountains rose up, the ocean basins sank. The continents were raised up above sea level as new mountain chains were formed. That just doesn’t happen without a lot of lava also being released. Water ran downhill forming new valleys and filling large, deep ocean basins now defined by the nearly vertical continental edges. God altered earth’s topography to set the boundary.

What Evidence Would We Expect To Find?

·         Continents once below sea level having thick deposits, especially marine

·         Soft sediments folded, thrust, overturned and uplifted in a short time

·         Massive volcanic deposits throughout the rock record.

·         Mass erosional features from receding waters.

·         Larger and deeper ocean basins to hold the receding water.

The landforms we see today are a result of the Flood, not Creation or millions of years. Let’s examine the evidence.

New Landforms

During the Flood, the break up of the crust must have released tremendous amounts of water, magma, and associated heat. And the erosion of the pre-Flood mountains and land surfaces had resulted in great quantities of sediments being deposited in the seas. This undoubtedly left earth’s crust in a highly unstable condition very possibly resulting in a redistribution of weight on the surface and a shifting of land surfaces. It is highly probable that the post-Flood continents were once the bottom of the pre-Flood seas.

Uplift Of Sediment-Covered Land

The continents were obviously once below sea level. Thick water-laid sediments full of marine fossils are deposited on them. Those same rocks have been uplifted thousands of feet, folded, thrust and overturned on a gigantic scale. Major faults (due to cracking and shifting of rock) dominate the landscape. Even in the United States. It is believed that most of the present mountain ranges have been uplifted almost simultaneously and during relatively recent times (70 million years ago). Marine fossils are found at the top of the highest mountains, including Mt. Everest!! The question is not their existence but how recently were they formed and how long did it take?

Scientists say the terrain where today’s mountains exist, in most cases, was nearly flat and near sea level when the recent intense pulse of uplift began. Not only flat, but also covered with thousands of feet of fossil-rich sediment. Marine fossils are found at the top of the highest mountains, including the Himalayas and the Andes.

·         These are very difficult to explain for evolutionary geologists. No continents are underwater today for the simple reason that continental crust is made of lighter rock than oceanic crust making the continents more buoyant in the mantle like Styrofoam on water.

·         And, nowhere can you find flatness of a shallow continental sea for hundreds of miles in all directions as the sediment deposits demand. And, have it stay that way for millions of years as pile after pile of sediment is laid down.

·         Grand Canyon is currently 7-8000 ft above sea level. The land supposedly went up and down several times, remaining almost completely flat. The ocean was over the continent each time. Harder to believe than considering it a onetime event!

·         And, it appears that all the world’s mountains rose almost simultaneously just a “few million years” ago—yesterday in earth’s history.

The big question then is how recent, and how long did it take?

The Model

1. Release of water and magma would cause readjusting of oceans and continents. As new ocean floors cooled, the rock became denser and sunk deeper into the mantle allowing water to flow off the continents. Movement of the water off the continents and into the oceans would have weighed down the ocean floor more and lightened the continents, resulting in the further sinking of the ocean floor, as well as upward movement of the continents.

2. The collision of the tectonic plates would have pushed up mountain ranges also, especially towards the end of the Flood.

How Are Mountains Formed?

Mountains form by folding of rock layers (the Appalachians, Arbuckles of Oklahoma), faulting (the Guadalupe Mountains and Big Bend region of west Texas), volcanic eruption above the surface or bulging from below after hardening below the surface (Mt St Helens, Stone Mountain in Georgia), uplift of land above sea level (the Ozarks), or a combination of the four (the Rockies). What would the evidence be that such activity didn’t take millions of years?

Strata Is Too Tightly Bent For Extended Time

According to the evolutionary view, many rocks were already hundreds of millions of years old at the time of uplift. There is a problem with this view. The strata are too tightly bent!! In many mountainous areas, strata thousands of feet thick are bent and folded into hairpin shapes. If the rocks were old at the time of folding and uplift, having been deeply buried and cemented for years, they should behave in a brittle fashion, shattering in the process. No gradual process can deform rocks into tight folds under normal temperature conditions without fracturing them. Once a rock becomes hard, it is extremely difficult to bend it without breaking it. Rocks would be expected to behave in a hard “brittle” fashion, not a soft “plastic” fashion. Closer examination of many folded rock layers indicate that they were formed while still in a soft, uncemented state. Most of these show no evidence that the rocks were subjected to high temperature and pressure. The evidence points toward “Soft Sediment Deformation.” Examples:

·         Grand Canyon—the same rocks that are perfectly flat at Grand Canyon village are standing in a near-vertical orientation a short distance away. The Tapeats Sandstone, now a very hard rock, was bent from horizontal to vertical in a space of 100 feet or so. It is supposedly 550 million years old. Yet, the time of bending was 480 million years later! No evidence exists of the cement binding the grains together having been broken. In order for folding to take place without fracturing, each grain in the rock layer has to rotate. So, it had to be done while they were still soft, like mashed potatoes moving—every grain had to rotate. This is called plastic deformation. But it only takes a few hundred years at best for sandy sediments to turn to stone in the presence of high overburden pressure and adequate cement. Evidently, the Tapeats wasn’t very old. This eliminates time— folding occurred less than millions of years after deposition.

·         The situation at the Grand Canyon is far from unique. There are many other places where now very hard rocks must have been deformed while in a soft, unconsolidated condition. The Rocky Mountains are full of such occurrences. The Appalachian Mountains likewise. Closer to home: the Arbuckles in southern Oklahoma. One such occurrence might be passed off as an anomaly, but the world is full of examples of soft sediment deformation, just as it should be if the earth is young and the Flood is really responsible for most of the world’s geologic features.

Injected Sandstone Dikes Shorten Time

Rockwall, TX is named after some very unusual rock walls—sandstone and limestone dikes (a vertical, wall-like feature buried underground) that are several miles long and 150 ft high. Contrary to the popular rumor spread by local citizens, they are not walls built by a prehistoric race of giants. They were evidently squeezed upward from a sandstone layer below into a thick limestone layer now found at the surface. But, old-earth geologists say the source sandstone bed was already millions of years old at the time of the squeezing. Yet, there is no evidence of cracking or breaking in the sandstone dikes. All points to the sand being semi-fluid when it was squeezed into the overlying cracks. Many similar sandstone dikes are found elsewhere such as west of Colorado Springs and in Kodachrome Basin State Park, Utah.

Massive Volcanic Activity Also Built Up The Land.

During the past, lava evidently flowed much more freely than now—spouting from craters, and pushing upward from immense cracks. Lava built up the land as volcanic rocks mixed with sedimentary rocks everywhere. Huge quantities of granite bulged up from below the surface to form great domes such as Pikes Peak and Enchanted Rock. Ps 104:32 says, He touches the mountains and they smoke. Some examples are:

·         Columbia Plateau in the Northwestern U.S.—Built up by oozing lava flows stacked one on top of another in rapid succession, covering 65,000 square miles in Washington, Oregon and Idaho and northern California several thousand feet deep AND built Earth’s most stupendous rock formation, stretching for a thousand miles along the shores of Canada and Alaska. The eruptions, probably occurring during the late Flood or early post-Flood, produced a lake of lava thousands of times larger than anything witnessed in historic times.

·         Indias Deccan Plateau—This is formed by a lava deposit that is two miles thick!! No doubt, lava poured out of the earth for years after the Flood ended.

·         Mt. AraratOne of the volcanic mountains formed in an earlier period of the Flood is Mount Ararat along with other similar mountains in the upland regions of what is now Armenia. The Ararat region abounds in what is known as pillow lava, a dense lava rock formed under great depths of water. The mountains also include certain sedimentary formations containing marine fossils.

Uplift Of Land Above Sea Level Resulted In Enlarged, Defined Ocean Basins.

As the water and magma burst forth and reduced pressure under the ocean basins, and the waters of the canopy washed down into the ocean basins, you would have a shifting of isostatic equilibrium, meaning the heavier rocks would sink and the lighter ones would rise. Supposedly the continental rocks are lighter than what is at the bottom of the oceans! The Grand Canyon is currently 7-8000 ft above sea level yet it supposedly went up and down several times as layers were deposited and eroded. The ocean was over the continent each time. That is harder to believe than a onetime event!

Continental shelves and slopes plus drowned submarine canyons indicate sea level was once several thousand feet lower than today. Some parts of the sea bottom have obviously dropped. Lots of “seamounts”—nonvolcanic, flat-topped drowned islands— exist in the middle of the ocean. No explanation. Actually, most of the earth is still covered with water from the Flood. Over 70% of earth’s surface is submerged at an average depth of over 2 miles. Much water is stored in the form of huge continents of ice at the north and south poles. It is also said that if you could level off the land and the ocean bottom, the ocean would cover the earth’s surface to a depth of 2 miles.

The Waters Receded

Once the crust began to move (the previous land surfaces downward to form the new ocean basins, the previous sea bottoms and their new deposits of stratified sediments upward to form the new continents), the waters began to drain off the emerging lands, “and the water receded steadily from, the earth” (Genesis 8:3). According to Dr. Henry Morris, the expression in the Hebrew indicates a rapid subsidence, as would have been expected under the circumstances. What would you expect to find? What do you find?

Leveled Land With Remnant High Spots

The rapidly receding floodwaters have left behind leveled-off land with remnant high spots, terraces from receding water levels, and huge drainage gullies. Initially, rapid withdrawal of water would have scoured wide, flat surfaces across the landscapes though sometimes being deflected around resistant areas forming remnant hills, mesas and buttes. Some examples are:

·         Llano Estacado or Staked PlainThis landform stretches from Glen Rio, Texas, to Santa Rosa, New Mexico. Early travelers put stakes into the ground to find their way from place to place on this almost featureless surface. Looks like a countertop that has been wiped clean.

·         Mesas and Buttes—Some areas resisted the sheet erosion so formed the mesas (wide ridges) and buttes (narrow ridges) in west Texas, New Mexico and other places in the west such as Monument Valley. If you have driven from here to Albuquerque NM, you’ve seen lots of these.

·         Devils Tower—This is the throat of a volcano that has a flat top. As overlying sediments were removed, the top of the already cooled lava forming Devil’s Tower was leveled off. And, the softer sediments were removed from around it. By the way, the presence of the vertical joints is evidence of ample available water to migrate into the rock, evaporate and exit out thus cooling the rock. The next time you notice these interesting vertical columns at a tourist site, think of the Genesis Flood.

·         Gulf Coast sediment basins—The Great Plains in the heartland of America became one gigantic alleyway of floodwaters draining off the continent. And, all the eroded sediment had to go somewhere. It may be found along the Gulf Coast—extending through the coastal lands and onto the present continental shelf. Wedge-shaped deposits, thicker on the Gulf end (40,000 feet) and nearly horizontal (tilting 1˚), extend from the Dallas area toward the Gulf. A surface rock layer near Nacogdoches is buried 14,000 feet below Galveston. It would have taken more water power than the few river systems located in east and southeast Texas—the Sabine, Trinity, Brazos, and Colorado—to lay down up to 40,000 feet of sediments, thousands of square miles in area! The inland edge was uplifted by faulting which further enhanced drainage and cementing of the sediments.

One other thing: Massive sheet erosion might explain the absence of human and large animal fossils in the remaining Flood sediments. The last to be buried—the floating, less streamlined creatures—would be the first to get eroded away and redeposited in the ocean basins.

Terraces And Valleys

Other evidences of receding waters are terraces and remnant valleys.

·         Terraces—Terraces are water lines left behind by subsiding water. Ancient water lines can be clearly seen along the coasts of all continents. California cities are built on them.

·         Great Inland LakesAs the waters drained off the continents, every bowl-shaped basin became a lake. Terraces are also found along the great inland lakes that have now dried, such as Lake Bonneville, Death Valley.

·         Carved Valleys Adopted by Rivers—In less flat areas, the receding waters would split into channels, which cut deep valleys in the soft, unconsolidated earth. Practically all river valleys are far deeper and wider than their present river systems require indicating they once carried a far greater volume of water. More in line with a flood than river erosion.

So, there’s evidence of receding waters. A lot of water, not a lot of time.

Deepened Oceans

Studying the continental shelves and slopes plus drowned canyons extending out from land-based rivers indicates that sea level was once several thousand feet lower than it is today. Some parts of the sea bottom have definitely dropped. This is particularly noticeable in oceanic “seamounts” (or, guyots)—about 70,000 volcanic, flat-topped drowned islands in the middle of the ocean. The cones have been seemingly chopped off at an average depth of 5-6,000 feet below sea level. Evidently, those volcanoes on the ocean floor grew up to the surface of the lowered ocean where their peaks were eroded and flattened by wave action. Later, sea level rose several thousand feet as ocean basins sank deeper, water continually drained off the land, and glaciers melted. No explanation for the seamounts being there.

Conclusion

The earth’s features appear to have been fashioned largely by rapid, catastrophic processes that affected the earth on a global scale. Could it be the effects of the Genesis Flood? Yes. The evidence matches the prediction. A lot of water, not a lot of time.

Sources For Further Study

1. What Geologic Processes Were Operating during the Flood?, John Morris, Back to Genesis #189, September 2004, page d.

2. When Did the Mountains Rise?, John Morris, Back to Genesis, March 2005, page d.

3. Recent Rapid Uplift of Todays Mountains, John Baumgardner, Impact #381, March 2005.

4. Warped Earth, David Allen, Creation 25(1), December 2002, pages 40-43. www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v25/i1/warped.asp

5. Were the Huge Columbia River Basalts Formed the Flood?, John Morris, Back to Genesis #185, May 2004.

6. Devils Tower and Bible Glasses, Tas Walker, Creation 24(3) June 2002 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v24/i3/devils_tower.asp

7. Creation Road Trip, Dave and Mary Jo Nutting at www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v1/n1/creation-road-trip.

8. Creation Road Trip: More Destinations, at www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v1/n1/creation-road-trip-more.

9. Utahs Testimony to Catastrophe, Andy McIntosh, May 8, 2007 at www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n2/utah-testimony-catastrophe.

10. Evidence for the Run-off of Flood Waters, Michael Oard, audio at http://www.answersingenesis.org/events/bio.aspx?Speaker_ID=24.

11. Noah’s Flood Q & A, Answers in Genesis website

12. Grand Canyon: Monument to the Flood DVD, book.

13. The Genesis Flood, Henry Morris and John Whitcomb.

14. The Genesis Record, Henry Morris.

15. In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood, Dr. Walt Brown. Online version at www.creationscience.com/onlinebook.

16. There are a number of excellent videos about the Flood—Evidences: The Record and the Flood; Raging Waters; Fossils and the Flood; The World That Perished

Creation Answers: A Brave New World

The information below is adapted from articles found on www.icr.org and www.answersingenesis.org plus others sourced at the end.

Noah and the other occupants of the Ark bravely stepped out into a very different world from the one they had previously known. The land looked different. He wouldn’t have recognized any familiar landmarks. New rivers and lakes needed to be explored and named. The mountains were higher and more rugged looking. Seeds and cuttings buried near the surface would be sprouting. But, the lush forests were gone. There must have been a sense of aloneness on this vast land.

But, the land surface quickly took on the look of a mature landscape, one that had been there a long time. Why do I say this? Because observations in the world show that mature landscapes don’t take millions of years to develop.

Rapidly Developed Mature Landscapes—How Long Did It Take?

Erosion of fresh surfaces takes place very rapidly then slows down as equilibrium is reached with the stability of the surface, plant coverage, etc. Just watch a recent excavation and preparation of land for building. If it rains right after sloping land is smoothed out, gullies will form in the soft land with little effort. Over the next few weeks, if it rains again, the gullies will deepen. But, that will stop as grass and weeds take hold on the unconsolidated earth and as the size of the gully becomes adequate to handle water flow on that slope. It will stop changing. And, within a few months, the slope will look like it had been there for years. You’ve seen that before, haven’t you?

New Landscapes Look Old

Mature looking landscapes such as those in mountains or on islands don’t take long to develop. We don’t have continents going up and down below sea level to observe, but volcanic mountains make excellent laboratories.

·         Surtsey IslandIn 1963, Surtsey Island was born in the ocean near Iceland. Within 3-5 months, the waves had reworked the island edges into level, sandy beaches. Within a few years, wind and rain had weathered the lava into soil for hollows and glens to become lush meadows. The official Icelandic geologist Sigurdur Thorarinsson wrote for National Geographic in 1964: “… in one week’s time we witness changes that elsewhere might take decades or even centuries … Despite the extreme youth of the growing island, we now encounter a landscape so varied that it is almost beyond belief.” Another scientist said, “…it gives the appearance of being thousands of years old.”

·         Mt. St. HelensThe same thing has been seen at Mount St. Helens over the past 25 years. Within just three years, 90% of the original plant species were already growing within the blast zone. Return of many animals soon followed. So, today the diversity of species living in the area is approaching its pre-eruption levels.

It’s not reasonable to assume that the earth has always been shaped by passive everyday processes. If, however, the bulk of the past geologic activity took place under intense conditions in a brief space of time, it’s not unreasonable to determine that mature landscapes could have developed within a few years rather than millions of years.

Caves Developed

Another landform that is attributed to millions of years of development is the underground cave. But, the evidence does not agree. So, let’s look at it:

1) Caves Form In Limestone Rock.

To have large caves like Mammoth cave and Carlsbad Caverns, you need great thicknesses of limestone. These are found all over the earth’s surface. Dallas and Fort Worth are both built on very thick limestone layers. We have small caves throughout our area. Creation scientists believe that most limestone layers accumulated during the Flood because they normally contain large numbers of catastrophically buried fossils (usually corals and shellfish) buried in limey mud.

To get that you need lots of dissolved calcium and carbon dioxide (already present in the ocean water) plus a change in temperature. During the Flood, volcanoes added massive heat to the ocean. The warmer the water, the more the dissolved CO2 changes to CO3, (called carbonate) which quickly combines with calcium to form the mineral calcium carbonate. CaCO3 is heavier than water so it drops out. This is the source material for limestones. So, increase in ocean temperature would be associated with increased lime muds available for deposit. Nowhere on the earth is limestone being deposited on such a mass scale. But, limey muds being deposited are cementing within a few years showing that this is possible.

These limey muds were buried rapidly under huge amounts of other sediments. The weight on top of the lime sediments would compact them, and tend to expel the water they contained, probably through internal cracks formed while the sediments were hardening. Mud tends to form cracks when it dries. The stage is set for caves.

2) Earth Movements Uplifted The Land.

Floodwaters receded and eroded the sediment layers above so that the layers of lime sediments would now again be near the surface. Groundwater would continue to permeate the limestone along those internal cracks where the rock would have been weakest. This happens today.

3) Acidic Groundwater Dissolves The Calcium Carbonate.

Calcium carbonate dissolves in acid. For months after the floodwater receded, excess groundwater made acidic by volcanic ash or decaying organic matter would be moving through these new semi-soft rocks below the water table, dissolving the rock. A new cave system would develop at that level.

Geologist Steve Austin studied the famous Mammoth Cave Upland region of Kentucky and determined that a cave 180 feet long and 3 feet square could form in one year. If even remotely similar rates of formation occurred elsewhere, huge caverns obviously could form in a very short time. On the contrary, at the rate those caves are being dissolved now, nothing would have been left after the supposed two million years age of those caves.

4) Drier Conditions Leave Caves Exposed.

When the excess groundwater drains away, the water table would be at a lower level so that the newly hollowed caves would be filled with air instead of water. Surface water continues to flow downward creating the stalactites, stalagmites, and flowstone in the cave systems.

These are known to form more rapidly than the usual “thousands of years explanation” when adequate water is present. In tropical areas, caves and their formations develop much faster than those in more temperate regions because of higher annual rainfall. Large stalactites are also found growing everywhere—in shopping centers, schools, universities, and even in multi-storey car parks. None of those are older than 100 years! One stalagmite in Carlsbad had grown so fast it was able to preserve a complete bat before the creature had time to decompose. A newly formed cave in Mexico has crystals as large as telephone poles that scientists say may have formed in 30-100 years because of the extreme temperatures and humidity.

Conclusion: It’s possible to consider that caves and their formations resulted more from the after-effects of the Genesis Flood than through slow and gradual processes over millions of years.

Canyons

A third landform often stated as Exhibit A for an old earth is the canyon. Especially the famous canyons like Palo Duro Canyon near Amarillo and, of course, the Grand Canyon. Just how long did it take?

The official story on the Grand Canyon is this: the rocks demonstrate slow and gradual processes over eons. The fossils document evolution’s march through time, with simple creatures at the bottom and complex ones at the top. The Colorado River took 70 million years to erode the Canyon. With such an authoritative story who could doubt?

Well, there is room to doubt, and even many old-earth advocates are revising their views, talking about catastrophic deposition and runaway erosion within the last one million years. They aren’t talking about Noah’s flood yet, but they might as well be!

Recent events have cast a new light on canyon formation that address several observations such as the fact that nearly all canyons are vastly larger than the river system it contains. Here are two examples:

·         A new canyon formed last century near Walla Walla, Washington in less than 6 days. In March 1926, an obstruction in a series of irrigation ditches, built in 1904, forced dammed up water to be diverted to a small side ditch (10 ft deep, 6 ft wide). In less than a week, what once was an insignificant ditch became a gully, then a gulch then a miniature Grand Canyon——1500 ft long, 120 ft deep—carved through silt, sand and solid rock!

·         At Mount St. Helens in one day’s time, layers of ancient solid rock, 500-ft thick, were eroded by fast-moving mud flows and water to produce several mature looking canyons 100 feet deep only 4 years after the initial eruption. Later, creeks formed at the bottom of the canyons. The canyons caused the creeks, not vice versa!! Is this a clue to post-Flood canyon formation? Gravity plus a lot of water; not a lot of time.

The Grand Canyon did get eroded, but probably not by the Colorado River. Examining the evidence reveals that erosion was rapid, not so long ago, and the waters carried the debris far to the west, not like the modern Colorado River. The main erosional features are typically those of soft sediments, not hard rock.

One current explanation is called the “Breached Dam” theory. There’s evidence that large lakes once existed upstream. It is speculated the canyon formed as the natural dams were breached. Later the river developed at the bottom of the canyon.

As mentioned above, some geologists are grasping the idea, especially after recognizing that the Channeled Scablands of Washington were likely formed by waters breaching an ice dam holding back ancient Lake Missoula in Montana. Also, at Yellowstone National Park, a canyon called “The Grand Canyon of Yellowstone” is now said to have been gouged out in one week by the water that broke through an ice dam, of course hundreds of thousands of years ago! This is a good example of how even evolutionists recognize such canyons can be formed quickly—yet they mock when creationists talk about the catastrophic origin of the Grand Canyon in Arizona.

So it is possible to interpret Grand Canyon rocks as having been laid down by the Flood, the area uplifted late in the Flood year, with trapped Floodwaters carving out the canyon itself while draining off the uplifted continents. Interestingly enough, Havasupai Indian legend says that there was a flood over the earth, then the canyon formed by excessive drainage from the flood. Could Palo Duro Canyon in Texas have formed this way as water drained off the Llano Estacado? What about other large canyons?

It’s interesting that secular scientists are increasingly suggesting that catastrophic processes, including the mighty force of water, explain much about the earth’s surface today. These features truly could have been formed by a watery global catastrophe and the subsequent unstable earth, which occurred ~4,400 years ago. Landscapes are evidence of the work of gravity, wind and a lot of water, not necessarily a lot of time.

It was a New World for Noah and his family as well as for the animals.

How Did The Animals Spread Throughout The New World?

Well, if God brought the animals to Noah from all over the earth, He certainly could make sure they spread out again. There are some clues as to how animals get from one place to another.

1) Multiply And Migrate

As animals moved out from the mountains of Ararat, they would have most likely traveled by land. Populations of animals may have had centuries to migrate, relatively slowly, over many generations. As they migrated, they rapidly increased in number. A recent example of this was seen after the Mount St. Helens eruption in 1980 when the decimated elk herd bounced back through an increase of multiple births per cow allowing the herd to grow rapidly. Those populations may have separated from one another, thus allowing variation to develop as the gene pools were reduced.

2) Cross Land Bridges

We’ll talk about the Ice Age in the next section. But, one thing of note is that as ice formed on the continents, water was removed from the oceans lowering sea level somewhat. Land bridges connected separate landmasses were exposed, giving animals a means to get to different continents. Perhaps by swimming.

3) Catch Rides On Vegetation Mats

The animals could also have migrated by catching rides on vegetation mats floating on the ocean surface. When Krakatoa erupted in 1883, the island remnant remained lifeless for some years, but was eventually recolonized by a surprising variety of creatures—insects, birds, lizards, snakes and even a few mammals. One would not have expected some of this surprising array of creatures to have crossed the ocean, but they obviously did. Present day observations of lizards catching rides on vegetation mats in the Caribbean Sea confirm this.

4) Expect Some Not To Survive

The ancestors of present-day creatures and plants may have established daughter populations in different parts of the world, but most of these populations subsequently became extinct because they weren’t suited to that climate. Kangaroos didn’t make it in Africa, but the group in Australia survived. Hummingbirds didn’t make it in Europe, but the ones in North America survived. You wouldn’t expect to find fossils of those creatures in other parts of the world unless those fossils had been buried by the Flood.

It’s not a hurdle for creationists to explain how the animals migrated to various parts of the earth and established unique populations in single locations. For man and animals, they left the Ark to brave a new world.

Was There Really An Ice Age?

Besides all the changes in the landscape as floodwaters were draining off the land, the climate would have changed as well, at first in the polar regions, later among the tops of the new tall mountains. This could have brought on the “ice age.”

An “ice age” is a time of extensive glacial activity that covers a relatively large area with ice. During the Ice Age, which ended a few thousand years ago, 30% of the land surface of the earth was covered by ice. Less of Europe and Asia than you probably knew. In North America an ice sheet covered almost all of Canada and the northern United States. We know this from the deposits left behind by the advancing and retreating ice sheets plus other surface features. Today’s polar ice caps and alpine glaciers are the remains of those vast ice sheets. The evidence points to just one ice age, though.

The Big Freeze

To accumulate and maintain large sheets of ice requires 3 conditions: 1) increased evaporation, 2) increased snowfall, and 3) decreased snowmelt. Evolutionists find the cause of the Ice Age a mystery. Obviously the climate would need to be colder. But global cooling by itself is not enough, because then there would be less evaporation, so less snow. How is it possible to have both a cold climate and lots of evaporation? All three requirements are met by the Flood model, especially through extensive volcanic activity during and after the Flood and the residual warm oceans following the Flood. Let’s examine how these provided the conditions for an ice age.

Increased Evaporation

For increased evaporation, the key is more heat in the ocean.

·         The opening of the “fountains of the great deep” caused tremendous volcanic activity. We saw evidence for that last time in the massive volcanic deposits all over the earth. Extensive volcanic activity with large lava flows, particularly undersea, would have added huge amounts of heat to the ocean.

·         Also, movements in the earth’s crust would have released high-pressure outflows of deep, hot water reservoirs. The rapid Flood currents would mix the warm water, driving it from pole to pole. Warm water would prevent the formation of ice in the sea.

·         As a result, the warm ocean would have a much higher level of evaporation than that in the modern cool ocean. Under such conditions, most of the resulting snow would fall in the middle latitudes and polar regions.

·         Studies of ocean floor sediments show that the oceans were at one time 40˚ warmer than today. This would encourage evaporation and more snowfall available to higher latitudes and elevations. You would expect to find thick snow accumulation forming ice sheets.

Increased Snow Fall

The key to snow rather than rain falling in an area is cooling.

·         Warm water and cold continents are a recipe for powerful and continuous snowstorms, whose behavior can be estimated using basic weather principles.

·         Volcanoes cast volcanic dust and aerosols (very small particles) into the stratosphere where they were trapped for several years following the Flood. These particles would have reflected some of the sunlight back to space and caused cooler summers, mainly over large landmasses.

·         Extensive volcanic activity would have continued for a number of years after the Flood and then gradually declined. By the way, there is abundant geologic evidence of extraordinary volcanic activity during the Ice Age, which would have replenished the dust and aerosols in the stratosphere (the layer of the atmosphere from 12 to 21 miles above the earth’s surface). Ice cores taken from Greenland and Antarctica also show abundant volcanic particles and acids in the sections associated with the Ice Age.

Decreased Snow Melt

Slick continents, denuded of vegetation, would radiate heat back to the atmosphere. Volcanic ash would have reduced incoming solar radiation, enhancing the cooling. The result would be cooler summers, not necessarily colder winters. In 1883, Krakatoa in East Indies sent up 3 cubic miles of volcanic dust into the stratosphere, which was then distributed globally. This caused red sunsets for 10 years and lowered the average temperature of the earth 4˚ F for about 3 years. One volcano affecting the atmosphere for 10 years! So, it’s reasonable to conclude that conditions for creating an ice age were met by the Flood.

Evidence That Ice Can Accumulate Quickly

·         Two B-17 Flying Fortresses and 6 P-38 Lightning fighters landed on the Greenland ice sheet during WWII. These aircraft were buried under about 250 feet of ice and snow in about 50 years. This means the ice sheet has been accumulating at an average rate of 5 feet per year. So, at that rate of accumulation, the 4000-ft thick Greenland ice sheet could have formed within the past 4500 years rather than the 160,000 years claimed by evolutionary scientists.

·         A flag, tent and sledge left at the South Pole by Antarctic explorer Amundsen in 1911 are now 40 feet under the ice. Antarctica is drier so the ice is accumulating more slowly than in Greenland. But, that may not have always been the case.

How Long Did It Last?

Meteorologist Michael Oard who specializes in “ice age” studies speculates that the accumulation of ice to its maximum depth (average 2,300 ft) over much of the Northern Hemisphere would have taken about 500 years.

Taking into consideration ice sheet meltback (about 33 ft per year along the edge, but slower in the interior), the gigantic glacial ice sheets (after the peak in accumulation) would have melted within 200 years. Of course, Greenland and Antarctica would have continued to grow because of their high latitude and altitude. Thus, the total time for the Ice Age is a maximum of only about 700 years (500 years to accumulate, 200 years to melt).

This means that from about 2350 B.C. until 1650 B.C., the ice sheets seriously affected life in Europe and North America. Interestingly, there’s a possible reference to this time in the book of Job.

“From whose womb does the ice emerge, and the frost from the sky, who gives birth to it, when the waters become hard like stone, when the surface of the deep is frozen solid?” (Job 38:29-30)

Job lived near Arabia. God spoke to Job as though Job was aware of sheets of ice (glaciers—hard as stone) up north in Europe and ice packs covering the polar regions of the oceans. Job lived between the time of Noah and Abraham so the Ice Age must have followed soon after the Flood.

What About The Rest Of The Land?

Land close to the warm oceans and on either side of the equator would still have had a pleasantly warm climate like today. Two-thirds of the land was NOT covered by ice.

Present day deserts were well-watered. Israel is described in the Old Testament as a lush land flowing with “milk and honey” producing abundant, large fruit. Today, it’s dry and desert, made green and productive through irrigation. In the Sahara Desert, dwarf crocodiles survived into the 20th century and lived in isolated lakes or pools along several wadis of the high western Sahara. People once lived in the Sahara Desert along with a variety of tropical and aquatic animals. They have left countless stone tools, pottery, and pictures of those animals carved on the rocks. Explorers have even found fishhooks and harpoons!

If you had all that water tied up in glaciers, the ocean levels would be considerably lower, in fact the sea level was ~600 ft lower at this time. The evidence for this is the drop off from land’s edge to the continental slope edges. Because of this lowered sea level, land bridges connected continents and islands, thus assisting the migration of animals and later people after the Flood.

Eventually, the seas gradually cooled, so evaporation would decrease, therefore the snow supply for the continents would also decrease. And as the ash settled out of the atmosphere, it would allow sunlight through. So the ice sheets began to melt. Sometimes the melting would have been rapid enough for the rivers that drained these ice sheets to flood. These catastrophes would have happened about 700 years after the Flood. Sea level rose to its current level. Rain declined in the middle latitudes, too, so that deserts formed.

Remnants Of The Ice Age

When the ice began to melt, about 500 years after the Flood, large lakes would have built up. Sometimes, natural ice dams would have contained them for a while. But when these finally cracked, the lakes would have burst through. This water can have tremendous destructive power.

·         The Spokane Flood—Glacial Lake Missoula in Montana at the end of the Ice Age was perched behind an ice dam at 4,200 feet above sea level. Only Washington State stood between it and the Pacific Ocean. When this ice dam failed, 500 cubic miles of water poured westward across an area twice the size of New Jersey at freeway speed. This has been nicknamed the “Spokane Flood.” It scoured the basaltic bedrock carving giant channels that are now dry (called coulees), deposited gravel/boulder bars over 300 feet high, and left dried waterfalls that dwarf Niagara Falls. The resulting landform is the Channeled Scablands in eastern Washington State. The Grand Coulee, a trench 50-miles long, one to six miles wide, and 900 feet high, was chiseled through hard basalt and granite.

·         The Quick-freeze of the Arctic Ocean—Scientists are now considering a massive catastrophic burst of an ice dam in Siberia, on the scale of the Spokane Flood releasing huge amounts of fresh water into the Arctic Ocean. Salt water stays liquid below 32 °F and is denser than fresh water. So if melt-water poured into the Arctic Ocean, it would tend to float on top, and freeze. The resulting ice layer would cover much of the ocean’s surface. The air above this sea ice is deprived of heat and moisture from the ocean. The snow that soon falls will reflect much of the sunlight back to space, cooling the air further. As a result, there would be a tremendous cold front over the land, and the temperature over the adjacent land could drop 54 °F in a week. This, with the added wind chill, could possibly explain the frozen mammoth carcasses and the apparently sudden change in the climate.

·         Niagara Falls—As the ice sheets melted, some of the meltwater remained pressurized under the ice. This is believed to have carved out the Finger Lakes in New York State during the Ice Age, and a similar process may have excavated part of the Niagara Gorge. Water from the melting glaciers would have greatly swelled the flow of the Niagara River causing rapid erosion of the newly deposited and hardened rock beneath. Add to that any scouring by glacial ice or meltwaters beneath glaciers, only 4,400 years are needed for the present day gorge to form—well within the biblical time frame.

Ice Age Animals And People

We’re going to talk about this more in the next lesson. But, it’s significant to say that any groups of people moving north from where the ark rested in Turkey and where the populations were dispersed from Babel would naturally run into climatic conditions that are very harsh. This would affect how they daily lived and established communities, the ability to provide nourishing food, and the size of the populations. By the way, some animals grew to giant size after the Flood as well. The mammoth we’ve seen. Scientists can usually tell what deposits are post-Flood—they don’t have the same characteristics of the rapidly deposited Flood layers filled with drowned creatures. Some other bones of giants found in post-Flood deposits are: a camel 12 feet tall, deer

Conclusion

Everywhere, we see layer upon layer of sediment laid down by the sorting action of moving water and also find great fossil beds intermixed with the sediments. These fossils seem to have been formed by sudden burial from a tremendous flood which prevented their rapid decay and decomposition as minerals replaced their cellular structure. Our vast deposits of oil, natural gas, and coal are called fossils fuels. Evidence indicates that they are the carbonized remains of great masses of plant and marine life which were washed together. Today, after years of pressure, heat, and chemical changes, these buried remains form the great coal seams and oil reservoirs that fuel our modern economy.

More and more evolutionary geologists today are returning to the concept of local catastrophism as the explanation for all types of geological features and formations. Catastrophic events not everyday processes appear to explain the formation of mountain ranges, deposition of thick sequences of sedimentary rocks with fossils, initiation of the glacial age, and extinction of dinosaurs and other animals. More and more creationist geologists and other scientists are returning to the concept that all these local catastrophes were essentially contemporaneous and continuous, making up a complex which was nothing less than a worldwide cataclysm. If Noah’s Flood laid down the rocks and the fossils, there is no evidence left for evolution and an old earth. Because it so restructured the surface of the earth, any attempt to reconstruct earth history without using Noah’s Flood is doomed to failure.

So What? There are 14 references to the Flood in the NT including Jesus’ own words. Combined with all this evidence, it must be true! God’s Word Can Be Trusted

Sources For Further Study:

1. Setting the Stage for an Ice Age, Michael Oard, Answers 2(2), April 2007 at www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n2/setting-stage-for-ice-age.

2. Mammoth—Riddle of the Ice Age, Jonathan Sarfati, Creation magazine, 22(2), March 2000 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v22/i2/mammoth.asp.

3. Frozen in Time, Michael Oard, online book at www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/FIT/index.asp.

4. Tackling the big freeze, Interview with weather scientist Michael Oard, Creation 19(1), December 1996 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v19/i1/freeze.asp.

5. Mammoth Q&A at www.answersingenesis.org.

6. Ice Age Q&A at www.answersingenesis.org.

7. Mammoth among the pharaohs?, Dennis Swift, Creation magazine 19(4), September 1997 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v19/i4/mammoth.asp.

8. Ice Cores and the Age of the Earth, Larry Vardiman, Impact #226, April 1992.

9. The lost squadron, Carl Wieland, Creation magazine, 19(3), June 1997 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v19/i3/squadron.asp.

10. Niagara Falls and the Bible, Larry Pierce, Creation magazine, 22(4) September 2000 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v22/i4/niagara_falls.asp.

11. Lubenow, Marvin L. “Surtsey: A Micro-Laboratory for Flood Geology,” Creation Research Society Quarterly, Volume 16, June 1979 at www.creationresearch.org/crsq/abstracts/sum16_1.html.

12. Limestone Caves: A Result of Noahs Flood?, Robert Doolan, John Mackay, Dr Andrew Snelling and Dr Allen Hallby, Creation 9(4) September 1987 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v9/i4/caves.asp.

13. Do ancient stalactites really exist? Evan Jamieson, Creation 16(1), December 1993 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v16/i1/stalactites.asp.

14. Rapid Stalactites, by Stephen Meyers and Robert Doolan, Creation 9(4), September 1987 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v9/i4/stalactites.asp.

15. A Canyon in Six Days, John Morris, Creation 24(4), September 2002 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v24/i4/canyon.asp.

16. How did animals get from the Ark to places such as Australia? Don Batten (editor), Ken Ham, Jonathan Sarfati, and Carl Wieland, The Revised and Expanded Answers Book, Chapter 17 online at www.answersingenesis.org/Home/Area/faq/migration.asp.

17. Surtsey, the Young Island that Looks old, Carl Wieland, Creaiton magazine 17(2), March 1995 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i2/surtsey.asp.

18. After Devastation, the Recovery, Keith Swenson and David Catchpoole, Creation magazine 22(2), March 2000 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v22/i2/recovery.asp.

Related Topics: Creation, Evolution

16. CONFUSION: The Great Dispersion

Related Media

Genesis 10 occurred chronologically in accordance with Genesis 11:9. Genesis 9:19 boldly declares that the whole earth was populated from Noah’s sons. Chapter 10 tells us how; chapter 11 tells us why. We will be studying this in chronological order.

Historical Insight: One of the most amazing phenomena of human history is the strange fact that, despite the essential biological unity of all nations and “races, there are more than 3,000 different languages among men. Each language is significantly different from all others, and it is often true that the more primitive tribes use the more complex languages. All human languages are separated by an essentially infinite barrier from the sounds made by animals, although the vocal organs as such may not be greatly different. The origins of language in general and of languages in particular, are thus inexplicable in terms of evolution, and yet it is impossible to overestimate the importance of articulate, propositional (as distinct from merely reflexive or emotional) speech in the life of mankind.” Genesis 10-11 are the final chapters dealing with the nations in general as distinct from the chosen nation, Israel, and provide the only true explanation for the origin of languages. (Dr. Henry Morris, The Beginning of the World, p. 155)

Day One Study

Read Gen 11:1-9.

1. What information is given in verses 1-3? What advantages did a common speech give humankind?

2. Within 200 years, the population could have grown to several thousand, considering size of families and longevity. According to Genesis 11:4, what were four things the people wanted to do AND why?

3.  Discuss God’s assessment of their behavior and what He decided to do about it. Why?

4. Read Genesis 9:19; 10:1-5; Acts 17:26. On the map below, locate the names of Japheths descendants mentioned in this passage. Color the area around each one blue.

5. Which of Japheth’s descendants are represented in the following verses, and what information is given about them?

·         Ezekiel 27:19—

·         Isaiah 66:19; Ezekiel 27:13; 32:26—

·         Ezekiel 38:6—

·         Ezekiel 38:2; 39:6—

·         Revelation 20:8—

6. Read the information regarding Japheth’s descendants on the “Creation Answers: Civilization Restart” information pages at the end of this lesson.

Day Two Study

7. Read Genesis 10:6-20. On the map above, locate the names of Hams descendants mentioned in this passage. Color the area around each one yellow.

8. Which of Ham’s descendants are represented in the following verses, and what information is given about them?

·         Isaiah 18:1-2—

·         Jeremiah 46:9—

·         Ezekiel 30:1-9; 38:1-6—

9. In Genesis 10: 8-12, what information is given about Nimrod as a man and the nation he founded?

10. Read the information regarding Ham’s descendants on the “Creation Answers: Civilization Restart” information pages at the end of this lesson.

11. Read Genesis 10:21-32. On the above map, locate the names of Shems descendants mentioned in this passage. Color the areas around each one red.

12. Which of Shem’s descendants are represented in the following verses, and what information is given about them?

·         Jeremiah 49:34-36—

·         Numbers 24:20-24—

·         Ezekiel 27:23-24—

13. Peleg’s name means “division.” In Genesis 10:25, what information is given about the time period in which he was born?

14. Read the information regarding Shem’s descendants on the “Creation Answers: Civilization Restart” information pages at the end of this lesson.

Shem’s Descendants—One Branch

15. Read Genesis 11:10-26. What do you notice about the life spans of the men listed in this genealogy compared to those listed in Genesis 5? Suggest a possible explanation for the change.

Scriptural Insight: What Does the Bible Say About the Races? “The race question is certainly one of the most important and explosive issues of our time, and the same is true for the issue of nationalism versus internationalism. The existence of distinctive ‘races’ and nations and languages is obviously a fact of modern life, in spite of efforts of many modern sociologists and politicians to remove racial and national barriers…The true origin of the world’s various races and nations and the events associated therewith must be clearly understood and placed in right perspective before there is any possibility that the problems rising out of them can be comprehended and solved…The origin of races and nations is still a mystery to most scientists, determined as they are to explain man and his culture in terms of an evolutionary framework. There are numerous contradictory theories on these matters among anthropologists and ethnologists, but the only fully reliable record of the origin of races, nations and languages is found here in Genesis 9 through 11.

It is significant that the Bible never mentions race at all; neither the word nor the concept is found in Scripture. A race, in evolutionary terminology, is a sub-species evolving into a new species but, in reality, there is no such thing. That is, as far as mankind is concerned, there is only one race—the human race. The various divisions are those of nations, tribes and languages—not races. Nevertheless, there have been three major groups of nations in world history, and these are those originally established by the three sons of Noah.” (Dr. Henry Morris, The Beginning of the World, p. 141-42)

Appreciation Application:

16. The Babel builders sought to make a name for themselves by erecting their tower, a foolish thing in the eyes of God. We just studied how God rearranged the plans of the people to bring them in line with His plan. Has God ever done this in your life, and how did you respond?

Day Three Study

Appreciation Assignment:

17. You descended from at least one of Noah’s sons, perhaps all three. From which nations of people have you descended? What do you appreciate about your heritage? Draw your family tree back through four generations. Which ones were Christians and might have had a positive influence on your life? How?

Deeper Discoveries:

·         Read the Fact Sheets “Civilization Restart” and “What Really Happened to the Dinosaurs?” found at the end of this lesson.

·         Ponder the archeological implications of the various tribes/groups radiating from Babel and having to develop their own separate cultures.

·         Go to www.answersingenesis.org and SEARCH anything related to Noah and his sons, Nimrod, Tower of Babel, races, etc. Select an article to read or watch a video. Also visit www.icr.org and search.

Creation Answers: Civilization Restart

The information below is adapted from resources found on www.icr.org and www.answersingenesis.org plus others sourced at the end.

Noah and the animals left the Ark more than 371 days after the start of the Flood. What a long time to be cooped up! A couple of years later, Noah’s grandchildren began to arrive. Soon, he had 16 grandkids. Genesis 10 and 11 tell what happens to those grandkids and their families. Chapter 10 is the genealogy of who they are and where they settled. The events of chapter 11 actually came first. If this is true, what evidence would you expect to find? You would expect that the oldest civilization had developed in that area. That’s what we do find.

Leaving The Ark

Where They Settled

They moved east to Shinar (Genesis 11:1-2) and built there. Shinar is the whole region of the Tigris-Euphrates valley—the closest fertile area to the mountains of Ararat. The most ancient peoples leaving written, historical records were the inhabitants of that valley (the Sumerians) just as expected, followed by the Nile Valley of Egypt and other near-Eastern areas. This area is called Mesopotamia (middle). Interestingly enough, modern computer studies have shown that the geographical center of the earth’s land areas is located within a short distance of the mountains of Ararat. Coincidence? I think not!

What They Did

Within 100 years, they were building cities. The Bible says they made brick for stone and used tar for mortar. What do we find? That area has no stone. The people had to make their own rock by way of burning local dirt into bricks. Written records describe the building of Babylon, the city, by the same brick-making process as described in Gen. 11:3. Samples of such bricks (man-made rock) have been found. One Dallas Morning News article described how ancient Mesopotamians (before 2000 BC) made their own rock by burning local clay at very high temperatures then used the “rock” for building. “This stuff could only have been made if there had been interactions between metallurgists and potters,” surprising archaeologists that people with different skills would be working together. A second article described how those same ancient people used a sticky, coal-based “tar” as glue on wood and stone, also surprising archaeologists. But not us!!

They planned a tower whose top literally is into heaven—meaning representing heaven, a center of worship. We find that the step-like tower known as a ziggurat originated there, acting as an artificial mountain that became the center of worship in the city. Seated in a miniature temple at the top of the tower was their god. [Side note: Perhaps they also thought a tower would protect them from the next flood should God change His mind!]

Who They Were

Ancient humans were NOT backward and ignorant savages as depicted in books and movies. Their forefathers built cities, herded livestock, played musical instruments, made tools of bronze and iron (Gen. 4:17-22) AND built an unsinkable boat! Building a city and tower required marvelous engineering skills. We know the ancient Sumerians had electric batteries and did electroplating of metals. The civilizations that shortly followed—Babylon, Egypt, Greece, China, India and in the Americas (Inca, Maya)—were amazingly advanced. This is seen in their elaborate architecture, calendars, writing, organized cities with intricate water supply systems, and amazing understanding of astronomy and seasonal changes. Awe-inspiring accomplishments without our modern day mechanics!! No, these were not savages, but intelligent men!! Yet, foolish. The builders’ sin was one of immense pride that led to open rebellion against God, declaring independence of Him. A common language enabled the rebellion.

So, God separated the people into language groups. Confused languages forced them to spread out and repopulate the earth. Genesis 10 describes how that happened. Verse 10:5, 20, and 31 all say they spread out by their clans and languages so God gave members of one clan the same language.

Did It Really Happen?

If this is true, you would expect to find: 1) evidence through archaeology, written records, and language studies that all people have migrated from that area AND 2) similarities of cultures in civilizations spread thousands of miles apart, including histories that contained traces of Creation, the Fall, and the Flood.

Two things make it hard to find evidence:

·         Since the 1960’s, the idea of cultural diffusion has been nixed as a means of explaining the development of civilizations. It is politically incorrect to suggest that a culture did not develop itself independent of others. However, the evidence suggests otherwise.

·         General archeology is evolution-based with assumptions of slow and gradual cultural development built right in.

You have to really glean any news to find out the real evidence that does, by the way, suggest otherwise. What do we find?

All People Have Migrated From The Shinar Area.

·         First of all, the entire world could have been populated in just centuries. With just 6 kids per family, within 250 years you would have a minimum of 100,000 people on earth.

·         Ice Age land bridges connected England to mainland Europe, Asia to North America through the Bering Strait, and the Malaysian Straits to New Guinea and perhaps Australia.

·         How’d they travel? By foot, boat, and possibly by wagon. Two Dallas Morning News articles from the 90s revealed that there were wagon wheels 5,000 years ago and that the early presence of humans on South Pacific islands means that were able to build watercraft and sail. That they could build boats is not surprising. Much evidence from antiquity indicates that they did!

·         Archaeology has confirmed that many civilizations appeared about the same time, only a few thousand years ago. Not surprisingly, the building of the Tower of Babel was carried with them as well. We find pyramidal shaped buildings in nearly all the ancient civilizations around the world, particularly in those who descended from Ham! Just as expected!

How Long Ago?

Remember that all recorded history has taken place in the past 5000 years alone. Before that is purely speculation. Man is the only reliable recorder of history, and people were already writing on clay tablets and scrolls (books), inscribing with an iron stylus on lead, and engraving in rock slabs. In fact, Job 19:23-24 confirms this shortly after the Tower of Babel time. Just as expected!

Truly verified archaeological datings (based upon written records, not radiocarbon dates) do not predate the time of the Biblical Flood— ~3000-2350 B.C. The oldest documents of Indo-European languages date from ~2000 BC. The oldest Chinese records ~2250 BC. This is really strange if men have been living on the earth for hundreds of thousands of years! A newly revised Egyptian chronology starts around 2200 B.C. rather than 3000 B.C. I’ve given you several references to check out. Just as expected if the Bible is true!

How Did It Happen?

Genesis 10 is called the Table of Nations. One archaeologist, Dr. W. F. Albright, says it’s “an astonishingly accurate document” and unique—its like simply does not exist. Many of the nations had disappeared from the historical scene centuries before the Jews were scattered and before Christ was born, making it a very ancient document indeed.

As the clans grew, individual families separated and migrated farther from one another, their languages gradually changing as well as their lifestyles. Each family group learned how to survive in the land where it had migrated.

In general, most families settling in Africa and Asia were descendants of Ham and Shem; in Europe and parts of west and northwest Asia, descendants of Japheth. Many of these early nations kept an accurate record down the centuries of their beginnings and wrote down the names of their founding patriarchs, providing us with a surprising link between the ancient post-Flood era (Genesis 9-11) and the rest of recorded history. You probably studied ancient history before, but this is the rest of the story!!

Ancient History—Now Revealed!! The first generations after the Flood lived to be very old, with some men outliving their children, grandchildren and more. (Noah lived 350 years and died only 3 years before Abraham was born.) This set them apart so that several things happened:

·         People in various areas called themselves by the name of the man who was their common ancestor.

·         They called their land, and often their major city and major river, by his name.

·         Sometimes the various nations fell into ancestor worship. When this happened, it was natural for them to name their god after the man who was the ancestor of all of them, or to claim their long-living ancestor as their god.

So, using these clues, we can trace most of the nations that formed from Noah’s sons.

Japheth And His Kin

6 Sons Headed North To Europe & Western Asia, 1 Headed East To Persia And India

His sons were Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meschech, and Tiras. Allowing for the gradual modification in form that always occur in such names with the passage of time, and noting pertinent references in both Scripture and early secular historical writings and on excavated archaeological monuments, we can trace most of these nations and recognize them as ancestors of the Indo-European peoples, a classification based upon common language. The Indo-European family of languages was/is spoken in nearly all of Europe and much of India, Pakistan and parts of western Asia.

Most of them went to the north and northwest. Some headed east. If you are from Great Britain, Ireland, or the Scandinavian countries, I can highly recommend an amazing book called After the Flood by Bill Cooper. It traces those ancestries to Noah and Japheth.

Gomer

Gomer’s tribe first settled in what is now Turkey. When Paul wrote to the Galatians, he was writing to a people group that had been previously known as Gomerites. By New Testament times, they were called Gauls or Galatians.

·         One group of the Gomerites/Gauls, migrated westward to France and Spain. For many centuries, France was known as Gaul (i.e., Julius Caesar and the Gallic wars). Northwest Spain is still called Galicia. Part of those Gomerites/Gauls migrated further west to the British Isles. The Welsh historian, Davis, records a traditional Welsh belief that the descendants of Gomer landed on the Isle of Britain from France, about three hundred years after the flood. He also records that the Welsh language is called Gomeraeg (after their ancestor Gomer).

·         The recorded ancestries (very ancient, predating Christianization) of the early Britons, Irish Celts, Anglo-Saxons, Danes and Norwegians all include their descent from Noah through Japheth. The Saxons considered Japheth, whom they called Sceaf, the son of Noah, to be the founder of the European nations and trace their own ancestry through his oldest son, Gomer. The Irish Celts have king lists that go back to Noah through Japheth via Gomer and Magog; the earliest Irish Chronicles insisted the people were of Scythian stock—the associated name Scot being a Greek and Saxon conversion from Scythian. This is not surprising since Galatia in Asia Minor was populated by a migrating colony of Gallic Celts whose relatives had spread to France (Gauls) and to the British Isles. Archaeologists and ethnologists consider many of the ancient peoples of Europe to be Celts (Greek name for them). The early Britons recorded (58 surviving manuscripts) their ancestors to be from Asia Minor (and that they traveled by sea, stopping at various countries along the way before reaching the shores of England).

·         Another clan settled in today’s Armenia. In fact, the Armenians traditionally claim to be descended from 2 of Gomer’s sons—Togarmah (probably origin of the name Turkey) and Ashkenaz, whose descendants there were called Askuzas, translated “Scythians” by the Greeks. Some of Ashkenaz’s clan later migrated to Germany, giving their name to that nation since Ashkenaz is the Hebrew word for Germany and German Jews are called the Ashkenazi. This group of Germanic peoples spread into Denmark (the Anglo-Saxons) and the northern islands.

·         Some of Gomer’s descendants ended up in China. The Miautso People of China claimed descent from Japheth through Gomer when they were encountered for the first time by Christian missionaries. Their histories (recorded in the form of ancient couplets recited at all public occasions through the ages) included surprisingly accurate accounts of Creation and the Flood (w/ names of Noah, his wife and three sons) plus a graphic account of Babel and the confusion of tongues that resulted in nations spreading out and encircling the globe. Eleven tribes settled in the Kiangsi province of China in the seventh generation from Gomer—five remained in the Miautso nation; six later intermarried with the invading Chinese who forced the Maiutso out of their land. Modern researchers say that people who once lived in northwest China (2000-400 BC) wrote in a language that bore striking similarities to Celtic and Germanic tongues (Indo-European group)—unlike any other in that part of the world. Mummies (>100 found) of those people revealed long noses and skulls, blond or brown hair, thin lips and deep-set eyes—European features. Some looked Irish, others Nordic! Easily explained by Genesis—they were Japheth’s descendants!

·         These groups formed the Celtic and Germanic language families which included Irish, Welsh, Breton, Italic (forerunner of Latin, French and Spanish), German, English, Dutch, Slavic and Baltic languages.

Javan

Javan’s kids headed northwest to present Turkey and continued west to Greece (Javan in Hebrew), Cyprus, Rhodes, and eventually Spain (the Mediterranean Sea was once known as the Sea of Tarshish, after Javan’s son) and northwest Africa. The name Javan morphed to Ionia, an ancient term identified with Greece. Javan’s son Elishah is preserved in the name “Hellas” which came to be applied to Greece as a whole (i.e., Hellenist). His descendants were the Elysians, an ancient Greek people. His son Kittim’s name is the biblical name for Cyprus.

In Greek literature, Japheth’s name is preserved as Iapetos, the son of heaven and earth, the father of many nations, and the legendary father of the Greeks. The ancient Romans perpetuated his name as Iu-Pater (meaning “Father Jove”), which was standardized to Jupiter. Here’s an incidence where the ancestor became the chief god.

Madai

Madai is the ancestor of modern-day Iranians. His descendants were called Medes by the Greeks. Every time the Medes are mentioned in the Old Testament, the word used is the Hebrew word Madai (maday). After the time of Cyrus, the Medes are always (with one exception) mentioned along with the Persians. They became one kingdom with one law —’the law of the Medes and Persians’ (Daniel 6:8, 12, 15). Later they were simply called Persians. Since 1935 they have called their country Iran.

·         The Medes also settled western India and Pakistan. The name Japheth is found in the literature as Pra-Japati (Father Japheth), the reputed ancestor of the Aryans of India (Aryan is a form of the word “Iran”), deemed to be the sun and lord of creation for those descended from him. Archaeologists discovered that from ~2600-1900 BC, the Indus civilization flourished in what is now Pakistan and western India. The city layouts were efficient, though not elaborate, with buildings built of baked bricks (sound familiar?). The culture was very organized and mostly nonmilitary. Unlike Egypt and Mesopotamia, they buried their dead without jewels, furniture and weapons—very simply. They practiced millet cultivation similar to that done in Africa (common source?), but their ancient script is thus far undecipherable.

Magog

He went north forming the nations around the Caspian and Black Seas all the way to Russia. The people of the region of modern Romania and Ukraine were known as Magogites until the Greeks called the area Scythia (people, the Scythians). The early Irish Celts traced their own lineage from Japheth through the line of Magog.

Tubal

The descendants of Tubal were known as the Tabali, then the Thobelites, and later as Iberes. The Romans gave the name Iberia to their land which covered what is now Georgia (whose capital to this day bears the name Tubal as Tbilisi). From here, having crossed the Caucasus Mountains, this people migrated due northeast across the Caucases mountains, giving their tribal name to the river Tobol, and hence to the famous city of Tobolsk.

Meshech

This is the ancient name for Moscow, both the capital of Russia and the region that surrounds the city. To this day, one section, the Meschera Lowland, still carries the name of Meshech, virtually unchanged by the ages.

Tiras

Tiras’s people were called Thirasians, changed to Thracians by the Greeks. Their homeland reached from Macedonia on the south to the Danube River on the north to the Black Sea on the east. Tiras was worshipped by his descendants as Thuras, or Thor, the god of thunder. Another incidence of an ancestor becoming a chief god.

Noah’s Prophecy About His Son Japheth

Genesis 9:27 — The prophecy for Japheth was to be enlarged which carries with it the idea of enticing/persuading so the thought may be one of mental enlargement; open-mindedness The Japhethites (especially the Greeks, Romans, and later the Europeans and the Americans) have stressed science and philosophy in their development.

“Dwell in the tents” is a common figure of speech meaning “have fellowship with him.” It could apply to sharing in Shem’s inheritance. As Shem and Japheth had united to show respect to their father and their father’s God, so they would unite to worship “the Lord God of Shem.”

There is abundant evidence that all forms of paganism have come originally from the ancient Babylonian religion. The various gods and goddesses of Rome, Greece, India, Egypt, and other nations can be essentially identified with the original pantheon of the Babylonians. (See Rev. 17:5.) Note: It is especially to the descendants of Japheth that the term Gentiles was applied.

Ham And His Kin

4 Sons Stayed Central Or Headed South And West

Ham’s sons were Cush, Mizraim, Put, and Canaan. Some of his descendants remained in Babel and Assyria. Most went south into Arabia or west and southwest to Canaan, Egypt and the rest of Africa. The Bible often refers to Africa as the land of Ham. Yet, some headed towards China, eventually populating the Americas. Afterward the families of the Canaanites were spread abroad (Genesis 10:18).

Cush 

Cush is identified with Ethiopia in the Bible. The Cushites apparently first migrated southward into Arabia, then crossed the Red Sea into Ethiopia.

Mizraim

Mizraim is the ancestor of the Egyptians, some writers suggesting that the semi-legendary founder of Egypt’s first dynasty, Menes/Mamenses, was the same as Mizraim (likely a plural form of the name of his tribe).

Put

Put is identified with North Africa west of Egypt, including Libya.

Canaan 

Canaan’s descendants settled in and around the land of Canaan and in Asia Minor (the Hittites, possibly being from Canaan’s son Heth), and a remnant seems to have later migrated eastward to the Far East. Of all the names in the Table of Nations, it does seem that two sons of Canaan—Heth and Sin—are the most likely to have become ancestors of the Oriental peoples.

·         Heth—Archeologists have noted a number of similarities between the Hittites and the people of Mongolia (the art of smelting and casting iron plus the breeding and training of horses). Native Americans have their ancestry in the Mongolian peoples. The Biblical Hittites were known to the Sumerians as Khittae and Assyrians as Khatti which may be the origin of Cathay (the English translation of the tribe visited by Marco Polo in northern China).

·         Sin—Biblical and secular references also mention a people in the Far East named “Sinim,” Sinae” suggesting some of the descendants of Canaan’s son Sin migrated eastward. The Assyrians knew the Biblical Sinites as the Siannu. It is significant that China and the Chinese people have always been identified by the prefix “Sino-” (e.g., Sino-Japanese War), and the name “Sin” is frequently encountered in Chinese names. Recent research of the genetic makeup of Chinese people shows correlation with the people in Africa. Just as expected!

Onward To America

Scientists generally believe that the Americas were first settled by humans who migrated across a land bridge that connected Asia with what is now Alaska. That land bridge disappeared when the sea level rose following the last ice age. So, Ham’s descendants in Asia crossed the land bridge to Alaska. From Alaska south were 2 corridors free of ice and open to travel. Migration campsites have been found along the way, some indicating they also had boats and were capable of offshore fishing. (No surprise!) The animals had preceded them by several hundred years. Hunters killed bison, mammoths, mastodons, camels and giant sloths for meat as they traveled.

·         An ancient spear unearthed in Siberia (under a layer of volcanic ash!) looks nearly identical to the Clovis point, a flint spearhead first unearthed in New Mexico and used to identify the earliest Americans who supposedly invented the points as hunter-gatherers traveled from campsite to campsite. By the way, all Native Americans have 4 special genetic markers that appear to trace back to modern Siberians and Mongolians. (Dallas Morning News article)

·         According to archeologists, about 3,000 years ago, the first civilization developed in the Western Hemisphere—the Olmec culture in Mexico and Central America. This occurred around the same time that the Shang Dynasty of China fell to enemies, forcing thousands of refugees to flee across the “Eastern Sea.” Interestingly enough, researchers have recently recognized at least 100 ancient Chinese language symbols embedded in the motifs that decorate Olmec art! The Shang society and Olmec society shared much in common including transportation skills, worship of earth and ancestors on similarly built mounds, human sacrifice, veneration of the same animals, and art carvings. Just as expected!

Noah’s Prophecy About His Son Ham

Genesis 9:25 — The prophecy to Ham through the name of his son Canaan. The translation “servant” does not mean “slave.” All of Ham’s descendants have not been continually in slavery. The word can just as well be translated “steward,” someone who gives material service to mankind, providing physical needs. The Hamites have been the great pioneers that opened up the world to settlement, to cultivation, and to technology. Among the many ways in which the Hamites have been the great “servants” of mankind are the following (from The Genesis Record, Dr. Henry Morris):

1) They were the original explorers and settlers of practically all parts of the world, following the dispersion at Babel.

2) They were the first cultivators of most of the basic food staples of the world, such as potatoes, corn, beans, cereals, and others, as well as the first ones to domesticate most animals.

3) They developed most of the basic types of structural forms and building tools and materials.

4) They were the first to develop most of the usual fabrics for clothing and the various sewing and weaving devices.

5) They discovered and invented a wide variety of medicines and surgical practices and instruments.

6) They invented most of the concepts of basic practical mathematics, as well as surveying and navigation.

7) The machinery of commerce and trade—money, banks, postal systems, and so forth—was developed by them.

8) They developed paper, ink, block printing, movable type, and other accoutrements of writing and communication.

If one traces back far enough, he will find that practically every other basic device or system needed for man’s physical sustenance or convenience originated with one of the Hamitic peoples. Truly they have been the “servants” of mankind in a most amazing way. Yet the prophecy was fulfilled also in that the Hamites have usually been able to go only so far with their explorations and inventions, and no farther. Sooner or later, the Japhethites and Semites have taken over their territories and their inventions. Some Hamites have been actual slaves.

Shem And His Kin

5 Sons Headed East, North And South From Babel.

Shem’s sons were Elam, Asshur, Arphaxad, Lud, and Aram.

Elam 

Elamites settled east of Babel, later merging with the Medes to form the Persian Empire.

Asshur

Asshur’s name is preserved in his descendants, the Assyrians, whose culture also included the Hamites (Nimrod and company). Unfortunately, Asshur was one of the earliest men to be deified and worshipped by his descendants.

Arphaxad

Arphaxad may have settled in Assyria, the earliest known settlement is 4 miles east of ancient Nineveh. Of particular interest, he’s father of the Chaldeans, and his descendants were adept astrologers, magicians, and mathematicians. He is better known by his son, Eber, whose name is possibly preserved in his descendants—the Hebrews. (Was Hebrew the original language? It is likely that it was!) Arphaxad’s grandson, Peleg, may have been born shortly after the time of the dispersion. According to Genesis 11:25, in his days the earth was divided which combined with Genesis 10:5, 32 clearly refer to a linguistic and geographical division.

Lud

Lud is historically associated with the Lydians, in Asia Minor, who were reputed archers and spoke an Indo-European language.

Aram 

His name is the Hebrew word for Syria. His sons became the Arameans, equivalent to Syrians. Their language was adopted as the trade language for the ancient world, commonly spoken even among Jews in Jesus’ day. Some Arameans migrated to Arabia where Job later lived.

Noah’s Prophecy About His Son Shem

Genesis 9:26 — The prophecy for Shem included the covenant-keeping name for God—Yhwh, suggesting a love for the Lord and faith in God’s promises. Shem’s blessing seemed to be related to his spiritual nature. Interestingly enough, the Semites throughout history have been dominated by religious motivations centered in monotheism—the Jews, the Moslems, and the Zoroastrians, etc. Through Shem, God’s greatest blessing for mankind, the promised Seed of the woman, would eventually come into the world.

A Corrupted Witness To The Truth

Paul said in Acts 14:15-17, “We are bringing you good news, telling you to turn…to the living God…In the past, He let all nations go their own way. Yet He has not left Himself without testimony: He has shown kindness by giving you rain…crops…plenty of food and fills your hearts with joy.”

Popular thought supposes that the nations of the world only became aware of the God of Genesis after they were populated by Jews or evangelized by Christian missionaries, not considering the possibility that pagan man was indeed aware of God and of His attributes, and that this awareness had existed and flourished for centuries without any exposure at all to the scriptures.

As people spread out, they took the story of Creation, the Curse, and the Flood with them. Flood legends (over 300), predating any contact with outsiders (especially missionaries), are found in almost every culture around the world, about 30 of them in writing. Some are remarkably close in their details to the story told in the Bible. Of those legends, 66% say that the Flood was caused by the sinfulness of man, 95% say that the whole world was covered by water, 86% say that there was a favored family which was told to build a boat so that the animals could be saved. Just as expected! The details are different, but the essence is the same. It becomes clear that the original is, in fact, the Bible story.

Documented Evidence

·         From Greece—an ancient document The Sybil: “When all men were of one language, some of them built a high tower, as if they would thereby ascend up to heaven; but the gods…gave everyone his peculiar language…After this they were dispersed abroad, on account of their languages, and went out by colonies everywhere…took possession of that land which they lighted upon, and unto which God led them;…There were some also who passed over the sea in ships, and inhabited the islands.”

·         From the British Isles—The Irish Chronicles record Irish remembrance of Creation and the Flood as relatively recent and definitely historical events and reveal that they reckoned the dates of other subsequent historical events by counting the years since the Creation (4000 BC). Anglo-Saxons and the early Britons believed in a recent creation and flood as well. Two versions of the Anglo-Saxon chronicles say that 5200 years covered the time from Creation until the year AD 6.

·         From Denmark—The epic poem Beowulf contains many references to Genesis 1-6 (including Cain, giants and a flood) with an abrupt cutoff at that point. Preserved by the northward migrating peoples, then interwoven with later Germanic history before the coming of Christianity to either Germany or Denmark (it contains no elements of Judeo-Christian teaching), the account was then brought to England from Denmark by the Anglo-Saxons in 400-500AD. Beowulf himself (a historic person) was a descendant of Saxon kings who claimed their ancestry from Noah through Japheth.

·         From Mexico—Found in the histories of the Toltec Indians of ancient Mexico (Ham’s descendants?) is a story of the first world that lasted 1,716 years and was destroyed by a great flood that covered even the highest mountains. Their story tells of a few men who escaped the destruction in a “toptlipetlocali,” which means a closed chest. Following the great flood, these men began to multiply and built a very high zacuali,” or a great tower, to provide a safe place if the world was destroyed again. However, the languages became confused, so different language groups wandered to other parts of the world. The Toltecs claim they started as a family of seven friends and their wives who spoke the same language. They crossed great waters, lived in caves, and wandered 104 years till they came to Hue Hue Tlapalan (southern Mexico). The story reports that this was 520 years after the great flood. Likewise, the Mayans of Central America measured time from the beginning of their culture after the Flood—~3113BC.

·         From China—The ancient Chinese preserved the truth about man’s earliest history in their ancient (~2000 BC) writings which refer to a violent catastrophe that happened to the Earth. The entire land was flooded with water reaching the highest mountains and completely covering all the foothills, leaving the country in desolate condition for years afterwards. This history records that one man, his wife, three sons, and three daughters escaped a great flood, were the only people left alive on earth, and repopulated the world afterwards. The accounts of Creation, the Fall, and the Flood are revealed in ancient Chinese characters (which combines pictographs to form new ideas) for “to forbid” (combines 2 trees and to command, God), “to sacrifice” (ox + sheep + unblemished + spear), “righteousness” (lamb + me, with the lamb placed over the me), and “boat” (vessel + 8 + person)—none of which make any sense apart from the Genesis record. The characters (found on early bronzes and ancient drums) were well-established (creation of new pictographs had ceased by 800 BC) and already exported to other oriental countries before the earliest Christians influenced China, ~640 AD.

What Happened To The Truth About God?

Someone forgot to teach the next generation! The Bible tells of the attitude of men before the Flood in Job 22:15-17 “Will you keep to the old path that evil men have trod? They were carried off before their time, their foundations washed away by a flood. They said to God, Leave us alone! What can the Almighty do to us?’” That attitude prevailed in some of Noah’s descendants as well. And they said, ‘Come, let us build for ourselves a city, and a tower whose top will reach into heaven, and let us make for ourselves a name; lest we be scattered abroad over the face of the whole earth.’” Gen. 11:3-4

The long war against God gained steam from Babylon outward. Excavator Stephen Langdon of Oxford University has determined that the history of man’s religion— steadily going from monotheism to extreme polytheism and widespread belief in evil spirits—is in a very true sense the history of the fall of man.

Ham’s grandson Nimrod is credited with instigating the Great Rebellion at Babel and founding the worst features of paganism, including the practice of magical arts, astrology and human sacrifice. Worshipped from earliest times (by Sumerians, Babylonians, and Assyrians), Nimrod was worshipped by the Romans as Bacchus (son of Cush). Various sites in the ancient world were named after him—Shinar was known as the Land of Nimrod. Ancestor worship also began in this area and, combined with other aspects of paganism mentioned above, was carried by tribes forming new nations—Assyria, China, the Saxons—resulting in the spread of polytheism and idolatry. Degrading from there, the forces of nature were given names (pantheism) so that some people considered everything to be a god—Mother Nature, Father Time, natural selection (evolution itself).

According to The Book of the Dead, dealing with life and beliefs in ancient Egypt by E.A. Wallis Budge, the Egyptians originally believed in one God (as did Greece and China) with His attributes eventually being recognized as pointing to many gods. The pharoah Akhnaten sought unsuccessfully to bring all Egypt under the persuasion that there was but one god instead of the many that the Egyptians worshipped by then. As God said in Romans 1:25 “they exchanged the truth for a lie.” And so three streams of nations dispersed to form their own nations as they repopulated the earth.

One Blood, The Biblical Answer To Racism

As they migrated out from Shinar and became individual nations, each group developed its own physical characteristics peculiar to each ethnic group. The Bible never talks about races but about tribes and nations. We are told in the Bible that we are all of one blood, one flesh (I Corinthians 15:39). There is really only one race—the human race! The modern concept of “race” is based on evolutionary thinking; racism is an idea used by man to divide people and justify social stratification.

Modern genetics shows that when a large, freely interbreeding group is suddenly broken into many smaller groups which from then on breed only among themselves, dominant characteristics unique to each group will arise very rapidly. There are 4 genes for skin color from which a whole range of skin shades may be produced in the offspring from light to dark. All skin color in humans comes from a pigment called melanin. Everyone has the same color, but some just have more of it (intensity). A person with a lot of melanin will be very dark; a little melanin renders her very light. All the information for the variations of skin shades goes back to the original parents—Adam and Eve. A recent news article stated that only one woman’s mitochondrial DNA survived to the present day in all of us. Just as expected!

“Primitive” And “Stone Age”?

No Primitive Man

No group of human beings today (or, in the past) speaks a “primitive” language even those in isolated cultures. Each language has nouns, verbs, etc. The observable evidence tells us that by 2000 BC all the people had broken up into these different language groups already. Just as expected!

Archaeologists confirm that many civilizations appeared about the same time, only a few thousand years ago. After short periods spent hunting and gathering, highly developed civilizations sprang up all over the world. A pattern seems to have been repeated:

·         A tribe moves to a new area, sets up a temporary camp until a more permanent site for their village or city could be established once the area was determined capable of supporting the people—game for hunting, water, and farmland.

·         Temporary homes could have been made of stones, hides, or sticks; even caves were used. Remains of these original occupation sites naturally suggest to evolutionists a “stone age culture” when actually they reflect only a very temporary situation.

·         Some groups have continued the simple style of living up to the present time; most have progressed to urbanization.

·         As soon as material for ceramics and metals could be found, the “stone age” at the site was succeeded by a “bronze age” or “iron age.”

·         Groups farther away from Babel may have lost much cultural ‘know–how’, including the loss of previous written, as well as spoken, language. Thus, it is not surprising that they would soon develop an alternative style of writing.

One People, Several Tribes — Where Neanderthal And Cro-Magnon Fits!

After the first bones were discovered in 1856 in the Neander Valley of Germany (thus, the Neanderthals), the first anatomist to examine them concluded he was homo sapiens (modern man) with rickets caused by a vitamin D deficiency. In the early 1900’s, a French paleontologist devised the modern concept of a stooped-over brute.

Modern researchers conclude Neanderthal walked upright (stood ~5’7”) but some had arthritis causing a stooped posture. Since then discoveries have been made (over 200 skeletons) in Palestine, Iraq, northwest Africa, and throughout Europe. Though evolutionists once used the fossils to support human evolution, today they are classified as fully human who lived 30,000 to 300,000 years ago.

Long-age ‘progressive creationists’ such as Hugh Ross, in order to reconcile their belief in the evolutionary ‘millions of years’ with the belief in a literally created Adam, are forced to claim that the Neandertals were ‘spiritless quasi-humans’. How much easier to take Genesis as written which leads to the conclusion that they were fully human descendants of Adam. They had a simple culture but NOT an animal culture.

·         A recent Time magazine article stated “they wielded simple tools, wore body ornaments, had religious rites, and ceremoniously buried their dead.”

·         Recent archaeological discoveries show that Neanderthals also built houses, decorated their bodies, and contained their fires in hearths.

·         Musical instruments have been found with their bodies, and they painted on cave walls.

Neanderthals were part of Japheth’s Indo-European language group who migrated away from the Tower of Babel. They found themselves in harsh Ice Age circumstances in northern Europe particularly (average temperature estimated to be 14˚F lower than now), and some were forced to live in caves. Add to this heavy cloud cover (blocking vitamin-D producing ultraviolet light), the need to wear heavy clothing, and poor diet (the only significant dietary sources of vitamin D are fatty fish and egg yolk, seldom consumed by Neanderthals) and the result is rickets (a deforming bone disease caused by lack of vitamin D) and arthritis.

By the way, many of the features we now call “Neanderthal”—heavy brow ridge, teeth crowding forward, deterioration of the chin, excessive wear on the teeth—are actually features of very old people. And why not? Post-flood patriarchs lived 100’s of years—Shem 600, Eber 464, Peleg and Reu 239, Abraham 175.

Dr. Jack Cuozzo, a Neanderthal expert studied Neanderthal children, concluding that they didn’t achieve maturity until much later than children of today. His book reveals that although Neanderthals had massive features and somewhat larger skulls than is common in mankind today, they would go unnoticed if dressed in modern clothing.

His research has also determined that skulls thicken with age, increasing in width and length but without vertical change. The results should be seen as noticeable changes in skulls that were at least 200-300 years old. Using computer extrapolation of skulls at old ages, the expected shapes at 200-300 years resembled Neanderthal skulls! By the way, the heavy brow ridges and sloping forehead found in Neanderthal skeletons are found in people living today.

Neanderthals are now considered to be a people group living at the same time as other human people groups elsewhere, having reached Europe first during the worst part of the Ice Age then crossed the Mediterranean Sea at the Rock of Gibraltar to live in northwest Africa. They probably intermarried with another tribe of people called Cro-Magnon (named after the cave in France where the first remains were found)—many fossils show such a mix of traits. In fact, there was great variation among both Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon tribes. Cro-Magnon people consumed fish routinely so were able to avoid rickets. They were probably those humans living at the end of the Ice Age when the climate became more normal. The human fossils found in Western Europe are generally more Neanderthal-like than those found in southern Europe, North Africa, or western Asia. Both groups were fully human. Just as expected!

Conclusion About Noah’s Descendants

A total of 70 “families” forming nations is mentioned in Genesis 10! These three streams of nations are not three “races.” We all have the same color; some just have more of it than others. There are dusky and black people found among all three groups of nations. The Bible does not mention “race” only nations. The modern concept of “race” is based on evolutionary thinking. And, Increasingly in recent years has archeology been confirming that civilization appeared more or less contemporaneously in all parts of the world, only a few millennia ago. Just as expected!

Sources For Further Study

1. Babel, John Whitcomb, Creation magazine 24(3), June 2002 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v24/i3/babel.asp.

2. Why the Electric Battery Was Forgotten, David Down, Creation magazine 16(2), March 1994 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v16/i2/battery.asp.

3. The Sixteen Grandsons of Noah, Creation magazine 20(4), September 1998 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i4/noah.asp.

4. The Mystery of Ancient Man, Steve Cardno, Creation magazine 20(2), March 1998 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i2/ancient.asp.

5. In the Days of Peleg, Larry Pierce, Creation magazine 22(1), December 1999 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v22/i1/peleg.asp.

6. How Does Mans History Fit with the Biblical Timeline? Bodie Hodge at www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/feedback/2006/0630.asp.

7. From Ararat to the Americas—in a Few Thousand Years? Bodie Hodge at www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/feedback/2006/0922.asp.

8. Searching for Moses, Technical Journal 15(1), April 2001 at www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v15/i1/moses.asp.

9. Archaeology Q&A at www.answersingenesis.org

10. Timing Is Everything, Tas Walker, Steve Cardno and Jonathan Sarfati, Creation magazine 27(3), June 2005 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v27/i3/down.asp.

11. American Genesis: The Cosmological Beliefs of the Indians, Bill Johnson, Impact #369 at www.icr.org.

12. Towering Change: Were all of todays thousands of languages separately created? And if not, have languages evolved? Carl Wieland, Creation magazine 22(1), December 1999 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v22/i1/towering_change.asp.

13. The Origin of Languages, Wayne Spencer, Creation Answers monthly newsletter, July 2007 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v22/i1/towering_change.asp.

14. The Neandertals: Our Worthy Ancestors, Part I, Marvin Lubenow, Answers online, November 29, 2006 at www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v1/n2/worthy-ancestors.

15. The Neandertals: Our Worthy Ancestors, Part II, Marvin Lubenow, Answers online April 11, 2007 at www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n1/worthy-ancestors-2.

16. One Blood: the Biblical Answer to Racism, by Ken Ham, Carl Wieland, and Don Batten, online book at www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/OneBlood/index.asp.

17. Where Did the Races Come From? by Ken Ham, Carl Wieland, and Don Batten, online book at www.answersingenesis.org/radio/pdf/races_booklet.pdf.

18. Associates for Biblical Research at http://abr.christiananswers.net/home.html.

19. Digging Up the Past at www.diggingsonline.com.

20. Genesis according to the Maio People, Impact #214, April 1991 at www.icr.org.

21. Man-made slabs offer new insight into Mesopotamia, Robert Cooke, Dallas Morning News, July 6, 1998, page 10D.

22. Success without the splendor, John Noble Wilford, New York Times News Service

23. Artifact generates questions, Associated Press

24. Babel, John Whitcomb, Creation magazine 24(3), June 2002 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v24/i3/babel.asp.

25. Pre-Flood Relics on the bottom of the Black Sea? Tas Walker, September 14, 2000 at www.answersingenesis.org/docs2/4377news9-14-2000.asp.

26. Ancient Chinese Flutes bring back sounds of old, Alexandre Witze, Dallas Morning News, September 27, 1999, page 7-8D.

27. Anthropology and Apeman Q&A at www.answersingenesis.org.

Creation Answers: What Happened To The Dinosaurs?

“They Died, But Not So Long Ago”

The information below is adapted from resources found on www.icr.org and www.answersingenesis.org plus others sourced at the end.

Our culture’s fascination w/ dinosaurs serves to promote evolution and to indelibly inscribe on the mind of each person that 1) the earth is very old, 2) that evolution is a fact, and 3) that no man has ever seen one. The facts really are on the side of the creationist interpretation, though. What do you want to know?

1. Did Dinosaurs And People Live Together? Did They Go On The Ark?

First of all, scripture says that God created all the marine and flying creatures on Day 5 such as plesiosaurs and pterodactyls plus land animals on Day 6 which included dinosaurs. Human and dinosaur footprints are found together in Texas and in Turkmenia, formerly part of the Soviet Union, plus other places.

The universe was changed when Adam disobeyed and took a bite of the fruit that God had forbidden him to eat. Before that sad event, death wasn’t part of God’s beautiful creation. Violence and death entered the physical world as animals fought and killed each other.

Dinosaurs got on the Ark. God told Noah to take all land creatures on the Ark which included dinosaurs. It is likely Noah took juveniles. Those outside the Ark were buried by the Flood. A number of fossil graveyards are known in which dinosaur skeletons are found buried together in jumbled heaps with evidence of mass drowning. Dinosaurs got off the Ark, multiplied and spread to all parts of the world through the land bridges.

They died out. Lots of animals have died out from this earth, and the memory of them has faded or been corrupted. The name “dinosaur” wasn’t even coined until the 1800s several years after the first bones of these creatures were found and studied scientifically.

2. Were Dinosaurs Really As Vicious As They Were Depicted In Jurassic Park?

How do scientists really know anything about dinosaurs? From its remains: bones, teeth, claws, spikes, horns, bony plates, footprints, imprints of skin (very rare); eggs (sometimes containing unborn babies), dung and stomach contents (also very rare). From fossils alone, scientist can only guess how the animal really looked or lived. The Tyrannosaurus looked vicious but may not have been. Very few fossils of this creature have been found. It’s more exciting to picture it as a great monster, though, not as a big lizard.

Although Genesis 1:29, 30 tell us they were created to be plant eaters before the Fall, enough is known of dinosaurs to strongly suspect that at least some of them occasionally ate meat by the time of the Flood. Fish and lizards are found in the stomach contents of some dinosaurs and flying reptiles. Were they vicious? Several types do have sharp teeth, sharp claws, spikes, armor plates perhaps used for offensive or defensive purposes, but many animals today that have sharp teeth use them for strictly peaceful ends—panda bear, fruit bat. After the Flood, God begins holding the animals accountable for the lifeblood of man so that man-eating dinosaurs may have been punished by God through death. But, they were not forbidden to kill other animals for food.

3. Are They Mentioned In The Bible?

All the nations of antiquity wrote about dinosaur-like animals they called dragons. The Biblical writers, inspired by God, wrote about creatures described by the Hebrew word tanniyn which is translated “dragons” in over 20 passages. Up until this century, that word was translated into English as dragon. They are depicted as dwelling in different types of habitats and as being of various sizes (Isaiah 34:13; Micah 1:8; Malachi 1:3). Modern translators of the Bible choose not to use the word “dragon” because modern man has never seen a creature that fits the description of some of the creatures mentioned in the Bible. So they translate the word tanniyn as jackal, whale, serpent, etc. but the Hebrew word means “dragon” or “monster,” not jackal.

·         Leviathan—A sea dragon is called a leviathan (“water monster”) in Isaiah 27:1, Psalm 74:14; 104:26 and is described by God Himself in Job 41:1-34 as a living, fearsome, fire-breathing monster who lived in the sea and on land, had huge teeth, and a scaly hide that could not be pierced with sword or spear, was absolutely without fear and could not be trapped or domesticated. Neither whales nor sharks nor crocodiles fit this description but a marine reptile or dinosaur called Kronosaurus does. Psalm 104:24-26 tells us that leviathan was initially formed to frolic in the sea. Something happened; the description doesn’t sound like frolicking!

·         Behemoth—God also drew Job’s attention to a huge land dragon called a behemoth (“beast par excellence”) that was a large grass eater, had a tail so large it was compared to a cedar tree, had great muscles and extremely strong bones, was not afraid of anything, and was “chief in the ways of God, “impossible to capture. Neither a hippopotamus nor an elephant fit the description. The description clearly fits that of a large sauropod such as Apatosaurus, a gigantic plant-eater with great muscles and very strong bones or Diplodocus which had leg bones so strong that he could have held three others on his back. The Egyptians knew of behemoth and leviathan. Both creatures are also named in Babylonian and Sumerian literature.

Why did God make such fierce creatures? Psalm 148:7 says they praise Him; Isaiah 43:20 says they will glorify Him who provides for them. In Isaiah 27:1 and in Job, God declares that He is more powerful than all of them, able to defeat them because He made them. He assured Job that He was well able to defeat Satan, too!

4. How Long Did They Live After The Flood?

Evidently the dinosaurs gradually died out or were hunted to extinction. Their existence has been preserved for us by people all over the world through the many legends of dragons, the descriptions of which closely resemble dinosaurs. Dragon legends are best understood as the faded and/or embellished memories of real human encounters with dragons.

We Know About Them Through Legends

Dinosaur-like animals have been drawn, written about and told about since the beginning of recorded history on every continent.

·         People in India worshipped huge hissing reptiles they kept in caves.

·         In the 10th century, an Irishman wrote of his encounter with a large beast with “iron” nails on its tail that pointed backwards and a head shaped like a horse. Stegasaurus? An ancient carving in an Angkor Cambodian temple also looks like a Stegasaurus.

·         A Scandinavian legend describes a reptile-like animal that had a body the size of a large cow; two long, strong back legs; two very short front legs; with very large jaws. Perhaps a T-Rex!

·         The city of Nerluc, France was renamed in honor of a slain dragon that was bigger than an ox and had long, sharp pointed horns on its head. Triceratops?

We Know About Them Through Drawings Left Behind

Many drawings of dragons look very much like known dinosaurs or composite drawings of various types.

·         An ancient Native American drawing found on a Grand Canyon wall looks very much like an Edmontosaurus.

·         The ancient Incas sketched creatures that look just like Triceratops and other dinosaur creatures.

·         Thousands of dragon stories and pictures can be found in ancient Chinese books and art. Chinese kings used dragons for pulling royal chariots.

·         In the 1500’s, a European scientific book listed several animals, which to us are dinosaurs, as still living back then, though relatively small and extremely rare.

We Know About Them Through Written Accounts

Flying reptiles have also been seen and described in written form by respected writers (Herodotus, Aristotle, Strabo) in ancient Egypt, Ethiopia, India and Arabia.

·         In 1856 France, a flying reptile was blasted out of a tunnel and died. It was studied by a scientist, declared to be a pterosaur with a 10’ wingspan.

·         Stories of giant man-eating birds are common among many other Indian tribes of the American Southwest. In Utah’s Black Dragon Canyon there is a beautiful pictograph of a pterosaur. These were called “thunderbirds.”

The most remarkable descriptions of living dinosaurs are those that the Saxon and Celtic people of Europe have passed down to us. The British Isles have historically been the habitat for lots of reptilian monsters. Over 80 places have been recorded where men, women and children have personally encountered them. Not just in the past 100 years and not just Loch Ness (or any other Scottish lake from which have been numerous sightings). The written accounts of many of these creatures include detailed descriptions of their skin and scale colors and refer to multiple witnesses.

·         Flying reptiles were a feature of Welsh life until surprisingly recent times. In fact, country people predicted the weather for centuries based upon their movements.

·         One church at Llanbadarn-y-Garrag in Wales contains the carving of a local giant lake-dwelling reptile whose features include large paddle-like flippers, a long neck and a small head.

·         One refers to a creature that spat poisonous venom at its victims. Another describes the creature as “being vast in body, with a crested head, teeth like a saw, and a tail extending to an enormous length.” It liked to eat sheep, and shepherds; local archers tried to kill the beast, unsuccessfully, due to its impenetrable hide.

·         At Carlisle Cathedral in England, a 15th century bishop’s tomb has brass carvings of creatures that look like dinosaurs.

The Saxon poem Beowulf describes three specific creatures: a flying reptile (the description of which matches a pteranodon), a sea dragon (common in harbors, depicted on Viking ships) and a land monster called a grendel.

·         The grendel was larger than a human, bipedal with small and puny forelimbs; it growled angrily and slayed with its mouth or jaws—swallowing the body of its victims rapidly in large gobbles!

·         He hunted alone and at night, approaching human settlements and waiting silently in the darkness for his prey to fall asleep. The Danes employed a giant watcher to watch for the approach of grendels.

·         A large carved stone in an old Saxon church (in England) shows such a creature biting the necks of other quadrupedal creatures.

·         Woodcut illustrations in medieval European books also show bipedal, scaled reptiles with large mouths. Too many incidents like these are reported down through the centuries and from all sorts of locations for us to say that they are all fairy-tales.

Even the stories of fire-breathing dragons may be true.

·         God describes leviathan to Job as follows: “His sneezings flash forth light,…out of his mouth go burning lights; sparks of fire shoot out. Smoke goes out of his nostrils, as from a boiling pot and burning rushes.” Job 41:18-21—A creature with a flame-throwing capability? Far-fetched?

·         Not when you examine the bombardier beetle. When threatened, the little beetle sprays a vapor, made from two chemicals stored in twin chambers at the rear of his body—hydroquinone and hydrogen peroxide—instantly heated to 212˚F. High-speed cameras have recorded both audible pops and puffs of smoke when the beetle sprays.

·         Some dinosaur skulls have been found with chambers in them as well, particularly the duck-billed or crested ones. Scientists have supposed they were echo chambers for making sounds, perhaps mating calls. They could just as well be for storing and mixing chemicals that ignite when projected. The little bombardier beetle is a mighty argument for creation. His system is so complex and exacting; nothing works until everything works! It is purely evidence of design and defies evolution!

5. What Happened To Them?

They died. Lots of animals have died out from this earth. The world after the Flood was much different than before. The environmental conditions, with the sparse vegetation, the destruction of the pre-Flood vapor canopy, and the temperature extremes during the ensuing Ice Age would have caused many animal types to become extinct, a process which continues today. Plant life and birds did not experience such extinction but many land creatures did. Though the pictures of dinosaurs choking to death from the cataclysmic dust of a meteor impact is a commonly touted idea, it does not explain why flowering plants or birds survived the holocaust!

·         Hunters wiped out mammoths and mastodons; perhaps they wiped out dinosaurs as well. Had there been zoos, maybe some could have been saved. In Wales, the flying reptiles were reckoned to be as bad as foxes for poultry so were routinely killed. Various accounts describe how the marine reptiles hanging around harbors were hunted and killed.

·         Some marine “dragons” survived because sailors have throughout history, even up to the present, reported “dragons” at sea. It may be that some are still alive in isolated parts of the oceans and deep lakes of the world. Numerous native accounts tell of a sauropod-like animal in the swampy interior of the Congolese rain forests.

·         Most creationists believe that dinosaurs have coexisted with man from the beginning, only becoming extinct in the Middle Ages. Evolutionists have difficulty explaining away dragon legends, cave drawings, and even modern sightings. They completely ignore human footprints in dinosaur strata and even inside dinosaur footprints. They can’t explain the evolution of dinosaurs or their demise. All they can do is get you excited about their imaginative recreations of a world that only exists in their minds.

6. Can Dinosaurs Be Cloned?

Can large animals be cloned using DNA from other species, like frogs? In order to clone dinosaurs, researchers need perfectly preserved and complete dinosaur DNA (which we don’t have) and a living mother dinosaur to provide the living egg cell (which we also don’t have and aren’t likely to have). Don’t lose any sleep over cloned dinosaurs!

Conclusion:

Dinosaurs did NOT live millions of years ago; they DID live beside people; they DID go on Noah’s Ark; they are mentioned in the Bible: they DID live after the Flood (Job 40-41). There is MUCH evidence that they have lived up until quite recently. God CREATED all animal types. Dinosaurs did NOT evolve, and there is really NO mystery about what happened to them.

It is important to defend the book of Genesis to our children and ourselves. After all, if the first book in the Bible can’t be trusted in our eyes or in their eyes, why should any other? As one woman once asked, “When my church told me that I had to accept evolution, and that Genesis couldn’t be believed as written, I must then ask, ‘When does God start telling the truth?’” Our God tells the truth from the very first verse!

Sources For Further Study

1. Dinosaurs Q&A at www.answersingenesis.org.

2. Bishop Bells Brass Behemoths!, Phillip Bell, Creation magazine 25(4), September 2003 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v25/i4/bishop.asp.

3. Evidence of Dinosaurs at Angkor, Kenneth E. Cole, January 15, 2007 at www.answersingenesis.org/docs2007/0115angkor.asp.

4. After the Flood, by Bill Cooper, New Wine Press and online at www.ldolphin.org/cooper.

5. Dinosaurs by Design, Duane Gish, Master Books.

6. Dinosaurs and Dragons: Stamping on the Legends, Russell M. Grigg, Creation magazine 14(3), June 1992 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v14/i3/dinosaurs.asp.

7. Messages on Stone, Dennis L. Swift, Creation magazine 19(2), March 1997 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v19/i2/stone.asp.

8. Thunderbirds, Bill Johnson, Creation magazine 24(2), March 2002 at www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v24/i2/thunderbirds.asp.

9. Utahs Testimony to Catastrophe, Andy McIntosh, May 8, 2007 at http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v24/i2/thunderbirds.asp.

10. What happened to the Dinosaurs?, Don Batten, Ken Ham, Jonathan Sarfati, and Carl Wieland at www.answersingenesis.org/home/Area/AnswersBook/dinosaurs19.asp.

11. Could Behemoth Have Been a Dinosaur?, Allan K. Steel, TJ Archive, August 2001 at www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v15/i2/behemoth.asp.

Related Topics: Creation, Evolution

17. CHRIST and the CROSS: The Promised Redeemer, Part 1

Related Media

“So he said to them, ‘You foolish people – how slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken! Wasn’t it necessary for the Christ to suffer these things and enter into his glory?’ Then beginning with Moses and all the prophets, he interpreted to them the things written about himself in all the scriptures.” (Luke 24:25-27)

Day One Study

Read Genesis 11:27-12:4.

1. What information is revealed to us about Abram in 11:27-12:1, 4? See also Genesis 24:7 and Acts 7:2.

2. Notice all the aspects of the promise God made to Abram. Which part of the promise specifically affects you and why? See Acts 3:25 and Galatians 3:8.

The Path To The Messiah

3. So, God made a nation for Himself through Abraham. After nearly two hundred years, seventy-two of his descendants went into Egypt to escape a famine; four hundred years later, two million Hebrews came out of Egypt on their way to the land promised to them by God earlier. Read Genesis 13:14-17 and 15:13-16. What did God promise?

Scriptural Insight: Recall God’s provision for the sin of Adam and Eve in Genesis 3:21 which required the slaying of an animal to provide covering for them. Two essential components of salvation were introduced at that time: the shedding of blood and atonement (covering) for sin. Through Moses, God graciously gave the new nation of Israel a sacrificial system (the Mosaic Law) which provided forgiveness for their sins by their obedience through faith in following the system He provided. The book of Leviticus describes this, the high point of the book being chapters 16 and 17 which are about ATONEMENT for sin made once a year by the High Priest for all the sins of the Israelites. Practically every SACRIFICE included the sprinkling or smearing of blood on the altar or within the tabernacle, thus teaching that atonement involves the substitution of life for life. The blood of the Old Testament sacrifices pointed forward to the blood of the Lamb of God, who obtained for his people “eternal redemption.” NEVER did God demand nor encourage human sacrifice from His people; He considered it evil. (Jeremiah 7:31)

Throughout the Old Testament, God promised to send a prophet to the Israelites from among their own people who would be God’s ANOINTED ONE. In Old Testament times, anointing signified being set apart for service, particularly as king or priest. But people were looking for not just an anointed one but the Anointed One—their Messiah. The English word MESSIAH comes from the Hebrew word for “anointed one,” and the English word CHRIST comes from the Greek word for “anointed one.” We will now begin to examine some of the prophecies of the Messiah in the Old Testament and their fulfillment in the New Testament through Jesus. Jesus claimed to be not a Messiah, but THE Messiah. See John 4:25-26.

Day Two Study

In the section below, read the Old Testament passages and describe what was promised about the Messiah. These are called Messianic Prophecies. Then read the New Testament references to Jesus’ fulfillment of these prophecies as the Messiah.

4. a. Prophecy: Read Genesis 3:15 (considered the “first gospel” promising the ultimate coming and victory of the Redeemer). What was promised about the Messiah?

b. Fulfillment: Read Romans 16:20 and Colossians 2:14-15. What was fulfilled in the life of Jesus the Messiah?

5. a. Prophecy: Read Deuteronomy 18:15-18. What was promised about the Messiah?

b. Fulfillment: Read Acts 3:19-23. What was fulfilled in the life of Jesus the Messiah?

6. a. Prophecy: Read 2 Samuel 7:12-16. What was promised about the Messiah?

b. Fulfillment: Read Matthew 1:1, 6; 21:9. What was fulfilled in the life of Jesus the Messiah?

7. a. Prophecy: Read Psalm 2. What was promised about the Messiah?

b. Fulfillment: Read Luke 3:21-22; Acts 4:25-28; and Hebrews 1:1-5. What was fulfilled in the life of Jesus the Messiah?

8. a. Prophecy: Read Isaiah 9:6. What was promised about the Messiah?

b. Fulfillment: Luke 2:7; John 8:58; Colossians 2:9; and Ephesians 2:14. What was fulfilled in the life of Jesus the Messiah?

9. Summarize what you have learned so far regarding Jesus fulfilling the Old Testament prophecies pertaining to the Christ.

Day Three Study

Deeper Discoveries

·         Read the essay “What Proof Do You Have that Jesus Was the Messiah?” following this lesson.

·         Much of the material used in this lesson and the next comes from Jews for Jesus, an evangelistic organization of Christian Jews specifically reaching out to their Jewish brethren. You may get more detailed information from their web site at www.jews-for-jesus.org, particularly the section called “The Case for the Messiah.” If you have Jewish friends or family, you will find valuable information to use in witnessing to them, including most of the questions asked by Jews about Christianity and their objections to what they have heard Christians preach.

What Proof Do You Have That Jesus Was The Messiah?

Taken from www.jewsforjesus.org.

It is important to begin by saying that for one who has already made up his or her mind that Jesus is not the Messiah, no amount of evidence will be convincing. But for those who are honest in asking, the evidence speaks for itself.

When sincerely asked, this question is a good one. After all, there have been false Messiahs in Jewish history. Among the most prominent were Bar Kochba and Shabbetai Zevi. Bar Kochba led a revolt against Rome in the years 132-135 C.E. (Christian Era)

During this revolt, one of the most famous figures in Jewish history, Rabbi Akiva, proclaimed him to be “King Messiah.” Unfortunately, Bar Kochba, Akiva and thousands of Jews were killed in 135 C.E. when the Romans stormed the stronghold of Betar. Shabbetai Zevi, on the other hand, was a self-proclaimed Messiah. Flourishing in 17th-century Europe, the Shabbatean movement spread among both the common people and the rabbis. But when Shabbetai Zevi was arrested in 1666 by the Sultan of Turkey, he converted to Islam rather than face death. We have been tragically wrong before, so it is not surprising that hard evidence should be sought for believing in Jesus.

The idea of a Messiah is one that is found throughout the Hebrew Bible. There, the Messiah’s “I.D.” is given to us. Imagine looking up a friend by first locating his country. That would not be enough information, so you would need lo ascertain his city, street, and specific number on that street. It would also help if you had a phone number and knew the time at which he would be home.

Similarly, the Bible tells us the “I.D.” of the Messiah. His ethnic background, place of birth, time frame of his arrival and other identifying characteristics are given. These “credentials” enable us to identify the Messiah, and to recognize imposters.

Of course it might be objected that if these “credentials” are so clear, why didn’t most Jewish people believe in Jesus, and why were they so taken in by false Messiahs like Bar Kochba and Shabbetai Zevi?

To understand this, one must realize that by the time of Jesus, the Messianic hope had become greatly politicized in the minds of the people. They were seeking deliverance from the tyranny of Rome. Although the Scripture spoke both of the sufferings and of the victories of the Messiah, the victorious aspect had become uppermost in the minds of the common people because of the Roman domination. This “lopsided” view of the Messiah has stuck with Jewish people, and the politicization of the Messianic hope has continued. Thus the hope of a political rather than a spiritual Messiah contributes to both the acceptance of people such as Bar Kochba, and the rejection of Jesus in his role as a Messiah.

This is not to say that all Jewish people rejected the claims of Jesus. Far from that being the case, all the first followers of Jesus were Jews. In fact, the rabbis of that time period and afterwards were well aware of the many Messianic prophecies which Christians claimed were fulfilled in Jesus. So for instance, although the Talmudic rabbis concurred that Isaiah 53 was a prediction of the Messiah, by medieval times the pressure from those who applied this prophecy to Jesus was so great that Rashi, that greatest medieval Biblical scholar, reinterpreted the chapter and said it referred to the nation of Israel. This interpretation is maintained today by many Jewish scholars, though it only dates back to the Middle Ages.

What, then, are some of the credentials of the Messiah? Only a few can be listed below; there are many others. All of these passages were recognized by the early rabbis as referring to the Messiah:

·         Messiah was to be born at Bethlehem: Micah 5:1.

·         Messiah would be from the tribe of Judah: Genesis 49:10.

·         Messiah would present himself by riding on an ass: Zechariah 9:9.

·         Messiah would be tortured to death: Psalm 22.

·         Messiah would arrive before the destruction of the Second Temple: Daniel 9:24-27.

·         Messiah’s life would match a particular description, including suffering, silence at his arrest and trial, death and burial in a rich man’s tomb, and resurrection: Isaiah 52:13-53:12.

In detail as to lineage, birthplace, time, and lifestyle, Jesus matched the Messianic expectations of the Hebrew Scriptures. The record of this fulfillment is to be found in the pages of the New Testament. But several other factors combine to further substantiate the Messiahship of Jesus.

In the first place, he claimed to be the Messiah! When a woman said to him, “I know that Messiah is coming.” he replied, “I who speak to you am he.” (John 4:25-26.) Naturally, that doesn’t prove anything one way or the other. But if Jesus had never made the claim to be the Messiah, why would we bother to try and prove that he was? His own claim lays the groundwork for the rest of the evidence.

Also, Jesus’ life is in sharp contrast to that of the false Messiahs, and it is a positive demonstration of what we would expect the Messiah to do. Thus, Jesus worked many miracles of healing, bringing wholeness into people’s lives, forgiving sin and restoring relationships. In contrast with Shabbetai Zevi, for instance, Jesus carried out the Law of Moses as a devout Jew. And in contrast with Bar Kochba, although Jesus also died, he was resurrected!

The resurrection is a third piece of additional evidence, and it is perhaps the most convincing vindication of Jesus’ claims. It is interesting that an Israeli scholar, Pinchas Lapide, has written a book which has attracted no small amount of attention in the Jewish community. The reason is that Lapide has said that the resurrection of Jesus is well within the realm of possibility. After all, he reasoned, the Hebrew Scriptures give a number of accounts of people coming back to life. Why not Jesus as well? Regrettably, Lapide fails to note that the resurrection of Jesus is described in terms that go far beyond the resuscitations of the other stories; and, he fails to come to grips with the fact that Jesus predicted his own resurrection, which vindicated his claims to Messiahship.

An assortment of explanations has been offered throughout history to explain away the resurrection as either non-historical (“It never happened.”) or as non-supernatural (“Here’s how it happened.”). But these explanations have not been successful. Run down the possibilities for yourself and see which makes the best sense. Did the Roman authorities steal the body of Jesus from the tomb? Then why didn’t they produce it when the word started being spread that Jesus was risen? Or maybe the disciples stole it. But could such a fabrication on their part account for the change in their attitude? Three days earlier they were disillusioned, defeated idealists who had hoped that Jesus would bring in a new world order; could a lie which they knew to be a lie, now account for their hope, their boldness in the face of official persecution, and for the high ethical standards they set?

Or perhaps Jesus never died: he just fainted on the cross and revived in the tomb. This idea was popularized in the book The Passover Plot by Hugh Schonfield. Unfortunately the author overlooked the fact that the Romans pierced Jesus’ side, which would have most certainly killed him. Also, there was a contingent of Roman soldiers guarding the tomb as well as a huge stone that blocked its entrance. There was no way that a resuscitated Jesus could have escaped and then convinced hundreds of skeptical eyewitnesses that he had conquered death forever! Or was it all a mass hallucination? It must have been quite a hallucination to be seen by vastly different kinds of people at different times of day in many different places. You might be able to fool one person, but can you fool five hundred who saw him at one time? And unlike the pattern of hallucinations, these appearances of the resurrected Jesus stopped as suddenly as they started, forty days after the resurrection took place.

The only satisfactory explanation is that the resurrection actually occurred, just as the record says. And if that’s the case, it’s a solid reason for accepting the Messiahship of Jesus.

Finally, Jesus transforms people’s lives. Because he provides atonement for sin and reconciliation with God, Jesus brings peace, joy, and purpose into people’s lives. Apart from faith in him, there is no basis for true peace or direction, for as the psalmist says, “Man is estranged from the womb.” That this estrangement is healed by the reconciling ministry of Jesus is the common experience of those who believe in him. So, between the objective evidence of the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament, and the subjective verification in our own lives--we think there’s ample evidence that Jesus was who he claimed to be!

© 1998 Jews for Jesus.

Related Topics: Creation, Evolution

18. CHRIST and the CROSS: The Promised Redeemer, Part 2

Related Media

“As his custom was, Paul went into the synagogue, and on three Sabbath days he reasoned with them from the Scriptures, explaining and proving that the Christ had to suffer and rise from the dead. ‘This Jesus I am proclaiming to you is the Christ,’ he said.” (Acts 17:2-3)

“Paul went to the Jews in the synagogue, as he customarily did, and on three Sabbath days he addressed them from the scriptures, explaining and demonstrating that the Christ had to suffer and to rise from the dead, saying, ‘This Jesus I am proclaiming to you is the Christ.’” (Acts 18: 27-28)

Day One Study

In the section below, read the Old Testament passages and describe what was promised about the Messiah. These are called Messianic Prophecies. Then read the New Testament references to Jesus’ fulfillment of these prophecies as the Messiah.

1. a. Prophecy: Read Isaiah 52:13-53:12. What was promised about the Messiah?

b. Fulfillment: Read the following verses to see what was fulfilled in the life of Jesus the Messiah.

·         Matthew 27:14—

·         John 12:37-40—

·         Acts 8:30-35—

·         2 Corinthians 5:21—

·         1 Peter 2:21-25—

2. a. Prophecy: Read Jeremiah 31:31-34. What was promised about the Messiah?

b. Fulfillment: Read the following verses to see what was fulfilled in the life of Jesus the Messiah.

·         Matthew 26:27-28—

·         Luke 22:20—

·         Hebrews 8:7-13—

Day Two Study

3. a. Prophecy: Read Micah 5:1-2. What was promised about the Messiah?

b. Fulfillment: Read Matthew 2:1-6. What was fulfilled in the life of Jesus the Messiah?

4. a. Prophecy: Read Zechariah 9:9. What was promised about the Messiah?

b. Fulfillment: Read Matthew 21:1-5 and John 12:14-15. What was fulfilled in the life of Jesus the Messiah?

5. a. Prophecy: Read Daniel 9:24-27. What was promised about the Messiah?

b. Fulfillment: Read Galatians 4:4. What was fulfilled in the life of Jesus the Messiah?

6. a. Prophecy: Read Psalm 22. What was promised about the Messiah?

b. Fulfillment: Read the following verses to see what was fulfilled in the life of Jesus the Messiah?

·         Matthew 27:35-36—

·         Matthew 27:43—

·         Matthew 27:46—

·         Mark 15:24—

·         Mark 15:29-32—

·         Luke 23:33—

·         John 19:28—

·         John 19:34—

·         Acts 17:26—

·         Philippians 2:10-11—

·         Hebrews 2:11-12—

Day Three Study

Appreciation Application:

7. For anyone who is honestly asking, “Who is Jesus?”, the evidence speaks for itself. For anyone of Jewish descent who is honestly asking, “What proof do you have that Jesus was the Messiah,” the evidence also speaks for itself. Jesus Himself, when quizzing His disciples about what others were saying about Him, asked the question in Mark 8:29 “But what about you? Who do you say I am?” Peter answered, “You are the Christ (Messiah, Anointed One).” Today, He asks the same question of us. “Who do you say I am?”

·         Are you convinced that He is the Christ?

·         Use a creative means (poem, song, drawing, art form, prose description) to explain your answer.

Appreciation Assignment:

8. Spend some time meditating upon God’s plan to redeem us. Then, spend time in prayer thanking Him, etc.

Deeper Discoveries:

Read the 2 essays about Jesus as Messiah, “Y’SHUA…Why That Name?” and “When the Messiah Comes,” following this lesson for additional insight into Jesus as the promised Messiah. Make notes about what you learn.

Y’shua…Why That Name?

Adapted from an article by Stuart Dauermann at www.jewsforjesus.org

The naming of the Messiah is recorded in the first chapter of the Gospel According to Matthew. In that account, Matthew describes an angel’s visit to Joseph, who was to become the guardian of the Messiah. (Angelic visitations preceding the birth of significant figures in Biblical history are not unusual. The births of Isaac and of Samson, for instance, were each preceded by an angelic visitor.) In Matthew’s account, the angel speaks to Joseph of the birth of the Messiah in these words: “She (Miriam) will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Y’shua, because he will save his people from their sins.”

Much may be learned about the Messiah from considering this brief text. The name Y’shua is necessarily the name of a human being: “She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Y’shua.” Although it may seem obvious to many that the Messiah would be a human being, it is necessary to reaffirm this fact because we live in a day when religious thought is influenced by science fiction. And indeed, many allusions to a Messiah figure can be found in sci-fi films and books. But no, the Messiah could neither be an angel, nor some kind of extraterrestrial humanoid. He had to be a man. This is necessary for a number of reasons:

First, he had to be a man in order to satisfy the demands of prophecy. The prophets predicted numerous times that the Messiah would be born as a human being. Isaiah wrote of him: “For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on His shoulders... Of the increase of His government and peace there will be no end.” Clearly the Messiah would be a human being.

Secondly, he had to be a man in order to satisfy the demands of God’s justice. The Scriptures reveal that one of the Messiah’s tasks was to offer Himself as a korban—a sacrifice—for the sins of His people. Although this understanding seems foreign to many Jews today, it was once widely accepted. For example, in the Midrash on the Book of Ruth, an allegorical interpretation is given to explain Ruth 2:14, “At mealtime Boaz said to her, ‘Come over here. Have some bread and dip it in the wine vinegar.”‘ The following is written: “The fifth interpretation (of Ruth 2:14) makes it refer to the Messiah. ‘Come hither’ means approach to royal state. ‘And eat of the bread’ refers to the bread of royalty; ‘And dip thy morsel in the vinegar’ refers to His sufferings as it is said, ‘But He was wounded because of our transgressions (Isaiah 53:5).”‘ If the Messiah was to suffer because of our transgressions, as our substitute, it is appropriate that he be a man.

Thirdly, the Messiah had to be a man to satisfy our need for a compassionate high priest. While it is well known that the Messiah would be a king, not so well known is his function as a priest, i.e., one who represents his people’s cause to God. Yet this is what the prophet Zechariah declared in Zechariah 6:13, where he said that the Messiah would sit as a priest upon his throne. In order for him to be a compassionate high priest, he needed to be one of us.

More Than A Man

Not only is Y’shua the name of a man, but Y’shua is necessarily the name of one who was to be more than a man. Indeed, the Jewish Scriptures say that the Messiah would be called God. Two passages often used by the rabbis in reference to the Messiah clearly teach this: “The days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will raise up to David a righteous branch, a king who will reign wisely and do what is right and just in the land. In his days, Judah will be saved and Israel will live in safety. This is the name by which he will be called: The Lord Our Righteousness” (Jeremiah 23:5-6). “And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace” (Isaiah 9:6).

Finally, Y’shua is necessarily the name of the only one through whom we can find salvation. An examination of the meaning of the name and its background in the Jewish Scriptures reveals why this is so.

Y’shua means “the Lord saves.” It involves a combination of the name YHWH (the Ineffable Name) and the Hebrew root YASHA’. YASHA’ is related to an Arabic word, “to make wide, to make sufficient” as con basted with TSARAR, meaning “narrow.” Wideness came to connote “freedom” or “safety” which led to the root YASHA’, having the meaning: to be delivered to a position of freedom or safety.

In the Tenach, God is presented as the source of salvation, “Our God is a God who saves” (Psalm 68:20). Human agents are effective only as they are empowered by God. Ultimately, salvation had only one source—The Lord: “...And there is no God apart from me, a righteous God and a Savior; there is none but me. Turn to me and be saved, all you ends of the earth; for I am God, and there is no other” (Isaiah 45:21b, 22).

Although many of our people assume that the Tenach speaks only of salvation from physical distress, this is not so; the concept developed in the sacred writings to specify the promise of salvation from sin:

Salvation from What?

“They will no longer defile themselves with their idols and vile images or with any of their offenses, for I will save them from all their dwelling places where they sinned, and I will cleanse them. They will be my people, and I will be their God...” (Ezekiel 37:23).

“Save me from bloodguilt, O God, the God who saves me, and my tongue will sing of your righteousness” (Psalm 51:14). “Help us, O God, our Savior, for the glory of your name; deliver us and atone for our sins, for your name’s sake” (Psalm 79:9).

Indeed, in Jeremiah 17:14 salvation is portrayed as a means of healing the effects of sin in our life and our relationship with God: “Heal me, O Lord, and I will be healed; save me and I will be saved, for you are the one I praise.” Jeremiah also specifies that God’s chosen agent of salvation is the Messiah. We see this in the passage quoted earlier (Jeremiah 23:6).

The Inevitable Name

The divine choice of Y’shua as the name for the Messiah has a “holy inevitability” and an iron clad logic. Salvation comes only from the Lord. The Messiah is the One through whom God accomplishes and culminates salvation. No wonder, then, that the angel told Joseph, “You are to give him the name Y’shua—the Lord saves—for he will save his people from their sins.”

It is Y’shua who brings us deliverance from the distress of our sins, bringing wholeness instead of woe.

“ He was wounded because of our rebellious deeds, crushed because of our sins; he endured punishment that made us well; because of his wounds we have been healed.” (Isaiah 53:5).

Why should the name Y’shua be important to us to day?

“And there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved.” (Acts 4:12).

Accessed at http://www.jewsforjesus.org/publications/issues/3_10/whythatname on March 20, 2012.

When The Messiah Comes...

Adapted from an article by Barry Rubin at www.jewsforjesus.org

Oftentimes, Jews who come to believe in Jesus are told by their unbelieving families, “If you’d only known more about Judaism, if you’d only studied your own religion, you never would have come to believe this way.”

My parents never said that to me because, before I accepted Christ, I went to see an Orthodox rabbi on my own initiative.

You see, I had met some Jews for Jesus who had given me some very convincing arguments from the Scriptures apparently pointing to Jesus as the Messiah. However, I was afraid to just “jump in.” “How can I be sure?” I thought. My impetuousness had gotten me into trouble in the past. Once I had gotten involved in the occult. Another time, I had come very close to marrying a Gentile girl I knew I shouldn’t marry. The only sound thing to do, I thought, would be to see a rabbi and ask him what he thought of these Scriptures. After all, I figured he should know.

Rabbi Bogner and I sat and discussed the many passages the Jews for Jesus had pointed out. We began with the 53rd chapter of Isaiah. The Jews for Jesus said it talked about the Messiah. The rabbi said it referred to Israel. Then we studied Jeremiah 31:31-34 which talks of a “new covenant” that God would make with His people. The rabbi just scoffed at this one.

Finally, I brought to his attention Daniel 9, which, according to the Jews for Jesus, told the time of the Messiah’s coming.

At that, Rabbi Bogner told me he was prohibited by Talmudic Law from studying that chapter. When I asked why, he said, “Cursed be the man who calculates the time of the coming of the Messiah.” He knew that Daniel 9 did indeed contain God’s message to us as to when the Messiah would come. But he explained that the Talmud prohibited studying it because of the possible unbelief that could arise from some making incorrect calculations and being disappointed.

But this didn’t make any sense to me. Why would God give us a Book and then tell us not to read part of it? I didn’t think God played “cosmic games” on us.

I left the rabbi’s study a little perplexed. And with more courage than I thought I had in me, I plunged into my own study of Daniel 9. Now I knew I was not a Bible scholar, but I was no dummy either! As a college instructor I felt I had a good grasp of concepts and could follow a carefully reasoned argument to its conclusion. And having been trained as an accountant, I knew I could make whatever mathematical calculations were necessary.

Well, Daniel 9 referred to “an anointed one” being “cut off” after a certain number of weeks. The Hebrew word for “anointed”“ is “mashiach,” which, in Greek, is “christos” or “Christ.” Also, in the Bible, to be “cut off” meant to die. I then needed to calculate the number of weeks starting with the rebuilding of Jerusalem as stated in the Scripture verse, “So you are to know and discern that from the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until Messiah the Prince there will be seven weeks and 62 weeks.” (Daniel 9:25) The only decree to go out was by Artaxerxes in 444 B.C.E. Biblically speaking, a week equals seven years and a sabbatical year, approximately 360 days. My computations were fairly simple, but the answer I got was difficult to accept.

This anointed one was to die in 32 C.E., the year Christ was crucified. I could not call this a coincidence. It would be like saying two plus two equals five.

I thought about Rabbi Bogner. It did help me to talk with him. For despite the Talmudic prohibition on studying that Scripture passage for fear of resulting unbelief, its study made me into a believer, a believer in the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

Accessed at http://jewsforjesus.org/publications/issues/1_3/messiahcomes on March 20, 2012.

Related Topics: Creation, Evolution

19. CHRIST and the CROSS: Restoration, Part 1

Related Media

As God designed and formed the human body, He knew, of course, that in the fullness of time even He would become a man. In that day, He would prepare a human body for His Son; and it would be “made in the likeness of men” (Philippians 2:7), just as man had been made in the likeness of God. Both in body and spirit, Jesus Christ was indeed Himself the image of God. Why did Jesus have to die on the cross? Why was it so important for Him to be resurrected from the dead? In what ways did Christ’s work on the cross and His resurrection frees those who believe in Him from the curse and its consequences?

Day One Study

1. Review Genesis 1:26-2:25. List words or phrases describing Adam and Eve’s relationships with God, each other, and their environment before sin. Example: perfect fellowship with God

2. Review Genesis 3:1-21. List words or phrases describing the effects of sin on Adam and Eve. Example: separation from God

Sin Is In Our Nature!!!

Someone might say, “I’m basically a good person and I’m very happy with my own religion, so why should I believe in Jesus?” If everyone was good in God’s sight, nobody would need Jesus. Oh, to be sure, most of us aren’t murderers or thieves or anything like that. We like to think of ourselves as respectable, with no need for major changes in our lives. Yet the picture the Scriptures present is that even the best of us is desperately sinful, deeply alienated from God, from each other and even from ourselves. We are all born sinners and continue to live that way!!

But God is serious about our sin. We tend to think that sin is exclusively a matter of committing individual acts. But sin is much more than that. The Scriptures show us that sin is a condition of human existence which does not pertain to a particular act, but rather to an attitude, one of arrogance and rebellion. The best of men, like Abraham, Moses and King David, all committed acts of sin. Sin is universal. And that’s why God provided a way of forgiveness, beginning with the Old Testament animal sacrifices and culminating in the death of the Messiah.

We really are sinful in the depths of our being, and all the education, affluence and technology in the world hasn’t changed that. It’s only enabled us to express our rebellion in a more sophisticated fashion. Jesus really did come in history, really did die and really did rise from the dead. All the objections in the world and all the ignoring of the evidence won’t make that reality go away…But God really does hold us responsible for facing the facts about ourselves and accepting His offer of forgiveness through Jesus.” (Adapted from www.jewsforjesus.org, “Questions and Answers”)

Restoration

The goal of this lesson is for you to see what Christ restored to us as individuals through His death and resurrection. Read the verses describing how sin and the curse affected us before Christ. Then read the corresponding verses to see what Christ’s death and resurrection restored to us.

3. a. Sins Effect: Read Ephesians 2:1-3, 11-12. How had sin and the Curse affected us before Christ? How is the life of the unbeliever described?

b. Restored: Read the following verses to see what Christ’s death and resurrection restored to us.

·         Ephesians 2:4-10, 13—

·         2 Corinthians 5:17-21—

Day Two Study

4. a. Sins Effect: Read Romans 5:12-14. How had sin and the Curse affected us before Christ?

b. Restored: Read Romans 5:1-2,16-19. What did Christ’s death and resurrection restore to us?

5. a. Sins Effect: Read the following verses to see how sin and the Curse had affected us before Christ.

·         Psalm 94:3-7—

·         Ecclesiastes 2:1-11—

·         Ecclesiastes 4:1-4—

b. Restored: Read the following verses to what Christs death and resurrection restored to us.

·         Romans 5:3-5—

·         2 Corinthians 1:3-5—

·         2 Corinthians 4:15—

·         2 Corinthians 12:9-10—

Day Three Study

Appreciation Application:

6. From what we have learned in this lesson,

·         What impact should Christ’s work have on your life today?

·         How does this lesson encourage you regarding the future?

·         Does this lesson convict you? How?

Related Topics: Creation, Evolution

20. CHRIST and the CROSS: Restoration, Part 2

Related Media

Day One Study

The goal of this lesson is for you to continue to see what Christ restored to us as individuals through His death and resurrection. As you did in the last lesson, read the verses describing how sin and the curse affected us before Christ. Then read the corresponding verses to see what Christ’s death and resurrection restored to us.

1. a. Sins Effect: Read 1 Corinthians 15:21-22. How had sin and the Curse affected us before Christ?

b. Restored: Read 1 Corinthians 15:20-27, 54-58. What has Christ’s death and resurrection restored to us?

2. a. Sins Effect: Read the following verses to see how sin and the Curse had affected us before Christ.

·         Psalm 14:1—

·         Psalm 51:5—

·         Isaiah 53:6—

·         Romans 8:5-8—

b. Restored: Read the following verses to see what Christ’s death and resurrection has restored to us.

·         Romans 8:1-4; 9-11—

·         Colossians 2:13-14—

·         Hebrews 9:13-14—

Day Two Study

3. a. Sins Effect: Read Romans 5:10a, Colossians 1:21, and James 4:4. How had sin and the Curse affected us before Christ?

b. Restored: Read the following verses to see what Christ’s death and resurrection restored to us.

·         Romans 5:10b—

·         Romans 8:31-39—

4. a. Sins Effect: Read the following verses to see how sin and the Curse had affected us before Christ.

·         Genesis 11:8-9; 9:19; 10:15, 20, 31—

·         Acts 10:27-28

·         Ephesians 2:11-12—

b. Restored: Read the following verses to see what Christ’s death and resurrection restored to us.

·         Matthew 28:19-20—

·         Acts 2:5-11—

·         Acts 10:34-35—

·         Ephesians 2:13-19—

·         Colossians 3:11—

Day Three Study

Appreciation Assignment:

5. From what you have learned in BOTH lessons (this one AND the previous one), think about what Christ has already restored to you as a believer. Knowing all this should boost your self-esteem sky high! You are greatly loved by a Great and Loving God who desires to free you from the curse; in part for now, in the future—completely! Spend some time thanking God for His indescribable gift! Feel free to be creative in the space below.

Related Topics: Creation, Evolution

22. CONSUMMATION: Restoration, Part 4

Related Media

A Possible Timetable For The End

As Paul writes in 1 Thessalonians, believers (living and those who have already died) will be “raptured” or “caught up” to meet Christ in the air when the time comes that God has predetermined and then go to heaven to be with Christ in new glorified, heavenly bodies. It is generally believed that a 7-year period of tribulation involving extreme deception, wars, and suffering will either follow or somehow be associated with the rapture of believers. Some people still on earth will become Christians during this time.

At the end of the 7-year period, Christ will gloriously return to earth as He promised, setting up His kingdom on earth with Jerusalem as His capital. Those who become believers during the Tribulation period will be given resurrection bodies and, along with the raptured believers, will rule with Christ on the earth. From Revelation 20, we determine that Satan will be bound for one thousand years (often called “The Millennium”) as Christ reigns on the earth. Worship will center at the Temple in Jerusalem. There will be worldwide peace between mankind and even among animals. Earth will be filled with the knowledge of the Lord but still not all will believe in Christ because man’s sin nature has not been removed. At the end of the 1000 years, Satan will be freed and will lead unbelievers against Christ but will be defeated and cast into the lake of fire.

There will then be a resurrection of all the unsaved from throughout the ages who will be judged as sinners and cast into the lake of fire. God will then create a new heaven and new earth…

Day One Study

1. Reviewing from last lesson. Why do you think God wants to create a new heaven and a new earth?

2. When you were a child, what did you imagine heaven to be like?

3. As an adult, what do you imagine heaven to be like?

4. Whom are you expecting/hoping to see there?

Read Revelation 21:1-27.

5. Have you ever wanted to throw out all your clothes and go shopping, and get everything new? Well, God does just that. What does God declare in Revelation 21:5?

6. Focus on 21:1-4. Write down all that happens in these four verses.

7. What could the advantage be to not having any seas? [Note: some suspect seas are referring to inland seas between land areas like the Mediterranean Sea, not the oceans in total.]

8. So, where will we, believers, spend eternity?

Day Two Study

“Everything Old Is New Again” — Restoration Complete!

9. Read Revelation 21:9-27. Describe the New Jerusalem—either through words or drawings.

10. Imagine and describe what it will be like for you to live there in the city with God as well as going forth from the city to places on the new earth. (God gives us the description so it is okay! In fact, He wants us to think about that glorious place which will be our future home!!)

11. Discuss the information given to us in Revelation 21:23 and 22:5. See also Genesis 1:3.

12. Read Revelation 22:1-21. Reference is made (verses 1-5, 14,19) to the Tree of Life again. What further information is given about it? See also Joel 3:18.

13. Does this information help you to understand the role of the Tree of Life in Eden? How?

Appreciation Application:

14. Read Genesis 32:30, Exodus 3:6; 33:18-23. Now read Revelation 22:4. At last after all this, we will be able to look at God’s face. Why will we be able to do this? Support your answer with scripture such as Titus 3:4-7 plus any other verses you can find.

Day Three Study

Appreciation Assignment:

15. Thinking back through this entire study:

·         In what ways will you apply/have you applied this study to your life?

·         In what ways have you seen that what we see in God’s World agrees with what we read in God’s Word?

Deeper Discoveries:

·         Go to www.answersingenesis.org and SEARCH anything related to the new heavens and new earth. Select an article to read or watch a video. Also visit www.icr.org and search.

·         Go to www.bible.org and SEARCH anything related to heaven, the new heavens and the new earth. Select an article to read.

Praise God for His Future Plans for You!!!

Related Topics: Creation, Evolution

The Net Pastor's Journal, Eng Ed, Issue 17 Fall 2015

Fall 2015 Edition

Author: Dr. Roger Pascoe, President,

The Institute for Biblical Preaching

Cambridge, Ontario, Canada

(http://tibp.ca/)

C:\Users\Roger\Documents\My Documents\Institute for Biblical Preaching\Forms, Binder Cover Page, Logo\IBP Logos\IBP Logo.jpg

Strengthening the Church in Biblical Preaching and Leadership

Part I: The Power For Preaching, Pt. 2

“The Power Of God” (2 Cor. 4:5-7)

In the last edition of this Journal, we introduced a series on “The Power for Preaching” in which we discussed “The Lost Power and Authority in Preaching.” In that article, I suggested three causes for lost spiritual power in preaching: (1) lost passion for God; (2) conformity to the culture; (3) lack of authority. Then I suggested three reasons why so many preachers do not preach with authority: (1) because their thinking is worldly; (2) because they are afraid of the people; (3) because they do not understand and have not applied the Word to themselves.

We concluded that article by listing the four essential ingredients for powerful preaching: (1) the power of God; (2) the power of the Holy Spirit; (3) the power of prayer; and (4) the power of Scripture. In this edition we are going to explore “The Power of God” in preaching. As the basis for this discussion, let’s look at 2 Cor. 4:5-7, where the apostle Paul’s thesis is basically that the power is of God and not ourselves.

Notice firstly, that preaching is not about us - ...we do not preach ourselves (5). Preaching is not about us and the message that we preach is not about us. Our motivation in preaching is the exact opposite of the god of this age whose objective is to blind the minds of those who do not believe, lest the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine on them (4)

If your mind is blinded, it means that you cannot accept or comprehend the truth of God. Satans objective is to blind unbelievers from comprehending the gospel of Christ, because it reveals the glory of Christ; to block unbelievers from hearing the truth about Christ. Satan does not want unbelievers to know God through Christ. He doesn’t want unbelievers to see or hear or accept the spiritual, life-giving light of the gospel, so he blinds their minds.

Our objective, on the other hand, is to preach Christ with such clarity and power that others see and hear only him, and certainly not us. Preaching is not about us and the message that we preach is not about us. If it were about us, you could understand why some don’t believe it. But it isn’t - it’s about Him who is the exact representation and full revelation of God. It’s about Christ Jesus the Lord (5a) - Christ, the anointed One; Jesus, the Saviour; the Lord, our Master, the supreme One, the Sovereign One. There is only one Lord, one Master, and that is not us. We are not lords over Christ’s flock (1 Pet. 5:3), but servants of his flock, your bondservants for Jesus sake (5b). We are servants of the church, ministers who serve God’s people for Jesus sake. That’s our motivation - for Jesus sake. That’s why we preach.

Just as Jesus became a bondservant (Phil. 2:7), so we make ourselves servants of God’s people for Jesus sake – for the sake of the gospel. Ministers who make themselves prominent and around whom their ministry revolves (when it’s more about the minister than the message; more about the vessel than the treasure) are not authentic ministers "for Jesus’ sake." Authentic ministers of the church are those who do not preach ourselves but Christ Jesus the Lord.

So, firstly, preaching is not about us. But, secondly, preaching is all about God. For it is the God who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, who has shone in our hearts to give us the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ (6). God is the One who, at creation, commanded light to shine out of darkness. And, similarly, he is the One who has shone his spiritual light into the darkness of our hearts in order to illuminate our understanding of God’s glory as reflected in the face of Jesus Christ. We cannot bring about salvation, only God can - Salvation is of the Lord (Jonah 2:9). Only the God of creation is the God of redemption (re-creation). Only the God who created physical light can create spiritual light. The light of the world is Jesus. The One who created light has become the Light. This was so vivid in Paul’s memory, when the light of God enveloped him on the Damascus road and flooded his soul with the light of the knowledge of God’s glory in the face of Jesus Christ. Only the face of Jesus Christ could adequately, properly, and fully manifest the glory of God such that we could understand it.

God commanded the light to shine out of darkness and through the gospel he has shone into our hearts the light of the knowledge of himself as incarnated (portrayed) in the human face of Jesus Christ (Jn. 1:14). Just as in his work of creation, God commanded the light to shine out of the darkness, so in his re-creation through the work of redemption he commanded the Light to shine into the darkness of our human condition so that we could know him. The source of ultimate truth (about who we are, who God is etc.) is only from God. I am the way, the truth, and the life Jesus said. He is the final and full revelation of God. Hence, it is in his face (his person, his incarnation, his self-revelation) that we come to know our glorious God.

Question: If this God of whom Paul speaks is so powerful as to command light to shine out of darkness and who has shone into our hearts to reveal his glory to us, why is it that the human vessels he uses in ministry are so frail, so lacking in glory? Why is there such a contrast between God’s power and glory and the minister’s weakness and frailty? Answer: So that there is no doubt whatsoever as to the divine nature of the message.

This brings us to the third point: preaching is a paradox (the treasure vs. the vessel). But we have this treasure in earthen vessels ... (7). On the one hand, what we preach (the gospel) is a treasure, but on the other hand, preachers ourselves are merely earthen vessels. Lest we think that the vessel (the minister) is as glorious as the message, Paul draws a sharp contrast between, on the one hand, God’s glory (the glory of the message, the gospel, our ministry) and, on the other hand, the incredible weakness of the human vessels whom God uses to proclaim that glory. The gospel we preach is a treasure. This treasure is what Paul elsewhere calls the ministry of the New Covenant (3:6); the ministry of the Spirit (3:8); the ministry of righteousness (3:9); “this ministry” (4:1); our gospel (4:3); the gospel of Christ’s glory (4:4); the light of the glorious knowledge of God in the face of Jesus Christ (4:6).

So what we preach is a treasure (the gospel), which stands in stark contrast to the earthen vessel in which the treasure is contained. The preacher himself is merely an earthen vessel. Earthen vessels are the ministers, the human vehicles in whom the treasure is incarnated and displayed and through whom it is preached. The picture here is of a fragile, breakable, cheap clay pot which contains a treasure. Ministers of the gospel are fragile, frail mortals who contain a divine treasure - the light of the knowledge of God’s glory.

The contrast between this treasure and the earthen vessel is intentional – ... so that the excellence of the power may be of God and not of us (7b). The purpose (so that) of God’s design in using human messengers to proclaim his divine message is to enhance the message (its source, its power, and its results) by the very means he chooses to proclaim and display it, namely, through human weakness. To put it another way: in order that no one can mistake (1) the source of the message, (2) the extraordinary character (“excellence”) of its power, and (3) the supernatural effect of the gospel as coming from anyone else other than God himself, God chose to incarnate (embody) his message in weak human vessels. Since the gospel so radically transforms lives, it could not possibly be a merely human message - it must be divine. The power of the message we preach is of such a character (i.e. superabundant, overpowering, magnificent, beyond human comprehension, life-transforming) that its author can only be God and not ourselves, the human messengers. The messenger, then, is weak, dependent, temporal but the message is powerful, eternal. We are creatures formed from the dust of the ground, whom God in his grace has chosen to bear his name, his gospel.

If the message were moderately powerful it may be attributed to our human wisdom, genius, invention. But such exceeding power that radically transforms lives, emanating from such weak, inadequate vessels must be from a divine source. Further, God’s powerful message is not limited by man’s utter weakness – rather, it is enhanced by it. Such is the case for every minister of the gospel: we are weak precisely so that God’s power may be manifest in us. Thus it was with Gideon and his 300 men, who put to flight the Midianites by merely breaking their earthen vessels so that the light shone out (Judges 7:15ff.; Heb. 11:34). Such it is with us - in our confessed and evident weakness, God displays his power and glory.

This gives us a proper perspective on ministry. We can be thankful for our bodily weakness and mental finitude and frailty because that is what God uses. The messenger, then, is weak, dependent, temporal but the message is powerful, eternal. We are creatures formed from the dust of the ground, whom God in his grace has chosen to bear his name, his gospel. So that when others see what a transformation the gospel produces in the lives of those who believe they can only conclude that the power is of God and not of us.

Part II: Preparing For Preaching

“Understanding The Text”

I. Read The Text

1. Read The Text For Understanding

Everything in sermon preparation begins with a thorough reading of the text. There is no substitute for reading the text. Ask the Holy Spirit to open your understanding as you read.

Read the book in which the text is located. Read it as many times as possible before beginning to prepare your sermon. This accomplishes several objectives: (1) it gives you an overview of the broad scope of the book; (2) it gives you an overview of the context of the particular passage; and (3) it gives you a feel for the flow of the passage and its main points.

Read the particular text for your sermon. Read it repeatedly so that you are saturated in it, so that you can repeat it by memory (not necessarily word-for-word). Read it thoroughly and prayerfully. Reading it in various translations can be helpful. If you are able, reading it in its original language is a good idea.

Read the text in order to: (1) derive a sense of what the text says and means; (2) remove barriers to understanding - i.e. preconceived notions of what it is about and what it means; and (3) hear the text as the original audience would have heard it.

2. Read The Text For Personal Response

Identify personal spiritual issues from the text that you must be deal with in your life. If you don’t deal with them, you won’t adequately and properly preach the text because you are not being obedient to it, in which case, how can you expect it to be effective in your audience?

3. Read The Text To Identify Textual Issues

As you read the text, identify any textual difficulties, variances, complexities, and problems that you need to research and deal with in your sermon.

4. Read The Text To Identify Its Structure

As you read, note the flow of thought in the text. How did the author present his material? Why did he write it? What is the subject? What is his point and how does he prove it?

II. Write Out The Text

1. Write Out A Summary Of The Text

After you have read the passage repeatedly (and perhaps in various translations), summarize the essential thoughts within each paragraph. One way to help you do this is as follows:

a) Download the biblical text to your computer.

b) Divide the text into separate paragraphs, one for each new idea that you have identified as you read the passage.

c) Leave wide margins so that you can write in them and then print this out.

d) Write in the margins the thoughts (ideas, points) expressed in each paragraph of the text, as you have divided it up. These are the main thoughts of the passage. Remember, since there is only ever one subject of a passage, each thought (idea, point) that you identify in each paragraph must relate to the subject of the whole passage. We will talk about identifying the subject of a passage in future editions of this journal.

e) Then, underneath the main thoughts that you have written in the margin of each paragraph, write the subordinate thoughts in the margin as well.

Now you will have at least a preliminary visual summary of the passage, which you will use to structure your sermon.

2. Paraphrase The Text

Paraphrasing the text is a good way to determine if you really understand it. If you are unable to paraphrase it, you probably don’t understand it.

Paraphrasing the text means writing out the passage in your own words as you understand it. Writing out a paraphrase of the text makes sure that you have a coherent grasp of the passage, by being able to express each thought in the passage clearly and connect each idea to the thought that went before it and that comes after it. This exercise solidifies your understanding of the text by putting it in your own words.

As you write out your personal paraphrase, be sure to amplify your paraphrase so that it contains the intent and application of the text as well as its basic meaning. If you have an “Amplified Bible”, read it to see how it does this.

III. Diagram The Text

Another method for identifying the structure of the text (its subject and complements) is to diagram the text (if you are able) by analyzing it grammatically and showing that grammatical structure diagrammatically.

Diagramming provides an objective, grammatical basis for the structure of the passage. The diagrammatical form displays the flow of thought in the text and the connection between the various thoughts in the text. Diagramming makes apparent the flow and structure of the passage and establishes the grammatical relationships between phrases, clauses, and words, which relationship is vital to a proper understanding of the text.

Diagramming the text means displaying main clauses and subordinate clauses, along with adverbial and adjectival qualifiers, in diagrammatic form. This is a way of allowing the structure of the text to emerge from the text and not from the imposition of your own structure on the text.

There are two ways of diagramming: (1) block diagrams in your own language, or (2) Greek diagrams. I am only going to try to explain “indented block diagrams” in your own language.

1. The Purpose Of An Indented Block Diagram is to portray the text visually (according to its grammatical structure) so that its overall composition (or, literary structure and divisions) becomes apparent. This will help you in outlining your sermon following the author’s original structure.

2. The Way To Make An Indented Block Diagram (see examples below) 1

a) Identify the first independent clause and copy it word for word from your text.

b) Copy succeeding material phrase by phrase, locating each phrase carefully under the word it supports or modifies. This will place main ideas to the left margin, with supporting ideas falling to the right below them.

c) If there is a series of equal ideas, they should be lined up vertically under each other in the order they occur in the text.

d) Set connectives apart in [brackets]. Put italicized words in (parentheses).

e) Underline verbs and circle words carrying the main themes of the text.

3. Examples Of Indented Block Diagrams

a) Psalm 1:1-2 (from, McDill, 37)

Blessed is the man

who walks not

in the counsel

of the ungodly

[nor] stands

in the path

of sinners

[nor] sits

in the seat

of the scornful

[But] his delight is in the law

of the Lord

[and] he meditates in the law

day [and] night

He is like a tree

planted by the rivers of water

that brings forth its fruit

in season

whose leaf also shall not wither

[And] whatever he does shall prosper

b) Romans 12:1-2

I beseech you therefore, brethren

... by the mercies of God

(a) that you present your bodies a ... sacrifice

living

holy

acceptable to God

... which is your reasonable service

[and] (b) (that you) do not be conformed

to this world

[but] (c) (that you) be transformed

by the renewing of your mind

... so that you may prove what is that ... will of God

good

[and] acceptable

[and] perfect

c) Mark 4:35-41 (narrative analysis)

When diagramming narratives, we use a different format. This format is not grammatical but sequential, based on the typical structure of narratives. Typically, narratives are structured around five progressive building blocks as follows:

i) The life situation (or context, background, setting) of the narrative (vv. 35-36):

On the same day, when evening had come, He said to them, Let us cross over to the other side. Now when they had left the multitude, they took Him along in the boat as He was. And other little boats were also with Him.

ii) The problem (or issue) that arises (v. 37):

And a great windstorm arose, and the waves beta into the boat, so that it was already filling.

iii) The conflict (or climax) of the story (which leaves you wondering how this is going to be resolved) (v. 38):

But He was in the stern, asleep on a pillow. And they awoke Him and said to Him, Teacher, do You not care that we are perishing?

iv) The resolution (v. 39):

Then He arose and rebuked the wind, and said to the sea, Peace be still! And the wind ceased and there was a great calm.

v) The application (or, response) (v. 40-41):

But He said to them, Why are you so fearful? How is it that you have no faith? And they feared exceedingly, and said to one another, Who can this be, that even the wind and the sea obey Him!

4. Analyze Your Diagram

Once you have diagrammed the text, then analyze your diagram. Identify the main clauses and subordinate clauses. Identify the adjectival and adverbial qualifiers on your diagram. Identify key nouns, verbs, connectives, repeated words, and key phrases. Research the case of the nouns (e.g. type of genitive, dative etc.). Parse the verbs. Understand the conditional clauses, participial phrases (adjectival, substantival, adverbial), and prepositional phrases.

Assess the relationship between sentences and paragraphs. How does the thought expressed in a subsequent sentence or paragraph relate to what went before and what comes after?

Circle key phrases, contrasting words, and modifiers for special study (e.g. Rom. 12:1, “living” = unusual description for a sacrifice). Identify the various sections of the passage in its flow of thought – e.g. where each thought in the development of the passage starts and stops.

This process will help you understand the flow of thought, how the passage all holds together, how the various parts of the passage relate to each other and how they help develop the writer’s point. The key purpose of a diagram is to allow you to see the text grammatically and define its details.

Part III: Leadership - Being A Godly Role Model

“Your Personal Credibility in Ministry” (Acts 20:17-35)

We learn much from final words of great leaders. Acts 20 records the final words of the great apostle Paul to the Ephesian Christians among whom he had laboured for several years. This final farewell of a godly leader are Paul’s final words of reflection, exhortation, and instruction for the church leaders. His final words point out four essential pre-requisites for credibility in church leadership.

1. We Must Have Clarity About Our Motives (18-21)

In our service for the Lord, our personal attitude must be one of humility, even in times of deep trial. You know in what manner I lived among you, Paul says, with all humility and with many tears and trials (18-19). This must be our personal attitude in everything we do. If it isn’t, then we need to examine our hearts as to what our motive really is. We must have clarity about our motives.

Our public activity must be open and inclusive, like Paul who kept nothing back that was helpful (20a). His public activity was marked by transparency, openness, giving, sharing. There was no secrecy in what he did: I proclaimed to you and taught you publicly and from house to house (20b). It didn’t matter if he was preaching publicly or teaching privately in people’s houses, Paul’s ministry was open and inclusive, testifying to Jews and also to Greeks (21a). His public ministry was applicable and available to everyone, regardless of race or religion. It didn’t matter what their religious or racial background was, he declared the same message to them all, namely, repentance toward God and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ (21b).

We must have clarity about our motives. Ask yourself, Why do you do what you do in ministry? Whats your attitude towards your ministry? How do you do your ministry? Are you proud of yourself and your accomplishments? Are you working for a larger following? Are you ministering to all kinds of people with all kinds of needs, or are you working only with an exclusive group of spiritually elite people, cut off from the rest of the world? We must have clarity about our motives in ministry.

2. We Must Have Confidence In The Future (22-25)

The men who have been role model and mentors to me all have been men with great confidence in the future. We must have confidence despite present uncertainty. For Paul that meant not knowing what will happen to me except that the Holy Spirit testifies in every city, saying that chains and tribulations await me (22-23). You might interpret this to mean that the Holy Spirit was saying: “Don’t go!” But I don’t think that’s what this means. I think it means that the Holy Spirit is warning him that everywhere he goes chains and tribulations would be ahead, for to be forewarned is to be forearmed.

Now, this kind of warning would set most of us back. This would make you think twice about going on. This would cause most of us uncertainty about the future. Our reaction would probably be, I better pray about this. Perhaps I shouldnt go. But circumstances are one of the most unreliable indicators for decision-making. First and foremost we must rely on God’s word and God’s call on our lives. That was always uppermost in Paul’s mind. He was motivated to continue on because he was bound in the spirit (22a) and that superseded any possible deterrent of chains and tribulations in the future. That’s undoubtedly why he could say, But none of these things move me nor do I count my life dear to myself (24a). Little things like imprisonment aren’t going to put him off or change his outlook or plans. Why? Because he was imprisoned by his inner conviction to go to Jerusalem, which not even the potential loss of his life would interrupt. That’s confidence in the future, isn’t it, despite present uncertainty?

That’s why he also had confidence in view of future completion. No earthly circumstances, threats, or opposition by the enemy would hinder or prevent him from completing the ministry God had called him to. Paul was confident that the One who had called him to be the apostle to the Gentiles would enable him to complete his ministry. The future held no doubts or hesitation for Paul. That’s why he could confidently look forward to the joyful completion of his work: so that I may finish my race (course) with joy and (so that I may finish) the ministry, which I received from the Lord Jesus, to testify to the gospel of the grace of God (24b) (see also 2 Tim. 4:7-8; Phil. 2:17). In God’s time and God’s way, Paul was confident that he would complete the work that God had given him.

3. We Must Have Convictions About Ministry (26-31)

This passage concludes with three convictions (“therefores”). Firstly, the conviction that you have acted with a clear conscience. Therefore, I testify to you this day, that I am innocent of the blood of all men (26). Innocent because I have not shunned to declare to you the whole counsel of God (27). He had done what God had called him to do. He hadn’t left anything out. Therefore, whatever the outcome of his ministry might be, however people might respond to it, he is innocent of the blood of all men. No one could say to Paul: You didnt tell me. No, Paul had fully declared the whole counsel of God and thus discharged his responsibility as God’s servant. Thus, he had acted with a clear conscience.

Secondly, the conviction to warn others about spiritual dangers. In order to be qualified and able to warn others about spiritual dangers, church leaders must take care of themselves. Therefore, take heed to yourselves (28a). Paul is saying, Take care of yourself as the servant of God. He is speaking to the elders of the church here. Church leaders must take care of themselves before they can take care of the church. They have to pay attention to and protect themselves from spiritual dangers. You do this by examining your own moral, spiritual, practical, theological, and personal health before you can take care of the people of God.

Once you have made sure that you are personally fit and qualified to lead, then church leaders are to take care of the church. Take heed... to all the flock among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God, which He purchased with his own blood (28b). To shepherd the church of God means to guide them, care for them, protect them, nurse them, nourish them. Remember, the flock is precious to God, for He purchased them with his own blood. Shepherding the church of God means protecting them from spiritual attack. For I know this that after my departure savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock (29). Savage wolves kill, steal, and destroy the flock. Savage wolves have no mercy for the flock; they just want to satisfy their base appetites.

Shepherding the church of God means protecting them from divisive men. For this I know also ... that men from among yourselves will rise up, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after themselves (30). “Perverse things” refers to false teaching. “Drawing away disciples after themselves” refers to false motives - accumulating personal power and a popular following. This is the work of Satan to divide and destroy the people of God.

Thirdly, the conviction to teach others by your example. Therefore watch, and remember that for three years I did not cease to warn everyone night and day with tears (31a). Paul warned them faithfully (without ceasing), continuously (night and day), and passionately (with tears). That was the legacy that Paul left them. His example to the Ephesians is his example to us as leaders of God’s people. Leadership isn’t just about public activity, preaching and teaching. What we say and do publicly must be based on who we are. Our personal example speaks volumes to those who see and hear us. So, teach others by your example of faithful warning, continuous labouring, and passionate commitment.

4. We Must Have Compassion For The Congregation (32-35)

Paul’s shows his compassion of the congregation in his final commendation: I commend you to God and the Word of His grace, which is able to build you up and give you an inheritance among all those who are sanctified (32). These are the unchangeable foundations for ministry - God himself and His inspired word. These are the two resources that alone can keep us true and faithful. We must rely on God and grow in his truth. We need the Word of his grace for our edification. It alone is able to build you up spiritually in your most holy faith. It contains all that we need for life and godliness, so that we can live strong and stable lives for the glory of God. We need the Word of his grace also for our sanctification - to give you an inheritance among all those who are sanctified.

This is Paul’s final benediction, commending the people to God for his care and provision, and commending the people to God’s word as the foundation of their spiritual lives.

Paul also shows his compassion for the congregation in his Pauls final exhortation: I have coveted no ones silver or gold or apparel. Yes, you yourselves know that these hands have provided for my necessities and for those who were with me (33-34). Ministry is not about taking. It’s not about taking any person’s silver or gold or clothing. I wasnt a freeloader, expecting something for nothing. Rather, I have shown you in every way by labouring like this that you must support the weak (35a). Ministry is not about taking. Ministry is about giving - labouring for the benefit of others and supporting the weak.

And remember the words of the Lord Jesus that he said, It is more blessed to give than to receive’” (35b). Paul’s ministry was an example of this principle – giving not taking.

Conclusions. Let me challenge you with these questions. Who are you following? Who you follow will determine where you end up Are the leaders that you look up to showing these characteristics in their leadership? Do they have clear, unselfish motives? Do they demonstrate confidence in God’s care and control of the future? Do they express certain convictions about what ministry is about – or are they wishy-washy? Do they practise care and compassion for the people?

How are you leading? What are the characteristics of your leadership style and activity? Is your leadership marked by clear, pure motives? confidence in the future? convictions about ministry? care and compassion for the people?

Part IV: Sermon Outlines

To listen to the audio version of these sermons in English, click on these links: Link 1 - Jn. 21:15-17; Link 2 - Jn. 21:18-19; Link 3 - Jn. 21:19-25

Title: Lessons in Christian Service

Point #1: The pledge in serving the Lord is to love him (21:15-17)

1. Despite our feeble loyalty, Jesus still values our love

2. Despite our feeble loyalty, Jesus still wants our service

Point #2: The purpose in serving the Lord is to glorify him (18-19a)

1. We are to glorify him when we are young (18)

2. We are to glorify him when we are old (18-19)

Point #3: The pattern in serving the Lord is to follow him (19b-23)

1. We follow him by responding to his call (19b)

2. We follow him by keeping our eyes on him (20)

3. We follow him by minding our own business (21-23)


1 For more details see “Twelve Essential Skills for Great Preaching,” Wayne McDill, pp. 27ff.

Related Topics: Pastors

Pages