MENU

Where the world comes to study the Bible

49. The Purpose of Prophecy (Genesis 49:1-28)

Related Media

Introduction

As a student in my senior year of seminary, I was required to write a thesis. I chose to write on the themes of the Exodus as they were employed in Isaiah 40-55. During my Christmas break I was trying to put all the pieces together and complete the thesis. At one point I became totally lost in the project and, in the midst of all the particulars, lost sight of the purpose of my paper. Only after consulting with Dr. Waltke, the department chairman, did I regain my perspective and complete the thesis.

I find biblical prophecy to be much the same for many Christians. There is a plethora of particulars, a mountain of minutia, which can overwhelm us and cause us to lose sight of the purpose of prophecy. Some Christians immerse themselves in the details of those “things to come” which comprise prophecy. They carefully chart out the future in even the most obscure and sketchy matters (so far as biblical revelation is concerned). And yet, while prophecy is a worthy matter for serious study and investigation, the details become an obsession while the weightier matters of godly living are brushed aside. In effect some Christians strain out eschatological gnats, while swallowing biblical camels.

Few would suppose that Genesis chapter 49 has much to say to the Christian of the 20th century. The prophecies contained in this text are related to the destiny of the descendants of Jacob. There are, of course, messianic prophecies here, and that we find of interest. But in addition to these we are given insight into the purpose of all prophecy as we consider the purpose which these prophecies had for the sons of Jacob and their descendants.

Jacob’s sons, who were the recipients of these prophecies, would die in Egypt. Like their forefathers, they would not live to see the fulfillment of God’s promises in their lifetime. Why, then, did God predict events which were beyond their lifetime? We may be able to grant that these prophecies had meaning to those who first read them from the pen of Moses. After all, these were the descendants of Jacob, who would begin to realize the prophecies of their forefather. But of what value were the words of Jacob to Rueben, Simeon, Levi, and the rest? I would like to suggest that they were of profit to them in precisely the same way that prophecy (yet unfulfilled) is important to us. Let us first learn from the sons of Jacob, and then consider the implications for ourselves.

Questions Which Provide the Key to this Passage

You may not agree with the answers which I find in this text, but I am convinced that none of us will understand the passage without answering a few key questions.

(1) Did every detail of Jacob’s prophecy come to pass? If not, why not?

(2) What purpose does this prophecy serve for the sons of Jacob, since none of them will live to see the fulfillment of them in Canaan?

(3) What reasons did Moses have for recording this conversation between Jacob and his sons?

(4) Why did Reuben, Simeon, and Levi receive a rebuke from their father for their sinful actions, when Judah, just as great a sinner (chapter 38), received the greatest blessing of all the sons, as he would be the forefather of the Messiah?

(5) What can we learn from these prophecies?

Observations Concerning the
Prophecy of Jacob Regarding His Offspring

Before we give our attention to some of the details of the prophecies of this passage, it would benefit us to look at the passage as a whole. Several characteristics can be identified.

First of all, these are the last words of Jacob. The prophecy is literally the final word of Jacob, spoken with his dying breath.

When Jacob finished charging his sons, he drew his feet into the bed and breathed his last, and was gathered to his people (Genesis 49:33).

The dying words of any man should not be taken lightly, much less those spoken by a patriarch and recorded under the superintendence of the Spirit of God.

Second, this is poetry. We might tend to think that a man’s last words, spoken with great effort, should be disorganized and difficult to follow. A look at this passage in the NASV reveals that we are dealing with Hebrew poetry, for the form is noticeably different from the preceding pages. There are numerous indications that these final words of Jacob were thought out carefully in advance. Jacob’s words are ones that have been carefully planned and probably rehearsed.

Third, this is more than poetry, it is prophecy. While the form is poetry, the substance is prophecy. Jacob’s words reveal “things to come” for his descendants. As a rule,104 the prophecy is general. It is not intended to spell out the future for Jacob’s sons as individuals, but as tribal leaders. The future which is foretold is the future of the nation as manifested in the twelve tribes (cf. verse 28). Normally the prophecy will not speak of a particular place,105 nor of a certain person,106 nor of a specific point in time,107 but of the character and disposition of the various tribes throughout their history. This forewarns us that we must be careful to look for fulfillment which is too specific.

Fourth, the words spoken by Jacob are a blessing:

All these are the twelve tribes of Israel, and this is what their father said to them when he blessed them. He blessed them, every one with the blessing appropriate to him (Genesis 49:28).

All the sons of Jacob were blessed in that they were to be a part of the nation Israel. All would enter into the land of Canaan and have an inheritance there.

Some would certainly receive a greater blessing than others. Even those who were rebuked by Jacob and whose future was portrayed as dismal were blessed, as we shall point out later.

Fifth, the future which is foretold is not independent of the past, but an extension of it. Moses told us that every one of the sons was given “the blessing appropriate to him” (verse 28). As we think our way through these blessings of Jacob we find that each of them was related to the past. The blessings of Reuben, Simeon, and Levi, were based upon the sins which they had committed in the past. Joseph, on the other hand, had been bitterly attacked, but had remained faithful (verses 23-24). Others found their blessings related to the name they had been given at their birth. Judah, derived from the Hebrew root, ‘to praise’ (cf. 29:35), is now prophesied to be praised by his brothers (49:8). Dan whose name seems to be the participle meaning ‘to judge’ (cf. 30:6), is foretold that he will “judge his People” (49:16). Prophecy, then, is not detached from history, but an extension of it into the future.

Reuben
(49:3-4)

Reuben, by virtue of his position as the first-born of Jacob, should have had pre-eminence over his brothers and the double portion of the inheritance (which was given to Joseph (cf. 48:5,6,22; I Chronicles 5:1-2). But these were taken from Reuben because of his instability:

Reuben, you are my first-born; My might and the beginning of my strength, Preeminent in dignity and preeminent in power. Uncontrolled as water, you shall not have preeminence, Because you went up to your father’s bed; Then you defiled it—he went up to my couch (Genesis 49:3-4).

As suggested earlier, I do not think Reuben’s lust was sexual as much as it was political—it was a lust for power. Reuben, like Satan, was not content with his exalted position and wanted more power, more pre-eminence (cf. Isaiah 14:12ff.; Ezekiel 28:12ff.). He therefore took Bilhah, his father’s concubine, not because of her sexual desirability, but because she was symbolic of the right to rule over the family. To possess the harem of the ruler was to usurp the authority of the ruler (cf. I Kings 2:13f.). Since “the last shall be first” (Mark 10:31) and those who serve shall rule in the kingdom of God (Mark 9:35), Reuben had to be rejected from his position of power and pre-eminence. He who would rule must surely first rule himself.

Simeon and Levi
(49:5-7)

Like Reuben, Simeon and Levi had demonstrated character that was not befitting to godliness:

Simeon and Levi are brothers; Their swords are implements of violence. Let my soul not enter into their council; Let not my glory be united with their assembly; Because in their anger they slew men, And in their self-will they lamed oxen. Cursed be their anger, for it is fierce; And their wrath, for it is cruel. I will disperse them in Jacob, And scatter them in Israel (Genesis 49:5-7).

These two brothers of Dinah were greatly angered by the violation of her purity at the hand of Shechem, but it was not righteous indignation. By their submitting to circumcision they had deceived the men of Shechem, letting them believe that a treaty was being ratified. And in their anger they slew the men of the city. The hamstringing of the oxen was a further evidence of their uncontrolled anger, a detail not mentioned in the account of Genesis 34:25-30. Horses were hamstrung because of their military use, pulling chariots (cf. Joshua 11:6), but oxen were used for peaceful purposes. The hamstringing of these oxen evidenced wanton violence and senseless destruction. The alliance of Simeon and Levi was an unholy one, and thus, like those at Babel who joined together in disobedience (Genesis ll:lff.), they would be dispersed.

Judah
(49:8-12)

After learning of Judah’s folly in Genesis 38 we would not expect him to prosper spiritually, but Jacob’s words speak of a bright future for his descendants:

Judah, your brothers shall praise you; Your hand shall be on the neck of your enemies; Your father’s sons shall bow down to you. Judah is a lion’s whelp; From the prey, my son, you have gone up. He couches, he lies down as a lion, And as a lion, who dares rouse him up? The scepter shall not depart from Judah, Nor the ruler’s staff from between his feet, Until Shiloh comes, And to him shall be the obedience of the peoples. He ties his foal to the vine, And his donkey’s colt to the choice vine; He washes his garments in wine, And his robes in the blood of grapes. His eyes are dull from wine. And his teeth white from milk (Genesis 49:8-12).

The pre-eminence which was taken from Reuben is clearly transferred to his younger brother, Judah (cf. also I Chronicles 5:2). He would not only rule over his brothers in the days to come,108 but he would also prevail over his enemies (verse 8). His military might is compared to the strength of a lion (verse 9). Verse 10 has long been held to be a messianic prophecy by both Jews and Christians, but the precise meaning of “Shiloh” is uncertain. It is either a reference to a place, as it is elsewhere in the Old Testament (e.g. Joshua 18:1,8,9; 19;51; I Samuel 1:13, etc.), or it may refer to the person of the Messiah.109

The prosperity of the tribe of Judah is depicted in verses 11 and 12. He will be so blessed in the vineyard that his vines will be strong enough to hold fast a young donkey, and the produce of the vine will be so abundant that he could, so to speak, wash his garments in its wine. In other words, wine will be as abundant as water. The quantity would be sufficient to more than meet a man’s capacity to consume it, thus the reddening of the eyes (verse 12). The cattle will prosper such that milk will also be readily available (verse 12).

The first six sons referred to are the offspring of Jacob and Leah. The next four are the sons of the concubines of Rachel and Leah. The last two sons are the children of Jacob and Rachel, the wife of his preference.

Zebulun and Issachar
(49:13-15)

The prophecy concerning Zebulun is disturbing, for it has not yet come to pass:

Zebulun shall dwell at the seashore; And he shall be a haven for ships, And his flank shall be toward Sidon (Genesis 49:13).

Kidner comments:

Zebulun’s allotted land in Joshua 19:l0-l6 did not reach the coast, unlike the neighboring Asher’s (cf. Jdg. 5:l7), nor did it closely approach Sidon. But it was near enough to both to be enriched by seaborne trade (to ‘suck the abundance of the seas’, Dt. 33:l9), and the prepositions in the verse could mean ‘towards.’110

In contrast to Judah, who subdued his enemies like a lion, Issachar failed to do so, and as a result, instead submitted to the service of the Canaanites. That which we do not master often tends to become our master.

Dan
(49:16-18)

Our hopes are raised initially, for it seems that the prospects for this tribe are bright, but they are suddenly dashed upon the rocks of reality:

Dan shall judge his people, As one of the tribes of Israel. Dan shall be a serpent in the way, A horned snake in the path, That bites the horse’s heels, So that his rider falls backward (Genesis 49:16-17).

Dan was the first child of Rachel, through Bilhah her handmaid (Genesis 30:1-6). Rachel felt that she would be vindicated through this son, and thus his name suggested that God had heard her cries and had judged in her favor. Dan would judge his people, as one of the sons of Israel, but he would eventually serve more destructive purposes. The incident in Judges 18 serves to reflect the bent which this tribe took. In the listing of the tribes of Israel in Revelation 7:5-8, Dan is omitted.

Verse 18 is an unusual outburst of hope and expectation, but it is difficult to relate to its context: “For thy salvation I wait, O Lord (Genesis 49:18).

I understand it to be a reflection of the faith and hope of Israel, in the light of the prophecies spoken. The prognosis for the tribes of Israel thus far has not been particularly good, with the exception of the tribe of Judah. Through David much of the prophecies will be fulfilled, but the ultimate fulfillment is in the Messiah, who is the son of David. Having finished his prophecy concerning Dan, and thus being halfway through his descendants, Jacob bursts out with these words in verse 18. An expression that the hope of the nation does not lie in the sons he has borne, but in the God who has borne him along throughout his sojourn. Salvation surely will not come from his sons, but from God. Salvation will not come from within, but from without. That, I believe, is the substance of Jacob’s words here.

Gad and Asher
(49:19-20)

As for Gad, raiders shall raid him, But he shall raid at their heels. As for Asher, his food shall be rich, And he shall yield royal dainties (Genesis 49:19-20).

Gad would be continually plagued by his neighbors, but would not be overcome.111 Asher,

With a fertile plain and trade routes to the sea, … would ‘dip his foot in oil’ (Duet. 33:24) and produce a notable annual quota for the palace (cf. I Ki. 4:7).112

Naphtali
(49:21)

Naphtali is a doe let loose, He gives beautiful words (Genesis 49:21).

The portrait of Naphtali’s future is one of unhindered freedom and increase. While the NASV translates verse 21 to read “words” in the second line, it seems preferable to render it more naturally, “fawns,” as in the King James Version. Under Barak, Israel was led to break their bonds (Judges 4-5).

Joseph
(49:22-26)

Joseph, we would all have to agree, was most worthy of any blessing which Jacob might pronounce. While he is greatly blessed by God, he does not have the privilege of being the forefather of Messiah, as does Judah.

Joseph is a fruitful bough, A fruitful bough by a spring; Its branches run over a wall. The archers bitterly attacked him, And shot at him and harassed him; But his bow remained firm, And his arms were agile, From the hands of the Mighty One of Jacob. (From there is the Shepherd, the Stone of Israel), From the God of your father who helps you, And by the Almighty who blesses you With blessings of heaven above, Blessings of the deep that lies beneath, Blessings of the breasts and of the womb. The blessings of your father Have surpassed the blessings of my ancestors Up to the utmost bound of the everlasting hills; May they be on the head of Joseph, And on the crown of the head of the one distinguished among his brothers (Genesis 49:22-26).

Joseph’s future is described as one of fruitfulness and abundance. He had been bitterly attacked, yet remained steadfast (verses 23-24). I believe the primary reference here to be to the rejection and persecution he experienced at the hand of his brethren. Joseph remained firm and the God of Jacob sustained him. His blessings are largely material. He will be pre-eminent among his brothers, but not in the same way as Judah. Because of Ephraim’s pride (Judges 8:1; 12:1) and apostasy (Hosea 4:17; 5:3f.), enjoyment of these blessings was not what it could have been.

Benjamin
(49:27)

Jacob described Benjamin as one who would be fierce and aggressive:

Benjamin is a ravenous wolf; In the morning he devours the prey, And in the evening he divides the spoil (Genesis 49:27).

This side of Benjamin can be seen in Judges 19-21. Moses, in a later pronouncement of blessing, has a more gentle word about Benjamin:

Of Benjamin he said, “May the beloved of the Lord dwell in security by Him, Who shields him all the day, And he dwells between His shoulders” (Deuteronomy 33:12).

Conclusion

Having given a very brief explanation of the prophecies of Jacob concerning each of his sons, we must return to our original questions if we are to gain a grasp of the purposes of prophecy.

(1) Did every detail of Jacob’s prophecy come to pass, as he predicted? I believe we can say with a fair degree of confidence that the answer is no. For example, Zebulun did not dwell at the seashore (verse 13). Also, we must remember that while Levi is rather harshly rebuked by his father here, and he is said to be dispersed among his brethren (verse 7), he is to become the head of the priestly tribe. In this position there is great blessing.

What explanation can we give for the fact that some prophecies are not precisely fulfilled, as we have come to expect? First, let me remind you that God’s purposes for Israel are not yet complete:

For I do not want you, brethren, to be uninformed of this mystery, lest you be wise in your own estimation, that a partial hardening has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in; and thus all Israel will be saved; just as it is written, “THE DELIVERER WILL COME FROM ZION, HE WILL REMOVE UNGODLINESS FROM JACOB.” “AND THIS IS MY COVENANT WITH THEM, WHEN I TAKE AWAY THEIR SINS” (Romans 11:25-27).

The promises to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, were never fully realized in Israel’s history, and thus they are still viewed to be future. How can we be surprised, then, that some prophecies are not yet fulfilled?

Secondly (and this will sound like a great heresy) God never intended to fulfill every prophecy. Before you turn me off and tear up this page, let me explain what I am saying. While most prophecies are specific and certain of their fulfillment, not all are so. Some prophecies are God’s warning of what would come to pass if men did not repent and change their attitudes and actions. This is why Jonah had no intention of prophesying impending judgment to the Ninevites:

When God saw their deeds and that they turned from their wicked way, then God relented concerning the calamity which He had declared He would bring upon them. And He did not do it. But it greatly displeased Jonah, and he became angry. And he prayed to the Lord and said, “Please Lord, was not this what I said while I was still in my own country? Therefore, in order to forestall this I fled to Tarshish, for I knew that Thou art a gracious and compassionate God, slow to anger and abundant in lovingkindness, and one who relents concerning calamity” (Jonah 3:10-4:2).

Some years later, the truth which Jonah knew was clearly stated by the prophet Jeremiah:

At one moment I might speak concerning a nation or concerning a kingdom to uproot, to pull down, or to destroy it, if that nation against which I have spoken turns from its evil, I will relent concerning the calamity I planned to bring on it. Or at another moment I might speak concerning a nation or concerning a kingdom to build up or to plant it, if it does evil in My sight by not obeying My voice, then I will think better of the good with which I had promised to bless it (Jeremiah 18:7-10).

(2) What purpose does this prophecy serve the sons of Israel, since they will all die before God causes the nation to return to Canaan? For the twelve sons of Jacob, the primary lesson I see is that their character not only affects their own destiny, but also the conduct of future generations and the consequences which that conduct conceives. In other words, the sons of Jacob are reminded of the lesson which Jacob had himself recently learned, that present actions have future results and repercussions. Jacob’s deceptiveness could be seen in his two sons, Simeon and Levi. The prophecies of Jacob remind his sons that what they are tends to shape what the nation will be in years to come. If they live godly lives, this will be a blessing to coming generations. If they are godless, the nation will likewise reap the consequences:

“You shall not worship them or serve them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, and on the third and the fourth generations of those who hate Me, … Oh that they had such a heart in them, that they would fear Me, and keep all My commandments always, that it may be well with them and with their sons forever! Go, say to them, ‘Return to your tents.’ But as for you, stand here by Me, that I may speak to you all the commandments and the statutes and the judgments which you shall teach them, that they may observe them in the land which I give them to possess.” So you shall observe to do just as the Lord your God has commanded you; you shall not turn aside to the right or to the left. You shall walk in all the way which the Lord your God has commanded you, that you may live, and that it may be well with you, and that you may prolong your days in the land which you shall possess (Deuteronomy 5:9, 29-33).

(3) Why did Moses record the words of Jacob? What did the ancient Israelites learn from them? The lesson for those Israelites was precisely that which Jacob sought to teach his sons, that present actions tend to shape the future. The early chapters of Deuteronomy (such as Deut. 5:9, 29-33, quoted above) record Moses’ attempt to underscore the importance of trusting and obeying God, for present and future blessing.

(4) Why did Reuben, Simeon and Levi receive rebuke from their father for their past sins while Judah is greatly blessed? Genesis 38 surely teaches us that Judah, like his brothers, was guilty of misconduct. But there is a significant difference between Judah and Reuben (for example). We are never told that Reuben repented of his evil, or that he changed his conduct significantly. Judah, when faced with his sin, confessed it and forsook it:

And Judah recognized them, and said, “She is more righteous than I, inasmuch as I did not give her to my son Shelah.” And he did not have relations with her again (Genesis 38:26).

Furthermore, Reuben’s response to their distress in Egypt was to “pass the buck” by telling his brothers, in effect, “I told you so” (42:22). Judah, on the other hand, took full responsibility for the safety of Benjamin (43:8-10) and offered himself as a hostage in place of his youngest brother (48:18ff.).

These observations bring us to the purpose of Jacob’s prophecy, and thus the purpose of all prophecy. Here, we can find the meaning of the many prophecies which are yet to be fulfilled, whether in our day or not.

The Purpose of Prophecy

(1) Prophecy focuses our attention upon future things. Our tendency is to live our lives as though there were no future. Israel’s hope, like ours, was a future hope. The ultimate reality is not in things seen, but in things unseen. Faith focuses upon the future rather than the present:

Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen (Hebrews 11:1).

While at the moment Jacob and his sons lived comfortably in Egypt, there was a grave danger in placing their hope and trust in what Egypt offered them. Israel’s hope and the fulfillment of God’s promises lay in Canaan, not Egypt. The sons of Jacob must look ahead.

We, too, must not fix our hopes on earthly things, in the momentary, temporal pleasures of this life, but in those things which God has yet in store for us:

Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His great mercy has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to obtain an inheritance which is imperishable and undefiled and will not fade away, reserved in heaven for you, who are protected by the power of God through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time (I Peter 1:3-5).

(2) Prophecy focuses not only on the future, however, but on living in the present in the light of the future. The promises of God to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were to prompt purity in the lives of Israel’s sons, not passivity or complacency. The future blessings (and judgments) which are in store for us are intended to encourage Christians to live in peace and purity:

But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, in which the heavens will pass away with a roar and the elements will be destroyed with intense heat, and the earth and its works will be burned up. Since all these things are to be destroyed in this way, what sort of people ought you to be in holy conduct and godliness, looking for and hastening the coming of the day of God, on account of which the heavens will be destroyed by burning, and the elements will melt with intense heat! But according to His promise we are looking for new heavens and a new earth, in which righteousness dwells (II Peter 3:10-13).

So it was that Moses was prompted to forego passing pleasures for eternal glory:

By faith Moses, when he had grown up, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter; choosing rather to endure ill-treatment with the people of God, than to enjoy the passing pleasures of sin; considering the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures of Egypt; for he was looking to the reward (Hebrews 11:24-26).

Prophecy, then, is given not to satisfy our curiosity, but to prompt us to purity. Many Christians have an obsession with prophecy, seeking to fill in their charts and laying out God’s program for the future in minutest detail, as though it were some kind of puzzle to be solved. I fear that it is possible for us to strain eschatological (prophetic) gnats while we swallow biblical camels. While prophecy has future promises, it also contains present implications which are intended to prompt us to purity and piety.

I must make a momentary aside for yet another reason why we must exercise caution in attempting to too precisely plot out all of God’s prophetic program.

We know that while all of the prophecies of our Lord’s first coming were literally and exactly fulfilled, no one, before the fact, could have predicted how it would happen. While the particulars of prophecy were known, the program was not. Dare we suppose that we will see the plan for our Lord’s second coming any more precisely than did those saints of olden days see the first? Let us be careful about a fixation on particulars when the purpose of prophecy is purity.

(3) While we may be certain that specific prophecy (such as the second coming of Christ) will be fulfilled as specifically and literally as were those prophecies of Christ’s first coming, more general prophecies may be given to warn men of the possibility of future things which can be avoided. Judgment did fall upon Ninevah, but it was delayed (from a human point of view) by repentance (Jonah 3:5ff.). And while judgment may fall on others, we may escape through the acceptance of divine grace.

In general we must say that all of the prophecy of Jacob either was fulfilled or will be in the future outworking of God’s plan for Israel. To the descendants of the twelve sons of Jacob, the prophecy was a warning of the potential for following in the footsteps of their father. As sons of their father, they had the predisposition to sin just as their forefathers. These words of warning were also words of hope for, through the grace which God provided, they need not follow in the steps of their fathers. The warning of sin and its consequences was designed to turn men from their sin to the Messiah, through whom deliverance would come. The sons of Jacob, like Jacob himself, must wait for God’s salvation: “For Thy salvation I wait, O Lord” (verse 18).

We should also add that none of the blessings which Jacob pronounced upon his descendants were realized apart from divine grace. No one could inherit grace from their forefathers, they must accept it personally. This was the error of those in Jesus’ day:

They answered Him, “We are Abraham’s offspring, and have never yet been enslaved to anyone; how is it that You say, ‘You shall become free’?” Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, every one who commits sin is the slave of sin. And the slave does not remain forever. If therefore the Son shall make you free, you shall be free indeed” (John 8:33-36).

Nationally, the prophecies of Jacob were certainties; they were sure to be fulfilled sooner or later in that tribe. But individually one could be the exception to the rule of the consequences of sin, or the participant in the divine promises of blessing, by trusting the Messiah who was to come.

The Scriptures abound in passages which speak of days ahead of suffering and eternal torment, of judgment and condemnation:

And I saw the dead, the great and the small, standing before the throne, and books were opened; and another book was opened, which is the book of life; and the dead were judged from the things which were written in the books, according to their deeds. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead which were in them; and they were judged, every one of them according to their deeds. And death and Hades were thrown in to the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire. And if anyone’s name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire (Revelation 20:12-15).

While some will surely face this judgment, you need not. Prophecy such as this is written so that you might turn from sin and judgment to Jesus Christ and the salvation He offers to all who will believe:

For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world should be saved through Him (John 3:16,17).

By acknowledging your sin and the judgment you deserve, by personally trusting in Jesus Christ as Messiah and Savior, you may avoid the judgment to come and may live in purity and expectation of the promise of God of the blessed hope:

And I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the first heaven and the first earth passed away, and there is no longer any sea. And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, made ready as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a loud voice from the throne, saying, “Behold the tabernacle of God is among men, and He shall dwell among them, and they shall be His people, and God Himself shall be among them, and He shall wipe away every tear from their eyes; and there shall no longer be any death; there shall no longer be any mourning, or crying, or pain; the first things have passed away” (Revelation 21:1-4).

For the unbeliever, the purpose of prophecy is to warn him of the wages of sin. For the Christian, the purpose of prophecy is to motivate him to live in this life in purity and hope, assured that God has even greater blessings in store for those who will trust and obey.


104 “To such an attempt it is important to premise the following remarks: (1) That these blessings or announcements have respect mainly to posterity not to the persons of the twelve sons of Jacob. (2) That, consequently, the materials of a just interpretation are to be sought for in the subsequent history of these tribes. It is only from the documents furnished in the sacred record, that the leading characteristic traits, and the most important events related of each tribe, can be determined, and the appropriateness of the predictions clearly made out. (3) That the fulfillment of these blessings is to be traced not in any one event, or in any single period of time, but in a continuous and progressive series of accomplishments, reaching down to the latest era of the Jewish polity” George Bush, Notes on Genesis (Minneapolis: James Family Christian Publishers, ((Reprint)) 1979), II, p. 385.

105 In the case of Zebulun, he did not and has not, as yet, possess land on the coast.

106 Blessings were prophesied through Messiah in verse 10, but this is still not very specific.

107 Reuben’s loss of the rights of the first-born was immediate, but the pre-eminence of Judah did not occur immediately. It was partially realized under David, and will be fully so under Messiah, when He comes.

108 It was Joseph who had pre-eminence over his brothers for the remainder of his life, not Judah. Only later would Judah rise to the position of preeminence.

109 “On the precise meaning of this clause it is still unsafe to dogmatize. Shiloh (AV, RV) is not elsewhere a biblical title of the Messiah, nor has it any clear meaning as a word. The alternative construction, ‘until he comes to Shiloh,’ corresponds to no Messianic event. But an early variant, revocalizing a shortened spelling of the consonants as selloh, yields either ‘till what is his comes’ (i.e. ‘till Judah’s full heritage appears’; cf. LXX) or ‘until he comes, to whom [it belongs]’ (cf. RSV). The latter, elliptical though it is, seems to be taken up and interpreted by Ezekiel 2l:26f. (MT. 31 f.) in words addressed to the last king of Judah: ‘Remove the mitre, and take off the crown . . . until he comes whose right it is: and I will give it to him.’ Here is the best support for the Messianic content which Jewish and Christian exegesis has found in the saying from earliest times2” Derek Kidner, Genesis: An Introduction and Commentary (Chicago: Inter-Varsity Press, 1967), p. 218.

110 Ibid, p. 219.

111 “Four of the six Hebrew words of this verse consist of God’s name and of word-plays on it. This may indicate that AV was right to translate it ‘a troop’ in 30:11; but puns can go by sound as well as sense (cf. the Hebrew of Is. 10:30: ‘poor Anathoth’).” Ibid, p. 220.

112 Ibid.

Related Topics: Prophecy/Revelation

50. The End of An Era (Genesis 49:29-50:26)

Related Media

Introduction

In a day when perhaps 80 percent of Americans die in institutions rather than at home, it is difficult to identify with the scene which took place around the deathbed of Jacob centuries ago. Perhaps these brief paragraphs by Joe Bayly will help us to better appreciate the difference in the way death is dealt with (or perhaps not dealt with) in our culture.

One of my early memories is of being led into my grandmother’s room in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, to give her a final kiss. She was dying, I had been told, “so be quiet and behave.”

That scene impresses me today with its Old Testament quality. Grandma, an imposing person, was conscious, slightly raised on a bolster, her white hair braided and carefully arranged on the quilt she had made as a young woman. The bed, a four-poster, was the one in which she had slept for fifty years, in which her four children had been conceived and born.

The wide-boarded floor creaked its familiar creak, the kerosene lamp flickered on the massive bureau, a bouquet of sweet peas from Grandma’s garden made the room faintly fragrant.

The old lady was surrounded by her children and grandchildren. In a few hours she died.

Forty years later my children were with their grandfather when he had his last heart attack. We gave him oxygen, called the doctor, and then the ambulance came. The men put Grandpa on a stretcher, carried him out of the house, and that was the last his grandchildren saw of him. Children are excluded from most hospitals.

In the intensive care unit of the hospital, my wife and I were with him until the visiting hours were over. The mechanics of survival—tubes, needles, oxygen system, electronic pacemaker—were in him and on him and around him.

Grandpa died alone, at night, after visiting hours. His grandsons had no chance to give him a final kiss, to feel the pressure of his hand on their heads.113

Men and women are granted little dignity in death in our cultural and technological age. There are hospital rooms with personnel continuously coming and going, tubes, tests, monitors and life sustaining (or death-prolonging) machines which make it difficult to even tell when one is really gone.

Jacob died in bed, at home, surrounded by those he most loved, and by those who most loved him. While most of us would prefer to die like Jacob, most may not have that choice. The need for very specialized treatment may force us to die in a hospital. And unexpected death may snatch us from those we love without any warning or opportunity to say farewell.

While the circumstances under which death comes may be beyond our control, our attitude toward death is something which we can determine, even now. I would like to suggest that few decisions are as important as our response to death. And no one chapter in the Old Testament has more to say on the subject of death than the final chapter of the book of Genesis.

One of the most dramatic changes in Jacob’s thinking was his attitude toward death. In the autumn years of his life, he was preoccupied with death. It probably began with the death of his beloved Rachel (Genesis 35:16ff.). The only woman he ever loved was gone. And later her oldest son Joseph appeared to be dead as well. Jacob saw little reason to live. The grave was not an appealing escape from pain, but it was the only one Jacob saw:

Then all his sons and all his daughters arose to comfort him, but he refused to be comforted. And he said, “Surely I will go down to Sheol in mourning for my son.” So his father wept for him (Genesis 37:35).

When Simeon was detained in Egypt and Benjamin was demanded as part of the integrity of Jacob’s sons, once again Jacob became preoccupied with death:

… My son shall not go down with you; for his brother is dead, and he alone is left. If harm should befall him on the journey you are taking, then you will bring my gray hair down to Sheol in sorrow (Genesis 42:38).

Judah, at least, believed his father (cf. 44:22). When Jacob learned that Joseph was alive and was reunited with him, he felt that now, at last, he was ready to die:

Then Israel said to Joseph, “Now let me die, since I have seen your face, that you are still alive” (Genesis 46:30).

While Jacob felt he was ready to die, God did not. It was to be after 17 years of communion with God and with Joseph in Egypt that Jacob was really ready to die. When we see the detail with which Moses recorded the death of Jacob, we begin to appreciate the importance of his death. And when we recognize that the final chapter of Genesis contains the record of two deaths, we cannot ignore the fact that death is the central theme of the passage. Let us, then, turn our attention to this final chapter in Genesis to learn how Jacob’s attitude toward death has changed. And let us seek to gain a godly view of death and dying.

Jacob Chooses His Cemetery Site
(49:29-33)

So far as I can tell, Jacob’s last words were not the blessing he gave his sons (49:1-28), but his very careful instruction about his burial.

Then he charged them and said to them, “I am about to be gathered to my people; bury me with my fathers in the cave that is in the field of Ephron the Hittite, in the cave that is in the field of Machpelah, which is before Mamre, in the land of Canaan, which Abraham bought along with the field from Ephron the Hittite for a burial site. There they buried Abraham and his wife Sarah, there they buried Isaac and his wife Rebekah, and there I buried Leah—the field and the cave that is in it, purchased from the sons of Heth.” When Jacob finished charging his sons, he drew his feet into the bed and breathed his last, and was gathered to his people (Genesis 49:29-33).

There is no deception about Jacob’s death (verse 29), but its imminence underscores the import of his words. Clear orders are given, but not for the first time (cf. 47:29-31), concerning his burial in Canaan. He was to be taken up to Canaan to the field of Machpelah, and buried in the cave along with his grandfather Abraham, and his father Isaac, and their wives. Leah, too, was buried there, and it would seem that at that time he had hewn out a place in the cave for his own burial (cf. 50:5). A very precise description of the cave, the field, and its location was given so that no mistakes would be made. In that day, contracts were most often (if not always) verbal (cf. 23:3-20), and so this “deed” must be passed on from one generation to the next.

Knowing that he had fulfilled all of his obligations, Jacob drew up his feet into the bed and shortly, if not immediately, died (verse 33). It would seem that death could not claim him until all of his final responsibilities were completed.

The Grief of Joseph and the Egyptians
(50:1-3)

Moses chose, at this point, to draw our attention to the grief of Joseph and the Egyptians, but without a word concerning his brothers. Their response would be specifically described in later verses (15-21).

Then Joseph fell on his father’s face, and wept over him and kissed him. And Joseph commanded his servants the physicians to embalm his father. So the physicians embalmed Israel. Now forty days were required for it, for such is the period required for embalming. And the Egyptians wept for him seventy days (Genesis 50:1-3).

Joseph was probably closer to Jacob than any of his brothers. He wept over his father and kissed him. Then those whose duty it was to care for Joseph’s medical needs114 were commissioned to embalm Jacob (verse 2). This was a lengthy process of 40 days duration (verse 3):

The process of embalming among the ancient Egyptians is thus described by Herodotus, b. ii., c. 86—8, “The body was given to the embalmers, who first took out the brains and entrails and washed them in palm wine impregnated with strong astringent drugs; after which they began to anoint the body with the oil of cedar, myrrh, cinnamon, and cassia; and this lasted thirty days. They next put it into a solution of nitre (saltpetre) for forty days longer, so that they allowed seventy days to complete the embalming; after which they bound it up in swathes of linen besmeared with gum. Being then able to resist putrefaction, it was delivered to the relatives, inclosed in a wooden or paper case somewhat resembling a coffin, and laid in the catacomb or grave belonging to the family, where it was placed in an upright posture against the wall.”115

As a gesture of respect, love, and sympathy, the Egyptians joined Joseph in mourning Jacob’s death a total of 70 days before the burial plan was put into action.116

The Burial of Jacob
(50:4-14)

Embalming was the customary Egyptian preparation of dignitaries for burial. For Jacob’s burial this was especially helpful for it was a long way back to Canaan to the cave where Jacob was to be laid to rest. Perhaps it was due to the same logistical problem (without the availability of embalmers) that forced Jacob to bury Rachel along the way rather than to transport her body to the cave of Machpelah (cf. Genesis 35:16-20).

Joseph’s next task was to secure the permission of Pharaoh to leave Egypt, along with all the adult members of the Israelite nation.

And when the days of mourning for him were past, Joseph spoke to the household of Pharaoh, saying, “If now I have found favor in your sight, please speak to Pharaoh, saying, ‘My father made me swear, saying, “Behold, I am about to die; in my grave which I dug for myself in the land of Canaan, there you shall bury me.”’ Now therefore, please let me go up and bury my father; then I will return.” And Pharaoh said, “Go up and bury your father, as he made you swear” (Genesis 50:4-6).

Joseph is said to have asked other Egyptian officials to petition Pharaoh to leave the land temporarily. This may be due to some kind of ceremonial defilement that would make Joseph’s personal appearance and appeal offensive to Pharaoh. A report of Jacob’s instructions that were sworn as an oath was included in the petition. Joseph reminded Pharaoh that this was Jacob’s strong desire and that he was sworn to carry through with it. This was to assure that Pharaoh would not take offense to Jacob’s burial in Canaan rather than Egypt. Without reservation, Joseph’s request was granted.

Few funeral processions have been so long or so large:

So Joseph went up to bury his father, and with him went up all the servants of Pharaoh, the elders of his household and all the elders of the land of Egypt, and all the household of Joseph and his brothers and his father’s household; they left only their little ones and their flocks and their herds in the land of Goshen. There also went up with him both chariots and horsemen; and it was a very great company (Genesis 50:7-9).

Joseph was accompanied by a large delegation of high-ranking Egyptian officials, many, if not all of whom, were subordinate to Joseph (cf. 40:40-44). Verse seven seems to indicate that men of various rank and offices went with Joseph to bury Jacob. In addition, all of Jacob’s adult family went along (verse 8). Attached to this large procession was a large company of horsemen and charioteers. Providing transportation and security seems to have been their assignment (cf. verse 9).

Upon reaching Canaan, the ceremony was so awesome it made a profound impression on the inhabitants of the land.

When they came to the threshing floor of Atad, which is beyond the Jordan, they lamented there with a very great and sorrowful lamentation; and he observed seven days mourning for his father. Now when the inhabitants of the land, the Canaanites, saw the mourning at the threshing floor of Atad, they said, “This is a grievous mourning for the Egyptians.” Therefore it was named Abel-mizraim, which is beyond the Jordan (Genesis 50:10-11).

For an unknown reason, the procession made its way from Egypt to Canaan by means of an unusual route. Rather than traveling to the north and approaching Canaan from the west, they proceeded northeasterly and entered Canaan from the east, from the other side of the Jordan (cf. verse 10).117 Perhaps it is not coincidental that this route would more closely parallel the entrance of Israel into Canaan after the Exodus.

Shortly after crossing the Jordan into Canaan, the procession halted at a place identified as “the threshing floor of Atad” (verse 10). Here a seven day period of mourning was observed which especially attracted the attention of the Canaanites who lived near (verse 11).

The seven day mourning period may have been primarily for the Egyptians, allowing them one final opportunity to grieve with Joseph and his family. From here it would seem that Jacob’s family proceeded on with the body to the cave of Machpelah where Jacob was buried. This would then have been a more private family matter neither participated in by the Egyptians nor viewed with curiosity by the Canaanites.

Moses reminds us that in so doing the charge of Jacob to his sons was exactingly carried out.

And thus his sons did for him as he had charged them; for his sons carried him to the land of Canaan, and buried him in the cave of the field of Machpelah before Mamre, which Abraham had bought along with the field for a burial site from Ephron the Hittite. And after he had buried his father Joseph returned to Egypt, he and his brothers and all who had gone up with him to bury his father (Genesis 50:12-14).

Having completed their mission, this large entourage, the Israelites, would then have returned to the threshing floor of Atad, rejoined their retinue of Egyptians, and returned en masse to Egypt.

Not Grief, But Guilt
(50:15-21)

It is at verse 15 that we see why Moses has described only the grief of Joseph and the Egyptians (cf. 50:1,3). While the death of Jacob undoubtedly occasioned grief on the part of Joseph’s brothers, another emotion seems to have prevailed—guilt.

When Joseph’s brothers saw that their father was dead, they said, “What if Joseph should bear a grudge against us and pay us back in full for all the wrong which we did to him!” (Genesis 50:15).

We cannot fully appreciate the feelings of Joseph’s brothers without recalling the past. For a long time feelings of jealousy and hatred had been growing like a cancer in the souls of Jacob’s “other” sons (cf. 37:2-4). More than once they must have considered a plan to eliminate Joseph, but one thing always prevented it—Jacob. Sometime, somehow, an occasion would arise when Jacob would not be present and then they could get rid of Joseph. The golden opportunity came when Jacob sent Joseph to them, many miles from home, far from the protection he had afforded to his favorite son (cf. 37:12ff.)

Now, years later, they were still plagued with guilt about their treatment of Joseph (cf. 42:21-22). They had not yet fathomed Joseph’s forgiveness, even though 17 years had evidenced nothing but grace. But, they reasoned, that was a time when Jacob still lived. Would Joseph not hesitate to retaliate with his father present even as they had waited for an opportune moment away from their father to eliminate Joseph? Now Jacob was gone for good. Joseph was free to do with them as he pleased. That thought consumed them, even more than the loss of their father. This fear prompted a plan which they hoped would soften Joseph’s anger.

So they sent a message to Joseph, saying, “Your father charged before he died, saying, ‘Thus you shall say to Joseph, “Please forgive, I beg you, the transgression of your brothers and their sin, for they did you wrong.”’ And now, please forgive the transgression of the servants of the God of your father.” And Joseph wept when they spoke to him (Genesis 50:16-18).

A message was conveyed to Joseph, perhaps through Benjamin. Joseph was told that Jacob had yet another charge not yet made known, to which Joseph was urged to submit. Before his death Jacob had requested that Joseph forgive his other sons for their sins. Having sent this message ahead, perhaps by Benjamin, the brothers appeared before Joseph. Humbly they fell before Joseph pledging their obedience and submission (verse 18). They now volunteered to do the very thing which Joseph had predicted (37:5-9) and which they had sought to avoid (37:19-20).

Joseph’s response is a model for all who would respond in a godly way to ungodly persecution:

But Joseph said to them, “Do not be afraid, for am I in God’s place? And as for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good in order to bring about this present result, to preserve many people alive. So therefore, do not be afraid; I will provide for you and your little ones.” So he comforted them and spoke kindly to them (Genesis 50:19-21).

Vengeance belongs to God, not man. Joseph would not consider usurping a prerogative which belonged only to God (cf. Romans 12:19; I Thessalonians 5:15; I Peter 4:19). Furthermore, while their attitudes and actions were evil, the result was intended by God for the good of all (verse 20; cf. 45:5-8; Acts 2:23). How could Joseph be angry when good had come of their sin through God’s providence? Instead, Joseph returned kindness for cruelty (cf. Proverbs 25:21-22; Romans 12:20,21). The kindness Joseph had shown while his father was alive would continue he reassured them.

The Death and Burial of Joseph
(50:22-26)

More than 50 years elapsed between verses 21 and 22.118 Moses was intent upon placing the deaths of Jacob and Joseph side by side. Irrelevant details are therefore set aside to take us directly to the death bed of Joseph, and thus to parallel the death of Jacob.

Now Joseph stayed in Egypt, he and his father’s household, and Joseph lived one hundred and ten years. And Joseph saw the third generation of Ephraim’s sons; also the sons of Machir, the son of Manasseh, were born on Joseph’s knees. And Joseph said to his brothers, “I am about to die, but God will surely take care of you, and bring you up from this land to the land which He promised on oath to Abraham, to Isaac and to Jacob.” Then Joseph made the sons of Israel swear, saying, “God will surely take care of you, and you shall carry my bones up from here.” So Joseph died at the age of one hundred and ten years; and he was embalmed and placed in a coffin in Egypt (Genesis 50:22-26).

Joseph’s life was full at the age of 110 (verse 22). He lived long enough to hold his great-great-grandsons on his knee (verse 23). Knowing that the day of his death drew near, Joseph like Jacob, charged his brothers concerning his burial. He did not wish his body to be carried back to Canaan, as Jacob had insisted.

While the burial of Jacob and Joseph are quite different, they are both reflective of the same faith and hope.119 Both believed that Israel’s blessings in the future would be realized in the land of promise. Both were embalmed—Jacob so that his body could be carried on the long journey to Canaan by his sons, Joseph so that his body could wait for the exodus at which time his bones would be returned to Canaan, borne by the Israelites:

And Moses took the bones of Joseph with him, for he had made the sons of Israel solemnly swear, saying, “God shall surely take care of you; and you shall carry my bones from here with you” (Exodus 13:19).

Jacob’s death occasioned a journey to Canaan where the Israelites once again beheld the land of promise to which they (in their offspring) would return at the exodus. The burial of Jacob reminded his descendants of their final home, and that Egypt was only a place of sojourn.

Joseph, on the other hand, was a continual reminder that some day the exodus would occur. Day after day in Egypt, that coffin spoke of Israel’s future and Joseph’s faith. And day after weary day, the Israelites trudged through the wilderness carrying the casket of Joseph. Both men, Jacob and Joseph, determined that their death and burial would be a testimony to their faith and a stimulus to the faith of their offspring.

Conclusion

And so we come to the end of an era and to the end of a magnificent book. But two funerals do not seem to be a very bright ending for a book. Man’s origin began in the garden of perfection and beauty in paradise. It ends in two coffins, one in Canaan, the other in Egypt. What a dismal conclusion. Moses could never make it as a writer in our times.

But wait a moment; that is just the point. Genesis chapter 50 is not the end of the story; it is only the end of the book of Genesis. Moses has yet four books to write, and God has ordained another 61 before the final chapter is written. And in the final chapters of the book of the Revelation we once again return to paradise.

And I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the first heaven and the first earth passed away, and there is no longer any sea. And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, made ready as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a loud voice from the throne, saying “Behold, the tabernacle of God is among men, and He shall dwell among them, and they shall be His people, and God Himself shall be among them, and He shall wipe away every tear from their eyes; and there shall no longer be any death; there shall no longer be any mourning, or crying, or pain; the first things have passed away” (Revelation 21:1-4).

And he showed me a river of the water of life, clear as crystal, coming from the throne of God and of the Lamb, in the middle of its street. And on either side of the river was the tree of life, bearing twelve kinds of fruit, yielding its fruit every month; and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations. And there shall no longer be any curse; and the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it, and His bond-servants shall serve Him; and they shall see His face, and His name shall be on their foreheads. And there shall no longer be any night; and they shall not have need of the light of a lamp nor the light of the sun, because the Lord God shall illumine them; and they shall reign forever and ever (Revelation 22:1-5).

Death, Moses would have us learn, is not the end. That was what Jacob had foolishly believed for many years. That is why he was so eager for it to come. He looked forward to death as the end of his earthly woes. So do all who choose the way of suicide to cease from suffering. But the tragedy of such death is that it is not the end at all. It is really only a beginning of an irreversible eternity.

Some years ago I was given the task of taking a young man to the hospital who had unsuccessfully attempted to take his life. On the way I asked him what he believed happened after death. He told me that he believed in reincarnation. I shared with him the verse which says, “… it is appointed unto men to die once, and after this comes judgment” (Hebrews 9:27).

He had to admit that if this verse were true, suicide thrust its victim into irreversible judgment. Reincarnation is a tempting thought, for it encourages us to end one life with the hope that a better one may follow.

During those years spent in Egypt, Jacob came to a very different view of death. No longer did he consider death the end of everything. Even if a man were to lose his cherished son, as God had commanded Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac, God could raise him again. There was life after death:

By faith Abraham, when he was tested, offered up Isaac; and he who had received the promises was offering up his only begotten son; it was he to whom it was said, “IN ISAAC YOUR SEED SHALL BE CALLED.” He considered that God is able to raise men even from the dead; from which he also received him back as a type (Hebrews 11:17-19).

Jacob had come to see that even if God did not resurrect the dead (in the way Abraham expected Him to raise Isaac), there was still life after death.

And Abraham breathed his last and died in a ripe old age, an old man and satisfied with life; and he was gathered to his people (Genesis 25:8).

And Isaac breathed his last and died, and was gathered to his people, an old man of ripe age; and his sons Esau and Jacob buried him (Genesis 35:29).

When Jacob finished charging his sons, he drew his feet into the bed and breathed his lost, and was gathered to his people (Genesis 49:33).

The expression, “to be gathered to his people” was no mere euphemism for death; it was an ancient expression of the patriarchs hope of life after death. These men found little comfort in having their bones in close proximity to those of other relatives. They viewed their death as the occasion to be rejoined with those whose death had separated the living from the dead.

When our Lord quoted the statement of God the Father, “I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob” (Matthew 22:32), He did so to prove there is life after death. For, otherwise, He would have said “I was the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob”!

May I suggest to you that the way you view death makes all the difference in the world. If it is the end of everything, then there is not any need to seek heaven or to shun hell. Suicide is a tempting option whenever life doesn’t seem to be going our way. If there is no life after death, the world is right when it says that we should “… eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die.”

But if we view death as a beginning rather than the end, then what lies after death must surely compel us to face eternity squarely, before death. And, once we are rightly related to God by faith in His Son, we need not fear death. We need not avoid talking about it. And, in one sense, we can welcome it, for it promises us a time when we shall be intimately and eternally with God and with those in the faith who have been separated from us by death.

Let not your heart be troubled; believe in God, believe also in Me. In my Father’s house are many dwelling places; if it were not so, I would have told you, for I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you to Myself; that where I am, there you may be also (John 14:1-3).

Therefore, being always of good courage, and knowing that while we are at home in the body we are absent from the Lord—for we walk by faith, not by sight—we are of good courage, I say, and prefer rather to be absent from the body and to be at home with the Lord (II Corinthians 5:6-8).

But I am hard-pressed from both directions, having the desire to depart and be with Christ, for that is very much better (Philippians 1:23).

But we do not want you to be uninformed, brethren, about those who are asleep, that you may not grieve, as do the rest who have no hope. For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so God will bring with Him those who have fallen asleep in Jesus. For this we say to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive, and remain until the coming of the Lord, shall not precede those who have fallen asleep. For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trumpet of God; and the dead in Christ shall rise first. Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and thus we shall always be with the Lord. Therefore comfort one another with these words (I Thessalonians 4:13-18).

Do you notice how candidly both Jacob and Joseph spoke of their death? That is not so with unbelievers. They avoid the subject with a passion. All kinds of euphemisms are employed so that death’s realities need not be faced. We do not speak of the dead, but of the departed; they are not buried, but interred. People do not die; they pass away. We do not bury the dead in graveyards, but in memorial parks.

Both Jacob and Joseph called their relatives to them, where they unhesitatingly spoke of their death and gave clear instructions regarding their burial. Today we do everything possible to conceal the truth from the dying. When the father of one of my best friends was dying of cancer, he would persistently ask his son, “Are they telling me everything?”

A number of years ago I was asked to visit a woman in the hospital. No one told me she was dying. I just knew it. She and I never avoided the subject of death, and it was obvious to me that she wished to talk about it. When she died, I was asked to conduct her funeral. I shall never forget my surprise at hearing the husband repeat to his wife’s friends and family, “She never knew she was dying.” I never knew she shouldn’t know. Her husband found comfort in concealing the truth from her.

The tragedy with this effort to deny death is that those last few days or hours are spent in deception. Rather than say our farewells and use our dying breath to speak words of lasting import, we dwell on trivia, which seems “safe” and remote from such unpleasant matters as death. And rather than facing the eternity which lies only a breath away, we carefully avoid it.

Most believers should not fall into the trap of denying death or avoiding a frank discussion of it. But there is a way in which we can also lose the joy of those last moments. There are some Christians who would say that sickness and death need not be endured if we would only have the faith to be healed.

Now I want to be quick to say that God can and does heal, and I am grateful for it. But there is no promise of healing or deliverance from suffering for all. I am inclined to believe that such instances are clearly the exception, rather than the rule.

But there are those who would walk into a hospital room and assure the dying that, if they have sufficient faith, God will raise them up and restore them, free from suffering, sickness, and death. Often, the ailing grasp at any hope of deliverance, not out of faith, but out of fear. Often, there is a bold pronouncement of faith and assurance of healing. There may be a period of remission. But often, the disease continues to consume the life of the terminally ill. Now, in the light of the almost certain approach of death, there can be only one conclusion. If one can be healed if he or she has sufficient faith, and they are not being healed, that person must not have sufficient faith.

Now, rather than face death with honesty and acceptance, the ill can only question his faith. And if his faith was inadequate to heal, can it be sufficient to save? The last days are spent in doubt and despair. There is no testimony, no joy, no worship—only despair.

Let us look at death as Jacob and Joseph. Let us see it not as the end, but the beginning. Let us, by faith, look forward to being reunited with those we love (I Thessalonians 4:13-18) and dwelling with our Savior (John 14:1-3), forever in His presence and experiencing the things he has prepared for us.

Finally, Joseph’s brothers, like Jacob (until his final days), felt that death was the end. They believed that God would care for them only so long as Jacob lived. They came to learn that God’s care was certain when neither Jacob nor Joseph were around. God’s program will never be contingent upon the presence of any one man, of any one church or organization. God’s plan and program is as certain as He is sovereign, as enduring as He is eternal.

Is it possible that you are uncomfortable with the subject of this scripture? Is death a matter you would prefer to put off? I felt the same way before I came to know Him who is not only the Way and the Truth, but the Life (John 14:6). I can remember, as a child, passing by a cemetery on the way to my grandparents. I always tried to concentrate on something on the other side of the road, hoping I would not have to be reminded of death. The fear of death is evidence of our uncertainty as to what lies beyond the grave. That fear can be denied, suppressed, or camouflaged. But it cannot be avoided indefinitely. The fear of death is overcome only by the faith of men like Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, who trusted in the one Who would eventually overcome it.

Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life; he who believes in Me shall live even if he dies, and everyone who lives and believes in Me shall never die. Do you believe this?” (John 11:25-26).

For He must reign until He has put all His enemies under His feet. The last enemy that will be abolished is death (I Corinthians 15:25-26).

“O DEATH, WHERE IS YOUR VICTORY? O DEATH, WHERE IS YOUR STING?” The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law; but thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore, my beloved brethren, be steadfast, immovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, knowing that your toil is not in vain in the Lord (I Corinthians 15:55-58).

And death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire. And if anyone’s name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire (Revelation 20:14-15).


113 Joe Bayly, The Last Thing We Talk About (Elgin, Illinois: David C. Cook Publishing Co., 1973), pp. 29-30. This book, formerly titled, The View From A Hearse, is one of the finest books on death and dying on a non-technical level.

114 “Since embalmers and physicians were members of distinct professions, Joseph’s use of the latter has seemed anomalous to some writers. J. Vergote, however, points out that physicians were more than competent to perform the task, and that Joseph might well have wished to avoid the magico-religious rites of the professional embalmers.” Derek Kidner, Genesis An Introduction and Commentary (Chicago: Inter-Varsity Press, 1967).

115 George Bush, Notes on Genesis (Minneapolis: James Family Christian Publishers, 1979 (Reprint), II, p. 419.

116 “The mourning period for Jacob, as Von Rad observes, was, significantly, very little short of the seventy-two days observed for a Pharaoh.” Kidner, Genesis, p. 223.

117 “This site is unknown, but its position implies a detour round the Dead Sea to approach Hebron from the north-east instead of the south-west. Presumably there was political unrest at some point, which the cavalcade’s arrival would have been in danger of aggravating. At the Exodus the direct route would again be impracticable (Ex. 13:17). Ibid.

118 “This last paragraph of Genesis refers to events fifty-four years after the preceding verse.” W, H. Griffith Thomas, Genesis: A Devotional Commentary (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1946), p. 486.

119 The similarity between Jacob and Joseph is that both gave specific instructions concerning their burial arrangements. There is an interesting difference too. Jacob commanded his sons concerning his death (49:29,33), but Joseph charged his brothers (50:24). Thus we see that Joseph was outlived by his older brothers. God wanted to teach these men that He would care for them without Jacob or Joseph.

38. The Skeleton in Judah’s Closet (Genesis 38:1-30)

Related Media

Introduction

Interruptions are often perturbing, but they are sometimes vital. Some years ago a couple that my wife and I had come to know told us of one such occasion. The wife knew how upset it made her husband to be interrupted in the middle of a project. Consequently, she walked up to him and stood quietly as he worked happily on a project in the garage. In due time he finished what he was doing and looked up, signaling his wife that it was now permissible to engage him in conversation. Her words took him totally by surprise. Calmly she reported, “The house is on fire.” And it really was!

Genesis 38 is an interruption also, but a very significant one. In chapter 37 our attention was focused upon Joseph, who was cruelly sold into slavery, a somewhat more appealing alternative than murder. In chapter 39 the principal character again is Joseph, this time in the house of Potiphar, Pharaoh’s officer. Chapter 38, therefore, seems to abruptly interrupt the flow of thought. Because of this some scholars of the more liberal persuasion have done a great injustice to this chapter. It is as though the book which Moses has been writing becomes unbearably dull, and this chapter is a kind of literary “centerfold,” spicing up the immaterial with the immoral.

Nothing could be further from the truth. This chapter is absolutely essential to the development of the argument of the book. It occurs by design, fitting beautifully into the context. While chapter 37 has explained how Joseph (and so the entire nation of Israel) wound up in Egypt rather than Canaan, chapter 38 tells us why this Egyptian sojourn was necessary. Chapter 38 provides a backdrop against which the purity of Joseph in chapter 39 stands out the more plainly. Chapters 39 and following describe the price which Joseph had to pay for the sins of his brothers. Chapter 38 suggests some of the consequences of the sin of Joseph’s sale which Judah suffered.

It is true that the chapter might be rated “PG” due to the immorality that is depicted.34 And yet, when you read the story carefully, there is much that is not said that could have added “spice” to the account. Hollywood would have much embellishing to perform before a saleable movie could be made from this record. And while some immoral acts are related, there is nothing here which would in any way entice us to experience these sins personally.

I am especially impressed with the message of this chapter because of its applicability to God’s people today. The very forces which were active in Judah’s day are at work today. The dangers described in chapter 38 which threatened the very ongoing of God’s purposes for Israel are those which threaten to hinder the program of God through His church in our own day. And the same God who providentially overruled the sins of men to bring about the fulfillment of His purposes then is alive and well and unchanging this very hour.

Judah’s Family
(38:1-11)

And it came about at that time, that Judah departed from his brothers, and visited a certain Adullamite, whose name was Hirah. And Judah saw there a daughter of a certain Canaanite whose name was Shua; and he took her and went in to her. So she conceived and bore a son and he named him Er. Then she conceived again and bore a son and named him Onan. And she bore still another son and named him Shelah; and it was at Chezib that she bore him. Now Judah took a wife for Er his first-born, and her name was Tamar. But Er, Judah’s first-born, was evil in the sight of the LORD, so the LORD took his life. Then Judah said to Onan, “Go in to your brother’s wife, and perform your duty as a brother-in-law to her, and raise up offspring for your brother.” And Onan knew that the offspring would not be his; so it came about that when he went in to his brother’s wife, he wasted his seed on the ground, in order not to give offspring to his brother. But what he did was displeasing in the sight of the LORD; so He took his life also. Then Judah said to his daughter-in-law Tamar, “Remain a widow in your father’s house until my son Shelah grows up”; for he thought, “I am afraid that he too may die like his brothers.” So Tamar went and lived in her father’s house (Genesis 38:1-11).

The sale of Joseph was only the “beginning of woes” for his father Israel. Directly on the heels of this sin flow the events of chapter 38. Unity among the sons of Israel was never a significant force. The selling of Joseph was only one indication of this, and even here, the brothers were not of one mind about it. But now Judah has chosen to leave his brothers and his father for “greener grass,” namely fellowship and union with the Canaanites.

Judah’s troubles began with an association with Hirah, an Adullamite. The events of the chapter as a whole inform us that Hirah was a close friend and a very poor influence on Judah. Wherever Hirah is mentioned there is trouble in store for Judah. While with Hirah at Adullam, Judah saw a certain Canaanite woman whose name is never given. She is only referred to as “Shua’s daughter” (verse 12, cf. verse 2). I take it from the fact that stress is laid on Judah’s seeing this woman (“and Judah saw there,” verse 2) that her outward appearance may have been his only consideration in taking her as a wife. Since this seems to have been influential in Jacob’s selection of a wife, we need not be surprised at this. It was, then, a purely physical choice. Certainly no spiritual considerations were taken into account.

I could not help but look back to chapter 34 where we are told of Shechem taking Dinah. It is said of him that he “saw her, he took her and lay with her” (34:2). There is very little difference between those words and the description we have in verse 2 of chapter 38. Judah “saw” this woman and “took her” and “went in to her.” Only the last expression differs, but both describe a physical union. The act which angered Israel’s sons to the point of murder is very much the same as Judah’s taking of a wife.

Three sons were born from this union of Judah and the Canaanite woman: Er, Onan, and Shelah. For the first son, Tamar was acquired for a wife. Er, however, was so evil that God took his life. His sins are not detailed, for they are irrelevant to the point of the passage. Onan was then instructed by Judah to marry Tamar and raise up seed to his brother. Since the headship of the family (the birthright) normally went to the firstborn, this was a necessary act.

We may be somewhat taken back by this early reference to what is later known as “levirate marriage.” Centuries later Moses commanded it as recorded in the book of Deuteronomy:

When brothers live together and one of them dies and has no son, the wife of the deceased shall not be married outside the family to a strange man. Her husband’s brother shall go in to her and take her to himself as wife and perform the duty of a husband’s brother to her. And it shall be that the first-born whom she bears shall assume the name of his dead brother, that his name may not be blotted out from Israel. But if the man does not desire to take his brother’s wife, then his brother’s wife shall go up to the gate to the elders and say, “My husband’s brother refuses to establish a name for his brother in Israel; he is not willing to perform the duty of a husband’s brother to me.” Then the elders of his city shall summon him and speak to him. And if he persists and says, “I do not desire to take her,” then his brother’s wife shall come to him in the sight of the elders, and pull his sandal off his foot and spit in his face; and she shall declare, “Thus it is done to the man who does not build up his brother’s house.” And in Israel his name shall be called, “The house of him whose sandal is removed” (Deuteronomy 25:5-10).

Such marriage did not originate with the Law of God given through Moses. It had been a common practice in the Near East for centuries. It served a very practical purpose, that of ensuring the ongoing of the family name. As such, it was commanded in the Law of Moses. More and more, I am becoming conscious of the fact that the Law of Moses did not necessarily initiate entirely new principles and precepts, but simply ratified many of those already existent (cf. also 35:2; 14:20, 28:22).

Onan knew that the offspring from his union with Tamar would only further the cause of his deceased brother rather than his own. Consequently he was not willing to have any children by her. To prevent Tamar from conceiving, Onan “spilled his seed on the ground” (verse 9). Such an act was regularly practiced, and God took the life of this man for his wickedness also.

Many are those who have tried to make this passage the prooftext for banning any method of birth control. Because of the strong emotional and moral implications involved here, we must take careful note of what it is that is called evil. I believe that Onan was condemned for three reasons. First, Onan’s sexual conduct was “contrary to nature.” While Paul was speaking of homosexuality and perhaps other perversions in Romans 1:26-27, what was practiced by Onan was also contrary to nature. It would be difficult, in my estimation, to defend Onan’s actions as “natural.”

Second, Onan was disobedient in his actions. His society at least commended the raising of seed to a brother’s name, and his father had directly commanded it (verse 8). We are led to infer from the story that Judah never knew why children had not been conceived, for only Tamar would have known the cause. From Judah’s biased perspective it was Tamar who must be the jinx, and this prompted him to withhold his last son.

Third, Onan sinned because his motivation was evil. Not only did Onan sin against his father and Tamar, but he sinned primarily against his dead brother. Onan put his own personal interests above his brother’s inability to continue the family line. In essence, Onan’s act was the product of self-seeking at the expense of others. Just as Joseph’s brothers had no “brotherly love,” neither did this son of Judah.35 In this sense he was surely a “son of his father.”

Personally, I think that we do the text an injustice if we conclude that any and every form of birth control is sin on the basis of this passage alone. Birth control in any form would have been evil for Onan, but that is not the same as saying it is wrong in any form for us, for we have not been commanded to raise up seed as he was. Birth control (or any act, for that matter) is evil if it is motivated by self-seeking and if it is clearly an act of disobedience. “Whatever is not of faith is sin” (Romans 14:23) must be one standard by which we measure our every action. Many, I fear, do prevent the conception of children for purely selfish reasons. Some practice birth control out of a lack of faith, doubting that God will provide materially or emotionally. Since “children are a gift of the Lord” (Psalm 127:3), I believe that one should carefully consider his real reasons for birth control, but I cannot step beyond this to say that it is always wrong. There may be reasons of health, for example, which would dictate that measures should be taken to prevent conception. Abortion, of course, is an entirely separate issue.

Once Onan was dead, Judah became very reluctant to give his youngest (and last) son to Tamar. It never seemed to occur to him that it was his sons who were the problem, not Tamar. Probably Shelah was too young at first to assume the role of husband and father, but more than enough time elapsed to solve this problem. Finally Tamar was convinced that Judah had no intention of giving Shelah to her. If she were to bear children to carry on the name of her first husband, she must force the issue, she concluded.

Judah’s Fornication
(38:12-19)

Now after a considerable time Shua’s daughter, the wife of Judah, died; and when the time of mourning was ended, Judah went up to his sheep-shearers at Timnah, he and his friend Hirah the Adullamite. And it was told to Tamar, “Behold, your father-in-law is going up to Timnah to shear his sheep.” So she removed her widow’s garments and covered herself with a veil, and wrapped herself, and sat in the gateway of Enaim, which is on the road to Timnah; for she saw that Shelah had grown up, and she had not been given to him as a wife. When Judah saw her, he thought she was a harlot, for she had covered her face. So he turned aside to her by the road, and said, “Here now, let me come in to you”; for he did not know that she was his daughter-in-law. And she said, “What will you give me, that you may come in to me?” He said, therefore, “I will send you a kid from the flock.” She said, moreover, “Will you give a pledge until you send it?” And he said, “What pledge shall I give you?” And she said, “Your seal and your cord, and your staff that is in your hand.” So he gave them to her, and went in to her, and she conceived by him. Then she arose and departed, and removed her veil and put on her widow’s garments (Genesis 38:12-19).

After a considerable period of time two events occurred which set the scene for Judah to depart even further from the faith of his fathers. Already Judah had left his brothers and formed an alliance with Hirah. He had married a Canaanite and produced three children, two so wicked that God had to remove them. In time, Judah’s Canaanite wife, whose name is never mentioned, passed away. In a sensually-oriented and sexually-perverted society36 this placed Judah in a vulnerable position. Also, sufficient time had passed for Shelah to grow up and take Tamar as a wife to raise up children to Er, the eldest brother. But while Tamar was officially regarded as the wife of Shelah, the marriage was never consummated, for Judah had never given Shelah to Tamar.

Judah, along with his unsavory companion Hirah, went up to Timnah to shear the sheep. News of this reached Tamar and signaled her to set into action a plan to provide a son to carry on the name of her first husband. In her society not only were the younger brothers able to raise up seed to her husband, but also her father-in-law, Judah.37 Since Judah was unwilling to risk the loss of his last and only living son, Tamar determined to force the matter, becoming pregnant by Judah. Judah was wrong in withholding Shelah, but so was Tamar by taking these matters into her own hands.

In my estimation Tamar was not taking a “long shot” in what she attempted in the gateway of Enaim.38 The moral atmosphere of the annual sheep-shearing might best be understood when compared to a contemporary television commercial. Visualize a group of hard-working shepherds finishing an exhausting, hot, and thirsty week among the sheep, leaving the fields after having completed this annual task. Suddenly one calls out to the others, “It’s Miller time!” With a girl in one arm and a bottle of booze in the other, the celebration begins. Tamar knew well that this was the kind of thing that took place at sheep-shearing season.39

Not only did she know men in general, but she knew Judah very well. Moral purity does not seem to be one of his virtues. There is little doubt that this wasn’t Judah’s first encounter with a prostitute. He does not evidence any of the naivety of one who is new at this sort of thing. He handled the arrangements like an experienced man of the world. Tamar was convinced that if she could only look like a prostitute, Judah would take things from there and that her purposes would be realized.

With all the savoir-faire of one who was worldly wise, Judah negotiated terms acceptable to both parties. It was probably common practice to ask for some kind of pledge since little could be done to force the “client” to pay after the fact. Judah was therefore not taken back by Tamar’s insistence that some guarantee be given. Not that Tamar had any interest in payment. She wanted only to become pregnant by Judah. But the pledge that was given would serve to prove at a later time that Judah was the father of the child that was conceived from this union.

The seal, cord, and staff were not items purchased from mass-produced stock. Each had distinctive characteristics which were peculiar to the owner. The seal was the ancient cylinder seal used in the making of contracts. It was the counterpart of our Master Charge card today. The seal was a cylinder with the unique design of its owner carved in it. When a contract was made, hot wax was put on the document and the seal was rolled over it, leaving the impression of the owner of the seal. Judah’s seal was one of a kind, as were those of others.40 He would therefore immediately recognize it as his own. The same was true of the staff. Possession of these gave Tamar proof of the identity of the father of her child when he was born.

Judah’s Folly
(38:20-26)

When this encounter ended Judah and Tamar went their separate ways. Judah never knew the identity of this “prostitute,” and Tamar went back to her normal routine, living as a widow in her father’s house. Normally such an affair would have been quickly forgotten, but several events occurred which made this immoral interlude a nightmare that Judah would never be able to put out of his mind.

When Judah sent the kid by his friend the Adullomite, to receive the pledge from the woman’s hand, he did not find her. And he asked the men of her place, saying, “Where is the temple prostitute who was by the road at Enaim?” But they said, “There has been no temple prostitute here.” So he returned to Judah, and said, “I did not find her; and furthermore, the men of the place said, ‘There has been no temple prostitute here.’” Then Judah said, “Let her keep them, lest we become a laughingstock. After all, I sent this kid, but you did not find her.” Now it was about three months later that Judah was informed, “Your daughter-in-law Tamar has played the harlot, and behold, she is also with child by harlotry.” Then Judah said, “Bring her out and let her be burned!” It was while she was being brought out that she sent to her father-in-law, saying, “I am with child by the man to whom these things belong.” And she said, “Please examine and see, whose signet ring and cords and staff are these?” And Judah recognized them, and said, “She is more righteous than I, inasmuch as I did not give her to my son Shelah.” And he did not have relations with her again (Genesis 38:20-26).

Hirah was sent to pay the prostitute and retrieve the pledge which Judah had given her. A subtle but significant change of words occurs here, which is indicative of a serious flaw in Judah’s character. Judah thought that the woman in the gateway of Enaim was a mere prostitute (verse 15, a harlot). But when Hirah searched for her he asked for the whereabouts of the “temple prostitute” (verses 21, 22).41 The religion of the Canaanites was so corrupt that prostitution was a part of their worship of the god of fertility. Judah, in his spiritual and moral dullness, was ignorant of such distinctions. To him it was merely an affair, but to the Canaanites it was an act of worship. Immorality would almost invariably lead to idolatry. Yet Judah was virtually aloof to these dangers.

Not finding the “temple prostitute” and, worse yet, being told that there was no such person to be found, placed Judah in a very awkward and potentially embarrassing position. It would seem that someone had gotten the best of him, but he was powerless to do anything about it. Who would ever report a theft to the authorities under such delicate circumstances. The more he sought to find this woman, the more his folly would become public knowledge. These were the kind of stories that were swapped in jest. Judah had no desire to become the laughingstock of the town. He had tried to find the woman and pay her, better to take his losses and hope this was the end of the matter.

As one month, then two, and nearly three passed by without incident, Judah may have begun to breathe a little easier. It seemed as though he had gotten off easy. The woman had not appeared again, nor was there any sign of his personal pledge. It never entered his mind that the matter would end up as it did.

One day Judah was informed that Tamar was pregnant. This was not mere fornication, but it was adultery, for Tamar was pledged to marry Judah’s third son, Shelah.42 Judah’s righteous indignation must have been awesome. She must be burned! This was an unusually severe punishment, even more than the Law required. The usual punishment prescribed by the Law of Moses was stoning (Deuteronomy 22:20-24). In cases of unusual wickedness, there was punishment by burning (Leviticus 20:14; 21:9). Why, then, was Judah demanding such treatment for his daughter-in-law? It may have been a sub-conscious overcompensation for his own immorality. Often we attempt to cover up our own sinfulness by a severity in our response to the sins of others.

On the other hand, it may have been even more devious. It is possible, in his low spiritual state, that Judah saw this as the solution to a problem over which he had long agonized. Sooner or later he would have to face the fact that Shelah, his only living son, was pledged to Tamar. There was no doubt but that he was old enough to assume the role of husband and father, but Judah feared losing this son also (38:11). If Tamar were put to death, his problem would be solved. No Tamar, no threat. It was almost too good to be true.43 While we can only conjecture on this point, it is not difficult to believe that this could be true at this time in his life. Judah’s sentence set in motion a sequence of events he would not have believed.

Tamar’s response to the situation was incredibly subdued and submissive. Frankly, I would have shouted that Judah was the father of this child from the housetops. I would have sought to maximize his embarrassment. What an opportunity to capitalize on the situation and find satisfaction for the years of delay and deceit in keeping Shelah from her. But she, it would seem, privately presented the evidence to Judah and politely urged him to carefully consider it. She made no condemning accusations but only submitted the seal, the cord, and the staff to Judah.

What a shock this must have been to Judah. It never occurred to him that he was the guilty party who should suffer the penalty he had pronounced with his own lips. Judah, the forefather of the Messiah and the great grandson of Abraham, had to say of this woman, “She is more righteous than I” (verse 26). It is worthy of note that he does not say she is more righteous than he in the matter of the immorality committed, but in that she acted so as to procure a son that was rightfully hers, while Judah refused to give her Shelah as he had promised. As to his act of immorality, Judah had no comment. What a contrast to his response to the report of Tamar’s “harlotry.”

Judah may have had some kind of turnabout here, for he did not again have any physical relations with Tamar. Also, the next time we read of him he is again back with his brothers and father. Some kind of spiritual renewal must have taken place.

Jesus’ Family
(38:27-30)

And it came about at the time she was giving birth, that behold, there were twins in her womb. Moreover, it took place while she was giving birth, one put out a hand, and the midwife took and tied a scarlet thread on his hand, saying, “This one came out first.” But it came about as he drew back his hand, that behold his brother came out. Then she said, “What a breach you have made for yourself!” So he was named Perez. And afterward his brother came out who had the scarlet thread on his hand; and he was named Zerah (Genesis 38:27-30).

The closing paragraph of the chapter describes the birth of the twins that resulted from the union of Judah and Tamar. Since the twin that was first to emerge from the womb traditionally possessed the rights of the firstborn, some kind of identifying mark was placed on the first to issue from the womb. When one of the boys thrust out a hand, a scarlet thread was tied about it, assuming that he would shortly come forth. The hand was withdrawn, however, and the firstborn was the other boy. This firstborn was named Perez, while the next son, the one with the scarlet thread, was named Zerah. As later genealogies will prove, this firstborn son, Perez, was to be the son of Judah who would carry on the messianic line until the time of David, and ultimately, of Jesus (cf. Ruth 4:12; Matthew 1:3).

Conclusion

Historically, this chapter had much to teach the ancient Israelites. To begin with, this event underscores the necessity of a sojourn in Egypt. Spiritual purity was essential for the purposes of God to be realized. Judah, the son through whom the Messiah would be born (Genesis 49:8-12), was so carnal that he was willing to marry a Canaanite woman, to have a heathen for his closest companion, and to enter into an illicit relationship with a cult prostitute. Something drastic had to be done, and the exile in Egypt was God’s remedy. There, living among a people who detested Hebrew shepherds (43:32; 46:34), even if the Hebrews were willing to inter-mingle and intermarry with these people, the Egyptians would not even consider such a thing. Racial bigotry, if not religious piety, would keep the people of God a separate people. While the sojourn in Egypt was in many respects a bitter experience, it was a gracious act on the part of God. Those Israelites who had gone through the exodus experience could begin to sense this as they read this account.

No Israelite could take this record seriously without a deep sense of humility. Israel’s “roots,” if you will pardon me for saying so, were rotten. They could not look back upon their ancestry with any feelings of smugness and pride. There were too many skeletons in the closet for that. Instead, they must acknowledge that whatever good had come to Israel was the result of grace alone.

The LORD did not set His love on you nor choose you because you were more in number than any of the peoples, for you were the fewest of all peoples, but because the LORD loved you and kept the oath which He swore to your forefathers, the LORD brought you out by a might hand, and redeemed you from the house of slavery, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt (Deuteronomy 7:7-8).

This was a lesson too quickly forgotten, for the Israelites of Jesus’ day took great pride in their ancestry and relied upon their “roots” for righteousness:

And do not suppose that you can say to yourselves, “We have Abraham for our father;” for I say to you, that God is able from these stones to raise up children to Abraham (Matthew 3:9).

They answered Him, “We are Abraham’s offspring, and have never yet been enslaved to anyone; how is it that You say, ‘You shall become free’?” (John 8:33)

Righteousness comes only from God through faith. Our first ancestor, Adam, failed to live by God’s standards and thus sinned. All of his offspring, like Adam, are sinners (Romans 5:12) and thus in need of a righteousness not their own. Jesus Christ, God’s Son, has come to this world to take our sin upon Himself, to bear the penalty for our sins, so that we can have His righteousness and spend eternity with God.

He made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him (II Corinthians 5:21).

And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to promise (Galatians 3:29).

The principal theme of this chapter is divine providence, which draws the entire section together; God is at work bringing about His purposes through men who are actively pursuing sin. In chapters 37 and 39 and following, God is providentially at work to fulfill His promise to make the descendants of Jacob a great and mighty nation (cf. 35:11), and at a time when these brothers were only intent upon diminishing their numbers. In chapter 38 God is at work, providentially assuring the fulfillment of His promise to provide a Messiah through the descendants of Judah (49:8-12).

Ideally, God’s sovereign power and all-wise and loving purposes are accomplished through obedient servants. But when His children go their own way, God’s infinite power is channeled through unwilling, disobedient men and women, who, in spite of themselves, achieve God’s plans. This they do unknowingly and unpleasantly.

Who would ever have thought that there was any chance of the messianic line continuing through Judah from the initial events of this chapter? Here was Judah, the ancestor of Messiah, taking a Canaanite wife, failing to keep his promise to his daughter-in-law, and propositioning a prostitute, who would just have well been a part of a pagan religious cult? In spite of all of Judah’s sins and in spite of Tamar’s impatience, Perez, the forefather of David and of the Savior, was born. Who but God could have brought such a thing to pass?

Many Christians are being taught that God’s purposes can only be achieved if we are faithful and obedient. What can they possibly say about this chapter in that regard? And who of us would want to believe that God’s purposes were contingent upon our commitment and consistency? Nothing could be further from the truth than thinking that God is somehow limited by man’s sinfulness.

The doctrine of the providence of God is one of the most comforting truths in all of the Bible, for it assures me that what God says, He will do, even if I am found to be actively resisting it. If the promise of eternal salvation were not dependent upon God’s character and His power, Who can bring about His will in spite of man, what kind of promise would it be? I might just as well quit now and avoid the rush. But if God’s promises are sure (as they are, Philippians 1:6) then I can diligently work for these goals, realizing that I cannot lose, even when I am faint of heart or go my own way through disobedience or rebellion.

At this point many are frightened by the implications of the sovereignty of God. They fear that Christians will conclude, “Why bother to obey God, to struggle against the desires of the flesh, or to fight the spiritual warfare? After all, if God’s will is going to be done whether I obey or not, why obey?”

There is the danger of God’s sovereignty and my security tempting me to complacency. That is why this problem is addressed in Scripture (Romans 5:19-6:23). But the danger does not disprove the doctrine. Many Christian heresies are the illogical misapplications of biblical truth. In the book of Romans, for example, the expression “God forbid” is an indication that this is the case. The principle is valid, but the application is not. Thus, when Paul teaches that “where sin increased, grace abounded all the more” (Romans 5:20), we recognize this doctrine to be true and one that is illustrated in Genesis 38. But to conclude from this that one should therefore sin in order that grace might abound even more (Romans 6:1) is an improper extension of a biblical principle. Some have been inclined to reject the doctrine of God’s sovereignty because of what some have done with it practically. It is the practice which should be condemned, not the doctrine.

Since much of what God does in this world is through His providential guidance, it is vital that we understand its implications for Christians today. The first is that godly living is necessary for the glory of God. Had we not been given the divinely inspired account of the sale of Joseph into slavery, we would not have imagined that it was part of God’s eternal plan. At best, unbelievers would have considered the outcome of the incident good luck or mere coincidence. You see, when God works providentially through disobedient men and women, not only are the instruments unaware of the hand of God, but so are the onlookers.

In chapter 39 we are told, “Now his master saw that the LORD was with him and how the LORD caused all that he did to prosper in his hand” (verse 3). Why could this be said of Joseph’s master but not of his brothers nor of the Midianite traders nor of Hirah nor Tamar? It was because God was working through men in spite of themselves. Joseph gave a clear testimony to his faith in God; his good work and divine blessing verified his faith in the God of Israel. Judah did not witness to Tamar as he was bargaining over the price of her services. Hirah probably never learned that Judah was to play a part in the purposes of God.

The point is this: while God can accomplish His purposes without man’s cooperation by His providential working in this world, He can best be exalted and proclaimed to unbelievers through those who trust in Him and obey His will. Lest we be tempted to be lax in our spiritual lives, convinced that God’s will will ultimately be done anyway, let us remember that God desires to be glorified in His saints (cf. Genesis 49:3; II Thessalonians 1:10,12).

The second implication stemming from the doctrine of God’s providential rule is that we Christians must view every circumstance through the eyes of faith. Judah did not realize at the time that God’s promises were being fulfilled through his act of immorality. Joseph did not fully know that his sale into slavery was going to bring about the deliverance of his brothers and father. There will be many times in the life of the Christian when it will appear that everything is falling apart at the seams. Tragedy, disputes, divisions, and heartache will afflict us so long as we are in these mortal bodies. We, too, must trust that in these times of adversity there is a God Who does work providentially in our lives. This is the assurance that we have from Romans 8:28:

And we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose.

Only the eye of faith will see the hand of God in the hard times of life.

While the doctrine of the providence of God is the major theme of this chapter, there are a number of implications that can be drawn from the text as well. Let me suggest some of these for further consideration.

(1) Spirituality is not evidenced by the standards which we hold for others, no matter how vigorously. God judges men on the basis of those standards by which they live their own lives. Judah was willing to stone Tamar and then burn her body for the very sin which he committed. In the New Testament we find this same concept:

Therefore you are without excuse, every man of you who passes Judgment, for in that you judge another, you condemn yourself; for you who judge practice the some things (Romans 2:1).

(2) In Jacob’s day, as in our own, one of Satan’s highest priorities is the attack on the home of the people of God. The purposes of God were to be realized in the families of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. It was the breakdown of the family which seriously threatened (from a human vantage point) the purposes of God. Today the same challenge faces the Christian family.

(3) In Jacob’s day, as in our own, the same basic issues are at stake. The family was under attack, as the church is today, on two major fronts. The first is in the area of purity and separation. Judah eagerly committed the sin for which he (or at least his brothers) put an entire city to the sword. He married a Canaanite and would have had sexual relations with a cult prostitute. Today our children are facing incredible pressure to conform to the world around them, to date and marry unbelievers, and to forsake the faith they have learned from their family.

Separation from the world is especially important in the matter of the friends that we choose. As Judah slipped away from his family, he entered into an alliance with Hirah, a man who was always present when Judah got into trouble. It is the apostle James who wrote so long ago,

You adulteresses, do you not know that friendship with the world is hostility toward God? (James 4:4)

The second front in Satan’s attack on the family and the church is the matter of unity and brotherly love. Joseph’s brothers had no brotherly love and no essential unity. Judah’s son Onan had no sense of obligation to his deceased brother and was motivated only by self-interest and selfish ambition. So far as he was concerned, it did not matter if Tamar ever had a child, but God had determined that she would be the one through whom the Messiah would come.

The New Testament abounds with passages which exhort us to practice brotherly love (cf. Romans 12:10; I Thessalonians 4:9; Hebrews 13:1; II Peter 1:7). The reason why we lack this kind of love and the unity which it fosters is that we, like Onan, are concerned more with our own interests than with those of others. Listen to the solution which Paul has outlined:

If therefore there is any encouragement in Christ, if there is any consolation of love, if there is any fellowship of the Spirit, if any affection and compassion, make my joy complete by being of the same mind, maintaining the same love, united in spirit, intent on one purpose. Do nothing from selfishness or empty conceit, but with humility of mind let each of you regard one another as more important than himself; do not merely look out for your own personal interests, but also for the interests of others. Have this attitude in yourselves which was also in Christ Jesus, who, although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bondservant, and being made in the likeness of men. And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross (Philippians 2:1-8).

(4) There are times when we must deal with things which are dirty. I am aware of the text which instructs us,

And do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but instead even expose them; for it is disgraceful even to speak of the things which are done by them (Ephesians 5:11-12).

It was necessary to deal with the sins of Onan and Judah because the Messiah was to come from the seed of Judah. Sexual sins in Judah’s family had very serious ramifications. The sins of Er were not necessary to instruct us, so they are not even named. While the sins of Onan and Judah are mentioned, there are no unnecessary details given. Our curiosity is not stimulated, nor are we in any way stimulated or encouraged to repeat these sins. Indeed, we are shown the painful price that was paid because of them. Sometimes sin must be exposed. In such cases, let us deal with it as Moses did.


34 Even a great commentator like Leupold suggests that this chapter is “entirely unsuited to homiletical use, much as the devout Bible student may glean from the chapter.” H. C. Leupold, Exposition of Genesis (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1942), II, p. 990.

35 “The enormity of Onan’s sin is in its studied outrage against the family, against his brother’s widow and against his own body. The standard English versions fail to make clear that this was his persistent practice.” Derek Kidner, Genesis: An Introduction and Commentary (Chicago: Inter-Varsity Press, 1967), p. 188.

36 “. . . for evidence of the demoralized conduct of the Canaanites has been found on every hand, in the remains of city after city of the Canaanites.” Harold G. Stigers, A Commentary on Genesis (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1976), p. 256. Here, Stigers refers the reader to M. F. Unger, Archaeology and the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1965), pp. 168-177.

37 “Marriage customs in this area provided for marriage within the husband’s house. Tamar could be reserved for other sons and even for her father-in-law, but she could not contract marriage for herself.” Harold G. Stigers, Genesis, p. 279. Stigers here refers the reader to C. H. Gordon, Introduction to Old Testament Times (Ventnor, N. J.: Ventnor Publishing Co., 1953), p. 123.

38 This is the view of Leupold, who writes, “She makes calculations that seem to have but one chance in a hundred of being realized, but just that one chance is sufficient.” Leupold, Genesis, II, p. 982.

39 “Sheep-shearing was a festive time (cf. I S. 25:4, 11, 36), when sexual temptation would be sharpened by the Canaanite cult, which encouraged ritual fornication as fertility magic.” Kidner, Genesis, P. 188.

40 “The ‘seal’ (chotham) may have been a ring or even a cylinder seal, such as the Babylonians commonly used. This was always carried around upon his person by the well-to-do man, suspended by the ‘cord’ (pethil); cf. Song 8:6. The ‘staff’ may have been like those which, according to Herodotus, the Babylonians carried, having at its head a specially carved figure of an apple, or a rose, or a lily, or an eagle, or any such thing, for no man may carry a staff without a device,’ (Herodotus 1:195, cited by Delitasch).” Leupold, Genesis, II, pp. 984-985.

41 “When Hirah sought out Tamar, he used a different word to describe her (qedesah) connoting a religious prostitute, available to the Canaanites who come to worship at shrines of the fertility goddess. Harlotry was not the stigma to the Canaanites that it was to Israel. A qedesah was distinguished from a zoneh . . . . Offerings to a qedesah were kids, as was Judah’s.* He considered qedesah and zoneh to be the same.” Stigers, Genesis, p. 280.

* S. Talmon, “Desert Motifs,” in Biblical Motifs, ed. A. Altmann (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1966), ii:3.

42 “Tamar was regarded as the affianced bride of Shelah, and was to be punished as a bride convicted of a breach of chastity.” C. F. Keil, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1968), I, p. 342.

43 Stigers suggests this when he writes,

“Yet one may ask, was he willing to let her be done away with in this manner to eliminate having to give her to Shelah? Does the apparent harshness of the sentence support this view?” Stigers, Genesis, p. 281. It should be noted that Stigers considers this a possibility, but is not strongly inclined to believe it to be the case.

Does "Elohim" in Gen. 1:1 mean God or gods?

The fundamental principle in the study of words is their context and the way they are used in throughout the Bible. And the same applies to any literature or writing. The Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament, Vol. I, Moody Press, Editor, R. Laird Harris, Associate Editor, Gleason L. Archer, Jr., Associate Editor, Bruce K. Waltke, has the following to say about Elohim:

Elohim. God, gods, judges, angels. This word, which is generally viewed as the plural of eloah, is found far more frequently in Scripture than either el or eloah for the true God. The plural ending is usually described as a plural of majesty and not intended as a true plural when used of God. This is seen in the fact that the noun elohim is consistently used with a singular verb forms and with adjectives and pronouns in the singular.

Albright has suggested that the use of this majestic plural comes from the tendency in the ancient near east toward a universalism:… a better reason can be seen in Scripture itself where, in the very first chapter of Gen, the necessity of a term conveying both the untiy of the one God and yet allowing for a plurality of persons is found (Gen. 1:2, 26). This is further borne out by the fact that the form elohim occurs only in Hebrew and no other Semitic language, not even in Biblical Aramaic…

The term occurs in the general sense of deity some 2570 times in Scripture. Yet … it is difficult to detect any discrepancy in use between the forms el, eloah, and elohim in Scripture.

When indicating the true God, elohim functions as the subject of all divine activity revealed to man and as the object of all true reverence and fear from men. Often, elohim is accompanied by the personal name of God, Yahweh.

Regarding the meaning and use of Eloah, they write:

The exact relationship between this name for God in Scripture and el or elohim and far from settled. It occurs in some of the oldest Old Testament poetry (Deut. 32:15, 17) and very frequently (forty-one times) in the debates between Job (and ancient believer) and his friends. It appears therefore to be an ancient term for God which was later dropped for the most part until the time of the exile and after, when there was great concern for a return to the more ancient foundations. It is not frequently used outside Job. It occurs once in Isa, once in Prov, twice in Hab, four times in Ps, and then in the postexilic books: II Chr., Neh, and Dan a total of five times.

… This term for God was usually clearly used for Israel’s God, the true God.… The Hebrew word is quite similar to the Aramaic elah, the usual name for God in Biblical Aramaic…

The key in the study of all biblical words is not their etymology or derivation, but their use with the ingredients of the context as the defining issues. Clearly, in most cases, these words are used in the Old Testament of the one true God who revealed himself to the nation of Israel by divine revelation in various ways through the patriarchs and the prophets.

In Deuteronomy 6:4, the well known passage called the Shema (from the Hebrew word meaning “to hear”), Hear, O Israel! The Lord is our God, the Lord is one!,” the word one is echad, which refers to one, not in the absolute sense, but one in the collective sense, like one bunch of grapes. Thus, even this passage does not destroy the concept of the trinity. While the trinity is not explicitly stated in either the Old or New Testaments, it is implicitly taught in a number of ways, but especially in the New Testament. For details on this, please see The Trinity (Triunity) of God on our web site under “Bible Studies / Theology / Theology Proper.”

A careful study of the New Testament demonstrates that not only did the authors of the New Testament declare that Jesus Christ was God in the flesh, but Christ himself believed and declared himself to be God and one in essence with the Father. The idea that he was only a god is polytheism, a concept totally contrary to both the Old and New Testaments. May I suggest a book that not only deals with this, but much more as it pertains to what the New Testament teaches about Christ. It’s called The Case For Christ, by Lee Strobel.

The New Testament does not teach one God who acted in three modes, modalism, but one divine being who exists in three persons who are co-equal and co-eternal. The main point is that the Bible clearly declares one God in three persons all of whom are God. Note what Paul said about Jesus Christ, and remember, this was not easy for him, as he was a Hebrew of Hebrews, a Pharisee (Phil. 3). He wrote of Jesus, “looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus.” According to the laws of Greek grammar, this passage, and there are plenty of others, declares that Christ Jesus is both our great God and Savior. The phrase “our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ” is one of the christologically significant texts affected by a grammatical rule called the Granville Sharp rule. In this text, we have one article, “the,” with two nouns, “God” and “Savior,” connected by kai, the Greek and. According to this rule, in the article-noun-kaiv-noun construction the second noun refers to the same person described by the first noun when (1) neither is impersonal; (2) neither is plural; (3) neither is a proper name. For more discussion see Wallace, Exegetical Syntax, 270-78, esp. 276.

The passage in John 1:1 can in no way can be made to say that Jesus was only a god who was with the Father. It dramatically says that he is God of very God, yet distinct from the Father as God. The fact that “God” (Greek theos) is without the article does not mean “a god,” but, again, according to Greek grammar, is designed to stress the undiminished deity of the Logos, “the Word.” For more on the meaning of this passage you might check out an essay called, The Word Was God, at www.inthebeginning.org.

Related Topics: Terms & Definitions, Theology Proper (God)

8. The Second Coming

Related Media

What is the second coming of Christ? The second coming is one of the most important doctrines in Scripture. It is mentioned more than 300 times in the New Testament.1 In Titus 2:13, Paul called it the believers’ “blessed hope” (Titus 2:13 ESV). Blessed can be translated as “happy.” Therefore, the second coming should be the happy and joyous expectation of every Christian. In Philippians 3:20 (NIV), Paul said this:

But our citizenship is in heaven. And we eagerly await a Savior from there, the Lord Jesus Christ, who, by the power that enables him to bring everything under his control, will transform our lowly bodies so that they will be like his glorious body.

In considering the second coming, we’ll look at its characteristics, purpose, the signs that precede it, whether it is imminent, and applications of it.

Characteristics

1. The second coming will be sudden—happening at an hour no one expects.

In Matthew 24:27, Christ described his coming being like “lightening” from the sky. He says, “For just like the lightning comes from the east and flashes to the west, so the coming of the Son of Man will be.” The coming is also compared to a thief in the night, which demonstrates how people will be unprepared for it. In Revelation 16:15, Christ said, “Look! I will come like a thief!” Because Christ comes like lightning and like a thief, no one will know the exact hour of his coming. Consider the following verses:

Therefore you also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him.

Matthew 24:44

But as for that day or hour no one knows it—neither the angels in heaven, nor the Son—except the Father. Watch out! Stay alert! For you do not know when the time will come.

Mark 13:32-33

Therefore stay alert, because you do not know the day or the hour.

Matthew 25:13

Therefore, any attempts to declare the timeframe that Christ will come are wrong. Unfortunately, there have been many false declarations throughout history and many people who have been led astray by them. Grudem’s comments on this are sobering:

The Jehovah’s Witnesses have made many predictions of specific dates for Christ’s return, and all of them have turned out to be wrong. But others in the history of the church have made such predictions as well, sometimes claiming new insight into biblical prophecies, and sometimes claiming to have received personal revelations from Jesus himself indicating the time of his return. It is unfortunate that many people have been deceived by these claims, because if people are convinced that Christ will return (for example) within a month, they will begin to withdraw from all long-term commitments. They will take their children out of school, sell their houses, quit their jobs, and give up work on any long-term projects whether in the church or elsewhere. They may initially have an increased zeal for evangelism and prayer, but the unreasonable nature of their behavior will offset any evangelistic impact they may have. Moreover, they are simply disobeying the teaching of Scripture that the date of Christ’s return cannot be known, which means that even their prayer and fellowship with God will be hindered as well. Anyone who claims to know the date on which Christ will return—from whatever source—should be rejected as incorrect.2

2. The second coming will be visible and dramatic.

Revelation 1:7 says, “Look! He is returning with the clouds, and every eye will see him, even those who pierced him, and all the tribes on the earth will mourn because of him. This will certainly come to pass! Amen.” Also, Matthew 24:30 says, “Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and all the tribes of the earth will mourn. They will see the Son of Man arriving on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.” It will be visible and dramatic in that all people will see Christ arriving on the clouds with power and mourn because of him. They will mourn because they never repented of their sins, because they lived a life of not recognizing his Lordship, and because their time is up and only judgment awaits (cf. Matt 7:23, 13:41-42, 25:31-46).

3. The second coming will be physical.

When Christ ascended to heaven from the Mount of Olives, angels said to his disciples in Acts 1:11, “Men of Galilee, why do you stand here looking up into the sky? This same Jesus who has been taken up from you into heaven will come back in the same way you saw him go into heaven.” Since Christ went to heaven in a glorified body, he will return in the same way. It is important to note that Christ will return physically because it was once popular in liberal teachings to say Christ will return spiritually in the sense that his teaching will be accepted and “an imitation of his lifestyle of love, would increasingly return to the earth.”3 However, Scripture is clear. He will physically return to the earth. “His feet will stand on the Mount of Olives,” which he originally ascended from (Zech 14:4, cf. Acts 1:11-12).

Purpose

What is Christ’s purpose in returning? What will he do when he returns?

1. When Christ returns, he will deliver Israel from the antichrist and the nations trying to destroy her; he will regather Israel and renew his covenant with her.

Zechariah 14:2-4 says,

For I will gather all the nations against Jerusalem to wage war; the city will be taken, its houses plundered, and the women raped. Then half of the city will go into exile, but the remainder of the people will not be taken away. Then the Lord will go to battle and fight against those nations, just as he fought battles in ancient days. On that day his feet will stand on the Mount of Olives which lies to the east of Jerusalem, and the Mount of Olives will be split in half from east to west, leaving a great valley. Half the mountain will move northward and the other half southward…

Ezekiel 11:17-20 (ESV) describes how Christ will gather Israelites from all nations and give them their land and a new heart:

Therefore say, ‘Thus says the Lord God: I will gather you from the peoples and assemble you out of the countries where you have been scattered, and I will give you the land of Israel.’ And when they come there, they will remove from it all its detestable things and all its abominations. And I will give them one heart, and a new spirit I will put within them. I will remove the heart of stone from their flesh and give them a heart of flesh, that they may walk in my statutes and keep my rules and obey them. And they shall be my people, and I will be their God.

Likewise, Zechariah 12:10 and Romans 11:26-27 talk further about Israel’s salvation, as Christ will give them hearts to accept and obey him.

I will pour out on the kingship of David and the population of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and supplication so that they will look to me, the one they have pierced. They will lament for him as one laments for an only son, and there will be a bitter cry for him like the bitter cry for a firstborn.

And so all Israel will be saved, as it is written: ‘The Deliverer will come out of Zion; he will remove ungodliness from Jacob. And this is my covenant with them, when I take away their sins.’

2. When Christ returns, he will judge Satan by having him temporarily bound in the abyss for 1000 years.

Revelation 20:1-3 says,

Then I saw an angel descending from heaven, holding in his hand the key to the abyss and a huge chain. He seized the dragon—the ancient serpent, who is the devil and Satan—and tied him up for a thousand years. The angel then threw him into the abyss and locked and sealed it so that he could not deceive the nations until the one thousand years were finished. (After these things he must be released for a brief period of time.)

3. When Christ returns, he will judge the unrighteous living on the earth.

In the parable of the weeds and wheat, Christ said:

As the weeds are collected and burned with fire, so it will be at the end of the age. The Son of Man will send his angels, and they will gather from his kingdom everything that causes sin as well as all lawbreakers. They will throw them into the fiery furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

Matthew 13:40-42

Likewise, in the parable of the sheep and goats, Christ said:

When the Son of Man comes in his glory and all the angels with him, then he will sit on his glorious throne. All the nations will be assembled before him, and he will separate people one from another like a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left … Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you accursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels! For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink. I was a stranger and you did not receive me as a guest, naked and you did not clothe me, sick and in prison and you did not visit me.’

Matthew 25:31-32 and 41-43

Also, in the Parable of the Minas, Christ declared how he will return and destroy those who did not want him to be king. In Luke 19:27, he said, “But as for these enemies of mine who did not want me to be their king, bring them here and slaughter them in front of me!”

4. When Christ returns, he will reward the righteous living on the earth.

In Luke 19:15-19, Christ said this in a parable describing his return:

When he returned after receiving the kingdom, he summoned these slaves to whom he had given the money. He wanted to know how much they had earned by trading. So the first one came before him and said, ‘Sir, your mina has made ten minas more.’ And the king said to him, ‘Well done, good slave! Because you have been faithful in a very small matter, you will have authority over ten cities.’ Then the second one came and said, ‘Sir, your mina has made five minas.’ So the king said to him, ‘And you are to be over five cities.’

Those who have been faithful in Christ’s absence, Christ will reward with various degrees of ruling in the coming kingdom. Likewise, in Luke 12:35-37, Christ said this about his return:

Get dressed for service and keep your lamps burning; be like people waiting for their master to come back from the wedding celebration, so that when he comes and knocks they can immediately open the door for him. Blessed are those slaves whom their master finds alert when he returns! I tell you the truth, he will dress himself to serve, have them take their place at the table, and will come and wait on them!

In a paradoxical reverse of expected events, Christ will serve his servants when he returns. This should motivate us to be faithful while Christ is gone and to be eager to serve. Christ will one day reward our service. Hebrews 6:10 says, “For God is not unjust so as to forget your work and the love you have demonstrated for his name, in having served and continuing to serve the saints.”

5. When Christ returns, he will set up his kingdom on the earth.

Zechariah 14:5, 9, and 16 says,

…Then the Lord my God will come with all his holy ones with him… The Lord will then be king over all the earth. In that day the Lord will be seen as one with a single name… Then all who survive from all the nations that came to attack Jerusalem will go up annually to worship the King, the LORD who rules over all, and to observe the Feast of Tabernacles.

In fact, there seems to be a gap of seventy-five days between the second coming and the beginning of the millennium. During this time, Christ will judge Satan and unbelievers, reward the righteous, and set up his kingdom on the earth.

Where do we see these 75 days? We see this by looking at various passages that describe the second half of the tribulation, the three-and-a-half years before his second coming. Daniel 12:11-12 says, “From the time that the daily sacrifice is removed and the abomination that causes desolation is set in place, there are 1,290 days. Blessed is the one who waits and attains to the 1,335 days.” Daniel describes the time from the middle of the tribulation where the antichrist sets an image in the temple (the abomination that causes desolation, Dan 9:27; cf. Matt 24:15, 2 Thess 2:3-4) to the end as 1,290 days, but then pronounces a blessing on the one who “waits and attains to the 1,335 days.” Why is there a 45-day gap?

In addition, in Revelations 12:6, there is a smaller number of days given for the time of the second half of the tribulation. It says, “The woman fled into the desert to a place prepared for her by God, where she might be taken care of for 1,260 days.” During the tribulation, Israel will be protected for 1,260 days in the wilderness. This is apparently the end of the second half of the tribulation period. But this adds another gap of 30 days—75 days altogether to reach the 1,335 days, where Daniel pronounced a blessing. If we take the 1,260 days as the time Christ comes to protect Israel and the 1,335 as the time Christ’s millennial kingdom officially begins, that means there is about a 75-day gap between the end of the tribulation and the millennium.

What is Christ doing for those 75 days before the kingdom is set up? Some have compared this to the United States presidential elections. On November 3rd, the president is elected, but it is not until January 20th that the president is inaugurated. During that 70+ day gap, the president elects his cabinet and sets in order his plans. This may be very similar to what Christ will do after his return. He defeats his enemies, resurrects and rewards believers—giving them authority to rule—and sets up the policies for his kingdom. The millennium will be discussed in greater depth in a later chapter.

Signs

In Scripture, signs are given to help us be prepared for Christ’s coming. Christ gave many of them in his Olivette discourse in Matthew 24, as he described the tribulation period which will happen on the earth before his coming.

What are some of these signs?

  • There will be a great rise in false prophets and messiahs.

In Matthew 24:4-5, 11, and 23-26, Christ said,

… Watch out that no one misleads you. For many will come in my name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and they will mislead many…And many false prophets will appear and deceive many … Then if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ!’ or ‘There he is!’ do not believe him. For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. Remember, I have told you ahead of time. So then, if someone says to you, ‘Look, he is in the wilderness,’ do not go out, or ‘Look, he is in the inner rooms,’ do not believe him.

  • There will be great distress on the earth including wars, famines, and earthquakes.

In Matthew 24:6-7, Christ said this:

You will hear of wars and rumors of wars. Make sure that you are not alarmed, for this must happen, but the end is still to come. For nation will rise up in arms against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. And there will be famines and earthquakes in various places. All these things are the beginning of birth pains.

These will be like birth pains as we approach the end times. They will happen over and over again but increasing in strength before Christ comes to judge.

  • There will be a great persecution of Christians.

In Matthew 24:9, Christ said, “Then they will hand you over to be persecuted and will kill you. You will be hated by all the nations because of my name.”

  • There will be a great apostasy—a falling away of professing believers from the faith.

In Matthew 24:12-13, Christ said, “and because lawlessness will increase so much, the love of many will grow cold. But the person who endures to the end will be saved.” Also, Paul described this great apostasy in 2 Thessalonians 2:2-3. He said,

…we ask you, brothers and sisters, not to be easily shaken from your composure or disturbed by any kind of spirit or message or letter allegedly from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord is already here. Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not arrive until the rebellion comes and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction.

Apparently, the great distress of the day, including natural disasters, wars, persecution, false prophets, and false messiahs, will cause many believers to abandon the faith in droves.

  • There will be a great evangelistic work, as the gospel is preached to all nations.

In Matthew 24:14, Christ said, “And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached throughout the whole inhabited earth as a testimony to all the nations, and then the end will come.”

  • There will be a rise of a powerful world-leader known as the antichrist who will seek to be worshiped as God and persecute the Jews and any others who do not follow him.

In Matthew 24:15-16, Christ said: “So when you see the abomination of desolation—spoken about by Daniel the prophet—standing in the holy place (let the reader understand), then those in Judea must flee to the mountains.” The abomination of desolation refers to when the antichrist breaks his seven-year peace covenant with the Jews, places an idol of himself in the Jewish temple, and commands them and everyone else to worship him. A few passages describe this event:

He will confirm a covenant with many for one ‘seven.’ In the middle of the ‘seven’ he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And at the temple he will set up an abomination that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him.

Daniel 9:27 (NIV)

Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not arrive until the rebellion comes and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction. He opposes and exalts himself above every so-called god or object of worship, and as a result he takes his seat in God’s temple, displaying himself as God.

2 Thessalonians 2:3-4

and, by the signs he [the false prophet] was permitted to perform on behalf of the beast [the antichrist], he deceived those who live on the earth. He told those who live on the earth to make an image to the beast who had been wounded by the sword, but still lived. The second beast was empowered to give life to the image of the first beast so that it could speak, and could cause all those who did not worship the image of the beast to be killed.

Revelation 13:14-15

  • There will be unique signs in the heavens.

In Matthew 24:29-30 Christ said,

Immediately after the suffering of those days, the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of heaven will be shaken. Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven

All these signs and more will precede Christ’s coming.

Is the Coming Imminent or Impending?

As we consider the continual New Testament challenges to “be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him,” to “stay alert, because you do not know the day or the hour” (Matt 24:44, 25:13), and to live righteously because Christ is “near” (Phil 4:5) and standing “before the gates” (Jam 5:9), it seems like Christ’s coming is imminent—in that it could happen at any moment. Also, the fact that Christ’s coming is compared to a “thief in the night” seems to argue for that (cf. Rev 16:15, Matt 24:43, 1 Thess 5:2). Nobody knows when a thief is coming—a thief could strike at any time. However, when considering the signs that will precede Christ’s coming, it is clear that Christ could not come at any moment (cf. Matt 24). The gospel still needs to be preached to the nations (Matt 24:14). At the moment, most people groups in the world do not even have the Bible translated in their own language.4 Israel does not even have a temple for the antichrist to place an idol in (cf. Dan 9:27, Matt 24:15). There are many things that must happen before Christ comes. Therefore, it is better to think of Christ’s coming as impending—in that it will happen soon. All the events could happen in our life-time. And because it is impending, we should always be ready for it and encourage others to be as well.

With that said, if the second coming is a two-stage event as pretribulationists believe (cf. 1 Thess 4:16-17, Matt 24:30-31)—Christ’s coming to take his church to heaven, followed by seven years of tribulation, and then Christ coming with his church to rule—then the second coming is in fact imminent. Christ can come at any moment to take his church. Either way, Christ is coming soon, and therefore, we must eagerly desire it and be ready for it.

Applications

Since Christ is coming soon, what should we do about it? Scripture teaches many things:

1. Because Christ is returning soon, we must faithfully use our gifts to serve God and others.

In the parable of the talents in Matthew 25:19-23, Christ describes his return and rewarding of those who faithfully use their gifts in his absence:

After a long time, the master of those slaves came and settled his accounts with them. The one who had received the five talents came and brought five more, saying, ‘Sir, you entrusted me with five talents. See, I have gained five more.’ His master answered, ‘Well done, good and faithful slave! You have been faithful in a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master.’ The one with the two talents also came and said, ‘Sir, you entrusted two talents to me. See, I have gained two more.’ His master answered, ‘Well done, good and faithful slave! You have been faithful with a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master.’

Likewise, after teaching about the believers’ resurrection which will happen when Christ returns, in 1 Corinthians 15:58, Paul said: “So then, dear brothers and sisters, be firm. Do not be moved! Always be outstanding in the work of the Lord, knowing that your labor is not in vain in the Lord.” Because Christ is coming, we must always be outstanding in using and cultivating our gifts to serve others and honor God.

2. Because Christ is returning soon, we must regularly gather with believers to worship, pray, and practice the Lord’s Supper to encourage one another to be faithful in these last days.

Consider the following verses:

And let us take thought of how to spur one another on to love and good works, not abandoning our own meetings, as some are in the habit of doing, but encouraging each other, and even more so because you see the day drawing near.

Hebrews 10:24-25

For the culmination of all things is near. So be self-controlled and sober-minded for the sake of prayer.

1 Peter 4:7

For every time you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes.

1 Corinthians 11:26

3. Because Christ is returning soon, we must strive to be holy by getting rid of sin in our lives.

In 1 John 3:2-3 (ESV), John said this to the Ephesians:

Beloved, we are God’s children now, and what we will be has not yet appeared; but we know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is. And everyone who thus hopes in him purifies himself as he is pure.

Also, in the context of Christ returning to judge and renew the earth (2 Pt 3:3-4), Peter said this:

Since all these things are to melt away in this manner, what sort of people must we be, conducting our lives in holiness and godliness, while waiting for and hastening the coming of the day of God?... Therefore, dear friends, since you are waiting for these things, strive to be found at peace, without spot or blemish, when you come into his presence.

2 Peter 3:11-12, 14

4. Because Christ is returning soon, we can always have hope, comfort, and encouragement, especially when enduring difficult times.

Consider the following verses:

…as we wait for the happy fulfillment of our hope in the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ…

Titus 2:13

Then we who are alive, who are left, will be suddenly caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will always be with the Lord. Therefore encourage one another with these words.

1 Thessalonians 4:17-18

…since indeed God considers it just to repay with affliction those who afflict you, and to grant relief to you who are afflicted as well as to us, when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with his mighty angels…

2 Thessalonians 1:6-7

5. Because Christ is returning soon, we must faithfully share God’s Word to win the lost and disciple believers.

In the context of talking about Christ’s coming, Peter said this in 2 Peter 3:9: “The Lord is not slow concerning his promise, as some regard slowness, but is being patient toward you, because he does not wish for any to perish but for all to come to repentance.” God delays Christ’s coming to judge because he desires that none should perish. Therefore, we must faithfully share the gospel so many will be saved.

In addition, Paul said this to Timothy who was pastoring the church of Ephesus:

I solemnly charge you before God and Christ Jesus, who is going to judge the living and the dead, and by his appearing and his kingdom: Preach the message, be ready whether it is convenient or not, reprove, rebuke, exhort with complete patience and instruction.

2 Timothy 4:1-2

Since Christ is coming soon, we must make disciples through faithfully teaching God’s Word.

6. Because Christ is returning soon, we must eagerly and patiently long for it.

Consider the following verses:

Finally the crown of righteousness is reserved for me. The Lord, the righteous Judge, will award it to me in that day—and not to me only, but also to all who have set their affection on his appearing.

2 Timothy 4:8

But our citizenship is in heaven. And we eagerly await a Savior from there, the Lord Jesus Christ who, by the power that enables him to bring everything under his control, will transform our lowly bodies so that they will be like his glorious body.

Philippians 3:20-21 (NIV)

The one who testifies to these things says, “Yes, I am coming soon!” Amen! Come, Lord Jesus!

Revelation 22:20

Let anyone who has no love for the Lord be accursed. Our Lord, come!

1 Corinthians 16:22

You also be patient and strengthen your hearts, for the Lord’s return is near.

James 5:8

In considering our need to be eager for Christ’s coming, Wayne Grudem’s comments are challenging:

Do Christians in fact eagerly long for Christ’s return? The more Christians are caught up in enjoying the good things of this life, and the more they neglect genuine Christian fellowship and their personal relationship with Christ, the less they will long for his return. On the other hand, many Christians who are experiencing suffering or persecution, or who are more elderly and infirm, and those whose daily walk with Christ is vital and deep, will have a more intense longing for his return. To some extent, then, the degree to which we actually long for Christ’s return is a measure of the spiritual condition of our own lives at the moment.5

Conclusion

The second coming is the believers’ happy hope. It provides hope because one day all things will be made right—there will be justice, peace, and righteousness. It provides hope because there will be a reward for our labor. It provides hope because one day we will see our God face to face. We must eagerly await our coming king and his kingdom. Come, Lord! Come!

Reflection

  1. What stood out most in the reading and why?
  2. What are characteristics of the second coming?
  3. What are signs of his coming?
  4. Is the second coming imminent or impending? Why or why not?
  5. What will Christ do when he returns?
  6. What applications does Scripture give to believers from considering the second coming?
  7. What other questions or applications did you take from the reading?

Copyright © 2021 Gregory Brown

Unless otherwise noted, the primary Scriptures used are taken from the NET Bible ® copyright © 1996-2016 by Biblical Studies Press, L.L.C. All rights reserved.

Holy Bible, New International Version ®, NIV® Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.® Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide.

Scripture quotations marked (ESV) are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®) Copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. All rights reserved.

Scripture quotations marked (NLT) are taken from the Holy Bible, New Living Translation, Copyright © 1996, 2004, 2007 by Tyndale House Foundation. Used by permission of Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., Carol Stream, Illinois 60188. All rights reserved.

Scripture quotations marked (NASB) are taken from the New American Standard Bible®, Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, and 1995 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission.

Scripture quotations marked (KJV) are from the King James Version of the Bible.

All emphases in Scripture quotations have been added.

BTG Publishing all rights reserved.


1 Enns, Paul. The Moody Handbook of Theology (p. 403). Moody Publishers. Kindle Edition.

2 Grudem, W. A. (2004). Systematic theology: an introduction to biblical doctrine (p. 1094). Leicester, England; Grand Rapids, MI: Inter-Varsity Press; Zondervan Pub. House.

3 Grudem, W. A. (2004). Systematic theology: an introduction to biblical doctrine (p. 1092). Leicester, England; Grand Rapids, MI: Inter-Varsity Press; Zondervan Pub. House.

4 Accessed 1/29/2021 from https://www.wycliffe.org.uk/about/our-impact/

5 Grudem, W. A. (2004). Systematic theology: an introduction to biblical doctrine (p. 1093). Leicester, England; Grand Rapids, MI: Inter-Varsity Press; Zondervan Pub. House.

Related Topics: Eschatology (Things to Come)

网上牧师杂志–中文版(简体), SCh Ed, Issue 46 2023 年 冬季

A ministry of…

Author: Dr. Roger Pascoe, President,
Email: [email protected]

I. 加强讲解式讲道:传讲书信的信息,第一部分

A. 书信的文学特色

书信通常都有一个很类似的特色…

1. 书信的格式。书信都有一定标准格式,跟古时流行的书信方式无大分别:

a) 信首(问候、作者和收信人的简介,感恩)。

b) 内文(讨论一些特别议题、劝勉、请求、投诉等)。

c) 结尾(问安语等客套说话)。

2. 书信的一些常见特色。像其他书信一样,新约书信有以下的常见特色。

a) 直接进入内容,直接方式仅次于人与人之间的对话。

b) 是私人性质的。书信是以私人关系(“我 / 我们” 和 “你”)互相称呼,写信人和收件人之间只是在空间上有点阻隔吧了。无论如何,书信没有法律文件的冷酷和乏味,而是很容易令人有温馨的情绪,流露出作者的品性、情感、心境、态度、观感,和意见。

3. 书信的作用和体裁。新约书信并不只是用作传递消息之用,而却好像是一篇讲章,用作传扬生命之道。又因为作者要讨论一些敏感,及与生活有密切关系的问题,书信便提供了一个比口述更好的书写方式来沟通的平台。

正因为书信不论在体裁,讨论内容和讨论方式都具有独特风格,当我们想要参考某方面的资料(例如:“保罗在这问题上是怎么说的?”)时,我们可以把它当作一本百科全书来看。Moises Silva曾经说过:“我们要把新约所有书信作一全面的研读”(An Introduction to Biblical Hermeneutics, 120),才可以明白作者的书写动机和对事情的观点。

新约书信是用不同的修辞方式出现(这是为着要迎合读者的情感、思绪,和口味),故此它可以用上很多不同的写作方法(例如对话、诗歌、写实 [ 例如加拉太书4章]),每种写法都有它本身的特性和演绎方式。

4. 书信的历史背景。跟其他圣经书卷不同的地方,书信都是因应某些需要、情况、困境,某些教会遇上难解的问题(例如:罗马、哥林多、加拉太教会等都曾遇上难以解决的问题),或某些人(例如:提多、提摩太、腓利门等)而产生出来的。但新约书信并不只和当代有关,但诚如朗多马(Tom Long)所说:“新约的书信跟其他大部份书信都是一样,虽与某些特定事件有关,但对后世仍是在讲说话” (Preaching and the Literary Forms of the Bible, 110.)。

要明白书信的意思和应用,至关重要的是我们须要对当时的历史背境有一深入的认识。找出了书信中所讨论的问题征结所在和解决办法,经过消化和整理,我们才可向现代读者解释和应用出来。在这个过程中,我们须要小心处理,如何将“过往”的经文过渡到“现在”的听众去。我们既须要忠于经文在古代的应用,也要忠于将之应用在今天的环境中。这是不容易做到的,因为古时发生的事情,未必可以适应于现代社会(例如:我们应否吃祭过偶像的肉?)。但无论如何,这些问题对我们来说也是适合讨论的。我们只需要注意一下,千万不要硬将“过往”的直接搬到“现在”去,也不要作出一些不适合的假设,硬生生的应用出来。

虽然如何将“过往”过渡到“现在”是一大难题,但讲解书信时,最大的益处就是在某些特定情形下,不论在教会或个人,应用或职责上,都可以给我们一个明确的教导。今天的神学家,释经学者,和教牧,他们的工作就是要决定那些教导是可以适用于现今社会的。

所以,如果这就是书信在文字上的特色,我们如何将其明白过来和讲解清楚呢?有什么可行的方法让我们遵从的?

B. 明白和讲解书信的一些指引

以下是一些可以帮助预备和讲解书信的一些指南 …

1. 文字结构的分析。这类分析在本刊前几期中已经讨论过了(例如:18-23期),但让我在这里再次强调数点在分析时要注意的事项。

文字结构的分析。这类分析在本刊前几期中已经讨论过了(例如:18-23期),但让我在这里再次强调数点在分析时要注意的事情。由于书信的固有特色(某些特殊的困难、问题等),有些人会贸然先去找出当时的历史和文化背境,然后才去明白内容。但重要的是,我们不能将经文的意思建基于重整过的历史和文化的背境上。所以,在把历史文化背境重整之前,我们应该把经文在文字方面先作一个释经学上的分析,从而解答到以下的问题:

a) 作者要说什么?

b) 他的意思是什么?

c) 他的论点和论证是如何演绎出来的?

然后,决定经文的结构和所要论说的。这正好是书信自己的本质 – 就是围绕着主题作个有系统性的论证,所以,你要找出经文的结构和论证要点,这便好组成你讲道内容的结构。这是对经文的写作方式和体裁作一仔细的分析。

作者在书信中,很有条理的将他的思想,论点、讨论和意见铺陈出来。我们只要把握每一段落,甚而整卷书信的思路(即辩证手法),我们便可以明白书信的来龙去脉。讲道时便跟着这个思路便可以了。

因此,当我们分析经文的文字结构时,我们可以使用以下的方法:

a) 决定整篇书信在文字上的结构 – 即是书信的主要段落。

b) 找出你所研读某段经文中(即一个或多个段落)中,作者是要传递什么中心思想(主题)。

c) 列出作者在这一段经文中,用作支持他论点的主要主张(一个或多个“要点”)。

d) 写出经文要带出来的影响(即目的是什么?)。

经文中的字面基本意义,到此可说是分析完毕。跟着我们便可以开始深入研究经文的内容,上文下理及每段落的意思(即是思想的脉胳)。到了这时,你才可以对经文的文法及字义作更深入的分析。

你一定要做到只用一个句子,便能把经文的中心思想表达出来,你的讲章才可以算是集中一起(即是不致于杂乱无章)。这也可以让你在整理讲章时,集中在如何把中心思想显示出来(即是将支持作者的论点可以尽情发挥)。

对于很多讲员来说,要找出经文的中心思想(主题)和关于这中心思想所提倡的意见( 主张),不是一件简单的事情。这可能就是很多讲员只讲一般性的问题的原因了。但你一定要讲一些特殊的课题,因为作者也正是在讨论著一些特别的课题。如果经文是说及“神的爱”,你就一定要先决定作者是在说明那一方面神的爱。中心思想要明确 – 因为“爱”包含的意思实在太过泛了。是神给全世界的爱吗?这就是神的爱所包含的范围了吗?是神坚贞的爱吗?当你找出经文的中心主旨,你才可以依循作者的意思演译。

你的读者应该可以找到你所说的重点,原则和应用所引用的经文。你的讲章就要依从这个原则连贯起来,这样你便可以达到“务要传道”(提后4:2)的目的了。你讲道的信息,凭着圣灵,一定可以大有能力的在会众生命中彰显出来。

通常,你会用圣经的一段经文(即是含有同一个主题的经文)来讲道。如果经文太长,一次不能讲完(例如以弗所书1:3-14),你可以将之分成数个段落(例如:某个分题 / 重点),但每次都不要离开全篇的主题。

要明白书信,如果能懂一些圣经希腊原文便更有帮助,因为希腊原文可以是最有效的将经文的结构和作者要讨论的不同事情(要点)和全文的中心思想勾划出来。如果你不懂希腊文,可以借助一本从希腊文直译过来的圣经翻译(英文的翻译本有ESV, NASB, NKJV, CSB)。

2. 搜集历史资料。在分析完经文的文字结构后,我们便可以搜集你要讲述的经文的历史和文化背景。这可让我们更深入的了解经文的内容 - 例如谁是收信人,写信目的,有什么与文化及风俗习惯有关的资料等。

历史的认识,对释经及应用是很重要的,这对书信来说尤其重要。在预备书信的讲章时,我们一定要找出,作者要讨论什么事情,和事情发生的起因,我们才可解答以下的问题。

a) 作者为什么这样说?

b) 为什么他有这样的回应?

c) 作者是要为着某些问题而写这信?如果是的话,这问题是什么?

d) 这段经文中的文化背景是什么?在这经文有那些字眼是与文化有关的(例如:信首格式可能便属这一类)?

e) 书写的背后历史因素(问题、需要、情景),而致引起作者要写这封信的动机?

我不是提议将所找到的历史资料如数家珍的全部讲出来,你只要将其中与你要解释的神学真理、教训、和应用有关的讲出来就可以了。诚如Scott Hafemann指出:“讲道是宣讲经文中的神学真理,和教训,而不是要上一个有关新约时代的背景、政治环境、当时的语言,或社会问题和风俗习惯的课”(”Handbook of Contemporary Preaching” 一书中365页的Preaching in the Epistles)。

要找出书信的背后动机(甚或书信所要回答的问题),有时候真的不容易,因为我们常常要透过推理才能得出结论。例如,保罗在哥林多前书并没有直接的写出他要回覆哥林多教会的什么问题。因此,有时候我们便要从字里行间,试行重整当时的情境。这样做的弊病是很容易流于主观,或只是推测而矣,故此Moises Silva提议将所有我们(或其他学者)的理论都作一个试验,这样我们便可以找到经文的“终极”意义,而不是由推理得到的结论(An Introduction to Biblical Hermeneutics, 126-128)。

II. 强化圣经中的领导才能
哥林多后书:“软弱中的力量”

在上期,我们对哥林多后书2:14 -7:16作了最后一次的讨论,就是保罗在讲论牧者领导才能时的题外话。在文中,我们已探讨过以下的问题:

1. 对牧会的信心(林后2:14-3:6)

2. 牧会权柄本质,第一、二部份(林后4:1-16)

3. 牧会的动机,第一、二、三部份(林后4:16-5:17)

4. 和好的职事,第一、二、三、四、五部份(林后5:18-7:16)

在离开讨论哥林多后书2:14-7:16之前,我想和大家分享我在分析哥林多后书时的体会,你便可以从中了解我在教授释经课前,我是如何预备教学资料的。你在每周预备讲章时,不会有充足时间作出这类释经研究的,但你可以借助释经书。

A. 时间

在哥林多前书,保罗处理了很多事情,其中有一宗是有人犯了乱伦的罪。在得悉教会已对那犯罪的人采取了惩治的行动后,保罗便如释重负,在林后1-7章中他更表示了欣慰。但在同一经文中,保罗却面临着越来越多的反对声浪。这第二波的反对声音在第10-13章中越发明显。保罗在此极力驳斥这班人是“假先知”。 “假先知”一词是保罗在得知那犯罪的人遭惩治后才使用的。对于这个遭到惩治的人和教会中越来越多反对声音是否有关联,我们就不得而知。

某种情况下,有些自称是使徒的假教师混进了哥林多教会,专门从事诽谤保罗。为此,保罗的信便是要驳斥这些人的指控,并暴露他们的虚假面具。为着保护哥林多教会,免被这群假教师的错谬道理所蒙骗,保罗便特为自己的人格、和使徒身份自辩。

同时,保罗亦须向哥林多人作一交代,解释他改变行程的原因(1:15ff.; cf. 林前16:5ff),并敦促他们要办妥为赒济耶路撒冷贫困信徒的捐款事宜,以预备他第三次的到访(13:1ff.)。他们这次筹募,是早已开始的了,但却是迟迟未完成。

打发了提多从以弗所到哥林多,并传递了前一封信(即哥林多前书),保罗便安排与提多在回程往特罗亚时会面。但到达特罗亚后,不见提多,他便决定往马其顿去,结果就是在那里,可能是在腓立比或尼亚波利,便遇上了提多(2:12f.;7:5ff.)。

提多给保罗带来了好消息,也有坏消息。好消息就是哥林多人很积极的回应保罗信上所写的,果断采取行动,正视他指出的问题,并加以纠正。这给保罗极大的喜乐(7:5)。但坏消息却是在哥林多教会中,仍然存在着好些,很明显是被那些假使徒挑拨的不良份子。这里是他们对保罗的一些指控:

a) 他们指摘保罗心口不一(因为他没有实现他说了的行程、而做了其他事情)。保罗回答说,他改变行程的原因,不是因为他拿不定主意或说话不可靠,而是他不想带着一个严厉的心情来见他们(2:1)。

b) 他们指控保罗心高气傲,其貌不扬,言语乏味,不诚实,不够资格作基督的使徒。

c) 他们怀疑保罗的使徒身份,因为他来哥林多时,没有荐信(3:1)。保罗为了这诸多关于他使徒身份的指控,特别提醒他们他一直是以一个福音使者来忍受诸般的非难(4至6章)。

d) 他们暗示保罗可能要为收集款项,赒济耶路撒冷贫穷信徒的工作,迟迟不能完成的缓慢进度负责(参阅八至九章)。

e) 他们指称保罗在远处未见面时,他那些令人折服的信显示他是一个坚毅勇敢的人。但见面时,却显得非常软弱(10:10;11:6)。

f) 他们宣称保罗传福音既不收酬金,便不值得花时间去听他(11:7ff)。他们甚而影射因他不取工价,可能他不是爱着他们(11:11; 12:15)。

这些使人分门结党的假使徒,他们的真正面目一定要被揭露出来 - 他们是偷着进来的,他们一点都不是真使徒。故此,保罗对这些指控都是基于真使徒和假使徒之间的不同点而加以剖析。其中之一就是真使徒是长久的受苦和克己。他的软弱没有让他有半点机会炫耀自己,但却全是彰显神的大神和恩典(11:21-12:12)。他告诉他们在那快要实行的第三次旅程,如有必要的话,他是不会犹疑行使他的使徒权柄(13:1ff)。但他的期望就是希望他们会毫无条件的归向他。

B. 文字结构及一致性

哥林多后书内容好像都是围绕着保罗的行程。他原本去希腊的第二次行程,是大概会两次到访哥林多教会,先由以弗所渡海到他们那里,逗留片刻,然后北上马其顿,回程时再到他们那里,和他们相聚一些时日,收集给耶路撒贫穷信徒的捐款后,才回到耶路撒冷。但最终他改变了行程 – 先从以弗所北上马其顿,跟着南行到哥林多(林前16:5ff,林后1:16),最后便到耶路撒冷。这样,他便可以和他们相聚一段稍长的时间,而不是两个短时期。

这个“行程”的细节便连贯了本书信上文下理。我们可以从中看到:

1. 过去:计划的改变(1-7章)。保罗表白自己的良心(1:12ff),并解释了为什么他改变了行程(1:15-2:4)。他是从以弗所到了特罗亚,以为在那里可以遇到提多。结果没有遇上,他便继续去了马其顿(2:12f.)。到此,经文有一段很长的文字(2:14-7:4),这些文字虽是全书信的一部份,但却与写作目的无关。到了7:5,书信才继续下去,在此保罗描述了他如何在马其顿遇见提多,和他带来的大喜信息,是有关哥林多教会对他的信(即哥林多前书)的积极回应。

2. 现在:差派提多完成筹募的事情(8-9章)。第八和第九章是描述为耶路撒冷穷苦信徒收集捐款的事。这不是题外的说话,但却迎合本书信的主题 – 保罗的行程可能有改变,但他访问哥林多教会的目的却是始终如一。他希望在到达前,为耶路撒冷信徒的捐款已经筹募完毕。为此,他差遣了提多和两位弟兄比他先行(并带同此封信,即哥林多后书)去统理这事。

3. 未来:确定并快将实现的保罗第三次到访(10-13章)。第十至十三章是揭露及谴责那些偷进哥林多教会及诋毁保罗声誉及权威的“假使徒”。保罗警告,在他第三次到访时,他必定会处理那些继续在教会滋事的人。

这个大纲,可以给大家将书信每段不同的主题及和语气一个结构上的分析,并把上文下理作一个概览。 Zahn说:“读者是被引导着,跟随保罗的行踪,由以弗所,经过特罗亚而到达马其顿(1-7章);跟着和他在马其顿教会停留了一段时间(8-9章);最后便被引导到如何利用保罗将要访问哥林多教会时的角度来了解教会所遇见的问题。′(T. Zahn, Introduction to the New Testament, Vol. 1, 312, 引用在Philip E. Hughes的The Second Epistle to the Corinthians, xxii中)。

4. 和哥林多前书的关系(“忧伤的信”)。我们不难想像为什么保罗称哥林多前书是一封“心里难过痛苦、多多地流泪” (林后2:4)的信。所以我们觉得那封忧伤的信就是指哥林多前书来说的;那么,哥林多后书便理应可以哥林多前书的内容来了解。那些说哥林多前书不是那封“忧伤的信”的人,可说是忽略了使徒在写给他所建立的教会时的信时的焦虑和悲痛情感。这可以从他信中尖锐笔锋看到出来,他谴责教会的分裂而非合作的团队精神;在灵命方面,保罗痛心教会偏于属世而不思属灵的事;保罗也极力教训他们要审理在他们中间所犯的罪行;责备他们竟有互相控诉的事情;主餐时,常有醉酒荒宴的事件;崇拜时不守规矩,误用属灵的恩赐,并纠正他们对主复活的真理的错误。

这样的一封信,如果不是出于焦虑和伤痛的心,并且满有泪水的,真不知是如何写出来的了。

5. 主题的连贯性:“软弱中的力量”。使徒就是用了这个标题,辩明他备受哥林多教会中反对人仕的诸多非难的使徒权柄的权威性。他肉体软弱,但神却用得着他,并加给他力量。故此,他的工作力量明显地是从神那里来的。为此,信中多次提到保罗的受苦、危险、和劳苦,就是要显明保罗在传道时所忍受的,亦同时显出神的大能。奇妙的是,人的软弱和神的大能竟可以在此相提并论。保罗在哥林多受到的攻击,都是集中在他肉身上的软弱,却从不提及他工作的果效。 这主题一直贯穿着整篇书信(例:1:5f; 1:8f; 2:12f; 3:5f; 4:7f; 4:16-18; 5:1f; 6:4f; 7:5f; 11:23f; 12:5-10; 13:4)。

6. 最后四章的可靠性。在最后四章,使徒的语气突然改变了,这引起了很多人怀疑这四章应该是属于另一封信的。但我觉得我们无须多疑,因为这四章跟本封书信的结构如出一辙。况且,它和整篇的主题非常吻合,那就是神的力量是透过我们的软弱而成就出来。

除了最後四章和全篇書信的連貫性互相一致之外,其他本書信前後的連貫性也是很容易看到出來。例如,比較以下的經文,你便可以得出結論:1:13 和 10:11; 1:17 和10:2; 2:1 和 12:14, 21, 13:1f.; 2:17 和 12:19; 3:2 和12:11; 6:13 和11:2, 12:14; 8:6, 18, 22 和12:17f.).

C. 全篇书信的结构

第一段落:简介(1:1-14)。随着问安语(1:1-2),保罗有一段很长的感恩(1:3-11)。保罗多次的受苦和艰难,对他来说,不过是分享“基督的苦楚”(1:5),并且从中经历到从基督而来的“安慰”(1:5)。这些经历,虽然是突发和痛苦的,但却教导了他要紧紧靠着那“发慈悲的父,赐各样安慰的神1:3。这个宝贵经历使他从今可以“能用神所赐的安慰去安慰那遭各样患难的人1:4。工作是建基于受苦(那是基督的苦和从信徒而来的苦),和一直由从神而来的安慰扶持着。受苦和得安慰是分不开的。

这段感恩说话似乎是说他在建立一个根基,在这根基上,作为一个使徒,他受的苦和得到的安慰都是为着哥林多教会(1:6),并使他们得着确切的盼望,因为“你们既是同受苦楚,也必同得安慰1:7。就算饱受死亡威胁,却是“叫我们不靠自己,只靠叫人复活的神”(1:8-10)。他从死里得救,固然是借着神的拯救,也是借着哥林多信徒的祷告,结果就是许多人向神感恩,“就是为我们因许多人所得的恩”(1:11)。

第二段落:保罗的表白(1:12-7:16)。这里,保罗转到行程的话题,他表白改变行程计划,绝不是因世俗或忽是忽非的原因(1:12-14)。反对保罗的人,声称他的改变行程便显示他不是一个可靠的人。但再重新细心思想之后(1:15-22),保罗解释他改变的原因是因为他深深爱着他们,不想他们过份伤痛,好像上一次到访时,当他严厉的责备那个犯了乱伦罪的人所引起的伤痛一样(1:23-24)。跟着是一段勉励的说话,他们饶恕并爱那位因犯罪而受责的人(2:5-11,并比较林前5章)。保罗为着此人亦曾写给他们一封“心里难过痛苦”(2:4)的信

就这样,笔锋一转便转到引起他写本信的原因 – 就是他遇见了提多(2;12-13 和7:5-16)-- 这个叙述,是因保罗用了很长篇幅讲论他工作的性质和宗旨(2:14-5:15),并呼吁信徒和好(5:16-7:4)而遭到打断的。

a) 工作的意義和目的(2:14-5:15. 這是保羅對反對他的人的第一次表白,他表示自己对他的工作有足够资格和胜任有余。

第一,他是蒙神呼召事奉神(2:14-16a)。神夸胜的带领,使他能在各处所遇见人中,散发出“香气” - 在灭亡的人中“作了死的香气叫他死”,而在得救的人中,“就作了活的香气叫他活2:16

第二,他传道的力量是来自神(2:16b-3:6)。他能作好神的工作不是凭自己的力量,否则他便和那些假使徒一样,都是为着自己“为利混乱神的道”;但他却是在神面前凭着基督讲道(2:17)。所以,他不须要举荐自己(3:1-3),他的信心不是出于自己,乃是出于神,“他叫我们能承当这新约的执事3:4-6

保罗跟着便比较新约及旧约的职事(3:7-18)。新约的职事给他勇气,“将那些暗昧可耻的事弃绝了;不行诡诈,不谬讲神的道理”,而是在“神面前”把真理表明出来,“基督荣耀福音的光4:2, 4。他是借着神的能力传扬基督(4:5),神吩咐要“光从黑暗里照出来”,同时,“已经照在我们心里,叫我们得知神荣耀的光颢在耶稣基督的面上4:6。福音的宝贝(即是基督)是放在瓦器里(即是:保罗肉体上的软弱,4:8-11),其中所显现的能力不是保罗的,而是来自神的(4:7)。

但这个软弱的肉体瓦器不是常常毁坏和死亡的(4:10-12)。肉体的软弱只是今世和可见到的,但有一天这些都会被永恒和见不到的取代(4:16-18)。当“地上的帐棚若拆毁了”,就“必得神所造,不是人手所造,在天上永存的屋”(5:1-4

神将我们改变过来,是借着圣灵作凭据(5:5),这样,我们便得着“行事为人是凭着信心,不是凭着眼见5:6-8的勇气。有着这个永恒的盼望,保罗立了志向,为要讨主喜悦(5:9),他努力劝别人留心审判是在“基督台前”和务要敬畏神,因为“主是可畏的(5:10-11)。虽然,他传福音不是要取悦那些举荐他们的人(5:12; cf. 3:1-3),但他传道也不是漫不经心的,而是受着基督的爱所激励(5:14)。

b) 和好的恳求(5:16-7:4. 作为基督的使者,保罗是在传讲一个使人和好的信息,因为基督为我们的罪牺牲了(5:16-21)。他劝他们“不可徒受他的恩典6:1,且要积极回应他艰辛的职分(6:1-10)。他敦促他们敝开心门,接纳主和他作为主使者的职分(6:11-13),承认如要与神有正常的关系,便要专心一致(6:14-7:1)。最后,保罗说他对他们有极大的信心(7:2-4)。

保罗继续复述他如何在马其顿,因再次遇见了提多而得到的安慰,并由他的回报,知道哥林多教会对他先前的信所作的正面回应而大大喜乐(7:5-16)。哥林多人经过保罗早些时候的训诫后,决心悔过,忧伤自己的过犯(7:10),保罗很是高兴,也放下心中的焦虑。

第三段落:为耶路撒冷贫苦圣徒的捐款(8:1-9:15). 对哥林多人悔改,并且“向我的热心7:7,保罗表示大大的释怀和欣慰,他便开始进到另一个重要的话题,他须要跟他们讲明清楚,这就是为耶路撒冷贫苦信徒的捐项。很踫巧地,他遇见提多的马其顿教会,是一个在患难中仍然乐于捐献的好榜样(8:7-9)。保罗劝哥林多人效法他们的榜样,这便可显出基督牺牲的恩典(8:7-9)。真的,完成收集捐献的事对他们大有益处,这工作已持续一年之久,现在也应来个了结(8:10-11)。这是一个良机,让他们从“富余”中供应耶路撒冷教会在现时所缺乏的;可能在将来,这情形会逆转过来也说不定(8:12-15)。为了能在保罗到达之前办好这个捐项事宜,保罗特意差遣提多和另外两位弟兄先到哥林多(8:16-24),保罗敦促他们和提多合作(8:24),好叫保罗到达的时候,捐款便已预备妥当,好使保罗不会觉着为难(9:1-5)。最后,他教导他们信徒捐输的操练(9:6-15),我们捐输应该是慷慨和甘心乐意的(9:6-7),因为“神能将各样的恩惠多多地加给你们9:8,而且“必多多加给你们种地的种子,又增添你们仁义的果子9:10。因此,不只他们凡事富足,神也会得到荣耀和感谢(9:11-15)。

第四段落:保罗对不断而来的攻击的回应(10:1-13:4). 这可能是指2:17及4:2所提及的人,保罗现在直接回应那些攻击他的说话(10:1-18)。他没有否认自己是在“血气中”行事,但绝“不凭着血气争战10:2-3。而他争战的兵器“乃是在神面前有能力,可以攻破坚固的营垒10:4

他也否认那些虚假传言,说他信中所说的很沉重,但却缺乏个人的权柄。论到权柄,无人拥有的可以和他相比。到再次见面时,保罗便会将他的权柄行使出来给他们看(10:7-10)。有些人专以自己的权柄为夸口,但保罗却不然,他“不愿意分外夸口,只要照神所量给我们的界限构到你们那里10:13-15,这里所说的界限当然是包括哥林多教会了。保罗的权柄,是基于“夸口的,当指着主夸口。因为蒙悦纳的,不是自己称许的,乃是主所称许的10:17-18)。

到了这时,保罗反守为攻,无情地揭露那些窃取教会权柄的假使徒的恶行(11:1-15)。他为着哥林多人不安,害怕他们会被那些“另传一个耶稣另受一个灵另得一个福音11:1-4的人所蒙骗。他一点不在“那些最大的使徒以下11:5;他独立传道,不是因为不愿意接受他们的金钱支助(11:7-9)的缘故。他最好的表态就是和攻击他的假使徒划清界线(11:12-15)。

跟着,保罗为着回覆愚昧人的愚妄话,他便稍微说了一点夸口的说话(11:16-21)。其他人既可以夸口,他当然也可以(11:21)。他是希伯来人的后裔(11:22),他为基督多受劳苦和牢狱之灾(11:23-28),他夸口那些其他人认为软弱的(11:29-12:10),例如他从大马士革逃出来(11:32-33),他肉体中叫他谦卑的一根刺(12:1-9a)。在软弱中所显出来的刚强,看似矛盾,但却被保罗看重成“我的能力是在人的软弱上显得完全 我什么时候软弱,什么时候就刚强了12:9b-10。他为着自己的夸口而致歉 - 他们应是站在他一边的,而不是强逼他这样夸口(12:11),因为他在他们中间时,他们已看过他作为使徒的凭据。如果他们觉着他不及其他众教会,那只有一个可能性,就是他传道,没有接受他们经济支助。为此,他请求他们寛恕。

第五段落:他的第三次到访(12:14-13:6)。当他第三次到访时,他仍不会依靠他们的供应,更不会贪取他们的便宜(12:14-18)。他希望他们能够长大建立起来(12:19)。但他忧虑他们不会像他所期望的,而他们也不会看到他是他们所期待的(12:20-21)。故此,他提醒他们,他这次到访,会采取严厉措施,因为他们好像想从他身上找到“基督在我里面说话的凭据”(13:1-4)。

第六段落:结语(13:5-14)。为要唤醒他们注意自己的属灵境况,他吩咐他们省察自己是否真的基督徒(13:5-6)。他的恳求就是他们不要犯罪,这样他们便可以凡事无愧于心(13:7),他情愿他们是刚强,而他是软弱的(13:9)。他写信的目的,就是希望他们作出积极回应,刚强壮胆。当他第三次来时,他便不须要严厉的对待他们(13:10)。

E. 经文大纲

I. 开首语

A. 问安(1:1-2)

B. 感恩(1:3-11)

II. 保罗的自白(1:12-7:16)

A. 行程的改变(1:12-2:13)

B. 他的使徒职份(2:14-5:15)

1. 他胜任他的职事(2:14-3:6a)

2. 他的福音事工与摩西律法事工的比较(3:6b-18)

3. 他和反对對者的比较(4:1-12)

4. 他的动机(4:13-5:15)

C. 和好的请求(5:16-7:4)

D. 期待已久先前寄出的信的回音(7:5-16)

III. 收集給耶路撒冷贫苦信徒的捐款(8:1-9:15)

IV. 保罗对反对的人的驳斥(10:1-13:14)

A. 对批评声音的回应(10:1-11)

B. 揭露假“使徒”(11:1-15)

C. 保罗“愚拙”的言词(11:16-12:13)

V. 保罗的第三次到访(12:14-13:5)

VI. 結語(13:5-14)

这是一个很简短的结构大纲。为我自己的缘故,我已加插了很多分段,但这已足够你了解整个过程如何作出来的了。

III. 讲道大纲

题目:学习主耶稣 – 承认耶稣的位格(太16:13-23)

主旨:耶稣是誰?

主题:当我们认识耶稣时,我们一定要承认他是谁和他做了什么。

第一点:耶稣问门徒他是谁(16:13-20)

1. “人说我人子是谁?”(13-14)

2.“你们说我是谁?”(15-20)

a) 彼得对耶稣的重大了解(16)

b) 耶稣对教会的启示(17-20)

第二点:耶稣预言他的受苦(16:21-23)

1. 彼得责难耶稣(22)

2. 耶稣斥责彼得(23)

Related Topics: Pastors

網上牧師雜誌 – 中文版(繁體), TCh Ed, Issue 46 2023 年 冬季

A ministry of…

Author: Dr. Roger Pascoe, President,
Email: [email protected]

I. 加強講解式講道:傳講書信的信息,第一部分

A. 書信的文學特色

書信通常都有一個很類似的特色…

1. 書信的格式。書信都有一定標準格式,跟古時流行的書信方式無大分別:

a) 信首(問候、作者和收信人的簡介,感恩)。

b) 內文(討論一些特別議題、勸勉、請求、投訴等)。

c) 結尾(問安語等客套說話)。

2. 書信的一些常見特色。像其他書信一樣,新約書信有以下的常見特色。

a) 直接進入內容,直接方式僅次於人與人之間的對話。

b) 是私人性質的。書信是以私人關係(“我 / 我們”和“你”)互相稱呼,寫信人和收件人之間只是在空間上有點阻隔吧了。無論如何,書信沒有法律文件的冷酷和乏味,而是很容易令人有溫馨的情緒,流露出作者的品性、情感、心境、態度、觀感,和意見。

3. 書信的作用和體裁。新約書信並不只是用作傳遞消息之用,而卻好像一篇講章,用作傳揚生命之道。又因為作者要討論一些敏感,及與生活有密切關係的問題,書信便提供了一個比口述更好的書寫方式來溝通的平台。

正因為書信不論在體裁,討論內容和討論方式都具有獨特風格,當我們想要參考某方面的資料(例如:“保羅在這問題上是怎麼說的?”)時,我們可以把它當作一本百科全書來看。Moises Silva曾經說過:“我們要把新約所有書信作一全面的研讀”(An Introduction to Biblical Hermeneutics, 120),才可以明白作者的書寫動機和對事情的觀點。

新約書信是用不同的修辭方式出現(這是為著要迎合讀者的情感、思緒,和口味),故此它可以用上很多不同的寫作方法(例如對話、詩歌、寫實 [ 例如加拉太書4章]),每種寫法都有它本身的特性和演繹方式。

4. 書信的歷史背境。跟其他聖經書卷不同的地方,書信都是因應某些需要、情況、困境,某些教會遇上難解的問題(例如:羅馬、哥林多、加拉太教會等都曾遇上難以解決的問題),或某些人(例如:提多、提摩太、腓利門等)而產生出來的。但新約書信並不只和當代有關,但誠如朗多馬(Tom Long)所說:“新約的書信跟其他大部份書信都是一樣,雖與某些特定事件有關,但對後世仍是在講說話”(Preaching and the Literary Forms of the Bible, 110.)。

要明白書信的意思和應用,至關重要的是我們須要對當時的歷史背境有一深入的認識。找出了書信中所討論的問題徵結所在和解決辦法,經過消化和整理,我們才可向現代讀者解釋和應用出來。在這個過程中,我們須要小心處理,如何將“過往”的經文過渡到“現在”的聽眾去。我們既須要忠於經文在古代的應用,也要忠於將之應用在今天的環境中。這是不容易做到的,因為古時發生的事情,未必可以適應於現代社會(例如:我們應否吃祭過偶像的肉?)。但無論如何,這些問題對我們來說也是適合討論的。我們只需要注意一下,千萬不要硬將“過往”的直接搬到“現在”去,也不要作出一些不適合的假設,硬生生的應用出來。

雖然如何將“過往”過渡到“現在”是一大難題,但講解書信時,最大的益處就是在某些特定情形下,不論在教會或個人,應用或職責上,都可以給我們一個明確的教導。今天的神學家,釋經學者,和教牧,他們的工作就是要決定那些教導是可以適用於現今社會的。

所以,如果這就是書信在文字上的特色,我們如何將其明白過來和講解清楚呢?有甚麼可行的方法讓我們遵從的?

B. 明白和講解書信的一些指引

以下是一些可以幫助預備和講解書信的一些指南 …

1. 文字結構的分析。這類分析在本刊前幾期中已經討論過了(例如:18-23期),但讓我在這裡再次強調數點在分析時要注意的事項。

由於書信的固有特色(某些特殊的困難、問題等),有些人會貿然先去找出當時的歷史和文化背境,然後才去明白內容。但重要的是,我們不能將經文的意思建基於重整過的歷史和文化的背境上。所以,在把歷史文化背境重整之前,我們應該把經文在文字方面先作一個釋經學上的分析,從而解答到以下的問題:

a) 作者要說甚麼?

b) 他的意思是甚麼?

c) 他的論點和論證是如何演繹出來的?

然後,決定經文的結構和所要論說的。這正好是書信自己的本質 – 就是圍繞著主題作個有系統性的論證,所以,你要找出經文的結構和論證要點,這便好組成你講道內容的結構。這是對經文的寫作方式和體裁作一仔細的分析。

作者在書信中,很有條理的將他的思想,論點、討論和意見舖陳出來。我們只要把握每一段落,甚而整卷書信的思路(即辯證手法),我們便可以明白書信的來龍去脈。講道時便跟著這個思路便可以了。

因此,當我們分析經文的文字結構時,我們可以使用以下的方法:

a) 決定整篇書信在文字上的結構 – 即是書信的主要段落。

b) 找出你所a研讀某段經文中(即一個或多個段落)中,作者是要傳遞甚麼中心思想(主題)。

c) 列出作者在這一段經文中,用作支持他論點的主要主張(一個或多個“要點”)。

d) 寫出經文要帶出來的影響(即目的是甚麼?)。

經文中的字面基本意義,到此可說是分析完畢。跟著我們便可以開始深入研究經文的內容,上文下理及每段落的意思(即是思想的脈胳)。到了這時,你才可以對經文的文法及字義作更深入的分析。

你一定要做到只用一個句子,便能把經文的中心思想表達出來,你的講章才可以算是集中一起(即是不致於雜亂無章)。這也可以讓你在整理講章時,集中在如何把中心思想顯示出來(即是將支持作者的論點可以盡情發揮)。

對於很多講員來說,要找出經文的中心思想(主題)和關於這中心思想所提倡的意見( 主張),不是一件簡單的事情。這可能就是很多講員只講一般性的問題的原因了。但你一定要講一些特殊的課題,因為作者也正是在討論著一些特別的課題。如果經文是說及“神的愛”,你就一定要先決定作者是在說明那一方面神的愛。中心思想要明確 – 因為“愛”包含的意思實在太過泛了。是神給全世界的愛嗎?這就是神的愛所包含的範圍了嗎?是神堅貞的愛嗎?當你找出經文的中心主旨,你才可以依循作者的意思演譯。

你的讀者應該可以找到你所說的重點,原則和應用所引用的經文。你的講章就要依從這個原則連貫起來,這樣你便可以達到“務要傳道”(提後42的目的了。你講道的信息,憑著聖靈,一定可以大有能力的在會眾生命中彰顯出來。

通常,你會用聖經的一段經文(即是含有同一個主題的經文)來講道。如果經文太長,一次不能講完(例如以弗所書1:3-14),你可以將之分成數個段落(例如:某個分題 / 重點),但每次都不要離開全篇的主題。

要明白書信,如果能懂一些聖經希臘原文便更有幫助,因為希臘原文可以是最有效的將經文的結構和作者要討論的不同事情(要點)和全文的中心思想勾劃出來。如果你不懂希臘文,可以借助一本從希臘文直譯過來的聖經翻譯(英文的翻譯本有ESV, NASB, NKJV, CSB)。

2. 搜集歷史資料。在分析完經文的文字結構後,我們便可以搜集你要講述的經文的歷史和文化背景。這可讓我們更深入的了解經文的內容 - 例如誰是收信人,寫信目的,有甚麼與文化及風俗習慣有關的資料等。

歷史的認識,對釋經及應用是很重要的,這對書信來說尤其重要。在預備書信的講章時,我們一定要找出,作者要討論甚麼事情,和事情發生的起因,我們才可解答以下的問題。

a) 作者為甚麼這樣說?

b) 為甚麼他有這樣的回應?

c) 作者是要為著某些問題而寫這信?如果是的話,這問題是甚麼?

d) 這段經文中的文化背景是甚麼?在這經文有那些字眼是與文化有關的(例如:信首格式可能便屬這一類)?

e) 書寫的背後歷史因素(問題、需要、情景),而致引起作者要寫這封信的動機?

我不是提議將所找到的歷史資料如數家珍的全部講出來,你只要將其中與你要解釋的神學真理、教訓、和應用有關的講出來就可以了。誠如Scott Hafemann指出:“講道是宣講經文中的神學真理,和教訓,而不是要上一個有關新約時代的背景、政治環境、當時的語言,或社會問題和風俗習慣的課”(”Handbook of Contemporary Preaching” 一書中365頁的Preaching in the Epistles)。

要找出書信的背後動機(甚或書信所要回答的問題),有時候真的不容易,因為我們常常要透過推理才能得出結論。例如,保羅在哥林多前書並沒有直接的寫出他要回覆哥林多教會的甚麼問題。因此,有時候我們便要從字裡行間,試行重整當時的情境。這樣做的弊病是很容易流於主觀,或只是推測而矣,故此Moises Silva提議將所有我們(或其他學者)的理論都作一個試驗,這樣我們便可以找到經文的“終極”意義,而不是由推理得到的結論(An Introduction to Biblical Hermeneutics, 126-128)。

II. 強化聖經中的領導才能
哥林多後書:“軟弱中的力量”

在上期,我們對哥林多後書2:14 -7:16作了最後一次的討論,就是保羅在講論牧者領導才能時的題外話。在文中,我們已探討過以下的問題:

1. 對牧會的信心(林後2:14-3:6)

2. 牧會權柄本質,第一、二部份(林後4:1-16)

3. 牧會的動機,第一、二、三部份(林後4:16-5:17)

4. 和好的職事,第一、二、三、四、五部份(林後5:18-7:16)

在離開討論哥林多後書2:14-7:16之前,我想和大家分享我在分析哥林多後書時的體會,你便可以從中了解我在教授釋經課前,我是如何預備教學資料的。你在每週預備講章時,不會有充足時間作出這類釋經研究的,但你可以借助釋經書。

A. 時間

在哥林多前書,保羅處理了很多事情,其中有一宗是有人犯了亂倫的罪。在得悉教會已對那犯罪的人採取了懲治的行動後,保羅便如釋重負,在林後1-7章中他更表示了欣慰。但在同一經文中,保羅卻面臨著越來越多的反對聲浪。這第二波的反對聲音在第10-13章中越發明顯。保羅在此極力駁斥這班人是“假先知”。“假先知”一詞是保羅在得知那犯罪的人遭懲治後才使用的。對於這個遭到懲治的人和教會中越來越多反對聲音是否有關聯,我們就不得而知。

某種情況下,有些自稱是使徒的假教師混進了哥林多教會,專門從事誹謗保羅。為此,保羅的信便是要駁斥這些人的指控,並暴露他們的虛假面具。為著保護哥林多教會,免被這群假教師的錯謬道理所蒙騙,保羅便特為自己的人格、和使徒身份自辯。

同時,保羅亦須向哥林多人作一交代,解釋他改變行程的原因(1:15ff.; cf. 林前16:5ff),並敦促他們要辦妥為賙濟耶路撒冷貧困信徒的捐款事宜,以預備他第三次的到訪(13:1ff.)。他們這次籌募,是早已開始的了,但卻是遲遲未完成。

打發了提多從以弗所到哥林多,並傳遞了前一封信(即哥林多前書),保羅便安排與提多在回程往特羅亞時會面。但到達特羅亞後,不見提多,他便決定往馬其頓去,結果就是在那裡,可能是在腓立比或尼亞波利,便遇上了提多(2:12f.;7:5ff.)。

提多給保羅帶來了好消息,也有壞消息。好消息就是哥林多人很積極的回應保羅信上所寫的,果斷採取行動,正視他指出的問題,並加以糾正。這給保羅極大的喜樂(7:5)。但壞消息卻是在哥林多教會中,仍然存在著好些,很明顯是被那些假使徒挑撥的不良份子。這裡是他們對保羅的一些指控:

a) 他們指摘保羅心口不一(因為他沒有實現他說了的行程、而做了其他事情)。保羅回答說,他改變行程的原因,不是因為他拿不定主意或說話不可靠譜,而是他不想帶著一個嚴厲的心情來見他們(2:1)。

b) 他們指控保羅心高氣傲,其貌不揚,言語乏味,不誠實,不夠資格作基督的使徒。

c) 他們懷疑保羅的使徒身份,因為他來哥林多時,沒有薦信(3:1)。保羅為了這諸多關於他使徒身份的指控,特別提醒他們他一直是以一個福音使者來忍受諸般的非難(4至6章)。

d) 他們暗示保羅可能要為收集款項,賙濟耶路撒冷貧窮信徒的工作,遲遲不能完成的緩慢進度負責(參閱八至九章)。

e) 他們指稱保羅在遠處未見面時,他那些令人折服的信顯示他是一個堅毅勇敢的人。但見面時,卻顯得非常軟弱(10:10;11:6)。

f) 他們宣稱保羅傳福音既不收酬金,便不值得花時間去聽他(11:7ff)。他們甚而影射因他不取工價,可能他不是愛著他們(11:11; 12:15)。

這些使人分門結黨的假使徒,他們的真正面目一定要被揭露出來 - 他們是偷著進來的,他們一點都不是真使徒。故此,保羅對這些指控都是基於真使徒和假使徒之間的不同點而加以剖析。其中之一就是真使徒是長久的受苦和克己。他的軟弱沒有讓他有半點機會炫耀自己,但卻全是彰顯神的大神和恩典(11:21-12:12)。他告訴他們在那快要實行的第三次旅程,如有必要的話,他是不會猶疑行使他的使徒權柄(13:1ff)。但他的期望就是希望他們會毫無條件的歸向他。

B. 文字結構及一致性

哥林多後書內容好像都是圍繞著保羅的行程。他原本去希臘的第二次行程,是大概會兩次到訪哥林多教會,先由以弗所渡海到他們那裡,逗留片刻,然後北上馬其頓,回程時再到他們那裡,和他們相聚一些時日,收集給耶路撒貧窮信徒的捐款後,才回到耶路撒冷。但最終他改變了行程 – 先從以弗所北上馬其頓,跟著南行到哥林多(林前16:5ff,林後1:16),最後便到耶路撒冷。這樣,他便可以和他們相聚一段稍長的時間,而不是兩個短時期。

這個“行程”的細節便連貫了本書信上文下理。我們可以從中看到:

1. 過去:計劃的改變(1-7章)。保羅表白自己的良心(1:12ff),並解釋了為甚麼他改變了行程(1:15-2:4)。他是從以弗所到了特羅亞,以為在那裡可以遇到提多。結果沒有遇上,他便繼續去了馬其頓(2:12f.)。到此,經文有一段很長的文字(2:14-7:4),這些文字雖是全書信的一部份,但卻與寫作目的無關。到了7:5,書信才繼續下去,在此保羅描述了他如何在馬其頓遇見提多,和他帶來的大喜信息,是有關哥林多教會對他的信(即哥林多前書)的積極回應。

2. 現在:差派提多完成籌募的事情(8-9章)。第八和第九章是描述為耶路撒冷窮苦信徒收集捐款的事。這不是題外的說話,但卻迎合本書信的主題 – 保羅的行程可能有改變,但他訪問哥林多教會的目的卻是始終如一。他希望在到達前,為耶路撒冷信徒的捐款已經F。為此,他差遣了提多和兩位弟兄比他先行(並帶同此封信,即哥林多後書)去統理這事。

3. 未來:確定並快將實現的保羅第三次到訪(10-13章)。第十至十三章是揭露及譴責那些偷進哥林多教會及詆譭保羅聲譽及權威的“假使徒”。保羅警告,在他第三次到訪時,他必定會處理那些繼續在教會滋事的人。

這個大綱,可以給大家將書信每段不同的主題及和語氣一個結構上的分析,並把上文下理作一個概覽。Zahn說:“讀者是被引導著,跟隨保羅的行踪,由以弗所,經過特羅亞而到達馬其頓(1-7章);跟著和他在馬其頓教會停留了一段時間(8-9章);最後便被引導到如何利用保羅將要訪問哥林多教會時的角度來了解教會所遇見的問題。′(T. Zahn, Introduction to the New Testament, Vol. 1, 312, 引用在Philip E. Hughes的The Second Epistle to the Corinthians, xxii中)。

4. 和哥林多前書的關係(“憂傷的信”)。我們不難想像為甚麼保羅稱哥林多前書是一封“心裡難過痛苦、多多地流淚” (林後2:4的信。所以我們覺得那封憂傷的信就是指哥林多前書來說的;那麼,哥林多後書便理應可以哥林多前書的內容來了解。那些說哥林多前書不是那封“憂傷的信”的人,可說是忽略了使徒在寫給他所建立的教會時的信時的焦慮和悲痛情感。這可以從他信中尖銳筆鋒看到出來,他譴責教會的分裂而非合作的團隊精神;在靈命方面,保羅痛心教會偏於屬世而不思屬靈的事;保羅也極力教訓他們要審理在他們中間所犯的罪行;責備他們竟有互相控訴的事情;主餐時,常有醉酒荒宴的事件;崇拜時不守規矩,誤用屬靈的恩賜,並糾正他們對主復活的真理的錯誤。

這樣的一封信,如果不是出於焦慮和傷痛的心,並且滿有淚水的,真不知是如何寫出來的了。

5. 主題的連貫性:“軟弱中的力量”。使徒就是用了這個標題,辯明他備受哥林多教會中反對人仕的諸多非難的使徒權柄的權威性。他肉體軟弱,但神卻用得著他,並加給他力量。故此,他的工作力量明顯地是從神那裡來的。為此,信中多次提到保羅的受苦、危險、和勞苦,就是要顯明保羅在傳道時所忍受的,亦同時顯出神的大能。奇妙的是,人的軟弱和神的大能竟可以在此相提並論。保羅在哥林多受到的攻擊,都是集中在他肉身上的軟弱,卻從不提及他工作的果效。這主題一直貫穿著整篇書信(例:1:5f; 1:8f; 2:12f; 3:5f; 4:7f; 4:16-18; 5:1f; 6:4f; 7:5f; 11:23f; 12:5-10; 13:4)。

6. 最後四章的可靠性。在最後四章,使徒的語氣突然改變了,這引起了很多人懷疑這四章應該是屬於另一封信的。但我覺得我們無須多疑,因為這四章跟本封書信的結構如出一轍。況且,它和整篇的主題非常吻合,那就是神的力量是透過我們的軟弱而成就出來。

除了最後四章和全篇書信的連貫性互相一致之外,其他本書信前後的連貫性也是很容易看到出來。例如,比較以下的經文,你便可以得出結論:1:13 和 10:11; 1:17 和10:2; 2:1 和 12:14, 21, 13:1f.; 2:17 和 12:19; 3:2 和12:11; 6:13 和11:2, 12:14; 8:6, 18, 22 和12:17f.).

C. 全篇書信的結構

第一段落:簡介(1:1-14)。隨著問安語(1:1-2),保羅有一段很長的感恩(1:3-11)。保羅多次的受苦和艱難,對他來說,不過是分享“基督的苦楚”(1:5),並且從中經歷到從基督而來的“安慰”(1:5)。這些經歷,雖然是突發和痛苦的,但卻教導了他要緊緊靠著那“發慈悲的父,賜各樣安慰的神”(1:3)。這個寶貴經歷使他從今可以“能用神所賜的安慰去安慰那遭各樣患難的人”(1:4。工作是建基於受苦(那是基督的苦和從信徒而來的苦),和一直由從神而來的安慰扶持著。受苦和得安慰是分不開的。

這段感恩說話似乎是說他在建立一個根基,在這根基上,作為一個使徒,他受的苦和得到的安慰都是為著哥林多教會(1:6),並使他們得著確切的盼望,因為“你們既是同受苦楚,也必同得安慰”(1:7。就算飽受死亡威脅,卻是“叫我們不靠自己,只靠叫人復活的神”(1:8-10。他從死裡得救,固然是藉著神的拯救,也是藉著哥林多信徒的禱告,結果就是許多人向神感恩,“就是為我們因許多人所得的恩”(1:11)。

第二段落:保羅的表白(1:12-7:16)。這裡,保羅轉到行程的話題,他表白改變行程計劃,絕不是因世俗或忽是忽非的原因(1:12-14 )。反對保羅的人,聲稱他的改變行程便顯示他不是一個可靠的人。但再重新細心思想之後(1:15-22),保羅解釋他改變的原因是因為他深深愛著他們,不想他們過份傷痛,好像上一次到訪時,當他嚴厲的責備那個犯了亂倫罪的人所引起的傷痛一樣(1:23-24)。跟著是一段勉勵的說話,他們饒恕並愛那位因犯罪而受責的人(2:5-11,並比較林前5章)。保羅為著此人亦曾寫給他們一封“心裡難過痛苦”(2:4的信

就這樣,筆鋒一轉便轉到引起他寫本信的原因 – 就是他遇見了提多(2;12-13 和7:5-16)-- 這個敍述,是因保羅用了很長篇幅講論他工作的性質和宗旨(2:14-5:15),並呼籲信徒和好(5:16-7:4)而遭到打斷的。

a) 工作的意義和目的(2:14-5:15. 這是保羅對反對他的人的第一次表白,他表示自己對他的工作有足夠資格和勝任有餘。

第一,他是蒙神呼召事奉神(2:14-16a)。神誇勝的帶領,使他能在各處所遇見人中,散發出香氣 - 在滅亡的人中“作了死的香氣叫他死”,而在得救的人中,“就作了活的香氣叫他活”(2:16)。

第二,他傳道的力量是來自神(2:16b-3:6)。他能作好神的工作不是憑自己的力量,否則他便和那些假使徒一樣,都是為著自己“為利混亂神的道”;但他卻是在神面前憑著基督講道(2:17)。所以,他不須要舉薦自己(3:1-3),他的信心不是出於自己,乃是出於神,“他叫我們能承當這新約的執事”(3:4-6

保羅跟著便比較新約及舊約的職事(3:7-18)。新約的職事給他勇氣,“將那些暗昧可恥的事棄絕了;不行詭詐,不謬講神的道理”,而是在“神面前”把真理表明出來,“基督榮耀福音的光”(4:2, 4)。他是藉著神的能力傳揚基督(4:5),神吩咐要“光從黑暗裡照出來”,同時,“已經照在我們心裡,叫我們得知神榮耀的光顥在耶穌基督的面上”(4:6。福音的寶貝(即是基督)是放在瓦器裡(即是:保羅肉體上的軟弱,4:8-11),其中所顯現的能力不是保羅的,而是來自神的(4:7)。

但這個軟弱的肉體瓦器不是常常毀壞和死亡的(4:10-12)。肉體的軟弱只是今世和可見到的,但有一天這些都會被永恆和見不到的取代(4:16-18)。當“地上的帳棚若拆毀了”,就“必得神所造,不是人手所造,在天上永存的屋”(5:1-4

神將我們改變過來,是藉著聖靈作憑據(5:5),這樣,我們便得著“行事為人是憑著信心,不是憑著眼見5:6-8的勇氣。有著這個永恆的盼望,保羅立了志向,為要討主喜悅(5:9),他努力勸別人留心審判是在“基督台前”和務要敬畏神,因為“主是可畏的5:10-11)。雖然,他傳福音不是要取悅那些舉薦他們的人(5:12; cf. 3:1-3),但他傳道也不是漫不經心的,而是受著基督的愛所激勵(5:14)。

b) 和好的懇求(5:16-7:4. 作為基督的使者,保羅是在傳講一個使人和好的信息,因為基督為我們的罪犧牲了(5:16-21)。他勸他們“不可徒受他的恩典”(6:1,且要積極回應他艱辛的職分(6:1-10)。他敦促他們敝開心門,接納主和他作為主使者的職分(6:11-13),承認如要與神有正常的關係,便要專心一致(6:14-7:1)。最後,保羅說他對他們有極大的信心(7:2-4)。

保羅繼續複述他如何在馬其頓,因再次遇見了提多而得到的安慰,並由他的回報,知道哥林多教會對他先前的信所作的正面回應而大大喜樂(7:5-16)。哥林多人經過保羅早些時候的訓誡後,決心悔過,憂傷自己的過犯(7:10),保羅很是高興,也放下心中的焦慮。

第三段落:為耶路撒冷貧苦聖徒的捐款(8:1-9:15). 對哥林多人悔改,並且“向我的熱心”(7:7,保羅表示大大的釋懷和欣慰,他便開始進到另一個重要的話題,他須要跟他們講明清楚,這就是為耶路撒冷貧苦信徒的捐項。很踫巧地,他遇見提多的馬其頓教會,是一個在患難中仍然樂於捐獻的好榜樣(8:7-9)。保羅勸哥林多人效法他們的榜樣,這便可顯出基督犧牲的恩典(8:7-9)。真的,完成收集捐獻的事對他們大有益處,這工作已持續一年之久,現在也應來個了結(8:10-11)。這是一個良機,讓他們從“富餘”中供應耶路撒冷教會在現時所缺乏的;可能在將來,這情形會逆轉過來也說不定(8:12-15)。為了能在保羅到達之前辦好這個捐項事宜,保羅特意差遣提多和另外兩位弟兄先到哥林多(8:16-24),保羅敦促他們和提多合作(8:24),好叫保羅到達的時候,捐款便已預備妥當,好使保羅不會覺著為難(9:1-5)。最後,他教導他們信徒捐輸的操練(9:6-15),我們捐輸應該是慷慨和甘心樂意的(9:6-7),因為“神能將各樣的恩惠多多地加給你們”(9:8,而且“必多多加給你們種地的種子,又增添你們仁義的果子”(9:10。因此,不只他們凡事富足,神也會得到榮耀和感謝(9:11-15)。

第四段落:保羅對不斷而來的攻擊的回應(10:1-13:4). 這可能是指2:17及4:2所提及的人,保羅現在直接回應那些攻擊他的說話(10:1-18)。他沒有否認自己是在“血氣中”行事,但絕“不憑著血氣爭戰”(10:2-3。而他爭戰的兵器“乃是在神面前有能力,可以攻破堅固的營壘”(10:4

他也否認那些虛假傳言,說他信中所說的很沉重,但卻缺乏個人的權柄。論到權柄,無人擁有的可以和他相比。到再次見面時,保羅便會將他的權柄行使出來給他們看(10:7-11)。有些人專以自己的權柄為誇口,但保羅卻不然,他“不願意分外誇口,只要照神所量給我們的界限搆到你們那裡”(10:13-15,這裡所說的界限當然是包括哥林多教會了。保羅的權柄,是基於“誇口的,當指著主誇口。因為蒙悅納的,不是自己稱許的,乃是主所稱許的”(10:17-18)。

到了這時,保羅反守為攻,無情地揭露那些竊取教會權柄的假使徒的惡行(11:1-15)。他為著哥林多人不安,害怕他們會被那些“另傳一個耶穌另受一個靈另得一個福音”(11:1-4)的人所蒙騙。他一點不在“那些最大的使徒以下”(11:5);他獨立傳道,不是因為不願意接受他們的金錢支助(11:7-9)的緣故。他最好的表態就是和攻擊他的假使徒劃清界線(11:12-15)。

跟著,保羅為著回覆愚昧人的愚妄話,他便稍微說了一點誇口的說話(11:16-21)。其他人既可以誇口,他當然也可以(11:21)。他是希伯來人的後裔(11:22),他為基督多受勞苦和牢獄之災(11:23-28),他誇口那些其他人認為軟弱的(11:29-12:10),例如他從大馬士革逃出來(11:32-33),他肉體中叫他謙卑的一根刺(12:1-9a)。在軟弱中所顯出來的剛強,看似矛盾,但卻被保羅看重成“我的能力是在人的軟弱上顯得完全 我甚麼時候軟弱,甚麼時候就剛強了”(12:9b-10)。他為著自己的誇口而致歉 - 他們應是站在他一邊的,而不是強逼他這樣誇口(12:11),因為他在他們中間時,他們已看過他作為使徒的憑據。如果他們覺著他不及其他眾教會,那只有一個可能性,就是他傳道,沒有接受他們經濟支助。為此,他請求他們寛恕。

第五段落:他的第三次到訪(12:14-13:6)。當他第三次到訪時,他仍不會依靠他們的供應,更不會貪取他們的便宜(12:14-18)。他希望他們能夠長大建立起來(12:19)。但他憂慮他們不會像他所期望的,而他們也不會看到他是他們所期待的(12:20-21)。故此,他提醒他們,他這次到訪,會採取嚴厲措施,因為他們好像想從他身上找到“基督在我裡面說話的憑據”(13:1-4)。

第六段落:結語(13:5-14)。為要喚醒他們注意自己的屬靈境況,他吩咐他們省察自己是否真的基督徒(13:5-6)。他的懇求就是他們不要犯罪,這樣他們便可以凡事無愧於心(13:7),他情願他們是剛強,而他是軟弱的(13:9)。他寫信的目的,就是希望他們作出積極回應,剛強壯膽。當他第三次來時,他便不須要嚴厲的對待他們(13:10)。

E. 經文大綱

I. 開首語

A. 問安(1:1-2)

B. 感恩(1:3-11)

II. 保羅的自白(1:12-7:16)

A. 行程的改變(1:12-2:13)

B. 他的使徒職份(2:14-5:15)

1. 他勝任他的職事(2:14-3:6a)

2. 他的福音事工與摩西律法事工的比較(3:6b-18)

3. 他和反對者的比較(4:1-12)

4. 他的動機(4:13-5:15)

C. 和好的請求(5:16-7:4)

D. 期待已久先前寄出的信的回音(7:5-16)

III. 收集給耶路撒冷貧苦信徒的捐款(8:1-9:15)

IV. 保羅對反對的人的駁斥(10:1-13:14)

A. 對批評聲音的回應(10:1-11)

B. 揭露假“使徒”(11:1-15)

C. 保羅“愚拙”的言詞(11:16-12:13)

V. 保羅的第三次到訪(12:14-13:5)

VI. 結語(13:5-14)

這是一個很簡短的結構大綱。為我自己的緣故,我已加插了很多分段,但這已足夠你了解整個過程如何作出來的了。

III. 講道大綱

題目:學習主耶穌 – 承認耶穌的位格(太16:13-23)

主旨:耶穌是誰?

主題:當我們認識耶穌時,我們一定要承認他是誰和他做了甚麼。

第一點:耶穌問門徒他是誰(16:13-20)

1. “人說我人子是誰?”(13-14)

2. “你們說我是誰?”(15-20)

a) 彼得對耶穌的重大了解(16)

b) 耶穌對教會的啟示(17-20)

第二點:耶穌預言他的受苦(16:21-23)

1. 彼得責難耶穌(22)

2. 耶穌斥責彼得(23)

Related Topics: Pastors

From the series:

Introduction to Coming to Jesus

Related Media

Download Word DocumentClick here to download the student handout for this lesson.

Download Word DocumentClick here to download the manuscript for this lesson.

Download Power PointClick here to download the PowerPoint for this lesson.


 

As I read through the book of Luke over and over in preparation for this study, I was struck with the shepherd’s heart that Jesus has for us. I realized that in many ways I felt like a wandering sheep who just needed Jesus to carry me home.

If you are like me, stressed with the busyness of life and even distracted by ministry demands, drink in the life of the Savior through your daily study time. Put it at the top of your list of priorities. Ask God to speak to you through each day’s lesson, through your small group discussion, and through the weekly lecture.

As you read the age-old story of Jesus, let it come alive to you. Consider what it must have been like to walk and talk with Him on the dusty roads of Galilee. Imagine yourself among the crowds of people pushing to get up close to the itinerant Teacher. See yourself grieving at the cross and exultant upon recognizing the Risen Lord.

May the Lord richly bless your study. May it truly be a time of coming home.

Kay Daigle
November 2004

How to Use this Study Guide

This study is designed to help you consistently spend time in God’s Word. You will gain the most from this study if you do it day by day, answering just that day’s questions, rather than trying to stuff it all in at once. Each week’s lesson is divided into five days of homework to encourage you to listen daily to His voice. The Bible is God’s message to you, and He wants to speak with you personally.

Unless instructed otherwise, use only the Scriptures to answer the questions. Rather than go to commentaries or even the notes in a study Bible, ask God to give you insight from His Word.

A Precious Word from God—Each week you will have a verse to memorize that brings out an essential lesson or thought from the week’s study. Begin learning it the first day. You might copy it on an index card and carry it with you throughout the week, hiding God’s Word in your heart.

Sharing questions are designed for you to write stories, insights, and applications from your own life. If we are to be in community with one another and support one another, we must truly know one another. You will never be forced to share one of these answers aloud with your group.

Responding to God questions are reminders that we study God’s Word so that He can speak to us and we are changed thereby. We should be listening for His voice. These types of questions ask for a response to God’s personal message to you. I have found that writing out my prayers helps me to focus better on what I need to say to God. No one will ask you to read yours, but you should always feel free to share your response with your group.

Diamonds in the Word are optional questions designed for those who want to dig deeper. Some of the answers will be easy for even a beginning Bible student to answer, and some will require more experience in God’s Word. As a group you will not discuss these, but the background that you gain from digging into God’s Word in a deeper way will certainly enrich your personal study.

Personal Stories

Each lesson includes a true story that relates the truths of that week’s lesson to a woman’s real life experience. Some of the names have been changed to protect the guilty! These stories will encourage you in your walk with God and your growth in godliness.

From the series:

Related Topics: Curriculum, Gospels, Spiritual Life

From the series:

Lesson 1: Prepare your Heart to Come Home (Luke 1:1-4:13)

Related Media

Download Word DocumentClick here to download the manuscript for this lesson.

Download Word DocumentClick here to download the student handout for this lesson.

Download Power PointClick here to download the PowerPoint for this lesson.

A Word from Kay Daigle on how to use the resources for this studyI want to encourage you to complete the personal lesson below before you click on any of the accompanying elements that may be found with this lesson (audio lecture, manuscript, PowerPoint, or handout). This study was written to help you maximize your personal spiritual growth. That means that you first spend time with God through His word, and then hopefully, discuss what you learned with a small group of women. After that, if you want to hear the audio (or read the manuscript) and follow the PowerPoint, filling in the handout, then that is a great time to do it! I cannot cover all the verses in depth, but you can read and study them for yourself. It is best for you to think through the passages before hearing what anyone else thinks, even me! You will find some lessons without lectures. At our church we use some of those weeks to spend extra time in our small groups sharing life stories, having a longer prayer time, or expressing how God is working in our lives.


 

A Precious Word from God

“He who is mighty has done great things for me, and holy is His name.”

Mary in Luke 1:49 (NET)

Introduction

Do you long to come home—the place of love, companionship, rest, peace, and security? Perhaps this is the kind of home you can only long for, never having been able to enjoy such a place here on earth. Picture a home where Jesus waits for you. Will you choose to spend time there with Him? Although salvation is a free gift that we can never lose, believers do not always enjoy the blessings of being at home with Jesus on this earth. As you read His story, drink in His presence and enjoy His beauty, the beauty of God Himself. It is possible to come home while we wait to go “home”!

This week we look at Jesus’ early life and preparation for ministry. Although our lesson is long, covering more than three chapters of the book of Luke, the stories will be familiar to you. Attempt to read them as if you were reading them for the first time. Put yourself in the places of the characters. See the sights and smell the scents of first century Israel. Focus on God, and come home to all that He is!

Day One Study

Read Luke 1:1-4.

    1. Luke outlines his reason, or purpose for writing this book here in the preface. What is it?

    2. The NIV and the NET translations of the Bible use the word “fulfilled” in v. 1 where the NASB uses the word “accomplished”. What does the word fulfilled suggest about the events that Luke relates in his book?

Read Luke 1:5-25.

    3. What prophecies are given to Zechariah about his son (vv. 13-17)?

    4. How would you have felt if you were Zechariah? Why?

Read Luke 1:26-56.

    5. What qualities do you see in Mary as you read through this passage? What does the text say that leads you to these insights about her?

Mary’s words in Luke 1:46-56, often interpreted as poetic or hymnic, are traditionally called the Magnificat, from the Latin for “My soul magnifies the Lord,” the first line of the song. Our memory verse this week is from Mary’s psalm. Begin to memorize it now.

  • Diamonds in the Word: Mary’s psalm is filled with similarities to Hannah’s song in 1 Samuel 2:1-10. What parallels do you observe as you compare these passages? What does this reveal about Mary?

    6.Sharing question:Sometimes God asks us to take on difficult assignments, just as He did Mary. Life situations such as broken families, difficult employers, or failing health challenge our faith. There are times when God brings trials, which are not caused by our own mistakes or sins, into our lives. God does this for a reason, just as He asked Mary to be pregnant outside of marriage in order to bless the whole world. Share with your group a difficult situation from the past or one which you are experiencing right now that you did not bring about through your own doing. What do you learn from Mary’s example that could have helped you?

    7.Responding to God: Write a prayer of praise based upon Mary’s psalm. In it, deal with a specific situation that you are facing today. Drink in the beauty of the Lord’s character, and see yourself at home with Him.

Day Two Study

Read Luke 1:57-80.

Zechariah’s praise psalm is called the “Benedictus”, from the Latin of the first line.

  • Diamonds in the Word:What Old Testament prophecies does Zechariah mention? Use your concordance to find the cross references and indicate where they are found in the Scriptures. It may be helpful to write these beside the Luke passage right in your Bible so that you can easily find them as you share Christ with others.

    8. Focus on 1:78-79. Describe Zechariah’s beliefs about what God would do for His people through the Messiah.

Read Luke 2:1-20, the often told story of Jesus’ birth.

    9. Trace the various emotions of the shepherds from vv. 8-20. They were the first people to announce the Messiah’s birth.1

Read Luke 2:21-40.

    10. What insights do these verses give you about Joseph and Mary?

    11.Sharing Question:What one quality do you see in either Simeon or Anna that you need in your life? What can you do to strengthen that area?

    12. What truths about Jesus did God reveal to Simeon and Anna?

Read Luke 2:41-52.

    13. How would you have felt in Joseph and Mary’s situation both before and after they found Jesus?

    14.Sharing question:Share one situation from the past or present with your group in which you experienced anxiety or unbelief because you didn’t understand God’s plan.

    15.Responding to God:Write a prayer asking God to help you focus on His hope and His promises when your emotions and circumstances tempt you to unbelief. If you are dealing with such a situation currently, mention it specifically. God is waiting for you to come home to Him in faith.

Day Three Study

Read Luke 3:1-20.

    16. Describe John the Baptist’s preaching.

    17. Write a definition of true repentance as you understand it from John’s message.

    18. Read John 1:19-28. From Luke and John’s accounts of John the Baptist, what do you learn about his character?

    19. How does the emphasis in John the Baptist’s message prepare the way of the Lord, fulfilling the prophecy quoted from Isaiah 40:3-5?

    20.Sharing question:What one area of your life is not prepared for Jesus’ entrance so that you can truly be at home with Him? You may be refusing Him access so that you can run things as you please or simply because you think you can handle it. Perhaps you are harboring unforgiveness or bitterness against someone who mistreated you. It may be that you are gossiping about a friend or employer behind her back. Perhaps you are fearful about the future because you want it to be your way rather than trusting God for His way. Whatever it is, share your struggle. You may want to write the struggle down as your prayer request to share with your small group.

    21.Responding to God:Write a prayer based upon the struggle that you mentioned in the last question. Confess anything that is sin and open your heart and yield this area to the coming of Jesus’ rule in your life so that you may truly know what it means to come home.

Read Luke 3:23-38, Jesus’ genealogy.

  • Diamonds in the Word:Compare this genealogy with the one in Mt. 1:1-17. Read in your commentaries and/or notes in your study Bible about the differences between the two. Explain your understanding.

Day Four Study

Read Luke 4:1-13.

    22. Why did Jesus go into the wilderness to be tempted?

    23. How did Jesus’ temptation, at this and other times in His life, prepare Him for ministry according to Hebrews 2:17-18; 4:14-15?

    24.Sharing question:Share about a time of testing or temptation that God clearly brought into your life. Nothing you did put you in the situation. It may involve the temptation not to trust God or to reject Him.

Jesus was vulnerable to the first temptation because He had been fasting. The NET Bible comments:2

The reference to Jesus eating nothing could well be an idiom meaning that he ate only what the desert provided; see Exod 34:28. A desert fast simply meant eating only what one could obtain in the desert. The parallel in Matt 4:2 speaks only of Jesus fasting.

NET Bible

I find that fatigue can be a huge factor when I sin with anger, impatience, or speaking when I should have kept my mouth shut. Also, I am more prone to sin in my own areas of weakness, just as you are. Such things as materialism, pride, or the desire for love can open us up to temptation.

    25.Sharing question:In what situations are you more vulnerable to temptation? How can being aware of these areas of vulnerability help you overcome temptation? What can you do to protect yourself from areas where you are more vulnerable to sin?

    26. In your own words, describe the three temptations of Jesus recorded in the Scriptures.

  • Diamonds in the Word:How were these three temptations designed specifically for Jesus? How do they compare with the lusts of 1 John 2:16?

    27.Responding to God:Pray Luke 11:4c for those areas of your life that are vulnerable.

Day Five Lesson

Today we continue looking at Jesus’ temptations—as well as our own. We have seen that His victory over temptation prepared Him for areas of His ministry.

Reread Luke 4:1-13.

    28. What kind of response did Jesus give in every temptation? What does this teach you?

    29. Read Ephesians 6:10-19 and answer these questions:

      a. What part does God’s word have in resisting the enemy?

      b. What other principles do you learn from this metaphor of armor about your own spiritual battles?

    30. Often we are vulnerable to temptation when we stray from “home.” What principles of spiritual warfare do you learn as you look at 1 Peter 5:5-11? Although every verse does not mention the enemy, that is the context and it covers many ways that we leave home and become open to attack.

    31. What parallels do you see in James 4:1-10?

    32.Sharing question:Share with your group how one temptation that you have overcome has helped prepare you to serve God and His people.

  • Diamonds in the Word:Consider James 1:12-16. How do you reconcile this with Jesus’ experience and with the Lord’s Prayer in Luke 11:4? Write down the explanation as you would give it to a new believer.

    33.Responding to God:Considering the principles that you saw in Ephesians, 1 Peter, and James, what specific action can you take to better stand against temptation? Write out a prayer asking for God’s strength to follow through.

The story that follows is Deborah’s true story of overcoming temptation by the power of God. I so appreciate the women who chose to share their struggles and temptations with you through this study. As you read these stories each week, think through how the principles of the lesson apply to the situation. I hope that you enjoy reading them as much as I did!

Deborah’s Story

Although I came to faith at 13, some years after college I spent time playing by my own rules. After I prayed for spiritual direction, God surrounded me at work with Christians that were praying for me. I wasn't too concerned about what they thought of my relationships because their judgment would be on their head not mine. Then one day God made it abundantly clear to me that the relationship I had with this man I was seeing was wrong. I would have to give him up. It was difficult. I had an index card next to the phone that said, "No, I won't see you again." When he called I read the card. When he would try to convince me otherwise I knew that he didn't understand what kind of spiritual relationship I had buried within my heart. It felt so good to be home spiritually. There were many unresolved issues but I had to believe that since the Father had not abandoned me he would take me the rest of the way home.

Fifteen years have passed. This fall I had an opportunity to share with some women my journey. I wasn't proud of what I had done but was amazed by God's forgiveness and grace. I believe that sharing my experience opened the door for some women to share their burdens with me. They too are seeking God's will. I now pray for these women regularly. I consider it now a blessing to be able to share how patient and how far the Father will go to reach one of his own.


1 Messiah is the Hebrew word for the Greek word Christ. Both mean “anointed one.”

2 NET Bible: New English Translation, Second Beta Edition, (Biblical Studies Press L.L.C.), Note 15, p. 1803.

From the series:

Related Topics: Curriculum, Gospels, Incarnation, Spiritual Life, Temptation

From the series:

Lesson 3: Be Humble and Come Home (Luke 6:12-8:3)

Related Media

Download Word DocumentClick here to download the student handout for this lesson.

Download Word DocumentClick here to download the manuscript for this lesson.

Download Power PointClick here to download the PowerPoint for this lesson.

A Word from Kay Daigle on how to use the resources for this studyI want to encourage you to complete the personal lesson below before you click on any of the accompanying elements that may be found with this lesson (audio lecture, manuscript, PowerPoint, or handout). This study was written to help you maximize your personal spiritual growth. That means that you first spend time with God through His word, and then hopefully, discuss what you learned with a small group of women. After that, if you want to hear the audio (or read the manuscript) and follow the PowerPoint, filling in the handout, then that is a great time to do it! I cannot cover all the verses in depth, but you can read and study them for yourself. It is best for you to think through the passages before hearing what anyone else thinks, even me! You will find some lessons without lectures. At our church we use some of those weeks to spend extra time in our small groups sharing life stories, having a longer prayer time, or expressing how God is working in our lives.


 

A Precious Word from God

“Blessed are you who are poor, for the kingdom of God belongs to you.”

Jesus in Luke 6:20 (NET)

Introduction

Our study this week involves the stories of several people who were poor spiritually, realizing their total dependence upon God. As we think about what it means to come home to Jesus, we realize an attitude of humility is a prerequisite.

Day One Study

Read Luke 6:12-16.

    1. Review Luke 6:1-11. What was happening when Jesus chose the twelve?

    2. What do you learn about making major decisions from Jesus?

    3. Read John 6:64. We Christians often think that if we pray enough and ask God to open the right doors, all will go well; otherwise, we conclude that we must have missed God’s will. What do we learn about this idea from this passage about Jesus’ choosing of the twelve and this verse in John?

    4. Read John 15:8, 16-17. What do these verses mean in a personal way to those of us who are disciples of Jesus?

  • Diamonds in the Word: Look up the word “apostles” in a Greek dictionary. What was the significance of using that term for the twelve? What does it tell you about their ministries?

    5.Sharing question: Relate a story from your life when you made a major decision with much prayer. As you look back, how do you see God’s hand in that decision, even if things did not go smoothly or as you expected?

    6.Responding to God: Write a prayer concerning a big or small decision that you are currently facing. Can you tell God that you will trust Him, believing that He knows better than you, even when the results are not easy?

Day Two Study

Read Luke 6:17-49.

You may be more familiar with Matthew’s account of this, or a similar sermon. Although Jesus stood on a plateau, or level place, it could have been in the midst of mountains; thus, this may be the same sermon recorded in more detail in Matthew 5-7, known as the Sermon on the Mount. If not, Jesus repeated some of the major teachings on another occasion. We could spend a long time on this message because the teaching is so rich. Sadly, we do no have enough time to do so. You might mark this spot and return to it once the entire study of Luke is over so you can study it in more detail.

Your Precious Word from God this week is from this sermon. As you memorize it, meditate upon what it means to be poor.

    7. There are four contrasts in Luke 6:20-26. By saying it in both positive and negative ways, Jesus emphasized His point. Summarize the four contrasts.

    8. List the specific ways Jesus taught us to love our enemies (6:27-36).

    9.Sharing question: Think of the person who is your enemy by Jesus’ definition—the one who hates you, mistreats you, strikes you, or steals from you. How are you doing with loving actions toward him or her? What one specific loving action can you do for her this week in application of Jesus’ comments?

    10. In light of the context of the entire passage (6:17-49), do Jesus’ instructions against judging others mean that we cannot hold them accountable, calling their words or actions sinful, or determine they have a heart issue? Explain your answer.

  • Diamonds in the Word:Use your exhaustive concordance to find other New Testament verses about judging others. How do you reconcile Luke 6:37 with the others?

    11.Sharing question: Evaluate yourself according to Luke 6:43-49. How does this reflect humility? What can you do to listen and obey more carefully?

    12.Responding to God: If you are artistic, draw a picture that represents some part of Jesus’ message in this sermon. Put yourself in it to represent your response to that message. If are you not artistic, try it anywayJ You don’t have to show it to anyone! Then, talk to God about it.

Day Three Study

Read Luke 7:1-10.

    13. How did the centurion exhibit spiritual poverty and faith?

    14. What was Jesus’ response to this faith and why? What specific things can you learn about faith and humility from the centurion’s example?

Read Luke 7:11-17.

    15. What were the results of Jesus’ raising the widow’s son?

    16. The centurion showed great faith, and Jesus responded. Why did Jesus act in the case of the widow, according to the text? What does this teach you about Jesus’ character?

  • Diamonds in the Word: Some believe and teach that faith always results in healing. Study Matt. 8:16-17; Isaiah 53:5; 1 Peter 2:24, 25 and comment. Use the stories that you have read in Luke and other examples from Jesus’ healing ministry as you explain the Scriptural perspective on physical healing.

    17.Sharing question: What lessons can you apply from the two stories you have studied today when those around you need healing?

    18.Responding to God: Write a prayer, poem, or psalm of thanksgiving to Jesus for who He is based upon these two stories.

Day Four Study

Read Luke 7:18-35.

    19. One of those who heard the report about Jesus (Luke 7:17) was John the Baptist. Compare John’s question for Jesus (Luke 7:19) with previous statements he made in John 1:26-34. What change do you see? Read Luke 3:15-20. What has happened that might explain John’s question to Jesus?

    20.Sharing question: What kinds of events in your life have brought doubt when you previously had faith?

    21. Compare Jesus’ answer to John with His message in the synagogue in Nazareth (Luke 4:18-21).

    22.Sharing question: How does Jesus’ assessment of John the Baptist (Luke 7:24-35) despite John’s doubt encourage you?

  • Diamonds in the Word:Do a character study of John the Baptist. Use your exhaustive concordance and study every passage that mentions him. Write down what you learn about his character.

    23.Sharing question: If Jesus evaluated you before others, what would He say? What do you want Him to say about you at the end of your life? What actions do you need to take to become that person? What part does humility play in being that person?

    24.Responding to God: Write a prayer of self-assessment, and request God to change you into the person you just described.

Day Five Study

Read Luke 7:36-50.

    25. Describe the events at the Pharisee’s dinner.

    What was nard? The NET Bible tells us.1

Nard or spikenard is a fragrant oil from the root and spike of the nard plant of northern India. This perfumed oil, if made of something like nard, would have been extremely expensive, costing up to a year’s pay for an average laborer.

NET Bible

    26. Contrast the woman’s love for Jesus with the Pharisee’s.

  • Diamonds in the Word: All of the gospels record a story of Jesus being anointed by a woman. Compare Matt. 26:6-13; Mark 14:3-9; and John 12:1-8 and this account in Luke. Which ones record the same story and which may be a completely different event. Why?

    27.Sharing question: If your love for Jesus were measured by your sacrificial actions, how would you rate? What specific action would be most revealing? Why?

Read Luke 8:1-3.

Considering that this was the first century rather than our own, this is an amazing account. As women, we need to appreciate Luke for the stories of women that he alone of the gospel writers includes. It is interesting that there is no record in the gospels of a woman responding negatively to Jesus!

    28. What impresses you about these women, particularly considering their culture?

    29.Sharing question: Think about the woman who anointed Jesus and these women who traveled with Him. In what one way would you like others to better see your love relationship with Jesus? What can you do to improve to make it true?

    30.Responding to God: Just as Peter and Levi, or Matthew, left everything behind and followed Jesus, so did a group of women. Ask God to give you such love and commitment to Him.

In our lesson we saw Jesus move on behalf of those who lacked faith. This next story reminds us that God is at work for our benefit even when we doubt Him.

Dorothy’s Story

During the first year of our marriage God moved on my behalf when I did not have the faith to believe that He would. My mother died unexpectedly during that year. I was pregnant with our first child. We were living in a different city, and I knew no one. Dick had been working there for a year before we married. Even though I was a Christian and also had the assurance that my mother was with the Lord, I was still angry with God for taking my mother from me. It hurt so much knowing that our child would not grow up having a grandmother.

For several months I kept to myself, grieving quietly and making no effort to try to make new friends in my new town. God reached out to me through one particular family in the church we attended. Sam worked for the same company as Dick. His wife Sue wouldn't take no for an answer when I insisted that I didn't want a baby shower. I told her I had no friends there to invite. She invited her own friends, and they showered me with much love and support.

The Lord gave us a beautiful baby girl. Six months after she was born Dick was transferred back to Dallas. We still keep in touch with our friends there who reached out to us in our time of need.


1 NET Bible Note 18, p. 1820

From the series:

Related Topics: Curriculum, Discipleship, Gospels, Grace, Love, Spiritual Life

Pages