MENU

Where the world comes to study the Bible

Acts 25

PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS

UBS4

NKJV

NRSV

TEV

NJB

Paul Appeals to Caesar Paul Appeals to Caesar Appeal to the Emperor Paul Appeals to the Emperor Paul Appeals to Caesar
25:1-5 25:1-12 25:1-5 25:1-5 25:1-5
25:6-12   25:6-12 25:6-8 25:6-12
      25:9  
      25:10-11  
      25:12  
Paul Brought Before Agrippa and Bernice Paul Before Agrippa Paul's Defense Before Agrippa
(25:13-26:32)
Paul Before Agrippa and Bernice Paul Appears Before King Agrippa
25:13-22 25:13-27 25:13-22 25:13-21 25:13-22
      25:22a  
      25:22b  
25:23-27   25:23-27 25:23-27 25:23-26:1

READING CYCLE THREE (from "A Guide to Good Bible Reading")

FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S INTENT AT THE PARAGRAPH LEVEL

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects. Compare your subject divisions with the five modern translations. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is the key to following the original author's intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every paragraph has one and only one main subject.

1. First paragraph

2. Second paragraph

3. Third paragraph

4. Etc.

 

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 25:1-5
 1Festus then, having arrived in the province, three days later went up to Jerusalem from Caesarea. 2And the chief priests and the leading men of the Jews brought charges against Paul, and they were urging him, 3requesting a concession against Paul, that he might have him brought to Jerusalem (at the same time, setting an ambush to kill him on the way). 4Festus then answered that Paul was being kept in custody at Caesarea and that he himself was about to leave shortly. 5"Therefore," he said, "let the influential men among you go there with me, and if there is anything wrong about the man, let them prosecute him."

25:1 "Festus" This was Felix's successor. He was a nobler personality, but obviously under the same political pressure and mind set. He was in office for two years and died in a.d. 62 while still in office (cf. Josephus, Antiq. 20.8.9).

▣ "three days later" This shows how upset and persistent the Jewish leadership was concerning Paul. Festus also wanted to make a good first impression.

25:2 "the chief priest and the leading men of the Jews" This may refer to the Sanhedrin, which was made up of 70 Jewish leaders from Jerusalem. They formed the highest judicial body of the Jews in both politics and religion. See Special Topic at 4:5. However, it could also refer to the other wealthy and elite citizens of Jerusalem who would be very anxious to meet the new Roman procurator and begin to establish a good relationship with him.

It is surely possible that it refers to both groups. After two years there was a new high priest, Ishmael ben Fabus (a.d. 56-62). He, too, wanted to establish himself and a good way to do this was to attack the renegade Pharisee, Paul.

▣ "they were urging him" This is an imperfect active indicative. They asked again and again.

25:3 This shows animosity against Paul on the part of these religious leaders. They saw Paul as an enemy from within!

▣ "(at the same time, setting an ambush to kill him on the way)" The tactics of the Jewish leadership had not changed (cf. 23:12-15).

25:5 "if" This is a first class conditional sentence which is assumed to be true from the author's perspective or for his purposes (cf. A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament, vol. 3, p. 429). Dr. Bruce Tankersley, the Koine Greek specialist at East Texas Baptist University, says it might be third class because there is no verb in the protasis. Festus assumed Paul was guilty. Why else would the Jerusalem leaders be so persistent, and so tenacious?

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 25:6-12
 6After he had spent not more than eight or ten days among them, he went down to Caesarea, and on the next day he took his seat on the tribunal and ordered Paul to be brought. 7After Paul arrived, the Jews who had come down from Jerusalem stood around him, bringing many and serious charges against him which they could not prove, 8while Paul said in his own defense, "I have committed no offense either against the Law of the Jews or against the temple or against Caesar." 9But Festus, wishing to do the Jews a favor, answered Paul and said, "Are you willing to go up to Jerusalem and stand trial before me on these charges?" 10But Paul said, "I am standing before Caesar's tribunal, where I ought to be tried. I have done no wrong to the Jews, as you also very well know. 11If, then, I am a wrongdoer and have committed anything worthy of death, I do not refuse to die; but if none of those things is true of which these men accuse me, no one can hand me over to them. I appeal to Caesar." 12Then when Festus had conferred with his council, he answered, "You have appealed to Caesar, to Caesar you shall go."

25:6-9 These events showed Paul that he had no real hope for justice with Festus. He knew what awaited him in Jerusalem (cf. v. 3). He also knew Jesus wanted him to go to Rome (cf. 9:15).

25:6 "After he had spent not more than eight or ten days among them" I would imagine the Jewish leaders wined and dined Festus. They manipulated all the Roman officials.

25:8 Paul asserts that he is innocent of all charges against

1. the Law of Moses (cf. 21:21,28)

2. the temple (cf. 21:28; 24:6)

3. Caesar (cf. 16:21; 17:7)

Numbers 1 and 2 are exactly what Stephen was charged with in 6:13-14.

25:10-11 Paul asserts that he was already before the proper authority and in the proper place. Luke records in v. 11 Paul's official appeal to Caesar.

The right of appeal to Caesar initially started with Octavian in 30 b.c. (cf. Dio Cassius, History, 51.19). This initial dictate was expanded to forbid blinding, scourging, and torture to any Roman citizen who appealed to Caesar (cf. Paulus, Sententiae 5.26.1).

There is a good discussion of Roman Law of the first century in A. N. Sherwin-White's Roman Society and Roman Law in the New Testament, "lecture four: Paul before Felix and Festus," pp. 48-70.

25:11 "If. . .if" These are two first class conditional sentences which are assumed to be true from the author's perspective or for his purpose. These two usages in context show how this grammatical construction was used to make a point. The first is false to reality (but exactly the same condition used by Felix in v. 5); the second is true to reality.

▣ "I do not refuse to die" Paul recognized the power of the state (cf. Rom. 13:4). The OT perspective on capital punishment can be found in Gen. 9:6. See an interesting discussion of capital punishment in Hard Sayings of the Bible, pp. 114-116.

NASB, TEV"no one can hand me over to them"
NKJV"no on can deliver me over to them"
NRSV"no one can turn me over to them"
NJB"no one has the right to surrender me to them"

The term charizomai basically means "to gratify" or "grant as a favor." Paul realized that Festus was trying to impress the Jewish leadership by giving them himself!

However, it is possible that Festus is trying to abide by a decree from Julius Caesar (cf. Josephus, Antiq. 14.10.2), which encouraged Roman officials in Palestine to allow the wishes of the high priest.

"I appeal to Caesar" This was the legal right of every Roman citizen in capital punishment cases (Pliny the Younger, Letters 10.96). At this point in history, Nero was the Caesar (a.d. 54-68).

25:12 "his council" This refers to Festus' Roman legal experts, not the Jewish leaders.

CONTEXTUAL INSIGHTS TO ACTS 25:13-26:32

BACKGROUND

A. Herod Agrippa II (Marcus Julius Agrippa)

1. He is the son of Herod Agrippa I (cf. Acts 12), who was the political ruler of Judea and who had control of the Temple and Priesthood (a.d. 41-44) and grandson of Herod the Great.

2. He was educated in Rome and was pro-Roman. He returned to Rome after the Jewish war of a.d. 70 and died there in a.d. 100.

3. At the age of 17 his father died, but he was too young to assume his kingdom.

4. In a.d. 50 Herod Chalcis, Agrippa II's uncle, the King of Chalcis (a small kingdom in Northern Palestine), died and Agrippa II was given his kingdom by Emperor Claudius. Also, he was given control over the Temple and the High Priesthood.

5. In a.d. 53 he exchanged this small kingdom for the tetrarches of Herod Philip (Ituraea and Trachonitis) and Lysanius (Abilene).

6. Later, Emperor Nero added certain cities and villages around the Sea of Galilee to his control. His capital was Caesarea Philippi, which he renamed Neronias.

7. For historical reference cf:

a. Josephus Jewish Wars 2.12.1,7-8; 15.1; 16.4; 7.5.1 

b. Josephus' Antiquities of the Jews 19.9.2; 20.5.2; 6.5; 7.1; 8.4; 9.6.

 

B. Bernice

1. She was the oldest daughter of Herod Agrippa I.

2. She was the sister of Agrippa II, and for a period of time may have been his incestuous lover (there is no evidence of this, only rumor). Later she was a mistress to Emperor Titus while he was a general. He was the Roman general who destroyed Jerusalem and the Temple in a.d. 70.

3. She was Drusilla's sister (cf. 24:24).

4. She was married to Herod Chalcis (Herod Agrippa I's brother, her uncle), but when he died she moved in with her brother.

5. She later married Polemon, King of Cilicia, but left him to return to her brother who had just been given the title of "King."

6. She was the mistress of Emperor Vespasian.

7. Historical references

a. Josephus Jewish Wars 2.1.6; 15.1; 17.1.

b.Josephus' Antiquities of the Jew 19.9.1; 15.1; 20.1.3

c. Tacitus' History 2.2

d. Seutonius' Life of Titus 7

e. Dio Cassius' Histories 65.15; 66.18

f. Juvenal's Satire 61.156-157

 

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 25:13-22
 13Now when several days had elapsed, King Agrippa and Bernice arrived at Caesarea and paid their respects to Festus. 14While they were spending many days there, Festus laid Paul's case before the king, saying, "There is a man who was left as a prisoner by Felix; 15and when I was at Jerusalem, the chief priests and the elders of the Jews brought charges against him, asking for a sentence of condemnation against him. 16I answered them that it is not the custom of the Romans to hand over any man before the accused meets his accusers face to face and has an opportunity to make his defense against the charges. 17So after they had assembled here, I did not delay, but on the next day took my seat on the tribunal and ordered the man to be brought before me. 18When the accusers stood up, they began bringing charges against him not of such crimes as I was expecting, 19but they simply had some points of disagreement with him about their own religion and about a dead man, Jesus, whom Paul asserted to be alive. 20Being at a loss how to investigate such matters, I asked whether he was willing to go to Jerusalem and there stand trial on these matters. 21But when Paul appealed to be held in custody for the Emperor's decision, I ordered him to be kept in custody until I send him to Caesar." 22Then Agrippa said to Festus, "I also would like to hear the man myself." "Tomorrow," he said, "you shall hear him."

25:13 "King Agrippa" This refers to Agrippa II. He was the brother of Drusilla and Bernice. He was educated in Rome and was very loyal to Rome's policies and programs.

SPECIAL TOPIC: BERNICE

25:13-19 This again reveals one of Luke's literary and theological purposes, which was to show that Christianity was not a political threat to Rome (cf. v. 25). In the early decades of the first century Christianity was considered a sect of Judaism, which was acknowledged by Rome as a legal religion. Rome wanted no part of disputes between Jewish religious sects!

25:18 "they began charges against him not of such crimes as I was expecting" This shows the intensity and nature of the Jewish opposition. It was not political, but religious.

NASB, NRSV,
NJB, NIV"crimes"
NKJV"such things"
TEV"evil crimes"
REB"charges"
NET Bible"evil deeds"
ASV"evil things"

There are several variants.

1. ponērōngenitive plural in MSS א2, B, E, meaning "things of evil" (cf. 28:21)

2. ponērauaccusative neuter singular in MSS P74, A, C*

3. ponēraaccusative neuter plural in MSS א*, C2

4. omit – MSS L, P, and some Lectionaries (cf. NKJV)

UBS4 puts option #1 in the text with a "C" rating (difficulty in deciding).

Felix was surprised that the charges were not serious and had to do with Jewish religious matters, not legal matters.

25:19 "religion" This is literally a compound term from "fear" and "gods." This term can mean "superstition," which was exactly what these Roman leaders thought about the Jewish religion. However, Festus would have not wanted to insult his Jewish dignitaries, so he used an ambiguous term (so too, Paul, 17:22).

Verses 18-19 show again that Roman justice found no fault with Paul or Christianity.

▣ "about a dead man, Jesus, whom Paul asserted to be alive" The resurrection was one the central pillars of the sermons (kerygma, see Special Topic at 2:14) in Acts (cf. 26:8). Christianity stands or falls on this theological assertion (cf. I Corinthians 15).

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 25:23-27
 23So, on the next day when Agrippa came together with Bernice amid great pomp, and entered the auditorium accompanied by the commanders and the prominent men of the city, at the command of Festus, Paul was brought in. 24Festus said, "King Agrippa, and all you gentlemen here present with us, you see this man about whom all the people of the Jews appealed to me, both at Jerusalem and here, loudly declaring that he ought not to live any longer. 25But I found that he had committed nothing worthy of death; and since he himself appealed to the Emperor, I decided to send him. 26Yet I have nothing definite about him to write to my lord. Therefore I have brought him before you all and especially before you, King Agrippa, so that after the investigation has taken place, I may have something to write. 27For it seems absurd to me in sending a prisoner, not to indicate also the charges against him."

25:23 What a wonderful opportunity to preach the gospel!

▣ "the commanders" This is the term chiliarch, which means leaders of a thousand, as centurion means leader of a hundred. We learn from Josephus' Antiq. 19.19.2, that there were five auxiliary cohorts in Caesarea at this period. Therefore, possibly five military men are referred to here.

▣ "the prominent men of the city" This would refer to the civic leaders of Caesarea.

Notice the groups in the assembly.

1. a Roman procurator

2. an Idumean regional king

3. Roman military leaders

4. prominent civic leaders of Caesarea

 

▣ 25:26 "the Emperor" This term is sebastos, which was the Greek equivalent of the Latin term augustus. Its basic etymology is "revere, "adore," "venerate," or "worship." It was first used of Octavian in 27 b.c. by the Senate. Here, it is used of Nero (a.d. 54-68). Nero seems to have expanded the worship of the Emperor cult.

25:26 "I have nothing definite about him to write" Festus had the same problem as Lysias, the commander from Jerusalem. He was bound by Roman law to write an indictment against Paul along with any evidence or judicial opinion. Paul was a mystery to these Roman leaders.

▣ "lord" The is the Greek word kurios, which means owner, master, ruler. This is the first documented use of kurios as a stand-alone title for Nero. This title was rejected by the Emperors Octavian/Augustus and Tiberias because they felt it was too close to the Latin rex (king), which caused the Roman populace and Senate discomfort. However, it appears often during and after Nero's day. Vespasian and Titus used the term "savior" and Domitian used "god" to describe themselves (cf. James S. Jeffers, The Greco-Roman World p. 101). The term kurios became the focus of the persecution against Christians, who could use only this term for Jesus Christ. They refused to use it in the incense offering and pledge of allegiance to Rome.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. Why did the Jewish leaders fear and hate Paul?

2. How does this chapter reflect one of Luke's purposes in writing Acts?

3. What was Paul's purpose in defending himself before Agrippa and Bernice?

 

Acts 26

PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS

UBS4

NKJV

NRSV

TEV

NJB

Paul Defends Himself Before Agrippa Paul's Early Life Paul's Defense Before Agrippa
(25:13-26:32)
Paul Defends Himself Before Agrippa Paul Appears Before King Agrippa
25:13-26:1
26:1-11 26:1-11 26:1 26:1 Paul's Speech Before King Agrippa
    26:2-3 26:2-3 26:2-3
    26:4-8 26:4-8 26:4-8
    26:9-11 26:9-11 26:9-11
Paul Tells of His Conversion Paul Recounts His Conversion   Paul Tells of His Conversion  
26:12-18 26:12-18 26:12-18 26:12-18 26:12-18
Paul's Testimony to Jews and Gentiles Paul's Post-conversion Life   Paul Tells of His Work  
26:19-23 26:19-23 26:19-23 26:19-23 26:19-23
Paul Appeals to Agrippa to Believe       His Hearers' Reactions
26:24-29 26:24-32 26:24-29 26:24 26:24-29
      26:25-27  
      26:28  
      26:29  
26:30-32   26:30-32 26:30-32 26:30-32

READING CYCLE THREE (from "A Guide to Good Bible Reading")

FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S INTENT AT THE PARAGRAPH LEVEL

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects. Compare your subject divisions with the five modern translations. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is the key to following the original author's intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every paragraph has one and only one main subject.

1. First paragraph

2. Second paragraph

3. Third paragraph

4. Etc.

 

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 26:1
 1Agrippa said to Paul, "You are permitted to speak for yourself." Then Paul stretched out his hand and proceeded to make his defense:

26:1 "stretched out his hand" This was a gesture of greeting and oratorical introduction (cf. Acts 12:17; 13:16 and 21:40, in which gestures of the hand are used for attention and silence).

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 26:2-3
 2"In regard to all the things of which I am accused by the Jews, I consider myself fortunate, King Agrippa, that I am about to make my defense before you today; 3especially because you are an expert in all customs and questions among the Jews; therefore I beg you to listen to me patiently.

26:2-3 Paul introduces his defense in a typical formal and flattering way, as he did in his trial before Felix (cf. 24:10), which was probably a culturally expected necessity.

26:2 "In regard to all the things of which I am accused by the Jews" Agrippa II had been put in charge of the Temple and Priesthood by Rome. Although pro-Roman and educated in Rome, he understood the intricacies of the Jewish faith (cf. v. 3).

▣ "fortunate" This is the same term which introduces each of the Beatitudes of Matt. 5:3-12; Luke 6:20-22; and Ps. 1:1 in the Septuagint.

26:3

NASB, NKJV"all customs and questions"
NRSV"all customs and controversies"
TEV"all of the Jewish customs and disputes"
NJB"customs and controversy"

The first term is ethōn, from which we get the English word "ethnic," or the cultural aspect of a particular people group.

The second term dzētēmatōn is used often in Acts to denote debates and arguments over aspects of rabbinical Judaism (cf. 15:2; 18:15; 23:19; 25:19; 26:3). These were not uncommon because of the existence of several factions within first century Judaism : Sadducees, Pharisees (also the theological factions of Shammai and Hillel), and the zealots.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 26:4-8
 4"So then, all Jews know my manner of life from my youth up, which from the beginning was spent among my own nation and at Jerusalem; 5since they have known about me for a long time, if they are willing to testify, that I lived as a Pharisee according to the strictest sect of our religion. 6"And now I am standing trial for the hope of the promise made by God to our fathers; 7the promise to which our twelve tribes hope to attain, as they earnestly serve God night and day. And for this hope, O King, I am being accused by Jews. 8"Why is it considered incredible among you people if God does raise the dead?

26:4 "all Jews know my manner of life" Paul has repeated this several times (cf. Acts 22:3-5; 23:1; 24:16; 25:8). Paul had lived an exemplary life among the Jews in Jerusalem (cf. v. 5).

▣ "my own nation" It is uncertain where Paul grew up. This could refer to (1) Tarsus in Cilicia or (2) Jerusalem.

26:5 "if" This is a third class conditional sentence which means potential action. In this context Paul knows they could testify about his past, but they would not.

▣ "Pharisee according to the strictest sect of our religion" This was a theological sect of Judaism which emerged during the Maccabean Period. It was committed to the oral and written tradition. See Special Topic at 5:34.

26:6 "the hope of the promise made by God to our fathers" This refers to the OT prophecy of (1) the coming of the Messiah or (2) the resurrection of the dead (cf. 23:6; 24:15; Job 14:14-15; 19:25-27; Dan. 12:2). Paul saw "the Way" as the fulfillment of the OT (cf. Matt. 5:17-19; Galatians 3).

For "hope" see Special Topic at 2:25 and the Special Topic: The Kerygma at 2:14.

26:7 "our twelve tribes" The tribal lineage (children of Jacob) was still very important to the Jews. Many of the ten northern tribes never came back from Assyrian exile (722 b.c.). We know some tribal information from the NT.

1. Mary, Joseph, and Jesus were from the tribe of Judah (cf. Matt. 1:2-16; Luke 3:23-33; Rev. 5:5)

2. Anna's tribe is identified as Asher (cf. Luke 2:36)

3. Paul's tribe is identified as Benjamin (cf. Rom. 11:1; Phil. 3:5)

Herod the Great was jealous of this and had the Temple records, which showed genealogies, burned.

For "twelve" see Special Topic at 1:22.

▣ "hope" One wonders exactly which hope Paul is referring to. From the larger context one would assume the resurrection (cf. v. 8). See SPECIAL TOPIC: HOPE at 2:25.

"as they earnestly serve God night and day" Paul loved his racial group (cf. Rom. 9:1-3). He knew how hard they tried to serve YHWH. He also uniquely knew the danger of legalism, dogmatism, and elitism.

"Night and day" was an idiom of intensity and regularity (cf. 20:31; Luke 2:37).

26:8 "Why is it considered incredible among you people" Paul is speaking to two groups:

1. Agrippa and other Jews present

2. the Gentiles present, such as Festus

 

▣ "if" This is a first class conditional sentence which is assumed to be true from the author's perspective or for his literary purposes.

▣ "God does raise the dead" This phrase speaks of the Jewish hope of a general resurrection (see Job 14:14-15; 19:25-27; Isa. 25:8; 26:19; Dan. 12:2-3), but Paul had Christ's resurrection specifically in mind (cf. I Cor. 15:1-28). These Sadducean accusers would be getting very nervous at this point (cf. 23:1-10).

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 26:9-11
 9"So then, I thought to myself that I had to do many things hostile to the name of Jesus of Nazareth. 10And this is just what I did in Jerusalem; not only did I lock up many of the saints in prisons, having received authority from the chief priests, but also when they were being put to death I cast my vote against them. 11And as I punished them often in all the synagogues, I tried to force them to blaspheme; and being furiously enraged at them, I kept pursuing them even to foreign cities."

26:9 Paul (egō, "I" and emautō, "myself") confesses his misdirected religious enthusiasm, which he now realizes was not the will of God (cf. I Tim. 1:13). He thought that by persecuting the followers of Jesus he was serving God and pleasing God. Paul's world and worldview totally changed on the Damascus road (cf. Acts 9).

▣ "the name" This Semitic idiom means "ther person of" (cf. 3:6,16). This is no magic formula, but a personal relationship!

▣ "Jesus of Nazareth" See Special Topics at 2:22.

26:10 "the saints" Literally this is "the holy ones." Paul knew now exactly whom he had persecuted and killed, God's people! What a shock, sorrow, and enlightenment Paul's Damascus vision must have been, a total reorientation of thought and life!

For "saints" see Special Topic at 9:13.

▣ "having received authority" Paul was the "official" persecutor for the Sanhedrin.

"when they were being put to death" This shows the intensity of the persecution. The "Way" was not a minor issue; it was a life-and-death issue and it still is!

▣ "cast my vote against them" This is the technical word in Greek for an official vote either in the Sanhedrin or a local synagogue. But because no local synagogue could/would vote on death issues, it was probably the Sanhedrin. If it was in the Sanhedrin, then Paul had to have been married. The term originally meant "a pebble," which was used to cast a vote—either a black one or a white one (cf. Rev. 2:17)

26:11 "tried to force" This is an imperfect tense of a Greek term that means to force or compel (cf. 28:19), but here it is used in the sense of tried. It refers to a repeated action in past time.

▣ "to blaspheme" Saul attempted to force them to publicly affirm their faith in Jesus as the Messiah and then condemn them. In later persecutions, believers were forced to reject faith in Christ, but this context is a different cultural situation.

NASB"being furiously enraged"
NKJV"being exceedingly enraged"
NRSV"I was so furiously enraged"
TEV"I was so furious"
NJB"my fury against them was so extreme"

This is a very intense adverb ("much more") and participle (present middle [deponent]). Festus uses the same root for Paul (i.e., rave in 26:24)

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 26:12-18
 12"While so engaged as I was journeying to Damascus with the authority and commission of the chief priests, 13at midday, O King, I saw on the way a light from heaven, brighter than the sun, shining all around me and those who were journeying with me. 14And when we had all fallen to the ground, I heard a voice saying to me in the Hebrew dialect, ‘Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me? It is hard for you to kick against the goads.' 15And I said, ‘Who are You, Lord?' And the Lord said, ‘I am Jesus whom you are persecuting. 16'But get up and stand on your feet; for this purpose I have appeared to you, to appoint you a minister and a witness not only to the things which you have seen, but also to the things in which I will appear to you; 17rescuing you from the Jewish people and from the Gentiles, to whom I am sending you, 18to open their eyes so that they may turn from darkness to light and from the dominion of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who have been sanctified by faith in Me.'"

26:12 Luke records Paul's personal testimony three times in Acts, 9:1-31; 22:3-21, and here. God's mercy and election towards Saul are so obvious. If God in Christ can forgive and use this man, He can forgive and use anyone!

26:13 See full note in 9:3.

The fact that there is variation in details in all three places where Paul shares his conversion speaks to the accuracy of Luke's recording of Paul's legal defenses (and, thereby, also the sermons) in Acts!

26:14 See full note at 9:4.

Frank Stagg, New Testament Theology, has a great paragraph on the vital connection between Jesus and His church.

"The most important fact about judgment is that we are judged in relation to Christ. In turn, this is a judgment in relation to his people. Our true relationship to him is reflected in our relationship to his people. To serve them is to serve him and to neglect them is to neglect him (Matt. 25:31-46). Never does the New Testament allow one to divorce his relationship to Christ from that to other people. To persecute them is to persecute him (Acts 9:1-2,4-5; 22:4,7-8; 26:10-11,14-15). To sin against the brethren is to sin against Christ (1 Cor. 8:12). Though we are not saved by our works, we are judged by them; for they reflect our true relationship to Christ and his grace. Judgment is merciful toward them that accept judgment, and judgment is merciful toward them who are merciful (Matt. 5:7)" (p. 333).

▣ "Hebrew dialect" In Paul's three personal testimonies in Acts, this is the only one in which the detail of Jesus speaking Aramaic is mentioned. See full note at 22:2.

▣ "Saul, Saul" This last half of v. 14 and the last part of v. 15, as well as vv. 16-18, are a quote from Jesus to Paul on the Damascus road.

▣ "It is hard for you to kick against the goads" This phrase is unique to this context, possibly because it was a Greek/Latin proverb, not Jewish. Paul always knew to what audience he was speaking and how to communicate to them! This is referring to

1. a pointed stick used by those who directed oxen to pull carts and plows

2. projections on the front of the cart or wagon to keep the animals from kicking backward

This proverb was used to denote the human futility of resisting divine initiatives.

26:15 See complete note at 9:5.

▣ "Jesus whom you are persecuting" This shows the close connection between Jesus and His church, (cf. Matt. 10:40; 25:40,45). To hurt them is to hurt Him!

26:16 "‘But get up and stand on your feet'" These are both aorist active imperatives. This sounds very familiar to the prophetic call of Jeremiah 1:7-8 and Ezekiel 2:1,3.

▣ "'for this purpose I have appeared to you'" God had a specific assignment for Paul. Paul's conversion and call are not typical, but extraordinary! God's mercy is powerfully demonstrated as well as God's election for Kingdom service and kingdom growth.

▣ "I have appeared to you. . .I will appear to you" These are both forms of horaō. The first is aorist passive indicative and the second is future passive indicative. In a sense Jesus is promising Paul future personal encounters. Paul had several divine visions during his ministry (cf. 18:9-10; 22:17-21; 23:11; 27:23-24). Paul also mentions a training period in Arabia in which he was taught by Jesus (cf. Gal. 1:12,17,18).

▣ "to appoint" This is literally "to take into the hand." It was an idiom of destiny (cf. 22:14; 26:16).

▣ "a minister and a witness" The first term literally referred to an "under-rower" on a ship. It came to be used idiomatically for a servant.

From the second term, martus, we get the English term "martyr." It had a double meaning:

1. a witness (cf. Luke 11:48; 24:48; Acts 1:8,22; 5:32; 10:39,41; 22:15)

2. a martyr (cf. Acts 22:20)

Both connotations were the personal experience of most of the Apostles and many, many believers throughout the ages!

26:17 "rescuing you" This is a present middle participle. In the middle voice this word usually means to select or choose. Normally it is translated "rescue or deliver" (cf. 7:10,34; 12:11; 23:27). God's providential care is evident here. Paul received several of these visions during his ministry in order to encourage him. This possibly alludes to the Septuagint's reading of Isa. 48:10 or possibly Jer. 1:7-8,19.

▣ "from the Jewish people and from the Gentiles" Paul will suffer opposition from both groups (cf. II Cor. 11:23-27).

▣ "to whom I am sending you" The "I" is emphatic (egō) here as in v. 15. The verb is apostellō (present active indicative), from which we get the term "Apostle." As the Father sent Jesus, so Jesus sends His witnesses, apostles (cf. John 20:21).

26:18 "to open. . .turn" These are both aorist infinitives. This may be an allusion to Isa. 42:7. The Messiah will open blind eyes as a metaphor for opening spiritual eyes (cf. John 9). Gospel knowledge and understanding must precede the call to a volitional response (repentance and faith). Satan tries to close our minds and hearts (cf. II Cor. 4:4) and the Spirit tries to open them (cf. John 6:44,65; 16:8-11).

▣ "from darkness. . .from the dominion of Satan" Notice the parallelism. "Dominion" is the Greek term exousia, usually translated authority or power (cf. NKJV, NRSV, TEV). The world is under the influence of personal evil (cf. Eph. 2:2; 4:14; 6:10-18; II Cor. 4:4; Col. 1:12-13, see Special Topic at 5:3).

In the OT, particularly the prophecies of Isaiah, the Messiah (see Special Topic at 2:31) was to bring sight to the blind. It was both a physical prediction and also metaphorical for truth (cf. Isa. 29:18; 32:3; 35:5; 42:7,16).

SPECIAL TOPIC: AUTHORITY (EXOUSIA)

"to light. . .to God" Notice the parallelism. Ancient humans feared darkness. It became a metaphor for evil. Light, on the other hand, became a metaphor for truth, healing, and purity. A good parallel passage on the light of the gospel is John 3:17-21.

"that they may receive" The verbal in this phrase is another aorist infinitive. There is no "may" in the Greek text (cf. TEV, NJB). The only condition in this context is "by faith in Me" clause, which is put last in the Greek sentence for emphasis. All of God's blessings are contingent on a faith response (i.e., receive, cf. John 1:12) to His grace (cf. Eph. 2:8-9). This is the NT counterpoint of conditional covenants in the OT.

▣ "forgiveness of sins" Luke uses this term (aphesis) often.

1. In Luke 4:18 it is used in an OT quote from Isa. 61:1, where it means release, which reflects the LXX usage of Exod. 18:2 and Lev. 16:26.

2. In Luke 1:77; 3:3; 24:47; Acts 2:38; 5:31; 10:43; 13:38; 26:18, it means "the removal of the guilt of sin," which reflects the LXX usage of Deut. 15:3, where it is used of the cancellation of a debt.

Luke's usage may reflect the New Covenant promise of Jer. 31:34.

"and an inheritance" This is the Greek term klēros, which denotes the casting of lots (cf. Lev. 16:8; Jonah 1:7; Acts 1:26) to determine an inheritance, as in Gen. 48:6; Exod. 6:8; and Josh. 13:7-8. In the OT the Levites did not have a land inheritance, only the 48 Levitical cities (cf. Deut. 10:9; 12:12), but the Lord Himself was their inheritance (cf. Num. 18:20). Now in the NT all believers are priests (cf. I Pet. 2:5,9; Rev. 1:6). The Lord (YHWH) is our inheritance; we are His children (cf. Rom. 8:15-17).

▣ "those who have been sanctified" This is a perfect passive participle. Believers (faithers) have been and continue to be sanctified by faith in Christ (cf. 20:21). See Special Topic at 9:32. Neither Satan nor the demonic can take this away (cf. Rom. 8:31-39).

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 26:19-23
 19"So, King Agrippa, I did not prove disobedient to the heavenly vision, 20but kept declaring both to those of Damascus first, and also at Jerusalem and then throughout all the region of Judea, and even to the Gentiles, that they should repent and turn to God, performing deeds appropriate to repentance. 21"For this reason some Jews seized me in the temple and tried to put me to death. 22"So, having obtained help from God, I stand to this day testifying both to small and great, stating nothing but what the Prophets and Moses said was going to take place; 23that the Christ was to suffer, and that by reason of His resurrection from the dead He would be the first to proclaim light both to the Jewish people and to the Gentiles."

26:19 "So, King Agrippa" See note at 25:13, Intro. Paul was trying to reach this man for the gospel (cf. vv. 26-29).

▣ "I did not prove disobedient" The Greek term peithō is from the name of the goddess of persuasion. In this context it has the alpha privative, which negates it, thereby denoting "disobedience" (cf. Luke 1:17; Rom. 1:30; II Tim. 3:2; Titus 1:16; 3:3). So, in a sense, this was a forceful way in Koine Greek to negate something, but in this context, it is a literary way of affirming Paul's obedience!

"heavenly vision" This refers to Paul's Damascus road encounter with the resurrected, glorified Christ.

26:20 "Damascus. . .Jerusalem" See Acts 9:19-25,27 for Paul's ministry in Damascus; 9:26-30 for Paul's ministry in Jerusalem and possibly 9:31 for Paul's ministry in Judea.

▣ "repent and turn to God" Paul's message (cf. Acts 20:21) was the same as

1. John the Baptist's (cf. Matt. 3:1-12; Mark 1:4-8)

2. Jesus' early message (cf. Mark. 1:15)

3. Peter (cf. Acts 3:16,19)

The Greek term repent means a change of mind. The Hebrew word means a change of action. Both are involved in true repentance. See Special Topic at 2:38. The two New Covenant requirements (which are also old Covenant requirements) for salvation are repentance (turning from self and sin) and faith (turning to God in Christ).

▣ "performing deeds appropriate to repentance" The believer's lifestyle (present active participle) confirms his/her initial faith commitment (cf. Matt. 3:8; Luke 3:8; Eph. 2:8-10, James and I John). God wants a people who reflect His character. Believers are called to Christlikeness (cf. Rom. 8:28-29; Gal. 4:19; Eph. 1:4; 2:10). The gospel is

1. a person to welcome

2. truth about that person to believe

3. a life like that person's to live

 

26:21 It was not Paul's theological views, but his preaching to and inclusion of "the Gentiles" (cf. v. 20) that caused the riot in the Temple.

▣ "tried to put me to death" This is an imperfect middle (deponent) indicative (tried again and again) with an aorist middle infinitive (to kill). The Jews (cf. Acts 9:24) from Asia (cf. 20:3,19; 21:27,30) tried to kill Paul several times.

26:22 "testifying both to small and great" This is an inclusive Semitic idiom. It is Paul's affirmation (like Peter's, cf. 10:38) that he, like God, is not respecter of persons (cf. Deut. 10:17; II Chr. 19:7, see fuller note at 10:34). He preaches to all humans.

▣ "stating nothing but what the Prophets and Moses said" Paul is asserting that his message and audience (i.e., Gentiles) are not an innovation, but OT prophecy. He is simply following OT guidelines (see Special Topic at 1:8), promises and truths.

26:23 Notice that Paul's message consisted of three parts:

1. the Messiah suffered for human forgiveness

2. the Messiah's resurrection was first fruits of all believers' resurrection

3. this Good News was for Jews and Gentiles

These three theological aspects must be combined with verse 20 which shows how we personally receive Christ (repentance, turning from self and sin; faith, turning to God in Christ).

▣ "that the Christ was to suffer" For the basic theological points of the Apostolic sermons in Acts see Special Topic at 2:14. It was the stumbling block for the Jews (cf. I Cor. 1:23), but it was an OT prediction (cf. Gen. 3:15; Psalm 22; Isaiah 53). This same truth is found in Luke 24:7,26,44-47.

The Greek "the Christ" reflects the Hebrew title "the Messiah." Paul asserts that Jesus, who was crucified, was truly the Christ, the Promised One, the Anointed One (cf. 2:36; 3:6,18,20; 4:10,26; 13:33; 17:3; 26:23, see special Topic: Messiah at 2:31).

"that by reason of His resurrection from the dead" Because of this text, and Rom. 1:4, there developed an early heresy called "adoptionism" (see glossary), which asserted that the human Jesus was rewarded for a good life by being raised from the dead. However, this aberrant Christology ignored all the texts about His pre-existence, such as John 1:1; Phi. 2:6-11; Col. 1:15-17; and Heb. 1:2-3. Jesus has always existed; He has always been divine; He was incarnated in time.

▣ "the light" Light is an ancient metaphor of truth and purity (cf. v. 18; Isa. 9:2; 42:6-7).

▣ "to the Jewish people and to the Gentiles" There is only one gospel for both groups (cf. Eph. 2:11-3:13). This was the mystery that had been hidden from the ages, but is now fully revealed in Christ. All humans are made in the image of the one creator God (cf. Gen. 1:26-27). Genesis 3:15 promises that God will provide salvation for fallen humanity. Isaiah affirms the universality of the Messiah (e.g., Isa. 2:2-4; 42:4,6,10-12; 45:20-25; 49:6; 51:4; 52:10; 60:1-3; and also Mic. 5:4-5).

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 26:24-29
 24While Paul was saying this in his defense, Festus said in a loud voice, "Paul, you are out of your mind! Your great learning is driving you mad." 25But Paul said, "I am not out of my mind, most excellent Festus, but I utter words of sober truth. 26For the king knows about these matters, and I speak to him also with confidence, since I am persuaded that none of these things escape his notice; for this has not been done in a corner. 27King Agrippa, do you believe the Prophets? I know that you do." 28Agrippa replied to Paul, "In a short time you will persuade me to become a Christian." 29And Paul said, "I would wish to God, that whether in a short or long time, not only you, but also all who hear me this day, might become such as I am, except for these chains."

26:24 "Festus said in a loud voice" Paul's message was unbelievable to him. His world-view and culture, education, and position biased his ability to understand.

▣ "Your great learning is driving you mad" In a roundabout way this shows the depth, clarity, and persuasiveness of Paul's defense.

26:25 "of sober truth" The Greek term sōphrosunē comes from two Greek words, "sound" and "mind." They mean a balanced approach to life and thinking. It is the antonym of "out of your mind" and "mad" (cf. v. 24).

▣ "the truth" See Special Topic below.

SPECIAL TOPIC: "TRUTH" IN PAUL'S WRITINGS

26:26-28 "the king knows about these matters" There has been much discussion about these verses. Apparently Paul wanted to use Agrippa II to confirm his testimony and if possible bring him to acceptance of its truth. Verse 28 could be translated, "Do you want me to be a Christian witness?"

26:26 "I speak to him also with confidence" Luke often uses this term in Acts, it is always connected with Paul (cf. 9:27,28; 13:46; 14:3; 18:26; 19:8). It is usually translated "speaking with boldness" (cf. I Thess. 2:2). This is one of the manifestations of being Spirit-filled. It was the object of Paul's prayer request in Eph. 6:20. Gospel proclamation with boldness is the Spirit's goal for every believer.

"for this has not been done in a corner" Peter made this same assertion again and again to his first hearers in Jerusalem (cf. 2:22,33). The facts of the gospel were verifiable and historical.

26:27 Paul knew that Agrippa was knowledgeable of the OT. Paul is claiming that his gospel message was clearly discernable from OT Scriptures. It was not a "new" or "innovative" message! It was fulfilled prophecy.

26:28

NASB"In a short time you will persuade me to become a Christian"
NKJV"You almost persuade me to become a Christian"
NRSV"Are you so quickly persuading me to become a Christian"
TEV"In this short time do you think you will make me a Christian"
NJB"A little more, and your arguments would make a Christian of me"

There is a lexical option about how to understand oligō (meaning small or little), "in a short time" (NASB, NRSV, TEV), or "with little effort" (NKJV, NJB). This same confusion is also present in v. 29.

There is also a textual variant related to this phrase: "to do" or "to make" (poieō) in the manuscripts P74, א, A (UBS4 gives it an "A" rating), or "to become" in MS E and the Vulgate and Peshitta translations.

The meaning in the larger context is obvious. Paul wanted to present the gospel in such a way that those who knew and affirmed the OT (Agrippa) would be brought under conviction or at the least, affirm the relevance of these OT prophecies.

"Christian" The people of "the Way" (followers of Christ) were first called Christians at Antioch of Syria (cf. 11:26). The only other place this name appears in Acts is on the lips of Agrippa II, which means the name had become widely known.

26:29 "I would wish to God" Verse 29 is a partial Fourth class conditional sentence (an with the optative mood), which expresses a desire that might remotely come to reality. It is usually a prayer or wish. Paul wished all of his hearers, Roman and Jewish, would come to faith in Christ like himself.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 26:30-32
 30The king stood up and the governor and Bernice, and those who were sitting with them, 31and when they had gone aside, they began talking to one another, saying, "This man is not doing anything worthy of death or imprisonment." 32And Agrippa said to Festus, "This man might have been set free if he had not appealed to Caesar."

26:30 How did Luke get this information? It was a private conversation between governmental leaders (and their families).

1. a servant have heard this and passed it on to Luke?

2. Luke assumes what they said by subsequent statements

3. Luke uses this opportunity to reinforce his literary purpose of showing that neither Paul or Christianity is a threat to Rome

 

26:31-32 "This man might have been set free if he had not appealed to Caesar" This shows one of Luke's major purposes in writing Acts, which was to show that Christianity was not treasonous to Rome. This is a second class conditional sentence which makes a false assertion to accentuate a truth. This man might have been set free (which he was not) if he had not appealed to Caesar (which he did).

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. How is this defense different from the defense before Festus and Felix?

2. How does Paul's personal testimony fit into his overall defense?

3. Why was a suffering Messiah so alien to the Jews?

4. Why is verse 28 so difficult to interpret?

5. How does the discussion of Festus, Agrippa and Bernice (vv. 30-31) fit into Luke's overarching literary purpose in Acts?

 

Acts 27

PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS

UBS4

NKJV

NRSV

TEV

NJB

Paul Sails for Rome The Voyage to Rome The Voyage to Malta Paul Sails for Rome The Departure for Rome
27:1-8 27:1-8 27:1-8 27:1-6 27:1-3
        27:4-6
  Paul's Warning Ignored   27:7-8 27:7-8
27:9-12 27:9-12 27:9-12 27:9-12 27:9-12
The Storm at Sea In the Tempest   Storm at Sea Storm and Shipwreck
27:13-20 27:13-38 27:13-20 27:13-20 27:13-20
27:21-26   27:21-26 27:21-26 27:21-26
27:27-32   27:27-32 27:27-32 27:27-32
27:33-38   27:33-38 27:33-38 27:33-38
The Shipwreck Shipwrecked on Malta   The Shipwreck  
27:39-44 27:39-44 27:39-44 27:39-41 27:39-41
      27:42-44 27:42-44

READING CYCLE THREE (from "A Guide to Good Bible Reading")

FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S INTENT AT THE PARAGRAPH LEVEL

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects. Compare your subject divisions with the five modern translations. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is the key to following the original author's intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every paragraph has one and only one main subject.

1. First paragraph

2. Second paragraph

3. Third paragraph

4. Etc.

 

CONTEXTUAL INSIGHTS

A. Luke had a vast knowledge, covering sailing (A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament, vol. 3, p. 456, says Luke used nine compounds with pleō, to sail) as well as literature, medicine, history and theology. Here is a list of technical, nautical terms and phrases

1. sailed (cf. 13:4; 14:26; 20:15;27:1)

2. under the shelter of (cf. 27:4,7)

3. weighed anchor (cf. 27:13)

4. euraquilo (cf. 27:14)

5. face the wind (cf. 27:15)

6. running under the shelter of (cf. 27:16)

7. undergirding (cf. 27:17)

8. sea anchor (skeuos) (cf. 27: 17

9. ship's tackle (skeuēn) (cf. 27:19)

10. soundings (cf. 27:28[twice])

11. athoms (cf. 27:28[twice])

12. four anchors from the stern (cf. 27:29,40)

13. the ropes of the rudders (cf. 27:40)

14. hoisting the foresail to the wind (cf. 27:40)

15. tacking (MSS P74, א, A, cf. 28:13)

 

B. One older book that has been such a help to commentators is James Smith's The Voyage and Shipwreck of St. Paul, 1848.

 

C. This trip to Rome was attempted at a dangerous time of the year for sailing (cf. 27:1,4,7,9,10,14). Usually November-February was the most dangerous time to travel, with a two to three week marginal period before and after. The regular grain shipments to Rome took ten to fourteen days, but because of the wind direction the return could take sixty days.

 

D. There are three different, possibly four, ships mentioned in this passage

1. a coastal ship which stopped at every port and hugged the coastline.

2. two Egyptian grain ships that ferried grain from Egypt to Italy

3. possibly a barge trip between Naples to a landing 43 miles south of Rome

It is interesting to follow Luke's account of this voyage on a map of the Mediterranean.

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 27:1-8
 1When it was decided that we would sail for Italy, they proceeded to deliver Paul and some other prisoners to a centurion of the Augustan cohort named Julius. 2And embarking in an Adramyttian ship, which was about to sail to the regions along the coast of Asia, we put out to sea accompanied by Aristarchus, a Macedonian of Thessalonica. 3The next day we put in at Sidon; and Julius treated Paul with consideration and allowed him to go to his friends and receive care. 4From there we put out to sea and sailed under the shelter of Cyprus because the winds were contrary. 5When we had sailed through the sea along the coast of Cilicia and Pamphylia, we landed at Myra in Lycia. 6There the centurion found an Alexandrian ship sailing for Italy, and he put us aboard it. 7When we had sailed slowly for a good many days, and with difficulty had arrived off Cnidus, since the wind did not permit us to go farther, we sailed under the shelter of Crete, off Salmone; 8and with difficulty sailing past it we came to a place called Fair Havens, near which was the city of Lasea.

27:1 "When it was decided that we would sail for Italy" Festus sent them at a dangerous time of the year for sailing. The "we" refers to Paul and Luke (possibly others). Most of the "we" sections of Acts have a sailing component (cf. 16:10-17; 20:5-15; 21:1-18; 27:1-28:16).

▣ "some other prisoners" We do not know anything about them except they were imperial prisoners heading for Rome.

▣ "centurion" These men are always presented in positive terms in the NT (cf. Matt. 8; Luke 7; 23:47; Acts 10; and Paul's trials, 21-28).

▣ "of the Augustan cohort" They were thought to be official couriers between Rome and the provinces (cf. W. M Ramsay, St. Paul the Traveler and Roman Citizen, pp. 315, 348), but this is only undocumented supposition before Emperor Hadrian (a.d. 117-138).

27:2 "an Adramyttian ship" This was a small coastal ship which stopped at every port. The home port of this ship was the seaport of Mysia in Asia Minor. This is the first stage of the long and dangerous trip to Rome.

▣ "Aristarchus" His home was in Thessalonica; possibly he was returning home (cf. Acts 19:29; 20:4; Col. 4:10; Philemon 24). He may have been accompanied by Secundas (cf. 20:4 and some western Greek manuscripts of this verse).

27:3 "Sidon" This is a Phoenician city about sixty-seven miles north of Caesarea. It was the ancient capital of Phoenicia, but had long since been eclipsed by Tyre.

NASB"with consideration"
NKJV, NRSV"kindly"
TEV"was kind"
NJB"was considerate"

This is a compound term from "love" (philos) and "humanity" (anthrōpos). The term is used twice in Acts, the noun in 28:2 (cf. Titus 3:4) and the adverb here in 27:3. Julius was a compassionate person (somewhat surprising for a Roman occupational soldier). He probably had heard about Paul's case.

▣ "his friends" This probably refers to the Christians there. Julius trusted Paul, but possibly a Roman guard went with him.

"receive care" The text does not specify what kind of attention (emotional, physical, financial).

27:4 "under the shelter of Cyprus" This is a confusing phrase because it makes English readers think "south of Cyprus," but in reality, it meant north. The other names mentioned are on the southern and western coast of modern Turkey.

27:6 "Alexandrian ship sailing for Italy" This was a larger ship (276 people on board plus huge amounts of grain) from Egypt on her way to Rome. Moderns know of these large ships from pictures on the walls of Pompeii and from Lucian's writings, around a.d 150. Myra was the major port for these large grain ships.

27:7 "Cnidus" This was a free maritime city on the southwest coast of the Roman province of Asia. Most Rome-bound ships used this port (cf. Thucydides, Hist. 8.35). It had two harbors because it was located on a peninsula.

"Salmone" This was a city on the eastern tip of the island of Crete. Because of the time of the year they tried to work their way west by sailing close to the island.

27:8 "Fair Havens" This is a bay near the southern city of Lasea on Crete. It is not a harbor, but a bay. It would have been difficult to stay here all winter.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 27:9-12
 9When considerable time had passed and the voyage was now dangerous, since even the fast was already over, Paul began to admonish them, 10and said to them, "Men, I perceive that the voyage will certainly be with damage and great loss, not only of the cargo and the ship, but also of our lives." 11But the centurion was more persuaded by the pilot and the captain of the ship than by what was being said by Paul. 12Because the harbor was not suitable for wintering, the majority reached a decision to put out to sea from there, if somehow they could reach Phoenix, a harbor of Crete, facing southwest and northwest, and spend the winter there.

27:9 There were certain times of the year (winter months) when the rapid movement of storm fronts and wind directions made sailing dangerous in the Mediterranean.

▣ "the fast" This refers to the Day of Atonement (cf. Leviticus 16). It is the only fast day mentioned in the writings of Moses. This would make the voyage sometime between September and October. October was the marginal period for sea travel.

▣ "Paul began" This is an Imperfect tense which can refer to (1) continuous action in past time or (2) the beginning of an action. In context option #2 is best.

27:10 Paul issues a strong and specific warning. However, in reality, this did not occur. Was Paul giving his personal opinion ("I perceive"), or did God change His mind and decide to spare the people on board (cf. v. 24)?

27:11

NASB"the pilot and the captain"
NKJV"the helmsman and the owner"
NRSV"the pilot and the owner"
TEV, NJB"the captain and the owner"

This phrase denotes two separate people.

1. the pilot (kubernētēs), which refers to the helmsman, the one who steers the ship (cf. Rev. 18:17)

2. the captain (nauklēros, compound of "ship" [naus] and "to inherit" or "a lot" [klēros]), although the word could mean "ship owners" (cf. F. F. Bruce, The Book of Acts, p. 507, quotes Ramsay, St. Paul the Traveler, p. 324, who quotes Inscriptiones Graecae, 14.918). Its use in the Koine Papyri is "captain." The exact difference between these two terms is uncertain (cf. Louw and Nida, Greek-English Lexicon, vol. 1, p. 548 vs. Harold Moulton, The Analytical Greek Lexicon Revised, p. 275), but probably on a ship of this size (Alexandrian grain ship) there were several levels of leaders, as well as regular sailors.

 

27:12 "if" This is a fourth class conditional sentence. Those who made the decision to sail knew it would be dangerous but thought they could make it.

"Phoenix" This is a harbor on the southern shore of Crete, westward of Fair Havens. There is some doubt from ancient sources about its exact location (Strabo, Geography, 10.4.3 vs. Ptolemy, An Egyptian Geography 3.17.3). They were still sailing close to the shore along the southern coast of Crete.

"facing southwest and northwest" Apparently at Phoenix there were two towns separated by a piece of land jutting into the sea. One harbor would be favorably related to winds from one direction and the other favorably related to winds from the other direction. The time of year determined which harbor was best.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 27:13-20
 13When a moderate south wind came up, supposing that they had attained their purpose, they weighed anchor and began sailing along Crete, close inshore. 14But before very long there rushed down from the land a violent wind, called Euraquilo; 15and when the ship was caught in it and could not face the wind, we gave way to it and let ourselves be driven along. 16Running under the shelter of a small island called Clauda, we were scarcely able to get the ship's boat under control. 17After they had hoisted it up, they used supporting cables in undergirding the ship; and fearing that they might run aground on the shallows of Syrtis, they let down the sea anchor and in this way let themselves be driven along. 18The next day as we were being violently storm-tossed, they began to jettison the cargo; 19and on the third day they threw the ship's tackle overboard with their own hands. 20Since neither sun nor stars appeared for many days, and no small storm was assailing us, from then on all hope of our being saved was gradually abandoned.

27:14

NASB, NRSV"a violent wind"
NKJV"a tempestuous wind"
TEV"a very strong wind"
NJB"a hurricane"

This Greek word is tuphōn (typhoon) + ikos (like). This was a sudden, very violent wind. It was probably intensified by the 7,000 foot mountains on Crete.

NASB"Euraquico"
NKJV"Euroclydon"
NRSV, TEV"the northeaster"
NJB"the north-easter"

This was a special name the sailors had given for this type of wind during this season. It is made up of (1) a Greek term, "east wind" (euros) and (2) a Latin term "north wind" (aquilo). It was a strong, sudden northeast wind.

Because this became a technical nautical term (eukakulōn), it was misunderstood by later scribes who altered it in several ways to try to make the context make sense.

27:15 "could not face the wind" Ancient ships had eyes painted on each side of the bow. Later human or animal figures were placed on the bow (cf. 28:11). Even today we personify ships as females. This phrase is literally "against" (anti) plus "eye" (ophthalmos). They could not head the ship into the wind.

27:16 "Clauda" This small island is about fifty miles off the southern coast of Crete. They were now helpless in the face of a strong northeastern wind. They took advantage of the brief shelter from the wind to do what they could to prepare the ship for rough seas.

There are several Greek manuscript variants as to the name of this island.

1. Kauda, MSS P74, א2, B

2. Klauda, MSS א*, A

3. Klaudēn, MSS H, L, P, and many later minuscule manuscripts

4. Gaudēn, the Greek text used by Jerome

5. Klaudion, some minuscule manuscripts

UBS3 and UBS4 give #1 a "B" rating (almost certain). The first two options may be the Greek form and the Latin form of the name.

▣ "to get the ship's boat under control" This refers to a smaller boat in tow (cf. vv. 30, 32). This trailing boat formed a drag which made it difficult to steer the larger ship.

27:17 "used supporting cables in undergirding the ship" This refers to wrapping special ropes around the hull to help hold it together in storms (cf. Aristotle, Rhetoric 2.5.18).

▣ "the shallows of Syrtis" These are moving sand bars off the coast of northern Africa. They were called Syrtis Major and Syrtis Minor (cf. Pliny, Nat. Hist. 5.4,27). They were the graveyard of many a sailing ship. To avoid the Syrtis Major the sailors steered the ship sideways, so as to drift slowly southward.

"sea anchor" The key to properly interpreting this context is the term "lowered." What did they lower: (1) a sea anchor or (2) part of the sail? The purpose was to slow the ship down, but at the same time allow some control.

A sea anchor is not an anchor that gripped the bottom, but a parachute-like sheet which used the weight of the water it contained to slow down the ship from drifting southward (cf. old Latin text and NASB, NRSV, and NJB).

There are several English translations which translate this as "lower the sail" (cf. NKJV, TEV, NJB, and Peshitta in English). The Greek term literally means "a thing" (cf. Louw & Nida, Greek-English Lexicon, vol. 2, p. 223) and must be interpreted in light of a specific context. There are several specific papyrii texts which use it for a sail (cf. Moulton & Milligan, The Vocabulary of the Greek Testament, p. 577). If so, they lower part of the sails but not all of them. They had to retain some control and attempt to travel sideways as slowly as possible.

27:18-19 This shows how violent and dangerous this storm seemed to these seasoned sailors (cf. 20).

27:18 "jettison the cargo" This act shows that these sailors were truly afraid for their lives.

27:19 "the ship's tackle" Exactly to what this refers is unknown, possibly the main sail and its rigging. The term is ambiguous. This very same term refers to the sea-anchor, or part of the sails, in v. 17.

27:20 "neither sun nor stars appeared for many days" This phrase apparently reveals that they had no clue as to where they were. They were afraid of the coast of north Africa, but they could not tell how close they were (cf. v. 29). Without stars or the sun they could not navigate or discern their position.

"from then on all hope of our being saved was gradually abandoned" This sets the stage for Paul's encouragement based on his previous vision (cf. vv. 21-26). Their resources were gone!

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 27:21-26
 21When they had gone a long time without food, then Paul stood up in their midst and said, "Men, you ought to have followed my advice and not to have set sail from Crete and incurred this damage and loss. 22Yet now I urge you to keep up your courage, for there will be no loss of life among you, but only of the ship. 23For this very night an angel of the God to whom I belong and whom I serve stood before me, 24 saying, ‘Do not be afraid, Paul; you must stand before Caesar; and behold, God has granted you all those who are sailing with you.' 25Therefore, keep up your courage, men, for I believe God that it will turn out exactly as I have been told. 26"But we must run aground on a certain island."

27:21 "they had gone a long time without food" There are at least three possible meanings in relation to v. 33:

1. maybe they were seasick from the violent, protracted storm

2. they were praying and fasting for the religious purpose of being spared (i.e., pagan ritual, cf. v. 29)

3. they were so busy trying to save the ship, eating became a lesser issue

 

"you ought to have followed my advice" This is Paul's "I told you so!" It provided Paul the opportunity to act as the Spirit's spokesman.

27:22 "but only of the ship" Notice the use of dei in v. 26. See full note on dei at 1:16. It is used three times in this chapter (vv. 21,24,26).

27:23 "an angel of the God" Several times Jesus or an angel appeared to Paul to encourage him (cf. 18:9-10; 22:17-19; 23:11; 27:23-24). God had an evangelistic plan and purpose for Paul's life (cf. v. 26; 9:15) and a storm was not going to stop it.

27:24 "Do not be afraid, Paul" This is a present middle (deponent) imperative with the negative participle which usually means stop an act already in process (cf. Acts 23:11; Pro. 3:5-6).

▣ "God has granted you all those who are sailing with you" This first verb is a perfect middle (deponent) indicative. God had a plan and purpose for Paul's ministry (cf. 9:15; 19:21; 23:11). He must (dei) witness in Rome before her governmental and military leaders.

Paul's life and faith impacted the destiny of his companions. This same extension of grace can be seen in Deut. 5:10; 7:9; I Cor. 7:14. This does not remove personal responsibility, but accentuates the potential influence of believing family, friends, and co-workers.

27:25 Paul's admonition of v. 22, "to keep up your courage," a present infinitive, is repeated, "keep up your courage," which is a present active imperative.

"for I believe God" Paul's encounter with the living Christ enabled him to trust God's word ("it will turn out exactly as I have been told" perfect passive indicative). Faith is the hand that receives the gifts of God—not only salvation, but providence.

Robert B. Girdlestone, Synonyms of the Old Testament has a great statement and quote from Romaine, Life of Faith.

"We now approach the N.T. with a clear distinction between faith on the one hand, and trust and hope on the other. Faith is the taking God at His word, while trust and patience and also hope are the proper fruits of faith, manifesting in various forms the confidence which the believer feels. A message comes to me from the Author of my existence; it may be a threat, a promise, or a command. If I take is as ‘yea and amen,' that is Faith; and the act which results is an act of amunah or faithfulness God. Faith, according to Scripture, seems to imply a word, message, or revelation. So the learned Romaine says in his Life of Faith:—‘Faith signifies believing the truth of the Word of God; it relates to some word spoken or to some promise made by Him, and it expresses the belief which a person who hears it has of its being true; he assents to it, relies upon it, and acts accordingly: this is faith.' Its fruit will vary according to the nature of the message received, and according to the circumstances of the receiver. It led Noah to build an ark, Abraham to offer up his son, Moses to refuse to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter, the Israelites to march round the walls of Jericho. I believe God that it shall be even as it has been told me—this is a picture of the process which the Bible calls faith" (pp. 104-105).

For "believe" see Special Topic at 2:40; 3:16; and 6:5.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 27:27-32
 27But when the fourteenth night came, as we were being driven about in the Adriatic Sea, about midnight the sailors began to surmise that they were approaching some land. 28They took soundings and found it to be twenty fathoms; and a little farther on they took another sounding and found it to be fifteen fathoms. 29Fearing that we might run aground somewhere on the rocks, they cast four anchors from the stern and wished for daybreak. 30But as the sailors were trying to escape from the ship and had let down the ship's boat into the sea, on the pretense of intending to lay out anchors from the bow, 31Paul said to the centurion and to the soldiers, "Unless these men remain in the ship, you yourselves cannot be saved." 32Then the soldiers cut away the ropes of the ship's boat and let it fall away.

27:27 "the fourteenth night" This time fits exactly the distance covered in their drifting configuration (i.e., sea anchor). They traveled 476 miles at 36 miles per 24-hour period.

▣ "Adriatic Sea" This refers to the south central Mediterranean (Adria). It does not refer to the Adriatic Sea of our day.

▣ "began to surmise that they were approaching some land" They possibly heard the breakers or saw certain birds or fish.

27:28 "sounding" This is from the verb that means "to heave the lead," which refers to dropping a weighted rope, marked to denote the depth of the water.

"fathom" This was the space between the arms outstretched. It denoted the measurement used by sailors to express the depth of the water.

27:29 It was still dark. They did not know exactly where they were. They wanted to slow down or stop the ship's approach to land until they could see where the ship was heading.

27:30 These sailors were not men of faith. They would do whatever they could to save themselves.

27:31 There were some conditions (third class conditional sentence) connected to Paul's updated vision and God's promise.

"saved" This is the OT sense of physical deliverance (cf. James 5:15). Knowing Paul, these sailors, soldiers, and fellow passengers also heard the gospel, which brings the NT sense of the term spiritual salvation. What a tragedy to be saved from physical death to die an eternal death!

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 27:33-38
 33Until the day was about to dawn, Paul was encouraging them all to take some food, saying, "Today is the fourteenth day that you have been constantly watching and going without eating, having taken nothing. 34Therefore I encourage you to take some food, for this is for your preservation, for not a hair from the head of any of you will perish." 35Having said this, he took bread and gave thanks to God in the presence of all, and he broke it and began to eat. 36All of them were encouraged and they themselves also took food. 37All of us in the ship were two hundred and seventy-six persons. 38When they had eaten enough, they began to lighten the ship by throwing out the wheat into the sea.

27:34 "not a hair from the head of any of you will perish" Paul uses words similar to Jesus' words (cf. Luke 12:7; 21:18). This was a Hebrew idiom of protection (cf. I Sam. 14:45; II Sam. 14:11; I Kgs. 1:52).

27:35 This does not refer to the Lord's Supper, but it does show Paul's faith, even in the midst of crisis. Paul's faith influenced others (cf. v. 36).

27:37 "two hundred and seventy-six" This includes crew and passengers.

1. Manuscript B (fourth century) has "76"

2. MSS א (fourth century) and C (fifth century) have "276"

3. Manuscript A (fifth century) has "275"

4. All modern English translations have 276

UBS4 gives it a "B" rating (almost certain).

27:38 This was a large grain ship from Egypt. They had already thrown overboard all other cargo and rigging (cf. v. 18).

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 27:39-44
 39When day came, they could not recognize the land; but they did observe a bay with a beach, and they resolved to drive the ship onto it if they could. 40And casting off the anchors, they left them in the sea while at the same time they were loosening the ropes of the rudders; and hoisting the foresail to the wind, they were heading for the beach. 41But striking a reef where two seas met, they ran the vessel aground; and the prow stuck fast and remained immovable, but the stern began to be broken up by the force of the waves. 42The soldiers' plan was to kill the prisoners, so that none of them would swim away and escape; 43but the centurion, wanting to bring Paul safely through, kept them from their intention, and commanded that those who could swim should jump overboard first and get to land, 44and the rest should follow, some on planks, and others on various things from the ship. And so it happened that they all were brought safely to land.

27:39 They could still control the ship to some degree (cf. v. 40).

There is a Greek manuscript variant related to "drive the ship onto it" (cf. MSS א, A, B2) and "land the ship safely" (cf. MSS B* and C). These two words sound very similar (exōsai vs. eksōsai). Ancient Greek manuscripts were often read by one and copied by many. Similar sounding terms were often confused.

27:40 These reefs along the shore caused many a ship wreck. In this case a reef developed where the ocean waves and the bay waters met.

NASB, NKJV,
NJV"rudders"
NRSV, TEV"steering-oars"

This refers to the dual rudders, which were typical on larger ships. James 3:4 uses this same word for "rudder."

"the foresail" This is a rare term, but it must refer to a small sail on the bow (cf. Juvenal, Sat. 12.69).

27:42 "The soldiers' plan was to kill the prisoners" If they escaped the soldiers would have had to bear their penalty!

27:43 Paul's words, faith, and actions had convinced the leader of the Roman contingent to trust him and protect him.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. Luke's account of Paul's sailing to Rome has many nautical technical terms. What is the implication of this?

2. Why is v. 20 so theologically significant?

 

Acts 28

PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS

UBS4

NKJV

NRSV

TEV

NJB

Paul on the Island of Malta Paul's Ministry on Malta Paul in Malta In Malta Waiting in Malta
28:1-10 28:1-10 28:1-6 28:1-6 28:1-6
    28:7-10 28:7-10 28:7-10
Paul Arrives at Rome Arrival at Rome The Journey to Rome From Malta to Rome From Malta to Rome
28:11-15 28:11-16 28:11-15 28:11-15 28:11-14
      In Rome 28:15-16
28:16   28:16 28:16  
Paul Preaches in Rome Paul's Ministry at Rome Paul and the Jews of Rome   Paul Makes Contact with the Roman Jews
28:17-22 28:17-31 28:17-22 28:17-20 28:17-20
      28:21-22 28:21-22
        Paul's Declaration to Roman Jews
28:23-29   28:23-29 28:23-27 28:23-27
        (26-27)
      28:28 28:28
    Conclusion 28:29 Epilogue
28:30-31   28:30-31 28:30-31 28:30-31

READING CYCLE THREE (from "A Guide to Good Bible Reading")

FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S INTENT AT THE PARAGRAPH LEVEL

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects. Compare your subject divisions with the five modern translations. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is the key to following the original author's intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every paragraph has one and only one main subject.

1. First paragraph

2. Second paragraph

3. Third paragraph

4. Etc.

 

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 28:1-6
 1When they had been brought safely through, then we found out that the island was called Malta. 2The natives showed us extraordinary kindness; for because of the rain that had set in and because of the cold, they kindled a fire and received us all. 3But when Paul had gathered a bundle of sticks and laid them on the fire, a viper came out because of the heat and fastened itself on his hand. 4When the natives saw the creature hanging from his hand, they began saying to one another, "Undoubtedly this man is a murderer, and though he has been saved from the sea, justice has not allowed him to live." 5However he shook the creature off into the fire and suffered no harm. 6But they were expecting that he was about to swell up or suddenly fall down dead. But after they had waited a long time and had seen nothing unusual happen to him, they changed their minds and began to say that he was a god.

28:1 "they had been brought safely through" This is the term sōzō (cf. 27:31) with dia prefixed. It was used regularly for someone reaching safety (cf. 23:24; 27:44; 28:1,4). Luke even uses it for physical healing in Luke 7:3.

The aorist passive participle shows that Luke attributed the safety as being provided by God (passive voice) according to His word (cf. 27:21-26).

▣ "Malta" The Phoenician sailors also called this island Melita, which was a Canaanite term that meant "refuge." This was originally a Phoenician colony. It is located between Sicily and North Africa. It is only eighteen miles long and eight miles wide, but its location afforded great maritime commercial value. It has several good harbors.

28:2 "natives" This is literally "barbarians." This is not a derogatory title, but simply refers to anyone who did not speak Greek or Latin.

NASB"extraordinary kindness"
NKJV, NRSV,
NJB"unusual kindness"
TEV"were very friendly"

This intensified phrase has the term philanthrōpos, which is literally "lover of men" as in 27:3. The specific care and provision given by the natives was because they saw Paul's miraculous encounter with a serpent on the beach. This, and other miraculous acts (cf. vv. 7-10), opened the door for evangelism! Paul always had a mind toward gospel proclamation (cf. I Cor. 9:19-23).

28:3 "Paul had gathered a bundle of sticks" This really shows Paul's humility. He worked along with all the others. No elitism since the road to Damascus!

▣ "a viper. . .fastened itself on his hand" This term's basic meaning is "to attach." It can mean "a bite" or "coiled around."

28:4 "the creature" This term for "creature" became the medical term for poisonous snakes (cf. 10:12).

▣ "justice has not allowed him to live" "Justice" or "Fate" was the name of one of their gods. They were expressing the irony of the situation, similar to Amos 5:19. Verse 6 shows that the native islanders were superstitious polytheists.

28:6 These islanders had personal experience with the snakes on the island. Their radical change of attitude is similar to the pagan reactions to the miraculous in Acts 14:11-13.

"to swell up" This is one of many medical terms used by Luke (cf. v. 8). It is found only here in the NT.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 28:7-10
 7Now in the neighborhood of that place were lands belonging to the leading man of the island, named Publius, who welcomed us and entertained us courteously three days. 8And it happened that the father of Publius was lying in bed afflicted with recurrent fever and dysentery; and Paul went in to see him and after he had prayed, he laid his hands on him and healed him. 9After this had happened, the rest of the people on the island who had diseases were coming to him and getting cured. 10They also honored us with many marks of respect; and when we were setting sail, they supplied us with all we needed.

28:7 "the leading man" This word means some type of governmental official, literally, "the first" (cf. 13:50; Luke 19:47, "of people"; 16:12, "of a city"). It has been found in two inscriptions on this island, one Greek and one Latin. Rome had allowed this island self-rule and at some point, full Roman citizenship.

28:8 "lying in bed afflicted with recurrent fever and dysentery" Malta was known for its fever which came from microbes in their goats' milk.

▣ "laid his hands on him and healed him" See Special Topis: Laying on of Hands at 6:6.

28:9 Both of these verbs are imperfect, which implies repeated or continuing action in past time (indicative mood). They kept coming. God kept healing them through Paul.

The Greek verb behind the English translation "getting cured" is therapeuō, from which we get the English "therapy." The term can be used for "service" as well as "healing." Only a specific context can determine which one is appropriate.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 28:11-15
 11At the end of three months we set sail on an Alexandrian ship which had wintered at the island, and which had the Twin Brothers for its figurehead. 12After we put in at Syracuse, we stayed there for three days. 13From there we sailed around and arrived at Rhegium, and a day later a south wind sprang up, and on the second day we came to Puteoli. 14There we found some brethren, and were invited to stay with them for seven days; and thus we came to Rome. 15And the brethren, when they heard about us, came from there as far as the Market of Appius and Three Inns to meet us; and when Paul saw them, he thanked God and took courage.

28:11 "an Alexandrian ship" This was probably another large grain ship going to the Bay of Naples from Egypt (cf. 27:6,38).

▣ "ship which had wintered at the island" The Mediterranean Sea was too stormy to navigate during the winter months. The shipping lanes opened back up in late February or March.

▣ "the Twin Brothers for its figurehead" This refers to Zeus' twin sons, Caster and Pollox. They were the patrons of sailors in the Roman pantheon. Poseidon had given them power and control over wind, waves, and storms. Their special constellation was Gemini. Apparently there was a carving of them on the bow, two little elf-like men.

28:12 "Syracuse" This was the principal city of Sicily located on the eastern coast. This port was eighty miles north of Malta.

28:13 "sailed around" The ancient uncial manuscripts א (Siniaticus), and B (Vaticanus) have "weighing anchor," which was a technical sailing term (so characteristic of Luke), but other ancient manuscripts P74, אc, and A have "passing by," like 16:8.

▣ "Rhegium" This is the city at the southwestern tip of Italy.

▣ "Puteoli" This was the grain importing center for Rome in the Bay of Naples. They traveled about 180 miles in two days.

28:14 "There we found some brethren" There were existing Christian congregations in Italy (cf. v. 15) and Rome who embraced Paul.

28:15 "Market of Appius" This was the end of the barge trip from the south of Italy and the beginning of the great Roman highway called the Appian Way. It was forty-three miles to Rome.

▣ "Three Inns" This was a rest stop about thirty-three miles from Rome.

▣ "Paul. . .took courage" Paul apparently had become discouraged again. He seems to have been prone to this. Jesus appeared to him personally several times to encourage him.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 28:16
 16When we entered Rome, Paul was allowed to stay by himself, with the soldier who was guarding him.

28:16 "When we entered Rome" This was not the way Paul expected to come to Rome. But, this was God's way to arrange for Paul to speak to the Roman governmental, military, and religious leaders.

▣ "Paul was allowed to stay by himself with the soldier who was guarding him" Paul was placed under house arrest. The testimony of the officer who brought him was instrumental in this decision.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 28:17-22
 17After three days Paul called together those who were the leading men of the Jews, and when they came together, he began saying to them, "Brethren, though I had done nothing against our people or the customs of our fathers, yet I was delivered as a prisoner from Jerusalem into the hands of the Romans. 18And when they had examined me, they were willing to release me because there was no ground for putting me to death. 19But when the Jews objected, I was forced to appeal to Caesar, not that I had any accusation against my nation. 20For this reason, therefore, I requested to see you and to speak with you, for I am wearing this chain for the sake of the hope of Israel." 21They said to him, "We have neither received letters from Judea concerning you, nor have any of the brethren come here and reported or spoken anything bad about you. 22But we desire to hear from you what your views are; for concerning this sect, it is known to us that it is spoken against everywhere."

28:17 "Paul called together those who were the leading men of the Jews" This was Paul's standard approach (cf. Rom. 1:16; 2:9). He explains his current circumstances and opens the door for a gospel presentation.

28:18-19 Here again Luke's apologetic purpose can be clearly seen! Christianity was not a threat to the Roman government.

28:19 "the Jews objected" This phraseology seems strange spoken to Jewish leaders in Rome. Luke uses Ioudaios (Jews) in two senses.

1. nationality – 2:5,11; 9:22; 10:22,28; 11:19; 13:56; 14:1; 16:1,3,20; 17:1; 17:10,17; 18:2,4,5,19; 19:10,17,34; 20:21; 21:21,39; 22:3,12; 24:5,9; 24:24,27; 25:8,9,24; 20:7; 28:17

2. those who had eyewitness knowledge of the last week of Jesus' life – 2:15; 10:39

He also used it in different evaluations.

1. in a negative sense – 9:23; 12:3,11; 13:45,50; 14:2,4,5,19; 17:5,13; 18:12,14,28; 19:13,14,33; 20:3,19; 21:11,27; 22:30; 23:12,20,27; 24:19; 25:2,7,10,15; 26:2,21; 28:19

2. in a positive sense – 13:43; 14:1; 18:2,24; 21:20

Possibly the best text in Acts which shows the different connotations of this term is 14:1-2.

28:20 "for the sake of the hope of Israel" Paul is addressing these Jewish leaders in such a way as to establish a relationship with his audience. He tries to find a common ground with these Jewish leaders in "the hope of Israel." For Paul, that referred to Jesus, for them, the Promised Coming One, the Messiah or possibly to the resurrection!

28:21 This lack of information about Paul is surprising in light of Paul's ministry on three mission journeys and the events and rumors in Jerusalem.

28:22 It is obvious that the news about Jesus was spreading and that many were responding to the gospel. In Jewish circles this was not good news! However, these Jewish leaders were willing to give Paul a hearing.

▣ "This sect" See Special Topic: Jesus the Nazarene at 2:22.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 28:23-29
 23When they had set a day for Paul, they came to him at his lodging in large numbers; and he was explaining to them by solemnly testifying about the kingdom of God and trying to persuade them concerning Jesus, from both the Law of Moses and from the Prophets, from morning until evening. 24Some were being persuaded by the things spoken, but others would not believe. 25And when they did not agree with one another, they began leaving after Paul had spoken one parting word, "The Holy Spirit rightly spoke through Isaiah the prophet to your fathers, 26saying, ‘Go to this people and say, You will keep on hearing, but will not understand; And you will keep on seeing, but will not perceive; 27For the heart of this people has become dull, And with their ears they scarcely hear, And they have closed their eyes; Otherwise they might see with their eyes, And hear with their ears, And understand with their heart and return, And I would heal them.' 28Therefore let it be known to you that this salvation of God has been sent to the Gentiles; they will also listen." 29[When he had spoken these words, the Jews departed, having a great dispute among themselves.]

28:23 "they came. . .in large numbers. . .from morning until evening" Paul explained the Christian faith to these Jews all day! What a marvelous opportunity.

▣ "the kingdom of God" This was the central theme of Jesus' preaching and teaching (parables). It is a present reality in the lives of believers and a future consummation of God's reign over all the fallen earth (cf. Matt. 6:10). This phrase is obviously not related to Israel only, but it was an integral part of Israel's hope (cf. v. 20). See Special Topic at 1:3.

▣ "the Law of Moses and from the Prophets" This is two of the three divisions of the Hebrew canon (see Special Topic at 13:15 and the note at 24:14) which stood for the entire OT (cf. Matt. 5:17; 7:12; 22:40; Luke 16:16; 24:44; Acts 13:15; 28:23). Paul's methodology (Christological typology and predictive prophecy) was to set the OT texts alongside the life of Jesus.

28:24 This reflects the mystery of the gospel. Why some believe and some do not is the mystery of a sovereign God and human free will.

In one sense Paul's ministry to the Jewish leaders in Rome is a microcosm of Paul's ministry. He first shared with the Jews. He shared Jesus' fulfillment of OT Scriptures. Some believed, but most did not. This too, was predicted in the OT (cf. Isa. 6:9-10).

28:25-27 "The Holy Spirit rightly spoke through Isaiah" This reveals Paul's view of the mystery of Israel's unbelief! The quote in verses 26-27 is from Isa. 6:9-10. Jesus used this verse often of human unbelief (cf. Matt. 13:14-15; Mark 4:12; Luke 8:10; John 12:39-40). By this time Paul had already penned Romans 9-11 (why has Israel rejected her Messiah?). Israel of the OT would not/did not fully believe either. There was a remnant of faith, but a majority of unbelief.

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE REMNANT, THREE SENSES

28:28 "this salvation of God has been sent to the Gentiles" This may be an allusion to Psalm 67, especially v. 2. This universal aspect of Christianity is what caused the riot in Jerusalem and was an ongoing problem for many Jews. This is logical from Gen. 1:26,27; 3:15; 12:3. It was prophesied in Isaiah, Micah, and Jonah. It is clearly stated as God's eternal plan by Paul in Eph. 2:11-3:13! See Special Topic at 1:8.

"they will also listen" This is the truth of Romans 9-11. The Jews rejected the Messiah because He did not fit their expectations and because the gospel opened the door of faith to all people.

The NT issue really is not Jew vs. Gentile, but believer vs. unbeliever. The issue is not who is your mother, but is your heart open to God's Spirit and God's Son?!

28:29 This verse is omitted in the ancient Greek manuscripts P74, א, A, B, and E. It does not appear in any Greek manuscript before P, which dates to the sixth century a.d. UBS4 rates its exclusion as "A" (certain).

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 28:30-31
 30And he stayed two full years in his own rented quarters and was welcoming all who came to him, 31preaching the kingdom of God and teaching concerning the Lord Jesus Christ with all openness, unhindered.

28:30 "two full years" This was possibly

1. the normal period of time required to see the Caesar

2. the time needed to get new papers from Festus

3. the mandatory waiting period for witnesses from Asia or Jerusalem

4. close to the legal statute of limitations

It was during this time that Paul wrote his prison letters (Colossians, Ephesians, Philemon, and Philippians).

▣ "in his own rented quarters" Paul had some source of income.

1. he worked at tent making or leather working

2. he was helped by churches (Thessalonica and Philippi)

3. he had some inherited funds

 

"welcoming" Luke uses this term often with the connotation of "heartily welcome" (cf. 18:27; 28:30 and paradechōmai in 15:4). It is used of the crowd welcoming Jesus in Luke 8:40 and 9:11. It is used of welcoming the gospel as preached by Peter in Acts 2:41.

"all who came" This was the problem. Paul's gospel had a universal reach. It was "good news" for all humans, not just Jews!

28:31 "preaching. . .teaching" The early, post-apostolic church made a distinction between these two ways of presenting truth. The body of sermons recorded in Acts (Peter, Stephen, Paul) is called the Kerygma (proclamation, cf. 20:25; 28:31; Rom. 10:8; Gal. 2:2; I Cor. 9:27; II Tim. 4:2), while the teaching of Jesus interpreted in the Epistles is called the Didache (teaching, cf. 2:42; 5:28; 13:12; Rom. 16:17; I Cor. 14:20).

"the kingdom of God" This was the subject of Jesus' preaching. It refers to the reign of God in man's hearts now that will one day be consummated on earth as it has been in heaven. This passage also shows that the topic is not only for Jews. See Special Topic at 1:3.

"the Lord" "Lord" is the translation of the Hebrew term adon, which meant "owner, husband, master, or lord" (see SPECIAL TOPIC: NAMES FOR DEITY at 1:6). The Jews became afraid of pronouncing the sacred name YHWH lest they take it in vain and break one of the Ten Commandments. Whenever they read the Scriptures, they substituted Adon for YHWH. This is why our English translations use all capitals Lord for YHWH in the OT. By transferring this title (kurios in Greek) to Jesus, the NT authors assert His deity and equality with the Father.

▣ "Jesus" "Jesus" is the name given to the baby in Bethlehem by the angel (cf. Matt. 1:21). It is made up of two Hebrew nouns: "YHWH," the covenant name for deity, and "salvation" (i.e., Hosea). It is the same Hebrew name as Joshua. When used alone it often identifies the man, Jesus of Nazareth, son of Mary (e.g., Matt. 1:16, 25; 2:1; 3:13,15,16).

▣ "Christ" "Christ" is the Greek translation of the Hebrew Messiah (i.e., an Anointed One, see Special Topic at 2:31). It asserts Jesus' OT title as YHWH's promised One sent to set up the new age of righteousness.

NASB"with all openness, unhindered"
NKJV"with all confidence, no one forbidding him"
NRSV"with all boldness and without hindrance"
TEV"speaking with all boldness and freedom"
NJB"with complete fearlessness and without any hindrance from anyone"

This verse shows that the Roman authorities did not consider Christianity subversive or dangerous. The Greek text ends with the adverb "unfettered" or "unhinderedly." This seems to emphasize the ongoing nature of the task of proclamation and the power of the Spirit.

Many have assumed, based on Acts 1:1 use of "first," which implies more than two, that Luke planned to write a third volume. Some even think that this third volume may be the Pastoral Letters (I Timothy, II Timothy and Titus).

For the Greek term (parrhēsia), translated "openness" by NASB, see Special Topic at 4:29.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. Why does Acts end with Paul still in prison? Why does it end so abruptly?

2. Why does Luke take so much time in describing Paul's trip and stay in Rome?

3. Why did Paul always try to witness to the Jews first?

4. Explain the difference between the Kerygma and Didache.

 

Ang Kapanganakan ni Hesu Kristo

Related Media

Panimula

Ang mga sumusunod ay bahagi ng maigsing serye ng mga debosyonal na aralin na may kinalaman sa kapanganakan ni Kristo. Para sa ilan, ang ganyang aralin ay hindi debosyonal dahil ito ay mas may kinalaman sa kasaysayan. Pero dapat nating isipin na si Hesus na ating sinasamba ay tunay na pinanganak sa kasaysayan. At ang sanggol sa sabsaban ay tunay na ipinako sa krus – at tiyak rin na nabuhay na mag-uli. Ang Biblia ay di katulad ng mga banal na aklat ng ibang relihiyon sapagka’t ang Biblia ay mag-anyaya ng pangkasaysayang pagsusuri. At kapag ito ay pumasa sa pagsusuri—na palaging mangyayari at di maiiwasan—ito ay nagdudulot ng paglago ng debosyon sa puso ng mananampalataya doon sa tinatawag nating Anak ng Diyos.

Ang Taon na Pinanganak si Hesus

Dito sa kanlurang bahagi ng mundo, hinati natin ang panahon base sa kapanganakan ni Hesu Kristo. Pero siya ba ay tunay na namuhay dito sa mundong ibabaw? Kung totoo, kailan siya ipinanganak?

Kailan lamang, nakausap ko ang isang taong na nagsasabi na walang Diyos. Siya ay ateista. Pero hindi yung tipikal na ateista na sa naniniwalang walang Diyos. Kanya ring pinagpipilitan na si Hesus Kristo ay hindi nabuhay sa mundong ibabaw! Itong taong ito ay matindi.

Itong kaibigan ko na ateista ay may di mapaniwalaan na pananampalataya—aking masasabi na isang bulag na pananampalataya. Yung kanyang mataimtim na paninindigan ay ipapahiya ang maraming mga ebanghelista. Pero ang ebidensiya na si Hesu Kristo ay pumasok sa kasaysayan ay hindi lamang tiyak sa testimonya ng Bagong Tipan—ito ay di mapag-kakaila! Yung mga kalaban ng Kristianismo ay sinsabi na siya ay nabuhay—at siya ay gumawa ng mga milagro! Mga maagang dokumento ng mg Hudyo na tulad ng Mishnah at kahit si Josephus—pati rin mga mga yung mga mananalaysay na Hentil noong unang siglo—tulad ni Thallus, Serapio at si Tacitus—lahat sila ay nagpapatotoo na ang isang nagngangalang Kristo ay namuhay sa Palestina at namatay sa ilalim ng pamumuno ni Pontio Pilato. Sabi ng iskolar na Briton na si F.F. Bruce, "Ang katotohanan ng kasaysayan ni Kristo ay [tiyak]. . . katulad ng katotohanan ng kasaysayan ni Julius Caesar" (NT Documents, pahina 119).

Ngayon tama na sabihin na kung si Kristo ay nabuhay (kailangan pa ba itong sabihin?), siya rin ay dapat ipinanganak. Ang Mga Mabuting Balita ay nagsasabi na ang kapanganakan niya ay bago namatay si Herodes na Mahalaga. Ang kamatayan ni Herodes ay tiyak nating masasabi kung kalian.

Sinulat ni Josephus yung eklipse ng buwan bago lamang yumao si Herodes. Ito ay nangyari noong ika-12 ng Marso taong 4 B.C. Sinasabi rin ni Josephus na si Herodes ay nalagot ang hininga bago ang Paskuwa. Itong fiesta na ito ay nangyari noong ika-11 ng Abril, sa parehas na taon, 4 B.C. Mula sa mga detalye na binanggit ni Josephus, ating matitiyak na si Herodes na Mahalaga ay pumanaw sa pagitan ng ika-29 ng at ika-4 ng Abril ng taong 4 B.C.

Magmumukhang kataka taka kung imumungkahi na si Hesus ay ipinanganak ng hindi aaga sa taong 4 B.C. sa dahilang ang ibig sabihin ng B.C. 'bago ipanganak si Hesukristo.' Pero ang ating ginagamit na kalendaryo na hinahati ang panahon sa pagitan ng B.C. at A.D. ay hindi na imbento hangagang A.D. 525. Noong panahong iyan, si Papa Juan na Una ay hiniling sa isang monghe na nagngangalang Dionysius na gumawa ng kalandaryong gagamitin ng Simbahan sa kanluran. Sa kasawiang palad, si pobreng Dionysius ay sumablay sa totoong hati at taon ng B.C./A.D ng di bababa sa apat na taon!

Ngayon sinabi ni Mateo sa atin na pinatay ni Herodes ang mga sanggol sa Bethlehem, mga edad dalawang taon at pababa. Ang pinakamaagang kapanganakan ni Hesus, samakatwid ay 6 B.C. Sa pamamagitan ng iba’t ibang indikasyon, ating masasabi ng may sapat na katiyakan na yung tinatawag na Messias ay ipinanganak noong huling bahagi ng 5 B.C. o kaya ay yung maagang bahagi ng 4 B.C.

Ang kaibigan kong ateista ay nangungutya sa ganyang pleksibidad. Sabi niya, "Kung di niyo alam kung kalian ang tumpak na kapanganakan ni Hesus, paaano niyo malalaman na siya ay totoong nabuhay?" Ito ay bahagya na makatarungang tanong! Noong isang araw tinawagan ko ang aking ina para batiin siya ng maligayang kaarawan. "Nanay, ilan po ang mga kandila sa iyong cake?" Ito ay aking itinanong. "Di ko alam, anak –di ko na binibilang ang aking edad," ito ang kanyang sagot. Pagkatapos ng ilang minuto ng malugod na pag-uusap, binaba na namin ang telepono.

Ngayon, siyempre di ko matitiyak, pero naniniwala ako na yung nasa kabilang linya ay yung nanay ko. Di niya matandaan kung ilang taon na siya (at siya ay di pa naman malilimutin at di parin may katandaan), pero di ibig sabihin sa siya ay di totoo ay kathang isp ko lamang, di ba? Kasi kung siya ay di totoo, samakatwid sa huling tatlong minute ay walang kang binabasa!

Ang Araw na Ipinanganak si Hesus

Ngayong darating na ika-25 ng Disyembre, maraming magulang ang di magsasabi ng totoo sa kanilang mga anak tungkol kay Santa Klaus. Ang ilan sa atin ay ipagdiriwang ang kapanganakan ng ating Taga-pagligtas. Pero siya ba ay talagang ipinanganak ng araw na ito?

Talaga bang ipinanganak si Hesus noong ika-25 ng Disyembre? Lahat halos ng buwan sa kalendaryo ay naipanukala ng mga iskolar ng Biblia. Bakit ba natin ipinagdiriwang ang kanyang kapanganakan sa Disyembre?

Ang tradisyon para sa ika-25 ng Disyembre ay napakatanda na. Si Hippolytus, noong iakalawang siglo A.D., ay nagsabi na ito ang kaarawan ni Kristo. Samantala, sa Simbahan na nasa Silangan, ika-6 ng Enero ang sinunod na petsa.

Pero noong ikapapat ng siglo, si Juan Chrysostom ay nagsabi navang ika-25 ng Disyembre ang tamang petsa at simula noong araw na iyon hanggang ngayon, ang simbahan sa Silangan, pati na rin ang Simbahan sa kanluran, ay ipinagdiriwang ang ika-25 ng Disyembre bilang opisyal na petsa ng kapanganakan ni Kristo.

Ngayong modernong panahon, ang tradisyonal na petsa ay pinagduduhan at gusting baguhin. Ang mga moderdong iskolar ay ipinakikita na noong si Hesus ay ipinanganak, ang mga pastol ay nagbabantay ng kanilang mga tupa sa mga gulod ng Bethlehem. Sinabi ni Lukas sa atin na may anghel na " Doon ay may mga pastol na nasa parang at nagbabantay ng kanilang mga tupa nang gabing iyon." (2:8).

May mga iskolar na ang palagay ay ang mga tupa ay nasa loob ng silongan mula Nobyembre hanggang Marso; at madalas, ang mga tupa ay wala sa labas tuwing gabi. Pero walang matibay na ebidensya tungkol dito. Sa katunayan, mga sina-unang mga dokumento ng mga Hudyo na nagpapahiwatig na ang nga tupa na nasa paligid ng Bethlehem ay nasa labas buong taon. Kaya iyong makikita na ang ika-25 ng Disyembre ay tumutugma sa parehas na tradisyon at yung nasusulat sa Biblia. Walang matibay na dahilan para tutulan ito.

Ngayon, di natin maikakaila na ang pagkakaraoon ng mga tupa na na nasa labas sa paligid ng Bethlehem ay hindi ginagawa sa ibang lugar. Pero itong mga tupa ng ito ay di mga ordinaryong tupa lamang. Sila ay mga korderong iaalay. Sa unang bahagi ng tag-sibol itong mga korderong ito ay papatayin sa panahaon ng Paskuwa.

At inihayag ng Diyos ang kapanganakan ng Messias sa mga pastol- -mga pastol na binabantayan ang mga korderong di makasasakit ng iba, mga tupang mamamatay sa di pagkalayuan para sa mga kasalanan ng makasalanang tao. Noong nakita nila yung sanggol, naunawaan kaya nila kung sino talaga ito? Nasabi kaya nila sa puso nila kung ano ang binanggit ni Juan Baustista na inihayag ng malakas, "Narito ang Kordero ng Diyos na nagaalis ng kasalanan!"

Ngayon, siyempre, di natin matitiyak ng tumpak kung kailan talaga ang araw ng kapanganakan ni Kristo. Hindi ngayon habang nasa lupa pa tayo. Pero ang maagang bahagi ng tag-lamig ay tila makatwiran na panukala tulad ng iba. At ang ika-25 ng Disyembre ang nangunguna sa may labing walong siglo. Kung walang matibay na ebidensya, walang mabuting dahilan na para baguhin ang petsa ngayon.

Pwede nating sisihin yung mga mananampalataya noon sa pagkawalan ng katiyakan kung kalian yung kapanganakan. Kasi di nila ipinagdiwang yung kapanganakan ni Kristo kahit minsan. Para sa kanila, hindi ito importante. Mas pinagtutuunan nila ng pansin yung kanyang kamatayan . . . at yung muling pagkabuhay.

Pero iyan ay nabaligtan sa ating kapanahunan. Ang isang sanggol na nakahiga sa sabsaban ay di katatakuran at walang banta. Pero ang isang namatay sa krus--ang taong nagsabi na siya ay Diyos—ang taong iyan ay isang banta! Siya ay humuhingi ng ating katapatan! Hindi natin siya pwedeng isantabi. Dapat siya ay ating tanggapin o tanggihan. Di niya tayo binigyan ng iba pang pagpipilian.

Ngayong kapaskuhan, tingnan nyong mabuti ang sabsaban. Huwag ninyong isispin na maganda ang tanawin—amuyin nyo ang mabahong hangin, pagmasdan nyo ang malamig at giniginaw na mga hayop. Sila ang kumakatawan sa mga pag-aalay sa Lumang Tipan. Sila ang sagisag ng kamatayan. Pero sila are anino lamang ng Sanggol sa kanilang kapaligiran. Siya ay ipinanganak para mamatay . . . para ang lahat ng maniniwala ay magkaroon ng buhay.

Ang Pagbisita ng mga Pantas

Noong ipinanganak si Hesu Kristo, mga lalaki—noon ay kilala bilang mga pantas—ay dumating na galing silangan para siya ay sambahin. Sila ba ay mga matatalinong mga tao o mga taong may kinalaman sa astrolohiya?

Inumpisahan ni Mateo ang pangalawang kabanata ng kanyang aklat ng mga salitang ito: "Panahon ng paghahari ni Herodes sa Judea nang ipanganak si Jesus sa Bethlehem. Nang siya'y isilang, may mga matatalinong taong mula pa sa silangan ang dumating sa Herusalem. Nagtanung-tanong sila, "Nasaan ang ipinanganak na hari ng mga Judio? Nakita namin sa silangan ang kanyang bituin, kaya't naparito kami upang siya'y sambahin."’’

Sino itong matatalinong tao na mula sa silangan? Walang sinabi sa Mateo na tungkol sa kanila—hindi niya binanggit ang mga pangalan nila, at kung ilan sila—kahit kung saang bansa sila nanggaling ay hindi nabanggit. Kung kataka taka ang kanilang pagdating, ganoon din sa kanilang paglisan. . . 

Kahit di sinabi sa atin ni Mateo ang maraming bagay tungkol sa kanila, may mga Kristiano sa mga nagdaang panahon ang nagdagdag ng impormasyon na wala sa Biblia at tiniyak nila ang katotohanan ng mga ito. Pagdating noong ikaanim na siglo, itong mga estranghero ay binigyan ng mga korona at mga pangalan: si Gaspar, si Melchior, at si Balthazar, ito raw ang mga pangalan nitong mga haring ito. Pero ito ay walang kinalaman sa kwento na nasa Biblia: di natin alam ang mga pangalan nila—at hindi rin alam kung ilan sila. Pwede na may 3 o kaya 300! Pero isa ang ating tiyak na alam: di sila dugong bughaw. Ang mga matatalinong pantas na ito ay mga taga payo ng mga hari sa silangan tungkol sa mga bagay na may kinalaman sa relihiyon at sa pulitika—pero ni walang patak man ng dugong bughaw sa kanila.

Pero di ba totoo na ang mga pantas na ito ay may kinalaman sa astrolohiya? At hindi ba may utos ang Diyos tungkol sa mga taong may kinalaman sa astrololohiya sa Lumang Tipan? 'Hindi lagi ' at 'oo’ ang mga sagot. Sa Deuteronomio 17, iniutos ng Diyos sa kanyang mga tao na patayin lahat ng may kinalaman sa astrolohiya sa pamamagitan ng pamamato. Si Jean Dixon ay walang pagasa sa ganyang teokrasya! Ang katunayan na siya—at yung iba na katulad niya—ay maluwag na pinahihintulutan—at lubos na ginagalang—dito sa makabagong Amerika ay pinatutunayan sa atin na ang Estados Unidos ay isang bansa na lumipas na ang Kristianismo bilang mainpluwensya na grupo sa lipunan . . . 

Pero sino ba talaga itong mga pantas na ito? Sila ba ay may kinalaman sa astrolohiya? Hindi ba sinundan nila ang isang bituin papunta sa Bethlehem.

Pwede nating sagutin ito sa tatlong paraan: Una, hindi lahat ng pantas ay may kinalaman sa astrolohiya, sapagkat si Daniel na propeta ay puno ng mga pantas sa kaharian ni Nebuchadnezzar. Sa pamamagitan ng kanyang inpluwensya, walang duda na marami sa mga pantas ang nagpatuloy ng kanilang tungkulin na may kinalaman sa relihiyon at politika bilang mga taga samba ng iisang tunay na Diyos.

Pangalawa, may mga iskolar ng Biblia na naniniwala na nakinita ni Isaias na may bituin na makikita pag-ipinanganak ang Messias. Kung tama ang interpretasyon na ito, samakatwid yung mga pantas na sumamba sa bagong silang na sanggol ay malinaw na sumusunod sa mga yapak ni Daniel, sapagkat sila ay tiyak na naturuan mula sa aklat ng Isaias.

Pangatlo, kahit na may kaunting naniniwala na yung 'bituin' na kanilang nakita ay nangyaring natural lamang--yung pagkakalinya ng Saturn at Jupiter—hindi nito kayang ipaliwanag kung bakit tumigil yung bituin sa ibabaw ng Bethlehem. Malinaw na ang 'bituin' ay ganap na supernatural na pangyayari. Kung totoo ito, malamang ay walang kinalaman dito ang astrolohiya.

Samakatwid, ang mga pantas ay di sumasangayon sa ganyang pamahiin na kamalian. Kaya nga, sila ay tunay na matatalinong tao. . . 

May nakita ako na stiker sa sasakya na ang nakasulat ay "Mga matatalinong tao ay hinahangad pa rin siya." Sa totoo lang, di iyan tama. Sabi sa Biblia "walang naghahanap sa Diyos, kahit isa." Kaya kung tayo ay kanyang inakay sa sarili niya, kaya tayo naging matalino. Dahil totoo na "mga matatalinong tao ay sinasamba siya."

Ang mga Batang Lalaki mula sa Bethlehem

Isa sa mga pinakasuklamsuklam na kalupitan sa kasaysayan ng tao ay ang pagpatay sa mga sanggol at bata sa Bethlehem sa autos ni Herodes na Mahalaga. Pero ito ba ay talagang nangyari?

Sa ikalawang kabanata ng Mateo, mababasa natin na noong narinig ni Herodes ang tungkol sa kapanganakan ng Messias, "siya'y naligalig, gayundin ang buong Jerusalem." Pagkatapos noong hindi bumalik sa kanya yung mga matatalinong tao, siya ay naging galit na galit at inutos na lahat ng sanggol na lalaki hanggang edad na dalawang taon sa Bethlehem at paligid nito ay patayin!

Tatlong tanong ang pumasok sa isipan habang ating pinag-iisipan ang malupit na pangyayari ito: Una, ilang sanggol at bata ang pinatay ni Herodes? Pangalawa, ilang taon na si Hesus noong mangyari ito? At ang huli, bakit walang ibang mananalaysay noong mga panahon na iyon ang sumulat ng ganitong kalaspatanganan? Sa madaling salita, ito ba ay talagang nangyari?

Ilang sanggol at bata ang pinatay ni Herodes? Ilang iskolar ang nagmungkahi na aabot ito ng 200! Pero marami ang tumututol sa bilang na ito. Ang Bethlehem ay maliit lang na bayan—halos paligid lungsod lang ng Jerusalem. Ang nayon na ito—at ang paligid nito—ay di hihigit ang mga sanggol at batang lalaki sa 30 na may edad dalawa pababa. Maraming iskolar ngayon ang nagbibigay ng bilang sa pagitan ng 20 at 30.

Pero yan ay kung mga lalaki lang ang piñatay. Pero yung nasa teksto sa Griego sa Mateo 2:16 ay pwede ang ibig sabihin ay ‘mga sanggol’ at hindi lang mga ‘sanggol na lalaki.’ At pwede ring nangyari na yung mga inutusan ni Herodes ay hindi na tiningnan kung ang kanilang mga biktima ay babae or lalaki. Ang dami ng pinatay ay pwedeng umabot sa 50 o 60.

Pangalawa, ilang taon na si Hesus noong mangyari ito? Ayon sa pinakamahusay na sunod na sunod na ebidensya, siya ay maaring hindi hihigit sa tatlo o apat na buwang gulang. Siya ay malamang na ipinanganak noong tag-lamig ng 5 o kaya 4 B.C.—namatay si Herodes noong maagang bahagi ng tag-sibol noong 4 B.C. Kaya bakit pinatay ni Herodes yung mga batang pababa ng dalawang taong gulang? Ang sagot sa ikatlong tanong ay makakatulong sagutin ito. . . 

Pangatlo, bakit walang natala sa labas ng Biblia ukol ditto? Ang particular ay bakit si Josephus, ang mananalaysay noong unang siglo ay hindi man lamang binangit ito?

Maraming binangit si Josephus tungkol kay Herodes. Ang pinakatamang paglalarawan sa kanyang pamumuno ay ‘mahilig pumatay.' Pinatay niya ang ama ng kanyang paboritong asawa, nilunod niya ang kapatid nito - - at pati rin yung paboritong asawa ay pinatay niya! Pinatay niya rin yung kanyang pinakapagkakatiwalaan na kaibigan, ang kanyang manggugupit, at 300 na mga pinuno sa hukbo niya- - lahat sa isang araw lamang! Pagkatapos pinatay niya rin yung kanyang tatlong anak na lalaki, sa paghihinala ng kanilang pagtataksil. Sinabi ni Josephus sa atin na "si Herodes ay gumawa ng matinding kalupitan sa mga Hudyo na kahit kung mga mababangis na hayop ang namumuno sa kanila ay di kayang gawin" (Antiquities of the Jews 17:310). Ang pagpatay sa mga sanggol ay hindi sumasalungat sa katauhan ng malupit na haring ito. At ang pagpatay sa mga sanggol at bata na may mga edad na dalawa pababa—upang matiyak na napatay niya si Hesus ay tumutugma sa kanyang pagiging baliw na pagkagahaman sa kapangyarihan.

Si Josephus ay maaaring hindi isinama sa kanyang salaysay ang pagpatay sa mga sanggol at bata sa isa sa dalawang dahilan: una, hindi siya kaibigan ng Kristianismo at kanyang sinadyang hindi ito isama; o kaya sa pangalawang dahilan, bago mamatay si Herodes ipinakulong niya ang may 3000 na mga pangunahing mamayan ng bansa at nagbigay siya ng utos na sila ay patayin sa oras ng kanyang pagkamatay. Gusto niyang masigurado na may matinding dalamhati sa kanyang pagpanaw. . . ang buong Israel ay nakatuon ang pansin dito na ang lihim na pagpatay sa kaunting sanggol at bata ay hindi napansin. . . 

Akala ni Herodes na nakamit niya ang tagumpay laban sa hari ng mga Hudyo. Pero ito ay munting anino ng tagumpay na akala ni Satanas noong si Hesus ay namatay sa krus ng Roma. Pero yung walang laman na libingan ang nagpapatotoo na yung madilim na Biyernes na yon ang pinakamatinding pagkatalo ni Satanas!

Ang Katapusan

Ating pinag-aaralan ang ilang aspeto ng kapanganakan ni Hesu Kristo dito sa maikling pag-aaral. Ngayon, ating itong pagsasamahin sa ating pagwawakas.

Noong tag-lamig na taong 5 o 4 B.C., sinalakay ng Diyos ang kasaysayan sa pamamagitan ng pagkakatawang tao. Siya ay ipinanganak sa isang maliit na bayan na nasa timog ng Herusalem. Bethlehem, na ang ibig sabihin ay 'ang bahay ng tinapay,' ay tunay nga na naging karapatdapat ng kanyang pangalan ng isang tahimik na gabi ng panahon ng tag-lamig. Sapagkat doon sa bayan na yon pinanganak ang Tinapay ng Buhay . . . 

Ang kanyang ina ay inihiga ang sanggol na hari sa sabsaban—yung lagayan ng kainan –dahil yung silid na kanilang pagpapalipasan ay may naninirahan. Ang kapanganakan ng hari ay ipinagdiwang noong gabi na yon ng kanyang ina, ang asawa, at kaunting mga pastol. Ang mga pastol na nasa parang sa palid ng Bethlehem na nagmamasid sa mga korderong mamamatay sa darating na Paskuwa. May anghel na nagpakita sa kanila at ibinalita ang kapanganakan: "Isinilang ngayon sa bayan ni David ang inyong Tagapagligtas, ang Kristong Panginoon," (Lukas 2:11). Sa kanilang simpleng pananampalataya, sila ay nagmadali na lumisan para makita ang kanilang bagong panganak na hari.

Pagkatapos ng kapanganakan ng Messias, agad na dumating ang mga pantas sa Herusalem at itinanong kay haring Herodes kung saan ipapanganak ang tunay na hari ng mga Hudyo. Ang mga nag-aaral ng teolohiya sa kaharian ni Herodes na dalubhasa sa Banal na Kasulatan--sa 'Bethlehem' ang sagot nila. Ang kataka-taka ay, kahit dalubhasa sila sa Banal na Kasulatan, hindi sila naniniwala dito! Hindi man lamang sila nagbiyahe ng may layong lima o anim na milya sa Bethlehem para makita ang kanilang Messias.

Pero si Herodes ay naniwala sa Banal na Kasulatan! Yan ang dahilan kaya siya nagsugo ng mga tauhan niya sa Bethlehem upang katayin ang mga inosenteng bata sa pagasa na mapatay niya yung kalaban niya sa trono. Pero siya ay nahuli. Dumating at nakaalis na ang mga pantas at si Hesus ay ligtas na na nasa Ehipto.

Ang mga pantas ay naniwala sa Banal na Kasulatan. Nagbiyahe sila ng ilang daang milya upang sambahim ang Sanggol. Sila ay inakay sa Bethlehem ng isang hindi pangkaraniwang pangyayari—at sa pamamagitan ng Banal na Kasulatan. Mukhang ang kanilang mga ninuno ay tinuruan ni Daniel na propeta ukol sa pagdataing ng Messias. . . Noong nakita nila ang bata, sila ay nagpatirapa at sinamba siya. Ito ay ang Diyos na nagkatawang tao. Wala silang ibang magagawa kundi ang sumamba.

At siya ay binigyan nila ng mga handog--ginto, insenso at mira. Ito ay hindi pangkaraniwang alay—sa kahit anong pamantayan. Ang ginto, ay siyempre ating mauunawaan—pero yung insenso at mira ay di karaniwan. Marahil nabasa nila ang propesiya ni Isaias na ang "vAng mga bansa ay lalapit sa iyong liwanag, [at] ang mga hari ay pupunta sa ningning ng iyong pagsikat . . . darating silang may dalang mga ginto at insenso, at naghahayag ng pagpupuri kay Yahweh. . . " (Isa. 60:3, 6). Ipinaliwanag dito ang ukol sa insenso, pero hindi ang mira.

Ang mira tulad ng insenso ay isang pabango. Pero di tulad ng insenso, ang mira ay may amoy ng kamatayan. Noong panahong iyon, ito ay ginagamit sa pageembalsamo ng patay. Si Hesus mismo ay inembalsa ng ganitong pabango (tingan ang Juan 19:39).

Kung ang mga pantas ay iniisip ang kamatayan ni Hesus noong dinala ang mira, walang duda na nalaman nila ito sa propesiya ni Daniel (9:24-27). Sa ikasiyam na kabanata ng Daniel ating mababasa na ang 'papatayin ang hinirang ng Diyos' at ' pagbayaran ang kasalanan' at sa laon ay 'maghahari na ang walang hanggang katarungan' (9:26, 24).

Kahit sa kapanganakan ng ating Taga-pagligtas, ang anino ng krus ay nakinikita na sa kanyang mukha. . . 

Ang mga nag-aaral ng teolohiya sa kaharian ni Herodes ay di pinaniwalaan ang Banal na Kasulatan. Sila ay mga baliw. Si Herodes ay naniwala, pero sumuway. Siya ay sira ulo. Ang mga pangkaraniwang pastol at ang mga marangal na pantas ay mga naniwala na iyong sanggol ay Taga-pagligtas—at itinuring silang matuwid. Nawa sila ang ating sundin.

Related Topics: Christology, Incarnation

Il Conforto Di Dio Nella Sofferenza E La Nostra Responsabilità ( 2 Cor 1:1-11)

Related Media

I. Schema

A. Indirizzo (1:1-2)

1. Mandanti (1:1a)

2. Destinatari (1:1b)

3. Il Saluto (1:2)

B. Conforto di Dio in mezzo alle Prove (1:3-11)

1. Il Motivo per cui Dio conforta Paolo e i suoi Compagni (1:3-7)

2. Afflizioni in Asia (1:8-11)

II. Il Conforto di Dio nella Sofferenza e la nostra Responsabilità

A. Indirizzo (1:1-2)

1. I Mandanti (1:1a)

Paolo è lo scrittore della Lettera e Timoteo lo serve con l’opera dell’Evangelo a Corinto. Paolo si descrive come un Apostolo,cioè come colui al quale il Signore ha dato l’Autorità di predicare la Parola e chiamare tutti gli Uomini all’Obbedienza dell’Evangelo (1 Cor 9:1-3; Rom 1:5). Paolo ha parlato con autorità nel nome del Signore. Dopotutto, Lui è stato un Apostolo per volere di Dio (Gal 1:1).

2. I Destinatari (1:1b)

Sebbene la prima Lettera ai Corinzi riveli le enormi difficoltà nella Chiesa, incluse la divisione e la discordia (1-4), un tipo di immoralità sessuale che non si trovava neanche tra i Pagani (5), processi l’uno contro l’altro (6), comprensione errata riguardo il matrimonio e il divorzio (7), l’uso corretto della Libertà e il fatto di scandalizzare gli altri (8-10), dispute riguardo il coprirsi il capo, ubriachezza ed eccessivo egoismo alla Cena del Signore (11), smoderatezza dei doni spirituali con una dannosa concentrazione del miracoloso (in particolare il parlare in lingue) come segno di una grande spiritualità (12-14) ed una visione sbagliata riguardo la resurrezione (15), nonostante tutto questo – senza menzionare i problemi che loro stessi causarono agli apostoli – Paolo si riferisce a loro come la Chiesa di Dio in Corinto. Leggendo la prima e la seconda lettera ai Corinzi bisogna notare la presenza del termine Fratelli per comprendere che Paolo li considerava Cristiani (sebbene forse non tutti singolarmente) anche se era afflitto profondamente per la loro immaturità e la mancanza di Amore (cfr. 1 Cor 3:1-17; 6:11, ecc.).

3. Il Saluto (1:2)

Paolo si rivolge alla Chiesa col saluto tradizionale. La Grazia si riferisce alla benignità di Dio immeritata verso peccatori indegni, una grazia che porta alla Pace nei loro cuori ( cioè la Pace di Dio che Egli stesso contiene), nel loro rapporto con Dio ed anche nel loro rapporto con gli altri. Qualsiasi insegnamento di Paolo è sempre Cristocentrico perché solo in Cristo il piano di Dio è realizzato nelle Vite dei santi. Per Paolo, tutto proviene dalla sua comprensione dell’Evangelo (1 Tim 1:11).

B. Conforto di Dio in mezzo alle Prove in Asia (1:3-11)

Dopo che Paolo nella lettera ha fatto un introduzione formale e ha dato il suo saluto tradizionale inizia a trattare la natura del suo ministerio apostolico tra i Corinzi fin da quando è stato preso di mira da alcuni oppositori (cfr 2 Cor 11:23). In questo paragrafo spiega il cambiamento della rotta del viaggio che è stato un punto dolente per la Chiesa. Il fatto che Lui non apra il discorso con un ringraziamento per la Chiesa (cfr Fl 1:3-8; Col 1:3-8) né con una preghiera (Fl 1:9-11; Col 1:9-14) rivela che il problema della sua prova in Asia è ancora fresca nella sua mente e che la prova, così come il suo viaggio, doveva essere discusso immediatamente. In questo paragrafo si parla soltanto della prova in Asia. Comunque, il contesto deve essere riguardato in modo che chi legge possa comprendere che il passo 1:3-11 si svolge in un campo semantico più vasto, vale a dire 1:3 e 7:6 così allora, dopo che Paolo parla del conforto che Dio gli ha dato nella provincia dell’Asia (1:3-11) affronta il problema del fratello che pecca nel passo 2:5-11. Infine il passo 2:14 e 7:6 è dedicato alla natura del ministerio apostolico. Presi insieme, i passi 1:3 e 7:6 servono a ravvivare nelle loro menti il suo impegno per loro per fargli comprendere la natura e i problemi del ministerio spirituale.

1. Il Motivo per cui Dio conforta Paolo e i suoi Compagni (1:3-7)

v. 3 Paolo inizia questo paragrafo attribuendo benedizione a Dio. Sebbene questo saluto di apertura sia il modo tradizionale con cui gli ebrei si avvicinavano a Dio, tuttavia esso esprimeva profonda devozione e riverenza. Qui, così come in Efesini 1:3 (cfr. anche 1 P 1:3) Dio è identificato in modo specifico come Dio e Padre del nostro Signore Gesù Cristo. Come abbiamo accennato nell’Introduzione, per Paolo tutto è Cristocentrico e ,di conseguenza, il modo in cui si conosce e si realizza Dio è attraverso Suo Figlio, Gesù Cristo.Dunque è il “figlio” che è il nostro Signore (Kyrios). L’utilizzo della parola Signore - riferendosi a Gesù - è ripreso dalla traduzione della Bibbia dal Greco YHWH come Signore (Kyrios) e conferma la posizione elevata di Gesù. Utilizzando la parola Nostro, Paolo dimostra la sua solidarietà con la Chiesa sotto la signoria di Cristo.

Dio deve essere lodato per molti motivi, per tutto ciò che Lui è e per ciò che fa, per la sua immensa grandezza del suo essere (Sl 145:3), per il suo Amore (Sl 86:15), la sua Fedeltà (La 3:22-23), la sua Forza (Is 41:10) e per la sua imperscrutabilità ( Ro 11:36). Qui Paolo, considerando il fatto di essere stato liberato da circostanze mortali in Asia minore riflette e ringrazia Dio per il suo infinito Amore. Infatti Paolo chiama Dio il Padre delle misericordie (da notare il plurale “misericordie”) e il Dio di ogni consolazione (Mi 7:19; Is 40:1; 66:13 ). La Misericordia di Dio è la sua compassione per noi nella nostra condizione impotente (sebbene non necessariamente innocente) e ciò lo si dimostra nel suo Conforto che lui ci dimostra. Paolo aveva sperimentato quella profonda compassione di un Padre che da alla parola amore un significato completamente nuovo e che ama un figlio nel bisogno estendendo il suo amore verso il figlio nel mezzo delle sue battaglie (cfr. Ro 5:1-5: L’amore di Dio è stato sparso nei notri Cuori ..”). Senza nessun dubbio ha confortato l’apostolo attraverso lo Spirito Santo e li ha infine liberati dal pericolo mortale (v. 11).

v. 4 Dio non seleziona chi deve confortare e, oltretutto, non ci sarà mai un momento in cui ci meriteremo la sua presenza speciale nell’Amore. Dobbiamo ricordare che è secondo le sue misericordie – le quali sono tante – e che in tutte le nostre afflizioni, dunque in qualsiasi afflizione potremmo ritrovarci. Forse hai peccato e ne stai patendo le conseguenze di ciò, ma Dio non di meno si avvicina a te per confortarti se glielo permetti.

Dio ci conforta in tutte le nostre afflizioni. Un Motivo per cui lui fa questo è affinché noi possiamo confortare coloro che sono nelle afflizioni col conforto del quale siamo stati confortati da Dio. Di certo è così affinché noi stessi sperimentiamo il suo amore e il suo aiuto,ma anche perché Lui vuole che noi diventiamo canali di questo tipo di Amore e non dei recipienti che trattengono tutto per sé. Una volta che abbiamo realizzato la compassione e il conforto di Dio nel mezzo di una prova,siamo meglio equipaggiati per ministrare lo stesso conforto verso gli altri. Noi sappiamo cosa c’è di bisogno, per la grazia di Dio,per aiutare gli altri che stanno soffrendo: questo è il punto centrale dell’evangelo.

V. 5 Paolo spiega il motivo per cui il verso 4 è vero, e cioè che come abbondano le sofferenze di Cristo in noi, così, per mezzo di Cristo, abbonda anche la nostra consolazione. Le Sofferenze di Cristo non si riferiscono a nessuna delle sofferenze che il Messia ha sopportato in quel cammino per assicurare la nostra redenzione. Esse piuttosto, si riferiscono alle sofferenze che Paolo ha subìto nel contesto del suo ministerio apostolico, cioè soffrire per Cristo in cui in effetti ogni Cristiano si ritrova come risultato del vivere nell’ “adesso.. ma non ancora..”. C’è un elemento escatologico nelle sofferenze in quanto sono prestabilite da Dio per completare la piena misura delle sofferenze di Cristo (Col 1:24). Sono le sofferenze di Cristo che vengono come risultato della sua vita in noi. Per certo, poiché vive in noi nel termine attuale del Regno, lui li sopporta insieme a noi fino a quando sono complete.

Così come le sofferenze abbondano, così anche il nostro conforto per mezzo di Gesù Cristo abbonda. Paolo dice che più si soffre, più si realizza il conforto per mezzo di Cristo. La particolare enfasi qui è sull’esperienza del conforto in mezzo alle sofferenze, non il fatto di essere confortati togliendo la sofferenza. Sebbene Paolo fu liberato da un tale pericolo mortale (1:8-11) tuttavia fu confortato in mezzo alla prova.

1:6 Paolo riprende il pensiero generale del verso 4 e lo applica nel rapporto suo con i Corinzi. Nel verso 4 dice che Dio conforta coloro che sono nelle prove affinché essi possano confortare gli altri che vivono delle prove. Paolo chiarisce questa verità al verso 6 quando dice “Ora se siamo afflitti, ciò è per la vostra consolazione e salvezza; se siamo consolati, ciò è per la vostra consolazione e salvezza, che operano efficacemente nel sostenere le medesime sofferenze che patiamo anche noi ” .

Due punti che devono essere notati al verso 6. Primo, le afflizioni di Paolo nel corso del suo ministerio nel predicare l’evangelo per Cristo risultano in salvezza di coloro che ascoltano il messaggio. Questo,ovviamente, ha incluso i Corinzi. Perciò è come se i Corinzi devono la loro salvezza – che gli ha portato conforto e realizzazione della presenza di Dio – alle sofferenze di Paolo. Secondo, il fatto che Paolo sia confortato nelle sue prove dimostra ai Corinzi che anche loro possono essere confortati da Dio. L’accenno di questo fatto, sebbene non siamo a conoscenza delle specifiche afflizioni dei Corinzi, risveglia in loro il fatto poter avere conforto da Dio. Il risultato finale è che tutto ciò che Dio ha fatto attraverso Paolo è stato sia per il proprio beneficio di Paolo che per il beneficio dei Corinzi.

1:7 Poiché le sofferenze a cui si riferisce Paolo sono uniche nel Cristiano – sofferenze che il cristiano subisce in conseguenza al fatto di essere un cristiano in un mondo decaduto – e nei Corinzi i quali condividono le sofferenze, Paolo è fiducioso che la Chiesa condividerà anche un simile conforto: Paolo è estremamente sicuro che Dio li conforterà. Ciò significa che anche loro saranno in grado di confortarsi l’un l’altro nelle prove che sopportano.

2. Difficoltà in Asia (1:8-11)

1:8 Utilizzando il tradizionale modo di scrivere nelle lettere di Paolo, l’apostolo dice “Perché non vogliamo, fratelli, che ignoriate..”. Paolo vuole che essi vengano a conoscenza dell’ afflizione che ci capitò .. in Asia,che lui e gli altri sono stati eccessivamente gravati, al di là delle loro forze, tanto da disperare della vita stessa. Il termine Perché (gar) unisce questo paragrafo, cioè i versi 8-11, con i versi 3-7 nel modo seguente: poiché loro riescono a condividere le sue sofferenze e il suo conforto, Paolo gli racconta della sua grande battaglia in Asia. Gli studiosi non sono sicuri di cosa sia esattamente accaduto nella provincia dell’Asia, ma molti hanno l’impressione che ciò si riferisca in qualche modo ai Giudei che si opposero a Paolo e che gli causarono dolore (cfr. 2 Cor 11:23). Sebbene non possiamo conoscere con sicurezza quale fu la difficoltà, tuttavia portò Paolo, per così dire, a inginocchiarsi: lui aveva un peso che andava oltre la sua capacità di sopportazione, oltre la sua forza che arrivava al punto di disperare della sua vita stessa.

Un’annotazione sulle afflizioni di Paolo in Asia

Ci sono stati molti suggerimenti riguardo a cosa potesse essere accaduto precisamente a Paolo riferendosi ai versi 1:8-11: (1) Sulla base di 2 Cor 11:25 si è pensato che quell’ “affondare” potesse essere un afflizione. Ciò è improbabile in quanto il termine affondare non lo si pensa come ad un’afflizione e oltretutto ciò è improbabile nella provincia dell’Asia; (2) Altri credono che Paolo stesse parlando del combattimento contro le belve selvagge ad Efeso (1 Cor 15:32); (3) Altri credano che si riferisca al tumulto ad Efeso istigato dall’orafo Demetrio con l’aiuto di altri (Atti 19:23-41); (4) Alcuni studiosi suggeriscono che Paolo si stia riferendo a qualche sorta di malattia mortale. Questa opzione sembra adattarsi bene quando si legge “ricevere la sentenza di morte in loro” (2 Cor 1:9); (5) Un’altra opzione è che la sua difficoltà in Asia si riferisca ai Giudei che gli hanno causato molto dolore. In Atti 20:19 Paolo stesso parla delle “prove che gli sono avvenute per le insidie dei Giudei” e quando Paolo è stato a Gerusalemme, sono stati i giudei di Gerusalemme che aizzarono la folla a mettere le mani addosso all’apostolo (Atti 21:27; cfr. anche Atti 19:23-41 e il ruolo di Alessandro in 2 Tim 4:14). Il complotto dei Giudei finalizzate a far del male a Paolo riflettono bene l’opposizione giudaica descritta nel libro (cfr. 2 Cor 11:23).1 In ultima analisi,dunque, non possiamo essere certi di che genere di prova Paolo abbia sopportato, ma possiamo dire che è stato qualcosa di estremamente doloroso e forse potenzialmente fatale.

1:9 Paolo dice di aver capito che ci fosse stata una sentenza e come verdetto ci fosse stata la morte o quantomeno questo è quello che gli è passato per la mente. Paolo aveva sicuramente creduto che non ci sarebbe stata nessuna via d’uscita e che la morte sarebbe stata inevitabile. Dopo che l’intera vicenda si concluse,però, Paolo disse che Dio lo aveva permesso “affinché (sia lui che altri) non confidassimo in noi stessi ma in Dio che fa risorgerei morti”. Paolo era arrivato al punto di vedere l’intera sua Vita nelle mani sovrane di Dio e nei suoi buoni propositi. Sapeva che Dio aveva permesso che accadesse tutta quella sofferenza per diversi motivi,facendo diventare la dipendenza dell’Apostolo da Dio il punto centrale più importante.Come Cristiani- e in virtù del fatto di diventare un cristiano - abbiamo imparato ad appoggiarci su Cristo e non su noi stessi. Questo l’abbiamo imparato nella conversione. Tale lezione però non finisce mai e in qualche modo si accelera di molto quando soffriamo: più la sofferenza è profonda,più ci disperiamo e più ci disperiamo, più avvertiamo il senso di morte e più profondo il senso della morte ,più il nostro grido va a Colui che può salvarci dalla morte. Cosa produce tutto ciò? Una capacità donata da Dio nel confortare in modo più profondo gli altri che stanno soffrendo.

1:10-11 Paolo è convinto che Dio abbia liberato lui e quelli che erano con lui da un pericolo di morte così grande e che continuerà a fare così anche in futuro,però vuole che i Corinzi sappiano che quella liberazione avviene quando il popolo di Dio prega e ne fa richiesta in situazioni del generi. La Preghiera è più di una semplice liberazione. Essa serve per l’intera opera di proclamazione del Vangelo e di tutto ciò che comporta tale opera. Il Risultato finale di tale preghiera e di questo “aiuto” è che molti daranno gloria a Dio per conto del suo dono di liberazione dato per grazia a Paolo e per l’avanzamento dell’evangelo.

III. Principi di Applicazione

1. L’adorazione per Dio non è una cosa cristiana del tempo passato: essa è la nostra vita stessa ed è una parte integrale della vita cristiana: è come collegare il blue al colore del Cielo. Non puoi avere una parte senza avere anche l’altra. “Come un regalo ponderato rispecchia la celebrazione di un compleanno,come un evento speciale rispecchia la celebrazione dell’anniversario,come un elogio sentito rispecchia la celebrazione alla vita, come un’unione sessuale rispecchia la celebrazione del matrimonio .. Così il culto di Adorazione rispecchia la celebrazione di Dio”(Ronald Allen, Worship: Rediscovering the Missing Jewel). La Lode è parte integrante della celebrazione dell’Amore e della compassione di Dio su Noi ,persone non amabili. Paolo loda suo Padre e lo benedice. Possiamo noi fare di meno?

2. La Chiesa cristiana in America è risolutamente individualistica, eppure il segno più evidente dei primi passi del cristiano è il pensiero che sta dilagando tra le nostre chiese che tutto ciò che riceviamo è per noi soltanto e che Dio ci benedice senza pensare ad estendere questa benedizione agli altri. Dio, però,ha detto ad Abrahamo che avrebbe benedetto Lui e il mondo attraverso di lui ! Paolo dice che Dio ci conforta affinché noi possiamo confortare gli altri con lo stesso conforto che abbiamo ricevuto da Dio: ecco ciò che ci salva da una religione senza utilità! Nella nostra cultura di certo c’è qualcuno disposto a prendere l’incoraggiamento di Dio attraverso di Te: Trovalo ed Amalo.

3. “Per due anni degli scienziati si sono segregati in un ambiente artificiale chiamato Biosfera 2. All’interno della loro comunità auto-sostenibile, i Biosferiani hanno creato una serie di mini-ambienti che includono il deserto,una foresta tropicale e persino un oceano. Quasi tutte le condizioni atmosferiche potrebbero essere simulate,tranne il vento .Durante quel periodo, la conseguenza della mancanza di vento divenne evidente: un numero di alberi di acacia si piegarono e caddero anche. Senza la spinta del vento che rafforza il tronco,esso è cresciuto debole e non riusciva a reggere il proprio peso (Jay akkerman). “Dobbiamo ricordare che il vento dell’avversità rafforza la nostra determinazione ad appoggiarci sul Signore e non su noi stessi. In effetti così come gli alberi sono soggetti ai venti delle tempeste,alla fine anche noi possederemo una forza maggiore. Così lo è stato per Paolo e così sarà il nostro caso se ci appoggeremo sul Signore che fa risorgere i morti.

4. Il risultato finale di tutto ciò che Dio fa è la Lode. Paolo inizia questa parte di 1:3-11 con la lode e benedicendo e finisce con lode unita a ringraziamento data a Dio. Ricorda che nella tua Vita tutta la Lode va a Dio,perché da Lui,attraverso Lui e per Lui sono tutte le cose!

Greg Herrick si è laureato al seminario Teologico di Dallas con Master in Teologia nel 1994 e con il Dottorato di Ricerca nel 1999. Greg e sua Moglie sono dei canadesi che vivono con i loro quattro figli in Texas.


1 Vedi Colin Kruse, The Second Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians, The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, ed. Leon Morris (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1987), 68-69.

Related Topics: Man (Anthropology), Suffering, Trials, Persecution, Comfort, Character of God

Leadership Qualities

This leadership series addresses the need for a more top-down approach to leadership that begins with the character, attributes, and actions of God rather than a biblical veneer added to worldly wisdom on the subject.

 Kenneth Boa

Website: http://www.kenboa.org
Commentary: http://www.kenboa.org/blog
Follow: http://twitter.com/kennethboa
Connect on Facebook: Kenneth Boa

Related Topics: Administrative and Organization, Christian Education, Issues in Church Leadership/Ministry, Leadership, Spiritual Formation, Men's Articles, Curriculum, Pastors

Romans 1

 

PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS

UBS4 NKJV NRSV TEV NJB
Salutation Greetings Salutations Salutation Salutation Address
1:1-7 1:1-7 1:1-6 1:1 1:1-2
      1:2-6  
        1:3-7
    1:7a 1:7a  
    1:7b 1:7b  
Paul's Desire to Visit Rome Desire to Visit Rome Thanksgiving Prayer of Thanksgiving Thanksgiving and Prayer
1:8-15 1:8-15 1:8-15 1:8-12 1:8-15
      1:13-15  
The Power of the Gospel The Just Live By Faith The Theme of the Letter The Power of the Gospel The Theme Stated
1:16-17 1:16-17 1:16-17 1:16-17 1:16-17
The Guilt of Mankind God's Wrath on Unrighteousness God's Judgment Upon Sin The Guilt of Mankind God's Retribution Against the Gentiles
1:18-23 1:18-32 1:18-23 1:18-23 1:18-23
1:24-32   1:24-25 1:24-25 1:24-25
    1:26-27 1:26-27 1:26-27
    1:28-32 1:28-32 1:28-32

READING CYCLE THREE

FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S INTENT AT THE PARAGRAPH LEVEL

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects. Compare your subject divisions with the five modern translations. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is the key to following the original author's intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every paragraph has one and only one subject.

1. First paragraph

 

* Although they are not inspired, paragraph divisions are the key to understanding and following the original author's intent. Each modern translation has divided and summarized the paragraphs. Every paragraph has one central topic, truth, or thought. Each version encapsulates that topic in its own distinct way. As you read the text, ask yourself which translation fits your understanding of the subject and verse divisions.
In every chapter we must read the Bible first and try to identify its subjects (paragraphs), then compare our understanding with the modern versions. Only when we understand the original author's intent by following his logic and presentation can we truly understand the Bible. Only the original author is inspired—readers have no right to change or modify the message. Bible readers do have the responsibility of applying the inspired truth to their day and their lives.
Note that all technical terms and abbreviations are explained fully in the following documents: Brief Definitions of Greek Grammatical Structure Textual Criticism, and Glossary.

2. Second paragraph

 

3. Third paragraph

 

4. Etc.

 

CONTEXTUAL INSIGHTS

A. Verses 1-7 form the introduction to the letter. It is the longest introduction of any of Paul's letters. He was trying to introduce himself and his theology to a church who did not know him personally and may have heard negative information about him.

 

B. Verses 8-12 are an opening prayer of thanksgiving. This was characteristic of Greek letters generally and of Paul's writings specifically.

 

C. Verses 16-17 state the theme of the book.

 

D. Verse 18 through 3:20 form the first literary unit and the first point of Paul's gospel; all humans (3 groups) are lost and need to be saved (cf. Genesis 3).

1. immoral pagans

2. moral pagans

3. Jews

 

E. Romans 1:18-3:20 reflects Genesis 3 (surprisingly the rabbis do not focus on this text, but Genesis 6, as the origin of sin). Humanity was created for fellowship with God, in His very image (cf. Gen. 1:26-27). However, mankind chose enlightenment and the promise of power and independence. In effect, humans exchanged the exaltation of God for the exaltation of themselves (atheistic humanism)!

God allowed this crisis. To be in God's image is to be responsible, to be morally accountable, to be volitionally free with consequences. God separates humans by both His choice and theirs (a covenant relationship)! He allows them to choose self with all its consequences. God is grieved (cf. Gen. 6:5-7), but humans are free moral agents with all the rights and responsibilities that brings. The repeated phrase "God gave them over" (cf. 1:24,26,28) is the recognition of that freedom, not a willful rejection by God. This was not God's choice. This is not the world that God intended (cf. Gen. 3:22; 6:5-7,11-13)!

F. The theological summary of 1:18-3:20 is found in 3:21-31. This is the first theological point of the "good news" of the gospel-all humans have sinned and have need of God's forgiveness. God graciously provides a way back to intimate fellowship (i.e., Eden experience, compare Genesis 1-2 with Revelation 21-22).

 

G. In this first literary unit of Paul's presentation of the gospel it is interesting to note that fallen mankind is held responsible for their rebellion and sin without any reference to Satan or the demonic (cf. Rom. 1:18-3:20). This section certainly reflects the theology of Genesis 3, but without a personal tempter. God will not allow fallen mankind to blame Satan again (cf. Gen. 3:13) or God Himself (cf. Gen. 3:12). Humans are made in God's image (cf. Gen. 1:26; 5:1,3; 9:6). They have the right, power and obligation to choose. They are responsible for their choices both corporately in Adam and individually in personal sin (cf. 3:23).

 

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 1:1-6
 1Paul, a bond-servant of Christ Jesus, called as an apostle, set apart for the gospel of God, 2which He promised beforehand through His prophets in the holy Scriptures, 3concerning His Son, who was born of a descendant of David according to the flesh, 4who was declared the Son of God with power by the resurrection from the dead, according to the Spirit of holiness, Jesus Christ our Lord, 5through whom we have received grace and apostleship to bring about the obedience of faith among all the Gentiles for His name's sake, 6among whom you also are the called of Jesus Christ;

1:1 "Paul" Most Jews of Paul's day had two first names, one Jewish, one Roman (cf. Acts 13:9). Paul's Jewish name was Saul. He, like the ancient King of Israel, was of the tribe of Benjamin (cf. Rom. 11:1; Phil. 3:5). His Roman name in Greek form, Paul (Paulos), meant "little." This referred to

1. his physical stature which was alluded to in a second century non-canonical book, The Acts of Paul, in a chapter about Thessalonica called "Paul and Thekla"

2. his personal sense of being least of the saints because he originally persecuted the Church (cf. 1 Cor. 15:9; Eph. 3:8; 1 Tim. 1:15)

3. simply the name given by his parents at birth

Option #3 seems best.

▣ "a bond-servant" NKJV, NRSV, TEV and JB translations read "servant." This concept was either

1. antithetical to Jesus as Lord

2. an OT honorific title (cf. Moses in Num. 12:7 and Jos. 1:1; Joshua in Jos. 24:29; and David in the Psalms (title), and Isaiah 42:1, 19; 52:13)

 

NASB, TEV,
NJB, REB"Christ Jesus"
NKJV, NRSV"Jesus Christ"

"Christ Jesus" is more unusual and, therefore, probably original (cf. MSS P10, B). The UBS4 gives it a "B" rating (almost certain).

However, the other form has really good attestation (cf. MSS P26, א, A, D, G, and most early church Fathers).

See Appendix Two on the assumptions of Textual Criticism. Most of the textual variants are like this one in the sense that they do not affect the basic meaning of the Greek text.

▣ "called as an apostle" This was God's choice, not his (cf. Acts 9:15; Gal. 1:15; Eph. 3:7). With this phrase Paul is asserting his spiritual qualifications and authority, as he does in 1 Cor. 1:1; 2 Cor. 1:1; Gal. 1:1; Eph. 1:1; Col. 1:1; 1 Tim. 1:1; Titus 1:1) to this church he had never met. See SPECIAL TOPIC: CALLED at 1:6.

The Koine term "apostle" in Palestinian Jewish circles of the first century meant "one sent as an official representative" (cf. 2 Chr. 17:7-9). In the NT this term was used in two senses: (1) of the Twelve special disciples and Paul and (2) of a spiritual gift that continues in the church (cf. 1 Cor. 12:28-29; Eph. 4:11).

SPECIAL TOPIC: SEND (APOSTELLŌ)

▣ "set apart" This is a perfect passive participle, which implied that he was set apart by God in the past (cf. Jer. 1:5 and Gal. 1:15) and this continued as a state of being. This was a possible play on the Aramaic word for "Pharisee." They were separated to Jewish legalism (and Paul also [Phil. 3:5] before his Damascus Road encounter with Jesus), but now he was separated to the gospel.

It is related to the Hebrew word for "holy" (BDB 872), which meant "set apart for God's use" (cf. Exod. 19:6; 1 Pet. 2:5). The terms "saint," "sanctify," and "set apart" all had the same Greek root, "holy" (hagios).

▣ "for the gospel of God" The preposition eis in this context (and v. 5) shows the purpose of Paul's "call" (v. 1b) and being "set apart" (v. 1c).

Gospel is a compound word from "good" (eu) and "message" (angellos). It became the term that described the doctrines revealed in the New Covenant (cf. Jer. 31:31-34; Ezek. 36:22-32) related to God's promised Messiah (cf. vv. 3-4). It is the "gospel of His Son" (v. 2).

This is God's gospel, not Paul's (cf. 15:16; Mark 1:14; 2 Cor. 11:7; 1 Thess. 2:2,8,9; 1 Pet. 4:17). Paul was not an innovator or cultural adapter, but a proclaimer of the truth he received (cf. Acts 9; 1 Cor. 1:18-25).

1:2 "He promised beforehand through His prophets in the holy Scriptures" This verb is an aorist middle (deponent) indicative. It is used only in Paul's writings (here and 2 Cor. 9:5). The gospel was no afterthought with God, but His eternal, purposeful plan (cf. Gen. 3:15; 12:3; Exod. 19:5; Isa. 53; Ps. 118; Mark 10:45; Luke. 2:22; Acts 2:23; 3:18; 4:28; Titus 1:2). The early sermons in Acts (the kerygma) present Jesus as the fulfillment of OT promises and prophecies.

The OT is referred to in the NT in two common ways.

1. "it is written" (or "writings," i.e., 2 Tim. 3:16; 2 Pet. 3:16)

2. Scripture(s)

It is also referred to in connection with the prophets. In the Jewish mind prophets wrote Scripture.

1. "the Law or the Prophets," Matt. 5:17-18; also note Luke 24:44

2. "prophecy," Luke 24:27

3. "writings of the prophets," Matt. 26:56

4. "prophetic writings," Rom. 16:26 (Rom. 1:2 also mentions "prophets")

5. "prophecy of Scripture," 2 Pet. 1:20

There are two instances of the adjective "holy" attached.

1. "holy Scriptures" (full clause also mentions "prophets"), Rom. 1:2

2. "sacred writings," 2 Tim. 3:15

 

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE KERYGMA OF THE EARLY CHURCH

1:3 "concerning His Son" The central message of the Good News is a person, Jesus of Nazareth, virgin-born son of Mary. In the OT the nation, the king, and the Messiah were called "son" (cf. 2 Sam. 7:14; Hos. 11:1; Ps. 2:7; Matt. 2:15).

In the OT God spoke through servants and prophets. Jesus was not a servant of God. He was a family member (cf. Heb.1:1-2; 3:6; 5:8; 7:28). Surprisingly this is the only place in the book where Paul focuses on Christology. Romans is not a complete systematic theology.

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE SON OF GOD

▣ "who was born a descendant of David" This relates to the prophecy of 2 Samuel 7. The Messiah was of the royal line of David (cf. Isa. 9:7; 11:1,10; Jer. 23:5; 30:9; 33:15) from the tribe of Judah (cf. Gen. 49:4-12; Isa. 65:9). In Matthew's Gospel Jesus is acknowledged as David's descendant several times (cf. 1:6; 9:27; 12:23; 15:22; 20:30,31; 21:9,15; 22:42), which reflected the Jewish hope of a coming Davidic savior.

It is surprising that Paul did not emphasize this aspect of Jesus. He mentioned it only here and in 2 Tim. 2:8; both passages may have been quotes from an early church's creedal formula. The NIDNTT, vol. 3, p. 61, lists several NT Scripture texts which may reflect early Christological creeds/hymns/liturgy (i.e., Rom. 1:3-4; 8:34; 1 Cor. 15:3-4; Phil. 2:6-11; 1 Tim. 3:16; 2 Tim. 2:8; 1 Pet. 3:18-20).

NASB, NKJV,
NRSV"according to the flesh"
TEV"as to his humanity"
NJB"according to human nature"

This was fulfillment of prophecy and an affirmation of Jesus' humanity, which was often denied in the eclectic religious world of the first century (cf. 1 John 1:1-4; 4:1-3). This verse clearly shows that Paul did not always use the term "flesh" (sarx) in a negative sense (cf. 2:28; 9:3). However, usually Paul used "flesh" to contrast "spirit" (cf. 6:19; 7:5,18,25; 8:3-9,12,13; 1 Cor. 5:5; 2 Cor. 1:17; 11:18; Gal. 3:3; 5:13,16,17-19,24; 6:8; Eph. 2:3; Col. 2:11,13,18,23).

This grammatical construction kata (according to) plus an accusative is paralleled in v. 4. Jesus is both human (according to the flesh, v. 3) and divine (according to the Spirit, v. 4). This doctrine of incarnation is crucial (cf. 1 John 4:1-3). It may also be the implication of Jesus' self-chosen designation, "Son of Man" (cf. Ps. 8:4; Ezek. 2:1 [human] and Dan. 7:13 [divine]).

SPECIAL TOPIC: FLESH (SARX)

1:4

NASB, NKJV,
NRSV, NIV"declared"
TEV"shown"
NJB, RSV"designated"
NET"appointed"
REB"proclaimed"

This is an aorist passive participle. God definitively appointed Jesus "the Son of God." This does not imply that Bethlehem was the beginning of Jesus or that He is inferior to the Father. See SPECIAL TOPIC: THE TRINITY at 8:11. See third paragraph below.

▣ "to be the Son of God with power" The NT authors did not often refer to Jesus by the title "Son of God" (cf. Matt. 4:3) because of the false implications from Greek mythology (the same is true of the virgin birth). The concept is usually qualified by "unique, one of a kind" (monogenes, cf. John 1:18; 3:16,18; 1 John 4:9). Thus the meaning is "Jesus, the only true Son of God." See Special Topic at 1:3.

The NT has two theological poles related to God the Father and Jesus the Son.

1. they are equal (cf. John1:1; 5:18; 10:30; 14:9; 20:28; 2 Cor. 4:4; Phil. 2:6; Col. 1:15; Heb. 1:3)

but   2. they are separate personalities (cf. Mark 10:18; 14:36; 15:34)

It is possible that Paul was quoting an early Christological creed or alluding to YHWH's Messianic King in Ps. 2:6,7 or 110:1 (cf. Acts 2:34-36). In so doing he was emphasizing the whole phrase "the Son of God with power" (NIDNTT, vol. 2, p. 79) which focused, not on His birth or baptism, but His ascension. However, Adoptionist Christologies (see Glossary) took the verse and quoted it for their own reasons. With this proof-texting method of Bible interpretation, one can make the Bible say anything (see my seminar on Biblical Interpretation free online at www.freebiblecommentary.org).

▣ "by the resurrection" God the Father affirmed Jesus' life and message by raising Him from the dead (cf. 4:24; 6:4,9; 8:11; Acts 2:31-33). The deity (cf. John 1:1-14; Col. 1:15-19; Phil. 2:6-11; Heb. 1:2-3) and resurrection of Jesus (cf. 4:25; 10:9-13; 1 Corinthians 15) are twin pillars of Christianity.

This verse was often used to advocate the heresy of "adoptionism" which asserted that Jesus was rewarded and elevated by God for His exemplary life of obedience. The heretics asserted that He was not always (ontologically) deity, but became deity when God raised Him from the dead. Although this is clearly untrue, which is obvious from many texts such as John 1 and 17, something wonderful was conferred on Jesus at His resurrection. It is difficult to express how deity can be rewarded, yet that is what happened. Even though Jesus shared eternal glory with the Father, His status was somehow enriched by the perfect fulfillment of His assigned redemptive task. The resurrection was the Father's affirmation of the life, example, teachings, and sacrificial death of Jesus of Nazareth; eternally divine, fully human, perfect savior, restored and rewarded, unique Son! See Appendix three - Adoptionism.

NASB, NKJV"according to the Spirit of holiness"
NKJV"according to the spirit of holiness"
TEV"as to his divine holiness"
NJB"in the order of the spirit, the spirit of holiness"

Some translations capitalize the "S" in Spirit, implying the Holy Spirit, while the lowercase "s" would refer to the human spirit of Jesus. As God the Father is Spirit, so too, is Jesus. The ancient Hebrew and Greek texts had no capitalizations, no punctuation, and no chapter or verse divisions, so these are all points of tradition or the interpretation by translators.

There are three ways to view verses 3 and 4.

1. as a reference to Jesus' two natures, human and divine

2. as a reference to two stages in His earthly life, human and resurrected Lord

3. as a parallel to "Jesus Christ our Lord"

 

▣ "Jesus" The Aramaic name Jesus is the same as the Hebrew name Joshua. It was a compound of two Hebrew words "YHWH" and "salvation." It can mean "YHWH saves," "YHWH delivers" or "YHWH is salvation." The thrust of the meaning can be seen in Matt. 1:21,25.

▣ "Christ" This was the Greek translation of the Hebrew term messiah (BDB 603), which meant "an anointed one." In the OT several groups of leaders (prophets, priests, and kings) were anointed as a sign of God's choice and equipping. Jesus fulfilled all three of these anointed offices (cf. Heb. 1:2-3).

The OT predicted that God would send a special "anointed one" to usher in the New Age of Righteousness. Jesus was His special "servant," "son," and "Messiah."

SPECIAL TOPIC: MESSIAH

▣ "Lord" In Judaism the Covenant name for God, YHWH, became so holy that the rabbis substituted the title "Lord," (Adon) when reading the Scriptures because they were afraid they might take God's name in vain (cf. Exod. 20:7; Deut. 5:11) and thereby break one of the Ten Commandments. When NT authors called Jesus "Lord" ("Kurios") in theological contexts, they were affirming His deity (cf. Acts 2:36; Rom. 10:9-13; Phil. 2:6-11).

SPECIAL TOPIC: NAMES FOR DEITY

1:5 "we" Paul mentions no other person in his introduction, as he often does in his other letters. This first phrase refers to Paul's Damascus Road conversion and appointment (cf. Acts 9), which strongly implies the editorial use of "we."

"we have received grace and apostleship" Paul is affirming not only the gift of salvation through Christ, but also and connected to it, the call to be the apostle to the Gentiles. All of this occurred instantaneously on the road to Damascus (aorist active indicative, cf. Acts 9:1-22; 22:3-16; 26:9-18). It was not from merit, but purposeful grace!

It is possible that "grace" and "apostleship" are to be taken as one unit, "the gift of apostleship" (NET note #13). All of the various translations listed in The New Testament in 26 Translations (p. 646) see it as a hendiadys also.

"to bring about" This is a second use of eis in a purpose context (cf. v. 1). The gospel restores the image of God in mankind through faith in Jesus. This allows the original purpose of God to be manifested, which is a people in intimate fellowship with Him who reflect His character (cf. v. 7).

NASB, NJB"the obedience of faith"
NKJV"for obedience to the faith"
NRSV"to bring about the obedience of faith"
TEV"to believe and obey"

This is the first usage of the pivotal term, "faith," in Romans (see Special Topic at 4:5). It was used in three distinct ways in this chapter and book.

1. Verse 5. It is used of a body of truths or doctrines related to Jesus and the Christian life (cf. Acts 6:7; 13:8; 14:22; 16:5; Rom. 14:1; 16:26; Gal. 1:23; 6:10; Jude 3, 20).

2. Verse 8. It is used in the sense of personal trust in Jesus. The English terms "believe," "faith," and "trust" all translate one Greek term (pistis/pisteuo). The gospel is both conceptual (doctrine) and personal (cf. v.16; John 1:12; 3:16). See Special Topic at 4:5.

3. Verse 17. It is used in its OT sense of trustworthiness, loyalty, or dependability. This is the meaning of Hab. 2:4. In the OT there was not a developed doctrine of faith, but example after example of lives of faith (cf. Abraham in Gen. 15:6), not perfect faith but struggling faith (cf. Hebrews 11). The hope of mankind is not in their ability to perform or believe correctly, but in God's character (cf. 3:24; 6:23; Eph. 2:8-9). Only God is faithful (cf. Mal. 3:6)!

There is a series of acts that can be called the salvation event.

a. repentance (cf. 2:4; Mark 1:15; Luke 13:3,5; Acts 3:16,19; 20:21)

b. belief/faith (cf. 1:16; John 1:12; 3:16; Acts 16:31, baptism is the public declaration of one's faith)

c. obedience (cf. 2:13; 2 Cor. 9:13; 10:5; 1 Pet. 1:2,22)

d. perseverance (cf. 2:7; Luke. 18:1; 2 Cor. 4:1,16; Gal. 6:9; I1 Thess. 3:13)

These are the conditions of the New Covenant. We must receive/believe and continue to receive/believe God's offer in Christ (cf. v. 16; John 1:12).

SPECIAL TOPIC: Believe, Trust, Faith, and Faithfulness in the Old Testament (אמן)

NASB "for His name's sake"
NKJV"for His name"
NRSV"for the sake of his name"
TEV"for the sake of Christ"
NJB"for the honor of his name"

See Special Topic at 10:9. 

▣ "the obedience of faith" The literal Greek phrase is "for (eis) obedience." The gospel has an

1. immediate obedience of repentance and faith

2. lifestyle obedience of Christlikeness and perseverance

The gospel is a grace gift but with expected results! The NT is a covenant like the OT. Both demand a faith/obedience response. They both have benefits, responsibilities, and expectations (i.e., E ph. 1:4; 2:10). This is not a works righteousness but a works confirmation (cf. James, 1 John)! Eternal life has observable characteristics!

NASB, NRSV"among all the Gentiles"
NKJV"among all nations"
TEV"people of all nations"
NJB"to all pagan nations"

This is the universal gospel. God's promise of redemption in Gen. 3:15 included all mankind. Jesus' substitutionary death included all of the fallen children of Adam (cf. 5:18; John 1:29; 3:16; 4:42; 6:33,51; 1 Cor. 15:22; 2 Cor. 5:19; Eph. 2:11-3:13; 1 Tim. 2:4; 4:10; Titus 2:11; Heb. 2:9; 2 Pet. 3:9; 1 John 2:2; 4:14). Paul sees his special call as preaching God's gospel to Gentiles (cf. Acts 9:15; 22:21; 26:17; Rom. 11:13; 15:16; Gal. 1:16; 2:29; Eph. 3:2,8; 1 Tim. 2:7; 2 Tim. 4:17).

SPECIAL TOPIC: YHWH's ETERNAL REDEMPTIVE PLAN

1:6 "you also" Paul was an extreme example (i.e., persecutor of the church) of the grace of God, but his readers were also examples of the undeserved, unmerited grace of God.

NASB, NKJV"the called of Jesus Christ"
NRSV"who are called to belong to Jesus Christ"
TEV"whom God has called to belong to Jesus Christ"
NJB"by his call belong to Jesus Christ"

This may be

1. a play on the term "church," which meant "the called out ones" or "gathered ones"

2. a reference to divine election (cf. Rom. 8:29-30; 9:1ff; Eph.1:4, 11; 3:21; 4:1,4)

3. the Revised English Bible translation of the phrase, "you who have heard the call and belong to Jesus Christ."

This also reflects the understanding of this phrase as translated in the NRSV, TEV, and JB. See Special Topic below.

SPECIAL TOPIC: CALLED

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 1:7
 7to all who are beloved of God in Rome, called as saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.

1:7 "beloved of God" This phrase was often used of Jesus (cf. Matt. 3:17; 17:5). Now it was used of the church in Rome! This shows the depth of God's love for those who trust in His Son. This kind of transfer can also be seen in Eph. 1:20 (God's actions on behalf of Jesus) and Eph. 2:5-6 (Jesus' actions on behalf of believers).

▣ "in Rome" Paul did not start this church. No one knows who did (see Intro.). Romans was a letter introducing himself to a church already established. The book of Romans is Paul's most developed presentation of the gospel he preached. It is least affected by a local situation although there existed tensions between Jewish and Gentile believers to whom he comments throughout the letter (esp. chaps. 9-11).

NASB"called as saints"
NKJV, NRSV,
NJB"called to be saints"
TEV"called to be his own people"

The term "saints" referred to the believers' position in Christ (see Special Topic at 6:4), not their sinlessness. It should also describe their progressive Christlikeness. The term was always plural except in Phil. 4:21. However, even in this context it is corporate. To be a Christian is to be part of a community, a family, a body.

Verse 1 indicates that Paul was called to be an apostle. Believers are "the called of Jesus Christ" in verse 6. Believers are also called "saints" in verse 7. This "calling" was a NT way of asserting the truth of the initiating priority of God (see Special Topic at 1:6). No fallen human ever called himself (cf. 3:9-13; Isa. 53:6; 1 Pet. 2:25). God always takes the initiative (cf. John 6:44,65; 15:16). He always brings the covenant (see Special Topic at 9:4) to us. This is true of our salvation (our imputed righteousness or legal standing), but also our giftedness for effective service (cf. 1 Cor. 12:7,11), and our Christian lives. See Special Topic following.

SPECIAL TOPIC: SAINTS

▣ "Grace to you and peace from God" This is Paul's characteristic opening blessing. It is a word play on the traditional Greek term "greetings" (charein) and the uniquely Christian term "grace" (charis). Paul may have been combining this Greek opening with the traditional Hebrew greeting shalom or "peace." However, this is only speculation. Notice that theologically grace always precedes peace.

▣ "from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ" Paul regularly uses only one preposition for both names (cf. 1 Cor. 1:3; 2 Cor. 1:3; Gal. 1:3; Eph. 1:2; Phil. 1:2; 2 Thess. 1:2; 1 Tim. 1:2; 2 Tim. 1:2; Titus 1:4). This was his way of grammatically linking these two Persons of the Trinity. This would emphasize Jesus' deity and equality with the Father.

SPECIAL TOPIC: FATHERHOOD OF GOD

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 1:8-15
 8First, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for you all, because your faith is being proclaimed throughout the whole world. 9For God, whom I serve in my spirit in the preaching of the gospel of His Son, is my witness as to how unceasingly I make mention of you, 10always in my prayers making request, if perhaps now at last by the will of God I may succeed in coming to you. 11For I long to see you so that I may impart some spiritual gift to you, that you may be established; 12that is, that I may be encouraged together with you while among you, each of us by the other's faith, both yours and mine. 13I do not want you to be unaware, brethren, that often I have planned to come to you (and have been prevented so far) so that I may obtain some fruit among you also, even as among the rest of the Gentiles. 14I am under obligation both to Greeks and to barbarians, both to the wise and to the foolish. 15So, for my part, I am eager to preach the gospel to you also who are in Rome.

1:8 "First" In this context "first" means "from the beginning" or "I must begin" (J. B. Phillips).

"I thank my God through Jesus Christ" Paul normally addresses his prayers to God through Jesus Christ. Jesus is our only way to approach God! See Special Topic: Paul's Prayers of Praise and Thanksgiving at 7:25.

"for you all" This use of "all," like v. 7, may reflect the jealousy and conflict between the believing Jewish leaders who fled Rome under Nero's edict and the resultant believing Gentile leaders who had replaced them for a few years. Romans 9-11 addresses this same issue.

It is also possible that the inclusion is addressed to "the weak" and "the strong" of Rom. 14:1-15:13. God loves all of the church at Rome and He loves them equally!

▣ "because your faith is being proclaimed throughout the whole world" Romans 16:19 made allusion to the same truth. This was obviously an Oriental overstatement (hyperbole) referring to the Roman world (cf. 1 Thess. 1:8).

1:9 "God. . .is my witness" Paul was taking an oath in God's name (cf. 9:1; 2 Cor. 1:23; 11:10-11,31; 12:19; Gal. 1:20; 1 Thess. 2:5). This was his Jewish way of asserting his truthfulness.

NASB"how unceasingly"
NKJV, NRSV"without ceasing"
NJB"continually mention"
NIV"how constantly"

This theme of Paul's constant and urgent prayers (cf. 1 Thess. 1:2; 2:13; 2 Tim. 1:3) should be an example church leaders diligently follow (cf. 1 Thess. 5:17). Prayer opens a powerful spiritual door. We have not because we ask not (James 4:2).

"in my spirit" This is a good example of the use of pneuma for the human spirit (cf. 8:5,10,16; 12:11) used in the sense of human life (i.e., breath, Hebrew ruach, BDB 924, cf. Gen. 6:17; 7:15,22).

SPECIAL TOPIC: SPIRIT (PNEUMA) IN THE NT

1:10 "always in my prayers making request" Paul did not start this church and yet he consistently prayed for them (cf. 2 Cor. 11:28), as he did for all his churches! See SPECIAL TOPIC: INTERCESSORY PRAYER at 9:3. However, Paul had many friends and co-workers in the Roman church as chapter 16 clearly shows.

▣ "if" This is a first class conditional sentence which is assumed to be true from the author's perspective or for his literary purposes. Paul planned to visit Rome on his way to Spain (cf. 15:22-24). He probably did not plan to stay a long time. Paul always wanted to minister in a new field where no other person had worked (cf. 15:20; 2 Cor. 10:15,16). It is possible that one of the purposes of the Roman letter was to solicit funds for his missionary journey to Spain (cf. 15:24).

"by the will of God I may succeed in coming to you" This is paralleled in v. 13 and 15:32. Paul did not feel that his life and travel plans belonged to himself, but to God (cf. Acts 18:21; 1 Cor. 4:19; 16:7). See Special Topic at 12:2.

Also notice that God's will can be affected by believers' prayers!

1:11 "'For I long to see you'" This parallels 15:23. For a long time Paul wanted to meet the believers in Rome (cf. Acts 19:21).

▣ "that I may impart some spiritual gift to you" The phrase "spiritual gift" was used in the sense of spiritual insight or blessing (cf. 11:29; 15:27). Paul saw himself as uniquely called to be the Apostle to the Gentiles (cf. v. 15).

"that you may be established" This is an aorist passive infinitive of histēmi. The word has three meanings.

1. establish, Rom. 1:11; 16:25; 1 Thess. 3:13; 2 Pet. 1:12

2. strengthen, Luke 22:32; 1 Thess. 3:2; 2 Thess. 2:17; 3:3; James 5:8; Rev. 3:2

3. a Semitic idiom for making a firm decision, Luke 9:51

See Special Topic at 5:2.

1:12 This is the purpose of Christian fellowship. The gifts are meant to unite believers into a ministering community. Believers are gifted for the common good (cf. 1 Cor. 12:7). All gifts are relevant. All the gifts are given by the Spirit at salvation (cf. 1 Cor. 12:11). All believers are called, gifted, full-time ministers (cf. Eph. 4:11-12). Paul clearly states his sense of Apostolic authority, but also a community-wide mutuality. Believers need one another! Believers are the Body of Christ.

1:13 "I do not want you to be unaware, brethren" This is an idiom which Paul uses often to introduce important statements (cf. 11:25; 1 Cor. 10:1; 12:1; 2 Cor. 1:8; 1 Thess. 4:13). It is similar in literary purpose to Jesus' "Amen, amen."

▣ "and have been prevented thus far" This is a passive verb. This same phrase occurs in 1 Thess. 2:18 where Satan is the agent. Paul believed his life was guided by God but disrupted by Satan. Somehow both are true (cf. Job 1-2; Dan. 10). The use of this term in 15:22 implies the hindrance was Paul's missionary work in the eastern Mediterranean area, which is not yet complete (but close).

▣ "that I might obtain some fruit among you" In this context "fruit" may refer to converts, but in John 15:1-8 and Gal. 5:22 it referred to Christian maturity. Matthew 7 says "by your fruit you shall be known," but it does not define the term fruit. The best parallel is probably Phil. 1:22, where Paul uses this same agricultural metaphor.

1:14 "I am under obligation" Paul uses this term several times in Romans.

1. Paul is obligated to preach the gospel to all Gentiles (here).

2. Paul is not obligated to "the flesh" (8:12).

3. The Gentile church is obligated to help the mother church in Jerusalem (15:27).

 

▣ "to Greeks" This referred to the civilized, cultured people around the Mediterranean Sea. Alexander the Great and his followers had Hellenized the known world. The Romans had taken over and assimilated the Greek culture.

▣ "to Barbarians" This (onomatopoeia) term meant the uneducated or uncultured people groups, usually to the north. It was used of people who did not speak Greek. Their speech sounded like "bar bar bar" to the Greeks and Romans.

"to the wise and to the foolish" It is possible that this is parallel in the Greek text to "barbarians," but not necessarily so. This may be another way of referring to all people groups and individuals.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 1:16-17
 16For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. 17For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith; as it is written, "But the righteous man shall live by faith."

1:16-17 Verses 16-17 are the theme of the entire book. This theme is amplified and summarized in 3:21-31.

1:16

NASB, NRSV"I am not ashamed of the gospel"
NKJV"I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ"
TEV"I have complete confidence in the gospel"
NJB"I am not ashamed of the Good News:"

Paul may be alluding to Jesus' words in Mark 8:38 and Luke 9:26. He is not ashamed of the content of the gospel or its resulting persecution (cf. 2 Tim. 1:12,16,18).

In 1 Cor. 1:23 the Jews were ashamed of the gospel because it affirmed a suffering Messiah and the Greeks because it affirmed the resurrection of the body.

▣ "salvation" In the OT, the Hebrew term (yasho) primarily referred to physical deliverance (cf. James 5:15), but in the NT the Greek term (sōzō) refers primarily to spiritual deliverance (cf. 1 Cor. 1:18, 21). See Robert B. Girdlestone, Synonyms of the Old Testament, pp. 124-126.

SPECIAL TOPIC: SALVATION (OLD TESTAMENT TERM)

NASB"to every one who believes"
NKJV"for everyone who believes"
NRSV"to everyone who has faith"
TEV"all who believe"
NJB"all who have faith"

The gospel is for all humans (oh, how I love the words "everyone," "whosoever," "all," see note at 1:5, 6th item), but believing is one of the conditions for acceptance (cf. Acts 16:30-31). The other is repentance (cf. Mark 1:15; Acts 3:16 and 19; 20:21). God deals with mankind by means of covenant (see Special Topic at 9:4). He always takes the initiative and sets the agenda (cf. John 6:44,65). But there are several reciprocal conditions (see note at 1:5, 4th item).

The Greek term, here translated "believe," can also be translated in English by the terms "faith" or "trust." The Greek word has a wider connotation than any one English word. Notice it is a present participle. Saving faith is continuing faith (cf. 1 Cor. 1:18; 15:2; 2 Cor. 2:15; 1 Thess. 4:14)! See special Topic at 10:4.

Originally the related Hebrew terms behind this Greek term for "faith" meant a stable stance, a man with his feet apart so that he could not be easily moved. The opposite OT metaphor would be "my feet were in the miry clay" (Ps. 40:2), "my feet almost slipped" (Ps. 73:2). The Hebrew related roots, emun, emunah, aman, came to be used metaphorically of someone who was trustworthy, loyal, or dependable. Saving faith does not reflect fallen mankind's ability to be faithful, but God's! Believers' hopes do not reside in their abilities but in God's character and promises. It is His trustworthiness, His faithfulness, His promises! See Special Topic at 1:5.

▣ "to the Jew first" The reason for this is discussed briefly in 2:9-10 and 3:1-20 and fully developed in chapters 9-11. It follows Jesus' statements in Matt. 10:6; 15:24; Mark 7:27; John 4:22.

This may relate to the jealousy between believing Jew and Gentile leadership in the Roman church.

1:17 "the righteousness of God" This phrase in context referred to (1) God's character, and (2) how He gives that character to sinful mankind. The Jerusalem Bible (JB) translation has "this is what reveals the justice of God." While this does refer to the believer's moral lifestyle, it primarily concerns his legal standing before the Righteous Judge. This imputation of the righteousness of God to fallen, sinful mankind, since the Reformation, has been characterized as "justification by grace through faith" (cf. 2 Cor. 5:21; Phil. 3:9). This is the very verse that changed Martin Luther's life and theology!

However, the goal of justification is sanctification, Christlikeness, or the righteous character of God (cf. Rom. 8:28-29; Gal. 4:19; Eph. 1:4; 2:10; 4:13; 1 Thess. 3:13; 4:3; 1 Pet. 1:15). Righteousness is not only a legal pronouncement, it is a call to a holy life; the image of God in mankind is to be functionally restored (cf. 2 Cor. 5:21).

SPECIAL TOPIC: RIGHTEOUSNESS

NASB, NKJV"from faith to faith"
NRSV"through faith for faith"
TEV"it is through faith, from beginning to end"
NJB"it shows how faith leads to faith"

This phrase has two prepositions, ek and eis, which denote a transition or development. He uses this same structure in 2 Cor. 2:16 and apo and eis in 2 Cor. 3:18. Christianity is a gift which is expected to become a characteristic and a lifestyle.

There are several possibilities in translating this phrase. The Williams NT translates it as "the Way of faith that leads to greater faith." The main theological points are

1. faith comes from God ("revealed")

2. mankind must respond and continue to respond

3. faith must result in a godly life

One thing is certain, "faith" in Christ is crucial (cf. 5:1; Phil. 3:9). God's offer of salvation is conditioned on a faith response (cf. Mark 1:15; John 1:12; 3:16; Acts 3:16 and 19; 20:21). See Special Topics at 1:5; 4:5; and 10:4.

NASB"But the righteous man shall live by faith"
NKJV"The just shall live by faith"
NRSV"The one who is righteous will live by faith"
TEV"He who is put right with God through faith shall live"
NJB"The upright man finds life through faith"

This was a quote from Hab. 2:4, but not from the Masoretic Text (MT) or the Septuagint (LXX). In the OT "faith" had the expanded metaphorical meaning of "trustworthiness," "faithfulness," or "loyalty to" (see Special Topic at 1:5). Saving faith is based on God's faithfulness (cf. 3:5,21,22,25,26). However, human faithfulness is evidence that one has trusted in God's provision. This same OT text is quoted in Gal. 3:11 and Heb. 10:38. The next literary unit, Romans 1:18-3:20, reveals the opposite of faithfulness to God.

It may be helpful to list how several modern commentators understand the last part of the phrase.

1. Vaughan: "begins in faith and ends in faith"

2. Hodge:  "by faith alone"

3. Barrett:  "on the basis of nothing but faith"

4. Knox:  "faith first and last"

5. Stagg:  "the upright out of faith shall live"

 

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 1:18-23
 18For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. 20For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. 21For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures.

1:18 "for" Notice the number of times gar is used in the theme statement of verses 16-17-three times, and now it introduces Paul's first point of the gospel (1:18-3:31), which is contrasted with the power of God unto salvation (1:16-17).

▣ "the wrath of God" Verses 18-23 depict the pagan world of Paul's day. Paul's characterization of the pagan world is also found in Jewish literature (cf. Wisdom of Solomon 13:1ff. and Letter of Aristeas, 134-38) and even in Greek and Roman ethical writings. The same Bible that tells us of God's love also reveals His wrath (cf. vv. 23-32; 2:5,8; 3:5; 4:15; 5:9; 9:22; 12:19; 13:4-5).

Both wrath and love are human terms which are applied to God. They express the truth that God has a way He wants believers to respond to and live. One's willful rejection of God's will (the gospel of Christ) results in consequences both temporal, as in this verse, and eschatological (cf. 2:5). However, God must not be viewed as vindictive. Judgment is His "strange work" (cf. Isa. 28:21ff). Love is His character, compare Deut. 5:9 to 5:10; 7:9. In Him justice and mercy predominate. Yet all will give an account to God (cf. Eccl. 12:13-14; Gal. 6:7), even Christians (cf. 14:10-12; 2 Cor. 5:10).

SPECIAL TOPIC: GOD DESCRIBED AS HUMAN (ANTHROPOMORPHISM)

"is revealed" As the gospel is a revealed truth (v. 17), so too, the wrath of God! Neither is an act of human discovery or logic.

▣ "who suppress the truth" This referred to human willful rejection, not ignorance (cf. vv. 21,32; John 3:17-21). This phrase can mean

1. they know the truth but reject it

2. their lifestyle shows they reject the truth

3. their lives and/or words cause others not to know and receive the truth

 

SPECIAL TOPIC: "TRUTH" IN PAUL'S WRITINGS

1:19 "that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them" All humans know something of God from creation (cf. v. 20; Job 12:7-10 and Ps. 19:1-6 through nature). In theology this is called "natural revelation." It is not complete, but it is the basis of God's holding responsible those who have never been exposed to God's "special revelation" in Scripture (cf. Ps. 19:7-14) or, ultimately, in Jesus (cf. Col. 1:15; 2:9).

The term "know" was used in two senses in the NT: (1) its OT sense of intimate personal relationship (cf. Gen. 4:1; Jer. 1:5) and (2) its Greek sense of facts about a subject (cf. v. 21). The gospel is both a Person to be welcomed and a message about that Person to be received and believed! In this verse it was used only in the sense of #2.

SPECIAL TOPIC: KNOW (USING MOSTLY DEUTERONOMY AS A PARADIGM)

1:20 This verse mentions three aspects of God.

1. His invisible attributes (His character, cf. Col. 1:15; 1 Tim. 1:17; Heb. 11:27)

2. His eternal power (seen in natural creation, cf. Ps. 19:1-6)

3. His divine nature (seen in His acts and motives of creation, cf. Genesis 1-2)

 

"for since the creation of the world" The preposition apo is used in a temporal sense. A similar phrase is found in Mark 10:6; 13:19; 2 Pet. 3:4. The invisible God is now seen in

1. physical creation (this verse)

2. Scripture (Ps. 19, 119)

3. ultimately in Jesus (cf. John 14:9)

 

▣ "divine nature" From Greek literature theiotēs could be translated "divine majesty." This is seen supremely in Jesus. He uniquely bears the divine image (cf. 2 Cor. 4:4; Heb. 1:3). He is God's full revelation in human form (Col. 1:19; 2:9). The wonderful truth of the gospel is that fallen mankind, through faith in Christ, will share Christlikeness (cf. Heb. 12:10; 1 John 3:2). The image of God in humanity (cf. Gen. 1:26-27) has been restored (theios, cf. 2 Pet. 1:3-4)!

NASB"have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made"
NKJV"are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made"
NRSV"have been understood and seen through the things he has made"
TEV"have been clearly seen; they are perceived in the things that God has made"
NJB"have been clearly seen by the mind's understanding of created things"

The combination of noeō (cf. Matt. 15:17) and kathoraō (both present passive) implies a true perception. God has written two books: (1) nature (cf. Ps. 19:1-6) and (2) Scripture (cf. Ps. 19:7-14). They are both capable of human understanding and demand a response (cf. Wisdom 13:1-9).

▣ "so that they are without excuse" This is literally "no legal defense." This Greek term (a plus apologeomai) is used only here and in 2:1 in the NT. Remember the theological purpose of 1:18-3:20 is to show the spiritual lostness of all mankind. Humans are responsible for the knowledge they do have. God holds humans responsible only for that which they know or could know (cf. 4:15; 5:13).

1:21 "for even though they knew God" Humans are not progressing religiously-they are progressively evil. Since Genesis 3 humanity has been going downhill. The darkness is increasing!

▣ "they did not honor Him as God, or give thanks" This is the tragedy of pagan idolatry in vv. 23, 24 (cf. Jer. 2:9-13). Believers "glorify" God by Christlike living (cf. Matt. 5:16; Rom. 12:1-2; 1 Cor. 6:20; 10:31; Phil. 1:20; 1 Pet. 4:11). YHWH wants a people who reflect/reveal His character to a fallen, blind world!

▣ "but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened." The New Testament: A New Translation by Olaf M. Morlie has "rather they busied themselves with silly speculations about Him, and their stupid minds groped about in the dark." Human religious systems are monuments to spiritual rebellion and pride (cf. v. 22; Col. 2:16-23).

The word translated "futile" was used in the LXX to refer to the "vain," "non-existent" idols of Israel's neighbors. Paul was a Hebrew thinker who knew the Septuagint. The use of Greek words in the LXX is a better guide to the NT authors' thoughts than Greek lexicons.

The two verbs are aorist passive indicatives. Does the passive voice imply that their lack of understanding and proper response was because God veiled their hearts or that their rejection of the light had hardened their hearts (cf. 10:12-16; 2 Kgs. 17:15; Jer. 2:5; Eph. 4:17-19)? This is the same theological question related to Pharaoh in the exodus.

 

God hardened his heart Pharaoh hardened his own heart
Exod. 4:21
9:12
10:20
11:10
14:4
14:8
14:17
Exod. 8:15
8:32
9:34

 

In 9:35 the hardening could refer to God or Pharaoh. This is the mystery of divine sovereignty and human free will!

▣ "heart" This was used in the OT sense of the entire person. However, it was often a way of referring to the thinking and feeling process. See Special Topic at 1:24.

1:22

NASB, NKJV"Professing to be wise, they became fools"
NRSV"Claiming to be wise, they became fools"
TEV"They say they are wise, but they are fools"
NJB"The more they called themselves philosophers, the more stupid they grew"

From the Greek word "fool" we get the English "moron." The problem is in mankind's pride and confidence in their own knowledge (cf. 1 Cor. 1:18-31; Col. 2:8-23). This goes back to Genesis 3. Knowledge brought separation and judgment. It is not that human knowledge is always wrong, it is just not ultimate!

1:23 Willfully ignorant humans who were made in God's image (cf. Gen. 1:26-27; 5:1,3; 9:6) turned God into earthly images such as

1. animals (Egypt)

2. forces of nature (Persia)

3. human forms (Greece/Rome)-idols! Even God's own people did this (cf. Deut. 4:15-24)

Some new forms of this old sin are

1. environmentalism (mother earth)

2. New Age eastern thought (mysticism, spiritualism, and the occult)

3. atheistic humanism (Marxism, utopianism, progressive idealism, and ultimate faith in politics or education)

4. holistic medicine (health and longevity)

5. education.

 

"glory" See Special Topic at 3:23

"corruptible man" See Special Topic following.

SPECIAL TOPIC: DESTROY, RUIN, CORRUPT (PHTHEIRŌ)

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 1:24-25
 24Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them. 25For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

1:24, 26, 28 "God gave them over" This is the worst possible judgment. It is God saying "let fallen humanity have their own way" (cf. Ps. 81:12; Hosea 4:17; Acts 7:42 quotes several OT texts on this theological issue). Verses 23-32 describe God's rejection (temporal wrath) of the pagan world and its religiosity (and ours)! Paganism was and is characterized by sexual perversion and exploitation!

1:24 "hearts" See Special Topic following.

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE HEART

1:25 "exchanged the truth of God for a lie" This can be understood in several ways.

1. the self-deification of mankind (cf. 2 Thess. 2:4,11)

2. mankind's worship of that which he has made-idols (cf. Isa. 44:20; Jer. 13:25; 16:19) instead of YHWH who created all things (cf. vv. 18-23)

3. mankind's ultimate rejection of the truth of the gospel (cf. Jn 14:17; 1 John 2:21,27)

In context #2 fits best.

▣ "worshiped and served" Mankind will always have gods. All humans sense there is someone, some truth, or something beyond themselves.

"who is blessed forever. Amen" Paul burst into a Jewish blessing, which is so characteristic of him (cf. Rom. 9:5; 2 Cor. 11:31). Paul's prays often as he writes (cf. 9:5; 11:36; 15:33; 16:27).

"forever" See Special Topic below.

SPECIAL TOPIC: FOREVER (GREEK IDIOM)

"Amen" See Special Topic below.

SPECIAL TOPIC: AMEN

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 1:26-27
 26For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, 27and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error.

1:26,27 Homosexuality is one example of life apart from God's obvious will in creation (be fruitful). It was a sin and a major cultural problem

1. in the OT (cf. Lev. 18:22; 20:13; Deut. 23:18)

2. in the Greco-Roman world (cf. 1 Cor. 6:9; 1 Tim. 1:10)

3. in our day

Homosexuality is probably listed as one example of the fallen life because of the entire context's orientation to Genesis 1-3. Mankind was made in God's image (cf. Gen. 1:26-27; 5:1,3; 9:6). Mankind was made male and female (cf. Gen. 1:27). God's command was to be fruitful and multiply (cf. Gen. 1:28; 9:1,7). Mankind's fall (cf. Genesis 3) disrupted God's plan and will. Homosexuality is an obvious violation! However it must be stated that this is not the only sin mentioned in the context (cf. vv. 29-31). All sins show mankind's separation from God and their deserved punishment. All sin, especially lifestyle sin, is abhorrent to God.

SPECIAL TOPIC: HOMOSEXUALITY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 1:28-32
 28And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, 29being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, 30slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; 32and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them.

1:28-31 This is one sentence in Greek. It characterized rebellious, fallen, independent mankind (cf. Rom. 13:13; I Cor. 5:11; 6:9; Gal. 5:19-21; Eph. 5:5; 1 Tim. 1:10; Rev. 21:8).

Humanity's sin was that they chose existence apart from God. Hell is that existence made permanent. Independence is a tragedy! Mankind needs God; he is lost, inadequate, and unfulfilled apart from Him. The worst part of an eternal hell is God's relational absence!

1:29 "a depraved mind" What fallen mankind sees as freedom is self-worship: "Anything and everything for me!" The agent of the passive voice is stated as God in 1:24,26,28, but in this context's relationship to Genesis 1-3 it is mankind's choice of knowledge and self which caused the problem. God allowed His creation to suffer the consequences of their own choices, their own independence.

▣ "being filled with" This is a perfect passive participle. Humans are filled and characterized by what they dwell upon. The rabbis would say that in every human heart is a black (evil yetzer) dog and a white (good yetzer) dog. The one who is fed the most becomes the largest.

1:29-31 These are the results and symptoms of life without God. They characterize individuals and societies who choose to reject the God of the Bible. This was one of several lists of sins that Paul gave (cf. 1 Cor. 5:11; 6:9; 2 Cor. 12:20; Gal. 5:19-21; Eph. 4:31; 5:3-4; Col. 3:5-9).

SPECIAL TOPIC: VICES AND VIRTUES IN THE NT

1:30 "arrogant" This is huperēphanous (see C., 3 below).

SPECIAL TOPIC: PAUL'S USE OF "HUPER" COMPOUNDS

1:32 "those who practice such things are worthy of death" This statement reflects the Law of Moses. It is summarized in Rom. 6:16,21,23; 8:6,13. Death is the opposite of God's will and God's life (cf. Ezek. 18:32; 1 Tim. 2:4; 2 Pet. 3:9).

▣ "but also give hearty approval to those who practice them" Misery loves company. Fallen mankind uses the sins of others as an excuse, "everyone is doing it." Cultures are characterized by their particular sins!

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. Why did Paul write to the Roman church?

2. Why was Romans such an important theological statement of Christianity?

3. Outline 1:18-3:20 in your own words.

4. Will those who have never heard the Gospel be rejected for not trusting Christ?

5. Explain the difference between "natural revelation" and "special revelation."

6.  Describe human life without God.

7.  Do verses 24-27 address the issue of homosexuality?

 

Romans 2

 

PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS

UBS4 NKJV NRSV TEV NJB
The Righteous Judgment of God God's Righteous Judgment Jews Under Judgment God's Judgment The Jews are Not Exempt
From the Retribution of God
2:1-16 2:1-16 2:1-11 2:1-16 2:1-11
The Jews and the Law The Jews Guilty as the Gentiles Basis For Judgment The Jews and the Law (2:17-3:8) The Law Will Not Save Them
    2:12-16   2:12-16
2:17-3:8 2:17-24 2:17-24 2:17-24 2:17-24
  Circumcision of No Avail     Circumcision Will Not Save Them
  2:25-29 2:25-29 2:25-29 2:25-29

READING CYCLE THREE

FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S INTENT AT THE PARAGRAPH LEVEL

This is a study guide commentary ,which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects. Compare your subject divisions with the five translations above. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is the key to following the original author's intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every paragraph has one and only one subject.

1. First paragraph

2. Second paragraph

3. Third paragraph

4. Etc.

 

CONTEXTUAL INSIGHTS ON ROMANS 2:1-3:20

 

A. Chapters 2 and 3 complete the literary unit started in 1:18. This section deals with:

1. the lostness of all mankind

2. God's judgment on sin

3. mankind's need for God's righteousness through Christ by means of personal faith and repentance

 

B. In chapter 2 there are seven principles concerning God's judgment

1. verse 2, according to the truth

2.  verse 5, accumulated guilt

3.  verses 6 and 7, according to works

4.  verse 11, no respecter of persons

5.  verse 13, lifestyle

6.  verse 16, the secrets of men's hearts

7.  verses 17-29, no special national groups

 

C. There is much discussion among commentators about who was being addressed in chapter 2:1-17. It is obvious that 2:12-29 deals with the Jews. Verses 1-17 serve the dual purpose of speaking both to moral pagans like Seneca (societal norms) and to the Jewish nation (Mosaic Law).

 

D. In 1:18-21, Paul asserted that humans can know God through creation. In 2:14-15, Paul also asserted that all humans have an inner moral conscience given by God. These two witnesses, creation and conscience, are the basis for God's condemnation of all mankind, even those who have not been exposed to the OT or the gospel message. Humans are responsible because they have not lived up to the best light they have had.

 

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 2:1-11
   1Therefore you have no excuse, everyone of you who passes judgment, for in that which you judge another, you condemn yourself; for you who judge practice the same things. 2And we know that the judgment of God rightly falls upon those who practice such things. 3But do you suppose this, O man, when you pass judgment on those who practice such things and do the same yourself, that you will escape the judgment of God? 4Or do you think lightly of the riches of His kindness and forbearance and patience, not knowing that the kindness of God leads you to repentance? 5But because of your stubbornness and unrepentant heart you are storing up wrath for yourself in the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God, 6who will render to each person according to his deeds: 7to those who by perseverance in doing good seek for glory and honor and immortality, eternal life; 8but to those who are selfishly ambitious and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, wrath and indignation.9There will be tribulation and distress for every soul of man who does evil, of the Jew first and also of the Greek, 10but glory and honor and peace to everyone who does good, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. 11For there is no partiality with God.

2:1

NASB"you have no excuse, everyone of you who passes judgment"
NKJV"you are inexcusable, O man, whoever you are who judge"
NRSV"you have no excuse, whoever you are, when you judge others"
TEV"You have no excuse at all, whoever you are. For then you judge others"
NJB"So no matter who you are, if you pass judgment you have no excuse."

This is literally "no legal defense" (cf. 1:20). It was placed first in the Greek sentence to magnify its significance. Verses 1-16 seem to relate both to the self-righteous Jewish legalists and the Greek moralists. By their judging others they condemn themselves.

This same phrase is used in 1:20, but the pronoun is "they"; here "you." Obviously Paul is addressing different groupings of sinners/rebels. Of one of the groups he was once a zealous member! There are two problems.

1. rejecting and perverting the knowledge of God

2. turning it into a set of rules and becoming judgmental and self righteous

Also note that the "they" of chapter 1 becomes "you" in 2:1-8. It is universalized from Jews and Greeks into "every soul of man" in 2:9-11. Though there are different groups (either two or three groups) in the end it makes no difference, all are under judgment (cf. 3:23).

2:2 "we know" This pronoun probably referred to fellow Jews although it could possibly refer to Christians. In vv. 2-4, Paul returns to his common technique of a question and answer format, called diatribe (i.e., vv. 1-11,17-29), which was a presentation of truth by means of a supposed objector. It was also used by Habakkuk, Malachi, and the rabbis, as well as the Greek philosophers (such as Socrates and the Stoics).

The phrase "we know that" is used several times in Romans (cf. 2:2; 3:19; 7:14; 8:22,28). Paul assumes his hearers have some degree of knowledge, unlike the immoral pagans of chapter 1.

▣ "the judgment of God" The Bible is clear on this truth. All humans will give an account to God for the gift of life (cf. vv. 5-9; Matt. 25:31-46; Rev. 20:11-15). Even Christians will stand before Christ (cf. 14:10-12; 2 Cor. 5:10).

2:3 The grammatical form of Paul's rhetorical question expects a "no" answer.

"do you suppose" This is the Greek verb logizomai. Paul uses it often (Rom. 2:3,26; 3:28; 4:3,4,5,6, 8,9,10,11,22,23,24; 6:11; 8:18,36; 9:8; 14:14; Gal. 3:6, ten times in I and 2 Corinthians, and twice in Philippians). See notes at 4:3 and 8:18.

▣ "O man" This matches the same idiom in v. 1. In 9:20 it refers to Jews.

2:4 This is also a question in Greek.

NASB"think lightly of"
NKJV, NRSV,
TEV, REB"despise"
NJB"disregarding"
NIV"show contempt"
NET"have contempt for"

By comparing English translations interpreters get a feel for the semantic range of the verb. This is a strong term for willing rejection. See its use in

1. Jesus' words, Matt. 6:24; 18:10

2. Paul, 1 Cor. 11:22; 1 Tim. 4:12; 6:2

3. Hebrews (of Jesus), 12:2

4. Peter, 2 Peter 2:10

5. the noun in Acts 13:41

 

▣ "the riches of His kindness and forbearance and patience" Humans have often misunderstood God's grace, mercy, and patience and have turned them into an opportunity to sin instead of to repent (cf. 2 Pet. 3:9).

Paul often describes the attributes of God as "the riches of" (cf. 9:23; 11:33; Col. 1:27; Eph. 1:7,18; 2:4,7; 3:8,16; Phil. 4:19).

The noun "forbearance" is used only twice in the NT, both times by Paul in this literary unit (1:18-3:31), here and 3:26. Both referring to God's patience with sinners.

▣ "leads you to repentance" Repentance is crucial for a faith-covenant relationship with God (cf. Matt. 3:2; 4:17; Mark 1:15; 6:12; Luke 13:3,5; Acts 2:38; 3:16,19; 20:21). The term in Hebrew meant a change of actions, while in Greek it meant a change of mind. Repentance is a willingness to change from one's self-centered existence to a life informed and directed by God. It calls for a turning from the priority and bondage of self. Basically it is a new attitude, a new worldview, a new master. Repentance is God's will for every fallen child of Adam, made in His image (cf. Ezek. 18:21,23,32 and 2 Pet. 3:9).

The NT passage which best reflects the different Greek terms for repentance is 2 Cor. 7:8-11.

1. lupeō, "grief" or "sorrow" in vv. 8 (twice), 9 (thrice), 10 (twice), 11

2. metamelomai, "regret" or "after care," in vv. 8 (twice), 9

3. metanoia, "repentance," or "after mind," in vv. 9, 10

The contrast is false repentance (metamelomai) (cf. Judas, Matt. 27:3 and Esau, Heb. 12:16-17) versus true repentance (metanoeō).

True repentance is theologically linked to

1. Jesus' preaching on the conditions of the New Covenant (cf. Matt. 4:17; Mark 1:15; Luke 13:3,5)

2. the apostolic sermons in Acts (kerygma, cf. Acts 3:16,19; 20:21)

3. God's sovereign gift (cf. Acts 5:31; 11:18 and 2 Tim. 2:25)

4. perishing (cf. 2 Pet. 3:9)

Repentance is not optional!

SPECIAL TOPIC: REPENTANCE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT

2:5-9 These verses describe (1) the stubbornness of fallen mankind and (2) God's anger and judgment.

2:5 "stubbornness" This noun is found only here in the NT. Israel is described in this same way in Exod. 32:9; 33:3,5; 34:9; Deut. 9:6,13,27 (also note Heb. 3:8,15; 4:7).

"heart" See Special Topic at 1:24.

▣ "in the day of wrath" This was called "The Day of the Lord" in the OT (cf. Joel, Amos). This is the concept of Judgment Day, or for believers, Resurrection Day. Mankind will give an account to God for His gift of life (cf. Matt. 25:31-46; Rev. 20:11-15).

Notice that it is the sinners themselves ("you" and "yourself") that store up wrath. God simply, at some point, allows this stored wrath to become evident and run its full course.

Wrath, like all human words to describe God, are only analogously (anthropomorphically, see Special Topic at 1:18) applied to deity! God is eternal, holy, and Spirit. Humans are finite, sinful, and corporeal. God is not emotionally angry, as in a rage. The Bible presents Him as loving sinners and wanting them to repent, but also as having a settled opposition to human rebellion. God is personal; He takes sin personally and we are personally responsible for our sin.

One additional thought about the wrath of God. In the Bible it is both in time (temporal, cf. 1:24,26,28) and at the end of time (eschatological, cf. 2:5-8). The Day of the Lord (Judgment Day) was one way the OT prophets warned Israel to repent at the present time so that their future would be blessed, not judged (cf. Deuteronomy 27-28). The OT prophets often took a crisis of their day and projected it into the end-time future.

2:6 This is a quote from Ps. 62:12 (cf. Matt. 16:27). It is a universal principle (see note at 2:1, 2nd paragraph) that humans are responsible for their actions and will give an account to God (cf. Job 34:11; Pro. 24:12; Eccl. 12:14; Jer. 17:10; 32:19; Matt. 16:27; 25:31-46; Rom. 2:6; 14:12; 1 Cor. 3:8; Gal. 6:7-10; 2 Tim. 4:14; 1 Pet. 1:17; Rev. 2:23; 20:12; 22:12). Even believers will give an account of their lives and service to Christ (cf. 2 Cor. 5:10). Believers are not saved by works but are saved unto works (cf. Eph. 2:8-10 [esp. 2:14-26]; James and 1 John). A changed and changing life of love, service, and selflessness is evidence of true salvation.

2:7 "to those who" There is a contrast between the persons described in v. 7 and those in v. 8 ("but to those who").

NASB"to those who by perseverance in doing good seek for glory and honor and immortality; eternal life"
NKJV"eternal life to those who by patient continuance in doing good seek for glory, honor, and immortality"
NRSV"to those who by patiently doing good seek for glory and honor and immortality, he will give eternal life"
TEV"Some men keep on doing good, and seek glory, honor and immortal life; to them God will give eternal life"
NJB"For those who sought renown and honor and immortality by always doing good there will be eternal life"

This referred to people like Cornelius (cf. Acts 10:34-35). This passage may sound like works righteousness (obtaining righteousness through human effort), but that would go against the major theme of the book of Romans. Remember that either vv. 1-16 or vv. 1-11 are a paragraph. The theological point of the whole is that God is no respecter of persons (v.11) and that all have sinned (v. 12). If people lived up to the light they had (natural revelation for the Gentiles, special revelation for the Jews, cf. 10:5) then they would be right with God. However, the summary of 3:9-18,23 shows that none ever have, nor can they!  A believer's changed godly life is seen as confirming and validating his initial faith response. A changed life is the evidence of the indwelling Spirit of God (cf. vv.10,13; Matt. 7; Eph. 2:8-10; James 2:14-26 and 1 John). See SPECIAL TOPIC: THE NEED TO PERSEVERE at 8:25.

"eternal life" This is a characteristic phrase of John's writings and is used sparingly in the Synoptic Gospels. Paul seems to derive the phrase from Dan. 12:2 (cf. Titus 1:2; 3:7), where it denotes the life of the new age, life in fellowship with God, resurrection life. He first uses it in Gal. 6:8. It is a common theme in the doctrinal section of Romans (cf. 2:7; 5:21; 6:22,23). It also occurs several times in the Pastoral Epistles (cf. 1 Tim. 1:16; Titus 1:2; 3:7).

2:8

NASB"those who are selfishly ambitious"
NKJV, NRSV"those who are self-seeking"
TEV"other people are selfish"
NJB"those who out of jealousy"

The term originally meant "work for hire" (cf. Tob. 2:11).

Louw and Nida, Greek-English Lexicon, vol. 2, p. 104, list two usages of this term.

1. "selfish ambition," using Rom. 2:8 noting "wanting to be better than someone else," which fits this context

2. "hostility," using Phil. 1:17 noting "rivalry" as a translation option (see also 2 Cor. 12:20; Gal. 5:20; Phil. 2:3; James 3:14,16)

 

▣ "and do not obey the truth," The term "truth" (aletheia) was used in its Hebrew sense (emeth) of truthfulness and trustworthiness. In this context, it had a moral, not intellectual, focus. See Special Topic: Truth in Paul's Writings at 1:18.

2:9 "for every soul of man" Paul used the Greek term pas translated "all" or "every" so often in these opening chapters of Romans to show the universal implications of both the "bad news" (mankind's lostness and God's no-partiality judgment) and the "good news" (God's offer of free salvation and complete forgiveness in Christ to all who repent and believe).

This context strongly implies a universal judgment and its resulting consequences. This truth demands a resurrection of both the righteous and the wicked (cf. Dan. 12:2; John 5:28-29; Acts 24:15).

If verses 6-11 are a chiasma, then vv. 8-9 are the key verses which denote judgment or evil doers.

2:9-10 "the Jew first" This is repeated for emphasis. The Jew was first in opportunity because they had God's revelation (cf. 1:16; Matt. 10:6; 15:24; John 4:22; Acts 3:26; 13:46), but also first in judgment (cf. 9-11) because they had God's Revelation (cf. 9:4-5).

2:11

NASB, NKJV"for there is no partiality with God"
NRSV"For God shows no partiality"
TEV"For God judges everyone by the same standard"
NJB"There is no favoritism with God"

Literally this is "to lift the face," which was a metaphor from the judicial system of the OT (cf. Lev. 19:15; Deut. 10:17; 2 Chr. 19:7; Acts 10:34; Gal. 2:6; Eph. 6:9; Col. 3:25; 1 Peter 1:17). If a judge saw to whom he was administering justice there was a chance of bias. Therefore, he was not to lift the face of the one who stood before him.

SPECIAL TOPIC: RACISM

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 2:12-16
 12For all who have sinned without the Law will also perish without the Law, and all who have sinned under the Law will be judged by the Law; 13for it is not the hearers of the Law who are just before God, but the doers of the Law will be justified. 14For when Gentiles who do not have the Law do instinctively the things of the Law, these, not having the Law, are a law to themselves, 15in that they show the work of the Law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness and their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them, 16on the day when, according to my gospel, God will judge the secrets of men through Christ Jesus.

2:12 "for all who have sinned without the Law" God will hold all humans responsible even if they have never been exposed to the OT or the gospel. All people have some knowledge of God from creation (cf. 1:19-20; Ps. 19:1-6), and an innate moral sense, (cf. 2:14-15). The tragedy is that all have willfully violated the light they have (cf. 1:21-23; 3:9,19,23; 11:32; Gal. 3:22).

▣ "the Law" There is no article with the term "law." This grammatical structure usually emphasized the quality of the noun. However, in Romans Paul uses "the law" to refer to several different things.

1. Roman Law

2. Mosaic Law

3. the concept of human societal mores in general

Context, not the article, must reveal which one. This context emphasized that all humans have some knowledge of God's natural revelation of Himself in their hearts (cf. v. 15).

2:13 "for it is not the hearers of the Law who are just before God" The term "hearers" can refer to (1) rabbinical usage which had a specialized sense of rabbinical students of the Torah or (2) those who heard the Scriptures read in synagogue. Remember the writers of the NT were Hebrew thinkers writing in Koine Greek. Therefore, word analysis must begin with the Septuagint, not a Greek lexicon.

The term "just" or "justified" (dikē in all its forms) is a crucial term in Paul's theology (cf. 3:4, 20,24,26,28,30; 4:2,5; 5:1,9; 6:7; 8:30,33). The words "just," "justify," "justification," "right," and "righteousness" are all derived from dikaios. See Special Topic: Righteousness at 1:17. In Hebrew (tsadag, BDB 843) it originally referred to a long straight reed (15 to 20 feet) which was used to measure things, such as walls or fences, for plumb. It came to be used metaphorically of God as the standard of judgment.

In Paul's writings the term had two foci. First, God's own righteousness is given to sinful mankind as a free gift through faith in Christ. This is often called imputed righteousness or forensic righteousness. It refers to one's legal standing before a righteous God. This is the origin of Paul's famous "justification by grace through faith" theme.

Second, God's activity of restoring sinful mankind into His image (cf. Gen. 1:26-27), or to put it another way, to bring about Christlikeness. This verse-like Matt. 7:24; Luke 8:21 and 11:28; John 13:17; James 1:22-23,25-urges believers to be doers not just hearers. Imputed righteousness (justification) must result in righteous living (sanctification). God forgives and changes sinners! Paul's usage was both legal and ethical. The New Covenant gives humans a legal standing but also demands a godly lifestyle. It is free, but costly.

▣ "but doers of the Law" God demands a new obedient lifestyle (cf. Lev. 18:5; Matt. 7:24-27; Luke 8:21; 11:28; John 13:17; James 1:22-25; 2:14-28). In many ways this concept mimics the Hebrew term shema (BDB 1033), which meant to hear so as to do (cf. Deut. 5:1; 6:4; 9:1; 20:3; 27:9-10).

2:14

NASB"For when Gentiles who do not have the Law do instinctively the things of the Law, these, not having the Law, are a law to themselves"
NKJV"for when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do the things contained in the law, these, although not having the law, are a law to themselves"
NRSV"When Gentiles, who do not possess the law, do instinctively what the law requires, these, though not having the law, are a law to themselves"
TEV"The Gentiles do not have the Law, but whenever of their own free will they do what the Law commands, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the Law"
NJB"For instance, pagans who never heard of the Law but are led by reason to do what the Law commands, may not actually 'possess' the Law, but, they can be said to 'be' the Law"

All cultures have an inner moral law, a societal norm. They are responsible for the light they have (cf. 1 Cor. 9:21). This verse was not meant to imply that they can be right with God if they live in light of their culture, but that they are responsible for their innate knowledge of God.

2:15 "their conscience bearing witness, and their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them" There is an inner moral voice. But only Scripture, enlightened by the Spirit, can be fully trusted. Fallenness has affected our conscience. However, creation (1:18-20) and this inner, moral law (2:14-15) are all the knowledge of God that some humans possess. There was no Hebrew term that was equivalent to the Greek word for "conscience" (syneidesis). The Greek concept of an inner moral sense of right and wrong was often discussed by the Stoic philosophers. Paul was familiar with the Greek philosophers (he quotes Cleanthes in Acts 17:28; Menander in 1 Cor. 15:33; and Epimenides in Titus 1:12) from his early education in Tarsus. His hometown was known for its excellent schools of Greek rhetoric and philosophy.

2:16 "on the day" See note at 2:5.

▣ "according to my gospel" In context this referred to Paul's preaching of the revelation of Jesus Christ. The pronoun "my" reflected Paul's understanding of the stewardship of the gospel that had been entrusted to him (cf. 16:25; 1 Cor. 15:1; Gal. 1:11; 1 Tim. 1:11; 2 Tim. 2:8). It was not uniquely his, but as the Apostle to the Gentiles he felt an awesome sense of responsibility for spreading the truth about Jesus in the Greco-Roman world.

▣ "God will judge the secrets of men" God knows the hearts of all people (cf. 1 Sam. 2:7; 16:7; 1 Kgs. 8:39; 1 Chr. 28:9; 2 Chr. 6:30; Ps. 7:9; 44:21; 139:1-6; Pro. 15:11; 21:2; Jer. 11:20; 17:10; 20:12; Luke 15:16; Acts 1:24; 15:8; Rom. 8:27; Rev. 2:23). The Father, through the agency of the Son, will bring both motive and action into judicial review (cf. Matt. 25:31-46; Rev. 20:11-15).

▣ "through Christ Jesus" Jesus did not come to act as judge (cf. John 3:17-21). He came to reveal God the Father, die a substitutionary death, and to give believers an example to follow. When people reject Jesus they judge themselves.

However, the NT also teaches that Jesus will act as the Father's representative in judgment (cf. John 5:22, 27; Acts 10:42; 17:31; 2 Tim. 4:1). The tension between Jesus as Judge and/or Savior can be seen in John's Gospel (cf. 3:17-21 versus 9:39).

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 2:17-24
 17But if you bear the name "Jew" and rely upon the Law and boast in God, 18and know His will and approve the things that are essential, being instructed out of the Law, 19and are confident that you yourself are a guide to the blind, a light to those who are in darkness, 20a corrector of the foolish, a teacher of the immature, having in the Law the embodiment of knowledge and of the truth, 21you, therefore, who teach another, do you not teach yourself? You who preach that one shall not steal, do you steal? 22You who say that one should not commit adultery, do you commit adultery? You who abhor idols, do you rob temples? 23You who boast in the Law, through your breaking the Law, do you dishonor God? 24For "the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you," just as it is written.

2:17 "if" This is a first class conditional sentence which is assumed to be true from the author's point of view or for his literary purposes. This condition extends to v. 20 but has no conclusion, therefore, TEV translates them as assumed affirmations which Jesus would make. The Jews were trusting in their lineage, traditions, and performance to provide salvation (cf. Matt. 3:9; John 8:33,37,39).

▣ "boast in God" Many Jews were relying on (1) their racial lineage to Abraham and (2) their personal performance of the Mosaic Law as the means of being accepted by God. However, their self-righteous legalism separated them from God (cf. Matt. 5:20; Gal. 3). What tragic irony!

Paul develops the idea of boasting in 1 Corinthians. Paul faced an arrogant Israel and an arrogant Greek intellectualism. The bottom line is no flesh will glory before God.

SPECIAL TOPIC: BOASTING

2:18 "approve" This is the Greek verb dokimazō in its present active indicative form. See Special Topic on Testing following.

SPECIAL TOPIC: GREEK TERMS FOR TESTING AND THEIR CONNOTATIONS

▣ "the Law" Verses 17ff. deal with the Jewish people, therefore, the term "the Law" must refer in this context to the Mosaic Law. This is confirmed by v. 25 which deals with circumcision.

2:18-20 The Jewish leaders believed their way (their sect of Judaism) was the right way, the only way to God. They were confident that they were the true teachers about religious matters (cf. Matt. 15:14). Privilege brings responsibility (cf. Luke 12:48).

Notice the parallel phrases related to their confidence (cf. Matt. 15:14; 23:16,24; Luke 6:39).

1. a guide to the blind, v. 19

2. a light to those in darkness, v. 19

3. a corrector of the foolish, v. 20

4. a teacher of the immature, v. 20

5. having in the law the embodiment of knowledge and of the truth, v. 20

 

2:21-24 If one trusts in personal obedience, then that obedience must be complete (cf. Matt. 5:20,48; Gal. 3:10, which is a quote from Deut. 27:26, and James 2:10). This is an impossibility for fallen mankind. Paul asks poses rhetorical questions to his Jewish readers/hearers in vv. 21-23.

2:22 It is difficult to know to what Paul was referring in vv. 22-23. Since the description does not fit most Jews of Paul's day it is possible that these sins are used in a spiritual sense similar to how Jesus interpreted the Law in Matt. 5:20-48. George Ladd in A Theology of the New Testament, says "Paul must be referring to robbing God of the honor due him, spiritual adultery, and profaning the devotion due God alone by exalting themselves as judge and lord over their fellow creatures." p. 505.

2:22 "abhor idols" The turning away from something because of stench is the root meaning of this term.

▣ "do you rob temples" It is uncertain historically to what this referred but it was somehow related to idolatry.

2:23 "boast" See SPECIAL TOPIC: BOASTING at 2:17.

2:24 This is a quote from Isaiah 52:5 in the Septuagint. God's blessing of Israel for covenant keeping (cf. Deuteronomy 27-28) was meant to be a witness to the world. However, Israel never kept the covenant, therefore, the world saw only the judgment of God (cf. Ezek. 36:22-32). Israel was to be a kingdom of priests (cf. Exod. 19:5-6), to bring all the world to faith in YHWH (cf. Gen. 12:3; Eph. 2:11-3:13). See Special Topic: YHWH's ETERNAL REDEMPTIVE PLAN at 1:5.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 2:25-29
  25For indeed circumcision is of value if you practice the Law; but if you are a transgressor of the Law, your circumcision has become uncircumcision. 26So if the uncircumcised man keeps the requirements of the Law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision? 27And he who is physically uncircumcised, if he keeps the Law, will he not judge you who though having the letter of the Law and circumcision are a transgressor of the Law? 28For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh. 29But he is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is that which is of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter; and his praise is not from men, but from God. 2Great in every respect. First of all, that they were entrusted with the oracles of God.

2:25 "circumcision" Paul is still using diatribe. Someone will raise the statement that, well at least we are circumcised (cf. Gen. 17:10-11). We are in the line of Abraham. Paul plainly and boldly dismantles this cherished Jewish claim (cf. Matt. 3:7-10; John 8:31-59).

All of Israel's neighbors except the Philistines were circumcised. It was not the act itself that was significant; it was the continuing faith of the recipient (cf. vv. 26-27; Deut. 10:16; 30:6). This is true of all religious rituals. Religious people often want the blessings of God's covenant but without the responsibilities.

2:25-26 "if. . .if. . .if" These are three third class conditional sentences which refer to possible future action. Obedience (cf. Deut. 27-30) is the key in Paul's argument in chapter 2, but not in 3:21-31 (cf. Gal. 3). Obedience is the result of salvation but grace is the basis (cf. Eph. 2:8-10).

2:26-27 These verses hold out hope that some Gentiles have responded to the light they have (grammar expects a "yes" answer in v. 26). The only possible biblical example of this would be Cornelius of Acts 10. Yet he does not quite fit this verse because he was a God-fearer and worshiped at the local synagogue.

These verses are in reality a counterpoint to Paul's argument about the need of salvation for the Jews. Romans 3:23 is the summary that all humans are spiritually lost without Christ. If there are Gentiles who live up to the light they have from creation and an inner moral sensitivity, God will provide an opportunity for them to respond to Christ- somehow, someway, sometime.

2:28-29 "For he is not a Jew. . .he is a Jew" This is an extremely important discussion because some modern theological groups attempt to separate or capsulize the OT people of God from the NT people of God. There is only one covenant and one people (cf. Rom. 9:6; Gal. 3:7-9, 29; 6:16; 1 Pet. 3:6). The new covenant is a development and fulfillment of the old. The people of God have always been so by faith, not lineage. They are a "heart people" not ritual or racial people. Faith, not the parent, is the key. Covenant mind, not covenant sign, is the mark.

▣ "flesh" See Special Topic at 1:3.

2:29 The covenant sign of circumcision (cf. Gen. 17:14) was a metaphor in the OT for one's openness to God. It developed metaphorically in several ways

1. heart circumcision (cf. Deut. 10:16; 30:6; Jer. 4:4; 9:24-25)

2. ear circumcision (cf. Jer. 6:10)

3. lip circumcision (cf. Exod. 6:12,30)

The Law was never meant to be an external code, but a life transforming daily relationship with YHWH that revealed His character and promises to all the children of Adam. See Special Topic: Paul's Views of the Law at 13:9.

NASB"that which is of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter"
NKJV"that of the heart, in the Spirit, and not in the letter"
NRSV"a matter of the heart -- it is spiritual and not literal"
TEV"which is the work of God's Spirit, not of the written Law"
NJB"in the heart - something not of the letter but of the spirit"

This phrase is ambiguous in Greek. Some translations take it to refer to the spiritual versus the literal (cf. NRSV, the Twentieth Century New Testament, the Knox translation, the Lamsa translation of the Peshitta, the Williams translation and the New Berkeley Version). Other translations see the contrast as between the Holy Spirit (cf. 7:6; 2 Cor. 3:6, where a similar construction occurs) and the written text (cf. NASB, NKJV, NEB, NIV and TEV). The Jerome Biblical Commentary, p. 299, gives the suggestion that based on 2 Cor. 3:6 it was Paul's metaphorical/literary way of referring to the Old Covenant and the New Covenant; the first characterized by an external code and the second by an internal new mind and new spirit given by the Holy Spirit in the new age of the Spirit.

Paul has been discussing the fact that some Gentiles might act pleasing to God apart from the Law. If this is true then the children of God included more than those who had been only physically circumcised (cf. Galatians). God's family is wider than racial Jews (cf. Gen. 3:15; 12:3; Exod. 19:5); Job, Melchizedek, Jethro, Caleb, Rahab, and Ruth were not racially Jewish. Even the tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh were half Egyptian (cf. Gen. 41:50-52).

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. How does the Jews' unfaithfulness affect God's promise (3:3-4)?

2. Is there any advantage before God for being Jewish (3:1-8)?

3. What is a diatribe?

4. What is the point of the supposed diatribe in vv. 5-8?

5. Does how one lives really count if justification is by grace through faith apart from works (3:8)?

6. What is the theological concept of total depravity (3:10-18)?

7. What is the purpose of the Mosaic law, or law in general (3:20; Gal. 3:24-25)?

8. Why is Satan not mentioned at all in chapters 1-3 which deal with man's lostness?

9. Are the OT promises conditional or unconditional?

10. What is the purpose of the Mosaic Law in the life of: (1) the non-Jew; and (2) the Jew?

11. Outline in your own words Paul's arguments in 1:18-3:20 paragraph by paragraph.

 

Romans 3

 

PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS

UBS4 NKJV NRSV TEV NJB
The Jews and the Law
(2:17-3:8)
God's Judgment Defended The Advantage of the Jews The Jews and the Law
(2:17-3:8)
God's Promises Will Not Save Them
3:1-8 3:1-8 3:1-8 3:1-4 3:1-8
      3:5-6  
      3:7-8  
There is None Righteous All Have Sinned All are Guilty No Man is Righteous All are Guilty
3:9-20 3:9-20 3:9-18 3:9-18 3:9-18
    3:19-20 3:19-20 3:19-20
Righteousness Through Faith God's Righteousness Through Faith The True Righteousness How God Put Men Right The Revelation of God's Judgment
3:21-26 3:21-26 3:21-26 3:21-26 3:21-26
  Boasting Excluded Boasting is Excluded   What Faith Does
3:27-31 3:27-31 3:27-31 3:27-31 3:27-31

READING CYCLE THREE

FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S INTENT AT THE PARAGRAPH LEVEL

This is a study guide commentary ,which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects. Compare your subject divisions with the five translations above. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is the key to following the original author's intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every paragraph has one and only one subject.

1. First paragraph

2. Second paragraph

3. Third paragraph

4. Etc.

 

CONTEXTUAL INSIGHTS

 

A. Verses 1-8 are a related content, but it is difficult to follow Paul's logic because he is using a literary technique called diatribe (a supposed objector).

 

B. It seems that Paul is anticipating how some Jewish people will respond to 2:17-29, so he answers their objections (Corley, Vaughan, Romans, pp. 37-39).

1. First question. Are there really no advantages for the Jews? (vv. 1-2)

2. Second question. Has God's word failed because some Jews were unfaithful? (vv. 3-4)

3. Third question. If God used the Jews to reveal His character are the Jews still judicially responsible? (vv. 5-8)

 

C. The conclusion goes back to 2:11. There is no favoritism with God. All humans are accountable for living apart from the light they have (natural revelation and/or special revelation).

 

D. Verses 9-18 contain a series of OT quotes which declare the sins of the Jews.

 

E. Verses 19-20 sum up the spiritual condition of Israel and the purpose of the OT (cf. Galatians 3).

 

F. Verses 21-31 are the summary of 1:18-3:20. They are the first theological point of the gospel (see brief outline, p. 2).

 

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 3:1-8
 1Then what advantage has the Jew? Or what is the benefit of circumcision? 2Great in every respect. First of all, that they were entrusted with the oracles of God. 3What then? If some did not believe, their unbelief will not nullify the faithfulness of God, will it? 4May it never be! Rather, let God be found true, though every man be found a liar, as it is written, "That You may be justified in Your words, And prevail when You are judged." 5But if our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God, what shall we say? The God who inflicts wrath is not unrighteous, is He? (I am speaking in human terms.) 6May it never be! For otherwise, how will God judge the world? 7But if through my lie the truth of God abounded to His glory, why am I also still being judged as a sinner? 8And why not say (as we are slanderously reported and as some claim that we say), "Let us do evil that good may come"? Their condemnation is just.

3:1 "what advantage has the Jew" Paul is continuing to use the literary technique of diatribe, or a supposed objector, to communicate his message. For a listing of the privileges of the Jewish people, see 3:2 and 9:4-5. Paul develops this paragraph in chapters 9-11.

3:2 "First of all" Paul uses "first" in 1:8, but without a second item being mentioned. He does the same here. Paul's writing was so intense, as well as being dictated, that often his grammatical constructions are incomplete.

▣ "they were entrusted with the oracles of God" Having God's revelation is an awesome responsibility as well as a tremendous privilege (cf. 9:4-5). They were stewards of God's gift (aorist passive, cf. I Thess. 2:4).

The word logion (oracles) is used in the Septuagint for the word from God (cf. Num. 24:4,16; Deut. 33:9; Ps. 107:11; 119:67; Isa. 5:24; 28:13), which would denote the OT. It is consistently used in this same sense in the NT (cf. Acts 7:38; Heb. 5:12; I Pet. 4:11).

3:3 "if" This is a first class conditional sentence which is assumed to be true from the author's perspective or for his literary purposes. Verses 5 and 7 are also first class conditional sentences.

The grammar of v. 3 expects a "no" answer.

NASB, NKJV"some did not believe"
NRSV, NJB"some were unfaithful"
TEV"what if some of them were unfaithful"

This may refer either to individual Israelite's (1) unfaithfulness or (2) lack of personal faith in YHWH. It is difficult to relate intellectually to the unconditional promises of God (i.e., redemption of a fallen mankind) and the conditional mandate of human response. See SPECIAL TOPIC: COVENANT at 9:4. Yet this is a biblical paradox (cf. 3:4-5). God is faithful even when His people are not (cf. Hosea 1,3; II T im. 2:13).

"nullify" See Special Topic below.

SPECIAL TOPIC: NULL AND VOID (KATARGEŌ)

▣ "the faithfulness of God" This truth (cf. I Cor. 1:9; 10:13; II Cor. 1:18) is foundational to humans' trust in God's (cf. Deut. 7:9; Isa. 49:7).

1. unchanging character

2. eternal promises

He has revealed Himself in creation, revelation, covenant, and Messiah! Even amidst human unfaithfulness He remains faithful (cf. II Tim. 2:13)!

3:4

NASB"May it never be!"
NKJV, TEV"Certainly not!"
NRSV"By no means!"
NJB"That would be absurd."

This is a rare use of the optative mood which expressed a wish or a prayer and this phrase should be translated, "May it never be." It may reflect a Hebrew idiom. This phrase of "astonished unbelief" was often used by Paul because of his literary technique of diatribe (cf. 3:4,6,31; 6:2,15; 7:7,13; 9:14; 11:1; I Cor. 6:15; Gal. 2:17; 3:21; 6:14). It was his way of emphatically denying a supposed assertion.

Notice the literary ways Paul rejects the supposed objector questions and statements.

1. "May it never be," vv. 4,6

2. "Let God be found true, though every man be found a liar," v. 4

3. "(I am speaking in human terms)," v. 5

4. "(as we are slanderously reported and as some claim that we say)," v. 8

 

▣ "let God be found true, though every man be found a liar" This is a present middle imperative. This construction focuses on the continuing state of the subject; God is faithful and truthful (see Special Topic at 1:18), humans are unfaithful and liars! This is an allusion to Ps. 116:11 and is similar to what Job had to learn in 32:2; 40:8.

Notice the universal element of sinfulness in this chapter, represented by Paul's use of pas (all, every) in vv. 4,9,12,19,20,23,24, but praise God, also the universal offer of salvation to all (cf. 3:22).

▣ "as it is written" Literally "it has been and continues to be written." This is a perfect passive indicative. It became a technical idiom used to assert God's inspiration of the Scriptures (cf. Matt. 5:17-19). It introduces a quote from Ps. 51:4 from the Septuagint (LXX).

3:5-6 The argument Paul is making in these verses relates to God's special choice of Israel as His means of reaching the world (cf. Gen. 12:3; Exod. 19:5-6). In the OT "election" referred to service, not special privilege. God made a covenant with them. He was faithful; they were unfaithful (cf. Nehemiah 9). The fact that God judged unfaithful Israelites is evidence of His righteousness.

Israel was meant to be a means of reaching the Gentiles. They failed (cf. 3:24)! God's purpose of universal salvation (cf. Gen. 3:15) is not affected by the failure of Israel. As a matter of fact, God's faithfulness to His original covenant is confirmed in Romans 9-11. Unbelieving Israel is rejected, but a believing Israel will culminate God's plan of redemption.

Paul's diatribe in vv. 5-6 is paralleled in vv. 7-8.

3:5 "if" This is a first class conditional sentence which is assumed to be true from the author's perspective or for his literary purposes. Verses 3 and 7 are also first class conditional sentences.

▣ "If our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God" This pronoun, "our," must refer in a collective sense to all Jews. See special topic at 1:17

▣ "what shall we say" Paul is still using diatribe (cf. 3:5; 7:7; 8:31; 9:14,39). Paul is clarifying his presentation by the use of a supposed objector (cf. Mal. 1:2,6,7,12,13; 2:14,17 [twice]; 3:7,13,14).

NASB"(I am speaking in human terms)"
NKJV"(I speak as a man)"
NRSV"(I speak in a human way)"
TEV"(I speak here as men do)"
NJB"- to use a human analogy -"

Paul often used human logic in his theological arguments (cf. 6:19; I Cor. 9:8; Gal. 3:15). Here it functions as a way of rejecting the assertions of the supposed objector.

3:7-8 There is an obvious parallel between vv. 5 and 7 (both begin with ei de). Paul is either

1. continuing to use the literary technique of diatribe, a supposed objector (cf. 3:5,7; 7:7; 8:31; 9:14,30)

2. reacting to criticism of his justification-by-faith-alone preaching (cf. v. 8)

Paul did not explain or answer the charge in detail but forcefully condemns the accusation. It is possible that the objection to a free undeserved justification by faith was that it would lead to lawlessness or just more unfaithful disobedience. Paul believed that free grace would lead to Christlikeness through a new spirit and life of gratitude! The Jews, the Greek moralists, and Paul all wanted ethical living in their converts! But it comes, not through conformity to an external law code, but a new heart, a new mind, and a new spirit (cf. Jer. 31:31-34; Ezek. 36:22-36).

3:7 "if" This is a first class conditional sentence (also vv. 3 and 5) which is assumed to be true from the author's perspective or for his literary purposes.

▣ "abounded" See Special Topic at 15:13.

▣ "His glory" See note at 3:23

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 3:9-18
 9What then? Are we better than they? Not at all; for we have already charged that both Jews and Greeks are all under sin; 10as it is written, "There is none righteous, not even one; 11There is none who understands, There is none who seeks for God; 12All have turned aside, together they have become useless; There is none who does good, There is not even one." 13"Their throat is an open grave, With their tongues they keep deceiving," "The poison of asps is under their lips"; 14"Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness"; 15"Their feet are swift to shed blood, 16Destruction and misery are in their paths, 17And the path of peace they have not known." 18"There is no fear of God before their eyes."

3:9 "Are we better than they" The grammar at this point is ambiguous. It is obvious that the main truth of this passage is that all humanity is in need of God's grace (cf. 3:9,19,23; 11:32; Gal. 3:22). However, it is uncertain whether the specific reference was to Jews (Paul and his kinsmen, cf. TEV, RSV) or Christians (Paul and fellow believers apart from the grace of God). Jews did have some advantages (cf. vv. 1-2; 9:4-5), but these advantages make them even more responsible (cf. Luke 12:48)! All humans are spiritually lost and in need of God's grace.

The term "better" is understood by a minority of scholars as passive voice instead of middle ("better off"), resulting in the translation "excelled by" or "disadvantaged by."

Romans is often said to be the most locally neutral of Paul's letters. Most of Paul's letters address a local need or crises (occasional documents). However, the jealousy between believing Jewish leaders and believing Gentile leaders in the church at Rome may be in the background of chapters 1-3 and 9-11.

"for we have already charged that both Jews and Greeks are all under sin" This verb (aorist middle [deponent] indicative) is found only here in the NT. Paul is referring to his sustained argument of 1:18-2:29.

"under sin" Paul personifies "sin" (Jerome Biblical Commentary, p. 300) as a cruel taskmaster over fallen humanity (cf. 6:16-23).

3:10-18 "as it is written" This phrase also occurs in v. 4. The following statements are a series of OT quotes using metaphors of the human body to emphasize the fallenness of mankind.

1. vv. 10-12, Eccl. 7:20 or Ps. 14:1-3

2. v.13, Ps. 5:9 and 140:3

3. v.14, Ps. 10:7

4. vv. 15-17, Isa. 59:7-8 and Pro. 1:16

5. v.18, Ps. 36:1

It is surprising that Paul did not use Isa. 53:6.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 3:19-20
 19Now we know that whatever the Law says, it speaks to those who are under the Law, so that every mouth may be closed and all the world may become accountable to God; 20because by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified in His sight; for through the Law comes the knowledge of sin.

3:19 "we know that" See note at 2:2.

▣ "the Law" In this context it must refer to the whole OT (cf. v. 21) because of the non-Pentateuch passages quoted in vv. 10-18. Paul personifies "the law" as he did "the sin" inv. 9 (cf. 6:16-23).

"to those who are under the Law" This refers uniquely to Jews and Gentile converts. Although it must be said that several of the OT quotes used refer to Gentiles in their original contexts. All humans are sinful (cf. 3:23)!

NASB"that every mouth may be closed, and all the world may become accountable to God"
NKJV"that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God"
NRSV"so that every mouth may be silenced, and the whole world may be held accountable to God "
TEV"in order to stop all human excuses and bring the whole world under God's judgment"
NJB"but it is meant to silence everyone and to lay the whole world open to God's judgment"

This is the major theme of chapter 1:18-3:20 which is summarized in 3:23.

"every mouth" There are several phrases in vv. 19-20 which denote all humanity.

1. "every mouth," v. 19

2. "all the world," v. 19

3. "no flesh," v. 20

 

3:20 "because by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified in His sight" This is an allusion to Ps. 143:2 (also note Job 4:17; 9:2; 25:4; Ps. 130:3; Pro. 20:9; Eccl. 7:20; I Kgs. 8:46; II Chr. 6:36), but with an added opening phrase. This was a major aspect of Paul's gospel (cf. Gal. 2:16; 3:11). As a committed Pharisee, Paul uniquely knew the inability of religious enthusiasm and meticulous performance to provide inner peace.

For "flesh" see Special Topic at 1:3.

 

NASB, NRSV"through the Law comes the knowledge of sin"
NKJV"for by the law is the knowledge of sin"
TEV"what the Law does is to make man know that he has sinned"
NJB"all that law does is to tell us what is sinful"

This was one of the purposes of the OT. See Special Topic at 13:9. It was never meant to bring salvation to fallen mankind. Its purpose was to reveal sinfulness and drive all humans to the mercy of YHWH (cf. 4:15; 5:13,20; 7:7; Gal. 3:19-22, 23-29).

 

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. How does the Jews' unfaithfulness affect God's promises? (3:3-4)

2. Is there any advantage with God in being Jewish? (3:1-8)

3. What is the point of the supposed objection (diatribe) in vv. 5-8?

4. Does how one lives really count if justification is by grace through faith apart from works (cf. 3:8)?

5. Define the theological (Calvin) concept of total depravity (cf. 3:10-18).

6. What is the purpose of the Mosaic law, or law in general (cf. 3:20; Gal. 3:24-25)?

7. Why is Satan not mentioned at all in chapters 1-3 which deal with mankind's lostness?

 

CONTEXTUAL INSIGHTS TO ROMANS 3:21-31

A. Romans 3:21-31

1. the climactic summary of 1:18-3:20

2. an amplification of 1:16-17

3. an introduction to chapters 4-8 (esp. 3:28)

 

B. This climactic summary of the doctrine of justification by grace through faith was characterized by the Reformers.

1. Martin Luther as "the chief point and very central place of the epistle and the whole Bible"

2. John Calvin as "there is not probably in the whole Bible a passage which sets forth more profoundly the righteousness of God in Christ"

 

C. This is the theological essence of evangelical Christianity. To understand this context is to understand Christianity. This is the gospel in a two-paragraph summary as John 3:16 is the gospel in a verse. This is the heart and soul of Paul's gospel presentation.

The three key interpretive questions are:

1. What does the term "law" mean?

2. What does the phrase "the righteousness of God" mean?

3. What do the terms "faith" and "believe" mean?

 

D. I thank God for the word "all" in v. 22 (cf. v. 29) and the word "gift" in v. 24 (cf. 5:15,17; 6:23).

 

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 3:21-26
 21But now apart from the Law the righteousness of God has been manifested, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, 22even the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all those who believe; for there is no distinction; 23for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus; 25whom God displayed publicly as a propitiation in His blood through faith. This was to demonstrate His righteousness, because in the forbearance of God He passed over the sins previously committed; 26for the demonstration, I say, of His righteousness at the present time, so that He would be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.

3:21 "But now" Paul is contrasting the Old Covenant with the New Covenant, the old age of rebellion with the new age of righteousness. This would then parallel "at the present time" (cf. v. 26; "but now" of 6:22; 7:6).

▣ "now apart from the Law" It is often hard to be certain whether Paul is referring to the Mosaic Law (NASB) or law in general (NRSV, TEV, NJB, NIV) in these opening chapters. In this context the Jewish Law fits Paul's argument best. All humans have violated every set of moral, societal guidelines whether internal or external. Our problems as fallen mankind is that we want no guidelines at all except our own selfish, self-centered desires (cf. Genesis 3) which so characterizes modern western individualism.

NASB"the righteousness of God"
NKJV, NRSV"the righteousness of God"
TEV"God's way of putting people right with himself"
NJB"God's saving justice"

There is no definite article with "righteousness." This does not refer to God's character, but God's way of imparting forgiveness and acceptance to sinful people. This very phrase was used in the theological theme of Rom. 1:16-17. The clearly revealed mechanism is faith in the crucified Jesus Christ (cf. v. 22,24-26).

The fact that this term (dikaiosonē) and its derivatives (see note at 2:13) are used so often in this context shows its significance (cf. 1:17; 3:5,21,22,25,26; 4:3,5,6,9,11,13,22; 5:17,21; 6:13,16,18,19,20; 8:10; 9:28,30,31; 10:3,4,5,6,10,17). This Greek term is from an OT construction metaphor (tsadak) of "a standard" or "a measuring reed" (see Special Topic at 1:17). The standard is God Himself. This term reflects God's character which is freely given to fallen mankind through Christ (cf. chap. 4; II Cor. 5:21). Admitting their need and accepting God's gift was, and is, so humiliating to prideful, self-centered mankind-especially legalistic, religious mankind.

▣ "has been manifested" This phrase is very similar to 1:17. However, the verb tense is different. The verb here can be translated, "has been and continues to be clearly revealed." It is a perfect passive indicative, while the synonym in 1:17 is present passive indicative. God has clearly revealed the gospel both in the OT (cf. chapter 4) and in Jesus.

▣ "being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets" This referred to two of the three divisions of the Hebrew canon (Law, Prophets, and Writings). These first two were used to refer to the whole (see note at 3:19; Matt. 5:17). This clearly showed that the gospel was contained in preliminary form in the OT (cf. Luke 24:27,44; Acts 10:43). It was not an afterthought, "Plan B," or a last minute crash program (cf. 1:2).

3:22 "through faith in Jesus Christ" This is literally "through faith of Jesus Christ." This is a genitive construction. It is repeated in Gal. 2:16 and Phil. 3:9 as well as a similar form in Rom. 3:26; Gal. 2:16,20; 3:22. It could mean

1. the faith or faithfulness of Jesus (subjective genitive)

2. Jesus as the object of our faith (objective genitive)

The same grammatical construction in Gal. 2:16 makes #2 the best choice.

This shows the main aspect of God's justification. It is the righteousness of God made operative in one's life by God's free gift through Christ (cf. 4:5; 6:23), which must be accepted by faith/belief/trust (cf. Eph. 2:8-9) and lived out in daily life (cf. Eph. 1:4; 2:10).

▣ "for all" The gospel is for all humans (cf. v. 24; Isa. 53:6; Ezek. 18:23,32; John 3:16-17; 4:42; I Tim. 2:4; 4:10; Titus 2:11; II Pet. 3:9; I John 2:1; 4:14). What a great truth! This must balance the biblical truth of election. God's election must not be understood in the Islamic sense of determinism nor in the ultra-Calvinistic sense of some vs. others, but in the covenantal sense. Old Testament election was for service, not privilege! God promised to redeem fallen mankind (cf. Gen. 3:15). God called and chose all mankind through Israel (cf. Gen. 12:3; Exod. 19:5-6). God elects through faith in Christ. God always takes the initiative in salvation (cf. John 6:44,65). Ephesians 1 and Romans 9 are the strongest biblical passages on the doctrine of predestination which was theologically emphasized by Augustine and Calvin.

God chose believers not only to salvation (justification), but also to sanctification (cf. Eph. 1:4; Col. 1:12). This could relate to

1. our position in Christ (cf. II Cor. 5:21)

2. God's desire to reproduce His character in His children (cf. Rom. 8:28-29; Gal. 4:19; Eph. 2:10)

God's will for His children is both heaven one day and Christlikeness now!

The goal of predestination is holiness (cf. Eph. 1:4), not privilege! God's call was not to a selected few of Adam's children, but all! It was a call to God's own character (cf. I Thess. 5:23; II Thess. 2:13). To turn predestination into a theological tenant instead of a holy life is a tragedy of human theological systems. Often our theological grids distort biblical texts!

See SPECIAL TOPIC: ELECTION/PREDESTINATION AND THE NEED FOR A THEOLOGICAL BALANCE/Predestination and the Need for a Theological Balance at 8:33.

▣ "who believe" Jesus died for all humans. Potentially all can be saved. It is mankind's personal reception (present participle, see Special Topic at 10:4) that makes Jesus' righteousness applicable to their lives (cf. 1:16; John 1:12; 3:16; 20:31; Rom. 10:9-13; I John 5:13). The Bible presents two criteria for imputed righteousness: faith and repentance (cf. Mark 1:15; Acts 3:16,19; 20:31 and see note at 1:5). This text clearly reveals the universal offer of salvation but the tragedy and mystery is that not all will be saved.

▣ "for there is no distinction" There is only one way and one Person by which humans (Jews and Gentiles) can be saved (cf. John 10:1-2,7; 11:25; 14:6). Anyone and everyone can be saved by faith in Christ (cf. 1:16; 4:11,16; 10:4,12; Gal. 3:28; Col. 3:11).

3:23-26 This is one sentence in Greek.

3:23

NASB, NKJV,
NRSV"for all have sinned and fall short of"
TEV"all men have sinned and are far away from"
NJB"sinned and forfeited"

This is a summary of 1:18-3:20. Everyone needs to be saved by Christ (cf. 3:9,19; 11:32; Gal. 3:22; Isa. 53:6). "Sinned" is an aorist active indicative, while "continues to come short" is a present middle indicative. Possibly this phrase referred to both (1) mankind's collective fall in Adam (cf. 5:12-21) and (2) his continual individual acts of rebellion. None of the modern English translations specifically reflect this distinction.

This verse relates theologically to v. 21 and not directly to v. 24.

▣ "the glory of God" Humans were made in God's image (cf. Gen. 1:26-27), which was not true of any other created thing. Humans were to fellowship with the God of glory and reflect His character! Sin damaged the image, but God's grace through Christ's death and believers's faith has restored the image (cf. Col. 3:10).

In the OT the most common Hebrew word for "glory" (kbd) was originally a commercial term (which referred to a pair of scales) which meant "to be heavy." See Special Topic below.

SPECIAL TOPIC: GLORY (DOXA)

3:24 "being justified as a gift by His grace" This is a present passive participle. This is where the gospel begins-the grace of God who gives righteousness (cf. 5:15-17; 6:23; Eph. 2:8-9). The Greek term "justify" (dikaioō) was from the same root as "righteousness" (dikaiosunē, see Special Topic at 1:17). God always takes the initiative (cf. John 6:44,65).

In verses 24-25 there are three metaphors used to describe salvation.

1. "justified" which was a legal term that meant "no penalty given" or to pronounce one not guilty

2. "redemption" which was from the slave market that meant "bought back" or "to set free"

3. "propitiation" which was from the sacrificial system and meant the place of covering or atonement

It referred to the lid of the Ark of the Covenant where sacrificial blood was placed on the Day of Atonement (cf. Leviticus 16; Heb. 9:5).

SPECIAL TOPIC: NEW TESTAMENT EVIDENCE FOR ONE'S SALVATION

"gift" Paul uses this concept several times using different terms.

1. dōrean, adverb, "freely"

2. dōrea, noun, "free gift"

3. dōron, noun, "gift" (cf. Eph. 2:8)

4. charisma, noun, "free debt" or "free favor" (cf. 1:11; 5:15,16; 6:23; 11:29; 12:6)

5. charisomai, verb, "grant as a free favor" (cf. 8:32)

6. charis, noun, "free favor" or "free gift" (cf. 4:4,16; 11:5,6; Eph. 2:5,8)

 

▣ "through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus" The mechanism for our salvation is Jesus' substitutionary death and resurrection. The biblical focus is not on how much was paid or to whom the price was paid (Augustine), but on the fact that mankind has been delivered from sin's guilt and punishment by means of an innocent substitute (cf. John 1:29,36; II Cor. 5:21; I Pet. 1:19).

The verse also shows the costliness of Gen. 3:15. Jesus bore the curse (cf. Gal. 3:13) and died (cf. II Cor. 5:21) as a substitute for fallen mankind. Salvation may be free, but it is surely not cheap.

SPECIAL TOPIC: RANSOM/REDEEM

3:25

NASB"whom God displayed publicly"
NKJV"whom God set forth" 
NRSV"whom God put forward"
TEV"God offered"
NJB"who was appointed by God"

This is an aorist middle indicative of protithēmi (in Rom. 1:13 and Eph. 1:9 it means "to purpose," as does the noun in Rom. 8:28), which meant that God Himself revealed His own heart and purpose by the death of Christ (cf. Eph. 1:9; Gal. 3:1). God's eternal redemptive plan (cf. Acts 2:23; 3:18; 4:28; 13:29; 26:22; and Special Topic at 1:5) involved the sacrifice of Jesus (cf. Isa. 53:10; Rev. 13:8). See note at 9:11.

▣ "to demonstrate" This Greek term endeiknumai (endeixis, cf. 3:25,26) is used several times in Romans (cf. 2:15; 9:17,23; LXX Exod. 9:16). Its basic meaning is to manifest or display. God wanted humanity to clearly understand His redemptive purpose, plan, and righteousness. This context is setting out a biblical worldview

1. about God's character

2. about Christ's work

3. about humanity's need

4. about redemption's purpose.

God wants us to understand! This context is crucial for a proper understanding of Christianity. Some of the words and phrases are ambiguous or can be understood in several ways, but the thrust of the whole is very clear and plain. This context is the theological north star for the gospel.

NASB"as a propitiation in His blood"
NKJV"to be a propitiation by His blood"
NRSV"as a sacrifice of atonement by his blood"
TEV"so that by his blood he should become the means by which people's sins are forgiven"
NJB"to sacrifice his life so as to win reconciliation"

In the Greco-Roman world this word carried the concept of a restoration of fellowship with an estranged deity by means of a price being paid. However, it is not used in this sense in the Septuagint. It was used in the Septuagint and in Heb. 9:5 to translate "mercy seat" (cf. Exod. 25:21-22; Lev. 16:12-15), which was the lid of the Ark of the Covenant located in the Holy of Holies, the place where atonement was procured on behalf of the nation on the Day of Atonement (cf. Leviticus 16). Obviously Paul is using sacrificial metaphors from Israel's sacrificial system (i.e., Leviticus 1-7). These metaphors (i.e., propitiation, ransom, sacrifice) are understood only in connection with the OT oracles of God. Paul then must explain their relevance to all mankind. YHWH revealed Himself to Abraham/Israel to reveal Himself to all; all are in His image; all have rebelled; all can be saved through faith in Christ (Jewish Messiah).

This term must be dealt with in a way that does not lessen God's revulsion to sin, but affirms His positive redemptive attitude toward sinners. A good discussion is found in James Stewart's A Man in Christ, pp. 214-224. One way to accomplish this is to translate the term so that it reflects God's work in Christ; "a propitiatory sacrifice"; or "with propitiatory power."

"In His blood" is an Hebraic way of referring to the substitutionary sacrifice of the innocent lamb of God (cf. John 1:29). To fully understand this concept Leviticus1-7 is crucial as well as the Day of Atonement in chapter 16. Blood refers to a sinless life given on behalf of the guilty (cf. Isa. 52:13-53:12).

One died for all (cf. 5:12-21)!

"through faith" Here again is the mechanism (cf. 1:17; 3:22,25,26,27,28,30) for anyone's and everyone's personal benefit available in Jesus' substitutionary death.

This phrase is omitted in the ancient uncial manuscript A from the 5th century (also the Greek text used by Chrysostom) and a 12th century uncial MS (2127). It is included in all other ancient Greek manuscripts. Some have the definite article (cf. MSS P40, B, C3, D3) with "faith" and some do not (cf. MSS א, C*, D*, F, G), however, this does not affect the meaning. The UBS3 rates its inclusion as B (almost certain).

▣ "to demonstrate His righteousness" God must be true to His character and His word (cf. Mal. 3:6). In the OT the soul that sins must die (cf. Gen. 2:17; Ezek. 18:4,20). God said He would not acquit the guilty (cf. Exod. 23:7). God's love for fallen mankind is so great He was willing to become a man, fulfill the Law, and die in fallen humanity's place (cf. 5:12-21). God's love and justice meet in Jesus (cf. v. 26).

NASB, NKJV,
NRSV"He passed over the sins previously committed"
TEV"in the past he was patient and overlooked people's sins"
NJB"for the past, when sins went unpunished"

The term "passed over" is paresis, which is used only here in the NT and never in the Septuagint. The Greek fathers and Jerome took it in its Greek literary meaning of "the forgiveness of a debt" (cf. Moulton and Milligan, p. 493). However, pariēmi, the verb from which it comes means "to let pass beside" or "to relax" (cf. Luke 11:42).

So the question is did God forgive sins in the past looking toward Christ's future work or did He simply overlook them knowing Christ's future death would deal with the sin problem? The result is the same. Human sin, past, present, and future, is dealt with by Christ's sacrifice.

This was a past act of God's grace looking forward to Christ's work (cf. Acts 17:30; Rom. 4:15; 5:13) as well as a present and future act (cf. v. 26). God did not and does not take sin lightly, but He does accept Jesus' sacrifice as a full and final remedy to human rebellion. It is no longer a barrier to intimate fellowship with Himself, which was the purpose of creation (cf. Gen. 1:26-27).

3:26 The term "righteousness" in v. 25 is etymologically related to the terms "just" and "justifier" of v. 26. God desires His character to be manifested in believers' lives through faith in Christ. Jesus becomes our righteousness (cf. II Cor. 5:21), but believers must also become conformed to His righteousness, His likeness (cf. 8:29; Matt. 5:48; Lev. 19:2). See Special Topic at 1:17.

NASB, NKJV,
NRSV"the one who has faith in Jesus"
TEV"everyone who believes in Jesus"
NJB"everyone who has faith in Jesus"
REB"anyone who puts his faith in Jesus"
NET"the one who lives because of Jesus' faithfulness"

The Greek text has "the one of faith of Jesus." The difficulty comes in the multitude of genitive usages (see G. B. Caird, The Language and Imagery of the Bible, p. 99). Most of the English translations see it as a person's belief/faith/trust in Jesus. The NET Bible takes it as referring to 3:22. However, v. 22 has both a reference to

1. Jesus' faithfulness

2. believers' faith

Salvation is a result of Jesus' faithfulness which must be received (cf. v. 30).

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 3:27-30
 27Where then is boasting? It is excluded. By what kind of law? Of works? No, but by a law of faith. 28For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law. 29Or is God the God of Jews only? Is He not the God of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, 30since indeed God who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith is one.

3:27 "Where then is boasting" The presence of the article with "boasting" may reflect the pride of the Jews (cf. 2:17,23). The gospel is humbling. Fallen mankind (Jews and Gentiles) cannot help themselves  (cf. Eph. 2:8-9). See SPECIAL TOPIC: BOASTING at 2:17.

Just a brief further note to clarify my previous statement. Although humans cannot merit God's love and forgiveness does not imply they have no part in their own salvation. Humans must sense their sin/guilt and embrace God's offer in Christ. God deals with fallen humanity by means of "covenant." We must respond and continue to respond.

1. repentance

2. faith

3. obedience

4. perseverance

We do have a crucial part in our relationship with God. We are responders! But we must respond! Free will is as crucial a biblical doctrine as is sovereignty. The Bible, being an eastern book, presents truth in tension-filled pairs.

SPECIAL TOPIC: EASTERN LITERATURE

▣ "It is excluded" This term (ek [out] plus kleiō [shut]) is used only here and in Gal. 4:17. It literally means "to lock out."

▣ "by a law of faith" God's New Covenant of Jer. 31:31-34 (Ezek. 36:22-38) is not based on performance, but on trust/faith/belief (pistis) in His gracious character and promises. Both the Old and New Covenants were meant to change fallen mankind into God's character (righteous, i.e., Lev. 19:2; Matt. 5:48; Rom. 8:29).

3:28 "we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law." This is a summary of 3:21-26 and a foreshadowing of chapters 4-8 (cf. II Tim. 1:9; Titus 3:5). Salvation is a free gift through faith in Christ's finished work (cf. 3:24; 5:15,17; 6:23; Eph. 2:8-9). However, maturity is a "cost everything" life of obedience, service, and worship (cf. Gal. 5:6; Eph. 2:10; Phil. 2:12; and see note at 1:5).

3:29 God's purpose has always been to redeem all humans made in His image (Gen. 1:26,27; 5:1; 9:6). The redemptive promise of Gen. 3:15 is to all of Adam's children. He chose Abraham in order to choose the world (cf. Gen. 12:31; Exod. 19:4-6; John 3:16).

This verse, like 3:9, may reflect tension in the Roman church between believing Jewish leadership, who may have left Rome following Nero's edict forbidding Jewish worship which resulted in believing Gentile leadership, who replaced them. Chapters 9-11 may also address this same tension.

3:30

NASB"since indeed God is one"
NKJV"since there is one God"
NRSV"since God is one"
TEV"God is one"
NJB"since there is only one God"

This is a first class conditional sentence which is assumed to be true from the author's perspective or for his literary purposes. If monotheism is true, then He must be the God of all people.

SPECIAL TOPIC: MONOTHEISM

▣ "He will justify the circumcised by faith" The Greek word "justify" is from the same root as "righteousness." See Special Topic at 1:17. There is only one way to be right with God (cf. Rom. 9:30-32). The two criteria for salvation are faith and repentance (cf. Mark 1:15; Acts 3:16,19; 20:21; see note at 1:5). This is true for both Jews and Greeks.

"by faith. . .through faith" There is obvious parallelism between these two clauses. The prepositions ek and dia are used here synonymously. No distinction is intended.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 3:31
 31Do we then nullify the Law through faith? May it never be! On the contrary, we establish the Law.

3:31

NASB"Do we then nullify the Law through faith"
NKJV"Do we then make void the law through faith"
NRSV"Do we then overthrow the law by this faith"
TEV"Does this mean that by this faith we do away with the Law"
NJB"Do we mean that faith makes the Law pointless"

The NT presents the OT in two different ways.

1. it is inspired, God-given revelation that will never pass away (cf. Matt. 5:17-19; Rom. 7:12,14,16)

2. it is worn out and has passed away (cf. Heb. 8:13).

Paul used the term "nullify" at least twenty-five times. It is translated "make null and void," "render powerless," and "to make of no effect." See Special Topic at 3:3. For Paul the Law was a custodian (cf. Gal. 3:23) and tutor (cf. Gal. 3:24), but could not give eternal life (cf. Gal. 2:16,19; 3:19). It is the grounds of man's condemnation (cf. Gal. 3:13; Col. 2:14). The Mosaic Law functioned both as revelation and a moral test as did the "Tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil."

There is uncertainty as to what Paul meant by "the Law."

1. a system of righteous works of Judaism

2. a stage for Gentile believers to pass through to salvation in Christ (Judaizers in Galatians)

3. a standard by which all humans fall short (cf. Rom. 1:18-3:20; 7:7-25; Gal. 3:1-29).

 

▣ "we establish the Law" In light of the previous phrase, what does this phrase mean? It could indicate that

1. the Law was not a way of salvation but it was a continuing moral guide

2. it testified to the doctrine of "justification by faith," 3:21; 4:3 (Gen. 15:6; Ps. 32:1-2,10-11)

3. the Law's weakness (human rebellion, cf. Rom. 7; Gal. 3) was fully satisfied by Christ's death, 8:3-4

4. the purpose of revelation is to restore the image of God in man

The Law, after forensic righteousness, becomes a guide to true righteousness or Christlikeness. See Special Topic: Paul's Views of the Mosaic Law at 13:9.

The shocking paradox is that the Law failed to establish God's righteousness, but through its nullification, by means of God's gift of grace through faith, the Christian lives a righteous, godly life. The goal of the Law has been met, not by human performance, but by the free gift of the grace of God in Christ! For "establish" see Special Topic: Stand at 5:2.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. Outline Romans 3:21-31 in your own words.

2. Why did God pass over man's sins in times past (v. 25)?

3.  How was the OT believer saved from sin (3:25)?

4. How does faith in Jesus confirm the Law (3:31)?

 

Pages