MENU

Where the world comes to study the Bible

Acts 7

PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS

UBS4 NKJV NRSV TEV NJB
Stephen's Speeches Stephen's Address: the Call of Abraham Preaching and Martyrdom of Stephen Stephen's Speech Stephen's Speech
    (6:8-8:1a)    
7:1-8 7:1-8   7:1 7:1-8
      7:2-8  
  The Patriarchs in Egypt 7:2b-8    
7:9-16 7:9-16 7:9-16 7:9-16 7:9-16
7:17-22 7:17-36 7:17-22 7:17-22 7:17-22
7:23-29   7:23-29 7:23-29 7:23-29
7:30-43   7:30-34 7:30-34 7:30-34
  Israel Rebels Against God 7:35-43 7:35-38 7:35-43
  7:37-43      
  God's True Tabernacle   7:39-43  
7:44-50 7:44-50 7:44-50 7:44-47 7:44-50
  Israel Resists the Holy Spirit   7:48-50  
7:51-53 7:51-53 7:51-53 7:51-53 7:51-53
The Stoning of Stephen Stephen the Martyr   The Stoning of Stephen The Stoning of Stephen, Saul as Persecutor
7:54-8:1a 7:54-60 7:54-8:1a 7:54-8:1a 7:54-8:1

 

READING CYCLE THREE (from "A Guide to Good Bible Reading")

FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S INTENT AT THE PARAGRAPH LEVEL

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects. Compare your subject divisions with the five modern translations. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is the key to following the original author's intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every paragraph has one and only one main subject.

1. First paragraph

2. Second paragraph

3. Third paragraph

4. Etc.

 

CONTEXTUAL INSIGHTS

A. Stephen's speech in Acts 7 is the longest recorded in Acts. It breaks the theological ground for Paul's (and the church's) understanding of the gospel's relationship to the Old Testament. Stephen's sermon answers the charges made against him, showing that

1. God has acted outside the Temple

2. God works with Gentiles

3. Jews have always rejected God's message, men, and now they have rejected the Messiah!

 

B. Stephen's defense affected Saul of Tarsus' heart and Paul's theology.

 

C. Stephen reveals the continuing covenant infidelity of the Jewish people and God's revelations outside the Promised Land and apart from the Temple in Jerusalem, which had become the focus of first century Jewish worship.

 

D. The Jewish people had regularly rejected God's spokesman and now they did it again. They had violently rejected Jesus of Nazareth and they were about to violently reject Stephen, His witness.

 

E. Stephen is charged by the same group with similar blasphemes as Jesus was. As he was being stoned Stephen said several things which mimic Jesus' words and actions on the cross. Was this an intentional literary device used by Luke? It seems so!

 

F. Stephen's perspective on the relationship between Jews and Christians will set the stage for the persecution (cf. 8:1-3) and ultimate splitting (i.e., a.d. 70 curse formulas) of these two groups. It is surely possible that God used Stephen, as He did Samson in the OT, to start a fight thereby forcing the spread of the gospel beyond Palestine.

 

G. Stephen's speech/defense/sermon has several details which differ from the Hebrew OT (he quotes from the Septuagint). Should scholars try to defend Stephen's sayings or allow them to be Jewish traditions or even historical errors? This question reveals the emotional and intellectual biases of interpreters. I believe that the Bible is true history, that Christianity stands or falls on the events of the Bible. However, the very beginning of the Bible (i.e., Genesis 1-11) and the end of the Bible (i.e., book of Revelation) are not "typical history"! As for the intervening accounts I think they are accurate and true. This takes into account that sometimes there are:

1. differences in numbers

2. differences in genre

3. differences in detail

4. rabbinical techniques of interpretation (ex. combining two or more texts)

These do not affect my affirmation of the historical accuracy or trustworthiness of biblical narratives. Stephen may have been recounting what he learned in Synagogue school or he may have modified texts to fit his purpose! To miss his message by focusing on one or two details shows our modern sense of historiography and not the first century's sense of history.

 

H. Basic Outline of Stephen's historical overview of God's dealing with Israel in chapter 7

1. the Patriarchs, vv. 2-16

2. the Exodus and Wilderness Wanderings, vv. 17-43

3. the Tabernacle and Temple, vv. 44-50

4. the application to them of his summary of the OT history, vv. 51-53

 

I. Stephen uses several OT references (quotes and allusions).

1. 7:3 – Gen. 12:1

2. 7:5 – Gen. 12:7 or 17:8

3. 7:6-7a – Gen. 15:13-14

4. 7:7b – Exod. 3:12

5. 7:8a – Gen. 17:9-14

6. 7:8b – Gen. 21:2-4

7. 7:8c – Gen. 25:26

8. 7:8d – Gen. 35:22-26

9. 7:9 – Gen. 37:10,28; 45:4

10. 7:10 – Gen. 39:21; 41:40-46

11. 7:11 – Gen. 41:54-55; 42:5

12. 7:12 – Gen. 42:2

13. 7:13 – Gen. 45:1-4

14. 7:14 – Gen. 45:9-10

15. 7:15 – Gen. 46:5; 49:33; Exod. 1:6

16. 7:16 – Gen. 23:16; 50:13

17. 7:17 –Exod. 1:7-8

18. 7:18 – Exod. 1:8

19. 7:19 – Exod. 1:10-11

20. 7:20 – Exod. 2:2

21. 7:21 – Exod. 2:5,6,10

22. 7:22 – Exod. 2:10

23. 7:23 – Exod. 2:11-12

24. 7:26 – Exod. 2:13

25. 7:27-28 –Exod. 2:14

26. 7:30 – Exod. 3:1-2

27. 7:29a –Exod. 2:15

28. 7:29b – Exod. 2:22; 4:20; 18:3-4

29. 7:32 – Exod. 3:6

30. 7:33-34 – Exod. 3:5,7-10

31. 7:36 – Exod. 12:41; 33:1

32. 7:37 – Deut. 18:15

33. 7:38 – Exod. 19:17

34. 7:39 – Num. 14:3-4

35. 7:40 – Exod. 32:1,23

36. 7:41 – Exod. 32:4,6

37. 7:42-43 – Amos 5:25-27

38. 7:44 – Exod. 25:31,36-40

39. 7:45 –Josh. 3:14ff; 18:1; 23:9

40. 7:46 – II Sam. 7:8ff

41. 7:47 – I Kings 6-8; II Chronicles 1-6

42. 7:49-50 –Isa. 66:1-2

Another good Scriptural summary of Israel's history is Nehemiah 9.

1. 9:6 – Genesis 1-11

2. 9:7-8 – Genesis 12-50

3. 9:9-14 – Exodus (the exodus)

4. 9:15-21 – Numbers (the wilderness wandering period)

5. 9:22-25 – Joshua (the conquest)

6. 9:26-31 – Judges

7. 9:32-38 – Samuel, Kings, Chronicles (the Monarchy)

 

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 7:1-8
 1The high priest said, "Are these things so?" 2And he said, "Hear me, brethren and fathers! The God of glory appeared to our father Abraham when he was in Mesopotamia, before he lived in Haran, 3and said to him, ‘Leave your country and your relatives, and come into the land that I will show you.' 4Then he left the land of the Chaldeans and settled in Haran. From there, after his father died, God had him move to this country in which you are now living. 5But He gave him no inheritance in it, not even a foot of ground, and yet, even when he had no child, He promised that He would give it to him as a possession, and to his descendants after him. 6But God spoke to this effect, that his descendants would be aliens in a foreign land, and that they would be enslaved and mistreated for four hundred years. 7And whatever nation to which they will be in bondage I Myself will judge,' said God, ‘and after that they will come out and serve Me in this place.' 8And He gave him the covenant of circumcision; and so Abraham became the father of Isaac, and circumcised him on the eighth day; and Isaac became the father of Jacob, and Jacob of the twelve patriarchs."

7:1 "The high priest" This was Caiaphas. See note at 4:6.

7:2 "And he said" Stephen's defense is very similar to the book of Hebrews. He answered the charges in two ways: (1) the Jewish people had continually rejected Moses in the past and (2) the Temple was only one of several ways that God used to speak with Israel. This is a direct answer to the charges brought against him in 6:13.

▣ "Hear" This is the aorist active imperative form of the Greek word akouō. It is used in the Septuagint to translate the famous prayer of Judaism, the Shema (cf. Deut. 6:4-5). It is also used in the prophets to reflect the sense of "hear so as to respond" (cf. Micah 1:2; 6:1). It is difficult to be certain this technical connotation is present when these Jewish men express their Hebrew thoughts in Koine Greek words, but in some contexts like this it may be true.

▣ "‘The God of glory" This God of glory (cf. Ps. 29:3) appeared to the Patriarch Abraham (cf. Gen. 12:1, 15:1,4; 17:1; 18:1, 22:1), thus beginning the Jewish people. See Special Topic at 3:13.

▣ "Abraham" Abraham was considered the father of the Jewish people. He was the first Patriarch. His call and subsequent walk with God are described in Gen. 12:1-25:11. In Galatians 3 and later Romans 4 Paul uses him as the paradigm of justification by grace through faith.

▣ "when he was in Mesopotamia before he lived in Haran" Genesis 11:31 implies that Abraham was in the city of Haran when YHWH spoke to him. However, the time of God's contact with Abraham was not specifically stated. Abraham was from Ur of the Chaldeans (cf. Gen. 11:28,31), but later moved to Haran (cf. Gen. 11:31,32; 29:4) following God's command. The point is that God spoke to Abraham outside of the land of Canaan. Abraham did not own or possess any part of the Holy Land (cf. v. 5) during his lifetime (except a cave to bury his family, cf. Gen. 23:9).

The term "Mesopotamia" can refer to the different ethnic groups:

1. a people group in the northern area of the Tigris and Euphrates (i.e., "Syria between the Rivers")

2. a people group near the mouth of the Tigris and Euphrates

 

7:3 "Leave your country and your relatives, and come into the land that I will show you" This is a quote from Gen. 12:1. The theological issue involved in this quote is when God says this to Abram:

1. while he was in Ur before he took his father Terah and nephew Lot to Haran

2. while he was in Haran and he waited until his father died to follow God south to Canaan?

 

7:4 "he left the land of the Chaldeans" Chaldea (BDB 505) may be the name of a district close to the mouth of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers (see note at 7:2). It later came to refer to the nation which developed in this region, also known as Babylon (BDB 93). This nation also produced many scholars who developed mathematical formulas related to the movement of the night lights (i.e., planets, stars, comets, etc.). This group of wise men (i.e., astrologers) was also known by the name Chaldean (cf. Dan. 2:2; 4:7; 5:7-11).

▣ "Haran" Haran (BDB 357) is a city to which Terah, Abraham, and Lot moved (cf. Gen. 11:31-32). Another of Abram's brothers settled there and the place is called by his name (i.e., city of Nahor, cf. Gen. 24:10; 27:43). This city on the upper part of the Euphrates (i.e., tributary river, Balikh) was started in the third millennium b.c. and has retained its name until today. Just as a note of interest, Abraham's brother, Haran (BDB 248), is not spelled the same in Hebrew as the city.

▣ "after his father died" Many have seen a contradiction here between Gen. 11:26,32 and 12:4. There are at least two possible solutions.

1. Abraham might not have been the oldest son, but the most famous son (i.e., listed first).

2. The Samaritan Pentateuch has Terah's age at death at 145, not 205, as the Hebrew text.

See Gleason L. Archer, Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties, p. 378.

7:5 "He promised that He would give it to him as a possession, and to his descendants after him" This is an allusion to Gen. 12:7 or 17:8. The theological key is not only God's promise, but Abraham's faith in God giving him a descendant as well as a land. This faith is highlighted in Gen. 15:6 (cf. Gal. 3:6; Romans 4:3).

7:6 This predictive prophecy is stated in Gen. 15:13,14 and reaffirmed in Exod. 3:12. However, Exod. 12:40 has "430 years" instead of "400 years." The Septuagint (LXX) translates Exod. 12:40 as "and the sojourning of the children of Israel, while they sojourned in the land of Egypt and the land of Canaan was 430 years."

The rabbis have said that the number "400 years" starts with the offering of Isaac in Genesis 22. John Calvin has called the 400 years a round number. It may relate to four generations of 100 years each (cf. Gen. 15:16).

7:7 "And whatever nation" This is a quote from the Septuagint of Gen. 15:14. This is not meant to be obtuse, but is a general statement. The nation was obviously Egypt. Other nations, however (i.e., Philistia, Syria, Assyria, Babylon), would become Israel's oppressors and God will judge them also.

▣ "and after that" This full phrase is a quote from Exod. 3:12. Stephen is reciting a loose, running history of Israel.

This text asserts that Canaan and Jerusalem will uniquely become YHWH's special place. This fits the emphasis of Deuteronomy.

"in this place" In the context of the quote from Exod. 3:12, this refers to Mt. Sinai (see Special Topic at 7:30), which is also outside the Promised Land and is the site of one of the major events in the life of Israel (the giving of the Law to Moses).

7:8 "covenant" See Special Topic at 2:47.

"circumcision" This was practiced by all of Israel's neighbors, except the Philistines (Greek Aegean people). For most cultures it was usually a rite of passage into manhood, but not for Israel, where it was an initiation rite into the covenant People. It was a sign of a special faith relationship with YHWH (cf. Gen. 17:9-14). Each Patriarch circumcised his own sons (i.e., acted as priest for his own family). Robert Girdlestone, Synonyms of the Old Testament, p. 214, says the rite of circumcision connected the rite of blood-shedding with the act of circumcision. Blood was connected to covenant forming (cf. Gen. 15:17), covenant breaking (cf. Gen. 2:17), and covenant redemption (cf. Isaiah 53).

▣ "the twelve patriarchs" This usually refers to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, but here it refers to Jacob's twelve sons, who will become the tribes of Israel.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 7:9-10
 9The patriarchs became jealous of Joseph and sold him into Egypt. Yet God was with him, 10and rescued him from all his afflictions, and granted him favor and wisdom in the sight of Pharaoh, king of Egypt, and he made him governor over Egypt and all his household.

7:9 "Joseph" This account is found in Gen. 37:11,28; 45:4. Stephen is trying to show that the Jewish people and their leaders have often rejected God's chosen leader (cf. Moses in v. 35).

7:10 This account is found in Gen. 39:21; 41:40-46.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 7:11-16
 11Now a famine came over all Egypt and Canaan, and great affliction with it, and our fathers could find no food. 12But when Jacob heard that there was grain in Egypt, he sent our fathers there the first time. 13On the second visit Joseph made himself known to his brothers, and Joseph's family was disclosed to Pharaoh. 14Then Joseph sent word and invited Jacob his father and all his relatives to come to him, seventy-five persons in all. 15And Jacob went down to Egypt andthere he and our fathers died. 16From there they were removed to Shechem and laid in the tomb which Abraham had purchased for a sum of money from the sons of Hamor in Shechem.

7:11 This account is found in Gen. 41:54-55; 42:5.

7:12 This account is found in Gen. 42:4.

7:13 This account is found in Gen. 45:1-4.

7:14 "seventy-five" This follows the Septuagint and the Dead Sea Scrolls manuscripts, while the Masoretic Text has "seventy" (cf. Gen. 46:27; Exod. 1:5; Deut. 10:22). At first this seems like a manuscript problem between the LXX, which Stephen quotes, and the Hebrew text of Exod. 1:5. On further reflection it may be two ways of counting all the descendants of Jacob. The problem arises between Gen. 46:26 and 27:

1. the MT of verse 27 has two sons born to Joseph in Egypt, while the LXX has nine, which means that Ephraim and Manassah later had more children between them

2. in the Hebrew text Jacob and his wife are counted, but Ephraim and Manasseh's extra children are not counted

In the Greek text (LXX) Jacob and his wife are not counted, but the extra children of Ephraim and Manasseh are counted. Both are accurate, but they add up the descendants in different ways at different times in Jacob's life. The Hebrew texts known as the Dead Sea Scrolls also have "seventy-five persons" in Gen. 46:27 and Exod. 1:5. Philo of Alexandia was familiar with both numbers.

We are all the benefactors of modern scholarship when it comes to difficult texts or number problems like this one. There is a new type of biblical resource available today which targets these difficult texts. I recommend:

1. Hard Sayings of the Bible, IVP

2. More Hard Sayings of the Bible, IVP 

3. Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties by Gleason Archer.

For a discussion of Acts 7:14-15 see #1 pp. 521-522. 

7:15 This account is found in Gen. 46:5; 49:33; Exod. 1:6.

7:16 "to Shechem" From the Genesis accounts of (1) the burial of Joseph recorded in Josh. 24:32 and (2) the burial of Jacob recorded in Gen. 50:13, there seems to be a discrepancy in Stephen's sermon. The problem is (1) the city; it should be Hebron, not Shechem, or (2) the patriarch; it should be Jacob, not Abraham. However, Abraham and Jacob both bought land (cf. Gen. 23:16; 33:19). At Hebron Sarah and Abraham were buried (cf. Gen. 23:19; 25:9), as were Isaac and Rebekah (cf. Gen. 49:29-31) and Jacob (cf. Gen. 50:13). Although it is uncertain about a burial plot at Shechem, it is possible that Abraham had earlier purchased a field on his stop there in Gen. 12:6-7. Later Jacob redeemed that same piece of land (cf. Gen. 33:19; Josh. 24:32). This is obviously speculation, but Stephen appears to be very knowledgeable of the OT history and this would be the only way to reconcile the various accounts.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 7:17-29
 17But as the time of the promise was approaching which God had assured to Abraham, the people increased and multiplied in Egypt, 18until there arose another king over Egypt who knew nothing about Joseph. 19It was he who took shrewd advantage of our race and mistreated our fathers so that they would expose their infants and they would not survive. 20It was at this time that Moses was born; and he was lovely in the sight of God, and he was nurtured three months in his father's home. 21And after he had been set outside, Pharaoh's daughter took him away and nurtured him as her own son. 22Moses was educated in all the learning of the Egyptians, and he was a man of power in words and deeds. 23But when he was approaching the age of forty, it entered his mind to visit his brethren, the sons of Israel. 24And when he saw one of them being treated unjustly, he defended him and took vengeance for the oppressed by striking down the Egyptian. 25And he supposed that his brethren understood that God was granting them deliverance through him, but they did not understand. 26On the following day he appeared to them as they were fighting together, and he tried to reconcile them in peace, saying, "Men, you are brethren, why do you injure one another?" 27But the one who was injuring his neighbor pushed him away, saying, "Who made you a ruler and judge over us? 28You do not mean to kill me as you killed the Egyptian yesterday, do you?" 29At this remark, Moses fled and became an alien in the land of Midian, where he became the father of two sons.

7:17 This would refer to Gen. 15:12-16 (the Promise) and Exod. 1:7 (their large number).

7:18 "until there arose another king" This is a quote from Exod. 1:8. There has been and continues to be debate among scholars on the date of the Exodus. The identity of this Egyptian king is caught up in the disagreement. One could identify him as an Egyptian king from the XVIII dynasty (1445 b.c.) or from the XIX dynasty (1290 b.c.). One theory is to relate this Egyptian king to the first native Egyptian dynasty who overthrew the Hyksos (Semitic) rulers of Egypt. This would explain the use of heteros in v. 18. A native Egyptian would not want Semites, like the Hebrews, in large numbers in his territory, fearing another invasion like the Hyksos.

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE DATE OF THE EXODUS

7:19 This account is found in Exod. 1:10ff.

7:20 "Moses was born" This account is found in Exodus 2.

▣ "was lovely in the sight of God" This is a Hebrew idiom of beauty (cf. Exod. 2:2). Even Josephus comments on Moses' beauty (cf. Antiq. 2.9.6).

7:21 This account is found in Exod. 2:5-6,10.

"he had been set outside" This is the Greek term ektithēmi, which means "to expose" (cf. v. 19) or "place outside." The Egyptians forced the Hebrews to abandon their male children to the elements and wild beasts so as to control their rapid population growth.

NASB, NKJV"Pharaoh's daughter took him away"
NRSV, NJB"Pharaoh's daughter adopted him"
TEV"the king's daughter adopted him"

The term anaireō literally means "to lift up." Moses was literally "lifted up" out of the river and by this act, became the adopted son of Pharaoh's daughter.

7:22 Moses had the best academic and military training available in his day at the court of Pharaoh.

▣ "he was a man of power in words and deeds" This must be a summary of Moses' later life because at his encounter with YHWH at the burning bush he claimed he could not speak well (cf. Exod. 4:10-17).

7:23-24 This account is in Exod. 2:11-12.

7:23 "he was approaching the age of forty" I think it was D. L. Moody who said Moses' life can be divided into three groups of forty:

1. for the first forty years he thought he was somebody (i.e., educated at Pharaoh's court)

2. for the second forty years he thought he had become a nobody (i.e., exiled to the land of Midian and learned the ways and terrain of the Sinai desert)

3. for the third forty years he found out what God could do with a nobody (i.e., led the people of God to the Promised Land)

 

7:25 This verse is Stephen's assumptions (possibly Jewish traditions); they are not stated in Exodus.

7:26-29 This account is found in Exod. 2:13-14.

7:28 The question expects a "no" answer.

7:29 "At this remark Moses fled" This account is found in Exod. 2:15,22. Moses' fear at killing an Egyptian shows that Pharaoh was not supportive of his being an adopted child of one of his daughters. Even so, Hebrews 11:27 is clear!

▣ "and became an alien in the land of Midian" God appeared to Moses at the burning bush in the land of Midian (cf. Exodus 3-4) and revealed His law to him at Sinai in the land of Midian (cf. Exodus 19-20), which shows that God was not limited as to where He revealed Himself. This same emphasis on God revealing Himself apart from the Temple in Jerusalem is seen in Acts 7:36, 44, 48, and 53.

▣ "became the father of two sons" This account is found in Exod. 2:22; 4:20; 18:3-4.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 7:30-34
 30After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to him in the wilderness of Mount Sinai, in the flame of a burning thorn bush. 31When Moses saw it, he marveled at the sight; and as he approached to look more closely, there came the voice of the Lord: 32"I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham and Isaac and Jacob." Moses shook with fear and would not venture to look. 33But the Lord said to him, "Take off the sandals from your feet, for the place on which you are standing is holy ground. 34I have certainly seen the oppression of My people in Egypt and have heard their groans, and I have come down to rescue them; come now, and I will send you to Egypt."

7:30 This account is found in Exodus, chapters 3 and 4.

▣ "an angel" In the OT text this angel is really YHWH. See full note at 5:19. Notice how this angel is characterized.

1. Exod. 3:2, "the angel of the Lord appeared to him in a blazing fire"

2. Exod. 3:4, "when the Lord (i.e., YHWH) saw that he turned aside to look"

3. Exod. 3:4, "God (i.e., Elohim) called to him from the midst of the bush"

See SPECIAL TOPIC: NAMES FOR DEITY at 1:6.

▣ "Mount Sinai" See Special Topic below.

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE LOCATION OF MT. SINAI

7:32 This account is found in Exod. 3:6.

"fathers" In both the Hebrew text and Greek translation (i.e., Septuagint) the word is singular. In every other occurrence of the phrase it is plural. God knew Moses' slave father.

7:33 This account is found in Exod. 3:5. Moses approached the bush out of curiosity, not religious devotion.

The exact reason for taking off his shoes is uncertain.

1. shoes might be polluted (i.e., animal dung)

2. taking off shoes might be a sign of intimacy or familiarity (i.e., at home).

3. a cultural practice of the Patriarchs or Egyptian ritual

 

7:34 This account is found in Exod. 3:7. For me this verse is so theologically significant for this reason: YHWH heard their prayers, saw the affliction, and responded. He came down to rescue them, but notice His rescue was effected through human instrumentality. God sent a reluctant Moses. God has chosen to deal with humans through humans!

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 7:35-43
 35This Moses whom they disowned, saying, "Who made you a ruler and a judge?" Is the one whom God sent to be both a ruler and a deliverer with the help of the angel who appeared to him in the thorn bush. 36This man led them out, performing wonders and signs in the land of Egypt and in the Red Sea and in the wilderness for forty years. 37This is the Moses who said to the sons of Israel, "God will raise up for you a prophet like me from your brethren." 38This is the one who was in the congregation in the wilderness together with the angel who was speaking to him on Mount Sinai, and who was with our fathers; and he received living oracles to pass on to you. 39Our fathers were unwilling to be obedient to him, but repudiated him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt, 40saying to Aaron, "Make for us gods who will go before us; for this Moses who led us out of the land of Egypt—we do not know what happened to him." 41At that time they made a calf and brought a sacrifice to the idol, and were rejoicing in the works of their hands. 42But God turned away and delivered them up to serve the host of heaven; as it is written in the book of the prophets, "It was not to Me that you offered victims and sacrifices forty years in the wilderness, was it, O house of Israel? 43You also took along the tabernacle of Moloch and the star of the god Rompha, the images which you made to worship. I also will remove you beyond Babylon."

7:35 "This Moses whom they disowned" God's people regularly reject God's spokesperson (cf. vv. 51-52). This may even be the purpose of v. 27!

▣ "with the help of the angel who appeared to him in the thorn bush" Again God came to an Israelite outside the Promised Land. God's activity was not limited to any locality. Much of Israel's history occurred outside Canaan and before the Temple in Jerusalem. All through the Israelites' history God's leaders were rejected by their peers (cf. vv. 9,27-28,35,39). This is a recurrent theme.

This angel is depicted as deity (cf. Exod. 3:2,4). This divine physical manifestation can also be seen in Gen. 16:7-13; 22:11-15; 31:11,13; 48:15-16; Exod. 13:21; 14:19; Jdgs. 2:1; 6:22-23; 13:3-22; Zech. 3:1-2. However, it must be stated that "the angel of the Lord" is not always a divine physical manifestation; sometimes he is just an angel, a messenger, (cf. Gen. 24:7,40; Exod. 23:20-23; 32:34; Num. 22:22; Judg. 5:23; II Sam. 24:16; I Chr. 21:15ff; Zech. 1:11; 12-13).

7:36 This is a summary of God's miraculous power (i.e., Moses' staff) through Moses and Aaron.

7:37-38 This is a Messianic quote from Deut. 18:15. Stephen is identifying God's presence during the Exodus and Wilderness Wandering Period as both God's angel and God's special successor of Moses (i.e., the Messiah, the Prophet). Stephen is not depreciating Moses, but truly listening to Moses!

7:38 "congregation" This is the Greek term ekklesia, but it is used in the sense of assembly, not church. See Special Topic: Church at 5:11.

"the angel who was speaking to him on Mount Sinai" Rabbinical theology asserted that angels were mediators between YHWH and the giving of the Law (see note at 7:53). It is also possible that the angel refers to YHWH Himself (cf. Exod. 3:21 compared to 14:19; and also Exod. 32:34; Num. 20:16; Jdgs. 2:1).

7:39 "our fathers were unwilling to be obedient to him" Stephen is connecting the dots of OT rebellion. His implication is that the Jews have always rejected God's leaders, and now they have rejected the Messiah.

"repudiated him" This account is found in Num. 14:3-4.

7:40-41 This account is found in Exodus 32. This was not idolatry, but the creation of a physical image of God. It later turned into fertility worship.

7:41 Stephen interprets the golden calf as an idol and uses this historical event to introduce a quote from Amos 5, which implies that Israel, even as far back as the Exodus and Wilderness Wandering, was idolatrous and rebellious.

7:42 "God turned away and delivered them up to serve" Verses 42 and 43 are quotes from Amos 5:25-27 where Amos asserts that Israel was always offering sacrifices to foreign gods. It was a regular, and early, pattern of their history (cf. Josh. 24:20). This reminds one of the drastic statements of rejection in Romans 1:24,26,28.

▣ "the host of heaven" This refers to Assyrian and Babylonian astral worship (cf. Deut. 17:3; II Kgs. 17:16; 27:3; II Chr. 33:3,5; Jer. 8:2; 19:13). There are several textual problems between the Hebrew text (MT) of Amos 5:25-27, the Greek text (LXX) and Stephen's quote:

1. the name of the star god. The MT has kywn or kaiwann, the Assyrian name for the planet Saturn. The LXX has rypn or raiphan, which may be repa, the Egyptian name for the planetary god of Saturn.

2. the Hebrew text (MT) and the Greek text (LXX) have "beyond Damascus," while Stephen quotes "beyond Babylon."

There is no known manuscript of Amos that has the reading. Stephen may have been combining the Assyrians exile, of which Amos speaks, with the later Babylonian exile of Judah, but substituting the place of exile.

The worship of astral deities began in Mesopotamia, but spread into Syria and Canaan (cf. Job 31:26,27). The archaeological discovery at Tell El-Amarna, which included hundreds of letters from Canaan to Egypt in the 14th century b.c. also uses these astral deities as place names.

"in the book of the prophets" This refers to the scroll that contained the twelve minor prophets (cf. 13:40). The quote in vv. 42-43 is from the Septuagint of Amos 5:25-27.

The next phrase in v. 42 is a question that expects a "no" answer.

7:43 "Moloch" The Hebrew consonants for the word king are mlk (BDB 574). There are several Canaanite gods whose names are a play on these three consonants, Milcom, Molech, or Moloch. Moloch was the chief fertility god of the Amorites to whom children were offered to ensure the health and prosperity of the community or nation (cf. Lev. 20:2-5; Deut. 12:31; I Kgs. 11:5,7,33; II Kgs. 23:10,13,14; Jer. 7:31; 32:35). A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures In the New Testament, vol. 3, p. 93, says Moloch was "an ox-headed image with arms outstretched in which children were placed and hollow underneath so that fire could burn underneath." The mention of the term Molech in Lev. 18:21 in context of inappropriate sexual unions, has caused some scholars to assume that children were not sacrificed to Molech, but dedicated to him as temple prostitutes, male and female. The concept fits in the general practices of fertility worship.

▣ "images" See Special Topic following.

SPECIAL TOPIC: FORM (TUPOS)

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 7:44-50
 44Our fathers had the tabernacle of testimony in the wilderness, just as He who spoke to Moses directed him to make it according to the pattern which he had seen. 45And having received it in their turn, our fathers brought it in with Joshua upon dispossessing the nations whom God drove out before our fathers, until the time of David. 46David found favor in God's sight, and asked that he might find a dwelling place for the God of Jacob. 47But it was Solomon who built a house for Him. 48However, the Most High does not dwell in houses made by human hands; as the prophet says: 49"Heaven is My throne, And earth is the footstool of My feet; What kind of house will you build for Me?" says the Lord, "Or what place is there for My repose? 50Was it not My hand which made all these things?"

7:44 This account is found in Exodus, chapters 25-31; 36-40. These detailed plans of the tabernacle were revealed to Moses on Mt. Sinai. The NT book of Hebrews talks about a heavenly tabernacle or sanctuary (cf. 8:5-6; 9:11,23) of which the earthly one was a copy. As Stephen dealt previously in this chapter with the charge of chapter 6 that he was against Moses (cf. 6:11), now he begins to deal with the second charge that he was against the Temple (cf. 6:13).

▣ "the pattern" See Special Topic at 7:43.

7:45 This covers a period of time from the conquest (either 1400 or 1250 b.c.) to the time of David (+ 1011 b.c. to 971/70 b.c., Harrison; 973 b.c., Young; 961 b.c., Bright).

7:46 This reflects II Samuel 7, which is such a significant passage. It is the divine establishment of the Davidic kingship.

7:47 "Solomon who built a house for Him" This account is found in I Kings 6-8 and II Chronicles 1-6.

7:48 This statement is similar to Solomon's statement in I Kgs. 8:27 and II Chr. 6:18.

7:49-50 This quote is taken from the Septuagint of Isa. 66:1-2. T he point is that even Solomon recognized that a building could not contain the God of creation!

Do these verses imply an argument for the inclusion of Gentiles? If so, it seems somewhat veiled. However, Solomon himself saw the temple as a place for the world to come to YHWH (cf. I Kgs. 8:41-43). It was the Greek-speaking Jews (i.e., the seven in Acts 6) who saw and proclaimed the worldwide mission even before the Apostles recognized this aspect of Jesus' teachings (cf. Matt. 28:18-20; Acts 1:8). Stephen may have been asserting this by implication in v. 50.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 7:51-53
 51"You men who are stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears are always resisting the Holy Spirit; you are doing just as your fathers did. 52Which one of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? They killed those who had previously announced the coming of the Righteous One, whose betrayers and murderers you have now become; 53you who received the law as ordained by angels, and yet did not keep it."

7:51 "You men" Stephen turns from the rebellion of Jewish leaders and people in the past to the current leaders and people in the temple hearing his message. They were and they are rebels against YHWH!

▣ "a stiff-necked" Stephens alludes to Moses' characterization of the children of Jacob/Israel (cf. Exod. 32:9; 33:3,5; 34:9; Deut. 9:6).

▣ "uncircumcised in heart" This Hebrew idiom means unfaithful, disloyal, and untrustworthy (cf. Lev. 26:41; Jer. 9:25-26; Ezek. 44:7). This is the opposite of Deut. 10:16; Jer. 4:4!

▣ "and ears" This idiom refers to their unwillingness to hear and respond to God's messengers (cf. Jer. 6:10).

"are always resisting the Holy Spirit" This is very similar to Isa. 63:10. God's love and faithfulness were extolled in Isa. 63:9,11-14, but the people's reaction was faithlessness!

7:51b-52 This is the strong condemnation of the current Jewish leadership, just like the ancient Israelite leadership! The ancient people of God had killed God's messengers and now they have killed the Messiah (cf. 3:14; 5:28).

7:52 "Righteous One" This is used as a title for Jesus in 3:14 and 22:14. See fuller note at 3:14 and Special Topic: Righteousness at 3:14.

7:53 "as ordained by angels" This refers to the rabbinical interpretation of Deut. 33:2 from the Septuagint in which God gave the law to Moses through angelic mediation which seems to be confirmed by Gal. 3:19 and Heb. 2:2.

"yet did not keep it" Stephen opened his defense with "hear" (BDB 1033) which may reflect the Hebrew Shema, "hear so as to heed" (cf. Deut. 6:4). Stephen and later James (Jesus' half brother ) both assert "be doers of the word not merely hearers" (cf. James 1:22-23 following Jesus, Matt. 7:24-27; Luke 11:48; John 13:17; as did Paul, Rom. 2:13).

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 7:54-60
 54Now when they heard this, they were cut to the quick, and they began gnashing their teeth at him. 55But being full of the Holy Spirit, he gazed intently into heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at the right hand of God; 56and he said, "Behold, I see the heavens opened up and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God." 57But they cried out with a loud voice, and covered their ears and rushed at him with one impulse. 58When they had driven him out of the city, they began stoning him; and the witnesses laid aside their robes at the feet of a young man named Saul. 59They went on stoning Stephen as he called on the Lord and said, "Lord Jesus, receive my spirit!" 60Then falling on his knees, he cried out with a loud voice, "Lord, do not hold this sin against them!" Having said this, he fell asleep.

7:54 "they" This must refer to the members of the Sanhedrin (cf. 6:15).

NASB"cut to the quick"
NKJV"cut to the heart"
NRSV"they became enraged"
TEV"they became furious"
NJB"they were infuriated"

This is an imperfect passive indicative. It is literally "cut to the heart" (cf. 5:33). Stephen's message really got to these leaders, but instead of repenting, they turned, as always, to rejection and murder (cf. 5:33).

▣ "gnashing their teeth" This is a sign of rage (cf. Job 16:9; Psalm 35:16; 37:12; Lam. 2:16).

7:55 "Holy Spirit. . .God. . .Jesus" Notice the mention of the Triune God. See Special Topic at 2:32-33.

▣ "Being full of the Holy Spirit" The concept of being filled with the Spirit for proclamation of the gospel is unique to Acts (i.e., plēroō, cf. 2:4; 4:8,31; plērēs, cf. 6:3,5,8; 7:55; 11:24). See full note at 5:17.

The biblical truths related to the Spirit are characterized as:

1. the person of the Spirit (cf. John 14-16)

2. the baptism of the Spirit (cf. I Cor. 12:13)

3. the fruit of the Spirit (cf. Gal. 5:22-23)

4. the gifts of the Spirit (cf. I Cor. 12)

5. the filling of the Spirit (cf. Eph. 5:18)

Of all of these, Acts focuses on #5. The early church leaders were empowered, apparently again and again, to boldly and powerfully proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ. In Stephen's case the effectiveness of his sermon cost him his life.

▣ "gazed intently" Luke is very fond of this term (cf. Luke 4:20; 22:56; Acts 1:10; 3:4,12; 6:15; 7:55; 10:4; 11:6; 13:9; 14:9; 23:1). Stephen looked up, as was typical of the Jewish manner of prayer, but instead of praying, God allowed him to see into heaven itself.

"saw the glory of God" Notice that Stephen is not said to have seen God, but His glory. No one could see God and live (cf. Exod. 33:20-23). Job believed he would see God (cf. Job 19:25-27; Acts 7:55). Jesus promises that one day the pure in heart will see God (cf. Matt. 5:8). See SPECIAL TOPIC: GLORY (DOXA) at 3:13.

▣ "Jesus standing at the right hand of God" Jesus being at God's right hand is an anthropomorphic idiom (see Special Topic at 2:33) for the place of divine power and authority. The fact that Jesus was standing shows His interest and care for the first Christian martyr.

God revealed Himself to Stephen in the form and manner that Stephen could receive. This does not mean to imply

1. that heaven is "up"

2. that God is sitting on a throne

It does mean to convey Jesus' care and concern. We must be careful of culturally conditioned anthropomorphic language as the source of doctrine. Modern western readers' trying to take every passage literally as a way to show trust or devotion to the Bible is an unfortunate cultural trend. God truly reveals Himself to His creation, but He does so in earthly ways and forms in which they can understand. There is surely an element of accommodation. Fallen, finite, human creatures are not able to fully comprehend the spiritual realm. God chooses things in our cultural and experiential world to use as analogies and metaphors to communicate to us. These are surely true, but not exhaustive.

7:56 "Son of Man" Stephen obviously is identifying Jesus with the "Righteous One" of 5:52. His hearers would not have missed this Messianic affirmation. The term "son of man" has two OT usages:

1. it was a common phrase for a person (cf. Ezek. 2:1; Ps. 8:4)

2. it was used of the divine personage (i.e., Messiah) in Daniel 7:13-14 and Ps. 110:1

Therefore, it had connotations of both humanity and deity. This is why Jesus used it as a self-designation and also because it was not used by the rabbis who tended to use OT titles in exclusivistic, nationalistic, and militaristic ways. This reference by Stephen is one of only two uses of this phrase outside of the words of Jesus (cf. John 12:34).

7:57-58 These hearers believed that Stephen had blasphemed by asserting that Jesus was the coming Son of Man (cf. Dan. 7:13). For these monotheistic (see Special Topic at 2:39) Jews this was just too much! They did to Stephen what Moses mandated for blasphemy (cf. Lev. 24:14-16; Deut. 13:9; 17:7). Stephen's affirmation is either true or he is a blasphemer worthy of death! There can be no middle ground about the claims of Jesus (cf. John 14:6-9).

7:57 "rushed at him with one impulse" This is the very term used so often by Luke to describe the unity of the early disciples (cf. 1:14; 2:46; 5:12; 15:25). The Sanhedrin was unified in their anger and rejection of Stephen (also see 18:12, where the Jews of Achaia reject Paul and 19:29 of the anger of the pagans of Ephesus against Christians).

7:58 "driven him out of the city" No one could be killed inside Jerusalem because it was "holy" ground!

▣ "stoning him" It is often stated that the Jews under Roman occupation did not have the right of capital punishment. This shows that that is not always true. Mob violence could not be stopped quickly.

▣ "a young man named Saul" In Jewish circles, one was considered young up to age 40. This is our first encounter with Saul of Tarsus by name, later to become Paul the Apostle. Paul heard Stephen's OT survey and possibly had heard him earlier in the synagogue of the Cilicians in Jerusalem (6:9). One wonders whether this began Saul's period of doubt, which he tried to deal with by persecuting Christians.

7:59 "Lord Jesus, receive my spirit" This is an aorist middle imperative. Notice that Stephen believed that he was going to heaven to be with Jesus (cf. II Cor. 5:6,8) and not to hades (i.e., the holding place of the dead like the Hebrew sheol, see Special Topic at 2:27). Stephen may have witnessed Jesus' crucifixion, or at least had heard about it in detail because he uses two similar phrases (i.e., vv. 59 and 60, cf. Luke 23:34,46).

It is interesting to note that Stephen prays to Jesus, as did the disciples in 1:24. However, in the rest of the NT prayer is made to the Father in the name of the Son.

7:60 "falling on his knees" Stoning was not always a quick experience. The text implies it took several minutes.

▣ "he cried out with a loud voice" This also mimics Jesus' experience. These words were as much for the crowd as for YHWH. These words must have echoed in Saul's ears.

▣ "he fell asleep" This is a biblical metaphor for death (ex. Job 3:13; 14:12; Ps. 76:5; II Sam. 7:12; I Kgs. 2:10; Jer. 51:39,57; Dan. 12:2; Matt. 27:52; John 11:11; Acts 7:60; 13:36; I Cor. 15:6,18,20; I Thess. 4:13; II Pet. 3:4). This does not affirm the doctrine of "soul-sleep."

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. What is the purpose of Stephen's statement?

What did it show about the Jews?

Why were they so enraged?

2. How was Jesus like Moses, verse 37?

3. Why is the quote from Isaiah 66:1-2 in verses 49-50 so important?

4. What was so significant about Stephen's vision of Jesus?

 

Acts 8

PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS

UBS4 NKJV NRSV TEV NJB
Saul Persecutes the Church Saul Persecutes the Church Spread of the Gospel to Samaria and the Sea Coast Saul Persecutes the church The Stoning of Stephen, Saul as Persecutor
8:1b-3 8:1-3 8:1b-3 8:1b-2 (7:55-8:3)
        8:2
      8:3 8:3
The Gospel is Preached in Samaria Christ is Preached in Samaria   The Gospel is Preached in Samaria Philip in Samaria
8:4-8 8:4-8 8:4-8 8:4-8 8:4-8
  The Sorcerer's Profession of Faith     Simon the Magician
8:9-13 8:9-13 8:9-13 8:9-13 8:9-13
  The Sorcerer's Sin      
8:14-24 8:14-24 8:14-24 8:14-17 8:14-17
      8:18-19 8:18-24
      8:20-24  
8:25 8:25 8:25 8:25 8:25
Philip and the Ethiopian Eunuch Christ is Preached to an Ethiopian   Philip and the Ethiopian Official Philip Baptizes a Eunuch
8:26-33 8:26-40 8:26-40 8:26-30 8:26-33
      8:31-33  
8:34-40     8:34-37 8:34-40
      8:38-40  

 

READING CYCLE THREE (from "A Guide to Good Bible Reading")

FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S INTENT AT THE PARAGRAPH LEVEL

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects. Compare your subject divisions with the five modern translations. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is the key to following the original author's intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every paragraph has one and only one main subject.

1. First paragraph

2. Second paragraph

3. Third paragraph

4. Etc.

 

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 8:1a
 1Saul was in hearty agreement with putting him to death.

8:1 "Saul was in hearty agreement with putting him to death" This phrase concludes chapter 7. It is a periphrastic imperfect active. Paul remembered this experience with great shame (cf. Acts 22:20; I Cor. 15:9; Gal. 1:13,23; Phil. 3:6; I Tim. 1:13). Some relate this passage to 26:10, where it is assumed Paul voted in the Sanhedrin to put Christians to death.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 8:1b-3
 1bAnd on that day a great persecution began against the church in Jerusalem, and they were all scattered throughout the regions of Judea and Samaria, except the apostles. 2Some devout men buried Stephen, and made loud lamentation over him. 3But Saul began ravaging the church, entering house after house, and dragging off men and women, he would put them in prison.

▣ "on that day a great persecution began against the church in Jerusalem" This probably represents the activity of the Jewish leaders (mostly Sadducees) because of the exploding growth and prominence of the early church in Jerusalem. However, it was also God's way of forcing the church to implement Acts 1:8! If not 1:8 then 8:1!

It is not by accident that Luke uses the term ekklesia (see Special Topic at 5:11) for the new body of believers. These men and women did not see themselves as something separate from God's OT promises, but the fulfillment! The term was used in the Septuagint to translate "the congregation" (MT - qahal) of Israel (cf. Acts 7:38); now it is used of the fellowship of believers in Jerusalem.

Luke is very fond of the term "great" (megas). He uses it twenty-five times in his Gospel and twenty-nine times in Acts. In chapter 8 he uses it for:

1. great persecution, v. 1

2. great lamentation, v. 2

3. loud voice, v. 7

4. someone great, v. 9

5. to the greatest, v. 10

6. great miracles, v. 13

 

▣ "they were all scattered throughout the region. . .except the apostles" It is extremely interesting that the persecution bypassed the Apostles and landed squarely on the Hellenistic Jewish Christians. Apparently at this stage the Apostles were still content to remain within Judaism. This event occurred some time after their meeting with Jesus in Galilee (cf. Matt. 28:18-20) Pentecost and still the Apostolic leadership was content to remain and preach only to Jews or proselytes and only in the Jerusalem area.

▣ "scattered throughout the regions of Judea and Samaria" This is in fulfillment of Luke's Great Commission mentioned in Acts 1:8. It has been some time now since Jesus spoke these words and apparently persecution was the only means of getting the church to go into all the world. The church is still reluctant!

8:2 "Some devout men buried Stephen" The term "devout men" is usually used of spiritually sensitive Jews (cf. Luke 2:25). It is possible that this refers to Jewish Christians or simply Jews who disagreed with the illegal procedures (i.e., mob violence) and execution of Stephen. The Mishnah permits the burial of blasphemers, but not with the loud lamentations made by those who bury them. These devout men grieved openly

1. in defiance of what happened

2. in reference to the fact that what happened was not officially sanctioned

 

8:3 "Saul began ravaging the church" This verb is an imperfect middle indicative. This can mean the beginning of an action in past time (cf. NASB, NJB) or recurrent action (cf. NKJV, NRSV, TEV).

The term "ravage" meant "the tearing of a body by an animal." It is used in the Septuagint of animals in Exod. 22:13; Ps. 74:13 and of military defeat in Jer. 28:2 and 31:18. Paul apparently was struggling with the truth of Stephen's statements, and may have tried to cover up his internal tension by aggressively persecuting the church (cf. Acts 9:1,13,21; 22:4,19: 26:10-11; I Cor. 15:9; Gal. 1:13; Phil. 3:6; I Tim. 1:13).

See Special Topic: Church at 5:11.

▣ "entering house by house" This phrase could be understood in two ways:

1. Paul found out where the Apostles had visited (cf. 5:42)

2. there were several house churches even at this early date in Jerusalem where believers met regularly

The early Christians would meet at

1. the local synagogues every Sabbath

2. the Temple on special days or even most days

3. special locations or numerous homes on Sundays

 

"dragging off men and women" This is a verb that is used for Satan sweeping a third of the stars from heaven in Rev. 12:4. It is used several times in Acts (cf. 8:3; 14:19; 17:6). Saul was vicious in his persecution (cf. 26:10). This is evidenced by the phrase "men and women." He tore apart families of sincere believers and had them imprisoned and some even killed (cf. 9:1,13,21; 22:4,19; 26:10,11; Gal. 1:13;23; I Tim. 1:13). This is why he later calls himself "the least of the saints" (cf. I Cor. 15:9; Eph. 3:8).

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 8:4-8
 4Therefore, those who had been scattered went about preaching the word. 5Philip went down to the city of Samaria and began proclaiming Christ to them. 6The crowds with one accord were giving attention to what was said by Philip, as they heard and saw the signs which he was performing. 7For in the case of many who had unclean spirits, they were coming out of them shouting with a loud voice; and many who had been paralyzed and lame were healed. 8So there was much rejoicing in that city.

8:4 "those who had been scattered went about preaching the word" Notice it was not the Apostles, because they remained in Jerusalem, but the Hellenistic Jewish Christians scattered throughout the region who became the early evangelists. It is amazing that the worldwide mission of the church was instigated, not by the Apostles, but by Stephen and Philip.

The "word" here must surely mean the gospel, but also the added worldwide, non-Jewish focus of Stephen (Great Commission, 1:8; Matt. 28:18-20; Luke 24:47).

8:5 "Philip" He is one of "the Seven" mentioned in 6:5 (cf. 21:8-9). He is depicted in three evangelistic settings: (1) Samaria; (2) the Ethiopian Eunuch; and (3) ministry in the Palestinian coastal area. These "seven" had a heart for evangelism.

▣ "went down to the city of Samaria" There is a manuscript question over whether the text reads "the city of Samaria" or "a city of Samaria." Manuscript attestation is in favor of the definite article (cf. MSS, P74, א, A, B). However, this city was not known by the name Samaria at this time, but as Sebaste. During this Roman period the term Samaria was used of the district. The major city of Samaria would have been Shecham, then called Neapolis and today Nablus. It has been theorized that this city may be Gitta because that is the traditional home of Simon Magus. This theory is from Justin Martyr, who was also from this area.

▣ "and began proclaiming Christ to them" The Samaritans were hated by the Jews because they considered them to be half-breeds (cf. Ezra 4:1-3). This was related to the Assyrian exile of 722 b.c. that repopulated the area of the northern Ten Tribes with pagans who intermarried with the small remaining Jewish population (cf. II Kings 17:24-41).

This group of people was also ministered to by Jesus. Jesus revealed His Messiahship to a woman of Samaria and her village (cf. John 4). Now Philip preaches about "the Christ" (definitive article), which is the Greek translation of "The Messiah" (see Special Topic at 2:31). The OT title relates to YHWH's promise of sending One who would set up the new kingdom, inaugurate the new age of the Spirit. This event is foreshadowed in Jesus' ministry and specifically mandated in Jesus' closing words (1:8).

8:6 "The crowds with one accord" The phrase "one accord" is very popular with Luke. See note at 1:14.

▣ "as they heard and saw the signs which he was performing" This refers to miracles confirming Philip's message (cf. v. 7). These same manifestations of the Spirit accompanied Jesus, the Twelve, the Seventy, and Peter and John preaching.

8:7 Demon possession is a reality in our world (cf. Merrill F. Unger's two books: [1] Biblical Demonology and [2] Demons in the World Today). See the two Special Topics at 5:16.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 8: 9-13
 9Now there was a man named Simon, who formerly was practicing magic in the city and astonishing the people of Samaria, claiming to be someone great; 10and they all, from smallest to greatest, were giving attention to him, saying, "This man is what is called the Great Power of God." 11And they were giving him attention because he had for a long time astonished them with his magic arts. 12But when they believed Philip preaching the good news about the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were being baptized, men and women alike. 13Even Simon himself believed; and after being baptized, he continued on with Philip, and as he observed signs and great miracles taking place, he was constantly amazed.

8:9 "a man named Simon" Whether this man truly believed (cf. vv. 13,18) or was simply a charlatan seeking power is uncertain. I would like to give him the benefit of the doubt based on v. 24. It is amazing how much tradition the early church developed around this man, but all of it is speculative (cf. The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible, vol. 5, pp. 442-444).

NASB, NRSV"magic"
NKJV, TEV"sorcery"
NJB"magic arts"

SPECIAL TOPIC: MAGIC

8:10 "This man is what is called the Great Power of God" This was a title for the high god of the Greco-Roman Pantheon (i.e., Zeus). In Aramaic it would be "This is the power of the god who is called great." This man had thoroughly tricked the locals. He may have even tricked himself (cf. vv. 9,13).

8:12 "believed" See Special Topic: Believe, Faith, Trust at 3:16 and OT Believe at 6:5.

NASB"preaching the good news"
NKJV"preached the things"
NRSV"was proclaiming the good news"
TEV"message about the good news"

This is the Greek verb euangelizō, which is a compound of good (eu) and message (angelizō). We get the English words evangel, evangelize, and evangelism from this Greek term. Philip presented the story of Jesus to these Samaritans and they responded in saving faith.

▣ "about the kingdom of God" See the Two Special Topics on this subject at 1:3.

"the name of Jesus Christ" See Special Topic at 2:21.

"they were being baptized" See Special Topic at 2:38.

"men and women alike" Contextually there may be two significances to this phrase.

1. Paul persecuted "men and women (cf. 8:3)," but the gospel also was saving "men and women"

2. In Judaism only men participated in the initial Jewish rite of circumcision, but now in the gospel, both genders participated in the initial rite of baptism.

 

8:13 "Simon believed" Most evangelicals use this term "believed" (See Special Topic at 3:16) in a very definitive sense, but there are places in the NT (e.g., John 8:31) where it denotes something less than conversion (cf. John 8:59).

Initial faith is not the only criteria (cf. Matt. 13:1-9,10-23; 24:13). Continuance and obedience are also evidence of a true relationship with Christ.

SPECIAL TOPIC: PERSEVERANCE

"he continued on with Philip" This is a periphrastic imperfect. Notice the sequence.

1. he heard, vv. 6-7,12

2. he saw, vv. 6-7,13

3. he believed, v. 13

4. he was baptized, v. 13

5. he went with Philip, v. 13

 

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 8:14-24
 14Now when the apostles in Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent them Peter and John, 15who came down and prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit. 16For He had not yet fallen upon any of them; they had simply been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. 17Then they began laying their hands on them, and they were receiving the Holy Spirit. 18Now when Simon saw that the Spirit was bestowed through the laying on of the apostles' hands, he offered them money, 19saying, "Give this authority to me as well, so that everyone on whom I lay my hands may receive the Holy Spirit." 20But Peter said to him, "May your silver perish with you, because you thought you could obtain the gift of God with money! 21You have no part or portion in this matter, for your heart is not right before God. 22Therefore repent of this wickedness of yours, and pray the Lord that, if possible, the intention of your heart may be forgiven you. 23For I see that you are in the gall of bitterness and in the bondage of iniquity." 24But Simon answered and said, "Pray to the Lord for me yourselves, so that nothing of what you have said may come upon me."

8:14 "when the apostles in Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent them Peter and John" Ministry to the Samaritans was forbidden to the disciples during Jesus' lifetime (cf. Matt. 10:5). Apparently the Apostles wanted to give their official sanction to this radical and unusual movement of the Holy Spirit among this traditionally hated racial group. This area was specifically mentioned in Acts 1:8. As was typical, Philip caught Jesus' implication of world-wide evangelization quicker than the Twelve.

Notice that believing in Jesus is parallel to "receiving the word of God." The word of God can stand for several things.

1. God's total communication to human beings

2. God's recorded communication to human beings (i.e., Scripture)

3. God's Son (i.e., the Word, cf. John 1:1) who is the ultimate revelation of God (cf. Heb. 1:3)

Notice that Peter and John were sent. Peter was the acknowledged leader of the apostolic group and John the one who earlier wanted to call down fire on the Samaritans (cf. Luke 9:54).

8:15 "who came and prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit" There are tremendous problems trying to build a theology of salvation from Acts for the following reason: the order of events and the events themselves surrounding salvation differs from passage to passage. The Holy Spirit in this passage refers to a confirmation, like Pentecost, showing that God had accepted and saved these Samaritans. They could not have truly been saved in the first place (i.e., receive is perfect middle indicative) without the work of the Holy Spirit (cf. Rom. 8:9).

I think the experience of Pentecost set a pattern, which God reproduced in the experience of different racial and geographical people groups, to show and confirm to the believing Jewish church that God Himself had fully and completely accepted a new group. The Spirit's manifestation in Acts (i.e., Pentecost) is thereby theologically different from the Corinthian tongues.

This text cannot be used to demand a Corinthian-like experience to confirm salvation (cf. I Cor. 12:29-30, which is a series of questions which expect a "no" answer). Luke records what occurred, not what should occur every time.

8:16-17 This is different from the stated order of events in Acts 2:38. The discrepancy is due to the specific action of the Holy Spirit: (1) in 2:38 in relation to salvation and (2) in 8:16 in relation to a Pentecostal type of experience. The same "Holy Spirit event" of Acts 2 now occurred with Samaritans. This was not for their benefit alone, but mostly for the Jewish Christian community. It showed them that God had fully accepted the Samaritans! This is not meant to assert a two-step initial salvation experience.

Please notice that it was Peter and John who noticed the absence of the special manifestation of the Spirit that they had experienced at Pentecost. This is not to imply that the miraculous signs which accompanied Philip's preaching were not true manifestations of the Spirit (cf. v. 13). Peter and John wanted a Samaritan Pentecost! This is so important because when Cornelius has the same experience (i.e., Acts 10), Peter knew that God had fully accepted a Roman military man and his family. The gospel is for all people. This is the great truth which this experience reveals in Acts!

8:16 This could be called the Samaritan Pentecost.

8:17 This cannot be a proof-text for the necessity of laying on hands. This procedure, for this purpose, does not occur again in Acts. It does express the power and authority of the Apostles. See SPECIAL TOPIC: LAYING ON OF HANDS at 6:6.

8:20 The theological question for us is the soteriological question for Simon. Was he saved or not? Peter's word can be taken as a curse or a warning. All new believers have weak and incorrect information about the gospel, but does Simon's denote an added element of egotism? Can people be saved with conflicting priorities in their lives?

▣ "the gift of God" Here the Spirit stands for all of God's work on behalf of sinful rebellious humanity (cf. Isa. 55:1-2; Jer. 31:31-34; Ezek. 36:22-38; Luke 11:13; Acts 2:38).

8:21 "You have no part or portion in this matter" The first term "part" (i.e., meris) means a portion in common. It has a negative connotation here and in II Cor. 6:15.

The second term "portion" (i.e., klēros) is the OT word for "lot," which was the way they determined the will of God (i.e., Urim and Thummim). They were used to divide the Promised Land among the tribes (cf. Josh. 12-19). Therefore, it is used in the sense of inheritance. This term came to be used in English for "clergy," but in the NT it refers to all believers.

▣ "your heart is not right before God" This may be an allusion to Ps. 78:37. The terms "right" and "just" (see Special Topic at 3:14) and their various forms, come from a term for a river reed found in Mesopotamia. It was fifteen to twenty feet tall and straight. God took this word, which was used in construction (checking the horizontal straightness of walls), to describe His own ethical character. God is the standard, ruler, straight edge by which all humans are judged. In light of this, all fail the test (cf. Rom. 3:9-18,23).

8:22 "repent" This is an aorist active imperative, which denotes urgency. See note and Special Topic at 2:38.

"pray" This is an aorist passive (deponent) imperative. Talking to God is evidence of a personal relationship, as conviction, which leads to repentance, is evidence of the indwelling Spirit!

"if" This is a first class conditional sentence, which is assumed to be true for the author's literary purposes or from his perspective. In this sentence it denotes a contingency based on Simon's willingness to repent and pray for forgiveness. His mindset and actions are a serious deviation from normative Christianity.

"the intention of your heart" Sin begins in the thought life. The rabbis say that the mind is like a plowed garden ready for seed. What we allow in through our eyes and ears takes root. If we dwell on it, these thoughts become actions. This is why the NT asserts that we should "gird up the loins of our minds" (cf. I Pet. 1:13) or "renew your mind" (cf. Rom 12:2; Eph. 4:23).

8:23

NASB, NRSV"the gall of bitterness"
NKJV"poisoned by bitterness"
TEV"full of bitter envy"
NJB"bitterness of gall"

The terms "gall" (cholē) and "bitterness" (pikros) both refer to a bitter spirit, usually associated with anger and apostasy (cf. Deut. 29:18; 32:28-33; Heb. 12:15). Paul uses the term "bitter" several times in lists of things to avoid (cf. Rom. 3:14; Eph. 4:31).

NASB"in the bondage of iniquity"
NKJV"bound by iniquity"
NRSV"chains of wickedness"
TEV"a prisoner of sin"
NJB"chains of sin"

This may be an allusion to the work of the Messiah (cf. Isa. 58:6). Jesus could free Simon from this evil bondage to personal power as he freed him from the penalty of sin. Sin has two aspects: (1) death both physically and spiritually and (2) who is in control in the sinner's life (it can affect both the saved and the lost, cf. I Cor. 3:1-3). Sin must be dealt with both in time and in eternity; its penalty and power must be dealt with, but only Christ and the Spirit can do it, but we as believers must allow Them to!

8:24 "Pray to the Lord for me yourselves" This is an aorist passive imperative (plural, which may refer to the entire mission team). Simon repeats Peter's words from v. 22. Peter's words have frightened him. I believe Simon is a believer, but a new, baby one.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 8:25
 25So, when they had solemnly testified and spoken the word of the Lord, they started back to Jerusalem, and were preaching the gospel to many villages of the Samaritans.

8:25 "solemnly testified" See note at 2:40.

▣ "and were preaching the gospel to many villages of the Samaritans" This shows the marked change of attitude on the part of the Apostles to the Samaritans.

It seems that "the word of the Lord" and "the gospel" are synonymous.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 8:26-40
 26But an angel of the Lord spoke to Philip saying, "Get up and go south to the road that descends from Jerusalem to Gaza." (This is a desert road.) 27So he got up and went; and there was an Ethiopian eunuch, a court official of Candace, queen of the Ethiopians, who was in charge of all her treasure; and he had come to Jerusalem to worship, 28and he was returning and sitting in his chariot, and was reading the prophet Isaiah. 29Then the Spirit said to Philip, "Go up and join this chariot." 30Philip ran up and heard him reading Isaiah the prophet, and said, "Do you understand what you are reading?" 31And he said, "Well, how could I, unless someone guides me?" And he invited Philip to come up and sit with him. 32Now the passage of Scripture which he was reading was this: "He was led as a sheep to slaughter; And as a lamb before its shearer is silent, So He does not open His mouth. 33In humiliation His judgment was taken away; Who will relate His generation? For His life is removed from the earth." 34The eunuch answered Philip and said, "Please tell me, of whom does the prophet say this? Of himself or of someone else?" 35Then Philip opened his mouth, and beginning from this Scripture he preached Jesus to him. 36As they went along the road they came to some water; and the eunuch said, "Look! Water! What prevents me from being baptized?" 37And Philip said, "If you believe with all your heart, you may." And he answered and said, "I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God." 38And he ordered the chariot to stop; and they both went down into the water, Philip as well as the eunuch, and he baptized him. 39When they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord snatched Philip away; and the eunuch no longer saw him, but went on his way rejoicing. 40But Philip found himself at Azotus, and as he passed through he kept preaching the gospel to all the cities until he came to Caesarea.

8:26 "an angel of the Lord spoke to Philip" Here "the angel of the Lord" and "the Holy Spirit" seem to be synonymous (cf. v. 29). This is common in Acts. See note at 5:19.

▣ "Get up and go south" These are both imperatives. This could refer to one of two roads to Egypt. This message may have been audible because of its specificity. This is obviously a divinely prepared evangelistic encounter (like Paul's).

NASB"(This is a desert road.)"
NKJV"This is desert"
NRSV"(This is a wilderness road)"
TEV"(This road is not used nowadays)"
NJB"the desert road"

If this is a comment by Luke, is Luke clarifying his source, or is this is a comment from Luke's source (probably Philip, cf. Acts 21:8)? These questions cannot be answered with certainty. Inspiration covers Bible productions no matter how many separate persons are involved.

8:27 "a court official" The term "official" is literally the term "eunuch." However, it is uncertain whether he was a physical eunuch or simply an official at court (derived meaning). In the OT, Potiphar is called a eunuch and yet he is married (cf. Gen. 39:1). In the OT, Deut. 23:1 forbids a eunuch from becoming a part of the Jewish community; however, in Isaiah 56:3-5, this ban is removed. This clearly shows the new age of the Spirit has dawned. Whether this man was a god-fearer or a proselyte is simply uncertain, but probable. The descriptive phrase implies he was a high government official.

▣ "Candace, queen of the Ethiopians" Candace is a title like "Pharaoh" or "Caesar." The reason the queen is mentioned is because the king in Ethiopia was considered to be a deity and, therefore, it was beneath him to deal with simple administrative or political affairs.

8:28 "reading the prophet Isaiah" Apparently this man had bought an expensive leather scroll of Isaiah, which would have been over 29 feet long (i.e., one found in the Dead Sea Scrolls). By the Spirit's direction, he had opened it to the Messianic passage of Isaiah 53:7-8 and was reading it.

8:29 "the Spirit said to Philip, ‘Go up and join this chariot'" This is an aorist passive imperative. It literally meant "be glued." The Spirit is giving Philip every specific guidance.

8:30 "Philip ran up and heard him reading Isaiah the prophet" Ancients all read aloud even when alone.

▣ "Do you understand what you are reading" What a great question! It is possible to read Scripture and not clearly see its intent. The Spirit is directing Philip to a "divine appointment" which will

1. show the new age has dawned

2. give a powerful witness to another people group

 

8:31 A. T. Robertson's Word Pictures in the New Testament comments on this verse, "This is a mixed condition, the conclusion coming first belongs to the fourth class. . .with ‘an' and the optative, but the condition. . .is of the first class. . .a common enough phenomenon in Koine" (p. 110). This first class condition, like Luke 19:40 uses ean instead of ei. The condition is determined by the mood, not the construction (cf. Luke 19:40).

8:32-33 This quote is from the Messianic passage from the Septuagint of Isa. 53:7-9. I am surprised that these verses are emphasized and not other Messianic verses in this OT context. However, Philip starts right where he was reading and explains the entire passage in light of the life, ministry, death, and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth. The OT prophecy has been fulfilled and forgiveness through Christ is offered to everyone!

8:35 "Philip opened his mouth" This shows the centrality of the OT passage concerning "the Suffering Servant" to gospel proclamation. I believe Jesus, Himself, showed the early church how these ancient prophecies applied to Himself (cf. Luke 24:27).

8:36 "Look! Water! What prevents me from being baptized" Philip's gospel message included baptism (cf. Matthew 3; 28:19; Acts 2:38; Rom. 6:1-11; Col. 2:12)! See Special Topic at 2:38. Notice he did not need approval from the Apostles in Jerusalem to baptize a convert. Baptism is not a denominational issue, but a kingdom issue. We must be careful of the denominational traditions that have so muddied the biblical waters as far as expected procedures in our day!

Was the eunuch worried about being accepted?

1. racial issue

2. physical issue

3. socio-economic issue

4. catechism issue

All barriers are down in Jesus Christ (cf. Eph. 2:11-3:13). Whosoever will may come (cf. John 1:12; 3:16; Rom. 10:9-13)!

8:37 This verse, which records the eunuch's confession, is not included in the ancient Greek papyri manuscripts P45 (Chester Beatty Papyri), P74 (Bodmer Papyri), or the ancient uncial Greek manuscripts א, A, B, or C. Neither is it present in some of the ancient Vulgate, Syriac, Coptic, or Ethiopian translations. Verse 37 is not original to Acts. UBS4 gives its omission an "A" rating, meaning certain. It is not even included in the text of NASB (1970) edition, but is included in the 1995 update with brackets.

8:38-39 "went down into the water. . .came up out of the water" This is not a proof-text for immersion. The context implies they walked into a body of water, not the method of the baptism. Be careful of your preconceived biases!

8:39 "the Spirit of the Lord snatched Philip away" Whether this is a miraculous occurrence like Elijah's (cf. I Kgs. 18:12; II Kgs. 2:16) or Ezekiel's (cf. Ezek. 3:14; 8:3) or simply a reference to his immediate departure is uncertain. The Spirit was intimately involved in this conversion. Notice also that extensive follow-up and catechism apparently did not occur, but the convert had the scroll of Isaiah and the indwelling Spirit!

▣ "went on his way rejoicing" The Good News is always accompanied by rejoicing (cf. 8:8). Ireaneus records the tradition that this eunuch became a gospel missionary to his own people. The Spirit Himself must have done the follow-up discipling!

8:40 Philip continued (imperfect middle indicative) his evangelistic ministry in the Philistine town of Ashdod (i.e., Azotus) on his way home to Caesarea by the sea. It is obvious that Philip understood the universal evangelistic implication of the Samaritans and the Ethiopians. The gospel included even Philistines!

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. Why did God allow persecution to come upon the early Church?

2. Why was the gospel being preached to Samaritans so significantly?

3. Was Simon a believer?

4. Why did the Samaritans not receive the Holy Spirit when they believed?

5. What type of persons does the eunuch represent?

6. Why is verse 37 not in all Bibles?

 

Acts 9

PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS

UBS4

NKJV NRSV TEV NJB
The Conversion of Saul The Damascus Road: Saul Converted Conversion of Saul of Tarsus The Conversion of Saul The Conversion of Saul
9:1-9 9:1-9 9:1-9 9:1-2 9:1-2
      9:3-4 9:3-9
      9:5a  
      9:5b-6  
  Ananias Baptizes Saul   9:7-9  
9:10-19a 9:10-19 9:10-19a 9:10a 9:10-12
      9:10b  
      9:11-12  
      9:13-14 9:13-19a
      9:15-16  
      9:17-19a  
Saul Preaches at Damascus Saul Preaches Christ   Saul Preaches in Damascus Saul's Preaching at Damascus
9:19b-22   9:19b-22 9:19b-20 9:19b-22
  9:20-22   9:21  
      9:22  
Saul Escapes From the Jews Saul Escapes Death Saul's First Visit to Jerusalem    
9:23-25 9:23-25 9:23-25 9:23-25 9:23-25
Saul at Jerusalem Saul at Jerusalem   Saul in Jerusalem Saul's Visit to Jerusalem
9:26-30 9:26-30 9:26-30 9:26-30 9:26-30
  The Church Prospers     A Lull
9:31 9:31 9:31 9:31 9:31
The Healing of Aeneas Aeneas Healed Peter's Journey to Lydda and Joppa Peter Sees Lydda in Joppa Peter Cures a Paralytic at Joppa
9:32-35 9:32-35 9:32-35 9:32-35 9:32-35
Dorcas Restored to Life Dorcas Restored to Life     Peter Raises a Woman to Life at Joppa
9:36-43 9:36-43 9:36-43 9:36-43 9:36-38
        9:39-42
        9:43

READING CYCLE THREE (from "A Guide to Good Bible Reading")

FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S INTENT AT THE PARAGRAPH LEVEL

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects. Compare your subject divisions with the five modern translations. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is the key to following the original author's intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every paragraph has one and only one main subject.

1. First paragraph

2. Second paragraph

3. Third paragraph

4. Etc.

 

CONTEXTUAL INSIGHTS

A. The emphasis in Acts is beginning to shift from

1. the Apostle Peter to the Apostle Paul

2. from Palestine to the Mediterranean world

3. from Jews to Gentiles.

 

B. Paul's conversion is such an important point in church history that it is recorded three times in the book of Acts.

1. Luke's account, 9:1-30

2. Paul's account before the mob in Jerusalem, 22:3-16

3. Paul's account before Agrippa II at Caesarea, 26:4-18

4. Paul also briefly mentions this same period in Gal. 1:13-17 and II Cor. 11:32-33

 

C. The similarities between Stephen's message and Paul's messages are obvious. Paul began to minister to the same Hellenistic Jews to whom Stephen had preached. Paul heard Stephen's sermon of Acts 7 (cf. 7:58; 8:1; 22:20). It is even possible that Paul was one of the leaders of the Hellenist Synagogues in Jerusalem who debated with Stephen and lost!

 

D. Some possible influential factors in Paul's conversion

1. failure of Judaism to provide internal peace and joy

2. the life and teachings of Jesus were well known and discussed in rabbinical circles (especially Jerusalem)

3. he heard Stephen's sermon and witnessed his death (possibly even debated Stephen)

4. he saw the demeanor and faith of Christians under persecution

5. his personal encounter with the resurrected Lord changed everything

 

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 9:1-9
 1Now Saul, still breathing threats and murder against the disciples of the Lord, went to the high priest, 2and asked for letters from him to the synagogues at Damascus, so that if he found any belonging to the Way, both men and women, he might bring them bound to Jerusalem. 3As he was traveling, it happened that he was approaching Damascus, and suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him; 4and he fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to him, "Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me?" 5And he said, "Who are You, Lord?" And He said, "I am Jesus whom you are persecuting, 6but get up and enter the city, and it will be told you what you must do." 7The men who traveled with him stood speechless, hearing the voice but seeing no one. 8Saul got up from the ground, and though his eyes were open, he could see nothing; and leading him by the hand, they brought him into Damascus. 9And he was three days without sight, and neither ate nor drank.

9:1 "Saul, still breathing threats and murder" This is literally "snorting." In Acts 26:11, Paul says of himself, that he was furiously enraged at them. Apparently Paul even killed some Christians (cf. 8:1).

"the disciples of the Lord" This term means learners. It only appears in the Gospels and Acts. This term is rapidly replaced by the term "saints." Notice the number of terms used in this chapter to describe the people of God:

1. disciples, vv. 1,10,19,25,26,36,38

2. the Way, v. 2

3. saints, vv. 13,32,41

4. brothers, v. 17.

▣ "went to the high priest" This is obviously a reference to the Sanhedrin (cf. Acts 26:10). See note on Sanhedrin at 4:5.

9:2 "for letters from him to the synagogues at Damascus" The Roman government had given limited authority to the Sanhedrin to conduct and control events in the synagogues or related to Jewish life in the Empire (cf. I Macc. 15:16-21 or Josephus, Antiq. 14.10.2). Judaism was a recognized, legal religion of the Greco-Roman world.

Apparently these were letters of extradition for the Jewish Christians who had fled Jerusalem in the face of the Jewish persecution (cf. 9:14,21; 22:5; 26:10).

"if" This is a third class conditional sentence meaning potential action.

▣ "The Way" This was the early designation for believers (cf. 19:9,23; 22:4; 24:14,22 and possibly 18:25,26). It has an OT background, speaking of lifestyle faith (cf. Ps. 1:1; 16:11; 119:105; 139:24; Pro. 4:10-19). Jesus uses this concept in Matt. 7:14 and uses the title for Himself in John 14:6. Christianity is a personal encounter followed by a daily relationship.

▣ "women" The mention of women three times amidst the groups that Paul persecuted is a way to show the intensity of Paul's actions (cf. 8:3; 22:4). Luke has a special concern for women!

9:3 "Damascus" This was an ancient city and capital of the Roman Province of Syria just north/northeast of Galilee. It was 150 miles from Jerusalem.

▣ "and suddenly" This term also has the connotation of "unexpectedly."

▣ "a light from heaven" Paul relates his experience with this light differently in his three accounts of his experience in Acts

1. "a light from heaven flashed around him" (9:3)

2. "a very bright light suddenly flashed from heaven all around me" (22:6)

3. "I saw on the way a light from heaven, brighter than the sun, shining all around me" (26:13)

Paul vividly remembers this event! It is just possible that this light is theologically/physically related to the Shekinah glory of YHWH's presence with Israel during the Wilderness Wandering Period. The Hebrew concept of "glory" takes on an aspect of bright light from this historical event (see SPECIAL TOPIC: GLORY (DOXA) at 3:13). This light would have showed Saul the rabbi that this was the personal presence of God.

9:4 "heard a voice" This heavenly voice was something Judaism was familiar with. It is known as a bath kol. This provided a means for the Jews to receive information and/or confirmation from God (during the interbiblical period between the closing of Malachi [or Chronicles] and the beginning of the ministry of John the Baptist). This form of revelation was necessary because there were no inspired prophets during this period.

"Saul, Saul" In Hebrew this repeating of the name was a way to show intensity.

"why are you persecuting Me" This is extremely significant theologically because it shows the continuity and intimacy between Jesus and His church (cf. Matt. 10:40; 25:40,45). Paul was persecuting the Church, but Jesus took it personally. From Acts 26:14 we know that Jesus spoke to Paul in Aramaic.

It is also theologically significant that Christianity is both a person (Jesus) and a group (church). The corporate metaphors used in the NT for the church are:

1. body

2. family

3. building

4. saints

All emphasize the corporate nature of faith (cf. I Cor. 12:7). It starts individually, but moves to the group (conscientiousness and concern). This individual corporality can be seen in Paul's discussion of Adam and Christ in Rom. 5:12-21. The One is part of the all; the One can affect the all (cf. Joshua 7).

9:5a "Who are You, Lord" What did Paul imply by the use of "Lord"?

1. sir, title of respect (ex. John 4:11)

2. YHWH, translated by Lord in the OT (ex. Gen. 2:4)

If surprise is the focus, then possibly #1 applies, but if the light from heaven denotes an action of God, then #2 is the case. If #2, then suddenly Paul's rabbinical theology is challenged. What a confusing and frightful time this must have been! See SPECIAL TOPIC: NAMES FOR DEITY at 1:6.

9:5b-6b These verses are not found in any early Greek manuscripts. They are found in only one Latin family of manuscripts. Erasmus, translating from the Vulgate, put them in his first edition of the Greek New Testament in 1516. These words are found in Acts 26:14. Their inclusion here shows a tendency of scribes to make parallels uniform and full of all details.

9:5 "I am Jesus whom you are persecuting" Paul is claiming to have seen the Glorified Christ (cf. Acts 22:14; I Cor. 9:1; 15:8-9). Paul will later understand this experience as an integral part of his call to be the Apostle to the Gentiles.

The crucified carpenter from Nazareth is the glorified Messiah!

9:6 This verse is explained in detail in vv. 10-19.

▣ "must do" See full note on dei at 1:16.

9:7 "The men who traveled with him" This possibly refers to

1. the Temple police accompanying Paul

2. other Jewish zealots, probably from Hellenistic synagogues

3. other theological students from Jerusalem

 

▣ "hearing the voice but seeing no one" There is a seeming discrepancy between 9:7 and 22:9 in the details of this event. There have been several theories how to deal with it:

1. It is a matter of syntax. The verb "to hear" can take a genitive (9:7) or an accusative (22:9). These different forms have different implications or connotations. The NRSV, in a footnote, has "The Greek suggests that his companions heard the sound of the voice, but not the words spoken."

2. Others say it is similar to John 12:29-30 about Jesus' entry into Jerusalem and the voice from heaven.

3. Others say that it is Paul's voice that is being referred to, not Jesus'. They heard Paul speaking, but they did not hear Jesus speaking.

4. Others say this is similar to the Synoptic problem. Different Gospel writers record the same events, sermons, and actions of Jesus in differing ways, which is different eyewitness accounts.

 

9:8 "though his eyes were open, he could see nothing" Paul apparently had eye problems from this point on (cf. Gal. 4:13-15; 6:11). I, personally, believe Paul's "thorn in the flesh" (cf. II Cor. 12:7-10; Gal. 4:13-15; 6:11) was Oriental ophthalmia, possibly caused by this experience. There is irony here; Paul experiences a reorientation. He thought he could see (physically and spiritually, cf. John 9), but he found out that he was blind. After this encounter with Christ he was physically blinded for a period, but his spiritual eyes were wide open!

9:9 "And he was three days without sight" This is a periphrastic imperfect. Some commentators see this as the occasion of Paul's vision of heaven recorded in II Cor. 12:1-4.

"and neither ate nor drank" Paul was fasting and praying (cf. v. 11). What a reorientation must have been occurring in Paul's mind (theology) and heart (desire)! He was beginning the transformation from persecutor of the gospel to proclaimer of the gospel!

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 9:10-19a
 10Now there was a disciple at Damascus named Ananias; and the Lord said to him in a vision, "Ananias." And he said, "Here I am, Lord." 11And the Lord said to him, "Get up and go to the street called Straight, and inquire at the house of Judas for a man from Tarsus named Saul, for he is praying, 12and he has seen in a vision a man named Ananias come in and lay his hands on him, so that he might regain his sight." 13But Ananias answered, "Lord, I have heard from many about this man, how much harm he did to Your saints at Jerusalem; 14and here he has authority from the chief priests to bind all who call on Your name." 15But the Lord said to him, "Go, for he is a chosen instrument of Mine, to bear My name before the Gentiles and kings and the sons of Israel; 16for I will show him how much he must suffer for My name's sake." 17So Ananias departed and entered the house, and after laying his hands on him said, "Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus, who appeared to you on the road by which you were coming, has sent me so that you may regain your sight and be filled with the Holy Spirit." 18And immediately there fell from his eyes something like scales, and he regained his sight, and he got up and was baptized; 19and he took food and was strengthened.

9:10 "Ananias" This name means "YHWH is gracious." Apparently he was a believing Jew of good reputation, not a refugee (cf. 22:12).

▣ "Here I am, Lord" This is a Jewish idiom of availability (cf. Isa. 6:8). Verse 11 was obviously given verbally because it is very specific instruction.

9:12 "he has seen in a vision a man named Ananias" "In a vision" is not in the ancient Greek manuscripts P74, א, and A, but it is in MSS B and C. The UBS4 put the shorter reading in the text but gives it a "C" rating (with difficulty in deciding). This verse shows that Ananias' coming, actions, and message were confirming Jesus' earlier words to Paul (cf. v. 6)

"lay his hands on hin" See Special Topic at 6:6.

9:13 "I have heard from many" Obviously Ananias had heard the bad reports about Paul's vicious persecution of believers from the Jewish refugees from Jerusalem.

▣ "Your saints" The term hagioi is related to the Greek word "holy" (hagios). The OT background (kadosh) relates to some thing, some person, or some place set apart by God for a special task. The term "saints" is always plural, except one time in Phil. 4:21, but even there it is in a plural context. To be a Christian is to be a part of a family, a community. There are no loners in the faith.

SPECIAL TOPIC: SAINTS

9:14 "the chief priests" In the OT the high priesthood was for life and was passed on to a special family of Levite's son (cf. Lev. 8-10). However, during the Roman period this position was purchased from the Roman officials. Therefore, there were several High Priests within the Sadducean family of Annas.

▣ "who call on Your name" This phrase has important theological implications. Luke uses it several times in Acts for

1. someone addressing Jesus (cf. 7:59)

2. someone who has accepted Jesus as Savior (cf. 9:14,21)

3. an OT quote from Amos 9:12, where it refers to someone upon whom YHWH's name is called (i.e., believers, cf. 15:17)

4. A way for someone to publicly affirm his faith in Jesus (cf. 22:16)

This phrase is also part of Paul's plea to Israel from Joel 2:32 in Rom. 10:9-13 (cf. II Tim. 2:22). Peter uses this same passage (Joel 2:28-32) in his Pentecost sermon and invited those present to "call upon the name of the Lord" from Joel 2:32.

The name stands for the person. By invoking the name sinners beseech Jesus to act on their behalf and include them in His family. See Special Topic at 2:22.

9:15 "Go" This is a present middle (deponent) imperative. Jesus authoritatively sends the reluctant Ananias to Saul.

▣ "for he is a chosen instrument of Mine" Oh, the greatness of the grace and election of God! Paul does not fit the evangelical model of voluntary, volitional conversion. He was dramatically drafted!

NASB, NKJV"before the Gentiles"
NRSV, NJB"to bring my name before Gentiles"
TEV"to make my name known to Gentiles"

What a startling statement for a Jew to be told (cf. Eph. 3:7)! Yet, this has always been God's plan (cf. Gen. 12:3; Exod. 19:5-6; Eph. 2:11-3:13, see Special Topic at 1:8). Israel was only an instrument to reach the world, made in the image of God (cf. Gen. 1:26-27), but fallen (cf. Gen. 3:15).

▣ "and kings" Paul spoke to governmental leaders, small and great, and finally to Caesar!

"and the sons of Israel" Paul's regular missionary pattern was to preach first at the local synagogue (cf. Rom. 1:16) in every city. This allowed the Jews and the God-fearers who knew the OT a chance to respond first to the gospel. Then he would turn to the pagans.

9:16 "for I will show him how much he must suffer for My name's sake" Suffering is not the exception, but the norm for Christians in a fallen world (cf. Matt. 5:10-12; John 15:18-21; 16:1-2; 17:14; Acts 14:22; Rom. 5:3-4; 8:17-18; II Cor. 4:7-12; 6:3-10; 11:24-33; Phil. 1:29; I Thess. 3:3; II Tim. 3:12; James 1:2-4; I Peter 4:12-16).

There is a theological relationship between the sufferings of Christ and the sufferings of His followers in this fallen realm. The book of I Peter shows this parallel.

1. Jesus' suffering, 1:11; 2:21,23; 3:18; 4:1,13; 5:1

2. His followers', 1:6-7; 2:19; 3:13-17; 4:1,12-19; 5:9-10

If the world rejected Him it will reject His (cf. John 7:7; 15:18-19; 17:14).

9:17 "and after laying his hands on him" There is no scriptural basis for the concept of "apostolic authority" in bestowing spiritual gifts. Ananias is an unknown lay believer in Damascus who becomes

1. God's spokesman and an agent in

2. Paul's being the filled with the Holy Spirit (cf. v. 17)

3. Paul's physical healing (cf. v. 18)

4. Paul's baptism (cf. v. 18)

 

▣ "Brother Saul" What a great example of obedience and love!

9:18 "there fell from his eyes something like scales" This is a technical medical term for the flaking of skin from a wound Luke uses to describe what happened to Paul's eyes in this moment of healing. The word scales is used of fish scales in the Septuagint (cf. Lev. 11:9,10,12; Deut. 14:9). The metaphorical extension can be seen in Num. 16:38, where it is used of flattened metal plates. In this context they were probably flakes of skin or crust which oozed from Paul's eyes.

▣ "was baptized" Ananias apparently also baptized Paul (cf. 8:36,38). NT baptism was an act of obedience to Jesus' example (cf. Matt. 3:13-17; Mark 1:9-11; Luke 3:21-22) and command (cf. Matt. 28:19.) It marks a change of ownership and allegiance.

9:19a "he took food and was strengthened" Paul had been fasting and praying since the light knocked him to the ground (cf. v. 9). After a three day total fast (no food or water), he must have been very weak.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 9:19b-22
 19bNow for several days he was with the disciples who were at Damascus, 20and immediately he began to proclaim Jesus in the synagogues, saying, "He is the Son of God." 21All those hearing him continued to be amazed, and were saying, "Is this not he who in Jerusalem destroyed those who called on this name, and who had come here for the purpose of bringing them bound before the chief priests?" 22But Saul kept increasing in strength and confounding the Jews who lived at Damascus by proving that this Jesus is the Christ.

9:20 "he began to proclaim Jesus in the synagogues" This is an imperfect active indicative. It can mean (1) the beginning of an action or (2) repeated action. What irony! He came earlier with a letter from the High Priests in Jerusalem to the synagogues in Damascus to persecute the followers of Jesus and now he came to the same synagogues preaching Jesus as the Messiah (cf. v 21).

▣ "‘He is the Son of God'" This is the only use of the title "Son of God" in the book of Acts (except for the quote of Ps. 2:7 in Acts 13:33). Its OT background reflects its significance: (1) the nation of Israel (cf. Hos. 11:1); (2) the King of Israel (cf. II Sam. 7:14); and (3) the Messiah (cf. Matt. 2:15). Paul's strict monotheism (see Special Topic at 2:39) is being redefined!

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE SON OF GOD

9:21 This verse is in the form of a question which expects a "yes" answer.

"destroyed" This is a rare and intense word meaning to ravage, lay waste to, or totally destroy. It is found only here and in Gal. 1:13,23 in the NT and in IV Macc. 4:23. Paul was a vicious persecutor!

9:22

NASB"Saul kept increasing in strength"
NKJV"Saul increased all the more in strength"
NRSV"Saul became increasingly more powerful"
TEV"Saul's preaching became even more powerful"
NJB"Saul's power increased steadily"

This is an imperfect passive indicative. It took some time for Saul's gifts and skills to develop. In context this refers to Paul's preaching and debating skills (cf. TEV).

▣ "confounding" This is an imperfect active indicative which denotes repeated action in past time. This is a compound term from "together" (sun) and "pour" (cheō). This word is only found in Acts.

1. 2:6, bewildered

2. 9:22, confounded

3. 19:32, confusion

4. 21:27, stir up

5. 21:31, confusion

The Jews could not explain Paul's conversion or his powerful preaching of Jesus as the promised OT Messiah. 

▣ "proving" This word means to conclude (cf. Acts 16:10; 19:33) and by extension, to prove. Paul's method was much like Stephen's. They both used OT passages and their fulfillment in the life of Jesus of Nazareth to prove that He was the Messiah promised in the OT.

"the Christ" This is a way of referring to the Messiah (Anointed One, Promised Coming One, see Special Topic at 2:31). Many times in Acts the definite article precedes the noun (ex. 2:31,36; 3:18,20). Saul was asserting with power and conviction that Jesus of Nazareth, killed in Jerusalem, was indeed God's Son, the Messiah. If this was true, it changed everything for Jews (and Gentiles)! They had misunderstood and rejected Him. They had missed God's gift and remained in spiritual darkness and need.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 9:23-25
 23When many days had elapsed, the Jews plotted together to do away with him, 24but their plot became known to Saul. They were also watching the gates day and night so that they might put him to death; 25but his disciples took him by night and let him down through an opening in the wall, lowering him in a large basket.

9:23 "When many days had elapsed" We must take into account Paul's personal account found in Gal. 1:15-24, where he spent a long period of time in Arabia. In this context Arabia refers to the Nabataean kingdom (ruled by Aretas IV, who reigned from 9 b.c. to a.d. 40) just southeast of Damascus. The three-year period probably reflects somewhere close to eighteen months. Jews counted part of a day as the whole day (cf. Matt. 26:61; 27:40,63); this reckoning was also used of years.

▣ "the Jews plotted together to do away with him" The Jews apparently stirred up the civil authorities (cf. II Cor. 11:32-33). This must have been humiliating for Paul because he mentions this very event in his discussion of weakness in II Corinthians 11.

9:25 "through an opening in the wall" This must refer to a window in a private house whose back wall was part of the wall surrounding the city (cf. II Cor. 11:33; Josh 2:15; I Sam. 19:12).

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 9:26-30
 26When he came to Jerusalem, he was trying to associate with the disciples; but they were all afraid of him, not believing that he was a disciple. 27But Barnabas took hold of him and brought him to the apostles and described to them how he had seen the Lord on the road, and that He had talked to him, and how at Damascus he had spoken out boldly in the name of Jesus. 28And he was with them, moving about freely in Jerusalem, speaking out boldly in the name of the Lord. 29And he was talking and arguing with the Hellenistic Jews; but they were attempting to put him to death. 30But when the brethren learned of it, they brought him down to Caesarea and sent him away to Tarsus.

9:26 "he came to Jerusalem" This was apparently eighteen to thirty-six months later (cf. Gal. 1:15-24). This verse shows the level of skepticism in which the Jerusalem believers held their former persecutor. Apparently Acts records several of Paul's visits to Jerusalem after his dramatic conversion.

1. 9:26, first visit

2. 11:30, relief visit

3. 12:25, after mission

4. 15:2, Jerusalem Council

5. 18:22, brief visit with the church

6. 21:17, visit with James and the elders and resulting Nazarite vow and arrest

 

9:27 "Barnabas" The popular meaning, though not etymological, was "son of encouragement." This was the great saint mentioned back in 4:36 who later became Paul's first missionary companion. See full note and Special Topic at 4:36.

▣ "brought him to the apostles" The only other account is Galatians 1:18.

▣ "and described to them" Barnabas knew and shared Saul's testimony. This opened the door to his acceptance (cf. v. 28).

9:28

NASB"moving about freely"
NKJV"coming in and going out"
NRSV"went in and out"
TEV"went all over"
NJB"to go around"

This is an OT idiom of everyday life or activity (cf. Num. 27:17; I Kgs. 3:7).

9:29 "he was talking and arguing with the Hellenistic Jews" This refers to the same group (synagogues of Greek-speaking Jews in Jerusalem) who killed Stephen; now they are planning to kill Saul, who was also a Jew from the diaspora. They must have thought Stephen had returned!

9:30 "when the brethren learned of it" From 22:17-21 we learn that Jesus appeared to Paul at this time to tell him to flee Jerusalem. Jesus appeared to Paul several times during his ministry to encourage and guide him (cf. 18:9-11; 22:17-21; and an angel of the Lord in 27:23).

"Caesarea" This refers to the Roman seaport on the Mediterranean coast of Palestine. This was the official headquarters of the Roman government in Palestine.

▣ "Tarsus" Paul is going to drop out of sight now for several years in his home town. Tarsus was a free city. It was also the third largest center of learning in the ancient world, behind Alexandria and Athens. The universities in Tarsus emphasized philosophy, rhetoric, and law. Paul was obviously trained both in Greek rhetoric and philosophy as well as rabbinical Judaism.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 9:31
 31So the church throughout all Judea and Galilee and Samaria enjoyed peace, being built up; and going on in the fear of the Lord and in the comfort of the Holy Spirit, it continued to increase.

9:31 This is a summary verse which concludes the account of Paul's conversion and introduces the travels of Peter. Luke uses these summary verses often in Acts. See Introduction IV Purpose and Structure, A.

"the church" See note and Special Topic at 5:11 and notice how the singular "church" refers to many individual congregations. The term "church" can denote a local church (ex. Col. 1:18,24; 4:15,16), all churches of an area (ex. Eph. 1:22; 3:10,21; 5:23,24,25,27,29,32), and all churches universally (ex. Matt. 16:18).

Notice the items Luke chooses to mention.

1. peace in all churches

2. growing and increasing

3. comfort from the Spirit

What a change from the persecution of 8:1! There were still problems, but God had met every need!

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. Why was Paul so vehement in his persecution of the church?

2. Why are there three accounts of Paul's conversion in the book of Acts?

3. What is the significance of Paul being commissioned, laid-hands on, and baptized by Ananias?

4. What is the significance of Paul's use of Jesus as "The Son of God"?

5. Why does Luke not record Paul's three year excursion to Arabia?

 

CONTEXTUAL INSIGHTS TO 9:32-10:48

A. Although the book of Acts begins the transition from Peter to Paul, chapters 9:32-12:25 show the itinerant ministry of Peter.

 

B. This section deals with Peter at Lydda, 9:32-35; Joppa, 9:36-43, 10:9-23; Caesarea, 10:1-8, 23-48; and at Jerusalem, 11:1-18; 12:1-17.

 

C. This section is extremely important because it deals with the continuing struggle over the Gentile mission and Peter's part (as head of the Apostolic group) in that struggle. Luke deems the Cornelius account so important as to repeat it three times in this section.

 

 WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 9:32-35
 32Now as Peter was traveling through all those regions, he came down also to the saints who lived at Lydda. 33There he found a man named Aeneas, who had been bedridden eight years, for he was paralyzed. 34Peter said to him, "Aeneas, Jesus Christ heals you; get up and make your bed." Immediately he got up. 35And all who lived at Lydda and Sharon saw him, and they turned to the Lord.

9:32 "Peter was traveling" Apparently the Apostles were preaching throughout Palestine and in neighboring countries.

▣ "the saints" This term is used in the book of Acts to describe the church. See SPECIAL TOPIC: SAINTS at 9:13. The term "disciples" is gradually replaced by the term "saints." The term is related to the OT word "holy" and means, "set apart" for God's service. It is never used in the singular except one time in Phil. 4:21, which is a corporate context. This shows that to be a saint means to be "in community." See Special Topic at 9:13. All believers are called "saints" in the NT! It is our position in Christ that is being emphasized.

SPECIAL TOPIC: NEW TESTAMENT HOLINESS/SANCTIFICATION

▣ "Lydda" The town of Lydda was located on the trade route from Babylon to Egypt. In the OT it was known as "Lod" (cf. I Chr. 8:12). It was about eleven miles inland from the Mediterranean Sea. This is the same area visited by Philip in chapter 8:40.

9:33 "a man named Aeneas" His Greek name means "praise." Whether he is a believer or unbeliever is uncertain, but apparently Peter is revisiting the established churches started by Philip.

▣ "who had been bedridden eight years, for he was paralyzed" This translation is the most common interpretation of this Greek phrase (NASB, NKJV, NRSV, TEV, NJB). However, the Greek phrase can mean "since eight years old" (cf. Newman and Nida, A Translator's Handbook on The Acts of the Apostles, p. 199).

9:34 "Jesus Christ heals you" There is no article here, which implies that these two terms had become a common designation. This is a literary form known as an aoristic present, which means "this instant the Messiah is healing you."

▣ "get up and make your bed" These are two aorist active imperatives showing intensity and urgency!

▣ "Immediately he got up" This shows the man's faith in response to Peter's message about Jesus.

9:35 "all who lived at Lydda" This is a good example of a hyperbolic use of the term "all" in the Bible (cf. Gen. 41:37; Deut. 2:25; Luke 2:1; Rom. 11:26).

▣ "Sharon" This refers to the northern coastal plain in Palestine. It is about thirty miles in length running from Joppa to Caesarea.

▣ "and they turned to the Lord" The word "turn to" may reflect the OT word for repentance (shub). It implies turning from sin and self (repentance) and turning to (faith) the Lord (cf. 11:21).

This little summary statement is included several times in this section, showing the great movement of the Spirit of God through Peter and later through Paul. This miraculous event opened the door for the proclamation of the gospel.

SPECIAL TOPIC: REPENTANCE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 9:36-43
 36Now in Joppa there was a disciple named Tabitha (which translated in Greek is called Dorcas); this woman was abounding with deeds of kindness and charity which she continually did. 37And it happened at that time that she fell sick and died; and when they had washed her body, they laid it in an upper room. 38Since Lydda was near Joppa, the disciples, having heard that Peter was there, sent two men to him, imploring him, "Do not delay in coming to us." 39So Peter arose and went with them. When he arrived, they brought him into the upper room; and all the widows stood beside him, weeping and showing all the tunics and garments that Dorcas used to make while she was with them. 40But Peter sent them all out and knelt down and prayed, and turning to the body, he said, "Tabitha, arise." And she opened her eyes, and when she saw Peter, she sat up. 41And he gave her his hand and raised her up; and calling the saints and widows, he presented her alive. 42It became known all over Joppa, and many believed in the Lord. 43And Peter stayed many days in Joppa with a tanner named Simon.

9:36 "Joppa" Today this town is known as Jaffa (Yafo). It was the ancient seaport for Jerusalem. Today it is part of the modern city of Tel Aviv-Yafo.

▣ "disciple" The term "disciple" is used quite often in this section of Acts. It literally means "learner," but is used in the sense of believer.

▣ "Tabitha. . .Dorcas" This lady's Aramaic name was Tabitha; her Greek name was Dorcas. Most Jews who had social or commercial contact with non-Jews had two names, an Aramaic one and a Greek one. Both of these names mean "gazelle," a symbol of grace and beauty (cf. Song of Songs 2:9, 17; 4:5; 7:3).

▣ "with deeds of kindness and charity" This refers to Jewish alms-giving. This was a Jewish concept of weekly donations that developed in the Synagogue for the care of the needy Jewish people in the community. It was considered spiritually important by the Jews of Jesus' day. The church followed this pattern (cf. Acts 6). See Special Topic at 3:2.

▣ "which she continually did" This is an imperfect active indicative. This speaks of habitual action in past time.

9:37 "they had washed her body, they laid it in an upper room" The washing of the body was typical of the Jewish preparation for burial. In Jerusalem a body had to be buried the same day one died, but outside of Jerusalem, burial could be delayed for three days. See Special Topic at 5:6.

9:38 "sent two men to him" These believers had heard of great miracles done by God through Peter and they believed that he could do something for this great Jewish Christian lady.

9:39 "and all the widows stood beside him" Apparently they were wearing the clothes that Dorcas had made for them of two different kinds: (1) the inner undergarments and (2) the outward cloaks.

9:40 "But Peter sent them all out" This is literally "threw them out." This is exactly what Jesus did in Mark 5:40. In fact, there are great similarities between the miracles performed in this section and the miracles performed in Jesus' lifetime. Jesus' ministry is the only model the Apostles had.

The question is, "Why did Peter want all of them to leave the room?" Jesus did this because He did not want to be known as a healer only and the gospel was not yet complete. But why did Peter do this? It seems that these miracles opened the door of faith, so it would seem he would want as many as possible to view it.

▣ "knelt down" The usual position for Jewish prayer was standing with the arms and eyes raised to heaven. However, in the Book of Acts, it is recorded several times that the disciples knelt down to pray. This apparently was for emphasis (cf. 7:60; 20:36; 21:5), as it was with Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane (cf. Luke 22:41).

▣ "‘Tabitha, arise'" Apparently he was speaking Aramaic. Jesus and the Jews in Palestine of the first century all spoke Aramaic, not Hebrew. This is true even as far back as Ezra-Nehemiah (cf. Neh. 8:4-8).

9:41 "saints" See Special Topic: Saints at 9:13.

9:42 "and many believed in the Lord" This is another summary statement that shows the great results of Peter's miracles and preaching ministry. See Special Topics at 2:40 and 3:16.

9:43 "Peter stayed many days in Joppa with a tanner named Simon" Peter's Jewish legalism must have been breaking down already for him to stay with a ceremonially unclean tanner (had to deal with dead animal skins) such as Simon.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. Why is the conversion of Paul recorded three times in Acts?

2. Why are the three accounts of Paul's conversion slightly different?

3. How much choice did Paul have in his conversion? Is his experience to be seen as normative?

4. Why did the Hellenistic Jews try to kill Paul?

5. If Peter and Paul used miracles to open the door for the gospel, why does God not use that method more today?

 

Acts 10

PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS

UBS4 NKJV NRSV TEV NJB
Peter and Cornelius Cornelius Sends a Delegation The Conversion of Cornelius Peter and Cornelius Peter Visits a Roman Centurion
10:1-8 10:1-8 10:1-8 10:1-3 10:1-2
        10:3-8
      10:4a  
  Peter's Vision   10:4b-8  
10:9-16 10:9-16 10:9-16 10:9-13 10:9-16
      10:14  
  Summons to Caesarea   10:15-16  
10:17-23a 10:17-23 10:17-23a 10:17-18 10:17-23a
      10:19-21  
      10:22-23a  
10:23b-33 Peter Meets Cornelius 10:23b-29 10:23b-29 10:23b-33
  10:24-33      
    10:30-33 10:30-33  
Peter Speaks in Cornelius' House Preaching to Cornelius' Household   Peter's Speech Peter's Address in the House of Cornelius
10:34-43 10:34-43 10:34-43 10:34-43 10:34-35
        10:36-43
Gentiles Receive the Holy Spirit The Holy Spirit Falls on the Gentiles   The Gentiles Welcome the Holy Spirit Baptism of the First Gentiles
10:44-48 10:44-48 10:44-48 10:44-48 10:44-48

READING CYCLE THREE (from "A Guide to Good Bible Reading")

FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S INTENT AT THE PARAGRAPH LEVEL

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects. Compare your subject divisions with the five modern translations. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is the key to following the original author's intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every paragraph has one and only one main subject.

1. First paragraph

2. Second paragraph

3. Third paragraph

4. Etc.

 

CONTEXTUAL INSIGHTS

A. The gospel is breaking out of its Jewish origins.

1. Cornelius – a Roman military God-fearer

2. the Ethiopian Eunuch – a Gentile God-fearer

 

B. The work of the Greek-speaking Jews (the seven of Acts 6) is having an influence.

 

C. The repeat of the Pentecostal experience shows God's acceptance of all people.

1. Samaritans (chapter 8)

2. Romans (chapter 10)

3. Ethiopian (chapter 8)

 

D. The theological stage is being set for the Jerusalem Council of chapter 15. A watershed of universal gospel availability has been reached!

 

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 10:1-8
 1Now there was a man at Caesarea named Cornelius, a centurion of what was called the Italian cohort, 2a devout man and one who feared God with all his household, and gave many alms to the Jewish people and prayed to God continually. 3About the ninth hour of the day he clearly saw in a vision an angel of God who had just come in and said to him, "Cornelius!" 4And fixing his gaze on him and being much alarmed, he said, "What is it, Lord?" And he said to him, "Your prayers and alms have ascended as a memorial before God. 5Now dispatch some men to Joppa and send for a man named Simon, who is also called Peter; 6he is staying with a tanner named Simon, whose house is by the sea." 7When the angel who was speaking to him had left, he summoned two of his servants and a devout soldier of those who were his personal attendants, 8and after he had explained everything to them, he sent them to Joppa.

10:1 "there was a man at Caesarea" The conversion of Cornelius was a major event. However, it must be remembered that he was not the first social barrier the gospel had overcome.

1. The first was the Samaritans

2. then there was the Ethiopian Eunuch who also was possibly a God-fearer

3. then Cornelius, who was not only a Gentile, but a Roman army officer who was part of the military occupation of the Promised Land

The emphasis of this account is not so much on Cornelius' conversion because he was already a God-fearer, like the Ethiopian Eunuch, but the large number of relatives and friends, mentioned in vv. 1,24,27,44,48, who were also saved. Peter refers to this account at the Jerusalem Council in Acts 15:7-9 and sets the stage for the Gentile mission of the Church.

▣ "Cornelius" Footnote 1 in F. F. Bruce's Commentary on the Book of the Acts, p. 214, has "Cornelius was an especially common name in Rome ever since Publius Cornelius Sulla in 82 b.c. liberated 10,000 slaves who were enrolled in the gens Cornelia, to which he belonged." A gens was a clan or group of families who shared a common name and a belief in a common ancestor or hero (as here).

▣ "a centurion" Centurions are mentioned several times in the NT and always in a favorable light (cf. Matt. 8:5; Luke 7:2; 23:47; Acts 10:1; 22:5; 27:3; etc). Technically they were leaders of a hundred men; however, they were noncommissioned officers, something like our sergeant majors.

▣ "called the Italian cohort" Usually a Roman cohort is made up of 600 men. This particular one was made up of a thousand Roman volunteers who were stationed in Syria. We know from historical evidence that they were called an auxiliary cohort. Possibly they were archers. Roman troops had to be stationed in Palestine because of the rebelliousness of the Jews.

10:2 "a devout man" There is a threefold description of this man's devotion:

1. he revered God (see note at v. 22) with all his households

2. he was always liberal in his many deeds of charity to the people

3. he had the habit of praying to God (cf. v. 22; 13:16,26).

This man was religiously, emotionally, and socially linked to the synagogue, although he was not a full convert. To be a full convert one had to

1. be circumcised if a male

2. baptize himself in the presence of witnesses

3. if possible, offer a sacrifice in the Temple.

These requirements prevented many interested Gentiles from becoming full proselytes.

▣ "with all his household" This is the first mention of a family as a religious unit which we find often in the Book of Acts (cf. Acts 10:2; 11:14; 16:15, 31; 18:8). It shows the cultural context that the faith of the father was always the faith of the household and even of the extended family which would include servants.

▣ "many alms" This refers to almsgiving. To Jewish people this would show that Cornelius was an active part of the local synagogue and apparently a God-fearer. See Special Topic: Alms Giving at 3:2.

"prayed to God continually" There are three present participles here, denoting continuing action which shows Cornelius' piety.

1. fearing, Present middle (deponent)

2. doing alms, present active

3. praying, present middle (deponent)

This man's devotion was daily and personal. He was doing the two things which rabbinical Judaism honored most—almsgiving and prayer.

10:3 "About the ninth hour" This refers to the time of the evening offering (i.e., 3 p.m., cf. Exod. 29:39, 41; Num. 28:3-31; I Kgs. 18:29-36; Ps. 55:17; 141:2; Dan. 6:10; Josephus Antiq. 11.4.1; Wars 1.1.1). This was a traditional time for prayer.

NASB, NRSV,
TEV"clearly saw"
NKJV"saw clearly"
NJB, NIV"distinctly saw"

In the Gospels the adverb phanerōs means to openly or publicly make an appearance (cf. Mark 1:45; John 7:10). This vision came in daylight hours and was very specific and distinct.

▣ "in a vision an angel of God" In some ways this conversion is like Saul's. This person was a devoutly religious man. God sends a supernatural agent to direct him to faith. Who could say "No"? These conversions are a sign of God's choice, not human free will. These people are responding to overwhelming evidence and experience of the reality of the gospel.

10:4 The angel's message contains two sacrificial terms: "ascended"and "memorial before God." Apparently God accepted this man's worship (i.e., prayers and almsgiving) even before he heard the gospel.

"fixing his gaze on him" See note at 1:10.

"‘What is it, Lord'" It is very difficult to know how to translate this term Lord. It can mean (1) "mister" or "sir" or (2) "Lord" in a theological sense of master/owner/sovereign. Another good NT passage which shows the ambiguity is John 4:1,11,15,19,49.

In Acts there is even an added possibility. Cornelius addresses the angel as Lord (cf. Rev. 7:14) and Peter addresses "the voice" (cf. 10:13,15) as Lord (cf. 10:14). Therefore, the term could refer to any supernatural, personal manifestation, with reference specifically to Jesus. In 8:26 and 29 an angel of the Lord is identified with the Spirit. This same fluidity and transference occurs between "the voice" and the Spirit in 10:13,14,15 and 19,20.

10:5 "Now dispatch some men to Joppa" This is an aorist middle (deponent) imperative. Notice the angel did not share the gospel, but sent for Peter. God uses human instruments (cf. Exod. 3:7-10). This man, though a devout, sincere religionist (like Saul), needed to hear and respond to the gospel of Jesus Christ.

10:7 "he summoned two of his servants and a devout soldier" This makes a party of three; however, in verse 19 only two of them are mentioned. Possibly the soldier was a guard and the two household servants spoke.

10:8 Cornelius involved his family and friends in his faith. This man lived out what he believed. A whole community would come to faith in Christ through him.

These three men must have walked through the night and wondered and discussed the angel's message and their master and friend's faith.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 10:9-16
 9On the next day, as they were on their way and approaching the city, Peter went up on the housetop about the sixth hour to pray. 10But he became hungry and was desiring to eat; but while they were making preparations, he fell into a trance; 11and he saw the sky opened up, and an object like a great sheet coming down, lowered by four corners to the ground, 12and there were in it all kinds of four-footed animals and crawling creatures of the earth and birds of the air. 13A voice came to him, "Get up, Peter, kill and eat!" 14But Peter said, "By no means, Lord, for I have never eaten anything unholy and unclean." 15Again a voice came to him a second time, "What God has cleansed, no longer consider unholy." 16This happened three times, and immediately the object was taken up into the sky.

10:9 "about the sixth hour to pray" Although rabbinical Judaism had set aside 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. to pray (the times of the daily sacrifices in the Temple), the Pharisees had added noon as another appropriate time. Apparently Peter was acting in the traditions of the elders by praying at noon or maybe he was just taking a nap before lunch.

10:10 "he became hungry" The setting of Peter's vision is in the context of his hunger and his view of the Mediterranean Ocean from Simon's roof.

 The word for "hunger" is used only here in all of known Greek literature. Its exact connotation is impossible to know, but with the preposition pros added, it may mean "extreme hunger," but this is surprising in this context. This hapax legomenon (words used only once in the NT) must remain uncertain until more lexical information is discovered. It must remain uncertain as to why Luke chose to use this rare term, but the general sense of the context is obvious.

▣ "he fell into a trance" This is literally "out of himself" or "beside himself," often used of astonishment (cf. Mark 5:42; 16:8; Luke 5:26; and several texts in LXX). We get the English term "ecstasy" from this Greek word. In this verse and 11:5 and 22:17 it means a semiconscious mental state which allows God to speak to the subconscious. This is a different word from the one used in verse 3 to describe Cornelius' vision.

10:11

NASB"the sky opened"
NKJV, TEV"heaven opened"
NRSV"the heaven opened"
NJB"heaven thrown open"

This is a perfect passive participle, literally "the heavens having been and continued to be opened." In the OT heavens is plural. This opening of the atmosphere is an idiom for the spiritual, invisible dimension to break into physical reality (cf. Ezek. 1:1; Matt. 3:16; Mark 1:10; Luke 3:21; John 1:51; Acts 7:56; 10:11; Rev. 4:1; 19:11).

▣ "like a great sheet" This is the same term used for the sails on a ship.

10:12 "all kinds of four footed animals and crawling creatures of the earth and birds of the air" This is the same threefold division of animals found in Gen. 1 and 6:20. Apparently they were made up of clean and unclean animals according to the Jewish food laws of Lev. 11.

10:13 "A voice came to him" From the time of the closing of Malachi to the coming of the NT period there was no authoritative prophetic voice from God among the Jews. During this period when the Jews wanted to confirm something as being revealed from God they depended on something known as a bath kol. We see this in the NT in Matt. 3:17; 17:5, also in Acts 9:7, and here.

10:14 "By no means Lord for I have never eaten anything unholy or unclean" "By no means" is a strong Greek phrase used several times in the Septuagint to translate several Hebrew idioms. Peter was still struggling with his Jewish orthodoxy. He was basing his actions on Leviticus. 11. However, Jesus seems to have specifically dealt with this issue in Mark 7:14ff, especially verse 19. It is interesting to note that the Gospel of Mark is apparently the later recollections or sermons of the Apostle Peter from Rome.

10:15 "What God has cleansed, no longer consider unholy" This is a present active imperative with a negative particle, which usually implies stop an action already in progress. God clearly states the cessation of the Mosaic food laws (i.e., Leviticus 11). They are no longer appropriate for new covenant believers. Here they are used in an analogous way to show the acceptance of all humans!

10:16 "This happened three times" It is not uncommon in the Bible for important prayers, praises, or actions to be repeated three times.

1. Jesus' prayer in the Garden of Gethsemane (cf. Mark 14:36,39)

2. Jesus' discussion with Peter after the resurrection (cf. John 21:17)

3. Paul's "thorn in the flesh" prayer (cf. II Cor. 12:8)

It was a Semitic way of emphasis (cf. Isa. 6:3; Jer. 7:4). In this case it specifically shows Peter's reluctance to obey this heavenly voice!

A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures In the New Testament has an incisive word at this point.

"Here is a striking illustration of obstinacy on the part of one who acknowledges the voice of God to him when the command of the Lord crosses one's preferences and prejudices. There are abundant examples today of precisely this thing. In a real sense Peter was maintaining a pose of piety beyond the will of the Lord" (p. 137).

 

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 10:17-23a
 17Now while Peter was greatly perplexed in mind as to what the vision which he had seen might be, behold, the men who had been sent by Cornelius, having asked directions for Simon's house, appeared at the gate; 18and calling out, they were asking whether Simon, who was also called Peter, was staying there. 19While Peter was reflecting on the vision, the Spirit said to him, "Behold, three men are looking for you. 20But get up, go downstairs and accompany them without misgivings, for I have sent them Myself." 21Peter went down to the men and said, "Behold, I am the one you are looking for; what is the reason for which you have come?" 22They said, "Cornelius, a centurion, a righteous and God-fearing man well spoken of by the entire nation of the Jews, was divinely directed by a holy angel to send for you to come to his house and hear a message from you." 23So he invited them in and gave them lodging.

10:17 "Peter was greatly perplexed" This is an imperfect active indicative, which here denotes the beginning of an action in past time.

The term is used several times by Luke to show mental confusion (cf. Luke 9:7; Acts 2:12; 5:24; 10:17). Peter did not immediately understand the purpose of the vision.

"the vision" The word used here to describe Peter's experience, horama, is the same as is used of Cornelius' vision in v. 3 (cf. v. 19).

10:19 "the Spirit said to him" The exact relationship between "the Spirit" (v. 19) speaking and "the angel" (vv. 3,22) speaking throughout this context is uncertain (cf. v. 20, "I have sent them Myself"). Apparently the angel spoke on the behalf of the Holy Spirit or the two are identified like an OT theophony (cf. Exod.3:2,4; Acts 8:26,29).

10:20 This verse is very emphatic.

1. get up, participle used as an imperative

2. go downstairs, aorist active imperative

3. accompany them, present middle (deponent) imperative

4. without misgiving, participle used as an imperative

5. I have sent them Myself, ego with perfect active indicative

There was no option for Peter but to go! This was a divine appointment. The Spirit was responsible for Cornelius' vision, Cornelius' sending the men, Peter's vision, and now Peter's responding to their request.

10:22 They faithfully relate what has happened.

NASB"a righteous"
NKJV"a just man"
NRSV, NJB"upright"
TEV"a good man"

This term must be used in the OT sense of "blameless." It does not refer to sinlessness (cf. Gen. 6:1; Job 1:1; Luke 1:6; 2:25) or to the imputed righteousness of Christ (cf. Rom. 4). This man lived up to all he understood about the will of God. See SPECIAL TOPIC: RIGHTEOUSNESS at 3:14.

NASB, NRSV,
NJB"God-fearing"
NKJV"one who fears God"
TEV"who worships God"

This phrase (or one like it) is used often to describe Cornelius (cf. 10:2,22,35). In Acts 13:16,26,43,50 it is used for those who are not racial Jews and not full proselytes, but those who regularly attended synagogues. They were called "God-fearers" (cf. 16:14; 17:4,17; 18:7).

10:23 "So he invited them in and gave them lodging" This is another example of Peter's continuing separation from his Jewish legalism. It is certain that the accompanying soldier was a Roman and yet Peter invited him in for dinner and fellowship. Notice how in v. 48 Peter will stay in a Roman house for a few days.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 10:23b-29
 23bAnd on the next day he got up and went away with them, and some of the brethren from Joppa accompanied him. 24On the following day he entered Caesarea. Now Cornelius was waiting for them and had called together his relatives and close friends. 25When Peter entered, Cornelius met him, and fell at his feet and worshiped him. 26But Peter raised him up, saying, "Stand up; I too am just a man." 27As he talked with him, he entered and found many people assembled. 28And he said to them, "You yourselves know how unlawful it is for a man who is a Jew to associate with a foreigner or to visit him; and yet God has shown me that I should not call any man unholy or unclean. 29That is why I came without even raising any objection when I was sent for. So I ask for what reason you have sent for me."

10:24 "some of the brethren from Joppa accompanied him" Chapter 11:12 says there were six of them. Peter knew that this incident would cause problems among some of the Jewish followers of Jesus. Therefore, he took several witnesses with him (cf. 11:12).

▣ "Caesarea" Caesarea was the beautiful city by the sea. It was named in honor of the Roman Caesar. It was the Palestinian quarters for the Roman occupation force. The Romans had made it into a small harbor.

▣ "called together his relatives and close friends" Cornelius, expecting a speaker from God, had called all his close family, friends, servants, and possibly other soldiers. They may have all been waiting for hours and hours. What a spirit of anticipation and expectation must have filled this house! All of these would have been discussing the vision and its message.

This is what shocked the leaders of the Jewish segment of the church, that a large number of Gentiles, many of them not God-fearers, had been included in the filling of the Spirit and baptism (cf. v. 27).

10:25,27 "When Paul entered. . .he entered" There is an apparent discrepancy in the Greek text here. However, the first "entering" mentioned in v. 25 could be the city gate on the courtyard of the house, and the second "entering" in v. 27 could be Cornelius' house. Whichever is the case, again Peter is violating Jewish ceremonial ritualism by entering a Gentile home.

10:25 "fell at his feet and worshiped him" This is the regular idiom in the Septuagint and the Gospels for worship. But, in this context "give respect" may better catch the idea (cf. NJB). An angel had prepared Peter's coming; of course Cornelius would honor and respect this messenger (cf. Rev. 19:10; 22:8-9).

10:28 "You yourselves know how unlawful it is for a man who is a Jew to associate" Peter is quoting his rabbinical training or synagogue school; however, this is not found in the OT, but simply in rabbinical interpretations.

"a foreigner" This term is another unique text found only here in the NT. Luke has chosen several very rare words in this chapter.

1. eusebēs, vv. 2,7, devout (cf. II Pet. 2:9)

2. prospeinos, v. 10, hungry

3. dienthumeomai, v. 19, reflecting

4. sunomileō, v. 27, talked

5. athemiton, v. 28, unlawful

6. allophulō, v. 28, foreigner

7. anantirrētos, v. 29, without even raising any objections (cf. Acts 19:36)

8. prosōpolēmpēs, v. 34, respecter of persons (similar to Rom. 2:11; Eph. 6:9; James 2:19)

9. katadunasteuō, v. 38, oppress (cf. James 2:6)

10. procheirotoneō, v. 41, elect before

It is uncertain whether Luke copied some of these early sermons and events in Acts from other sources or records verbal interviews with those who were present.

▣ "yet God has shown me that I should not call any man unholy or unclean" Peter got the message! The animals in the sheet represented all human beings made in the image of God (cf. Gen. 1:26-27). God's love for Cornelius and his family and friends showed Peter the worldwide scope of the gospel! This would confirm the witness of Stephen and the preaching of Philip.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 10:30-33
 30Cornelius said, "Four days ago to this hour, I was praying in my house during the ninth hour; and behold, a man stood before me in shining garments, 31and he said, ‘Cornelius, your prayer has been heard and your alms have been remembered before God. 32Therefore send to Joppa and invite Simon, who is also called Peter, to come to you; he is staying at the house of Simon the tanner by the sea.' 33So I sent for you immediately, and you have been kind enough to come. Now then, we are all here present before God to hear all that you have been commanded by the Lord."

10:30 "in shining garments" Angels often appear in this form (cf. 1:10; Matt.28:3; Mark 16:5; John 20:12; Luke 24:4).

10:31 This is the third time in this chapter that Cornelius' piety has been affirmed (cf. vv. 4,22). Cornelius is not the surprise; it is his friends, servants, and family who also trust Christ. This is one of several examples in Acts of "household salvations."

Those of us who have grown up with western evangelical models of evangelism which emphasize individual volitional response are surprised by these kinds of corporate responses, but most of the world has a tribal, family, group orientation. God is able to work through many models to reach humans made in His image. There is no one model of evangelism!

10:33 These people were ready to hear! They realized they were in the midst of a divine moment with a God-sent messenger.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 34-43
 34Opening his mouth, Peter said: "I most certainly understand now that God is not one to show partiality, 35but in every nation the man who fears Him and does what is right is welcome to Him. 36The word which He sent to the sons of Israel, preaching peace through Jesus Christ (He is Lord of all)—37you yourselves know the thing which took place throughout all Judea, starting from Galilee, after the baptism which John proclaimed. 38You know of Jesus of Nazareth, how God anointed Him with the Holy Spirit and with power, and how He went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, for God was with Him. 39We are witnesses of all the things He did both in the land of the Jews and in Jerusalem. They also put Him to death by hanging Him on a cross. 40God raised Him up on the third day and granted that He become visible, 41not to all the people, but to witnesses who were chosen beforehand by God, that is, to us who ate and drank with Him after He arose from the dead. 42And He ordered us to preach to the people, and solemnly to testify that this is the One who has been appointed by God as Judge of the living and the dead. 43Of Him all the prophets bear witness that through His name everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins."

10:34 "that God is not one to show partiality" This is the beginning of Peter's sermon to Cornelius. It is a good example of the preaching of the early church to non-Jews. In the OT this judicial phrase characterized God (cf. Deut. 10:17; II Chr. 19:7) and is required of His people (cf. Deut. 1:17; 16:19). It is also a common characterization of God in the NT (cf. Rom. 2:11; Gal. 2:6; Eph. 6:9; Col. 3:24-25; I Pet. 1:17). In the OT this phrase literally meant "to lift the face." In Hebrew courts the defendants kept their heads bowed so that the judge would not recognize the person and thereby be biased.

God has no favorites (nations, races, or individuals)! If this is true then how does predestination work? Or how is Israel special? Be careful of modern systems of theology!

10:35 "in every nation the man who fears Him and does what is right is welcome to Him" This description does not refer to the concept of spiritual salvation, but apparently to the idea of almsgiving, prayer, and piety. See Special Topic at 3:2. This phrase must be theologically balanced with the mandate to receive the gospel (cf. John 1:12; 3:16; Rom. 10:9-13).

The major truth is that God accepts Gentiles without their becoming proselyte Jews. This set the theological stage for Acts 15, the Jerusalem Council.

10:36-39 The Jerome Biblical Commentary (vol. II, p. 188) makes a several good comments about these names.

1. they constitute Peter's summary of the gospel (i.e., Kerygma)

2. they have poor syntax, which shows that Luke accurately records his sources and does not invent them or edit them

 

10:36 "The word which He sent to the sons of Israel" This does not refer to the OT, but Jesus and the Apostles' preaching.

▣ "preaching peace through Jesus Christ" This may be an allusion to Isa. 52:7. The term "peace" is used in three ways in the NT:

1. peace between God and humanity (cf. Col. 1:20)

2. the subjective peace of the individual believer (cf. John 14:27; 16:33, Philippians 4)

3. peace between human groups who respond to Christ (cf. Eph. 2:14-3:6; Col. 3:16)

All human barriers are down in Christ (cf. Gal. 3:28; Col. 3:11) 

▣ "(He is Lord of all)" This is an editorial/authorial comment. Here is the universal element of the message and invitation of the gospel of Jesus Christ that still sounded so radical in the mouth of an orthodox Jew (cf. Acts 2:36; Matt. 28:18; Rom. 10:12; Eph. 1:20-22; Col. 2:10; I Pet. 3:22). He is Lord of all races and all things (i.e., cosmic Lordship)!

10:37,39 "you yourselves know the things which took place" Peter is using the same form as his Pentecost sermon (cf. 2:22,33). They had heard about Jesus and what happened to Him in Jerusalem.

One wonders how these people would have had all this information. Is Peter using hyperbole? Were these somehow involved in some of the events in Jerusalem? Were some of these household servants Jewish? The text is too brief and we just do not know.

Some have used this sermon to assert:

1. Luke wrote all the sermons in Acts (but Luke is a good Koine writer and vv. 36-38 are not good, acceptable Greek).

2. Luke was true to his sources and quoted them accurately without correcting their poor grammar.

3. This phrase is meant to be understood by later readers of Acts (cf. The Jerome Commentary, vol. II, p. 189).

 

10:37 "after the baptism which John proclaimed" Why Jesus was baptized has always been a concern for believers because John's baptism was a baptism of repentance. Jesus did not need repentance or forgiveness, for He was sinless (cf. II Cor. 5:21; Heb. 4:15; 7:26; I Pet. 2:22; I John 3:5). The theories have been:

1. it was an example for believers to follow

2. it was His identification with believers' need

3. it was His ordination and equipping for ministry

4. it was a symbol of His redemptive task

5. it was His approval of the ministry and message of John the Baptist

6. it was a prophetic foreshadowing of His death, burial, and resurrection (cf. Rom. 6:4; Col. 2:12).

The baptism by John was seen as the beginning of Jesus' Spirit-filled, public ministry. All three Synoptic Gospels record this inaugural event. Mark begins his Gospel (Peter's eyewitness account) with this event. This was seen by the early church as the special start of the new age of the Spirit as it relates to the public ministry of Jesus.

10:38 "Jesus of Nazareth, how God anointed Him with the Holy Spirit and with power" Notice the things Peter affirms about Jesus.

1. God anointed Him (anoint is the Hebrew root word of Messiah)

2. with the Holy Spirit (the new age is the age of the Spirit)

3. with power (effective ministry)

a. doing good

b. healing all oppressed by the devil (power of evil and Satan)

4. God was with Him (He spoke and acted on behalf of YHWH, cf. John 3:2; 9:33; 10:38; 14:10-11)

Apparently this refers to Jesus' baptism (cf. F. F. Bruce, Answers to Questions, pp. 171-172).

Robert B. Girdlestone, Synonyms of the Old Testament, makes the interesting statement:

"The verb χρίειν is used five times in the N.T. In four of these passages it refers to the anointing of Christ by His father, namely: Luke 4. 18, which is quoted from Isa. 61. 1; Heb. 1. 9, quoted from Ps. 45. 7; Acts 4. 27, where it is used with special reference to the quotation from the second Psalm, which immediately precedes it; and Acts 10. 38, where we are told God anointed Jesus with the Spirit" (p. 183).

See Special Topic: Kerygma at 2:14.

▣ "healing all who were oppressed by the devil" See special Topics at 5:3 and 5:16.

10:39 "They also put Him to death by hanging Him on a cross" "They" refers to the Jewish leadership, the mob, and the Roman authorities. See note at 2:23. This concept of hanging upon a tree is mentioned in 5:30 and reflects Deut. 21:23 (which originally referred to impaling on a stake after death to humiliate someone, but the rabbis of Jesus' day interpreted it as Roman crucifixion), whereby Jesus bore the curse of the OT law (cf. Isa. 53) for us (cf. Gal. 3:13).

10:40 "God raised him" It is theologically interesting that Isa.53:4-6,10 asserts that it was YHWH's will and purpose that Jesus suffer and die (cf. Gen. 3:15). YHWH used the agency of

1. Satan

2. evil Jewish leadership

3. manipulated Roman leadership

4. an angry Jewish mob

Evil is in the will of God! He uses it to accomplish His ultimate purpose for humanity made in His image/likeness. Wow! What a theology of sovereignty! He allows death, then brings resurrection life to Jesus and to all!

The NT affirms that all three persons of the Trinity were active in Jesus' resurrection:

1. Spirit (Rom. 8:11)

2. Jesus (John 2:19-22; 10:17-18)

3. Father (Acts 2:24,32; 3:15,25; 4:10; 5:30; 10:40; 13:30,33,34,37; 27:31; Rom. 6:4,9)

This was confirmation of the truth of Jesus' life, death, and teachings about God. This was a major aspect of the Kerygma (i.e., sermons in Acts, see Special Topic at 2:14).

▣ "on the third day" Because of I Cor. 15:4, some relate this to Ps. 16:10 or Hosea 6:2, but more probably Jonah 1:17 because of Matt. 12:40.

10:40-41 "granted that He become visible, not to all the people" Jesus appeared to several select groups (cf. John 14:19, 24; 15:27; 16:16, 22; I Cor. 15:5-9).

10:41 "who ate and drank with Him after He rose from the dead" Although Jesus' resurrection body did not need physical nourishment, He ate and drank to show His special witnesses He was real and to express His fellowship with them (cf. Luke 24:35, 41-43; John 21:9-13).

10:42 "He ordered us to preach to the people" The pronoun refers to Jesus (cf. Matt. 28:18-20; Luke 24:47-48; John 15:27). This witness was to begin in Jerusalem but reach to all the world (cf 1:8).

▣ "Judge of the living and the dead" Christ is the Father's agent in judgment (cf. Dan. 7:13-14; John 5:22,27; Acts 17:31; II Cor. 5:10; II Tim. 4:1; I Pet. 4:5) as He was the Father's agent in creation (cf. John 1:3; Col. 1:16; Heb. 1:2). Jesus did not come to judge, but to save (cf. John 3:17-19).

The phrase "living and dead" refers to eschatological judgment, the Second Coming. Some believers will be alive (cf. I Thess. 4:13-18).

SPECIAL TOPIC: JUDGE, JUDGMENT, and JUSTICE ( שׁפט) IN ISAIAH

10:43 "Of Him all the prophets bear witness" Jesus showed the two disciples on the road to Emmaus (only recorded in Luke 24:13-35) where and how the OT referred to Himself. These showed the disciples in the upper room and this information became the standard approach of witnessing to Jews (cf. 3:18). Jesus opened the disciples' minds (cf. Luke 24:45).

▣ "through His name" (cf. Joel 2:32 and Luke 24:47)

▣ "everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins" This is the gospel message:

1. everyone

2. through His name

3. who believes in Him

4. receives forgiveness of sin (cf. Luke 24:46-47)

It is Jesus-focused, not performance focused (i.e., the new covenant of Jer. 31:31-34, cf. Ezek. 36:22-38). All that needs to be done for everyone, anyone, to be saved has been done! God has chosen to work with fallen humanity through covenant. He initiates it and sets the agenda, but He has also demanded that humans respond by repentance, faith, obedience, and perseverance. Humans must receive God's gift in Christ (cf. John 1:12; 3:16; Rom. 10:9-13). It is not an automatic transfer.

Frank Stagg, New Testament Theology, has an interesting comment about forgiveness and its assumed relationship to repentance.

"Forgiveness calls for a new awareness of sin and a turning from it. The assurance is given that forgiveness and cleansing will certainly follow upon the confession of sins (I John 1:9), but no promise is given where confession does not obtain. In the home of Cornelius, Peter related forgiveness to faith, declaring that to this one (Jesus) all the prophets bear witness: ‘that through his name everyone who trusts him shall receive forgiveness of sins' (Acts 10:43). In this trust, with its repentance and confession, one both ‘owns and disowns' his sin. This does not mean that repentance wins forgiveness; even repentance does not make one worthy of forgiveness. As another has put it, the sinner must accept his rejection and accept his acceptance, although he knows himself to be unacceptable. The sinner is not forgivable until he is willing to accept God's no in order to hear his yes" (p. 94).

For "believes in Him" see Special Topic at 3:16.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 10:44-48
 44While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who were listening to the message. 45All the circumcised believers who came with Peter were amazed, because the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also. 46For they were hearing them speaking with tongues and exalting God. Then Peter answered, 47"Surely no one can refuse the water for these to be baptized who have received the Holy Spirit just as we did, can he?" 48And he ordered them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked him to stay on for a few days.

10:44 Notice that Peter had not yet finished his sermon when the Spirit fell (cf. 8:16-17; 10:44; 11:15).

▣ "upon all those who were listening to the message" The real theological tension was not Cornelius. He had been fully accepted by the local synagogue. It was all the friends! They had no apparent previous contact, even with Judaism, and now God had fully accepted them. This acceptance was demonstrated and confirmed by the same manifestation of spiritual power and presence shown at Pentecost.

Also notice that the order of events changes. The Spirit comes before water baptism, not in conjunction with it (cf. 2:38) or after it (cf. 8:17). Luke records what happened, not what "should have happened." Be careful of trying to turn one of these gospel encounters recorded in Acts into "the" gospel encounter!

10:45 The same supernatural manifestation of the Spirit (cf. v. 46) that occurred at Pentecost, occurred again involving Romans! This special sign was not for Cornelius and his friends only, but primarily for the circumcised believers (cf. v. 47). It showed in a powerful, undisputable fashion that God had accepted Gentiles (cf. 11:17), even Romans!

Luke is setting the literary stage for Acts 15, the Jerusalem Council. Both Peter and Paul had been convinced along with the Hellenistic believing Jews that God fully accepted Gentiles through Christ.

▣ "the gift of the Holy Spirit" The ministry of the Spirit can be seen clearly in John 16:8-14. In one sense, conviction of sin is a gift from the Spirit. Salvation itself is a gift of the Spirit. The indwelling presence is a gift of the Spirit. This is the new age of the Spirit (cf. 2:38; 8:20; 11:17). Nothing permanent and effective happens without the presence and power of the Spirit.

"had been poured out" This is a perfect passive indicative. Pouring was part of the OT sacrificial system. It was predicted of the Spirit in Joel 2:28 and quoted by Peter in his Pentecostal sermon (cf. 2:17,33). The Spirit has been fully and permanently given to believers by God.

10:47 This is a rhetorical question which expects a "no" answer. This question was to gain the consensus of the Jewish believers who accompanied Peter from Joppa. See SPECIAL TOPIC: BAPTISM at 2:38.

10:48 "he ordered them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ" Notice that baptism was immediate. Also, notice that it was done in Jesus' name as in 2:38 and 19:5. The baptismal formula in Acts was "in the name of Jesus," while in Matt. 28:19 it was in the name of the Triune God. The formula is not the key, but the heart of the candidate!

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. Why is the salvation of Cornelius so significant?

2. How is Cornelius' salvation experience like Paul's?

3. What theological significance did the sheet full of animals and Peter's comments have in relation to Cornelius?

4. Why was Cornelius' friends' conversion such a problem?

5. Outline Peter's sermon and compare it with other salvation events in Acts. They are all different, yet the same.

 

Acts 11

PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS

UBS4 NKJV NRSV TEV NJB
Peter's Report to the Church at Jerusalem Peter Defends God's Grace Peter's Defense Peter's Report to the Church at Jerusalem Jerusalem: Peter Justifies His Conduct
11:1-18 11:1-18 11:1-18 11:1-4 11:1-10
      11:5-17  
        11:11-14
        11:15-17
      11:18 11:18
The Church at Antioch Barnabas and Saul at Antioch Mission to the Greeks in Antioch The Church at Antioch Foundation of the Church of Antioch
11:19-26 11:19-26 11:19-26 11:19-26 11:19-21
        11:22-24
        11:25-26
  Relief to Judea Famine Relief Sent to Jerusalem   Barnabas and Saul Sent as Deputies of Jerusalem
11:27-30 11:27-30 11:27-30 11:27-30 11:27-30

READING CYCLE THREE (from "A Guide to Good Bible Reading")

FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S INTENT AT THE PARAGRAPH LEVEL

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects. Compare your subject divisions with the five modern translations. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is the key to following the original author's intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every paragraph has one and only one main subject.

1. First paragraph

2. Second paragraph

3. Third paragraph

4. Etc.

 

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 11:1-18
 1Now the apostles and the brethren who were throughout Judea heard that the Gentiles also had received the word of God. 2And when Peter came up to Jerusalem, those who were circumcised took issue with him, 3saying, "You went to uncircumcised men and ate with them." 4But Peter began speaking and proceeded to explain to them in orderly sequence, saying, 5"I was in the city of Joppa praying; and in a trance I saw a vision, an object coming down like a great sheet lowered by four corners from the sky; and it came right down to me, 6and when I had fixed my gaze on it and was observing it I saw the four-footed animals of the earth and the wild beasts and the crawling creatures and the birds of the air. 7I also heard a voice saying to me, ‘Get up, Peter; kill and eat.' 8But I said, ‘By no means, Lord, for nothing unholy or unclean has ever entered my mouth.' 9But a voice from heaven answered a second time, ‘What God has cleansed, no longer consider unholy.' 10This happened three times, and everything was drawn back up into the sky. 11And behold, at that moment three men appeared at the house in which we were staying, having been sent to me from Caesarea. 12The Spirit told me to go with them without misgivings. These six brethren also went with me and we entered the man's house. 13And he reported to us how he had seen the angel standing in his house, and saying, ‘Send to Joppa and have Simon, who is also called Peter, brought here; 14and he will speak words to you by which you will be saved, you and all your household.' 15And as I began to speak, the Holy Spirit fell upon them just as He did upon us at the beginning. 16And I remembered the word of the Lord, how He used to say, ‘John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit.' 17Therefore if God gave to them the same gift as He gave to us also after believing in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I that I could stand in God's way?" 18When they heard this, they quieted down and glorified God, saying, "Well then, God has granted to the Gentiles also the repentance that leads to life."

11:1 This verse implies that the church in Jerusalem's leadership was surprised at this turn of events. They were shocked and not fully supportive! They had not understood the Great Commission (cf. Matt. 28:18-20; Luke 24:47; Acts 1:8) to include pagans. This same phrase occurs in 8:14 at Samaritan's receiving the gospel.

▣ "brethren" This is an early title for believers which emphasizes our corporate family identify (cf. 1:15; 6:3; 9:30; 10:23; 11:1,12, 29; 12:17; 14:2; 15:1,3,22,23,32-33,40; 16:2,40; 17:6,10,14; 18:18,27; 21:7, 17; 22:5; 28:14-15). To be a Christian is to be a part of a family (cf. I Cor. 12:13; Gal. 3:28; Col. 3:11).

▣ "throughout Judea" This shows the geographical limitations of the church up to the time. Even after many years the church had not moved beyond its cultural boundaries. Jesus' command in 1:8 had not been obeyed! It is "almost" parallel to Genesis 10-11.

▣ "Gentiles also had received the word of God" This is aorist middle (deponent) indicative. It shows the necessity of a personal reception of the gospel message (cf. John 1:12; 3:16; Rom. 10:9-13 Eph. 2:8-9).

The phrase "the word of God" is parallel to "the gospel." The OT universal promises/prophecies are being fulfilled. See the Special Topic at 1:8.

11:2 "When Peter came up to Jerusalem" Apparently the problem with the Gentile mission which continues in chapter 15 was a recurring problem for the Jerusalem leadership of the early church. Many of the converts to Christianity were still very nationalistic (cf. 15:5; 21:18-26).

NASB"those who were circumcised"
NKJV"those of the circumcision"
NRSV, NJB"the circumcised believers"
TEV"those who were in favor of circumcising Gentiles"
Williams"the champions of circumcision"

This phrase is used in several different senses:

1. in 10:45 to describe Peter's six Jewish companions

2. here, it refers to a group of believers in the church at Jerusalem (cf. 11:18 or 15:5)

3. in Galatians it refers to believers from the Jerusalem church (cf. 2:12) as well as Jewish unbelievers (cf. 1:7; 2:4; 5:10,12)

There is no question about the sincerity of these believers, nor the logic of their position. However, the radical nature of the gospel had opened the door to all people totally unconnected to the Mosaic Law (i.e., Rom. 3:21-31) This is a message (grace, not performance, brings salvation) many modern believers need to hear and heed!

NASB"took issue"
NKJV"contended"
NRSV, TEV"criticized"
NJB"protested"

This is an imperfect middle indicative. This grammatical form can denote repeated action in past time or the beginning of an action. Notice these believing traditionalists took issue with Peter, not with the gospel. They did not see that this was a gospel issue.

11:3 "You went to uncircumcised men and ate with them" Obviously Peter is not the unchallenged leader. Grammatically this verse can be a statement or a question (NRSV).

This issue of table fellowship was very important to Jewish people. This may be the very issue behind the food laws of Leviticus 11. Jews were not to share any social event with Canaanites. Eating in the Ancient Near East was a kind of covenant of fellowship.

Jesus had been accused of a similar breach of tradition in Matt. 9:11; 11:19; Luke 5:30; 15:2.

Peter struggled with this issue in his ministry (cf. Gal. 2:12). This was such a sensitive issue for these first believers. It is so hard to rethink traditions, culture, and personal preferences, but the gospel demands that we do (cf. I Cor. 12:13; Gal. 3:23-29; Col. 3:11). The Jew vs. Gentile model of the OT has been totally replaced with the believer vs. unbeliever model!

11:4-18 Peter recounts his experience at Simon's and Cornelius' houses (Acts 10) for the Jewish leaders at Jerusalem. This repetition (cf. the Jerusalem Council in chapter 15) is Luke's way of showing how important this issue (world evangelization) was for the life of the church. This was a theological watershed moment!

11:4

NASB"in orderly sequence"
NKJV"in order from the beginning"
NRSV"step by step"
TEV"a complete account"
NJB"the details point by point"

The word kathexēs is used in the NT only by Luke (cf. Luke 1:3; 8:1; Acts 3:24; 11:4; 18:23). It has the connotation of explaining something in a logical, temporal, or sequential order. This fits Luke's research method (cf. Luke 1:1-4), personality, and professional training (physician).

11:6 "fixed my gaze on it" See note at 1:10.

11:12

NASB"without misgivings"
NKJV"doubting nothing"
NRSV"not to make a distinction"
TEV"without hesitation"
NJB"have no hesitation"

There are several Greek manuscript variants connected to the tense of this participle (present middle from 10:20 or aorist middle in MSS P74, אi2, B). It is even omitted in the Greek manuscripts P45, D, and some Old Latin and one Syrian version. Scribes tended to make parallels agree. As with most of the textual variants in the NT, these do not affect the meaning of the phrase. The UBS4 put the aorist middle participle in the text but gives it a "C" rating (difficulty in deciding).

11:14 "will be saved" Cornelius' piety and generosity did not make him a Christian! He and his family and friends are saved by faith in Christ!

11:15 This verse is theologically crucial in seeing the purpose of the repeated Pentecostal experience in Acts. God used the inaugurating experience in Jerusalem to show His acceptance of other racial, geographical, and cultural groups (cf. v. 17). The experience was not only for Cornelius, but for

1. Peter

2. the accompanying Jewish believers

3. the church in Jerusalem

 

11:16 "I remembered the word of the Lord" This is an allusion to Jesus' words in Acts 1:5. This shows the pattern of the early Apostles' approach to theology:

1. quote Jesus

2. use Jesus' example

3. quote the OT (cf. Matt. 3:11; Acts 1:5)

Peter is establishing that the Lord Himself foresaw this development (i.e., sign).

11:17 "if" This is a first class conditional sentence which is assumed to be true from the author's perspective or for his literary purposes.

▣ "God gave to them the same gift" This, like v. 15, refers to the Pentecost experience (cf. 2:1-4; 8:15; 10:46; 15:8). Salvation, like the Spirit, is also a gift from God (cf. Rom. 3:24; 5:15-17: 6:23; Eph. 2:8).

"after believing in the Lord" It must be received (cf. 11:1; John 1:12; Eph. 2:8-9). Notice how v. 17 asserts both the sovereignty of God and the mandated human response. There are several prepositions in the NT used to describe faith in Jesus:

1. epi = on (here)

2. eis = into

3. en = in

4. hoti = statement about Jesus

5. Dative case without preposition

This variety seems to imply that there was no specific grammatical form connected to "believe" (pisteuō). Usually the personal, volitional aspect is emphasized (except for hoti, which means the content of the gospel or doctrines). Jesus is a person to be welcomed! See Special Topics at 2:40 and 3:16.

11:18 "they quieted down and glorified God" Peter's testimony not only stopped the negative atmosphere, but it engendered praise! Most of these early leaders and believers were teachable and flexible. They were willing to adjust their theology and follow God's lead.

▣ "God has granted to the Gentiles also the repentance that leads to life" There are several passages in the NT that imply that the sovereign God is the source of repentance as well as grace (cf. Acts 5:31, 8:22; II Tim. 2:25).

The theological issue related to this phrase is, "how is the sovereignty of God related to salvation versus the demanded response of humans?" Are faith and repentance (cf. Mark 1:15; Acts 3:16,19; 20:21) human responses or gifts from God? There are texts which strongly imply that they are a gift from God (cf. Acts 5:31; 11:18; Rom. 2:4; and II Tim. 2:25). Since I believe that all Scripture is inspired (cf. II Tim. 3:16) then one must compare all texts related to any theological issue and not succumb to a proof-text or denominational method. It is obvious that the one true God is in control of all things! Acts emphasizes this over and over. However, He has chosen to relate to His highest creation by means of covenant. God always takes the initiative and sets the agenda, but mankind must respond and continue to respond. It is never an either/or question. It is always a both/and relationship. See Special Topic: Covenant at 2:47. For "repentance" see Special Topic at 2:38.

Michael Magill, NT TransLine (p. 435, #24) has a good summary statement of what the early believing Jews in Jerusalem thought would happen.

"The Jewish believers knew the message was for the world. But that salvation was to come to the Gentiles apart from Judaism, with all the implications that this has, was a new thought for them. They were assuming salvation would be proclaimed to the world as part of and through a true, spiritual Judaism; that Judaism would reign and all people would become Jews as part of finding life in Christ; that Israel's culture would gloriously become world culture."

 

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 11:19-26
 19So then those who were scattered because of the persecution that occurred in connection with Stephen made their way to Phoenicia and Cyprus and Antioch, speaking the word to no one except to Jews alone. 20But there were some of them, men of Cyprus and Cyrene, who came to Antioch and began speaking to the Greeks also, preaching the Lord Jesus. 21And the hand of the Lord was with them, and a large number who believed turned to the Lord. 22The news about them reached the ears of the church at Jerusalem, and they sent Barnabas off to Antioch. 23Then when he arrived and witnessed the grace of God, he rejoiced and began to encourage them all with resolute heart to remain true to the Lord; 24for he was a good man, and full of the Holy Spirit and of faith. And considerable numbers were brought to the Lord. 25And he left for Tarsus to look for Saul; 26and when he had found him, he brought him to Antioch. And for an entire year they met with the church and taught considerable numbers; and the disciples were first called Christians in Antioch.

11:19-30 These verses seem to be a historical flashback and a theological summary. They connect to 8:4.

11:19 "those who were scattered because of the persecution" We have several early examples of these persecutions in Acts (cf. 5:17ff; 6:8-15; 8:1-3; 9:1-2). Stephen's understanding of the radical implication of the gospel forced all the Jewish believers in Palestine to reassess their faith and the purpose of the gospel.

▣ "Antioch" Antioch was the third largest city of the Roman Empire after Rome and Alexandria. It was the capital of Syria and it had a large Jewish population. It was well known for its university life and its sexual immorality. It was also famous worldwide for its chariot racing. It will become a major center of Christianity!

▣ "speaking the word to no one except to Jews alone" This shows that the early church was not certain whether preaching to the Gentiles was appropriate. The conservatives would quote the words of Jesus in Matt. 10:5, while the visionaries would quote Matt. 28:18-20 or Acts 1:8. This theological issue will resurface in Acts 15.

11:20 "men of Cyprus and Cyrene" These are the same Greek-speaking Jewish believers as in Acts 6-8, who began to preach the universal implications of the Christian gospel in Jerusalem. Barnabas was also from this geographical area.

▣ "to Greeks" This word (Hellēn) normally refers to Gentiles (cf. 14:1; 16:1,3; 18:4; 19:10,17; 20:21; 21:28). However, in 17:4 it refers to Gentiles who were connected to the synagogues (God-fearers), but not members (i.e., proselytes).

The question is, "Who is Luke referring to as being preached to."

1. Greek-speaking Jews as in 6:1 and 9:29 (Hellēnists)

2. Gentiles related to the synagogue (Hellēn)

3. full Gentiles (cf. TEV, NJB)?

With all the commotion this caused, possibly the term refers to those who spoke Greek; some might be Jews of the Diaspora, and others full Gentiles.

▣ "preaching the Lord Jesus" This is a present middle participle of the verb from which we get the English term "evangel" and evangelism." Their message was not about OT laws and procedures, but about Jesus of Nazareth as the Messiah (see Special Topic at 2:31)!

11:21 "the hand of the Lord was with them and a large number who believed turned to the Lord" This is another summary statement of the great movement of God through evangelistic preaching. Finally Acts 1:8 was being fulfilled (cf. v. 24b).

This is an OT idiom for the acknowledgment of YHWH's presence and power for the accomplishing of His purpose in human activity (cf. II Sam. 3:12).

It is interesting to note that the term "Lord" (Kurios) is used in the first of this verse to refer to YHWH (cf. LXX Exod. 3:14; II Sam. 3:12; Isa. 59:1, see Special Topic at 1:6). However, in the latter part of the verse it is used to refer to Jesus Christ. This transference of titles is a common literary technique of the NT authors to assert the deity of Jesus. Notice where Paul quotes Ot texts referring to YHWH and applies them to Jesus (i.e., Rom. 10:13; I Cor. 2:16; Phil. 2:10-11).

The "hand of the Lord" is an OT anthropomorphic idiom (see special Topic at 2:33). YHWH is an eternal spirit present through time and creation. He does not have a physical body. However, the only vocabulary humans have to speak of anything personal is physical, human terms. We must remember the limits of fallen, temporal, earth-bound human language. It speaks of the spiritual realm in metaphors, analogies, and negations. It expresses truth, but in non-exhaustive ways. God is far greater than our ability to know and express. He communicates truly to us, but not exhaustively. We can trust the Bible as God's self-revelation, but we must realize God is greater still! Human language both reveals and limits!

SPECIAL TOPIC: HAND (ILLUSTRATED FROM EZEKIEL)

11:22 "Barnabas" Barnabas is a major figure in the book of Acts (cf. 4:36-37; 9:27). His name is used in the sense of encourager, which is obvious in v. 23. The church in Jerusalem was still uncomfortable about Gentile inclusion! See Special Topic at 4:36.

11:23 It is interesting to notice that when Barnabas saw the active presence of God's grace through the Spirit, he encouraged all of them to remain in faith (cf. 14:22). This clearly shows the need for diligence on the part of God's people for purposeful perseverance (see Special Topic at 14:22). The Jews and the church were very concerned about the immoral cultural context of paganism. The gospel was not only a free gift of salvation, but a call to godliness (cf. Matt. 5:48; Rom. 8:28-29; II Cor. 3:18; Gal. 4:19; Eph. 4:1; I Thess. 3:13; 4:3; I Pet. 1:15). God wants a people who reflect His character to a lost world. The goal of Christianity is not only heaven when we die, but Christlikeness now so that others may come to faith in Christ!

11:24 "he was a good man, and full of the Holy Spirit and of faith" This description is very similar to the Greek-speaking Jewish believers (the seven) of Acts 6:3, 5. The early church was full of men like this! Oh that it may be true of our day, our culture, our church!

11:25 "And he left for Tarsus to look for Saul" This verb in the Egyptian Koine papyri (but not the LXX) implies that Saul was not easy to find. Only Luke uses this term in the NT (cf. Luke 2:44,45; Acts 11:25).These silent years are apparently referred to in Gal. 1:21. The exact time frame is uncertain, but it was approximately ten years.

11:26 "church" See Special Topic at 5:11.

▣ "he brought him to Antioch. . .the disciples were first called Christians in Antioch&uuot; At first "Christian" was a derogatory reference to believers coined by pagans. Surprisingly this is a rare term in the NT. The word's formation (ending ianos) follows the pattern of the formation of a term for those who support and follow; Herod (and his family) are called "Herodians" (cf. Mark 3:6; 12:13; Matt. 22:16). Its use in this Hellenistic environment shows how the title for Messiah (Hebrew) translated Christ in Greek has become a name for Jesus' followers (Christians).

In this Hellenistic setting, it is possible that the term was given by governmental officials to differentiate Jews from believers.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 11:27-30
 27Now at this time some prophets came down from Jerusalem to Antioch. 28One of them named Agabus stood up and began to indicate by the Spirit that there would certainly be a great famine all over the world. And this took place in the reign of Claudius. 29And in the proportion that any of the disciples had means, each of them determined to send a contribution for the relief of the brethren living in Judea. 30And this they did, sending it in charge of Barnabas and Saul to the elders.

11:27 "prophets" Prophets are mentioned several times in the NT (cf. 13:1; 15:32; 21:10; I Cor. 12:28; 14:1-5, 29-33; Eph. 2:20; 4:10). It is not always certain whether their function is primarily foretelling, as here, or forth-telling, as in I Corinthians 14 and Acts 2:17 (cf. 13:6; 15:32; I Cor. 12:28; 14:1-5, 29-33; Eph. 2:20; 4:10).

In the OT prophets are seen as the spokesmen of God, explaining His revelation; however, NT prophets are not the mediators of God's revelation. This is reserved to NT authors, most of whom were Apostles or those related to an Apostle (Mark, Luke) . The NT gift of prophecy must be limited. Inspired revelation has ceased (cf. Jude 3 and 20).

SPECIAL TOPIC: NEW TESTAMENT PROPHECY

11:28 "great famine all over the world. . .Claudius" This geographical phrase refers to the Roman Empire (cf. 17:6, 31; 19:27; 24:5). Claudius reigned from a.d. 41-54. He followed Caligula and preceded Nero. There were several severe famines during his reign (cf. Suetonius, Life of Caludius 18:2). The worst famine for Palestine was sometime between a.d. 44-48, according to Josephus, Antiq. 20.5.2.

11:29 "in the proportion that any of the disciples had means, each of them determined to send a contribution" This is one of the major strategies of the Gentile churches, to promote fellowship with their sister church in Jerusalem. This would set a pattern in Paul's churches (cf. 24:17; Rom. 15:2-28; I Cor. 16:1-4; II Cor. 8-9; Gal. 2:10).

11:30 "sending it. . .to the elders" This is the first mention of church "elders" (cf. 14:23; 15:2,4, 6, 22,23; 16:4; 20:17; 21:18). The term "elders" is synonymous with the terms "overseers," "bishops," and "pastors" (cf. Acts 20:17,28 and Titus 1:5,7). The term elder (presbuteros) has an OT tribal background, while overseer (episkopos) has a Greek city-state governmental background. Apparently this refers to a specific group of leaders in the Jerusalem church (cf. 15:2,6,22,23). The more Jewish portions of the NT, like James and Hebrews, still use the Jewish understanding of older, local leaders, but not necessarily pastors.

▣ "of Barnabas and Saul" There is much discussion as to whether the visit to Jerusalem mentioned in Gal. 2:2,10 is referring to this visit or to the Jerusalem Council which is mentioned in Acts 15. We know so little of Paul's early life and ministry.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. Why was Gentiles receiving Christ such a theological problem?

2. Is repentance a gift of God (v. 18) or a covenant requirement (Mark 1:15; Acts 3:16,19; 20:21)?

3. Why did Barnabas go and seek for Saul (Paul)?

 

Acts 12

PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS

UBS4 NKJV NRSV TEV NJB
James Killed and Peter Imprisoned Herod's Violence to the Church Herod Agrippa's Persecution More Persecution Peter's Arrest and Miraculous Deliverance
12:1-5 12:1-5 12:1-5 12:1-5 12:1-5
Peter Delivered from Prison Peter Freed from Prison   Peter is Set Free from Prison  
12:6-17 12:6-19 12:6-11 12:6-10 12:6-11
      12:11  
    12:12-17 12:12-15 12:12-17
      12:16-17  
12:18-19   12:18-19 12:18-19a 12:18-19
      12:19b  
The Death of Herod Herod's Violent Death Death of Herod Agrippa The Death of Herod The Death of the Persecutor
12:20-23 12:20-24 12:20-23 12:20 12:20-23
      12:21-23  
  Barnabas and Saul Appointed Barnabas and Saul in Cyprus

(12:24-13:12)

  Barnabas and Saul Return to Antioch
12:24-25   12:24-25 12:24 12:24
  12:25-13:3   12:25 12:25

READING CYCLE THREE (from "A Guide to Good Bible Reading")

FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S INTENT AT THE PARAGRAPH LEVEL

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects. Compare your subject divisions with the five modern translations. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is the key to following the original author's intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every paragraph has one and only one main subject.

1. First paragraph

2. Second paragraph

3. Third paragraph

4. Etc.

 

CONTEXTUAL INSIGHTS

The lineage of Herod the Great (for more information consult the index of Flavius Josephus in Antiquities of the Jews).

 

I. Herod the Great

A. King of Judea (37-4 b.c.)

B. Matt. 2:1-19; Luke 1:5

II. His Sons

A. Herod Philip (son of Marianne of Simon)

1. Husband of Herodias

2. Tetrarch of Iturea (4 b.c. - a.d. 34)

3. Matt. 14:3; Mark 6:17

B. Herod Philip (son of Cleopatra)

1. Tetrarch of area north and west of the Sea of Galilee (4 b.c. - a.d. 34)

2. Luke 3:1

C. Herod Antipas

1. Tetrarch of Galilee and Perea (4 b.c.- a.d. 39)

2. Executed John the Baptist

3. Matt. 14:1-12; Mark 6:14,29; Luke 3:19; 9:7-9; 13:31; 23:6-12,15; Acts 4:27; 13:1

D. Archelaus, Herod the Ethnarch

1. Ruler of Judea, Samaria and Idumea (4 b.c. - a.d. 6)

2. Matt. 2:22

E. Aristobulus (son of Mariamne)

1. his only son was Herod Agrippa I

2. Ruled all of Palestine (a.d. 41-44)

3. Killed James and had Peter imprisoned

4. Acts 12:1-24; 23:35

(a) his son was Herod Agrippa II, Tetrarch of northern territory (a.d. 50-70)

(b) his daughter was Bernice

(1) consort of her brother

(2) Acts 25:13-26:32

(c) his daughter was Drusilla

(1) wife of Felix

(2) Acts 24:24

 

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 12:1-5
 1Now about that time Herod the king laid hands on some who belonged to the church in order to mistreat them. 2And he had James the brother of John put to death with a sword. 3When he saw that it pleased the Jews, he proceeded to arrest Peter also. Now it was during the days of Unleavened Bread. 4When he had seized him, he put him in prison, delivering him to four squads of soldiers to guard him, intending after the Passover to bring him out before the people. 5So Peter was kept in the prison, but prayer for him was being made fervently by the church to God.

12:1 "Herod" This refers to Herod Agrippa I. He reigned over different areas of Palestine from a.d. 37-44. He was raised in Rome and became friends with Gaius, who followed Emperor Tiberius and who later became the Emperor Caligula. The Jews readily accepted Herod as a leader because his grandmother (Mariamne) was a Hasmonean/Maccabean (i.e., Jewish patriot) princess. He was a strict follower of Judaism (but possibly for political reasons). For a full discussion of this Herod, see Josephus' Antiq. 19.7.3; 19.8.2.

▣ "church" See Special Topic at 5:11.

▣ "in order to mistreat them" Herod did this to gain support and approval from the Jewish leadership (cf. vv. 3,11). Roman leaders did the same thing (cf. 24:27; 25:9).

Luke uses this term several times (cf. 7:6,19; 12:1; 14:2; 18:10). It was a common term in the Septuagint for ill-treatment. Luke's vocabulary is greatly influenced by the Septuagint.

12:2 "James, the brother of John, put to death with a sword" This refers to the Apostle James, who was the brother of John (cf. Luke 5:10; 6:14; 8:51; 9:28,54). He was a member of the inner circle of disciples (cf. Matt. 17:1; 26:37; Mark 5:37; 9:2; 14:33; Luke 9:28). Why James should die and Peter be spared is a mystery of God. Beheading with a sword was the normal method of capital punishment for Roman citizens, but it apparently was odious to Jews.

It is interesting that at this time the early church did not sense the need to replace James as they had Judas (cf. 1:15-20). The reasons are unclear, but possibly it was Judas' treachery, not death, that caused the replacement (cf. 1:15-26).

Some may assert that Paul calling James, the half brother of Jesus and leader of the Jerusalem church, an apostle (cf. Gal. 1:19) constitutes a replacement. The question relates to the official position of the original Twelve versus the ongoing gift of apostleship (cf. Eph. 4:11).

Reading James D. G. Dunn, Unity and Diversity in the New Testament has caused me to think about the possible different authority structure in the first century church.

1. the Jerusalem Apostles

2. the inner circle (Peter, James, John) of the Apostles

3. James the Lord's half-brother, who led the Jerusalem church

4. the Seven (Acts 6) who were leaders of the Greek-speaking Jews

5. later Paul and Barnabas and their sending to the church in Antioch of Syria

To this could be added the sects related to Christianity, Judaizers, Gnostics, Ebionites. Each of these also had their own leadership. The unity that Luke often refers to among Christians was difficult to maintain. The preaching of Jesus and the Scriptures were ambiguous enough to allow multiple interpretations. This is the reason that the "rule of faith" developed in the first centuries. There had to be a standard to evaluate a group's theology. The dynamic Spirit-led emphasis of the NT turned into the organized structure of the eastern and western church centers. Orthodoxy is a significant issue for those generations removed from the Founder and eyewitnesses.

12:3 "arrest Peter" This is Peter's third arrest (cf. 4:3; 5:18). Christians are not spared from persecution.

▣ "during the days of Unleavened Bread" This refers to the Passover Feast (cf. v. 4), combined with the Feast of Unleavened Bread, which lasted eight days (cf. Exod. 12:18; 23:15; Luke 22:1). Both celebrated Israel's deliverance from Egyptian bondage. It was celebrated on Nissan 14-21, which would be our March or April, depending on the Jewish lunar calendar.

12:4 "four squads of soldiers" This would mean four squads of soldiers four times a day, or sixteen men. The number shows Herod's concern over Peter's possible escape (cf. 5:19).

12:5 "prayer for him was being made fervently by the church to God" The church is praying (cf. v. 12), but will be surprised when God answers! "Fervently" is a very intense adverb (cf. Luke 22:44). It is used only three times in the NT (cf. I Pet. 1:22).

SPECIAL TOPIC: INTERCESSORY PRAYER

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 12:6-17
 6On the very night when Herod was about to bring him forward, Peter was sleeping between two soldiers, bound with two chains, and guards in front of the door were watching over the prison. 7And behold, an angel of the Lord suddenly appeared and a light shone in the cell; and he struck Peter's side and woke him up, saying, "Get up quickly." And his chains fell off his hands. 8And the angel said to him, "Gird yourself and put on your sandals." And he did so. And he said to him, "Wrap your cloak around you and follow me." 9And he went out and continued to follow, and he did not know that what was being done by the angel was real, but thought he was seeing a vision. 10When they had passed the first and second guard, they came to the iron gate that leads into the city, which opened for them by itself; and they went out and went along one street, and immediately the angel departed from him. 11When Peter came to himself, he said, "Now I know for sure that the Lord has sent forth His angel and rescued me from the hand of Herod and from all that the Jewish people were expecting." 12And when he realized this, he went to the house of Mary, the mother of John who was also called Mark, where many were gathered together and were praying. 13When he knocked at the door of the gate, a servant-girl named Rhoda came to answer. 14When she recognized Peter's voice, because of her joy she did not open the gate, but ran in and announced that Peter was standing in front of the gate. 15They said to her, "You are out of your mind!" But she kept insisting that it was so. They kept saying, "It is his angel." 16 But Peter continued knocking; and when they had opened the door, they saw him and were amazed. 17But motioning to them with his hand to be silent, he described to them how the Lord had led him out of the prison. And he said, "Report these things to James and the brethren." Then he left and went to another place.

12:6 "On the very night" Luke's writings are characterized by time indicators (cf. vv. 3,4,5,6,7,8,10,18). But be careful of interpreting this as western, sequential, chronological history. Luke has a theological evangelistic purpose.

▣ "between two soldiers" This verse shows the impossibility of Peter's escape. It is almost as if they expected an attempt to release him (cf. 5:19).

12:7 "an angel of the Lord suddenly appeared" It is unusual that the supernatural interventions of the angel of the Lord (cf. 5:19; 7:30,35,38,53; 8:26; 10:3,7,22) and the Holy Spirit (cf. 8:29,39; 10:19) are interchanged throughout the book of Acts. Apparently the Spirit speaks intuitively, but the angel is an outward physical manifestation. It is interesting to see the combination of the natural and the supernatural in this account (similar to the plagues of the Exodus).

▣ "Get up quickly" This is an aorist active imperative which denotes urgency. Why is the angel in a hurry? Is he not in control of events?

12:8 "Gird yourself and put on your sandals" These are both aorist middle imperatives.

▣ "Wrap your cloak around you and follow me" This is an aorist middle imperative followed by a present active imperative. The angel was really in a hurry to perform this task! This was one nervous angel!

12:9 Peter was uncertain whether this was a vision, dream, or reality (cf. v. 11-12; 10:17,19; 11:5).

12:11 "When Peter came to himself" Luke uses a similar phrase in describing the Prodigal Son (cf. Luke 15:17). Suddenly the reality of the experience and its implications dawned on him (cf. v. 12).

12:12 "the house of Mary" Mary was a very common name. There are several Marys mentioned in the Gospels.

1. the mother of Jesus (cf. Luke 1:27)

2. Mary of Magdala, a disciple from Galilee (cf. Luke 8:2; 24:10)

3. mother of James and John (cf. Luke 24:10)

4. sister of Martha and Lazarus (cf. Luke 10:39,42)

5. wife of Cleophas (cf. John 19:25)

6. mother of John Mark (here)

 

▣ "the mother of John" This refers to John Mark's mother. The early church met in this family's house in Jerusalem (cf. Acts 12:12). It was also the site of the Lord's three post resurrection appearances and the coming of the Spirit at Pentecost.

John Mark accompanied Paul and his cousin Barnabas (cf. Col. 4:10) on the first missionary journey (cf. Acts 12:25-13:13). For some reason he deserted the team and returned home (cf. Acts 15:38). Barnabas wanted to include him on the second missionary journey, but Paul refused (cf. Acts 15:36-41). This resulted in Paul and Barnabas separating. Barnabas took John Mark to Cyprus (cf. Acts 15:39). Later, while Paul was in prison, he mentions John Mark in a positive way (cf. Col. 4:10) and still later in Paul's second imprisonment at Rome, just before his death, he mentions John Mark again (cf. II Tim. 4:11).

Apparently John Mark became part of Peter's missionary team (cf. I Pet. 5:13). Eusebius' Eccl. His. 3.39.12 gives us an interesting account of John Mark's relation to Peter.

"In his own book Papias gives us accounts of the Lord's sayings obtained from Aristion or learnt direct from the presbyter John. Having brought these to the attention of scholars, I must now follow up the statements already quoted from him with a piece of information which he sets out regarding Mark, the writer of the gospel:

This, too, the presbyter used to say. ‘Mark, who had been Peter's interpreter, wrote down carefully, but not in order, all that he remembered of the Lord's sayings and doings. For he had not heard the Lord or been one of His followers, but later, as I said, one of Peter's. Peter used to adapt his teaching to the occasion, without making a systematic arrangement of the Lord's sayings, so that Mark was quite justified in writing down some things just as he remembered them. For he had one purpose only—to leave out nothing that he had heard, and to make no misstatement about it'" (p. 152).

In this quote Papias refers to "John the elder." Irenaeus says "and these things are borne witness to in writing by Papias, the hearer of John, and a companion of Polycarp." This implies Papias heard it from John the Apostle.

▣ "many were gathered together and were praying" The grammatical forms of these words reveal that the church had gathered and intended to remain in prayer (perfect passive participle followed by a present middle [deponent] participle).

12:13 "door of the gate" This was a small door on the street. There was a larger door upstairs.

▣ "Rhoda" Her name means "rose." It is uncertain whether she worked for the homeowners or was a member of the prayer meeting.

12:15 "You are out of your mind" The church was praying for God to act, but they were extremely surprised (cf. v. 16) when He did.

▣ "They kept saying" There are two imperfect active indicatives in this context, which implies that Rhoda's affirmation and that of those in the prayer meeting in the upper room's response happened more than once.

▣ "It is his angel" Angels play a prominent role in Luke's writings. Apparently the Jews believed that one's guardian angel could take their physical shape (for a good discussion of Jewish sources and beliefs about guardian angels, see Encyclopaedia Judaica, vol. 2, p. 963). There is no scriptural basis for this belief. This development of angeology may have come from the concept of fravashi in Zoroastrianism. Much of rabbinical angelology can be traced to this Persian influence. There is some scriptural evidence for guardian angels for new believers (cf. Matt. 18:10). Angels are servants of the redeemed (cf. Heb. 1:14).

12:17 "motioning to them with his hand to be silent" This is obviously an eyewitness detail (cf. 13:16). Luke records this gesture several times (cf. 13:16; 19:33; 21:40).

▣ "Report these things to James and the brethren" This shows that James, the half-brother of Jesus, was already the leader of the Jerusalem church (cf. 15:13-21).

SPECIAL TOPIC: JAMES, THE HALF-BROTHER OF JESUS

▣ "went to another place" No one knows where Peter went, but apparently he did not go to Rome as some supposed because he is present at the Jerusalem Council recorded in Acts 15.

Even though God supernaturally delivered Peter, this did not imply that he could be reckless or expect this miraculous intervention every time. Remember James had been killed! Peter also sends word to the church to expect more physical persecution because of his deliverance.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 12:18-19
 18Now when day came, there was no small disturbance among the soldiers as to what could have become of Peter. 19When Herod had searched for him and had not found him, he examined the guards and ordered that they be led away to execution. Then he went down from Judea to Caesarea and was spending time there.

12:18 "there was no small disturbance" It is interesting that Luke states things in the negative, often by understatement (cf. 12:18; 15:2; 19:11,23,24; 20:12; 26:19,26; 27:30; 28:2, see footnote #8, p. 134, of G. B. Caird, The Language and Imagery of the Bible). This literary feature is unknown in Hebrew literature, but is used often in Greek literature. Luke was a highly educated Greek!

12:19 "he examined the guards and ordered that they be led away to execution" This is the implication of the text (cf. NKJV, NRSV, TEV), but it is not stated explicitly (cf. NJB). Some translations use italics to identify words that are not in the Greek text. If a guard lost his prisoner, he had to bear the prisoner's punishment (cf. 16:27; 27:42, Code of Justinian 9.4.4).

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 12:20-23
 20Now he was very angry with the people of Tyre and Sidon; and with one accord they came to him, and having won over Blastus the king's chamberlain, they were asking for peace, because their country was fed by the king's country. 21On an appointed day Herod, having put on his royal apparel, took his seat on the rostrum and began delivering an address to them. 22The people kept crying out, "The voice of a god and not of a man!" 23And immediately an angel of the Lord struck him because he did not give God the glory, and he was eaten by worms and died.

12:20 "Now he was very angry with the people of Tyre and Sidon" Herod was very angry and continued to be so (periphrastic imperfect). The particular historic incident and person are not known in history, but the region of Tyre and Sidon depended on the agricultural produce from the area of Galilee (cf. I Kgs. 5:11; Ezra 3:7; and possibly Ezek. 27:17).

12:21 "On an appointed day Herod, having put on his royal apparel" This occurred in a.d. 44. For a more complete account of this event see Josephus' Antiq. 19.8.2 (translated by William Whiston, Kregal).

"At which festival, a great multitude was gotten together of the principal persons, and such as were of dignity through his province. On the second day of which shows he put on a garment made wholly of silver, and of a contexture truly wonderful, and came into the theatre early in the morning; at which time the silver of his garment being illuminated by the fresh reflection of the sun's rays upon it, shone out after a surprising manner, and was so resplendent as to spread a horror over those that looked intently upon him: and presently his flatterers cried out, one from one place, and another from another, (though not for his good,) that he was a god: and they added,—‘Be thou merciful to us; for although we have hitherto reverenced thee only as a man, yet shall we henceforth own thee as superior to mortal nature.' Upon this the king did neither rebuke them, nor reject their impious flattery. But, as he presently afterwards looked up, he saw an owl sitting on a certain rope over his head, and immediately understood that this bird was the messenger of ill tidings, as it had once been the messenger of good tidings to him; and fell into the deepest sorrow. A severe pain also arose in his belly, and began in a most violent manner. He therefore looked upon his friends, and said,—‘I, whom you call a god, am commanded presently to depart this life; while Providence thus reproves the lying words you just now said to me; and I, who was by you called immortal, am immediately to be hurried away by death'" (p. 412).

Herod's temper and the physical condition which accompanied it are also described in gruesome detail in Antiq. 17:6:5.

The Jerome Biblical Commentary (vol. 2, p. 191) informs us that these gruesome details of a person's death was ancient writer's way of showing what happens to those who offend God.

1. Antiochus IV Epiphanes – II Macc. 9:5-18

2. Herod the Great – Josephus, Antiq. 17.6.5

 

12:23 "the angel of the Lord" This refers to the Death Angel (cf. Exod. 12:23; II Sam. 24:16; II Kgs. 19:35). Death is in the hands of God, not Satan. This is an example of temporal judgment.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 12:24
 24But the word of the Lord continued to grow and to be multiplied.

12:24 This is a characteristic Lukan summary statement (cf. 6:7; 9:31; 12:24; 16:5; 19:20; 28:31).

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 12:25
 25And Barnabas and Saul returned from Jerusalem when they had fulfilled their mission, taking along with them John, who was also called Mark.

12:25 This begins the account of Paul's missionary journeys. There is a textual variant in this verse relating to whether they returned "to" Jerusalem (cf. eis, MSS א and B) or "from" Jerusalem (cf. apo, MS D or ek, MSS P74, A). Chapter 13 begins with Barnabas and Saul in Antioch ("from Jerusalem to Antioch," cf. MS E and Old Latin, Syrian, and Coptic versions).

▣ "Mark" See note at "Persons Mentioned," Acts 16 Introduction.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. Why did God spare Peter and not James?

2. Was the assembled church surprised when their prayers were answered? Explain the implication.

3. Do believers need angels if they have the indwelling Holy Spirit?

 

Acts 13

PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS

UBS4 NKJV NRSV TEV NJB
Barnabas and Saul Commissioned Barnabas and Saul Appointed Barnabas and Saul in Cyprus Barnabas and Saul are Chosen and Sent The Mission
Sent Out
  (12:25-13:3) (12:23-13:12)    
13:1-3   13:1-3 13:1-2 13:13
      13:3  
The Apostles Preach in Cyprus Preaching in Cyprus   In Cyprus Cyprus: The Magician Elymas
13:4-12 13:4-12 13:4-12 13:4-5 13:4-5
      13:6-11a 13:6-12
      13:11b-12  
Paul and Barnabas at Antioch of Pisidia At Antioch of Pisidia Journey to Antioch of Pisidia and Iconium In Antioch in Pisidia They Arrive at Antioch in Pisidia
13:13-16a 13:13-41 13:13-16a 13:13-16a 13:13-16a
13:16b-25   14:16b-25 13:16b-20a 13:16b-25
      13:20b-25  
13:26-41   13:26-41 13:26-41 13:26-31
        13:32-37
        13:38-39
  Blessing and Conflict at Antioch     13:40-41
13:42-43 13:42-52 13:42-43 13:42-43 13:42-43
        Paul and Barnabas Preach to the Gentiles
13:44-52   13:44-47 13:44-47 13:44-47
    13:48-52 13:48 13:48-49
      13:49-52  
        13:50-52

READING CYCLE THREE (from "A Guide to Good Bible Reading")

FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S INTENT AT THE PARAGRAPH LEVEL

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects. Compare your subject divisions with the five modern translations. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is the key to following the original author's intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every paragraph has one and only one main subject.

1. First paragraph

2. Second paragraph

3. Third paragraph

4. Etc.

 

CONTEXTUAL INSIGHTS

A. This is an account of Paul and Barnabas' first missionary journey. The rest of Acts will be given over to Paul's ministry.

 

B. It would be very helpful to turn to the map in the back of your Bible or atlas and follow the geographical locations mentioned in chapters 13 and 14.

 

C. There is an obvious transition in chapters 13 and 14 from the leadership of Barnabas to the leadership of Paul.

 

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 13:1-3
 1Now there were at Antioch, in the church that was there, prophets and teachers: Barnabas, and Simeon who was called Niger, and Lucius of Cyrene, and Manaen who had been brought up with Herod the tetrarch, and Saul. 2While they were ministering to the Lord and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, "Set apart for Me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them." 3Then, when they had fasted and prayed and laid their hands on them, they sent them away.

13:1 "Antioch" See note at 11:19.

▣ "the church" See Special Topic at 5:11.

▣ "prophets and teachers" These two gifts of the Spirit are listed in I Cor. 12:28 and Eph. 4:11. The grammatical construction is such that it is uncertain whether the five men listed were both prophets and teachers or if the first three are prophets and the last two are teachers.

The problem with this term is, "How is the NT gift of prophecy related to OT prophets?" In the OT prophets are writers of Scripture. In the NT this task is given to the original twelve Apostles and their helpers. As the term "apostle" is retained as an ongoing gift (cf. Eph. 4:11), but with a changed task after the death of the Twelve, so too, is the office of prophet. Inspiration has ceased; there is no further inspired Scripture. New Testament prophets' primary task is proclamation of the gospel, but also a different task, possibly how to apply NT truths to current situations and needs. See Special Topic at 11:27.

The gift of teacher is mentioned in Acts 13:1 in combination with prophecy, but in Eph. 4:11 it is linked with pastors. In II Tim. 1:11 Paul says he is a preacher, apostle, and a teacher. Here it seems to stand independently, as it does in Rom. 12:7. It is also discussed separately in James 3:1ff. This implies that these leadership gifts can be combined in different ways in different believers to meet the need of the church in that day or area. Each of these gifted leaders (cf. Eph. 4:11) proclaimed the gospel, but in different ways (ordering, preaching, instructing).

SPECIAL TOPIC: INSPIRATION

SPECIAL TOPIC: ILLUMINATION

▣ "Simeon who was called Niger" The term niger is Latin for dark or black. Some commentators try to relate this Simon to Mark 15:21.

▣ "Lucius of Cyrene" Possibly this is one of the Hellenistic Jews that preached to the Gentiles in Antioch (cf. 11:20). He is probably not the Lucius mentioned in Rom. 16:21.

▣ "Manaen who had been brought up with Herod the tetrarch" Manaen is a Greek form of the Hebrew Manahem, which means "comforter." This man was either a foster brother (Greek literature) of Herod Antipas (see Introduction to chapter 12) or he grew up with him (Koine papyri). Luke probably got much of his information about Herod Antipas (the Tetrarch) from conversations with this man.

13:2

NASB"ministering"
NKJV"ministered"
NRSV"worshiping"
TEV"serving"
NJB"offering worship"

This is the Greek term leitourgia (a compound from "public" and "work") from which we get the English term liturgy. Originally it referred to someone who did public service at their own expense. In this context it implies a period of seeking God's will during a worship service. The verb could refer to the entire church or just the five men listed.

▣ "had fasted" In the OT there is only one fast day a year, the Day of Atonement, Leviticus 16. However, during the first century, rabbinical Judaism had developed two fasts a week. Although fasting is not required of believers, many times it is helpful in discerning God's will (cf. 14:23).

SPECIAL TOPIC: FASTING

▣ "the Holy spirit said" This is another biblical evidence for the personality of the Holy Spirit (see Special Topic at 1:2). Whether it was audible or intuitive is uncertain (cf. 8:29; 10:19; 11:12; 20:23; 21:11). It is obvious that this was a very specific message (cf. 16:6-7), probably given through one of the prophets.

▣ "Set apart" This is an aorist active imperative. The term aphorizō has the same connotation as "holy" (hagiazō). It implies set apart and equipped for an assigned divine task (cf. Rom. 1:1; Gal. 1:15).

After "set apart" in the Greek text is the particle , which denotes intensity (cf. Luke 2:15; I Cor. 6:20). It gives an earnestness to the Spirit's call. There is a parallel in Paul's statement of 15:36.

▣ "the work to which I have called them" This is a perfect middle (deponent) indicative. It is the Spirit who calls and equips for ministry tasks (cf. I Cor. 12:7,11).

13:3 The verse has three aorist participles describing the spiritual preparations to send out the first missionaries from the church at Antioch.

1. fasted

2. prayed

3. laid hands on them

This seems to be the united actions of the whole congregation, not just the other prophets and teachers. The whole church should be involved in Great Commission activities!

▣ "laid their hands on them" This particular verse is one of the ambiguous texts on which our modern practice of ordination is based. However, it is inappropriate as a biblical foundation for our modern denominational practices. There are many physical examples of "laying on of hands" in the Bible.

1. in the OT for the purpose of

a. sacrificial identification (cf. Lev. 1:4; 3:2; 4:4; 16:21)

b. a blessing (cf. Gen. 48:13ff; Matt. 19:13,15)

c. the commissioning of a successor (cf. Num. 27:23; Deut. 34:9)

2. In the NT the background is equally as varied

a. for healing (cf. Luke 4:40; 13:13; Acts 9:17; 28:8)

b. dedication or commissioning to a task (cf. Acts 6:6; 13:3)

c. connected with receiving the Holy Spirit or spiritual gifts (cf. Acts 8:17; 19:6; I Tim. 4:14; II Tim. 1:6)

d. a reference to the basic teachings of Judaism or the church (cf. Heb. 6:2)

This laying on of hands was not an inaugurating experience. These men were already called, gifted, functioning leaders. It is not a new ministry they are called to, but an expansion of what they were already doing.

Ordination tends to encourage a distinction among believers. It gives credence to the clergy-laity dichotomy. The Greek word cleros (to inherit by lot) and laos (Greek word for people), when used in the NT, always refers to the entire group of believers. All believers are called, gifted, full time ministers of the gospel (cf. Eph. 4:11-12). There is no biblical evidence for separating believers into hierarchal groups. All believers are gifted for ministry to the body of Christ (cf. I Cor. 12:7, 11).

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 13:4-12
 4So, being sent out by the Holy Spirit, they went down to Seleucia and from there they sailed to Cyprus. 5When they reached Salamis, they began to proclaim the word of God in the synagogues of the Jews; and they also had John as their helper. 6When they had gone through the whole island as far as Paphos, they found a magician, a Jewish false prophet whose name was Bar-Jesus, 7who was with the proconsul, Sergius Paulus, a man of intelligence. This man summoned Barnabas and Saul and sought to hear the word of God. 8But Elymas the magician (for so his name is translated) was opposing them, seeking to turn the proconsul away from the faith. 9But Saul, who was also known as Paul, filled with the Holy Spirit, fixed his gaze on him, 10and said, "You who are full of all deceit and fraud, you son of the devil, you enemy of all righteousness, will you not cease to make crooked the straight ways of the Lord? 11"Now, behold, the hand of the Lord is upon you, and you will be blind and not see the sun for a time." And immediately a mist and a darkness fell upon him, and he went about seeking those who would lead him by the hand. 12Then the proconsul believed when he saw what had happened, being amazed at the teaching of the Lord.

13:4 "being sent out by the Holy Spirit" This context does not assert the authority of the local church, but the authority of the Spirit. He is that part of the Trinity (see Special Topic at 2:32) emphasized in Acts. The "new Messianic age" was known as "the age of the Spirit." He calls, gifts, directs, convicts, and empowers (cf. John 14:16-17,26; 15:26; 16:7-15). No permanent or effective ministry can occur without His presence and blessing.

▣ "Seleucia" This was the port city of Antioch of Syria. It was about fifteen miles southwest. Its name goes back to Alexander the Great's general (Seleucid), who ruled this area after Alexander's death.

▣ "Cyprus" This was Barnabas' home (cf. 4:36) where there was a large Jewish population. In the OT it is known as Kittim. This was not the first Christian witness on this island (cf. 11:19-20).

13:5 "Salamis" This was the port city on the east coast of the island of Cyprus. It was the commercial center of the island.

▣ "they began to proclaim the word of God in the synagogue" The reason for this is obvious.

1. these Jews already knew the OT

2. Jews were the chosen people (cf. Gen. 12:1-3) and had the first opportunity to respond (cf. 3:26; 13:46; 17:2; 18:4,19; 19:8; Rom. 1:16)

3. in the synagogue services were Gentiles who [a] had already been attracted to the one true God and [b] knew the OT

This became Paul's regular missionary method wherever there was a synagogue.

▣ "John" This refers to John Mark in whose home the disciples met (cf. Acts 12:12). He is also the traditional writer of the Gospel of Mark, which seems to record the eyewitness testimony of the Apostle Peter. He is also the cause of the great argument between Paul and Barnabas which split the missionary team (cf. 15:36-41). However, later on Paul mentions John Mark in a positive way (cf. Col. 4:10; II Tim. 4:11 and Philemon v. 24). See fuller note at Introduction to chapter 16.

13:6 "when they had gone through the whole island" This probably means that they stopped and preached in every synagogue on the island.

▣ "Paphos" This refers to new Paphos, in contradistinction from the older Phoenician city seven miles away. Both of these cities are named after the Phoenician goddess Paphian. This was the god of love also known as Aphrodite, Astarte, Venus, etc. This city was the official political capital of Cyprus.

▣ "Bar-Jesus" This man was a Jewish false prophet. His name means "son of Joshua." We learn from v. 8 that he went by the designation Elymas the magician. This term magician reflects the Greek equivalent of an Aramaic root that means "sorcerer" (cf. v. 10). See Special Topic at 8:9.

13:7 "the proconsul, Sergius Paulus" There has been much discussion about the historicity of Luke's accounts. Here is a good example of the accuracy of Luke the historian. He calls this man "a proconsul," which meant Cyprus was a Roman Senatorial province. We learn this occurred in a.d. 22 by decree from Augustus. We also learn from a Latin inscription at Soloi that Sergius Paulus began his proconsulship in a.d. 53. The more information archaeology discovers from the Mediterranean world of the first century, the more Luke's historical accuracy is corroborated.

"a man of intelligence" This term is used with a wide variety of connotations. In this context it implies he was able to rule effectively. Also characterizing him in this way shows that the gospel not only impacted the poor and uneducated, but also the wealthy and educated (cf. Manaen 13:1). It is also possible that one of Luke's intents of writing Acts was to show that the gospel did not threaten Roman rule.

13:8 "Elymas" It seems that this Greek name is a transliteration of

1. an Arabic term for a wise man (a sage, a diviner, one who can foresee and control the future by manipulating the unseen powers/forces of the unseen realm, AB, vol. 2, p. 487)

2. an Aramaic word for one who interprets dreams

 

▣ "magician" This is related to the term "magi," which meant Chaldean-Median wise men, like Daniel (cf. Dan. 2:2; 4:9; Matt. 2:1). However, by Paul's day, it was used of itinerant magicians and wandering quacks in the Greco-Roman world. See Special Topic at 8:9.

▣ "the faith" This term is used in three specific ways in the NT:

1. personal trusting in Jesus Christ as a Savior

2. faithful, godly living

3. theological content of the gospel (i.e., doctrine, cf. Jude 3, 20)

The same ambiguity is seen in Acts 6:7. Here it seems to refer to #3 because of the article and the context. See Special Topics at 3:16 and 6:5.

13:9 "Paul" This is the first use of his Roman cognomen in the book of Acts. Paul is from a Greek term that means "little." Some think it refers to Paul's physical size, others to his own personal evaluation of himself as "the least of the apostles" because he persecuted the church. It was probably the second name given to him by his parents at birth.

▣ "Paul, filled with the Holy Spirit" The power of the Spirit that guided the early church is described by the term "the filling" (cf. 2:4; 4:8,31; 6:3; 7:55; 9:17; 13:9,52). The ongoing, daily filling of the Spirit is the normal state of all believers (cf. Eph. 5:18). In Acts it is usually associated with a boldness to proclaim the gospel.

▣ "fixed his gaze" See fuller note at 1:10.

13:10 Paul characterizes this Jewish false prophet by several terms.

1. "full by deceit," meaning to entrap with a bait (this is the only use of this term in Luke's writings)

2. "full of all fraud," this is from the Greek word that means to do something lightly or frivolously, but it came to have an evil connotation (cf. 18:14). This term is found only in Acts (cf. 13:10; 18:14).

3. "son of the devil," this is a Semitic idiom (cf. 3:25; 4:36) for one characterized by the actions of the devil (cf. Matt. 13:38; John 8:38,41,44, see Special Topics at 5:3)

4. "enemy of all righteousness," This term is used several times in Luke's writings involving OT quotes (cf. Luke 1:71,74; 20:43; Acts 2:35). All that is like God, this man was against. See SPECIAL TOPIC: RIGHTEOUSNESS at 3:14.

5. Paul uses the inclusive term "all" three times to show this man's complete volitional wickedness

 

▣ "to make crooked the straight ways of the Lord" This question expects a "yes" answer. The word "right" or "straight" in the NT reflects the OT concept of righteousness, which meant a standard or measuring reed. The NT terms "crooked" or "perverted" reflect the OT terms for sin, which were a deviation from the standard, which is God Himself. This man made everything crooked (i.e., the opposite of righteousness). See Special Topic at 3:14.

13:11 "the hand of the Lord" This is a Semitic anthropomorphic phrase referring to the power and presence of YHWH (cf. Luke 1:66; Acts 11:21). In the OT it often refers to God's judgment (cf. Exod. 9:3; I Sam. 5:6; Job 19:21; 23:2; Ps. 32:4; 38:2; 39:10), as it does here.

▣ "you will be blind" These powerful descriptive terms of evil and rebellion by which Paul characterizes this man and the form of his temporary divine punishment may reflect Paul's own previous life. He looks back now and sees himself in this Jewish false teacher and his manipulation (cf. 9:8).

Blindness is often used in a parabolic sense of a lack of spiritual receptivity (cf. John 9; Acts 9; also note Deut. 28:28-29).

13:12 "believed when he saw what happened" This is the same Greek word (pisteuō, the noun can be translated as believe, faith, or trust) used throughout the NT for genuine belief. This governor responded to the gospel message. One man's eyes were closed (literally); one man's eyes were opened (metaphorically). This is the mystery of belief and unbelief (cf. John 9). See Special Topics: Faith (noun, verb, and adjective) at 3:16 and OT Faith at 6:5.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 13:13-16a
 13Now Paul and his companions put out to sea from Paphos and came to Perga in Pamphylia; but John left them and returned to Jerusalem. 14But going on from Perga, they arrived at Pisidian Antioch, and on the Sabbath day they went into the synagogue and sat down. 15After the reading of the Law and the Prophets the synagogue officials sent to them, saying, "Brethren, if you have any word of exhortation for the people, say it." 16Paul stood up, and motioning with his hand said,

13:13 "Paul and his companions" Obviously the leadership has changed. From now on in the book of Acts Paul's name will be listed first.

▣ "Perga in Pamphylia" Perga was the largest city of the small Roman coastal province of Pamphylia (mid-southern Turkey). It was located several miles inland to discourage attacks by sea-faring raiders.

Apparently Paul did not preach here at this time, but did so later (cf. 14:25). There is no historical evidence of a Christian group in this area for several hundred years. He merely passed through this coastal region.

"John left them and returned to Jerusalem" Luke records this event, but gives no clue as to why (nor does any other NT author). See Introduction to chapter 16, he returned to the Lord's service!

13:14 "Pisidian Antioch" This literally means "Antioch towards Pisidia" because it was located in the ethnic area of Phrygia the Roman Province of Galatia. This was a distinct ethnic group, probably from Europe.

"on the Sabbath day" This would denote from sundown on Friday to sundown on Saturday. The Jews counted time from evening to evening, following Genesis 1.

"sat down" This may be an idiom denoting someone who was to speak in the synagogue. Rabbis always taught while seated (cf. Matt. 5:1; Luke 4:20). The synagogues regularly allowed itinerant visitors to speak if they wished (cf. v. 15).

13:15 "the reading of the Law and the Prophets" This was the part of the typical order of service in a synagogue in Jesus' day. Originally only the Law of Moses was read, but Antiochus IV Epiphanes forbade this in 163 b.c. The Jews then substituted the reading of the Prophets. During the Maccabeen revolt, Judaism was restored and both the Law and the Prophets were continued to be read together as a basic format of synagogue services (cf. v. 27). See Special Topic following.

SPECIAL TOPIC: HEBREW CANON

▣ "the synagogue officials" These were the men in charge of building maintenance and the order of worship (cf. Luke 8:41,49). They often invited guests to speak.

▣ "if you have any word of exhortation" This is a first class conditional sentence, assumed to be true from the perspective of the author of for his literary purposes. This was a normal aspect of synagogue worship. Paul took full advantage of the opportunity.

13:16 "Paul stood up" Usually Jewish teachers sit when they teach; however, it was the Greco-Roman custom to stand while teaching. Paul modified his manner and presentation to the audience.

▣ "motioning with his hand" Paul gestured for quiet. Luke mentions this eyewitness detail often (cf. 12:17; 13:16; 19:33; 21:40).

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 13:16b-25
 16"Men of Israel, and you who fear God, listen: 17'The God of this people Israel chose our fathers and made the people great during their stay in the land of Egypt, and with an uplifted arm He led them out from it. 18For a period of about forty years He put up with them in the wilderness. 19When He had destroyed seven nations in the land of Canaan, He distributed their land as an inheritance—all of which took about four hundred and fifty years. 20After these things He gave them judges until Samuel the prophet. 21Then they asked for a king, and God gave them Saul the son of Kish, a man of the tribe of Benjamin, for forty years. 22After He had removed him, He raised up David to be their king, concerning whom He also testified and said, "I have found David the son of Jesse, a man after My heart, who will do all My will." 23From the descendants of this man, according to promise, God has brought to Israel a Savior, Jesus, 24after John had proclaimed before His coming a baptism of repentance to all the people of Israel. 25And while John was completing his course, he kept saying, ‘What do you suppose that I am? I am not He. But behold, one is coming after me the sandals of whose feet I am not worthy to untie.'"

13:16b "Men of Israel, and you who fear God, listen" There were two groups present, Jews and Gentile "God-fearers" (cf. v. 26; 10:2,22,35). This sermon is very similar to Stephen's sermon of Acts 7. In many ways Paul was deeply influenced by Stephen's understanding of the OT and the gospel.

13:17 Paul began his review of OT history with the call of the Patriarchs (Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in Genesis) and the captivity and deliverance from Egypt (Exodus-Deuteronomy).

▣ "with an uplifted arm He led them out" This is typical OT imagery (cf. LXX Exod. 6;1,6) of YHWH in physical terms. It is similar to the anthropomorphic phrase, "His right arm." The Bible speaks of God in human vocabulary (i.e., anthropomorphism) even though He is an eternal, non-physical, all pervasive Spirit. These biblical analogies are the source of many misunderstandings and literal overstatements. The Bible speaks of God in analogy, metaphor, and negation. God is far greater than fallen, time-bound, earth-bound humans can comprehend or express! See Special Topic at 2:33.

13:18 "For a period of about forty years He put up with them in the wilderness" This reflects Deut. 1:31 and could be translated "fed as a nurse" (cf. MSS A, C). This reflects the OT books of Exodus and Numbers.

The term "forty" is often a round number. Literally the time from Horeb to Shittim was thirty-eight years with a two year period at Horeb (Sinai). See Special Topic at 1:3.

13:19 "destroyed seven nations" The nations of Palestine can be characterized in several ways.

1. collective terms, Canaanite (i.e., lowlander, cf. Gen. 10:18-29; Jdgs. 1:1) or Amorite (i.e., highlander, cf. Gen. 15:16)

2. two nations (Canaanites, Perizzites, cf. Gen. 13:7; 34:30; Jdgs. 1:4-5)

3. three nations (Hivites, Canaanites, Hittites, cf. Exod. 23:28)

4. six nations (Canaanite, Hittite, Amorite, Perizzite, Hivite, Jebusite, cf. Exod. 3:8,17; 33:2; 34:11; Deut. 20:17; Josh. 9:1; 12:8)

5. seven nations (Hittites, Girgashites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites, Jebusites, cf. Deut. 7:1; Josh. 3:10; 24:11)

6. ten nations (Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaim, Amonites, Canaanites, Girgashites, Jebusites, cf. Gen. 15:19-21)

 

SPECIAL TOPIC: PRE-ISRAELITE INHABITANTS OF PALESTINE

▣ "an inheritance" The triple compound term kata + klēros + nemō is common in the Septuagint, but is used only here in the NT (other texts have kata + klēros + didōmi). It implies the casting of lots as a means of dividing the Promised Land among the tribes (cf. Josh. 13-19). The word klēros is where we get the English word "clergy," but in the NT it always refers to the body of believers, not an elite group!

▣ "four hundred and fifty years" This number seems to be arrived at by:

1. 400 year bondage in Egypt (cf. Gen. 15:13)

2. 40 year wilderness wandering period (cf. Exod. 16:35; Num. 14:33-34; 32:13)

3. 7-10 year conquest (cf. Josh. 14:7,10)

The Textus Receptus (KJV) moves the number to v. 20 and seems to involve the Judges (following Josephus, Antiq. 8.3.1), but this wording is not in the older and better uncial Greek manuscripts (cf. א, A, B, C), which fits better with I Kgs. 6:1 dating. The dash found in the NASB is to accentuate the proper place of the number.

13:20 This refers to the period from the book of Judges through I Samuel 7.

13:21 This refers to I Sam. 8-10.

"for forty years" This time phrase is not found in the OT unless the OT manuscript problem connected to I Sam. 13:1 includes "forty" (NIV). Josephus, Antiq. 6.14.9 also mentions that Saul reigned "forty" years. The Septuagint just omits the entire sentence and starts with I Sam. 3:2. "Forty" was obviously a rabbinical tradition.

13:22 "I have found David the son of Jesse, a man after My heart" This is not a direct quote from the OT but it seems to be a combination of Psalm 89:20 and I Samuel 13:14. It needs to be remembered that this sermon by Paul follows the basic pattern of Stephen's historical rendition in Acts 7. That David can be called a man after God's heart, when he was such a notorious sinner (cf. Ps. 32,51; II Samuel 11), is a great encouragement to all believers.

This combination quote implies several things.

1. This was a standard practice with the rabbis, which explains many of the unusual OT quotes in the NT.

2. This was already a part of Christian catechism. Paul often quotes from early Christian hymns and possibly other literature.

3. This quote is unique to Paul and shows that Luke must have gotten his summary of this first recorded message of Paul in Acts from Paul himself.

 

NASB, NKJV"who will do all My will"
NRSV"who will carry out all my wishes"
TEV"who will do all I want him to do"
NJB"who will perform my entire will"

This verse is a combination OT allusion. This part of the sentence is not in the OT passages. In the OT context Saul was disobedient and rejected. But David's life also had disobedience. God works with imperfect humans to accomplish His redemptive plan.

13:23 This is parallel to Acts 7:52. It points back to all the OT promises.

1. a redemption through the seed of a woman, Gen, 3:15

2. a ruler from Judah, Gen. 49:10

3. a coming leader like Moses, the Prophet, Deut. 18:15,18

4. a leader from David, II Sam. 7; Ps. 132:11; Isa. 11:1,10; Matt. 1:1

5. a suffering servant, Isa. 52:13-53:12

6. a savior, Luke 2:11; Matt. 1:21; John 1:29; 4:42; Acts 5:31

For Luke #4 is prominent (cf. Luke 1:32,69; 2:4; 3:31; Acts 2:29-31; 13:22-23). The Messiah would be of Jesse's line (cf. Isa. 9:7; 11:1,10; 16:5).

13:24 John the Baptist's ministry and message is described in Mark 1:1-8; Matt. 3:1-11; Luke 3:2-17; John 1:6-8,19-28. John fulfilled the prophecies of Matt. 3:1; 4:5-6. His preaching of repentance also set the pattern for Jesus' early preaching (cf. Matt. 4:17; Mark 1:14-15).

John spoke of a Coming One, greater than himself (cf. Matt. 3:11; Mark 1:7; Luke 3:16; John 1:27,30; Acts 13:25).

13:25 "while John was completing his course" God had a specific task for John to perform. John's public ministry only lasted eighteen months. But, what a year and a half it was, filled with the Spirit's power and preparing the way for the Messiah.

Paul knew the OT from his youth in synagogue school and his training as a rabbi under Gamaliel in Jerusalem. He heard the gospel

1. from Stephen

2. from believers he persecuted

3. by a special vision from Jesus

4. from a believing Jewish layman from Damascus

5. by Jesus in Arabia

6. when he visited with the other Apostles

He tries to quote Jesus' whenever he can on a subject. Here he quotes the Gospel accounts of His life

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 13:26-41
 26"Brethren, sons of Abraham's family, and those among you who fear God, to us the message of this salvation has been sent. 27For those who live in Jerusalem, and their rulers, recognizing neither Him nor the utterances of the prophets which are read every Sabbath, fulfilled these by condemning Him. 28And though they found no ground for putting Him to death, they asked Pilate that He be executed. 29When they had carried out all that was written concerning Him, they took Him down from the cross and laid Him in a tomb. 30But God raised Him from the dead; 31and for many days He appeared to those who came up with Him from Galilee to Jerusalem, the very ones who are now His witnesses to the people. 32And we preach to you the good news of the promise made to the fathers, 33that God has fulfilled this promise to our children in that He raised up Jesus, as it is also written in the second Psalm, ‘You are My Son; today have begotten You.' 34As for the fact that He raised Him up from the dead, no longer to return to decay, He has spoken in this way: ‘I will give you the holy and sure blessings of David.' 35Therefore He also says in another Psalm, ‘You will not allow Your Holy One to undergo decay.' 36For David, after he had served the purpose of God in his own generation, fell asleep, and was laid among his fathers and underwent decay; 37but He whom God raised did not undergo decay. 38Therefore let it be known to you, brethren, that through Him forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you, 39and through Him everyone who believes is freed from all things, from which you could not be freed through the Law of Moses. 40Therefore take heed, so that the thing spoken of in the Prophets may not come upon you: 41'Behold, you scoffers, and marvel, and perish; For I am accomplishing a work in your days, A work which you will never believe, though someone should describe it to you.'"

13:26 "sons of Abraham's family, and those among you who fear God" This refers to both the Jewish hearers (or proselytes) and the Gentiles (God-fearers) attached to Judaism's monotheism and morality.

"this salvation" This is referring to God's promise to redeem fallen humanity through a Messiah (cf. Gen. 3:15). It includes Gentiles (cf. Gen. 12:5; Exod. 19:5-6; and Acts 28:28 and 13:46).

13:27 This is such a tragic verse. It succinctly summarizes the blindness of the Jews in Jerusalem about the Scriptures even though they read them continuously. By missing the prophetic signs (cf. Psalm 22; Isaiah 53; Zechariah; Malachi) and prophecies (Isaiah, Jonah) they became the prophetic sign! He came to His own, but His own received Him not (cf. John 1:11-12).

13:28 Acts records again and again the spiritual responsibility of the Jews in Jerusalem (cf. 2:23,36; 3:13-15; 4:10; 5:30; 7:52; 10:;39; 13:27-28).

13:29 "they. . .they" These must refer to different groups. The first were those who sought His death (i.e., Jewish leadership, the crowd before Pilate). The second involves those who wanted a proper burial. This could have involved sincere Jewish people who saw the injustice (similar to Acts 8:2, involving the burial of Stephen) or secret disciples like Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus (cf. John 19:38-42).

▣ "all that was written concerning Him" Jesus' life was one of fulfilled prophecy. One strong evidence for the inspiration of the Bible and the Messiahship of Jesus of Nazareth is predictive prophecy (cf. Luke 22:22; Acts 2:23; 3:18; 4:28; 10:43; 13:29; 24:14; 26:22).

It is surely true that many of the details of Jesus' life, which we in the church today call prophecy, are in a sense typology. Many events happened in the life of Israel which later seem to also occur in Jesus' life (one example, Hosea 11:1). Often ambiguous, oblique passages, which would not have been understood in context as prophetic, seem to jump to life as one views Jesus' earthly experience (ex. Psalm 22; Isaiah 53). It takes inspiration and a sense of the flow of redemptive history to fully appreciate the OT foreshadowing of Jesus. I would also add that although inspired NT writers use typology, even allegory, that modern teachers and preachers should not use this method of interpretation! See Bob's Biblical Interpretation Seminar online at www.freebiblecommentary.org

"the cross" See notes at 5:30 and 10:29.

13:30,33,34,37 "But God raised Him from the dead" The NT affirms that all three persons of the Trinity were active in Jesus' resurrection:

1. the Spirit (cf. Rom. 8:11)

2. the Son (cf. John 2:19-22; 10:17-18)

3. the Father (cf. Acts 2:24,32; 3:15,26; 4:10; 5:30; 10:40; 13:30,33,34,37; 17:31; Rom. 6:4,9; 10:9; I Cor. 6:14; II Cor. 4:14; Gal. 1:1; Eph. 1:20; Col. 2:12; I Thess. 1:10).

This was the Father's confirmation of the truth of Jesus' life and teachings. This is a major aspect of the Kerygma (i.e., content of the sermons in Acts). See Special Topic at 2:14.

13:31 "for many days" Acts 1:3 says "forty days." However, forty is a common OT round number. See Special Topic at 1:3.

"He appeared" See Special Topic: Jesus' Post-resurrection Appearances at 1:3

13:32 "the promise made to the fathers" This refers to the initial promise of YHWH to Abraham for a land and a seed (cf. Gen. 12:1-3; Romans 4). This same promise of God's presence and blessing was repeated to the Patriarchs and to their children (cf. Isa. 44:3; 54:13; Joel 2:32). The OT focuses on the land, while the NT focuses on "the seed." Paul alludes to this very promise in Rom. 1:2-3.

13:33 This quote from Ps. 2:7, which is a royal messianic psalm about the conflict and victory of God's Promised Messiah. Jesus had been killed by evil forces (human and demonic), but God had raised Him to victory (cf. Rom. 1:4).

This verse and Rom. 1:4 were used by early heretics (adoptionists) to assert that Jesus became Messiah at the resurrection. There is surely a NT emphasis on Jesus being affirmed and glorified because of His obedience, but this must not be taken in isolation from His preexistent glory and deity (cf. John 1:1-5,9-18; Phil. 2:6-11; Col. 1:13-18; Heb. 1:2-3).

This same verb, "raised up" (anistēmi), is used in Acts 3:26 of God raising up "His Servant"; in Acts 3:22 of God raising up the Prophet (cf. 7:37; Deut. 18:19). This seems to be a distinct usage from "raised" from the dead (cf. vv. 30,34,37). Jesus was "raised up" before He died!

13:34 "no longer to return to decay" This statement refers to Jesus' death and resurrection. He was the first to be resurrected (first fruits of the dead, cf. I Cor. 15:20) rather than resuscitated. Many people were brought back to physical life in the Bible, but they all had to die again. Enoch and Elijah were translated to heaven without death, but they were not resurrected.

▣ "I will give you the holy and sure blessings of David" This is a quote from Isa. 55:3 from the LXX. The quote includes the plural "sure blessings," but does not specify to what this refers. It is something that passed from God to David, to Jesus, then to His followers (plural "you" in the quote). The OT context shows the significance of "you" (cf. Isa. 55:4-5 LXX, "Behold, I have made him a testimony among the Gentiles, a prince and commander to the Gentiles. Nations which know thee not, shall call upon thee, and peoples which are not acquainted with thee, shall flee to thee for refuge, for the sake of the Lord thy God, the Holy One of Israel, for he has glorified thee," The Septuagint, Zondervan, 1976, p. 890).

The blessings and promises to David (i.e., Jews) are now the blessing and promises of the Gentiles (i.e., the entire human race).

13:35-37 This is the same argument used earlier in Peter's Pentecost sermon (cf. 2:24-32), also taken from Psalm 16. These early sermons in Acts reflect an early Christian catechism. Several OT Messianic texts were strung together. Therefore, often the pronouns and details do not seem to be relevant to the central purpose of the NT author, which was to affirm the physical resurrection of Jesus and the decay of David.

13:38 Paul is using an OT augmented argument, as does Peter (Acts 2) and Stephen (Acts 7) to reach these synagogue hearers.

Paul promises a full and complete forgiveness of sins, which Judaism could not provide (cf. v. 39), to all who trust Jesus as the Christ (i.e., "This One," vv. 38,39).

13:39 "and through Him everyone" Notice the universal element. God loves all humans and all humans have the opportunity to respond to Him by faith (cf. 10:43; Isa. 42:1,4,6,10-12; 55; Ezek. 18:23,32; Joel 2:28,32; John 3:16; 4:42; Rom. 3:22,29,30; 10:9-13; I Tim. 2:4; 4:10; Titus 2:11; II Peter 3:9; I John 2:1; 4:14).

▣ "who believes" See Special Topics at 3:16 and 6:5.

NASB, NKJV"is freed from all things" (v. 39)
NRSV"is set free from all those sins" (v. 39)
TEV"is set free from all the sins" (v. 39)
NJB"justification from all sins" (v. 38)

This is literally "justified" (present passive indicative). This is a legal term which describes our standing before God through Jesus Christ's righteousness (cf. II Cor. 5:21). In Hebrew it originally means a "river reed" (see Special Topic at 3:14). It reflects an OT construction term used metaphorically for God as the standard or ruler by which judgement is made.

▣ "which you could not be freed through the Law of Moses" This was Paul's major theological point (cf. Rom. 3:21-30). The Mosaic law was a tutor to bring us to an understanding of our personal sin and to cause us to desire Christ (cf. Gal. 3:23-29). The OT Law is not a means of salvation, because all sinned (cf. Rom. 3:9-18,23; Gal. 3:22). It had become a death sentence, a curse (cf. Gal. 3:13; Col. 2:14).

SPECIAL TOPIC: PAUL'S VIEWS OF THE MOSAIC LAW

13:40-41 Paul calls on his hearers (present active imperative) to respond by trusting Jesus as the Promised Messiah, as the only way to receive forgiveness (cf. John 14:6; Acts 4:12; I Tim. 2:5).

He quotes Hab. 1:5 from the Septuagint as a warning. In other places in Paul's writings he quotes Hab. 2:4 as an appropriate response (cf. Rom. 1:17; Gal. 3:11). Paul preaches for a decision. Intellectual assent is not enough; a complete personal surrender to Jesus as the only hope is required. This initial faith and repentant response must be matched by daily Christlike living.

Verse 41 describes the shocking new methodology of salvation of the new covenant in Christ.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 13:42-43
 42As Paul and Barnabas were going out, the people kept begging that these things might be spoken to them the next Sabbath. 43Now when the meeting of the synagogue had broken up, many of the Jews and of the God-fearing proselytes followed Paul and Barnabas, who, speaking to them, were urging them to continue in the grace of God.

13:42 This shows the power of the Spirit (1) using Paul's sermon and (2) the hunger for forgiveness and restoration with God within the hearts of humans made in God's image.

13:43

NASB"God-fearing proselytes"
NKJV"devout proselytes"
NRSV"devout converts to Judaism"
TEV"Gentiles who had been converted to Judaism"
NJB"devout converts"

This phrase is literally "worshiping proselytes." This is a different group from the "ones fearing God" of vv. 16,26 (cf. 10:2,22,35).

Verse 43 refers to those Gentiles who had officially become Jews. This required

1. self baptism in the presence of witnesses

2. circumcision for males

3. offering a sacrifice at the Temple in Jerusalem when possible

There are a few references to Jewish proselytes in the NT (cf. Matt. 23;15; Acts 2:11; 6:5; 13:43).

▣ "urging them to continue in the grace of God" From the context it is difficult to define this phrase.

1. some of these hearers may have already responded to the gospel in their hearts

2. those who were faithful to what they understood of the grace of God in the OT are urged to continue to seek God and listen to Paul again (cf. v. 44)

 

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 13:44-47
 44The next Sabbath nearly the whole city assembled to hear the word of the Lord. 45But when the Jews saw the crowds, they were filled with jealousy and began contradicting the things spoken by Paul, and were blaspheming. 46Paul and Barnabas spoke out boldly and said, "It was necessary that the word of God be spoken to you first; since you repudiate it and judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life, behold, we are turning to the Gentiles. 47For so the Lord has commanded us, ‘I have placed You as a light for the Gentiles, That You may bring salvation to the end of the earth.'"

13:44 Paul's message had an obvious impact. This is also hyperbole. Not everyone in the city attended.

NASB, NRSV,
TEV"the word of the Lord"
NKJV, NJB,
REB"the word of God"

There is a Greek manuscript variant at this point.

1. Lord is in MSS P74, א, A, B2

2. God is in MSS B, C, E

The UBS4 puts "Lord" in the text, but rates it "C" (difficulty deciding). As with so many variants, this does not change the sense of the text. The gospel is a divine revelation about Jesus, the Messiah/Christ.

13:45 "when the Jews saw the crowd. . .jealousy" Whether it was the large turnout or the large number of Gentiles in the crowd that caused the jealousy is uncertain in this context. Jealousy is attributed to Jewish leadership both in Jerusalem and the Diaspora. (cf. Matt. 27:18; Mark 15:10; Acts 17:5).

Later in Romans Paul develops the theological problem of Jewish unbelief (cf. Romans 9-11). He asserts that God has temporarily blinded Israel so that the Gentiles might be saved. However, God will use the salvation of the Gentiles as a means (i.e., jealousy) to cause Israel to respond to Christ, so that all believers will be united through the gospel (cf. Eph. 2:11-3:13).

The problem is when does this occur? The same question could be asked of Zech. 12:10. Is this prophecy related to the early church, which was made up of believing Jews, or to a future period? Jealousy is meant for a redemptive purpose (cf. Rom. 10:19; 11:11,14), but the jealousy in this text causes unbelief!

"they were fill with jealousy" See note at 3:10.

"were blaspheming" As these Jews defended their traditions and attacked Paul's preaching, they themselves were guilty of blasphemy. There is no middle ground here. Either Judaism or Christianity is a true reflection of God's will. They are exclusive!

13:46 "spoke out boldly" This is one of the signs in Acts of being Spirit-filled.

"‘It was necessary that the word of God be spoken to you first'" This was the pattern of early missionary preaching. The Jews had priority (cf. Romans 9-11), but God had included Gentiles. Those in the synagogue knew their OT and could check the prophecies. Acts has a series of texts on this concept and pattern (cf. 3:26; 9:20; 13:5,14; 16:13; 17:2,10,17).

"‘you repudiate it'" This is a strong verb (present middle indicative) used several times in the Septuagint. Its basic meaning is "to thrust away." It was used of the Israelites in Stephen's sermon (cf. 7:39). It is also used by Paul in Rom. 11:1-2 to assert that God has not rejected His people, but they have rejected His Son, His only means of salvation, His full revelation.

▣ "‘judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life'" It is difficult to hold the concept of predestination, which is emphasized so often in Acts, with the concept of mandated individual personal response. No one can come to faith without the drawing of the Spirit (cf. John 6:44,65), but we are judged by whether we respond or not. By their rejection of Paul's preaching of the gospel, they revealed their true selves (cf. John 3:17-21). The blame for lack of response cannot be placed on God. He has provided a way, His Son, but He is the only way! It is the myster of "unbelief"!

▣ "we are turning to the Gentiles" This becomes a regular pattern of gospel proclamation (cf. 18:6; 22:21; 26:20; 28:28; Rom. 1:16).

13:47 This is a quote from Isa. 49:6 (cf. 42:6) from the Septuagint. Simeon used this quote at the blessing of Jesus in Luke 2:32 to affirm His Messianic task of universal redemption (see Special Topic at 1:8). It is even possible that the "light" in the context refers to Paul and Barnabas' preaching of the gospel to these Gentiles (cf. "Use of the Old Testament in the New," by Darrell Boch, p. 97 in Foundations for Biblical Interpretation, Broadman & Holman Publishers, 1994). Now Paul uses it to show the universal proclamation of the universal gospel!

The ending phrase, "to the end of the earth," may be an allusion to 1:8. It highlights the universality of the gospel.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 13:48-52
 48When the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord; and as many as had been appointed to eternal life believed. 49And the word of the Lord was being spread through the whole region. 50But the Jews incited the devout women of prominence and the leading men of the city, and instigated a persecution against Paul and Barnabas, and drove them out of their district. 51But they shook off the dust of their feet in protest against them and went to Iconium. 52And the disciples were continually filled with joy and with the Holy Spirit.

13:48 "When the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord" Many of these had been in the synagogue for years and had never heard the inclusive, universal message of God's love and acceptance of all humanity by faith in Messiah. When they heard it they enthusiastically received it (cf. 28:28) and passed it on to others (cf. v. 49).

▣ "as many as had been appointed to eternal life believed" This is a clear statement of predestination (so common in the rabbis' and Intertestamental Jewish literature), but it is in the same ambiguous relationship as all NT passages that relate to the paradox of God's choice and human's free will (cf. Phil. 2:12, 13). It is a pluperfect passive periphrastic that comes from a military term (tassō) which means to "enroll" or "appoint."

This concept of enrolling refers to the two metaphorical books that God keeps (cf. Dan. 7:10; Rev. 20:12). First is the Book of the Deeds of men (cf. Ps. 56:8; 139:16; Isa. 65:6; and Mal. 3:16). The other is the Book of Life (cf. Exod. 32:32; Ps. 69:28; Isa. 4:3; Dan. 12:1; Luke 10:20; Phil. 4:3; Heb. 12:23; Rev. 3:5; 13:8; 17:8; 20:12-15; 21:27). See Special Topic: Election/Predestination and the Need for a Theological Balance at 2:47.

13:50 "But the Jews incited the devout women of prominence" This text gives historical and cultural setting of the exalted place of women in Asia Minor in the first century (cf. 16:14; 17:4).

In this context it refers to proselytes to Judaism who were also leaders in the community or were married to the civic leaders. A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament, vol. 3, p. 201, makes the point that Gentile women were greatly attracted to Judaism (cf. Strabo 7:2 and Juvenal 6:542) because of its morality.

"instigated a persecution against Paul" Paul refers to this in II Tim. 3:11.

13:51 "they shook off the dust of their feet" This is a Jewish sign of rejection (cf. Matt. 10:14; Mark 6:11; Luke 9:5; 10:11). It is uncertain whether this refers to (1) dust on their feet and sandals from walking or (2) dust on their robes which was kicked up when they were working.

▣ "Iconium" This was a major city of Lycaonia, located in the Roman province of Galatia. It was about eighty miles east, south-east of Pisidian Antioch and directly north of Lystra.

13:52 "continually filled with joy" This is an imperfect passive indicative which can mean the beginning of an action or the repeat of an action in past time. The NASB, 1995 update, takes it in the second sense. Only the Holy Spirit can give joy amidst persecution (cf. Rom. 5:3; James 1:2ff; I Peter 4:12ff).

The phrase "the disciples" is ambiguous. Does it refer to the new believers, the missionary team, or both?

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. Why can 13:2-3 not be used as a proof-text for ordination by a select group?

2. Why did Paul preach in the synagogue first?

3. Why did John Mark leave the mission team? (cf. v. 13)

4. How is v. 39 related to Galatians 3?

5. Explain v. 48b in relation to predestination and human free will.

 

Acts 14

PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS

UBS4

NKJV NRSV TEV NJB
Paul and Barnabas at Iconium At Iconium Ministry in the Iconium Region and Return In Iconium Iconium Evangelism
14:1-7 14:1-7 14:1-7 14:1-4 14:1
        14:2
        14:3
        14:4-7
      14:5-7  
Paul and Barnabas at Lystra Idolatry at Lystra   In Lystra and Derbe Healing of a Cripple
14:8-18 14:8-18 14:8-18 14:8-13 14:8-10
        14:11-18
      14:14-18  
  Stoning, Escape to Derbe     End of the Mission
14:19-20 14:19-20 14:19-20 14:19-20 14:19-20
The Return to Antioch in Syria Strengthening the Converts   The Return to Antioch in Syria  
14:21-28 14:21-28 14:21-23 14:21-23 14:21-23
    14:24-28 14:24-26 14:24-26
      14:27-28 14:27-28

READING CYCLE THREE (from "A Guide to Good Bible Reading")

FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S INTENT AT THE PARAGRAPH LEVEL

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects. Compare your subject divisions with the five modern translations. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is the key to following the original author's intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every paragraph has one and only one main subject.

1. First paragraph

2. Second paragraph

3. Third paragraph

4. Etc.

 

How Does Paul's Mission Relate to Galatians?

A. These two aspects of background material must be dealt with together because two opposing theories of the identities of the recipients affect the dating of the letter. Both theories have logical weight and limited biblical evidence.

B. The two theories

1. The traditional theory that was unanimous until the eighteenth century.

a. It is called the "Northern Galatian Theory."

b. It assumes that "Galatia" refers to the ethnic Galatians of the northern central plateau of Turkey (cf. I Pet. 1:1). These ethnic Galatians were Celts (Greek Keltoi or Latin Gall) who invaded this area in the third century b.c. They were called "Gallo-Graecians" to distinguish them from their western European brothers. They were defeated in 230 b.c. by Attalus I, the King of Pergamum. Their geographical influence was limited to northern central Asia Minor or modern Turkey.

c. If this ethnic group is assumed, then the date would be the mid 50's during Paul's second or third missionary journey. Paul's traveling companions would be Silas and Timothy.

d. Some have linked Paul's illness in Gal. 4:13 to malaria. They assert that Paul went north into the highlands to get away from the marshy, malaria-infested, coastal lowlands.

2. The second theory is championed by Sir Wm. M. Ramsay, St. Paul the Traveler and Roman Citizen, New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1896.

a. Whereas the traditional theory defined "Galatia" as ethnic, this theory defines it as administrative. It seems that Paul often used Roman provincial names (cf. I Cor. 16:19; II Cor. 1:1; 8:1, etc.) The Roman province of "Galatia" included a larger area than ethnic "Galatia." These ethnic Celts supported Rome very early and were rewarded with more local autonomy and expanded territorial authority. If this large area was known as "Galatia," then it is possible that Paul's first missionary journey to these southern cities of Antioch in Pisidia, Lystra, Derbe and Iconium, recorded in Acts 13-14, is the location of these churches.

b. If one assumes this "Southern Theory," the date would be very early—close to, but before, the "Jerusalem Council" of Acts 15, which addresses the same subject matter as the book of Galatians. The Council occurred in a.d. 48-49 and the letter was probably written during the same period. If this is true, Galatians is the first letter of Paul in our New Testament.

c. Some evidences for the southern Galatian theory

(1) There is no mention of Paul's traveling companions by name, but Barnabas is mentioned three times (cf. 2:1,9,13). This fits the first missionary journey of Paul.

(2) It is mentioned that Titus was not circumcised (cf. 2:1-5). This fits best before the Jerusalem Council of Acts 15.

(3) The mention of Peter (cf. 2:11-14) and the problem of fellowship with Gentiles fits best before the Jerusalem Council.

(4) When the money was taken to Jerusalem several companions of Paul from different areas (cf. Acts 20:4) were listed. None, however, were listed from northern Galatia cities, although we know these ethnic Galatian churches participated (cf. I Cor. 16:1).

For a detailed presentation of the different arguments concerning these theories, consult a technical commentary. They each have valid points. At this point in time there is no consensus, but the "Southern Theory" seems to fit all of the facts best.

C. Relationship of Galatians to Acts

1. Paul made five visits to Jerusalem, recorded by Luke in the book of Acts

a. 9:26-30, after his conversion

b. 11:30; 12:25, to bring famine relief from the Gentile churches

c. 15:1-30, the Jerusalem Council

d. 18:22, brief visit

e. 21:15ff., another explanation of Gentile work

2. There are two visits to Jerusalem recorded in Galatians:

a. 1:18, after three years

b. 2:1, after fourteen years

3. It seems most probable that Acts 9:26 is related to Gal. 1:18. Acts 11:30 & 15:1ff. are the setting of unrecorded meetings which are mentioned in Gal. 2:1.

4. There are some differences between the Acts 15 and Gal. 2 accounts but this is probably due to

a. different perspectives

b. different purposes of Luke and Paul

c. the fact that Gal. 2 may have occurred sometime before the meeting described in Acts 15 but in conjunction with it.

 

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 14:1-7
 1In Iconium they entered the synagogue of the Jews together, and spoke in such a manner that a large number of people believed, both of Jews and of Greeks. 2But the Jews who disbelieved stirred up the minds of the Gentiles and embittered them against the brethren. 3Therefore they spent a long time there speaking boldly with reliance upon the Lord, who was testifying to the word of His grace, granting that signs and wonders be done by their hands. 4But the people of the city were divided; and some sided with the Jews, and some with the apostles. 5And when an attempt was made by both the Gentiles and the Jews with their rulers, to mistreat and to stone them, 6they became aware of it and fled to the cities of Lycaonia, Lystra and Derbe, and the surrounding region; 7and there they continued to preach the gospel.

14:1 "Iconium" There is a second century non-canonical book known as The Acts of Paul and Thekla, which is reported to be Paul's activities in Iconium. This book possibly contains the only physical descriptions of Paul ever recorded: short, bald, bowlegged, heavy eyebrows, and protruding eyes. It is quite uninspired and yet reflects the impact that the Apostle Paul had in this region of Asia Minor. Most of this area was in the Roman Province of Galatia.

▣ "entered the synagogue" This was Paul and Barnabas' regular pattern. These hearers, both Jews and Greeks, would be familiar with the OT prophecies and promises.

"a large number of people believed, both of Jews and of Greeks" This phrase shows the purpose of Acts. The gospel is spreading vigorously among various people groups. The implications of the OT promises to all humanity (cf. Gen. 3:15; 12:3) are now being realized.

These summary statements relating to the rapid growth of the church are characteristic of Luke's writings.

14:2 "the Jews who disbelieved" Salvation is characterized by "believed" (cf. v. 1), spiritual blindness and recalcitrance is characterized by "disobedience" or "disbelief." The refusal to respond to the gospel dooms one to blindness and lostness!

Luke documents the virulent antagonism of Jewish unbelief and active persecution. It is their rejection that opens the door of faith to the Gentiles (cf. Romans 9-11).

"stirred up" This is a common Septuagint verb for rebellion (cf. I Sam. 3:12; 22:8; II Sam. 18:31; 22:49; I Chr. 5:26), but it is used in the NT only in Acts 13:50 and here.

"embittered" This is another common term in the Septuagint to describe evil, oppressive people who mistreat others. Luke uses this term often in Acts (cf. 7:6,19; 12:1; 14:2; 18:10).

14:3 God used the miraculous to confirm His gracious character and the truthfulness of the gospel of Jesus Christ in this new area (cf. 4:29-30; Heb. 2:4).

14:4 "But the people of the city were divided" The word of truth always divides (cf. 17:4-5; 19:9; 28:24; Matt. 10:34-36). Some of the Jews in the Synagogue believed, but others became militant against the gospel.

▣ "with the apostles" This refers to both Paul and Barnabas. In this chapter (i.e., 14:4 and 14) is the only time Luke uses this term to refer to anyone except the original Twelve. Barnabas is called an apostle (cf. v. 14). This is also implied in I Cor. 9:5-6. This is obviously a wider use of the term "apostle" than the Twelve. James the Just (half brother of Jesus) is called an apostle in Galatians 1:19; Silvanus and Timothy were called apostles in I Thess. 1:1 combined with 2:6; Andronicus and Junius (Junia in KJV), are called apostles in Rom. 16:6-7; and Apollos is called an apostle in I Cor. 4:6-9.

The twelve Apostles were unique. When they died no one replaced them (except Matthias for Judas, cf. Acts 1). However there is an ongoing gift of apostleship mentioned in I Cor, 12:28 and Eph. 4:11. The NT does not provide enough information to describe the functions of this gift. See Special Topic: Send (Apostellō) following.

SPECIAL TOPIC: SEND (APOSTELLŌ)

14:5 "with their rulers" This could refer to the leaders of the city or the leaders of the synagogue. Some early scribes and modern commentators assert two persecutions, (1) v. 2 and (2) v. 5, but the context implies just one.

NASB, NRSV,
TEV"mistreat"
NKJV"abuse"
NJB"make attacks"

The Greek term hubrizō is more intense than "mistreat," possibly "to run riot," or "to commit violent acts." It is very common in the Septuagint. Luke uses this term often in three senses.

1. insult, Luke 11:45

2. violent act, Luke 18:32; Acts 14:5

3. loss of physical property, Acts 27:10,21

 

"stone" This second descriptive term shows just how violently the opposition planned to attack the believers. Probably the Jewish element chose this specific means because of its OT connection to blasphemy (i.e., Lev. 24:16; John 8:59; 10:31-33).

14:6 "and fled to the cities of Lycaonia, Lystra and Derbe" Iconium was in Phyrgia. It was close to the boundary of a racially distinct group. This detail shows the historicity of the book of Acts.

14:7 The verb is a periphrastic perfect middle, meaning that they preached again and again. This is the theme of Paul's missionary journeys (cf. 14:21; 16:10). Those who trusted Christ under his preaching also sensed the urgency and mandate to present the gospel to others. This was/is the priority (cf. Matt. 28:19-20; Luke 24:47; Acts 1:8)!

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 14:8-18
 8At Lystra a man was sitting who had no strength in his feet, lame from his mother's womb, who had never walked. 9This man was listening to Paul as he spoke, who, when he had fixed his gaze on him and had seen that he had faith to be made well, 10said with a loud voice, "Stand upright on your feet." And he leaped up and began to walk. 11When the crowds saw what Paul had done, they raised their voice, saying in the Lycaonian language, "The gods have become like men and have come down to us." 12And they began calling Barnabas, Zeus, and Paul, Hermes, because he was the chief speaker. 13The priest of Zeus, whose temple was just outside the city, brought oxen and garlands to the gates, and wanted to offer sacrifice with the crowds. 14But when the apostles Barnabas and Paul heard of it, they tore their robes and rushed out into the crowd, crying out 15and saying, "Men, why are you doing these things? We are also men of the same nature as you, and preach the gospel to you that you should turn from these vain things to a living God, who made the heaven and the earth and the sea and all that is in them. 16In the generations gone by He permitted all the nations to go their own ways; 17and yet He did not leave Himself without witness, in that He did good and gave you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying your hearts with food and gladness." 18Even saying these things, with difficulty they restrained the crowds from offering sacrifice to them.

14:8 "At Lystra" This town was Timothy's home (cf. 16:1). This is a Roman colony established by Augustus in a.d. 6. There was probably no synagogue here, so Paul and Barnabas conducted street preaching.

So that there was no possibility of a trick or deception (cf. 3:2). There are three specific descriptive phrases describing this man'spermanent condition.

1. no strength in his feet

2. lame from his mother's womb

3. had never walked

 

▣ "no strength" The term adunatos usually means "impossible" or literally "unable" (cf. Luke 18:27; Heb. 6:4,18; 10:4; 11:6), but here Luke uses it like the medical writers in the sense of impotent or weak (cf. Rom. 8:3; 15:1).

It is interesting that Luke, in many ways, parallels Peter's and Paul's ministries. Peter and John heal a lame man in 3:1-10 now so too, do Paul and Barnabas.

14:9 "when he had fixed his gaze on him" Luke uses this phrase often (cf. 3:4; 10:4). See note at 1:10. Paul saw that this man was listening intently. Therefore, he commanded him to stand up and walk (cf. v 10) and he did!

▣ "that he had faith to be made well" This is used in the OT sense of the term "saved," meaning physical deliverance. Notice that Paul's ability to heal was based on the man's faith. This is often, but not exclusively, the case in the NT (cf. Luke 5:20; John 5:5-9). Miracles had several functions:

1. to show the love of God

2. to show the power and truth of the gospel

3. to train and encourage the other believers present

 

14:11 "in the Lycaonian language" Obviously Paul and Barnabas did not understand what the crowd was saying. This was the indigenous language of the region.

14:12 "calling Barnabas Zeus and Paul, Hermes, because he was the chief speaker" A local tradition asserted that the Greek gods often visited humans in human form (cf. Ovid, Metamorphoses 8:626ff). From local inscriptions we learn this was an area where Zeus and Hermes were worshiped (cf. v. 13).

Notice that Barnabas is mentioned first. This is probably because Paul, as the spokesperson, would be understood by these pagans as the equivalent of Hermes (Mercury); the silent Barnabas must then be the high god Zeus (Jupiter).

14:13 "gate" This could refer to the city or, more probably, to the temple of Jupiter (Zeus) which was located just outside the city gate and facing it. It was a time of great confusion and misunderstanding.

14:14 "apostles" See note at 14:4.

▣ "tore their robes" This is a Jewish sign of mourning and blasphemy (cf. Matt. 26:65; Mark 14:63). It surely would have communicated even to these pagans that there was a problem.

▣ "rushed out" This is a common term in the Septuagint for "leaping out" or "rushing out," though it is used only here in the NT. Paul and Barnabas sprang up and out into the midst of the crowd.

14:15-17 Here is a summary of Paul's first sermon to pagans. It is much like his sermon on Mars Hill (cf. 17:22-33).

14:15

NASB, NKJV"men of the same nature as you"
NRSV"we are mortals just like you"
TEV"we ourselves are only human beings like you"
NJB"we are only human beings, mortal like yourselves"

The term is homoiopathēs, which is a compound of "the same" and "passions." This term is used only here and in James 5:17 in the NT. The locals had thought Paul and Barnabas were gods (homoiōthentes, cf. v. 11), which means "made like" men. Paul uses the same root to denote their common humanity. Luke shows the humility of Paul and Barnabas in contradistinction to Herod Antipas in 12:20-23.

▣ "you should turn from these vain things" The term "vain" means empty, void, non-existent. Paul is directly confronting their superstitious paganism.

"to a living God" This is a play on the term YHWH, which is from the Hebrew verb "to be" (cf. Exod. 3:14). YHWH is the ever-living, only-living God. See SPECIAL TOPIC: NAMES FOR DEITY at 1:6.

"who made" This is a quote from Exod. 20:11 or Ps. 146:6. The Hebrew term Elohim (cf. Gen. 1:1) describes God as creator and provider (cf. The Expositor's Bible Commentary, vol. 1, pp. 468-469) as YHWH describes Him as Savior, Redeemer (cf. The Expositor's Bible Commentary, vol. 1, pp. 471-472) and covenant-making God. See special Topic at 1:6.

14:16 "In the generations gone by He permitted all the nations to go their own ways" This phrase may be an allusion to Deut. 32:7-8 in which Moses asserts that YHWH establishes the boundaries of the nations. Theologically this affirms God's care and attention to the nations (Gentiles, cf. Girdlestone, Synonyms of the Old Testament, pp. 258-259). God desired that they know Him, but the fallenness of humanity caused superstition and idolatry (cf. Rom. 1:18-2:29). However, He continued to pursue them (cf. v. 17).

The Gentile's ignorance of God is contrasted with the Jews' knowledge of God. The irony is that Gentiles respond in mass by faith to the gospel, while Jews respond in mass rejection and persecution toward the gospel (cf. Romans 9-11).

14:17 "He did not leave Himself without witness" This is the concept of natural revelation (cf. Ps. 19:1-6; Rom. 1:19-20; 2:14-15). All humans know something about God from creation and an inner moral witness.

▣ "rains. . .food" The local pagan tradition said that Zeus was the giver of rain and Hermes was the giver of food. Paul, following Deuteronomy 27-29, affirms God's control of nature.

These pagans did not know God so the covenant curses of Deuteronomy are replaced by God's patience (cf. Acts 17:30; Rom. 3:25; 4:15; 5:13). Paul was God's unique choice (apostle to the Gentiles) to reach the nations! Paul uses God's creation and provision through nature (cf. Ps. 145:15-16; 147:8; Jer. 5:24; Jonah 1:9) as his point of contact.

It is interesting that there is nothing of the gospel per se in this sermon summary. One assumes that Paul continued in the same line of reasoning as he did in his Athenian sermon in Acts 17:16-34. One wonders whether Luke got this summary from Paul or possibly Timothy (this was his home).

14:18 This is an eyewitness detail.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 14:19-23
 19But Jews came from Antioch and Iconium, and having won over the crowds, they stoned Paul and dragged him out of the city, supposing him to be dead. 20But while the disciples stood around him, he got up and entered the city. The next day he went away with Barnabas to Derbe. 21After they had preached the gospel to that city and had made many disciples, they returned to Lystra and to Iconium and to Antioch, 22strengthening the souls of the disciples, encouraging them to continue in the faith, and saying, "Through many tribulations we must enter the kingdom of God." 23When they had appointed elders for them in every church, having prayed with fasting, they commended them to the Lord in whom they had believed.

14:19 Jewish opposition in the cities where Paul had preached united in recurrent attacks on him (cf. II Cor. 4:7-15; 6:3-10; 11:23-30). Notice that the attack was focused on Paul, not Barnabas. Notice also the fickleness of the pagan crowd. Paul and Barnabas are honored as gods one moment and stoned the next!

▣ "they stoned Paul" This was not a resuscitation miracle, but an account of Paul's physical stamina and bravery (cf. vv. 20-21). II Corinthians 11:25 and Galatians 6:17 also refer to this same event. The stoning planned in v. 5 now became a reality!

14:20 "while the disciples stood around him" Although it is not specifically stated, I think this was a prayer meeting to which God wondrously responded. Notice how persecution continued to be the mechanism/motivation for the spread of the gospel (i.e., a new city).

14:21 "After they had preached the gospel to that city" This refers to Derbe (cf. v. 20). This city was also in the Lycaonian part of the Roman province of Galatia. This was as far eastward as Paul and Barnabas traveled on this missionary journey.

This city also wonderfully responded to the gospel and many were saved.

▣ "they returned to Lystra and to Iconium and to Antioch" Apparently they did not preach publicly on this return visit, but were privately organizing and encouraging the believers (cf. vv. 22-23).

14:22 This verse is a summary of Paul's discipleship message. Notice it is focused on (1) perseverance and (2) tribulation. Believers are matured through trials (cf. Rom. 5:3-4; 8:17-18; I Thess. 3:3; II Tim. 3:12; James 1:2-4; I Pet. 4:12-16).

▣ "strengthening" This term is used several times in the Septuagint in the sense of "to cause to rest on" or "to be established." Luke uses this term several times to describe Paul's follow-up discipleship ministry (cf. 14:22; 15:32,41; 18:23).

"the souls of the disciples" The term soul (psuchē) is used in the sense of the person or their mental activities. This is not the Greek concept of every person having an immortal soul, but the Hebrew concept of soul (nephesh, BDB 659, KB 711-713, cf. Gen. 2:7) as a way of referring to a human being (cf. Acts 2:41; 3:23; 7:14; 14:2,22; 15:24; 27:37).

▣ "encouraging them to continue in the faith" See SPECIAL TOPIC: PERSEVERANCE following.

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE NEED TO PERSEVERE

▣ "the kingdom of God" This is a difficult phrase to interpret. Jesus used it often in connection to His own ministry. However, the Apostles obviously misunderstood its significance (cf. 1:3,6). In Acts it is almost synonymous with the gospel (cf. 8:12; 19:8; 20:25; 28:23,31). However, in 14:22 it takes on eschatological implications. It is this "already" (cf. Matt. 12:28; Luke 16:16) vs. "not yet" (cf. Matt. 24:14,30,36-37; 25:30,31; II Pet. 1:11) tension which characterizes this age. See Special Topic at 2:17. The Kingdom has come in Jesus Christ (i.e., First Coming), but its consummation is future (i.e., Second Coming).

14:23 "they had appointed elders" The term "elders" (presbuteros) is synonymous with the terms "bishop" (episkopos) and "pastors" (poimenos) in the NT (cf. Acts 20:17,28 and Titus 1:5,7). The term "elder" has a Jewish background (cf. Girdlestone, Synonyms of the Old Testament, pp. 244-246 and Frank Stagg, New Testament Theology, pp. 262-264), while the term "bishop" or "overseer" has a Greek city-state background. There are only two church officers listed in the NT: pastors and deacons (cf. Phil. 1:1).

The term "appoint" can mean "elect by the show of hands" (cf. II Cor. 8:19 and Louw and Nida, Greek-English Lexicon, pp. 363, 484). The term is later used of "ordination" by the early church fathers. The real issue is how does "elect by vote" fit this context? A vote by these new churches seems inappropriate (although the church in Jerusalem voted for the Seven in Acts 6 and the church votes to affirm Paul's ministry to the Gentiles in Acts 15).

F. F. Bruce, Answers to Questions, p. 79 says, "originally indicated appointment or election by a show of hands (literally by stretching out the hand), it had lost this specific force by New Testament times and had come to mean simply ‘appoint,' no matter by what procedure." One cannot advocate or reject an ecclesiastical polity by the use of this term in the NT.

 Notice that Paul instructs Titus to also appoint "elders" on Crete, but to Timothy in Ephesus Paul says let the church select persons with certain qualifications (cf. I Timothy 3). In new areas leaders were appointed, but in established areas leadership traits had a chance to be manifested and be affirmed by the local church.

Notice that Paul's missionary strategy is to establish local churches who will continue the task of evangelism and discipleship in their area (cf. Matt. 28:19-20). This is God's method for reaching the entire world (i.e., local churches)!

▣ "church" See Special Topic at 5:11.

▣ "having prayed with fasting" This may be purposefully parallel to 13:2-3. Paul had experienced the Spirit's power and direction at Antioch. He continued this same spiritual pattern. They had to prepare themselves for God to reveal His will. See SPECIAL TOPIC: FASTING at 13:2.

"in whom they had believed" This is a pluperfect active indicative, which denotes a settled action in past time. These new elders had believed for a period of time and had proved to be faithful exhibiting leadership qualities.

This grammatical construction of eis connected to pisteuō (cf. Acts 10:43) is characteristic of John's writings, but is also present in Paul's (cf. Rom. 10:14; Gal. 2:16; Phil. 1:29) and Peter (cf. I Pet. 1:8). See the important Special Topics at 3:16 and 6:5.

▣ "they commended them to the Lord" This does not refer to some type of ordination. The same verb is used in v. 26 of Paul and Barnabas, while in 20:32 for those who were already elders. Ordination is helpful in that it emphasizes the truth that God calls people into leadership roles. It is a negative and unbiblical if it makes a distinction between believers. All believers are called and gifted for ministry (cf. Eph. 4:11-12). There is no clergy-laity distinction in the NT.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 14:24-28
 24They passed through Pisidia and came into Pamphylia. 25When they had spoken the word in Perga, they went down to Attalia. 26From there they sailed to Antioch, from which they had been commended to the grace of God for the work that they had accomplished. 27When they had arrived and gathered the church together, they began to report all things that God had done with them and how He had opened a door of faith to the Gentiles. 28And they spent a long time with the disciples.

14:24 The highland province of Pisidia is just north of the coastal province of Pamphylia. Perga was the chief city of the region. Paul apparently only passed through this city earlier (cf. 13:13), but now returned and preached the gospel (cf. v. 25).

14:25 "Attalia" This was the seaport of Perga.

14:26 "sailed to Antioch" They did not return to Cyprus. Barnabas will return after the dispute with Paul over John Mark (cf. 15:36-39).

"they had been commended to the grace of God" The verb is a periphrastic pluperfect passive. This first missionary journey, initiated and sustained by the Spirit, was a marvelous success.

14:27 "gathered the church together, they began to report all things that God had done" Notice they were responsible to the church. "Even the Apostle to the Gentiles" reported to a local church (See Special Topic at 5:11). They also acknowledged who accomplished this great accomplishment—YHWH/Spirit.

They did not report to the leaders (cf. 13:1), but to the congregation and later reported on their mission activity to the congregation in Jerusalem (cf. 15:4) and, for that matter, all other congregations along the way (cf. 15:3). I think it was the whole congregation who had laid hands on them and commissioned them on their journey.

▣ "and how He had opened a door of faith to the Gentiles" Paul used this phrase "door of faith" quite often (cf. I Cor. 16:9; II Cor. 2:12; Col. 4:3; and also notice Rev. 3:8). God opened a door to all humanity in the gospel that no one could close. The full implication of Jesus' words in 1:8 is now being fulfilled.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. Outline Paul's first missionary journey by geographical sites.

2. Outline both of Paul's sermons; to the Jews and to pagans.

3. How is fasting related to modern Christians? 

4. Why did John Mark quit the missionary team?

 

Acts 15

PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS

UBS4 NKJV NRSV TEV NJB
The Council at Jerusalem Conflict Over Circumcision Controversy Over Admission of Gentiles The Meeting At Jerusalem Controversy at Antioch
15:1-5 15:1-5 15:1-5 15:1-2 15:1-2
      15:3-5 15:3-4
        Controversy at Jerusalem
  The Jerusalem Council     15:5-7a
15:6-11 15:6-21 15:6-21 15:6-11 Peter's Speech
        15:7b-11
15:12-21     15:12-18 15:12
        James' Speech
        15:13-18
      15:19-21 15:19-21
The Reply of the Council The Jerusalem Decree   The Letter to the Gentile Believers The Apostolic Letter
15:22-29 15:22-29 15:22-29 15:22-29 15:22-29
  Continuing Ministry in Syria     The Delegates at Antioch
15:30-35 15:30-35 15:30-35 15:30-34 15:30-35
      15:35  
Paul and Barnabas Separate Division Over John Mark Departure on Second Missionary Journey Paul and Barnabas Separate Paul Separates from Barnabas and Recruits Silas
15:36-41 15:36-41 15:36-41 15:36-41 15:36-38
        15:39-40

READING CYCLE THREE (from "A Guide to Good Bible Reading" p. vi)

FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S INTENT AT THE PARAGRAPH LEVEL

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects. Compare your subject divisions with the five modern translations. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is the key to following the original author's intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every paragraph has one and only one main subject.

1. First paragraph

2. Second paragraph

3. Third paragraph

4. Etc.

 

CONTEXTUAL INSIGHTS

A. This chapter is often called "The Jerusalem Council."

 

B. This was a major turning point, a theological watershed, in the methods and goals of the Early Church. In a sense it is a merging of the two centers of Christendom, Jerusalem and Antioch.

 

C. The conversions of non-Jews in Acts 8-11 seem to have been allowed as exceptions (they were not full, practicing pagans), not as a new policy to be vigorously pursued (cf 11:19).

 

D. This chapter's relationship to Galatians 2 is disputed. Acts 15 or Acts 11:27-30 could be the background to Galatians 2. See Introduction to chapter 14, C.

 

E. It is interesting that the recurrent Pentecostal sign of speaking in tongues (chapters 2, 8 & 10; possibly v. 8) is not mentioned at all as an evidence for the assurance of salvation of Gentiles (i.e., pagans).

 

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 15:1-5
 1Some men came down from Judea and began teaching the brethren, "Unless you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved." 2And when Paul and Barnabas had great dissension and debate with them, the brethren determined that Paul and Barnabas and some others of them should go up to Jerusalem to the apostles and elders concerning this issue. 3Therefore, being sent on their way by the church, they were passing through both Phoenicia and Samaria, describing in detail the conversion of the Gentiles, and were bringing great joy to all the brethren. 4When they arrived at Jerusalem, they were received by the church and the apostles and the elders, and they reported all that God had done with them. 5But some of the sect of the Pharisees who had believed stood up, saying, "It is necessary to circumcise them and to direct them to observe the Law of Moses."

15:1 "Some men came down from Judea" This paragraph refers to events in Antioch. "Some men" refers to a group of believing Jews who were committed to both Judaism and Jesus. They saw Jesus as the fulfillment of the OT faith (cf. Matt. 5:17-19), not a rival or substitute for it (cf. 11:2; 15:5; Gal. 2:12). These persons' theology is related to the false Jewish teachers (Judaizers) referred to in Galatians. These men were somehow connected to the church in Jerusalem (cf. v. 24), but they were not official representatives.

Notice it says "down." If you look at a map, it seems to be "up," but for Jews everywhere was "down," theologically, from Jerusalem (cf. v. 2).

▣ "began teaching" This is an imperfect tense, which can mean (1) started to teach or (2) taught again and again.

▣ "Unless you are circumcised" This is a third class conditional sentence, which means potential action. Circumcision was the covenant sign to Abraham and his descendants (cf. Gen. 17:10-11). This was not a minor matter in Judaism, but related to salvation itself. These men felt that the only way to YHWH was through Judaism (cf. v. 5). This type of people became known as Judaizers (cf. Gal. 1:7; 2:4. They believed in Christ plus conformity to the Mosaic Covenant (cf. v. 5). Righteousness was based on their performance, not on God's free gift. One's relationship with God was achieved by one's performance (cf. Rom. 3:21-30; Gal. 5:2-9). The real issue was who are "the people of God" and how do you characterize them?

15:2 "Paul and Barnabas had great discussion and debate with them" Luke uses the expression "great discussion" to show extreme emotion (cf. Luke 23:19,25; Acts 15:2; 19:40; 23:7,10; 24:5). This debate was crucial! It was directed at the heart of the gospel message:

1. How is one brought into right standing with God?

2. Is the New Covenant inseparably linked to the Mosaic Covenant?

The phrase in the NASB, "had a great discussion and debate," is literally "discord and questioning not a little." Young's Literal Translation of the Bible (p. 95), has "not a little dissension and disputation." This literary technique of expressing something in a negative understatement is characteristic of Luke's writings. See full note at 12:18.

▣ "the brethren determined that" This refers to "the church" (cf. v. 3). There are several groups in chapter 15 that relate to the different leadership or polity styles.

1. In verses 2,3,12, and 22 congregational authority is mentioned.

2. In verses 6 and 22 apostolic or episcopal authority (i.e., James) is mentioned, which is Roman Catholic or Anglican polity.

3. In verses 6 and 22 the authority of the elders is mentioned. This seems to parallel Presbyterian polity.

The New Testament records all of these polity structures. There is a development from the authority of the Apostles (who would one day die) to the authority of the congregation, with the pastors being the leadership catalysts (cf. v. 19).

In my opinion the polity structure is not as crucial as the spirituality of the leaders. Great Commission, Spirit-filled leaders are crucial to the gospel. Certain forms of polity fall in and out of favor, usually based on the cultural political model.

▣ "and some others" A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament, p. 224, has an interesting comment on this verse, "Certainly Titus (Gal. 2:1,3), a Greek and probably a brother of Luke who is not mentioned in Acts." This is certainly a possibility, but it is based on several assumptions. We must be careful that because a text (with our presuppositions) can mean or imply something, does not mean that it does! We must be content with the original author's writings and not our expanded assumptions, valid though they may be.

"to the apostles" The leadership structure of the Jerusalem church is not settled. From several texts it looks as if James, the half-brother of Jesus, was the leader. This appears to be true in this chapter also. Yet, there were other leadership groups (cf. vv. 4,22):

1. the Twelve

2. local elders

3. the congregation as a whole

What is uncertain is how James relates to these groups. He is called an apostle in Gal. 1:19. It is also possible he was the acknowledged leader of the group of elders (cf. Peter called himself an elder in I Pet. 5:1; John calls himself an elder in II John 1 and III John 1).

▣ "elders" In this context "elders" would refer to an older group of leadership modeled on the synagogue pattern. See note at 11:30 or 14:23.

15:3 "church" See Special Topic at 5:11.

▣ "they were passing through both Phoenicia and Samaria" This is an imperfect middle indicative. Phoenicia was mostly Gentile, while Samaria was a mixed population of Jews and Gentiles. These areas had previously been evangelized (cf. 8:5ff; 11:19).

"describing in detail the conversion of the Gentiles" It seems that Paul and Barnabas reported the marvelous work of God among the "nations" to every congregation they came in contact with. To people knowledgeable of the OT, the conversion of the "nations" was a fulfilled prophecy (i.e., Isa. 2:2-4; 42:6; 49:6)!

It is also possible that by widely reporting the success of the mission endeavor that the church in Jerusalem would not be able to quietly and secretly dismiss the issue (cf. 21:18-20).

"were bringing great joy to all the brethren" These were Gentile areas. The churches would have been mixed churches. Their response is a prophetic reminder to the Jerusalem church. The world-wide mission started by Hellenists, is confirmed by Hellenist churches.

15:4 "the church and the apostles and the elders" Here all their polity groups are mentioned, as in verse 22.

"they reported all that God had done with them" This had become a pattern!

15:5 "But some of the sect of the Pharisees who had believed" Faith (perfect active participle) in Jesus as the promised Messiah was the foundation of the church. But within the church there were differences of opinion about how this faith in Christ related to the covenants and promises to Israel. This vocal group ("stood up" is fronted in Greek to show its emphasis) of saved Pharisees felt that the OT was inspired and eternal and therefore must be maintained (cf. Matt. 5:17-19)! One must trust Jesus and obey Moses (i.e., dei, necessary [1] to circumcise; [2] to charge them; and [3] to keep; all three are present infinitives). It is this very question that forms the theological content of Romans 1-8 and Galatians! See SPECIAL TOPIC: PHARISEES at 5:34.

"it is necessary" See full note on dei at 1:16.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 15:6-11
 6The apostles and the elders came together to look into this matter. 7After there had been much debate, Peter stood up and said to them, "Brethren, you know that in the early days God made a choice among you, that by my mouth the Gentiles would hear the word of the gospel and believe. 8And God, who knows the heart, testified to them giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He also did to us; 9and He made no distinction between us and them, cleansing their hearts by faith. 10Now therefore why do you put God to the test by placing upon the neck of the disciples a yoke which neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear? 11"But we believe that we are saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus, in the same way as they also are."

15:6 "The apostles and the elders came together" Here the leadership met in private first. This speaks of the Presbyterian pattern of polity.

15:7 "After there had been much debate" The leadership was not unanimous. Some agree with the statement in v. 5. These were all sincere believers. But some were clinging to the familiar while being blinded to the radical nature of the gospel. Even the Apostles were slow to see the full implications (cf. 8:1). Notice the elements of policy making: (1) private discussion; (2) open discussion; (3) vote by the congregation.

▣ "Peter stood up" This must have been the way to get to speak to the assembled group (cf. v. 5). This is the last mention of him in Acts. He recalls his experience with Cornelius (cf. chapters 10-11).

▣ "Gentiles would hear the word of the gospel and believe" God used Peter to witness to His love and acceptance of the nations! God allowed this new radical understanding to proceed in stages.

1. the Samaritans first, chapter 8

2. the Ethiopian Eunuch, chapter 8

3. Cornelius, chapters 10-11

These were not full practicing pagans, but were all related to Judaism. However, 1 and 3 were confirmed by the Pentecost experience, which was evidence for the early church of God's acceptance of other groups.

15:8 "God who knows the heart" This was a way of confirming God's complete knowledge (cf. I Sam. 1:24; 16:7; Ps. 26:2; 139:1; Pro. 21:2; 24:12; Jer. 11:20; 17:10; Luke 16:15; Rom. 8:27; Rev. 2:23) of the faith of these Gentile converts.

▣ "giving them the Holy Spirit" This apparently refers to the same type of spiritual experience as Pentecost ("just as He also did to us"). The very same manifestation of the Spirit occurred in Jerusalem, in Samaria, and in Caesarea. It was the sign to the Jewish believers of God's acceptance of other people groups (cf. v. 9; 11:17).

15:9 "He made no distinction between us and them" This was the theological conclusion Peter came to in 10:28,34; 11:12. God is no respecter of persons (cf. Gal. 3:28; Eph. 3:11-4:13; Col. 3:11). All humans are made in the image of God (cf. Gen. 1:26-27). God desires all humans to be saved (cf. Gen. 12:3; Exod. 19:5-6; I Tim. 2:4; 4:10; Titus 2:11; II Pet. 3:9)! God loves the whole world (cf. John 3:16-17).

▣ "cleansing their hearts by faith" This term is used in the Septuagint to denote Levitical purification. It denotes the removal of that which us separates from God.

This is the very verb used in Peter's experience of the clean and unclean animals in 10:15 and 11:9 (which follows the LXX of Gen. 7:2,8; 8:20).

In the Gospel of Luke it is used for the cleansing of leprosy (cf. 4:27; 5:12,13; 7:22; 17:14,17). It came to be a powerful metaphor for cleansing from sin (cf. Heb. 9:22,23; I John 1:7).

The heart is an OT way of referring to the whole person. See Special Topic at 1:24. These Gentiles have been completely cleansed and accepted by God through Christ. The means of their cleansing is faith in the gospel message. They have believed, received, and fully trusted in the person and work of Jesus (cf. Rom. 3:21-5:11; Gal. 2:15-21).

15:10 "why do you put God to the test" The OT background of this statement is Exod. 17:2,7 and Deut. 6:16. This Greek term for "test" (peirazō) has the connotation of "to test with a view toward destruction." This was a serious discussion! See Special Topic: Greek Terms for "Testing" and Their connotations at 5:9.

▣ "yoke" This was used by the rabbis for the recitation of the Shema, Deut. 6:4-5; therefore, it stands for the Law, written and oral (cf. Matt. 23:4; Luke 11:46; Gal. 5:1). Jesus uses it in Matt. 11:29 for the requirements of the New Covenant in Him.

▣ "which neither our fathers or we have been able to bear" This reflects the teachings of Jesus (cf. Luke 11:46). This subject is addressed by Paul in Galatians 3. But this is Peter who, like James, feels the weight of Judaism (cf. Gal. 2:11-21).

This phrase admits the theological truth that the Law was not able to bring salvation because fallen humanity could not keep a holy law (cf. Romans 7)! Salvation could not and cannot be based on human performance. However, the saved, gifted, and indwelt believer needs to live a godly life (cf. Matt. 11:30; Eph. 1:4; 2:10). Godliness (Christlikeness, i.e., Rom. 8:29; Gal. 4:19; Eph. 4:13) is always the goal of Christianity, for the purpose of providing opportunities for evangelism, not personal pride nor judgmental legalism.

15:11 This is a summary of salvation (i.e., "saved," aorist passive infinitive) by grace through faith (for Peter cf. Acts 2-3; for Paul cf. 13:38-39; Rom. 3-8; Galatians 3; Ephesians 1-2). Notice the way of salvation is the same for Jews and Gentiles (cf. Rom. 3:21-31; 4; Eph. 2:1-10).

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 15:12-21
 12All the people kept silent, and they were listening to Barnabas and Paul as they were relating what signs and wonders God had done through them among the Gentiles. 13After they had stopped speaking, James answered, saying, "Brethren, listen to me. 14Simeon has related how God first concerned Himself about taking from among the Gentiles a people for His name. 15With this the words of the Prophets agree, just as it is written, 16'After these things I will return, And I will rebuild the tabernacle of David which has fallen, And I will rebuild its ruins, And I will restore it, 17So that the rest of mankind may seek the Lord, And all the Gentiles who are called by My name,' 18Says the Lord, who makes these things known from long ago. 19Therefore it is my judgment that we do not trouble those who are turning to God from among the Gentiles, 20but that we write to them that they abstain from things contaminated by idols and from fornication and from what is strangled and from blood. 21For Moses from ancient generations has in every city those who preach him, since he is read in the synagogues every Sabbath."

15:12 "All the people kept silent, and they were listening" Peter's words had settled the group of leaders. From the context it seems that at this point the two missionaries repeated their review of the mission trip a second time. This time the leadership listened! The Jerome Biblical Commentary (vol. 2, p. 195) believes it was another meeting separate from the church council of vv. 6-11. I think it is the same meeting.

▣ "Barnabas and Paul" Notice that the names are reversed because this was Barnabas' home church.

"relating the signs and wonders" The theological purpose of the Pentecostal tongues in Acts is a sign of God's acceptance, so one wonders whether this particular sign was often repeated as a way of confirmation.

Signs themselves were performed by Jesus (cf. 2:22), the Apostles (cf. 2:43; 3:7; 4:16,30; 5:12), the Seven (cf. 6:8; 8:6,13), and Paul and Barnabas (cf. 14:3; 15:12). God was confirming His presence and power through the gospel by these signs and wonders. These were further evidence to the Judaizing group that God fully accepted full pagans on the basis of grace alone, through faith.

15:13 "James" This is not the Apostle James because he was killed in Acts 12:1-2. This was Jesus' half-brother who became the leader of the Jerusalem church and author of the NT book of James. He was known as "James the Just." He was sometimes called "camel knees" because he prayed so often, kneeling. The two main Jerusalem leaders are vocal on this issue (Peter and James). See Special Topic at 12:17.

15:14 "Symeon" This is the Aramaic form of Simon, which is Peter (cf. II Pet. 1:1).

▣ "about taking from among the Gentiles a people for His name" This is the universal emphasis of the OT prophets (ex. Isa. 2:2-4; 42:6; 45:20-23; 49:6; 52:10). The people of God were always to include both Jews and Gentiles (cf. Gen. 3:15; 12:3; Exod. 9:16; Eph. 2:11-3:13).

 The phrase "for His name" may be an allusion to Jer. 13:11 and 32:20 or Isa. 63:12,14.

15:15-18 "it is written" This is a free quote from Amos 9:11-12 in the Septuagint. The term "mankind" in verse 17 is Edom (the nation) in the Masoretic Text, but the Septuagint has anthropos (mankind). James quotes the Septuagint because in this case it uniquely fits his purpose of expressing the universal nature of God's promise of redemption.

Notice the promised actions are of YHWH. This is similar to Ezek. 36:22-38. Notice the number of "I's"!

This quote from the LXX, which is obviously at variance with the MT, shows that the real issue of faith is not a perfect text, but a perfect God and His plan for mankind. None of us like the textual variants of the OT or NT, but they do not affect believers' faith in the trustworthiness of Scripture. God has effectively and faithfully revealed Himself to fallen humans! Hand-copied ancient texts cannot be used as an excuse to reject this revelation. See Manfred Brauch, Abusing Scripture, chapter 1, "The Nature of Scripture," pp. 23-32.

15:16 It is obvious from the context that James chooses and modifies this quotation from the Septuagint to assert the inclusion of the nations. Did he also choose this text because it asserts the destruction of OT Mosaic religion? The New Covenant is radically different.

1. grace-based, not performance-based (gift not merit)

2. Messiah-focused, not temple-focused (Jesus is the new Temple)

3. world-wide in scope, not focused on the Jewish race

These changes would be devastating to a "circumcision party" of believers. Now the chief Apostle (Peter), the converted rabbi Apostle (Paul), and the leader of the Jerusalem church (James) all agree against them, as does the consensus (vote) of the mother church and the mission churches!

15:17 What a wonderful universal statement. But also note the "election" phrase, "all the Gentiles who are called by My name" (cf. Dan. 9:19). It denotes a worship experience of some kind (cf. LXX of Deut. 28:10; also note Isa. 63:19; Jer. 14:9).

15:18 The inclusion of the Gentiles has always been God's plan (cf. Gal. 3:26-29; Eph. 3:3-6, see Special Topic at 1:8). The means of salvation will come from the lineage of King David (cf. v. 16; II Chr. 6:33).

15:19 This is James' conclusion.

15:20 These guidelines were meant to (1) assure table fellowship in mixed churches and (2) enhance the possibility of local Jewish evangelism. These things have nothing to do with the Gentiles' individual personal salvation! These guidelines were directed at both Jewish sensibilities and pagan worship excesses (cf. v. 29; 21:25).

 The Levitical laws were given to accentuate a distinction (social and religious) between Jews and Canaanites. Their very purpose was disfellowship, but here the purpose is just the opposite. These "essentials" are to help maintain fellowship between believers of two cultures!

There are many Greek manuscript variations related to this Apostolic Decree. Some have two items, three items, or four items. For a full discussion of the options, see Bruce M. Metzger's A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, pp. 429-434). Most English translations have the four-fold list.

NASB, NRSV,
REB"from fornication"
NKJV, REV,
NET"from sexual immorality"
NJB"from illicit marriages"

It is difficult to know for sure if this prohibition was directed towards

1. pagan immoral worship practices (i.e., immorality)

2. Jewish sensibilities about incest (cf. Leviticus 18; see F. F. Bruce, Answers to Questions, p. 43; NJB)

 

▣ "what is strangled and from blood" Some commentators relate both of these to the Mosaic food laws (cf. Lev. 17:8-16). It is, however, possible that "from blood" refers to murder, which is also a major issue in Moses' writings.

15:21 This verse means

1. to assure the legalists that the Torah was being taught to Gentiles in all localities or

2. since there were Jews in every locality, their scruples should be respected so that they may be effectively evangelized (cf. II Cor. 3:14-15)

 

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 15:22-29
 22Then it seemed good to the apostles and the elders, with the whole church, to choose men from among them to send to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas—Judas called Barsabbas, and Silas, leading men among the brethren, 23and they sent this letter by them, "The apostles and the brethren who are elders, to the brethren in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia who are from the Gentiles, greetings. 24Since we have heard that some of our number to whom we gave no instruction have disturbed you with their words, unsettling your souls, 25it seemed good to us, having become of one mind, to select men to send to you with our beloved Barnabas and Paul, 26men who have risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. 27Therefore we have sent Judas and Silas, who themselves will also report the same things by word of mouth. 28For it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us to lay upon you no greater burden than these essentials: 29that you abstain from things sacrificed to idols and from blood and from things strangled and from fornication; if you keep yourselves free from such things, you will do well. Farewell."

15:22 This delegation was for the purpose of unity (cf. v. 23), not to mandate compliance.

"Judas called Barsabbas" This faithful leader, like so many in the NT, is unknown to us. Nothing else in the NT is said about him. But God knows him well!

It is just possible that this man was the brother of Joseph Barsabbas, who was one of the candidates to replace Judas Iscariot in 1:23. If so, they were both sons of a man named Barsabbas.

▣ "Silas" He, like Barnabas, was a leader in the church of Jerusalem. He is called Silvanus by Paul and will replace Barnabas as Paul's associate on the second missionary journey. Paul may have chosen him so that when someone accused him of (1) preaching a different gospel than the Twelve or (2) being out of fellowship with the mother church, Silas could answer their concerns and accusations.

SPECIAL TOPIC: SILAS/SILVANUS

15:23 The letter from the Jerusalem Council is directed only to certain churches, apparently which had a large believing Jewish component. By listing only certain regions, James shows that it was not meant as rules for all the Gentile churches. The letter was only for fellowship and evangelism purposes and not for guidelines for ethics or salvation!

Do you as a modern believer totally avoid non-Kosher meats? See

1. Manfred Brauch, Abusing Scripture, chapter 7, "The Abuse of Context: Historical Situation and Cultural Reality," pp. 202-249

2. Gordon Fee, Gospel and Spirit

3. Hard Sayings of the Bible, "How Kosher Should Christians Live?", pp. 527-530 and "To Eat or Not to Eat," pp. 576-578

These are all helpful articles. It is so comforting to read other informed, sincere and Bible-believing Christians struggle with these issues. Their writings give other believers the freedom to think and live based on the light they have. Unity, not uniformity, is the key to healthy, growing, Great Commission churches.

▣ "Cilicia" This is Paul's home area (cf. 22:3).

15:24 This verse shows that the church in Jerusalem had become aware that some of their membership, who had no authority or official standing (cf. v. 1), were (1) traveling to these mission churches and (2) demanding conformity to the Mosaic law (cf. v. 1). The verb (anaskeuazō) used is a strong military term used only here in the NT for plundering a city.

15:25

NASB"having become of one mind"
NKJV"being assembled with one accord"
NRSV, NJB"we have decided unanimously"
TEV"we have met together and have all agreed"

This unity among believers was a characteristic of the Spirit's presence (cf. v. 28). Notice this did not mean that there was no discussion or the exchange of strong opinions, but that after a full airing of the issue the believers came to a unified agenda.

This unified theological agreement needed to be published abroad so the same tension and argument would not occur again and again. The Jerusalem church has now taken an official stand on the content of the gospel and its implications for Gentiles!

15:26 Paul and Barnabas shared not only the victories, but also the hardships of mission work. This vulnerability was not a passing feeling, but a permanent commitment (perfect active participle).

15:28 "the Holy Spirit and to us" God was present at this crucial meeting. He expressed His will through the discussion! The Holy Spirit is the one who produced unity. Here both aspects of biblical covenant are highlighted—God's activity and appropriate human response. Notice it was a compromise; each side got something. The grace-alone, faith-alone gospel was affirmed, but Jewish sensibilities were respected. See SPECIAL TOPIC: THE PERSONHOOD OF THE SPIRIT at 1:2.

▣ "these essentials" These do not refer to personal individual salvation, but fellowship between believing Jews and believing Gentiles in local churches.

15:29 This meant for Gentiles a complete break with their idolatrous past. Christian freedom and responsibility are hard to balance, but they must be (cf. Rom. 14:1-5:13; I Cor. 8:1-13; 10:23-28). These pagans' previous worship involved all three of these excluded things!

These "essentials" are listed in various ways in different Greek manuscripts. The real question is to what do they relate?

1. things sacrificed to idols would refer to meat (cf. I Cor. 8; 10:23-33)

2. blood could refer to either

a. non-kosher meat 

b. premeditated murder

3. things strangled must refer to non-kosher ways of killing animals, implying that the previous two also relate to food sensibilities of the Jews (i.e., Leviticus 11)

4. fornication could refer to

a. participation in pagan worship rituals (as well as the food)

b. OT Levitical laws against incest (cf. Lev. 17:10-14, see F. F. Bruce, Answers to Questions, p. 43)

All of these "essentials" relate not to salvation, but to fellowship within mixed churches and expanded opportunities for Jewish evangelism. See F. F. Bruce, Answers to Questions, pp. 80-81.

SPECIAL TOPIC: CHRISTIAN FREEDOM VS. CHRISTIAN RESPONSIBILITY

▣ "if" Grammatically this is not a conditional sentence. The NJB has "avoid these, and you will do what is right."

▣ "Farewell" This is a perfect passive imperative which was used as a common closing wishing strength and health.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 15:30-35
 30So when they were sent away, they went down to Antioch; and having gathered the congregation together, they delivered the letter. 31When they had read it, they rejoiced because of its encouragement. 32Judas and Silas, also being prophets themselves, encouraged and strengthened the brethren with a lengthy message. 33After they had spent time there, they were sent away from the brethren in peace to those who had sent them out. 34But it seemed good to Silas to remain there. 35But Paul and Barnabas stayed in Antioch, teaching and preaching with many others also, the word of the Lord.

15:30 This is another congregational meeting. It shows the significance of the gathered local church.

15:31 This second congregation (i.e., the Gentile church of Antioch) did not see these essentials as negative or restrictive.

15:32 This verse defines the thrust of NT prophecy. It is primarily the preaching of the gospel and its application; who knows, maybe it is NT evidence for long sermons! See Special Topic: NT Prophecy at 11:27.

15:33 "in peace" This NASB translation is awkward. See NKJV or NRSV for a clearer way to translate this verse. This may reflect the Hebrew good-bye, Shalom (i.e., "peace", BDB 1022). This is a further way of showing the full support of the Jerusalem church and her leadership.

15:34 This verse is not included in the Greek manuscripts P74, א, A, B, E, nor the Vulgate Latin translation. It is also omitted by NRSV, TEV, NJB, and NIV. It is in a modified form in the other uncial Greek manuscripts (i.e., C and D). It is probably not originally part of Acts. UBS4 rates its exclusion as "certain" (A).

15:35 This verse shows how many other first century preachers and teachers we moderns know nothing about. The NT is so selective in its witness about the lives of the other Apostles and other missionaries and preachers. God knows! Acts is not interested in biographies.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 15:36-41
 36After some days Paul said to Barnabas, "Let us return and visit the brethren in every city in which we proclaimed the word of the Lord, and see how they are." 37Barnabas wanted to take John, called Mark, along with them also. 38But Paul kept insisting that they should not take him along who had deserted them in Pamphylia and had not gone with them to the work. 39And there occurred such a sharp disagreement that they separated from one another, and Barnabas took Mark with him and sailed away to Cyprus. 40But Paul chose Silas and left, being committed by the brethren to the grace of the Lord. 41And he was traveling through Syria and Cilicia, strengthening the churches.

15:36 "Let us return" It was Paul and Barnabas' purpose to return and strengthen the new churches which had been started on their first journey. Notice there was not the divine manifestation about this mission as there was for the first one (cf. 13:2).

15:38 "Paul kept insisting" This is an imperfect active indicative. Apparently Paul continued to express his reluctance.

▣ "who had deserted them" Exactly why John Mark left the first mission is uncertain (cf. 13:13).

15:39 "there occurred such a sharp disagreement that they separated from one another" The root meaning of this term is "sharp," meaning "to sharpen as a blade." It is used in a positive sense in Heb. 10:24. The verb is also used in Acts 17:6 and I Cor. 13:5. They really had an argument!

"Barnabas took Mark with him and sailed away to Cyprus" Now there are two mission teams.

15:40 "Paul chose Silas" Paul chose another leader from the Jerusalem church.

▣ "being committed by the brethren to the grace of the Lord" This would have involved a type of dedicatory prayer service (cf. 6:6; 13:3 14:26; 20:32). This implies the whole church, not a select group.

15:41 "Cilicia" Why and how these churches were started is uncertain. Possibly Paul himself started them during his silent years in Tarsus. Cilicia was Paul's home province.

▣ "churches" See Special Topic at 5:11.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. Why is this chapter so important?

2. Who are the Judaizer-Christians?

3. Why was James' opinion given so much weight?

4. Who are the elders?

5. Do the restrictions of verses 28-29 refer to salvation or fellowship?

 

Acts 16

PARAGRAPH DIVISIONS OF MODERN TRANSLATIONS

UBS4

NKJV NRSV TEV NJB
Timothy Accompanies Paul and Silas Timothy Joins Paul and Silas Timothy Joins Paul Timothy Goes with Paul and Silas Lycaonia: Paul Recruits Timothy
        15:41-16:3
16:1-5 16:1-5 16:1-5 16:1-5  
        16:4
        16:5
Paul's Vision of the Man of Macedonia The Macedonia Call Through Asia Minor

to Troas

In Troas: Paul's Vision The Crossing into Asia Minor
16:6-10 16:6-10 16:6-10 16:6-10 16:6-8
        16:9-10
The Conversion of Lydia Lydia Baptized at Philippi Paul and Silas in Philippi In Philippi: the Conversion of Lydia Arrival at Philippi
16:11-15 16:11-15 16:11-15 16:11-15 16:11-15
The Imprisonment at Philippi Paul and Silas Imprisoned   In Prison at Philippi Imprisonment of Paul and Silas
16:16-24 16:16-24 16:16-18 16:16-22a 16:16-18
    16:19-24   16:19-24
      16:22b-24  
  The Philippian Jailer

Saved

    The Miraculous Deliverance of Paul and Silas
16:25-34 16:25-34 16:25-34 16:25-28 16:25-28
      16:29-30 16:29-34
  Paul Refuses to Depart Secretly   16:31-34  
16:35-40 16:35-40 16:35-40 16:35 16:35-37
      16:36  
      16:37  
      16:38-40 16:38-40

READING CYCLE THREE (from "A Guide to Good Bible Reading")

FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S INTENT AT THE PARAGRAPH LEVEL

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

Read the chapter in one sitting. Identify the subjects. Compare your subject divisions with the five modern translations. Paragraphing is not inspired, but it is the key to following the original author's intent, which is the heart of interpretation. Every paragraph has one and only one main subject.

1. First paragraph

2. Second paragraph

3. Third paragraph

4. Etc.

 

CONTEXTUAL INSIGHTS INTO ACTS 15:36-16:40

I. THE SECOND MISSIONARY JOURNEY (15:36-18:23)

A. This mission took much longer than the first journey, possibly lasting 3-4 years.

 

B. It focused primarily in Macedonia and Achaia, which is modern Greece.

 

C. Brief Outline

1. Barnabas and Paul split, 15:36-40 (fight over John Mark)

2. Syria and Cilicia, 15:41 (when and how these churches began is uncertain.)

3. Lystra and Derbe, 16:1-5 (Timothy joins the team.)

4. Troas (Troy), 16:6-10 (Paul receives a vision to turn west.)

5. Philippi, 16:11-40

6. Thessalonica, 17:1-9

7. Berea, 17:10-14

8. Athens, 17:15-34

9. Corinth, 18:1-17

10. Back to Antioch of Syria, 18:18-22

 

PAUL'S CO-LABORERS 

A. John Mark (John is a Jewish name. Mark is a Roman name, Acts 12:25.)

1. He grew up in Jerusalem. His mother's house is mentioned in Acts 12:12 as the place that the early church in Jerusalem met for prayer.

2. Many have asserted that his house was the site of the Lord's Supper and that the naked man of Mark 14:51-52 was John Mark. Both of these are possible, but they are only speculation.

3. He was the cousin of Barnabas (cf. Col. 4:10).

4. He was the companion of Barnabas and Paul (cf. Acts 13:5).

5. He left the team early and returned to Jerusalem (cf. Acts 13:13).

6. Barnabas wanted to take him on the second journey, but Paul refused (cf. Acts 15:36-41).

7. Later Paul and John Mark were apparently reconciled (cf. II Tim. 4:11; Philemon 24).

8. He apparently became close friends with Peter (cf. I Peter 5:13).

9. Tradition says that he wrote the Gospel that bears his name by recording Peter's sermons preached in Rome. Mark's Gospel has more Latin terms than any other NT book and was probably written for Romans. This comes from Papias of Hierapolis, as recorded by Eusebius ‘ Eccl. His. 3.39.15.

10. Tradition says he is associated with the establishment of the Alexandrian Church.

 

B. Silas

1. He is called Silas in Acts and Silvanus in the Epistles.

2. He, like Barnabas, was a leader in the Jerusalem Church (cf. Acts 15:22-23).

3. He is closely associated with Paul (cf. Acts 15:40; 16:19ff; 17:1-15; I Thess. 1:1).

4. He, like Barnabas and Paul, was a prophet (cf. Acts 15:32).

5. He is called an apostle (cf. I Thess. 2:6).

6. He, like Paul, was a Roman citizen (cf. Acts 16:37-38).

7. He, like John Mark, is also associated with Peter, even possibly acting as a scribe (cf. I Peter 5:12).

 

C. Timothy

1. His name means "one who honors God."

2. He was the child of a Jewish mother and a Greek father and lived in Lystra. The Latin translation of Origen's commentary on Rom. 16:21 says Timothy was a citizen of Derbe. This is possibly taken from Acts 20:4. He was instructed in the Jewish faith by his mother and grandmother (cf. II Tim. 1:5; 3:14-15).

3. He was asked to join Paul and Silas' missionary team on the second journey (cf. Acts 16:1-5). He was confirmed by prophecy (cf. I Tim. 1:18; 4:14).

4. He was circumcised by Paul in order to work with both Jews and Greeks.

5. He was a dedicated companion and co-worker of Paul. He is mentioned by name more than any other of Paul's helpers (17 times in 10 letters, cf. I Cor. 4:17; 16:10; Phil. 1:1; 2:19; Col. 1:5; I Thess. 1:1; 2:6; 3:2; I Tim. 1:2,18; 4:14; II Tim. 1:2; 3:14-15).

6. He is called an "apostle" (cf. I Thess. 2:6).

7. Two of the three Pastoral Epistles are addressed to him.

8. He is last mentioned in Hebrews 13:23.

 

WORD AND PHRASE STUDY

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 16:1-5
 1Paul came also to Derbe and to Lystra. And a disciple was there, named Timothy, the son of a Jewish woman who was a believer, but his father was a Greek, 2and he was well spoken of by the brethren who were in Lystra and Iconium. 3Paul wanted this man to go with him; and he took him and circumcised him because of the Jews who were in those parts, for they all knew that his father was a Greek. 4Now while they were passing through the cities, they were delivering the decrees which had been decided upon by the apostles and elders who were in Jerusalem, for them to observe. 5So the churches were being strengthened in the faith, and were increasing in number daily

16:1 "Derbe and to Lystra" These cities are located in the southern part of the Roman Province of Galatia (modern Turkey). Paul visited this area on his first missionary journey (cf. v. 14).

▣ "And a disciple was there" Luke uses the term idou to introduce this phrase. It was a way of showing emphasis. Timothy will become a major participant in Paul's ministry.

▣ "the son of a Jewish woman who was a believer, but his father was a Greek" From II Tim. 1:5 we learn that his grandmother was also a Jewish believer or a faith-oriented Jew. His grandmother was named Lois and his mother was named Eunice. His mother, and possibly grandmother, became believers on Paul's first mission.

16:2 "he was well spoken of" This is an imperfect passive indicative. People spoke well of Timothy again and again. One of the qualifications for a church leader was "no handle for criticism," within both the believing and unbelieving communities (cf. I Tim. 3:2, 7, 10).

▣ "in Lystra" Timothy's hometown was Lystra. However, some Greek manuscripts of Acts 20:4 (and Origen's writings) imply that Derbe was his hometown.

16:3 "Paul wanted this man to go with him" Notice that Paul calls Timothy. This was not Timothy's choice alone (cf. I Tim. 3:1). In a sense Timothy becomes Paul's apostolic delegate or representative.

▣ "had circumcised him" Paul wanted him to be able to work with Jews (cf. I Cor. 9:20; Acts 15:27-29). This was not a compromise with the Judaizers because

1. of the results of the Jerusalem Council (cf. v. 15)

2. he refused to circumcise Titus (cf. Gal. 2:3)

However, Paul's actions surely confused the issue! Paul's methodology of becoming all things to all men in order to win some (cf. I Cor. 9:19-23) makes people and their salvation priority!

▣ "father was a Greek" The imperfect tense implies that he was dead.

16:4 Paul and Silas reported (i.e., imperfect active indicative) on the results of the Jerusalem Council (cf 15:22-29). Remember these "essentials" were for two purposes:

1. fellowship within the churches

2. Jewish evangelism (as was Timothy's circumcision)

 

16:5 This is another of Luke's summary statements (cf. 6:7; 9:31; 12:24; 16:5; 19:20; 28:31). Paul had a heart for discipling (cf. 14:22; 15:36; 15:5). Evangelism without discipleship violates the Great Commission (cf. Matt. 28:18-20) and results in "spiritual abortions"!

▣ "churches" See Special Topic at 5:11.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 16:6-10
 6They passed through the Phrygian and Galatian region, having been forbidden by the Holy Spirit to speak the word in Asia; 7and after they came to Mysia, they were trying to go into Bithynia, and the Spirit of Jesus did not permit them; 8and passing by Mysia, they came down to Troas. 9A vision appeared to Paul in the night: a man of Macedonia was standing and appealing to him, and saying, "Come over to Macedonia and help us." 10When he had seen the vision, immediately we sought to go into Macedonia, concluding that God had called us to preach the gospel to them.

16:6 "passed through the Phrygian and Galatian region" In this text Luke is speaking more of racial, linguistic groupings than of Roman political divisions or provinces. This idiom would refer to the unofficial boundary between these ethnic groups.

▣ "having been forbidden" This is an aorist passive participle. It is a common term in the Septuagint and in the NT. The Spirit was intimately involved in the actions and decisions of the early church (cf. 2:4; 8:29,39; 10:19; 11:12,28; 15:28; 16:6,7; 21:4; Rom. 1:13). The modern church has lost the dynamism of the early church.

"in Asia" This refers to the Roman Province of Asia Minor, which was the western end of modern Turkey. 

16:6,7 "the Holy Spirit. . .Spirit of Jesus" For the personality of the Spirit, see Special Topic at 1:2. See Special Topic following.

SPECIAL TOPIC: JESUS AND THE SPIRIT

16:7 "Mysia" This was an ethnic area in the northwest of the Roman Province of Asia Minor. It was mountainous with several major Roman roads. Its major cities were Troas, Assos, and Pergamum.

▣ "Bithynia" This region was also in northwest Asia Minor, northeast of Mysia. This was not a Roman Province in Luke's day, but was combined with Pontus as one political unit. Peter later evangelized this area (cf. I Pet. 1:1). We learn from Philo that there were many Jewish colonies in this area.

16:8 "passing by Mysia" In this context, it must mean "passing through" or "around" (cf. BAGD 625). Remember, context determines meaning and not lexicons/dictionaries.

▣ "Troas" This city was four miles from ancient Troy. It was founded about 400 years earlier and remained a free Greek city until it became a Roman colony. It was the regular port of departure from Mysia to Macedonia.

16:9 "A vision appeared to Paul" God led Paul several times by supernatural means.

1. bright light and Jesus' voice, 9:3-4

2. a vision, 9:10

3. a vision, 16:9,10

4. a vision, 18:9

5. a trance, 22:17

6. an angel of God 27:23

 

▣ "a man of Macedonia" How Paul knew he was from Macedonia is uncertain. Possibly it was because of accent, clothes, ornaments, or simply stated in the vision. Some commentators think the man was Luke (cf. v. 10).

This was a major geographical decision. The gospel turns to Europe!

▣ "Come over. . .help us" The first is an aorist active participle, used as an imperative, the second is an aorist active imperative. The vision was very specific and forceful.

16:10 "we" This is the first occurrence of the "we" sections in Acts. This refers to Luke's addition to the missionary group of Paul, Silas, and Timothy (cf. 16:10-17; 20:5-15; 21:1-18; 27:1-28:16). Some commentators have thought that the man Paul saw in v. 9 was Luke, the Gentile physician and author of the Gospel and Acts.

"Macedonia" Modern Greece was divided into two Roman Provinces.

1. Achaia in the south (Athens, Corinth, Sparta)

2. Macedonia in the north (Philippi, Thessalonica, Berea)

 

"concluding" This is the term sumbibazō, which literally means to bring together or unite. Here it has the implication that all that happened was God's leadership to go to Macedonia.

1. the Spirit not letting them preach in Asia, cf. v. 6

2. the Spirit closing off Bythinia, cf. v 7

3. and the vision of v. 9

 

"God has called" This is a perfect passive indicative. The Spirit's leadership was not for safety, but for evangelism. This is always God's will.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 16:11-15
 11So putting out to sea from Troas, we ran a straight course to Samothrace, and on the day following to Neapolis; 12and from there to Philippi, which is a leading city of the district of Macedonia, a Roman colony; and we were staying in this city for some days. 13And on the Sabbath day we went outside the gate to a riverside, where we were supposing that there would be a place of prayer; and we sat down and began speaking to the women who had assembled. 14A woman named Lydia, from the city of Thyatira, a seller of purple fabrics, a worshiper of God, was listening; and the Lord opened her heart to respond to the things spoken by Paul. 15And when she and her household had been baptized, she urged us, saying, "If you have judged me to be faithful to the Lord, come into my house and stay." And she prevailed upon us.

16:11 "ran a straight course" This is one of many nautical terms used by Luke (cf. chap. 27). They took a direct ship sailing route vessel, not a coastal vessel. Luke knew sailing terms well or interviewed the sailors.

▣ "Samothrace" This is a small rocky island rising out of the Aegean Sea about 5,000 feet. It was about halfway between Troas and Philippi.

▣ "Neapolis" This is literally "new town." There were several cities in the Mediterranean with this name. This one was the seaport for Philippi, which was about 10 miles away. At this seaport the Ignatian Way, the major Roman road running east to west, ended its eastern trek.

16:12 "Philippi" The Greek is plural, probably denoting the unifying of several settlements into one united city. It was located on the famous Roman highway, the Ignatian Way. This city was originally called Kreinides (wells). Philip II of Macedon captured it because of its gold deposits and renamed it after himself.

NASB, NRSV"a leading city of the district of Macedonia"
NKJV"the foremost city of that part of Macedonia"
TEV"a city of the first district of Macedonia"
NJB"the principal city of that district"

This phrase is very uncertain. Amphipolis was the "leading town of Macedonia." What Luke meant by this has been greatly disputed. It may have been an honorary title of significance.

▣ "a Roman colony" In 42 b.c., Octavian and Mark Antony defeated Cassius and Brutus near this city. In memory of this victory, Octavian made Philippi a Roman colony and retired his troops there. In 31 b.c., after the defeat of Antony and Cleopatra at Attium, Octavian settled more troops there. Other Roman colonies mentioned in the NT are Pisidian Antioch, Lystra, Troas, Corinth, and Ptolema. They had all the privileges of cities in Italy:

1. self-government

2. no taxation

3. special legal perks

Paul often preached and established churches in these Roman colonies.

16:13 "on the Sabbath" There were apparently no synagogues in Philippi. This being a Roman colony, it probably did not have ten male Jews in the town, which was the minimum number required to have a synagogue. Apparently there were some God-fearers or proselytes (cf. v. 14; 13:43; 17:4,17; 18:7). Many women were attracted to the morality and ethics of Judaism.

▣ "to a riverside" This seems to have been a common place of religious worship (cf. Josephus' Antiquities of the Jews 14.10.23).

▣ "sat down" This was the typical rabbinical teaching position, but this is a Roman city and, therefore, probably has no significance. It is just another of Luke's eyewitness details.

16:14 "A woman named Lydia from the city of Thyatira" The Roman province of Macedonia had more opportunities for women than any other place in the first century Mediterranean world. Lydia was from a city in Asia Minor (cf. Rev. 2:17ff). It was known for its purple dye, made from mollusks' shells, which was very popular with the Romans. There was a synagogue in her hometown. Her name came from Lydia, the ancient province, where the city was located. She is not mentioned in Paul's later letters, therefore, she may have died.

▣ "worshiper of God" This refers to God-fearers who were attracted to Judaism but had not yet become full proselytes.

▣ "the Lord opened her heart" The Bible describes the relationship between God and humanity as a covenant. God always takes the initiative in establishing the relationship and setting the conditions of the covenant (see Special Topic at 2:47). Salvation is a covenant relationship. No one can be saved unless God initiates (cf. John 6:44,65). However, God desires that all humans be saved (cf. John 3:16; 4:42; Titus 2:11; I Tim. 2:4; 4:10; II Pet. 3:9; I John 2:1; 4:14); therefore, the implication is that God, on some level (natural revelation, cf. Ps. 19:1-6 or special revelation, cf. Ps. 19:7-14), confronts every person with their sin (cf. Romans 1-3) and His character.

The mystery is why some respond and some do not! I personally cannot accept that the answer is God's choice of some, but not others. All humans are made in God's image (cf. Gen. 1:26-27) and God promises to redeem all of them in Gen. 3:15.

Maybe it is not so important that we understand why, but that we faithfully present the gospel to all and let it do its work in the heart and mind of its hearers (cf. Matt. 13:1-23). Paul preached to Lydia and she and her household responded.

16:15 "her household had been baptized" This apparently refers to her family, servants, and workers (cf. Cornelius, Acts 10:2; 11:14; and the Philippian jailer, Acts 16:33). Also, notice that she, like others in the NT, was baptized immediately. It is not an option! See Special Topic: Baptism at 2:38.

The theological question which this verse raises is, "Were children involved in these examples of household conversions in Acts?" If so, then there is a biblical precedent for infant baptism in those "family salvations." Those who assert this as evidence also point toward the OT practice of including children into the nation of Israel as infants (i.e., circumcision at eight days of age, see James D. G. Dunn, pp. 175-176).

Although it is surely possible that faith in Christ immediately affected the whole family (cf. Deut. 5:9 and 7:9) in this societal setting, the question remains, "Is this a universal truth to be practiced in every culture?" I would assert that the NT is a revelation about personal volitional choices related to the awakening sense of guilt. One must recognize his need for a savior. This leads to the further question of, "Are people born sinful in Adam, or are they sinful when they choose to disobey God?" Judaism allows a period of childhood innocence until a knowledge of the Law and a commitment to keep it; for males, age 13, for females, age 12. The rabbis do not emphasize Genesis 3 as much as the church.

The NT is an adult book. It asserts God's love for children, but its message is directed toward adults! However, we live in a democratic, individual-focused society, but the Near East is a tribal, clan, family society!

▣ "If" This is a first class conditional, which is assumed to be a true believer from the author's perspective or for his literary purposes.

▣ "you have judged me to be faithful to the Lord" The first verbal is a perfect active indicative. Lydia is asserting that she is now a believer. She was inviting these missionaries to use her house and resources for the gospel. This is in accordance with Jesus' message to the seventy when He sent them out on mission (cf. Luke 10:5-7).

"come into my house and stay" Lydia was an assertive personality type, a business woman! This first verb is an aorist active participle, used as an imperative; the second is a present active imperative.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 16:16-18
 16It happened that as we were going to the place of prayer, a slave-girl having a spirit of divination met us, who was bringing her masters much profit by fortune-telling. 17Following after Paul and us, she kept crying out, saying, "These men are bond-servants of the Most High God, who are proclaiming to you the way of salvation." 18She continued doing this for many days. But Paul was greatly annoyed, and turned and said to the spirit, "I command you in the name of Jesus Christ to come out of her!" And it came out at that very moment.

16:16 "It happened" Apparently this occurred on another day, possibly the next Sabbath. This was a chance encounter, but God was fully involved for His purposes, as He is in every event, every personal encounter, every day!

▣ "a spirit of divination" There are two terms used in this sentence to describe this slave girl. The first, "divination" (found only here in the NT) has an OT background, but uses different Greek terms in the Septuagint (cf. Lev. 19:31; 20:6,27; Deut. 18:11; I Sam. 28:3,7; II Kgs. 21:6; I Chr. 10:13). This was a demon-possessed person who, by chants, incantations, or the interpreting of natural phenomena (i.e., flight of birds, clouds, remains in a drinking cup, animal liver, etc.) could predict and, to some degree, affect the future.

In this Greek cultural setting the term is puthōn, which comes out of Greek mythology where a giant serpent is killed by Apollo. This myth became an oracle rite (i.e., Delphi), where humans could consult the gods. This site was known for its temple snakes (i.e., pythons) who would crawl over people who lay down in the temple and allowed the snake to crawl over them for the purpose of knowing and affecting the future.

▣ "by fortune telling" This term (present active participle, feminine, singular) is used only here in the NT. The root term is common in the Septuagint for "diviner, seer, prophet," usually in a negative context. It means one who raves, thereby denoting the emotional trance which accompanies their prediction. Here it denotes one who predicts the future for profit. The contextual and lexical implication is that the girl was indwelt with an unclean spirit.

16:17 "Following after Paul. . .kept crying out" This is a present active participle and an imperfect active indicative. She continued to follow and kept on crying out (cf. v. 18).

▣ "These men are bondservants of the Most High God" Jesus would not accept demonic testimony (cf. Luke 8:28; Mark 1:24; 3:11; Matt. 8:29) and neither would Paul because it could lead to the implication of demonic support.

The term "Most High God" (cf. Mark 5:7; Luke 8:28) is used of YHWH (i.e., El, Elyon) in Gen. 14:18-19; II Sam. 22:14 (see Special Topic at 1:6), but it was also used in this culture of Zeus. This spirit was not giving testimony to glorify God, but to associate the gospel with the demonic.

▣ " who are proclaiming to you the way of salvation" There is no article with "way" (cf. NRSV). She was possibly saying that they were one of several ways to the Most High God. This demon is not trying to help Paul's ministry. The purpose of this statement is

1. to identify Paul with divination

2. to present an alternative way, not the way of salvation (i.e., faith in Christ)

The NET Bible (p. 2022 #16) has a good discussion of the grammatical issues involved in translating "the way" vs. "a way." It prefers "the way."

The real issue is what the hearers in first century Philippi would have understood. In their cultural setting, "the Most High God" would have referred to Zeus, so the presence of absence of the definite article with "way" is not the exegetical issue.

16:18 "Paul was greatly annoyed" In this instance Paul acted, not out of love, but out of irritation. Paul was human too! This same strong verb is found in the Septuagint in Eccl. 10:9, where it means hard labor. In the NT it is used only here and in 4:2. It denotes someone who is completely worn out.

"to the spirit" Notice Paul does not address the slave girl, but the demon indwelling and controlling her. Paul's exorcism was couched in the same manner as other NT exorcisms (i.e., in the name of Jesus). See the Special Topics: The Demonic and Exorcism at 5:16.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 16:19-24
 19But when her masters saw that their hope of profit was gone, they seized Paul and Silas and dragged them into the market place before the authorities, 20and when they had brought them to the chief magistrates, they said, "These men are throwing our city into confusion, being Jews, 21and are proclaiming customs which it is not lawful for us to accept or to observe, being Romans." 22The crowd rose up together against them, and the chief magistrates tore their robes off them and proceeded to order them to be beaten with rods. 23When they had struck them with many blows, they threw them into prison, commanding the jailer to guard them securely; 24and he, having received such a command, threw them into the inner prison and fastened their feet in the stocks.

16:19 "saw that their hope of profit was gone" These "masters" did not care at all that a human being had been freed from the bondage to evil. They were distressed by the monetary loss (cf. v. 16), much like the people in Luke 8:26-39.

▣ "seized Paul and Silas" Why Luke and Timothy were not taken is uncertain.

16:20 "chief magistrates" This is the term praetors. Officially their titles were duumvirs, but we learn from Cicero that many liked to be called Praetors. Luke is very accurate in his use of Roman governmental officials' titles. This is one of several evidences of his historicity.

16: 20, 21 "being Jews. . .being Romans" This shows their racial pride and prejudice. Paul's time in Philippi may be close to Claudius' edict expelling the Jews from Rome, a.d. 49-50 (actually he forbade any Jewish worship practices). Roman anti-Semitism may be seen in Cicero's Pro Fiasco 28 and Javenal 14.96-106.

▣ "proclaiming customs which it is not lawful for us to accept" Notice this charge has nothing to do with the slave girl's exorcism. It apparently refers to their preaching of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Judaism was a legal religion in the Roman Empire, but as it became obvious that Christianity was destined to be seen as a separate and, therefore, illegal religion. It was illegal for Jews to attempt to proselytize Romans, and it was illegal for Paul as well.

16:22 "tore their robes off them and proceeded to order them" The verbal forms imply that the two Praetors, moved by the uproar of the crowd, tore the clothes off Paul and Silas themselves (aorist active participle, plural). This would have been highly unusual for them to be such active participants in a judicial event.

1. they tore off (aorist active participle)

2. they ordered to flog (i.e., an imperfect active indicative followed by a present active infinitive)

 

▣ "to be beaten with rods" This type of punishment (i.e., verberatio, which was administered by the authority of a city court) was not as severe as Roman scourging. There was no set number for the blows. Paul was beaten like this three times (cf. II Cor. 11:25). This is the only recorded one (cf. I Thess. 2:2).

16:24 "inner prison" This means maximum security. There was a fear factor here (cf. v. 29). Paul's exorcism got their attention.

▣ "feet in the stocks" Most jails of that day had chains attached to the walls to which the prisoner was shackled. Therefore, the doors were only latched, not locked. These stocks would spread the feet wide apart and caused great discomfort and added security.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 16:25-34
 25But about midnight Paul and Silas were praying and singing hymns of praise to God, and the prisoners were listening to them; 26and suddenly there came a great earthquake, so that the foundations of the prison house were shaken; and immediately all the doors were opened and everyone's chains were unfastened. 27When the jailer awoke and saw the prison doors opened, he drew his sword and was about to kill himself, supposing that the prisoners had escaped. 28But Paul cried out with a loud voice, saying, "Do not harm yourself, for we are all here!" 29And he called for lights and rushed in, and trembling with fear he fell down before Paul and Silas, 30and after he brought them out, he said, "Sirs, what must I do to be saved?" 31They said, "Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household." 32And they spoke the word of the Lord to him together with all who were in his house. 33And he took them that very hour of the night and washed their wounds, and immediately he was baptized, he and all his household. 34And he brought them into his house and set food before them, and rejoiced greatly, having believed in God with his whole household.

16:25 "about midnight" They probably could not sleep because of the pain of the beating and the stocks.

▣ "praying and singing hymns of praise to God" It is possible that the theological content of these prayers and hymns caused the prisoners to trust Christ (i.e., "the prisoners were listening to them") because none of the prisoners escaped when the earthquake opened the doors (cf. vv. 26,28, "we are all here").

▣ "the prisoners were listening" This is an imperfect middle (deponent) indicative, implying they listened continually to Paul and Silas. The verb epakroaomai is a rare word in the NT and the Septuagint. Its use in I Sam. 15:22 denotes an intense listening with joyfulness. These down-and-out prisoners eagerly heard and responded to a message of God's love, care, and acceptance!

16:26 "earthquake" This was a natural event, but with supernatural purpose, timing, and effect (cf. Matt. 27:51,54; 28:2). God had delivered Peter from prison by means of an angel (cf. 4:31), but here an event was chosen that gave Paul a chance to preach the gospel to both the prisoners and the guards.

16:27 "sword" This was the small, two-edged sword worn in the belt, which was shaped like a tongue. This was the instrument of capital punishment for Roman citizens. If a jailor lost prisoners, he suffered their fate (cf. 12:19).

16:28 Paul and Silas' faith and the content of their prayers and songs made a powerful impact on the other prisoners (I think they, too, were saved)!

16:29 "called for lights" Notice the plural. There were other jailers.

16:30 "Sirs, what must I do to be saved" This reflects mankind's (1) fear of the supernatural and (2) search for peace with God! He wanted the peace and joy that Paul and Silas had exhibited, even in these unfair and painful circumstances. Notice this man, as so many, knew there must be some kind of human response (cf. Luke 3:10,12,14; Acts 2:37; 22:10).

16:31 "‘Believe in the Lord Jesus'" The verb (aorist active imperative) pisteuō can be translated "believe," "faith," or "trust." See Special Topics at 2:40, 3:16, and 6:5. It is primarily a volitional trusting response (cf. 10:43). Also notice that it is trust in a person, not a doctrine or a theological system. This man had no Jewish background (i.e., Ninevites in Jonah). Yet the requirements for complete salvation are very simple and just the same! This is the most succinct summary of the gospel in the NT (cf. 10:43). His repentance (cf. Mark 1:15; Acts 3:16,19; 20:21) was shown by his actions.

▣ "you will be saved, you and your household" In the ancient world the religion of the head of the house was the religion of all its members (cf. 10:2; 11:14; 16:15; 18:8). How this worked out on an individual level is uncertain, but apparently it involved some level of personal faith on each individual's part. Paul subsequently preached the full gospel message to the jailer and his household (cf. v. 32).

In this instance, not only his household but his prison also!

16:32 "the word of the Lord" There is a variant involving this phrase.

1. "The word of the Lord" is in MSS P45,74, אi2, A, C, D, E. The UBS4 gives it a "B" rating (almost certain).

2. "The word of God" is in MSS א*, B

In context the issue is to whom does "Lord" refer?

1. Jesus, v. 31

2. YHWH (cf. vv. 25,34; 13:44,48; it is an OT phrase cf. Gen. 15:14; I Sam. 15:10; Isa. 1:10; Jonah 1:1)

 

16:33 "and immediately he was baptized, he and all his household" This shows the importance of baptism. Acts mentions it over and over. See SPECIAL TOPIC: BAPTISM at 2:38. Jesus did it (cf. Luke 3:21) and commanded it (cf. Matt. 28:19) and that settles it (cf. Acts 2:38). It also is consistent with other examples in Acts that baptism occurred immediately after their profession of faith (cf. Acts 10:47-48). In a sense it was their visible and verbal public profession of faith in Christ (i.e., Rom. 10:9-13).

16:34 "and rejoiced greatly having believed in God with his whole household" The two verbs are singular referring to the jailor. However, the adverbial phrase implies the inclusion of the man's extended family and servants.

The verb, "believed" is a perfect active participle, implying a settled state. Notice the change in tense from v. 31.

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 16:35-40
 35Now when day came, the chief magistrates sent their policemen, saying, "Release those men." 36And the jailer reported these words to Paul, saying, "The chief magistrates have sent to release you. Therefore come out now and go in peace." 37But Paul said to them, "They have beaten us in public without trial, men who are Romans, and have thrown us into prison; and now are they sending us away secretly? No indeed! But let them come themselves and bring us out." 38The policemen reported these words to the chief magistrates. They were afraid when they heard that they were Romans, 39and they came and appealed to them, and when they had brought them out, they kept begging them to leave the city. 40They went out of the prison and entered the house of Lydia, and when they saw the brethren, they encouraged them and departed.

16:35 "policemen" This is literally "rod-bearer" (hrabdouchosta lictor). This refers to those involved in official discipline (cf. v. 20). The Italian "fascist" party got their name from this term. A bundle of these rods (from Latin fasces) was the symbol of political authority.

16:37 "men who are Romans" Philippi was a Roman colony with many extra legal privileges which could be in jeopardy from Rome if this unfair treatment of Roman citizens was reported. Beating Roman citizens was a serious violation of their colonial legal status (cf. v. 39; see Livy, "History" 10.9.4 or Cicero, "Pro Rabirio 4.12-13).

16:39 The purpose of Paul's protest was possibly to protect the fledgling church at Philippi and to achieve a certain recognized status for them. The leaders, by their actions, imply that gospel preaching was not illegal! The door was open for future evangelistic efforts in Philippi.

16:40 "and departed" Luke apparently stayed behind. We find him still here in 20:5-6.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

This is a study guide commentary, which means that you are responsible for your own interpretation of the Bible. Each of us must walk in the light we have. You, the Bible, and the Holy Spirit are priority in interpretation. You must not relinquish this to a commentator.

These discussion questions are provided to help you think through the major issues of this section of the book. They are meant to be thought-provoking, not definitive.

1. Why is the Holy Spirit called the Spirit of Jesus?

2. Why did God allow the missionaries to encounter so much opposition and trial?

3. Why did Paul not accept the slave girl's testimony?

4. List the people saved at Philippi.

5. Why were only Paul and Silas imprisoned?

6. Why did the other prisoners not escape?

7. List the elements of salvation in this chapter. Are they different from those in other chapters in Acts?

8. Did this jailer have any background in Judaism or Christianity?

9. What does "his household was saved" mean?

10. Why did Paul make the city officials apologize in person?

 

Pages