MENU

Where the world comes to study the Bible

Q. Why Did God Make His Covenant With Such Jerks?

I am moved to the point of distraction at how God continuously reiterated his covenant to Abraham and his sons despite the fact that Abraham and his family were clearly quite deceitful people!

We have:

1. Abraham’s not relying on God’s ability to protect him, instead telling a lie about Sarah (even though she was, technically, his half-sister, Abraham’s motive was clearly to deceive),
2. Isaac’s identical lie about Rebekah being his sister,
3. Jacob essentially stealing Esau’s birthright by threatening to withhold life-saving water to Esau,
4. Jacob literally stealing Esau’s blessing,
5. Rebekah being an instrument of deception in fooling her own husband because she favored one son over the other.

Answer

Dear Friend,

You are right to observe the fact that our Old Testament “heroes” are far from it in reality. Just look at some of the folks in the “hall of faith” in Hebrews chapter 11: Rahab, Gideon, Barak, Samson, and Jephthah. Wow! What an unlikely bunch! Which is exactly the point:

4 “Do not say in your heart when the LORD your God has driven them out before you, ‘Because of my righteousness the LORD has brought me in to possess this land,’ but it is because of the wickedness of these nations that the LORD is dispossessing them before you. 5 “It is not for your righteousness or for the uprightness of your heart that you are going to possess their land, but it is because of the wickedness of these nations that the LORD your God is driving them out before you, in order to confirm the oath which the LORD swore to your fathers, to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. 6 “Know, then, it is not because of your righteousness that the LORD your God is giving you this good land to possess, for you are a stubborn people. 7 “Remember, do not forget how you provoked the LORD your God to wrath in the wilderness; from the day that you left the land of Egypt until you arrived at this place, you have been rebellious against the LORD. 8 “Even at Horeb you provoked the LORD to wrath, and the LORD was so angry with you that He would have destroyed you. 9 “When I went up to the mountain to receive the tablets of stone, the tablets of the covenant which the LORD had made with you, then I remained on the mountain forty days and nights; I neither ate bread nor drank water (Deuteronomy 9:4-9, NASB).

When the Israelites worshipped the golden calf in Exodus 32 Moses did not appeal to God on the basis of the Israelites trying harder, but on the basis of God’s character, and the fact that He kept His promises. And this Moses did a total of ten times with that first generation that left Egypt (see Numbers 14:1-25, especially verse 22).

Paul made it clear that God’s choice of Jacob over Esau had nothing to do with works Jacob had done, or would do (Romans 9:10-16). And if this is not enough we see Paul’s words to the Corinthian church:

26 For consider your calling, brethren, that there were not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble; 27 but God has chosen the foolish things of the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to shame the things which are strong, 28 and the base things of the world and the despised God has chosen, the things that are not, so that He may nullify the things that are, 29 so that no man may boast before God. 30 But by His doing you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, and righteousness and sanctification, and redemption, 31 so that, just as it is written, “LET HIM WHO BOASTS, BOAST IN THE LORD” (1 Corinthians 1:26-31).

When you read Paul’s Corinthian epistles, or the letters to the seven churches in Revelation 2 and 3 you see that God’s people are messy.

It all comes down to this. God’s dealings with men are the result of His grace, and not of our goodness. I sometimes think of what the angels in heaven must have thought as they looked down upon the church (1 Peter 1:10-12; 1 Corinthians 11:10). I believe that Paul has made the reason clear in his epistle to the Ephesians. It can be summed up by the word GRACE:

5 He predestined us to adoption as sons through Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the kind intention of His will, 6 to the praise of the glory of His grace, which He freely bestowed on us in the Beloved. 7 In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of His grace 8 which He lavished on us. In all wisdom and insight 9 He made known to us the mystery of His will, according to His kind intention which He purposed in Him 10 with a view to an administration suitable to the fullness of the times, that is, the summing up of all things in Christ, things in the heavens and things on the earth. In Him 11 also we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to His purpose who works all things after the counsel of His will, 12 to the end that we who were the first to hope in Christ would be to the praise of His glory (Ephesians 1:5-12, emphasis mine).

1 And you were dead in your trespasses and sins, 2 in which you formerly walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, of the spirit that is now working in the sons of disobedience. 3 Among them we too all formerly lived in the lusts of our flesh, indulging the desires of the flesh and of the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, even as the rest. 4 But God, being rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us, 5 even when we were dead in our transgressions, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved), 6 and raised us up with Him, and seated us with Him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, 7 so that in the ages to come He might show the surpassing riches of His grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. 8 For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; 9 not as a result of works, so that no one may boast. 10 For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them (Ephesians 2:1-10, emphasis mine).

1 For this reason I, Paul, the prisoner of Christ Jesus for the sake of you Gentiles— 2 if indeed you have heard of the stewardship of God’s grace which was given to me for you; 3 that by revelation there was made known to me the mystery, as I wrote before in brief. 4 By referring to this, when you read you can understand my insight into the mystery of Christ, 5 which in other generations was not made known to the sons of men, as it has now been revealed to His holy apostles and prophets in the Spirit; 6 to be specific, that the Gentiles are fellow heirs and fellow members of the body, and fellow partakers of the promise in Christ Jesus through the gospel, 7 of which I was made a minister, according to the gift of God’s grace which was given to me according to the working of His power (Ephesians 3:1-7).

Blessings,
Bob Deffinbaugh

Related Topics: Covenant

Be Gracious

Related Media

Too often we meet folks who are anything but kind and gracious. Unfortunately, such people have never come to grips with the biblical standard of graciousness. The Scriptures, however, point out that human beings should live in accordance with that standard. Indeed, God himself is gracious. For example, from early times he showed his graciousness to Sarah by giving to her the ability to conceive and give birth to a son, even when she was well along in years (Gen. 21:1-2).

The psalmists often mention graciousness as evidence of good manners. This is often seen in David’s psalms. Thus, as David mentions in his well-known prayer psalm, as he faced arrogant, godless men, he called out to the Lord:

You, O Lord, are a compassionate and gracious God,
Slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulness.
Turn to me and have mercy on me;
Grant your strength to your servant
And save the son of your maid servant.
Give me a sign of your goodness,
That my enemies may see it and be put to shame,
For you, O LORD, have helped me and comforted me. (Psalm 86:15-17)1

David counted on his gracious, compassionate Lord to deliver him from his oppressors. In another psalm declares the Lord’s righteous care for those needy who put their faith in Him:

The LORD works righteousness
And justice for the oppressed.
He made known His ways to Moses,
His deeds to the people of Israel.
The LORD is compassionate and gracious,
Slow to anger, abounding in love.
He will not always accuse,
Nor will he harbor his anger forever. (Ps. 103:6-9)

As Van Gemeren remarks, “The Lord does not tolerate injustice in the world (cf. 33:4-5), His rule is characterized by “righteousness” as he rights what is wrong. 2

In another Psalm, the psalmist praises the Lord for his kindness to his people saying,

Great are the works of the Lord;
They are pondered by all who delight in them.
Glorious and majestic are his deeds,
And his righteousness endures forever.
He has caused his wonders to be remembered,
The Lord is gracious and compassionate. (Ps. 111:2-4)

Although the psalmist may have some particular divine workings in mind, his praise may include the source of his wonderful works, namely God himself. In another psalm of David (Ps. 145), we see David’s many proclamations of the Lord’s goodness and activities. Especially to be noted once again is his declaration that,

The Lord is gracious and compassionate,
Slow to anger and rich in love.
The Lord is good to all;
He has compassion on all he has made (Ps. 145: 8-9).

God’s grace and compassion are cited as of great importance in the Minor Prophets. Thus Joel (Joel 2:12-13) instructs his people to have “a total recommitment on the part of the whole populace … is reassuring for the believer to understand something of God’s character so as to be able to rely on his perfect response to any situation. God is consistent in his character: he is gracious and merciful, not easily angered, and full of kindness.”3

Likewise, the prophet Jonah, having experienced God’s gracious forgiveness to the people of Ninevah remarks that, “when God saw what they did and how they turned from their evil ways, he had compassion and did not bring upon them the destruction he had threatened.“ (Jonah 3:10) God’s prophet Jonah complains to the Lord that even before he went to Ninevah he was afraid that if the Ninevites repented, the Lord would forgive them (Jonah 4:2-3). As I have pointed out, “Because God is a gracious and merciful God, as Jonah knew him to be, Jonah should rather have considered his mission to have been highly successful, since the result was in keeping with what Jonah knew God to be.”4

In his distress a psalmist cries out, “O Lord save me.” He goes on to point out that, “The Lord is righteous; our God is full of compassion” (Ps. 116:4b-5). The psalmist knew that the Lord was his true source of help. But not only is God gracious and compassionate, he is also forgiving. Thus Nehemiah reminds his hearers that the Lord is a “forgiving God, gracious and compassionate, slow to anger and abounding in love” (Neh. 9:17; cf. v. 31)

Therefore, today’s believers may echo those of long ago even as the psalmist prayed,

May God be gracious to us and bless us
And make his face shine upon us,
That your ways may be known on earth,
Your salvation among all nations. (Ps. 67:1-2)

As Futato remarks, “Psalm 67 challenges us not to give up the pursuit of blessing, but to pursue blessings all the more earnestly with God’s own intended outcome.”5

May we, then, ourselves likewise follow the reassurance of Hosea’s charge to his people, “Say to him: ‘forgive all our sins and receive us graciously, that we may offer the fruit of our lips’ ” (Hos. 14:2). Thus Israel “was to come into God’s presence with heartfelt confession on their lips” … and “having repented and come to God with proper intentions, they were to petition God for forgiveness of their sins and guilt.”6 Even deeper, this charge may follow Paul’s advice and admonition to the Colossians,

Let the peace of Christ rule in your hearts, since as members of one body you were called to peace. And be thankful, let the word of Christ dwell in you richly as you teach and admonition one another with all wisdom. … Whatever you do, whether in word or deed, do it all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through him” (Col. 3:15-17).

In so doing, we also may sing songs with gratitude.

There’s a wideness in God’s mercy, like the wideness of the sea;
There’s a kindness in his justice, which is more than liberty.
If our lives were but more simple, we should take him at his Word,
And our lives would be all sunshine, in the sweetness of our Lord.7

John W. Petersen declares,

No other song have I but that of Jesus,
The Son of God who came to seek and save.
Who paid the price for pardon and redemption
When on the cross His life He freely gave.
No other song have I but that of Jesus
And even when I gain the other shore
I’ll join me in the great angelic anthem
And sing my Savior’s praise forevermore.8


1 All scriptural citations are taken from the NIV.

2 William A. Van Gemeren, “Psalms,” in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary, ed. Frank E. Gaebelein (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1991), 653.

3 Richard D. Patterson, “Joel,” in Cornerstone Biblical Commentary, (Carol Stream, Il, Tyndale House, 2008), 10, 125.

4 Patterson, “Jonah,” in Cornerstone Biblical Commentary, (Carol Stream, Il, Tyndale House, 2008), 10, 284.

5 Mark D. Futato, “The Book of Psalms”, in Cornerstone Biblical Commentary, (Carol Stream, Il, Tyndale House, 2009), 7, 223.

6 Richard D. Patterson, “Hosea” in Cornerstone Biblical Commentary, (Carol Stream, Il, Tyndale House, 2008), 10, 85-86.

7 Frederick W. Faver, “There’s a Wideness in God’s Mercy”.

8 John W. Petersen, “No Other Song”.

Related Topics: Christian Life

Q. Does Luke 16 Teach That Christians Cannot Consult The Dead?

Answer

The problem with using Luke 16 is that the barrier that cannot be crossed in that parable is that which exists between the lost who are dead and suffering torment (i.e. the rich man) and the dead (i.e. Lazarus) who are enjoying the bliss of Abraham’s bosom. The barrier you seek to find in Scripture is that between the abode of the dead and those living on earth.

In Luke 16:27-31 Abraham is telling the rich man that sending someone to warn his living relatives is not more likely to be received than the message contained in Moses and the Prophets. He does not say in this place that it is impossible for someone from heaven to return to earth and warn the living (even if this is true), only that it would be unprofitable.

All this to say that Luke 16 may not be the most powerful text to use with your friend. In addition, we have that puzzling text about Saul consulting Samuel through the witch at Endor (1 Samuel 28:5-25), which raises some interesting questions of its own.

I think it best to simply focus on those passages which forbid consulting psychics and the like:

10 “There shall not be found among you anyone who makes his son or his daughter pass through the fire, one who uses divination, one who practices witchcraft, or one who interprets omens, or a sorcerer (Deuteronomy 18:10; see also Deuteronomy 18:14; 2 Kings 21:1-6; Leviticus 19:26, 31; 20:6).

I find it difficult not to trust in a God who is all-knowing (omniscient), merciful and compassionate, and sovereign (in complete control of the past, present, and future). What is it that one needs to know beyond what He has revealed? Job never knew the reasons for his suffering, but in the process his faith in God grew, and we are privileged to grow by reading of his experience with God.  Often, our faith is tested by our obedience to God without knowing how it will end:

8 By faith Abraham, when he was called, obeyed by going out to a place which he was to receive for an inheritance; and he went out, not knowing where he was going (Hebrews 11:8).

Perhaps this text in Deuteronomy also applies here:

29 “The secret things belong to the LORD our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our sons forever, that we may observe all the words of this law (Deuteronomy 29:29).

Blessings,
Bob Deffinbaugh

On 3/11/2018 3:04 PM, Christina Sawle wrote:

I have used this passage to explain how the dead (or spirits of the dead) cannot return to earth to interact with the living. Especially when people share that they are going to psychics to interact with deceased love ones. When reading this portion of passage, it explains that there is a chasm between heaven and hell. I then surmise that a chasm may also exist between heaven/hell and earth (or the living). I haven't discovered a passage that directly states this but my spirit senses that it is true.

I have a friend that is a Christian believer that is returning to visit a psychic because the psychic has given her true facts about deceased loved ones. I believe that since the psychic has been accurate, she hopes to learn her future outcomes.

I attempted to explain to her That spirits and servants of the devil have existed throughout man's history. They too can give account of private activities of deceased loved ones . I explained that in the spiritual realm these servants of evil surround us and witness our daily lives. Couldn't the same spirits give account of the activities of loved ones when they were living? The Bible warns us not to interact with such individuals and things that may be associated with the devil.

My question is , am I accurate in my belief concerning evil spirits interacting through a psychic? Also , am I accurate to use this Bible passage to explain the chasm between heaven , hell and the living? I appreciate your attention in regard to my questions and hope to learn your beliefs on this issue.

Thank you and may the Lord bless,

Christina Irland-Sawle

Related Topics: Cults/Magic, Demons

Q. How Should I Handle Marriage To A Difficult Man?

Answer

When I first read your description of your marriage my mind was drawn to the book, Marriage to a Difficult Man: The Uncommon Union of Jonathan and Sarah Edwards. I suppose that reading such a book might have some value to you, but your husband is not Jonathan Edwards.

Let me first give you some biblical texts to ponder, along with a sermon article on each:

As a starting point, it would seem to me that you need to discern your husband’s spiritual state. He is either an unbeliever by his own profession, an unbeliever who falsely professes faith in Christ, or a believer who is willfully disobedient to our Lord. The difference is important because determining which category your husband is in helps you to determine the way you are to respond to him.

  • If your husband is clearly an unbeliever, then I believe 1 Peter 3:1-6 applies.
  • If your husband professes to believe, but is consistently living in disobedience and refusing to repent then Matthew 18:15-20 and 1 Corinthians 5 would apply.

Because your husband has professed faith at some point in time, I would suggest that Matthew 18:15-20 should be your starting point, your first course of action. This assumes that you are a part of a Bible-believing, Bible-practicing church. If not, I would make joining a sound church a priority.

Many disobedient spouses will protest if you seek to enlist outside help. They often protest that your marriage problems are your own, personal, family business, and thus they are not to be shared outside the family. Initially, sin should be addressed as privately as possible, so that reconciliation can most easily take place, with the fewest number of people knowing of the sin (see Matthew 18:15). But if this effort fails, then efforts to confront and restore a person must become more public. Ultimately, if the wayward individual refuses to repent altogether then he or she must be treated as an unbeliever. In effect this warns the wayward one of the possibility of divine discipline and harsh consequences, including Satan’s destructive involvement (see 1 Corinthians 5:5; 1 Timothy 1:20). In the end it removes the rebellious sinner from church fellowship, thus protecting the church from unhealthy influences. The goal of this discipline process is not only to protect the church, but also to turn the sinner from sin and bring them back into fellowship with the Lord and His church. If your husband is placed under discipline by the church, then you, like others, must regard him as though he were an unbeliever.

I would then call your attention to 1 Peter 3:1-6 and 1 Corinthians 7:13-16, which gives the believer some good instructions regarding their marriage to an unbeliever. In 1 Corinthians the believing spouse is encouraged not to divorce (though there are exceptional instances where this would be permissible – Matthew 5:31-32; 19:9) and to remain in the marriage as long as the unbeliever is willing to do so. If the unbeliever chooses to leave the marriage, then the believer is not to resist this, but to let the unbeliever depart.

Finally, I would call your attention to two additional texts, Philippians 2 and 1 Samuel 25. In Philippians 2 you find a clear definition of submission. Submission is not “doing whatever you are told,” but giving up your personal interests in order to pursue the best interests of another. This is what our Lord did when He obeyed the Father by coming to earth and dying on the cross of Calvary.

1 Samuel 25 is an example of true humility, although it does not look like submission at first glance. Clearly Abigail did not do what her husband Nabal wanted. But Abigail did put herself at considerable risk by going out to meet David (who intended to kill members of Nabal’s household), and by asking that David take out his anger on her. She sacrificed her own interests (her own well-being) in order to seek the protection of her husband (and his male servants). My point here is that true submission subordinates one’s self-interest to the best interests of others. Submission, in your case, includes the subordination of your own interests to the well-being of your husband. I would contend the initiating church discipline (Matthew 18:15-20) is seeking your husband’s best interests, but it may well have some negative repercussions for you.

Now, as for your children. If your husband were guilty of physical abuse to your children I would seriously consider calling the civil authorities (after having first consulted the church regarding this matter). I am convinced that God will not use your obedience to Him in a way that is harmful to your children. You will have to act in faith and trust God on this one.

I know it is easy to give advice when it is directed to others, but these are the biblical texts which I believe are relevant to your circumstances.

I’ll pray for you and your family,
Bob Deffinbaugh

Related Topics: Discipline, Marriage, Women

What is the significance of “firstborn” in the Bible?

I’m going to copy some articles on this subject, but let me give you my summation of all of them. In the Old Testament, the firstborn son was the one who normally received a double inheritance, and was the one who would inherit his father’s role as head of the family. God sometimes reversed this order, as he did with Jacob and Esau (Genesis 25:21-26), and as Jacob later did with Ephraim and Manasseh (Genesis 48:13-22). Reuben was the firstborn of Jacob, but his rights as the firstborn were taken away because of his sin (Genesis 35:22; 49:3-4).

The term firstborn therefore has two main meanings. The first is more literal, referring to the fact that this son is the first son to be born of his father. The second meaning refers to the rights and authority of a person, because they are the firstborn. Our Lord is the “firstborn” in several ways, as one of the attached articles indicates. But most of all He is the One who has been appointed by God to be in authority over all things (Colossians 1:13-23; especially verses 15, 18).

Closely related is the expression “son” (which you see in 2 Samuel 7:14; Psalm 2:7-9 [compare Psalm 110:1-3]; Hebrews 1:5-14). I understand the expressions, “Thou art My Son, Today I have begotten Thee” (Hebrews 1:5a) and “I will be a Father to Him, And He shall be a Son to Me” (Hebrews 5b) to be synonymous. This speaks not of the birth of our Lord (as though this were when He came into existence - for He is eternal as John 1:1-3 indicate), but of His installation as King of the earth by His Father.

FIRST-BEGOTTEN

furst-be-got’-’-n (prototokos): This Greek word is translated in two passages in the King James Version by “first-begotten” (Heb 1:6; Rev 1:5), but in all other places in the King James Version, and always in the Revised Version (British and American), by “firstborn.” It is used in its natural literal sense of Jesus Christ as Mary’s firstborn (Lk 2:7; Mt 1:25 the King James Version); it also bears the literal sense of Jesus Christ as Mary’s firstborn (Lk 2:7; Mt 1:25 the King James Version); it also bears the literal sense of the firstborn of the firstborn of men and animals (Heb 11:28). It is not used in the New Testament or Septuagint of an only child, which is expressed by monogenes (see below).

Metaphorically, it is used of Jesus Christ to express at once His relation to man and the universe and His difference from them, as both He and they are related to God. The laws and customs of all nations show that to be “firstborn” means, not only priority in time, but a certain superiority in privilege and authority. Israel is Yahweh’s firstborn among the nations (Ex 4:22; compare Jer 31:9). The Messianic King is God’s firstborn Septuagint prototokos), “the highest of the kings of the earth” (Ps 89:27). Philo applies the word to the Logos as the archetypal and governing idea of creation. Similarly Christ, as “the firstborn of all creation” (Col 1:15), is not only prior to it in time, but above it in power and authority. “All things have been created through him, and unto him” (Col 1:16). He is “sovereign Lord over all creation by virtue of primo-geniture” (Lightfoot). It denotes His status and character and not His origin; the context does not admit the idea that He is a part of the created universe. So in His incarnation He is brought into the world as “firstborn,” and God summons all His angels to worship Him (Heb 1:6). In His resurrection He is “firstborn from the dead” (Col 1:18) or “of the dead” (Rev 1:5), the origin and prince of life. And finally He is “firstborn among many brethren” in the consummation of God’s purpose of grace, when all the elect are gathered home. Not only is He their Lord, but also their pattern, God’s ideal Son and men are “foreordained to be conformed to (his) image” (Rom 8:29). Therefore the saints themselves, as growing in His likeness, and as possessing all the privileges of eldest sons, including the kingdom and the priesthood, may be called the “church of the firstborn who are enrolled in heaven” (Heb 12:23).

FIRSTBORN; FIRSTLING

furst’-born, furst’-ling (bekhor; prototokos): The Hebrew word denotes the firstborn of human beings as well as of animals (Ex 11:5), while a word from the same root denotes first-fruits (Ex 23:16). All the data point to the conclusion that among the ancestors of the Hebrews the sacrifice of the firstborn was practiced, just as the firstlings of the flocks and the first-fruits of the produce of the earth were devoted to the deity. The narrative of the Moabite war records the sacrifice of the heir to the throne by Mesha, to Chemosh, the national god (2 Ki 3:27). The barbarous custom must have become extinct at an early period in the religion of Israel (Gen 22:12). It was probably due to the influence of surrounding nations that the cruel practice was revived toward the close of the monarchical period (2 Ki 16:3; 17:17; 21:6; Jer 7:31; Ezek 16:20; 23:37; Mic 6:7). Jeremiah denies that the offering of human beings could have been an instruction from Yahweh (7:31; 19:5). The prophetic conception of God had rendered such a doctrine inconceivable. Clear evidence of the spiritualization and humanization of religion among the Israelites is furnished in the replacement, at an early stage, of the actual sacrifice of the firstborn by their dedication to the service of Yahweh. At a later stage the Levites were substituted for the firstborn. Just as the firstlings of unclean animals were redeemed with money (Ex 13:13; 34:20), for the dedication of the firstborn was substituted the consecration of the Levites to the service of the sanctuary (Nu 3:11-13,15). On the 30th day after birth the firstborn was brought to the priest by the father, who paid five shekels for the child’s redemption from service in the temple (compare Lk 2:27; Mishna Bekhoroth viii.8). For that service the Levites were accepted in place of the redeemed firstborn (Nu 3:45). See note. According to Ex 22:29-31 the firstborn were to be given to Yahweh. (The firstborn of clean animals, if free from spot or blemish, were to be sacrificed after eight days, Nu 18:16 ff.) This allusion to the sacrifice of the firstborn as part of the religion of Yahweh has been variously explained. Some scholars suspect the text, but in all probability the verse means no more than similar references to the fact that the firstborn belonged to Yahweh (Ex 13:2; 34:19). The modifying clause, with regard to the redemption of the firstborn, has been omitted. The firstborn possessed definite privileges which were denied to other members of the family. The Law forbade the disinheriting of the firstborn (Dt 21:15-17). Such legislation, in polygamous times, was necessary to prevent a favorite wife from exercising undue influence over her husband in distributing his property, as in the case of Jacob (Gen 25:23). The oldest son’s share was twice as large as that of any other son. When Elisha prayed for a double portion of Elijah’s spirit, he simply wished to be considered the firstborn, i.e. the successor, of the dying prophet. Israel was Yahweh’s firstborn (Ex 4:22; compare Jer 31:9 (Ephraim)). Israel, as compared with other nations, was entitled to special privileges. She occupied a unique position in virtue of the special relationship between Yahweh and the nation. In three passages (Rom 8:29; Col 1:15; Heb 1:6), Jesus Christ is the firstborn—among many brethren (Rom 8:29); of every creature (Col 1:16). This application of the term to Jesus Christ may be traced back to Ps 89:27 where the Davidic ruler, or perhaps the nation, is alluded to as the firstborn of Yahweh.

See CHILD; CIRCUMCISION; FIRST-BEGOTTEN; PLAGUES OF EGYPT.

NOTE—The custom of redeeming the firstborn son is preserved among the Jews to this day. After thirty days the father invites the “Kohen,” i.e. a supposed descendant of Aaron, to the house. The child is brought and shown to the “Kohen,” and the father declares the mother of the child to be an Israelite. If she is a “Kohen,” redemption is not necessary. The “Kohen” asks the father which he prefers, his child or the five shekels; the father answers that he prefers his son, and pays to the “Kohen” a sum equivalent to five shekels. After receiving the redemption-money, the “Kohen” puts his hands on the child’s head and pronounces the Aaronite blessing (Nu 6:22-27).

T. Lewis

III. Conclusion

We thus conclude that in Col 1:15 the phrase proƒtotokos paseƒs ktiseoƒs is predicated of the preexistent Christ. Its thrust is to ascribe to him a primacy of status over against all of creation. This status is summarized by saying that he is God’s heir par excellence. The heirship is predicated upon his role in creation, preservation and teleology. Behind the predication lies Paul’s theological conception of Christ as the second Adam.*** While sovereignty is the keynote of the expression and is placed in juxtaposition with creation, one must recall the OT and intertestamental usages that demonstrate overtones of special privilege and affection when the term was used as a title. That this latter nuance is completely lacking in Col 1:15 does not follow at all. Indeed, an OT illustration suffices to guard against such a conclusion. In Gen 22:2 Isaac is styled the “beloved son,” and the ensuing narrative also informs us that it was to him that Abraham gave all that he had since Isaac was his heir (24:36; cf. 25:5). Our point is simply this: It is artificial to say that eikoƒn refers only to Christ’s relationship to the Father and proƒtotokos only to creation. Since both terms depict Jesus as the second Adam, he is thereby brought into relationship with both God the Father and creation. What does not seem to be present in Paul’s use of proƒtotokos is any notion of an “eternal generation” from the Father. This is reading back into the text the dogmatic reflections of later theologians—reflections that are legitimate but not intended by the apostle Paul’s diction.

The predication of Christ as firstborn in the NT offers a challenge to Christologies ancient and modern. One cannot help being impressed by the scope of this title. At his incarnation (Luke 2:7) Jesus is designated as Mary’s firstborn, an appellative connoting his consecration to God and possibly his rightful claim to the Davidic throne. By his glorious resurrection, in which he was victorious over sin and death, he has become the “firstborn from among the dead” (Col 1:18) and now exercises sovereign sway over his redeemed people as the “firstborn from the dead” (Rev 1:5). As the head of a new, redeemed humanity destined in the eschatological transfiguration to bear the impress of his image, he is the “firstborn among many brothers” (Rom 8:29). But the conception moves not only forward toward consummation but also, in the thought of Paul, backward into the realm of protology (Col 1:17). In Paul’s view all creation finds its reference point with respect to the “firstborn over all creation,” “the heir of all things” (Col 1:15; Heb 1:2, 6). Indeed, in the eschaton Christ is the integration point for all things (Eph 1:10). A Christology that falls short of this all-encompassing affirmation does not do justice to the Scriptural data. (Multiple, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, (Lynchburg, VA: JETS (Electronic edition by Galaxie Software)) 1988.)

From The New Bible Dictionary:

FIRST-BORN.

I. In the Old Testament

The Heb. root bkr, found in many Semitic languages, has the general meaning ‘(to be) early’. bÿk£o‚r, ‘first-born’ (fem. bÿk£i‚ra‚ b), is used of people and animals, cognate terms being employed for firstfruits, and the first-born son’s privileges and responsibilities are known as his ‘birthright’ (bÿk£o‚ra„h). In Gn. 25:23, the eldest son is called rab£, a description occurring elsewhere only in 2nd-millennium cuneiform texts.

The first-born was regarded as ‘the beginning of (his) strength’ (re„ásŒi‚t£i‚áo‚n—Gn. 49:3; Dt. 21:17; cf. Ps. 78:51; 105:36) and ‘the opener of the womb’ (pet£er reh£em—Ex. 13:2, 12, 15; Nu. 18:15; etc.), emphasizing both paternal and maternal lines. The pre-eminent status of first-born was also accorded to Israel (Ex. 4:22) and the Davidic line (Ps. 89:27).

The eldest son’s special position was widely recognized in the ancient Near East, though it was not usually extended to sons of concubines or slave-girls (cf. Gn. 21:9-13; Jdg. 11:1-2). The accompanying privileges were highly valued, and in the OT included a larger inheritance, a special paternal blessing, family leadership and an honoured place at mealtimes (Gn. 25:5-6; 27:35-36; 37:21ff.; 42:37; 43:33; Dt. 21:15-17). The double inheritance of Dt. 21:15-17, though apparently unknown to the Patriarchs (Gn. 25:5-6), is mentioned in several Old Babylonian, Middle Assyrian and Nuzi documents, and is alluded to elsewhere in the OT (2 Ki. 2:9; Is. 61:7).

These privileges could normally be forfeited only by committing a serious offence (Gn. 35:22; 49:4; 1 Ch. 5:1-2) or by sale (Gn. 25:29-34), though paternal preference occasionally overruled in the matter of royal succession (1 Ki. 1-2; 2 Ch. 11:22-23; cf. 1 Ch. 26:10). There is also a marked interest, especially in Genesis, in the youngest son (Jacob, Ephraim, David; cf. Isaac, Joseph), but such cases were certainly contrary to expectation (Gn. 48:17ff.; 1 Sa. 16:6ff.).

Where no sons existed, the eldest daughter took responsibility for her younger sisters (Gn. 19:30ff.). It was an Aramaean custom (Gn. 29:26), and perhaps also an Israelite one (1 Sa. 18:17-27), for the eldest daughter to be married first. A Ugaritic text mentions the transfer of birthright from the eldest to the youngest daughter.

In Israelite ritual, the first-born of man and beast had a special place. The male first-born belonged to Yahweh (Ex. 13:2; 22:29b-30; Nu. 3:13), and this was underlined by Israel’s deliverance in the final plague. Children were redeemed in the Exodus generation by the Levites (Nu. 3:40-41), and later, at a month old, by a payment of five shekels (Nu. 18:16; cf. 3:42-51). Sacrifice of human first-born is occasionally mentioned, following Canaanite practice (2 Ki. 3:27; Ezk. 20:25-26; Mi. 6:7; cf. 1 Ki. 16:34), but this was a misinterpretation of Ex. 22:29. Clean male firstlings were sacrificed (Nu. 18:17-18; Dt. 12:6, 17), while imperfect animals were eaten in the towns (Dt. 15:21-23). Male firstlings of unclean animals were redeemed (Nu. 18:15), though an ass was redeemed with a lamb or had its neck broken (Ex. 13:13; 34:20).

Bibliography. I. Mendelsohn, BASOR 156, 1959, pp. 38-40; R. de Vaux, Ancient Israel2, 1965, pp. 41-42, 442-445, 488-489; idem, Stuades in OT Sacrifice, 1964, pp. 7O-73; J. Henninger, in E. Gräf (ed.), Festschrift W. Caskel, 1968, pp. 162-183; M. Tsevat, TDOT 2, pp. 121-127. m.j.s.

II. In the New Testament

Jesus was the first-born (pro„totokos) of his mother (Mt. 1:25; Lk. 2:7), a phrase which allows, but does not demand, that Mary had other, later children (cf. Mk. 6:3; *Brethren of the Lord). As such, Jesus was taken to the Temple by Mary and Joseph to be offered to God (Lk. 2:22-24); since Luke omits mention of a price being paid to redeem the child, he may have intended the incident to be regarded as the dedication of the first-born to the service of God (cf. 1 Sa. 1:11, 22, 28). Jesus is also the first-born of his heavenly Father. He is the first-born of all creation, not in the sense that he himself is a created being, but rather that as God’s Son he was his agent in creation and hence has authority over all created things (Col. 1:15-17). Similarly, he is the first-born in the new creation by being raised first from the dead, and is thus Lord over the church (Col. 1:18; Rev. 1:5). He is thus the first-born in a whole family of children of God who are destined to bear his image (Rom. 8:29). There may be an echo of Ps. 89:27 in Heb. 1:6, where God’s Son is the object of worship by the angels at his coming into the world (whether the incarnation, resurrection or second advent is meant is debatable). Finally, God’s people, both living and dead, can be described as the first-born who are enrolled in heaven, since they share the privileges of the Son (Heb. 12:23).

Bibliography. O. Eissfeldt, Erstlinge und Zehnten im Alten Testament, 1917; W. Michaelis, TDNT 6, pp. 871-881; K. H. Bartels, NIDNTT 1, pp. 667-670. i.h.m.1

***Editor's Note: The author appears to be referring to what the Scriptures more specifically call the "last Adam," not the "second Adam" in 1 Corinthians 15;45. Inference could perhaps contrast the reference in the verse to the "first Adam" with Jesus then as "second Adam." However to be precise with Scripture, the text calls Jesus the "last Adam," not the "second Adam."

Related Topics: Terms & Definitions

7. Abraham: The Faith of Our Father (Romans 3:27-4:25)

Introduction

A scene in one of my favorite movies, Return to Snowy River, depicts Mr. Patton, a banker, talking with a British officer. Their discussion involves the ancestry of the movie’s Harrison family. According to Mr. Patton, the Harrison family certainly could not have come from such aristocratic stock as he; they were obviously inferior. After asking a few questions about his family line and listening politely, the officer silences the snobbish Mr. Patton with one remark: “As I remember, Patton, my ancestors used to hunt down people from your family line and hang them as horse thieves!”

Is it not amazing how people remember only the noble side of their ancestry? If ever there were a people proud of their ancestry, it was the Jews. They took particular pride in being descendants of Abraham, believing that this physical descent made them better than others. They even believed their ancestry assured them of eternal life in the kingdom of God.

Many of the Jews even believed they possessed salvation solely on the basis of being Abraham’s descendant. Beyond this, they thought they determined who was eligible for salvation, because they owned it. Before the coming of Christ, they shared salvation only with those willing to become Jewish proselytes. When proselytes converted to Judaism, they must be circumcised and place themselves under the Law of Moses.

With the coming of Christ, Christianity was altogether rejected by many Jews. They did not believe Jesus was the Messiah, and they opposed the preaching of Jesus as the Messiah even to the Gentiles. Jews who converted to Christianity wanted to obtain ownership and control, just as they had done in Judaism. The Jews insisted that to be saved, Gentiles needed not only to believe in Jesus as the Messiah, but they must be circumcised and keep the Law.

In virtually all the churches he founded or to which he wrote, Paul found it necessary to refute and correct the errors of the Judaisers. This included the church at Rome. Throughout the Book of Romans, Paul deals with the misconceptions and heresies of Judaism. He has already shown that “all,” Jews as well as Gentiles, fall short of the glory of God. In order to be saved from their sin and condemnation, all are in need of a righteousness not their own.

Some of Judaism’s principle errors stem from a false sense of pride and security, due to their physical descent from Abraham. To the Jews, Abraham was their father. They took great pride in looking upon themselves as the sons of Abraham. Paul must correct some of their views concerning Abraham. The entire fourth chapter of Romans is therefore devoted to Abraham. Paul does far more than show the Jews to be mistaken concerning the righteousness of Abraham; Paul shows that Abraham was justified by faith, apart from works, and that he is the “father” of all who believe, Jew or Gentile. Abraham’s righteousness is precisely the same righteousness which God has made available to men today, and on the same basis.

Structure of the Text

Paul begins in chapter 4 to answer the three questions he has raised at the end of chapter 3. These questions begin to interpret and apply Paul’s teaching in the first three chapters of Romans and serve as an introduction to what follows. Those three questions are:

  • Where is boasting? (3:27-28)
  • Is God the God of the Jews only, or of the Gentiles also? (3:29-30)
  • Is the Law nullified by salvation by faith? (3:31)

The entire fourth chapter of Romans surrounds Abraham, the Old Testament patriarch. Abraham’s faith in God’s promise of His blessings through Abraham’s seed is the central issue. This promised “seed” would come about through a son, whom he and Sarai would have. His belief in God’s promise of this son was reckoned to him as righteousness. Chapter 4 can be divided into three major segments:

  • Abraham’s justification by faith alone, apart from works (4:1-8)
  • Abraham’s justification by faith, as a Gentile, before circumcision (4:9-17)
  • Abraham’s resurrection faith is just like that required today (4:17-25)112

Review of Abraham’s Life

In the Old and New Testament, Abraham113 is named in 230 verses. References to Abraham (or Abram) in Genesis 11–25:10 disclose biographical incidents in the life of Abraham. From this point on, the 135 remaining references to Abraham point back to these historical events. Paul’s argument in Romans 4 assumes some grasp of the events of Abraham’s life. As a background to our study, we must consider a brief overview of the major events in the life of Abraham, the father of our faith.

Originally Abram114 came from the land of Ur of the Chaldeans (Genesis 11:28). Terah, Abram’s father, took Abram and Lot as far as Haran where they settled. God instructed Abraham to leave Haran and go to the place He would show him. There, God promised to bless Abraham by making of him a great nation, and by blessing the entire world though his seed (Genesis 12:1-3). Abram obeyed, taking along Lot, his nephew. When a famine occurred in Canaan, Abram went to Egypt. Fearing he might be killed and his still beautiful wife might be taken in marriage, Abram passed off his wife Sarai as his sister. This put at risk the promised “seed,” which would come through Abram and Sarai. Pharaoh took Sarai into his harem, but God prevented a consummation of this “marriage.” Pharaoh learned Sarai was Abram’s wife and rebuked him, escorting him back to the land of Canaan (12:10-20).

After Abram and Lot were separated (Genesis 13), Lot was taken captive, and Abram went to his rescue. After Lot’s successful recovery, Abram met Melchizedek, a mysterious king to whom Abram offered a tithe (Genesis 14). Reiterating His covenant with Abram and promising him a son, Abraham believed God’s promise, and his faith was reckoned to him as righteousness (Genesis 15:1-6). God further told Abram of the 400 years his descendants would be mistreated in a foreign land, after which they would possess the land of Canaan (15:12-21).

As the years passed, Abram and Sarai became concerned, since no son had yet been given them by God. They decided that it was only necessary for Abram to father the child and that Hagar could serve as the mother of the child, in Sarai’s place. At age 86, through Hagar, Abram and Sarah had a son, Ishmael. This son was not the “son of promise,” but God would care for the land as He had said (16:1-16).

At age 99, 24 years after God first promised a “seed” for Abraham, God reaffirmed His covenant with Abram and Sarai. He changed Abram’s name to Abraham and Sarai’s name to Sarah. The next year, God promised, they would have a son. God commanded Abraham to be circumcised and to circumcise all the males in his household. Circumcision was to be a sign of God’s (Abrahamic) covenant for all generations to come. Thus, years after he was declared to be righteous, on the basis of his faith (Genesis 17),115Abraham was circumcised.

God told Abraham, His friend, what He was about to do with the wicked cities of Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 18 and 19). Abraham pled with God to spare these cities, if but a handful of righteous were found. The cities were destroyed, with only Lot and his immediate family spared. Watching from afar, Abram’s spirit was very different from that of Jonah many years later (compare Genesis 19:27-29; Jonah 4:1-11). After repeating his sin of deception in Gerar before Abimelech (Genesis 20), Abraham and Sarah had Isaac (Genesis 21). Sacrificing this son of promise was the greatest test of Abraham’s life, but it revealed that Abraham had finally come to trust in God as the One able to give life to the dead. Abram no longer needed to lie or to be afraid (Genesis 22).

At the age of 127, Sarah died (Genesis 23). Abraham lived yet another 38 years, married again, and fathered more children (25:1-4). Sarah’s burial was a demonstration of Abraham’s faith, for it was necessary to purchase the piece of land which would serve as the family burial site, in Canaan. That land which God had promised to give to Abraham someday was not yet his. He nevertheless bought the parcel of land, on which Sarah, and he, and his descendants could be buried (chapter 23).

As Abraham’s days drew to a close, he became very concerned about finding the right kind of wife for his son, Isaac. Commissioning his most trusted servant to secure a wife for his son, she was not be from among the Canaanites nor was Isaac to be taken back to the land from which he had come. Guided by the hand of God, his trusted servant found Rebekah as a wife for Isaac, from Abraham’s relative, Bethuel (Genesis 24). After this, Abraham died at the ripe old age of 175 (Genesis 25). Chapters 11–25 of Genesis portray 100 years of Abraham’s walk with God, as a sojourner in the land his descendants would one day possess. One fourth of this century of Abraham’s walk was spent in waiting for the son God had promised.

Abraham’s name is mentioned many other times in the Old Testament. Most often in the books of Israel’s history God’s name is mentioned to demonstrate that God’s actions were in fulfillment of His promise to Abraham. The consistency of God’s promises and program in history is clearly demonstrated. This same faithfulness is emphasized in the Psalms:

Seek the LORD and His strength; Seek His face continually. Remember His wonders which He has done, His marvels, and the judgments uttered by His mouth, O seed of Abraham, His servant, O sons of Jacob, His chosen ones! He is the LORD our God; His judgments are in all the earth. He has remembered His covenant forever, The word which He commanded to a thousand generations, The covenant which He made with Abraham, And His oath to Isaac. Then He confirmed it to Jacob for a statute, To Israel as an everlasting covenant, Saying, “To you I will give the land of Canaan As the portion of your inheritance,” When they were only a few men in number, Very few, and strangers in it. And they wandered about from nation to nation, From one kingdom to another people. He permitted no man to oppress them, And He reproved kings for their sakes: “Do not touch My anointed ones, And do My prophets no harm” (Psalm 105:4-15).

When Isaiah spoke of the righteousness and salvation God was to provide, as He promised, He called upon His people to think back to their beginnings, in Abraham and Sarah:

“Listen to Me, you who pursue righteousness, Who seek the LORD: Look to the rock from which you were hewn, And to the quarry from which you were dug. Look to Abraham your father, And to Sarah who gave birth to you in pain; When he was but one I called him, Then I blessed him and multiplied him.” Indeed, the LORD will comfort Zion; He will comfort all her waste places. And her wilderness He will make like Eden, And her desert like the garden of the LORD; Joy and gladness will be found in her, Thanksgiving and sound of a melody. “Pay attention to Me, O My people; And give ear to Me, O My nation; For a law will go forth from Me, And I will set My justice for a light of the peoples. My righteousness is near, My salvation has gone forth, And My arms will judge the peoples; The coastlands will wait for Me, And for My arm they will wait expectantly. Lift up your eyes to the sky, Then look to the earth beneath; For the sky will vanish like smoke, And the earth will wear out like a garment, And its inhabitants will die in like manner, But my salvation shall be forever, And My righteousness shall not wane. Listen to Me, you who know righteousness, A people in whose heart is My law; Do not fear the reproach of man, Neither be dismayed at their revilings. For the moth will eat them like a garment, And the grub will eat them like wool. But My righteousness shall be forever, And My salvation to all generations” (Isaiah 51:1-8).

Jeremiah too spoke of Israel’s future deliverance and salvation in terms of the fulfillment of God’s covenant with Abraham (see Jeremiah 23:19-26). Ezekiel likewise called upon Israel to trust in Him, by faith. They were to remember that Abraham, who was but one man, became a great nation because of God’s faithfulness to His promise (see Ezekiel 33:23-29). The final words of Micah’s prophecy remind God’s people of His faithfulness to His covenant promise to Abraham and to his descendants:

“Shepherd Thy people with Thy scepter, The flock of Thy possession Which dwells by itself in the woodland, In the midst of a fruitful field. Let them feed in Bashan and Gilead As in the days of old. As in the days when you came out from the land of Egypt, I will show you miracles.” Nations will see and be ashamed Of all their might. They will put their hand on their mouth, Their ears will be deaf. They will lick the dust like a serpent, Like reptiles of the earth. They will come trembling out of their fortresses; To the LORD our God they will come in dread, And they will be afraid before Thee. Who is a God like Thee, who pardons iniquity And passes over the rebellious act of the remnant of His possession? He does not retain His anger forever, Because He delights in unchanging love. He will again have compassion on us; He will tread our iniquities under foot. Yes, Thou wilt cast all their sins Into the depths of the sea. Thou wilt give truth to Jacob And unchanging love to Abraham, Which Thou didst swear to our forefathers From the days of old (Micah 7:14-20).

These Old Testament prophets spoke of the righteousness and salvation God would provide in fulfillment of His promise to Abraham. That righteousness, like the righteousness of Abraham, was not a righteousness which men earned by their law-keeping, but a righteousness which God Himself would provide through His Messiah, the coming Savior.

Abraham is also a very prominent person in the New Testament. Especially in the Gospels do we see the distorted thinking of the Jews concerning Abraham. The Jews took pride in their physical descent from Abraham, believing that being his seed was synonymous with salvation. John the Baptist immediately challenges this thinking as incorrect:

But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming for baptism, he said to them, “You brood of vipers, who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? Therefore bring forth fruit in keeping with repentance; and do not suppose that you can say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham for our father’; for I say to you, that God is able from these stones to raise up children to Abraham. And the axe is already laid at the root of the trees; every tree therefore that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. As for me, I baptize you with water for repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, and I am not fit to remove His sandals; He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. And His winnowing fork is in His hand, and He will thoroughly clear His threshing floor; and He will gather His wheat into the barn, but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire” (Matthew 3:7-12).

Believing they had confirmed reservations in the kingdom of God, the Jews saw the Gentiles as those who would never enter into the blessings promised Abraham. They were wrong. Jesus’ teaching must have rocked the boat of Jewish exclusivism. Consider these instances of Jesus’ teaching which must have horrified the Jews. Note especially Jesus’ references to Abraham, the blessings of God, and the kingdom.

Jesus marveled at and commended the faith of the Gentile centurion:

Now when Jesus heard this, He marveled, and said to those who were following, “Truly I say to you, I have not found such great faith with anyone in Israel. And I say to you, that many shall come from east and west, and recline at the table with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven; but the sons of the kingdom shall be cast out into the outer darkness; in that place there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth” (Matthew 8:10-12).

Because of his faith, the centurion would be at the banquet table, along with Abraham, but many of the “sons of the kingdom” would be cast into hell. Here was a revolutionary thought to the Jews, but one completely consistent with the Old Testament and with the gospel.

A similar shock was in store for the Jews when Jesus told the story of the rich man and Lazarus (Luke 16:19-31). According to Jewish thinking, the rich man would surely go to heaven while the poor man was surely destined for hell. Jesus reversed the destinies of these two. The rich man was found in hell, and the poor man, Lazarus, went to heaven. Most shocking are the words of the rich man when appealing for mercy:

“Now it came about that the poor man died and he was carried away by the angels to Abraham’s bosom; and the rich man also died and was buried. And in Hades he lifted up his eyes, being in torment, and saw Abraham far away, and Lazarus in his bosom. And he cried out and said, ‘ Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool off my tongue; for I am in agony in this flame.’ But Abraham said, ‘Child, remember that during your life you received your good things, and likewise Lazarus bad things; but now he is being comforted here, and you are in agony. And besides all this, between us and you there is a great chasm fixed, in order that those who wish to come over from here to you may not be able, and that none may cross over from there to us.’ And he said, ‘Then I beg you, Father, that you send him to my father’s house—for I have five brothers—that he may warn them, lest they also come to this place of torment.’ But Abraham said, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them hear them.’ But he said, ‘No, Father Abraham, but if someone goes to them from the dead, they will repent!’ But he said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone rises from the dead’” (Luke 16:22-31, emphasis mine).

Imagine this scene and the Jews’ horror at these words from the lips of our Lord. Heaven was, not unexpectedly, “Abraham’s bosom” (Luke 16:22). But the rich man, who called out from hell, called out, “Father Abraham” (see verses 24 and 30). Priding themselves that Abraham was their physical forefather, the Jews were self-assured that they would enter into the promised kingdom and the blessings promised Abraham. And now, from the depths of hell, they call out to “Father Abraham.” Surely Jesus was teaching precisely what John the Baptist before Him, and Paul after Him, were teaching: that physical descent from Abraham does not assure anyone of salvation. Salvation is attained through faith and not through the fatherhood of Abraham.

The great showdown between Jesus and the Jewish religious leaders was over Jesus’ relationship to Abraham:

Jesus therefore was saying to those Jews who had believed Him, “If you abide in My word, then you are truly disciples of Mine; and you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” They answered Him, “We are Abraham’s offspring, and have never yet been enslaved to anyone; how is it that You say, ‘You shall become free’?” Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is the slave of sin. And the slave does not remain in the house forever; the son does remain forever. If therefore the Son shall make you free, you shall be free indeed. I know that you are Abraham’s offspring; yet you seek to kill Me, because My word has no place in you. I speak the things which I have seen with My Father; therefore you also do the things which you heard from your father.” They answered and said to Him, “ Abraham is our father.” Jesus said to them, “If you are Abraham’s children, do the deeds of Abraham. But as it is, you are seeking to kill Me, a man who has told you the truth, which I heard from God; this Abraham did not do. You are doing the deeds of your father.” They said to Him, “We were not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.” Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love Me; for I proceeded forth and have come from God, for I have not even come on My own initiative, but He sent Me. Why do you not understand what I am saying? It is because you cannot hear My word. You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature; for he is a liar, and the father of lies. But because I speak the truth, you do not believe Me. Which one of you convicts Me of sin? If I speak truth, why do you not believe Me? He who is of God hears the words of God; for this reason you do not hear them, because you are not of God.” The Jews answered and said to Him, “Do we not say rightly that You are a Samaritan and have a demon?” Jesus answered, “I do not have a demon; but I honor My Father, and you dishonor Me. But I do not seek My glory; there is One who seeks and judges. Truly, truly, I say to you, if anyone keeps My word he shall never see death.” The Jews said to Him, “Now we know that You have a demon. Abraham died, and the prophets also; and You say, ‘If anyone keeps My word, he shall never taste of death.’ Surely You are not greater than our father Abraham, who died? The prophets died too; whom do You make Yourself out to be?” Jesus answered, “If I glorify Myself, My glory is nothing; it is My Father who glorifies Me, of whom you say, ‘He is our God’; and you have not come to know Him, but I know Him; and if I say that I do not know Him, I shall be a liar like you, but I do know Him, and keep His word. Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day, and he saw it and was glad.” The Jews therefore said to Him, “You are not yet fifty years old, and have You seen Abraham?” Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was born, I am.” Therefore they picked up stones to throw at Him; but Jesus hid Himself, and went out of the temple (John 8:31-59, emphasis mine).

In this passage we see that the Jews emphatically boasted that Abraham was their father (verses 33 and 39). But clearly it was not Abraham who would save the Jews, but the Son (8:36). The Jews in reality, as evidenced by their unbelief, were sons of the devil (verse 44). Those who were truly Abraham’s seed would believe in Him and obey His words. In so doing, they would never see death (verse 51). Did Jesus think Himself better than Abraham, the Jews challenged? Jesus’ final response was, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was born, I AM” (verse 58).

In preaching the gospel to the Jews, Jesus was presented as God’s only provision for entering into the kingdom and experiencing the blessings God promised to provide through Abraham’s seed (see Acts 7:2ff.). Paul adds a very significant note to this whole matter. He points out that the “seed” of Abraham, through whom the blessings were to be poured out on all who believe, Jew or Gentile, was singular. The “seed” was one Person—Jesus; it was not plural, the nation Israel:

Brethren, I speak in terms of human relations: even though it is only a man’s covenant, yet when it has been ratified, no one sets it aside or adds conditions to it. Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. He does not say, “And to seeds,” referring to many, but rather to one, “And to your seed,” that is, Christ (Galatians 3:15-16).

No wonder Paul devotes an entire chapter to Abraham’s justification by faith! Not only does Abraham’s justification prove the Jews wrong for trusting and boasting in Abraham as their physical forefather, but it proves Abraham to be the father of all those who believe in God, by faith!

The Implications of Paul’s Teaching
(3:27-31)

27 Where then is boasting? It is excluded. By what kind of law? Of works? No, but by a law of faith. 28 For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law. 29 Or is God the God of Jews only? Is He not the God of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, 30 since indeed God who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith is one. 31 Do we then nullify the Law through faith? May it never be! On the contrary, we establish the Law.

Thus far, Paul has shown that all mankind fails to meet God’s standard of righteousness, all have fallen short of God’s promised blessings and have come under divine condemnation. Jews and Gentiles alike are under God’s wrath and the sentence of death. In His righteousness, God condemns the sin of men. In His righteousness, God has made a provision for man’s justification, by punishing Jesus Christ in our place on the cross of Calvary. All who believe in Jesus Christ and accept His provision of righteousness by faith, are justified, saved by grace.

What does all of this mean? Paul raises three questions at the end of chapter 3 in verses 27-31 which pursue the practical implications of his teaching. He asks and answers each question very briefly. He wants the answer to each question to be clear in the mind of his reader. He then follows up each answer, briefly provided in verses 27-31, with a more extensive explanation in his teaching which follows. Chapter 4 deals directly with the answer to the first two questions. Chapters 6-8 expand on the role of the Law in the life of the believer.

The first question, found in verse 27 is this: What basis does anyone have for boasting concerning salvation? There is no basis for boasting. Men cannot boast about receiving something which they did not earn. Men are saved by faith, on the basis of what God has done through His Son, Jesus Christ. Anyone who boasts in his salvation does not understand grace and may never have received salvation in the first place.

The second question is recorded in verse 29: Are God’s dealings with men universal, or are they restricted to Jews only? Paul’s question seems to extend beyond salvation alone to God’s interest and involvement in the lives of men. The Jews may have thought God’s only interest was in them and that He could care less about the Gentiles. The Gentiles would be like the outcast class in India,116 which neither receives the privileges of the upper class nor is even regarding as existing by those of a higher cast. Perhaps the Jews thought God looked upon the Gentiles in this same way. But Paul is quick to affirm that “God … is one.” God deals with both Jews and Gentiles on the same basis. This is because Jewishness and Gentileness is irrelevant to the issue of salvation. The only determining factor in salvation is the absence or presence of faith.

The third question is found in verse 31: Is the Law of no use or value, now that faith has come? Does entering into a relationship with God by faith set the Law aside? Not at all. Abraham’s faith was before the Law. The faith of men like David was evident in his love for and obedience to the Law. The Law was never meant to save. In one sense, the Law was as useless in Old Testament times as it is today. The Law could never save. The Law does have a positive role to play, however, and thus it is not to be rejected. Our Lord said He did not come to destroy the Law but to fulfill it. Righteousness delights in the Law, but sin disdains it.

Justification by Faith
(4:1-8)

1 What then shall we say that Abraham, our forefather according to the flesh, has found? 2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about; but not before God. 3 For what does the Scripture say? “And Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness.” 4 Now to the one who works, his wage is not reckoned as a favor, but as what is due. 5 But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness, 6 just as David also speaks of the blessing upon the man to whom God reckons righteousness apart from works: 7 “Blessed are those whose lawless deeds have been forgiven, And whose sins have been covered. 8 “Blessed is the man whose sin the Lord will not take into account.”

Do we have any grounds for boasting? More particularly, do the Jews have grounds? Our study of Abraham, especially in the Gospels, revealed that the Jews believed they did have grounds for boasting: Abraham was their forefather. But what if Abraham himself could not boast? If Abraham could not boast, could his descendants boast? By going back to the “first father” of the Jews, at least in their minds, Paul caused the whole Jewish system of pride and boasting to collapse with one well-placed blow. By demonstrating that Abraham himself had no grounds for boasting, no Jew could boast in Abraham or in being his descendant.

Performance is the only basis for boasting in oneself. Had Abraham’s righteousness been rooted in his works, he would have grounds for boasting, though in comparison with God his accomplishments, no matter how great, would be insignificant. If Abraham was justified by faith, then he could take no credit at all for his righteousness, for it would be a gift from God.

The Word of God instructs us that such was the case. Paul turns our attention to Genesis 15:6 and the statement made by Moses, “AND ABRAHAM BELIEVED GOD, AND IT WAS RECKONED TO HIM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS.” Abraham’s works were not the basis for his justification; his faith was the basis. Abraham’s faith was in God and in His promise of a son. Therefore, the one person about whom Abraham could boast was God. Abraham’s faith, and his justification, were a favor from God and not a payment for services rendered on God’s behalf. Works and grace are two very distinct entities. Men can only boast when they receive payment for their works. Men cannot boast when they receive grace.

Abraham’s faith alone did not save him. God saved Abraham by means of faith. But more than this, Abraham’s faith was in God’s promise and in God’s provision. Abraham believed God. Specifically, Abraham believed God when He promised him a son. Abraham’s faith was faith in God, in God’s promise, and in God’s ability to provide that which He promised. For the Jews, Abraham was the star of the show. To Paul, God was the center of attention. The greatness of Abraham’s faith is not in view, but the greatness of the God in whom he trusted. Indeed, we need not look far to see how frail and fragile was Abraham’s faith. How often his faith lapsed! He believed God, and yet he lied about the identity of his wife to Abimelech (Genesis 20).117 He believed God, and yet he had a son by Hagar (Genesis 16).

The process or transaction by which God justified Abraham is known by theologians as imputation.118 In our text, the term used for this imputation is “reckoned”7 (verses 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 22, 23, 24).119 In general, the term means to “reckon,” “consider,” “compute,” or “take into account.” The reckoning process is essential to man’s salvation. It enables God to deal with men in a way which saves them and which demonstrates His righteousness. In our text, Paul stresses that God’s imputation is a coin with two sides. The imputation by which God saves sinners is two-fold.

First,120 God imputes the righteousness of Jesus Christ to men. Men cannot attain to God’s standard of righteousness. Men can never become righteous by their good works. Their righteousness must come from another source. Paul cites Genesis 15:6 to show that God reckoned Abraham to be righteous. He immediately follows this statement with another in verses 4 and 5 which stresses that this was not something which Abraham earned, but rather favor which God bestowed upon Abraham.

Second, the imputation which results in man’s salvation has another side: not only does God impute the righteousness of Christ to unrighteous men, He also does not impute men’s sins to them. God saves men by not imputing their sin to them and by imputing the righteousness of Christ to them. From what Paul has already said, and what he says elsewhere, we know that this is possible because Christ has taken our place. Our sins have been imputed to Christ, so that He was punished in our place. His righteousness has been imputed to us, so that we are regarded and treated as righteous by God, since we, by faith, are in Him.

The imputation of righteousness to men is illustrated by the justification of Abraham, who was reckoned righteous by God because of his faith. The non-imputation of sin to men is illustrated by the experience of David, as described by his own words in Psalm 32. This is his psalm of confession. His sin was that of adultery with Bathsheba and the murder of her husband, Uriah. The Law was in force, which pronounced sentence upon David. But the Law made no provision for David’s salvation. It could only pronounce him guilty and worthy of death. David knew the grace of God, and he pled for mercy and forgiveness. On the basis of his faith in the promise of salvation, and in the character of God, David pled for forgiveness and received it. God did not impute his sin to him, though he deserved to die. Men are saved because God imputes righteousness to them, but not their sin. God saves men through the process of imputation, on the basis of the work of Christ on Calvary, and in response to faith.121

Abraham’s righteousness then was not due to his Law-keeping or to his good works, but only to God’s grace. On the basis of faith alone, apart from works, God reckoned Abraham to be righteous. Abraham believed God’s promise and was saved. Abraham had nothing to boast about, other than God’s grace. His offspring could not boast either.

Abraham the Gentile—The “Father of Us All”
(4:9-17)

9 Is this blessing then upon the circumcised, or upon the uncircumcised also? For we say, “Faith was reckoned to Abraham as righteousness.” 10 How then was it reckoned? While he was circumcised, or uncircumcised? Not while circumcised, but while uncircumcised; 11 and he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had while uncircumcised, that he might be the father of all who believe without being circumcised, that righteousness might be reckoned to them, 12 and the father of circumcision to those who not only are of the circumcision, but who also follow in the steps of the faith of our father Abraham which he had while uncircumcised. 13 For the promise to Abraham or to his descendants that he would be heir of the world was not through the Law, but through the righteousness of faith. 14 For if those who are of the Law are heirs, faith is made void and the promise is nullified; 15 for the Law brings about wrath, but where there is no law, neither is there violation. 16 For this reason it is by faith, that it might be in accordance with grace, in order that the promise may be certain to all the descendants, not only to those who are of the Law, but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all, 17 (as it is written, “A father of many nations have I made you”) in the sight of Him whom he believed, even God, who gives life to the dead and calls into being that which does not exist.

Paul’s first question and answer recorded in Romans 3:27 has been documented by the experience of Israel’s most revered patriarch, Abraham. Paul now moves to the second question (3:29-30): Is God only the God of the Jews, or is He the God of both the Jews and the Gentiles? Paul’s opponents might be willing to concede that God has always justified men on the basis of faith and not by works. But just who is eligible for justification? The Jews viewed themselves as a privileged group, with exclusive access to God’s blessings. If a Gentile wanted to be saved, he must first convert to Judaism. He must be circumcised, and then keep the Law of Moses (see Acts 15).

In verses 9-17 Paul will turn to events in the life of Abraham, the “Father of the Jews,” to show that he is even more so “the father of all believers.” Paul turns to the rite of circumcision, which was the sign of the Abrahamic Covenant.122 He reminds his readers that Abraham was justified apart from works, without the Law, and years before he was circumcised. By Jewish definitions, Abraham was really a Gentile when he was saved.

The first recorded promise of a son in the Book of Genesis was given at the time of Abraham’s call (Genesis 12:1-3). At that time, Abram was 75 years old (12:4). In Genesis 15 we are told of a more specific promise of a son, of Abram’s belief, and of his justification by faith. It is almost as though we have been watching a motion picture. Suddenly, Paul shouts, “Stop the projector!,” right at Genesis 15:6. He now asks the question, “Was Abraham circumcised here, at the time he was reckoned as righteous by God, or was it later?” We all know it was years later. Abraham’s circumcision is recorded in Genesis 17, and we are told that he was then 99 years old. Abraham was justified by faith, apart from works, the Law, or circumcision. Let’s face it; Abraham was a Gentile when he was justified by faith. God is the God of all men, and not just of the Jews.

Circumcision did not contribute in any way to Abraham’s salvation. It could not have done so. It was merely a sign, a seal. Circumcision played much the same role in Abraham’s day as baptism does in our day. It is only a visible token or sign of an invisible change, of salvation. Abraham’s circumcision testified to his justification by faith, apart from works. His circumcision, like his salvation, meant something very different than what the Jews made of it. If Abraham could be saved without being circumcised, so the Gentiles could be saved, apart from circumcision, the Law of Moses, or Judaism.

Just as circumcision did not contribute to the salvation of Abraham, neither did the Law. The Law of Moses would not be given for more than 400 years. It did not exist at the time of Abraham’s justification by faith. And even if the Law were in existence at that time, it could not have saved Abraham. The Law cannot save. The Law cannot make any man righteous. The Law can only condemn men as sinners, worthy of God’s eternal wrath. If the Law could justify men, it would nullify faith. Faith, however, does not nullify the Law. Faith brings about the imputation of the righteousness which the Law defines and demands, but which it cannot produce. The Law required perfect obedience; God’s promise requires only faith.

Faith enables God to save men, because it enables God to deal with men in accordance with grace. The wrath which the Law demands has been suffered by our Lord on Calvary. Having satisfied God’s holy anger (propitiation, see 3:25), God can now deal with men in accordance with mercy and grace. God can prevent men from suffering the wrath they deserve and deal benevolently with men by giving them blessings they do not deserve.

Abraham is therefore shown to be much more than the “father of the Jews.” He is the “father of us all,” the father of all believers. This too is in fulfillment of God’s promise to Abraham, that he would be “A FATHER OF MANY NATIONS” (verse 17, citing Genesis 17:5). Abraham’s faith was faith in God. He believed that God is able to “give life to the dead.” Abraham’s resurrection faith is the last topic of Paul’s teaching, as recorded in Genesis 4:17-25.

Abraham’s Faith: Resurrection Faith
(4:17-25)

17 (as it is written, “A father of many nations have I made you”) in the sight of Him whom he believed, even God, who gives life to the dead and calls into being that which does not exist. 18 In hope against hope he believed, in order that he might become a father of many nations, according to that which had been spoken, “So shall your descendants be.” 19 And without becoming weak in faith he contemplated his own body, now as good as dead since he was about a hundred years old, and the deadness of Sarah’s womb; 20 yet, with respect to the promise of God, he did not waver in unbelief, but grew strong in faith, giving glory to God, 21 and being fully assured that what He had promised, He was able also to perform. 22 Therefore also it was reckoned to him as righteousness. 23 Now not for his sake only was it written, that it was reckoned to him, 24 but for our sake also, to whom it will be reckoned, as those who believe in Him who raised Jesus our Lord from the dead, 25 He who was delivered up because of our transgressions, and was raised because of our justification.

Verse 17 serves as a transition, linking Paul’s argument in verses 18-25 with his previous teaching in verses 9-16. This verse is therefore included in both sections. In this last section of chapter 4, Paul strikes a final blow against the errors of Judaism. Turning to the life of Abraham one final time, he shows that Abraham’s saving faith was a “resurrection faith.” His faith, like ours, was in a God who was able to raise the dead.

The doctrine of the resurrection of the dead was a serious problem for the Sadducees. They did not believe in the resurrection, or in the afterlife, in heaven or hell, in angels or demons. They were anti-supernaturalists. The Pharisees had a different problem. They were supernaturalists. They did believe in heaven and hell, angels and demons, and the resurrection of the dead. Their problem was that while in principle they believed in the doctrine of the resurrection, they rejected it in the person of Jesus Christ. They refused to admit that Jesus had been raised from the dead. To do so would have meant they were wrong. This would prove that Jesus was the promised Messiah, and that God had shown His divine approval of His earthly ministry.

Jesus staked His entire ministry on His ability to rise from the dead (see Matthew 12:38-41; John 10:15-18). The apostles preached the resurrection of Christ as a fundamental element of the gospel, which must be believed in order for men to be saved (Acts 2:22-42; 3:14-15; 4:2; 17:18; Romans 10:9). The writer to the Hebrews teaches that all the Old Testament saints believed in the resurrection of the dead (Hebrews 11:13-40, especially verses 13-15, 19, 35, 39-40). Paul finds in Abraham’s life a dramatic demonstration of his “resurrection faith.”

Abraham “believed in God, who gives life to the dead, and calls into being that which does not exist” (verse 17). Abraham’s faith did not cause him to close his eyes to reality. He knew that so far as bearing children was concerned Sarah and he were “as good as dead” (verse 19). And yet he considered also that God’s promises are as certain as God’s power to fulfill them. And so he believed God’s promise of a son, even though this would take, as it were, a resurrection of the dead (he and Sarah, speaking in terms of their ability to reproduce). He knew that “what He promised, He was able to perform” (verse 21). It was because of this very faith, a resurrection faith, that righteousness was imputed to him (verse 22).

In verses 23-25, Paul links the “resurrection faith” of Abraham with the faith of every true believer today. Justification comes to all who, by faith, believe in God who raised His Son, Jesus Christ, from the dead. In the final verse of his argument (verse 25), Paul speaks of the work of Christ in such a way as to show the absolute necessity of the resurrection of Jesus, and in the sinner’s need to believe His resurrection, for salvation. The sacrificial death of our Lord, Paul writes, was required by our transgressions. Christ had to die, because “the wages of sin is death.” Our justification requires His resurrection, Paul writes:

He who was delivered up because of our transgressions, and was raised because of our justification (Romans 4:25).123

Conclusion

If anything is clear in this chapter it is this: Abraham’s justification by faith is precisely the same as that which the gospel offers to all men, Jew or Gentile, today. It is justification based upon the person and work of God, believed by faith, accomplished by imputation. It is a free gift, available to those who are uncircumcised and who are not under the Law of Moses, like Abraham.

Justification by faith is God’s only way of saving men. It is also the same way in which men have been saved from the beginning of human history. Men were not saved by works in Old Testament times and are now saved by faith. Men have always been saved by faith, apart from works. Abraham is an excellent example of justification by faith because he lived in a day when neither the Law of Moses nor the rite of circumcision existed as a part of Israel’s religion. He was saved apart from any works, apart from circumcision, and apart from the Law. His justification, like ours, was based upon God’s faithfulness to His promise and not on human performance. It is a gift of God’s grace and not something earned.

Abraham’s life teaches us important lessons about faith. We learn from Abraham’s justification that faith is the only means by which men may obtain righteousness. We also see that while men have faith in God, it is not perfect faith. Abraham’s faith faltered when he lied about his wife and when he attempted to produce a child through Hagar. His faith continued to grow, throughout his life, as he came to appreciate more and more the faithfulness of God. His faith enabled him to see life as it really was (he was as good as dead with regard to having a child with Sarah), but he saw God as powerful and His promises as sure. His faith was a reasoning faith. He did not have to be told that God was able to produce life from death; he reasoned that God was able to do as He promised.124

The faith of Abraham and the birth of Isaac remind us that even when we have faith in God’s promise there is no assurance that God’s promise will be immediately fulfilled. Abraham believed God’s promise of a son, but he still waited 25 years for that son to be given. The story of Abraham’s life makes it very clear that God had a certain time for that son to be born. God’s “delay” was a time for Abraham’s faith to be tested and strengthened. Why is it that some tell us that if we have not immediately received the answers to our prayers, we do not have enough faith? Faith may not remove all doubts, and it certainly does not remove all delays.

As I have studied this text, I have been reminded of the importance of remembering our roots. We dare not forget how it was that God saved us, and for what purpose we were saved. Abraham was hopeless and helpless, and God, in His great mercy and grace, saved him, apart from any human merit or contribution. Abraham’s justification, like ours, should result in humility, gratitude, adoration and worship. Abraham’s response to God’s revelation (the Abrahamic Covenant, and specifically God’s promise of a son) was belief, growth in faith, and giving glory to God (verse 20).125

Because of their unbelief and rejection of God’s full and final revelation in Christ, the minds of the Jews were darkened (see 2 Corinthians 3:12-18), so that they distorted Abraham’s conversion to that which fit and which sanctioned their own unbelief and self-righteousness. The Israelites forgot that the blessings of God upon them were not due to their own righteousness or status, but due to God’s grace. They failed to recall that the righteousness which God requires is also that which He provides, by imputation. Thus, there can be no boasting. There is no basis for pride. There should only be humble gratitude and thanksgiving to God for His unspeakable gift.

I challenge you to think through the Scriptures, Old Testament and New, and to recall all of the times when God instructed His people to remember their roots, in order that they might be humbled and serve God in truth. How easy it is for us to forget that we are what we are by the grace of God, apart from anything we have done, or will do. To God be the glory!


112 I include verse 17 in the last two segments because it serves as a transition between the two.

113 This does not include references to “Abram,” prior to the time when God changed his name to “Abraham” in Genesis 17.

114 The name Abram means “exalted father”; Abraham means “father of a multitude.”

115 Abraham was first promised a “seed” in Genesis 12:2 at the age of 75 (12:4). A more specific promise was given in Genesis 15:4. Abram was between 75 and 86 (16:16) when he was reckoned to be righteous by God, as recorded in Genesis 15:6. Isaac, the son of promise, was born to Abraham and Sarah when Abraham was 100 years old, and Sarah was 90 (17:17; 21:5).

116 I can well remember my first impression of this, while stranded at the airport in Bombay. One of the outcast class was sweeping the sidewalk with a primitive broom. This woman would not even look up at me, and those who passed her by would not even look at her, to acknowledge her as a person. She was not only looked down upon; she was not even looked at.

117 Abraham made it clear to Abimelech that this was not just the second time he had passed off Sarah as his sister. He explained that this was the agreement they had made long ago which they consistently practiced everywhere they went (see Genesis 20:13). It was Abraham’s foreign policy, based upon his fear of death. His resurrection faith would soon outrun his fear of death (see Genesis 22).

118 The verb rendered “reckon,” according to Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, p. 379, is used 31 times in the New Testament. Of these 31 instances, Paul employs the term in all but 4 occurrences. Eleven of the 27 uses by Paul are found in Romans 4. Imputation is a dominant theme in chapter 4.

119 In verse 8 the expression is “take into account,” but the marginal note in the NASB points us to the fact that we have the same term rendered “reckon” throughout this passage.

120 So far as the order of our text is concerned.

121 Paul will elsewhere emphasize that even our faith is God’s gift and not some work of our own (see Ephesians 2:1-10).

122 The rainbow was the sign of the Noahic Covenant (Genesis 9:8-17). Circumcision was the sign of the Abrahamic Covenant (Genesis 17:9-14). The Sabbath was the sign of the Mosaic Covenant (Exodus 31:12-17).

123 There is a great deal of discussion in the commentaries about the exact meaning of the term twice rendered “because of” in Romans 4:25. Regardless of the meaning we give to this term, the point remains: both the death and the resurrection of our Lord were necessary for man’s salvation.

124 The “reasoning of Abraham’s faith” is even more clearly stated in Hebrews 11:17-19. In this case, it was Abraham’s reasoning in relationship to the command of God to offer up Isaac as a sacrifice. I believe Abraham “reasoned” that God was able to “raise men even from the dead” (11:19) on the basis of Isaac’s birth. If Abraham and Sarah were “dead” with respect to child-bearing, then God gave life from death in the conception and birth of Isaac. If God could, as it were, raise Isaac into existence, from the dead, then Abraham reasoned that God could raise him back to life, after he was offered up to God as a sacrifice. How often men want God to tell them exactly what to do when God desires for men to reason it out by faith. I do not believe God is as pleased with unthinking obedience as He is with reasoned obedience, an obedience based upon the reasoning of faith. Faith not only has its reasons, it reasons.

125 I see here a deliberate contrast between Abraham’s “giving glory to God” (verse 20) and the unbelief of men as described in chapter 1: “For even though they knew God, they did not honor [literally, “glorify,” see marginal note in NASB] Him as God, or give thanks (1:21). While these unbelievers became increasingly darkened in their understanding of God and of reality (1:21-22), Abraham saw God and life ever more clearly (4:19-21).

Related Topics: Faith, Regeneration, Justification

7. God’s Mighty Power to Save (Exodus 7:1-25)

Related Media

March 18, 2018

Life of Moses (7)

I think that sometimes we forget the mighty power of God that is required to deliver souls from Satan’s domain of darkness. We receive training in how to present the gospel effectively to the lost and for the most part, such training is helpful. Every Christian should be able to give a simple gospel presentation with appropriate Bible verses. Every Christian should be prepared to answer common questions and objections that unbelievers raise.

But even after good training, seeing lost people repent and believe the gospel does not depend on our methods or persuasive skills in presenting the gospel. Saving a soul from eternal judgment requires nothing less than God’s mighty power that raised Jesus from the dead (Eph. 1:19-20). God must impart new life to one who is dead in his sins (Eph. 2:1-6). If God doesn’t do that, you may be able to get a person to pray the sinner’s prayer or to make a profession of faith. But if God does not impart new life to that walking spiritual corpse, there will be no genuine conversion. Salvation is not a matter of a person walking the aisle or making a decision to invite Jesus into his heart. It’s a matter of God raising the dead through His mighty power to save. We are simply the instruments through whom He works to deliver souls from bondage.

Exodus 7 reports the beginning of ten miraculous plagues that the Lord brought on Egypt through Moses, culminating in Pharaoh’s releasing Israel from centuries of slavery. It’s a literal story of God’s people being freed from an evil tyrant so that eventually they could conquer the land which the Lord had promised to give to Abraham’s descendants. But it’s also a picture of how God delivers sinners from slavery to Satan’s cruel domain. As such, the main lesson for us is:

Delivering people from bondage to sin is God’s work, dependent on His power over the forces of darkness.

Scholars point out that the first nine plagues fall into three sets of three in an ascending order of severity (Walter Kaiser, Expositor’s Bible Commentary [Zondervan], ed. by Frank Gaebelein, 2:348-349). The first plague in each set has a purpose clause where God states His rationale and aim for the plague (Exod. 7:17; 8:22; 9:14). The overall purpose for the plagues is (Exod. 7:5): “The Egyptians shall know that I am the Lord, when I stretch out My hand on Egypt and bring out the sons of Israel from their midst.” God’s purpose in these plagues was to show His supreme power and exalt His name over all the earth (Exod. 9:16; Rom. 9:17). And He wanted to show His people that He is the Lord (Exod. 6:1-2).

Some scholars argue that the ten plagues directly confronted Egypt’s many gods and showed the superiority of the God of Israel over them. For example, the Egyptians had a god of the Nile, who was confounded by God’s turning that mighty river into blood. They worshiped the sun god, whose power was defeated by the ninth plague of darkness. Different gods had multiple functions, such as gods of fertility, crops, storms, and health. Many of the gods were worshiped in different locations and assimilated by other gods over time (see John Hannah, The Bible Knowledge Commentary [Victor Books], ed. by John F. Walvoord & Roy Zuck, 1:120). But the overall point of the plagues was to show the superiority of the one true God over Egypt’s many gods and idols and to show His power over Pharaoh, who claimed to be a god.

Also, some scholars argue that the plagues can be explained as natural catastrophes. For example, each year the Nile is flooded from waters upstream that carry red sediments into it, making it look like blood. Also, a type of algae comes from the swamps in the upper Nile that produce a stench and cause many of the fish to die from a lack of oxygen (Kaiser, 2:350). But, this explanation doesn’t account for the sudden, miraculous change that came over the river when Aaron stretched his staff over the water and struck it (Exod. 7:19-20). And the text does not say that the river looked like blood, but rather that it became blood, along with the water in reservoirs and storage vessels. So I understand that God’s miraculous power was on display through the plagues. There are two main spiritual lessons for us:

1. Delivering people from bondage to sin is God’s work.

It’s obvious in the opening verses that God is in charge here. He appeared to Moses at the burning bush and commissioned him to return to Egypt to deliver His people. When Moses became discouraged because of initial setbacks, the Lord again told him to go to Pharaoh and speak the words that the Lord would give him (Exod. 6:28-30). The Lord announced beforehand what would happen and what He would do. Then He did “just as He said” (Exod. 7:3, 13b, 22b; 8:15, 19; 9:12).

Moses and Aaron were merely His instruments and spokesmen: Moses would be as God to Pharaoh and Aaron would be his prophet (Exod. 7:1). Moses wasn’t God, of course, but he was a type of the one who would come as both God and man to save His people from their sins. God has always chosen to use human instruments to accomplish His sovereign plans (Philip Ryken, Exodus [Crossway], p. 195). Since Pharaoh viewed himself as a god, through the plagues, the Lord was putting him in his place. There are three lessons here about how God delivers people from bondage to sin:

A. God uses His inadequate servants who know Him to be the instruments of delivering others.

These miraculous events follow immediately after Moses has again protested his own inability (Exod. 6:30). Perhaps Moses’ and Aaron’s ages are given (Exod. 7:7) to show that these two old men did not have the natural ability to deliver Israel. Only God could do that through them. Picture the scene: Two old men, one of them in simple shepherd’s clothing, with no weapons, no armor, and nothing impressive about their appearance, stand before this powerful monarch in his opulent palace, surrounded by powerful armed guards and well-dressed attendants. Pharaoh would not have been impressed with Moses and Aaron. They had to trust in God’s supernatural power. They let Pharaoh know that they were not acting on their own, but rather that “the Lord God of the Hebrews” had sent them (Exod. 7:16).

Before the first plague, the Lord directed Moses and Aaron to throw Aaron’s staff on the ground, where it became a snake. Pharaoh called his magicians, who were able to do the same trick (more on that in a moment). But God displayed His superiority over Pharaoh’s magicians when Aaron’s staff turned snake swallowed the magicians’ staffs. God used a common shepherd’s staff to swallow the staffs of Pharaoh’s powerful magicians.

Have you ever thought about the fact that God’s method for reaching the world with the gospel is incredibly inefficient? He could have sent His angels to every people group on the planet with the good news about Jesus’ death and resurrection on behalf of sinners. The angels wouldn’t have had to learn the many languages in the world. They wouldn’t have needed to raise support before they went. If they had faced persecution, they could have struck their opponents dumb or dead. They wouldn’t have needed to learn how to communicate the gospel in a way that each culture could understand. The job would have been finished in a matter of days, instead of the two thousand years that it’s taken. And we still have many people groups that have not heard!

But just as God chose to use Abraham’s often-disobedient, faithless descendants to be His channel of blessing the nations, so He has chosen His church to take the gospel to the ends of the earth. Each of us is God’s spokesperson to the world. Like Moses, we may often feel tongue-tied and inadequate for the task. But the gospel is like Moses’ staff, powerful to deliver people from bondage (Rom. 1:16). And His promise to Moses, “I will be with you,” is also His promise to us (Exod. 3:12; 4:12; Matt. 28:20).

B. God’s servants must faithfully and obediently deliver His message, not their own.

In Moses’ case, because of his faithless protest that he could not speak well, God condescended to let Aaron be Moses’ mouthpiece to Pharaoh (Exod. 4:14-16; 7:1-2). But, they weren’t free to come up with a feel-good message that Pharaoh might like. God told Moses (Exod. 7:2), “You shall speak all that I command you, and your brother Aaron shall speak to Pharaoh that he let the sons of Israel go out of his land.” That wasn’t a message that Pharaoh wanted to hear, but it was the very word of God that he needed to hear. As difficult as it would have been for these two old men to tell Pharaoh God’s words, we read (Exod. 7:10), “So Moses and Aaron came to Pharaoh, and thus they did just as the Lord had commanded.” And again (Exod. 7:20), “So Moses and Aaron did even as the Lord had commanded.”

When God commanded Aaron to throw down his staff, which became a serpent, he was directly challenging and demeaning Pharaoh’s authority. The cobra was the symbol of Pharaoh’s power, depicted on his crown. The Egyptians had a temple for the snake god. So when Aaron threw his staff down in front of Pharaoh, Philip Ryken explains (p. 207), “He was taking the symbol of the king’s majesty and making it crawl in the dust. This was a direct assault on Pharaoh’s sovereignty; indeed, it was an attack on Egypt’s entire belief system.”

Ryken applies this (ibid.): “One of the best ways to convince people of their need for Christ is to find out what they are counting on, and then show them why it cannot be trusted.” If they think that their good works will get them into heaven, ask them, “How many good works will you need to qualify you to stand in the presence of the holy God? How can your good works atone for your many sins?” Show them that even Mother Teresa could not earn heaven by good works, “because by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified in His sight” (Rom. 3:20).

If they’re trusting in money, show them how fleeting and insecure riches are, even for the super-rich. If they’re living for pleasure and the good life, show them how quickly it can be taken away through an accident or terminal illness. Tell them about Jesus’ parable about the rich man who planned to build bigger barns to contain all of his crops, only to have God say to him (Luke 12:20), “You fool! This very night your soul is required of you; and now who will own what you have prepared?”

There are many false prophets today who give people a feel-good “gospel,” which is not the saving gospel of God. They tell people that they’re wonderful and that God loves them just as they are, but they never confront sin. They’re like the false prophets of Jeremiah’s time, who healed people’s brokenness superficially, saying, “Peace, peace,” but there was no peace (Jer. 6:14; 8:11). God’s only way of peace is to come to Him as a guilty sinner and lay hold of Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross. That’s not a popular message, but it’s the one we obediently and faithfully have to proclaim.

C. God’s purpose in delivering His people is primarily His glory and only secondarily their happiness.

God clearly states His purpose for hardening Pharaoh’s heart (Exod. 7:3): “But I will harden Pharaoh’s heart that I may multiply My signs and My wonders in the land of Egypt.” He adds (Exod. 7:5), “The Egyptians shall know that I am the Lord, when I stretch out My hand on Egypt and bring out the sons of Israel from their midst.” And, when Moses and Aaron directly confront Pharaoh before the first plague, God tells them to say (Exod. 7:17), “Thus says the Lord, ‘By this you shall know that I am the Lord ….’”

It’s clear that with regard to Pharaoh, God’s purpose was not that Pharaoh would come to a saving knowledge of the Lord, but rather that God would be glorified through Pharaoh’s defeat. As Paul states (Rom. 9:17-18),

For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I raised you up, to demonstrate My power in you, and that My name might be proclaimed throughout the whole earth.” So then He has mercy on whom He desires, and He hardens whom He desires.

With regard to the Egyptians, Dr. Kaiser (ibid. 2:345) suggests that some of them may have become believers through the plagues and were the “mixed multitude” that left with Israel in the exodus (Exod. 12:38). But the point is (as Paul further elaborates in Rom. 9:20-23), as the divine potter God is free to make some vessels of wrath prepared for destruction and other vessels of mercy prepared for glory. The same gospel that God uses to save some hardens others (Matt. 13:14-16; Luke 10:21-22; 2 Cor. 2:15-16). God will be glorified both in judging the wicked and in saving His elect. So while the gospel brings both temporal and eternal joy to all who are saved, God’s primary purpose in saving us is His glory because He is central; our happiness is secondary, because we are not central.

Thus delivering people from bondage to sin is God’s work. Thus, it follows that …

2. Delivering people from bondage to sin is a spiritual battle dependent on God’s power over the forces of darkness.

Our text brings out four lessons here:

A. Satan’s power sometimes seems comparable to God’s power, although it never is.

Pharaoh asked for a miracle to show God’s power (Exod. 7:9), only to shrug it off when his magicians were able to do the same thing. This is typical of unbelievers, who ask for proof of the gospel, but then explain it away when you give it to them because they love their sin and don’t want to submit to the lordship of Jesus Christ (John Calvin, Calvin’s Commentaries [Baker], p. 144).

When Moses and Aaron performed the miracle of the staff turned into a serpent, they probably did not expect Pharaoh’s wise men and sorcerers to be able to do the same. They were probably also surprised when Pharaoh’s magicians matched the miracle of turning the water into blood. I think that their power was demonic. With God’s permission, Satan can perform impressive miracles (Deut. 13:1-3). He sent lightning to destroy Job’s shepherds and flocks, he sent a tornado to destroy the home where Job’s children were to kill them, and he struck Job with painful boils (Job 1:16, 18-19; 2:7). Jesus warned about false prophets in the end times who will show great signs and wonders (Matt. 24:24). The antichrist will deceive many through signs and false wonders (2 Thess. 2:9-12; Rev. 13:12-15). So, don’t believe everyone who is able to perform impressive miracles!

But Satan’s power is always subject to and inferior to God’s power. Aaron’s staff that became a serpent swallowed up the staffs of Pharaoh’s magicians that had become serpents. Pharaoh’s magicians could turn water into blood, but they couldn’t turn the blood into water. Later, they could make frogs come up on the land of Egypt, but they couldn’t get rid of the frogs (Exod. 8:7). Satan is always a counterfeiter, disguising himself as an angel of light to look like God (2 Cor. 11:14). But, in God’s timing he will be eternally defeated (Rev. 20:10).

B. Miracles confirm the faith of believers but harden the hearts of proud skeptics.

These miracles confirmed the faith of Moses, Aaron, and the Israelites (Exod. 4:28-31), but Pharaoh saw the same miracles and hardened his heart. Skeptics often will sneer, “Show me a miracle and I’ll believe!” Jesus’ critics often asked Him for a sign, but He replied (Matt. 16:4), “An evil and adulterous generation seeks after a sign; and a sign will not be given it, except the sign of Jonah.” He was referring to His resurrection from the dead (Matt. 12:40). The Lord doesn’t perform miracles to impress skeptics. He has given them eyewitness testimony of the greatest miracle in history, namely, His resurrection from the dead. If they don’t believe the abundant biblical evidence for His resurrection, they won’t believe a miracle done before their eyes (Luke 16:31). Impressive miracles are not the antidote for unbelief. Pharaoh saw a bunch of them! Miracles can confirm the faith of those whose hearts God has opened, but they only serve to increase judgment for proud skeptics who refuse to repent.

C. When evil leaders persist in their opposition to God, their people suffer under them.

Egypt’s gods had failed them, so for a week the Egyptians had to dig in the sand around the Nile to try to find potable water (Exod. 7:24). Pharaoh didn’t want to release the Hebrew slaves because he wanted to save the Egyptian economy. But by the time the plagues were over, Pharaoh’s stubborn opposition to God had ruined their economy! The crops were destroyed, livestock had died, and finally all in Egypt who did not put blood on their doorposts lost their firstborn sons.

God ordained government authority to protect and bless those under authority, but Satan perverts that authority to kill and destroy (John 10:10). For exhibit A in our day, look at North Korea or some of the other nations where corrupt leaders live in luxury while their people suffer in horrific conditions.

The same is true about spiritual authority. God ordains elders to oversee local churches and husbands to lead in their homes to protect and bless those under their care. But when elders or husbands promote false doctrines or use their authority for selfish purposes, those under their authority suffer. It’s especially tragic when abuse happens in supposedly Christian churches and homes. Leaders who themselves are in bondage to sin can’t deliver their people who are in bondage to sin. Satan robs people of the protection and blessing of godly authority by using abusive authority to discredit the concept of godly authority.

D. To deliver people from bondage to sin is a spiritual battle in which God must soften hard hearts.

Four times this chapter calls attention to Pharaoh’s hard heart (Exod. 7:3, 13, 14, 22). All people are born with spiritual hardness of heart because of Adam’s sin (Eph. 4:18). Unbelief is a matter of the heart and God must give a person a soft heart for him to repent and believe (Ezek. 36:26). He must open deaf ears and blind eyes (Matt. 13:14-16; Luke 10:21-22) and impart spiritual life to those who are dead in their sins (Eph. 2:1-7). Delivering people from bondage to sin is God’s work, dependent on His power over the forces of darkness. While we should be wise and persuasive in how we present the gospel, in the final outcome, delivering sinners from Satan’s domain of darkness depends on God’s mighty power (Col. 1:13; 2:13-15).

Conclusion

Two concluding applications:

(1) Get some training in how to present the gospel, but don’t trust in your training. Trust in the Lord! You need to know how to present the gospel clearly and succinctly. Memorize key verses. In a nutshell, the gospel is: All people have sinned and need a Savior: Romans 3:23, “For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” God sent His eternal Son Jesus to pay the penalty that sinners deserve: Romans 6:23, “For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.” We receive God’s gift of eternal life by faith in Christ alone: Ephesians 2:8-9, “For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not as a result of works, so that no one may boast.”

(2) Since delivering people from bondage to sin is God’s work, dependent on His power, put on God’s armor and pray for opportunities and boldness. After telling us to put on God’s armor so that we will be able to stand firm against the spiritual forces of darkness (Eph. 6:10-17), Paul concludes by asking for prayer (Eph. 6:19-20): “Pray on my behalf, that utterance may be given to me in the opening of my mouth, to make known with boldness the mystery of the gospel, for which I am an ambassador in chains; that in proclaiming it I may speak boldly, as I ought to speak.” In Colossians 4:3, he asks for prayer “that God will open up to us a door for the word,” so that he could preach the gospel.

Let’s trust God to use us to deliver people from their bondage to the spiritual forces of darkness!

Application Questions

  1. A Christian friend asks: “If God desires all people to be saved, why does He harden the hearts of some?” Your reply?
  2. Since making a decision to accept Christ may not necessarily mean that God has saved a person, how can we know if he is truly saved?
  3. Should we give assurance of salvation to a person who has just prayed the sinner’s prayer to accept Jesus? Why/why not?
  4. Why is it important to remember that God’s glory is His primary purpose in salvation? What are the practical ramifications of this in presenting the gospel?

Copyright, Steven J. Cole, 2018, All Rights Reserved.

Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture Quotations are from the New American Standard Bible, Updated Edition © The Lockman Foundation

Related Topics: Christian Life, Hamartiology (Sin), Soteriology (Salvation)

Psalms Of Rejoicing

Related Media

Having written earlier this year concerning a certain psalmist’s call to rejoice,1 we now turn our attention to examining certain psalms that speak of doing so. We begin with the second psalm. Although this psalm is directed at royalty, it has other applications as well. Of particular interest is the fact that it is of particular messianic stimulation and forms the first of three primarily Messianic Psalms (note vv. 1-2; cf. Acts 4:25-26; Matt. 3:17; Acts 13:3; Heb. 1:5; 5:5; 7:28; 2 Pet. 1:17). Our primary focus in this study is on verse 11: “Serve the LORD with fear and rejoice with trembling.” Although addressed primarily to kings, the need to “serve the Lord” and rejoice in him remains true and a standard for all people, especially believers. This is especially the case when the believer realizes that he can truly do so, for God is his protector (Ps. 5:11).

Indeed there are many texts that remind us that as believers we have been told and repeatedly shown how rejoicing in the Lord is called for. Thus the ninth Psalm begins:

I will praise you, O LORD, with all my heart;
I will tell of all your wonders.
I will be glad and rejoice in you;
I will sing praise to your name, O Most High. (vv.1-2)2

This is especially true for believers:

Rejoice in the LORD and be glad, you righteousness;
Sing all you who are upright in heart! (Ps. 32:11; cf. Ps. 68:3)

As another psalmist points out, this is only natural, for God is our ultimate hope:

We wait in hope for the LORD;
He is our help and shield.
In him our hearts rejoice,
For we trust in his holy name (Ps.33:20-21)

As David comments in Psalm 40,

May all who seek you rejoice and be glad in you
May those who love your salvation always say,
The LORD be exalted! (v. 16)

Similarly, in another psalm after once again pleading for God’s help (Ps. 70:1), he subsequently comments:

May all who say to me, “Aha: Aha:”
Turn back because of their shame.
But may all who seek you
Rejoice and be glad in you. (Ps. 70:4)

David’s petition underscores the reality that ultimately the true source of man’s help is the Lord. Believers should therefore live in such a way that they enjoy God’s fellowship, and look to him for help and leadership in their lives. Two other Psalms also express this:

May the righteous be glad
And rejoice before God;
May they be happy and joyful (Ps. 68:3).

Rejoice in the LORD, you who are righteous
And praise his holy name (Ps. 97:12).

Such will lead to a life of genuine contentment.

May we, then, follow this advice and sing with the psalmist:

Oh my strength, I sing praise to you;
You, O God, are my fortress, my loving God (Ps.59:17).

Regardless of the circumstances, may our very minds and souls follow the suggestions of another psalmist who, in preparing to speak of God’s righteous leadership and accomplishments says:

Let the hearts of those who seek the LORD rejoice.
Look to the LORD and his strength;
Seek his face always (Ps. 105:3b-4).

Then, rest assured God will enable us to declare each day:

The LORD is my strength and my song;
He has become my salvation.

…….

This is the day the LORD has made;
Let us rejoice and be glad in it (Ps. 118:14, 24).

May we be those who follow the Lord’s direction and can proclaim:

Your statutes are my delight,
They are my counselors. (Ps. 119:24)

As Van Gemeren remarks, “In difficulty and distress, the Lord and his word are a comfort to the godly.”3 In so doing we will long to fellowship with God’s fellow servants. Thus David could rejoice with those who said, “Let us go to the house of the LORD” (Ps. 122:1b). As the hymn writer writes:

Rejoice, ye pure in heart,
rejoice give thanks and sing;
Your festal banner wave on high,
the cross of Christ your King.
Rejoice, Rejoice, Rejoice, Give thanks and sing!4

© Copyright 2018.


1 Richard D. Patterson, “A Psalmist’s Call for Rejoicing,” Biblical Studies Press,2018.

2 All scriptural citations are taken from the NIV.

3 William A. Van Gemeren, “Psalms” in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1991), 5, 741.

4 Edward H. Plumptre, Rejoice Ye Pure in Heart.

Related Topics: Christian Life

Easter [2018]: Jesus is Risen—So What? (Acts 25:23, 26:1-29)

Related Media

April 1, 2018

Years ago, Dr. Paul Adkins, one of the nation’s leading lung surgeons, looked at his own chest X-ray and realized that he was looking at his own obituary (Reader’s Digest [11/82]). He was dead four and a half months later, at age 55, from lung cancer, the disease that he had attempted to treat in hundreds of other patients. The ironic fact was that Dr. Adkins himself had smoked up to a pack and a half of cigarettes daily for 40 years. His mother had smoked and lived to an old age, and so Dr. Adkins foolishly concluded that he could do the same. Even after he realized that he had lung cancer he continued to smoke, against the strong warnings of his colleagues.

If anyone knew the dangers of smoking, Dr. Adkins did, but he did not apply that knowledge to himself. Knowledge is worthless if we don’t apply it. The same is true spiritually. We can know the truth, but if we don’t apply it personally, it does us no good.

Polls show that one-third to one-half of Americans claim to be born again Christians, and yet there’s not much difference between how they live and how other Americans live. Professing Christians watch the same TV shows and movies as non-Christians do. They view pornography, engage in sexual immorality, and get divorced at about the same rate as other Americans. The apostle Paul would ask them, “Doesn’t the resurrection of Jesus from the dead mean anything to you?” In other words, Jesus is risen—so what? How should that fact affect your life?

Acts 26 relates Paul’s defense before the Roman governor Festus, King Agrippa II, his sister, Bernice, and many dignitaries at the Roman capital, Caesarea. Agrippa II was the son of Agrippa I (Acts 12). He ruled over Galilee and some other territories to the north. A popular but unproven rumor alleged that Agrippa and Bernice were in an incestuous relationship. She later became the lover of the Roman general and future emperor Titus, whose army destroyed Jerusalem in 70. Agrippa and Bernice had a sister, Drusilla, who was married to the previous governor, Felix (Acts 24). Drusilla later died in the eruption of Mt. Vesuvius in AD 79.

This is the third time in Acts that Luke repeats Paul’s testimony of his conversion, which, along with the witness of the other apostles, is a strong evidence for the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Here Paul especially focuses on the commission that the risen Lord Jesus gave to him, to go to the Gentiles so that they might repent and turn to God (Acts 26:18, 20). His message to us is:

Because Jesus was raised bodily from the dead, you should repent and turn to God.

In other words, to say, “I believe in Jesus as my Savior,” but to go on living in the same way as this godless world, does no more good than for a lung surgeon to say, “I believe that smoking causes lung cancer,” but to go on smoking a pack a day. If we truly believe that Jesus Christ is risen from the dead, our lives will show it. Repentance is not optional. You can’t separate it from genuine saving faith. It is the mark of genuine conversion.

Paul’s defense makes two main points: (1) The bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ is a fact; (2) Repenting of your sins and turning to God is the only reasonable response to this great fact.

1. Jesus’ bodily resurrection from the dead is an historical fact.

Paul is speaking here to a skeptical audience, and so he presents his case inductively. He doesn’t state up front, “Jesus Christ is risen from the dead.” He would have been hooted out of the room. Even when he finally states this great truth, Festus interrupts to say that he’s out of his mind (Acts 26:24). So Paul begins with the possibility of resurrection in general. Then he describes his own encounter with the risen Lord Jesus, and the changes that took place in his life as a result. Then he relates the message that the risen Lord told him to proclaim. Finally he comes to the foundation for his message, namely, that according to the Scriptures Jesus died and was raised from the dead. He gives four proofs of the resurrection:

A. Resurrection in general is possible because of God.

Paul begins by telling of his early life in Judaism and identifying himself with the hope of God’s promise to the Jews, namely, the coming of Messiah and His kingdom. That promise would have been worthless to the Jews from past generations if there were no resurrection of the dead. Yet it was for this Jewish hope that Paul’s Jewish kinsmen, the Sadducees, were accusing him. Thus he interjects (Acts 26:8), “Why is it considered incredible among you people if God does raise the dead?”

In other words, if you believe in the God of the Bible, you must necessarily believe that He has the power to raise the dead. And, as Paul will go on to assert, the fact that God raised Jesus bodily proves that He is the Jewish Messiah. Paul’s logic here is solid: If you believe in the God who created all things and who spoke life into existence, you must also agree that He has the inherent power to raise the dead.

B. Jesus’ resurrection is proved by eyewitness testimony.

Paul goes on (Acts 26:12-16) to recount his own dramatic encounter with the risen Lord Jesus on the Damascus Road. Skeptics might say that Paul only saw a vision or hallucination, not the actual risen Lord Jesus. If Paul had been the only one to make such a claim, perhaps we would have to concede the point, or at least not build our case on it. But in 1 Corinthians 15:5-8, Paul states that the risen Lord appeared to Peter and the other apostles, as well as to over 500 followers at one time, most of whom were still alive when Paul wrote. Floyd Hamilton states (in Teacher’s Manual for the Ten Basic Steps Toward Christian Maturity [Campus Crusade for Christ, 1965], p. 104, italics his),

Now it is perfectly possible for one man to have an hallucination, and two men might have the same hallucination by a singular coincidence, but that eleven men of intelligence, whose characters and writings indicate their sanity in other respects, or that five hundred men in a body should have the same hallucination and at the same time, stretches the law of probability to the breaking point!

Concerning Jesus’ resurrection J. N. D. Anderson wrote (“The Resurrection of Jesus Christ,” Christianity Today [3/29/68], pp. 5, 6),

The most drastic way of dismissing the evidence would be to say that these stories were mere fabrications, that they were pure lies. But, so far as we know, not a single critic today would take such an attitude. In fact, it would really be an impossible position. Think of the number of witnesses, over 500. Think of the character of the witnesses, men and women who gave the world the highest ethical teaching it has ever known, and who even on the testimony of their enemies lived it out in their lives. Think of the psychological absurdity of picturing a little band of defeated cowards cowering in an upper room one day and a few days later transformed into a company that no persecution could silence—and then attempting to attribute this dramatic change to nothing more convincing than a miserable fabrication they were trying to foist upon the world. That simply wouldn’t make sense.

Someone may be thinking, “That’s great for those who saw the risen Christ. But I’ve never seen Him. Why should I believe?”

You should believe because there is reasonable evidence to believe. We all believe in things we cannot see and in people we do not know. You trust that the people who package the food you buy at the store did not poison it. You trust that the mechanic who fixed your brakes did a good job. You trust the teller at the bank to deposit your money in your account and not steal it. If you trust the witness of men, the witness of God concerning His Son is greater (1 John 5:9). He will hold you accountable if you reject the eyewitness testimony that He has given regarding the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

C. Jesus’ resurrection is proved by the changed lives of the witnesses.

Paul had been relentless in persecuting Christians. He says (Acts 26:11) that he “punished them often,” “tried to force them to blaspheme” and was “furiously enraged” at them. And yet here he is, a prisoner for the cause of Christ, having endured much persecution himself because of his faith in Christ, but he’s not bitter or hateful toward his enemies. How did this hate-driven terrorist change into a man compelled by the love of Christ, willing to lay down his life to tell others about Jesus? The only explanation is that he had seen the risen Savior. All of the other apostles had also been radically transformed. Would these men have died martyrs’ deaths for what they knew to be a myth or hoax?

D. Jesus’ resurrection is supported by fulfilled prophecy.

Paul affirms (Acts 26:22-23) that he is saying nothing except that which the Prophets and Moses had said would take place, “that the Christ was to suffer, and that by reason of His resurrection from the dead He should be the first to proclaim light both to the Jewish people and to the Gentiles.” Probably Paul went into more detail here, quoting from Genesis 22, Isaiah 53, Psalm 16, and Psalm 22, all of which prophesied of Messiah’s death and resurrection centuries before these things took place.

Thus Paul’s point is that the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ was an historical fact. Such a miracle is possible because God exists. It is proved by eyewitness testimony and by the changed lives of the witnesses. It is supported by the Hebrew Scriptures. But, so what? What difference should this fact make?

2. Repenting of your sins and turning to God is the only reasonable response to Jesus’ resurrection.

Paul shows this both by his own example and by his direct preaching. When Paul believed in Jesus Christ, he did a 180-degree turnaround. From then on he preached (Acts 26:20) that all people “should repent and turn to God, performing deeds appropriate to repentance.” Repentance involves a change of mind, but it is more than only a change of mind. It involves a turning of the whole person, including a change of behavior. Repentance is not separate from saving faith; rather, it’s a necessary part of genuine faith. If you truly believe that a prescription medicine will cure you, you don’t just set it on the shelf. You take the pill. If you truly believe that Jesus Christ is the risen Savior, you turn to God from your sins. Paul here says four things about repentance:

A. Repentance involves a change of understanding: from darkness to light.

The risen Christ was the first to proclaim light (Acts 26:23). God sent Paul (Acts 26:18) “to open their eyes so that they may turn from darkness to light.” Apart from Christ, all people, no matter how brilliant, are “darkened in their understanding” (Eph. 4:18). As Jesus said (John 3:19), they “loved the darkness rather than the Light, for their deeds were evil.” Paul said (2 Cor. 4:4) that “the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelieving so that they might not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ.”

People in the darkness cannot see the blazing light of God’s holiness. If you had asked Paul before his conversion whether he believed that God is holy, there’s no doubt that he would have answered, “Of course!” He knew that fact intellectually. But only when the light from heaven brighter than the sun blinded him did Paul realize that God was far more holy than he had ever imagined. Previously, Paul had thought that his own good deeds as a Pharisee would qualify him for heaven (Phil. 3:4-6). But the instant the light of God’s holiness struck him to the ground, Paul, like Isaiah, was undone. He realized that his own good works were like filthy rags in God’s sight (Isa. 6:5; 64:6).

Suddenly, Paul saw that he was far more sinful than he ever had imagined. If you had asked Paul before his conversion if he were a sinner, he would have replied, “Of course, all men are sinners.” But like the Pharisee in Jesus’ story (Luke 18:10-12), he probably would have thought, “I’m glad that I’m not a really bad sinner! I tithe, I pray, I fast.” But when the light from heaven blinded him, Paul instantly realized that he could never qualify for heaven by his good deeds. All of his supposed good deeds could never atone for his many evil deeds.

Years after his conversion, Paul wrote (1 Tim. 1:15), “Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, among whom I am foremost.” He did not say, I was foremost, but I am foremost! As C. S. Lewis pointed out (Mere Christianity [Macmillan], p. 87), “When a man is getting better, he understands more and more clearly the evil that is still in him. When a man is getting worse, he understands his own badness less and less.” Thus repentance is not just a one-time experience at the moment of conversion. It is the ongoing practice of every believer who walks in God’s holy light.

If sin and Satan blind people so that they cannot see the light of God’s truth regarding His holiness and their own sin, how can they change? The biblical answer is, only God can change them. As Paul said (2 Cor. 4:6), “For God, who said, ‘Light shall shine out of darkness,’ is the One who has shone in our hearts to give the Light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Christ.” God brings this change through the preaching of the gospel. Thus the risen Lord told Paul (Acts 26:18) that through his preaching God would “open their eyes, so that they may turn from darkness to light and from the dominion of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who have been sanctified by faith in Me.”

God not only opens the sinner’s eyes to the light of His holiness and to the darkness of the sinner’s sin, but also to the abundance of God’s grace in Christ, who bore the penalty that sinners deserve. Since Paul, the foremost of sinners, found mercy at the cross, that same mercy is available to you if you will repent.

B. Repentance involves a change of masters: from Satan to God.

Everyone by nature is born into this world as a captive in Satan’s evil domain of darkness (Col. 1:13; 2 Tim. 2:26). Both Jesus and Paul describe our condition as being slaves of sin (John 8:34-35; Rom. 6:17, 20).

How can anyone break free from so strong a master? Jesus said (John 8:36), “So if the Son makes you free, you will be free indeed.” Paul says (Col. 1:13-14) that God “rescued us from the domain of darkness, and transferred us to the kingdom of His beloved Son, in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins.” God alone can free us from slavery to sin and make us slaves of righteousness (Rom. 6:17-23).

This means that if you have not experienced a definite change of masters, from Satan to God, from serving sin and self to serving the Lord Jesus in holiness, you need to examine yourself to see whether you have truly repented of your sins. Repentance means turning “from the dominion of Satan to God” (Acts 26:18).

C. Repentance involves a change of relationship: from condemnation to forgiveness and acceptance as heirs.

Paul continues (Acts 26:18), “… that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who have been sanctified by faith in Me.” Before repentance, we were under God’s just condemnation because of our sins (John 3:18, 36). But the instant that we repent and believe in Christ, God sets us apart (“sanctified”) and grants us forgiveness of sins and all of the riches that are in Christ. At that moment, we enter into a personal relationship with Jesus Christ (John 17:3). Rather than being afraid of God because of our sins, now we can come boldly into His presence through Christ’s blood to receive grace to help in our time of need (Heb. 4:16; 9:22-28). Thus if you have turned from your sins and trusted in Christ, you now enjoy God’s forgiveness and every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus (Eph. 1:3-8).

Thus repentance involves a change of understanding, from darkness to light; a change of masters, from Satan to God; a change of relationship, from condemnation to forgiveness and acceptance as heirs. Finally,

D. Repentance involves a change of behavior: from sin to deeds appropriate to repentance.

In Acts 26:20, Paul reports his obedience to this heavenly vision: He kept declaring both to Jews and Gentiles, “that they should repent and turn to God, performing deeds appropriate to repentance.” Whether you have been a religious person (as Paul and the Jews were) or an unbelieving pagan (as the Gentiles were), the message is the same: Repent and turn to God, performing deeds appropriate to repentance.

The deeds follow repentance. As G. H. Lang put it, “None more firmly than Paul rejected works, before or after conversion, as a ground of salvation; none more firmly demanded good works as a consequence of salvation” (The Gospel of the Kingdom, cited by F. F. Bruce, The Book of Acts [Eerdmans], p. 493). Biblical repentance is not just a change of mind or an intellectual decision. It is a turning of the whole person from sin to God, resulting in a life of obedience to God from the heart (Rom. 6:17).

Then Paul personally addressed Agrippa (Acts 26:27), “King Agrippa, do you believe the Prophets?” Before Agrippa could respond, Paul answered his own question, “I know that you do.” Yes, Agrippa believed the prophets intellectually, just as many Americans “believe in Jesus” intellectually. But it made no difference in the way he lived. But Paul was not just preaching for intellectual agreement. He was preaching for repentance.

So am I! Repentance means that you believe in the risen Savior with such conviction that it turns around the way you live. Instead of living in darkness, you now live in the light of God’s holy presence. Instead of living under Satan’s domain, you now live under the Lordship of Jesus in line with His Word. Instead of living for yourself and sinful pleasure, you now live to please Jesus Christ.

Now Paul had Agrippa cornered. If he denied his belief in the Prophets, he would lose face with the Jews. If he agreed with Paul, he could see that the next question would be, “Why don’t you believe in Jesus Christ as the risen Savior?” He wasn’t ready to go there! So he skated out of this embarrassing dilemma with a mildly sarcastic humorous dodge (Acts 26:28), “In a short time you will persuade me to become a Christian”. The ESV translates it as a question, “In a short time would you persuade me to be a Christian?” And so to save face in front of this pompous crowd, Agrippa threw away his opportunity to receive God’s forgiveness and gift of eternal life! Don’t follow his example!

Conclusion

Probably almost everyone here believes that seat belts save lives. But that belief doesn’t do you any good in a crash unless you actually have your seat belt fastened. Those who buckle up are those who truly believe that seat belts save lives. Your belief is worthless if you don’t personally apply it.

Do you believe that Jesus Christ is risen from the dead? Good for you! You’re right so to believe, because it is true! But if that belief has not led to a life of repentance from sin, it won’t do you any good when you stand before God. Your response to the historical fact of Jesus’ bodily resurrection should be repentance.

Application Questions

  1. Why is it important to assert the factual basis of the Christian faith? In other words, if believing in Christianity gives us a happy life, what difference does it make whether it’s true?
  2. Some evangelicals argue that to require repentance for salvation is to add works to faith alone. Why is this not valid?
  3. If God must grant repentance (Acts 11:18), is it futile to call people to repent? Why/why not?
  4. Can true Christians be enslaved to sin (Rom. 6:17, 22)? Cite biblical evidence to support your answer.

Copyright, Steven J. Cole, 2018, All Rights Reserved.

Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture Quotations are from the New American Standard Bible, Updated Edition © The Lockman Foundation

Related Topics: Easter, Resurrection, Soteriology (Salvation)

The Anticipation of Israel's Messiah

Related Media

Introduction

Whenever we think of Israel's anticipation of the coming Messiah, we do so with about as much zeal as we would have watching a video tape of the Dallas Cowboys' loss last Sunday to the Cincinnati Bengals. We know who the Israel Messiah is, and thus there is no mystery or suspense about the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy regarding Messiah. Our fascination and interest is, however, stimulated by discussions pertaining to the unknown elements of the future--the identity of the antichrist, or of the "great harlot" of Revelation, or the nations which comprise the revived Roman Empire.

In the light of the fulfillment of the Messianic prophecies of the Old Testament (at least those pertaining to His first coming) we fail to appreciate what it must have been like to be an Israelite looking forward to the arrival of Messiah. How, for example, every pregnant Israelite woman would wonder whether or not the child in her womb was a son, and if a son, if he might be the Messiah. While we read the gospel accounts of the Messiah's birth, we cannot really fathom the depth of joy experienced by those godly few who had yearned for the Messiah's arrival.

The purpose of this message is to focus on the progressive revelation of Israel's Messiah in the Old Testament, and the growing expectation, which climaxed at the time of Christ's coming. At some times in Israel's history, the anticipation of Messiah's coming was great, while at other times the sense of expectancy waned. In many instances, Israel's hopes seemed to be dashed on the rocks of reality. It is only as we can appreciate the rising and falling hopes of God's people that we can more fully grasp the greatness of the event of Christ's birth.

Early in the Bible, we are given a skeletal outline, with some of the essential facts. As the Old Testament continues, we find more and more of the details filled in, until, at the end of the Old Testament, a great deal was known about God's Messiah who was to come. The New Testament writers make a point of informing us of many of the ways in which our Lord's person and birth fulfilled these prophecies, and also some aspects of fulfillment which were not even viewed as prophetic.1

Our lesson will not deal with the New Testament texts or the arrival of His coming, since that is the subject of another message. We will not even be able to study all of the Old Testament texts which foretell the coming of Messiah. We will, however, attempt to gain a sense of Israel's expectation in the various stages of her history and development. It is hoped that gaining a greater grasp of the anticipation of Messiah's coming will enhance our celebration of Christmas this year.

Messianic
Hope in the Pentateuch

As we should come to expect, the Pentateuch (the first five books of the Old Testament) reveals much about the coming Messiah, in broad and general terms which will be further clarified as further Scripture is given. I will focus on the Messianic hope as developed in the Book of Genesis. In Genesis 1 and 2, God has created the universe, which included all living things and man, as the crown of creation.2 Had Adam and Eve obeyed God in the one prohibition (not to eat of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, 2:16-17), they could have lived eternally in fellowship with God and in joyful occupation in the garden. Satan tempted them, however, and their disobedience had profound implications, so great that only time would reveal them all.

In Genesis chapter 3 God pronounced a curse on each of the three parties involved in the fall. Here, I wish to focus your attention on the consequences for the serpent and for the woman.

And the LORD God said to the serpent, "Because you have done this, Cursed are you more than all cattle, And more than every beast of the field; On your belly shall you go, And dust shall you eat All the days of your life; And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her seed; He shall bruise you on the head, And you shall bruise him on the heel" (Genesis 3:14-15).

God began by addressing Satan and spelling out the punishment for his sin. This is appropriate in light of the fact that Satan was the instigator, the tempter. He enticed the woman with the thought of disobedience. As the promoter of sin, his punishment rightly comes first. The first promise of a coming Messiah in the Bible comes in God's rebuke of Satan in Genesis 3:15. The promise is technically a promise of destruction for the serpent, and only secondarily the promise of salvation for Adam and Eve and the whole human race. The Messiah was to come, then, both to destroy Satan and to deliver men from his dominion, a theme which continues on into the New Testament.3

There is another reason why I believe the judgment of Satan is given first: The destruction of Satan and thus the deliverance of man gives hope to Adam and Eve, even in their punishment. After Satan's judgment is pronounced (from which there is no deliverance) the penalties for Adam (and thus men) and for Eve (and thus all women) are indicated. The difference here is that the pain of the penalty is softened by the promise of deliverance. Specifically, Eve will suffer birth pangs in child-bearing, but this pain will be eased by the knowledge that her offspring will also be the means of Satan's destruction. Motherhood has its painful price, but it also has a promise: Eve's seed will prove to be Satan's destroyer.

Adam and Eve would soon learn that God's grace was essential to the fulfillment of His promise of a deliverer. When their first son was born, there must have been great joy. And then there was another son. They must have reasoned that one these two sons, either Cain or Able, would have been the means (either immediately or ultimately) of fulfilling God's promise. Imagine the horror to discover that Can had, in fact, killed his brother Able (Genesis 4). How could the seed of the woman save mankind when one was killing the other? The righteous son was dead, the other son a killer. What hope did they have now of being delivered from Satan's grip? The doctrine of the depravity of man was one that was learned the hard way by Adam and Eve. In God's grace, He gave them another son, Seth (4:25), the means of the fulfillment of God's promise.

While Seth must have inspired hope in his parents, there seemed little room for optimism in Genesis chapter 6, because the whole race had become corrupt. Were it not for God sparing Noah and his family, the whole race would have been wiped out in the flood (Genesis 6-9). After the flood, flaws in the family of Noah inspire little hope for man's deliverance, apart from divine intervention. Righteous Noah gets drunk, and some of his family responded wrongly to this shameful incident (Genesis 9:20-27).

In the 11th chapter of Genesis fallen men conspire against God's command by building a tower and a city. When God confused man's language, nations were created in a new and different way. This has resulted in much of the contention and strife in the world ever since. Just as God promised to deliver man through the seed of Eve in Genesis chapter 3, He now promises to deliver the nations the seed of one man--Abraham:

Now the Lord said to Abram, "Go forth from your country, And from your relatives And from your father's house. To the land which I will show you; And I will make you a great nation, And I will bless you, And make your name great; And so you shall be a blessing; And I will bless those who bless you, And the one who curses you I will curse. And in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed" (Genesis 12:1-3).

There are various ways in which the nation Israel will prove to be a blessing to the nations (cf. Romans 9:3-5), but our interest is in the blessing which will come to the nations through the Messiah, who is now announced to come through the offspring of Abraham. Paul understood and taught that when God used the term "seed" in the Abrahamic Covenant (cf. also Genesis 13:15; 22:18), He was speaking specifically of the one "Seed," the Messiah:

Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. He does not say, "And to seeds," as referring to many, but rather to one, "And to your Seed," that is Christ (Galatians 3:16).

Early on, Abraham was successful in waging war with those kings who had captured his nephew, Lot (Genesis 14). Abraham turned down the spoils of war offered to him by pagan kings. When he met an unknown king, Melchizedek, he offered tithes to him. This Melchizedek was later identified as a type of Christ, a theme picked up in Psalm 110, and more fully explained in Hebrews chapter 5 (cf. vss. 6, 10) and 7.

Messianic hope must have run high in Abraham's heart and in the heart of the godly Israelite as he or she read of the promise of Messiah as one of Abraham's offspring. Later developments would certainly be the cause of some decline in hope. Abraham and Sarah were elderly, without a son, and with little hope of having one. Abraham unwisely took his wife's advice and had a son by Hagar, Sarai's handmaid. This son eventually had to be sent away. On several occasions Abraham was willing for his wife to be added to the harem of a pagan king,4 thus jeopardizing the possibility of the promised child being born to both he and Sarah.

God gave Abraham the supreme test of his faith, ordering him to sacrifice Isaac, the child on whom all of his future hopes were placed (Genesis 22). This scene of Abraham on the mountain, about to sacrifice his son, is a beautiful picture (a type) of God the Father and of Christ. Abraham is a type of the Father, who will, on Calvary, sacrifice His beloved and only Son. Isaac pictures the Son of God, who willingly and obediently, obeys the will of His Father, even unto death.

Passing from Isaac, we come to Jacob, Abraham's scheming grandson, the man whose name would be changed to Israel, and who would be the patriarch of the nation Israel. One finds Jacob a very unlikely candidate for such a calling. Most of his life was spent "wheeling and dealing." Only very late in life did Jacob evidence the kind of faith which the writer to the Hebrews found praiseworthy (Hebrews 11:21). Jacob's dream of the ladder ascending to heaven does point forward to Christ, as our Lord's words in John 1:51 will later indicate.

Humanly speaking, Jacob's sons were even more dubious so far as their ability to fulfill God's purposes and promises to Abraham. Reuben lay with Jacob's concubine (Genesis 35:22). Joseph's brothers were violent men. They dealt severely with the men of Shechem, action which caused Jacob to fear for the safety of his family (Genesis 34). These same men nearly killed Joseph and did sell him into slavery, with no compassion on either their own brother or father (Genesis 37). And Judah was willing to have inter into a sexual union with a woman he thought to be a cult prostitute (Genesis 38). These are not the kind of men which inspire confidence, especially in regard to the fulfillment of God's gracious promises. Nevertheless, it was of Judah that Jacob prophesied:

"Judah, your brothers shall praise you; Your hand shall be on the neck of your enemies; Your father's sons shall bow down to you. Judah is a lion's whelp; From the prey, my son, you have gone up. He couches, he lies down as a lion, As a lion, who dares rouse him up? The scepter shall not depart from Judah, Nor the ruler's staff from between his feet, Until Shiloh comes, And to him shall be the obedience of the peoples" (Genesis 49:10-12).

Israel's 400 year sojourn in Egypt proved to be God's solution to the problems which threatened her existence in Canaan. Nevertheless, new dangers arose in Egypt. When new Pharaoh came to power in Egypt (who knew not Joseph, Exodus 1:8), the ominous threat of genocide seemed to cloud Israel's future. An attempt was made to systematically exterminate the male Israelites (Exodus 1:15-16, 22). God providentially spared His people by using Pharaoh's daughter to set a precedent which overturned Pharaoh's decree. Moses, who was taken from the water by Pharaoh's daughter, became God's deliverer. By means of the plagues God brought upon Egypt, the Egyptians were defeated and the Israelites delivered from their bondage.

When the Law of Moses was given to the Israelites (Exodus 20ff.), it prescribed the conduct God required of Israel which would bring them God's blessing and which would manifest God's character to the nations. While the Israelites eagerly accepted God's laws, they could never live up to them. Had God not provided a sacrificial system to deal temporarily with Israel's sins (cf. Romans 3:25), God himself would have wiped out the nation. Indeed, in Exodus 32 it appeared momentarily that God would wipe Israel out and make a new nation from the offspring of Moses (cf. Exod. 32:9-10). The sacrificial system provided yet another picture of the Messiah, who would later be called "the lamb of God" (cf. John 1:29). The brazen serpent (Numbers 21:5ff.) provided yet another pentateuchal picture of the Messiah, one which would be taken up by our Lord (cf. John 3:14; 12:32).

Even a man who seemed to be a pagan prophet--Balaam--gave testimony of the coming Messiah:

"The oracle of him who hears the words of God, And knows the knowledge of the Most High, Who sees he vision of the Almighty, Falling down, yet having his eyes uncovered. I see him, but not now; I behold him, but not near; A star shall come forth from Jacob, And a scepter shall rise from Israel, And crush through the forehead of Moab, And tear down all the sons of Sheth. And Edom shall be a possession, Seir, it enemies, also shall be a possession; While Israel performs valiantly. One from Jacob shall have dominion, And shall destroy the remnant from the city" (Numbers 24:16-19).

Finally, in Deuteronomy 18:15, Moses was referred to as a prototype of Messiah:

"The LORD your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among you, from your countrymen, you shall listen to him" (cf. also v. 16).

Messianic Hope
in the Period of Conquest

In the books of Joshua, Judges, and Ruth, there is very little emphasis on the coming Messiah. In the Book of Ruth Boaz is a picture, a type, of Messiah, in his role of the kinsman redeemer (cp. Deuteronomy 25:5-10). Deliverers (judges) were raised up at times of need. These, however, appear to be exceptions to the rule. I believe this is due to the optimism of Israel at this point. God had promised Abraham a land, a seed, and a blessing. The seed and the blessing were a real hope, but Israel's entrance into the land of Canaan temporarily overshadowed the other aspects of God's promise to Abraham. It was only when Israel's hope of possessing the land was in question that the nation' attention turned back to the promise of the Messiah and the blessings He would bring.

Messianic Hope
in the Period of the United Kingdom

The Israelites wearied of judges and demanded to have a king, like the other nations:

Then all the elders of Israel gathered together and came to Samuel at Ramah; and they said to him, "Behold, you have grown old, and your sons do not walk in your ways. Now appoint a king for us to judge us like all the nations" (1 Samuel 8:4-5).

To the Israelites, this request had some biblical basis (cf. Deuteronomy 17:14-20) and it also had many practical benefits. They could have one person to lead them, as well as to represent them. Furthermore, if a dynasty was established, it would always be possible to know who would next be king (remember that there were various judges, each raised up by God at a time of crisis, but with no established pattern). Most importantly of all (in the minds of the people), they could be like everyone else if they had a king.

Not only was this request repugnant to Samuel, but to God. For all intents and purposes, Israel was rejecting God as her king, and wanted to install a man in His place:

And the Lord said to Samuel, "Listen to the voice of the people in regard to all that they say to you, for they have not rejected you, but they have rejected Me from being king over them. Like all the deeds which they have done since the day I brought them up from Egypt even to this day--in that they have forsaken Me and served other gods--so they are doing to you also" (1 Samuel 8:7-8).

For Israel, this request for a king was sin, it was a rejection of God. Nevertheless, God granted them a king and used this for His own purposes. Saul quickly proved to be a less-than-ideal king. He had great stature and bearing, but little character. God rejected him and replaced him with David, a man after His own heart. In one sense, David gave Israel a taste of what the ideal king could be. God did promise David that he would have an eternal throne:

"The LORD also declares to you that the LORD will make a house for you. When your days are complete and you lie down with your fathers, I will raise up your descendant after you, who will come forth from you, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build a house for My name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever. I will be a father to him and he will be a son to Me; when he commits iniquity, I will correct him with the rod of men and the strokes of the sons of men, but My lovingkindness shall not depart from him, as I took it away from Saul, whom I removed from before you. And your house and your kingdom shall endure before Me forever; your throne shall be established forever" (2 Samuel 7:11b-16).

Immediately, the promise had to do with David's son, Solomon, and with future sons. As God's words indicate, this son would sin and would need chastening. The key word for us is the word "forever." This word indicates that God was a promising David that his throne (or dynasty) would be an eternal one. This would ultimately be fulfilled by Messiah, now designated to be of David's lineage. How exciting this must have been. Subsequent history will confirm that neither Solomon not his son, Rehaboam, would prove to be God's promised Messiah, but from this time on the Messiah is known as the "son of David" (cf. Luke 1:32; 2:4; 18:38).

Some of the most beautiful messianic promises written during the period of the united kingdom are found in the Psalms. Some come from the pen of David (e.g. Psalm 22, 110); another (72) was the work of Solomon. God spoke through the psalmists of Israel, foretelling the arrival of Messiah, the Israel's coming King.

Psalm 2 speaks of the Messiah as the One whom God will install as His King over Israel (v. 7). Messiah will be given the nations as His inheritance, and He will rule over those who seek to oppose Him (vss. 1-3, 8-9). The nations are thus urged to worship God now, or face the wrath of His coming King. In contrast,

Psalm 22 portrays the suffering of Messiah on the cross of Calvary. It begins with the words which our Lord quoted upon the cross, "My God, my God, why has Thou forsaken me?" thus identifying the Savior with the One whose sufferings are described in this Psalm.

Psalm 45 is written for the celebration of the king's marriage. It therefore focuses on the splendor and majesty of the coming King (vss. 3-6), and upon the fact that His throne is eternal (v. 6). The bride of the king loves righteousness and hates wickedness (the church?) and has been chosen by Him as His bride. The splendor and beauty of the bride is described as she has been prepared for her presentation to the King.

Psalm 72 depicts the reign of the Righteous King of Israel, who judges the people with righteousness and justice, and who vindicates the afflicted. He is the One who will answer the cries of the afflicted and will bring them deliverance.

Psalm 110 speaks of the installation of the Messiah at the right hand of God, who will rule over His enemies. Not only is He to rule as king, but He is also an eternal priest after the order of Melchizedek (v. 4). He will come to the earth to destroy His enemies.

Messianic Hope
in the Divided Kingdom

In the untied kingdom of Israel, as ruled by kings Saul, David, and Solomon, things were not perfect. Saul had to be removed (1 Samuel 15), David sinned greatly with regard to Uriah and his wife Bathsheba (2 Samuel 11), and Solomon's reign ended pitifully (1 Kings 11). Things were destined to get worse, however. Solomon's son Rehaboam was so foolish as to listen to his peers, rather than to the wise counselors of his father. The result was that the united kingdom became two kingdoms: Israel, led by Jeroboam, and Judah, led by Rehaboam. Israel was led by kings who were consistently evil, while Judah's kings alternated between those who were good and those who were evil (cf. 1 Kings 12).

Elijah, Elisha, and Jonah were prophets to the northern kingdom of Israel. In their persons and work, each of these prophets anticipated the coming Messiah. Elijah was a type of John the Baptist, who was to prepare the way of the Lord (cf. Malachi 4:5-6; Luke 1:17; Matthew 17:9-13). Elisha typified the Lord, who came after Elijah, and who manifested even greater power in the Spirit than his predecessor. Jonah, the disobedient prophet typified both Israel in her disobedience and Messiah, in His death, burial and resurrection (cf. Matthew 12:38-41).

Among the prophets to the southern kingdom of Judah were Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Micah. Each of these prophets looked forward to the time when Judah would be driven from the land and taken captive in Babylon (cf. Jeremiah 25:8-11; Micah 3:12; Isaiah 3:1-26; 5:13-17). Jeremiah spoke of Messiah as the offspring of David who would reign as the "righteous Branch" (23:5), who would gather the scattered flock of Israel and restore righteousness and justice in the land. Micah, too, spoke of Israel's restoration, and the righteous reign of Messiah (chapter 4) who would be born in Bethlehem (5:2).

It is Isaiah, however, who has the most to say about Messiah. Through Isaiah, God has indicted Judah for her sin in chapters 1-5. The people still go through their religious rituals, but practice injustice and violence. They have no mercy or compassion on the helpless, the orphan and the widow (1:11-17). The nation is affluent (2:5ff.), but oppressive (3:13-15) and proud (3:16). Because of their sin, God is going to judge the nation, send them into exile (cf. 8:1-8), and later restore them (3:13--4:6). God will use the nations as instruments of judgment (cf. 8:1-8; 10:5; 13:1-22), but it will be the Messiah who will finally and fully deliver His people and restore them. The coming of Messiah is thus a prominent theme in the Book of Isaiah.

In chapter 7 the kings of Israel and Syria formed an alliance and attacked Jerusalem. Isaiah assured Ahaz that God would not allow these two "firebrands" to prevail. Although Ahaz would not ask for a sign, God proclaimed one:

"Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, a virgin will be with child and bear a son, and she will call His name Immanuel. He will eat curds and honey at the time He knows enough to refuse evil and choose good. For before the boy will know enough to refuse evil and choose good, the land whose two kings you dread will be forsaken" (Isaiah 7:14-16).

The "sign" which God gave to Ahaz has a two-fold function. The first has to do with a son who will be born to a virgin, whose name will be Immanuel, and who will eat "curds and honey," at the time these two kings will be disposed of. From verse 22 we know that "curds and honey" is the food of prosperity and abundance, not of adversity. Had the siege been successful, the people of Jerusalem would have been starving. The child's birth may not have been supernatural, since the term "virgin" can also mean simply "maiden." It is therefore capable of at least two senses. In the first "sign" the boy seems to have been naturally born, but nevertheless a sign to the king, not so much in his birth, but in the food which he ate at the time the two kings were dispatched.

There was latent in this "sign" the makings of an even greater sign, for in time to come a virgin would supernaturally conceive and bear a son, and this son would be the evidence of God's final and full deliverance of His people once and for all. Only in the light of our Lord's birth would this "sign" be understood as such., thanks to Matthew's account (1:23).

In chapter 9, Isaiah turns from the judgment of Judah to her restoration, which will be accomplished by Messiah:

For a child will be born to us, a son will be given to us; And the government will rest on His shoulders; And His name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace. There will be no end to the increase of His government or of peace, Or the throne of David and over his kingdom, To establish it and to uphold it with justice and righteousness From then on and forevermore. The zeal of the Lord of hosts will accomplish this (Isaiah 9:6-7).

This prophecy is especially significant for several reasons. First, it builds upon the promise of a virgin born Savior in chapter 7. A child, we are told will be born, a son will be given (v. 6). The humanity of the Messiah (something always assumed) is here maintained. Secondly, however, the claim is boldly made that this child who will be born is to be God incarnate. The name of the child is equated with His person, and His names are the names and the attributes of God. He is called "the Mighty God" and the "Eternal Father." In some way not yet fathomed by the human mind, the Messiah was to be both God and man. This God-man would sit upon the throne of David and would establish his kingdom, an eternal kingdom of justice and righteous.

This prophecy thus gathers up the elements of the previous messianic promises (such as the Davidic Covenant in 2 Samuel 7 and the messianic psalms) and adds to them the startling disclosure that the Messiah will be a God-man. How this prophecy must have been pondered by the minds of the godly Israelites of old.

In chapter 11 we are told that Messiah will be empowered by Holy Spirit and some of the manifestations of the Spirit's ministry are outlined:

Then a shoot will spring from the stem of Jesse, And a branch from his roots will bear fruit. And the Spirit of the Lord will rest on Him, The spirit of wisdom and understanding, The spirit of counsel and strength, The spirit of knowledge and the fear of the Lord. And He will delight in the fear of the Lord, And He will not judge by what His eyes see, Nor make a decision by what His ears hear; But with righteousness He will judge the poor, And decide with fairness for the afflicted of the earth; And He will strike the earth with the rod of His mouth, And with the breath of His lips He will slay the wicked. Also righteousness will be the belt about His loins, And faithfulness the belt about His waist (Isaiah 11:1-5).

In chapter 49 Messiah's work of restoring Israel is once again taken up, but another new dimension of His ministry is proclaimed:

And now says the Lord, who formed Me from the womb to be His Servant, To bring Jacob back to Him, in order that Israel might be gathered to Him (For I am honored in the sight of the Lord, And My God is My strength), He says, "It is too small a thing that You should be My Servant To raise up the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the preserved ones of Israel; I will also make You a light of the nations So that My salvation may reach to the end of the earth."

Thus says the Lord, the Redeemer of Israel, and its Holy One, To the despised One, To the One abhorred by the nation, To the Servant of rulers, Kings shall see and arise, Princes shall also bow down; Because of the Lord who is faithful, the Holy One of Israel who has chosen You" (Isaiah 49:5-7).

Here we find the promise of the Messiah's salvation reaching even to the Gentiles. While this was implied in the Abrahamic Covenant ("And in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed," Genesis 12:3), it is clearly stated in Isaiah's prophecy.

Finally, in those well-known prophecies of Isaiah 52 and Isaiah 53, the first coming of Christ and His substitutionary atonement are described in some of the most beautiful verses in all the word of God.5

Messianic Hope in the Exile

The years the Jews spent in exile were some of the darkest hours of the nation's history. The disobedient people of God experienced exactly what God had warned through the prophets. Nevertheless, God gave His people hope during this time by assuring them that He would restore His people to Himself and to their land. Once again, the Messiah was the central figure in Israel's hope for the future. Two prophets in particular, Ezekiel and Daniel, encouraged the nation by speaking comforting words about Israel's Messiah. Ezekiel spoke of Messiah as Israel's Shepherd:

Then I will set over them one shepherd, My servant David, and he will feed them; he will feed them himself and be their shepherd. And I, the Lord, will be their God, and My servant David will be prince among them; I, the Lord, have spoken" (Ezekiel 34:23-24).

What better words could this scattered flock hear than the promise of Messiah as their Good Shepherd.

Daniel spoke to the nation in captivity as well. He described the second coming of the Messiah in terms of His majesty and splendor:

"I kept looking in the night visions, And behold, with the clouds of heaven One like a son of Man was coming, And He came up to the Ancient of Days And was presented before Him. And to Him was given dominion, glory and a kingdom, That all the peoples, nations, and men of every language Might serve Him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion Which will not pass away; And His kingdom is one Which will not be destroyed" (Daniel 7:13-14).

What greater hope could Israel have in her hour of judgment than to be given a vision of the coming of their king in glory and power, to establish an everlasting kingdom.

Messianic Hope
in the Post Exilic Period

Two prophets in particular, Zechariah and Malachi, spoke of Messiah to the Israelites who had returned to their land after their exile. God's Servant, the Branch was to be sent (Zechariah 3:8). Even some of the details of His coming were given:

Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion! Shout in triumph, O daughter of Jerusalem! Behold, your king is coming to you; He is just and endowed with salvation, Humble, and mounted on a donkey, Even on a colt, the foal of a donkey (Zechariah 9:9).

Malachi foretold of the coming of John the Baptist, who would come to announce the arrival of the Messiah in the spirit of the prophet Elijah:

"Behold, I am going to send My messenger, and he will clear the way before Me. And the Lord, whom you seek, will suddenly come to His temple; and the messenger of the covenant, in whom you delight, behold, He is coming," says the Lord of hosts (Malachi 3:1, cf. also, vss. 2-3).

The broad outline of messianic promise, found in the Pentateuch, has been greatly filled in. We now know that Messiah will be of the Davidic line, virgin born in the city of Bethlehem, introduced by a prophet like Elijah, and presented to His people riding on the foal of a donkey.

Conclusions

There are several observations which we can make from our survey of the messianic prophecies of the Old Testament. First, we should note the persistent failure of men to meet the standards set for Messiah. No earthly king (including David and Solomon) came even close to being the kind of Messiah-king described in the messianic psalms. Whatever man might have been thought for the moment to have some claim to be Israel's Messiah failed miserably with time and scrutiny. Secondly, we should note the drama, the rise and fall of messianic hopes, based upon changing circumstances. From a human point of view it often looked as is Israel's messianic hopes were dashed on the rocks of reality. Third, we should note the faithfulness of God which resulted in further revelation regarding Messiah, so that new hope was given when men's faith began to wane. Fourth, we should observe that the revelation of Messiah's character and coming were progressively revealed, as is the case with other doctrines of Scripture. Finally, we can observe that the revelation of Messiah's coming included (perhaps even blended) his first coming to die for man's sins and his second coming, to reign over all creation.

What did the revelation of Messiah's coming, hundreds of years prior to its occurrence, mean to the ancient Israelite? Let us consider the meaning of the messianic hope for the Israelite of old before we consider its meaning for us.

First, the messianic prophecies of the Old Testament gave the ancients hope. Adam and Eve, because of the promise of Messiah, had hope, even in the midst of their fallenness and the curse which they had to bear. The same could be said for everyone who followed them and who sinned, which is, of course, everyone.

Second, the messianic prophecies of the Old Testament were the basis for the believer's faith, and thus the substance of the "gospel" of the Old Testament. As one reads the 11th chapter of the Book of Hebrews it is apparent that prophecy is the basis of the faith of those saints of old. Messianic prophecy is the core of all prophecy. Thus, our Lord could say, "Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day; and he saw it, and was glad" (John 8:56).

Third, the messianic prophecies served as a standard for the conduct of the Old Testament saint. The messianic prophecies did not deal exclusively with the circumstances of Messiah's coming (e.g., being virgin born, born in Bethlehem), but instead emphasized the character of Messiah and the nature of His righteous rule. When the prophets spoke of the righteousness of Messiah, who would rescue the oppressed, care for the afflicted, and judge the evildoer impartially, this was both an indictment of Israel's wickedness and a standard for her conduct. Many of the very things which Messiah was promised to do in the future, the Israelites were instructed to do in their own day. Thus, the descriptions of Messiah were given as a model and as a motivation for godly conduct on the part of those who looked for His coming. The same emphasis is found in the New Testament:

Since all these things are to be destroyed in this way, what sort of people ought you to be in holy conduct and godliness, looking for and hastening the coming of the day of God, on account of which the heavens will be destroyed by burning, and the elements will melt with intense heat! But according to His promise we are looking for new heavens and a new earth, in which righteousness dwells. Therefore, beloved, since you look for these things, be diligent to be found by Him in peace, spotless and blameless (2 Peter 3:11-14).

Beloved, now we are children of God, and it has not appeared as yet what we shall be. We know that, when He appears, we shall be like Him, because we shall see Him just as He is. And every one who has this hope fixed on Him purifies himself, just as He is pure (1 John 3:2-3).

Fourth, the messianic prophecies provided much of the substance for the godly Israelite's worship. The messianic psalms were not just a description of the Messiah for Israel to know about in advance. They were descriptions of Messiah so that He could be God could be worshipped more precisely. In my opinion, the Old Testament saint not only "saw" Messiah, but they worshipped Him.

For those who were fortunate enough to be living at the time of Messiah's advent, the messianic prophecies enabled them to recognize the Christ child as Messiah and to worship Him. Some of the prophecies concerning Messiah, such as His virgin birth and being born in Bethlehem, would help the true believer to recognize the Christ child as Messiah, even in spite of conditions which may appear contradictory (who would have expected the Christ to have been born in a stable, in conditions of poverty?).

Perhaps even more than this, the messianic prophecies would enable those who were led to the Christ child to worship Him as they should. It would have been very easy to misunderstand the mission of this "babe in a manger." How, for example, would foreign dignitaries have known to worship Him as Israel's king apart from the biblical revelation of Messiah as Israel's King? The worth and work of Messiah, as revealed by the Old Testament messianic prophecies were the basis for the worship of the babe in the manger. He was worshipped not so much for what men saw in Him at that moment, but what the Scriptures said of Him and of His mission. Thus, the Scriptures guided men in their worship of Messiah at His birth.

In conclusion, let us consider what the Old Testament messianic prophecies mean to New Testament Christians.

First of all, the fact that many of the messianic prophecies have already been fulfilled, down to the last detail, assures us of the accuracy, faithfulness, and reliability of the Word of God. If all of the prophecies pertaining to the first coming of Christ were fulfilled precisely, we have every reason to believe that the remaining prophecies will also be fulfilled. In a slightly different context, Peter's words apply:

"And so we have the prophetic word made more sure, to which you do well to pay attention as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star arises in your hearts" (2 Peter 1:19).

Secondly, the messianic prophecies provide us with God's word about the future, which is the basis for our faith and hope. We must remember that roughly half of the messianic prophecies of the Old Testament are still awaiting fulfillment. Just as the promise of Messiah's coming, to judge the wicked and to establish His kingdom in righteousness, was the basis for the faith and hope of the Old Testament saint, so it is for the New Testament saint. The closing words of the New Testament look forward to the Messiah's return, as foretold in the Old Testament:

He who testifies to these things says, "Yes, I am coming quickly." Amen, Come, Lord Jesus (Revelation 22:20).

In the darkest days of history there is no brighter hope, no more encouraging word than that of the nearness of Messiah's coming.

Finally, let me suggest that the messianic prophecies of the Old Testament should serve to balance and guide our worship of the Lord Jesus at this Christmas season. Quite frankly, we need to beware of worshipping our Lord according to a "Christmas card theology." We worship the "babe in the manger" in a way quite different from that of those first worshippers of whom we read in the gospels.

As I look at the description of the worship of the Christ child in the gospel accounts, I find that they worshipped the Messiah in terms of what He would do. They did not separate His redemption of men on the tree at Calvary from His reigning over all men on His throne. Some would say that this is because the two comings of Christ were not yet understood at this time. I would agree, but I would also protest that we have made so much of a distinction between the two that we fail to see how intertwined they are in Scripture. I believe that when we worship at Christmas we must worship the Christ who came to suffer and to forgive and the Christ who came to judge and to rule. It is not two Christs, but One. Let us remember this Christmas that the manger was also the "Mighty God," "the Eternal Father," and the "Prince of Peace."

It is not nearly so difficult for men to adore a babe in a manger than to bow in reverence to a holy and righteous King, who will reign in righteousness and justice. Yet this is who the Christ child is.


1 For example, the text in Hosea 11:1, "Out of Egypt I called My son," would not have been thought of as a messianic prophecy, and yet Matthew (2:15) interprets it as such.

2 It has been rightly pointed out that in Genesis chapter 2, verses 1-3, it is not man who is featured as the crown of creation, but God's rest. The point still remains, however, that among God's creatures man is the crown of creation.

3 Cf. Matthew 6:13; John 8:44; 12:31; 14:30; 16:11; 17:15.

4 We read of two incidents in Genesis in which Adraham lied in representing Sarah as his sister, and thus eligible to become the wife of the king (Genesis 12:10-20; 20:1-18). In the latter case, however, Abraham's explanation to Abimelech (v. 13) suggested that this policy of representing Sarah as his sister was one that was routinely used, thus making these two of what could have been numerous misrepresentations (thus perhaps frequently endangering the fulfillment of God's promise).

5 Consult the Bible Knowledge Commentary (Wheaton: Victor Books, 1985), Old Testament, p. 1049, for a listing of the many messianic prophecies of Isaiah.

Related Topics: Christology, Dispensational / Covenantal Theology, Soteriology (Salvation)

Pages