MENU

Where the world comes to study the Bible

Proverbs Lesson 6

Related Media

This guided tour of Proverbs 1-9 presents an overview of Proverbs and examines the nature and source of wisdom.  It also considers the practices that enhance wisdom and the snares that lead to foolishness. Proverbs 10-31 investigates ten aspects of the character of the wise and deals with the important issues of wise communication and wise use of money. 

Kenneth Boa

Website: http://www.kenboa.org
Commentary: http://www.kenboa.org/blog
Follow: http://twitter.com/kennethboa
Connect on Facebook: Kenneth Boa
From the series: Proverbs PREVIOUS PAGE

Proverbs Lesson 7

Related Media

This guided tour of Proverbs 1-9 presents an overview of Proverbs and examines the nature and source of wisdom.  It also considers the practices that enhance wisdom and the snares that lead to foolishness. Proverbs 10-31 investigates ten aspects of the character of the wise and deals with the important issues of wise communication and wise use of money. 

Kenneth Boa

Website: http://www.kenboa.org
Commentary: http://www.kenboa.org/blog
Follow: http://twitter.com/kennethboa
Connect on Facebook: Kenneth Boa
From the series: Proverbs PREVIOUS PAGE

Studies in the Book of John

This is an audio series by Dr. Kenneth Boa that walks through the book of John.

Kenneth Boa

Website: http://www.kenboa.org
Commentary: http://www.kenboa.org/blog
Follow: http://twitter.com/kennethboa
Connect on Facebook: Kenneth Boa

Conformed to His Image

Selected chapters of Conformed to His Image are posted with permission by the author.

 

Process Spirituality: Being Vs. Doing; Process Vs. Product

 

In our culture, we increasingly tend to be human doings rather than human beings.  The world tells us that what we achieve and accomplish determines who we are, but the Scriptures teach that who we are in Christ should be the basis for what we do.  The dynamics of growth are inside-out rather than outside-in.  This section talks about becoming faithful to the process of life rather than living from one product to the next.  It also focuses on what it means to abide in Christ and to practice His presence.

 

Continuing on the Journey

 

What does it take to stay in the race?  This concluding chapter considers a variety of issues related to finishing well, including intimacy with Christ, fidelity in the spiritual disciplines, a biblical perspective on the circumstances of life, teachability, personal purpose, healthy relationships, and ongoing ministry.

 

 Kenneth Boa

Website: http://www.kenboa.org
Commentary: http://www.kenboa.org/blog
Follow: http://twitter.com/kennethboa
Connect on Facebook: Kenneth Boa

 

 

 

Paradigm Spirituality (15-part Audio)

 

This audio series contrasts the temporal and eternal value systems and emphasizes the need for a paradigm shift from a cultural to a biblical way of seeing life.  The experience of our mortality can help us transfer our hope from the seen to the unseen and realize the preciousness of present opportunities.  Our presuppositions shape our perspective, our perspective shapes our priorities, and our priorities shape our practice.

 

 Kenneth Boa

Website: http://www.kenboa.org
Commentary: http://www.kenboa.org/blog
Follow: http://twitter.com/kennethboa
Connect on Facebook: Kenneth Boa

 

 

Marriage: Intimates or Inmates?

Related Media

In this article, we will explore the essential issues related to the husband-wife relationship with practical applications of biblical principles.

 Kenneth Boa

Website: http://www.kenboa.org
Commentary: http://www.kenboa.org/blog
Follow: http://twitter.com/kennethboa
Connect on Facebook: Kenneth Boa

Note to Couples

The following is not meant to be a "passive" lesson. There are blanks to fill out, questions to answer and thoughts to discuss and ponder with your partner. The space provided below may not be enough, so feel free to download the Word Document first, and print it out from there.

Introduction

Apart from knowing God, marriage is the most significant relationship we can experience. But never has the institution of marriage been more threatened by external and internal problems than it is today. It is challenged from without by a culture which promotes an independent spirit, minimizes the responsibility of complete commitment, and offers divorce as an increasingly common and acceptable alternative. It is challenged from within by manipulation, unforgiveness, and a lack of communication.

As children of God, we need not settle for lackluster relationships where marriage partners feel more like inmates than intimates. When we believe and obey God's precepts and principles, our marriages can become increasingly fulfilling and meaningful as the years go by. In this booklet, we will look at these scriptural principles to see how we can enrich our lives through marital relationships that are characterized by commitment and communion.

Purpose of Marriage

According to Scripture, marriage was not invented by man, but instituted by God. It was divinely designed not only to be the basic building block of society, but also to provide an earthly analogy of spiritual truth. Marriage is a lifetime covenant of mutual commitment between a man and a woman which leads to oneness on every level: spirit, soul, and body. This communion and intimacy between marriage partners is designed to reflect the image of God and provide the context for a lasting relationship of love and respect. This relationship in turn is the foundation for the privilege of reproduction and the God-given responsibility of physical, psychological, and spiritual nurturing of children.

This is a high calling, and it is unattainable apart from conscious dependence upon the grace and power of God. It may seem safer to settle for less, but in doing so, we will miss out on the fulfillment God intended for us and end up in mediocrity. People do not accomplish more than they set out to attempt. No one plans to have a humdrum marriage, but without the right objectives, a couple will gradually drift into one. It is always tempting to concentrate on things rather than relationships, places rather than people, and the material rather than the spiritual.

If we want the joy of a marriage that grows into an incarnation of God's design, we must set goals that are consistent with God's purpose for marriage and implement these goals by walking in the power of the Spirit and not in the flesh.

  • Write out the God-designed purpose for marriage.
  • Reflect for a few moments on your marriage … is it directed toward those purposes? Is there discernible, positive progress?
  • As you begin to study, write out a prayer of commitment to learn, grow, and change in your marriage relationship.

PRINCIPLE: Marriage is a reflection of a personal covenant relationship between two people.

Principles from Scripture

Genesis 1-2

Genesis 1 describes the creation of the universe and climaxes with the creation of man. Genesis 2 concentrates on the creation of man and climaxes with the institution of marriage. The first chapter portrays God as powerful (the name Elohim is used of God as the creator); the second chapter portrays God as personal (the name Yahweh is used of God as the covenant-keeper).

Study chapters 1 and 2 and list several contrasts between them:

Genesis 1

Genesis 2

Creation of the universe

Creation of man

Climax: creation of man

Climax: creation of marriage

Genesis 1:26-27 states that male and female together constitute the image of God. "And God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them" (Gen. 1:27). It is the Lord who created the masculine and the feminine and endowed them with different characteristics so that each expresses something different about God. In a healthy marriage, these personality differences must be acknowledged and accepted. There are exceptions, but the male is more likely to be realistic, logical, and holistic in his thinking, while the female is more likely to be idealistic, intuitive, and detailed in her thinking. In general, men are more conscious of a need for achievement and significance, while women desire affection and security. When these differences are accepted by both partners, they become complimentary rather than competitive. The result is that the total becomes greater than the sum of the parts.

  • Genesis 1:26-27 states that male and female are created in the image of God. What do you think this means?
  • How does this affect your sense of self-worth? (Read Ps. 139: 13-16.)
  • Accepting yourself sets you free to accept your partner. What truth in Genesis 1:27 helps you in the acceptance of your mate? (See also 1 Pet. 3:7.)

PRINCIPLE: The image of God is best expressed in the combination of male and female.

PRINCIPLE: The God-designed difference between male and female are to be accepted as complementary, not competitive.

Genesis 1:28-30 describes the divine mandate to the man and the woman: "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it" (vs. 28). God's first command was to reproduce and have dominion over the earth. From the beginning, God made marriage and the family central to His creative and redemptive purposes.

PRINCIPLE: Marriage is a major part of God's plan to bring redemption to the human race. The seed of the marriage relationship provided the vehicle for the incarnation of the Savior, Jesus Christ.

Genesis 2:18-22 reveals that marriage was ordained by God, and not by men. It is a covenant relationship, and because it was divinely instituted before the fall (Gen. 3), it was part of God's plan from the beginning, not an emergency measure that resulted from sin.

Verse 18 says, "Then the Lord God said, 'It is not good for the man to be alone; I will make him a helper suitable for him.'" God created a sense of need in the man by having him name the animals and so that he would discover that none of them fully corresponded to him. Then from his side God fashioned a new creature that was wonderfully different and yet perfectly complemented him on a spiritual, intellectual, emotional, and physical level. Loneliness was replaced by companionship and completion, and this is central to God's design for marriage. The concept of "a helper suitable for him" (vss. 18,20) speaks of a supportive relationship between allies and in no way implies that one is inferior to another.

  • What does the concept of "a helper suitable for him" mean?
  • What was man's response and why did he respond in this manner (Gen. 2:23-25)?

PRINCIPLE: Marriage is a divine, not human institution.

PRINCIPLE: Marriage is to be a relationship of companionship, completion, and communion.

Genesis 2:23-25 tells us that marriage was designed to be a permanent covenant relationship of mutual commitment, support, and esteem. The man's response in verse 23, "This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh," is an expression of delight that at last he has found one who corresponds to him. God ordained the marital relationship to be a source of joy and fulfillment, not drudgery.

Verses 24-25 present three essential prerequisites to a quality marriage, and we will look at these in the next section, "Portrait of Marriage."

PRINCIPLE: Marriage was designed by God to be a permanent, mutual, covenant relationship.

PRINCIPLE: God's intent is for marriage to be an inestimable source of joy and fulfillment.

1 Corinthians 7

While Genesis 1-2 portrays the institution of marriage, 1 Corinthians 7 provides specific instructions for marriage. Paul's letter was written to believers in a center of commerce that was noted for moral corruption and sexual promiscuity.

Verses 1-7 defends the legitimacy of marriage but also acknowledges the place of the celibate life. Paul relates celibacy to the gift of self-control (vss. 7,9) and states that there are certain advantages to remaining single if one has this gift. Two of these advantages are that the single person is more free to minister (especially in troubled times), and has fewer distractions to a life of devotion to God (vss. 29-35). It would be wrong to pressure a person with the gift of celibacy to get married; marriage is a may, but not a must.

Paul portrays marriage as a reciprocal relationship in which "The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does; and likewise also the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does" (vs. 4). Each is enjoined to regularly satisfy the sexual needs of the other ("Let the husband fulfill his duty to his wife, and likewise also the wife to her husband;" vs. 3). In the marital relationship, it is proper for the husband to concern himself with pleasing and serving his wife, and for the wife to desire to please and serve her husband (vss. 33-34).

  • List two reasons why Paul advocates the celibate lifestyle.
  • Study Philippians 2:3-11. How does the example of Christ in this passage have a direct bearing on the marriage relationship?

PRINCIPLE: Celibacy is commendable for those called to it. Singleness is not a second-class state.

PRINCIPLE: Marriage is a reciprocal relationship, designed to meet the needs of others.

Portrait of marriage

For this cause a man shall leave
his father and his mother,
and shall cleave to his wife;
and they shall become one flesh.
And the man and his wife were
both naked and were not ashamed
(Gen. 2:24-25).

These verses give us the clearest and most concise portrait of marriage ever presented. The three elements of leaving, cleaving, and establishing a one-flesh relationship are prerequisites to a healthy marital relationship of commitment, completeness, and companionship.

  • *Study Genesis 2:24-25 and determine the three elements of God's ideal plan for marriage.

Leave

Leaving must precede cleaving--marriage requires the forsaking of other relationships so that the husband and wife can be fully committed to each other. When a man and a woman leave home to start a new family unit, they are no longer under the authority of their parents, but are now directly responsible to God and to each other. They are to be independent of their parents in a geographical, emotional, and financial sense, and no other relationship should be allowed to come between them. Independence, however, is not the same as avoidance. Scripture requires them to continue to love and honor their parents and to assist them in times of need.

Cleave

In a relationship of mutual commitment, leaving is the negative aspect, and cleaving is the positive. The marital vows that are expressed in the presence of witnesses establish a permanent covenant in which a man and a woman acknowledge that they are inseparably joined together. The word used in God's mandate for a man to "cleave to his wife" entails the idea of holding fast, of clinging, and of being glued or welded together. There are many external and internal forces that would threaten to sever this bond, but a Christian couple makes a solemn vow to cling together through troubled as well as calm waters. As they renew this vow, implement the principles of Scripture, and depend on God's grace, their relationship can continue to grow in spite of contrary circumstances.

Cleaving also means that the relationship between a husband and wife is to be second only to their relationship with the Lord. Their marriage is to have priority over everything else, including children, career, hobbies, friends, and ministry.

One Flesh

"They shall become one flesh" is the mystery of marriage. While this phrase certainly alludes to the sexual relationship, it goes beyond this, saying that a man and wife actually become one (note that it is a process). The two complete one another physically, psychologically, and spiritually, and this completeness is used in the New Testament to portray an even deeper mystery:

For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife; and the two shall become one flesh. This mystery is great; but I am speaking with reference to Christ and the church (Eph. 5:31-32).

The sexual union was designed by God to be a delightful physical expression of a committed love relationship, and this relationship was in turn designed to portray the spiritual relationship between Jesus Christ and His bride, the church.

The Scriptures are clear that polygamy, adultery, promiscuity, and divorce distort God's purpose for marriage (cf. Prov. 5:15-23; 6:32; Mal. 2:16) because they minimize its permanency and commitment. Marriage was never intended to be a static or dreary experience that tempts people to look elsewhere for fulfillment, but a dynamic process of deepening completeness and companionship. There is to be a new identity as two people become one in spirit, soul, and body. But growing marriages do not happen by default; they are cultivated by years of mutual effort (discipline) and reliance on the grace of God (dependence). When marital problems prevail, they inevitably arise from a failure to leave, a failure to cleave, or a failure to establish a one-flesh relationship.

See if you can fill in the following chart with examples from your own marriage or from any marriage with which you are familiar:

   

POSITIVE EXAMPLES

NEGATIVE EXAMPLES

LEAVE

   

CLEAVE

   

ONE FLESH

   

Priority of love

The threefold mandate of leaving, cleaving, and becoming one flesh cannot be fulfilled without love. This immediately raises a problem, because there are so many personal and cultural misconceptions about the nature of love. Many people confuse love with infatuation which is generally based on a superficial level of outward appearance, a desire for self-satisfaction, fantasy, and romantic euphoria.

The biblical perspective on love is radically different from what most people associate with the term. The Bible is in fact a love story from beginning to end, revealing God's unchanging and sacrificial love for rebellious people:

For this is the way God loved the world: He gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life. (John 3:16).

No one has greater love than this--that one lays down his life for his friends. (John 15:13).

But God demonstrates his own love for us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. (Rom. 5:8).

Husbands, love your wives just as Christ loved the church and gave himself for her (Eph. 5:25).

In this is love: not that we have loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son to be the atoning sacrifice for our sins. (1 John 4:10).

God's love is not static but dynamic, because it is manifested in action as well as attitude. It is a love which seeks the highest good for its object. This deepest love results from a choice to give rather than a desire to get. Marriage is to be modeled on the relationship between Christ and His bride, the church, and it is the nature of Christ's love to serve and to give (see Mark 10:45).

Love is not primarily a matter of mysterious feelings and irrational passions. We can choose to love, we can learn to love, and we can develop the depth of our love even in times of difficulty. Esteem for the unique value of another is based more on choice than on feelings, and it is this esteem and commitment which provides stability in a marriage when feelings fluctuate. All of us desire the emotional aspects of love, but left to themselves, emotions can become tyrannical. According to Scripture, beliefs determine behavior. The right thinking will lead to the right actions, and this in turn will lead to the right emotions.

So far, we have been talking about agape, the highest form of love because it is the love which God has for us. But there are other aspects of love which should also be part of the marital relationship. In The Four Loves, C. S. Lewis develops the meaning of four Greek words for love, and to this list we will add a fifth.

1. Epithumia--In a negative sense, this word is translated lust, but it can also be used in a positive way to speak of legitimate desire. Physical desire should be a part of each marriage; an absence or minimizing of the sexual relationship is symptomatic of problem areas that need to be corrected like painful experiences in the past or tension and poor communication in the present. Marriage was divinely designed to create oneness between a man and a woman on every level, and the shared experience of sexual pleasure is an important form of love which enriches the other forms of love in a marriage union.

2. Eros--This word was commonly used in Greek literature, though it does not appear in the New Testament. While it is the basis for our word erotic, it is not limited to the sensual dimension of love but goes beyond this to the romantic preoccupation with the beloved. Eros can be present with or without epithumia or sexual desire (what Lewis calls "Venus"). It can lead to such a powerful identification that it virtually overcomes the distinction between giving and receiving. Because it is such an emotional love, eros cannot be summoned at will or sustained without help.

3. Storge--Like eros, this word is not used in the New Testament. Storge is the love of affection and belonging, and it borne out of familiarity. It is a love shared by members of a family who know they belong together and are comfortable in one another's presence. It provides a sense of security and an emotional refuge from the outside world.

4. Phileo--This is the love of friendship, companionship, and openness. It is the product of shared interests, time, insights, vision, and experiences. In eros, the lover is occupied with the beloved; in phileo, two or more companions are occupied with common interests and activities. Without this dimension of friendship, a marriage will slip into the rut of mediocrity.

5. Agape--We have already seen that this is the highest of the loves because it is characterized by unselfishness and giving, even to the point of sacrifice. Agape is not a conditional "if" love that places others on a performance basis. Nor is it a "because" love that results from mutual attraction or friendship. Agape is an "in spite of" love which sets no conditions and stands firm in spite of circumstances. It is prompted by a willful choice to put another's interest before one's own and to serve another person regardless of his or her response. It relates more to the will than to the emotions. Agape is not theoretical but practical, because it is expressed in actions.

Agape is not natural. It is a divine love, and our choice to love others in this way requires us to be willing vessels of God's love. It is not something we can manufacture in the power of the flesh. Agape is the only love which can provide a true foundation for a successful Christian marriage. The other loves are all important, and each of them should be facets of the marital relationship. But they are like flowers in a garden that must be cultivated, nourished, and weeded by agape. Without it, the other loves can degenerate and become ends in themselves:

  • Epithumia can become an addictive and selfish quest for the acquisition of pleasure; legitimate sexual desire for a spouse can turn into sexual lust for other men or women.
  • Eros can become a tyrant; the feeling of "being in love" can be so romanticized that it speaks with the voice of a god and leads people into illicit relationships.
  • Storge can lead to rudeness, bad manners, jealousy, the demanding of "rights," and the need to be needed.
  • Phileo can degenerate into the sharing of secret evils and hatreds; it can lead to a we-versus-they mentality that excludes outsiders.

When these loves are controlled and transformed by the love of God, each of them can become aspects of agape while also remaining, in the best sense, the natural loves they were. Frictions and faults are really invitations to turn these loves into agape, "which is the perfect bond of unity" (Col. 3:14), so that we respond with "compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience; bearing with one another, and forgiving each other" (Col. 3:12-13).

LET'S REVIEW

  • * Write out a personal definition for each word for "love":

EPITHUMIA

 

EROS

 

STORGE

 

PHILEO

 

AGAPE

 

  • In this exercise, note the dangers of each kind of love apart from agape. Then describe how each is controlled and transformed when expressed in the context of God's love, agape.

   

Dangers Apart from Agape

Fruits in Context of Agape

Epithumia

   

Eros

   

Storge

   

Phileo

   

  • Now that you understand the five kinds of love and the important contribution each makes to a healthy marriage relationship, take some time to discuss them with your spouse to see how each can be enhanced in your marriage.
  • Exercise: Read 1 Corinthians 13:4-7 two times to gain a better understanding of agape in action. Then read it a third time and visualize the life of Christ as you substitute the name of Jesus for love. Finally, read the passage a fourth time while substituting your own name, and use this as a diagnostic tool to surface areas of deficiency in your own love for your husband or wife. Acknowledge these areas to the Lord and ask Him to transform the quality of your love.

Communication in Marriage

The word communication is derived from the Latin word communis, which means to have in common. Commonalty is essential to every form of love. Studies consistently reveal that the primary cause of marital problems and divorces is a lack of communication.

Communication is the process of sharing thoughts and feelings, through verbal and non-verbal means, with another person so that he or she understands what you are attempting to express. Effective communication does not happen by accident; it is a skill which requires the discipline of development. There are three essential components of the communication process: talking, listening, and caring.

Talking

The most obvious aspect of communication is verbalizing. Scripture exhorts us to speak the truth in love (Eph. 4:15), and this requires a mutual attitude of openness and honesty. For love to grow in a marriage there must be regular times of interaction and comradeship. At some point in each day, both partners should make an effort to move beyond the level of routine conversation to verbalize hopes, disappointments, joys, fears, prayer requests and answers, plans, ideas, and interests. As a couple talks things over, confides in each other, and spends time together, they become better and better friends.

Your mate should be your best friend. Tragically, this rarely occurs in marriage. Too often, couples get so wrapped up with their children that they hardly know each other. Then when the children leave, they discover that they are like strangers who have been living for years under the same roof. This does not need to happen, but effort is required to avoid it. Friendships are cultivated by shared thoughts, feelings, and experiences.

Listening

Listening is the biggest problem in effective communication. Most of us have developed poor listening habits, and this is especially true in the way we listen to our mates. Because we think we know our partners so well, we often tune them out and miss what they are really trying to say. Preoccupation, daydreaming, worry, distractions (e.g., television), and lack of interest are a few of the barriers to real listening. Norm Wright mentions another barrier in Communication: Key to Your Marriage. He observes that when one person talks to another, there are actually six messages that can be communicated:

What you mean to say.

What you actually say.

What the other person hears.

What the other person thinks he hears.

What the other person says about what you said.

What you think the other person said about what you said.

It is easy for the speaker to fall short of the ideal in verbalization, "Say what you mean and mean what you say." It is even easier for the listener to incorrectly perceive, interpret, evaluate, and respond to a message.

A study conducted by Albert Mehrabian demonstrated that a listener determines the attitude of a speaker toward him by three components: the words themselves, the tone of voice, and non-verbal factors. Significantly, the words account for only 7% of the message; the remaining 93% is communicated by the tone of voice (38%) and non-verbal cues (55%). This is a sharp reminder that what we do speaks so loudly that our partners often cannot hear what we say.

Here are several suggestions for improving your listening skills:

1. Listening requires focused attention. Avoid the temptation of doing other things while conversing with your mate.

2. Make an effort to establish good eye contact. Much is communicated through facial expressions and the eyes, so look at your partner, not at the floor, ceiling, or television.

3. Because you can think faster than a person can speak, there is a temptation to drift away and get engaged in your own thoughts. Use this extra time by looking for key words, feelings, and subliminal messages. Work on concentrating on what your mate is really saying.

4. Show enthusiasm and interest, and be sure to ask probing and clarifying questions to ensure effective communication.

5. Try to set aside a special time for undistracted conversation. For many people, the late evening is best.

6. Be careful not to interrupt or jump to premature conclusions.

7. Look for understanding even when you disagree; try to see issues from your partner's perspective.

  • Exercise: Look up the following passages and write down a communication principle for each one:

Principles that Principles that

Help Communication

Hinder Communication

Proverbs 12:25

Proverbs 11:13

Proverbs 15:1

Proverbs 12:22

Proverbs 15:23

Proverbs 18:2

Proverbs 25:11

Proverbs 18:13

Isaiah 50:4

Proverbs 18:19

Ephesians 4:15

Proverbs 21:9,19

Ephesians 4:29b

Ephesians 4:26-27

1 Peter. 2:22-23; 3:9-10

Ephesians 4:29a

James 1:19-20

James 3:5-12

Caring

Caring is a key ingredient in effective communication, because it is the genuine desire to understand the other person, to build areas of common ground, and to deepen the relationship. Real caring requires a willingness to concentrate on another person's strengths and accept his or her weaknesses. Caring involves transparency, vulnerability, and supportiveness; it is other-centered rather than self-centered.

Here are some suggestions for developing this aspect of your relationship. Check the areas you need to work on:

1. You can enhance positive associations with your mate by visualizing times of shared joys and experiences and remembering the good things you have done together.

2. At least once a year, plan an overnight or a weekend retreat (if you have children, get a baby sitter). Use this time to relax and discuss your marriage, family goals, spiritual life, recreation, finances, and so forth.

3. Display physical affection. Touch, pat, hug, and kiss your partner.

4. Make it a point to notice and pay attention to your spouse when other people are present.

5. Steer away from the habit of nagging and criticism.

6. Stretch your sphere of interests to include at least some of your mate's, and look for ways to do things together (gardening, special projects, cultural events, tennis, etc.).

7. Compliment your husband or wife whenever possible.

8. Don't take your partner for granted; extend the kind of courtesy you showed when you were dating.

  • Quality communication is essential to a maturing, dynamic relationship. Don't settle for mediocrity. Develop some specific, achievable goals for improving the quality of your mental communication. Two examples are provided to get you started.

1. Set up a time to study the HELPS and HINDRANCES passages with my mate.

2. Plan an overnight rendezvous with my spouse (get a baby sitter if you have kids) and discuss marriage and family goals (e.g., spiritual life, recreation, finances, etc.).

3.

4.

Challenges to Marriage

We live in a culture that has succumbed to the process of secularization and reflects materialistic values on every level. Though we are supposed to love people and use things, more and more of us use people and love things. Increasing stress and rootlessness, along with confusion of roles and excessive activities have threatened the stability of the family unit. Communication and creative participation in the home have been on the decline for years. As marital and parental bonds grow weaker, separation and divorce become more common. These and other cultural influences challenge the viability of quality marriages and affect us all.

In such a relativistic society, we need more than ever to be grounded in an absolute frame of reference. If we do not daily renew our minds by the truths of the Word in this and in other areas of life, we will unavoidably slip into the mind-set of our surrounding culture and our marriages will be severely threatened. Many Christians have already absorbed the prevailing attitude that divorce is a live option. When two people enter into a marriage thinking that they can always bail out when times get rough, the possibility of divorce is greatly enhanced.

The Bible is clear in its teaching that marriage is to be permanent ("'For I hate divorce,' says the Lord, the God of Israel;" Mal. 2:16). Separation and divorce are contrary to the purposes for which God instituted marriage. When Jesus was tested by the Pharisees in this area, He went back to God's original design for marriage, quoting Genesis 1:27 and 2:24 and concluding, "What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate" (Matt. 19:6; Mark 10:9). When a man and a woman marry, God yokes them in an indissoluble union. It is therefore dishonoring to God to even consider divorce as an escape hatch, because this distorts the spiritual reality of marriage and creates a breach in commitment that can widen under pressure.

As Christians, we are to pursue a higher standard than that of the prevailing culture. God's pattern and purpose for marriage is constantly imperiled by internal forces of selfishness and external forces of society. Because of the problem of sin, we all fall short of God's ideal for our marriages. It is only as we abide in His power that we can fulfill His plan in this most important of earthly relationships.

God deals with us in the present; if in the past you have made mistakes that have lead to separation or divorce, you can claim His forgiveness in the present and be relieved from any burden of guilt. Like Paul, you can forget what lies behind and reach forward to what lies ahead (Phil. 3:13). If in the present you are suffering from an unhappy marriage, you can prayerfully apply biblical principles and maintain your commitment by God's power regardless of the response of your mate. If for the sake of Christ you have been called to endure hardship, God's grace will be sufficient for you as you honor Him (see Rom. 8:18; 2 Cor. 4:17; 12:9; Phil. 4:13; 1 Pet. 2:19-21; 3:1).

  • Exercise: Carefully read Matthew 19:3-12; Mark 10:2-12; and 1 Corinthians 7:10-28. Write down the key principles you gain on marriage, divorce, and remarriage from these crucial passages:

1.
 

2.
 

3.
 

4.
 

5.
 

6.
 

Communion in Marriage

The goal of marriage is communion: it is a relationship of oneness on the spiritual, psychological, and physical levels.

Spirit

On the deepest level, we are spiritual beings, created in God's image to have an eternal relationship with Him. Nothing short of this relationship will satisfy our God-given needs for unconditional love and acceptance, significance and identity, and competence and achievement. In our new position in Christ we are perfectly loved and accepted as sons and daughters of God's family; we have significance and identity as members of the body of Christ; and we have been made competent by the gifts of the Spirit to achieve God's purposes for our lives.

If we look to our marriage partners to get our personal worth needs met, we will be exploiting the relationship to get something the other person can never deliver. But if we look to Christ and daily renew our minds with the truth that our needs are fully met in Him, we will liberate our partners from unrealistic demands and find fulfillment rather than frustration. When we trust God's love for us and believe His promise that our deepest longings are satisfied in Him, we are then free to give to the other person without expecting or demanding anything in return. Even if we are rejected in our efforts to serve, we can continue to give in spite of the pain as we acknowledge our feelings to God and reaffirm our true and unchanging position in Christ. We can do this knowing that we are secure in the love of Christ; our true significance is not threatened when we are hurt and rejected by others.

Oneness takes place on the spiritual level when both partners look to the Lord to meet their needs and encourage each other to develop this sense of complete dependence. As the two draw nearer to God, they also come closer to each other because both are finding meaning and fulfillment in the same source.

[Triangle of relationships illustration.]

Couples can cultivate their spiritual oneness by taking a little time in the morning or evening to study the Bible and pray together (consistency is crucial).

Isn't it strange, even tragic, that so few couples pray together? They share meals and conversation, work and play; they share their own bodies and hopes and plans. But they do not openly share God together. Yet He is their deepest source of unity, joy and fulfillment (Armand Nigro).

In addition to shared time in prayer and Scripture, it can also be helpful to read and discuss Christian books of mutual interest and listen together to tapes by various Bible teachers.

  • What are the three God-given needs that all people have?

1.
 

2.
 

3.
 

* How are these three needs met by God?

1.
 

2.
 

3.
 

Soul

On the spiritual level, a husband and wife must depend on the Lord to meet their deepest needs. As they encourage each other to do this, a spiritual oneness develops between them. This in turn is the basis for unity on the psychological level; married couples have been called to an interpersonal oneness of mind, emotion, and will. While they cannot alter the reality of their security and significance in Christ, they can enhance one another's realization of this truth.

In The Marriage Builder, Larry Crabb discusses two opposing principles that surface in Christian marriages: the principle of manipulation versus the principle of ministry. He states the important truth that beliefs determine goals. If a man or woman does not believe that his or her needs are really met in Christ, that person will pursue the goal of manipulating others to get those needs met. When this happens, marriage motivations are self-centered rather than other-centered, and this leads to parasitic relationships.

The only way to turn from the goal of manipulation to the goal of ministry is a change of beliefs. When we believe the New Testament truth that our fulfillment is found in Christ, we are then free to give ourselves unconditionally to our spouses. Knowing who we are in Christ, we can choose in the power of the Spirit to minister to our partner's needs.

It is natural to desire that our partners reciprocate in this process, but this desire must not become our goal, since it depends on the other person for its fulfillment. We must continue to pursue the goal of ministry and leave our desires in God's hands. If we fail to do so, we will slip into the subtle trap of manipulating our partners to change according to our desires. We must rely on the grace of God to sustain us during times of sadness, failure, rejection, and disappointment in marriage so that we will not succumb to despair. During such trials, we must cling to the truth of God's goodness, believing that regardless of our circumstances, God's good and loving purpose is to make us more like Christ. With this attitude, we can joyfully obey God's mandate to commit ourselves to the satisfaction of our spouses. We can accept and forgive them just as we have been accepted and forgiven by Jesus.

  • In this section, we discussed the difference between the goal of manipulation and the goal of ministry. In what ways have you tried to manipulate your mate to conform to your desires?

 

  • What practical steps do you need to implement the principle of ministry to your spouse? For example: Pray with my wife regularly. Share a word of encouragement with my mate in a phone call.
  • What truth do you need to believe in order to selflessly minister to your mate?

Body

Oneness on the level of spirit and soul provides the basis for physical oneness in marriage. From a biblical standpoint, sex should not be regarded as "making love" but as expressing love. Sexual intimacy was designed to be an expression of spiritual and psychological (mental, emotional, and volitional) intimacy. As Larry Crabb notes, the two bodies that come together should house two persons who are already together. The sexual relationship was never intended to lead to a good marriage, but to be the product of a good marriage.

Our culture has cheapened and debased the idea of sexuality by minimizing this dimension of personal meaning and ignoring the boundaries originally set by God. Sex has become associated with coarse humor, promiscuity, obsession, perversion, exploitation, and abuse. It is a tyrannical master of those who pursue physical pleasure as a solution for their personal problems.

The biblical perspective is utterly opposed to this mentality. Scripture teaches that God is the originator of the sexual relationship; it was not produced in the gutter but in glory. It is God who designs, but man who degenerates. Listen to what C. S. Lewis has the demon Screwtape say to his nephew Wormwood in The Screwtape Letters:

Never forget that when we are dealing with any pleasure in its healthy and normal and satisfying form, we are, in a sense, on the Enemy's ground. I know we have won many a soul through pleasure. All the same, it is His invention, not ours. He made the pleasures: all our research so far has not enabled us to produce one.

Larry Christenson in The Christian Family observes that believers tend to fall into two basic errors in their attitude toward sex. The first is the Puritanical and Victorian attitude that sex is a kind of necessary evil. This mentality is not derived from the Bible, but from the ancient Greek dualism between the physical (evil) and the spiritual (good). By contrast, Genesis teaches that marriage and sex were given as a gift of God before, not after the fall. It is therefore good, not sinful, when used according to His design.

  • Exercise: Look up these passages to determine the divine parameters for the use of the gift of sex:

Genesis 2:24

Exodus 20:14

Proverbs 5:15-17

Proverbs 6:23-32

1 Corinthians 6:15-20

Ephesians 5:3

1 Thessalonians 4:1-8

Hebrews 13:4

While the first basic error deprecates sex, the second error spiritualizes it. It is sometimes described in such elevated terms that one would hardly know that the primary aspect of the sexual relationship is physical and emotional pleasure. Sex is sometimes solemnized to the point that Christians are afraid to admit it is fun. Play and laughter should not be banished from the bedroom.

Scripture reveals three purposes for the sexual dimension of marriage: procreation, pleasure, and protection.

Procreation--The divine mandate to "be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth" was given before the fall (Gen. 1:28) and after the flood (Gen. 9:7) so that the earth would be populated. Children are the logical outcome of a love relationship.

Pleasure--God created the pleasure of sexuality to enhance this aspect of communication and shared experience. Read these passages to see what they say about sexual desire and pleasure:

Genesis 3:16

Genesis 18:12

Genesis 26:8

Deuteronomy 24:5

Proverbs 5:18-19

The relationship between Solomon and Shulamith so beautifully portrayed in the rich poetic imagery of the Song of Solomon offers an unparalleled illustration of sensuous love. For a clear picture of this pattern for the sexual expression of love, you and your partner may want to read A Song for Lovers by S. Craig Glickman, a commentary on the Song of Solomon which includes a new translation and paraphrase of the book.

Protection--Another divine purpose for the sexual union between a husband and wife is to protect them both from immorality.

But because of immoralities, let each man have his own wife, and let each woman have her own husband. Let the husband fulfill his duty to his wife, and likewise also the wife to her husband. The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does; and likewise also the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does. Stop depriving one another, except by agreement for a time that you may devote yourselves to prayer, and come together again lest Satan tempt you because of your lack of self-control (1 Cor. 7:2-5).

This is not a matter of legalized prostitution, because both sides are equally represented in this passage. There is no double standard here; Paul speaks of mutual responsibility. The husband and the wife have relinquished the right to their bodies and turned that authority over to each other. The wife's body belongs to her husband, and the husband's body belongs to his wife. Neither has the right to withhold physical affection or use sex in a manipulative way. Sex is not to be used as a club or as a reward for good behavior. Instead, both partners are responsible to care for and fulfill one another's physical needs. Sex was never intended to be self-oriented but partner-oriented.

Verse 5 teaches that apart from brief periods by mutual consent, a couple should not defraud each other by abstaining from habitual sexual practice, because this would lead to excessive temptation. Each should serve as a magnet to the other so that they will be able to resist the pull of outside attraction (see Prov. 5:15-17,20; 1 Cor. 7:9).

  • 1 Corinthians 7:1-5 is one of the clearest passages in the Bible on the importance of sex in marriage. According to these verses, mark the following statements either true or false:

T. F. The husband has the greater need for sex; it is assumed that the wife has little
interest in or need for sex.

T. F. Failure to meet the sexual need of one's partner is sin.

T. F. Meeting your mate's sexual needs in an option, not an obligation.

  • What conditions are required in verse 5 for sexual abstinence in marriage?

1.

2.

3.

There are three principal barriers to a fulfilling sexual relationship in marriage. The first arises from painful experiences in the past that relate to sexuality. These can lead to inhibitions and a fear of full participation with one's mate. This obstacle is overcome when a person realizes that his or her needs are fully met in Christ, and that rejection or painful associations do not threaten his or her true identity and security.

The second barrier stems from spiritual and/or psychological tension between marriage partners. When there is a lack of caring and communication, when there is anger, guilt, unforgiveness, and resentment, when there is anxiety because of insecurity in the relationship, sexual responsiveness is impaired. The solution lies in what was said earlier about exchanging goals of manipulation for goals of ministry. When we believe that we are complete in Christ, we can look beyond ourselves to the needs of our mates and pursue the proper goal of being God's instruments to touch those needs.

The third barrier is poor sexual technique. This can be overcome by a better understanding of the physiological and psychological aspects of romance, warmth, sensitivity, caressing, arousal, etc. For help in this area, consider reading one of the following: Intended for Pleasure by Ed and Gaye Wheat, The Gift of Sex by Clifford and Joyce Penner, Sexual Happiness in Marriage by Herbert J. Miles, or The Act of Marriage by Tim and Beverly LaHaye.

  • What are the three principal barriers to a fulfilling sexual relationship in marriage, and how is each overcome?

1.

2.

3.

Spiritual, psychological, and physical communion in marriage can continue to grow through the years when a man and a woman are committed to ministering to one another on every level. In Love-Life for Every Married Couple, Ed Wheat presents a helpful list of the strands that make up the bond of intimacy between a husband and wife:

Physical touching of an affectionate, non-sexual nature (touch should not be used exclusively as a signal for sex)

--Shared feelings

--Closeness without inhibitions

--Absence of psychological defenses

--Open communication and honesty

--Intellectual agreement on major issues

--Spiritual harmony

--Sensitive appreciation of the mate's physical and emotional responses

--Similar values held

--Imparted secrets

--Genuine understanding

--Mutual confidence

--A sense of warmth, safety, and relaxation when together

--Sensuous nearness

--Sexual pleasures lovingly shared

--Signs of love freely given and received

--Mutual responsibility and caring

--Abiding trust

  • Personal inventory exercise: Use this list to examine your own marriage. Pray about the areas of deficiency and ask for God's grace and enabling to minister more effectively to your mate.

Role of the Husband

"Roles always determine relationships, and relationships create responsibility" (Howard Hendricks). Because of the abuse and misunderstanding of roles and because of the current cultural trend away from role differentiation, this subject is often looked upon with disfavor. But the Scriptures clearly teach that men and women have distinctive roles to fulfill in Christian marriage, and that these roles actually reflect and illustrate the spiritual relationship between Christ and the church.

Ephesians 5:22-33 paints the clearest biblical portrait of the position of the husband and wife. Significantly, this passage is set within the context of the manifestations of the filling of the Spirit. Verse 21 tells us that one evidence of the Spirit-controlled life is mutual submission in the fear of Christ. Submission is not the exclusive responsibility of the woman; it is to be the life-style of every believer. No one who refuses to live under authority is fit to wield authority. All Christians are called to submit to the authority of Christ and to the truths of God's Word. One of these truths is that marriage best reflects the relationship between Christ and His bride (the church) when the husband assumes the responsibility of being the head of the home. As God's representative authority, he is to take the initiative and leadership in the marriage relationship.

Before we can clearly see what the Bible means by headship, we need to clear away the debris of misconceptions. Here are five (modified from Heaven Help the Home by Howard Hendricks):

1. Headship is not dictatorship. The Bible does not give the husband permission to set up an autocracy in the home. Husbands are not to lord their authority over their family, but exercise it in humility. Ephesians 5:23 says, "For the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ also is the head of the church, He Himself being the Savior of the body." Christ is not the dictator but the lover and Savior of the church.

2. Headship does not mean that the husband is superior. Men and women have an equal standing before Christ (see Gal. 3:28). The best biblical analogy is in 1 Corinthians 11:3--"But I want you to understand that Christ is the head of every man, and the man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of Christ." Clearly, this is not a matter of inferiority, but of function. It is just as heretical to say that women are inferior to men as it is to say that Christ is inferior to God.

3. Headship does not mean that the husband must make all the decisions. Husbands are told to manage their households (1 Tim. 3:12); a wise manager does not make decisions in areas of incompetence, but delegates authority.

4. Headship does not mean that the husband is always right. It does mean that he is responsible for the decisions that are made.

5. Headship is not to be demanded. Husbands are commanded to love their wives, not to make them submit by lecturing and haranguing them.

The husband's God-given task is nothing less than a leadership of love:

Husbands, love your wives just as Christ loved the church and gave himself for her to sanctify her … In the same way husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. (Eph. 5:25-26,28).

There could be no higher analogy; a husband's love for his wife is to be modeled after Christ's supreme passion for the church. This love is rooted in self-sacrifice; like Christ, husbands are actually told to give themselves up for the spiritual welfare of their wives. They are called to protect their wives physically, emotionally, and spiritually.

The husband is to be the initiator not only in leadership, but also in love. He is to manifest both authority and affection as head and heart of the home. This provides the perfect balance, because it avoids the two extremes of autocracy (leadership without love) and sentimentality (love without leadership). This can only be achieved by being dependent upon the power of the Holy Spirit.

The Ideal Husband

Ephesians 5:21 introduces the best known passage in Scripture on the role of the husband and wife in marriage. You as a husband are to be subject to your wife through the proper exercise of your God-given role. Always keep this basic relational principle before you as you proceed through this study.

Leader

The first role of a husband mentioned in Ephesians 5:23 is that he should be the head of the wife.

HEAD: As God's representative authority, the husband is to take the initiative, leadership, and responsibility for the marriage relationship.

1. Being the head means to be the initiator. List five key areas of the marriage or family relationship in which a husband should fulfill his role as head of his wife.

2. What is a current misapplication of this principle?

3. If you applied the same initiative, drive, creativity, planning, and priority to a business of which you were the chief executive officer as you currently apply to your marriage and family, which of the following terms would most appropriately describe the outcome of your business venture?

--Miserable failure

--Still alive but doing poorly

--Maintaining status quo

--Doing well but have a long way to go

--Growing, successful company

4. What positive effect has your spiritual growth had on the climate of your home?
 

5. Are you willing to take the initiative in praying with and for your wife?

Lover

The second role of a husband is that he is to love his wife.

1. Are there any conditions listed in Ephesians 5:25-29 which free a man from the responsibility to love his wife sacrificially?

 

2. Paul tells husbands to love their wives in two ways. What are they?

a.

b.

3. After careful thought, fill in the chart below with some practical ways you can love your wife.

How I love my own body

How I should love my own wife

   

4. Now take time out for an interview with your wife. Carefully jot down in the space below her responses to the following questions (you may wish to write her answers on a separate sheet of paper):

a. What are your needs (e.g., emotional, intellectual, physical, spiritual, etc.)?

b. How would you prioritize these needs?

c. What practical suggestions do you have for me so that I can help meet these needs?

5. What do you think Peter means when he says, "live with your wives in an understanding way" (1 Pet. 3:7)?

6. You can measure your “U.Q.” (understanding quotient) by checking the statements that are true for you:

____ I listen carefully and attentively when my wife describes the activities of her day and the various difficulties she encounters.

____ Even when I believe my wife is wrong, I am compassionate toward her and considerate of why she feels the way she does.

____ I make a habit of trying to overlook the surface words and actions of my wife when she expresses anger or hurt and patiently try to discover the real cause.

____ I am a student of my wife and pay close attention to her feelings, likes, dislikes, attitudes, etc.

Point to Ponder: "I used to pray, 'God, change my wife.' Then I realized I was praying the wrong prayer, and began to pray, 'God, change my wife's husband.'"

Role of the Wife

Jay Adams has summarized God's high calling for married believers in two questions: "Husbands, do you love your wives enough to die for them? Wives, do you love your husbands enough to live for them?" The husband is to love his wife as his own body and give himself up for her. The wife is to respect her husband and voluntarily respond to his God-given authority.

Ephesians 5:22-24 and the parallel passage in Colossians 3:18 tell wives to be subject to their own husbands as is fitting in the Lord in the same way that the church is subject to Christ. Many people in our culture have taken issue with this mandate because they misunderstand the New Testament picture of submission. Paul was no woman-hater; his epistles often commend and speak of women with graciousness and respect. It is important to overcome misconceptions in this area:

1. Submission does not mean inferiority. In 1 Peter, there is a clear parallel between Christ's submission to "Him who judges righteously" (1 Pet. 2:23) and the mandate for wives to be submissive "in the same way" to their own husbands (1 Pet. 3:1). This, coupled with the analogy between Christ and the Father in 1 Corinthians 11:3, shows that the wife's role is dignified, not demeaned, because it so clearly reflects the life Jesus lived.

2. Submission does not mean that a wife must place her brain on the shelf. A woman can creatively use her talents and exercise her spiritual gifts within the context of her divinely-given role and responsibilities.

3. Submission does not mean a lack of fulfillment. True freedom comes from obedience to God's design. Rebellion against biblical truth in an attempt to go one's own way leads to frustration, not fulfillment.

  • Exercise: Proverbs 31:10-31 is a beautiful portrait of an excellent wife who has found fulfillment in her God-given role. She recognizes her worth and creatively uses every one of her gifts in the service of her household. Read this passage and list ten of her qualities. How does her husband respond?

The Excellent Wife

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

g.

h.

i.

j.

4. Submission does not mean passivity. It is an active choice that requires the courage of trusting God and depending on Him in the midst of the trials and circumstances of married life.

5. Submission does not mean servility. Important decisions in a family should not be made without the perspectives and opinions of the wife. A woman can be outspoken in her ideas and still maintain a biblical attitude toward her husband.

"To be submissive means to yield humble and intelligent obedience to an ordained power or authority" (Larry Christenson). We have seen that submission is not restricted to women; it is to be the life-style of every believer. There are different spheres of authority (e.g., government, employment, church), and corresponding spheres of responsibility. In the home, God has ordained that the final responsibility for decision-making rests in the hands of the husband.

As a wife submits to her husband, she honors God by obeying His design for marriage and reflecting Christ's complete submission to His Father:

In the same way, you wives, be submissive to your own husbands so that even if any of them are disobedient to the word, they may be won without a word by the behavior of their wives, as they observe your chaste and respectful behavior (1 Pet. 3:1-2).

Though Christ suffered innocently, He did not lash back. In a similar way, a Christian woman is told to be submissive even if her husband fails in his role. Like Jesus (see 1 Pet. 2:21-25), she can entrust herself to God, knowing that she is never alone, and believing that the ultimate result of obedience to Him is worth the cost. The real test is not how others act, but how we react. By God's grace, both men and women should pursue the legitimate goal of being the right person rather than the illegitimate goal of changing their mates' behavior. Because God is loving and good, they can trust Him for the final outcome.

Peter adds that while external adornment may fade, inner adornment in a woman can increase with time. The quality of a gentle and quiet spirit is imperishable and precious in the sight of God (1 Pet. 3:3-4). This inward attractiveness is maintained by hope in God and manifested by submission to the husband (1 Pet. 3:5). When a woman honors God in this way, she does not need to be afraid of the consequences of her obedience (1 Pet. 3:6). (If her husband asks her to do something that is clearly in violation of Scripture, she should try to find an alternative course of action. If he persists, she must obey God and respectfully disobey her husband.)

The Ideal Wife

Ephesians 5:21 introduces the best known passage in Scripture on the role of the husband and wife in marriage. You are to be subject to your husband through the proper exercise of your God-given role. Always keep this basic relational principle before you as you proceed through this study.

The primary role of a wife mentioned in Ephesians 5 and 1 Peter 3 is that she is to be submissive to her husband.

SUBMISSION: Submission is a voluntary, positive and respectful response to the God-given authority of the husband.

1. Circle the appropriate answer(s) to the following statement:

A woman should submit to her husband's authority because . . .

a. Women are generally incompetent in the area of decision making.

b. Someone must have the final say, and God has given this responsibility to the husband.

c. Husbands are normally more deserving of the role of authority.

d. The husband is stronger physically and intellectually.

e. This is what God asked her to do.

f. The husband says he is the boss, and that's the way it is.

g. Her opinions and feelings are relatively unimportant.

2. Ephesians 5:24 commands submission "in everything." Daniel 3:1-30 cites an exception to this principle, and Daniel 1:1-21 is an example of a creative response to a conflict in the authority pattern. Briefly write your advice regarding the following situations:

a. My husband asked me to lie on our income tax.

b. My husband is not a Christian and he has told me not to attend church.

c. My husband has told me not to wear my favorite red dress anymore.

Principles to Ponder:

1. I must always obey God.

2. He has commanded me in His Word to obey those in authority over me (i.e., government and employer--1 Pet. 2; home--1 Pet. 3; Eph. 6; church leaders--1 Pet. 5).

3. I must obey God and respectfully disobey my human authority when I am asked by them to violate a clear biblical absolute (e.g., my husband asked me to lie, steal, murder, commit adultery, etc.).

3. Read 1 Peter 3:1-2 and complete the following statement: If a wife becomes a Christian and her husband is still an unbeliever, the best way for her to help him become a Christian is:

4. In verse 1, wives are told to be submissive "in like manner." To what or to whom does this phrase refer? (See 1 Pet. 2:21-25.)

5. Does 1 Peter 3:3-4 suggest that external appearances should be totally unimportant to the Christian wife and that it does not matter whether or not she looks nice? If not, exactly what is the point of the passage?

6. Are there any conditions listed in 1 Peter 3:1-6 which your husband must meet in order for you to respect and submit to him?

Relating to In-Laws

" That is why a man leaves his father and mother. . ." (Gen. 2:24). We have already seen that a successful marriage requires a separation from both sets of parents. This separation can be traumatic to all concerned if the parents have not been preparing their children for the responsibilities of married life. Maturity involves a process of moving from complete dependence to complete independence.

Serious marital problems can develop when this independence is incomplete. (1) Physical. It is not advisable to live with parents or even to spend great amounts of time with them. This can threaten the establishment of a bond of intimacy between a husband and wife. (2) Emotional. The psychological umbilical cord must be severed, or there will always be the temptation to turn to parents to fulfill roles that should be reserved for your spouse. (3) Financial. Financial dependence upon parents can lead to domination, low self-esteem, and marital tension.

Another source of strife between couples is an unloving and critical attitude toward in-laws. Even if they are unkind in their treatment, Scripture tells us to respond with kindness, forgiveness, and prayer (see Luke 6:27-28). Paul adds, "Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good" (Rom. 12:21).

  • In what ways, if any, have you failed to develop a healthy independent relationship with your in-laws? What action steps are necessary to correct this?

Practical Suggestions

A marriage relationship is never static, but dynamic. It is either growing or dying. That is why periodic evaluation is always healthy. The following practical suggestions are designed to facilitate the evaluation process. Prayerfully go through the checklist, mark those areas the Holy Spirit impresses upon you, and go to work on them. Do it now. Do it regularly. You'll develop a wonderful marriage in the process!

Suggestions for Husbands

Find creative ways to do special things for your wife.

Regularly share your hopes and plans with your wife and listen carefully to hers.

Be sensitive to her emotional needs and tune in to what she is feeling.

Look for her strengths and praise her for them.

Leave her weaknesses to the Lord and pray about them.

Do not get slack in courtesy and good manners.

Avoid a domineering and bossy attitude.

Try to learn new things about her and the things she enjoys.

Do not compare her with other women.

Encourage her in her activities.

Keep yourself spiritually, mentally, and physically fit.

Suggestions for Wives

Find creative ways to do special things for your husband.

Look for his strengths and praise him for them.

Leave his weaknesses to the Lord and pray about them.

Try to learn new things about him and the things he enjoys.

Do not compare him with other men.

Encourage him in his activities.

Keep yourself spiritually, mentally, and physically fit.

Suggestions for Couples

Study the Bible together and talk about practical applications.

Pray together on a daily basis.

Do not criticize, nag, or taunt each other.

Do your financial planning together. Try hard to reach a unified attitude on credit, spending, and savings. Disharmony over finances is one of the greatest threats to marriage.

Do not go to sleep with unresolved anger or grievances.

Practice the art of communication.

Resolve to make the best of what is rather than fantasying about what might have been.

Pursue the goal of ministering to the needs of your mate, knowing that your needs are already met in Christ.

Notice each other when in public and never make a public remark at the expense of your mate.

Look for common activities and interests and try to develop them.

Plan a weekend retreat or vacation alone with your mate at least once a year.

Here are six passages which, if consistently applied, can revolutionize your marriage. Write a sentence on the relevance of each of these passages to your relationship with your mate:

Matthew 18:21-35

 

Philippians 2:2-5

 

Philippians 4:4-7

 

Philippians 4:8-9

 

Philippians 4:13

 

1 Peter 2:19-21; 3:8-9

 

Books for Further Study

Communication: Key to Your Marriage by H. Norman Wright (Regal Books)

Man and Woman in Biblical Perspective by James B. Hurley (Zondervan)

Marriage Takes More Than Love by Jack and Carole Mayhall (NavPress)

Maximum Marriage by Tim Timmons (Revell)

Strike the Original Match by Charles R. Swindoll (Multnomah Press)

The Marriage Builder by Lawrence J. Crabb, Jr. (Zondervan)

What Wives Wish Their Husbands Knew About Women by James Dobson (Tyndale)

Scripture Memory Cards

Genesis 2:24; Proverbs 15:1; 18:13; Ephesians 5:22-23; 5:25; Philippians 4:8; Colossians 3:12-13; James 1:19.

Related Topics: Christian Home, Marriage, Love

Forming an Authentic Self in an Inauthentic World

Related Media

Our new identity as followers of Jesus is based on who we have become in Christ. Instead of fabricating a false self based on having and doing, our identity is based on being - our new birth as beloved chiildren of God.

Kenneth Boa

Website: http://www.kenboa.org
Commentary: http://www.kenboa.org/blog
Follow: http://twitter.com/kennethboa
Connect on Facebook: Kenneth Boa

 

”Simon, son of John, do you love m more than these do?" (John 21:15)

In recent days, I have been haunted by this penetrating question. Perhaps “these” referred to the boon of fish, symbolizing the joy of successful work. Or Jesus may have meant the other disciples, alluding to the pleasures of friendship with likeminded people. Our Lord could even have been asking Peter whether his love for Him exceeded the other disciples’ love for Him. Regardless of the referent, however, the piercing point of the question remains the same. As we substitute our names for “Simon, son of John” we sense the voice of Jesus as His eyes gaze into our souls, inviting us to a ruthless examination of what we may love more than Him. There in the wellspring of the soul we find the conflicted desires of our true and false selves.

There is little doubt that when Peter saw the charcoal fire on the shore of the Sea of Tiberias (John 21:9), the pain associated with his triple denial of the Lord before another charcoal fire (John 18:18) returned to him with searing heat. In Luke’s account, Peter’s third denial was immediately followed by the crowing of a rooster and the worst moment of his life: “The Lord turned and looked at Peter” (Luke 22:61). That penetrating gaze caused him to go out weeping bitterly, and it was upon him once again as Jesus took him aside to confront, heal, and reinstate him with renewed purpose and mission (John 21:15-19). The three commissions in this text corresponding to and superceding the three denials illustrate the profound and unique biblical truth that “where sin increased, grace abounded all the more” (Romans 5:20).

The harsh reality is that the sometimes wrenching journey from the false self toward the wholeness of the true self is replete with our own denials of the Lord when we turn to our own way instead of His way. We deny Jesus’ rightful rule when we crave pride-driven autonomy rather than the humility of radical trust and abandonment to divine providence.

The false self, engendered and nourished by the quest for having, being, and doing on our own terms can choke the life of the new self that has been implanted in the heart of the believer. The illusory persona is inherently biased to follow false compasses because of our pursuit of need gratification. Given the power of continually reinforced cultural cues, it is little wonder that people who wish to follow Jesus often end up following the fantasies of this present darkness. The corrupting effect of invalid role models and the erosion of our knowledge of goodness, truth, and beauty through the accelerating process of relativism conspire against the formation of meaningful identity in this world.

As films like Memento, The Bourne Identity, and The Man Without a Past vividly portray, the prospect of living in this world without a coherent identity can be terrifying. We are driven to cobble together some sense of past and of place, of possession and of position, in an attempt to authenticate our being and assure our trajectory. The sea is wide and our boats are small and frail, and we are desperate to think we are on course, though few people have a clue as to their real destination. Without a transcendent source of meaning and identity, people will cling to the detritus of myths that happen to be floating about, myths of power and fantasy; myths of success; coming of age myths; travel myths. Our ambient world system promotes and rewards a fundamental desire to succeed in the false self that naturally outstrips the desires of the true self.

In spite of its shortcomings, the recent film Bruce Almighty well illustrates the quest for the godlike power to reshape the world according to our liking. Bruce Nolan, a television reporter in Buffalo, New York is unhappy with his life. At the end of a terrible day, Bruce rants and raves against God who responds by challenging him to see if he can do a better job. Temporarily endowed with divine abilities, Bruce is giddy with power, using it selfishly and foolishly with unintended consequences. To cope with millions of prayer requests, he answers them all with a blanket “Yes”—thus, for instance, 400,000 people win the lottery and then are outraged to discover that they have won only $17.00 apiece! As the plot progresses, Bruce begins to discover a fundamental biblical truth in which God in effect tells us all, “I am God, and you are not. . . .You cannot be Me, and you wouldn’t want to be Me.”

Scripture clearly teaches that we were never meant to be autonomous individuals who make our own way in this world apart from God. We cannot even know ourselves without knowing the One through whom and for whom we were created. We can only find and nurture the true self by abandoning our illusions of control and committing ourselves to the boundless goodness and grace of the living Lord of all. It has been rightly affirmed that our service to Him is perfect freedom.

The false self will always worship and serve the created order through the idolatry of possessions, positions, and people. These idols are cruel taskmasters and their service is burdensome. The true self, embraced by dying to the idolatrous quest of the false self, revels in the fact that nothing less than God will satisfy the restless heart.

The Old and the New Self in Paul’s Thought

All who are born in this world receive the gift of bios, or biological life, but the greater gift of zoē, or spiritual life, is a product of the second birth. This zoē is a radically new form of life, because it is the life of Christ in us (Galatians 2:20; Colossians 1:27). Since we were formerly dead, blind, and bound (Ephesians 2:1; 2 Corinthians 4:4; 2 Timothy 2:26), the new self is more than a resuscitation of the old self; it is a new entity before God (2 Corinthians 5:17; Ephesians 4:24; Colossians 3:10). I see the new self as the life of God’s Son within us, uniquely expressed through the prism of each believer’s personality. This new self must be perfect before God, or we could not have intimate communion with the holy Father of lights.

On the other hand, I would not equate the new self with the imago Dei, since the image of God in its various dimensions (e.g., our soul, relationality, God-given authority, and spiritual capacity) was distorted, but not eradicated in the fall. The new or true self, which is our inner life in Christ (Ephesians 3:16; Romans 7:22), impinges on and progressively transforms our thinking, character, and actions in such a way that the imago Dei is gradually being purified, though never fully or perfectly in this earthly life.

I associate the false or old self with the way Paul uses sarx (“the flesh”) in texts like Galatians 5:13-24 and Romans 7:18, 25. When God implanted His zoē in our regeneration, He did not erase the old memories, false scripts, and inauthentic ways of having, being, and doing. In this life of progressive but often fitful growth in sanctification, we are fully capable of thinking, speaking, and acting in ways that express the deeds of the flesh instead of the life of the Spirit within us. False patterns of beliefs and behaviors can be manifested in the hidden self (avoiding God and others), the unseen self (not perceived until illuminated by grace), and the masked self (the false images we act out before others).

The radical contrast between what we actually were, when stripped of our pretense and posturing, and what we are now called to be in Christ is evident in Paul’s exhortations to the Colossians:

So put to death whatever in your nature belongs to the earth: sexual immorality, impurity, shameful passion, evil desire, and greed which is idolatry. Because of these things the wrath of God is coming on the sons of disobedience. You also lived your lives in this way at one time, when you used to live among them. But now, put off all such things as anger, rage, malice, slander, abusive language from your mouth. Do not lie to one another since you have put off the old man with its practices and have been clothed with the new man that is being renewed in knowledge according to the image of the one who created it (Colossians 3:5-10).

The “image of the One who created it” is the very image of God’s Son, and it is God’s ultimate intention that we become conformed to His image (Romans 8:29). The marred imago Dei is now being restored by the redemptive power of the new creation in Christ (2 Corinthians 5:17). The world does not now see us as we will be, but our Lord already sees us as we truly are in the depths of our being in Him. Because we have been purchased by His blood and metamorphosed into new creatures, we have died, and our new life is hidden with Christ in God; when He is revealed, then we will also be revealed with Him in glory (Colossians 3:3-4). This is proleptic life—living in anticipation of the age to come and manifesting the presence and power of the kingdom in this passing age. Spiritual formation involves living the not-yet in the midst of the now; the life of the new creation in the context of the old; and the splendor of the eternal in the sphere of the temporal.

Progressing Toward the True Self

For this to be a viable process, we need access to incarnational truth—valid and palpable role models that distinguishably manifest the immediacy of Christ in the theater of human endeavor. Such agents of kingdom life are visible compasses that help us discern the authentic in a world of image, posing, and externalism. But they are in short supply in this fallen world, as is evident from the shallowness and hypocrisy that is so often associated with Christendom. I just heard about someone who was wearing a T-shirt with the words, “Jesus, save me from Your followers.” It is generally easier to see the beauty, order, and creativity of God in nature than it is in people. Nevertheless, God has chosen to use imperfect people as agents and mediators of His grace, and the paradoxical tension is that we cannot become authentic selves without being embedded in community. A both/and problem requires a both/and solution; God is concerned about both the personal and the corporate expressions of following His Son. This is why the historic disciplines of the faith are both personal (e.g., meditation, prayer, fasting, simplicity, solitude, and study) and corporate (e.g., confession, worship, guidance, celebration, submission, and service).

As Kierkegaard observed, the great task of becoming an authentic self requires the overthrow of the illusory and sensate self that was forged in the personal and social milieu of youth. Most people successfully resist this arduous process by embracing avoidance strategies to guard them from reflection, ambiguity, and pain. Pascal predicted that distraction and indifference would characterize the age of modernity, since these are powerful means of living in immediacy without ultimacy. “This alone have I discovered: God made mankind upright, but they have sought many evil schemes” (Ecclesiastes 7:29). We use multifarious devices to sidestep God’s claims on our lives, because they challenge our attempts at autonomy, our selfish pride, and our illusions of control. Yet God has multifarious means of getting our attention. Recall C. S. Lewis’ insight in The Problem of Pain: “God whispers to us in our pleasures, speaks in our conscience, but shouts in our pains: it is His megaphone to rouse a deaf world.” The Greek playwright Aeschylus made this poignant observation: “Even in our sleep, pain that cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart, and in our own despair, against our will, comes wisdom through the awful grace of God.” It is the “awful grace of God” that drives the false self to the point of despair through affliction, disappointments, adversity, and failure. The defining moment in the parable of the Prodigal Son was “when he came to his senses” and said, “I will get up and go to my father” (Luke 15:17-18). Without the experience of radical desperation, he would never have reached this defining moment. Grace drove him to it, and grace drew him through it to the father’s house.

It has been observed that the doctrines of grace elevate us without inflating us and humble us without degrading us. The elevation of Romans 6, the humbling of Romans 7, and the empowering and glorification of Romans 8 portray the counterpoint of grace. In this harmonious dance, God takes the lead and the soul follows His lead in glorious submission to the music and majesty of His loving embrace.

The true dynamics of human depravity and dignity and of divine holiness and grace are not learned from culture, but from Scripture. The empirical and rational ways of knowing must be suffused with the light of revelation, the third way of knowing. If God had not revealed His powers, perfections, will, and ways through the prophets and apostles, and most decisively through the person and work of His Son, we could never hope to arrive at answers to the fundamental issues of origin, purpose, and destiny. Only in Scripture do we find definitive answers to the questions, “Where did we come from?”, “Why are we here?”, and “Where are we going?”. Without these answers, we cannot arrive at authentic identity, because an understanding of the true self must be shaped by the truth of our condition.

Cultivating an Eternal Perspective in a Temporal Arena

The problem is that the world is always ready to define us by default—do nothing, and it will readily tell us who we are, what to want, and what to do by means of the ubiquitous carriers of our increasingly secularized, pluralistic, and privatized culture. While the world defines us by default, the Word will only define us by discipline. This requires the repeated choices of habituated intention to energize the ongoing renewal of the mind through the infusion of Scripture in the soul. To “be transformed by the renewing of your mind” (Romans 12:2) is to engage in the process of developing an eternal perspective in a temporal arena, and this steadily moves us away from conformity to the world system toward welcoming the good, acceptable, and perfect will of God.

There is no permanent change in our lives without a change in our perspective. Thomas Keating in Intimacy with God refers to this spiritual orientation as the intention of consenting to God’s presence and action within us. This active intention requires self-surrender and trust, so that we freely and boldly welcome God’s presence and action in our inward being. As we do this, we learn to live from the center, engaging in the inward-to-outward process of loving the Lord our God with all our heart, and with all our soul, and with all our mind, and with all our strength (Mark 12:30).

Through the new covenant miracle of redemption and justification, God has given us a new heart and a new life (Jeremiah 31:33; Ezekiel 36:26-27; Matthew 26:28; Romans 6:3-11; 8:9-17; 2 Corinthians 5:17, 21; Colossians 1:27; Hebrews 9). Our deepest identity and thus our true self in Christ has been created in the likeness of God in righteousness and holiness of the truth (Ephesians 4:24) and is being renewed to a true knowledge according to the image of Christ (Colossians 3:10). Our new inward identity with God as His regenerated, justified, and adopted children is unchanging, but our outward practice is one of fitful growth and gradual transformation in the painful and joyful journey of sanctification. The process of formation and maturation involves growth in trust and dependence, movement from the new being on the inside to its manifestation on the outside, and releasing the power of the Spirit through the episodic brokenness of self-renunciation.

All the classical spiritual exercises relate to and enhance one another (see the section on Disciplined Spirituality in my book, Conformed to His Image), but some of them are particularly suited to the formation and maturation of the true self. Here are seven, but bear in mind that disciplines such as solitude and silence pervade all of them.

1. Formational reading. In Shaped by the Word, M. Robert Mulholland, Jr. contrasts two approaches to Scripture:

INFORMATIONAL READING

FORMATIONAL READING

Seeks to cover as much as possible

Focuses on small portions

A linear process

An in-depth process

Seeks to master the text

Allows the text to master us

The text as an object to use

The text as a subject that shapes us

Analytical, critical, and judgmental approach

Humble, submissive, willing, loving approach

Problem-solving mentality

Openness to mystery

There is an important place for informational reading of Scripture and for exegetical and topical methods of Bible study. But those who approach Scripture only in this way often overlook the formational approach that centers on speaking to the heart more than informing the mind. The Bible is not merely an object, but a divinely inspired oracle that is “living and active” (Hebrews 4:12) and has the power to transform those who receive it in humility and obedience (James 1:21-22). The true self is nurtured by the formative power of revealed truth as we come to love God through His Word.

2. Recollection. The discipline of recollection relates to the practice of the presence of God and can be habitual or actual. Habitual recollection is analogous to a man’s or a woman’s love for a spouse or children, and does not require an ongoing consciousness. Just as we can form a habitual identity as being a husband, a wife, or a parent, so we can ask for the grace to form a habitual state of mind as a follower of Jesus Christ. Actual recollection involves the developing habit of turning to God at regular times throughout the course of the day. This is more along the lines of what Brother Lawrence, Frank Laubach, and Thomas Kelly pursued in their quest for a more conscious awareness of God in the routines of everyday life.

3. Setting the mind. The apostle Paul urged his readers to set their minds on the things of the Spirit (Romans 8:5-6), to keep seeking the things above where Christ is (Colossians 3:1-2), to walk by the Spirit (Galatians 5:16, 25), and to rejoice always, pray without ceasing, and in everything give thanks (1 Thessalonians 5:16-18). As we set our minds on Jesus, we will abide in Him and His words will abide in us (John 15:4-7). By fixing the eyes of our heart on Him, we will run with endurance the race that is set before us (Hebrews 12:1-2).

4. Reflection. The spiritual exercise of reflection at the end of the day on the events and conversations that transpired can reveal patterns of attitudes and behaviors that emerge from the false self. We can also profit from answering diagnostic questions like those of A. W. Tozer’s “Seven Rules for Self-Discovery”:

  • What do we want most out of life?
  • What do we think most about in this life?
  • How do we use our money?
  • What do we do with our leisure time?
  • Who is the company that we enjoy?
  • Whom and what do we admire?
  • What do we laugh at?

5. Discerning prayer. Because we have deep impulses of which we are not fully conscious, it is good for us to invite the Spirit of God to search us and reveal any hurtful ways in us (Psalm 139:23-24). (For this discipline, I recommend the particular and general examinations of conscience in the first week of the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius.)

6. Personal and corporate thanksgiving and praise. Since the heart becomes steadily conformed to what it most admires, the practice of gratitude and of delighting in His beauty, goodness, and glory makes the soul increasingly responsive to His gracious initiatives. “For to worship is to quicken the conscience by the holiness of God, to feed the mind with the truth of God, the purge the imagination by the beauty of God, to open up the heart to the love of God, to devote the will to the purpose of God” (William Temple).

7. Corporate example, exhortation, and soul care. The discipline of meeting together to “stimulate one another to love and good deeds” and to “encourage one another day after day” (Hebrews 10:24-25; 3:13) is essential to the formation of an authentic self in an inauthentic world.

8. The discipline of gratitude. Nothing ages more quickly than gratitude. As we take the many blessings of our lives for granted, the grace of God degenerates into entitlement. As my friend Ed Dudley used to put it, if we were born on third base, we wake up believing we just hit a triple. If we are wise, we will not leave gratitude to spontaneous moments, but cultivate a spirit of thanksgiving for all God has done in our past (Deuteronomy 8:2-3, 11-18), contentment with what He is doing in our present (1 Thessalonians 5:16-18), and joyful hope for what He has promised for our future in Christ (1 Peter 1:3-4; 5:10). A heart of gratitude enhances the true self, because it reminds us that all we are and have comes from the hand of God.

By God’s grace and power, may we grow in the true knowledge of Him, in love of Him, in trust and obedience to Him, and in likeness to Him. In this way we will experience the truth, beauty, goodness, love, joy, and peace of becoming the true selves God always intended us to be, increasingly conformed to the glorious image of His beloved Son.

Related Topics: Man (Anthropology), Spiritual Life

A Biblical Worldview of Work

Related Media

This is a top-down approach to work that moves from who God is, to who we are (heart), how we think (mind), to what we do (hands).

Kenneth Boa

Website: http://www.kenboa.org
Commentary: http://www.kenboa.org/blog
Follow: http://twitter.com/kennethboa
Connect on Facebook: Kenneth Boa

 

Work and Who God Is

Work is not a result of the fall. It is a part of God’s created order for humanity (Genesis 2:5, 15), and it is patterned after God Himself (Exodus 20:11; Hebrews 4:3-4; Revelation 15:3).

Jesus accomplished the works of His Father during His earthly sojourn (John 4:34; 5:17; 5:36; 10:32-37; 14:10-13; 17:4).

The Father gives us work to accomplish during our earthly sojourn (Acts 13:2; 1 Corinthians 16:10; Ephesians 2:10).

God has appointed us over the works of His hands (Genesis 1:27-28; Hebrews 2:7).

We are called to please God by bearing fruit in every good work (Colossians 1:10; Hebrews 13:21).

Our work will be tested and rewarded by God (1 Corinthians 3:13-15).

We must work for the food which endures to eternal life (John 6:27-29).

Work and Who I Am (Heart)

When work is done in and for the Lord, it benefits others and honors God. It is in creative activity that we externalize our identities as people made in the image of God.

Our identity transcends our work, and if we do not derive our identity from our relationship with the Lord, our work will tend to shape and define us.

True importance is not found in position or prestige, but in the manner in which our work is done and the Audience for whom we do it. Significance is not determined by wisdom, power, or wealth (Jeremiah 9:23-24; Philippians 3:8), but by our relationship with God. Because of this, it is always a mistake to compare ourselves with others.

If we look to our customers and clients rather than the Lord as our source of provision, we will be far more inclined to manipulate and use them than to minister to them.

There should be no secular/spiritual duality regarding work. God has promised that the product of our work will ultimately perish (2 Peter 3:10). It is not the fruit of our labors but the focus of our heart that gives value to our work in the sight of God. Thus, “secular” work becomes spiritual when it is done to please God, and “religious” work becomes secular when it is done to please and impress people.

We are called to do our work as unto the Lord instead of seeking to impress and please people (Ephesians 6:5-8; Colossians 3:23-24). Employers should see themselves as accountable to Christ for the way they treat their employees (Ephesians 6:9; Colossians 4:1).

Work and How I Think (Head)

The fall affected the character of work in such a way that it became associated more with toil than with joy (Genesis 3:17-19).

Work becomes idolatrous when it becomes an end in itself (Ecclesiastes 2:4-11, 18-23; Luke 12:16-22), and it can become a means of exploitation and oppression (Exodus 1:11-14; 2:23; James 5:4).

Work hard, but do not overwork. The sluggard is reproached in the Old and New Testaments (Proverbs 6:6-11; 12:27; 13:4; 20:4; 21:25-26; 22:13; 24:30-34; 26:13-16; Matthew 25:24-30; Ephesians 4:28; 1 Thessalonians 4:10-12; 2 Thessalonians 3:6-12; 1 Timothy 5:8, 13). But when work becomes the source of our significance and security, we swing to the opposite extreme and become consumed by our work.

It is God who gives us our ability (Romans 12:6), our intelligence (Daniel 2:21), our wealth (Deuteronomy 8:18), and our promotions (Psalm 75:6-7).

We do not work to provide for our needs. Our culture associates work with the quest for success, significance, provision, esteem, and purpose. By contrast, Scripture teaches us that it is God, not our work, to whom we should look for these things (1 Corinthians 4:7; Philippians 4:19). Believers must come to see that God is their source of provision, and their work is a means He uses to supply their needs.

We cannot contribute to the work of God (Esther 4:13-14; Psalm 115:3; 127:1-2; Ecclesiastes 3:14; Isaiah 46:9-10; 2 Corinthians 3:5), but we can participate in it (John 4:34; 1 Corinthians 3:6-9). If we think that we can add to the work of God, our work becomes so inflated in importance that it can overwhelm relational commitments. We take ourselves too seriously when we think God needs what we have to offer. When leaders attempt to build ministry empires by using people to serve their visions, they make the mistakes of trying to measure the ministry and of basing their significance upon their accomplishments.

Working harder does not necessarily lead to greater prosperity. There is certainly a correlation here, but not a fixed causality. In many occupations (e.g., farming, real estate, technology), the ratio of productivity to time invested can vary dramatically. We may suppose that we can out-earn our needs by working harder, but income is only one of several components that can affect our standard of living. If we miss these truths, we will be inclined to sacrifice other priorities (our relationships with God and others) when business is less productive.

Work and What I Do (Hands)

Scripture rebukes idleness and sloth and affirms that work has genuine value (Ecclesiastes 2:24; 3:12-13; 5:18).

All honest professions are honorable, and there is dignity in manual as well as mental work, as is evident from the occupations of the characters of the Bible.

When we seek to glorify God in whatever we do (1 Corinthians 10:31), we will pursue excellence in our work, whether others notice or not. (Consider the superb craftsmanship of Bezalel and Oholiab, the men who constructed the tabernacle in the wilderness; Exodus 35-40. Also imagine the quality and workmanship of the wooden articles that Jesus crafted during His years as a carpenter.)

Work embeds us in a natural environment in which we can exhibit kingdom values and hope in a temporal arena. It provides a context in which we can represent Jesus Christ by building relationships; by demonstrating character, conviction, and integrity; and by doing our work with care and quality.

God is not impressed by or dependent upon our abilities or accomplishments. But if we do our work for His sake, it pleases Him in the same way the drawings children make for their parents decorate the refrigerator. These drawings are not valued because they qualify to hang in an art gallery, but because of the parent’s relationship with the children who made them.

There should be a rhythm between work and leisure in our lives so that we can enjoy periods of refreshment, renewal, restoration, and relationships. Work and rest are equally legitimate in God’s economy, but most of us have a tendency to overvalue work. Leisure can be a mode of worship (Leviticus 16:29-31; Deuteronomy 14:22-26) and an expression of contentment with the will of God in our lives. From a biblical standpoint, rest is not so much the absence of activity as it is the presence of God (Exodus 33:14; Nehemiah 8:10-12; Matthew 11:28-30; Mark 6:31; Romans 15:32; Hebrews 3:11-4:11).

Related Topics: Spiritual Life, Apologetics

How Accurate is the Bible?

Related Media

The trustworthiness of Scripture is essential to a well-grounded Christian worldview, since it provides a foundation for authority that transcends the limitations of human reason and experience.

Kenneth Boa

Website: http://www.kenboa.org
Commentary: http://www.kenboa.org/blog
Follow: http://twitter.com/kennethboa
Connect on Facebook: Kenneth Boa

 

Jack, you're always quoting the Bible to me as if were the last word on issues about life. How can you base your life on a book that's so full of contradictions and errors? Historians and scientists have long since proven that the Bible is inaccurate and unreliable.

Many people are of the opinion that the teachings of the Bible are outdated, contradictory, and full of scientific and historical errors. With few exceptions, they have reached these conclusions through second- and third-hand sources rather than their own study of the Bible.

Consider the following statements:

  • The Bible says that God helps those who help themselves.
  • The books of the New Testament were written centuries after the events they describe.
  • Cleanliness is next to godliness is in the Bible.
  • According to the Bible, the earth is flat.
  • The earliest New Testament manuscripts go back only to the fourth or fifth centuries A.D.
  • The Bible teaches that the earth is the center of the universe.
  • The English Bible is a translation of a translation of a translation (etc.) of the original, and fresh errors were introduced in each stage of the process.

How many of these statements do you think are true? The answer is that all of them are false. Yet these false impressions persist in the minds of many, and misinformation like this produces a skeptical attitude toward the Bible.

In this booklet, we will consider a number of objections to the accuracy and reliability of the Bible to help you make a more informed decision as to whether or not it is authoritative.

How can you be sure that the Bible is the same now as when it was written? The Bible has been copied and translated so many times! Haven't you ever played the game where people sit in a circle and pass a sentence from one person to the next until it comes back around in a completely distorted version? If that could happen in a room in just a few minutes, think of all the errors and changes that must have filled the Bible in the centuries since it was first written!

There are three lines of evidence that support the claim that the biblical documents are reliable: these are the bibliographic test, the internal test, and the external test. The first test examines the biblical manuscripts, the second test deals with the claims made by the biblical authors, and the third test looks to outside confirmation of the biblical content.

I. The Bibliographic Test

A. The Quantity of Manuscripts

In the case of the Old Testament, there are a small number of Hebrew manuscripts, because the Jewish scribes ceremonially buried imperfect and worn manuscripts. Many ancient manuscripts were also lost or destroyed during Israel's turbulent history. Also, the Old Testament text was standardized by the Masoretic Jews by the sixth century A.D., and all manuscripts that deviated from the Masoretic Text were evidently eliminated. But the existing Hebrew manuscripts are supplemented by the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Septuagint (a third-century B.C. Greek translation of the Old Testament), the Samaritan Pentateuch, and the Targums (ancient paraphrases of the Old Testament), as well as the Talmud (teachings and commentaries related to the Hebrew Scriptures).

The quantity of New Testament manuscripts is unparalleled in ancient literature. There are over 5,000 Greek manuscripts, about 8,000 Latin manuscripts, and another 1,000 manuscripts in other languages (Syriac, Coptic, etc.). In addition to this extraordinary number, there are tens of thousands of citations of New Testament passages by the early church fathers. In contrast, the typical number of existing manuscript copies for any of the works of the Greek and Latin authors, such as Plato, Aristotle, Caesar, or Tacitus, ranges from one to 20.

B. The Quality of Manuscripts

Because of the great reverence the Jewish scribes held toward the Scriptures, they exercised extreme care in making new copies of the Hebrew Bible. The entire scribal process was specified in meticulous detail to minimize the possibility of even the slightest error. The number of letters, words, and lines were counted, and the middle letters of the Pentateuch and the Old Testament were determined. If a single mistake was discovered, the entire manuscript would be destroyed.

As a result of this extreme care, the quality of the manuscripts of the Hebrew Bible surpasses all other ancient manuscripts. The 1947 discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls provided a significant check on this, because these Hebrew scrolls antedate the earliest Masoretic Old Testament manuscripts by about 1,000 years. But in spite of this time span, the number of variant readings between the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Masoretic Text is quite small, and most of these are variations in spelling and style.

While the quality of the Old Testament manuscripts is excellent, that of the New Testament is very good--considerably better than the manuscript quality of other ancient documents. Because of the thousands of New Testament manuscripts, there are many variant readings, but these variants are actually used by scholars to reconstruct the original readings by determining which variant best explains the others in any given passage. Some of these variant readings crept into the manuscripts because of visual errors in copying or because of auditory errors when a group of scribes copied manuscripts that were read aloud. Other errors resulted from faulty writing, memory, and judgment, and still others from well-meaning scribes who thought they were correcting the text. Nevertheless, only a small number of these differences affect the sense of the passages, and only a fraction of these have any real consequences. Furthermore, no variant readings are significant enough to call into question any of the doctrines of the New Testament. The New Testament can be regarded as 99.5 percent pure, and the correct readings for the remaining 0.5 percent can often be ascertained with a fair degree of probability by the practice of textual criticism.

C. The Time Span of Manuscripts

Apart from some fragments, the earliest Masoretic manuscript of the Old Testament is dated at A.D. 895. This is due to the systematic destruction of worn manuscripts by the Masoretic scribes. However, the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls dating from 200 B.C. to A.D. 68 drastically reduced the time span from the writing of the Old Testament books to our earliest copies of them.

The time span of the New Testament manuscripts is exceptional. The manuscripts written on papyrus came from the second and third centuries A.D. The John Rylands Fragment (P52) of the Gospel of John is dated at A.D. 117-38, only a few decades after the Gospel was written. The Bodmer Papyri are dated from A.D. 175-225, and the Chester Beatty Papyri date from about A.D. 250. The time span for most of the New Testament is less than 200 years (and some books are within 100 years) from the date of authorship to the date of our earliest manuscripts. This can be sharply contrasted with the average gap of over 1,000 years between the composition and the earliest copy of the writings of other ancient authors.

To summarize the bibliographic test, the Old and New Testaments enjoy far greater manuscript attestation in terms of quantity, quality, and time span than any other ancient documents.

II. The Internal Test

The second test of the reliability of the biblical documents asks, What claims does the Bible make about itself? This may appear to be circular reasoning. It sounds like we are using the testimony of the Bible to prove that the Bible is true. But we are really examining the truth claims of the various authors of the Bible and allowing them to speak for themselves. (Remember that the Bible is not one book but many books woven together.) This provides significant evidence that must not be ignored.

A number of biblical authors claim that their accounts are primary, not secondary. That is, the bulk of the Bible was written by people who were eyewitnesses of the events they recorded. John wrote in his Gospel, And he who has seen has borne witness, and his witness is true; and he knows that he is telling the truth, so that you also may believe (John 19:35; see 21:24). In his first epistle, John wrote, What was from the beginning, what we have heard, what we have seen with our eyes, what we beheld and our hands handled concerning the Word of life . . . what we have seen and heard we proclaim to you also (1 John 1:1, 3). Peter makes the same point abundantly clear: For we did not follow cleverly devised tales when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of His majesty (2 Peter 1:16; also see Acts 2:22; 1 Peter 5:1).

The independent eyewitness accounts in the New Testament of the life, death, and resurrection of Christ were written by people who were intimately acquainted with Jesus Christ. Their gospels and epistles reveal their integrity and complete commitment to the truth, and they maintained their testimony even through persecution and martyrdom. All the evidence inside and outside the New Testament runs contrary to the claim made by form criticism that the early church distorted the life and teachings of Christ. Most of the New Testament was written between A.D. 47 and 70, and all of it was complete before the end of the first century. There simply was not enough time for myths about Christ to be created and propagated. And the multitudes of eyewitnesses who were alive when the New Testament books began to be circulated would have challenged blatant historical fabrications about the life of Christ. The Bible places great stress on accurate historical details, and this is especially obvious in the Gospel of Luke and the Book of Acts, Luke's two-part masterpiece (see his prologue in Luke 1:1-4).

III. The External Test

Because the Scriptures continually refer to historical events, they are verifiable; their accuracy can be checked by external evidence. The chronological details in the prologue to Jeremiah (1:1-3) and in Luke 3:1-2 illustrate this. Ezekiel 1:2 allows us to date Ezekiel's first vision of God to the day (July 31, 592 B.C.).

The historicity of Jesus Christ is well-established by early Roman, Greek, and Jewish sources, and these extrabiblical writings affirm the major details of the New Testament portrait of the Lord. The first-century Jewish historian Flavius Josephus made specific references to John the Baptist, Jesus Christ, and James in his Antiquities of the Jews. In this work, Josephus gives us many background details about the Herods, the Sadducees and Pharisees, the high priests like Annas and Caiaphas, and the Roman emperors mentioned in the gospels and Acts.

We find another early secular reference to Jesus in a letter written a little after A.D. 73 by an imprisoned Syrian named Mara Bar-Serapion. This letter to his son compares the deaths of Socrates, Pythagoras, and Christ. Other first- and second-century writers who mention Christ include the Roman historians Cornelius Tacitus (Annals) and Suetonius (Life of Claudius, Lives of the Caesars), the Roman governor Pliny the Younger (Epistles), and the Greek satirist Lucian (On the Death of Peregrine). Jesus is also mentioned a number of times in the Jewish Talmud.

The Old and New Testaments make abundant references to nations, kings, battles, cities, mountains, rivers, buildings, treaties, customs, economics, politics, dates, etc. Because the historical narratives of the Bible are so specific, many of its details are open to archaeological investigation. While we cannot say that archaeology proves the authority of the Bible, it is fair to say that archaeological evidence has provided external confirmation of hundreds of biblical statements. Higher criticism in the 19th century made many damaging claims that would completely overthrow the integrity of the Bible, but the explosion of archaeological knowledge in the 20th century reversed almost all of these claims. Noted archaeologists such as William F. Albright, Nelson Glueck, and G. Ernest Wright developed a great respect for the historical accuracy of the Scriptures as a result of their work.

Out of the multitude of archaeological discoveries related to the Bible, consider a few examples to illustrate the remarkable external substantiation of biblical claims. Excavations at Nuzi (1925-41), Mari (discovered in 1933), and Alalakh (1937-39; 1946-49) provide helpful background information that fits well with the Genesis stories of the patriarchal period. The Nuzi tablets and Mari letters illustrate the patriarchal customs in great detail, and the Ras Shamra tablets discovered in ancient Ugarit in Syria shed much light on Hebrew prose and poetry and Canaanite culture. The Ebla tablets discovered recently in northern Syria also affirm the antiquity and accuracy of the Book of Genesis.

Some scholars once claimed that the Mosaic Law could not have been written by Moses, because writing was largely unknown at that time and because the law code of the Pentateuch was too sophisticated for that period. But the codified Laws of Hammurabi (ca. 1700 B.C.), the Lipit-Ishtar code (ca. 1860 B.C.), the Laws of Eshnunna (ca. 1950 B.C.), and the even earlier Ur-Nammu code have refuted these claims.

Related Topics: Bibliology (The Written Word), Apologetics

Paul's Four Life-Changing Prayers

Related Media

Thse prayers are transformational when we pray through them regularly and take them to heart. They relate to our highest good - the experiential, personal, relational knowledge of God that can only be given to us through His indwelling Spirit.

Kenneth Boa

Website: http://www.kenboa.org
Commentary: http://www.kenboa.org/blog
Follow: http://twitter.com/kennethboa
Connect on Facebook: Kenneth Boa

 

I. Ephesians 1:17-19a

I pray that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give you spiritual wisdom and revelation in your growing knowledge of him--since the eyes of your heart have been enlightened--so that you may know what is the hope of his calling, what is the wealth of his glorious inheritance in the saints, and what is the incomparable greatness of his power toward us who believe ….

II. Ephesians 3:16-19

I pray that according to the wealth of his glory [the Father] may grant you to be strengthened with power through his Spirit in the inner person, that Christ may dwell in your hearts through faith, so that, because you have been rooted and grounded in love, you may be able to comprehend with all the saints what is the breadth and length and height and depth, and thus to know the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, so that you may be filled up to all the fullness of God.

III. Philippians 1:9-11

And I pray this, that your love may abound even more and more in knowledge and every kind of insight so that you can decide what is best, and thus be sincere and blameless for the day of Christ, filled with the fruit of righteousness that comes through Jesus Christ to the glory and praise of God.

IV. Colossians 1:9b-12

[I ask] God to fill you with the knowledge of his will in all spiritual wisdom and understanding, so that you may live worthily of the Lord and please him in all respects--bearing fruit in every good deed, growing in the knowledge of God, being strengthened with all power according to his glorious might for the display of all patience and steadfastness, joyfully giving thanks to the Father who has qualified you to share in the saints' inheritance in the light.

Related Topics: Prayer, Character Study

Pages