MENU

Where the world comes to study the Bible

Appendix 1: Study Group Tips

Related Media

Leading a small group using the Bible Teacher's Guide can be done in various ways. One format for leading a small group is the “study group” model, where each member prepares and shares in the teaching. This appendix will cover tips for facilitating a weekly study group.

  1. Each week the members of the study group will read through a select chapter of the guide, answer the reflection questions (see Appendix 2), and come prepared to share in the group.
  2. Prior to each meeting, a different member can be selected to lead the group and share Question 1 of the reflection questions, which is to give a short summary of the chapter read. This section of the gathering could last from five to fifteen minutes. This way, each member can develop their gift of teaching. It also will make them study harder during the week. Or, each week the same person could share the summary.
  3. After the summary has been given, the leader for that week will facilitate discussions through the rest of the reflection questions and ask select review questions from the chapter.
  4. After discussion, the group will share prayer requests and pray for one another.

The strength of the study group is that members will be required to prepare their responses before the meeting, which will allow for easier discussion. In addition, each member will be given the opportunity to teach, which will further equip their ministry skills. The study group model has distinct advantages.

Appendix 2: Reflection Questions

Related Media

Writing is one of the best ways to learn. In class, we take notes and write papers, and all these methods are used to help us learn and retain the material. The same is true with the Word of God. Obviously, all of the authors of Scripture were writers. This helped them better learn the Scriptures and also enabled them to more effectively teach it. In studying God’s Word with the Bible Teacher’s Guide, take time to write so you can similarly grow both in your learning and teaching.

  1. How would you summarize the main points of the text/chapter? Write a brief summary.
  2. What stood out to you most in the reading? Did any of the contents trigger any memories or experiences? If so, please share them.
  3. What follow–up questions did you have about the reading? What parts did you not fully agree with?
  4. What applications did you take from the reading, and how do you plan to implement them into your life?
  5. Write several commitment statements: As a result of my time studying God’s Word, I will . . .
  6. What are some practical ways to pray as a result of studying the text? Spend some time ministering to the Lord through prayer.

Appendix 3: Walking the Romans Road

Related Media

How can a person be saved? From what is he saved? How can someone have eternal life? Scripture teaches that after death each person will spend eternity either in heaven or hell. How can a person go to heaven?

Paul said this to Timothy:

But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have become convinced of, because you know those from whom you learned it, and how from infancy you have known the holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. 2 Timothy 3:14-15

One of the reasons God gave us Scripture is to make us wise for salvation. This means that without it nobody can know how to be saved.

Well then, how can a people be saved and what are they being saved from? A common method of sharing the good news of salvation is through the Romans Road. One of the great themes, not only of the Bible, but specifically of the book of Romans is salvation. In Romans, the author, Paul, clearly details the steps we must take in order to be saved.

How can we be saved? What steps must we take?

Step One: We Must Accept That We Are Sinners

Romans 3:23 says, “For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” What does it mean to sin? The word sin means “to miss the mark.” The mark we missed is looking like God. When God created mankind in the Genesis narrative, he created man in the “image of God” (1:27). The “image of God” means many things, but probably, most importantly it means we were made to be holy just as he is holy. Man was made moral. We were meant to reflect God’s holiness in every way: the way we think, the way we talk, and the way we act. And any time we miss the mark in these areas, we commit sin.

Furthermore, we do not only sin when we commit a sinful act such as: lying, stealing, or cheating. Again, we sin anytime we have a wrong heart motive. The greatest commandments in Scripture are to “Love God with all our heart, mind, and soul and to love others as ourselves” (Matt 22:36-40, paraphrase). Whenever we don’t love God supremely and love others as ourselves, we sin and fall short of the glory of God. For this reason, man is always in a state of sinning. Sadly, even if our actions are good, our heart is bad. I have never loved God with my whole heart, mind, and soul and neither has anybody else. Therefore, we have all sinned and fall short of the glory of God (Rom 3:23). We have all missed the mark of God’s holiness and we must accept this.

What’s the next step?

Step Two: We Must Understand We Are Under The Judgment Of God

Why are we under the judgment of God? It is because of our sins. Scripture teaches God is not only a loving God, but he is a just God. And his justice requires judgment for each of our sins. Romans 6:23 says, “For the wages of sin is death.”

A wage is something we earn. Every time we sin, we earn the wage of death. What is death? Death really means separation. In physical death, the body is separated from the spirit, but in spiritual death, man is separated from God. Man currently lives in a state of spiritual death (cf. Eph 2:1-3). We do not love God, obey him, or know him as we should. Therefore, man is in a state of death.

Moreover, one day at our physical death, if we have not been saved, we will spend eternity separated from God in a very real hell. In hell, we will pay the wage for each of our sins. Therefore, in hell people will experience various degrees of punishment (cf. Lk 12:47-48). This places man in a very dangerous predicament—unholy and therefore under the judgment of God.

How should we respond to this? This leads us to our third step.

Step Three: We Must Recognize God Has Invited All To Accept His Free Gift Of Salvation

Romans 6:23 does not stop at the wages of sin being death. It says, “For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.” Because God loved everybody on the earth, he offered the free gift of eternal life, which anyone can receive through Jesus Christ.

Because it is a gift, it cannot be earned. We cannot work for it. Ephesians 2:8-9 says, “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast.”

Going to church, being baptized, giving to the poor, or doing any other righteous work does not save. Salvation is a gift that must be received from God. It is a gift that has been prepared by his effort alone.

How do we receive this free gift?

Step Four: We Must Believe Jesus Christ Died For Our Sins And Rose From The Dead

If we are going to receive this free gift, we must believe in God’s Son, Jesus Christ. Because God loved us, cared for us, and didn’t want us to be separated from him eternally, he sent his Son to die for our sins. Romans 5:8 says, “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” Similarly, John 3:16 says, “For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believeth in him should not perish but have eternal life.” God so loved us that he gave his only Son for our sins.

Jesus Christ was a real, historical person who lived 2,000 years ago. He was born of a virgin. He lived a perfect life. He was put to death by the Romans and the Jews. And he rose again on the third day. In his death, he took our sins and God’s wrath for them and gave us his perfect righteousness so we could be accepted by God. Second Corinthians 5:21 says, “God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.” God did all this so we could be saved from his wrath.

Christ’s death satisfied the just anger of God over our sins. When God saw Jesus on the cross, he saw us and our sins and therefore judged Jesus. And now, when God sees those who are saved, he sees his righteous Son and accepts us. In salvation, we have become the righteousness of God.

If we are going to be saved, if we are going to receive this free gift of salvation, we must believe in Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection for our sins (cf. 1 Cor 15:3-5, Rom 10:9-10). Do you believe?

Step Five: We Must Confess Christ As Lord Of Our Lives

Romans 10:9-10 says,

That if you confess with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you confess and are saved.

Not only must we believe, but we must confess Christ as Lord of our lives. It is one thing to believe in Christ but another thing to follow Christ. Simple belief does not save. Christ must be our Lord. James said this: “Even the demons believe and shudder” (James 2:19) but the demons are not saved—Christ is not their Lord.

Another aspect of making Christ Lord is repentance. Repentance really means a change of mind that leads to a change of direction. Before we met Christ, we were living our own life and following our own sinful desires. But when we get saved, our mind and direction change. We start to follow Christ as Lord.

How do we make this commitment to the lordship of Christ so we can be saved? Paul said we must confess with our mouth “Jesus is Lord” as we believe in him. Romans 10:13 says, “Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.”

If you admit that you are a sinner and understand you are under God’s wrath because of them; if you believe Jesus Christ is the Son of God, that he died on the cross for your sins, and rose from the dead for your salvation; if you are ready to turn from your sin and cling to Christ as Lord, you can be saved.

If this is your heart, then you can pray this prayer and commit to following Christ as your Lord.

Dear heavenly Father, I confess I am a sinner and have fallen short of your glory, what you made me for. I believe Jesus Christ died on the cross to pay the penalty for my sins and rose from the dead so I can have eternal life. I am turning away from my sin and accepting you as my Lord and Savior. Come into my life and change me. Thank you for your gift of salvation.

Scripture teaches that if you truly accepted Christ as your Lord, then you are a new creation. Second Corinthians 5:17 says, “Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come!” God has forgiven your sins (1 John 1:9), he has given you his Holy Spirit (Rom 8:15), and he is going to disciple you and make you into the image of his Son (cf. Rom 8:29). He will never leave you nor forsake you (Heb 13:5), and he will complete the work he has begun in your life (Phil 1:6). In heaven, angels and saints are rejoicing because of your commitment to Christ (Lk 15:7).

Praise God for his great salvation! May God keep you in his hand, empower you through the Holy Spirit, train you through mature believers, and use you to build his kingdom! “The one who calls you is faithful, he will do it” (1 Thess 5:24). God bless you!

Lesson 11: Sexual Purity (1 Thessalonians 4:3-8)

Related Media

October 9, 2016

Most of us have had trouble at times discerning the will of God. At those times, we’ve wished that God would just speak audibly, “My will is that you take the job that you’ve been offered.” Or, “My will is that you marry Suzy.” “Okay, God, I’ve got it!”

In our text, God plainly states His will for each of us in one important matter (1 Thess. 4:3): “For this is the will of God, your sanctification; that is, that you abstain from sexual immorality.” There is no ambiguity in that: God wants you to be morally pure. He doesn’t command moral purity to deprive you of fun, but rather to increase your ultimate pleasure in Him. At His right hand are pleasures forever (Ps. 16:11). He designed the sexual relationship in marriage for our pleasure in Him. So, any violation of moral purity goes against God’s good and perfect will for your life. Any form of sexual immorality will hurt God’s name, hurt you, and hurt others. As the one who created sex, God tells us in His word both how sex can bless us and how it can harm us. His clearly stated will is that we abstain from sexual immorality.

But it’s safe to say that we live in a world where sexual temptation is more readily accessible than at any other time in history. When I was a young man, it wasn’t nearly as easy to view pornography as it is now. Then, you had to deliberately search it out, often in sleazy stores where you wouldn’t want to be caught dead. Now, it just takes a few clicks on your smartphone.

In 1988, before the internet or smartphones existed, Leadership journal (Winter, 1988, p. 24) did a survey on sex and the American clergy. Of the pastors responding to the survey, 20 percent said that they looked at sexually oriented print, video, or movies at least once a month! And 38 percent of these pastors said they find themselves fantasizing about sex with someone other than their spouse at least once a month.

The same survey found that 12 percent of pastors admitted to committing adultery since entering local church ministry! Leadership asked the same questions of readers of Christianity Today magazine who were not pastors. The incidences of immorality were nearly double, with 23 percent admitting to extramarital sex (p. 12)!

More than a decade ago, Al Mohler wrote (cited without reference by Ligon Duncan in a sermon on Eph. 5:3, June 4, 2006, at: fpcjackson.org/resources/sermons/Ephesians):

The statistics are truly frightening. According to industry studies, 70% percent of 18-24 year old men visit pornographic sites in a typical month. These young men represent something like one-fourth of all visitors to pornographic sites on the internet. The next largest group of users are young men in their 20’s and 30’s, 66% of whom report being regular users of pornography….

Today the average teenage boy is likely to have seen thousands of explicit sexual images, ranging across the spectrum of sexualities and perversions. Many of these boys and young men are driven by sexual fantasies that previous generations of young men would not have even known existed…. Today Americans rent more than 800 million pornographic videos and DVD’s every year. About 20% of all video rentals are pornographic. At least 11,000 pornographic videos are produced annually, amounting to revenue for the adult film industry estimated at between 5 and 10 billion dollars a year.

Of course, with the invention of the smartphone, those statistics are probably not nearly as high as they would be now. And if you think that Christian men are exempt from this temptation, you’re not in touch with reality. It is a huge problem in the evangelical church! And I’ve read that the problem exists among Christian women, also. So, as the Apollo 13 astronauts famously said, “Houston, we’ve got a problem!”

But, so did the Thessalonians. Granted, they didn’t have cell phones and the internet to tempt them. But they did live in a sexually promiscuous culture, where the goddess Aphrodite, who was among the most popular deities in Thessalonica, was the symbol of sexual license and the patroness of prostitutes (Gene L. Green, The Letters to the Thessalonians [Eerdmans/Apollos], p. 35). Men could go to pagan temples and commit immorality with priestesses as an act of religious devotion. Various forms of extramarital sex were tolerated and even encouraged. F. F. Bruce (Word Biblical Commentary, 1 & 2 Thessalonians [Thomas Nelson], p. 82) writes,

A man might have a mistress who could provide him also with intellectual companionship; the institution of slavery made it easy for him to have a concubine, while casual gratification was readily available from a harlot. The function of his wife was to manage his household and be the mother of his legitimate children and heirs.

So Paul’s commandments for sexual purity were as countercultural in that day as they are in ours. His message is crystal clear:

God’s will is for His people to be sexually pure by knowing Him and by the power of the Holy Spirit.

1. God’s will is for His people to be sexually pure or holy.

We saw in verses 1 & 2 that as believers, we are under obligation to walk and please God by obeying His commandments. Now, Paul specifically zeroes in on the need for sexual purity or holiness:

A. Holiness means to be set apart unto God, who called us out of darkness into His light.

“Sanctification” (NASB) means “holiness.” To be holy is to be set apart from this evil world unto God. Paul repeats the word three times in our text for emphasis (verses 3, 4, & 7). In verse 7, Paul links sanctification with our salvation: “For God has not called us for the purpose of impurity, but in sanctification.” God’s calling refers to His effectual call to salvation. He took the initiative to rescue us from His judgment and wrath by sending His own Son to bear the penalty that we deserve. But now, having been bought by the precious blood of Jesus, God commands us to be holy, even as He is holy (1 Pet. 1:14-16).

The Bible uses “sanctification” or “sanctify” in three senses: First, there is positional sanctification. Every believer is set apart in Christ (1 Cor. 1:2; 6:11; Heb. 10:14). Second, there is progressive sanctification, the process by which we become holy in all our behavior (1 Pet. 1:14-15). Third, someday we all will achieve perfect sanctification, when Jesus returns and we will be like Him, with all traces of sin removed (1 John 3:1-3).

Dr. Ryrie used to illustrate this by a little girl with a lollipop. She wants it all for herself, but she sees her friend coming and is afraid that she will have to give it to her. So, she licks it all over. Now it is “positionally sanctified.” It belongs totally to her. Then she begins appropriating that lollipop for herself as she progressively licks it. Finally, it will be totally “conformed” to her, when she finishes it. In our text, verse 7 may be referring to our positional sanctification. God has called us in the sphere of sanctification, or holiness. But in verses 3 & 4, Paul is referring to our growth in holiness, which as we saw last time, comes from walking daily with the Lord. Specifically, here Paul focuses on sexual purity:

B. Holiness means abstaining from sexual immorality.

The Greek word (porneia) refers to any kind of sexual relation outside of heterosexual marriage. This includes sex before marriage, adultery, homosexuality, incest, prostitution, or bestiality (Green, p. 190; cf. 1 Cor. 6:9-11; 1 Tim. 1:9-11). Paul is not calling us to moderation of our sexual impulses, but to total abstinence outside of the marriage bond. As he wrote (Eph. 5:3-5):

But immorality or any impurity or greed must not even be named among you, as is proper among saints; and there must be no filthiness and silly talk, or coarse jesting, which are not fitting, but rather giving of thanks. For this you know with certainty, that no immoral or impure person or covetous man, who is an idolater, has an inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God.

As Jesus made clear, sexual immorality begins on the heart or thought level. To look on a woman with lust is to commit adultery with her in your heart (Matt. 5:27). He also said (Mark 7:21-23),

For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed the evil thoughts, fornications, thefts, murders, adulteries, deeds of coveting and wickedness, as well as deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride and foolishness. All these evil things proceed from within and defile the man.

So to win the battle for sexual purity, you must control your thought life, which requires controlling what goes into your mind. You cannot look at sensuous movies or TV shows or internet content and be morally pure. You can’t avoid looking at all the sensuously dressed women who parade around in our culture, but you can avoid the second look. And, you can immediately redirect your thoughts by following Romans 13:14: “But put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh in regard to its lusts.” But, to do that requires control:

C. Holiness in the sexual realm requires self-control.

In verses 4 & 5, Paul explains what he means by abstaining from sexual immorality: “that each of you know how to possess his own vessel in sanctification and honor, not in lustful passion, like the Gentiles who do not know God.” The problem is, Paul’s explanation is not exactly clear! There are two main views:

Some argue that “possess his own vessel” should be translated, “acquire his own vessel,” where “vessel” refers to a wife. Many godly Bible scholars hold to this view. The Greek verb as used elsewhere in the New Testament means “to acquire,” not to “possess” or “control.” This would line up with 1 Corinthians 7:9, where Paul teaches that if you lack self-control, you should marry rather than burn with lust. When Paul says that a Christian should “possess his own vessel in sanctification and honor, not in lustful passion,” he means that rather than basing marriage primarily on sexual attraction, as we often see in the Hollywood crowd, there should be a sanctity about the married relationship. It portrays the exclusive love that exists between Christ and His church (Eph. 5:22-33). Thus marriage should be held in honor and the marriage bed should be undefiled (Heb. 13:4; 1 Pet. 3:7).

The second view is that “vessel” refers to a person’s body and that “possess” has the meaning of “controlling, gaining mastery over, or keeping.” The verb can have that nuance (G. K. Beale, 1-2 Thessalonians [IVP Academic], p. 117). Paul’s other uses of “vessel” refer to persons or their bodies (e.g. Rom. 9:21-22; 2 Cor. 4:7; 2 Tim. 2:21). So Paul was exhorting not only the men (as the first view would imply), but both men and women to control their bodies by restricting sexual activity to one’s marriage partner (1 Cor. 6:15-7:9). I lean toward this view.

But both views require self-control in the sexual realm and Paul taught both views elsewhere. God gave heterosexual marriage as the legitimate place for sexual relations. And, whether single or married, both men and women need to control sexual lust, beginning on the thought level. We must guard our thought life and put a huge fence around our marriages as sacred. You may think that no one knows what you’re thinking or looking at, and that as long as you don’t get physically involved with a woman or man who is not your spouse, no one will get hurt. But that’s fallacious on two counts: First, God knows your heart and you can’t be close to Him while you’re entertaining sinful lust. Second, looking at porn or looking lustfully at women is like tolerating cracks in a dam beneath the water level. No one can see them but if they’re not fixed, eventually the dam will collapse and there will be a lot of damage. That leads to the second point:

2. Sexual sin among God’s people always causes damage.

A. Sexual sin hurts God’s name.

God is holy and He is identified with His people. When pro­fessing Christians engage in sexual immorality, it drags God’s holy name through the mud in the eyes of the watching world. This is especially true when Christian leaders are caught in sin. The world mocks and shrugs off the claims of the gospel as a joke. It gives occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme (2 Sam. 12:14).

B. Sexual sin hurts the sinner himself.

Contrary to what is often said, all sin is not the same. Paul says that the immoral man sins against his own body (1 Cor. 6:18). Those who engage in homosexual sin, whether men or women, dishonor their bodies and “receive in their own persons the due penalty of their error” (Rom. 1:24-27). God’s moral laws are like the traffic laws: you can disobey them for a while and perhaps get where you want to go faster. But sooner or later, you’ll come around a curve too fast, hit a pole, and suffer the consequences. God’s laws are designed by the wise Creator to protect us.

C. Sexual sin hurts many others.

This is probably what Paul means when he says (1 Thess. 4:6), “and that no man transgress and defraud his brother in the matter….” To have sexual relations with another man’s wife or another woman’s husband is to transgress against the innocent spouse and defraud him or her. To violate an unmarried woman is to hurt her and to defraud her future husband of her virginity. Implicit in the word “defraud” (related to the word for “greed”) is that sexual sin is inherently selfish. You’re taking advantage of the other person for your own pleasure or benefit. You may rationalize it by saying that it was by mutual agreement and for mutual pleasure. But you’re deceiving yourself. If you have children or grandchildren, your sexual sin hurts them by robbing them of your godly example. It hurts other church members by damaging the reputation of Christians in the community. As David’s sin with Bathsheba shows, he paid an awful price with his family and with his kingdom for a night of sinful pleasure. But Paul ups the ante:

3. God will bring judgment on those who are sexually impure.

Paul adds (1 Thess. 4:6b), “because the Lord is the avenger in all these things, just as we also told you before and solemnly warned you.” Then in verse 8, he adds the warning, “So, he who rejects this is not rejecting man but the God who gives His Holy Spirit to you.” This reminds me of the severe warning in Hebrews 10:26-31:

For if we go on sinning willfully after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a terrifying expectation of judgment and the fury of a fire which will consume the adversaries. Anyone who has set aside the Law of Moses dies without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. How much severer punishment do you think he will deserve who has trampled under foot the Son of God, and has regarded as unclean the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and has insulted the Spirit of grace? For we know Him who said, “Vengeance is Mine, I will repay.” And again, “The Lord will judge His people.” It is a terrifying thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

Hebrews 13:4 also warns, “Marriage is to be held in honor among all, and the marriage bed is to be undefiled; for fornicators and adulterers God will judge.” Perhaps you’re wondering, “I thought that Christians were totally forgiven. I thought that we were under grace. But that doesn’t sound very gracious!”

If a genuine Christian falls into these sins and repents, God will forgive his sin, but He may not remove the consequences (as with David’s sin). But if someone professes to be a Christian, but habitually engages in sexual immorality, he may be deceived in calling himself a Christian. The Bible repeatedly warns that the sexually immoral will not inherit the kingdom of God (1 Cor. 6:9; Gal. 5:19-21; Eph. 5:3-6). These strong warnings show that true Christians are susceptible to sexual immorality. But, true Christians will be miserable when they sin and cannot continue in sin (1 John 3:9). To reject God’s clear warnings indicates that the person does not truly know Him. So, how, then can a Christian be sexually pure?

4. To be sexually pure, you must know God and walk by the power of His indwelling Holy Spirit.

More could be added for a comprehensive strategy against sexual sin, but here Paul mentions these two things:

A. To be sexually pure, you must know God.

Paul contrasts Christian sexual purity with “the Gentiles who do not know God” (1 Thess. 4:5). To be a true Christian means that you have come to know God through Jesus Christ (John 17:3; Gal. 4:9). In 2 Thessalonians 1:8, Paul says that when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven, He will deal “out retribution to those who do not know God and to those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus.” In Romans 1, those whom God gives over to suffer the consequences of their sin knew about God, since His attributes are evident through creation, but they suppress the truth in unrighteousness and do not honor God as God or give thanks. He goes on to add (Rom. 3:18), “There is no fear of God before their eyes.” If we truly know God, we fear Him, hate evil, and turn away from sin (Job 28:28; Ps. 97:10; Ps. 111:10; Prov. 1:7; 9:10).

B. To be sexually pure, you must walk by the power of His indwelling Holy Spirit.

Paul mentions (v. 8) in passing (indicating that he also taught them this truth) that God “gives His Holy Spirit to you.” He uses a Greek construction that emphasizes “Holy” (literally, “His Spirit, the Holy One”). In Galatians 5:16, Paul writes, “But I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not carry out the desire of the flesh.” He goes on to enumerate some of those sinful desires, which include immorality, impurity, and sensuality. He adds that one fruit of the Holy Spirit is self-control. So a daily step-by-step walk of dependence on the indwelling Holy Spirit is the key to resisting sexual temptation and developing sexual purity.

There are several aspects of this to keep in mind: First, the Holy Spirit is a gracious, undeserved gift. When you think about the fact that you deserved God’s judgment, but He chose you and called you to salvation and gave you His Holy Spirit to live in you, it will make you hate your sin and turn from it.

Second, the Holy Spirit is holy! As the eternal third person of the trinity, He is the one of whom the angels cover their faces in His presence as they say (Isa. 6:3), “Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts, the whole earth is full of His glory.” He is light and in Him is no darkness at all (1 John 1:5). His eyes are too pure to approve evil (Hab. 1:13). Peter exhorts (1 Pet. 1:14-16), “As obedient children, do not be conformed to the former lusts which were yours in your ignorance, but like the Holy One who called you, be holy yourselves also in all your behavior; because it is written, ‘You shall be holy, for I am holy.’”

Third, this Holy Spirit dwells in you. If you think about that when you’re tempted to click on that porn site or entertain lustful thoughts about a woman, you would immediately cut off your hand or pluck out your eye (Matt. 5:27-30). As David Powlison wrote (Sex and the Supremacy of Christ [Crossway], ed. by John Piper & Justin Taylor, p. 105), “The only way you ever sin is by suppressing God, by forgetting, by tuning out his voice, switching channels, and listening to other voices.”

Fourth, remember that your sin grieves the Holy Spirit (Eph. 4:30). “Grieve” is an emotional love-word. When you sin against someone who loves you, that person grieves. To sin against the Holy Spirit who sealed you for the day of redemption is to grieve the God who gave His Son to save you.

Conclusion

So if you know the Lord, His clearly stated will is for you to be sexually pure by the power of His Holy Spirit. If you are defeated by sexual sin, take whatever radical measures are necessary to get on the path to sexual purity. As John Owen put it (The Works of John Owen, Vol. 6, “Temptation and Sin” [Banner of Truth], p. 9), “Be killing sin or it will be killing you.”

Application Questions

  1. Some professing Christians argue that the Bible permits committed, loving homosexual relationships. To deny them this would mean that they cannot fulfill their sexual desires. How would you counter this with Scripture?
  2. Some Christians justify going to R-rated movies by saying, “I need to understand where our culture is at.” Your response?
  3. Some argue that genuine Christians may fall into habitual immorality and that the consequence is, they lose their rewards, but they’re still saved. How would you counter this biblically?
  4. How would you counsel a professing Christian who said, “Help, I’m addicted to pornography?”

Copyright, Steven J. Cole, 2016, All Rights Reserved.

Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture Quotations are from the New American Standard Bible, Updated Edition © The Lockman Foundation

Related Topics: Christian Life, Sexual Purity, Sexuality

Lição 1: O Comissionamento de Josué (Josué 1:1-18)

Related Media

De várias formas, a preparação para a invasão e conflito diante de Josué e o povo começa neste capítulo. É significante notar que esta preparação, no capítulo 1, procede da comunicação de Deus. Primeiramente, Deus fala e comissiona Josué (1:1-5), incitando-o depois a ser forte e corajoso (1:6-9). Em seguimento das palavras de Deus, Josué dirige-se ao povo e dá-lhe instruções a fim de que se prepare para atravessar o Jordão no espaço de três dias (1:10-15). A isto segue-se a resposta do povo, cuja fonte recaía obviamente na Palavra de Deus (1:16-18). A revelação de Deus deve sempre ser seguida de uma resposta que tenha em conta a Sua Palavra inspirada.

A Comissão Dada
(1:1-5)

1 E sucedeu, depois da morte de Moisés, servo do Senhor, que o Senhor falou a Josué, filho de Num, servo de Moisés, dizendo: 2 Moisés, meu servo, é morto. Levanta-te, pois, agora, passa este Jordão, tu e todo este povo, à terra que eu dou aos filhos de Israel. 3 Todo o lugar que pisar a planta do vosso pé vo-lo tenho dado, como eu disse a Moisés. 4 Desde o deserto e desde este Líbano, até ao grande rio, o rio Eufrates, toda a terra dos heteus, e até o grande mar, para o poente do sol, será o vosso termo. 5 Nenhum se susterá diante de ti, todos os dias da tua vida: como fui com Moisés, assim serei contigo: não te deixarei, nem te desampararei.

A vitória e possessão da terra que se seguem são o resultado directo da Palavra de Deus e de um homem, neste caso Josué, que escuta e responde à Sua Palavra. Tal deverá ilustrar que não existe qualquer vitória ou hipótese de experimentarmos as bênçãos da nossa nova vida em Cristo se nos apartarmos da Palavra de Deus. Logo que um crente começa a desviar-se da Palavra, por indiferença ou apatia motivadas por uma qualquer razão, está na verdade a desviar-se do Senhor e a dirigir-se à derrota.

A comissão de Josué dá-se apenas após a morte de Moisés (versículos 1-2). Isto é significante. A missão de Josué e a continuação dos propósitos de Deus quanto a introduzir Israel na terra prometida, por certas razões tipológicas, chegam somente depois do falecimento de Moisés. Porquê?

Moisés fora o grande legislador que representara a Lei do Sinai, aquela legislação fantástica que demonstra a santidade perfeita de Deus e a condição pecaminosa do homem, que se mantém separado de Deus (Rom. 3:23). Contudo, a Lei, embora santa e boa, jamais poderia dar vida ou espiritualidade, nem providenciar justificação. Era antes um ministério da morte, revelando o homem como pecador e sob o domínio do pecado (2 Cor. 3:7; Rom. 7:7; Gál. 3:19-22).

Moisés retratava a lei que não consegue conduzir-nos à vida abundante e salvadora de Cristo. Era apenas uma tutora, uma serva que cedo se retiraria (Gál. 3:23 ss). Embora apontasse para Cristo no tabernáculo, sacerdócio e sacrifícios, não conseguia remover o pecado ou providenciar a salvação a partir da carne. Porquê? Porque era fraca no aspecto em que dependia do homem e da sua habilidade (Rom. 8:3-4). A Lei conferia um padrão justo, mas não poder ou graça para a carne ou pecado interior (Rom. 6:14; 8:3 ss).

Assim, Moisés tinha de sair de cena antes de Josué poder ser comissionado e receber ordens no sentido de liderar o povo pelo Jordão e até à Terra Prometida. Uma razão adicional está patente no nome de Josué, que tão claramente nos lembra que "Yahweh É Salvação". Enquanto equivalente hebraico de "Jesus", Josué tipifica o Senhor Jesus e a Sua vida redentora, que não só nos proporciona redenção, mas também o poder de que necessitamos a fim de entrarmos na posse das nossas possessões em Cristo.

Com a menção da morte de Moisés, é dito a Josué "Levanta-te, pois, agora, passa este Jordão, tu e todo este povo". Em jeito de aplicação para os tempos de hoje, as palavras "Levanta-te, pois, agora" (com vista à morte de Moisés e ao que a mesma representava) ensinam-nos uma verdade: nenhum homem pode viver a vida cristã mantendo um conjunto de leis ou tabus. Embora a vida cristã envolva obediência aos princípios e imperativos da Palavra, é mais do que isso. É uma vida para ser vivida pela fé no poder de Deus. Não nos é simplesmente possível viver a vida cristã recorrendo à nossa própria energia ou determinação. Uma existência cristã não consiste somente em ser o Senhor Simpático ou em manter meramente um conjunto de princípios e regras cristãs. É uma relação fiel com Deus para ser vivida no poder do Espírito e à luz da Palavra.

Com as Palavras “levanta-te, passa este Jordão”, o Senhor está a dizer “sai do deserto e move-te para Canaã”. A vontade de Deus para o fiel nunca se encontra no deserto. Está antes em Canaã, o lugar da salvação e da conquista. “Levanta-te, passa” afirma, pelo paralelismo com a verdade do Novo Testamento, “pega na tua armadura, usa os teus recursos sobrenaturais, pára de confiar em ti mesmo, confia em mim e vai”.

“Tu e todo este povo” ilustra que a espiritualidade não se destina a apenas alguns eleitos, mas que está disponível para qualquer crente. A vida cristã abundante e madura é o plano de Deus para cada fiel. É apenas limitada pela nossa falta de disponibilidade face à sua disponibilidade constante para nós. Todo o crente é abençoado com toda a bênção espiritual, constituindo um sacerdote de Deus, com graça abundante disponível em qualquer situação. Devemos relembrar que todo o Israel saiu do Egipto da mesma maneira – graças à fé na graça de Deus –, e cruzaria o Jordão exactamente da mesma forma – pela fé na salvação de Deus.

As palavras “à terra que eu dou aos filhos de Israel” e, no versículo 3, “todo o lugar” ilustram a verdade de Efésios 1:3 e Colossenses 2:10. “Que eu dou” e “vo-lo tenho dado” mostram que Deus estava então a providenciar-lhes o que lhes pertencia desde há muito tempo. Josué 2:9-11 revela que a terra fora virtualmente deles por 40 anos. Estava meramente à espera de ser possuída. De modo semelhante, Deus concedeu a cada fiel toda a bênção espiritual e provisão desde o momento da salvação. Obviamente, tal como este livro deixa claro, ter um título de propriedade sobre a terra (ou sobre as nossas bênçãos em Cristo) não significa que as nossas vidas se mantenham sem provas, conflitos, lutas e pressões. De facto, terão todas essas coisas; mas, uma vez que a batalha é do Senhor e que Deus fez a maior parte por nós em Cristo, com as provações e tentações virá a salvação de Deus, pela fé e aplicação da Palavra.

No versículo 5, é feita a Josué a promessa “nenhum se susterá diante de ti”; porém, esta promessa é também um aviso. Embora a terra fosse deles, não seria tomada sem conflito ou batalha. De modo semelhante, tal como a terra de Canaã estava cheia de cidades fortificadas e de inimigos que precisavam de ser expulsos, também a vida cristã é uma existência de conflito contra inimigos que necessitam de ser vencidos. Não obstante o resultado estar assegurado caso reclamemos os recursos de Deus e a vida salvadora de Cristo, temos mesmo assim de batalhar e de lidar com a existência do inimigo durante esta vida. Este é um chamamento para despertarmos, uma realidade que necessita de ser enfrentada: a vida está cheia de batalhas e conflitos. Não estamos no Éden nem no reinado milenar de Cristo. Em vez disso, debatemo-nos com a carne (o pecado interior), com o demónio e poderes sobrenaturais da escuridão, bem como com um sistema mundial antagonista de Deus, da Sua Palavra e de uma conduta piedosa (compare com Rom. 7:15 ss; Gál. 5:16 ss; Efé. 5:15-16; 6:10 ss; 1 Ped. 5:8-9).

Ainda assim, o lado positivo é o de que estas palavras - “nenhum se susterá diante de ti” – são também uma promessa de salvação contínua, batalha após batalha. Graças à adequabilidade da vida salvadora de Cristo, através da obra que finalizou na cruz, da Sua presença triunfante à direita de Deus, da nossa identificação com Ele na Sua morte, ressurreição e assembleia no Céu, e mediante o dom do Espírito Santo, não existe inimigo que possamos enfrentar que o Senhor (o nosso Josué) não tenha já conquistado. A nossa necessidade centra-se em tomarmos posse daquilo que Ele já fez por nós, através da aplicação sábia e fiel da Sua Palavra.

Embora ainda activo e vagueando, o poder de Satanás foi quebrado e é-nos possível resistir aos seus enganos e ataques. Mesmo que o princípio do pecado ainda habite cá dentro ou que a carne esteja activa nos nossos membros, o seu poder sobre nós foi boicotado graças à nossa união com Cristo na Sua morte e ressurreição. Tal significa que a vitória de possuir as nossas possessões é conferida através do dom do Espírito Santo (Rom. 6 e 8) e do poder santificador de uma vida cheia da Palavra (João 17:17; Efé. 5:18; Col. 3:16).

Aplicação: Todos nós alimentamos o desejo de viver num mundo ideal, no qual a vida decorre suavemente, sem problemas ou stress. De facto, fomos criados para tal, e não há nada de errado em ansiar pelo tempo que chegará com a vinda do Senhor Jesus, nosso Josué. Mas as doutrinas da apostasia dos últimos dias, a natureza malvada desta era, bem como a presença dos nossos três inimigos, são recordações constantes de que jamais poderemos gozar da verdadeira paz mundial e duradoura sem o retorno do Senhor. Temos de enfrentar os factos e estar preparados para lidar com a vida da forma que esta realmente é. Em Cristo, somos superconquistadores e, através da Sua vida salvadora, podemos ultrapassar as batalhas individuais da vida, embora precisemos de estar preparados para militar a boa milícia.

Todos gostamos de nos mover sem nada que atrapalhe os nossos horários ou nos obrigue a sair da nossa zona de conforto. Assim que tentamos escapar da luta, Deus lança-nos de novo na realidade mediante alguma condição ou experiência desagradável, e deparamo-nos novamente com o mundo. Depois das férias, temos de voltar ao trabalho e lidar com aquele colega tão difícil de suportar. Estamos a ir bem quando, de repente, aparece uma ameaça à nossa saúde ou à da nossa esposa ou filho. Ou quiçá enfrentemos a morte de um ente-querido, que nos traz mágoa e solidão, bem como novas pressões e responsabilidades. Assim acontece na sua vida e na minha, mas as palavras “Nenhum se susterá diante de ti, todos os dias da tua vida” irrompem nas nossas existências trazendo duas realidades: um aviso e uma promessa.

As palavras “como fui com Moisés, assim serei contigo: não te deixarei, nem te desampararei” canalizam a nossa atenção para uma das maiores verdades da Bíblia. Israel entraria na terra da mesma forma que saíra do Egipto. De modo semelhante, entramos na vida abundante de Cristo da mesma forma que somos salvos da ira – através da fé na vida salvadora de Cristo. Assim como confiámos em Cristo e nas proezas da cruz em termos de justificação e redenção, temos de confiar nessas realizações como base da nossa segurança e resgate diário (Rom. 6:4-11; Col. 2:6-3:3).

O Apelo à Coragem
(1:6-9)

6 “Esforça-te, e tem bom ânimo; porque tu farás a este povo herdar a terra que jurei aos seus pais lhes daria. 7 Tão somente esforça-te e tem mui bom ânimo, para teres o cuidado de fazer conforme a toda a lei que o meu servo, Moisés, te ordenou: dela não te desvies, nem para a direita nem para a esquerda, para que prudentemente te conduzas, por onde quer que andares. 8 Não se aparte da tua boca o livro desta lei; antes, medita nele, dia e noite, para que tenhas cuidado de fazer conforme a tudo quanto nele está escrito; porque, então, farás prosperar o teu caminho, e, então, prudentemente te conduzirás. 9 Não to mandei eu? Esforça-te, e tem bom ânimo; não pasmes, nem te espantes: porque o Senhor, teu Deus, é contigo, por onde quer que andares.”

Enquanto os primeiros cinco versículos se relacionam com a comissão de Josué, a ter início após a morte de Moisés, o grande impulso dos versículos 6-9 diz respeito a algo vital para que Josué fosse capaz de assim agir – e o que foi verdade para Josué é igualmente verdadeiro para nós.

Existe uma palavra ou tema repetidos pelo menos três vezes nestes versículos que precisamos de captar e relacionar connosco. Por três vezes Deus diz a Josué: “Esforça-te, e tem bom ânimo” (1:6, 7, 9). Mais tarde, uma vez que tal diz respeito à sua obediência a Deus, Josué repetirá o mesmo comando ao povo (1:18; 10:25), que de igual modo enfrentará os desafios e o cumprimento dos propósitos de Deus para a nação – habitar na terra como uma nação sacerdotal, representante de Deus diante das nações.

Portanto, o assunto diante de Josué consistia num apelo para ser forte e corajoso, em vista do cargo de liderança que lhe estava a ser passado. Deus estava a chamá-lo para um ministério muito especial e difícil, com desafios tremendos e obstáculos bastante para lá das suas próprias capacidades. Porém, a vida de cada um de nós está repleta de desafios deste género, por isso não passemos adiante sem repararmos na aplicação pessoal que esta ideia poderá ter em cada um de nós. Os versículos 6-9 são fundamentais para se obter a força e coragem requeridas para os desafios de qualquer ministério ou responsabilidade.

Esta passagem não se destina apenas a uma classe especial de líderes, como pastores ou missionários. Deus convocou cada um de nós para o ministério. Nenhum crente está exempto. Todos nós temos dons, todos somos sacerdotes de Deus e líderes em algum sentido, com responsabilidades pessoais para com outros, seja como anciãos, diáconos, pais e mães, etc.

Frequentemente, as pessoas fogem do ministério ou de situações difíceis devido ao medo ou aos obstáculos. Tal como a anterior geração de Israelitas falhara em entrar na terra e em tomar posse das suas possessões por causa da descrença e de medo de gigantes, também nós estamos sujeitos a não penetrar no chamamento de Deus nas nossas vidas.

Aplicação: Sem a força e coragem pessoal de Deus, fracassaremos no que toca a enfrentar os desafios ou a assumir as responsabilidades para as quais Deus nos convoca. Outros, por serem demasiado autoconfiantes, talvez procurem fazer tudo sozinhos, uma maneira igualmente errada de tentar servir o Senhor, tal como veremos ilustrado no capítulo 7, com a derrota em Ai.

Falando em termos bíblicos, de onde provêm a força moral e a coragem, e será que significam a ausência de medo? A força moral e a coragem provêm (1) da fé na soberania e provisão de Deus e (2) no facto de estarmos convencidos de que aquilo que fazemos é justo e o mais acertado, bem como essencial à vida. Mas há muito mais, como esta passagem nos mostrará. A coragem é aquela qualidade mental que permite ao homem enfrentar o perigo e a dificuldade com firmeza e resolução, apesar dos seus medos interiores (compare com 1 Cor. 2:3; 2 Cor. 7:5). Por outras palavras, a coragem não é a ausência de medo. Embora não procurasse o perigo nem presumisse do Senhor, Paulo nunca se evadiu de algo que soubesse ser correcto ou a vontade de Deus. No seu excelente livro acerca de liderança espiritual, J. Oswald Sanders escreveu:

Coragem do mais alto nível é requerida de um líder espiritual – sempre coragem moral e, frequentemente, coragem física também…

Martin Luther possuía esta importante qualidade numa medida excepcional. Foi já declarado que talvez tenha sido o homem mais corajoso que alguma vez viveu. Ao partir na sua momentosa viagem até Worms, afirmou “Podeis esperar tudo de mim, excepto medo ou retracção. Não fugirei, nem muito menos me retrairei.” Os seus amigos, avisando-o dos graves perigos que corria, procuravam dissuadi-lo. Mas Luther não podia ser dissuadido. “Não ir até Worms?”, disse. “Iria até Worms nem que existissem tantos demónios como telhas nos telhados.”…

Contudo, nem todos os homens são por natureza tão corajosos como Luther, sendo esse facto tanto implícito como explícito nas Escrituras. O grau mais elevado de coragem é visto na pessoa mais receosa, mas que se recusa a sucumbir ao medo. Não obstante quão amedrontados pudessem estar, os líderes de Deus em sucessivas gerações foram instruídos a ter bom ânimo. Caso estivessem sem medo, esta ordem não faria sentido.1

Portanto, de onde vêm a força e a coragem? Os conceitos seguintes ensinam-nos vários pontos importantes:

(1) A força e a coragem provêm de Reconhecer e Relacionar-se com o prazer de Deus (a Sua vontade), tendo uma noção do chamamento de Deus e do destino (1:1-2).

Conhecer a Palavra de Deus, a Sua vontade claramente revelada, conjuntamente com o reconhecimento dos dons, habilidades e treino de cada um, partes integrantes de compreender o Seu prazer ou vontade para a vida de alguém, é fundamental para encontrar a força e coragem necessárias para aceitar qualquer área de responsabilidade no ministério. Sem esta compreensão, uma pessoa dificilmente terá motivação ou coragem para se encaminhar em direcção aos ministérios que Deus a chama a executar.

Existe um processo específico a ser notado nos versículos 1-9. Primeiramente, a Palavra de Deus é dirigida a Josué, de modo a comissioná-lo e a encorajá-lo. A coragem aqui requisitada é o resultado directo da Palavra e de se conhecer a vontade de Deus (veja Efé. 5:9-10). Em paralelo, Josué é recordado de que fora preparado e treinado para isto, enquanto servo de Moisés (1:1).

A instrução de Josué no versículo 1 equivale a obtermos compreensão bíblica. É isto que forma o alicerce para a coragem e convicção, bem como para a fé e acção. Temos de orar e procurar a vontade e sabedoria de Deus. O fundamento inicial da coragem consiste em conhecer a Palavra e a vontade de Deus.

Ser o substituto de Moisés ilustra dois princípios-chave: (1) O princípio de ter um exemplo piedoso (1 Tim. 4; 1 Ped. 5:1-3). (2) O princípio de Lucas 16:10 e respectivo impacto no desenvolvimento de coragem e motivação para o ministério. Josué fora fiel nas pequenas coisas, e seria fiel em muito mais. O serviço nas maiores áreas de responsabilidade começa com fidelidade em coisas mais pequenas. Cada um de nós precisa de encontrar um lugar para servir e crescer. É possível que tal venha a constituir o treino inicial para outras áreas de ministério, para as quais Deus o poderá estar a chamar.

“Moisés, meu servo, é morto” (vs. 2). Esta afirmação lembra-nos que ninguém é indispensável e que a liderança muda. Se não treinamos outros nem somos treinados, deixamos buracos abertos (2 Tim. 2:2).

“Levanta-te, pois, agora” enfatiza a necessidade de acção decisiva capaz de preencher o vazio deixado pela ausência de Moisés. Isto é verdadeiro para todos nós no ministério, sempre que, por qualquer razão, se gera um vazio pela remoção dos servos de Deus. Um verdadeiro sentido de urgência é sempre um elemento vital na resolução e acção que preencham aquela necessidade; é parte da raiz que produz o fruto. Mas existe outro componente essencial à coragem e decisão no que toca a fazer a vontade de Deus.

(2) A força e a coragem provêm de Repousar nas promessas de Deus (1:2b-6).

Repare, por favor, que as promessas aqui dadas a Josué foram conferidas em relação ao ministério e à obra que Deus o chamara a desempenhar. Isto aplica-se a cada um de nós, independentemente do ministério particular para o qual Deus nos tenha convocado no corpo de Cristo. Leia estes versículos cuidadosamente e veja a aplicabilidade que lhes pode dar na sua vida. Sente o chamamento de Deus na sua vida para O servir de um modo particular, mas tem medo? Receia o fracasso? Tem medo de quanto lhe possa custar? Medite nestes versículos.

Podemos ainda atentar a alguns dos obstáculos observáveis nesta passagem, uma vez que, ao reclamarmos as promessas de Deus, a fé terá de enfrentar obstáculos.

“Passa este Jordão.” Na Escritura, o Jordão representa frequentemente um obstáculo, um impedimento ao crescimento, ministério e progresso. Existe uma boa razão para acreditar que as margens do Jordão se encontravam inundadas nesta altura do ano (compare com Jos. 3:15; 4:18). Esta é uma das razões pelas quais a coragem é necessária.

Paralelamente, cruzar o Jordão significava entrar numa terra hostil, num país repleto de inimigos, alguns dos quais eram gigantes e habitavam em cidades amplamente fortificadas. Este não era um desafio simples. Recorde: a geração anterior falhara em Cades devido a falta de coragem. Mas ainda há mais.

“Tu e todo este povo.” Não se tratava de um grupo pequeno! Os números faziam disto uma tarefa colossal. Josué tinha a responsabilidade de liderar um povo conhecido por ter uma cerviz dura e por apedrejar os seus líderes. A palavra “todo” lembra-nos que é vontade de Deus que todo o Seu povo amadureça e se fortaleça, cumprindo a Sua vontade e usufruindo de vidas vitoriosas.

Não obstante, independentemente dos obstáculos, a vontade de Deus fora claramente transmitida a Josué. Ele necessitava de agir em relação a esse facto através de fé na pessoa, promessas e provisão do Senhor.

Concentremo-nos na promessa do versículo 2b:à terra que eu dou aos filhos de Israel” (vs. 2). Adicionalmente, repare nas palavras “vo-lo tenho dado” (vs. 3). O povo estava prestes a entrar na Terra Prometida, o país prometido aos patriarcas, a Abraão, Isaac e Jacob ou Israel, pelo próprio Deus, que não pode recuar nas Suas promessas. De facto, Ele começara a preparar os habitantes nativos para a derrota (compare com 2:9 ss). A terra começara a pertencer-lhes há quarenta anos atrás, mas não tinham conseguido entrar nela devido a descrença e falta de coragem.

A Palavra de Deus encontra-se repleta de centenas de promessas (vss. 3-6, 9). Essencialmente, cada princípio da Escritura torna-se uma promessa, pois com tal princípio vem a promessa inerente de Deus, que É veracidade perfeita, de modo a podermos confiar nesse princípio. Porém, temos de conhecer essas promessas e agir nelas pela fé. As promessas de Deus são conferidas de modo a nos transportarem através do Jordão da vida – não necessariamente para o remover do nosso caminho, mas sim para nos capacitar a avançar e a atravessá-lo com fé. Não nos são dadas para que evitemos os obstáculos ou tentemos ir à volta, mas sim para que os cruzemos vitoriosamente.

Como reclamamos e agimos baseados nessas promessas? Como fazemos dessas promessas parte das nossas vidas?

(3) A força e a coragem provêm da Renovação diária nos Princípios de Deus (1:7-8).

De acordo com uma definição bíblica de sucesso, um ministério bem-sucedido está em última análise relacionado com uma aprendizagem e estudo sólido da Bíblia, em detrimento dos nossos métodos humanos, técnicas e estratégias que, com demasiada frequência, recorrem à pressão, coacção e manipulação a fim de permitirem o alcance dos nossos planos ou resultados.

A Palavra é intrinsecamente poderosa e capaz de produzir uma mudança piedosa nas vidas dos fiéis, uma vez que motiva, encoraja, dá esperança e direcção, e expõe-nos quer às nossas necessidades, quer à provisão de Deus. A Palavra foi-nos concedida no sentido de estabelecer uma relação comunicativa com Deus. É um meio de comunhão com Ele. Contudo, tal leva o seu tempo – tempo de qualidade e diligência. Repare na ênfase conferida a este assunto ao longo dos versículos seguintes. “Fazer conforme a toda a lei…; dela não te desvies…” (vs. 7), “antes, medita nele, dia e noite…” (vs. 8).

Qual é a nossa tendência? Nos dias de hoje, a pessoa comum procura uma solução rápida – três passos fáceis. Queremos que Deus faça isto por nós agora. Mas este tipo de aproximação não desenvolve uma relação com o Senhor. Uma amizade com Deus, conhecê-lO, tal como qualquer outra relação, leva o seu tempo. É isto que nos propicia sucesso no ministério e na vida, independentemente de para onde vamos ou do que façamos.

O Aviso: Josué foi avisado ou alertado relativamente a três aspectos:

  • “Para que tenhas cuidado” avisa contra o perigo, incita à prudência, observação ou escrutínio cuidadoso, bem como à conscienciosidade (compare com Efé. 5:15).
  • “De fazer conforme a tudo” aponta para o conceito do conselho íntegro da Palavra.
  • “Dela não te desvies” aponta para o conceito da Escritura enquanto nosso indicador ou padrão objectivo, alertando contra a relatividade moral.

O Processo: Josué deveria fazer três coisas em relação às Escrituras:

  • A Lei não deixaria a sua boca; deveria falar sobre ela (compare com Deut. 6:7). Isso seria um meio de se manter ocupado com os pensamentos e caminhos de Deus.
  • Meditaria nela dia e noite; deveria pensar nela constantemente (compare com Salmos 1:2; 119:97). De forma a ser capaz de falar sobre dela e de a aplicar, a pessoa tem de a conhecer e ver como se aplica. Temos de a manter na nossa mente e coração, de modo a que nos fortifique, encoraje e dirija.
  • Deveria fazer tudo o que nela estivesse escrito, conduzindo a sua vida em obediência a todas as suas ordens (compare com Ed 7:10; Tiago 1:22‑25).

(4) A força e a coragem provêm de Contar com a Pessoa e presença de Deus (1:9).

Por último, mas não menos importante, há que considerar a presença de Deus, sempre atenta e protectora. Não existe situação, problema ou inimigo que alguma vez enfrentemos sós. O Senhor está sempre lá, como nosso suporte e provisão constantes. Se estamos preocupados com o nosso ministério ou com qualquer outra coisa, podemos ficar absolutamente certos de que Deus está infinitamente mais preocupado do que nós. Basta-nos caminhar na luz da Sua presença, contando com a Sua orientação, suporte, provisão e cuidado, ao mantermos n'Ele o nosso foco (Heb. 12:1-2).

“Não to mandei eu.” Qual é o ponto importante aqui? É a fonte do comando e das promessas. O “eu” refere-se a Yahweh. Atente ao que se segue.

“Porque o Senhor (Yahweh), teu Deus (Elohim), é contigo, por onde quer que andares.” Estas palavras enfatizam a natureza daquele que deu o comando. Elas canalizam a nossa atenção para quem e o que é Deus. Um dos segredos para a audácia e coragem é a consciência da provisão e presença de Deus, especialmente da Sua presença enquanto aquele que prometeu nunca nos abandonar.

Compare João 20:19 e o medo dos discípulos antes de experienciarem a presença de Cristo ressuscitado e a promessa da Sua presença imperecível (compare com Mt. 28:18-20) com a ousadia que demonstraram em Actos 4:13-20. O que fez a diferença nos discípulos? Estes eram agora homens confiantes na presença de Cristo (Mt. 28:18-20), que conheciam a vontade de Deus e a Sua Palavra, e estavam repletos do Espírito de Deus (compare com Actos 4:8). Quando o Espírito Santo assume o controlo sobre a vida de um homem e o instrui na Palavra de Deus, ele não transmite “o espírito de temor, mas de fortaleza, e de amor, e de moderação”:

“Porque Deus não nos deu o espírito de temor, mas de fortaleza, e de amor, e de moderação” (2 Timóteo 1:7).

“Temor” é deilia, significando covardia, o oposto da coragem. "Fortaleza" é dunamis, a capacidade de fazermos o que devemos. "Amor" é agaph, uma atitude mental de preocupação sacrificial relativamente aos outros. Implica motivação e capacidade de tomar decisões difíceis. "Moderação" é swfronismos, significando pensamento salutar, um produto da compreensão bíblica, que mantém os nossos medos sob controlo, modifica valores e prioridades e confere coragem e resolução.

Em Hebreus 13:1-3, o autor relembrou aos seus leitores a necessidade de servir os santos. Escreveu, por exemplo, “permaneça o amor fraternal. Não vos esqueçais da hospitalidade, …”. Deus deseja que atendamos às necessidades dos outros, o que requer coragem e obediência, significando por vezes sacrifício. O texto mencionado também nos alerta em relação aos nossos valores e fontes de segurança, lembrando-nos depois da presença e provisão de Deus.

Sejam os vossos costumes sem avareza, contentando-vos com o que tendes; porque ele disse: Não te deixarei, nem te desampararei.

E assim, com confiança, ousemos dizer: O Senhor é o meu ajudador, e não temerei o que me possa fazer o homem. (Heb. 13:5-6)

À medida que enfrentamos os desafios, oportunidades e o chamamento de Deus, lembremos estas três promessas feitas por Deus a Josué. Com a convocação de Deus para o serviço, chega sempre a provisão apropriada d'Ele. O problema não reside no Senhor, mas sim na nossa responsabilidade quanto a seguir as Suas admoestações tal como foram dadas a Josué.

Josué Fala ao Povo
(1:10-15)

10 Então deu ordem Josué aos príncipes do povo, dizendo: 11 Passai pelo meio do arraial e ordenai ao povo, dizendo: Provede-vos de comida, porque dentro de três dias passareis este Jordão, para que entreis a possuir a terra que vos dá o Senhor, vosso Deus, para que a possuais.

12 E falou Josué aos rubenitas, e aos gaditas, e à meia tribo de Manassés, dizendo: 13 Lembrai-vos da palavra que vos mandou Moisés, o servo do Senhor, dizendo: O Senhor, vosso Deus, vos dá descanso, e vos dá esta terra. 14 As vossas mulheres, os vossos meninos e o vosso gado fiquem na terra que Moisés vos deu, desta banda do Jordão; porém vós passareis armados na frente dos vossos irmãos, todos os valentes e valorosos, e ajudá-los-eis; 15 Até que o Senhor dê descanso aos vossos irmãos, como a vós, e eles também possuam a terra que o Senhor, vosso Deus, lhes dá; então tornareis à terra da vossa herança, e possuireis a que vos deu Moisés, o servo do Senhor, desta banda do Jordão, para o nascente do sol.

Na nossa lição anterior, a mensagem principal consistia na revelação de Deus a Josué, concernente às Suas promessas, aos Seus propósitos para a nação, aos grandes princípios da Lei e à Sua presença permanente. É isto que forma o pano de fundo, a motivação e inspiração para a secção presente e tudo o que se segue. Agora, nos versículos 10-15, Josué incita o povo a agir à luz da revelação e promessas de Deus. Aqui, o conceito-chave é a resposta imediata e obediente de Josué, independentemente dos obstáculos à sua frente. Há nesta secção uma nota de urgência, certeza, expectativa e fé nas ordens de Josué ao povo. Como Deus ordenara, o novo líder estava a assumir o controlo, seguindo com confiança as ordens do Senhor.

(1) Assim fez imediatamente, sem demora ou procrastinação. Há um adágio antigo, “Bata o martelo, enquanto o ferro está quente”. Quanto mais nos demoramos, mais relutantes ficamos quanto a obedecer aos requerimentos de Deus. A demora também pode ser desobediência. A procrastinação pode evidenciar falta de coração para o chamamento de Deus, bem como falta de zelo pelo Seu povo e glória. Note as palavras em Salmo 119:60, “Apressei-me, e não me detive, a observar os teus mandamentos”.

(2) Assim fez com confiança, mostrando fé no Senhor e coragem para enfrentar a tarefa diante de si. Uma resposta tão imediata evidencia fé na Palavra e confiança no Senhor.

(3) Assim fez com uma compreensão clara quanto àquilo que enfrentavam. Tal enfatiza ainda mais a essência da sua coragem. Primeiro, por experiência pessoal, percebeu o que enfrentavam, pois, quarenta anos antes, fora um dos doze espiões enviados a explorar a terra. É possível que lembrasse com pessimismo o relato negativo dos dez, antecipando uma resposta similar por parte da nova geração. Mas os olhos de Josué repousavam no Senhor com solidez. Demasiadas vezes, enfraquecemos o nosso foco no Senhor e no Seu poder por pensarmos em todos os aspectos negativos, em tudo que pode acontecer se seguirmos em frente. Em segundo lugar, Josué poderá ter sido informado do que enfrentariam através da descrição de dois espiões, que enviara à terra no capítulo 2, provavelmente antes da ordem no versículo 11.2

Ainda assim, Josué e o povo deparavam-se com uma situação que, em muitos aspectos, estabelecia um paralelo com o dilema que Moisés e os israelitas haviam enfrentado no Mar Vermelho (Êx. 14). “Em cada caso, o obstáculo ocorrera no início do ministério do líder. Ambos eram impossíveis de solucionar através de meios naturais. Ambos exigiam dependência implícita e absoluta num Deus operador de milagres.”3

Após quarenta anos a deambular, pensando terem por fim chegado à Terra Prometida, encontram o rio inundando as suas margens (3:15). Enfrentavam o que para eles era uma dificuldade intransponível. A vida é mesmo assim, não é verdade? Tantas vezes, quando as nossas esperanças estão em alta, assim que as coisas parecem estar a correr à nossa maneira, aparecem problemas vindos do nada, e parece que ficamos a contemplar uma travessia impossível. Porém, todas as coisas são possíveis a Deus, que tudo opera em benefício daqueles que O amam (veja Gén. 18:14; Jer. 32:17; Mt. 19:26; Lucas 1:37; 18:27).

Dois assuntos tinham de ser analisados antes que pudessem atravessar o Jordão. Mais tarde, em 3:1 ss, Josué dará instruções específicas quanto à forma como o Jordão deveria ser atravessado mas, primeiro, como um bom líder, avalia a situação de modo responsável, estabelecendo duas coisas a ser feitas.

Planeamento Logístico: Tinham de ser Recolhidas Provisões (1:11)

A comida aqui recolhida fora tomada como espólio das suas conquistas ao longo do deserto. O maná ainda estava disponível, mas não era possível guardá-lo de um dia para o outro sem que se estragasse. Marchariam de Sitim até às margens do Jordão, um trajecto com apenas cerca de oito milhas (aproximadamente treze quilómetros); contudo, dado o número de pessoas e tudo o que estava envolvido, evidentemente não poderiam recolher o maná.

Analogia: O assunto aqui mencionado consiste no sustento que lhes permitisse atravessar e tomar posse das suas possessões, bem como lidar com as batalhas que enfrentariam, mediante fé no poder do Senhor. De modo similar, temos de ser nutridos pelas Palavras da fé, de forma a continuarmos a entrar nas nossas bênçãos em Cristo (compare com 1 Tim. 4:6 ss e Heb. 3:7-19).

Planeamento Estratégico: Um Lembrete de Responsabilidades (1:12-15)

Nos versículos 12-14, Josué recorda as tribos de Gad, Rúben e meia tribo de Manassés das suas promessas e responsabilidades (Núm. 32:16-32; Deut. 3:12-20). Vemos neste facto uma chave para o sucesso de Josué.

(1) Ele estava a obedecer à sua missão de “fazer conforme a toda a lei de Moisés”.

Ele lembrava-se e procurava viver segundo os princípios e promessas da Palavra. Compare com 1:13, “Lembrai-vos da palavra que vos mandou Moisés”. Esta tornara-se a Palavra para Israel.

(2) Ele relembrou a Palavra ao povo. A sua autoridade para o desafio frente às duas tribos e meia consistia na Palavra do Senhor.

“O que estimulou Josué a procurar a cooperação deles não foi prudência natural ou um espírito de conveniência.”4 Não se tratou apenas de procurar mais ajuda por os seus recursos serem insuficientes. Não consistiu em pedir isto como um favor para si mesmo. Não, o apelo e autoridade provieram das ordens factuais da Palavra de Deus. Os servos de Deus devem aprender a confiar no poder da Palavra quanto a motivar e servir outros e a realizar os propósitos de Deus.

Em princípio, porém, esta ordem de Moisés, aqui reiterada por Josué, promovia o conceito do povo de Deus como uma equipa. Ele delegava tarefas específicas para estas pessoas. Cada indivíduo era necessário, tendo de fazer a sua parte. Agiriam como tropas de choque, indo diante dos seus irmãos.

Existe ainda um outro factor. Nas palavras do versículo 13b, “O Senhor, vosso Deus, vos dá descanso, e vos dá esta terra”, seguidas das palavras do versículo 15, “até que o Senhor dê descanso aos vossos irmãos, como a vós, …”, Josué lembrava-lhes as suas obrigações face ao seu povo, colocando sobre eles uma obrigação adicional, baseada na gratidão por aquilo que Deus já fizera em seu favor.

A Resposta do Povo
(1:16-18)

16 Então responderam a Josué, dizendo: Tudo quanto nos ordenaste faremos, e onde quer que nos enviares iremos. 17 Como em tudo ouvimos a Moisés, assim te ouviremos a ti: tão somente que o Senhor, teu Deus, seja contigo, como foi com Moisés. 18 Todo o homem que for rebelde à tua boca, e não ouvir as tuas palavras, em tudo quanto lhe mandares, morrerá: tão somente esforça-te, e tem bom ânimo.

Em qualquer iniciativa bem-sucedida da parte do povo de Deus, é essencial que os líderes obtenham o apoio do povo a fim de que a obra avance. Poderíamos intitular esta secção de Encorajamento de Josué. Ele honrara a Palavra de Deus, e agora era Deus que honrava Josué, incitando o povo a responder-lhe. É tremendamente encorajador para os líderes e restantes pessoas quando o povo é responsivo à Palavra, mostrando obediência e compromisso. Pela mesma razão, pode ser desencorajador ver o contrário a acontecer. Em tempos assim, tanto os líderes como o povo devem continuar a confiar no Senhor, examinando os seus ministérios e procurando que o Senhor os estimule à obediência em vez de recorrerem a algum tipo de manipulação ou coacção.

O povo não só estava disposto a obedecer, como também se propunha a lidar com a desobediência que surgisse, devido ao efeito desmoralizador sobre os demais e à desonra que tal traria ao Senhor. Esta acção é sempre crucial para qualquer povo de Deus.

Aplicação: Esta secção ilustra a necessidade da aplicação cuidadosa e amorosa da disciplina eclesiástica no corpo. Tal nunca é fácil. Requer compromisso real, devendo sempre ser feito com vista à reconciliação e recuperação de um crente pecador.

A afirmação “tão somente que o Senhor, teu Deus, seja contigo, como foi com Moisés” pode ser interpretada de duas maneiras. É possível considerá-la uma condição, desejo ou súplica. Se interpretada como condição, as pessoas estavam a dizer que queriam evidência clara quanto a Josué ser guiado por Deus, constatando que ele era verdadeiramente o homem de Deus, caminhando com o Senhor. Se tomada enquanto súplica ou desejo, demonstra o reconhecimento do favor de Deus como necessário para alcançar o sucesso. Comprova o facto de que reconheciam ser insuficientes para a tarefa, mas que o Senhor era suficiente. Precisavam de um líder que estivesse em contacto com o Deus vivo.

Aplicação: Nisto constatamos a necessidade dos líderes espirituais serem exemplos para o rebanho (Heb. 13:7). As pessoas querem ver e precisam de realidade espiritual madura nos seus líderes. Foi por este motivo que Paulo encorajou Timóteo com as seguintes palavras:

1 Timóteo 4:11-16. Manda estas coisas e ensina-as. 12 Ninguém despreze a tua mocidade; mas sê o exemplo dos fiéis, na palavra, no trato, no amor, no espírito, na fé, na pureza. 13 Persiste em ler, exortar e ensinar, até que eu vá. 14 Não desprezes o dom que há em ti, o qual te foi dado por profecia, com a imposição das mãos do presbitério. 15 Medita nestas coisas; ocupa-te nelas, para que o teu aproveitamento seja manifesto a todos. 16 Tem cuidado de ti mesmo e da doutrina, persevera nestas coisas; porque, fazendo isto, te salvarás, tanto a ti mesmo como aos que te ouvem.

Texto original de J. Hampton Keathley, III.

Tradução de C. Oliveira.


1 J. Oswald Sanders, Spiritual Leadership, Moody Press, 1967, pp. 78-79.

2 O que se encontra descrito em 3:2 pode ser igual a 1:11 ou ter sucedido a esse acontecimento.

3 D.K. Campbell, Joshua: Leader Under Fire, Victor Books, Wheaton, 1981, p. 12.

4 Arthur Pink, Gleanings in Joshua, Moody Press, Chicago, 1964, p. 50.

Related Topics: Character Study

From the series: The Rapture PREVIOUS PAGE

5. The Rapture

Article contributed by www.walvoord.com

Related Media

Editor’s Note: This is a lightly edited transcription of the audio message. Thanks goes to Marilyn Fine for the transcription work.

Introduction

This week, as you know if you have been attending the services, I have been trying to get you excited about the Rapture of the Church. Of course, one of the important elements of that is to persuade you that the Bible teaches that Christ could come very soon. I want to review this just a bit. Then, I want to turn to the Book of Revelation to see what the Rapture has to do with the Second Coming. Finally with the time left we will have some questions and answers.

Review On The Coming Of Christ

Now, what have I been teaching you? First of all, I pointed out that the Rapture, wherever it is located in the Bible in the New Testament, always speaks of it as the next event. There is nothing preceding it. This is quite in contrast to the Second Coming of Christ to the earth where there are all kinds of important and world-shaking events that precede. The Rapture – never. It is always presented that we should be “looking for that blessed hope” (according to Titus) not for some preceding event.

Then, we also examined I Thessalonians 4 and 5 and we found that when the Rapture occurs, the Day of the Lord begins and the Day of Grace, such as we have in our present dispensation, ends. People will still get saved, but this is a time of divine judgment on a world that has rejected Christ and eventually recognizes the antichrist as their god and as their savior. God is going to pour out the terrible judgments that the Bible describes.

Then, we saw also how the false teachers came into Thessalonica and taught them that they were already in the Day of the Lord. Paul had said they would never get into the Day of the Lord because the Rapture was first. Thus this new teaching upset them and Paul wrote II Thessalonians.

What did he tell them? He said you are not in the Day of the Lord. Why not? Because the man of sin, the lawless one, the antichrist, has not appeared. You see, the first major event of the Day of the Lord is the emergence of this man of sin. He said you are not in that day because he has not emerged. Of course, he cannot emerge until the Day of the Lord begins. The Day of the Lord cannot begin until the Rapture occurs. So, in effect he is saying that you cannot have this period of trial and trouble following the Rapture until the Rapture itself occurs. Hence we have an order of events that are necessary—the Rapture first, the Day of the Lord beginning next, and then the antichrist appearing.

Now, when will he be recognized? Obviously, as he moves on toward the end time it becomes more and more evident that he is the antichrist. But I think he is recognized first of all when he conquers three of those 10 countries in the revived Roman Empire. This empire is going to emerge about the same time as the Rapture. When he conquers the three countries, then all ten, it is rather obvious that he is that person.

According to Daniel 9:27, when he gets to that position of power he makes a seven-year covenant with Israel. Get the chronology of this. Seven years before the Second Coming, he makes the covenant. Before he makes the covenant, he has to conquer those ten countries. Before he can conquer those ten countries, he has to appear. He cannot appear until the Day of the Lord begins and the Day of the Lord cannot begin until the Rapture occurs. So we have a Rapture that is more than seven years prior to the Second Coming. That wipes out the post-Tribulational view, it wipes out the mid-Tribulational view, and it wipes out the partial-Rapture view. You see the Rapture occurs more than seven years before the Second Coming. That is what II Thessalonians teaches as we put together all the scriptures.

We also went into the Book of Revelation yesterday and looked at this idea that the Church has to go through the Tribulation. While the post-Tribulationists, before World War II, just said it was all past and that there was no tribulation ahead. Now, they say there is tribulation ahead. Now they have to face the facts that the Bible teaches that we are not subject to wrath.

When you get into the Book of Revelation it is very obvious that the wrath is there. Chapter 6 states that the wrath of God is there. The fourth seal in Chapter 6 wipes out a fourth of the world’s population. If that is not the Great Tribulation I do not know what is! Then, when you get down to the trumpet judgments that follow the seal judgments you find a third of the world destroyed in the sixth trumpet. Then, on top of that you come to Chapter 16 and here they pour out the seven bowls of the wrath of God on the world and there are devastating world-wide judgments. The last one of which in Chapter 16 is an earthquake that levels the cities of the Gentiles (apparently not Israel). On top of that islands disappear, mountains disappear, the whole world is in convulsions. Can you imagine the loss of life, the destruction of property, the tidal waves, all the catastrophes that add up through this end-time scene? Then, on top of that, we are told that the world is peppered with a hail storm, with the hailstones weighing 100 pounds each. I do not need to tell you that that is absolute destruction. If you go to fictional books you could not imagine a more awful time.

Now, the post-Tribulationalists want us to believe that the Church goes through this unscathed! But, that is exactly what the Book of Revelation contradicts. While the 144,000 are preserved (12,000 from each of the 12 tribes), in Revelation Chapter 7 beginning in verse 9 Scripture pictures the scene in Heaven and John sees a great multitude of people from every nation and kindred and tongue. He asks where did they come from? They came out of the Great Tribulation. These are people who were saved after the Rapture – millions of them, perhaps— but now they are facing the awful judgments of the end time. The world ruler is going to try to kill every one of them. Behead them, according to scripture, because they will not worship him. Then, they are also subject to all the catastrophes that overtake the world in pestilence, famine, war. These do not just single out unsaved people. So, there is going to be a great mass of people who got saved after the Rapture that now seal their testimony with their own blood. It does not sound to me like the Church is going to go through this period unscathed. There will be some who escape, but I take it the percentage is small. The evidence seems to pile up that most of those who come to Christ in the Tribulation time will die a sudden, catastrophic death of one kind or another. So, that is what the Bible teaches. So, there is not any room for a post-Tribulational Rapture.

The Book of Revelation

Now, I want to turn to the Book of Revelation. I want you to see that this is not something I foist on the Book. This is what the Bible teaches. It is all related to the Second Coming of Christ. You see, the traditional post-Tribulationist view says that when Christ comes from Heaven in His Second Coming, that the Church rises up to meet Him and then turns around and comes back to earth with Him. The problem is where is that in the Bible? It simply is not there. I want you to see that.

In Chapter 19, first of all, we are introduced to the great glory of Heaven and the announcement is made in verse 7, “Let us be glad and rejoice and give glory for the marriage [and it should be the marriage feast] of the Lamb has come and his wife hath made herself ready. So, blessed are those who are called to the marriage supper of the Lamb.”

The Greek word is “gammos” in both cases. They did not have a marriage ceremony in Christ’s day like ours. They had a marriage supper. In understanding the traditions of the times there were three stages to this. There was the first stage where the parents of the bridegroom would pay the parents of the bride a dowry. When that dowry was paid, the young people were legally married. Usually, they did not start living together for at least another year. Then, there came the second phase when the bridegroom, as illustrated in the parable of the ten virgins, would claim his bride. That would be phase 2. The third phase was the wedding feast. What do we have here? The wedding feast.

So, it is very clear from Chapter 19 that the Rapture has already occurred. The bridegroom has already claimed his bride. You see, there is no room for a subsequent event like that when they are celebrating the marriage feast. That, of course, is the point of the ten virgins. The ten virgins, of course, assumed that the bridegroom has paid the dowry. He did that when He died for us on the cross. Then, the bridegroom claims his bride, but that is not the point of the parable. The point of the parable is to tell us who is eligible to attend the wedding feast. That is where the ten virgins come in. Of course, as you know, the five virgins were wise and went into the marriage feast and the others, who were not ready because they did not have oil in their lamp, were shut out.

In other words, the issue and the point of the whole parable was not so much to discuss the dowry or the Rapture of the Church because it does not really detail that. But it does teach the people who are going to face the issue to ask “are we ready for the marriage supper of the Lamb?”

There is a lot of debate as to when that occurs but hereafter more than seven years have gone by and it has not occurred yet. So, apparently, it probably is in connection with the first days of the Millennial Kingdom. That is as near as we can get to an affirmation. Now, you bear in mind and you have all seen this picture of this unending table which goes out into infinity. Are millions and millions of people are going to sit down to a wedding feast? Well, I am a literalist, but I find that a little bit hard to understand. I cannot imagine millions of people sitting down to a supper. So I take it that is what it is talking about is that we are all going to enjoy the blessings of Heaven-the bride and the bridegroom are there, of course. Then, all the others that are not part of the Church are also going to share in the blessings of eternity. They are going to be there and enjoy the Millennial Kingdom. That is why I think it is called a marriage supper. It climaxes Christ coming for His Church and taking her to Himself.

Let’s go on to this because in verse 19 and following we have a picture of Jesus Christ coming back in power and glory. In verse 11 and following, and I want you to listen as I read this—(Bear in mind the contrast between this scene of the Second Coming and the scene of the Rapture in I Thessalonians 4. What happened at the Rapture? Well, Christ appeared, oddly in Heaven. He calls Christians who have died to be resurrected; living Christians to be changed. They meet Him in the air and go to Heaven. He never touches the earth. The earth is not affected at all. In fact, there is no clear evidence that anybody in the world knows what is happening because the Rapture is an instantaneous event. Suddenly, every Christian is gone. It is going to be quite a traumatic experience for a person who is not a Christian to be talking to a Christian who suddenly disappears. I take it that the Rapture is going to really jolt some people into finding out what the truth is. I believe many of them will come to Christ as a result. Millions of people will accept Christ after the Rapture. That seems to be what the Bible teaches. Now, many of them, as I pointed out, will be martyred, but they will be saved and will be with Jesus forever.)—Here is the picture of what He saw in verse 11,

“I saw Heaven open and, behold, a white horse. He who sat on it was called faithful and true and in righteousness He judges and makes war.”

This is not a peaceful venture. The white horse, of course, is symbolic of victory. A Roman general when he won a victory would ride through the streets on a white horse and the prisoners of war would follow them in the streets. It says that he in righteousness judges and makes war. It is a time of judgment.

“His eyes are like a flame of fire. On his head were many crowns. He had a name written that no one knew except Himself. He was clothed with a robe dipped in blood and His name is called the Word of God. The armies in Heaven clothed in fine linen, white and clean, followed Him on white horses.”

They are part of the victory, you see.

“Out of His mouth goes a sharp sword goes a sharp sword that with it He should strike the nations and He, Himself, will rule them with a rod of iron. He, Himself, treads the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of almighty God and He had on His robe and on His thigh a name written, King of Kings and Lord of Lords.”

This is an awesome, awesome picture and the scriptures tell us that the whole world is going to see it. Millions of saints and angels accompanying Christ from Heaven to the earth to assist in His Millennial Kingdom, His reign on earth. It is going to be a glorious thing and the heavens are going to be ablaze with the glory of God. I take it there may be a processional that will last for 24 hours because the earth turns. It says the whole world is going to see it. Now, it happened in an instant in one place in the Holy Land and the other side of the world could not see it. It says every eye is going to see it. They are going to know what it is. They are going to know it is the Second Coming of Christ and they are going to know that they are not saved. It is too late. There comes a time when it is too late. It is a time when the glory of Christ appears in Heaven. It’s too late to turn to Christ and be saved.

The verses which follow do not describe any rapture. In fact, I do not think there is a scrap of evidence that there is either a rapture or a resurrection on the day of Christ’s Second Coming. It is commonly held that is when it is going to occur. Try to find it in the Bible. It simply is not there. The resurrection comes a few days later, but there is not any rapture at all. You see, at the Rapture of the Church there are two things: there is a rapture of living people whose bodies were instantly changed,(according to I Corinthians 15, and made suitable for Heaven) and also there is a raising of the dead Christians from the dead and their souls reentering their new body. Those are the two things necessary for a rapture.

There is another resurrection but only one rapture in the Bible. So this is what happens at the Rapture of the Church. But there is no rapture here in Revelation 19 and there is no resurrection. We follow here in verse 17 that the “vultures, the birds in the midst of Heaven are invited to come and gather together for the supper of the great God that ye eat the flesh of kings, the flesh of captains, the flesh of mighty men” and so on. In other words, when Christ uses the sword out of His mouth, these armies which have been fighting it out for power and were brought there by Satan have all turned to try to fight the army from Heaven, but it is all absolutely futile. There is no war. Christ just speaks the word and all these millions of men involved in this final struggle and their horses are instantly killed. The judgment of God is not pretty. It is awful! That is one of the awful judgments here. The vultures are invited to feast and have their supper. This is in contrast to the marriage of the Lamb in the early part of the chapter, you remember, where the wedding feast is for the saved. Now, this is the vultures feeding on those who are lost.

It sums it up in verse 20, with the beast (that is the world ruler) and the false prophet (who worked with them and caused the people to worship him) are both captured alive and cast into the lake of fire. At this point, there is nobody in the lake of fire. To this point when unsaved people die they go to what we call “Hades,” a place of the dead. We have this place Hades described in various passages such as Luke 16 where the rich man and the poor man go to glory and they are separated and the poor man is in torment in Hades. Well, that is where they go now, but here is the first one that is cast into the lake of fire. We learn in Matthew 25 that the lake of fire is prepared for the devil and his angels. That is its primary purpose. That is where they are going to end up. But those who reject Christ are going to share that awful fate as the Bible makes very plain.

Certain things follow the Second Coming. It is amazing to me how Bible scholars mess this up. In Chapter 20, verses 1-3, it pictures the binding of Satan. You know what the Amillennialists try to tell us? That Satan was bound at the first coming of Christ. That is not what my Bible teaches. You remember in I Peter it tells us that the “devil is as a roaring lion seeking whom he may devour”? If the roaring lion came down that aisle here you would lose interest in my sermon in a hurry, wouldn’t you? A roaring lion is not something you can tamper with. That is what Satan is doing. Do you realize? I do not think many Christians realize it, but if Satan had his way he would kill every Christian. He would ruin every Christian work. He would spoil everything and make it impossible. The only reason why we preachers survive and the only reason why you survive as a Christian with any testimony at all is because God protects you. That has always been true.

Do you remember the Book of Job? He was a godly, righteous man and God called Satan’s attention to him. Satan said, “well, it is because you are so good to him. Let me at him.” You know, God said “all right. You can get at him but you cannot take his life.” The first thing that Satan did was to kill every one of his family and all his herds. They were carried away and he was robbed. He was left with nothing except a wife who told him to curse God and die. The devil left her because he could use her. A sad thing, isn’t it?

Then, Satan said “let me get at HIM” and God said “all right. You can get at his body, but you cannot kill him.” He had terrible sores and we have the long record of how his friends tried to figure out what was happening. Now, this illustrates that Satan can get at us if God permits it. Satan told God “you have built a hedge about him that I cannot get at.” The only reason you have any peace and tranquility at all is because God has marvelously protected you. When you get to Heaven, you are going to discover all sorts of things that were kept out of your life by the power and grace of God that Satan would have loved to have brought in and just wrecked your life in every which way. So, here, we have some cast into the lake of fire where the Devil and his angels are going ultimately.

Now, in Chapter 20 we have Satan bound. I am distinguishing in this passage what John saw and what he heard. He saw an angel come down from heaven with a big chain and He bound Satan and put him in the abyss (that is the home of the demon world) and put a seal on the top and shut him out. That much he could see. What he did not know was the purpose. He heard that. It was revealed to him that what he was seeing is that Satan would be bound for 1,000 years. You cannot “see” those details. That had to be told to him.

Now, I believe that on the one hand we have to interpret what we see, but, on the other hand, when God says “this is what it means” then you are not free to “tamper” with that and say it does not mean what God says it means. The devil was bound here. For the entire 1,000–year reign of Christ, following His Second Coming, Satan and the demon world will be inactive.

People say, “why is there a Millennial Kingdom anyway?” Well, you know God has been trying the human race. He has tried them out in innocency and they sin. He tried them out with conscience—go down through the dispensations, He has tried every means possible! Now, people say, “well, it is the devil that tempted me.” All right. The devil is going to be bound. Are men still wicked? Yes, they are. We read that some, in spite of everything, with Christ visually present in the world, and His glorious nature. Yet they attempt to conquer the city of Jerusalem, the capital city, by force. Of course, there is a tragic end for them because fire comes down from heaven and destroys them. It illustrates that man, even under the best environment, with all the information that he needs to lead a holy life, is still basically wicked. Apart from the grace of God, there will be no salvation, no sanctification, no Heaven, and no grace of God is manifest in their life.

Verses 4 to 6 are especially interesting to me in regard to the Rapture. He said,

“I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for their witness of Jesus and for the Word of God who would not worship the beast or his image, who had not received his mark on their foreheads or on their hands.”

Now, who are these people? These are people who lived in that last three-and-a-half years prior to the Second Coming of Christ. It says here that when this beast, this world ruler was in power, that they refuse to worship him. The result was they were beheaded. They were killed one, two or three years before the Second Coming of Christ. Now it says that they lived and reigned with Christ 1,000 years. When were they resurrected? After the Second Coming of Christ. They had just been dead a few years. Now they are resurrected and resurrected from the grave. Do you know what the amillenarians do with that? They say this is simply the conversion of the unsaved. Where in the world is that in that passage? I cannot understand how competent scholars, godly men, can come up with such a strange interpretation. This is not the conversion of unsaved people. This is the resurrection of people who are born again and have died as martyrs and now are being restored. For what purpose? To live and reign with Christ for how many years? 1,000 years. You see, I am a pre-millenarian and I believe that Christ comes first and the Millennium follows. The reason I do is because it is taught in this verse. These people are going to reign with Christ for 1,000 years.

Now, it goes on to say this is the first resurrection. Wait a minute! Is this the Rapture? Well, of course not. What does it mean the first resurrection? You know it is amazing to me how post-Tribulational books land on this and they say this must be the Rapture. It has been explained again and again and again in pre-Tribulational books that that is not what it means. I have yet to read a post-Tribulational book that will acknowledge that they know the other answer. See, the word “first” occurs in different ways. It is not number one resurrection, but it means that something is done first. For instance, the housewife will say “I am going downtown to shop but first I am going to put the supper in the oven.” That is not the first time she did it. What does she mean when she says it is done first? Well, it is done before. There are two events here: going downtown is the second event, but the first event is putting the meal into the oven. Now, here are two events, too. Here is the resurrection of the righteous martyrs who died. That is first. The second resurrection is at the end of this chapter where the wicked dead, 1,000 years later, are raised from the dead and cast into the lake of fire. You see, one, two.

One of the strange things that theologians have tried to perpetuate is the idea there is one great final judgment and one great resurrection. The Bible does not teach that. You have just got to ignore what the Bible teaches in order to arrive at such a strange conclusion. You see, there is another resurrection in the Bible. What is the first one? Christ. Was He raised from the dead? Yes. Then, in Matthew 27 it tells us there was a token resurrection where a few were raised. Why? Because when Christ was raised He was the first fruits, plural, and so there are others raised to illustrate this and they were raised in Matthew 27.

Then, we have the Rapture of the Church. That is resurrection number three. Then, in Revelation 11, we have the two witnesses that witnessed for three-and-a-half years and God allows them to be killed. While the world is gloating over their death, they are lying in the streets of Jerusalem, suddenly they rise from the dead and are sent to Heaven. They are resurrected, too.

Here is the resurrection of the martyred dead—still another resurrection. This is resurrection number five if you want to keep track. Then, in Daniel 12 it mentions the Old Testament saints as being raised into the Tribulation. We are not told specifically what day it is, but that is the next one so there are six. The seventh resurrection, of course, is the resurrection of the wicked dead at the end of this chapter.

I want you to notice something, though, here. When does this resurrection take place? It takes place several days, apparently, after the Second Coming. In order words, there is a resurrection here, but there is no translation. You see, the saints that live on the earth at the time of the Second Coming go into the Millennial Kingdom in their natural bodies. They are not raptured. They still are in their natural bodies and the Bible pictures it that way. You read Isaiah 65. They are going to plant crops, they are going to build houses, they are going to bear children, they are going to live, they are going to die, they are going to sin. You see, they are still in their natural bodies and that is the way they are going to enter the Millennial Kingdom. So, there is no Rapture at that time.

If they have all been raptured at the time of the Second Coming there would be nobody left to populate the millennial earth in its natural way. So, there cannot be a Rapture at this time and there is not any. So, the first resurrection is the resurrection that is first in the sense that it is before the resurrection of the wicked at the end of the 1,000 years. It reminds us again they shall reign with Him 1,000 years. Verse 7 also tells us when the 1,000 years are expired Satan will be released from his prison and he will go out, as I have indicated earlier, and cause people who are not saved to rebel against God even in the Millennial Kingdom. And they are destroyed by a fire from heaven. Then follows the great sad, great White Throne Judgment of the wicked. They are cast into the lake of fire because their names are not written in the Lamb’s Book of Life.

Now, you see there is just no Rapture here. We saw yesterday how in the judgment of the nations that the Gentiles the sheep are still mixed with the unsaved, the goats, after the Second Coming of Christ. There was no Rapture at the Second Coming. There was no separation, but it did occur later when those that were unsaved were taken out because they were not worthy to enter the Millennial Kingdom. But the righteous stay on earth, just the opposite of the Rapture, the righteous stay in and the wicked are taken out and they go into the Millennial Kingdom.

So, as you examine these scriptures there simply is no Rapture. There just isn’t any. Those who say that there is a Rapture at this point have to create it out of whole cloth. They do not have a single verse of the Bible to support their position.

Question and Answer

Now, we are going to have a little question/answer hour, as I promised, and our system is going to be very simple. Raise your hand. and I will ask you to state your question. Then, I will try to repeat it because they are going to try to record this. We will see if we can get a few questions answered this morning. Who will be first? Stand up so I can see you. All right.

Q: The question is where do people go into the Millennial Kingdom?

A: Now, the Bible does not give us much information on this, but it does tell us that when the present earth and Heaven flee away and are destroyed the New Jerusalem descends from God out of Heaven. In contrast to the new heavens and new earth which are said to be created, the New Jerusalem is not said to be created. This has raised the question. Is it in existence during the Millennial Kingdom? It is 1,500 miles square. It obviously would blot out the whole Holy Land if it was on earth. So it cannot be on earth. The theory is that there can be a city like that as a satellite city. The Bible does not tell us this. They are just manufacturing this in trying to figure it out. But there are some that think that resurrection and raptured saints will have their residence in the new Jerusalem.

Just like a person who has his residence in the country and goes into town to his office so we will commute from that to the earth to carry on our functions because we are going to work in the world. There is so little scripture on this that I would rather say I do not know and leave the matter up to God when the time comes.

There is much that God has not seen fit to reveal. Why has He not revealed it? Because we do not need to know. It is amazing how we all want to know the things we do not need to know and the things we ought to know sometimes we neglect. That, unfortunately, is the case in the study of prophecy. There are a lot of things that are not revealed. So, I cannot really answer your question with finality because the Word of God does not answer it. Next question.

Q: The question is, is the Holy Spirit taken out of the world at the Rapture? The resulting question is how can people be born again if the Holy Spirit is taken out?

A: Of course, you cannot take the Holy Spirit out. God is omnipresent. There is no way that that can be changed where He is not present in a part of His universe. So, He is going to be there. According to II Thessalonians 2, they Holy Spirit is going to be taken away in the sense that He removes the restraint. Now, you see in the present age the Church indwelt by the Holy Spirit is God’s principle means of holding down the floodtides of evil. While we are a small minority we, nevertheless, are the fountainhead for morality and rule of life and things that are right and wrong. We still point to the Church. The Church is indwelt by the Holy Spirit. Now, if the Holy Spirit’s restraint is removed, the only way this could be accomplished is by the Holy Spirit to be taken out with the Church.

You see, before Pentecost the Holy Spirit did not indwell every Christian – now He does. As far as I can tell from scripture, once the Rapture of the Church occurs, the Holy Spirit does not indwell people in the Tribulation time. When you get to the Millennial Kingdom, then, again, the Holy Spirit indwells. So, we have to be very careful how we observe exactly what the scripture says and exactly what it does not say. You cannot remove the Holy Spirit. The fact is, as I brought out, millions of people will be saved after the Rapture. This cannot be accomplished without the Holy Spirit. Of course, the answer is how? Well, how were they saved before Pentecost? You see, the Holy Spirit was in the world there, but He was not in us. So, what changed is the indwelling of the presence of the Holy Spirit and His restraint upon the world of sin as a whole. That is going to be changed in the Great Tribulation. God is going to allow the human race to manifest how terribly sinful it really is. It will be a time of unprecedented lawlessness summed up, of course, ultimately in the worship of Satan and the world rulers. So, I take it the Holy Spirit is omnipresent, but He does not exercise the qualities He is doing now. Next question.

Q: The question is will the pope be able to bring together the various churches?

A: We have the so-called ecumenical movement that came to a head in 1948 when the World Council of Churches was formed and the purpose of this is to unite all Christians under one gigantic organization where the power will be in a hierarchy at the top. It has not worked out very well because it is largely in the hands of liberals, although there are some evangelical Christians involved in it. The world church movement is not prospering.

I take it when the Rapture of the Church occurs and every true Christian is taken out of the world, including out of the world-Church-movement, all who will be left will be apostate teachers. I take it this fulfills what Revelation 17 described as a harlot astride a scarlet colored beast. This is a world Church movement that is utterly wicked and utterly departing from God. In fact, the woman is described as drunk with the blood of the saints. He is going to put to death those who are actually born again.

So, there is a world Church movement in the world today. It is one of the major things I did not get to this week along with the work in the Church, the true Church, the Rapture of the Church, and then the nations of the world, the changes in Europe and the formation eventually of the Roman Empire. Then, we saw in Israel the fact that Israel is in the land—all these things are important and the world church movement is another aspect of that. So, I take it that that is part of the end-time picture. Now, put this together, if you will. In 1946, the United Nations brings the idea of a world government which, of course, characterizes the end. In 1948, Israel is given their 5,000 square miles. Israel is back in the land. In 1948, the World Council of Churches is formed. Here you have the three major areas of God’s prophecies – the Church, the world, and Israel – all affected in a very short time after World War II. It is just as if God is saying that the stage is getting set and the time is drawing near. It could be that the Rapture of the Church is very, very near.

Conclusion

Now, our time is up and we want to conclude this service. Let us bow in a word of prayer.

Our Father, how grateful we are that while there are many things we only know in part and many questions which cannot be finally answered, the things that are important have been answered. We know how to be saved. We know how to look for the Lord’s coming. We know that when He comes He is going to catch us out of the world and take us to Heaven. We know we are going to be in His presence forever. We are the objects of His love and grace and will illustrate through all eternity what the grace of God is. So, help us, Lord, to get excited about this and be looking for this precious hope and then be living in the way that is well pleasing to the Lord as we face this great future. We ask it in Christ’s name. Amen.

From the series: The Rapture PREVIOUS PAGE

Why Saving Faith Is Impossible Without Repentance

Related Media

We are saved by grace through faith in the person and work of Jesus Christ—alone. Nothing can be added to Christ’s perfect work or to faith by which the salvation He accomplished becomes ours. Simple faith the size of a mustard seed unites to Christ, in whom the righteousness of His perfect obedience and payment of the penalty required by God’s justice is imputed (credited) to us, by which we are justified forever. God’s justice demands no less for the forgiveness of sin and eternal life.

The call to faith, however, also includes a call to repentance. Indeed, saving faith cannot exist without repentance. How can this be?

A Change of Heart

If you have you ever watch a loved one suffer from cancer or some other horrible disease you can easily understand how love to someone cannot abide with love for the disease that hurts them. In the same way, we cannot embrace both Christ and evil that is His enemy. Light and darkness are incompatible; love to one implies hate for the other. Thus, none can love a God of moral perfection and love moral darkness at the same time. And yes, our every sin chooses, for the moment, moral darkness over the light of God’s perfect will. (No one lives in perfect conformity with God’s holy standards this side of glory.) Yet, none can embrace the One whose beauty is holiness, while sin remains the supreme and enduring love of one’s heart. Never can these opposite principles share preeminence in the same soul.

Therefore, saving faith always includes turning from the love of darkness to the love of light, from the love of sin to the love of holiness. Indeed, one cannot love God without loving the holiness that renders His every attribute beautiful. This helps explain why faith that merely seeks to avoid hell cannot be a true and saving faith if the love of evil remains supreme in the heart. People do not like to suffer and may gladly accept a “get out of jail free” card if it does not require a change of heart and life. But faith without a new nature saves no one.

A Change of Faith

Second, while unbelief lacks saving faith, it does not lack faith, per se. All unbelief is faith in something or someone other than God. All people are people of faith, in this sense, but not all people have faith in the only true God. Thus, the call to saving faith in Christ always involves a call to repent of a misplaced faith. For instance, trusting Christ’s righteousness alone for salvation involves turning from trust in our own righteousness, or turning to God from idols.

A Change of Worldview

Third, the call to faith in Christ requires repentance from a false worldview to the true, biblical worldview. To trust Christ for salvation involves a changed view of God, His universe, and who we are with respect to God. True faith no longer views God as unreal, unimportant, unknowable, or made-up, but as the triune and self-existent creator of all things that He has revealed Himself to be in Scripture. Our view of our self, mankind, and reality changes from uncreated and independent of God to created, dependent, and sustained by God. We trust Christ as the redeemer of condemned sinners before a holy God.

Moreover, our change in worldview involves a new view of knowledge, truth, and authority. The unbelieving worldview sees knowledge as attainable without God and truth as determined by our own interpretation of reality, while the believing worldview accepts our dependence on God as the source of all knowledge and truth. In trusting Christ, our supreme authority shifts from personal opinion to God and Scripture as the ultimate explanation of Himself, His world, sin, judgment, Christ, the Gospel, etc. One cannot trust Christ without trusting God’s revelation of His person and works. We embrace a real and sufficient Savior as revealed to us in the Bible, not a fantasy or abstract idea of our own making.

Also, because saving faith accompanies a change of one’s heart toward God and evil, from a love of darkness to the love of holiness, so it involves a change of our source and standard of morality. Indeed, saving faith comes to Christ in obedience to the exhortations of Scripture, our new rule of life and godliness. And while our practice remains imperfect this side of glory, we repent of the idea that we determine right and wrong and can do what we please. Repentance turns from self to God as our supreme moral authority.

An Enduring Change

Thus, the simple saving faith that unites us to Christ cannot exist without repentance. The heart at war with God will not love and trust Christ until the enmity dissipates and Christ is embraced for the glorious Lord and Savior He is. At the same time, our knowledge remains imperfect and our best works tainted with sin. In fact, as Edwards paraphrased Shepard, “sometimes the change made in a saint, at first, is like a confused chaos; so that the saints know not what to make of it.”1 Nonetheless, the heart must change and the fruit of the transformation emerge, even while our love and gratitude for His grace have barely begun to grasp the height of His excellence. By the promised gift of the Holy Spirit, our new nature will display itself in new affections, a new direction, new priorities, and good works, even if they are not immediately and always visible to others at every moment. The change will be real and enduring. Thus, repentance always accompanies saving faith, even as it contributes nothing to justification according to God’s perfect standard of righteousness, the standard met by Christ—alone. And so, with faith and new hearts of love to Christ, we sing, “In my hand no price I bring, simply to thy cross I cling.”2


1 Jonathan Edwards speaking of an observation by Thomas Shepard in Religious Affections, Banner of Truth, 89; Yale WJE, Vol. 2, 161.

2 From the hymn, Rock of Ages, by Augustus M. Toplady (1740-1778).

Related Topics: Faith, Soteriology (Salvation)

Lesson 12: Working at Love and Loving at Work (1 Thessalonians 4:9-12)

Related Media

October 16, 2016

A student once walked into Dr. Howard Hendricks’ office at Dallas Seminary and announced, “Prof, I’m dropping out of school.” “Why is that?” asked Dr. Hendricks. “Because I’m convinced that the Lord is going to return shortly and I want to get involved in a ministry before He comes.” Dr. Hendricks replied, “If there is something that you would be doing differently if you knew that Jesus Christ would return tomorrow, then you’d better be doing it!”

Dr. Hendricks wasn’t suggesting that the student drop out of school and go out preaching on the streets. If he believed that, he wouldn’t have been committed to training men for the ministry at Dallas Seminary. He was saying that we should live every day with an expectancy of the Lord’s near return and yet also live in a normal manner. As Martin Luther is reputed to have said, “If I knew that the Lord was returning tomorrow, I’d plant a tree today.”

Throughout church history, there have been both individuals and groups that have gotten so caught up with prophecy about the Lord’s coming that they have acted strangely. Some have sold everything, quit their jobs, and waited on a hilltop for the Lord’s return at a predicted date. Harold Camping thought that Jesus would return in 1988. Others were sure it would be in 2000.

Apparently some of the Thessalonians had gotten a bit carried away and decided that in light of the Lord’s near return, they should quit their jobs and spend their time proclaiming the end of the world. In the meantime, if they had need of the world’s goods, well, other Christians were commanded to help them! So they were not working and were sponging off the church. This problem was probably only in its earliest stages when Paul wrote 1 Thessalonians, so he just mentions it in passing. But by the time he wrote 2 Thessalonians, the problem had grown, so he deals with it there more extensively (2 Thess. 3:6-15).

In our text, Paul gives some practical instructions about how to live until the Lord returns. He says that …

We should work at loving one another more and be showing God’s love by our behavior at work.

1. We should work at loving one another more.

1 Thess. 4:9-10: “Now as to the love of the brethren, you have no need for anyone to write to you, for you yourselves are taught by God to love one another; for indeed you do practice it toward all the brethren who are in all Macedonia. But we urge you, brethren, to excel still more ….”

Paul began this letter commending the Thessalonians for their “labor of love” (1 Thess. 1:3). But he didn’t want them to rest on their laurels and become complacent about this most important quality. Note three things about loving one another:

A. Love for one another should be the distinguishing mark of the church.

In contrast to lust (4:3-8), Paul now turns to Christian love. Probably their culture, like ours, often confused the two. Sexual lust is never loving. It’s always selfish and harms all tainted by it. But Christians are not to be characterized by the passion of lust, but rather by fervent, pure love for one another. Paul uses the Greek word “philadelphia” (v. 9) which was used in secular writings for affection between natural brothers and sisters in a family. But in the New Testament, it is used of love between the members of the family of God, the church. Paul wasn’t correcting the Thessalonians for a lack of love, but rather encouraging them to keep working at it. Leon Morris (The First and Second Epistles to the Thessalonians [Eerdmans], p. 129) observes,

Something which should give modern Christians much food for thought is the way in which the early church was characterized by love. “Behold how these Christians love one another” is hardly the comment which springs spontaneously to the lips of the detached observer nowadays. But if our manner of life was based on the New Testament picture something like it would be inevitable.

Jesus commanded His disciples to love one another even as He had loved them. Then He added (John 13:35), “By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another.” He also said that love for others is the second greatest commandment, after love for God (Matt. 22:39). Paul said that “love is the fulfillment of the law” (Rom. 13:10). John said (1 John 3:10, 14), “By this the children of God and the children of the devil are obvious: anyone who does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor the one who does not love his brother…. We know that we have passed out of death into life, because we love the brethren. He who does not love abides in death.” So love isn’t optional. Genuine love for one another should be the mark of the church.

B. God is the One who teaches us about loving one another.

Paul says (v. 9), “you have no need for anyone to write to you, for you yourselves are taught by God to love one another.” He has just mentioned that God gives His Holy Spirit to you. In Romans 5:5, he states that “the love of God has been poured out within our hearts through the Holy Spirit who was given to us.” So when he says that the Thessalonians are taught by God to love one another, he’s probably referring to this work of the Holy Spirit, whom we receive when we trust in Christ. As 1 John 4:7-8 states, “Beloved, let us love one another, for love is from God; and everyone who loves is born of God and knows God. The one who does not love does not know God, for God is love.”

More than anywhere else, we see God’s amazing love demonstrated at the cross (John 3:16): “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.” Paul writes (Eph. 5:1-2), “Therefore be imitators of God, as beloved children; and walk in love, just as Christ also loved you and gave Himself up for us, an offering and a sacrifice to God as a fragrant aroma.”

Based on these and other verses, I developed this definition: Love is a self-sacrificing, caring commitment that shows itself by seeking the highest good of the one loved. God so loved that He gave. Christ loved us and gave Himself up for us. God’s love involves self-sacrifice. Selfishness is the main hindrance to love. Husbands are exhorted to love their wives even as Christ loved us and gave Himself up for us (Eph. 5:25). It’s easy to grandstand and say, “I’d lay down my life for my wife if someone was attacking her.” But what about sacrificing your time and inconveniencing yourself to serve your wife each day? What about thinking of her needs and her perspective above your own? That’s where biblical love has to show itself. It isn’t just talk; it requires observable action.

Also, love is caring. This is the emotional element of love. It’s not just cold, perfunctory service. The actions of love are done out of a heart that genuinely cares about the other person’s well-being. Love is a caring commitment. With regard to marriage, it’s a lifelong covenant before God to your mate. Although you should feel love towards others, even when the feelings aren’t there you should act in love because you’re committed to them.

And, love seeks the highest good of the one loved, namely, that he or she would come to know Jesus and be conformed to His image. The goal of love, both in the family and in the church, should be to encourage and help the other person to know Christ and to grow in Christ. Our model for love is our Lord and Savior, who gave Himself for us on the cross while we were yet sinners (Rom. 5:8). He teaches us to love by His own example.

C. Love is an action that always requires improvement.

Paul has repeatedly commended their love, but they still needed to excel even more (cf. 1 Thess. 1:3; 3:6, 12; 4:1). Since Christ’s perfect example is our standard (John 13:34), we always have room to grow. We can always love our spouse more, our children more, our family members more, our fellow Christians more, and our neighbors more. This is not automatic; it doesn’t come naturally to any of us. It requires deliberate thought and effort. If you’re not deliberately thinking about and working at loving others more, chances are you’re not improving at this commitment.

One practical way to work on this is to write 1 Corinthians 13:4-8 on an index card and read it over every morning until it governs all of your interactions with people that day. Begin applying it to your immediate family, but extend it to all you have contact with. Ask yourself hard questions about each quality:

“Love is patient.” Would my family or co-workers describe me as a patient person? Do I have a “short fuse”?

“Love is kind.” Am I kind and gracious toward others, especially when they fall short of my expectations?

“Love is not jealous.” Am I competing with others by trying to get the attention, relationships, or possessions which they have?

“Love does not brag and is not arrogant.” Am I self-focused, always trying to impress others with my achievements, my opinions, or my knowledge?

“Love does not act unbecomingly.” Am I rude? Do I often interrupt others? Am I considerate of their feelings and points-of-view?

“Love does not seek its own.” Am I selfish? Do I think about others’ needs ahead of my own?

“Love is not provoked.” Am I easily offended? Do I get angry when people don’t do what I want them to do?

“Love does not take into account a wrong suffered.” Do I keep score? Do I remind others of past sins or failures? Do I hold grudges? Am I quick to forgive?

“Love does not rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices in the truth.” Am I glad when others fail or sin, because it makes me look good and I can use it as ammunition against them? Am I truly happy when I hear of others’ victories in the Lord?

“Love bears all things.” Do I bear with people in their immaturity or shortcomings or do I always correct them?

“Love believes all things.” Am I suspicious of others? Do I trust them unless there is good reason not to do so?

“Love hopes all things.” Do I “write people off”? Do I believe that God can work to change the other person?

“Love never fails.” Do I give up on others who have wronged or hurt me? Am I committed to help that person become all that God wants him or her to be?

Even if others who know you would say that you’re doing fairly well at loving others, there’s always room to grow because our standard is none other than the Lord Jesus Christ.

But Paul was concerned not only for love in our homes and in the church, but also that God’s love would be seen in the workplace. The connection between verses 9-10 & 11-12 is not immediately obvious. But Paul seems to be showing how we should demonstrate God’s love (vv. 9-10) in the workplace (vv. 11-12).

2. We should be showing God’s love by our behavior at work.

1 Thess. 4:11-12: “and to make it your ambition to lead a quiet life and attend to your own business and work with your hands, just as we commanded you, so that you will behave properly toward outsiders and not be in any need.” Note four things:

A. Showing God’s love at work requires goal-oriented behavior, not mindless drifting with the culture.

What is your goal at work? You say, “To provide for my family’s needs.” That’s a worthy goal, since Paul says that if you don’t provide for your family, have denied the faith and are worse than an unbeliever (1 Tim. 5:8)! That’s a serious warning! But if your only goal is to provide for your family, how do you differ from the world? That’s why almost everyone works. They’re trying to provide enough for their family’s needs and wants.

Paul says, “make it your ambition.” That phrase implies a goal and some effort toward that goal. The goal isn’t to climb the ladder to success or make a pile of money or beat your competitors. The goal is to be a godly witness to those without Christ. In LifeWork ([YWAM Publishing], p. xxi), Darrow Miller writes,

As the so-called developed world enters the twenty-first century, too often we Westerners find that the secular worldview has reduced work to a career and life to an endless consuming of things. As a result we live without hope and purpose, and both our work and life itself carry little if any meaning…. When we see our worth as determined by the marketplace and the amount of money we make, we often sacrifice what matters most—family, friends, marriages, Christian fellowship—in pursuit of success, prestige, fame, power, and other goals prized by the world.

So the point of “make it your ambition” is that you need to think biblically about your goals at work. Your aim should not be to become rich or successful. Rather, it should be to display the love of our Savior to those who wrongly think that making a lot of money or becoming successful at work will bring lasting happiness.

B.The means for showing God’s love at work is to lead a quiet life and to attend to your own business.

What does Paul mean by “lead a quiet life”? He uses a similar phrase in 1 Timothy 2:2, where he says that we should pray “for kings and all who are in authority, so that we may lead a tranquil and quiet life in all godliness and dignity.” Peter mentions a similar quality when he enjoins wives with unbelieving husbands to win them without a word, specifically “with the imperishable quality of a gentle and quiet spirit” (1 Pet. 3:1-6). In both contexts, the goal is godly witness, not through preaching, but through behavior that demonstrates contentment and peace in Christ. Because we are content with food and covering and don’t seek to get rich (1 Tim. 6:9-9), we can exude the quiet contentment that stands in contrast to the self-seeking, money-oriented values of the world.

“To attend to your own business” means that we should not be busybodies or gossips, meddling in matters that are none of our business (2 Thess. 3:11-12). He does not mean that we should not care about others’ problems, but rather that we should be known as those who can be trusted with confidential information without blabbing it all over the workplace. Both phrases imply that a Christian’s witness at work should primarily be through godly behavior, not through preaching.

C. The motivation for showing God’s love at work is to see the God-given dignity of work that is done for His glory.

The Greek culture in Paul’s day looked down on manual labor, which they viewed as fit only for slaves. But the Bible consistently upholds the dignity of all work. God gave Adam and Eve manual labor in the garden before the fall. Godly men in the Old Testament worked as farmers or shepherds. Paul made tents. He told slaves that they could do their menial work as unto the Lord (Col. 3:22-24). And, our Savior was a carpenter. When Paul says to work with your hands, he’s not prohibiting an office or professional job, but he is elevating manual labor as a dignified endeavor.

Some Christians erroneously view work as a curse. But God didn’t curse Adam’s work after the fall, but rather the ground that he tilled (Miller, p. 107). Work is now more difficult, but it does not lack dignity if we do it as unto the Lord. While some jobs may not be as satisfying as other jobs, we need to see work itself as being our calling from God. If you view work as a curse, you’ll try to avoid work and you won’t do your best on the job. You’ll only do the minimum required. But that hinders witness. Paul’s concern is that every Christian, including slaves, would (Col. 3:23) “do your work heartily, as for the Lord rather than for men.” Why?

D. The aim for showing God’s love at work is to be a witness to outsiders and to provide for our own needs.

“To walk properly toward outsiders” means that our witness to unbelievers by our behavior on the job should always be uppermost in our minds. You should not spend company time in verbal witness, which would not please your employer. Except for a brief word here and there that doesn’t interfere with work, reserve that for after hours. Your employer didn’t hire you to evangelize your fellow employees on the job! Your witness on the job should primarily be by your contentment and peace in Christ and your personal integrity. Other workers should see that you aren’t greedily trying to take advantage of others. They should see your moral purity, concern for others, honesty, and work ethic.

“To not be in any need” means that we should be responsible managers of our income: paying our bills, living within our means, being generous and ready to share, and not mooching off the government or anyone else because we’re lazy or trying to take advantage of the system. Christians should not be a burden to others, but rather be able to help provide for those with true needs (the disabled, etc.; Eph. 4:28). Your fellow workers should be able to see that you live simply and generously as a Christian. You’re not acting in love when you expect financial favors from other believers simply because they’re your brothers in Christ.

Conclusion

Thus Paul is saying that we are to work diligently at loving one another and we are to act in ways that show God’s love at work. The Russian author, Leo Tolstoy (Twenty-Three Tales [Oxford University Press], “Where Love is, God is,” pp. 131-146) tells a story about a lonely, old Russian cobbler who was reading in Luke 7 about the Pharisee who did not welcome Jesus to his home. He thought, “If He came to me, would I welcome Him?” Pondering this, he fell asleep. Suddenly, the old man heard a voice calling his name: “Martin, Martin, look out in the street tomorrow for I shall come.”

The next day, he kept watch out of his window as he worked. He saw an old man that he knew, invited him in by his fire, and gave him some tea. He told the man about Christ’s mercy as he had been reading in the gospels. The old man listened with tears running down his cheeks and left thanking him for his hospitality.

A while later, Martin saw outside a woman dressed in shabby summer clothes, trying to keep her crying baby warm. He invited her in to sit by his fire. She was destitute and had pawned her shawl the day before to get something to eat. He fed her, gave her an old coat to wrap around her baby, and gave her the money to get her shawl out of pawn. Later he helped reconcile a poor woman and a boy who stole an apple from her. So the day passed, but there had been no appearance of Christ.

It was evening now. Martin lit his lamp, and opened his Bible. He had intended to read where he had left off the night before, but the Bible fell open to another place. Before he read, he heard a voice call out, “Martin, it is I.” He looked up and saw the old man he had helped, and then he vanished. This was repeated with the woman and her baby, and with the woman and boy he had served that day. Then he read, “I was an hungered, and ye gave Me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave drink: I was a stranger, and ye took Me in.” At the bottom of the page, he read, “Inasmuch as ye did it unto one of these my brethren, even these least, ye did it unto me” (Matt. 25). Tolstoy concludes, “And Martin understood that his dream had come true; and that the Savior had really come to him that day, and he had welcomed him.”

That poor cobbler was demonstrating God’s love in his workplace. Paul wants us to be working at love for others and to be showing God’s love at work.

Application Questions

  1. Some would say that if love requires effort and is not spontaneous, it is not genuine. Why is this false?
  2. What’s the difference between loving a fellow Christian and liking him (or her)? Are we obligated to like others?
  3. Is it wrong for a Christian to have “getting rich” as part of a career goal? Consider 1 Tim. 6:6-11 in your answer.
  4. Are “full-time ministry” jobs a notch above “secular” jobs in God’s kingdom? Why/why not?

Copyright, Steven J. Cole, 2016, All Rights Reserved.

Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture Quotations are from the New American Standard Bible, Updated Edition © The Lockman Foundation

Related Topics: Love

Lesson 13: God’s Prophetic Plan (Various Scriptures)

Related Media

October 23, 2016

This message will probably sound more like a Bible college classroom lecture than a sermon. But before we plunge into Paul’s treatment of biblical prophecy (1 Thess. 4 & 5; 2 Thess. 1 & 2), it’s important for you to understand an overview of various approaches to biblical prophecy. For some, this may be a boring review (my apologies!). But I hope for others it will help you understand some of the issues involved.

It has always troubled me that if I were to announce a mid-week series on prayer, few would show up, but if it was on prophecy, the place would be packed. It has also bothered me that much of the hype connected with prophecy is based on speculation about the future without application to the present. People are fascinated to know whether some famous world leader’s name transliterated into Hebrew or Greek adds up to 666 or whether the European Union is the 10-horned beast of Daniel 7, but knowing that doesn’t help them grow in godliness or love.

Also, many evangelicals think that all Bible-believing Christians believe in the pretribulation rapture of the church, as popularized by Hal Lindsey’s The Late Great Planet Earth and Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins’ Left Behind books. I was taught that view in seminary. Some of my professors believed that all other views border on liberalism. When I graduated from seminary 40 years ago, I agreed with that view.

But the more I’ve studied biblical prophecy, the less certain I’ve become that that is what the Bible teaches. I’d like for it to be true, because who wants to go through the tribulation? And I don’t have a system worked out so that I can explain all the prophetic passages. I’ve read many commentaries and books on prophecy, but I still don’t understand the Book of Revelation well enough to teach it. So I continue to read and study, but don’t expect a series on Revelation any time soon! But we’re coming to several sections dealing with prophecy, so I’ll try to explain them as best as I know how at this point in my understanding.

In this message, though, I want to provide a survey of the major views of biblical prophecy among Bible-believing Christians and explain some of the pros and cons of each view. To sum up:

All true Christians agree that Jesus Christ will come back bodily in power and glory, but there are some major differences about the details.

Let me begin by saying that as long as a person believes that Jesus Christ will come back bodily in power and glory, we should not make agreement on our particular view of prophecy a test for fellowship. Godly men and women differ on these matters, but each view has biblical support; if it didn’t, all who believe the Bible would be in the same camp. So while it’s fine to debate prophetic views in a friendly way, we should not attack those who differ with us as if they were enemies of the gospel.

1. All true Christians agree that Jesus Christ will come back bodily in power and glory.

All of the major approaches to biblical prophecy agree on this truth: Jesus will return bodily and when He comes, He will come in great power and glory to reign. At His trial Jesus told the Sanhedrin (Matt. 26:64), “I tell you, hereafter you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power, and coming on the clouds of heaven.” He was referring to Daniel 7:14, which predicts that Messiah’s kingdom will be everlasting. The angel told the disciples as they watched Jesus ascend into heaven after His resurrection (Acts 1:11), “This Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven.” He ascended bodily; He will return bodily. However Christians understand the details of prophecy, all agree that Jesus is coming back bodily to reign. To deny that is heresy.

2. True Christians disagree regarding the specifics of biblical prophecy.

There are three main views regarding the Lord’s coming:

A. Postmillennialists believe that Jesus will return after a time of widespread acceptance of the gospel.

According to this view, the gospel in this church age will grow like the mustard seed until it becomes a large tree. Or, it will spread like leaven in bread dough, until it permeates the whole earth, so that the world is largely Christianized. This millennial age in which God’s kingdom will come to earth will last for a long period of time (not necessarily 1,000 literal years). At the end of this time, Christ will return to resurrect the dead for judgment and usher in the new heavens and new earth (cf. Lorraine Boettner, The Meaning of the Millennium [IVP], ed. by Robert Clouse, pp. 117ff.).

The millennium envisioned by postmillennialists is very different than that expected by premillennialists (ibid. pp. 120-121). The conditions on earth will not be substantially changed, except as a majority of believers may bring about a culture of righteousness. Jesus won’t be bodily reigning in Jerusalem on the throne of David, since He doesn’t return until the end of the millennium. People will still be in their normal bodies, since the resurrection of the living and dead happens at the return of Christ. There will not be a final rebellion against Christ, as premillennialists believe. The millennium will be a time much like today, except that the gospel will spread widely throughout the world.

Some of those from the past who have held to postmillennialism are Reformers Martin Bucer and Theodore Beza, many of the Puritans, including Matthew Henry, the Wesley brothers, Jonathan Edwards, William Carey, Charles Hodge, and Augustus Strong. In our day, Kenneth Gentry (in Three Views on the Millennium and Beyond [Zondervan], ed. by Darrell Bock, who supplies the list above, plus many others), and Douglas Wilson (desiringgod.org/messages/an-evening-of-eschatology), among others, contend for this view.

Postmillennialism rests on God’s purpose of being glorified in His creation. It believes in His sovereign power to accomplish His purpose and that He has equipped His church with the necessary gifts and power to accomplish that purpose (Gentry, ibid., develops these points). It has a strong hope in the power of the gospel to spread and transform lives. It encourages evangelism with the hope that God will bless the gospel with widespread conversions. And it is supported by many Scriptures in both the Old and New Testaments that predict the ultimate triumph of Christ (Gentry, pp. 31-55). Also, one modern form of postmillennialism (advocated by Gentry and the late Greg Bahnsen) is called theonomy, Reconstructionism, or dominion theology, which holds that God’s Old Testament civil laws are binding on governments today.

Against postmillennialism is the picture of the end times in the New Testament, when godlessness and the persecution of the godly increase, not decrease. Also, current world conditions do not reflect any sort of increasing righteousness, but rather increasing rebellion against God. Against theonomy is the New Testament teaching that we are not under the Mosaic Law. And the Scriptures used to support postmillennialism can easily fit into other approaches to prophecy.

B. Amillennialists believe that there is no future earthly millennium, but that Jesus is now reigning spiritually over His kingdom.

Amillennialism was the predominant view of the church from the time of Augustine (early 5th century) until the Reformation. Today, many godly Reformed theologians and pastors hold this view, although some object to the label. They believe that the “thousand years” (Rev. 20:4) refers to the current church age when Satan’s influence over the nations has been bound (Rev. 20:1-3; Matt. 12:29; Col. 2:15) so that the gospel may spread to every nation. Christ’s kingdom began when He was on earth (Matt. 12:28). He is now reigning from heaven over His church, but there is a future fulfillment of His kingdom in the new heavens and new earth.

There will not be a literal future seven-year worldwide tribulation. Some amillennialists say that at the end of this age, Satan will be released for a time, leading to the deception of the nations, Armageddon, and the physical return of Christ. This will be followed by the resurrection of both the righteous and the wicked for judgment, and then the new heavens and new earth.

Amillennialists argue that because the Jews rejected their Messiah, the kingdom was taken away from them and given to a believing “nation,” the church (Matt. 21:43; 1 Pet. 2:9). Christ is the true Israel (Isa. 42:1-7), the true temple where God dwells with His people (John 2:19-21). Believers in Him are the true seed of Abraham (Gal. 3:7), who saw in God’s promises of the land the heavenly city, whose architect and builder is God (Heb. 11:10-16). The promise of the land for God’s people will be fulfilled in the new heavens and earth that follows Christ’s return. Some amillennialists (e.g. Martyn Lloyd Jones) believe that Romans 11 teaches that there will still be a widespread conversion of the Jews before Jesus returns. But there are not two separate prophetic programs, one for the Jews and another for the church.

In favor of amillennialism is the fact that it is fairly simple. Amillennialists argue that they interpret Old Testament prophecies in line with the way that the New Testament interprets them, which often includes a spiritual fulfillment in Christ (e.g. Acts 2:17-21; 13:32-35; 15:16-18; Gal. 4:21-31; Heb. 4:1-11; 1 Pet. 2:9-10). Also, Revelation 20 is the only passage which mentions a thousand year reign of Christ and that number, like most numbers in Revelation, should be interpreted symbolically.

The main reason that I reject amillennialism is that I cannot swallow their interpretation of the binding of Satan (Rev. 20:1-3). They argue that it is limited to his ability to deceive the nations, but the picture in Revelation is much more extensive than that. He is thrown into the abyss and the door is shut and sealed over him. That sounds like complete restriction, which doesn’t describe the present age! Even if you limit it to being bound from deceiving the nations, it seems to me that he has deceived most nations (“people groups”) for these past 2,000 years. Many are still in complete spiritual darkness (2 Cor. 4:4; 1 John 5:19).

Also, several passages in the Old Testament seem to describe a future period of glory that is greater than the present age, but not descriptive of the eternal state (Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology [Zondervan], p. 1117). For example, Isaiah 65:20 describes a time when infants will not die, those who die in youth will be 100, and those who don’t live to 100 will be thought to be accursed. That is certainly not true now and it won’t be true in the new heavens and earth, when there is no death. It would seemingly refer to the millennium (also, cf. Ps. 72:8-14; Isa. 11:2-9; Zech. 14:6-21; Rev. 2:27; 12:5; 19:15; cf. Grudem, pp. 1114-1121 for further arguments against amillennialism). Also, it seems to me that amillennialism goes a bit too far in spiritualizing God’s promises to Israel. That leads us to the third major view:

C. Premillennialists believe that Christ will return and rule on earth for a thousand years prior to the eternal state.

To complicate matters a bit, within premillennialism, there are two major views: pretribulational (or dispensational) premillennialism; and classic or historic premillennialism.

1) Pretribulational (or dispensational) premillennialism teaches that Christ will return secretly for His church before the great tribulation and again at the end of the tribulation to establish His millennial kingdom.

This is the view I was taught in seminary. It’s probably the most popular view among American evangelicals. Some dispensationalists argue that this view has been around for centuries, but most scholars agree that it was developed and popularized by the 19th century Plymouth Brethren leader, John Nelson Darby. It rests largely on two pillars: a sharp distinction between Israel and the church; and, a literal hermeneutic in prophetic interpretation.

The church will be removed through the secret rapture, followed by seven years that complete Daniel’s 70th “week” for Israel. During this time, many Jews will be saved, and many will be martyred by those loyal to the Antichrist, who will come to power and rule a one-world government. At the climax of the tribulation, just as the forces of the Antichrist are ready to annihilate Israel, Jesus will return, slay all of His enemies, and establish His millennial reign in Jerusalem. During this time, Satan will be bound and Christ will rule the nations with a rod of iron. Many will be saved, but there will still be some who will resist His rule.

At the end of this period, Satan will be released and lead a final rebellion. Fire will come down from heaven and destroy all the rebels. Satan will be thrown into the lake of fire. The dead will be raised for judgment and thrown into the lake of fire, which is the second death (see Rev. 20:1-15).

There are also a few variations among dispensational premillennialists. A few argue for a partial rapture before the tribulation, where the watchful or overcomers will be taken to heaven, but the rest of the church will be purified through the tribulation. Watchman Nee taught this view. Others hold to a mid-tribulation rapture or a pre-wrath rapture that removes the entire church just before the worst judgments of the tribulation begin.

The main reason I no longer hold to the pretribulation rapture of the church is that I don’t see two separate returns of Christ clearly taught in Scripture. I heard Dr. Richard Mayhue of The Master’s Seminary, who holds to this view, say that it must be inferred. Several verses and arguments lead to this inference:

First, Christ’s promise to the church in Philadelphia (Rev. 3:10) is to keep them from the hour of testing that is about to come upon the whole world. This is interpreted to apply to the church at the end of this age. Second, the purpose of the tribulation is for the pouring out of God’s wrath (Rev. 6:17), but the church is not destined for wrath, but for salvation (1 Thess. 1:10; 5:9). Third, it is argued that if Christ is not returning until the end of the tribulation, then His coming could not be imminent. (Dr. J. Dwight Pentecost, Things to Come [Zondervan], pp. 193-218, lists 28 arguments for the pretribulation rapture, but we don’t have time to go through all of these.)

I reject the argument about being spared from God’s wrath because throughout history, God has not protected His church from horrible tribulation. In our day, Christians are being persecuted and annihilated in many Muslim countries. The wrath from which we are to be spared is not temporal persecution, but the eternal wrath of God in the lake of fire. With regard to the argument about imminence, dispensational premillennialists agree that Christ’s Olivet Discourse (Matt. 24 & 25; Mark 13) refers to His second coming, not to the pretribulation rapture of the church. But Jesus clearly teaches that no one knows the day or hour of His coming and He warns His disciples to be on the alert (Matt. 24:36-44). He says (Matt. 24:44), “For this reason you also must be ready; for the Son of Man is coming at an hour when you do not think He will.” So even though His second coming follows the events of the tribulation (described in Matt. 24:4-28), the Lord pictures it as imminent and urges us to be alertly watching for it.

Also, there are predicted events that must transpire before the church could be removed from the earth. The disciples had to bear witness in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria, and to the ends of the earth (Acts 1:8), which would have taken many years (in fact, it still has not been fulfilled). Jesus said that the end would not come until the gospel had been preached in the whole world, which is the task of the church (Matt. 24:14). The Lord told Peter that he would live to be an old man (John 21:18). He told Paul that he would live to bear witness in Rome (Acts 23:11). So the idea that we must hold to the pretribulation rapture because any other teaching denies that Christ could return at any moment doesn’t hold up (cf. Moo, pp. 207-211). As I said, I hope that the pretribulation rapture is true, because I don’t want to suffer. But I’m not convinced that the biblical arguments prove it.

2) Posttribulational (or classic) premillennialism teaches that the church will go through the tribulation, followed by the second coming of Christ and His millennial rule.

This is also called historic premillennialism. It was the predominant view of the church for the first three centuries of the church. The late George Ladd (The Blessed Hope [Eerdmans]), Douglas Moo (Three Views on the Rapture [Zondervan]) and Wayne Grudem (Systematic Theology) all defend this view.

As I said, the pretribulation rapture rests on the pillars of a complete distinction between God’s purpose for the church and His purpose for Israel; and, on the literal interpretation of biblical prophecy. With regard to the distinction between Israel and the church, I see some distinctions, but not distinctions that continue throughout eternity. Paul states that in Christ there is no Jew or Gentile (Gal. 3:28; Eph. 2:11-22; Col. 3:11). I find it hard to see in Scripture that the church is merely a parenthesis in God’s program, separate from Israel. Rather, Christ and the church are the culmination of God’s redemptive program. Many dispensationalists say that during the millennium, the Jewish temple will be rebuilt and animal sacrifices will be offered there as a memorial. I find that idea to be in opposition to the Book of Hebrews. Christ is the complete and final sacrifice for our sins. Why go back to offering “memorial” sacrifices when we have Christ’s perfect sacrifice for our sins?

Regarding the literal interpretation of prophecy, there are many places where even dispensationalists interpret the fulfillment of prophecies spiritually (cf. Vern Poythress, Understanding Dispensationalists [P&R Publishing], chapters 8-11). For example, the church is now the temple of God, where He dwells (1 Cor. 3:16-17). We are now “a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God’s own possession” (1 Pet. 2:9).

When it comes to a “secret rapture” of the church, the text that we will study next time is often used as a main support. But it doesn’t sound very secret: the Lord “will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet of God” (1 Thess. 4:16). Dr. Grudem states (p. 1134),

The doctrine of a pretribulation rapture is an inference from several passages, all of which are disputed. Moreover, even if one believes this doctrine to be in Scripture, it is taught with such little clarity that it was not discovered until the nineteenth century. This does not make it seem likely.

Conclusion

I don’t expect all of you to agree with me. But as I said, we need to disagree with one another graciously, admitting that there are many godly scholars in each camp. Whatever you believe, here are some concluding applications:

First, no matter what view you take, the Lord Jesus clearly is going to return bodily to execute judgment on unbelievers. This, along with the uncertainty of life, is incentive to believe in Christ without delay. Use this when you witness.

Second, in light of His coming (1 Cor. 15:58), “… be steadfast, immovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, knowing that your toil is not in vain in the Lord.”

Third, we can have assurance and comfort in the midst of the present world turmoil. God is sovereign and He works all things after the counsel of His will (Eph. 1:11). He sets up rulers and takes them down to accomplish His plans (Prov. 21:1). No evil ruler, including the Antichrist himself, can thwart God’s plan. Therefore (Ps. 2:12), “Do homage to the Son, that He not become angry, and you perish in the way, for His wrath may soon be kindled. How blessed are all who take refuge in Him!”

Finally (1 John 3:3), “Everyone who has this hope fixed on Him purifies himself, just as He is pure.” Make sure that you’re living in holiness in light of Christ’s warnings to be ready when He comes (Mark 13:33-37)!

Application Questions

  1. Which of the three major views is the most convincing to you? Why?
  2. What are some differing practical applications that stem from each view? What dangers may be connected with each view?
  3. When do we cross the line of being too enamored with biblical prophecy? What warning signs should we heed?
  4. To what extent should we try to connect current events with the signs of Christ’s coming? Is this too speculative?

Copyright, Steven J. Cole, 2016, All Rights Reserved.

Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture Quotations are from the New American Standard Bible, Updated Edition © The Lockman Foundation

Related Topics: Prophecy/Revelation

The Rescue - Why Did Jesus Come?

Article contributed by Stand To Reason
Visit Stand To Reason website

Related Media

Introduction

In just a few weeks most of us will be hovering over a gastronomical feast preparing to eat much more than we should, appropriately celebrating the generosity of God towards us that is much more than we deserve.

Not long after, we will celebrate the most sublime example of that generosity, the greatest reason for giving such hearty thanks just weeks before—God come down. God getting low. God with us. Emmanuel.

Christmas starts the story of Jesus, the greatest tale ever told. But it is not really a tale at all, because the story is a true one. It is the most important part of the true Story of Reality.

What follows is an excerpt from The Story of Reality—How the World Began, How It Ends, and Everything Important that Happens in Between. In this part of the Story I answer the second of the two most important questions anyone could ever ask about the remarkable man from Nazareth: Why did He come? It is a question there is far too much confusion about, even for those who call the Story their own.

To answer that question I first want to tell what Jesus did not come to do. Then I want to tell you why He did come. It’s captured in the most important Christmas verse in the Bible you will never see printed on a Christmas card and you will never hear recited at a Christmas pageant. It tells of a rescue operation that formally started at Christmas, but ended in a dark event decades later. It tells the reason Jesus was born. It tells the reason God came down.

The Rescue

Now to our second question: What did Jesus come to do? Since there is more debate on this than there ought to be, we must first correct a misunderstanding. Sometimes knowing what Jesus did not come to do is almost as important as knowing what He did come to do, because a wrong understanding of the first can lead to confusion on the second.

So let us be clear. Jesus did not come to help us get along, or teach us to take care of the poor, or to restore “social justice.”1 To some, this assertion is a bold stroke, since they have been told just the opposite. This is because there are many noble people who are drawn to Jesus for His moral excellence (as they should be). However, often their admiration of His civic virtue has distracted them from a more important matter.

Their mistake is thinking that Jesus came principally to teach us how to live a better life. He did not. God had already sent many before with the kind of advice we need to hear, and there was no point in His personally coming down merely to repeat what had already been said. No, Jesus came for a different reason.

What I am going to say next will come as a shock to some, but here it is. You can eliminate every single thing Jesus ever said in His life about the poor and social justice, and still you will not undermine His main message one bit. As severe as that may sound, this is precisely what one of Christ’s closest followers actually did.

The Gospel of John is the last biography written on Jesus, and it came to us from His last surviving Apostle, the “beloved” disciple John, a member of Jesus’ intimate inner circle. Many think it the most elegant summary and most definitive statement of who Jesus was and what He came to do. Yet you can read from John’s first sentence to his last and you will not find a single word about helping the poor or restoring social justice. Not one. In John’s lone reference to the poor, Jesus is actually somewhat dismissive of them.2 That is not because He doesn’t care about them, but because He is comparing their situation with something far more important.

This observation about John’s account in itself seems enough to make the point about Jesus’ focus, but let’s go a bit further. Jesus gave four major discourses—the Sermon on the Mount, the Bread of Life Discourse, the Olivet Discourse, and the Upper Room Discourse.3 Only in the first does He mention the poor at all. Yet even here there are two qualifiers you must keep in mind.

First, in His Sermon on the Mount Jesus commends not the poor per se, but rather the poor in spirit. To them, He says, belongs the Kingdom of Heaven. There is a reason the Kingdom belongs to them—not because they are poverty stricken (their income is irrelevant to Jesus), but because they are morally broken and they know it.4 That is what “poor in spirit” means. Picture the tax collector in Jesus’ parable—hardly a destitute man—beating his breast pleading, “God, have mercy on me, a sinner.”5 This man proclaiming his spiritual poverty goes away justified, Jesus says, while the Pharisee, whose spiritual arrogance clouds his genuine spiritual need, does not.

The second qualifier I want you to keep in mind about Jesus’ comments on the poor is this. In the vast majority of cases where Jesus mentions the poor, He does so not to commend the poor as such, but to make a point about something else—hypocrisy, a widow’s generosity, Zaccheus’s repentance, the rich young ruler’s confusion, or a lesson about the afterlife.6 Even when He mentions them, the plight of the poor simply was not the focus of Jesus’ teaching.

Now, we must not conclude from this that Jesus didn’t care about the poor and so we need not care, either. He cared very much about them, and the Story has much to say about their situation. Do not miss, though, that He also cared about the rich and powerful. Jesus helped everyone and anyone who came to Him—poor beggar or prostitute, wealthy tax collector or Pharisee. The divide for Jesus was not between the poor and the rich, but between the proud and the repentant, regardless of income or social standing. Miss that, and you miss everything.

These are the facts we must face if we are to get Jesus right. “Social justice” is not the Gospel. It was not Jesus’ message. It was not why He came. His real message was much more radical. Jesus’ teaching—and the Story itself—focuses on something else. Not on the works of Christians, but rather on the work of Christ. That is what the Story teaches.

And so our question remains: Why did God come down? What was the reason He became a man? What did He come to earth to do? The Story tells us.

I want you to think for a moment about what the Story says about Christmas. Now when I say “Christmas,” I am not speaking of any of those things that usually come to mind when you think about the birth of Christ. I do not want you to think, for example, about shepherds or wise men or stables or mangers or anything like that. Those things all have their place, but they have nothing at all to do with my point.

I am talking about something in the Story you probably have never noticed. I want you to consider the most important Christmas verse in the Story that you will never see on a Christmas card, and you will never hear in a Christmas pageant because it is not in the accounts of Jesus’ birth at all. In fact, it does not appear anywhere in the record of His life. Instead, you find it in a dark and foreboding passage that speaks of blood and sacrifice and death. It is a section of the Story recounting a ghastly, grisly system of slaughter where bulls and goats were bled out, their innocent lives forfeit on behalf of others who were the guilty ones.

Now, I think it is obvious to just about everyone that animals can never really pay for people at all. The system of sacrifice God gave to the Hebrews, as important as it was, served only as a kind of sop, a temporary measure to cover man’s moral wound for the moment. It would never do in the long run, and it was not meant to. No, man owes the debt, and in the long run man, not creatures, must pay. And only a sinless man—someone with no debt of his own—could cover the debt of another. And only a man who was more than a man could ever pay for the sins of multitudes.

And this brings us to the most important Christmas verse you will never hear on Christmas. Here it is:

Therefore, when Christ came into the world, He said: “Sacrifice and offering You did not desire, but a body You prepared for Me; with burnt offerings and sin offerings You were not pleased. Then I said, ‘Here I am—it is written about Me in the scroll—I have come to do Your will, O God.’” (Heb. 10:5-7 NIV)

Note the opening words of this passage: “When Christ came into the world….” The Story is saying that on that first Christmas, in some incredible way the eternal Son of God in a baby’s body said to His Father, “Here I am. I will do as You have asked. I accept the body You have prepared for Me, the body that will bleed out in perfect payment for sin.”

And this is the answer to our question. This is why Jesus came to earth. God’s Son surrendered His sinless human self to be the future unblemished offering to perfectly and completely save sinners.

And this we do find in the birth narratives, everywhere. God tells Joseph that Mary “will give birth to a son, and you will give Him the name Jesus, because He will save His people from their sins.” In the field that first Christmas night the angel tells the shepherds, “Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you. He is the Messiah, the Lord.” Zacharias prophesies over his son, the infant John Baptist, saying John would go prepare the way for “the Lord,” and “give His people the knowledge of salvation through the forgiveness of their sins.” Thirty years later John points at the Lord Jesus Christ and says, “Behold, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.”7

Each of these events echoes our unsung Christmas verse: “A body You prepared for Me.” The Lord. The Christ. The Savior. Emmanuel. God with us, who would die for us. The Lamb of God.

So, the Story tells us the precise reason the Son came to Earth. Not to teach love and peace and care for the poor, but to submit Himself to something unspeakably violent and brutal. That is why every crèche ought to have a cross hanging over it, because Jesus was born to die. And on this point Jesus speaks clearly:

  • “God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through Him.” (Jn. 3:17 NIV)
  • “The Son of Man came to seek and to save the lost.” (Lk. 19:10 NIV)
  • “I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.” (Lk. 5:32 NIV)
  • “I lay down My life so that I may take it again. No one has taken it away from Me, but I lay it down on My own initiative.” (Jn. 10:17-18 NASB)
  • “The Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for many.” (Matt. 20:28 NIV)

I want you to think very carefully about Jesus’ last statement, because there are three questions we must answer to understand His meaning. The first is, “What is a ransom?” Well, a ransom is the price paid to purchase a hostage or a slave, of course. A ransom buys a body. Second, “Whose body does Jesus buy with the ransom?” He buys those who are held hostage. He pays a price to purchase sinners, rebels, and slaves. Finally, “What is the price He will pay?” Jesus will buy bodies by surrendering His own body. “A body You prepared for Me.” He will sacrifice Himself to save others.

So, Jesus came to earth to save sinners. The statement is so common to our ears, it is easy to miss its significance. “Save” means to rescue from imminent danger. Jesus came to rescue us because we were in danger. What was that danger? What was Jesus rescuing us from? Here is the answer. Jesus did not come to rescue us from our ignorance or our poverty or our oppressors or even from ourselves. Jesus came to rescue us from the Father. 8

Remember, the King is angry.9 He is the One who is offended. He is the One who is owed. He is the Sovereign we have rebelled against, the Father we have disobeyed, the friend we have betrayed. And that is a dangerous place for us to be. Jesus said, “Do not fear those who kill the body, but are unable to kill the soul, but rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in Hell.” Later in the Story we learn, “It is a terrifying thing to fall into the hands of the living God.”10

That is the bad news. And it is very bad news, to be sure. Yet, without the bad news, the good news is not good. And the good news is very, very good. Here it is: The Father has mounted a rescue operation. There has been an invasion.11 God came down. “A body You prepared for Me.”

Jesus’ life was filled with many extraordinary deeds, so many, one of His disciples wrote, the world itself could not contain the books needed to record them.12 But there are two very particular things Jesus did that were vital to the rescue.

First, Jesus lived the life we should live, but do not. We rebel; He submitted. We sin; He obeyed. We live for self; He lived for the Father. We falter; He succeeded. He had no hint of sin, no darkness, no shadow. As one has put it, “He remained free, uncontaminated, uncompromised.”13 Jesus never failed, obeying even to the death. This no one has ever done. There was no one like Him.

Second, Jesus made a trade. He took His perfect life and He traded it for our rotten lives. He gets our badness—and the judgment and punishment that go with it. We get His goodness. We take His place, and He takes our place.

If that seems hard to imagine (and I understand completely if it does), let me offer something that might help. On a flight from Jacksonville to Miami I spoke with a dear Muslim woman about the differences between the God of Jesus and the God of Mohammed. I said that both were holy and both demanded we be holy, too, and there will be justice to pay because we are not. But on this issue of justice, I said, we come to an important distinction.

I asked the Muslim woman to imagine our plane being hijacked and the terrorists trying to drag her out onto the tarmac to kill her in front of cameras for all the world to see. I then asked her to imagine that I put my own body between hers and the attackers and said, “Don’t take her. Take me instead.” She said she could not imagine anyone doing that for her.

Yet this, I told her, is what God has done in Jesus. To satisfy justice, God came down. Not Allah; Yahweh. Not Mohammed; Jesus. God stepped out of Heaven and dwelt among us—“A body You prepared for Me”—and said to the Father, “Take Me instead.” That was the trade.

The trade took place on a small outcropping of rock outside the walls of ancient Jerusalem. It was called Golgotha, the place of the skull. We know it as Calvary, the place of the cross. It was the reason Jesus was born. It is the reason God came down.

Taken from The Story of Reality by Gregory Koukl. Copyright © 2017 by Gregory Koukl. Used by permission of Zondervan. www.zondervan.com.


1 The term “social justice” is misleading. The poor only need justice if they have been wronged in some way. Otherwise, the Story teaches charity and mercy towards those in need. The view that all poor people are victims is a recent invention. It is not what Jesus taught, and it is not part of the Story.

2 The single reference in John to the poor is found in Jn. 12:8: “You will always have the poor among you, but you will not always have Me.” (NIV)

3 Find the Sermon on the Mount in Matt. 5-7; the Bread of Life Discourse in Jn. 6; the Olivet Discourse in Matt. 24, Lk. 21, Mk. 13; and the Upper Room Discourse Jn. 13-17.

4 Jesus does make reference to the poor in Lk. 4:18-19: “The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, because He anointed Me to preach the Gospel to the poor. He has sent Me to proclaim release to the captives, and recovery of sight to the blind, to set free those who are oppressed, to proclaim the favorable year of the Lord.” (NASB) Even here, though, it seems clear that, in light of the rest of the verse and everything that follows about Jesus’ teaching on “the Gospel,” He is principally making reference to spiritual benefits, not material benefits.

5 “God, have mercy on me, a sinner” (Lk. 18:9-14 NIV)

6 Hypocrisy (Matt. 6:2-3), a widow’s generosity (Lk. 21:2-3), Zaccheus’s repentance (Lk. 19:8), the rich young ruler’s confusion (Matt. 19:21), a lesson about the afterlife (Lk. 16:20, 22).

7 “And this we do find in the birth narratives….” Matt. 1:21 (NIV), Lk. 2:11 (NIV), Lk. 1:76-77 (NIV), Jn. 1:29 (NASB).

8 Jesus saves us from the Father, but His intention is not at odds with the Father since it was the Father who, out of love, sent Jesus to rescue the world in the first place.

9 The point about the King being angry is developed earlier, in chapter 15 of The Story of Reality.

10 “Do not fear those who kill the body…” (Matt. 10:28 NASB), “It is a terrifying thing to fall into the hands of the living God” (Heb. 10:31 NASB)

11 The idea that the incarnation is a kind of invasion of enemy-occupied territory comes from C.S Lewis in Mere Christianity.

12 “The world itself could not contain the books…” (Jn. 21:25 NASB)

13 “He remained free, uncontaminated, uncompromised,” John Stott, The Cross Of Christ (Downers Grove: IVP, 1986), 231.

Related Topics: Apologetics, Christmas, Soteriology (Salvation), Thanksgiving

Pages