MENU

Where the world comes to study the Bible

Chinese NET Bible Project / Resource Website - CNET Tools

 

 

 The following tools are listed below:

NET聖經(中譯本)項目 / 資源網站——CNET聖經工具

 

 

NET聖經(中譯本)現已提供以下工具:


以 English 简体中文 瀏覽該頁

NET圣经(中译本)项目 / 资源网站——CNET圣经工具

 

 

NET圣经(中译本)现已提供以下工具:

 


以 English 繁體中文 浏览该页

Angelology: The Doctrine of Angels

Related Media

Introduction

The fact that God has created a realm of personal beings other than mankind is a fitting topic for systematic theological studies for it naturally broadens our understanding of God, of what He is doing, and how He works in the universe.

We are not to think that man is the highest form of created being. As the distance between man and the lower forms of life is filled with beings of various grades, so it is possible that between man and God there exist creatures of higher than human intelligence and power. Indeed, the existence of lesser deities in all heathen mythologies presumes the existence of a higher order of beings between God and man, superior to man and inferior to God. This possibility is turned into certainty by the express and explicit teaching of the Scriptures. It would be sad indeed if we should allow ourselves to be such victims of sense perception and so materialistic that we should refuse to believe in an order of spiritual beings simply because they were beyond our sight and touch.1

The study of angels or the doctrine of angelology is one of the ten major categories of theology developed in many systematic theological works. The tendency, however, has been to neglect it. As Ryrie writes,

One has only to peruse the amount of space devoted to angelology in standard theologies to demonstrate this. This disregard for the doctrine may simply be neglect or it may indicate a tacit rejection of this area of biblical teaching. Even Calvin was cautious in discussing this subject (Institutes, I, xiv, 3).2

Though the doctrine of angels holds an important place in the Word of God, it is often viewed as a difficult subject because, while there is abundant mention of angels in the Bible, the nature of this revelation is without the same kind of explicit description we often find with other subjects developed in the Bible:

Every reference to angels is incidental to some other topic. They are not treated in themselves. God’s revelation never aims at informing us regarding the nature of angels. When they are mentioned, it is always in order to inform us further about God, what he does, and how he does it. Since details about angels are not significant for that purpose, they tend to be omitted.3

While many details about angels are omitted, it is important to keep in mind three important elements about the biblical revelation God has given us about angels.

(1) The mention of angels is inclusive in Scripture. In the NASB translation these celestial beings are referred to 196 times, 103 times in the Old Testament and 93 times in the New Testament.

(2) Further, these many references are scattered throughout the Bible being found in at least 34 books from the very earliest books (whether Job or Genesis) to the last book of the Bible (Revelation).

(3) Finally, there are numerous references to angels by the Lord Jesus, who is declared to be the Creator of all things, which includes the angelic beings. Paul wrote, “For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities (a reference to angels)—all things have been created by Him and for Him.”

So while the mention of angels may seem incidental to some other subject contextually, it is an important element of divine revelation and should not be neglected, especially in view of the present craze and many misconceptions about angels. It is out of this extended body of Scripture, therefore, that the doctrine of angels, as presented in this study, will be developed. The objective is to make the Bible our authority rather than the speculations of men or their experiences or what may sound logical to people.

Though theologians have been cautious in their study of angels, in recent years we have been bombarded by what could easily be called Angelmania. In “Kindred Spirit” Dr. Kenneth Gangel has written an article on the widespread discussion and fascination with angels even by the secular world which he entitled, Angelmania.4 Gangel writes,

In his 1990 book Angels: An Endangered Species, Malcolm Godwin estimates that over the last 30 years one in every ten pop songs mentions an angel. But that was just romantic fun.

Now our culture takes angels seriously, if not accurately. In the last two years Time, Newsweek, Ladies’ Home Journal, Redbook, and a host of other popular magazines have carried articles about angels. In mid-1994, ABC aired a two-hour, prime time special titled “Angels: the Mysterious Messengers.” In Newsweek’s November 28, 1994 issue an article titled “In Search of the Sacred” observed that “20% of Americans have had a revelation from God in the last year, and 13% have seen or sensed the presence of an angel” (p. 54).

Newsweek is right; modern society, so seemingly secular and hopelessly materialistic, desperately searches for some spiritual and supernatural meaning. If angels can provide it, then angels it will be. Certainly they are more cheerful and brighter than our long-standing infatuation with movies about demons and evil spirits, along with endless Dracula revivals5

The bookstores abound with books on angels and many claim encounters with angels. One of the major networks has a popular program entitled “Touched By An Angel.” Certainly, this is just a story to entertain, but it does illustrate our fascination with this topic. In addition, it illustrates a very poor grasp of what the Bible really teaches about angels and about God. By these comments I do not mean to discount all the so-called encounters with angels that we occasionally read or hear about. Why? Because, as will be discussed in more detail later, angels are servants of God, described by the author of Hebrews as, “ministering spirits, sent out to render service for the sake of those who will inherit salvation.” See also Psalm 91:11 and Matthew 4:11. So certainly, due to the inspired and inerrant character of Scripture, we can trust completely in the Bible’s teaching on angels and, “with a perhaps lesser degree of certainty, consider the personal accounts of reputable Christians.”6

There is an important question that needs to be asked. Why all the fascination of our culture with angels? First, there is always a bent in man for the miraculous or supernatural, for that which lifts him out of the mundane and pain of life, even if for a moment, but there is more to this issue. The interest in angels is due in part to pendulum swings of society. In the past, society had swung from the gross mystical speculations of the middle ages to the rationalism of the late 1800s and early 1900s. Now, due in part to the failure of rationalism and materialism to give answers and meaning to life, the emptiness of man’s heart along with the futility of his pursuits has given rise to his interest in the mystical, in the supernatural, and in the spiritual. The tragedy is that our culture continues to pursue this independently of God’s revelation, the Bible. The pendulum has swung back to mysticism as it is seen so prominently in the New Age movement, the occult, and in the cults. So belief in Satan, demons, and angels is more and more common place today and used as a substitute for a relationship with God through Christ. This predisposition is not because people are believing the Bible, but because of the rise of occult phenomena and the futility of life without God (see Eph. 2:12 and 4:17-19).

A Simple Definition

Angels are spiritual beings created by God to serve Him, though created higher than man. Some, the good angels, have remained obedient to Him and carry out His will, while others, fallen angels, disobeyed, fell from their holy position, and now stand in active opposition to the work and plan of God.

The Terms Used of Angels

General Terms

    Angel

Though other words are used for these spiritual beings, the primary word used in the Bible is angel. Three other terms undoubtedly referring to angels are seraphim (Isa. 6:2), cherubim (Ezek. 10:1-3), and ministering spirits, which is perhaps more of a description than a name (Heb. 1:13). More will be said on this later when dealing with the classification of angels.

The Hebrew word for angel is mal`ach, and the Greek word is angelos. Both words mean “messenger” and describe one who executes the purpose and will of the one whom they serve. The context must determine if a human messenger is in view, or one of the celestial beings called “angels,” or if it is being used of the second Person of the Trinity as will be discussed below. The holy angels are messengers of God, serving Him and doing His bidding. The fallen angels serve Satan, the god of this world (aiwn, “age”) (2 Cor. 4:4).

Illustrations of uses that do not refer to celestial beings:

(1) For human messengers from one human to another (Luke 7:24; Jam. 2:25).

(2) For human messengers bearing a divine message (Hag. 1:13; Gal. 4:14).

(3) For an impersonal agent, Paul’s thorn in the flesh described as “a messenger of Satan” (2 Cor. 12:7).

(4) For the messengers of the seven churches (Rev. 2-3). It is also used in connection with the seven churches of Asia, “To the angel of the church in …” Some take this to mean a special messenger or delegation to the church as a teaching elder, others take it to refer to a guardian angel.

Thus, the term angelos is not only a generic term, pertaining to a special order of beings (i.e., angels), but it is also descriptive and expressive of their office and service. So when we read the word “angel” we should think of it in this way.

    Holy Ones

The unfallen angels are also spoken of as “holy ones” (Ps. 89:5, 7). The reason is twofold. First, being the creation of a holy God, they were created perfect without any flaw or sin. Second, they are called holy because of their purpose. They were “set apart” by God and for God as His servants and as attendants to His holiness (cf. Isa. 6).

    Host

“Host” is the Hebrew tsaba, “army, armies, hosts.” It is a military term and carries the idea of warfare. Angels are referred to as the “host,” which calls our attention to two ideas. First, it is used to describe God’s angels as the “armies of heaven” who serve in the army of God engaged in spiritual warfare (Ps. 89:6, 8; 1 Sam. 1:11; 17:45). Second, it calls our attention to angels as a multitude of heavenly beings who surround and serve God as seen in the phrase “Lord of hosts” (Isa. 31:4). In addition, tsaba sometimes includes the host of heavenly bodies, the stars of the universe.

Difficult Terms

    Sons of God

In their holy state, unfallen angels are called “sons of God” in the sense that they were brought into existence by the creation of God (Job 1:6; 38:7). Though they are never spoken of as created in the image of God, they may also be called “sons of God” because they possess personality like God. This will be demonstrated later in this study. This term is also used in Genesis 6:2 which tells us the “sons of God” took wives from among the “daughters of men.” Some scholars understand “the sons of God” of Genesis 6:2 to refer to the sons of the godly line of Seth and the “daughters of men” to refer to the ungodly line of the Cainites. Others, in keeping with the use of “sons of God” in Job, believe the term refers to fallen angels who mated with the daughters of men to produce an extremely wicked and powerful progeny that led to the extreme wickedness of Noah’s day. Most who hold to this latter view find further support in 2 Peter 2:4-6 and Jude 6-7.7 Still others believe they refer to despots, powerful rulers. Ross writes:

The incident is one of hubris, the proud overstepping of bounds. Here it applies to “the sons of God,” a lusty, powerful lot striving for fame and fertility. They were probably powerful rulers who were controlled (indwelt) by fallen angels. It may be that fallen angels left their habitation and inhabited bodies of human despots and warriors, the mighty ones of the earth.8

    The Angel of the Lord

The second difficulty concerns the identity of “the angel of the Lord” as it is used in the Old Testament. A careful study of the many passages using this term suggests that this is no ordinary angel, but a Theophany, or better, a Christophany, a preincarnate appearance of Christ. The angel is identified as God, speaks as God, and claims to exercise the prerogatives of God. Still, in some passages He distinguishes Himself from Yahweh (Gen. 16:7-14; 21:17-18; 22:11-18; 31:11-13, Ex. 3:2; Judg. 2:1-4; 5:23; 6:11-22; 13:3-22; 2 Sam. 24:16; Zech. 1:12; 3:1; 12:8). That the Angel of the Lord is a Christophany is suggested by the fact a clear reference to “the Angel of the Lord” ceases after the incarnation. References to an angel of the Lord in Luke 1:11; and 2:8 and Acts 5:19 lack the Greek article which would suggest an ordinary angel.

The Origin, Nature, and Number of Angels

Angels Are Created Beings

    The Fact of Their Creation

That angels are created beings and not the spirits of departed or glorified human beings is brought out in Psalm 148. There the Psalmist calls on all in the celestial heavens, including the angels, to praise God. The reason given is, “For He commanded and they were created” (Ps. 148:1-5). The angels as well as the celestial heavens are declared to be created by God.

Since God is Spirit (John 4:24) it is natural to assume that there are created beings who more closely resemble God than do the mundane creatures who combine both the material and immaterial. There is a material kingdom, an animal kingdom, and a human kingdom; So it may be assumed, there is an angelic or spirit kingdom. However, Angelology rests not upon reason or supposition, but upon revelation.9

    The Time of Their Creation

Though the exact time of their creation is never stated, we know they were created before the creation of the world. From the book of Job we are told that they were present when the earth was created (Job 38:4-7) so their creation was prior to the creation of the earth as described in Genesis one.

    The Agent of Their Creation

Scripture specifically states that Christ, as the one who created all things, is the creator of angels (cf. John 1:1-3 with Col. 1:16).

The Son’s Creation includes “all” things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible. These indicate the entire universe, both material and immaterial. A highly organized hierarchy of angelic beings is referred to with the word “thrones” (qronoi), “powers” (kuriothtes), “rulers” (arcai), and “authorities” (exousiai). This not only indicates a highly organized dominion in the spirit world of angels, but shows that Paul was writing to refute an incipient form of Gnosticism that promoted the worship of angels in place of the worship of Christ (cf. Col. 2:18). In this, Paul demonstrates superiority and rightful place of worship as supreme (cf. Eph. 1:21; 3:10; 6:12; Phil. 2:9-10; Col. 2:10, 15).10

    The Nature and Number of Their Creation

The angels were created simultaneously as a host or a company. God created man and the animal kingdom in pairs with the responsibility and ability to procreate. Angels, however, were created simultaneously as a company, a countless host of myriads (Col. 1:16; Neh. 9:6). This is suggested by the fact they are not subject to death or any form of extinction and they do not propagate or multiply themselves as with humans. Hebrews 9:27 says, “… it is appointed for men to die once and after this comes judgment.” While fallen angels will be judged in the future and permanently confined to the lake of fire (Matt. 25:41; 1 Cor. 6:4; 2 Pet. 2:4; Jude 6), there is never any mention of the death of angels (see Luke 20:36). Nevertheless, they are an innumerable host created before the creation of the earth (cf. Job 38:7; Neh. 9:6; Ps. 148:2, 5; Heb. 12:22; Dan. 7:10; Matt. 26:53; Rev. 5:11; with Matt. 22:28-30; Luke 20:20-36).

Angels Are Spirit Beings

    Their Abode

Statements like, “the angels which are in heaven” (Mark 13:32) and “an angel from heaven” suggest that angels have fixed abodes or centers for their activities. However, due to the ministry and abilities given to them in the service of God, they have access to the entire universe. They are described as serving in heaven and on earth (cf. Isa. 6:1f; Dan. 9:21; Rev. 7:2; 10:1).

Though fallen angels seem to have an abode other than heaven itself, no specific location is given except that Satan will be bound in the “Abyss” for the thousand years after the Second Coming before he is released (Rev. 20:3). Likewise the plague which seems to be demonic is spoken of as coming from the Abyss (9:1-30). Fallen angels also have a king who is referred to as “the angel of the Abyss” (vs. 11). The destiny of fallen angels is the lake of fire (Matt. 25:41). The holy angels will dwell in the new heavens and new earth described in Revelation 21-22.11

The reference to “the Abyss” brings up another important element regarding the abode of the fallen angels. Ryrie writes:

The Scriptures clearly indicate two groups of fallen angels, one consisting of those who have some freedom to carry out Satan’s plans, and the other who are confined. Of those who are confined, some are temporarily so, while others are permanently confined in Tartarus (2 Peter 2:4 and Jude 6). The Greeks thought of Tartarus as a place of punishment lower than hades. Those temporarily confined are in the abyss (Luke 8:31; Rev. 9:1-3, 11), some apparently consigned there to await final judgment while others will be loosed to be active on the earth (vv. 1-3, 11, 14; 16:14).12 (emphasis mine)

Jude also speaks of an abode for angels:

Jude 1:6 And angels who did not keep their own domain, but abandoned their proper abode, He has kept in eternal bonds under darkness for the judgment of the great day.

While the meaning of this passage is debated, it does show us that angels not only have a domain or area of authority assigned to them, but a dwelling place.

The most likely reference here is to the angels (“sons of God,” cf. Gen. 6:4; Job 1:6; 2:1) who came to earth and mingled with women. This interpretation is expounded in the pseudepigraphical Book of Enoch (7, 9.8, 10.11; 12.4), from which Jude quotes in v. 14, and is common in the intertestamental literature and the early church fathers (e.g., Justin Apology 2.5). These angels “did not keep their positions of authority” (ten heauton archen). The use of the word arche for “rule,” “dominion,” or “sphere” is uncommon but appears to be so intended here (cf. BAG, p. 112). The implication is that God assigned angels stipulated responsibilities (arche, “dominion”) and a set place (oiketerion). But because of their rebellion, God has kept or reserved (tetereken perfect tense) these fallen angels in darkness and in eternal chains awaiting final judgment. Apparently some fallen angels are in bondage while others are unbound and active among mankind as demons.13

    Their Immaterialness

Though at times they have revealed themselves in the form of human bodies (angelophanies) as in Genesis 18:3, they are described as “spirits” in Hebrews 1:14. This suggests they do not have material bodies as humans do. This is further supported by the fact they do not function as human beings in terms of marriage and procreation (Mark 12:25) nor are they subject to death (Luke 20:36).

Mankind, including our incarnate Lord, is “lower than the angels” (Heb. 2:7). Angels are not subject to the limitations of man, especially since they are incapable of death (Luke 20:36). Angels have greater wisdom than man (2 Sam. 14:20), yet it is limited (Matt. 24:36). Angels have greater power than man (Matt. 28:2; Acts 5:19; 2 Pet. 2:11), yet they are limited in power (Dan. 10:13).

Angels, however, have limitations compared to man, particularly in future relationships. Angels are not created in the image of God, therefore, they do not share man’s glorious destiny of redemption in Christ. At the consummation of the age, redeemed man will be exalted above angels (1 Cor. 6:3).14

Millard Erickson writes:

That angels are spirits may also be inferred from the following considerations:

Demons (fallen angels) are described as spirits (Matt. 8:16; 12:45; Luke 7:21; 8:2; 11:26; Acts 19:12; Rev. 16:14).

We are told that our struggle is not against “flesh and blood, but against the principalities, against the powers, against the world rulers of this present darkness, against the spiritual hosts of wickedness in heavenly places” (Eph. 6:12).

Paul, in Colossians 1:16, seems to identify the heavenly forces as invisible.

That angels are spirits seems to follow (although not necessarily from Jesus’ assertions that angels do not marry (Matt. 22:30) and do not die (Luke 20:36).15

Angels, though spirit beings and very powerful, are not omnipotent, omniscient, nor omnipresent. They cannot be everywhere at once.

    Their Appearance

Since they are spirit beings, they are usually not seen, unless God gives the ability to see them or unless they manifest themselves. Balaam could not see the angel standing in his way until the Lord opened his eyes (Num. 22:31) and Elisha’s servant could not see the host of angels surrounding him until Elisha prayed for his eyes to be opened (2 Kings 6:17). When angels have been seen as recorded in Scripture, they were often mistaken as men because they were manifested in a man-like appearance (Gen. 18:2, 16, 22; 19:1, 5, 10, 12, 15, 16; Judg. 13:6; Mark 16:5; Luke 24:4). Sometimes, they appear in a way that either manifests God’s glory (Luke 2:9; 9:26) or in some form of brilliant apparel (cf. Matt. 28:3; John 20:12; Acts 1:10 with Ezek. 1:13; Dan. 10:6). Consistently, they have appeared as real men, never as ghosts, or as winged animals (cf. Gen. 18:2; 19:1; Mark 16:3; Luke 24:4).

They are occasionally pictured in other forms and in other manifestations as with wings, and as a combination of man, beast, and birds as in Ezekiel 1:5f and Isaiah 6:6. But apparently such manifestations only occurred by way of a vision or special revelation from God. No angel literally appeared in such form.

They also seem to always have appeared as youthful or mature men (Mark 16:5), but never as old men, perhaps because they neither age nor die (Luke 20:36).

In the present fascination of our culture, previously referred to as angelmania, the common conception of angels is that of winged creatures and most times as female.

Some of the commonly held conceptions are not supported by the scriptural witness. There are no indications of angels appearing in female form. Nor is there explicit reference to them as winged, although Daniel 9:21 and Revelation 14:6 speak of them as flying. The cherubim and seraphim are represented as winged (Exod. 25:20; Isa. 6:2), as are the symbolic creatures of Ezekiel 1:6 (cf. Rev. 4:8). However, we have no assurance that what is true of cherubim and seraphim is true of angels in general. Since there is no explicit reference indicating that angels as a whole are winged, we must regard this as at best an inference, but not a necessary inference, from the biblical passages which describe them as flying.16

While angels generally appear as men in Scripture, Zechariah 5:9 may suggest this is not always the case. The two women mentioned in this passage are not specifically called angels, but they are clearly agents of God or forces of Satan, like angels, good or evil.

    Their Holiness

All angels were created holy, without sin, and in a state of perfect holiness.

Originally all angelic creatures were created holy. God pronounced His creation good (Gen. 1:31), and, of course, He could not create sin. Even after sin entered the world, God’s good angels, who did not rebel against Him, are called holy (Mark 8:38). These are the elect angels (1 Tim. 5:21) in contrast to the evil angels who followed Satan in his rebellion against God (Matt. 25:41).17

    Their Creatureliness

As created beings, they are of course mere creatures. They are not divine and their worship is explicitly forbidden (see Col. 2:18; Rev. 19:10; 22:9). As a separate order of creatures, they are both distinct from human beings and higher than humans with powers far beyond human abilities in this present age (cf. 1 Cor. 6:3; Heb. 1:14; 2:7). But as creatures they are limited in their powers, knowledge, and activities (1 Peter 1:11-12; Rev. 7:1). Like all of creation, angels are under God’s authority and subject to His judgment (1 Cor. 6:3; Matt. 25:41).

Following the revelation given to John, on two occasions the apostle fell on his face in worship, but the angel quickly told John not to worship him and then gave the reason. Angels are but “fellow servants” and called upon to serve God as all God’s creatures should. So John was told to “worship God.” The worship of angels (as with any other object of worship) distracts from the worship of God and attributes godlike powers to the object of worship. Angels are powerful and awesome in many ways, but, like us, they are only creatures and servants of the living God who alone deserves our worship. This means we are not to pray to them or trust in them even though God may use them to minister to our needs in various ways. Our trust is to be in God, not angels. They minister to us at His bidding under His authority and power. Though sometimes the instrument of aid or deliverance was an angel, New Testament believers recognized it was the Lord who delivered them (see Acts 12:11).

In Acts 27:23-25, Luke recounted Paul’s experience with an angel who brought him a message from the Lord, but there was no worship of the angel. Instead, Paul’s faith was in the God he served.

23 For this very night an angel of the God to whom I belong and whom I serve stood before me, 24 saying, ‘Do not be afraid, Paul; you must stand before Caesar; and behold, God has granted you all those who are sailing with you.’ 25 "Therefore, keep up your courage, men, for I believe God, that it will turn out exactly as I have been told.

Though writing about their invisibility to mankind, Chafer has an interesting comment:

One reason angels are rendered invisible to human sight may be that , if they were seen, they would be worhiped. Man, who is so prone to idolatry as to worship the works of his own hands, would hardly be able to resist the worship of angels were they before his eyes.18

The church at Colossae had been invaded by false teachers who were teaching a false humility and the worship of angels as a part of the means to spirituality. It seems these teachers were claiming special mystic insights by way of visions in connection with their worship of angels. Concerning this, Paul wrote:

Colossians 2:18 Do not let anyone who delights in false humility and the worship of angels disqualify you for the prize. Such a person goes into great detail about what he has seen, and his unspiritual mind puffs him up with idle notions (NIV).

The person attempting to make such judgment is described as one “who delights in false humility and the worship of angels.” The context suggests that he seeks to impose these things on the Colossians and that this is the means by which he attempts to disqualify them for their prize.19

This was demonic because it was an attempt to usurp the preeminent place and sufficiency of Christ as Savior and Lord (cf. Col. 2:10). It is no wonder, then, that the author of Hebrews, in the most extended passage on angels in the New Testament (Heb. 1:5-29), demonstrates the superiority of Christ to even the mighty angels (Heb. 1:2-4, 13). In this he concludes his argument with a question designed to show that Christ, God’s very Son and the radiance of His glory who sits at God’s right hand, is superior to angels for he asked, “Are they not all ministering spirits, sent out to render service for the sake of those who will inherit salvation?” (Heb. 1:14).

    Their Personalities

There are several qualities common to personality all of which angels possess—personal existence, intellect, emotion, and will. As personalities we see them interacted with over and over again through the Bible. Ryrie writes:

Angels then qualify as personalities because they have these aspects of intelligence, emotions, and will. This is true of both the good and evil angels. Good angels, Satan, and demons possess intelligence (Matt. 8:29; 2 Cor. 11:3; 1 Peter 1:12). Good angels, Satan, and demons show emotions (Luke 2:13; James 2:19; Rev. 12:17). Good angels, Satan, and demons demonstrate that they have wills (Luke 8:28-31; 2 Tim. 2:26; Jude 6). Therefore, they can be said to be persons. The fact that they do not have human bodies does not affect their being personalities (any more than it does with God).20

The fallen angels are even described by actions of personality like lying and sinning (John 8:44; 1 John 3:8-10). Some have considered angels, including Satan, as merely the abstract personification of good and evil, but such is not at all in keeping with the teaching of Scripture.

    Their Abilities and Powers

Their Knowledge: Jesus said, “But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone” (Matt. 24:36). This comment by the Lord suggest two things: (1) The phrase, “not even the angels” implies that angels have superhuman knowledge, but (2) the main statement of this verse shows they are limited in their knowledge, they are not omniscient. That their knowledge is greater is also suggested by the fact they were present at some of the heavenly counsels, were involved in conveying revelation (Gal. 3:19), and were used of God to interpret visions as with Daniel and Zechariah.

Ryrie suggests three reasons for their superior knowledge:

(1) Angels were created as a higher order of creatures in the universe than humans are. Therefore, innately they possess greater knowledge. (2) Angels study the Bible more thoroughly than some humans do and gain knowledge from it (James 2:19; Rev. 12:12). (3) Angels gain knowledge through long observation of human activities. Unlike humans, angels do not have to study the past; they have experienced it. Therefore, they know how others have acted and reacted in situations and can predict with a greater degree of accuracy how we may act in similar circumstances. The experiences of longevity give them greater knowledge.21

Their Strength: Since man is created lower than the angels with limitations angels do not have, we would expect them to possess superhuman strength as well. That angels have greater strength than man is evident from at least two considerations:

(1) Specific Statements in Scripture: Scripture specifically speaks of their greater power. Psalm 103:20 at least implies their greater strength in the statement, “Bless the Lord, O you his angels, you mighty ones who do his word.” Then, 2 Thessalonians 1:7 refers to the return of the Lord with His mighty angels in flaming fire. Further, 2 Peter 2:11 reads, “whereas angels who are greater in might and power do not bring a reviling judgment against them before the Lord.” The only question here is who is being compared? The major subject of the context is that of the false teachers (humans beings), however, due to verse 10, some believe the comparison is being made between the “angelic majesties” of verse 10, good angels and evil angels. If so, then the verse is stating that the good angels are more powerful than the evil ones.

(2) Their Activities as Described in Scripture: Though their great power is always a derived power from God, the mighty works they accomplish, as in the execution of God’s judgments, demonstrate their superhuman strength (cf. 2 Chron. 32:21; Acts 12:7-11; and the many references to angelic activities in Revelation). In this regard, Elisha’s confidence and prayer for his servant to see the myriad of angels surrounding them in the face of the human forces, suggests their greater power (2 Kings 6:15-17). His confidence was certainly not simply in their greater numbers. Illustrations of their power are seen in Acts 5:19; 12:7, 23; Matthew 28:2 (the stone rolled away by the angel weighed about 4 tons).

The Psalmist exclaimed, “Blessed be the LORD God, the God of Israel, Who alone works wonders” (Ps. 72:18). All miraculous power has its source in God. As angelic creatures, they are subject to the limitations of their creatureliness. They are mighty, but not almighty. Even Satan, a fallen angel, with his angelic powers must operate under the permissive will of God (Job 1:12; 2:6).

    Their Position
      In Regard to Man

By creation man is lower than the angels (Heb. 2:7-9). Angels are higher in intelligence, power, and movement, yet angels serve men as ministering spirits (Heb. 1:14) sent forth to serve the saints regardless of their high position and power. As mentioned, men are warned to never worship angels for they are only creatures.

Today believers are experientially lower than the angels, yet positionally higher because of their union in Christ (cf. Eph 1:20-22; with Eph 2:4-6 and Heb 2:9). Christians share Christ’s seat at God’s right hand. One day, however, believers will be both positionally and experientially higher and will judge angels (1 Cor 6:3). This undoubtedly refers to some kind of governmental direction believers will have over angels.

      With Reference to Christ

By His essential nature and being, Christ is higher because He is God the Creator (cf. Heb 1:4ff with Col. 1:15-17). By Christ’s incarnation He became lower for a little while (Heb 2:9), but this only applied to His humanity. By Christ’s death, burial, resurrection, and ascension He became far superior to angels as the last Adam and the second man (cf. 1 Cor. 15:45-48; Eph. 1:20-22; 1 Pet. 3:18-22; Col. 2:15). As the glorified and exalted God-man He became the last Adam. Adam was the head of the first race of men, but Christ became the head of the second race of regenerated men. He is called last because there will never be another fall, and because He, as the glorified and exalted Savior, is a life-giving Spirit. As the second man from heaven He is viewed as the head and beginning of a new and exalted race of people.

The Division of Angels—Good and Evil

While all the angels were originally created holy and without sin, there was a rebellion by Satan, who, being lifted up by his own beauty, rebelled and sought to exalt himself above God. In his rebellion, he took with him one-third of the angels (Rev. 12:4). This rebellion and fall is probably described for us in Isaiah 14:12-15 and Ezekiel 28:15 embodied in the kings of Babylon and Tyre.22 Prophesying of a future angelic conflict that will occur in the middle of the Tribulation, John wrote, “And there was war in heaven, Michael and his angels waging war with the dragon. And the dragon and his angels waged war” (Rev. 12:7). In other words, there are good angels and there are evil angels. Regarding their fall, Bushwell writes:

We infer that the angels which sinned did so in full knowledge of all the issues involved. They chose self-corruption, knowing exactly what they were doing. They sinned without remedy, and there is no atonement for them (II Peter 2:4; Jude 6). On the other hand, it seems that the holy angels, being faced with the same ethical choice and possessing the same God-given ability to choose, remained and are confirmed in their state of holiness. They have never known the experience of sin.23

As is clear from Revelation 12:7 and many other passages, the leader of these fallen angels, or demons as they are also called, is Satan (cf. Matt. 12:25-27). As the leader of these unholy angels, Satan is a liar, a murderer, and a thief (John 10:10). As God’s great antagonist, Satan hates God and His people and is constantly on the prowl like a roaring lion in search of those he may devour by his nefarious schemes (1 Peter 5:8). As an angelic being, Satan, along with his demon-like angels, is supernaturally powerfully and brilliant, and uses all his powers against humanity. Not only is he a liar, a thief, and a distorer, but one of his chief characterizations is deception. John describes him as the one “who deceives the whole world” (Revelation 12:9). In his cunning, he disguises himself as an angel of light (2 Cor. 11:14). In view of this, the Apostle Paul wrote, “Therefore it is not surprising if his servants also disguise themselves as servants of righteousness …” (2 Cor. 11:15).

The Organization of Angels

The Fact of Angelic Organization

While the Bible’s revelation on the organization of angels is rather meager, it says enough to show us there does seem to be organization in the angelic world. They appear to be organized into various ranks and orders and positions. This is suggested by the fact Michael is called the Archangel or chief angel (Jude 9). Then, in Daniel 10:13 he is called one of the chief princes. Other ranks and orders are suggested by the terms used of angels in Ephesians 3:10; 6:12, and 1 Peter 3:22. Ryrie writes:

The Scriptures speak of the “assembly” and “council” of the angels (Ps. 89:5, 7), of their organization for battle (Rev. 12:7), and of a king over the demon-locusts (9:11). They are also given governmental classifications which indicate organization and ranking (Eph. 3:10, good angels; and 6:12, evil angels). Unquestionably God has organized the elect angels and Satan has organized the evil angels.

A very important practical point emerges from this. Angels are organized; demons are organized; yet Christians, individually and in groups, often feel that it is unnecessary that they be organized. This is especially true when it comes to fighting evil. Believers sometimes feel that they can “go it alone” or expect victory without any prior, organized preparation and discipline. It is also true when it comes to promoting good. Believers sometimes miss the best because they do not plan and organize their good works.24

This is further supported by Jude’s statement regarding the angels who left their “domain” (NASB) or “positions of authority” (NIV) in Jude 6. “Domain” is the Greek arch, which can mean, “domain, rule, authority,” or “sphere of influence.”25

The Classifications of Angels

Paul Enns provides us with an excellent overview of most of the various rankings or classifications of the organized angelic world.

Angels who are governmental rulers. Ephesians 6:12 refers to “ranking of fallen angels”: rulers are “those who are first or high in rank”; powers are “those invested with authority”; world-forces of this darkness “expresses the power or authority which they exercise over the world”; spiritual forces of wickedness describes the wicked spirits, “expressing their character and nature.” Daniel 10:13 refers to the “prince of the kingdom of Persia” opposing Michael. This was not the king of Persia but rather a fallen angel under Satan’s control; he was a demon “of high rank, assigned by the chief of demons, Satan, to Persia as his special area of activity” (cf. Rev. 12:7).

Angels who are highest ranking. Michael is called the archangel in Jude 9 and the great prince in Daniel 12:1. Michael is the only angel designated archangel, and may possibly be the only one of this rank. The mission of the archangel is protector of Israel. (He is called “Michael your prince” in Dan. 10:21.) There were chief princes (Dan. 10:13), of whom Michael was one, as the highest ranking angels of God. Ruling angels (Eph. 3:10) are also mentioned, but no further details are given.

Angels who are prominent individuals. (1) Michael (Dan. 10:13; 12:1; Jude 9). The name Michael means “who is like God?” and identifies the only one classified as an archangel in Scripture. Michael is the defender of Israel who will wage war on behalf of Israel against Satan and his hordes in the Tribulation (Rev. 12:7–9). Michael also disputed with Satan about the body of Moses, but Michael refrained from judgment, leaving that to God (Jude 9). Jehovah’s Witnesses and some Christians identify Michael as Christ; this view, however, would suggest Christ has less authority than Satan, which is untenable.

(2) Gabriel (Dan. 9:21; Luke 1:26). His name means “man of God” or “God is strong.” “Gabriel seems to be God’s special messenger of His kingdom program in each of the four times he appears in the Bible record … He reveals and interprets God’s purpose and program concerning Messiah and His kingdom to the prophets and people of Israel.” In a highly significant passage, Gabriel explained the events of the seventy weeks for Israel (Dan. 9:21–27). In Luke 1:26–27 Gabriel told Mary that the One born to her would be great and rule on the throne of David. In Daniel 8:15–16 Gabriel explained to Daniel the succeeding kingdoms of Medo-Persia and Greece as well as the untimely death of Alexander the Great. Gabriel also announced the birth of John the Baptist to Zacharias (Luke 1:11–20).

(3) Lucifer (Isa. 14:12) means “shining one” or “star of the morning.” He may have been the wisest and most beautiful of all God’s created beings who was originally placed in a position of authority over the cherubim surrounding the throne of God.

Angels who are divine attendants. (1) Cherubim are “of the highest order or class, created with indescribable powers and beauty … Their main purpose and activity might be summarized in this way: they are proclaimers and protectors of God’s glorious presence, His sovereignty, and His holiness.” They stood guard at the gate of the Garden of Eden, preventing sinful man from entering (Gen. 3:24); were the golden figures covering the mercy seat above the ark in the Holy of Holies (Exod. 25:17–22); and attended the glory of God in Ezekiel’s vision (Ezek. 1). Cherubim had an extraordinary appearance with four faces—that of a man, lion, ox, and eagle. They had four wings and feet like a calf, gleaming like burnished bronze. In Ezekiel 1 they attended the glory of God preparatory for judgment.

(2) Seraphim, meaning “burning ones,” are pictured surrounding the throne of God in Isaiah 6:2. They are described as each having six wings. In their threefold proclamation, “holy, holy, holy” (Isa. 6:3), it means “to recognize God as extremely, perfectly holy. Therefore, they praise and proclaim the perfect holiness of God. The seraphim also express the holiness of God in that they proclaim that man must be cleansed of sin’s moral defilement before he can stand before God and serve Him.”26

Regarding the governmental rulers in the angelic world, Ryrie described this as follows:

1. Rulers or principalities. These words, used seven times by Paul, indicate an order of angels both good and evil involved in governing the universe (Rom. 8:38; Eph. 1:21; 3:10; 6:12; Col. 1:16; 2:10, 15).

2. Authorities or powers. This likely emphasizes the superhuman authority of angels and demons exercised in relation to the affairs of the world (Eph. 1:21; 2:2; 3:10; 6:12; Col. 1:16; 2:10, 15; 1 Peter 3:22).

3. Powers. This word underscores the fact that angels and demons have greater power than humans (2 Peter 2:11). See Ephesians 1:21 and 1 Peter 3:22.

4. Place of rule. In one place demons are designated as world rulers of this darkness (Eph. 6:12).

5. Thrones or dominions. This designation emphasizes the dignity and authority of angelic rulers in God’s use of them in His government (Eph. 1:21; Col. 1:16; 2 Peter 2:10; Jude 8).27

Some question whether the Seraphim and Cherubim are actually angels since they are never clearly identified as angels, but due to the nature of angels and their service as superhuman servants of God, this is the most logical place to classify them. It would be helpful to also consider Ryrie’s explanation of these angelic beings:

Cherubim: Cherubim constitute another order of angels, evidently of high rank since Satan was a cherub (Ezek. 28:14, 16). They seem to function as guardians of the holiness of God, having guarded the way to the tree of life in the Garden of Eden (Gen. 3:24). The use of cherubim in the decoration of the tabernacle and temple may also indicate their guarding function (Ex. 26:1ff.; 36:8ff.; 1 Kings 6:23-29). They also bore the throne-chariot which Ezekiel saw (Ezek. 1:4-5; 10:15-20). Some also identify the four living ones of Revelation 4:6 as cherubim, though others feel these represent the attributes of God. Representations of the cherubim will also be a part of the millennial temple (Ezek. 41:18-20).

Seraphim: All we know about this rank of angelic beings is found in Isaiah 6:2, 6. Apparently the seraphim were an order similar to the cherubim. They acted as attendants at the throne of God and agents of cleansing. Their duty also was to praise God. Their description suggests a six-winged humanlike creature. The word may be derived from a root meaning “to burn” or possibly from a root which means “to be noble.”28

Three other classification of angels remain:

    1. Elect Angels: In 1 Timothy 5:21, Paul speaks of “the elect angels.” These are the holy angels who are somehow included in the elect purposes of God. These are angels who did not follow after Satan in his rebellion. There is little revealed about their election, but apparently there was a probationary period for the angelic world and these, being the elect of God, remained faithful and are confirmed in their holy state in the service of the Lord. As Chafer writes, “The fall of some angels is no more unanticipated by God than the fall of man. It may be implied, also that angels have passed a period of probation.”29

    2. The Living Creatures: These are angelic creatures who seem to be involved with revealing the glory of the God of Israel in His omniscience, omnipotence, and omnipresence (Ezek. 1:5f; Rev. 4:6; 6:1). Ezekiel 10:15, 20 reveal them as cherubim. Through the four faces, they may also anticipate what God would do to bring salvation to man through His Son: (a) The face of the man suggests wisdom, compassion, intelligence and pictures Christ’s humanity as the Son of man, the special focus found in the gospel of Luke; (b) the face of a lion speaks of kingly appearance and pictures Christ as King which is Matthew’s emphasis; (c) the face of a bull or ox portrays a servant, the emphasis seen in Mark; and (d) the face of an eagle speaks of heavenly action and portrays the deity Christ, which is John’s emphasis.

    3. Watchers: “Watchers” is an Aramaic word which means, “vigilant, waking, watchful.” Verse 17 may infer this is a special type of angel (if a special class is intended). It seems to describe holy angels who are constantly vigilant to serve the Lord and who watch over the rulers of the world and the affairs of men (Dan. 4:13, 17, 23). The added description, “a holy one” in verse 13 may imply there are unholy watchers, i.e., demonic forces who are watching the affairs of men and seeking to influence and destroy.

Special Angels

    Angels Associated With the Tribulation

In Revelation a number of angels are specifically associated with certain judgments that will be poured out on the earth like the seven trumpets and the seven last plagues (Rev. 8-9; 16). In addition, some angels are related to special functions given to them, at least in these last days. There is the angel who has power over fire (Rev. 14:18), the angel of the waters (9:11), the angel of the abyss who will bind Satan (20:1-2).

    Angels Associated With the Church

In Revelation 2-3, each of the seven letters to the seven churches is addressed to “the angel of the church of …” In addition, they are each seen to be in the right hand of Christ in the vision of chapter one (Rev. 1:16, 20). However, since the term for angel means “messenger” and is also used of men, there is debate over whether these references refer to angelic beings or to the human leaders of the seven churches. It could refer to a guardian angel over these churches or to those men who function in the capacity of teachers of the Word, like the human pastors or elders.

The Ministry of Angels

The most basic characteristic of the good angels is seen in the way they are described in Hebrews 1:14 as ministering spirits and in the accounts of their many and varied activities of ministry as described in Scripture. Essentially, they function as priestly messengers (leitourgika pneumatata) in the temple-universe of God.30 From the account of their activities in the Bible, their service can be summarized as that of (1) the worship of God (Isa. 6:3; Rev. 4:8), (2) as messengers of God (Dan. 9:22; Luke 1:11, 26; 2:9; Rev. 1:1), (3) as soldiers in spiritual combat (Dan. 10:13f; Rev. 12:7), and (4) as ministers to God’s people (Heb. 1:14). Regarding their activity as ministering spirits, Bushwell comments:

The question may be asked, if we are not to worship the angels, or in any way pray to them, what is the value of the doctrine that they are “ministering spirits”? In answer we can say at least that the Scriptural teaching in regard to the ministry of the angels is a beautiful enrichment of our conception of God’s government of the world.31

As God’s celestial servants who carry out His purposes, we may observe that their ministry falls into several different relationships:32

In Relation to God: In their service to God, they are seen as attendants around His throne, waiting to serve Him and do His bidding (Ps. 103:20; Isa. 6:1f; Job 1:6; 2:1; Rev. 5:11; 8:1f), as worshippers in praise of Him (Isa. 6:3; Ps. 148:1-2; Heb. 1:6; Rev. 5:12), as observers who rejoice over what He does (Job 38:6-7; Luke 2:12-13; 15:10), as soldiers in battle with Satan (Rev. 12:7), and as instruments of His judgments (Rev. 7:1; 8:2).

In Relation to the Nations: In relation to the nation of Israel, Michael, the archangel, seems to have a very important ministry as their guardian (Dan. 10:13, 21; 12:1; Jude 9). In relation to other nations, they watch over rulers and nations (Dan. 4:17) and seek to influence their human leaders (Dan. 10:21; 11:1). In the Tribulation they will be the agents God uses to pour out His judgments (see Rev. 8-9 and 16).

In Relation to Christ: with the plan of God centering in the person of His Son, Jesus Christ, they naturally perform many services for the Savior.

  • In relation to His birth, they predicted it (Matt. 1:20; Luke 1:26-28) and then announced his birth (Luke 2:8-15). An angel warned Joseph to take Mary and the baby Jesus and flee into Egypt (Matt. 2:13-15), and an angel directed the family to return to Israel after Herod died (vv. 19-21).
  • In relation to His suffering, angels ministered to Him after His temptation (4:11), in His stress in the Garden of Gethsemane (Luke 22:43), and Jesus said He could have called a legion of angels who stood ready to come to His defense if He so desired (Matt. 26:53).
  • In relation to His resurrection, an angel rolled away the stone from the tomb (28:1-2), angels announced His resurrection to the women on Easter morning (vv. 5-6; Luke 24:5-7), and angels were present at His ascension and gave instruction to the disciples (Acts 1:10-11).
  • In relation to His coming again, the voice of the archangel will be heard at the translation of the church (1 Thess. 4:16), they will accompany Him in His glorious return to earth (Matt. 25:31; 2 Thess. 1:7) and they will separate the wheat from the tares at Christ’s second coming (Matt. 13:39-40).

In Relation to the Unrighteous: Angels not only announce and inflict judgment (Gen. 19:13; Rev. 14:6-7; Acts 12:23; Rev. 16:1), but they will separate the righteous from the unrighteous (Matt. 13:39-40).

In Relation to the Church: Hebrews 1:14 describes their ministry as “ministering spirits, sent out to render service for the sake of those who will inherit salvation.” In this, however, Scripture points to a number of specific ministries: they bring answers to prayer (Acts 12:5-10), they help in bringing people to the Savior (Acts 8:26; 10:3), they may encourage in times of danger (Acts 27:23-24), and they care for God’s people at the time of death (Luke 16:22).

In Relation to New Epochs: Ryrie points out that angels appear to be unusually active when God institutes a new epoch in the sweep of history and then outlines this for us:

A. They Joined in Praise When the Earth Was Created (Job 38:6-7)

B. They Were Involved in the Giving of the Mosaic Law (Gal. 3:19; Heb. 2:2)

C. They Were Active at the First Advent of Christ (Matt. 1:20; 4:11)

D. They Were Active During the Early Years of the Church (Acts 8:26; 10:3, 7; 12:11)

E. They Will Be Involved in Events Surrounding the Second Advent of Christ (Matt. 25:31; 1 Thes. 4:1)33

Of course, the ministry of angels occurred at other times, but the question naturally arises, especially in view of our present day fascination with angels, is there biblical evidence these varied ministries of angels continue to function in the present age of the church?

Whether angels continue to function in all these ways throughout the present age is uncertain. But they did perform these ministries and may well continue to do so even though we are not aware of them. Of course, God is not obliged to use angels; He can do all these things directly. But seemingly He chooses to employ the intermediate ministry of angels on many occasions. Nevertheless, the believer recognizes that it is the Lord who does these things whether directly through using angels (notice Peter’s testimony that the Lord delivered him from the prison though God actually used an angel to accomplish it, Acts 12:7-10 compared with vv. 11 and 17).

Perhaps an inscription I once saw in an old church in Scotland states the balance well.

“Though God’s Power Be Sufficient to Govern Us,
Yet for Man’s Infirmity He appointed His Angels to Watch over Us.”34

Hebrews 13:2 reads, “Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for by this some have entertained angels without knowing it” (NIV). Entertaining angels unawares brings to mind Abraham (Gen. 18:1ff.) and Lot (Gen. 19:1ff.), but even this statement does not prove angels function today as in Old and New Testament times. As Ryrie points out, ‘The word “angel” may refer to superhuman beings (see Gen. 18:1-8 for an example of such entertaining) or it may refer to a human being who is a messenger from God (see James 2:25 for an example of such entertaining).’35

Perhaps no aspect of their ministry to man is more talked about than the idea of “a guardian angel.” People often ask, “Does everyone have a guardian angel?” The concept that every person has a specific guardian angel is only by implication from the statement that angels do guard or protect as Psalm 91:11 declares. But this passage is directed to those who make the Lord their refuge.

The psalmist explained that no harm or disaster can befall those who have made the Lord their refuge (mahseh, “shelter from danger”; …) because He has commissioned angels to care for them. Angels protect from physical harm and give believers strength to overcome difficulties, pictured here as wild lions and dangerous snakes. Satan, in tempting Christ, quoted 91:11-12 (Matt. 4:6), which shows that even God’s most marvelous promises can be foolishly applied.36

Some would claim that this Old Testament passage should not be applied in modern times, but in Hebrews 1:14 the author of Hebrews does not seem to draw that distinction. That they are ministering spirits who minister to the saints is presented as a general truth of the Bible and should not be restricted to Bible times.

Surely it is comforting to know that God may protect, provide, and encourage us through His angels, but this fact does not always guarantee such deliverance, and certainly we should never presume on this provision of God. So having considered the various ways angels minister, we should keep in mind that God does not always deliver us from danger or supply our needs in miraculous ways whether by angels or by His direct intervention. For His own sovereign and wise purposes, the opposite is sometimes His will as life clearly illustrates and Scripture declares (see Heb. 11:36-40).

But there is another truth regarding angels that needs to be kept in view. Just as people usually do not think of the punitive ministry of angels, so people, in their popular ideas about angels, often ignore the Scripture’s teaching about the deception of Satan’s evil angels (2 Cor. 11:14-15). That society is ignorant of this is not without reason. The reason lies in Satan’s deception and in the vacuum of man’s heart as he continues to seek answers apart from God and Scripture’s revelation of God and His plan of salvation in Christ. As the arch deceiver and antagonist to God, to the church, and to mankind as whole, Satan is the master of disguise. Much of how society thinks today in its enchantment with angels is clearly a product of his masquerade as an angel of light with his angels who also disguise themselves in keeping with his purposes. Investigate what is being written in books and said in seminars and you will find numerous publications and teaching filled with what is nothing less than pure demonic deception. For more on this whole issue as it applies to today’s fascination with angels, see the study, “Angels, God’s Ministering Spirits” on our web page in the theology section.

The Watchfulness of Angels

The Fact of Their Watchfulness

Significantly, a number of passages speak of the angels as observers. Some are surprised by this truth, but the Bible teaches us that angels are spectators of God’s activities in the world and that they are especially keen on observing the unfolding of His plan of redemption. Since a number of passages specifically address the fact angels are spectators of what God does, we would be remiss to ignore this biblical truth for there is certainly a reason and a lesson to be learned from this (Job 38:7; Luke 15:10; 1 Cor. 4:9; 11:10; Eph. 3:10; Tim. 3:16; 1 Pet. 1:12).

The Objects of Their Watchfulness

As indicated previously, they observed God’s creation and rejoiced (Ps. 38:7). At seeing the birth of Christ, the angels rejoiced in praise to God (Luke 2:13-14) and they witnessed the entirety of Jesus’ life on earth (1 Tim. 3:16). They also observe God’s joy when a sinner repents (Luke 15:10).37 Angels are keenly interested in man’s salvation in Christ and carefully observe God’s manifold wisdom in the unfolding of His redemptive plan (1 Pet. 1:12; Eph. 3:10). In the statement, “things into which the angels long to look,” “things” are those things that belong to our salvation (vs. 10), and “long to look” is the same word used of the actions of John and Peter and Mary when they stooped down to peer into the empty tomb (Luke 24:12; John 20:5, 11). The verb, parakuptw, “to bend over,” conveys the idea of bending over to see something more clearly or to look intently (see also Jam. 1:24).

The Reasons for Their Watchfulness

    The Two Kingdoms and the Angelic Conflict

A question that naturally arises is why are angels so deeply interested and observant of what is happening on this earth? First, as holy creatures they are concerned for the worship and glory of God that is His due as the holy and infinite Creator. This is clearly evident in Isaiah 6:3 where, in antiphonal chorus, seraphim sing of God’s holiness, “Holy, Holy, Holy, is the Lord of hosts, The whole earth is full of His glory.” John states that in their devotion to God’s worship the living creatures never stop saying: “Holy, holy, holy is the Lord God Almighty, who was, and is, and is to come” (NIV). Their devotion to God’s glory becomes exceedingly prominent and specific in Revelation. In Revelation 4:8-11, their continuous praise evokes the praise of the twenty-four elders which is aimed at God’s worthiness as the Sovereign Creator. Then in chapter 5:8-14, angels, accompanied by the twenty-four elders (representatives of the church), direct their praise toward God’s gracious work of salvation through the Lamb in view of His worthiness to open the seven seals. He alone is found worthy to open the seven-sealed book and break its seals (cf. Rev. 5:1 with 5:9f).

Though we are not told the exact contents of the seven-sealed book, written inside and on the back, it undoubtedly contains the story of man’s loss of his lordship over the earth (Gen. 1:26) to Satan, the usurper, and its recovery through the God-man Savior, the Lion who is also the Lamb. This Lamb is alone able to accomplish what no one else in the universe is qualified and able to do. The following three truths form an important element of God’s revelation:

(1) God’s Purpose Declared: It was God’s intention that man would rule over this earth under God’s authority (Gen. 1:26; Ps. 8:4-6; Heb. 2:5-8a).

(2) God’s Purpose Delayed: Because of the fall, as recorded in Genesis 3, Satan wrested the rule away from man (cf. Heb. 2:5 with 2:8b). God’s intention was for man to rule over this earth, never angels, much less the fallen angels.

(3) God’s Purpose Fulfilled: But as promised in Genesis 3:15, the Lamb breaks Satan’s hold by means of His incarnation, sinless life, death, resurrection, ascension (see Heb. 2:9-14) and will one day recover that which was lost through the judgments of the seven seals as described in Revelation 6-19.

One of the key features of Revelation concerns the two kingdoms: the kingdom of the world (Satan’s kingdom) and the kingdom of God. The words “king, kings, kingdom,” etc., occur thirty times in twenty-five verses in this book. In view of the struggle between the two kingdoms, there is a joyous celebration of voices raised in heaven at the sounding of the seventh trumpet in anticipation of what the seventh trumpet would accomplish.38 This surely includes the holy angels:

Revelation 11:15 And the seventh angel sounded; and there arose loud voices in heaven, saying, “The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord, and of His Christ; and He will reign forever and ever.”

The issue of Satan’s rebellion to God’s authority may well explain Paul’s statement in 1 Corinthians 11:10 that a woman is to have a symbol of authority on her head because of the angels. This suggests that one of the areas angels observe is that of submission to authority. Submission glorifies God while rebellion dishonors God and promotes Satan’s goals. At the root of the angels’ keen interest in what God is doing today is the rebellion and fall of Satan. As observers, all the angels were present when Satan, in his quest to be like the Most High, sought to usurp God’s sovereign rule (see Isa. 14:12-15). This was an offense to the glory of God. It appears from Revelation 12:3-4 that one-third of the angelic hosts chose to follow Satan. Because of Satan’s sin, he was thrust out of his exalted place and became the great adversary of God and God’s people (see Ezek. 28:11-19).39 In addition, the Lord also explicitly tells us that the lake of fire was prepared for Satan and his angels (Matt. 25:41). Though a defeated foe (cf. Col. 2:15), Satan is not confined there now, but he and his fallen angels will be and this is a great point of anticipation in the Bible (cf. Rom. 16:20; Rev. 20:10).

    Satan’s Characterization as the Slanderer

An understanding of one of Satan’s names is helpful here and is loaded with implications. The term, devil, as used so often of Satan, means, “slanderer, defamer, one who accuses falsely.”40 This name reveals him in one of his key characterizations in Scripture. As “the slanderer,” he is one who defames the character of God and one of the ways he seeks to do this is by accusing believers (Rev. 12:10). The book of Job gives us a good illustration of his defaming accusations against believers and how, at the same time, he seeks to malign the character of God. When you read the first two chapters of Job, the true purpose of Satan’s accusations become quickly evident. Satan’s claim was that Job only worshipped God because of all God had given to him; it was not because Job loved God for who He was or because God deserved to be worshipped as the Holy and Sovereign Creator. Just take away all that he has and he will curse you, was the essence of Satan’s accusation (cf. Job 1:6-11; 2:1-6).

    Satan’s Characterization of God

From the Bible’s characterization of Satan as “adversary” (1 Pet. 5:8)41 and “the devil,”42 and from his activities as seen in Scripture, it seems only logical that Satan may have argued that God was unloving and that His judgment of Satan and his angels to the lake of fire was unfair and unjust. Shortly after the creation of Adam and Eve, the devil’s attack on the character of God as unfair becomes immediately evident in the slanderous nature of his questions and statements to Eve in the temptation (Gen. 3:1-5). So today, from a world that lies under his deception (see John 12:31; 16:11; Eph. 2:2; 2 Cor. 4:3-4), there is a common sentiment echoed among many who, rejecting God’s Word, may say, “The God of the Bible is vengeful. How could a loving God send people to hell? I refuse to believe in a God like that.”

    A Reason for Man

Part of the reason for man’s creation and for God’s plan of salvation in Christ is to demonstrate the truth of God’s character as wise, holy, just, loving, gracious, merciful, and good. In His holiness and justice, God had no other choice but to judge Satan and his angels to the lake of fire. The same is true with sinful man. But God is also merciful, gracious, and loving, so He provided a solution through the cross so that man could have eternal life. This gracious plan of love was not only anticipated in the Old Testament, but was actually first announced to the serpent (the devil in disguise) in Genesis 3:16, which is significant in view of the angelic conflict and the slanderous accusations of Satan. Man’s redemption and the recovery of paradise lost has always been based on what God would do through the seed of the woman, the Messiah Savior who would die as man’s substitute, but also defeat Satan and, by implication, demonstrate Satan’s slander as false (cf. Isa. 53; Rom. 3:21-26; Col. 2:10-15; Heb. 2:14-16).

The Scriptures disclose the truth that the angels learn much about God from His activities through the person and work of Christ and through the church, especially in the unfolding of God’s plan of redemption. Concerning the sufferings of Christ, the glories that will follow, and the things announced to believers through those who preached the gospel by the Holy Spirit, Peter declared, “things into which angels long to look” (see 1 Pet. 1:11-12). Then, along a similar line Paul wrote,

Ephesians 3:8-11 To me, the very least of all saints, this grace was given, to preach to the Gentiles the unfathomable riches of Christ, 9 and to bring to light what is the administration of the mystery which for ages has been hidden in God, who created all things; 10 in order that the manifold wisdom of God might now be made known through the church to the rulers and the authorities in the heavenly places. 11 This was in accordance with the eternal purpose which He carried out in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Consequently, the church becomes a means of unveiling both the manifold wisdom and grace of God to angels, for in Ephesians 2:4-7 Paul wrote:

But God, being rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us, 5 even when we were dead in our transgressions, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved), 6 and raised us up with Him, and seated us with Him in the heavenly places, in Christ Jesus, 7 in order that in the ages to come He might show the surpassing riches of His grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus.

Chafer quotes Otto Von Gerlach who pointed out:

By the revelation of Himself in Christ, by the institution of the Christian Church on earth, God after a manner hitherto unknown glorifies Himself before the heavenly principalities. They who until now had, filled with awe, been praising Him for the wonder of creation, now see His wisdom glorified in a new form in the Christian communion through the manifold ways by which lost men are saved. Entirely new and inexhaustible wealth of divine wisdom was manifested in redemption.43

    Victory Anticipated

Revelation 4-5 sets forth heaven’s perspective in preparation for the judgments that will follow on earth as described in chapters 6-19. It is these judgments that defeat Satan and his world system and establish God’s Son on His throne on earth. In these two chapters, however, there is a strong emphasis on the holiness of God, His worthiness to receive glory and honor, and on the worthiness of the Lamb, the Lord Jesus, to open and pour out the seals and to reign and receive glory and honor. And who are also prominent in these two chapters? The angels!

In view of this scenario, we can see why God’s holy angels are so keenly interested in our salvation because in it they observe the manifold wisdom, love, grace, and holiness of God (Eph. 3:10; 1 Pet. 1:12). This becomes even more of an issue when one considers the rebellion and accusations of Satan in light of the condescension of Christ whose entire life they witnessed (1 Tim. 3:16). To witness the submission and condescension of God incarnate, even to the death of the cross, was an awesome declaration of God’s character as holy and immutable.

What amazing condescension! Obeying his own law as if he were a mere creature, and in the attitude of a servant! This was new. They had seen him as the governor of the universe; but never till now as a subject! Encountering Satan in conflict and prolonged temptation! This was new.44

Think of this! They had seen Satan cast down from his exalted position and sentenced to the lake of fire because of his pride and rebellion, but in Christ’s incarnation and submissive life, even to the cross, they have the ultimate example of God’s holiness, love, grace, and mercy and the justness of Satan’s sentence.

But what about the fallen angels? Evidently, there was a time of grace and testing for the angels before Satan’s fall, but they now remain confirmed in their fallen state just as those who die without Christ will remain in their fallen state to face the Great White Throne Judgment and eternal separation from God.

The Angelic Conflict
and the Moral Problem of Evil

Understanding the above scenario provides us with part of the answer to the age old question of how a God who is good could permit evil, especially if He is omniscient and omnipotent. Contrary to Scripture, which declares the omnipotence and omniscience of God, some have sought to answer the problem by claiming that though God is good, He was helpless to stop evil from happening. Though it is only by implication, the Bible alone gives us an answer to the problem of evil, which lies, in part at least, in the angelic conflict briefly described in the preceding paragraphs. Certain things are basic to a discussion of this issue.

Scripture reveals God to be perfect in holiness, love, benevolence, grace, and mercy. This means God cannot do evil because evil is contrary to His Holy character. For instance, God cannot lie (Tit. 1:2). Further, He cannot tempt the creature to sin (Jam. 1:13). He cannot be the author of sin because He has judged all evil and to author sin would be contrary to His perfect justice and righteousness. God could not judge sin in the creature if He was the author of the creature’s sin. Therefore, though allowed by God, evil did not originate from God. It originated from something outside of God.

According to the Bible, the original human sin as recorded in Genesis 3 is not the first sin in the universe. The Bible reveals the moral problem is related to: (1) the fall of Satan and his angels into sin; (2) Satan’s characterization as the slandering adversary of God; (3) God’s purpose for man to rule on the earth with the loss of that rule through man’s temptation and fall into sin; and (4) man’s redemption and the recovery of that rule through the sinless God-man Savior who bore the penalty for our sin.

In the study of this moral problem certain facts emerge. It is clear that God in creating angels and men created them as moral creatures with the power of choice. The sin problem is present when a moral creature chooses sin instead of righteousness. This is the explanation for the fall of angels and the fall of men.45

Scripture’s revelation of Satan’s fall, man’s fall, and the ensuing angelic conflict envelops us in things far beyond our comprehension. Nevertheless, the Bible teaches that God created the angels and man. As suggested by the fellowship that can be observed in the Trinity between the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, God’s very being necessitated that He bring forth creatures for fellowship, but He did not create these creatures as robots who have no choice. There would be no fellowship or glory with a mechanical robot that had no choice. God gave both angels and human beings personalities with intellect, emotion, and volition. By the exercise of this personality, both mankind and angels could have fellowship with God and bring glory to Him. But, though created perfect and without sin, freedom of choice also meant the possibility, known from eternity by God, that Satan and mankind could choose against God, which both did. So why did God allow it? Perhaps the answer lies in the aftermath of sin since God’s glory is displayed even more. Just as nothing displays the splendor of a diamond in the light more than a backdrop of black velvet, so nothing could display the glory of God’s mercy, goodness, grace, and love as much as the blackness of man’s sin.

Because this perplexes the human mind, many reject the whole idea of God or postulate weakness to God or in some way find fault with God. But the Bible has some important words of warning regarding such a response and the story of Job, his trials, the activity of Satan and the good angels as mentioned in Job are instructive here. The book of Job is significant to questions regarding the moral problem of evil and the presence of suffering because of the insight it gives us into the adversarial activity of Satan and the activities of angels called “sons of God” (see Job 1:6-13; 2:1-7; 38:4-6).

Angels are mentioned as present and giving praise to God when God created the earth (Job 38:7), but in Job 1:6 and 2:1, the “sons of God” appear before God, undoubtedly as His attendants and submissive servants in adoration and praise of the Almighty. But then Satan is suddenly introduced into the picture as the slandering accuser. Though the specific reason for Satan’s appearance is not stated, the questions God asks of Satan makes the reason clear. He is there to carry on his slanderous activity in his ongoing conflict against the character of God.

Briefly, then, what the Bible teaches us about Satan and sin and suffering provides us with an answer to this moral dilemma. The book of Job with its revelation about Satan, the angels, Job’s trials and his responses to his suffering add important insight to our understanding and response to the moral problem of evil.

Job was a man who suffered tremendously. His losses and pain were awful. So along came three friends who sought to counsel him, but with friends like these, who needs enemies? In essence, their counsel was that his suffering was caused by sin. And, of course, sometimes that is the cause of suffering, but personal sin is only one of the reasons Scripture gives for suffering. In the process of Job’s dialogue with his three friends, Job sought to vindicate himself against their accusations. He sought to show he was innocent of any wrong that had caused his pain. And in essence, he was. But as this dialogue and Job’s suffering continued over a prolonged period, Job began to become angry with God and he developed a demanding spirit. This seems evident by God’s words to Job seen in chapters 38-40, but especially in the following verses:

Job 38:2-4 Who is this that darkens counsel By words without knowledge? 3 Now gird up your loins like a man, And I will ask you, and you instruct Me! 4 Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? Tell Me, if you have understanding,

In other words, how absurd to think that a creature should become the critic of the Creator or of what He is doing as the Sovereign Lord of the universe. The next two chapters, then, develop this theme of God’s wisdom and power.

Job 40:1-2 Then the LORD said to Job, “Will the faultfinder contend with the Almighty? Let him who reproves God answer it.”

Job then answered and said,

Job 40:4-5 Behold, I am insignificant; what can I reply to You? I lay my hand on my mouth. 5 Once I have spoken, and I will not answer; Even twice, and I will add no more.

Though this was a start in the right direction, it is clear from what followed that Job was humbled but not yet repentant so God questioned him further. Why? May I suggest that when Job criticized God’s ways or became demanding toward God he was in effect following in the footsteps of Satan in both finding fault and usurping God’s position as governor of the world. In the next paragraph (vss. 6-14), one full of irony, God asks if Job can really perform those things that only God is able to do. Note verses 7-9:

Job 40:7-9. Then the LORD answered Job out of the storm, and said, 7 “Now gird up your loins like a man; I will ask you, and you instruct Me. 8 Will you really annul My judgment? Will you condemn Me that you may be justified? 9 Or do you have an arm like God, And can you thunder with a voice like His?”

Though the problem of evil and Satan baffles the human mind, only God’s Word gives us a reasonable explanation as to the cause, course, and ultimate destiny of evil. Our need is to recognize that God is not only sovereign and infinitely wise, but submit in faith to the plan of God. The book of Revelation, a book filled with references to angels, gives us the end result—the final defeat of sin, death, and Satan with his fallen angels, and with paradise regained. Then God will wipe away every tear and the universe will know permanent joy and peace beyond our wildest dreams.

The very nature of the complexity of creation not only demands an adequate cause, a Creator, but it demonstrates His infinite wisdom and power (Ps. 19:1-6; Rom. 1:18-21). God is infinitely wise. He is the omniscient One in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge. And though God has revealed some things to us, He has obviously left much that is not revealed. We would simply not have the ability to grasp it in our present state (cf. Deut. 29:29). Regardless, it is vital for faith and practice that we come to the point where we not only recognize our thoughts and ways are far different from His, but that in faith we accept what He has revealed. Note the focus in the passage below.

Isaiah 55:6-9 Seek the Lord while He may be found; Call upon Him while He is near. 7 Let the wicked forsake his way, And the unrighteous man his thoughts; And let him return to the Lord, And He will have compassion on him; And to our God, For He will abundantly pardon. 8 “For My thoughts are not your thoughts, Neither are your ways My ways,” declares the Lord. 9 “For as the heavens are higher than the earth, So are My ways higher than your ways, And My thoughts than your thoughts.”

Does this mean we should not ask questions and look for answers to the mysteries of the universe? Of course not. But where God has given us revelation or where we find God’s answers in the Bible, whether by explicit statement or by strong implicit arguments, our need is to humbly submit to what it teaches and put the things that still perplex us on the top shelf for later understanding. This, of course, is the crucial issue. What does the Bible really teach on any of these questions? Our tendency is to look at the Bible’s answers through human reason and logic. Then, when it seems contrary to human reason, our tendency is to reject it or at least question it or twist the truth to suit our human logic. For instance, the doctrine of the trinity is not explicitly taught in the Bible, but it is clearly taught implicitly in Scripture. Other doctrines, like the incarnation, are beyond our ability to grasp but it is a doctrine explicitly stated in the Bible. So Isaiah wrote, “But to this one I will look, To him who is humble and contrite of spirit, and who trembles at My word” (Isa. 66:3b).

Lessons From the Angels

A study of the angels, both good and bad, furnishes us with a number of lessons as to how we should and should not live both negatively and positively. The apostle Paul provides a precedent for this in his warning regarding selecting novices for elders in 1 Timothy 3:6-7.

Negative Lessons

Satan, as the anointed cherub, was not only created perfect, but he was exceedingly beautiful. His high position and beauty, of course, were the products of God’s grace and creative powers, not Satan’s. Nevertheless, he became puffed up with pride over his own beauty and power. He forgot his creatureliness and wanted to become like God (cf. Ezek. 28:11-15; Isa. 14:12-13). For his pride and rebellion, he was judged and cast from his exalted position as the anointed cherub and sentenced to the lake of fire, the place of his eventual doom. As such, Satan not only becomes the classic illustration of the temptation and foolishness of pride in the creature, but pride becomes one of his chief snares by which he seeks to cause trouble among the people of God who are so prone to become puffed up over their own abilities or roles or over the abilities and roles of others, all of which are gifts of God. In view of this ever present danger, Paul warned against selecting a new convert to a position of authority, “lest he become conceited and fall into the condemnation incurred by the devil. And he must have a good reputation with those outside the church, so that he may not fall into reproach and the snare of the devil” (1 Tim. 3:6-7).

Satan and his fallen angels also warn us against the evil nature and the dangers of rebellion in contrast with submission and obedience. Perhaps there is no place where this is more clearly stated than in 1 Samuel 15:22-23. Here the seriousness of disobedience (vs. 22), which is essentially defined as rebellion (vs. 23), is underscored by the comparisons made to divination and idolatry. Samuel compares it to divination (Hebrew, qesem, a general term for various occult practices or spiritism. For some of the various forms of divination see Deuteronomy 18:10-11.). Divination like idolatry is demonic (see 1 Cor. 10:19-22). Behind the occult and idolatry is the work of Satan, the rebel of rebels.

Ultimately, Satan and his evil angels, the demons, furnish examples of all that is evil along with the hideous consequences of evil. Satan is a rebel, a liar, a murderer, a deceiver, a slanderer, a tempter, a distorter, and one who opposes all that is good, righteous, and holy. As a murderer from the beginning and the father of lies (John 8:44) who tempted Eve in Eden, he ultimately becomes the father of all that is evil.

This, of course, does not abdicate man from his responsibility to choose what is good nor can we blame Satan for our own sin, though he is always on the prowl to promote sin and to deceive and tempt us. Though Satan tempts us constantly, our temptation to sin ultimately stems from our own lusts that wage war in our souls (Jam. 1:14; 1 Pet. 2:11; Eph. 2:3).

Positive Lessons

The many references to God’s holy angels in the Bible are chiefly records of their many activities, but two things quickly standout. They are constantly seen in the activities of worshipful adoration of God and in humble service, totally submissive to the will of God. If these celestial beings, with all their strength, holiness, and knowledge of God are so committed, should they not be a motivation and an example to us?

It was after Isaiah saw the holy seraphim in worship and humility (suggested by the covering of their feet) exalting the Lord, that he then saw and confessed his own sinfulness and became a willing servant. It was then, in answer to the Lord’s question, “Whom shall I send?” that the prophet said, “Here am I, send me” (see Isa. 6:1-8). Following the joyous news of Messiah’s birth, the experience of seeing Jesus in Bethlehem, and hearing the heavenly hosts of angels praising God, it was the shepherds who, following the example of the angels, went back “glorifying and praising God for all that they had heard and seen, just as had been told them” (Luke 2:20).

A consciousness of the reality of the vast hosts of angelic being—the benefit derived from the good, and the opposition of the bad—can be gained only through meditation upon the Scriptures that record these truths, and through prayer.46


1 William Evans, The Great Doctrines of the Bible, Moody Press, Chicago, 1912, p. 215.

2 Charles C. Ryrie, Basic Theology, Victor Books, Wheaton, IL, 1987, chapter 17, electronic media.

3 Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, 1983, p. 434.

4 “Kindred Spirit,” a quarterly publication of Dallas Theological Seminary, Summer 1995, pp. 5-7.

5 Gangel, p. 5.

6 Gangel, p. 7.

7 For an excellent discussion and support for this view, see Deffinbaugh’s study on Genesis 6 in his study of the book of Genesis on our web site.

8 The Bible Knowledge Commentary, OT, John F. Walvoord, Roy B. Zuck, Editors, Victor Books, Electronic Media.

9 Lewis Sperry Chafer, Systematic Theology, Vol. 2, Kregel Publications, 1993, p. 3.

10 The Bible Knowledge Commentary, NT, John F. Walvoord and Roy B. Zuck, Editors, Victor Books, 1983, electronic media.

11 Lewis Sperry Chafer, Lewis Sperry Chafer Systematic Theology, Vol. 1, Part 3, Abridged Edition, John F. Walvoord, Editor, Donald K. Campbell, Roy B. Zuck, Consulting Editors, Victor Books, Wheaton, Ill., 1988, p. 284.

12 Ryrie, p. 159.

13 Frank E. Gaebelein, General Editor, The Expositors’ Bible Commentary, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, electronic media, 1997.

14 Paul Enns, The Moody Handbook of Theology, Moody Press, Chicago, 1996, electronic media.

15 Erickson, p. 439.

16 Erickson, p. 440.

17 Ryrie, p. 124.

18 Lewis Sperry Chafer, Systematic Theology, Vol. 2, Kregel Publications, 1993, p. 8.

19 Gabelein, Expositor’s Bible Commentary, electronic media.

20 Ryrie, p. 125.

21 Ryrie, p. 125.

22 The terms and descriptions given there certainly go far beyond that of any human monarch. Further, other passages clearly teach us that there are often angelic or demonic forces behind the reign of human kings or kingdoms (cf. Dan. 10; and Eph. 6:10-12).

23 James Oliver Bushwell Jr., A Systematic Theology of the Christian Religion, Vol. 1, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, 1962, p. 134.

24 Ryrie, p. 128.

25 Walter Bauer, Wilbur F. Gingrich, and Frederick W. Danker, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979, electronic media.

26 Paul Enns, The Moody Handbook of Theology, Chicago, Ill.: Moody Press, 1996.

27 Ryrie, p. 129.

28 Ryrie, pp. 129-130.

29 Chafer, p. 17.

30 Ryrie, p. 131.

31 James Oliver Bushwell Jr., A Systematic Theology of the Christian Religion, Vol. 1, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, 1962, p. 133.

32 The material covering the ministry of angels in their various relationships is adapted from Ryries, Basic Theology, pp. 131-132.

33 Ryie, p. 131.

34 Ryrie, p. 133.

35 Charles Caldwell Ryrie, Ryrie Study Bible, Expanded Edition, Moody Press, Chicago, 1995, p. 1964.

36 The Bible Knowledge Commentary, OT, John F. Walvoord, Roy B. Zuck, Editors, Victor Books, 1983, 1985, electronic media.

37 The main point of verse 10 is that there is great joy in heaven (cf. vs. 7) when a sinner repents. Some would argue that the text does not say that angels rejoice, only that there is joy in their presence. They observe God’s joy, but surely, angels who are devoted to God’s will, also rejoice as we see them praising God in Luke 2 at the birth of Christ.

38 The seven trumpets proceed out of the seven seals and immediately following this final trumpet are the seven bowl judgments that result in Christ’s return to earth, defeat of Satan’s kingdom, and the establishment of Christ’s rule on earth.

39 “This section, with its superhuman references, apparently describes someone other than the human king of Tyre, namely, Satan. If so, Satan's unique privileges before his fall are described in verses 12-15 and the judgment on him in verses 16-19. You had the seal of perfection (v. 12). I.e., Satan was the consummation of perfection in his original wisdom and beauty.” (Charles Caldwell Ryrie, Ryrie Study Bible, Expanded Edition, Moody Press, Chicago, 1995, p. 1306).

40 Greek, diabolos, “an accuser, a slanderer,” from diabollw, “to accuse, malign.”

41 “Adversary,” the Greek antidikos, was used of a legal adversary, “an opponent in a lawsuit.”

42 For more details on Satan, his origin, titles, etc., see the doctrine of Satanology on our web site.

43 Chafer, p. 25.

44 Chafer, p. 22, cites Dr. William Cooke, Christian Theology, pp. 622-23.

45 Lewis Sperry Chafer, Lewis Sperry Chafer Systematic Theology, Vol. 1, Abridged Edition, John F. Walvoord, Editor, Donald K. Campbell, Roy B. Zuck, Consulting Editors, Victor Books, Wheaton, Ill., 1988, p. 289.

46 Chafer, p. 27.

Related Topics: Angelology

CNET音响版(由朱小奇朗读)

CNET音响版(由朱孝慈朗读)

 
NET Bible全名是New English Translation Bible (新英語譯本)。縮寫的NET 也代表互聯網, 故下稱網英。CNET是 (網英的中譯本)下稱網中, 。NET 和 CNET 的版權均屬於 Bible Studies Press (或稱Bible.org)。
 
網英是由二十多位聖經學者在1995 年開始,將全本聖經從希伯來文本、亞蘭文本、希臘文本,重新譯成英語。網英的創始版和首版分別在1999 年和2009 年面世。網英的獨特性在它的詳細註解--全書共有六萬多註解。註解分為三大類:
(1) 譯者註 (tn)。這是從原文的字義文義的角度,寫下翻譯過程中譯者們對每字每句的推敲斟酌,並附以其他英譯本的翻譯為參考。
(2) 研讀註 (sn)。這些是深研治學精神的註解,客觀地列出不同的見解及出處 。
(3) 古卷註 (tc)。指出眾手鈔古卷出入之處,並附以各英譯本因採納不同古卷而有的不同思路。
 
網中的經文部份主要以和合本為基礎,只在幾方面稍作修改。原因是和合本是近百年來最被接納的中文聖經, 譯者只希望能指出有其他譯法, 以供參考。更改範圍有三:
(1)和合本措詞與網英不同時,改為網英的字眼,以便配入註解。
(2) 文字的古意與今意不同時改為今意,有些對白稍改為生動化的今日語氣。
(3) 度量衡單位改用公制 (網英本用英制), 原制及英制加入註解中。註解部份, 網中將三類註解合併為一; 研讀註全部翻譯, 譯者註和中文文法無關部份從略, 古卷註絕少譯出。此外, 譯者自知才具有限, 翻譯上恐辭不達意而曲解經文, 故置英語原詞於括號內, 以備參考。
 
網中是德仁文化文流中心和Bible.org 合作翻譯而成, 從2004年開始至2011年完成首版。2015 年年底網英完成第二版, 目前無計劃印刷, 只以電子版面世。網中第二版亦在2016年四月完成, 也只是提供電子版。中英對照版可瀏覽 NET.BIBLE.ORG 網站。
 
順便一提, 該網站各類參考文章, 在非商業性使用下, 歡迎下載採用。若有文章需要翻譯, 請與本會(BIBLE.ORG) 接洽。
 
 
◎編按
CNET (網中)的經文已上架,但六萬多註解,正在施工中。CNET 亦授權信望愛網站朗讀,目前由義工朱孝慈進行。請各位為她禱告。求上帝給她夠用的恩典與能力。

Women's Leadership Team

Welcome to the Women's Ministry of Bible.org. The mission of Bible.org Women is to provide trustworthy resources, proven training materials and biblical encouragement to women so that they walk more closely with God and expand their influence for Christ. In this area you'll find great resources in the areas of: Bible Study, A Woman's Life, Personal Growth and more.

Women's Leadership Team     Engage Blog Authors


Sue Bohlin

Sue Bohlin is a speaker/writer and webmistress for Probe Ministries, a Christian organization that helps people to think biblically. She loves teaching women and laughing, and if those two can be combined, all the better. She also loves speaking for MOPS (Mothers of Pre-Schoolers) and Stonecroft Ministries (Christian Women's Clubs) on the topic How to Handle the Things You Hate But Can't Change, based on her lifelong experience as a polio survivor. She has a freelance calligraphy business in her home studio; hand lettering was her "Proverbs 31 job" while her children were young. Sue also serves on the board of Living Hope Ministries, a Christ-centered organization that helps people struggling with unwanted homosexuality and the family members of those with same-sex attractions. Sue never met a cruise ship she didn't like, especially now that God has provided a travel scooter for getting around any ship! She is happily married to Dr. Ray Bohlin, vice-president of Probe Ministries, and they have two grown sons.

Ann Golding

Ann Golding

Ann Golding is a graduate of Baylor University and Dallas Theological Seminary. Ann has a passion for coming alongside others in times of grief and crisis and has written a curriculum titled “The Ministry of Presence” which she has been teaching since 2003. Ann has Clinical Pastoral Education training from Methodist Hospital System, Dallas; Victim Relief Chaplain’s Association Certification; Dallas Police Department Volunteer Chaplaincy training and has worked as a volunteer chaplain at DFW Airport Interfaith Chaplain’s Office. Ann also enjoyed several years in Bible Study Fellowship in various capacities. She has recently worked for RREACH ministries as a program developer and Global Proclamation Academy coordinator. Currently she is enjoying serving as the chair for Association of Women in Ministry Professions, and employing her passion at UTSW Clements Hospital as a volunteer chaplain.

Ann loves spending time with her family: husband Steve, son Garrett and wife Elizabeth, daughter Mallory and her husband Brian, and especially her first grandchild Quinn Rebecca.

Gwynne Johnson

Gwynne Johnson currently serves on the Board of Entrust, Inc., an international education and training mission where she authored the Entrust curriculum, Developing a Discerning Heart. She recently served as Co-Chair of the training project, Christian Women in Partnership, Russia and as Senior Director of Women's Ministry at Stonebriar Community Church in Frisco, Texas. Gwynne has a M.A. in Biblical Studies from Dallas Theological Seminary.

She currently lives in Huntsville, Texas with her husband of 58 years, Don. She works part-time in her daughter and granddaughter's bakery "The Best Box Ever," where she gets paid in cookies.

Dianne Miller

Pursuing her life passion to teach the Word of God, train leaders and connect people in community, Dianne Miller has dedicated years as a teaching leader in Bible Study Fellowship as well as directing Women’s Ministries at the Church of the Apostles in Atlanta, Georgia and Northwest Bible Church, Dallas, Texas. Most recently, she was the Minister of Community at Northwest. She earned a Master in Biblical Studies from Dallas Theological Seminary. Dianne celebrates 45 years of marriage to her husband Brad. They have three children: Carrie who is married to Michael, Matt who is married to Bess, and Brent who is married to Shea. Her greatest joy is her seven grandchildren, Olivia, Hammer, Raleigh, Madeleine, Morgan, Connell, and Lelia.

Karla Zazueta

Karla D. Zazueta is an architect-turned-discipleship-leader serving at Stonebriar Community Church (Spanish Ministries) in Frisco, Texas. She loves all things Guatemalan—coffee, cookies, and especially engagement rings. God used her itch for international travel to turn her surrendered single life into one of marriage and ministry. She sums up her and her husband’s love story in this way: “I got engaged in Guatemala to a Mexican I met in Israel.” Many countries visited and several years later, she is now a Spanish language student, Hispanic pastor’s wife, natural wellness teacher, writer, and mother to two furry felines.

Karla has a M.A. in Christian Leadership from Dallas Theological Seminary and a B.S. in Architectural Studies from Southern Illinois University. She is the author of Discipleship for Hispanic Introverts and was a featured contributor in the Fall 2015 Issue of DTS Magazine with the article, “From the Garden to the Garden: Tracing Our Sobremesa through the Bible.”

Esperança

Related Media

Introdução

Existem muitos termos e conceitos-chave na Escritura, tais como fé, esperança, amor, alegria, graça, paz, agradar ao Senhor, etc., com os quais nos cruzamos à medida que lemos as nossas Bíblias, mas, com frequência, não passam de conceitos vagos para muitas pessoas. O estudo seguinte destina-se a providenciar uma explicação bíblica condensada acerca da esperança, tal como é encontrada na Palavra de Deus. Conforme o tempo permitir, disponibilizaremos outros estudos condensados em relação a termos-chave, especialmente do Novo Testamento. 

Uma Definição de Esperança

O que é a esperança? Será um “talvez” fraco ou um tipo de optimismo inseguro? A ideia moderna de esperança é “querer, esperar, mas sem certeza de concretização; desejar muito, mas sem garantia real de obter o que se deseja”.

Na Escritura, de acordo com os termos hebraicos e gregos traduzidos pela palavra “esperança” e com a utilização bíblica respectiva, a esperança é uma indicação de certeza. Na Escritura, “esperança” significa “uma expectativa forte e confiante”. Embora este sentido seja arcaico nos termos modernos, a esperança equivale a confiar e a uma expectativa confiante.

A esperança pode referir-se à actividade de esperar ou ao objecto esperado – o conteúdo da esperança de alguém. Através da sua própria natureza, a esperança realça duas coisas: (a) carácter futuro, e (b) invisibilidade. Lida com coisas que não conseguimos ver, que não recebemos ou com ambas.

Romanos 8:24-25 Porque na esperança é que fomos salvos. Mas a esperança que se vê não é esperança, pois aquilo que alguém vê, como é que o espera ainda? 25 Mas, se esperamos o que não vemos, com paciência o esperamos.

Em termos bíblicos, da perspectiva do objecto esperado, a esperança é sinónima de salvação e suas múltiplas bênçãos – passadas, presentes e futuras –, conforme prometido na Escritura. Isto também é verdade em relação ao que já recebemos enquanto crentes, porque tais bênçãos estão contidas na categoria daquilo que não conseguimos ver. Podemos contemplar alguns dos resultados, mas tal também requer fé e esperança. Por exemplo, não vemos a obra justificadora de Deus, a imputação de Cristo por nossa causa, a presença interior do Espírito Santo quando somos salvos nem a nossa co-união com Cristo. Acreditamos que estas coisas são reais, mas trata-se de uma questão de esperança pessoal. Cremos no testemunho de Deus na Palavra e esperamos os resultados nas nossas vidas.

Em resumo, a esperança é a expectativa confiante, a certeza segura de que aquilo que Deus prometeu na Palavra é verdadeiro, aconteceu ou irá acontecer, de acordo com a Sua Palavra certa. 

Uma Descrição da Esperança

É Dinâmica ou Activa

Na Bíblia, a esperança nunca é uma coisa estática ou passiva. É dinâmica, activa, directiva e sustém a vida. Isto torna-se óbvio à medida que lemos a Palavra. Pegue num índice, procure a palavra “esperança” e encontrará, referência após referência, serem indicados os resultados activos da esperança nas vidas daqueles que verdadeiramente têm uma esperança bíblica e vivem de modo concordante.

Por outras palavras, a esperança bíblica não é uma fuga da realidade ou dos problemas. Não nos deixa ociosos, à deriva ou a baloiçar no alpendre. Se a nossa esperança é bíblica e baseada nas promessas de Deus, levar-nos-á a agir.

Tem Resultados

(1) Muda a forma como nos vemos. Transforma-nos em peregrinos, pessoas que vêem esta vida como uma estadia temporária.

2 Pedro 1:13 Tenho por meu dever, enquanto estiver neste tabernáculo, manter-vos vigilantes, com as minhas admoestações,

1 Pedro 2:11 Caríssimos, rogo-vos que, como estrangeiros e peregrinos, vos abstenhais dos desejos da carne, que combatem contra a alma.

(2) Muda aquilo que valorizamos. A esperança, se bíblica, foca a nossa mente nas coisas do Céu, em detrimento das coisas terrenas. Aqui, as palavras de Nosso Senhor destroem as nossas ilusões.

Mateus 6:19-21 Não acumuleis tesouros na terra, onde a ferrugem e a traça os corroem e os ladrões arrombam os muros, a fim de os roubar. 20 Acumulai tesouros no Céu, onde nem a traça nem a ferrugem os corroem nem os ladrões arrombam os muros, a fim de os roubar. 21 Pois, onde estiver o teu tesouro, aí estará também o teu coração.

(3) Afecta o que fazemos com as nossas vidas – os nossos talentos, tempo, tesouros.

Tito 2:1-13 Quanto a ti, ensina o que é conforme à sã doutrina. 2 Os anciãos devem ser sóbrios, graves, prudentes, firmes na fé, na caridade e na paciência. 3 Do mesmo modo, as anciãs devem mostrar no seu exterior uma compostura santa; não devem ser maldizentes nem dadas ao vinho, mas devem dar bons conselhos, 4 a fim de ensinarem as jovens a amar os seus maridos e filhos, 5 a serem prudentes e honestas, cuidadosas da casa, bondosas e submissas a seus maridos, para que a palavra de Deus não seja desacreditada. 6 Exorta também os jovens a que sejam moderados. 7 E tu serve de exemplo em tudo, pelo teu bom comportamento, pureza de ensinamentos, gravidade, 8 e por uma linguagem sensata e irrepreensível, para que os nossos adversários sejam confundidos por não terem mal algum a dizer de nós. 9 Exorta os servos a serem obedientes aos seus senhores. Que procurem agradar-lhes em tudo e que não os contradigam 10 nem os defraudem, mostrando-se fiéis em tudo, para que em tudo honrem a doutrina de Deus, nosso Salvador. 11 A graça de Deus, fonte de salvação, manifestou-se a todos os homens, 12 ensinando-os a renunciar à impiedade e aos desejos mundanos, a fim de que vivamos no século presente com toda a sobriedade, justiça e piedade, 13 aguardando a bem-aventurada esperança e a vinda gloriosa do grande Deus e Salvador nosso, Jesus Cristo.

1 João 3:1-3 Vede com que amor nos amou o Pai, ao querer que fôssemos chamados filhos de Deus. E, de facto, somo-lo! Por isso, o mundo não nos conhece, porque não O conheceu a Ele. 2 Caríssimos, agora somos de Deus, e ainda não se manifestou o que havemos de ser. Mas sabemos que, quando Ele Se manifestar, seremos semelhantes a Ele, porque O veremos como Ele é. 3 E todo o que n’Ele tem esta esperança, purifica-se a si mesmo, como também Ele é puro.

A vida cristã, quando compreendida de acordo com a verdade de Deus, é uma obsessão magnífica com uma esperança eterna, uma esperança que não conduz a uma atitude escapista, mas sim à busca da vida numa dimensão completamente nova. Faz-nos ser optimistas, como se pode dizer hoje em dia, relativamente às potencialidades desta vida como comissários de Deus. Dá-nos poder para vivermos corajosamente, para sermos tudo o que Deus nos chamou a ser em Cristo.

Assim, por que optamos tão rapidamente pelos tesouros terrenos e nos mostramos tão lentos a ficarmos obcecados com os tesouros celestes? Talvez seja porque não acreditamos nas realidades celestiais. Estas representam um cliché celestial nas nossas mentes, mas nada mais.1 Compreenda que, nas palavras de Pedro, só a pessoa que acredita nesta esperança celeste e está tão focada nela é que é capaz de ter uma afeição tão leve pelas coisas deste mundo que consegue pôr as coisas mais importantes em primeiro lugar.

Por outras palavras, a esperança bíblica não é uma fuga da realidade ou dos problemas. Não nos deixa ociosos, à deriva ou a baloiçar no alpendre. Se a nossa esperança é bíblica e não apenas um cliché celestial ou semelhante ao sinal “em caso de emergência, parta o vidro”, vai levar-nos a agir.

Mas, ao ser dinâmica, a esperança também tem outras características:

Traz Recompensas e Bênçãos

(1) Dá-nos alegria e paz.

Romanos 15:13 Que o Deus da esperança vos encha plenamente de alegria e de paz na vossa crença, para que abundeis na esperança, pela virtude do Espírito Santo.

Romanos 5:2 pelo Qual temos acesso, pela fé, a esta graça, na qual permanecemos e também nos gloriamos, apoiados na esperança da glória de Deus.

(2) Dá-nos protecção.

Salmo 33:18 Eis que os olhos do Senhor estão sobre os que O temem, sobre os que esperam na Sua misericórdia;

(3) Dá-nos força, coragem, audácia.

Salmo 31:24 Sede corajosos e valentes no vosso coração, todos quantos esperais no Senhor.

(4) Dá-nos resistência, conforto, confiança na hora da morte.

1 Tessalonicenses 4:13 Não queremos, irmãos, que ignoreis coisa alguma a respeito dos mortos, para não vos entristecerdes como os outros, que não têm esperança.

(5) Dá-nos confiança no ministério.

1 Timóteo 4:10 Se nos afadigamos e recebemos ultrajes, é porque pomos a nossa esperança em Deus vivo, Salvador de todos os homens, principalmente dos fiéis.

A Derivação (Origem) da Esperança

Onde e Como Obtemos Esperança?

Negativa – avisos relativos à falsa esperança

Existe um conjunto de avisos na Escritura contra colocarmos a nossa esperança em algo que não o Senhor, pois essas coisas vão deixar-nos envergonhados, frustrados, desapontados e na ruína.

Job 8:11-15 Porventura sobe o junco sem lodo? Ou cresce a espadana sem água? 12 Estando ainda na sua verdura, e ainda não cortada, todavia antes de qualquer outra erva se seca. 13 Assim são as veredas de todos quantos se esquecem de Deus; e a esperança do hipócrita perecerá. 14 A sua esperança fica frustrada, e a sua confiança será como a teia de aranha. 15 Encostar-se-á à sua casa, e ela não se terá firme; ampará-la-á, e ela não ficará em pé.

Salmo 33:17 O cavalo é vão para a segurança: não livra ninguém com a sua grande força. Conclusão: a salvação deve vir do Senhor.

Salmo 146:5 Bem-aventurado aquele que tem o Deus de Jacob por seu auxílio, e cuja esperança está posta no Senhor, seu Deus; isto é, em vez de no homem.

Provérbios 10:28 A esperança dos justos é alegria, mas a expectação dos ímpios perecerá.

Provérbios 11:7 Morrendo o homem ímpio, perece a sua expectação, e a esperança da iniquidade perde-se. O homem forte deposita esperança na sua força física, dinheiro, poder ou cargo mas, por fim, perecerá.

Provérbios 24:14 Tal será o conhecimento da sabedoria para a tua alma; se a achares, haverá para ti galardão, e não será cortada a tua expectação. Sem a sabedoria de Deus, que concede esperança piedosa, a sua esperança estará depositada no sítio errado e será destruída.

Positiva – os meios e a base da única esperança verdadeira

Deus é chamado “o Deus da Esperança”. Tal significa que Ele É a fonte de toda a esperança real. Para que possamos ter esperança (uma expectativa confiante), é necessário que esta provenha d’Ele, uma vez que só Ele tem poder para a dar.

Salmo 62:5 Ó minha alma, espera somente em Deus, porque dele vem a minha esperança.

Romanos 15:13 Que o Deus da esperança vos encha plenamente de alegria e de paz na vossa crença, para que abundeis na esperança, pela virtude do Espírito Santo.

Quem está sem Cristo, encontra-se sem Deus e sem esperança.

Efésios 2:12 …lembrai-vos de que, naquele tempo, estáveis sem Cristo, separados da comunidade de Israel, e estranhos aos concertos da promessa, não tendo esperança, e sem Deus no mundo.

1 Timóteo 1:1-2 Paulo, apóstolo de Jesus Cristo, segundo o mandado de Deus, nosso Salvador, e do Senhor Jesus Cristo, esperança nossa, 2 A Timóteo, meu verdadeiro filho na fé: graça, misericórdia e paz, da parte de Deus, nosso Pai, e da de Cristo Jesus, nosso Senhor!

(1) A esperança depende do conhecimento da Palavra de Deus.

Romanos 15:4 Porque tudo o que dantes foi escrito, para o nosso ensino foi escrito, para que, pela paciência e consolação das Escrituras, tenhamos esperança.

Colossenses 1:5-6 Por causa da esperança que vos está reservada nos céus, da qual já antes ouvistes, pela palavra da verdade do evangelho, 6 Que já chegou a vós, como também está em todo o mundo; e já vai frutificando, como também entre vós, desde o dia em que ouvistes e conhecestes a graça de Deus em verdade;

(2) A esperança depende de conhecer e confiar na Graça de Deus.

2 Tessalonicenses 2:16 E o próprio nosso Senhor Jesus Cristo e nosso Deus e Pai, que nos amou, e em graça nos deu uma eterna consolação e boa esperança,

(3) A esperança depende de uma vida preenchida pelo Espírito.

Romanos 15:13 Que o Deus da esperança vos encha plenamente de alegria e de paz na vossa crença, para que abundeis na esperança, pela virtude do Espírito Santo.

1 Pedro 1:13 Portanto, cingindo os lombos do vosso entendimento, sede sóbrios, e esperai inteiramente na graça que se vos ofereceu na revelação de Jesus Cristo.

Amigos, em que têm depositado a vossa esperança? Será que a vossa vida o prova? Alterou quem sois, aquilo que valorizais e os que fazeis com a vossa vida?

Artigo original por J. Hampton Keathley III, Th.M.

Tradução de C. Oliveira

J. Hampton Keathley III, Th.M., licenciou-se em 1966 no Seminário Teológico de Dallas, trabalhando como pastor durante 28 anos. Em Agosto de 2001, foi-lhe diagnosticado cancro do pulmão e, no dia 29 de Agosto de 2002, partiu para casa, para junto do Senhor.

Hampton escreveu diversos artigos para a Fundação de Estudos Bíblicos (Biblical Studies Foundation), ensinando ocasionalmente Grego do Novo Testamento no Instituto Bíblico Moody, Extensão Noroeste para Estudos Externos, em Spokane, Washington.


1 John White, The Cost of Commit­ment, p. 4.

Related Topics: Comfort

It Happened To Me

Related Media

These are real-life stories from the Bible.org Women’s Leadership Team to encourage you and provide take-aways for your ministry.

Ann Golding:

I was almost derailed in my first year of teaching a medium-sized, all-ages women’s bible study. During the lecture portion of the lesson as we gathered in a smaller area, the front row was especially close to the platform. I began to hear someone’s phone ringing (this was many years ago, so even the sound of a phone ringing during Bible study was a bit disarming). Not only did the young woman not silence her phone, she picked it up and engaged in a rather lengthy conversation.

I was so distracted by someone having a phone conversation fifteen feet in front of me that I’m certain my train of thought went out the window. What did I do? I kept teaching but totally lost my concentration and was rattled for a few moments afterwards. What should I have done now that I’m more experienced and have the benefit of hindsight? Several possibilities come to mind:

  • Remind the audience to turn off their cell phones prior to beginning the lecture.
  • Focus and carry on despite the distraction.
  • Silently wait for the conversation to be completed and then continue the lecture.
  • Stop and address it creatively with humor. For example, sing or dance to the music of the ring tone.

Take away: Distractions are a given if you plan to teach. Expect them. There’s no telling what you will face as a teacher. As you become more experienced you’ll learn how to take distractions in stride. That’s why it’s essential to pray and rely on the Holy Spirit to guide you and your responses. Remember to be gracious, the next time the phone rings it might be yours.

Dianne Miller:

You’ve had the nightmare, haven’t you? You show up at school and realize your homework isn’t done or you didn’t prepare for the test? Perhaps your nightmare is into a staff meeting forgetting a big project due today! From time-to-time we all share these bad dreams that reveal our subconscious concern and desire to be prepared.

Have you ever experienced a real-life nightmare? I narrowly missed one and I learned a valuable lesson.

I was asked to speak at Dallas Theological Seminary chapel service. What an honor to address the students and faculty where I had graduated from years earlier. Since I had the freedom to choose my subject topic, I wanted to share my current ministry challenge of working with and leading a diverse “lay” team. My role as Minister of Community included leading the effort to change our Sunday School model to a “church of small groups.” To accomplish this I recruited a lay team that was intergenerational, singles and married, male and female. I was to learn how different each personality was on the team. The road to work together was not always smooth but we found ways to work through our differences. My great desire was to share how challenging ministry is and yet, how great the opportunity to learn to love one another while accomplishing a task.

Videoing each team member individually sharing their story of working together was powerful and uniquely answered the question, “Am I valuable on this team?” My task was to pull their stories together and compare to the “team” Jesus had led. I was relying heavily on the videos to illustrate my points. I knew my script well and had several copies of the videos. But I was in for a big surprise when I got to campus!

I was the last person scheduled to be in the “old” chapel before anticipated renovations. All technology was going to be replaced and current video capabilities were not always reliable. In fact, I was told when I arrived it may or may not work today. My worst nightmare could potentially happen as I did not have a hard copy of their stories; I was depending on the videos. As I prayed, God graciously answered and the team videos worked without a glitch. But what if it hadn’t?

Take away: I have learned to be prepared “in season and out of season,” with technology or without technology. Ask yourself the question, what is your backup if the technology fails for this presentation?

  • Arrive early the day of the presentation to test the technology.
  • Bring an electronic copy of your presentation on a different medium.
  • If possible, also bring a hard copy of your presentation.

Karla D. Zazueta

Was I out of my mind? How could I have agreed to be one of five speakers on a panel discussion for my alma mater, Dallas Theological Seminary? (Sheer intimidation.) The moderator of the panel discussion assigned just two questions to each speaker and allotted only three minutes per question. “I can do this,” I thought, trying to give myself a pep talk. “No problem. That’s no time at all.” 

The day before the event I wrote out answers to each question and practiced (out loud) to ensure my responses would fall within the time limit. In fact, knowing that I tend to speak slower in public, and ad lib on occasion, I left room for the unknown and even shortened my responses. Taking my preparation a step further, I highlighted the essential key points should I have even less time for whatever reason. Lastly, I made note of the clock time/duration when I would be speaking. I then transferred my responses to my iPad and printed out a hard copy. (Never put your whole trust in technology.)

My boss from my previous career in architecture always used to describe me in this way, “Whatever you lack in experience, you make up for in preparation.” I was still nervous, but at least I was prepared.

The next day the moderator placed me fifth in the seating arrangement, the last of the speakers. The discussion began and although nervous, I got caught up in the other speakers’ contributions. What they were sharing was fascinating. When it became my turn to speak I glanced at the clock and with shock, realized it was already 11:17 a.m. I was scheduled to speak from 11:14-11:17 am for my first response. I had no time. My time was up before I even started. As often happens in discussion formats, time slips away.

But I had to say something, and I had to say it fast (but not make it seem like I was saying it fast). As I started speaking I also started scrolling past all the details that I had written and hit the main highlighted points only. I wrapped it up in record time and turned it back to the moderator. The moderator then explained we now had just two (not three) minutes each to answer the last question.

Four speakers and four more fascinating responses later, it was again my turn, and when I looked at the clock, again I had no time. Time was up. So once again I scrolled, scrolled, scrolled through my responses on my iPad, hitting the main points and cutting the rest. The moderator wrapped it up, and overall, we only exceeded our total time by a few minutes. Whew! I survived.

How did I survive? Preparation. Had I not practiced, had I not highlighted the key points, I would have either frozen on that stage or caused the entire discussion to be way over time, possibly not allowing for question number two. But I also give thanks to the Holy Spirit, who, during the inside-my-head-panic, made sense of all that I had written and practiced, and condensed it down to be exactly what the audience needed to hear.

Take away: Be prepared, have key points highlighted in your notes, rely on the Holy Spirit, and then try to not take time away from other speakers. (Ha!)

Sue Bohlin

“I wear makeup as a public service.”

That is one of my favorite lines when I give my testimony. It always gets a laugh . . . in the United States. But when I shared my story through a translator with the women of a small church in Belarus (in the former Soviet Union), it fell flat.

In Belarus, many women--especially those in churches--don’t wear much makeup. In fact, it is frowned upon; many church people see it as ungodly and worldly. And there is no such thing as public service in Soviet bloc countries as we have here. My little joke fell completely flat because it didn’t make any sense. Humor often doesn’t translate well into other cultures. (Except, as I learned from my friend Dr. Sandra Glahn, for mother-in-law jokes. Those are universal.)

Take away: know your audience, and be especially sensitive to cultural differences.

Gwynne Johnson

I wasn't sure I could make it. It was time to give the lecture I prepared but I awoke with a burning bladder infection. I was abjectly miserable, but with an entire class dependent upon me to complete their morning study, I got dressed and drove to Bible study, prayed and began. My memory of the forty-minute teaching was blurry, and snuggling into bed to recover later that day I was overwhelmed with feelings of failure.

The next week as the class leadership gathered, I began to hear reports of how God worked in the lives of not only the leaders, but the class members as well. Truly God had used a weak and stumbling lecturer to accomplish His purposes.

I learned that day, and the lesson was reinforced over and over many times, that it IS God who does the work through the instrument of His choice. So often as teachers we inwardly "rate" our performance: good, bad, or in-between. That habit is dangerous. If we feel that we have "done well" we are in danger of pride. If we feel we were totally ineffective, we berate ourselves and succumb to guilt. Neither is productive.

I am reminded of the words of Dr. Bill Bright when he was teaching on evangelism. He described witnessing as "Sharing Christ, in the power of the Holy Spirit, and leaving the results to God." That mantra is mine now for teaching.  My job is to be faithful in preparation and presentation in the power of the Holy Spirit and trust that God will use it for His purposes. In this way, no matter the skill or lack thereof, if I have been faithful in prayer and preparation, I can leave the results to God. I can resist the temptation of pride and the bitter taste of guilt and failure.

Take-aways:

  • My responsibility is to pray, prepare and present.
  • God's part is to use my preparation for His purposes.
  • Don't waste time and emotional energy scoring my "performance."

Related Topics: Leadership, Teaching the Bible, Women's Articles

Lesson 10: Why Be Baptized? (Various Scriptures)

Related Media

June 18, 2017

One of the sad ironies of church history is that a subject that should unite all believers has divided us. Paul said (Eph. 4:5) that there is “one Lord, one faith, one baptism.” But sincere, godly believers differ over many aspects of that one baptism! Lutherans, Episcopalians, the Orthodox Churches, and the Roman Catholic Church, believe that baptism effects the new birth. Since they all administer baptism to infants, they believe that when they sprinkle water on a baby, that child is regenerated.

While not all who identify with these churches understand or embrace their church’s official teaching, the view that baptism automatically confers regeneration is heretical. It contradicts the gospel of salvation by God’s grace through faith in Christ (Eph. 2:8-9; Rom. 1:16-17; 3:22; 4:4-5; etc.). No ritual administered to anyone can confer eternal life or forgiveness of sins.

Most Reformed churches also baptize infants, but they deny that baptism confers regeneration on those baptized. But you have to read their statements of faith very carefully to conclude that! The Westminster Confession of Faith states (XXVIII, I): “Baptism is a sacrament of the new testament, ordained by Jesus Christ, not only for the solemn admission of the party baptized into the visible Church; but also, to be unto him a sign and seal of the covenant of grace, of his ingrafting into Christ, of regeneration, of remission of sins, and of his giving up unto God, through Jesus Christ, to walk in newness of life.” They teach that the sign and seal are only confirmed when the baptized infant later comes to faith in Christ.

While (as I will explain) I think the biblical support for infant baptism is extremely flimsy and the practice of it is potentially detrimental, many of my favorite theologians endorse infant baptism. They were (and are) men whose scholarship and godliness far exceed my own. So we must differ graciously with those who hold that view, as long as they believe that salvation is by grace through faith in Christ alone.

The Baptist Confession of 1689 adapts the language of the Westminster Confession (A Faith to Confess: The Baptist Confession of 1689 Rewritten in Modern English [Carey Publications], 29:1):

Baptism … is intended to be, to the person baptized, a sign of his fellowship with Christ in His death and resurrection, and of his being engrafted into Christ, and of the remission of sins. It also indicates that the baptized person has given himself up to God, through Jesus Christ, so that he may live and conduct himself “in newness of life.”

But, rather than baptizing infants, it adds (29:2), “The only persons who can rightly submit themselves to this ordinance are those who actually profess repentance towards God and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, being willing to yield obedience to Him.” I believe that this position is in line with Scripture:

Only believers in Jesus Christ should be baptized as a confession of faith in obedience to Christ’s command.

1. Baptism is an outward symbol and confession of the inward reality of saving faith in Jesus Christ.

Wayne Grudem (Systematic Theology [Zondervan], 978) notes that we need to ask, “What does baptism do? … What does it actually accomplish? What benefit does it bring?” As I already noted, Lutherans, Episcopalians, Orthodox Churches, and Roman Catholics believe that baptism confers the new birth. Most Reformed Christians believe that baptism symbolizes future regeneration, when the baptized infant is old enough to come to saving faith. But, since not all baptized infants actually come to saving faith, they must say that it points to “probable future regeneration” (Grudem, 979).

But Baptists believe that baptism pictures actual, accomplished salvation. The person being baptized is outwardly confessing that God has brought him to genuine saving faith in Jesus Christ. Note five things:

A. Baptism is a symbol of salvation, not the means of salvation.

The act of baptism does not save anyone. It never has; it never will. The overwhelming testimony of Scripture is that salvation is by grace through faith alone (Eph. 2:8-9). Both Romans and Galatians, in large part, deal with the theme that we are justified (declared righteous by God) through faith in Jesus Christ, not by any ritual or good works (see Gal. 3:7-9; Titus 3:4-7).

Those who argue that baptism confers salvation usually camp on Acts 2:38, where Peter says, “Repent, and let each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; . . .” If this were the only verse in the Bible which dealt with this subject, we might conclude that baptism confers forgiveness of sins. But there are many other verses that say nothing of baptism as a requirement for forgiveness.

For example, in the next chapter (Acts 3:19), Peter exhorts his hearers, “Therefore repent and return, that your sins may be wiped away, in order that times of refreshing may come from the presence of the Lord.” He does not mention baptism. In Acts 10:43, he tells the Gentiles at Cornelius’ house, “Of Him [Christ] all the prophets bear witness that through His name everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins.” Again he makes no mention of baptism as a requirement for forgiveness.

So how do we explain Acts 2:38? (See my sermon, “How to Receive God’s Forgiveness,” 11/12/00, for more detail.) We have to harmonize it with the many Scriptures that clearly teach that salvation comes through faith alone. I think that we must understand Acts 2:38 in light of the close connection in the minds of the apostles between belief and baptism. The idea of an unbaptized Christian is foreign to the New Testament. Saving faith is obedient faith. But, Scripture is clear that baptism always follows the faith which saves. So Peter added baptism as the naturally understood consequence of believing. But it is not baptism, but repentance and faith, which bring forgiveness. Baptism is the outward sign of inward belief. It is a symbol of salvation, not the means of it.

Here are a few verses that show that baptism always follows saving faith. There is not a single example of baptism preceding faith:

Acts 2:41: “So then, those who had received his word were baptized ….”

Acts 8:12: “But when they believed Philip preaching the good news about the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were being baptized, men and women alike.”

Acts 10:44, 46b-48a: “While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who were listening to the message.… Then Peter answered, ‘Surely no one can refuse the water for these to be baptized who have received the Holy Spirit just as we did, can he?’ And he ordered them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ.”

Acts 16:30-34: [The Philippian jailer asks Paul and Silas], “‘Sirs, what must I do to be saved?’ They said, ‘Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household.’ And they spoke the word of the Lord to him together with all who were in his house. And he took them that very hour of the night and washed their wounds, and immediately he was baptized, he and all his household. And he brought them into his house and set food before them, and rejoiced greatly, having believed in God with his whole household.” These verses are often used to support infant baptism. But it does not say that Paul baptized any infants. Rather, it implies that since Paul proclaimed the gospel to the whole household, they all believed and were baptized.

Acts 18:8: “Crispus, the leader of the synagogue, believed in the Lord with all his household, and many of the Corinthians when they heard were believing and being baptized.”

Never once does the New Testament report, “They were baptized and later believed,” or, “They baptized their infants, who later believed.” In every instance, it was believers who were baptized as a confession of their new faith in Jesus Christ.

B. Baptism is a symbol of cleansing from sin, not the means of cleansing from sin.

No ritual, even in the Old Testament, confers forgiveness of sins apart from the faith and repentance of the one doing the ritual (Ps. 51:16-18). The water of baptism pictures cleansing from sin. But immersing someone in water cannot cleanse the heart. Only the blood of Christ, applied to a person’s heart through faith, can do that. When Peter was explaining to the Jerusalem Council how God saved the Gentiles through believing the gospel (Acts 15:7), he added (Acts 15:9), “He made no distinction between us and them, cleansing their hearts by faith.” As we saw from Acts, they believed and then they were baptized. The water pictures the cleansing from sin that took place the moment they believed in Christ.

C. Baptism is a symbol of our total identification with Christ in His death, burial, and resurrection.

“Baptism” is a transliteration of the Greek word, baptisma, and some related words which mean to dip or immerse. Even John Calvin, who believed in sprinkling infants, said (The Institutes of the Christian Religion, ed. by John T. McNeill [Westminster Press], 4:15:19], “Yet the word ‘baptize’ means to immerse, and it is clear that the rite of immersion was observed in the ancient church.” Since the object dipped or immersed became totally identified with the substance in which it was dipped, the idea of identification is central to the meaning of the words. Water baptism by immersion symbolizes the fact that when we believed, we were totally identified with Christ in His death, burial, and resurrection.

In Romans 6:3-4, Paul states, “Or do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus have been baptized into His death? Therefore we have been buried with Him through baptism into death, so that as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life.” At the instant we believed, we were placed “in Christ.” Our old life ended and a new life, lived unto God in the resurrection power of Christ, began. Water baptism pictures this change.

D. Baptism is a symbol of our identification with the church.

Paul states (1 Cor. 12:13), “For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body, whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free, and we were all made to drink of one Spirit.” The primary reference here, as in Romans 6, is to the baptism of the Holy Spirit, when He places a believer into Christ at the moment of salvation. But we not only are placed into Christ; we also become members of His body, the church. Water baptism symbolizes our identification with the church which took place spiritually when we believed.

In the act of baptism, a believer publicly identifies himself with other Christians. He’s saying, “Now I’m one of them.” In our culture, since Christian baptism is fairly common, this isn’t a big deal. But in countries where Christians are persecuted, baptism separates the true believers from the superficial. I once heard Stuart Briscoe tell of sitting in a hut in Pakistan with several believing men as they discussed the probability that they would be martyred if they went ahead with baptism. Would you be baptized if it meant that you would be cut off from your family and targeted for death? While we’re not yet there in our country, baptism should hold that level of commitment for those who are baptized.

E. Therefore, baptism should be restricted to believers.

Since baptism symbolizes our salvation, cleansing from sin, identification with Jesus Christ, and identification with His church, it must be restricted to those who give a credible testimony that they have trusted in Christ for salvation. To administer baptism to infants is confusing at best and detrimental at worst. While I love Calvin’s Institutes for his exposition and application of Scripture in so many areas, when you get to his section on baptism, he abandons both Scripture and logic and argues emotionally. In my opinion, while he did so much to counter his Roman Catholic upbringing, he couldn’t separate himself emotionally from the Catholic practice of infant baptism. Here are just a few quotes that show how confusing his view is. He states (4:15:3),

But we must realize that at whatever time we are baptized, we are once for all washed and purged for our whole life. Therefore, as often as we fall away, we ought to recall the memory of our baptism and fortify our mind with it, that we may always be sure and confident of the forgiveness of sins.

Thus if we were baptized as infants, Calvin seems to be saying that we were washed and purged of our sins at that time. How we are supposed to recall the memory of it is beyond me! Later (4:15:5), he says that “those who receive baptism with right faith truly feel the effective working of Christ’s death in the mortification of their flesh, together with the working of his resurrection in the vivification of the Spirit.” How can an infant “receive baptism with right faith” and feel the effective working of God?

Later (4:15:14), after explaining the meaning of the symbolism of baptism (on which I largely agree with him), he says, “These things, I say, he performs for our soul within as truly and surely as we see our body outwardly cleansed, submerged, and surrounded with water.” That sure sounds like believer’s baptism by immersion, not infant baptism by sprinkling!

But beyond being confusing, I argue that infant baptism is potentially detrimental. If a person mistakenly assumes, when he grows up (as many brought up under this teaching do assume), that because he was baptized as an infant, he is saved and is a member of Christ’s church, then he is sadly deceived. There is no grace imparted in the physical act of baptism, apart from the faith of the one being baptized. To count upon one’s infant baptism as the ground upon which one will stand before God is to trust in a false hope. Only personal faith in the crucified and risen Savior will avail in that day.

So, why do sincere, godly believers argue for infant baptism? I have an entire sermon where I give the arguments for it and why we do not practice it (“Why We Do Not Baptize Infants,” 9/8/96). Here I must be brief. The main support for infant baptism is the correlation between circumcision in the Old Testament and baptism in the New Testament. Colossians 2:11-12 states, “And in Him you were also circumcised with a circumcision made without hands, in the removal of the body of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ; having been buried with Him in baptism, in which you were also raised up with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead.”

While there are some obvious parallels between circumcision and baptism, there are also many differences. The sign of circumcision was administered to the male, physical descendants of Abraham under the old covenant. But there is no command or example in the New Testament of administering baptism to the physical descendants of Christians, male or female. If baptism is the fulfillment of circumcision, then just as circumcision was administered to the physical descendants of Abraham in the age of type, so baptism ought to be administered to the spiritual descendants of Abraham in the age of fulfillment, namely, to believers, who are the true seed of Abraham (Rom. 4:16; 9:8; Gal. 3:7). In refuting the Judaizers, Paul never hints that circumcision had been replaced by baptism. And Jesus made it clear that the sign of the New Covenant is the Lord’s Supper, not baptism (1 Cor. 11:25).

Also, in Colossians 2 Paul is talking about believer’s baptism. Infant baptism could not have removed “the body of the flesh.” He specifically states that baptism pictures being raised up from spiritual death through faith in the working of God. The parallel between baptism and circumcision concerns the picture of dying to the old life so that we can live holy lives in Christ. Paul is taking the spiritual meaning of circumcision and applying it spiritually to believers, not physically to the baptism of believers’ children. Baptism is for those who have undergone circumcision of the heart through saving faith, not for infants who cannot believe.

It is also argued that the household baptisms in the New Testament support infant baptism. For example, Peter states (Acts 2:39), “For the promise is for you and your children.” But the verse continues, “and for all who are far off, as many as the Lord our God will call to Himself.” Three verses later specifically states (Acts 2:41), “Those who received his word were baptized,” not, “those who received his word and all their infants were baptized.” The support for infant baptism is so scant that, although I’ve read their arguments, I can’t find any biblical support for it.

Thus baptism is an outward symbol and confession of an inward reality, namely, saving faith in Jesus Christ. Also,

2. Baptism is an act of obedience to Jesus Christ who commanded it.

There is no automatic blessing imparted through the mere act of baptism, apart from faith. But, saying that baptism is a symbol does not mean that there are no spiritual benefits obtained from doing it. God always blesses obedience. In the Great Commission Jesus commanded (Matt. 28:19-20), “Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” If a person has truly believed in Christ, obedience to His commands will follow (James 2:14-26; Eph. 2:8-10).

3. Thus, every believer in Jesus Christ should be baptized.

But this raises three questions: (1) How long after one has believed should he wait to be baptized? In the New Testament, baptism seems to have taken place as soon as possible after the person believed. It was one of the first evidences of saving faith. Walking the aisle or raising your hand to confess your faith in Christ publicly was unknown. In our day of “easy-believism” and superficial faith, it makes sense to see some evidence of genuine conversion before baptism. But it should not be put off for years.

(2) How old should believing children be before they are baptized? It depends on the maturity of the child. He (or she) should understand the gospel and give some observable evidence of being truly born again. While full understanding of the meaning of baptism is not necessary (what adult can say that he fully understands it?), a child should have some comprehension of the meaning and significance of baptism. Parents should not push the child, but rather let it be his decision in response to his understanding of the matter, based on the biblical teaching of his parents and the church.

(3) Should a person who was baptized as an infant or before he truly believed be re-baptized? There is no indication in the Bible that anyone who had believed in Christ and had been baptized was re-baptized after a lapse of faith or when the person came to a deeper understanding of salvation. The way of restoration for a person who has fallen away from the Lord is confession of sin (1 John 1:9).

However, there is an instance of re-baptism in the New Testament. In Acts 19:1-5, Paul encountered some men who had been baptized by John the Baptist. But they had not heard about the Holy Spirit or Jesus. When Paul told them about Christ, they believed and were re-baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus (v. 5). This suggests that a person who was baptized before he came to personal faith in the Lord Jesus Christ (whether as an infant or older) should be re-baptized as a confession of faith in Christ. What if he isn’t sure whether he was truly born again at the time? If as far as he knew then, he was born again and was being baptized to confess his faith in Christ, then he should not be re-baptized. We all grow in our understanding of what saving faith means.

Conclusion

If you’ve trusted Christ as Savior but have not confessed your faith publicly through baptism, I urge you to be baptized as soon as possible! If you’ve never trusted in Christ as Savior, do not think that because you were baptized or that if you will get baptized, it will get you into heaven. Eternal life is the free gift that God offers based upon Christ’s death for your sins. You can only receive it by faith in Jesus Christ. Then to confess your faith in obedience to Christ’s command, be baptized!

Application Questions

  1. Should believers’ baptism be a requirement for church membership? Why/why not?
  2. Should a person who was baptized as an infant be re-baptized when he comes to faith in Christ? What if it offends his parents? What Scriptures apply?
  3. What factors might warrant a new convert holding off on baptism for a while?
  4. Some denominations teach that baptism is necessary for salvation. Is this a serious heresy or just a different view of which we should be tolerant? Give biblical support.

Copyright, Steven J. Cole, 2017, All Rights Reserved.

Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture Quotations are from the New American Standard Bible, Updated Edition © The Lockman Foundation

Related Topics: Baptism, Ecclesiology (The Church)

Lesson 11: How To Come To The Lord’s Supper (1 Corinthians 11:17-34)

Related Media

June 25, 2017

Come with me to a typical church. We’re going to look at a few of the members, both as they look from the outside and also as they are on the inside, as seen by the Lord.

Here comes Mary Smith. She seems happy as she smiles at various friends as she enters the church. But you may have missed that icy glance that she cast toward Linda Brown. The two women aren’t talking to one another since that falling out they had a couple of months ago. “To think that she calls herself a Christian!” Mary thinks to herself as she goes down the aisle toward her seat. As Linda notices Mary smiling at everybody, she thinks, “That hypocrite! What a phony!”

And over there is Jerry Jones. He serves on the deacon board, is active with the men’s fellowship, and teaches a fourth grade boys Sunday school class. He’s there every time the church doors are open. Jerry is a real servant—if you need anything done around the church, just call Jerry. He helped out every Saturday and a lot of evenings the year they were putting up the new social hall! The pastor calls Jerry, “old faithful.” He’s the kind of church member every pastor is looking for!

Or is he? If you could look beneath the frenzy of activities, you would find a man who is trying to work off a load of guilt. There are some things in Jerry’s past that nobody here at First Church would ever guess. Not even his wife knows about some of the terrible things he did when he was in the Navy. Maybe if he can just do enough serving the Lord, he can forget about all those things and tip the scale so that he can forgive himself. Besides, he and his wife don’t get along well, and it’s just easier at home if he keeps himself busy with church work.

Oh, and there is James, a single young man who is fighting a losing battle with pornography. He’s not alone—he’s only one of many single and married men who are defeated by this plague. These are just fictional people that I made up. I’m sure that there aren’t real people like these in evangelical churches, are there?

There were in the church at Corinth. There were various factions in the church, vying for predominance. Some were involved in sexual immorality. Some had drinking problems! While the church should have had an influence on their pagan city, the reality was that the city had quite an influence on the church.

The early church had no church buildings, and Sunday was not a day off. It was their custom to gather on Sunday evenings in the homes of the wealthier members to celebrate the Lord’s Supper. Their worship time was preceded by a pot-luck supper called the Agape, or Love Feast (Jude 12). The problem in Corinth was that the wealthy members got there first with their sumptuous dinners and gorged themselves. When the slaves and other poor people arrived, the food was gone. Even worse, a few of the wealthy filled their wine glasses a bit too often, so that they were getting drunk. As a result, they completely missed the significance and purpose of the Lord’s Supper. Some of the members were suffering severe discipline from the Lord for their irreverence.

That’s the background for our text. Paul writes to correct these problems and to show how to come to the Lord’s Supper:

Come to the Lord’s Supper often with love for others, remembrance of the Lord, and examination of yourself.

The Lord’s Supper (1 Cor. 11:20), along with baptism, is one of two ordinances or sacraments that Jesus commanded His church to observe. It is probably also called, “the breaking of bread” (Acts 2:42, 46; 20:7, 11). We get the name “communion” from 1 Corinthians 10:16 (“sharing” is the Greek word, koinonea, which means “fellowship” or “communion”). It’s also called “the table of the Lord” (1 Cor. 10:21) and the Eucharist, from the Greek word for “thanksgiving” (Mark 14:23).

The original Lord’s Supper was a Passover meal, where Jesus adapted and applied the meaning of that Jewish feast to Himself. The idea is that just as Israel was delivered from the death of their firstborn and from slavery to Pharaoh through the blood of the Passover lamb, so you are spared from God’s judgment and slavery to sin by the death of the Lamb of God (see The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible [Zondervan], 3:380-381). In our text, Paul gives four ways that we should come to the Lord’s Supper:

1. Come to the Lord’s Supper often (1 Cor. 11:25-26).

Paul cites Jesus’ words (1 Cor. 11:25), “do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me.” He adds (v. 26), “For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes.” If “the breaking of bread” in Acts refers to the Lord’s Supper, then at first in the early church, they seemed to have celebrated the Lord’s Supper daily (Acts 2:46). Later (Acts 20:7), it became a weekly occurrence that took place on “the first day of the week” (our Saturday night). Many churches today observe it every Sunday. Some do it once a month. A few churches are less frequent. There is no command as to how frequently we are to observe it, but it should be often.

We had a visitor last year who came up to me after the service very upset because we did not observe the Lord’s Supper that Sunday. I tried to explain why, but she informed me that she would not be back. If we had only one service with no need to get the first service over by a certain time, I’d prefer having the Lord’s Supper weekly. But the need to fit in announcements and missions reports only allows us to celebrate it every other week.

However often you come to the Lord’s Supper, the complaint often arises that it just becomes an empty ritual. How should we deal with that problem? Anything that you do often can become an empty ritual. Reading your Bible every morning can become something that you just check off your “to do” list. Or, you can truly seek the Lord through His Word, asking Him to apply it to your heart. Prayer can become an empty ritual, where you just run through your prayer list. Or, you can really make contact with the Lord. Singing during worship can be a mindless ritual. Or, you can think about the words and worship God in spirit and in truth. I tell my wife that I love her and kiss her goodbye every morning. Even that could become a perfunctory ritual. But I try to make it memorable and meaningful! So, come to the Lord’s Supper often, communing with the Lord in a meaningful way.

2. Come to the Lord’s Supper with love for others (1 Cor. 11:17-22, 33-34).

Before and after Paul gave instructions about how to come to the Lord’s Table (1 Cor. 11:23-32), he confronted the problem of divisions and strife in the church. He has already dealt extensively with this problem in this letter, but he’s still shocked at their display of factionalism at such a sacred occasion as the Lord’s Supper. In 1 Corinthians 10:17, he wrote, “Since there is one bread, we who are many are one body; for we all partake of the one bread.” Apparently, they passed around a common loaf of bread and each person broke off a part as they observed the Lord’s Supper. That one loaf pictures the fact that we are one body in Christ. But the divisions among the Corinthians contradicted the reality of the one body of Christ. Thus he writes (1 Cor. 11:18-19):

For, in the first place, when you come together as a church, I hear that divisions exist among you; and in part I believe it. For there must also be factions among you, so that those who are approved may become evident among you.

Verse 19 is difficult to understand. Most commentators understand Paul to be saying that God works good even out of a bad situation. He permits the factions in a church to reveal who the truly spiritually mature ones are. But even though I’m going against the majority of scholars, I side here with The New Living Translation and J. B. Phillips’ paraphrase, both of which understand Paul to be using sarcasm. The NLT [Tyndale] puts it, “But, of course, there must be divisions among you so that those of you who are right will be recognized!” I would paraphrase, “Of course you must have your factions, so that your favorite leaders can be in the spotlight!” Paul says that it would be better not to come together as a church at all than to come together with this sort of rivalry (1 Cor. 11:17).

Then (1 Cor. 11:20-22) Paul confronts the selfishness and gluttony of those who were stuffing themselves and even getting drunk at the common meal before coming to the Lord’s Supper. They were not considerate of the slaves and other poor who were a part of the church. When he says (1 Cor. 11:20), “when you meet together, it is not to eat the Lord’s Supper,” he means that their selfish approach nullified the very meaning of the remembrance of the self-sacrifice of our Savior. Their selfish gluttony and drunkenness despised the church of God and shamed the poor (1 Cor. 11:22). Paul was shocked by their selfish behavior!

Paul says it in a negative way, but stated positively the point is that we are to come to the Lord’s Supper with genuine love for one another. The Lord’s Supper is one spiritual activity that you do not practice alone. You can and should pray and read the Bible by yourself. Much of the spiritual life is hidden. But the Lord’s Supper is to be celebrated with the Lord’s people. So to come to it rightly, you have to deal with damaged relationships as best as you can. Our common participation in the symbols of the body and blood of our Lord should demonstrate the self-sacrificing love of the one who gave Himself up to die on our behalf.

I realize that some relational conflicts take time to resolve and some are never fully resolved. As Paul says (Rom. 12:18), ‘If possible, so far as it depends on you, be at peace with all men.” But to the best of our ability, we should seek to be right with others before we come to the Lord’s Supper. As Jesus taught in a Jewish context (Matt. 5:23-24), “Therefore if you are presenting your offering at the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your offering there before the altar and go; first be reconciled to your brother, and then come and present your offering.” God wants us to be reconciled with one another before we worship Him. Otherwise, we become religious hypocrites.

For example, in my opening story, “Mary” and “Linda” who weren’t talking to each other need to meet privately. Each one needs to ask the other’s forgiveness for however she wronged the other one. Each one needs to grant forgiveness and affirm the other as a sister in Christ. Then each one can participate in the Lord’s Supper with a clean conscience.

Husbands and wives who have angrily fought during the week need to realize on Saturday that they will be coming to the table of the Lord the next day. They need to ask forgiveness of one another and affirm their love for one another before they take communion on Sunday. Parents who were angry with their children need to say, “I was wrong when I yelled at you yesterday. I’ve asked God to forgive me. Will you forgive me, too?” If you don’t do that, your kids watch you go to church and partake of communion and think, “What a phony! His Christianity is worthless!” The Lord’s Supper should display the truth that we are one body in Christ. Before we partake, we should clear up all relational conflicts to the best of our ability. Coming often to the Table means that we need to deal often with relational issues.

3. Come to the Lord’s Supper with remembrance of the Lord (1 Cor. 11:23-26).

Since Paul wrote 1 Corinthians before Matthew, Mark, and Luke were written, we have here the earliest recorded words of Jesus and the earliest account of the first Lord’s Supper. Scholars differ over whether Paul means (v. 23) that he received this as a direct revelation from Christ or whether he received it from the Lord through the other apostles. I think that the Lord directly revealed this account of the first Lord’s Supper to Paul (see Gal. 1:11-12). Remember four things:

A. Remember the Lord Himself.

Maybe you’re thinking, “Wait a minute! I’m a Christian! How could I forget the Lord?” But the reality is, we get busy with all sorts of things, even with serving the Lord, and we easily forget the Lord Himself.

In my office I have several photographs of my family. If you were to ask, “Are those pictures there because you can’t remember your family?” I would answer, “No, those pictures are not there to jog my memory. They are there to touch my heart.” When I look at those pictures during the day, they remind me of my loved ones from whom I am temporarily separated. I think about what each of them means to me. I recall good times we’ve had together. I thank God for giving them to me and to pray for His ongoing protection and grace in their lives. I look forward to seeing them again, to feel their hugs, and to enjoy their company. The value of a picture is emotional. It touches our hearts.

In the Lord’s Supper, Jesus left us a picture of Himself for us to remember Him by. We should pause and look at it often. When we do, it should remind us of His great love for us as shown supremely on the cross. It should fill our hearts with the desire to see Him when He comes again. It should make us look to ourselves to ask, “Is there anything in my life that needs to be dealt with before I meet my Bridegroom face to face?” It should touch our hearts and make us say, “Thank God for what He has given us in Christ!” The Lord’s Supper is a time to remember our beloved Savior.

B. Remember the Lord’s substitutionary sacrifice for you.

Jesus took the bread, broke it, gave thanks, and said (1 Cor. 11:24), “This is My body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of Me.” This fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah 53 that Jesus, the spotless Lamb of God, would die for our sins. Our guilt was placed on Him. The guilt-ridden deacon in my opening story should realize when he comes to the Lord’s Supper that Jesus died in his place and bore all his guilt. Now, by faith in Christ, he can live guilt-free.

Christians have been divided over the meaning of Jesus’ words, “This is My body.” Without going through all the different views, I understand that Jesus was speaking symbolically: the elements picture Jesus’ body and blood, which was shed for us. Is He spiritually present with us when we celebrate the Lord’s Supper? Yes, but not in some mystical sense any more than He is spiritually present when we worship or hear His Word preached. Partaking of the elements does not automatically confer grace on anyone unless they partake in faith.

So when you come to the Lord’s Supper, by faith remember Jesus’ suffering and death on the cross for you. As 1 Peter 2:24 puts it, “He Himself bore our sins in His body on the cross, so that we might die to sin and live to righteousness; for by His wounds you were healed.” Never forget that!

C. Remember your complete forgiveness through the new covenant.

The old covenant sacrifices could not take away sins permanently (Heb. 10:11). But Jesus said (1 Cor. 11:25), “This cup is the new covenant in My blood; do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me.” The “new covenant” refers to the Lord’s promise (Jer. 31:34; cf. Heb. 8:12; 10:16-17), “For I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin I will remember no more.” We should remember that the Lord forgets! Of course, He is omniscient, so He doesn’t forget our sins as we forget things. Rather, He means that He will not bring our sins up for judgment against us if our faith is in Jesus and His death for us on the cross. If you’ve never come to Christ and put your trust in Him, that is your greatest need. If you have done that, never forget that His death reconciled you to God forever!

D. Remember that Jesus is coming again.

1 Cor. 11:26: “For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes.” The Greek verb translated “proclaim” is used elsewhere of proclaiming the gospel (1 Cor. 9:14). The Lord’s Supper is a proclamation of Jesus’ death and resurrection, because He couldn’t come again if He were not raised from the dead. Each time we partake of the Lord’s Supper could be the last. The trumpet may sound, the dead in Christ will rise, and we shall be caught up to meet the Lord in the air (1 Thess. 4:16-17)! The Lord’s Supper reminds us to be ready for that day! But, Paul goes on to give a sober warning:

4. Come to the Lord’s Supper with examination of yourself (1 Cor. 11:27-34).

I don’t have time to explain this section in detail. In summary, Paul says that many of the Corinthians were suffering sickness and even death because they were coming to the Lord’s Supper in the relationally unloving, irreverent, self-centered manner that he has described. He clarifies (1 Cor. 11:32) that this judgment does not mean eternal condemnation, but rather divine discipline. To avoid such discipline, he gives the prerequisite for coming to the Lord’s Supper (1 Cor. 11:28): “But a man must examine himself, and in so doing he is to eat of the bread and drink of the cup.” By judging the body rightly (v. 29), I understand Paul to be referring to the body and blood of the Lord (v. 27). He means that we should not partake of communion flippantly or irreverently, but worshipfully and thankfully.

By examining ourselves, Paul means that we should do a private, mental inventory of our relationship with Christ (2 Cor. 13:5). Am I truly trusting in Him alone for salvation? Am I sinfully at odds with anyone else? Is there any sin that I have not confessed and turned from? The Lord’s Supper is not for the sinless, but for those who are dealing with their sin on the heart level as they are walking with Christ.

It’s encouraging to remember that at the first Lord’s Supper, the disciples were arguing about which of them was the greatest. Jesus predicted Peter’s threefold denial of Him that very night. A short time later, the disciples couldn’t stay awake to watch and pray with Jesus in the Garden. So the Lord’s Supper is not for perfect saints, but rather for those who struggle with the shortcomings and sins that are common to us all. But, we should not shrug off any known sin or excuse it by saying, “It’s just my weakness.” As Paul rhetorically asks (Rom. 6:1-2), “Are we to continue in sin that grace may increase? May it never be! How shall we who died to sin still live in it?” The Lord’s Supper gives us a frequent reminder that we need to deal with our sins on the heart level before God.

Conclusion

John Duncan was a prominent Scottish theologian. Once as communion was being held in a Church of Scotland, when the elements came to a 16-year-old girl, she suddenly turned her head aside and motioned for the elder to take the cup away; she couldn’t drink it. Professor Duncan reached his arm over, touched her shoulder, and said tenderly, “Take it, lassie, it’s for sinners.” (In Billy Graham, How to be Born Again [Word], p. 137.)

John Stott once forcefully stated (cited by David Watson, I Believe in Evangelism [Eerdmans], p. 71), “If the cross is not central in our thinking, it is safe to say that our faith, whatever it be, is not the Christian faith, and our creed, whatever it be, is not the Apostles’ Creed.” The Lord’s Supper reminds us to keep the cross of Jesus Christ central. Come often with love for others, remembrance of the Lord, and examination of yourself.

Application Questions

  1. Why must the cross be central to our Christian lives?  What does this mean practically?
  2. When does looking to ourselves go too far? How much introspection is healthy?
  3. Is it spiritually and emotionally healthy to think often of our own depravity? Why/why not?
  4. Practically, how can we keep communion from becoming an empty ritual?

Copyright, Steven J. Cole, 2017, All Rights Reserved.

Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture Quotations are from the New American Standard Bible, Updated Edition © The Lockman Foundation

Related Topics: Communion

Pages