MENU

Where the world comes to study the Bible

11. Experiencing God’s Call (1 Kings 19:19-21)

Related Media

Elijah went from there and found Elisha son of Shaphat. He was plowing with twelve pairs of oxen; he was near the twelfth pair. Elijah passed by him and threw his robe over him. He left the oxen, ran after Elijah, and said, “Please let me kiss my father and mother goodbye, then I will follow you.” Elijah said to him, “Go back! Indeed, what have I done to you?” Elisha went back and took his pair of oxen and slaughtered them. He cooked the meat over a fire that he made by burning the harness and yoke. He gave the people meat and they ate. Then he got up and followed Elijah and became his assistant.

1 Kings 19:19-21 (NET)

How can we experience God’s call? Often, people struggle with discerning God’s call for their vocation, how to serve their church, or even who to marry. For many, discerning God’s call is a mystery that seems to elude them.

In 1 Kings 19, Elijah meets with God through a whisper on Mount Horeb and receives marching orders to anoint Elisha to eventually replace him as Israel’s chief prophet (v. 11-16). After that, he travels 160 miles from Mount Horeb to Abel Meholah1 where Elisha lived (v. 16, 19) and threw his robe on Elisha, symbolizing his call to prophetic ministry and to be Elijah’s apprentice. Elisha responds by saying goodbye to his parents, burning his farm equipment, slaughtering two oxen, and having a going-away party before following Elijah.

From considering Elisha’s call to ministry, we learn principles about experiencing God’s call for our lives, including common hindrances which can keep us from discerning that call and obeying it when we do.

Big Question: What principles about experiencing God’s call can we discern from Elisha’s call to ministry?

To Experience God’s Call, We Must Be Faithful in Areas God Has Already Called Us To

Elijah went from there and found Elisha son of Shaphat. He was plowing with twelve pairs of oxen; he was near the twelfth pair. Elijah passed by him and threw his robe over him.

1 Kings 19:19

In considering Elisha’s call, we must notice that he was called while plowing his field. His call did not come through a dream or mountain top experience, but simply while faithfully doing the work he was called to. Likewise, when considering God’s calling of people in Scripture, many, if not most, are called while faithfully working. Ray Pritchard said it this way:

God called Moses while he was tending Jethro’s flocks. He called David while he was tending his father’s sheep. He called Nehemiah, who had a hugely important job as cupbearer to the king. He called Peter when he was a fisherman and Matthew when he was a tax collector. He called Elisha when he was plowing the field. We are far more likely to encounter God by getting out of bed and getting busy doing our job than if we stay in bed waiting for a dream or a vision.2

In general, to know God’s will for our future, we must be faithful with what he has presently called us to. The student must be faithful with his studies, the parent with raising godly children, the church member with faithfully praying for and serving his church, and the teacher with faithfully shaping and molding young minds. When we’re faithful with what God has called us to, he often will call us to more. In Luke 16:10-12, Christ said,

The one who is faithful in a very little is also faithful in much, and the one who is dishonest in a very little is also dishonest in much. If then you haven’t been trustworthy in handling worldly wealth, who will entrust you with the true riches? And if you haven’t been trustworthy with someone else’s property, who will give you your own?

Ecclesiastes 9:10 says, “Whatever you find to do with your hands, do it with all your might...” Colossians 3:23-24 says, “Whatever you are doing, work at it with enthusiasm, as to the Lord and not for people, because you know that you will receive your inheritance from the Lord as the reward. Serve the Lord Christ.”

As we’re faithful with what we know God has called us to, he often opens the door for more or reveals the next step. No doubt, Elisha was one of the faithful remnant that God had preserved in Israel. He had faithfully run his farm, being a light to his family, servants, and neighbors. God saw that and called him for more, just like he saw David faithfully shepherding sheep and called him for more.

As we consider this, we must ask ourselves, “Are we being faithful with what God has already told us or assigned to us? Are we serving with the right attitude and with all our might as unto the Lord?” As we’re faithful with our little, God often calls us for more.

Application Question: Why is being faithful to God’s revealed will so important for experiencing further revelation from God (cf. Matt 13:12)? How is God calling you to be even more faithful in the areas he has already called you to—family, church, friendships, school, and work?

To Experience God’s Call, We Must Be Willing to Be Discipled and Disciple Others

Elijah went from there and found Elisha son of Shaphat. He was plowing with twelve pairs of oxen; he was near the twelfth pair. Elijah passed by him and threw his robe over him.

1 Kings 19:19

When Elijah found Elisha, he was plowing the field with twelve pairs of oxen. Elijah passed by him and threw his robe over Elisha. Placing his robe on Elisha was a tremendous symbolic act which meant Elisha was going to be trained by Elijah to replace him. In 2 Kings 2, when Elijah is taken to heaven around ten years later, he leaves his robe for Elisha, as he would be Israel’s chief prophet.

Likewise, in experiencing God’s call, it is always a call to invest in and disciple others. While Christ ministered on the earth, like Elijah, he approached many people and called for them to follow him. Specifically, he chose twelve who he would spend most of his time with. They ate together, stayed in the same lodging, traveled together, prayed and worshiped together, and did ministry together. Throughout Christ’s three years, he invested in them so they could essentially take on his mantle—so they could minister to the world. When Christ ascended to heaven, he told them to go and make disciples of all nations, teaching them everything that he had commanded (Matt 28:19-20). This is still God’s call on our lives. We are called to share the gospel with people and disciple them by teaching them what we have learned from Scripture and through our experience with walking with God. We are called to make disciples.

Now, certainly, like Christ, we must share the good news with all, but we must specifically invest most of our time and energy into a few. This is just logical because we are limited in time and capacity, but it’s also strategic. We should invest in those who are most faithful, so they can do the same with others. In 2 Timothy 2:1-2, Paul said this to his disciple, Timothy:

So you, my child, be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus. And entrust what you heard me say in the presence of many others as witnesses to faithful people who will be competent to teach others as well.

Paul told Timothy to train faithful people who will likewise train others. There are four generations of disciples in this passage: Paul, Timothy, faithful people, and others. Likewise, we must seek to invest in the faithful who will teach others. Yes, we should encourage, teach, and build up many, but we should invest the majority of our time in a few—the most faithful ones. Their faithfulness will be seen in the fact that they faithfully attend church and seek to consistently read their Bible and be involved in church activities, among other things. They try to be consistent with both their outward profession of faith and their secret lives. They aim to be the same on Sunday as on Monday. And because they are faithful with little, they will be faithful with much. They are the ones we should invest the most in.

No doubt, this was true of Elisha. His name means “God is salvation.” As mentioned, when God said to Elijah that he had preserved a remnant of 7,000 who had not worshiped Baal (v. 18), obviously, Elisha and his parents were part of that remnant. They had been faithful. God saw this and consequently called Elijah to disciple Elisha.

Therefore, as we consider Elisha’s call, we must be reminded that we are also called to be discipled and to disciple. It’s often been said that we all should have an Elijah and an Elisha (or a Paul and a Timothy). (1) Our Elijah relationship is often manifested through one-on-one mentorship where we meet with one more spiritually seasoned than us for coffee or meals, for service together, and in general to share life together. (2) At other times, these relationships happen in small groups. Christ invested in the twelve by groups, mostly a large group of twelve, but at other times just with three. (3) Also, as in Paul’s letter to Timothy, sometimes God will choose to disciple us through the faithful ministry of others whom we may never meet in person, through their sermons, writings, podcasts, or simply their example from afar. With our discipling of others, we might say to ourselves, “I’m a young Christian. I don’t know much. How can I teach someone?” The simple answer is, “Find someone who knows less than you and share what you know, even if that is a nonbeliever or a child.”

In experiencing God’s call, we must know it is always a call to invest in others and to allow others to invest in us. Elijah would mentor Elisha, but Elisha would also serve Elijah. There would be a mutual giving and receiving in the relationship. Discipling is part of God’s call on our lives; it is essentially the Great Commission. People should invest in us; we should invest in others who in turn will invest into others. This is God’s plan to reach the world, and he has called us to be a part of that. To not do this because of apathy or busyness is to reject God’s call.

The Difficulty of Discipling Relationships

It should be added that these types of relationships are not always easy. Christ became very frustrated with his disciples. He constantly challenged them for having little faith; in fact, one time he rebuked them by calling them an “unbelieving and perverse generation,” as they were faithless just like the world (Matt 17:17). Our mentees will fail us, and so will our mentors. Any relationships that we truly invest in (family, friends, or discipleship relationships) have the potential to hurt us. That’s the reason some never become vulnerable enough to begin these relationships. However, Christ opened himself and made himself vulnerable though he knew they would fail him. He was deserted by his disciples in his last hour, and one betrayed him. But, they were worth the investment. Those who deserted him eventually repented and turned the world upside down by their witness. We must be faithful in this ministry, discipling and being discipled. It is part of God’s call on our lives.

Application Question: Who is your Elijah and who is your Elisha? How is God calling you to cultivate these types of relationships? What makes discipleship relationships so special and what makes them so difficult to find and cultivate?

To Experience God’s Call, We Must Be Willing to Sacrifice

He left the oxen, ran after Elijah, and said, “Please let me kiss my father and mother goodbye, then I will follow you.” Elijah said to him, “Go back! Indeed, what have I done to you?” Elisha went back and took his pair of oxen and slaughtered them. He cooked the meat over a fire that he made by burning the harness and yoke. He gave the people meat and they ate.

1 Kings 19:20-21

Observation Question: What sacrifices did Elisha make to experience God’s call on his life?

Another aspect of God’s call of Elisha which must stand out is the great sacrifices that Elisha had to make to follow it. Like Abraham having to leave his home, family, and property (cf. Gen 12), so did Elisha. Apparently, Elijah put his robe on Elisha and continued walking away from him. Therefore, Elisha immediately left his oxen to run after Elijah. He asked if it was OK for him to kiss his father and mother goodbye and then follow. Elijah responded, “Go back! Indeed, what have I done to you?” (v. 20). Since Elisha leaves to speak to his family and make a sharp break from his vocation, it is clear that Elijah’s response was affirming. Therefore, the NLT translates it as, “Go on back, but think about what I have done to you.” Elisha needed to remember the special call of God on his life, so he wouldn’t be tempted to stay home when he visited family.

There is a similar story in Luke 9 where a young man says he will follow Christ wherever he goes, but that he also first must say goodbye to his family. However, unlike Elijah, Christ gave this man a stern reply. Luke 9:61-62 shares this account: “Yet another said, ‘I will follow you, Lord, but first let me say goodbye to my family.’ Jesus said to him, ‘No one who puts his hand to the plow and looks back is fit for the kingdom of God.’” Christ essentially tells the young man if he went home, he was not fit for heaven. Why so sharp? It’s clear that for this young man, if he returned home, he would not come back. The love and influence of family and friends would be too much, and therefore, he would never return. This wasn’t the case with Elisha. He returned home not to get permission but to pay his respects to his parents. We are always called to honor our parents (Ex 20:12), but once we are adults and supporting ourselves, we do not always have to obey our parents in everything (Col 3:20). Elisha was leaving his parents. He didn’t know when he would return, but it seemed clear that if he returned, it would only be short-term.

The Cost of Family

Family was one of the sacrifices that Elisha gave up to experience God’s call, and many others must give it up as well. Following God at times may mean disobeying family expectations to go into a career field or ministry they don’t approve of. It may mean moving across the ocean and raising your children without them being significantly involved. This is difficult and not ideal, but some callings, some ministry fields, will demand a greater cost. For many, this will be too much and will keep them from accepting God’s call. However, in Luke 14:26, Christ said this about following him in general: “If anyone comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother, and wife and children, and brothers and sisters, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple.” To hate means that we must put Christ and his call on our lives before everything else, including family. Now, certainly this doesn’t mean we should love our family less. Following God means that we must love our family more (1 Tim 5:8); however, Christ and his call must be first.

As Elijah said to Elisha, “think about what I have done to you” (v. 20), we must remember what God has done for us when considering his call. He has saved us from eternal damnation through Christ’s death on a cross and his resurrection from the dead. He has empowered us with spiritual gifts to build his kingdom. He has called us to give our lives totally to him, so others may know God’s salvation as well. To faithfully obey God, we must remember the great cost Christ suffered for us and his call on our lives.

The Cost of Career

But not only did Elisha have to willingly accept the cost of being separated from family to experience God’s call, he also had to give up his successful career and the comforts that came with it. The fact that Elisha was overseeing twenty-four oxen plowing a field means that he probably came from a wealthy family. He wasn’t a mountain man wearing camel clothes like Elijah. They had different backgrounds. Elisha was now going to give up his wealth to follow an itinerant preacher who seemingly had nothing, and because of that, God often had to provide food for him miraculously. God provided food through ravens, then later through a poor widow, and then through an angel. Elijah was living the “seek first the kingdom of God and everything will be provided for you” motto (Matt 6:33 paraphrase).

The Cost of Persecution

In addition to the cost of family and career, being a prophet was not in vogue during that time. They were being hunted by the leadership of Israel. Many were living in caves. By following Elijah, Elisha was giving up his security and taking on great risk, even to his life.

Even with all these clear costs, Elisha chose the difficult path of being the prophet’s apprentice in a very matter-of-fact fashion. He took two oxen, slaughtered them, burned their yoke, and prepared a meal for his family, friends, and workers. He essentially had a going-away party, which demonstrated that he wasn’t coming back to his career.

Likewise, for many, following God’s call means giving up the creature comforts we once had and that many friends and family members enjoy. It might mean trusting God with our children’s college education, retirement, and sometimes even with month-to-month expenses. It also may come with many more risks, as some are called to cities and countries where Christian views are not welcomed and even despised. Certainly, each person’s call is different. But even serving in prestigious positions, like in government, a Fortune 500 business, or an elite university, comes with many temptations and sacrifices. Whatever God’s call, we must be willing to sacrifice to do it, including giving up some of our intimacy with family, the security of career and creature comforts, and embracing some risks for the kingdom. In Luke 14:27, Christ said this to potential followers, “Whoever does not carry his own cross and follow me cannot be my disciple.”

Joyful Giver

As we consider Elisha’s joyful response to following Elijah by throwing a going away party, we must remember the greatness of our sacrifice demonstrates how much God really means to us. In fact, it has been said that “sacrifice is ‘the ecstasy of giving the best you have to the one you love the most.’”3 Ecstasy means that in some sense our sacrifices for God can in fact be a thrill for us—an enjoyment because they’re given to the one we love and esteem. Second Corinthians 9:7 says, “God loves a cheerful giver.” In context that is dealing with money, but no doubt that is true of other sacrifices we offer God as well—home, country, career, family, and other things we hold dear. God loves a cheerful giver. In Romans 12:1, Paul said, “Therefore I exhort you, brothers and sisters, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a sacrifice—alive, holy, and pleasing to God—which is your reasonable service.” Because of all Christ has done for us, it is only “reasonable” that we offer him everything—our jobs, comforts, families, and even our bodies. He deserves nothing short of our best.

Great Reward

As we consider the great costs that come with experiencing God’s call, we must remember that the great rewards of following God’s call far outweigh the cost. In Mark 10:28-31, Peter and Christ interact about the cost and reward of following Christ. It says:

Peter began to speak to him, “Look, we have left everything to follow you!” Jesus said, “I tell you the truth, there is no one who has left home or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or fields for my sake and for the sake of the gospel who will not receive in this age a hundred times as much—homes, brothers, sisters, mothers, children, fields, all with persecutions—and in the age to come, eternal life. But many who are first will be last, and the last first.”

We must remember this as we weigh the costs and sacrifices of following Christ—being away from family, lacking creature comforts, and possibly encountering risks including persecution. Christ said we will receive a hundred times more in this life and in the age to come, eternal life. The rewards will far outweigh the costs. To experience God’s call, we must be willing to sacrifice.

Application Question: What are some of the costs which you struggle with most in considering God’s call or potential call on your life? How has God met your needs abundantly as you have followed God’s call in big or little ways?

To Experience God’s Call, We Must Be Willing to Humbly Serve Others

…Then he got up and followed Elijah and became his assistant.

1 Kings 19:21

Finally, we see that Elisha’s call was initially to be Elijah’s assistant. In 2 Kings 3:11 (ESV), it says that he would pour water on Elijah’s hands. Elisha wasn’t leaving his wealth to start preaching to large crowds or doing miracles; he did things most people wouldn’t notice and some would even look down on. He served Elijah by fetching things for him, washing his hands, and probably preparing accommodations for him. Though minor, these would indeed lead to greater things. As mentioned, we will see Elisha again in 2 Kings 2. When Elijah is taken to heaven, he leaves his robe for Elisha. Elisha would receive a double portion of Elijah’s spirit, which led to him working miracles and being Israel’s chief prophet. However, Elisha’s greater ministry began with humbly serving Elijah—probably for around ten years.

This is one of the reasons many cannot experience God’s call. It’s because they’re not willing to humbly serve the Lord in places where they will not have the spotlight and nobody will see them. This is even harder for people like Elisha who come from wealth and are probably used to having people serve them. No doubt, this is the reason that those God uses greatly often come from the lower rungs of society—fisherman, farmers, carpenters, and shepherds—who are used to serving others in minuscule ways. And when God calls somebody who might be considered great in society, he first humbles them greatly before he exalts them. With Moses, God took him from being a prince in Egypt to being a lowly shepherd, which Egyptians despised (Gen 46:34). God made Moses exactly what he despised and then exalted him to shepherd his people. God exalts the humble and humbles the proud (cf. Jam 4:6, 10, 1 Pet 5:5-6). Luke 14:11 says, “For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but the one who humbles himself will be exalted.” Matthew 20:26-27 says, “Whoever wants to be great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first among you must be your slave.”

When following God’s call, often the way up is the way down. Elisha, as a wealthy man, lowered himself to serve Elijah, and later God exalted him. Likewise, Christ humbled himself by becoming a servant and giving his life for people, and because of that, God has exalted him through resurrecting him, seating him on the throne in heaven, and giving him a name above all names (Phil 2:5-11). How is God calling you to humble yourself and serve others? God’s call always leads to humbly serving others, and the more God exalts us the more people we can serve.

Application Question: Why is it so difficult at times for people who zealously want to be used by God to humbly serve others, especially in minuscule ways? In what ways have you seen or experienced how faithfully serving others, even in minuscule ways, often leads to serving people in a greater way? How is God calling you to humbly serve others in this season?

Conclusion

How can we experience God’s call on our lives? From considering Elisha’s call to ministry, we can discern general principles about God’s call.

  1. To Experience God’s Call, We Must Be Faithful in Areas God Has Already Called Us To
  2. To Experience God’s Call, We Must Be Willing to Be Discipled and Disciple Others
  3. To Experience God’s Call, We Must Be Willing to Sacrifice
  4. To Experience God’s Call, We Must Be Willing to Humbly Serve Others

Application Question: What stood out most in the reading and why? What questions or applications did you take from the reading?

Prayer Prompts

  • Pray for grace to faithfully obey and serve God in the areas he has already called us to—our devotional time with God, serving our family and friends, being faithful in our studies or career, and serving the church—all for God’s glory.
  • Pray for more mature believers to pour into us and for God to open opportunities to pour into others—whether that be one-on-one, in small groups, or by serving in various ministries.
  • Pray for grace to be willing and joyful in sacrificing for God and others.
  • Pray for God to speak clearly to his church—renewing his call on people’s lives or giving them new dreams and directions that will glorify him and bless many people.

Copyright © 2022 Gregory Brown

Unless otherwise noted, the primary Scriptures used are taken from the NET Bible ® copyright © 1996-2016 by Biblical Studies Press, L.L.C. All rights reserved.

Holy Bible, New International Version ®, NIV® Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.® Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide.

Scripture quotations marked (ESV) are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®) Copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. All rights reserved.

Scripture quotations marked (NLT) are taken from the Holy Bible, New Living Translation, Copyright © 1996, 2004, 2007 by Tyndale House Foundation. Used by permission of Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., Carol Stream, Illinois 60188. All rights reserved.

Scripture quotations marked (NASB) are taken from the New American Standard Bible®, Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, and 1995 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission.

Scripture quotations marked (KJV) are from the King James Version of the Bible.

All emphases in Scripture quotations have been added.

BTG Publishing all rights reserved.


1 Pink, A.W.. The Life of Elijah (Kindle Locations 3382-3384). Kindle Edition.

2 Pritchard, Ray . Fire and Rain: the Wild-Hearted Faith of Elijah . Keep Believing Ministries. Kindle Edition.

3 Pritchard, Ray. Fire and Rain: the Wild-Hearted Faith of Elijah . Keep Believing Ministries. Kindle Edition.

Related Topics: Character Study, Christian Life

12. Guarding Our Lives And Communities Against Corruption (1 Kings 21)

Related Media

After this the following episode took place. Naboth the Jezreelite owned a vineyard in Jezreel adjacent to the palace of King Ahab of Samaria. Ahab said to Naboth, “Give me your vineyard so I can make a vegetable garden out of it, for it is adjacent to my palace. I will give you an even better vineyard in its place, or if you prefer, I will pay you silver for it.” But Naboth replied to Ahab, “The Lord forbid that I should sell you my ancestral inheritance.” So Ahab went into his palace, bitter and angry that Naboth the Jezreelite had said, “I will not sell to you my ancestral inheritance.” He lay down on his bed, pouted, and would not eat. Then his wife Jezebel came in and said to him, “Why do you have a bitter attitude and refuse to eat?” He answered her, “While I was talking to Naboth the Jezreelite, I said to him, ‘Sell me your vineyard for silver, or if you prefer, I will give you another vineyard in its place.’ But he said, ‘I will not sell you my vineyard.’ “His wife Jezebel said to him, “You are the king of Israel! Get up, eat some food, and have a good time. I will get the vineyard of Naboth the Jezreelite for you.” She wrote out orders, signed Ahab’s name to them, and sealed them with his seal. She then sent the orders to the leaders and to the nobles who lived in Naboth’s city. This is what she wrote: “Observe a time of fasting and seat Naboth in front of the people. Also seat two villains opposite him and have them testify, ‘You cursed God and the king.’ Then take him out and stone him to death.” The men of the city, the leaders and the nobles who lived there, followed the written orders Jezebel had sent them. They observed a time of fasting and put Naboth in front of the people. The two villains arrived and sat opposite him. Then the villains testified against Naboth right before the people, saying, “Naboth cursed God and the king.” So they dragged him outside the city and stoned him to death. Then they reported to Jezebel, “Naboth has been stoned to death.” When Jezebel heard that Naboth had been stoned to death, she said to Ahab, “Get up, take possession of the vineyard Naboth the Jezreelite refused to sell you for silver, for Naboth is no longer alive; he’s dead.” When Ahab heard that Naboth was dead, he got up and went down to take possession of the vineyard of Naboth the Jezreelite. The Lord told Elijah the Tishbite: “Get up, go down and meet King Ahab of Israel who lives in Samaria. He is at the vineyard of Naboth; he has gone down there to take possession of it. Say to him, ‘This is what the Lord says: “Haven’t you committed murder and taken possession of the property of the deceased?” ‘ Then say to him, ‘This is what the Lord says: “In the spot where dogs licked up Naboth’s blood they will also lick up your blood—yes, yours!” ‘ “When Elijah arrived, Ahab said to him, “So, you have found me, my enemy!” Elijah replied, “I have found you, because you are committed to doing evil in the sight of the Lord. The Lord says, ‘Look, I am ready to bring disaster on you. I will destroy you and cut off every last male belonging to Ahab in Israel, including even the weak and incapacitated. I will make your dynasty like those of Jeroboam son of Nebat and Baasha son of Ahijah because you angered me and made Israel sin.’ The Lord says this about Jezebel, ‘Dogs will devour Jezebel by the outer wall of Jezreel.’ As for Ahab’s family, dogs will eat the ones who die in the city, and the birds of the sky will eat the ones who die in the country.” (There had never been anyone like Ahab, who was firmly committed to doing evil in the sight of the Lord, urged on by his wife Jezebel. He was so wicked he worshiped the disgusting idols, just like the Amorites whom the Lord had driven out from before the Israelites.) When Ahab heard these words, he tore his clothes, put on sackcloth, and fasted. He slept in sackcloth and walked around dejected. The Lord said to Elijah the Tishbite, “Have you noticed how Ahab shows remorse before me? Because he shows remorse before me, I will not bring disaster on his dynasty during his lifetime, but during the reign of his son.”

1 Kings 21 (NET)

How can we guard against corruption in our families, churches, workplaces, governments, and nations? This is important to consider because Scripture says, “A little leaven leavens the whole lump” (1 Cor 5:9). Sin starts small and then grows until it saturates all parts of a community. We each have a role in stopping the spread of corruption and injustice in the spheres God has placed us. Christ calls believers the salt of the earth and the light of the world (Matt 5:13-14) because we stave off spiritual and moral decay and promote righteousness.

In 1 Kings 21, we see not only a corrupt government but also how far the people of God had fallen into corruption. Ahab, the king of Israel, desired Naboth’s plot of land to build himself a vegetable garden next to his castle. When rejected, his wife, Jezebel, hatches an evil plan to have Naboth killed, and apparently his sons as well (cf. 2 Kings 9:26, “the blood of Naboth and his sons”). The elders of the land go along with this plot and trump up false witnesses to accuse Naboth of cursing the king and God. For that reason, he was stoned to death, and then Ahab took his plot of land. From this narrative, we can learn principles about guarding against corruption in the various spheres God has placed us as salt and light.

Big Question: In 1 Kings 21, what principles can be discerned about guarding against corruption in the communities God has placed us?

To Guard Against Corruption, We Must Be Careful of Greed and Covetousness

After this the following episode took place. Naboth the Jezreelite owned a vineyard in Jezreel adjacent to the palace of King Ahab of Samaria. Ahab said to Naboth, “Give me your vineyard so I can make a vegetable garden out of it, for it is adjacent to my palace. I will give you an even better vineyard in its place, or if you prefer, I will pay you silver for it.” But Naboth replied to Ahab, “The Lord forbid that I should sell you my ancestral inheritance.” So Ahab went into his palace, bitter and angry that Naboth the Jezreelite had said, “I will not sell to you my ancestral inheritance.” He lay down on his bed, pouted, and would not eat.

1 Kings 21:1-4

As mentioned, this sad story all begins with Ahab coveting his neighbor’s vineyard. Ahab had at least two castles—one in Samaria and one in Jezreel, where Jezebel stayed. Naboth’s field was right next to the castle in Jezreel. Ahab approached Naboth with a good offer—to give him another vineyard or to pay him in silver. However, Naboth refused, saying, “The Lord forbid that I should sell you my ancestral inheritance” (v. 3). Apparently, he didn’t reject simply because it was not a good deal but out of honor for God. In the Mosaic law, God taught Israel that God actually owned the land of Canaan and that they were just tenants of land. God had distributed the land to the various tribes and their families, and because of that, they were not to sell the land permanently. Leviticus 25:23-24 (NLT) says:

The land must never be sold on a permanent basis, for the land belongs to me. You are only foreigners and tenant farmers working for me. “With every purchase of land you must grant the seller the right to buy it back.

Numbers 36:7 says, “In this way the inheritance of the Israelites will not be transferred from tribe to tribe. But every one of the Israelites must retain the ancestral heritage.” The land could only be sold in extreme circumstances when one was poor, but it had to be returned in the year of Jubilee (Lev 25:25-28). Naboth was not in dire circumstances where he needed the money, so he rightly felt that he could not sell the land in good conscience before God. It was God’s land, not his. Clearly, Naboth was one of the 7,000 faithful Jews who had not bowed his knee to Baal in the land (cf. 1 Kgs 19:18). This made Ahab angry, so like a spoiled child, he began to sulk and refused to eat. When Jezebel saw this, she challenged him to be like a king and then set a plan in motion to get the land (v. 7).

What must stand out is the fact that Naboth’s death happened because of Ahab’s greed and covetousness. Furthermore, Ahab’s family would one day be wiped out because of Ahab’s untamed desires. Though Ahab was over the entire land of Israel and owned two castles, it was not enough. Therefore, his greed led to the destruction of Naboth and his family and also Ahab’s family.

Often this is the beginning of corruption in our societies as well. It begins when children at a young age are not taught to tame their desires. They don’t have to have every toy, every piece of candy, get to watch every TV show, and stay up late at night. Untamed desires, including coveting, can lead to breaking every one of God’s commands. We blaspheme God because we didn’t get what we want. We lie to get something we don’t have. We steal to get it, and maybe even murder.

It was greed and covetousness that led the world into sin. God gave Adam and Eve everything in the entire world except the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. It was coveting the fruit of that tree which led them to disobey God and therefore suffer the consequences of the fall, which affects all of humanity. Likewise, we must keep ourselves from covetousness and greed if we are going to protect ourselves, our families, and our communities from corruption.

In Luke 12:15, Christ warned of the dangers of greed; he said, “Watch out and guard yourself from all types of greed, because one’s life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions.” Likewise, in 1 Timothy 6:9-10, Paul said:

Those who long to be rich, however, stumble into temptation and a trap and many senseless and harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is the root of all evils. Some people in reaching for it have strayed from the faith and stabbed themselves with many pains.

The longing for wealth leads many into various temptations and traps—destroying people’s integrity, health, family, and even faith. Proverbs 27:20 says, “As Death and Destruction are never satisfied, so the eyes of a person are never satisfied.”

Contentment

Because our eyes are never satisfied, we must learn the discipline of contentment and teach our children the same to protect ourselves and them from the common consequences of covetousness and greed. In Philippians 4:11-13, Paul said:

I am not saying this because I am in need, for I have learned to be content in any circumstance. I have experienced times of need and times of abundance. In any and every circumstance I have learned the secret of contentment, whether I go satisfied or hungry, have plenty or nothing. I am able to do all things through the one who strengthens me.

Paul had learned the secret of contentment, whether well fed or in lack, and it was through finding strength and satisfaction in Christ. Likewise, in 1 Timothy 6:6-8, Paul challenged Timothy with this discipline:

Now godliness combined with contentment brings great profit. For we have brought nothing into this world and so we cannot take a single thing out either. But if we have food and shelter, we will be satisfied with that.

Again, remember, if Ahab didn’t want the land, it would have preserved him from a curse, kept his family from destruction, and protected Naboth’s life. Likewise, if David had not longed uncontrollably for Bathsheba, it would have kept him from losing his firstborn son, having his daughter raped, his son killing his brother, and eventually the same son trying to usurp David’s throne and losing his life. Therefore, if we teach ourselves and our children contentment, it will keep us and them from many dangers. Godliness with contentment truly brings great profit (1 Tim 6:6).

Application Question: How can we learn contentment?

  1. To learn contentment, we must learn the difference between a need and a want. God promises to provide our needs but not necessarily all our wants (cf. Matt 6:33). As we discern the difference, we must often decide to be content with our needs and choose to not pursue our wants. Since our “eyes … are never satisfied” this will keep us from always grasping after the next thing (Prov 27:20).
  2. To learn contentment, we must practice generosity. By giving, we learn how it is truly more blessed to give than receive (Acts 20:35). It delivers us from a grasping, discontent, and idolatrous spirit. Also, we open the door for God to continually pour into us. Luke 6:38 says, “Give, and it will be given to you. Good measure, pressed down, shaken together, running over, will be put into your lap. For with the measure you use it will be measured back to you.”
  3. To learn contentment, we must continually practice thanksgiving. In 1 Thessalonians 5:18, Paul said, “In everything give thanks. For this is God’s will for you in Christ Jesus.” Being thankful often leads to contentment. It helps keep our eyes from continually wandering and wanting something else.
  4. To learn contentment, we must develop a flourishing relationship with God. As we abide in Christ, through time in the Word, prayer, worship, fellowship, and serving, God satisfies us. As Paul said, he could do all things, including being content, through Christ who strengthened him (Phil 4:11-13). If we’re not satisfied in our relationship with God, we’ll never be content, and we’ll continually seek to satisfy our discontentment with things, people, or accomplishments. Hebrews 13:5 says, “Your conduct must be free from the love of money and you must be content with what you have, for he has said, ‘I will never leave you and I will never abandon you.’”

Ahab’s greed and covetousness led to government corruption, and we must guard against the same to stop corruption and injustice from spreading in our communities.

Application Question: Why is it so difficult to be content, both with what we have and in our circumstances in general? In what ways are you vulnerable to discontentment, greed, or covetousness? How is God calling you to grow in contentment and get rid of covetousness?

To Guard Against Corruption, We Must Be Careful of Ungodly Relationships

So Ahab went into his palace, bitter and angry that Naboth the Jezreelite had said, “I will not sell to you my ancestral inheritance.” He lay down on his bed, pouted, and would not eat. Then his wife Jezebel came in and said to him, “Why do you have a bitter attitude and refuse to eat?” He answered her, “While I was talking to Naboth the Jezreelite, I said to him, ‘Sell me your vineyard for silver, or if you prefer, I will give you another vineyard in its place.’ But he said, ‘I will not sell you my vineyard.’ “His wife Jezebel said to him, “You are the king of Israel! Get up, eat some food, and have a good time. I will get the vineyard of Naboth the Jezreelite for you.” She wrote out orders, signed Ahab’s name to them, and sealed them with his seal. She then sent the orders to the leaders and to the nobles who lived in Naboth’s city. This is what she wrote: “Observe a time of fasting and seat Naboth in front of the people. Also seat two villains opposite him and have them testify, ‘You cursed God and the king.’ Then take him out and stone him to death.” … There had never been anyone like Ahab, who was firmly committed to doing evil in the sight of the Lord, urged on by his wife Jezebel.

1 Kings 21:4-10, 25

As mentioned, when Naboth denied Ahab, he went home and began to pout, even choosing to not eat. When his wife, Jezebel, noticed, she said, “Why do you have a bitter attitude and refuse to eat?” (v. 5). He then explained the situation. In response, Jezebel rebukes him, “You are the king of Israel! Get up, eat some food, and have a good time. I will get the vineyard of Naboth the Jezreelite for you” (v. 7). She essentially says, “You’re the king! You can’t let a Jezreelite deny you!” Jezebel was a daughter of the King of Sidon (1 Kgs 16:31), and in that culture, kings had absolute power—ruling with an iron fist. That’s what she saw from her daddy. Jewish kings were not known for the same leadership style, since they saw themselves as ruling under Yahweh and executing his laws. Therefore, Jezebel took things into her hands. She wrote letters telling the elders to falsely accuse Naboth and have him put to death. She used Ahab’s seal (v. 8), which implies Ahab was complicit in her evil plan.

This is not the first time that Jezebel influenced Ahab to commit evil. She had done that throughout their marriage. First Kings 16:31 says this about Ahab, “As if following in the sinful footsteps of Jeroboam son of Nebat were not bad enough, he married Jezebel the daughter of King Ethbaal of the Sidonians. Then he worshiped and bowed to Baal.” It was after Ahab married Jezebel that he started to worship Baal. In fact, Jezebel was the power behind the throne. First Kings 21:25 describes Ahab as being “urged on by his wife” to do evil. She was the one who was hunting and killing prophets, causing them to hide in caves (1 Kgs 18:4). And she was the one who threatened to take Elijah’s life after he took the lives of the false prophets (1 Kgs 19:2). After Elijah took their lives, Ahab simply listened to Elijah. He went to eat because Elijah said the rain was coming, and when it came, he then listened to Elijah again and rode to Jezreel (1 Kgs 18:41-46). It was Jezebel who threatened Elijah’s life and aided in hardening Ahab’s heart.

Certainly, this commonly happens today, not only in marriage, but also in relationships in general. It is always easier to pull somebody down than to pull somebody up. For this reason, Scripture strongly urges us to stay away from relationships that would encourage us towards spiritual apathy and sin. In 1 Corinthians 15:33, Paul said, “Do not be deceived: ‘Bad company corrupts good morals.’” In context, the Christians were being tempted to doubt the resurrection, which would nullify their faith. Paul said without the resurrection, our faith is in vain and challenged them to stay away from false teachers. In 2 Corinthians 6:14-18 (ESV), Paul said this to the Corinthians:

Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? What accord has Christ with Belial? Or what portion does a believer share with an unbeliever? What agreement has the temple of God with idols? For we are the temple of the living God; as God said, “I will make my dwelling among them and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.

Being “unequally yoked” was a farming metaphor. Two bulls would be yoked to pull a cart; however, if the bulls weren’t yoked equally in temperament and strength, one bull might harm the other, or pull in the wrong direction, and consequently, they couldn’t be effective in their work. Likewise, Paul says that yoking relationships with the world—whether in marriage, close friendships, or work relationships—can be hazardous. It is always easier to pull somebody in a sinful direction than in a righteous one. Also, by being unequally yoked one hinders his relationship with God. Consider the corresponding promise in 2 Corinthians 6:17-18:

Therefore go out from their midst, and be separate from them, says the Lord, and touch no unclean thing; then I will welcome you, and I will be a father to you, and you shall be sons and daughters to me, says the Lord Almighty.

It’s only by being separate from the world that God promises to “welcome” us and be our “father,” which refers to intimacy. Therefore, by joining with Jezebel, Ahab lost intimacy with God and soon became a worshiper of Baal. This happens to many as they yoke with the world. It may not be by friendships or marriage but by the music they listen to, the books they read, or the TV shows they watch. Since these are so anti-god in their message, they hinder intimacy with God and lead people down the wrong path. People who do this should not be surprised when reading the Bible and listening to sermons become dry to them, and they get nothing from corporate worship. They have yoked with the world in some way, and it is hindering their relationship with God and influencing them negatively. Friendship with the world is enmity with God (Jam 4:4).

With all that said, certainly there is a clear line between being unequally yoked with the world and being a “friend of … sinners,” which Christ was called (Matt 11:19). Christ could be friends with sinners because his relationship with them was an influencing relationship and not one where he was being influenced. It was genuine, but not as intimate as he would desire, because they had not repented of their sins to follow him. We must be salt and light to the world, and therefore be around unbelievers, but we must be careful of reducing our saltiness and dimming our light.

Ahab yoked with the world through marriage to Jezebel, and it led to him being the worst king in Israel’s history (v. 25-26). He was incited to further sin through his wife. In this narrative, apart from her, he would have simply pouted because he did not get the vineyard, but because of Jezebel, he was party both to Naboth’s death and his sons’ (2 Kgs 9:26).

If we are going to guard against corruption in our lives, we must be careful of ungodly relationships. Instead, we must seek to have our closest relationships with those who zealously love and follow God. In 2 Timothy 2:22, Paul said this to Timothy, “But keep away from youthful passions, and pursue righteousness, faithfulness, love, and peace, in company with others who call on the Lord from a pure heart.” It’s commonly been said that Christ’s relationships could be characterized by several widening circles. In his closest circle were the three strongest disciples—James, John, and Peter. Then, there was the twelve; then the seventy-two; then other believers; then the world. Our closest relationships must be with those who are zealous for the Lord as well, so they can inspire us to greater heights. Proverbs 13:20 says, “The one who associates with the wise grows wise, but a companion of fools suffers harm.” Certainly, this must be true of those we marry, since they will affect us the most.

If we’re going to guard against corruption, we must be careful of ungodly relationships.

Application Question: Why are our relationships so important to our spiritual life? How have you experienced worldly relationships which influenced you negatively and also godly relationships which influenced you positively?

To Guard Against Corruption, We Must Have Righteous Leaders

His wife Jezebel said to him, “You are the king of Israel! Get up, eat some food, and have a good time. I will get the vineyard of Naboth the Jezreelite for you.” She wrote out orders, signed Ahab’s name to them, and sealed them with his seal. She then sent the orders to the leaders and to the nobles who lived in Naboth’s city. This is what she wrote: “Observe a time of fasting and seat Naboth in front of the people. Also seat two villains opposite him and have them testify, ‘You cursed God and the king.’ Then take him out and stone him to death.” The men of the city, the leaders and the nobles who lived there, followed the written orders Jezebel had sent them. They observed a time of fasting and put Naboth in front of the people. The two villains arrived and sat opposite him. Then the villains testified against Naboth right before the people, saying, “Naboth cursed God and the king.” So they dragged him outside the city and stoned him to death. Then they reported to Jezebel, “Naboth has been stoned to death.”

1 Kings 21:7-14

Another aspect that must stand out about the corruption in this narrative is that it was all propagated by those in authority—the king, queen, and elders. This reminds us of the importance of godly character in our leaders. When God gives qualities of those who can serve as elders and deacons in the church in 1 Timothy 3, they are primarily character traits, like not being given to much wine, not being a brawler (somebody who gets into fights), being hospitable (somebody who loves strangers), running one’s household well, etc. When God looks to use somebody for the kingdom, his or her character is the primary quality. He takes a person with godly character, then trains and equips them for greater service.

Unfortunately, with the world, education, skills, experiences, beauty, contacts, and other qualifications are often the most important which commonly leads to having people with bad character in authority. When our leaders are corrupt, they only exasperate and increase ungodliness in a culture or nation.

Application Question: How should we respond to the importance of having godly leaders to restrain sin and corruption in society?

1. Because of the importance of having godly leadership to restrain sin and promote righteousness in society, believers must support their leaders through prayer and other practical ways.

They should pray that the leadership might be saved, protected from evil, and that they would be wise and righteous (cf. 1 Tim 2:1-4). They should also support them by encouraging them instead of criticizing them, obeying them, lovingly holding them accountable when needed, and serving them in other practical ways. Hebrews 13:7 says, “Obey your leaders and submit to them, for they keep watch over your souls and will give an account for their work. Let them do this with joy and not with complaints, for this would be no advantage for you.”

2. Because of the importance of having godly leadership to restrain sin and promote righteousness in society, believers should pray for God to raise up godly leaders and prayerfully consider serving in leadership.

God put Joseph, David, Daniel, Obadiah, and Nehemiah in leadership positions. Both Joseph, Daniel, and Obadiah (who supervised Ahab’s palace and saved the prophets; 1 Kgs 18:3), served in very pagan and ungodly environments and yet remained loyal to God. Proverbs 29:2 (NLT) says, “When the godly are in authority, the people rejoice. But when the wicked are in power, they groan.” Romans 13:1-7 says those in authority are God’s servants meant to reward the righteous and punish wrongdoers. Serving in leadership positions is a tremendous way to honor God and bless people. Those in leadership have an incredible capacity to influence communities negatively or righteously; therefore, we should continually pray for them, support them, and also consider serving in those positions.

Application Question: Why is leadership so important? What makes it so difficult to serve in leadership positions? How can we better support our leaders? Do you feel called to serve your community through leadership, and if so, how?

To Guard Against Corruption, We Must Courageously Confront Sin and Protect the Most Vulnerable

The men of the city, the leaders and the nobles who lived there, followed the written orders Jezebel had sent them. They observed a time of fasting and put Naboth in front of the people. The two villains arrived and sat opposite him. Then the villains testified against Naboth right before the people, saying, “Naboth cursed God and the king.” So they dragged him outside the city and stoned him to death. Then they reported to Jezebel, “Naboth has been stoned to death.” When Jezebel heard that Naboth had been stoned to death, she said to Ahab, “Get up, take possession of the vineyard Naboth the Jezreelite refused to sell you for silver, for Naboth is no longer alive; he’s dead.” When Ahab heard that Naboth was dead, he got up and went down to take possession of the vineyard of Naboth the Jezreelite. The Lord told Elijah the Tishbite: “Get up, go down and meet King Ahab of Israel who lives in Samaria. He is at the vineyard of Naboth; he has gone down there to take possession of it. Say to him, ‘This is what the Lord says: “Haven’t you committed murder and taken possession of the property of the deceased?”‘ Then say to him, ‘This is what the Lord says: “In the spot where dogs licked up Naboth’s blood they will also lick up your blood—yes, yours!”‘

1 Kings 21:11-19

Certainly, as mentioned, one of the things that must stand out in this narrative is the willingness of the elders to go along with Jezebel’s evil plan. Maybe, they were afraid of losing their authority and wealth or being killed by Jezebel. Therefore, they simply agreed to her request. They even instituted the evil plan with a veil of religious piety. In obedience to Jezebel, they called for a fast. Most likely, Israel was suffering a famine or plague, and the fast was to seek God’s face and determine why it was happening. After seeking the Lord, two hand-selected villains sitting next to Naboth accused him of cursing God and the king. Therefore, Naboth was killed and apparently so were his children which allowed Ahab to confiscate the land.

Again, the spiritual and administrative leaders of Israel said nothing, they just obeyed Jezebel’s plan. However, when God informed Elijah, he met Ahab at the vineyard and rebuked him for his sin—telling him that God was going to judge him and his family (v. 17-24). This must stand out because the previous time we saw Elijah in Jezreel, in 1 Kings 19, he ran for his life because he heard Jezebel was going to kill him. But, now, maybe a few years later, he boldly returns to Jezreel to confront the king outside of his home at the vineyard.

Likewise, if we are going to guard against corruption, we must also be willing to confront sin, even at risk to ourselves. This is what Christ did when he visited the Jewish temple twice (John 2, Matt 21). When religious leaders were allowing the poor and those from far away to be charged exorbitant prices to offer sacrifices at the temple, Christ turned over tables, kicked out the money changers, and rebuked the leaders. At times, we may need to wisely do the same, especially to protect the vulnerable. When corruption abounds, the bullies pick on the weak in society—the widow, the orphan, the poor, the ethnic and religious minorities (including Christians), and the sick. Like Christ (and Elijah in this context), we must stand up for them.

In addition, we must remember that if we are aware of the evil being done in the classroom, at church, or in the business, and we do nothing, God will often hold us liable. In Samuel 3, God judges Eli, the priest, because he knew his sons were cheating people at the tabernacle, including being promiscuous with the women, but he did nothing about it. He did warn his sons, but that’s all he did, even when they continued in sin (1 Sam 2:22-26). Consider what God said to Eli through Samuel in 1 Samuel 3:13-14:

You should tell him that I am about to judge his house forever because of the sin that he knew about. For his sons were cursing God, and he did not rebuke them. Therefore I swore an oath to the house of Eli, ‘The sin of the house of Eli can never be forgiven by sacrifice or by grain offering.’

Likewise, Proverbs 24:10-12 says this:

If you faint in the day of trouble, your strength is small! Deliver those being taken away to death, and hold back those slipping to the slaughter. If you say, “But we did not know about this,” does not the one who evaluates hearts consider? Does not the one who guards your life know? Will he not repay each person according to his deeds?

When there is stealing, cheating, abuse of the vulnerable, and other sins happening that we know of and can do something about, but do nothing, God will hold us accountable.

In the church, according to Christ’s teaching in Matthew 18:15-17, that means approaching people one on one to challenge them in love. If they don’t repent, it means bringing a few others to help hold them accountable, and if they still don’t repent, bringing it before the church. If they still don’t repent, it means removing them from the church, all in love to help them repent. If this is not done, a little leaven leavens the whole lump (1 Cor 5:6). Sin begins to spread throughout the church. Outside the church, similar principles should be followed—approaching a person one on one to confirm and challenge the person, and if that doesn’t work, possibly going to leadership.

This is hard, especially if it might negatively affect our livelihood or our friends and family. That’s part of the reason Eli never removed his children from leadership, though he knew they were morally unfit. However, we must do this at times in obedience to God. Otherwise, corruption and sin will flourish, and God will hold us partially responsible for knowing and doing nothing, as Eli did.

Application Question: Who are the most vulnerable in our churches, schools, and/or workplaces, and how can we better protect and provide for them? Why is it so hard to challenge people who are in sin, especially those we know and love? How can we challenge people wisely?

To Guard Against Corruption, We Must Fear God’s Omniscient and Righteous Judgment

When Elijah arrived, Ahab said to him, “So, you have found me, my enemy!” Elijah replied, “I have found you, because you are committed to doing evil in the sight of the Lord. The Lord says, ‘Look, I am ready to bring disaster on you. I will destroy you and cut off every last male belonging to Ahab in Israel, including even the weak and incapacitated. I will make your dynasty like those of Jeroboam son of Nebat and Baasha son of Ahijah because you angered me and made Israel sin.’ The Lord says this about Jezebel, ‘Dogs will devour Jezebel by the outer wall of Jezreel.’ As for Ahab’s family, dogs will eat the ones who die in the city, and the birds of the sky will eat the ones who die in the country.”

1 Kings 21:20-24

One of the great hindrances to sin and corruption is a recognition of God’s omniscience and his judgment. With Ahab’s and Jezebel’s sin, it seemed like a perfectly executed plan. Nobody would tell—not the elders or the paid liars; however, God knew. He immediately told Elijah, including giving Elijah prophetic words of judgment. Proverbs 15:3 says, “The eyes of the Lord are in every place, keeping watch on those who are evil and those who are good.” God knows everything and will one day judge all sin.

When Elijah met with Ahab, he told Ahab that God would destroy all the males in Ahab’s family, effectively ending his dynasty (v. 22). Dogs would devour Jezebel at the wall of Jezreel (v. 23). Those who died outside the city would be eaten by birds and those who died inside would be eaten by dogs (v. 23). All of this eventually happened. As we’ll see, God had mercy on Ahab, and therefore delayed these judgments until Ahab’s son reigned. Ahab was shot while in his chariot during a battle, and when they brought the chariot back to Samaria, the dogs licked his blood (1 Kgs 22:37-38). Later, Jehu shot Jehoram, Ahab’s son, and had him thrown in Naboth’s field (2 Kgs 9:24-26). Jehu also had Jezebel thrown out of a tower in her castle at Jezreel. When Jehu wanted to bury her, there wasn’t enough of her body left because the dogs got to her. They tore apart her body in Naboth’s field (2 Kgs 9:34-37). After that, Jehu executed seventy of Ahab’s sons who were living in Samaria (2 Kgs 10).

What we can see from this narrative is that God sees and knows all, and every account will be paid. They are paid in this life. People always reap what they have sown, even if that is just the regular consequences of sin, which affects us and others (Gal 6:7-8). The person who cheats has the memory of their cheating, the lack of satisfaction when they get their grade (because of their cheating); they will have a greater propensity to cheat later on in life, including on bigger issues (like in marriage or at work) which could have drastic consequences. People always reap what they sow, because God made the earth that way. In addition, because God keeps perfect records, one day, he will judge all at Christ’s coming. For believers, that will mean reward or loss of reward, but they will still enter heaven (1 Cor 3:10-15). For unbelievers, that means being separated from God’s blessings eternally in a place of judgment (Rev 20:11-15). Though others might not see our sins, we must remember God always sees.

For this reason, when society has lost a fear of God, corruption expands and saturates all aspects of society. Romans 1:28-29, says it this way:

And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what should not be done. They are filled with every kind of unrighteousness, wickedness, covetousness, malice…

A lack of acknowledging God as creator, savior, and judge always leads to various forms of depravity. If the beginning of wisdom is to fear the Lord (Prov 9:10), to not fear God is to live without wisdom, where greater sins continue to abound.

Application Question: How should we respond to the importance of fearing God to stave off corruption?

The importance of fearing God to stave off corruption reminds us of our need to be salt and light to the world. As we live in the fear of the Lord by being obedient to God and loving others, it helps restrain and expel darkness around us. Therefore, when we compromise and become more like the world, the world loses the witness it so desperately needs and becomes more corrupt.

Being salt and light to the world includes our need to share the gospel with others. Though creation reflects that there is a powerful God, only Scripture teaches people how to be saved. Consequently, we must zealously share the gospel with others, even if it leads to being accused and mocked like Elijah was. As more people are saved and therefore rightly fear God, it staves off corruption and promotes righteousness.

Application Question: How do you see a lack of fearing God leading to greater sins in people, society, and your nation specifically (Rom 1:18-32)? Why is this happening? How can this be remedied?

To Guard Against Corruption, We Must Understand God’s Great Merciful Character

(There had never been anyone like Ahab, who was firmly committed to doing evil in the sight of the Lord, urged on by his wife Jezebel. He was so wicked he worshiped the disgusting idols, just like the Amorites whom the Lord had driven out from before the Israelites.) When Ahab heard these words, he tore his clothes, put on sackcloth, and fasted. He slept in sackcloth and walked around dejected. The Lord said to Elijah the Tishbite, “Have you noticed how Ahab shows remorse before me? Because he shows remorse before me, I will not bring disaster on his dynasty during his lifetime, but during the reign of his son.”

1 Kings 21:25-29

Finally, at the end of the narrative, we see God’s great mercy towards Ahab. After Elijah rebuked Ahab, Ahab mourned before the Lord. He tore his clothes, put on sackcloth, and fasted (v. 27). Because of this, God told Elijah that these terrible things would not happen in Ahab’s lifetime, but in the reign of his son (v. 29). Judgment was postponed for around three years.1 Certainly, this demonstrates how gracious and merciful God is, especially since Ahab was Israel’s worst king up to that point in their history (v. 25).

Interpretation Question: Was Ahab genuinely repentant?

There is no evidence that Ahab returned Naboth’s field, but since God honored his mourning, it must have been at least temporarily genuine, though not lasting. At the moment, he was truly repentant, but maybe after Jezebel found out and rebuked him, he snapped out of it. However, even that moment of genuine remorse moved God’s heart. God is tremendously gracious and merciful, and his graciousness is meant to draw us to repentance and righteousness. Romans 2:4 says, “Or do you have contempt for the wealth of his kindness, forbearance, and patience, and yet do not know that God’s kindness leads you to repentance?” Furthermore, God’s patience with Ahab and us is always given to allow us more time to repent. First Peter 3:9 says, “The Lord is not slow concerning his promise, as some regard slowness, but is being patient toward you, because he does not wish for any to perish but for all to come to repentance.”

Application Question: How should understanding God’s great merciful character towards sinners affect people?

1. Understanding God’s great merciful character should draw people to repent of their sins and accept God’s forgiveness.

First John 1:9 says, “But if we confess our sins, he is faithful and righteous, forgiving us our sins and cleansing us from all unrighteousness.” If God had mercy on Ahab and gave him more time to repent towards salvation, even though he and his wife had killed the prophets and persecuted the righteous, how much more so will God demonstrate mercy towards us and our nations if we genuinely repent?

2. Understanding God’s great merciful character should help us not give up on the most hardened sinners.

Again, if God continually gave Ahab opportunities to be saved—sending Elijah to rebuke him and withholding judgment, all so there could be true repentance—then, we should not give up on those who are far away from God, including our families, communities, and countries. God mercifully saved Paul who was having Christians jailed and killed. Certainly, there are no sinners so far away from God that the Lord won’t graciously forgive them if they repent. For this reason, we should continue to pray, share the gospel, and not give up. God sent his Son to die on the cross for our sin, and he still pursues sinners today. Though God may appear indifferent towards sin, he is just being patient with sinners so that they might repent and have life. Praise God for his merciful grace.

3. Understanding God’s great merciful character should help us be quick to forgive others, even when their repentance is not sustained.

Ephesians 4:32 says, “Instead, be kind to one another, compassionate, forgiving one another, just as God in Christ also forgave you.” Likewise, Matthew 18:21-22 says this in describing Peter’s conversation with Christ over forgiveness: “‘Lord, how many times must I forgive my brother who sins against me? As many as seven times?’ Jesus said to him, ‘Not seven times, I tell you, but seventy-seven times!’” Certainly, this is hard, but God’s grace is available to continually help us forgive, as God forgives us.

Application Question: What makes forgiving others as God forgives us difficult? What does this look like practically?

Conclusion

How can we guard against corruption? We can discern principles from considering the great corruption in Israel, as Ahab and Jezebel framed and killed Naboth to take his land, and God’s response.

  1. To Guard Against Corruption, We Must Be Careful of Greed and Covetousness
  2. To Guard Against Corruption, We Must Be Careful of Ungodly Relationships
  3. To Guard Against Corruption, We Must Have Righteous Leaders
  4. To Guard Against Corruption, We Must Courageously Confront Sin and Protect the Vulnerable
  5. To Guard Against Corruption, We Must Fear God’s Omniscient and Righteous Judgment
  6. To Guard Against Corruption, We Must Understand God’s Great Merciful Character

Application Question: What stood out most in the reading and why? What questions or applications did you take from the reading?

Prayer Prompts

  • Pray for God to deliver us from greed, covetousness, and discontent. Pray that God would empower us to be content through Christ whether in times of blessing or trial.
  • Pray for God to help us cut any cords with the world which negatively influence us (friendships, entertainment, news sources, etc.) and that we would instead yoke ourselves to what is good and righteous.
  • Pray for God to guide, protect, and give supernatural wisdom to our leaders so they can lead righteously in government, education, business, the medical field, the church, and the home.
  • Pray for God to give his people boldness to confront sin, even at cost to themselves, and that they would fight for the vulnerable. Pray for grace and protection over the oppressed and neglected, including the unborn, orphans, the poor, the foreigner, and the elderly.
  • Pray for God to give grace to the members of our society to fear God and therefore turn away from sin to righteousness. Pray for God to draw the lost to himself, so that they would genuinely repent and be saved.

Copyright © 2022 Gregory Brown

Unless otherwise noted, the primary Scriptures used are taken from the NET Bible ® copyright © 1996-2016 by Biblical Studies Press, L.L.C. All rights reserved.

Holy Bible, New International Version ®, NIV® Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.® Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide.

Scripture quotations marked (ESV) are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®) Copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. All rights reserved.

Scripture quotations marked (NLT) are taken from the Holy Bible, New Living Translation, Copyright © 1996, 2004, 2007 by Tyndale House Foundation. Used by permission of Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., Carol Stream, Illinois 60188. All rights reserved.

Scripture quotations marked (NASB) are taken from the New American Standard Bible®, Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, and 1995 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission.

Scripture quotations marked (KJV) are from the King James Version of the Bible.

All emphases in Scripture quotations have been added.

BTG Publishing all rights reserved.


1 Meyer, F.B. Elijah and the Secret of His Power (pp. 63-64). Kypros Press. Kindle Edition.

Related Topics: Character Study, Christian Life

13. Characteristics Of Our Faithful God (2 Kings 1)

Related Media

After Ahab died, Moab rebelled against Israel. Ahaziah fell through a window lattice in his upper chamber in Samaria and was injured. He sent messengers with these orders, “Go, ask Baal Zebub, the god of Ekron, if I will survive this injury.” But the Lord’s angelic messenger told Elijah the Tishbite, “Get up, go to meet the messengers from the king of Samaria. Say this to them: ‘You must think there is no God in Israel! That explains why you are on your way to seek an oracle from Baal Zebub the god of Ekron. Therefore this is what the Lord says, “You will not leave the bed you lie on, for you will certainly die!’” So Elijah went on his way. When the messengers returned to the king, he asked them, “Why have you returned?” They replied, “A man came up to meet us. He told us, “Go back to the king who sent you and tell him, ‘This is what the Lord says: “You must think there is no God in Israel! That explains why you are sending for an oracle from Baal Zebub, the god of Ekron. Therefore you will not leave the bed you lie on, for you will certainly die.’” The king asked them, “Describe the appearance of this man who came up to meet you and told you these things.” They replied, “He was a hairy man and had a leather belt tied around his waist.” The king said, “He is Elijah the Tishbite.” The king sent a captain and his fifty soldiers to retrieve Elijah. The captain went up to him, while he was sitting on the top of a hill. He told him, “Prophet, the king says, ‘Come down!’” Elijah replied to the captain, “If I am indeed a prophet, may fire come down from the sky and consume you and your fifty soldiers!” Fire then came down from the sky and consumed him and his fifty soldiers. The king sent another captain and his fifty soldiers to retrieve Elijah. He went up and told him, “Prophet, this is what the king says, ‘Come down at once!’” Elijah replied to them, “If I am indeed a prophet, may fire come down from the sky and consume you and your fifty soldiers!” Fire from God came down from the sky and consumed him and his fifty soldiers. The king sent a third captain and his fifty soldiers. This third captain went up and fell on his knees before Elijah. He begged for mercy, “Prophet, please have respect for my life and for the lives of these fifty servants of yours. Indeed, fire came down from the sky and consumed the two captains who came before me, along with their men. So now, please have respect for my life.” The Lord’s angelic messenger said to Elijah, “Go down with him. Don’t be afraid of him.” So he got up and went down with him to the king. Elijah said to the king, “This is what the Lord says, ‘You sent messengers to seek an oracle from Baal Zebub, the god of Ekron. You must think there is no God in Israel from whom you can seek an oracle! Therefore you will not leave the bed you lie on, for you will certainly die.’” He died just as the Lord had prophesied through Elijah. In the second year of the reign of King Jehoram son of Jehoshaphat over Judah, Ahaziah’s brother Jehoram replaced him as king of Israel, because he had no son. The rest of the events of Ahaziah’s reign, including his accomplishments, are recorded in the scroll called the Annals of the Kings of Israel.

2 Kings 1 (NET)

When studying Scripture, we often focus on learning how to live—finding applications for our daily lives. However, even more important than teaching us how to live, Scripture teaches us about God and his character. Therefore, as we consider Ahaziah’s short reign in Israel and how he died, there are principles we can learn about God and his character which will enable us to worship and serve him better.

In 2 Kings 1, after Ahab’s death, Moab rebelled against Israel. They were a vassal state who came under Israel’s authority when David initially defeated them (2 Sam 8:2). They paid taxes each year to Israel’s king and gave him honor. However, after Ahab died, they rebelled. When Ahaziah, Ahab’s son and the new king of Israel, heard this, he was in an upper chamber of his palace in Samaria. In his shock, he must have leaned on one of the wooden frames, and it gave way, causing him to fall several stories to the ground. The crash was not fatal, but it severely injured him. Consequently, Ahaziah sent messengers to ask Baal Zebub, the god of Ekron, if he would survive. Baal Zebub means “Lord of the flies.” Most likely, there were many flies in that area that carried diseases, and it was believed that Baal Zebub warded off these flies and therefore protected the Philistines from sickness.1 It’s not clear why Ahaziah sought Baal’s guidance at Ekron, since there were, no doubt, prophets of Baal in Israel. In 1 Kings 18, all Baal’s prophets were destroyed in the contest with Elijah, but that was about ten years prior to this. The temple at Ekron was very famous, as Baal was the chief god of that city2, so maybe that is why Ahaziah sent his servants there for a diagnosis and possibly with hope that Baal would heal him.

When Ahaziah sought answers from Baal, God sent a prophetic word through Elijah that Ahaziah would die for not seeking help from the true God. As we consider this passage, we learn principles about God’s character which will help us worship and serve him better, including keeping us from rebellion.

Big Question: What principles can we learn about God’s character from this narrative in 2 Kings 1?

God’s Punishment on People’s Sins Is Often Distributed by Allowing Their Sins to Negatively Affect Their Children for Generations

After Ahab died, Moab rebelled against Israel. Ahaziah fell through a window lattice in his upper chamber in Samaria and was injured. He sent messengers with these orders, “Go, ask Baal Zebub, the god of Ekron, if I will survive this injury.”

2 Kings 1:1-2

Ahaziah’s parents, Ahab and Jezebel, introduced Baal worship in Israel. Ahab was dead, but Jezebel was still alive and, no doubt, had significant power in Israel. In considering this narrative, it is clear that Ahaziah simply practiced his parents’ sins. When he was injured, he sought the deity that his family worshiped—Baal. In addition, when Elijah rebuked Ahaziah’s messengers, he responded just like his parents would. Ahaziah responded by force—trying to take Elijah with a regimen of fifty soldiers. Previously, Jezebel had hunted down all the prophets of Yahweh and put many of them to death (1 Kgs 18:4). She even threatened Elijah’s life (1 Kgs 19:2). Ahaziah had seen both his parents’ zeal for Baal in his home, and no doubt, witnessed their great fury. When they were angry, they probably even got physical. Therefore, Ahaziah responded just like them.

Ahaziah’s unfaithfulness must be considered in the context of the Mosaic law—God’s covenant with Israel. In Exodus 20:5, God said this about idol worship and how it would affect the families who practiced it:

You shall not bow down to them or serve them, for I, the Lord, your God, am a jealous God, responding to the transgression of fathers by dealing with children to the third and fourth generations of those who reject me.

God was not saying that he would punish children for their parents’ sins, because in other places, God directly said that he would never do that. Ezekiel 18:20 says,

The person who sins is the one who will die. A son will not suffer for his father’s iniquity, and a father will not suffer for his son’s iniquity; the righteous person will be judged according to his righteousness, and the wicked person according to his wickedness.

Therefore, God’s covenant in Exodus 20:5 seems to demonstrate how parents’ sins would negatively impact their children for generations—consequently leading to their punishment. The power of rebellion will be hard to root out of family lines, which is why we commonly see sins passed down generationally.

If fathers put work before their family, their sons will commonly do the same in their marriage—hurting both their wives and children. If parents struggle with addictions to alcohol or other types of drugs, the children commonly will as well. Typically, alcohol abuse, domestic abuse, divorce, infidelity, debt, etc., can be clearly seen across generational lines. This should be sobering for parents or potential parents because our virtues and vices will most likely show up in our children. If we put things before God—neglecting family devotions and church—our children will typically do the same. Similarly, if we demonstrate the importance of not just attending church but also finding ways to serve and get involved, our children will often do so as well.

Therefore, as we consider Ahaziah’s practicing his parent’s rebellion, we must soberly ask ourselves, “What are our vices as parents (or potential parents) and what were our parents’ vices?” As we discern these, we can work on rooting them out, so they don’t continue down our generational lines. This is a common reflective activity done with pre-marital couples. They are instructed to look back at their parents’ marriage, training of the children, handling of finances, resolving of conflicts, etc., so they can identify what they want to model and don’t. If couples don’t reflect, they will often by default practice the negative aspects of their parents and pass those on to their children. For mature couples whose children are older or out of the house, it’s not too late to reflect, set a godly example for them, and help bring transformation in their lives. It just will be harder and possibly a longer process than if certain vices were removed before the children were born or while they were young.

Ahab and Jezebel set a terrible example for Ahaziah in their pagan worship and their harsh policies, and Ahaziah clearly modeled them to his own destruction and that of his children.

Application Question: What are your virtues and your vices? What are some things you would like to develop in your life or get rid of to be more of a blessing to your children (or future children) and others who come in contact with you? How did your parents’ examples positively and negatively affect you?

God Desires People to Rely on Him for Guidance and Therefore Will Bring Judgment for Relying on the World and the Occult

But the Lord’s angelic messenger told Elijah the Tishbite, “Get up, go to meet the messengers from the king of Samaria. Say this to them: ‘You must think there is no God in Israel! That explains why you are on your way to seek an oracle from Baal Zebub the god of Ekron.

2 Kings 1:3

After Ahaziah sent messengers to Ekron to seek guidance from Baal Zebub, God immediately let Elijah know about it and sent him with a prophetic message. Second Kings 1:3-4 says,

But the Lord’s angelic messenger told Elijah the Tishbite, “Get up, go to meet the messengers from the king of Samaria. Say this to them: ‘You must think there is no God in Israel! That explains why you are on your way to seek an oracle from Baal Zebub the god of Ekron. Therefore this is what the Lord says, “You will not leave the bed you lie on, for you will certainly die!” ‘ “So Elijah went on his way.

In the Old Testament, God expressly warned Israel about dabbling in the occult. This was one of the reasons God judged the Canaanites and planned to remove them from the land. In Deuteronomy 18:9-14, Moses said this to Israel:

When you enter the land the Lord your God is giving you, you must not learn the abhorrent practices of those nations. There must never be found among you anyone who sacrifices his son or daughter in the fire, anyone who practices divination, an omen reader, a soothsayer, a sorcerer, one who casts spells, one who conjures up spirits, a practitioner of the occult, or a necromancer. Whoever does these things is abhorrent to the Lord and because of these detestable things the Lord your God is about to drive them out from before you. You must be blameless before the Lord your God. Those nations that you are about to dispossess listen to omen readers and diviners, but the Lord your God has not given you permission to do such things.

In addition, Leviticus 20:6 says, “‘The person who turns to the spirits of the dead and familiar spirits to commit prostitution by going after them, I will set my face against that person and cut him off from the midst of his people.” God promised to cut off Israelites who sought the guidance of demons through occultic practices, and with Ahaziah, God was faithful to his Word. Because Ahaziah sought guidance through the occult, he was going to die. Likewise, one reason Scripture gives for God’s judgment of Saul is because he sought guidance from a medium. First Chronicles 10:13-14 says,

So Saul died because he was unfaithful to the Lord and did not obey the Lord’s instructions; he even tried to conjure up underworld spirits. He did not seek the Lord’s guidance, so the Lord killed him and transferred the kingdom to David son of Jesse.

This reminds us of how dangerous occultic practices are. Believers should not use horoscopes. They should not play with Ouija boards or seek guidance from psychics. When they do this, they open the door to demons and stir up God’s wrath. Because of this, Paul warned the Corinthians against participating in idol feasts. In 1 Corinthians 10:20-22, he said:

No, I mean that what the pagans sacrifice is to demons and not to God. I do not want you to be partners with demons. You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons. You cannot take part in the table of the Lord and the table of demons. Or are we trying to provoke the Lord to jealousy? Are we really stronger than he is?

By participating in occultic practices, we will provoke God to jealously and bring his discipline on our lives. Charles Swindoll said it this way:

I realize that most people who begin dabbling in astrology or fortune telling or Ouija boards don’t take it all that seriously. Astrology, for example, has a captivating appeal. Most do it for fun. Or out of curiosity. But these simple, harmless-looking games begin a process that many cannot handle; and they open doors that should not be opened. Then, it’s only a matter of time before the dark powers of demonic forces suck them in, and they find themselves ensnared. As the forces of darkness capture more of their minds, they become driven by these powers, consumed by them, ruled by them, rather than governed by God.3

Obviously, one of the main reasons people seek the occult is to gain guidance about the future; however, when we do that, we are rejecting God’s guidance, and like Ahaziah and Saul, we will provoke God to jealousy and wrath.

In considering God’s desire to guide us, 2 Timothy 3:16-17 says, “Every scripture is inspired by God and useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the person dedicated to God may be capable and equipped for every good work.” Through Scripture, God promises to equip us for “every good work.” Do we need guidance for relationships, parenting, business, the future, etc.? In Scripture, God either tells us what to do, especially in moral situations, or gives us principles. If that were not enough, James 1:5 says, “But if anyone is deficient in wisdom, he should ask God, who gives to all generously and without reprimand, and it will be given to him.”

When worrying about the future or feeling like we need further guidance, we must seek God through his Word and prayer instead of the world, including the occult. If we seek the world’s guidance, including on major decisions like who to marry, how to parent, and what to do with our lives in general, we discredit God’s guidance and will bring God’s discipline on our lives.

Application Question: In what ways are Christians tempted to rely on the world’s wisdom instead of God’s? Why is the occult so dangerous? What is your experience with the occult?

God’s Grace Is Sometimes Revealed in Delivering People from Suffering and at Other Times by Empowering Them Through It

When the messengers returned to the king, he asked them, “Why have you returned?” They replied, “A man came up to meet us. He told us, “Go back to the king who sent you and tell him, ‘This is what the Lord says: “You must think there is no God in Israel! That explains why you are sending for an oracle from Baal Zebub, the god of Ekron. Therefore you will not leave the bed you lie on, for you will certainly die.” ‘ “The king asked them, “Describe the appearance of this man who came up to meet you and told you these things.” They replied, “He was a hairy man and had a leather belt tied around his waist.” The king said, “He is Elijah the Tishbite.” The king sent a captain and his fifty soldiers to retrieve Elijah. The captain went up to him, while he was sitting on the top of a hill. He told him, “Prophet, the king says, ‘Come down!’ “Elijah replied to the captain, “If I am indeed a prophet, may fire come down from the sky and consume you and your fifty soldiers!” Fire then came down from the sky and consumed him and his fifty soldiers. The king sent another captain and his fifty soldiers to retrieve Elijah. He went up and told him, “Prophet, this is what the king says, ‘Come down at once!’ “Elijah replied to them, “If I am indeed a prophet, may fire come down from the sky and consume you and your fifty soldiers!” Fire from God came down from the sky and consumed him and his fifty soldiers.

2 Kings 1:5-12

When the messengers returned, the king was surprised at the brevity of their trip; therefore, he asked them, “Why have you returned?” (v. 5). In response, they told him about the prophet and what he said. He then asked what the prophet looked like (v. 7). In verse 8, they responded, “He was a hairy man and had a leather belt tied around his waist.” Literally, “hairy man” can be translated “possessor of hair.”4 Elijah was probably wearing some type of animal garment with a leather belt around his waist. When the king heard this, he knew it was Elijah.

He then sent a captain with fifty soldiers to take Elijah by force. Elijah was on the top of a hill (probably praying and communing with God; cf. 1 Kgs 18:42, 19:11). The captain said, “Prophet, the king says, ‘Come down!” (v. 9). It might seem like a gentle request; however, the context demonstrates that it was threatening. The king and his family were already antagonistic to Elijah—having tried to kill him multiple times—and they had killed many other prophets (1 Kgs 18, 19). Also, with the third captain, God told Elijah to not be afraid of him (v. 15), which demonstrates that Elijah probably felt like he was in danger. The king clearly had bad intentions for Elijah. In response to the first and second captain, Elijah said, “If I am indeed a prophet, may fire come down from the sky and consume you and your fifty soldiers!” (v. 10 and 12). Both times, God brought fire from heaven to judge them for threatening Elijah.

This was very reminiscent of 1 Kings 18 when Elijah had a contest with the prophets of Baal to prove who was the true God. The true God was the one who brought fire from heaven on the sacrifice. What should God do if some Israelites still didn’t believe he was God? Bring fire again, and that’s exactly what God did. God brought fire from heaven both to prove that he was the true God and also to protect his prophet.

God Our Protecter and Preserver

Here, we must remember something about God. He is our protector. In Matthew 18:10, Christ said, “See that you do not disdain one of these little ones. For I tell you that their angels in heaven always see the face of my Father in heaven.” Also, Psalm 91:11-12 says, “For he will order his angels to protect you in all you do. They will lift you up in their hands, so you will not slip and fall on a stone.” Scripture says God has angels around us ready to respond to his call to protect us; no doubt, God was doing that here with Elijah. Certainly, there are many untold ways God has protected us throughout our lives, which we won’t know about until we get to heaven—the many times that Satan asked to sift us like wheat, but God said no, or accidents God kept from happening.

With that said, in God’s sovereign will, it is not always his will to protect his saints from suffering. Sometimes, as with Christ, it is God’s will for his saints to experience great sorrow and pain, including death. Through the suffering, he matures their character, and if it is God’s will for his saints to die, he perfects them in heaven. In Hebrews 12:23, the saints are called “the spirits of the righteous, who have been made perfect.”

Hebrews 11:32-40 describes these two aspects of God’s will for believers by giving examples of those who, because of their faith, were delivered from suffering and others, likewise through faith, who God gave grace to persevere through suffering.

And what more shall I say? For time will fail me if I tell of Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, of David and Samuel and the prophets. Through faith they conquered kingdoms, administered justice, gained what was promised, shut the mouths of lions, quenched raging fire, escaped the edge of the sword, gained strength in weakness, became mighty in battle, put foreign armies to flight, and women received back their dead raised to life. But others were tortured, not accepting release, to obtain resurrection to a better life. And others experienced mocking and flogging, and even chains and imprisonment. They were stoned, sawed apart, murdered with the sword; they went about in sheepskins and goatskins; they were destitute, afflicted, ill-treated (the world was not worthy of them); they wandered in deserts and mountains and caves and openings in the earth. And these all were commended for their faith, yet they did not receive what was promised. For God had provided something better for us, so that they would be made perfect together with us.

Whatever God’s choice, whether to supernaturally deliver us from pain, as with Elijah, or to allow us to endure pain, as with Christ, we must trust God. Like the three Hebrew men being threatened to be thrown into the fire if they did not worship the Babylonian king’s idol, we must say:

If this be so, our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the burning fiery furnace, and he will deliver us out of your hand, O king. But if not, be it known to you, O king, that we will not serve your gods or worship the golden image that you have set up.”

Daniel 3:17-18

As we consider this, we must ask ourselves, are we willing to trust God with the outcome of being righteous in an antagonistic world—an antagonistic family, workplace, or country? Christ prayed for his cup of suffering to be removed, but also said, “… not my will but yours be done” (Lk 22:42). We must do the same—trusting the outcome to God. Many times, it’s God’s will to deliver us from suffering and pain, and at other times, he preserves us through it. We must trust God’s will with both.

Application Question: Why is it important to recognize that God’s grace sometimes delivers us from suffering and at other times enables us to persevere through it? What are major beliefs within the prosperity gospel, and in what ways is it undermining the ability of believers to suffer and even die for Christ?

God Blesses the Humble Who Revere Him, But Judges the Prideful Who Reject Him

The king sent a third captain and his fifty soldiers. This third captain went up and fell on his knees before Elijah. He begged for mercy, “Prophet, please have respect for my life and for the lives of these fifty servants of yours. Indeed, fire came down from the sky and consumed the two captains who came before me, along with their men. So now, please have respect for my life.” The Lord’s angelic messenger said to Elijah, “Go down with him. Don’t be afraid of him.” So he got up and went down with him to the king.

2 Kings 1:13-15

After the first two captains and their soldiers were destroyed by fire, a third captain approached Elijah humbly. In verses 13-14, he said:

Prophet, please have respect for my life and for the lives of these fifty servants of yours. Indeed, fire came down from the sky and consumed the two captains who came before me, along with their men. So now, please have respect for my life.

The word “prophet” in verse 13 can literally be translated “man of God” (ESV). Elijah represented God, and because the third captain approached Elijah with humility, God spared his life and that of the soldiers. Therefore, God told Elijah to go with the captain to the king and not be afraid. This account demonstrates God’s graciousness to the humble and yet his stern anger against the proud. James 4:6 says, “God opposes the proud, but he gives grace to the humble.”

When the first two soldiers commanded Elijah to come down in the name of the king, they were exalting the king over Israel’s God; therefore, God killed them. But, when the third captain approached Elijah in humility, God gave grace. Similarly, in Acts 12:21-23, when the Jews essentially called Herod a deity because of his speech and Herod didn’t give glory to God, God struck him through an angel and he died. God fights against the proud.

This reminds us of our need to be humble before God. In prayer, we should not boast of our righteousness or declare that God must do this or that. We should not command God, as some have at times taught and practiced in various Christian circles. We should approach him humbly, realizing that any blessings we receive are a work of God’s mercy and grace, since we all ultimately deserve a fiery death.

In addition, it reminds us to be humble about our accomplishments—remembering that all we have achieved is from God’s grace. We should be humble by putting others before ourselves. We should be humble in our worship—remembering how great God is. God gives grace to the humble but fights against the proud.

Psalm 34:7-10 (ESV) says this about the grace God gives to those who fear him:

The angel of the Lord encamps around those who fear him, and delivers them. Oh, taste and see that the Lord is good! Blessed is the man who takes refuge in him! Oh, fear the Lord, you his saints, for those who fear him have no lack! The young lions suffer want and hunger; but those who seek the Lord lack no good thing.

God richly blesses those who humbly worship him. He protects them, delivers them, and meets their needs.

God Eternally Saves the Humble

In contrast, God’s judgment on the proud captains and their soldiers reminds us that God will eventually consume all who do not humbly submit to him as Lord. They will be consumed eternally in an unquenchable fire. Second Thessalonians 1:8-9 says,

With flaming fire he will mete out punishment on those who do not know God and do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. They will undergo the penalty of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his strength,

Therefore, God’s fiery judgment on the two detachments reminds us of how 2,000 years ago, God sent his Son to take the wrath that we all deserve. Christ died on the cross and took the fire from God we earned because of our prideful rebellion. If we, like the third captain, do not come to God in humility, accepting his perfect sacrifice for our sins, we will spend eternity in a fiery punishment. God fights against the proud but gives grace to the humble. Christ said if we don’t become like a child (Matt 18:1-4)—totally dependent on God for salvation—we will not enter his kingdom. We cannot earn salvation through our works. It is a free gift which only the humble who accept Christ receive. The third captain experienced God’s grace because he humbly realized his life was in God’s hand, while the other two pridefully stood against God, as they threatened his representative and therefore experienced judgment. How will we respond to this all-powerful, just, and merciful God?

Application Question: What are some ways that pride manifests itself in people’s lives, especially in their relationship with God and others? How does humility manifest itself in people’s lives? How can we grow in humility so we can receive God’s blessing and not his judgment?

God’s Warnings and Delays of Judgment Are Given So People Can Repent of Their Sins

Elijah said to the king, “This is what the Lord says, ‘You sent messengers to seek an oracle from Baal Zebub, the god of Ekron. You must think there is no God in Israel from whom you can seek an oracle! Therefore you will not leave the bed you lie on, for you will certainly die.’ “He died just as the Lord had prophesied through Elijah. In the second year of the reign of King Jehoram son of Jehoshaphat over Judah, Ahaziah’s brother Jehoram replaced him as king of Israel, because he had no son. The rest of the events of Ahaziah’s reign, including his accomplishments, are recorded in the scroll called the Annals of the Kings of Israel.

2 Kings 1:16-18

Finally, we must recognize God’s grace on King Ahaziah. When Elijah rebuked the king and gave him a prophecy about his death, this was meant to make the king humble himself before God and repent. God did this previously with Ahaziah’s father, Ahab. God predicted his death and that all his male children would die early and be eaten by dogs because Ahab murdered Naboth and stole his field (1 Kgs 21). However, Ahab humbled himself and fasted before God, and because of this, God told Elijah he would not fulfill the prophecy during Ahab’s lifetime. Likewise, God’s warning was a chance for Ahaziah to repent instead of rebelling against God.

In the same way, we must remember that, though God doesn’t always give immediate punishment for sins that happen, he keeps perfect records. At some point, he will judge. Sometimes, the judgment happens as a natural consequence of sin. Sometimes, God judges in a public way, as with Ahaziah and his soldiers. Ahaziah was going to die, not because he fell from a high floor in his castle, but because he sought the occult for answers (v. 6). Ultimately, God will judge all sin at Christ’s coming. Until then, his slowness in bringing judgment is meant to allow time for repentance. Second Peter 3:9 said it this way, “The Lord is not slow concerning his promise, as some regard slowness, but is being patient toward you, because he does not wish for any to perish but for all to come to repentance.”

Application Question: How should we respond to God’s justice and yet great patience?

(1) This reminds us to not doubt God or become angry with him when he delays his justice in an abusive family, corrupt company or government. There is a day of accounting coming. (2) Also, it reminds us to be patient with others in their rebellion, struggles with sin, or when they fail us. God was gracious and patient with us; therefore, we should be patient with others as well. (3) With that said, God’s patience reminds us to continually urge others to repent and come to God, so they can be saved. He will not be patient forever.

Because Ahaziah did not repent of his sins, God judged him, and God will judge us and others as well if we do not repent. John the Baptist, who came in the spirit of Elijah, said this to the teachers of Israel in Matthew 3:8-10:

Therefore produce fruit that proves your repentance, and don’t think you can say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ For I tell you that God can raise up children for Abraham from these stones! Even now the ax is laid at the root of the trees, and every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire.

We must boldly call others to repentance as well, because God’s judgment is coming. God is loving and patient, but he is also just.

Application Question: Why is God patient with people’s sins and failures? How is God calling you to be patient and merciful with others who are failing you?

Conclusion

As we consider God’s judgment of King Ahaziah, we not only learn principles about how to live but specifically about God’s character.

  1. God’s Punishment on People’s Sins Is Often Distributed by Allowing Their Sins to Negatively Affect Their Children for Generations
  2. God Desires People to Rely on Him for Guidance and Therefore Will Bring Judgment for Relying on the World and the Occult
  3. God’s Grace Is Sometimes Revealed in Delivering People from Suffering and at Other Times by Empowering Them Through It
  4. God Blesses the Humble Who Revere Him, But Judges the Prideful Who Reject Him
  5. God’s Warnings and Delays of Judgment Are Given So People Can Repent of Their Sins

Application Question: What stood out most in the reading and why? What questions or applications did you take from the reading?

Prayer Prompts

  • Pray that God would deliver us from sins, including pride, anger, lust, and spiritual apathy, and that he will protect our future children from the consequences of our sin. Pray that God would purify us through his Word, his saints, and his discipline.
  • Pray that God would raise up our children and their children’s children to fear God and be used greatly by him. Pray that God would sever all generational sins.
  • Pray that God would deliver us from trials and suffering, but if not, that we will faithfully endure trials and suffering for the glory of God.
  • Pray that those who don’t know Christ would, in humility, repent of their sins and accept him as Lord and Savior, so they can be delivered from God’s wrath.

Copyright © 2022 Gregory Brown

Unless otherwise noted, the primary Scriptures used are taken from the NET Bible ® copyright © 1996-2016 by Biblical Studies Press, L.L.C. All rights reserved.

Holy Bible, New International Version ®, NIV® Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.® Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide.

Scripture quotations marked (ESV) are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®) Copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. All rights reserved.

Scripture quotations marked (NLT) are taken from the Holy Bible, New Living Translation, Copyright © 1996, 2004, 2007 by Tyndale House Foundation. Used by permission of Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., Carol Stream, Illinois 60188. All rights reserved.

Scripture quotations marked (NASB) are taken from the New American Standard Bible®, Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, and 1995 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission.

Scripture quotations marked (KJV) are from the King James Version of the Bible.

All emphases in Scripture quotations have been added.

BTG Publishing all rights reserved.


1 Guzik, David. 2 Kings (Enduring Word Commentary). 2005

2 Wiersbe, Warren, Be Distinct (2 Kings)

3 Charles R. Swindoll. Elijah: A Man of Heroism and Humility (Great Lives From God’s Word 5: Profiles in Character from Charles R. Swindoll) (Kindle Locations 1702-1706). Kindle Edition.

4 Guzik. David. 2 Kings, The Enduring Word Commentary

Related Topics: Character Study, Christian Life

14. Marks Of A Faithful Servant (2 Kings 2:1-18)

Related Media

Just before the Lord took Elijah up to heaven in a windstorm, Elijah and Elisha were traveling from Gilgal. Elijah told Elisha, “Stay here, for the Lord has sent me to Bethel.” But Elisha said, “As certainly as the Lord lives and as you live, I will not leave you.” So they went down to Bethel. Some members of the prophetic guild in Bethel came out to Elisha and said, “Do you know that today the Lord is going to take your master from you?” He answered, “Yes, I know. Be quiet.” Elijah said to him, “Elisha, stay here, for the Lord has sent me to Jericho.” But he replied, “As certainly as the Lord lives and as you live, I will not leave you.” So they went to Jericho. Some members of the prophetic guild in Jericho approached Elisha and said, “Do you know that today the Lord is going to take your master from you?” He answered, “Yes, I know. Be quiet.” Elijah said to him, “Stay here, for the Lord has sent me to the Jordan.” But he replied, “As certainly as the Lord lives and as you live, I will not leave you.” So they traveled on together. The fifty members of the prophetic guild went and stood opposite them at a distance, while Elijah and Elisha stood by the Jordan. Elijah took his cloak, folded it up, and hit the water with it. The water divided, and the two of them crossed over on dry ground. When they had crossed over, Elijah said to Elisha, “What can I do for you, before I am taken away from you?” Elisha answered, “May I receive a double portion of the prophetic spirit that energizes you.” Elijah replied, “That’s a difficult request! If you see me taken from you, may it be so, but if you don’t, it will not happen.” As they were walking along and talking, suddenly a fiery chariot pulled by fiery horses appeared. They went between Elijah and Elisha, and Elijah went up to heaven in a windstorm. While Elisha was watching, he was crying out, “My father, my father! The chariot and horsemen of Israel!” Then he could no longer see him. He grabbed his clothes and tore them in two. He picked up Elijah’s cloak, which had fallen off him, and went back and stood on the shore of the Jordan. He took the cloak that had fallen off Elijah, hit the water with it, and said, “Where is the Lord, the God of Elijah?” When he hit the water, it divided and Elisha crossed over. When the members of the prophetic guild in Jericho, who were standing at a distance, saw him do this, they said, “The spirit that energized Elijah rests upon Elisha.” They went to meet him and bowed down to the ground before him. They said to him, “Look, there are fifty capable men with your servants. Let them go and look for your master, for the wind sent from the Lord may have carried him away and dropped him on one of the hills or in one of the valleys.” But Elisha replied, “Don’t send them out.” But they were so insistent, he became embarrassed. So he said, “Send them out.” They sent the fifty men out and they looked for three days, but could not find Elijah. When they came back, Elisha was staying in Jericho. He said to them, “Didn’t I tell you, ‘Don’t go’?”

2 Kings 2:1-18 (NET)

What are marks of a faithful servant of God?

In 2 Kings 2, Elijah is taken to heaven in a whirlwind. Elijah is one of two people in Scripture that never tasted death—the other is Enoch. Both walked with God and had an intimate relationship with him. Both lived in a time of great rebellion. With Enoch, the children of Adam had rebelled against God and soon God wiped them out in a flood. With Elijah, Ahab, the worst king in Israel’s history up to that point, and his family were ruling on the throne and had influenced Israel to worship Baal. Both of these men were prophets to their generation. Jude tells us that Enoch prophesied about Christ’s second coming before his first coming (Jude 1:14). No doubt, God took these men away in a spectacular fashion in part to be a witness to the wicked generation around them and also to affirm their righteousness. Those who called them evil and troublemakers had clear confirmation from God that they were righteous. It also confirmed the validity of their prophetic words, in the hope that people would repent. Enoch’s and Elijah’s translation straight to heaven without death also foreshadows how one day believers who are still alive at Christ’s coming will also be taken straight to heaven (1 Thess 4:13-18). This will ultimately confirm them before the world who rejected them and their words.

In this narrative, Elijah and Elisha travel to various schools of prophets—no doubt to encourage them before Elijah was taken to heaven. At each place, Elijah tries to encourage Elisha to stay behind (v. 3, 5)—maybe he did not want him to experience the trauma of him being taken, or in humility, he didn’t want to make a big display out of it, or he was simply trying to test Elisha’s commitment. Either way, Elisha committed to staying with him. Finally, before Elijah departed, he asked Elisha what he could do for him, and Elisha asked for a double portion of his spirit (v. 9). Elijah recognized the difficulty of his request but said that if Elisha saw him leave, God would grant his request (v. 10). Soon after, Elijah was dramatically taken to heaven, and Elisha was empowered to be the chief prophet of Israel (v. 11-15).

As we consider Elijah dramatically being taken to heaven by God and Elisha being anointed as Elijah’s successor, we learn marks of a faithful servant. As mentioned, no doubt, Elijah’s translation was a public declaration by God that Elijah had been faithful in his generation, especially to those who demonized him and declared otherwise. He was a faithful warrior who God was pleased with, like Enoch before him. Certainly, as Elijah’s translation witnessed to God being pleased with him, we must also seek to be pleasing to God with our lives. One day all our works will be evaluated by God and we will receive rewards or loss of rewards. Some will be called, “good and faithful servants,” and others will be called “wicked and lazy servants” (Matt 25:14-30). Therefore, it is important for us to consider, “What are marks of a faithful servant?”

Big Question: What marks of a faithful servant can be discerned from 2 Kings 2, as God publicly affirms Elijah and his ministry by taking him to heaven without his dying?

A Mark of a Faithful Servant Is Trusting God’s Plan, Even When Encountering Delays, Disappointments, and Unanswered Prayers

Just before the Lord took Elijah up to heaven in a windstorm, Elijah and Elisha were traveling from Gilgal.

2 Kings 2:1

From the beginning of this narrative, it is clear that Elijah, as well as Elisha and the prophets, knew that God was going to take Elijah home in a miraculous way. This must remind us how around ten years earlier in a fit of despair, Elijah prayed to die (1 Kgs 19:4).1 In 1 Kings 19, Jezebel promised to put Elijah to death within a twenty-four-hour period, which caused him to run for his life, struggle with depression, and pray for death. However, it was not Elijah’s time yet, even though he was weary and wanted to give up.

We must remember this, especially during times of disappointment; often God’s best answer to our prayer requests or pursuits is to say no or close the door. Though from our limited perspective or desperation, a certain path may seem best; God in his wisdom and sovereignty often closes a door because he knows it’s not best and has something infinitely better for us. Elijah wanted to die, but God wanted to give him a tremendous gift years later by taking him to heaven apart from dying. Often, God does the same with us.

Because God often graciously closes doors, allows delays, disappointments, and seemingly unanswered prayers, we must trust that God’s plan is perfect even when we don’t understand. The job or career that didn’t work out, the relationship that ended, or the scholarship that was lost or never received, somehow is part of God’s sovereign and perfect plan for us. It may be to teach us a valuable lesson, lead us in a better direction, or simply to help us trust God more and conform us to his image. Either way, God’s plan is infinitely better than our plans, which is clearly seen in the life of Elijah. God’s plan was to use Elijah’s trials to sharpen him and prepare him for greater things, which included the discipling of other prophets who would continue the ministry after he was gone.

In considering how God did not answer Elijah’s initial prayer to die, F. B. Meyer wisely said this:

We shall have to bless Him [God] forever, more for the prayers He refused than for those He granted. When next your request is denied, reflect that it may be because God is preparing something for you as much better than your request as the translation of Elijah was better than his own petition for himself.2

Application Question: How can we trust God when encountering delays, unanswered prayers, and disappointments?

1. To trust God’s plans, we must remember God’s character and promises.

Romans 8:28 says, “And we know that all things work together for good for those who love God, who are called according to his purpose.” Also, in Jeremiah 29:11, God originally said this to Israel who was stuck in exile, but it certainly applies to us in our delays and disappointments: “For I know what I have planned for you,’ says the Lord. ‘I have plans to prosper you, not to harm you. I have plans to give you a future filled with hope.” God is sovereign and wise and working things for our good. We must remember this when disappointments, delays, and unanswered prayers accumulate.

To remember God’s character and promises, especially in times of disappointment, we need to live in God’s Word more by reading, studying, quoting, and praying it. As we do this, God will give us his peace as we trust in and wait on him. Isaiah 26:3 (ESV) says, “You keep him in perfect peace whose mind is stayed on you, because he trusts in you.” God’s plans are good even when they don’t seem to be.

2. To trust God’s plans, we must in faith give thanks to God and rejoice in the good he will accomplish through our disappointments.

First Thessalonians 5:18 says, “… in everything give thanks. For this is God’s will for you in Christ Jesus.” James 1:2-3 says, “My brothers and sisters, consider it nothing but joy when you fall into all sorts of trials, because you know that the testing of your faith produces endurance.” Romans 5:3-4 says, “Not only this, but we also rejoice in sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, and endurance, character, and character, hope.”

It’s important to trust God with unanswered prayers, delays, and disappointments, because if not, we will be tempted to become bitter at God, others, and our circumstances, which will only lead to our spiritual harm and that of others. Remember Israel complained in the wilderness, and it led to God’s discipline. In 1 Corinthians 10:10-11, Paul said:

And do not complain, as some of them did, and were killed by the destroying angel. These things happened to them as examples and were written for our instruction, on whom the ends of the ages have come.

As we consider the outcome of Elijah’s life, we must learn to trust God’s plan, especially when encountering various disappointments.

Application Question: In what ways have you experienced disappointments, delays, and seemingly unanswered prayers which God used for your good? How can we maintain and increase our faith in the midst of what seems like a disappointment?

A Mark of a Faithful Servant Is Humility

Just before the Lord took Elijah up to heaven in a windstorm, Elijah and Elisha were traveling from Gilgal. Elijah told Elisha, “Stay here, for the Lord has sent me to Bethel.” But Elisha said, “As certainly as the Lord lives and as you live, I will not leave you.” So they went down to Bethel. Some members of the prophetic guild in Bethel came out to Elisha and said, “Do you know that today the Lord is going to take your master from you?” He answered, “Yes, I know. Be quiet.” Elijah said to him, “Elisha, stay here, for the Lord has sent me to Jericho.” But he replied, “As certainly as the Lord lives and as you live, I will not leave you.” So they went to Jericho. Some members of the prophetic guild in Jericho approached Elisha and said, “Do you know that today the Lord is going to take your master from you?” He answered, “Yes, I know. Be quiet.” Elijah said to him, “Stay here, for the Lord has sent me to the Jordan.” But he replied, “As certainly as the Lord lives and as you live, I will not leave you.” So they traveled on together.

2 Kings 2:1-6

Another thing that must stand out in this narrative is the fact that, though Elijah knew that God was going to take him to heaven, he never publicly shared it with anybody—even though he met with several schools of prophets and was with Elisha the whole day. With Elisha specifically, Elijah told him three times to stay behind when going to Bethel, then Jericho, and then the Jordan; however, Elijah never revealed that God was planning to take him to heaven (v. 2, 4, 6). There is a sense in which Elijah is like Christ in this regard. Often Christ would heal somebody (the deaf, the lepers, etc.) and then tell them to not tell anybody (cf. Matt 8:3-4, Mk 7:36). He wasn’t seeking the crowds in the sense of being famous; in fact, crowds would have hindered his ability to get around and do what God called him to do. Like Christ, Elijah apparently was a deeply humble man. And obviously, Elisha knew this about his master and, therefore, kept telling the prophets to be quiet about the fact that Elijah was going to be taken home (v. 3, 5). Elisha probably kept hushing the prophets because he knew Elijah was not a man who sought fan fair. Elijah was the type of man who was content to worship God alone at a brook or on a mountain without anybody seeing him.

If Elijah’s quietness about this great honor of being taken directly to heaven doesn’t quite stand out, think of how most people would react to experiencing a great honor. Would they not share it with all their friends, post it on Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, and everywhere else? F. B. Meyer said this about Elijah: “Anyone less great would have let the secret out, or have contrived to line the heights of the Jordan with expectant crowds of witnesses. Instead of this, he kept the secret well.”3 No doubt, it was Elijah’s great humility that led to his great exaltation. James 4:6 says, “God opposes the proud, but gives grace to the humble.”

For many of us, God cannot exalt us because it will prompt pride in us and then lead to our fall. Proverbs 16:18 says, “Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.” And with those God does exalt, he often brings equal pains to keep them humble. With Paul, because of how much God exalted him through revelations and dreams, God allowed him to have a thorn in the flesh to keep him humble. In 2 Corinthians 12:7, Paul said this:

… even because of the extraordinary character of the revelations. Therefore, so that I would not become arrogant, a thorn in the flesh was given to me, a messenger of Satan to trouble me—so that I would not become arrogant.

Application Question: How can we grow in the practice of humility so we can experience more of God’s grace?

1. To grow in humility, we must practice the discipline of secrecy.

Certainly, Christ must be our example and teacher. In Matthew 11:29, he called himself “gentle and humble in heart.” In Matthew 6, Christ taught that as a discipline we must practice our righteousness in secret—not seeking to share it publicly. When giving, we should not blow a trumpet to let people know about it (v. 2-3). When praying, we should go into our closet instead of seeking to pray in public arenas (v. 5-6). When fasting, we should not make it obvious that we are fasting, like the hypocrites commonly did (v. 16-18). When we practice humility in our works of service or our accomplishments, the God who sees us in secret will reward us (v. 4).

2. To grow in humility, we must practice the discipline of intimacy with our Lord.

As we abide with Christ through studying the Word, prayer, worship, and service, we will become more like him. Again, in Matthew 11:29, Christ said, “Take my yoke on you and learn from me, because I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls.” Taking on the yoke was a picture of an older bull training a younger bull to properly carry a weight. As we abide in Christ, he teaches us how to be gentle and humble like him—humbly putting others before ourselves and seeking to exalt God’s name instead of our own. This all comes from abiding in Christ. In John 15:5, Christ said to abide in him, and we would produce much fruit. Apart from him we can do nothing. In fact, one of the fruits of the Spirit is humility (“gentleness” in NET) which comes from living in the Spirit (Gal 5:16, 23). If we don’t continually spend time with Christ through the Word, prayer, worship, and acts of service, we will grow in pride which only leads us away from God and others and further into sin.

A mark of a faithful servant is humility, even as a mark of unfaithfulness is pride as seen with Satan and the Pharisees. Pride makes us seek to glorify ourselves over God and others.

Application Question: What are the fruits and consequences of pride in a person’s life? What is humility and why is it so important for the Christian life? How is God calling you to pursue greater humility in your serving him and others?

A Mark of a Faithful Servant Is Praying Daring Prayers

When they had crossed over, Elijah said to Elisha, “What can I do for you, before I am taken away from you?” Elisha answered, “May I receive a double portion of the prophetic spirit that energizes you.” Elijah replied, “That’s a difficult request! If you see me taken from you, may it be so, but if you don’t, it will not happen.”

2 Kings 2:9-10

Before Elijah was taken in a whirlwind, he asked Elisha what he could do for him. Elisha had faithfully served him for probably ten years, and so Elijah wanted to bless him. Elisha in response asked for a “double portion” of Elijah’s spirit (v. 9). Elijah responds, “That’s a difficult request! If you see me taken from you, may it be so” (v. 10). The “double portion” probably referred to Elisha receiving the rights of the firstborn and, therefore, replacing Elijah as Israel’s chief prophet. It also included a special anointing to do the work.

Though this is Elisha’s request and not Elijah’s, it no doubt represented what Elisha had seen in Elijah’s ministry throughout the years. Throughout Elijah’s ministry, he always asked great and daring prayer requests, which Elisha was modeling. In fact, in James 5:16-18, James tells believers to pray for the healing of others in part because Elijah was a regular person like us, and yet he prayed for it to not rain and it didn’t rain. He prayed for rain and it did. Throughout Elijah’s ministry, he was willing to ask God for bold requests. He not only prayed for it to rain and not rain, he also prayed for the first resurrection in the Bible, which Elisha would later duplicate (cf. 1 Kgs 17:19-23, 2 Kgs 4:32-37). Elijah prayed for fire to come down from heaven three times, and each time God listened (1 Kgs 19:37-38, 2 Kgs 1:9-12). In this narrative, Elijah split the Jordan River so they could walk to the other side on dry land (v. 8). Elijah was willing to pray daring requests, and therefore, Elisha did as well. In fact, after Elijah was taken, Elisha boldly put his mantle on the Jordan River so it would split, even as Elijah did (v. 14).

Likewise, if we are going to be faithful servants, we must also be people of prayer, including praying daring requests. In Ezekiel 22:30, God said, “I looked for a man from among them who would repair the wall and stand in the gap before me on behalf of the land, so that I would not destroy it, but I found no one.” Also, James 4:2 says, “You do not have because you do not ask.” How many miracles do we miss out on simply because we don’t ask or don’t persevere in asking? When Elijah prayed for rain, at first it didn’t rain. He prayed seven times and eventually it rained (1 Kgs 18:42-45). Likewise, if we are going to be faithful servants, we must be people who are willing to pray daring prayers. We are not praying daring prayers simply because we are bold, but because God wants us to. We have not because we ask not. God seeks to find men and women who will stand in the gap and pray. He wants people to pray for healing over others, revival in schools and nations. He wants people to pray like Elisha essentially did—”Lord, I’m weak. Will you empower me to serve? Will you give me special gifts to bless your people?” Does not God tell us to desire the better gifts in 1 Corinthians 12:31? We should ask for gifts of teaching, prophecy, encouragement, and healing—not for our glory but to better serve God and others. Solomon asked for wisdom, and God made him the wisest man on the earth, so he could better rule Israel (2 Chr 1).

But certainly, we should be challenged from this narrative to not only ask for gifts and graces for ourselves but also to ask for others. Elijah played a role in Elisha receiving the double portion from God. Likewise, Timothy somehow received a spiritual gift through Paul laying hands on him. Second Timothy 1:6 says, “Because of this I remind you to rekindle God’s gift that you possess through the laying on of my hands.” We should cry out for special grace over our church leaders, youth and children’s teachers, the people in our small group or classes, and the children in our church, that God would anoint them and use them. Certainly, we must be challenged to pray daring prayers for ourselves and those we serve, including our physical and spiritual children.

Are we willing to pray daring prayers? Throughout Scripture, faithful servants do.

Application Question: What daring requests have you asked the Lord for in the past and what was the outcome? What daring requests do you believe God is calling you to pray for yourself and others (including your family, church, and nation) in this season?

A Mark of a Faithful Servant Is Fighting and Suffering Hardships for Christ

As they were walking along and talking, suddenly a fiery chariot pulled by fiery horses appeared. They went between Elijah and Elisha, and Elijah went up to heaven in a windstorm. While Elisha was watching, he was crying out, “My father, my father! The chariot and horsemen of Israel!” Then he could no longer see him. He grabbed his clothes and tore them in two.

2 Kings 2:11-12

After Elijah and Elisha were split by a fiery chariot with horses and Elijah was taken to heaven in a windstorm, Elisha, who was looking on, said, “My father, my father! The chariot and the horsemen of Israel!” (v. 12). It’s possible that Elisha was pointing out to Elijah that the chariot and horsemen of Israel were with him, as he was being taken to heaven; however, most likely, Elisha was calling Elijah the chariot and horsemen of Israel. F. B. Meyer said this about Elisha’s proclamation:

There was fitness in the exclamation with which Elisha bade him farewell. He cried, “My father, my father, the chariot of Israel, and the horsemen thereof” (2 Kings 2:12). Doubtless, amid that sudden flash of glory he hardly knew what he said. Yet he closely hit the truth. That man, whom he had come to love as a father, had indeed been as an armed chariot of defense to Israel. By his faith and prayers and deeds, he had often warded off evil and danger with more certain success than could have been effected by an armed troop. Alas that such people are rare! But in our time we have known them; and when they have been suddenly swept from our side, we have felt as if the Church had been deprived of one main source of security and help.4

To further support that Elisha was calling Elijah the chariot and horsemen of Israel, when Elisha died, King Joash called Elisha the same thing. Second Kings 13:14 says, “Now Elisha had a terminal illness. King Joash of Israel went down to visit him. He wept before him and said, ‘My father, my father! The chariot and horsemen of Israel!’” Both of these men defended and fought for Israel through their prayers, preaching, and suffering.

Either way, whether Elisha was referring to Elijah or the actual chariot and horsemen, it is clear that the chariot and horsemen were instruments of war, and God was giving Elijah a war hero’s welcome home. He had been a faithful soldier, and he was going home to his reward. This reminds us that Elijah’s life, though successful, was far from easy. It had much difficulty in it. He lived in a world where he was a pilgrim—an outcast. While most of Israel worshiped Baal, he remained faithful to the true God. He rebuked the king and the Israelites (1 Kgs 17, 18). He lived in quarantine for three and a half years—first by himself at a brook and then with a poor widow and her son, outside of Israel (1 Kgs 17). When threatened by Jezebel, he ran in fear and asked God to take his life (1 Kgs 19). He was surrounded by bands of soldiers multiple times with intentions of taking him captive and possibly ending his life (2 Kgs 1). Elijah’s life was no cakewalk, and neither will any faithful Christian’s life be. In 2 Timothy 3:12, Paul said this to Timothy before eventually being beheaded for the faith, “Now in fact all who want to live godly lives in Christ Jesus will be persecuted.” To faithfully follow Christ means to suffer like he did—possibly by being rejected by family and friends, being stepped over for promotion or let go from a job because of holding moral convictions, and for some, even paying the ultimate price with their lives.

We must remember that following Christ means enlisting in his army. We are in a spiritual war for the lives of people, and any progress into enemy territory will be met with equal force. To have a faithful life means to be in warfare and, at times, to suffer. With Job, he lost his health, wealth, and family, and all of it was spiritual warfare—as Satan attacked him. Certainly, we must always remember Christ’s words in Luke 14:26-27 to those considering following him:

If anyone comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother, and wife and children, and brothers and sisters, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple. Whoever does not carry his own cross and follow me cannot be my disciple

Luke 14:27

Also, we must remember Paul’s words in Ephesians 6:11-12:

Clothe yourselves with the full armor of God so that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world rulers of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavens.

Being a faithful servant does not mean ease; in fact, it often means hardship and suffering. Are we willing to suffer for Christ—being a light to an antagonistic world and bearing up under the attacks of the enemy? Elijah was a war hero who went home—he was the chariot and horsemen of Israel.

Application Question: Why is being willing to persevere through suffering so important to being a faithful servant of God? What are some of the attacks happening around the world against Christians and biblical values? How can we better persevere through the various attacks and trials that come with faithfully serving God and others?

A Mark of a Faithful Servant Is a Focus on Equipping and Blessing Others

The fifty members of the prophetic guild went and stood opposite them at a distance, while Elijah and Elisha stood by the Jordan. Elijah took his cloak, folded it up, and hit the water with it. The water divided, and the two of them crossed over on dry ground. When they had crossed over, Elijah said to Elisha, “What can I do for you, before I am taken away from you?” Elisha answered, “May I receive a double portion of the prophetic spirit that energizes you.” Elijah replied, “That’s a difficult request! If you see me taken from you, may it be so, but if you don’t, it will not happen.” As they were walking along and talking, suddenly a fiery chariot pulled by fiery horses appeared. They went between Elijah and Elisha, and Elijah went up to heaven in a windstorm. While Elisha was watching, he was crying out, “My father, my father! The chariot and horsemen of Israel!” Then he could no longer see him. He grabbed his clothes and tore them in two. He picked up Elijah’s cloak, which had fallen off him, and went back and stood on the shore of the Jordan. He took the cloak that had fallen off Elijah, hit the water with it, and said, “Where is the Lord, the God of Elijah?” When he hit the water, it divided and Elisha crossed over. When the members of the prophetic guild in Jericho, who were standing at a distance, saw him do this, they said, “The spirit that energized Elijah rests upon Elisha.” They went to meet him and bowed down to the ground before him.

2 Kings 2:7-15

Historians tell us that there were schools of prophets at Gilgal, Bethel, and Jericho—the three places that Elijah visited before he was taken to heaven.5 These were possibly created by Samuel (cf. 1 Sam 10:5, 9-10, 19:20); however, at this time, Elijah was the chief prophet and professor. Therefore, as mentioned, he probably went to each of these schools to encourage and further equip them before he left. Israel was still worshiping Baal, and they needed people who knew God’s law and taught God’s Word. Not only did he visit each of these schools, but he also empowered Elisha to be his official representative when he left.

Certainly, Elijah realized long ago that his most impactful ministry would not be his miracles but duplicating himself throughout Israel. Ray Pritchard said this about Elijah:

He understood that his greatest gift to the nation would be to multiply himself by leaving behind a crop of young men who could carry on his work after he was gone. One man could only do so much, but one man who poured himself into dozens of younger men could start a movement that might one day ignite a revolution that could overthrow Baal worship once and for all. Here is the ultimate argument for Christian education. We pass along what we know to the up-and-coming generation precisely because we know we won’t be here forever. We do it so that our work will not end when we do, but in the providence of God, while we sink into the dust of the earth, God’s truth goes marching on.6

This was the same thing Christ did during his ministry. He focused on equipping the twelve to turn the world upside down after he left. Ministering to big crowds was important but most important was ministering to the few faithful who would eventually minister to others.

Before Paul died, like Elijah, he focused on equipping his apprentice, Timothy. Paul’s last letter before his death in Rome was the book of 2 Timothy, in which he constantly encouraged and challenged Timothy. In 2 Timothy 2:2, Paul said, “And entrust what you heard me say in the presence of many others as witnesses to faithful people who will be competent to teach others as well.” There are four generations of Christians in this passage—Paul, Timothy, faithful people, and those who will teach others. Likewise, we must focus on doing the same. We must invest in our peers, the younger generation, and our children. Paul told Titus to tell the older women to teach the younger women (Titus 2:3-5). We have all been called to make disciples of unbelievers—teaching them the gospel, baptizing them, and training them in Scripture (Matt 28:19-20). We have all been called to disciple and be discipled.

Certainly, as we consider Elijah mentoring the prophets and installing Elisha as the chief prophet, we must ask ourselves who our Elijahs and Elishas are? Who pours into us and who do we pour into? Our mission is too big for us to accomplish alone. We must be equipped by those farther along in the faith, and we must give great attention to investing in others—through one-on-one mentorship, small groups, formal and informal education. Who is pouring into you and who are you pouring into?

Application Question: Who are your Elijahs and who are your Elishas? How is God calling you to pursue mentorship and to mentor others? What are common hindrances to receiving and giving mentorship?

Conclusion

What are marks of a faithful servant? As taught in the Parable of the Talents, all of us will either hear, “Well done good and faithful servant” or “You wicked and lazy servant” (cf. Matt 25:14-30). Elijah was a man who was publicly affirmed by God before others as he was translated to heaven without death. Therefore, from his life and translation, we can discern marks of a faithful servant.

  1. A Mark of a Faithful Servant Is Trusting God’s Plan, Even When Encountering Delays, Disappointments, and Unanswered Prayers
  2. A Mark of a Faithful Servant Is Humility
  3. A Mark of a Faithful Servant Is Praying Daring Prayers
  4. A Mark of a Faithful Servant Is Fighting and Suffering Hardships for Christ
  5. A Mark of a Faithful Servant Is a Focus on Equipping and Blessing Others

Application Question: What stood out most in the reading and why? What questions or applications did you take from the reading?

Prayer Prompts

  • Pray for God to increase our faith so that we can trust him when encountering delays, disappointments, and unanswered prayers.
  • Pray for God to deliver us from pride, selfish ambition, and independence (from him and his body) and that he would give us grace to be humble—consumed with God and others before ourselves.
  • Pray for God to give us grace to pray daring prayers—to intercede for others, our churches, and our nations and that God would move mightily because of our prayers.
  • Pray for God to give us courage and grace to stand, fight, and suffer for the kingdom, as we serve others.
  • Pray for God to empower us to make disciples—that we would lead people to Christ and help others continue to follow Christ and complete his plans for their lives.

Copyright © 2022 Gregory Brown

Unless otherwise noted, the primary Scriptures used are taken from the NET Bible ® copyright © 1996-2016 by Biblical Studies Press, L.L.C. All rights reserved.

Holy Bible, New International Version ®, NIV® Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.® Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide.

Scripture quotations marked (ESV) are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®) Copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. All rights reserved.

Scripture quotations marked (NLT) are taken from the Holy Bible, New Living Translation, Copyright © 1996, 2004, 2007 by Tyndale House Foundation. Used by permission of Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., Carol Stream, Illinois 60188. All rights reserved.

Scripture quotations marked (NASB) are taken from the New American Standard Bible®, Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, and 1995 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission.

Scripture quotations marked (KJV) are from the King James Version of the Bible.

All emphases in Scripture quotations have been added.

BTG Publishing all rights reserved.


1 Wiersbe, Warren. Be Distinct (2 Kings, Be Series).

2 Meyer, F.B. Elijah and the Secret of His Power (p. 74). Kypros Press. Kindle Edition.

3 Meyer, F.B. Elijah and the Secret of His Power (p. 70). Kypros Press. Kindle Edition.

4 Meyer, F.B. Elijah and the Secret of His Power (p. 73). Kypros Press. Kindle Edition.

5 Charles R. Swindoll. Elijah: A Man of Heroism and Humility (Great Lives From God’s Word 5: Profiles in Character from Charles R. Swindoll) (Kindle Locations 1794-1798). Kindle Edition.

6 Pritchard, Ray. Fire and Rain: the Wild-Hearted Faith of Elijah. Keep Believing Ministries. Kindle Edition.

Related Topics: Character Study, Christian Life

La Revue Internet Des Pasteurs, Fre Ed 44, Edition du l’été 2022

Un ministère de…

Auteur: Dr. Roger Pascoe, Président,
Email: [email protected]

I. Renforcement De La Prédication Par Exposition :
Prêcher Les Evangiles Du N.T, Pt. 3, Les Paraboles

Les paraboles ne sont pas exclusives aux Evangiles. Nathan, par exemple, a utilisé une parabole pour alerter David de son péché (2 Sam. 12 :1-10). Ésaïe a utilisé une parabole pour accuser la maison d’Israël (És. 5 :1-7. Notez que la parabole se trouve dans Ésaïe 5 :1-6 et l’application dans És. 5 :7). Cependant, pour les besoins de cet article, je traiterai des paraboles comme un sous-genre de “l’évangile”.

1. Définition et structure des paraboles. Une parabole est une courte histoire dans laquelle certaines expériences et certains personnages représentent certaines vérités morales ou spirituelles. Jésus utilisait fréquemment des paraboles pour faire valoir un point. En règle générale, une parabole commence par décrire des événements ou des personnages dans une situation particulière et se termine par une application directe ou une explication de l’histoire, de sorte que les auditeurs reconnaissent sa pertinence dans leur vie. C’est pourquoi vous trouvez souvent de fortes réactions négatives aux paraboles de Jésus, car elles touchent la conscience des auditeurs.

2. Formes littéraires des paraboles. En termes simples, une parabole est une forme de langage figuratif. Permettez-moi de faire les distinctions suivantes …

(1) Les “vraies” paraboles. Par “vraies” paraboles, j’entends des paraboles qui suivent la structure et la définition que j’ai décrites ci-dessus. Des exemples de « vraies » paraboles sont : (1) Le bon Samaritain (Lc. 10 :25-37) ; (2) La brebis perdue, la pièce perdue et le fils perdu (Lc. 15 :1-32) ; (3) Le grand souper (Lc. 14 :15-24) ; (4) Les ouvriers de la vigne (Matt. 20 :1-16) ; (5) L’homme riche et Lazare (Lc. 16 :19-31) ; (6) Les dix vierges (Matt. 25 :1-13).

(2) Comparaisons. Certaines paraboles prennent la forme de comparaisons étendues où le sujet et la chose avec laquelle il est comparé sont distincts l’un de l’autre et rendus explicites en utilisant des comparaisons telles que “comme” ou “comme” - par ex. « Le royaume des cieux est comme… » (Matt. 13 :44-46). Des exemples de paraboles sous forme de comparaisons étendues sont : (1) Le levain dans la farine (Matt. 13 :33) ; (2) Le semeur (Matt. 13 :1-23) ; (3) La graine de moutarde (Matt. 13 :31-32).

(3) Métaphores. Certaines paraboles ont des caractéristiques d’une métaphore étendue, dans laquelle, contrairement à une comparaison étendue, la comparaison entre le sujet et la chose à laquelle il est comparé est implicite et inséparable - par ex. « Vous êtes le sel de la terre… Vous êtes la lumière du monde “(Matt. 5 :13-14). Bien que l’on puisse soutenir que de telles déclarations ne sont que des métaphores (et ce serait vrai), néanmoins, dans le contexte dans lequel elles sont utilisées, je pense qu’il est juste de classer certaines comme ayant des caractéristiques paraboliques dans leur structure et leur objectif.

3. Le but des paraboles. Malgré l’apparente simplicité de la forme et du contenu de la parabole, il y a eu beaucoup de débats sur leur signification. Et en effet, il y a des paraboles difficiles à comprendre, comme la parabole du chef d’entreprise malhonnête (Lc 16, 1-13). Nous lisons une histoire comme celle-là et nous nous demandons : “Qu’est-ce que Jésus voulait dire exactement ? Loue-t-il vraiment la malhonnêteté de l’homme ? Ou, y a-t-il plus dans cette histoire qu’il n’y paraît au départ ? “Même les disciples eux-mêmes se sont demandé ce que signifiaient certaines des paraboles de Jésus (M.c 4 :10 ; L.c 8 :9).

Malheureusement, l’explication de Jésus sur la signification des paraboles est elle-même une déclaration difficile à comprendre : “C’est à vous qu’a été donné le mystère du royaume de Dieu; mais pour ceux qui sont dehors tout se passe en paraboles, afin qu’en voyant ils voient et n’aperçoivent point, et qu’en entendant ils entendent et ne comprennent point, de peur qu’ils ne se convertissent, et que les péchés ne leur soient pardonnés. “(M.c 4 :11-12 ; citant És. 6 :9-10). Bien que cette déclaration n’implique pas nécessairement que c’était le but de toutes les paraboles de Jésus, cela explique pourquoi il a utilisé certaines paraboles pour présenter le secret divin concernant la nature du royaume de Dieu, un secret dont la signification est révélée à ceux qui ont la divinité. La vie mais retenu à ceux qui refusent catégoriquement la vérité.

Peut-être que l’explication de Jésus est mieux comprise dans le contexte où son ministère a eu deux effets diamétralement opposés. Comme le dit l’apôtre Paul, pour certains auditeurs, le message de Jésus dans les paraboles était « une odeur de vie donnant la vie », mais pour d’autres, il était « une odeur de mort donnant la mort “(2 Cor. 2 :14-16). Ou, comme le dit l’apôtre Pierre, car pour “vous qui croyez”, Jésus est présenté dans les paraboles comme « la pierre qu’ont rejetée ceux qui bâtissaient - qui est devenue la principale de l’angle », mais pour les incroyants, il est « une pierre d’achoppement, et un rocher de scandale » (1 Pi. 2 :7-8). En d’autres termes, les paraboles de Jésus forçaient les gens à prendre parti. Vous étiez soit pour lui, soit contre lui. C’était clairement l’effet de nombreuses paraboles - elles ont divisé le peuple et, ce faisant, ont révélé la vérité de leur cœur. Comme le souligne Moises Silva, « Les paraboles… lorsqu’elles s’adressent à ceux qui se sont opposés au Seigneur, deviennent des instruments de jugement. Ainsi, ‘celui qui a recevra plus ; à celui qui n’a pas, même ce qu’il a lui sera ôté » (Mc. 4, 25). (Silva, Une introduction à l’herméneutique biblique, 111).

Les paraboles servent donc à discriminer entre ceux qui ont entendu Jésus - d’une part pour obscurcir la vérité de ceux qui ont rejeté ses paroles, et d’autre part pour clarifier la vérité pour ceux qui ont répondu positivement à ses paroles. Pour ceux qui ont répondu positivement à ses paroles, les paraboles de Jésus ont révélé Dieu, sa vérité et ses desseins pour son peuple. Pour ceux qui ont rejeté Jésus et ses paroles, les paraboles ont été utilisées par Jésus comme des instruments de jugement et un moyen de leur cacher la vérité (par exemple, Matt. 13 : 10-15 ; Mc. 4 : 11-12 ; Lc. 8 : 9 -dix). Comme le dit Henry Virkler : « Les mêmes paraboles qui éclairaient les croyants fidèles étaient sans signification pour ceux qui endurcissaient leur cœur contre la vérité » (Virkler, Hermeneutics, 165). Il s’agit d’un enseignement similaire à 1 Corinthiens 2 concernant la capacité de la personne régénérée à comprendre la vérité spirituelle par rapport à l’incapacité de la personne non régénérée. La différence est que l’un a la vue spirituelle et l’autre est spirituellement aveugle. Ainsi, les paraboles ont deux objectifs, ou points focaux - d’abord pour les croyants et ensuite pour les non-croyants.

Le but des paraboles est double : (1) instruire les auditeurs sur les vérités spirituelles telles que la prière, le don, etc. (par exemple, Matt. 13 : 10-12 ; Mc. Une vie inappropriée, pécheresse ou hypocrite (par exemple, Lc. 7 : 36-50). En général, le but des paraboles est de révéler la vérité sur le caractère et l’identité des auditeurs - qui et ce qu’ils sont.

4. La nature des paraboles. Probablement la caractéristique des paraboles qui explique pourquoi Jésus les a tant utilisées dans son enseignement est qu’il s’agissait de simples histoires intéressantes sur la vie quotidienne, que les gens ordinaires pouvaient comprendre, auxquelles ils pouvaient s’identifier et dont ils pouvaient apprendre.

Par conséquent, les paraboles révèlent, clarifient, soulignent et appliquent la vérité spirituelle à la fois au cœur et à la conscience. La nature des paraboles est telle qu’elles font une impression sur les esprits et les consciences des gens ; ce qui est beaucoup plus dramatique, efficace et durable que de simplement énoncer un sujet - par ex. la veuve persistante et le juge injuste (Lc 18 :1-8), ou le pharisien et le publicain (Lc. 18 :9-14).

La nature des paraboles est donc qu’il s’agit de courtes histoires réalistes sur des situations, des personnes et des événements familiers qui comparent une situation, une personne ou un événement à un autre afin d’illustrer, d’éclairer et d’enseigner une situation non familière ou inconnue qui est pourtant une vérité spirituelle importante. De par leur nature, les paraboles sont indirectes et exigent une réponse des auditeurs

5. Comprendre et interpréter les paraboles. La parabole est le message. Elle est dite afin de s’adresser aux auditeurs et de les captiver, de les informer de leurs propres actions ou de les amener à répondre d’une manière ou d’une autre à Jésus et à son ministère. C’est cette caractéristique qui rend l’interprétation des paraboles difficile, parce que c’est un peu comme interpréter une blague - si vous devez l’interpréter, elle n’est pas drôle et intuitivement évidente. Comme pour l’attrait immédiat d’une blague, les auditeurs de paraboles auraient eu une identification immédiate avec les points de référence qui les ont amenés à comprendre le sens de la parabole.

Étant donné que nous pouvons peut-être ne pas comprenons immédiatement le sujet en raison de notre distance par rapport au temps, à la culture et au langage des paraboles, elles ne fonctionnent pas tout à fait de la même manière pour nous que pour les auditeurs originaux. Cependant, en interprétant correctement les paraboles, nous pouvons comprendre ce qu’ils ont compris.

Généralement, l’interprétation et l’application de l’histoire viennent à la fin de la parabole et sont distinctes de l’histoire elle-même. Par exemple, dans Luc 7 :40-42, les trois points de référence sont : le prêteur et les deux débiteurs. L’identification est immédiate : (1) Dieu est comme le prêteur d’argent ; (2) la prostituée et Simon sont comme les deux débiteurs. La parabole est une parole de jugement appelant à une réponse de Simon. La force de la parabole est telle que Simon ne pouvait pas passer à côté. Il convient de noter que les points de référence eux-mêmes ne constituent pas la parabole. Ils ne servent qu’à attirer les auditeurs dans l’histoire et à fournir un point de référence avec lequel ils sont identifiés. Le point de l’histoire est dans la réponse souhaitée. Dans ce cas, c’est un mot de jugement à Simon et ses amis et un mot d’acceptation et de pardon à la femme.

Rappelez-vous que toutes les paraboles de Jésus sont, d’une certaine manière, les moyens que Jésus a choisis pour décrire et proclamer le royaume. Par conséquent, nous devons être très familiers avec la signification du royaume dans le ministère de Jésus.

6. Lignes directrices pour la recherche et l’interprétation des paraboles. Lorsque les paraboles ont été prononcées pour la première fois, elles avaient rarement besoin d’être interprétées car leur propos était intuitivement évident pour les auditeurs. Mais parce que nous n’étions pas là et parce qu’ils ne sont que sous forme écrite, nous manquons de la compréhension immédiate de certains des points de référence que les auditeurs originaux avaient. Grâce au processus exégétique, cependant, nous pouvons découvrir leur point avec un haut degré de précision. Ce que nous devons faire est de traduire ce point dans notre propre contexte (comme l’a fait Matthieu - par exemple dans 18 : 10-14 ; 20 : 1-16). Une façon de le faire dans votre prédication est d’insérer dans l’histoire des points de référence contemporains qui sont appropriés sur le plan contextuel et herméneutique.

Alors que tous les outils, procédures et principes exégétiques normaux et traditionnels doivent être utilisés pour étudier les paraboles dans leur contexte afin de déduire l’intention de l’auteur, le genre de la parabole semble être si fluide, pour avoir une telle variété et contenir tant de niveaux de sens qu’ils laissent une grande souplesse dans la prédication. Nous devons nous rappeler que nos congrégations d’aujourd’hui aiment les histoires des paraboles et les trouvent généralement sans doute aussi fascinantes que les auditoires originaux. Cela souligne le pouvoir du récit.

La règle d’or (comme pour toutes les recherches exégétiques en préparation à une prédication) est de ne pas donner aux paraboles qu’elles n’étaient pas censées avoir. C’est une erreur courante dans l’interprétation des paraboles - à savoir, essayer de donner à chaque détail une signification alternative parallèle (c’est-à-dire allégoriser votre interprétation). Le problème avec l’allégorisation en tant que méthode d’interprétation est qu’elle est tellement subjective. Dix personnes différentes pourraient trouver dix significations différentes pour chaque détail. Une règle générale pour comprendre et prêcher les paraboles est que, comme le disait un de mes amis pasteurs, nous ne devrions pas essayer de “faire marcher les paraboles à quatre pattes » - c’est-à-dire ne pas essayer d’attribuer un sens à chaque petit détail à moins que cela soit évident de par la parabole elle-même.

De plus, l’allégorisation, en essayant d’attribuer un sens à chaque petit détail, passe souvent à côté de l’essentiel de la parabole. Afin de contrer la méthode d’interprétation allégorisation, certains chercheurs affirment que chaque parabole n’a qu’un seul point et que les détails ne sont que de la façade narrative. Mais c’est sûrement une simplification excessive. Par exemple, dans la parabole du fils prodigue, le fils, le père et le frère aîné ne représentent-ils pas chacun une personne différente ? Les paraboles peuvent faire un point unique ou plusieurs points, tout comme elles peuvent avoir plusieurs objectifs, formes et applications. Cependant, bien qu’une parabole puisse avoir plusieurs points de référence, chaque parabole (comme tout autre passage de l’Écriture) ne véhicule qu’un seul point ou principe théologique.

7. Une approche équilibrée pour l’interprétation des paraboles (adapté de Craig Blomberg, cité dans Duval and Hays, 260f.).

(a) Cherchez le point principal pour chaque personnage principal. Tous les autres détails ne font qu’enrichir l’histoire. Par exemple, dans la parabole du fils prodigue (Lc 15 :11-32), le fils prodigue représente clairement les pécheurs qui se tournent vers Dieu dans la repentance et la foi. Le père représente la volonté de Dieu d’étendre la miséricorde et le pardon. Le frère aîné représente les religieux – les pharisiens et les scribes à qui Jésus adressait la parabole (Lc 15, 2), qui pensent qu’eux seuls sont dignes de la grâce de Dieu.

Encore, dans la parabole du bon Samaritain (Lc. 10, 29-37), l’homme battu par un brigand représente le prochain dans le besoin (c’est le sujet que Jésus aborde, Lc. 10, 29). Le prêtre et le lévite représentent des chefs religieux dont on s’attendrait à ce qu’ils aiment inconditionnellement leurs « prochains », mais qui ne le font peut-être pas vraiment. Le Samaritain représente ceux dont on ne s’attendrait pas à ce qu’ils aiment leurs « prochain “d’origine religieuse et culturelle différente, mais qui peuvent en fait le faire de manière pratique et publique.

(b) Déterminez le point principal que le public original aurait compris. Ne lisez pas ou n’interprétez pas les paraboles isolément de ce qui se passe autour d’elles. Vérifiez attentivement leur contexte littéraire. Invariablement, les paraboles de Jésus illustrent ce qui se passait dans la question ou la circonstance immédiatement précédente.

Lorsque vous essayez de déterminer le point principal d’une parabole, il est utile de vous poser quelques questions, telles que : (1) Quelle réponse est demandée et générée ? (2) Y a-t-il une surprise, un rebondissement, un choc dans le récit ? (3) Comment ou que nous enseigne la parabole sur le royaume – directement ou indirectement ? (4) Quels sont l’orientation et l’enseignement christologiques et théologiques ? (5) De quel type de parabole s’agit-il - une vraie parabole, une comparaison ou une métaphore ? (6) Quels sont les différentes scènes et mouvements de la parabole ? (7) Qui est le public ? (8) Qui sont les personnages principaux et qui représentent-ils ? (9) Quel est le point théologique central ?

8. Quelques conseils supplémentaires pour interpréter les paraboles.

(1) Écoutez la parabole encore et encore. Identifiez les points de référence qui auraient été repris par les auditeurs de Jésus. Essayez de déterminer comment les auditeurs originaux se seraient identifiés à l’histoire - ce qu’ils auraient entendu et comment ils l’auraient interprété et appliqué. Parfois, le sens est énoncé explicitement dans la parabole ; d’autres fois, cela est sous-entendu par l’application (cf. Matt. 5 :13 ; 18 :21, 35 ; 29 :1-16 ; 22 :14 ; 25 :13 ; Lc. 12 :15-21 ; 15 :7, 10 ; 18 :1, 9 ; 19 :11).

(2) Examinez le contexte attentivement. Comme pour toute méthodologie d’interprétation solide, examinez attentivement le contexte de chaque parabole dans la perspective que l’auteur a choisie pour présenter son matériel. Par exemple, la parabole des ouvriers dans la vigne (Matt. 20 :1-16) vient immédiatement après l’histoire du jeune dirigeant riche (Matt. 19 :16-22). Après avoir souligné que la richesse peut être un grand obstacle à l’entrée dans le royaume, Pierre dit : “Regarde, nous avons tout quitté et nous t’avons suivi. Alors qu’y aura-t-il pour nous ? (Lc. 19 :27). Jésus assure à Pierre qu’ils recevront leur juste récompense (Lc. 19 :28-30), mais fait suivre à cette assurance la parabole sur le « propriétaire qui sortit tôt le matin pour embaucher des ouvriers pour sa vigne “(Matt. 20 : 1), dans laquelle Jésus réprimande l’attitude pharisaïque de Pierre : “Vois ce que nous avons fait pour toi Jésus, combien nous avons donné pour toi… » Pierre parlait comme les ouvriers de la vigne qui pensaient avoir droit à plus que ceux qui n’ont pas travaillé aussi longtemps qu’ils l’ont fait, plutôt que de se contenter de servir le Christ par amour. C’est dans cette perspective que l’auteur a choisi de présenter cette parabole.

Examinons d’abord le contexte historique et culturel – son cadre spécifique. Par exemple, Jésus raconte la parabole du fils prodigue précisément pour réprimander les scribes et les pharisiens qui murmuraient contre lui : “Cet homme accueille des gens de mauvaise vie et mange avec eux » (Lc. 15 :1-2). Ensuite, Jésus raconte la parabole dans laquelle les pharisiens et les scribes sont dépeints comme ceux qui « se plaignent plutôt que de se réjouir lorsqu’un pécheur est « retrouvé... “Le point à apprécier est le rôle du fils aîné, dont le seul frère - pas un sur cent ou même un sur dix – avait été perdu. Ce fils aîné représente les pharisiens grincheux, qui semblent incapables de partager la joie de Dieu et des anges du ciel “(Moises Silva, 112-113).

Pour comprendre le contexte culturel, il faut étudier les coutumes du premier siècle afin de comprendre l’impact de ce qui se dit et se fait. Par exemple, lorsque le fils prodigue a demandé à son père de lui donner sa part d’héritage, il demandait quelque chose qui n’a normalement lieu qu’à la mort du père. Ce faisant, il en déduit qu’il souhaitait la mort de son père. Comprendre cela rend l’amour et la grâce du père à recevoir ces fils d’autant plus remarquables.

II. Renforcement Le Leadership Biblique “Le Ministère De La Réconciliation, Pt. 4 (Suite) : Un Appel Pour La Réconciliation Du Peuple De Dieu Avec Le Ministre De Dieu “(2 Cor. 6 :11-7 :16)

Nous continuons avec ce passage à nouveau dans cette édition du Net Pastors Journal. La dernière fois, nous avons couvert 2 Cor. 6 :11-18 dans lequel nous avons abordé les deux premières sections du passage :

1. Un appel pastoral d’amour (6 :11-13).

2. Un appel pastoral d’avertissement (6 :14-18).

Maintenant, nous continuons avec la troisième section …

3. L’application de l’appel pastoral (7 :1-4). « Ayant donc... » (tirant une conclusion de ce qui vient d’être dit), sur la base des promesses contenues dans l’A.T. (6:16-18) que Dieu sera leur Père, rétablissant Son peuple dans sa relation appropriée avec lui, si (notez que les promesses sont conditionnelles) ils se séparent du mal (à savoir les pratiques religieuses païennes ; en particulier, le culte des idoles ) alors l’injonction de Paul est : “Ayant donc de telles promesses, bien-aimés, purifions-nous de toute souillure de la chair et de l’esprit, en achevant notre sanctification dans la crainte de Dieu» (7:1).

Pour Paul, le principe primordial de la sainteté parmi le peuple de Dieu est que nous “Ne vous mettez pas avec les infidèles sous un joug étranger » (6 :14), et la pratique d’une telle sainteté parmi le peuple de Dieu est que nous nous « purifions de toute souillure de la chair et de l’esprit » (7 :1). Le principe est que « les injustes n’hériteront pas le royaume de Dieu ? (1 Cor. 6 :9-10). Le peuple de Dieu a été « lavé… sanctifié… justifié au nom du Seigneur Jésus-Christ et par l’Esprit de notre Dieu “(1 Cor. 6 :11) et est donc, en principe et en permanence, purifié «de toute souillure de la chair et de l’esprit. »

Le principe doit être évident dans leur pratique pour qu’il soit vrai d’eux. En d’autres termes, la sanctification positionnelle doit être démontrée dans la sanctification pratique. Nous avons été sanctifiés par Dieu - c’est la sanctification positionnelle (par exemple, Ac. 26 :18 ; Héb. 10 :14 ; 13 :12 ; 1 Pi. 1 :2 ; Éph. 5 :26 ; Jn. 17 :17) - et nous devons nous sanctifier – c’est une sanctification progressive et pratique (1 Cor. 1 :18 ; 1 Pi. 3 :15) afin que notre union avec le Christ devienne de plus en plus évidente et réelle dans nos vies. Ayant été libéré de l’esclavage du péché (Rom. 6 :11-18) et capable maintenant de ne pas pécher (1 Jn. 3 :9), Dieu agit en nous (1 Thess. 5 :23 ; Tite 2 :14) afin que nous devenions de plus en plus semblables à Christ (2 Cor. 3 :18 ; Rom. 8 :29 ; Héb. 13 :20-21 ; 1 Jn. 2 :6 ; 3 :7). Le Saint-Esprit est l’agent divin particulièrement actif dans notre sanctification (1 Thess. 4 :3 ; 2Thess. 2 :13 ; Gal. 5 :16-18, 22-23).

Il n’y a pas ici de conflit entre les concepts jumeaux de sanctification passive et active. Non seulement la sanctification est une œuvre de Dieu en nous par laquelle nous sommes sanctifiés, mis à part, appelés saints, saints (1 Cor. 1 :2 ; 2 Cor. 1 :1), et non seulement Dieu en Christ nous a accordé la sanctification (Rom. 1 : 30 ; 2 Th. 2 : 13), mais aussi nous nous sanctifions, en nous efforçant de ne péché (1 Cor. 6 : 18 ; 2 Cor. 7 : 1 ; 1 Jn. 3 : 6‑9), cherchant à mettre en pratique ce que Dieu déclare être vrai de nous (1 Cor. 7 :34 ; 1 Thess. 4 :3-8 ; Rom. 6 :19), et désirant ressembler davantage à Christ (Rom. 8 :13 ; Héb. 12 :1 ; Phil. 2 :12 ; 3 :13-14 ; 2 Pierre 1 :5ff.).

L’« impureté » (souillure, malpropreté) qui résulte du fait d’être « sous un joug étranger “(en particulier, au culte d’autres dieux) est totale en ce qu’elle souille à la fois « la chair et l’esprit ». Par conséquent, la « purification » qui est requise de la “chair » (nettoyage physique, extérieur - qui nous sommes à l’extérieur) et de “l’esprit » (nettoyage spirituel, intérieur - qui nous sommes à l’intérieur) est également totale.

« Amener la sainteté à son achèvement “implique certainement que notre sanctification est progressive alors que nous nous efforçons ici et maintenant de tendre vers la sainteté, tout en comprenant que la perfection de la sainteté ne sera réellement expérimentée qu’à notre glorification. Mais même si l’ultime achèvement de ce processus de sanctification aura lieu dans l’eschaton (1 Thess. 3 :13 ; Jude 24 ; 2 Cor. 11 :2), nous continuons néanmoins à nous efforcer maintenant d’amener ce processus à son achèvement. Encore une fois, l’utilisation de l’expression “mener à bien » indique que c’est quelque chose que nous devons faire pour nous-mêmes. Comme cela s’applique aux Corinthiens, ils doivent perfectionner leur sainteté en se séparant de toute souillure ou association avec des incroyants - en particulier le culte des idoles, mais sans s’y limiter.

Tout comme “la crainte de Dieu » était l’un des facteurs de motivation dans le ministère de Paul (5 :11 ; cf. 1 Cor. 2 :3 ; 2 Cor. 7 :11), elle devrait être l’un des principaux facteurs pour motiver le peuple de Dieu à la sainteté – “pour nous purifier de toute impureté de la chair et de l’esprit ». Nous vivons sous le regard omniscient et omniscient de Dieu. Nous ne pouvons pas échapper à son examen minutieux et à son jugement.

Poursuivant son flux de pensée de 6 :11-12, Paul continue avec son appel pastoral aux Corinthiens. « Donnez-nous une place dans vos cœurs. Nous n’avons fait tort à personne, nous n’avons ruiné personne, nous n’avons tiré du profit de personne » (7 :2). Il les supplie de lui donner « une place dans leur cœur ». Il leur avait apporté la bonne nouvelle de l’évangile en premier lieu, afin que leurs cœurs lui soient ouverts et, inversement, fermés aux faux apôtres (qui gagnaient une influence sur eux) et aux incroyants dont ils adoptaient les pratiques païennes. (David E. Garland, 2 Corinthiens, 344). Après tout, il n’y avait rien de sa part qui les ferait agir envers lui comme ils l’avaient fait. Malgré ses sévères réprimandes et ses fortes directives, il n’avait fait de tort à personne, il n’avait corrompu personne, ni trompé personne. Alors, pourquoi le traiteraient-ils de cette façon ; pourquoi le fermeraient-ils leurs cœurs ?

« Ce n’est pas pour vous condamner que je parle de la sorte ; car j’ai déjà dit que vous êtes dans nos cœurs à la vie et à la mort » (7 : 3). Paul veut être sûr qu’ils n’interprètent pas mal sa déclaration de défense dans 7 :2. Quelqu’un le lisant, particulièrement dans la condition spirituelle des Corinthiens, pourrait déduire que Paul ne se défendait pas mais les accusait. Par conséquent, il clarifie sa déclaration en disant : “Ce n’est pas pour vous condamner que je parle de la sorte » et il reconfirme son amour pour eux, « car j’ai déjà dit que vous êtes dans nos cœurs à la vie et à la mort ». Il ne veut aucun malentendu à ce sujet.

L’expression « à la vie et à la mort » pourrait être traduite par : “pour que nous mourons ensemble en vue de (« εις “en grec) vivre ensemble ». Ainsi, il s’agit vraiment d’une déclaration d’intention dans laquelle Paul peut avoir à l’esprit ici soit une référence à son expérience chrétienne et à leur dévouement actuels (c’est-à-dire mourir avec le Christ et vivre en et pour le Christ), soit peut-être fait-il référence à leur avenir commun quand ils mourront ensemble en tant que croyants en Christ et ressusciteront ensemble dans leur destin commun de vivre ensemble au ciel avec Christ, telle est la proximité avec eux qu’il veut leur communiquer.

« J’ai une grande confiance en vous, j’ai tout sujet de me glorifier de vous ; je suis rempli de consolation, je suis comblé de joie au milieu de toutes nos tribulations » (7 : 4). Ce verset pourrait être interprété soit comme le dernier verset de cet excursus (2 :14-7 :4) soit comme le premier verset de la section suivante (7 :4-16) qui est une continuation de 2 :13 concernant trouver Titus et entendre son rapport à leur sujet. Plutôt que d’essayer de décider où le verset s’inscrit, il est probablement plus sûr de considérer 7 : 4 comme un verset charnière terminant une section et commençant la suivante, car il se rapporte bien aux deux. Il conclut le renforcement positif de l’attitude de Paul envers eux (7 :3) et il introduit sa réaction positive au rapport de Tite (7 :5-16), qui, à son tour, se rapporte à l’ouverture de l’épître (2 :2 -3 cf. 7 :4, 13).

Son ancienne audace de parole envers eux (les réparant sur divers problèmes) avait provoqué la repentance pieuse et l’action corrective qu’il voulait et qui était nécessaire (7 : 9-10). Ainsi, son discours direct pour leur réprimande et leur correction a atteint le résultat escompté et produit maintenant sa “fierté “en eux. Son audace de parole qui aurait pu rompre définitivement leur relation (car personne n’aime être corrigé) s’est en fait bien déroulée grâce à leur réponse positive, de sorte que maintenant il est capable et se plaît à être fière d’eux. En effet, il est « je suis rempli de consolation... je suis comblé de joie “même dans (et malgré) “toutes nos tribulations. “Les afflictions auxquelles il se réfère sont évidemment celles qu’il a rencontrées en Macédoine lorsqu’il y est allé chercher Tite (7 :5).

III. Plans De Sermons

Titre : L’évangile selon Jésus (Matt. 7 :13-14)

Sujet : Deux chemins vers l’éternité.

Thème : Vous devez choisir le chemin étroit et difficile de la vérité si vous voulez entrer dans le royaume de Dieu.

Point 1 : Une route commence facilement mais se termine difficilement (7 :13).

1a) Ça commence facile car l’entrée est large et la route est spacieuse.

1b) Ça finit dur parce que sa destination est la destruction éternelle.

Point 2 : L’autre route commence difficilement mais se termine facilement (7:14).

2a) Ça commence dur car l’entrée est étroite et la route est difficile.

2b) Il se termine facilement car sa destination est la vie éternelle.

Related Topics: Pastors

Jurnalul Electronic Al Păstorilor, Rom Ed 44, Editia de Vară 2022

A ministry of…

Author: Dr. Roger Pascoe, President,
Email: [email protected]

I. Consolidarea Predicării Expozitive:
Predicarea Din Evanghelii, Partea A 3-A: Pildele

Pildele nu apar exclusiv în evanghelii. Natan, de pildă, a folosit o pildă ca să-l înștiințeze pe David cu privire la păcatul său (2 Sam. 12:1-10). Isaia a folosit o pildă pentru a ridica acuzații împotriva casei lui Israel (Is. 5:1-7. Să reținem că pilda se află în Is. 5:1-6, iar aplicația în Is. 5:7). Totuși, în acest articol voi trata pilda ca sub-gen al „evangheliei”.

1. Definiția și structura pildelor. Pilda este o scurtă povestire în care anumite experiențe și personaje din viața de zi cu zi reprezintă anumite adevăruri morale sau spirituale. Isus a folosit adesea pilde pentru a explica ceva. De obicei, o pildă începe cu descrierea evenimentelor sau a personajelor implicate într-o anumită situație și se încheie cu o aplicație directă sau cu explicarea povestirii, astfel încât ascultătorii să înțeleagă relevanța pildei în viața lor. De asta vedem adesea reacții negative puternice la pildele lui Isus, pentru că ele atingeau conștiința ascultătorilor.

2. Formele literare ale pildelor. Simplu spus, pilda este o formă de limbaj figurat. Permiteți-mi să fac următoarele distincții…

(1) Pildele „adevărate”. Când spun pilde „adevărate”, mă refer la acele pilde care urmează structura și definiția de mai sus. Iată câteva exemple de pilde „adevărate”: (1) Bunul Samaritean (Lc. 10:25-37); (2) Oaia pierdută, banul pierdut și fiul rătăcitor (Lc. 15:1-32); (3) Pilda celor poftiți la cină (Lc. 14:15-24); (4) Pilda lucrătorilor viei (Mat. 20:1-16); (5) Pilda bogatului nemilostiv (Lc. 16:19-31); (6) Pilda celor zece fecioare (Mat. 25:1-13).

(2) Comparațiile. Unele pilde iau forma unor comparații extinse, în care subiectul și obiectul cu care acesta este asemănat sunt lucruri distincte și sunt explicate printr-o comparație, folosind expresiile „se aseamănă cu” sau „ca” – ex. „Împărăţia cerurilor se mai aseamănă cu…” (Mat. 13:44-46). Iată câteva exemple de pilde sub formă de comparații extinse: (1) Pilda aluatului (Mat. 13:33); (2) Pilda semănătorului (Mat. 13:1-23); (3) Pilda grăuntelui de muștar (Mat. 13:31-32).

(3) Metaforele. Unele pilde au caracteristicile unei metafore extinse, în care, spre deosebire de comparația extinsă, comparația între subiect și obiectul cu care este comparat este implicită și inseparabilă – ex. „Voi sunteţi sarea pământului… Voi sunteţi lumina lumii” (Mat. 5:13-14). Deși s-ar putea spune că astfel de afirmații sunt simple metafore (ceea ce este adevărat), totuși, în contextul în care sunt folosite, cred că este corect să considerăm că unele au anumite caracteristici de pilde în structura și scopul lor.

3. Scopul pildelor. În ciuda simplității aparente a formei și conținutului pildei, au existat multe dezbateri cu privire la semnificația lor. Și într-adevăr, unele pilde sunt greu de înțeles, cum ar fi pilda ispravnicului necredincios (Lc. 16:1-13). Citim o astfel de povestire și ne întrebăm: „Ce anume a vrut să spună Isus? Oare chiar laudă El nedreptatea acestui om? Sau este ceva dincolo de ceea ce se observă la prima vedere?” Chiar și ucenicii au întrebat uneori ce înseamnă unele din pildele lui Isus (Mc. 4:10; Lc. 8:9).

Din păcate, și explicațiile date de Isus cu privire la semnificația pildei sunt greu de înțeles: „Vouă”, le-a zis El, „v-a fost dat să cunoaşteţi taina Împărăţiei lui Dumnezeu; dar pentru cei ce sunt afară din numărul vostru, toate lucrurile sunt înfăţişate în pilde; pentru ca, „măcar că privesc, să privească şi să nu vadă, şi măcar că aud, să audă şi să nu înţeleagă, ca nu cumva să se întoarcă la Dumnezeu şi să li se ierte păcatele.” (Mc. 4:11-12; citând din Is. 6:9-10). Deși această afirmație nu înseamnă că acesta a fost scopul tuturor pildelor lui Isus, totuși explică de ce Isus a folosit unele pilde pentru a prezenta taina divină cu privire la natura împărăției lui Dumnezeu, o taină a cărei semnificație este descoperită celor ce au viață divină, însă care este ascunsă de cei ce refuză adevărul cu încăpățânare.

Poate că înțelegem mai bine explicația lui Isus atunci când ne gândim că lucrarea Lui a avut două efecte diametral opuse. După cum spune apostolul Pavel, pentru unii ascultători, mesajul lui Isus din pilde a fost „o mireasmă de la viaţă spre viaţă”, însă pentru alții, „o mireasmă de la moarte spre moarte” (2 Cor. 2:14-16). Sau după cum spune apostolul Petru, „pentru voi care aţi crezut”, Isus este prezentat în pilde astfel: „Piatra pe care au lepădat-o zidarii a ajuns să fie pusă în capul unghiului”, însă pentru necredincioși, El este „o Piatră de poticnire şi o Stâncă de cădere” (1 Pet. 2:7-8). Cu alte cuvinte, pildele lui Isus îi sileau pe oameni să se poziționeze de-o parte sau de alta. Fie erai cu El, fie împotriva Lui. În mod clar, acesta a fost efectul multor pilde – îi divizau pe oameni, arătând astfel adevărul din inima lor. După cum spune Moises Silva, „Pildele… atunci când sunt adresate celor care se împotrivesc Domnului, devin instrumente ale judecății. Astfel, «celui ce are i se va da; dar de la cel ce n-are se va lua şi ce are» (Mc. 4:25).” (Silva, An Introduction to Biblical Hermeneutics [O introducere în hermeneutica biblică], 111).

Pildele mai au, apoi, rolul de a face deosebire între cei care Îl ascultau pe Isus – pe de o parte, să ascundă adevărul de cei care respingeau cuvintele Lui și, pe de altă parte, să clarifice adevărul pentru cei care răspundeau pozitiv la cuvintele Lui. Pentru cei care răspundeau pozitiv la cuvintele Sale, pildele lui Isus Îl revelau pe Dumnezeu, adevărul Lui și planurile Sale pentru poporul Său. Pentru cei care Îl respingeau pe Isus și cuvintele Sale, pildele erau folosite de Isus ca instrumente de judecată și ca mijloc de a ascunde adevărul de ei (ex. Mat. 13:10-15; Mc. 4:11-12; Lc. 8:9-10). După cum spune Henry Virkler, „aceleași pilde care îi ajutau pe credincioși să înțeleagă mai bine, erau fără sens pentru cei care își împietreau inima în fața adevărului” (Virkler, Hermeneutics [Hermeneutică], 165). Această învățătură este similară cu cea din 1 Corinteni 2, care vorbește despre capacitatea persoanei regenerate de a înțelege adevărul spiritual, în comparație cu incapacitatea persoanei neregenerate. Diferența constă în faptul că prima are vedere spirituală, pe când cealaltă este oarbă din punct de vedere spiritual. Așadar, pildele au două ținte sau puncte focale – credincioșii și necredincioșii.

Pildele au două scopuri: (1) să dea învățătură ascultătorilor cu privire la adevăruri spirituale ca rugăciunea, dărnicia etc. (ex. Mat. 13:10-12; Mc. 4:11) și (2) să îi provoace cu privire la trăirea lor nepotrivită, păcătoasă sau ipocrită (ex. Lc. 7:36-50). În general, scopul pildelor este să descopere adevărul cu privire la caracterul și identitatea ascultătorilor – cine și ce sunt ei.

4. Natura pildelor. Poate că ceea ce explică de ce Isus a folosit atât de mult pildele în învățătura Sa este faptul că acestea sunt istorisiri interesante simple despre viața de zi cu zi, ușor de înțeles pentru oamenii de rând, cu care se puteau identifica și din care puteau extrage învățături.

Pildele, așadar, descoperă, clarifică, scot în evidență și aplică adevărul spiritual, adresându-se atât inimii, cât și conștiinței. Pildele, prin natura lor, lasă o impresie în mintea și conștiința oamenilor mult mai dramatică, eficientă și de durată decât simpla rostire a ideii – ex. văduva insistentă și judecătorul nedrept (Lc. 18:1-8) sau vameșul și fariseul (Lc. 18:9-14).

Pildele sunt, așadar, povestiri veridice despre situații, persoane și evenimente familiare, în care se compară o situație, o persoană sau un eveniment cu altul, pentru a ilustra, a lămuri și a învăța un adevăr spiritual important, însă necunoscut sau nerecunoscut. Prin natura lor, pildele sunt indirecte și cer un răspuns de la ascultători.

5. Cum să înțelegem și să interpretăm pildele. Pilda este mesajul. Scopul ei este să capteze atenția ascultătorilor, să-i uluiască cu privire la acțiunile lor sau să-i determine să reacționeze într-un fel sau altul față de Isus și lucrarea Lui. Această trăsătură a pildelor le face greu de interpretat, pentru că este ca și cu interpretarea glumelor – dacă trebuie să interpretezi o glumă, ea nu mai este amuzantă și își pierdea acea claritate intuitivă. Ca și în cazul impactului imediat al unei glume, cei care ascultă o pildă se vor identifica imediat cu punctele de referință care i-au făcut să înțeleagă ideea pildei.

Pildele nu au același impact în cazul nostru ca și în cazul ascultătorilor din vremea aceea, pentru că uneori nu prindem imediat ideea ca și ei, din cauza distanței în timp și a diferențelor de cultură și limbaj. Totuși, dacă interpretăm corect pildele, putem înțelege și noi ceea ce au înțeles ei atunci.

În general, interpretarea și aplicarea povestirii vin la finalul pildei, fiind distincte de povestirea în sine. De exemplu, în Luca 7:40-42, cele trei puncte de referință sunt: cămătarul și cei doi datornici. Identificarea are loc imediat: (1) Dumnezeu este precum cămătarul; (2) femeia păcătoasă și Simon sunt ca cei doi datornici. Pilda este un cuvânt de judecată, care cere un răspuns de la Simon. Forța pildei este atât de mare încât Simon nu putea rata mesajul ei. Trebuie să observăm că punctele de referință nu constituie pilda. Rolul lor este doar de a-i atrage pe ascultători în povestire și să ofere un punct de referință cu care aceștia să se identifice. Scopul povestirii se află în răspunsul cerut. În cazul nostru, un cuvânt de judecată împotriva lui Simon și a prietenilor lui și un cuvânt de acceptare și iertare către femeie.

Să nu uităm că toate pildele lui Isus sunt, într-o anumită măsură, un mijloc prin care Isus a ales să descrie și să proclame Împărăția. Prin urmare, trebuie să cunoaștem foarte bine semnificația Împărăției în lucrarea lui Isus.

6. Principii pentru studierea și interpretarea pildelor. Atunci când pildele au fost rostite pentru prima dată, rareori aveau nevoie de interpretare, pentru că ascultătorii le înțelegeau în mod intuitiv. Însă pentru că noi nu ne aflăm acolo și pentru că noi le avem doar în formă scrisă, nu avem acea înțelegere imediată a unor puncte de referință, pe care o aveau ascultătorii de atunci. Prin procesul exegetic, însă, putem descoperi mesajul lor cu un grad de acuratețe destul de mare. Și ce trebuie noi să facem este să aducem acel mesaj în contextul nostru (cum a făcut Matei – ex. 18:10-14; 20:1-16). O modalitate în care poți face lucrul acesta în predicarea ta este să inserezi în povestire puncte de referință contemporane potrivite din punct de vedere contextual și hermeneutic.

Toate instrumentele, procedurile și principiile exegetice tradiționale obișnuite trebuie folosite atunci când studiem pildele în contextul lor, cu scopul de a deduce intenția autorului, însă genul literar al pildei pare atât de fluid, având o varietate mare și conținând multiple niveluri de semnificații, încât permite o mare flexibilitate în predicare. Să nu uităm că membrilor noștri le plac pildele și de obicei le consideră la fel de fascinante cum erau, fără îndoială, și pentru primii ascultători. Aceasta subliniază puterea narațiunii.

Regula de aur (ca și în cazul oricărui studiu exegetic în vederea pregătirii unei predici) este să nu facem pilda să spună altceva decât trebuia să spună. Aceasta este o greșeală frecventă în interpretarea pildelor – adică să încerci să dai fiecărui detaliu o semnificație alternativă paralelă (i.e. să alegorizezi interpretarea). Problema alegorizării ca metodă de interpretare este faptul că e foarte subiectivă. Zece persoane diferite ar putea avea zece semnificații diferite pentru fiecare detaliu al pildei. O regulă generală pentru înțelegerea și predicarea pildelor este că, așa cum spunea un prieten de-al meu, pastor, nu trebuie să încercăm „să facem pilda să se conformeze” – adică să nu încercăm să facem fiecare detaliu să aibă o semnificație anume decât dacă aceasta este evidentă în pildă.

Mai mult, alegorizarea, adică încercarea de a conferi semnificație fiecărui mic detaliu, duce adesea la pierderea din vedere a mesajului general al pildei. Pentru a contracara alegorizarea ca metodă de interpretare, unii teologi susțin că fiecare pildă are un singur mesaj și că detaliile sunt doar o cosmetizare narativă. Însă aceasta este o simplificare exagerată. De exemplu, în pilda fiului risipitor, tatăl, fiul și fratele mai mare nu reprezintă fiecare o altă persoană? Pildele pot transmite un singur mesaj sau mai multe, la fel cum pot avea mai multe scopuri, forme și aplicații. Totuși, chiar dacă o pildă poate avea mai multe puncte de referință, fiecare pildă (ca orice alt pasaj din Scriptură) transmite o singură idee teologică sau un singur principiu teologic.

7. O abordare echilibrată a interpretării pildelor (adaptat după Craig Blomberg, citat în Duval și Hays, 260 și urm.).

(a) Caută ideea principală a fiecărui personaj principal. Toate celelalte detalii doar dezvoltă povestirea. De exemplu, în pilda fiului risipitor (Lc. 15:11-32), este limpede că fiul risipitor reprezintă păcătosul care se întoarce la Dumnezeu cu pocăință și credință. Tatăl reprezintă dorința lui Dumnezeu de a oferi îndurare și iertare. Fratele mai mare reprezintă oamenii religioși – fariseii și cărturarii, cei cărora Isus le spunea pilda (Lc. 15:2) și care credeau că erau singurii vrednici de harul lui Dumnezeu.

Apoi, în pilda samariteanului milostiv (Lc. 10:29-37), omul bătut de tâlhari îl reprezintă pe aproapele nostru care se află în nevoie (acesta este subiectul abordat de Isus, Lc. 10:29). Preotul și levitul îi reprezintă pe liderii religioși, de la care te-ai aștepta să-și iubească aproapele în mod necondiționat, însă care s-ar putea să nu facă asta cu adevărat. Samariteanul îi reprezintă pe cei care de la care nu te-ai aștepta să-și iubească „aproapele”, care vin dintr-un context religios și cultural diferit, însă care s-ar putea să își arate, de fapt, dragostea într-un mod practic și public.

(b) Stabilește ideea principală pe care au înțeles-o ascultătorii inițiali. Nu citi și nu interpreta o pildă, izolând-o de contextul ei! Verifică cu atenție contextul ei literar! Pildele lui Isus întotdeauna ilustrează ceea ce se întâmpla în împrejurarea imediat anterioară.

Atunci când încerci să stabilești ideea principală a unei pilde, există câteva întrebări ajutătoare, cum ar fi: (1) Care este răspunsul cerut și oferit? (2) Există o surpriză, o întorsătură sau ceva șocant în narațiune? (3) Cum sau ce ne învață pilda despre Împărăție – direct ori indirect? (4) Care este învățătura și accentul teologic și cristologic? (5) Ce tip de pildă este – o pildă adevărată, o comparație sau o metaforă? (6) Care sunt scenele și mișcările din pildă? (7) Cine sunt ascultătorii? (8) Cine sunt personajele principale și pe cine reprezintă ele? (9) Care este ideea teologică centrală?

8. Câteva sugestii în plus pentru interpretarea pildelor.

(1) Ascultă pilda din nou și din nou. Identifică punctele de referință care ar fi fost alese de ascultătorii lui Isus. Încearcă să stabilești cum s-ar fi identificat cu povestirea ascultătorii inițiali – ce ar fi auzit ei și cum ar fi interpretat și aplicat ce au auzit. Uneori semnificația pildei apare în pildă în mod explicit; alteori semnificația este sugerată în aplicație (cf. Mat. 5:13; 18:21, 35; 29:1-16; 22:14; 25:13; Lc. 12:15-21; 15:7, 10; 18:1, 9; 19:11).

(2) Cercetează contextul cu atenție. Ca în cazul oricărei metodologii de interpretare serioase, cercetează cu atenție contextul fiecărei pilde din perspectiva din care autorul a ales să-și prezinte materialul. De exemplu, pilda lucrătorilor viei (Mat. 20:1-16) vine imediat după istorisirea cu tânărul bogat (Mat. 19:16-22). După ce se arată că bogățiile pot fi un mare obstacol în ce privește intrarea în Împărăție, Petru spune: „Iată că noi am lăsat totul şi Te-am urmat” (Lc. 18:28). Isus îl asigură pe Petru că își vor primi răsplata cuvenită (Lc. 19:28-30), însă continuă apoi cu pilda despre „un gospodar care a ieşit dis-de-dimineaţă să-şi tocmească lucrători la vie” (Mat. 20:1), pildă în care Isus mustră atitudinea lui Petru de auto-neprihănire: „Vezi ce am făcut noi pentru tine, Isus, și la câte am renunțat pentru Tine…” Petru vorbea ca acei lucrători din vie, care credeau că li se cuvine o plată mai mare decât celor care nu au lucrat la fel de mult, în loc să se mulțumească să-L slujească pe Hristos din dragoste. Aceasta este perspectiva din care autorul a ales să prezinte pilda.

În primul rând, să privim la contextul istoric și cultural – adică la contextul specific al pildei. De exemplu, Isus spune pilda fiului risipitor anume pentru a-i mustra pe cărturari și farisei, care cârtiseră împotriva Lui: „Omul acesta primeşte pe păcătoşi şi mănâncă cu ei” (Lc. 15:1-2). Apoi, Isus spune pilda în care fariseii și cărturarii sunt prezentați ca fiind cei care „se plâng în loc să se bucure atunci când un păcătos este «găsit»… Ceea ce trebuie să evaluăm aici este rolul fiului mai mare, al cărui unic frate – nu unul dintr-o sută și nici măcar unul din zece – fusese pierdut. Acest frate mai mare îi reprezintă pe fariseii care cârteau și care păreau incapabili să se bucure împreună cu Dumnezeu și cu îngerii din cer” (Moises Silva, 112-113).

Pentru a înțelege contextul cultural, trebuie să studiem obiceiurile oamenilor din primul secol, ca să înțelegem impactul a ceea ce se spune sau se face. De exemplu, când fiul risipitor cerea ca tatăl să-i dea partea lui de moștenire, el cerea ceva ce, în mod normal, nu ar fi primit înainte de moartea tatălui său. Făcând lucrul acesta, el sugera că și-ar fi dorit ca tatăl său să moară. Dacă înțelegem aceasta, dragostea tatălui și harul arătat atunci când își primește fiul înapoi sunt chiar mai uimitoare.

II. Consolidarea Conducerii Biblice
„Slujba Împăcării, Partea A 4-A (Continuare): O Chemare La Împăcarea Poporului Lui Dumnezeu Cu Slujitorul Lui Dumnezeu” (2 Cor. 6:11-7:16)

Continuăm tot cu acest text biblic în prezenta ediție a jurnalului. Data trecută am studiat 2 Cor. 6:11-18 și am vorbit despre primele două secțiuni ale textului:

1. O chemare pastorală la dragoste (6:11-13).

2. O chemare pastorală la avertizare (6:14-18).

Continuăm acum cu cea de-a treia secțiune…

3. Aplicarea chemării pastorale (7:1-4). „Deci...” (se trage o concluzie din ceea ce s-a spus mai înainte), pe baza promisiunilor din Vechiul Testament (6:16-18), conform cărora Dumnezeu va fi Tatăl lor, readucându-și poporul într-o relație corectă cu El, dacă (observați că promisiunile sunt condiționate) se vor separa de rău (adică de practicile religioase păgâne; mai exact, de închinarea la idoli), Pavel poruncește: „Deci fiindcă avem astfel de făgăduinţe, preaiubiţilor, să ne curăţăm de orice întinăciune a cărnii şi a duhului şi să ne ducem sfinţirea până la capăt, în frica de Dumnezeu” (7:1).

Pentru Pavel, principiul de bază al sfințeniei pentru poporul lui Dumnezeu este: „Nu vă înjugaţi la un jug nepotrivit cu cei necredincioşi” (6:14), iar trăirea acestei sfințenii în poporul lui Dumnezeu înseamnă „să ne curăţăm de orice întinăciune a cărnii şi a duhului” (7:1). Principiul este că cei nedrepţi nu vor moşteni Împărăţia lui Dumnezeu” (1 Cor. 6:9-10). Cei din poporul lui Dumnezeu au fost spălați…sfințiți… socotiţi neprihăniţi, în Numele Domnului Isus Hristos şi prin Duhul Dumnezeului nostru” (1 Cor. 6:11) și sunt, așadar, curățiți, declarațional și pozițional, „de orice întinăciune a cărnii şi a duhului...”

Principiul trebuie să fie evident în trăirea lor ca să fie adevărat cu privire la ei. Cu alte cuvinte, sfințirea pozițională trebuie să fie demonstrată prin sfințirea practică. Am fost sfințiți de Dumnezeu – aceasta este sfințirea pozițională (ex. Fapte 26:18; Evr. 10:14; 13:12; 1 Pet. 1:2; Ef. 5:26; In. 17:17) – și noi trebuie să ne sfințim – aceasta este sfințirea practică și progresivă (1 Cor. 1:18; 1 Pet. 3:15; ), pentru ca unirea noastră cu Hristos să devină din ce în ce mai evidentă și mai reală în viața noastră. Fiind eliberați de robia păcatului (Rom. 6:11-18), putând astfel să nu mai păcătuim (1 In. 3:9), Dumnezeu lucrează în noi (1 Tes. 5:23; Tit 2:14), ca să devenim tot mai asemănători cu Hristos (2 Cor. 3:18; Rom. 8:29; Evr. 13:20-21; 1 In. 2:6; 3:7). Duhul Sfânt, în special, este agentul divin activ în sfințirea noastră (1 Tes. 4:3; 2 Tes. 2:13; Gal. 5:16-18, 22-23).

Nu există conflict între cele două concepte gemene de sfințire pasivă și sfințire activă. Sfințirea nu este doar o lucrare a lui Dumnezeu în noi, prin care suntem sfințiți, puși deoparte, numiți sfinți (1 Cor. 1:2; 2 Cor. 1:1) și Dumnezeu nu numai că ne-a dat sfințirea în Hristos (Rom. 1:30; 2 Tes. 2:13), ci și noi ne sfințim, străduindu-ne să evităm păcatul (1 Cor. 6:18; 2 Cor. 7:1; 1 In. 3:6-9) și să facem ceea ce Dumnezeu spune că este adevărat cu privire la noi (1 Cor. 7:34; 1 Tes. 4:3-8; Rom. 6:19), dorind să fim tot mai mult ca și Hristos (Rom. 8:13; Evr. 12:1; Fil. 2:12; 3:13-14; 2 Pet. 1:5 și urm.).

„Întinăciunea” (pângărirea, murdărirea) care rezultă din a fi „înjugaţi la un jug nepotrivit cu cei necredincioşi” (mai exact, din închinarea la zei) este totală, pentru că întinează și „carnea și duhul.” De aceea, „curățirea” cerută apoi „cărnii” (curățire exterioară, fizică – cine suntem în exterior) și „duhului” (curățire interioară, spirituală – cine suntem în interior) este, de asemenea, totală.

„Să ne ducem sfinţirea până la capăt.” Îndemnul acesta sugerează, cu certitudine, că sfințirea noastră este progresivă, pentru că ne străduim aici și acum către sfințenie, înțelegând totodată că sfințenia deplină va fi experimentată doar la glorificarea noastră. Însă chiar dacă desăvârșirea procesului de sfințire va avea loc în eschaton (1 Tes. 3:13; Iuda 24; 2 Cor. 11:2), totuși continuăm să ne luptăm acum pentru a duce acest proces la capăt. Repet, folosirea expresiei „să ducem până la capăt” indică faptul că noi trebuie să facem lucrul acesta. În ce-i privește pe corinteni, ei trebuie să-și ducă sfințirea până la capăt, separându-se de orice întinăciune și asociere cu cei necredincioși – în special în ce privește închinarea la idoli, dar nu numai.

Așa cum „frica de Domnul” a fost unul dintre factorii motivatori în slujirea lui Pavel (5:11; cf. 1 Cor. 2:3; 2 Cor. 7:11), tot așa trebuie să fie unul dintre factorii principali în motivarea poporului lui Dumnezeu în procesul sfințirii – „să ne curăţăm de orice întinăciune a cărnii şi a duhului.” Noi trăim sub privirea atotvăzătoare și atotcunoscătoare a lui Dumnezeu. Nu putem scăpa de cercetarea și judecata Lui.

Continuând șirul de idei din 6:11-12, Pavel își continuă chemarea pastorală adresată corintenilor. „Înţelegeţi-ne bine! N-am nedreptăţit pe nimeni, n-am vătămat pe nimeni, n-am înşelat pe nimeni” (7:2). El stăruiește pe lângă ei: „Înţelegeţi-ne bine”. El le adusese vestea bună a evangheliei pentru prima dată, așa că inimile lor ar trebui să fie deschise pentru el și, dimpotrivă, închise pentru apostolii falși (care câștigau influență asupra lor) și pentru necredincioșii ale căror practici păgâne le adoptau (David E. Garland, 2 Corinthians [2 Corinteni], 344). În definitiv, nu era nimic la el care să-i facă să se poarte cu el așa cum o făceau. Chiar dacă i-a mustrat aspru și le-a dat instrucțiuni drastice, el nu a nedreptățit pe nimeni, nu a vătămat și nu a înșelat pe nimeni. Așa că, de ce să se poarte astfel cu el? De ce să-l dea la o parte?

Nu spun aceste lucruri ca să vă osândesc, căci am spus mai înainte că sunteţi în inimile noastre pe viaţă şi pe moarte” (7:3). Pavel vrea să se asigure că ei nu vor răstălmăci ceea ce el a spus în apărarea sa în 7:2. Cineva s-ar putea gândi, mai ales cineva aflat în starea spirituală a corintenilor, că Pavel nu se apăra acolo, ci îi acuza pe ei. De aceea, el își clarifică afirmația: Nu spun aceste lucruri ca să vă osândesc și își reconfirmă dragostea pentru ei: sunteţi în inimile noastre pe viaţă şi pe moarte. El vrea ca aceste lucruri să fie înțelese foarte clar.

Expresia pe viaţă şi pe moarte ar putea fi tradusă „ca să murim împreună pentru (“εις” în greacă) a trăi împreună.” Acesta este într-adevăr scopul său, prin care Pavel s-ar putea să se refere fie la devotamentul și experiența creștină prezentă a lui și a lor (i.e. a muri cu Hristos și a trăi în și pentru Hristos) sau poate se referă la viitorul lor comun, când vor muri împreună ca și credincioși în Hristos și vor fi înviați împreună pentru destinul lor comun de a trăi împreună în cer cu Hristos. El este atât de apropiat de ei, încât vrea să comunice cu ei.

Am o mare încredere în voi. Am tot dreptul să mă laud cu voi. Sunt plin de mângâiere, îmi saltă inima de bucurie în toate necazurile noastre” (7:4). Versetul acesta poate fi interpretat ca fiind fie ultimul verset din excursus (2:14-7:4), fie primul verset din următoarea secțiune (7:4-16), care este o continuare de la 2:13 referitor la găsirea lui Tit și la ce va avea el de spus despre ei. Decât să încercăm să decidem unde se potrivește acest verset, este probabil mai bine să considerăm 7:4 un verset de legătură care încheie o secțiune și o începe pe următoarea, din moment ce se potrivește foarte bine cu ambele. Versetul încheie reafirmarea atitudinii pozitive a lui Pavel față de ei (7:3) și introduce reacția sa pozitivă față de raportul lui Tit (7:5-16), care, la rândul său, are legătură cu începutul epistolei (2:2-3 cf. 7:4, 13).

Îndrăzneala pe care o avusese în vorbirea sa față de ei (corectându-i cu privire la diferite aspecte) adusese o pocăință plină de evlavie și acțiunea corectivă necesară pe care el o dorea (7:9-10). Astfel, vorbirea lui directă atunci când i-a mustrat și i-a corectat și-a atins scopul dorit și îl face acum să se poată „lăuda” cu ei. Vorbirea lui plină de îndrăzneală, care ar fi putut afecta relația lor pentru totdeauna (pentru că nimănui nu îi place să fie corectat), a avut totuși un rezultat bun, pentru că ei au avut un răspuns bun, așa că el poate și chiar se bucură să se laude cu ei. Într-adevăr, „sunt plin de mângâiere îmi saltă inima de bucurie chiar și în toate necazurile noastre (și în ciuda lor). Necazurile la care se referă sunt, în mod evident, cele pe care le-a întâlnit în Macedonia, unde s-a dus să-l caute pe Tit (7:5).

III. Schițe De Predici

Titlu: Evanghelia după Isus (Mat. 7:13-14)

Subiect: Două drumuri spre veșnicie.

Tema: Trebuie să alegi calea îngustă și grea a adevărului, dacă vrei să intri în Împărăția lui Dumnezeu.

Punctul 1: Un drum începe ușor, dar se termină greu (7:13).

1a) Începe ușor pentru că intrarea este largă și drumul este lat.

1b) Se termină greu pentru că duce la distrugere veșnică.

Punctul 2: Celălalt drum începe greu, dar se termină ușor (7:14).

2a) Începe greu pentru că intrarea este îngustă și drumul este dificil.

2b) Se termină ușor pentru că duce la viață veșnică.

Related Topics: Pastors

Журнал для пасторов Net, Rus Ed 44, Летнее издание 2022

Служение Института Библейского Проповедования…

Автор: Проф. Роджер Паскоу, Президент,
Email: [email protected]

I. Усиливая Объяснтительную Проповедь: Проповедь Новозаветных Евангелий, Ч. 3, Притчи

Притчи встречаются не только в Евангелиях. Нафан, например, использовал притчу, чтобы предупредить Давида о его грехе (2 Цар. 12:1-10). Исаия использовал притчу, чтобы обвинить дом Израилев (Ис. 5:1-7. Обратите внимание, что притча находится в Ис. 5:1-6, а ее применение - в Ис. 5:7). Однако для целей этой статьи я буду рассматривать притчи как поджанр «евангелия».

1. Определение и структура притч. Притча — это короткий рассказ, в котором определенные повседневные переживания и персонажи представляют определенные моральные или духовные истины. Иисус часто использовал притчи, чтобы подчеркнуть мысль. Как правило, притча начинается с описания событий или персонажей в конкретной ситуации и заканчивается прямым применением или объяснением истории, чтобы слушатели осознали ее актуальность для своей жизни. Вот почему вы часто встречаете сильную негативную реакцию на притчи Иисуса, потому что они затрагивают совесть слушателей.

2. Литературные формы притч. Проще говоря, притча — это форма образного языка. Позвольте мне сделать следующие различия…
1) «Правдивые» притчи. Под «истинными» притчами я подразумеваю притчи, которые следуют структуре и определению, которые я изложил выше. Примеры «истинных» притч: 1) Добрый самаритянин (Лк. 10:25-37); 2) Потерянная овца, потерянная монета и потерянный сын (Лк. 15:1-32); 3) Великая вечеря (Лк. 14:15-24); 4) Работники в винограднике (Мф. 20:1-16); 5) Богач и Лазарь (Лк. 16:19-31); 6) Десять дев (Мф. 25:1-13).

2) Сравнения. Некоторые притчи принимают форму развернутых сравнений, в которых предмет и вещь, с которой он сравнивается, отличаются друг от друга и становятся явными с помощью таких сравнений, как «подобно» или «как». «Царство Небесное подобно…» (Мф. 13:44-46). Примеры притч в форме развернутых сравнений: 1) Закваска в муке (Мф. 13:33); 2) Сеятель (Мф. 13:1-23); 3) Горчичное зерно (Мф. 13:31-32).

3) Метафоры. Некоторые притчи имеют черты развернутой метафоры, в которой, в отличие от развернутого сравнения, сравнение между предметом и вещью, с которой он сравнивается, неявно и нераздельно - например. «Вы - соль земли… Вы - свет миру» (Мф. 5:13-14). Хотя можно поспорить, что такие утверждения являются просто метафорами (и это было бы правдой), тем не менее, в контексте, в котором они используются, я считаю справедливым классифицировать некоторые из них, как имеющие иносказательные черты в своей структуре и цели.

3. Цель притч. Несмотря на кажущуюся простоту формы и содержания притч, было много споров о том, что они означают. И действительно, есть притчи, которые трудно понять, как, например, притча о нечестном управителе (Лк. 16:1-13). Мы читаем подобную историю и спрашиваем себя: «Что именно имел в виду Иисус? Он действительно хвалит нечестность этого человека? Или в этой истории есть нечто большее, чем кажется на первый взгляд?» Даже сами ученики задавались вопросом, что означали некоторые притчи Иисуса (Мк. 4:10; Лк. 8:9).

К сожалению, объяснение Иисусом значения притч само по себе трудно понять: «Вам дано знать тайны Царства Божьего, а тем внешним все бывает в притчах, так что они своими глазами смотрят, но не видят, и всегда слышат, но не разумеют; да не обратятся и будут прощены им грехи» (Мк. 4:11-12; цитируется Ис. 6:9-10). Хотя это утверждение не обязательно подразумевает, что это было целью всех притч Иисуса, оно объясняет, почему он использовал некоторые притчи, чтобы представить божественную тайну относительно природы Царства Божьего, тайну, значение которой открывается тем, кто обладает божественной силой. жизни, но утаивается от тех, кто непреклонно отвергает истину.

Возможно, объяснение Иисуса лучше понять в контексте того, что его служение имело два диаметрально противоположных результата. По выражению апостола Павла, для одних слушателей послание Иисуса в притчах было «запахом живительным на жизнь», а для других «запахом смертоносным на смерть» (2 Кор. 2:14-16). Или, как выразился апостол Петр, для «тех, кто уверовал» Иисус представлен в притчах как «камень, который отвергли строители, Сделавшийся краеугольным камнем», а для неверующих Он — «камень, о который они претыкаются, и камень, о который спотыкаются» (1 Пет. 2:7-8). Другими словами, притчи Иисуса заставляли людей принимать какую-либо сторону. Вы были либо за него, либо против него. Очевидно, это было следствием многих притч – они разделили людей и тем самым открыли истину их сердец. Как указывает Мойзес Сильва: «Притчи… когда они обращены к тем, кто восстал против Господа, становятся орудиями суда. Таким образом, «кто имеет, тому будет дано больше; кто не имеет, у того отнимется и то, что имеет» (Мк. 4:25). (Сильва, Введение в библейскую герменевтику, с. 111).

Таким образом, притчи служат цели различения тех, кто слышал Иисуса, — с одной стороны, для того, чтобы скрыть истину от тех, кто отверг Его слова, а с другой стороны, чтобы разъяснить истину тем, кто положительно откликнулся на Его слова. Тем, кто положительно отреагировал на его слова, притчи Иисуса открыли Бога, Его истину и Его цели для своего народа. Для тех, кто отверг Иисуса и его слова, Иисус использовал притчи как орудие суда и средство скрыть от них истину (напр., Мф. 13:10-15; Мк. 4:11-12; Лк. 8:9-10). Как выразился Генри Вирклер: «Те же притчи, которые давали понимание верным верующим, были лишены смысла для тех, кто ожесточал свои сердца против истины» (Вирклер, Герменевтика, с.165). Это учение похоже на 1 Коринфянам 2 относительно способности возрожденного человека понимать духовную истину в сравнении с неспособностью невозрожденного человека. Разница в том, что у одного есть духовное зрение, а у другого - духовная слепота. Таким образом, притчи имеют две цели, или фокусf, – первый для верующих, второй - для неверующих.

Цель притч двояка: 1) научить слушателей духовным истинам, таким как молитва, даяние и т. д. (например, Мф. 13:10-12; Мк. 4:11), и 2) бросить им вызов в отношении неправильного, греховного или лицемерного образа жизни (напр., Лк. 7:36-50). В общем, цель притч — раскрыть правду о характере и личности слушателей — кто они, и что они из себя представляют.

4. Природа притч. Вероятно, характеристика притч, которая объясняет, почему Иисус так часто использовал их в своем учении, заключается в том, что это были простые интересные истории из повседневной жизни, которые обычные люди могли понять, с которыми они могли отождествлять себя, и из которых они могли чему-то научиться.

Таким образом, притчи раскрывают, проясняют, подчеркивают и применяют духовную истину как к сердцу, так и к совести. Природа притч такова, что они производят впечатление на умы и совесть людей гораздо более драматичное, действенное и продолжительное, чем простое изложение сути — т.е. упорная вдова и неправедный судья (Лк. 18:1-8), или фарисей и мытарь (Лк. 18:9-14).

Таким образом, природа притч заключается в том, что они представляют собой рассказы из реальной жизни о знакомых ситуациях, людях и событиях, которые сравнивают одну ситуацию, человека или событие с другой, чтобы проиллюстрировать, просветить и научить незнакомой или непризнанной, но важной духовной истине. По своей природе притчи косвенны и требуют ответа от слушателей.

5. Понимание и толкование притч. Притча — это послание. Говорится, чтобы обратиться к слушателям и захватить их, рассказать им об их собственных действиях или заставить их каким-то образом отреагировать на Иисуса и его служение. Именно эта особенность затрудняет толкование притч, потому что она чем-то похожа на толкование анекдота — если вам приходится его толковать, он не может быть смешным и интуитивно очевидным. Как и в случае с непосредственным обращением к шутке, слушатели притч должны были немедленно отождествить себя с теми моментами, которые заставили их понять суть притчи.

Поскольку мы можем не сразу понять сути из-за нашей отдаленности от времени, культуры и языка притч, они действуют на нас не так, как на первых слушателей. Однако, правильно иистолковывая притчи, мы можем понять то, что тогда понимали они.

Как правило, толкование и применение истории происходит в конце притчи и отличается от самой истории. Например, в Луки 7:40-42 три ориентира: ростовщик и два должника. Отождествление происходит немедленно: 1) Бог подобен ростовщику; 2) блудница и Симон подобны двум должникам.

Притча – это слово суда, требующее ответа от Симона. Сила притчи такова, что Симон не мог упустить ее сути. Следует отметить, что оиертиры сами по себе не составляют притчи. Они служат только для того, чтобы вовлечь слушателей в историю и дать им ориентир, с кем или с чем они отождествляются. Суть истории в предполагаемом ответе. В данном случае слово осуждения Симону и его друзьям и слово принятия и прощения женщине.

Помните, что все притчи Иисуса в некотором роде являются средством, которое Иисус избрал для описания и провозглашения Царства. Следовательно, мы должны очень хорошо знать значение царства в служении Иисуса.

6. Рекомендации по исследованию и толкованию притч. Когда притчи были впервые произнесены, они редко нуждались в толковании, поскольку их смысл был интуитивно очевиден для слушателей. Но поскольку нас там не было и поскольку они были только в письменной форме, нам не хватало непосредственного понимания некоторых отиентиров, которые были у первоначальных слушателей. Однако посредством толковательного процесса мы можем обнаружить их точку зрения с высокой степенью точности. Что нам нужно сделать, так это перевести этот момент в наш собственный контекст (как это сделал Матфей, например, 18:10-14; 20:1-16). Один из способов сделать это в своей проповеди — это вставить в историю контекстуально и герменевтически подходящие современные ориентиры.

В то время как все обычные, традиционные экзегетические инструменты, процедуры и принципы должны быть использованы при изучении притч в их контексте, чтобы сделать вывод об авторском замысле, жанр притчи кажется таким изменчивым, имеющим такое разнообразие и содержащий такое множество уровней. Это означает, что они оставляют большую гибкость в проповеди. Мы должны помнить, что наши собрания сегодня любят притчи и обычно находят их такими же увлекательными, как и первоначальные слушатели. Это подчеркивает силу повествования.

Золотое правило (как и во всех толкующих исследованиях при подготовке к проповеди) состоит в том, чтобы не придавать притчам значения того, для чего они не предназначались. Это распространенная ошибка при толковании притч, а именно попытка придать каждой детали параллельный альтернативный смысл (т. е. аллегоризировать ваше истолкование). Проблема аллегоризации как метода толкования заключается в том, что она очень субъективна. Десять разных людей могли придумать десять разных значений для каждой детали. Общее правило для понимания и проповеди притч заключается в том, что, как говаривал один мой друг-пастор, мы не должны пытаться «заставить притчи ходить на четвереньках», то есть не пытаться придавать смысл каждой детали, если она не очевидна из самой притчи.

Более того, аллегоризация, пытающаяся придать значение каждой детали, часто упускает из виду общий смысл притчи. Чтобы противостоять аллегорическому методу толкования, некоторые ученые утверждают, что каждая притча имеет только один смысл, а детали - просто повествовательная показуха. Но это, безусловно, чрезмерное упрощение. Например, в притче о блудном сыне не представляют ли сын, отец и старший брат разных личностей? Притчи могут иметь одну или несколько точек зрения, так же как они могут иметь несколько целей, форм и применений. Однако, хотя притча может иметь несколько моментов, каждая притча (как и любой другой отрывок из Писания) имеет только одну доктринальную основу или принцип, который она передает.

7. Сбалансированный подход к толкованию притч (адаптировано из Craig Blomberg, цитируется у Duval and Hays, 260f.).
а) Искать главную мысль для каждого главного героя. Все остальные детали лишь усиливают историю. Например, в притче о блудном сыне (Лк. 15:11-32) блудный сын ясно представляет грешника, обращающегося к Богу с покаянием и верой. Отец представляет готовность Бога проявить милость и прощение. Старший брат олицетворяет религиозных людей – фарисеев и книжников, к которым Иисус обращался в притче (Лк. 15:2), считающих, что они одни достойны благодати Божией.

Опять же, в притче о добром самаритянине (Лк. 10:29-37) человек, побитый разбойником, представляет нуждающегося ближнего (это тема, к которой обращается Иисус, Лк. 10:29). Священник и левит представляют религиозных лидеров, от которых можно было бы ожидать безоговорочной любви к своим «ближним», но на самом деле они могут этого не делать. Самарянин представляет тех, от кого вы не ожидаете, что они будут любить своих «ближних» с другим религиозным и культурным происхождением, но которые действительно могут делать это практически и публично.

б) Определите основную мысль, которую могли бы понять первоначальные слушатели. Не читайте и не толкуйте притчи в отрыве от того, что происходит вокруг них. Внимательно проверьте их литературный контекст. Притчи Иисуса неизменно иллюстрируют то, что происходило в непосредственно предшествующем вопросе или обстоятельстве.
Пытаясь определить основной смысл притчи, полезно задать себе несколько вопросов, например: 1) К какому ответу призывают и взывают? 2) Есть ли в повествовании неожиданность, поворот, шок? 3) Как или чему эта притча учит нас о Царстве – прямо или косвенно? 4) Какова христологическая и богословская направленность и учение? 5) Что это за притча – настоящая притча, сравнение или метафора? 6) Каковы различные сцены и движения притчи? 7) Кто аудитория? 8) Кто главные персонажи и кого они представляют? 9) Что является центральным теологическим моментом?

8. Еще несколько советов по толкованию притч.
1) Слушайте притчу снова и снова. Определите ориентиры, которые могли быть схвачены слушателями Иисуса. Попытайтесь определить, как первоначальные слушатели отождествили бы себя с историей – что они услышали бы, и как бы они это истолковали и применили. Иногда смысл прямо указывается в притче; в других случаях это подразумевается через применение (ср. Мф. 5:13; 18:21, 35; 29:1-16; 22:14; 25:13; Лк. 12:15-21; 15:7, 10; 18:1, 9; 19:11).

2) Внимательно изучите контекст. Как и в случае любой прочной методологии толкования, внимательно исследуйте контекст каждой притчи с той точки зрения, которую автор выбрал для представления своего материала. Например, притча о работниках в винограднике (Мф. 20:1-16) идет сразу после истории о богатом юноше-управителе (Мф. 19:16-22). Указав, что богатство может быть большим препятствием для входа в Царство, Петр говорит: «Вот, мы оставили все и последовали за вами. Так что же будет для нас?» (Лк. 19:27). Иисус уверяет Петра, что они получат должное вознаграждение (Лк. 19:28-30), но следует за этим заверение притчей о «хозяине земли, который вышел рано утром нанять работников для своего виноградника» (Мф. 20: 1), в этой притче Иисус упрекает Петра в самодовольстве: «Смотри, что мы сделали для Тебя, Иисус, сколько мы пожертвовали ради Тебя…» платить больше, чем те, кто не работал так долго, как они работали, вместо того, чтобы довольствоваться служением Христу из любви. Именно с такой точки зрения автор избрал эту притчу.

Во-первых, посмотрите на исторический и культурный контекст — его конкретную обстановку. Например, Иисус рассказывает притчу о блудном сыне специально, чтобы обличить книжников и фарисеев, роптавших на него: «Он принимает грешников и ест с ними» (Лк. 15:1-2). Затем Иисус рассказывает притчу, в которой фарисеи и книжники изображаются как те, кто «скорее жалуется, чем радуется, когда грешник „найден”… Следует оценить роль старшего сына, чей единственный брат — не один из ста или даже один из десяти – и он был потерян. Этот старший сын олицетворяет ворчливых фарисеев, которые, кажется, не могут разделить радость Бога и ангелов небесных» (Мойзес Сильва, с. 112–113).

Понимание культурного контекста требует изучения обычаев первого века, чтобы понять влияние того, что говорится и делается. Например, когда блудный сын просил отца отдать ему его часть наследства, он просил то, что обычно не происходит до того как отец умер. Поступая так, он как бы желает смерти своему отцу. Понимание этого делает любовь и благодать отца, принявшего обратно этого сына, еще более замечательными.

II. Усиливая библейское руководство
“Служение примирения, Ч. 4 (продолжаю): Призыв к примирению Божьего народа с Божьим служителем» (2 Кор. 6:11-7:16)

Мы снова продолжим этот отрывок в этом выпуске журнала для пасторов The Net В прошлый раз мы рассмотрели 2 Кор. 6:11-18, в котором мы обратились к первым двум частям отрывка:

1. Пасторский призыв любви (6:11-13).

2. Пасторский призыв увещевания (6:14-18).

Теперь мы продолжаем третий раздел…

3. Применение пасторского призыва (7:1-4). «Итак...» (делая вывод из только что сказанного), исходя из обетований, содержащихся в В.З. (6:16-18), что Бог будет их Отцом, восстанавливая Свой народ в надлежащих отношениях с Ним, если (обратите внимание, что обетования условны) они отделят себя от зла (а именно, языческих религиозных практик; в частности, идолопоклонства), то наставление Павла: «Итак, возлюбленные, имея такие обетования, очистим себя от всякой скверны плоти и духа, совершая святыню в страхе Божием» (7:1).

Для Павла главный принцип святости среди Божьего народа состоит в том, чтобы мы «не преклонялись под ярмо с неверующими» (6:14), и практика такой святости среди Божьего народа заключается в том, что мы «очищаем себя от всякой нечистоты». плоти и духа» (7:1). Принцип заключается в том, что «неправедные не наследуют Царства Божьего? (1 Кор. 6:9-10). Народ Божий был «омыт… освящен… оправдан во имя Господа Иисуса Христа и Духом Бога нашего» (1 Кор. 6:11) и, следовательно, в принципе и по существу очищен «от всякой скверны плоти и духа..»

Этот принцип должен быть очевиден в их практике, чтобы он был верным. Другими словами, позиционное освящение должно проявиться в практическом освящении. Мы были освящены Богом — это позиционное освящение (например, Деян. 26:18; Евр. 10:14; 13:12; 1 Пет. 1:2; Еф. 5:26; Ин. 17:17) — и мы должны освящать себя – это постепенное, практическое освящение (1 Кор. 1:18;1 Пет. 3:15), чтобы наш союз со Христом становился все более и более очевидным и реальным в нашей жизни. Освободившись от рабства греха (Рим. 6:11-18) и будучи способным уже не грешить (1 Ин. 3:9), Бог действует в нас (1 Фес. 5:23; Тит. 2:14). так что мы все больше и больше уподобляемся Христу (2 Кор. 3:18; Рим. 8:29; Евр. 13:20-21; 1 Ин. 2:6; 3:7). В частности, Святой Дух является божественным посредником, действующим в нашем освящении (1 Фес. 4:3; 2 Фес. 2:13; Гал. 5:16-18, 22-23).

Этот принцип должен быть очевиден в их практике, чтобы он был верен им. Другими словами, позиционное освящение должно проявляться в практическом освящении. Мы были освящены Богом — это позиционное освящение (например, Деян. 26:18; Евр. 10:14; 13:12; 1 Пет. 1:2; Еф. 5:26; Ин. 17:17) — и мы должны освящать себя – это постепенное, практическое освящение (1 Кор. 1:18; 1 Пет. 3:15; ), чтобы наш союз со Христом становился все более и более очевидным и реальным в нашей жизни. Освободившись от рабства греха (Рим. 6:11-18) и будучи способным уже не грешить (1 Ин. 3:9), Бог действует в нас (1 Фес. 5:23; Тит. 2:14). так что мы все больше и больше уподобляемся Христу (2 Кор. 3:18; Рим. 8:29; Евр. 13:20-21; 1 Ин. 2:6; 3:7). В частности, Святой Дух является божественным посредником, действующим в нашем освящении (1 Фес. 4:3; 2 Фес. 2:13; Гал. 5:16-18, 22-23).

Здесь нет конфликта между двумя концепциями пассивного и активного освящения. Мало того, что освящение есть работа Божья в нас, посредством которой мы освящаемся, отделяемся, называемся святыми, освященными (1 Кор. 1:2; 2 Кор. 1:1), и не только Бог во Христе даровал нам освящение (Рим. 1:30; 2 Фес. 2:13), но и мы освящаем себя, стараясь избежать греха (1 Кор. 6:18; 2 Кор. 7:1; 1 Ин. 3:6-9), стремясь практиковать то, что Бог объявляет истиной о нас (1 Кор. 7:34; 1 Фес. 4:3-8; Рим. 6:19), и желая быть больше похожим на Христа (Рим. 8:13; Евр. 12:1; Флп. 2:12; 3:13-14; 2 Пет. 1:5 и далее).

«Нечистота» (осквернение, нечистота), возникающая в результате «воссоединения с неверующими» (в частности, в поклонении иным богам), тотальна, поскольку оскверняет и «плоть, и дух». Следовательно, «очищение», которое, следовательно, требуется от «плоти» (физическое, внешнее очищение — кто мы снаружи) и «духа» (духовное, внутреннее очищение — кто мы внутри), также является тотальным.

«Доведение святости до конца» безусловно подразумевает, что наше освящение прогрессивно, поскольку мы здесь и сейчас стремимся к святости, все время понимая, что совершенство святости будет реально переживаться только при нашем прославлении. Но хотя окончательное завершение этого процесса освящения произойдет в эсхатоне (1 Фес. 3:13; Иуды 24; 2 Кор. 11:2), тем не менее мы продолжаем стремиться и сейчас привести этот процесс к финалу. Опять же, использование фразы «доведение до конца» указывает на то, что это то, что мы должны сделать для себя. Что касается коринфян, то они должны совершенствовать свою святость, отделяя себя от любого осквернения неверующими или общения с ними, особенно, не ограничиваясь, идолопоклонством.

Точно так же, как «страх Божий» был одним из мотивирующих факторов в служении Павла (5:11; ср. 1 Кор. 2:3; 2 Кор. 7:11). Он должен был быть одним из основных факторов в служении Павла. Побуждение Божьего народа к святости – «очиститься от всякой скверны плоти и духа». Мы живем под всевидящим и всезнающим взглядом Бога. Мы не можем избежать его пристального внимания и осуждения.

Продолжая свой поток мыслей от 6:11-12, Павел продолжает свое пасторское обращение к коринфянам. «Освободите место для нас в ваших сердцах. Мы никого не обидели, никого не развратили, никого не обманули» (7:2). Он умоляет их «освободить место в их сердцах» для него. Он прежде всего принес им благую весть Евангелия, поэтому их сердца должны быть открыты для него и, наоборот, закрыты для лжеапостолов (которые приобретали у них популярность) и неверующих, чьи языческие обычаи они начинали перенимать. (Дэвид Э. Гарланд, “2 Коринфянам”, с. 344). В конце концов, с его стороны не было ничего, что заставило бы их вести себя по отношению к нему так, как раньше. Несмотря на его резкие упреки и строгие указания, он никого не обидел, никого не развратил и никого не обманул. Итак, почему они так к нему относятся; почему они закрылись от него?

«Говорю это не для того, чтобы осудить вас, ибо уже сказал, что вы в сердцах наших, чтобы вместе умереть и вместе жить» (7:3). Павел хочет быть уверенным, что они не истолкуют неправильно его заявление в свою защиту в 7:2. Кто-то, кто читает его, особенно о духовном состоянии коринфян, может сделать вывод, что Павел не защищал себя, а обвинял их. Следовательно, он разъясняет свое заявление словами: «Я говорю это не для того, чтобы осуждать вас», и подтверждает свою любовь к ним: «вы в наших сердцах, чтобы вместе умереть и жить вместе». Он не хочет никаких недоразумений по этому поводу.

Выражение «умереть вместе и жить вместе» можно было бы перевести так: «чтобы мы умерли вместе с целью («εις» по-гречески) жить вместе». Таким образом, это действительно заявление о цели, в которой Павел может иметь здесь в виду либо ссылку на его и их нынешний христианский опыт и преданность (т. е. смерть со Христом и жизнь во Христе и для Христа), либо, возможно, он имеет в виду их общее будущее, когда они умрут вместе, как верующие во Христа и вместе воскреснут в своей общей судьбе жить вместе на небесах со Христом, такова близость к ним, которую он хочет им сообщить.

«Я очень откровенен с вами; Я очень горжусь тобой. Я полон воодушевления; Я преисполнен радости при всех наших скорбях» (7:4). Этот стих может быть истолкован либо, как последний стих этого экскурса (2:14-7:4), либо как первый стих следующего раздела (7:4-16), который является продолжением 2:13 о том, как найти Тита и услышать свой отчет о них. Вместо того, чтобы пытаться решить, куда подходит этот стих, вероятно, безопаснее рассматривать 7:4, как связующий стих, заканчивающий один раздел и начинающий следующий, поскольку он хорошо связан с обоими. Это завершает положительное подкрепление Павлом своего отношения к ним (7:3) и представляет его положительную реакцию на сообщение Тита (7:5-16), которое, в свою очередь, относится к началу послания (2:2). -3 ср. 7:4, 13).

Его прежняя смелость в обращении с ними (исправление их по разным вопросам) привела к благочестивому покаянию и исправлению, которого он желал и в котором нуждался (7:9-10). Таким образом, его прямая речь об их упреке и исправлении достигла намеченного результата и вызывает теперь его «гордость» за них. Его смелость речи, которая могла навсегда разорвать их отношения (ибо никто не любит, когда его поправляют), на самом деле оправдалась благодаря их положительному ответу, так что теперь он может и с удовольствием хвастается ими. В самом деле, он «наполнен ободрением… переполнен радостью» даже (и несмотря на) «все наши невзгоды». Страдания, о которых он говорит, очевидно, с которыми он столкнулся в Македонии, когда отправился туда искать Тита (7:5).

III. План проповеди

Заголовок: Евангелие, согласно Иисусу (Мф. 7:13-14)

Предмет: Две дороги, ведущие в вечность.

Тема: Вам нужно избрать узкий, трудный путь истины, если вы хотите войти в Царство Божье.

Пункт 1: Одна дорога начинается легко, но заканчивается плохо (7:13).

1а) Начинается легко, потому что вход широкий и дорога широкая.

1б) Заканчивается тяжело, потому что ее конечная цель - вечная погибель.

Пункт 2: Другая дорога начинается сложно, но заканчивается легко (7:14).

2а) Начинается тяжело, потому что вход узкий и дорога трудная.

2б) Заканчивается легко, потому что ее конечная цель – вечная жизнь.

Related Topics: Pastors

網上牧師雜誌 – 中文版(繁體), TCh Ed, Issue 44 2022 年 夏季

A ministry of…

作者: Roger Pascoe,博士,主席,
郵箱: [email protected]

I. 加強講解式講道:傳講新約福音,第三部分,比喻

比喻並非是福音獨有的。比如拿單,用了一個比喻警示大衛關於他的罪(撒下12:1-10)。以賽亞用了一個比喻控告以色列家(賽5:1-7.其中1-6節為比喻,7節為應用)。 然而,為了本文的目的,我將把比喻作為“福音”的一個下屬類型來處理。

1..比喻的定義和結構。比喻是一種短篇故事,裡面的日常經歷和人物代表了某些道德或屬靈的真理。耶穌經常用比喻來說明問題。通常,比喻以描述某一特定情況下的事件或人物開始,以直接應用或解釋故事結束,使聽者認識到故事與他們的生活有關。這就是為什麼你經常會看到對耶穌比喻的強烈負面反應,因為這些比喻觸到了聽眾的良心。

2.比喻的文學形式。簡單來說,比喻是修辭的一種形式。讓我做以下的區分…

(1) “真正的”比喻。我所說的“真正的”比喻是指那些符合我上面所給出的結構和定義的比喻。“真正的”比喻的例子:(1)好撒瑪利亞人(路1:25-37);(2)失羊、失錢和浪子(路15:1-32);(3)大宴席(路14:15-24);(4)在葡萄園做工(太2:1-16);(5)財主和拉撒路(路16:19-31);(6)十個童女(太25:1-13).

(2)明喻。一些比喻採用擴展的明喻的形式,其中主體與被比較的事物是有區別的,通過使用“像”或者“如同”這樣的比較使其明確——“天國就像…”(太13:44-46).比喻中明喻的例子有:(1)面酵(太13:33);(2)撒種(太13:1-23);芥菜種(太13:31-32)。

(3) 隱喻。有些比喻採用擴展的隱喻。與明喻不同的是, 隱喻的主體與被比較物之間的比較是隱含的、分不開的。例如“你們是世上的鹽…你們是世上的光”(太5:13-14)。雖然可以說這些陳述只是隱喻(這也是真的),但從他們所處的上下文來說,我認為有些隱喻從結構和目的來說有比喻的特點。

3..比喻的目的。雖然比喻的形式和內容簡單明瞭,但是關於它們的意義有很多爭論。確實,有些比喻難以理解,比如不義管家的比喻(路16:1-13)。當我們看到這樣一個故事,會問:“耶穌到底說的是什麼意思?難道他真的要我們不誠實嗎?或者這個故事不僅僅是表面所看到的?”。就連門徒們也會疑問耶穌一些比喻的意義(可4:10;‘路8:9’)。

不幸的是,耶穌對比喻意義的解釋本身就是一個難以理解的陳述:“神國的奧秘只叫你們知道;若是對外人講,凡事就用比喻,叫他們看是看見,卻不曉得;聽是聽見,卻不明白。恐怕他們回轉過來,就得赦免”(可4:11-12;引用賽6:9-10.雖然這句話並不一定意味著這是耶穌所有比喻的目的,但是它確實解釋了為什麼耶穌用一些比喻來講解天國的神聖奧秘,這些神聖的奧秘對於那些有神的生命的人是敞開的,向頑固抵擋真理的人是隱藏的。

或許耶穌的解釋最好從經文的背景來理解。他的事工有兩方面完全相反的效果。正如使徒保羅說的,對有些人來說,耶穌在比喻中傳遞的資訊是“活的香氣叫人活”,但是對另外一些人就是“死的香氣叫人死”(哥後2:14-16).或者,像使徒彼得說的,對於“你們相信的人”,耶穌是“匠人所棄的石頭已變成了房角的頭塊石頭”,但是對其他人,他是“絆腳的石頭,跌人的磐石”(彼前2:7-8。換句話說,耶穌的比喻迫使人選擇立場。你不是支持他就是反對他。這顯然是很多比喻的效果—它們將人區分開來,並顯明人的心跡。就像Moises Silva所說的,“比喻…對那些選擇反對主的人來說,成為審判的工具。因此,‘有的,還要給他;沒有的,連他所有的也要奪去’(可4:25)” (Silva, An Introduction to Biblical Hermeneutics, 111)。

因此,比喻是為了區分那些聽過耶穌的人—一方面,向拒絕他的人,隱藏了真理,另一方面,向那些對他的話積極回應的人,顯明了真理。對於那些積極回應他的話的人,耶穌的比較彰顯了神,他的真理和他對自己百姓的心意。對於那些拒接耶穌和他的話的人,比喻被耶穌用作審判以及向他們隱藏真理的工具(比如太 13:10-15; 可 4:11-12; 路 8:9-10)。就像Henry Virkler說的,“同樣的比喻使忠誠的信徒明白真理,但對那些硬著心反對真理的人卻毫無意義” (Virkler, Hermeneutics, 165)。哥前2章也教導了同樣的道理,重生的人明白屬靈的真理,而未重生的人不能明白真理。不同的是,一個有屬靈的看見,而另一個是屬靈瞎眼的。因此,比喻有兩個目的或者焦點—一個對相信的人,第二個是對不相信的人。

比喻的目的是兩方面的:(1)教導聽者關於屬靈的真理,比如禱告、奉獻等(如可13:10-12;可4:11),和(2)就不當、罪惡或虛偽的生活向他們提出質疑(如路7:36-50)。一般來說,比喻的目的是向聽的人顯明他們的內心和品性—他們是誰/怎樣的人。

4. 比喻的本質。比喻是普通人能夠輕易理解的、能從中找到認同並能從中學習的、與日常生活相關的簡單有趣的故事。可能正是因為比喻的這些特點,耶穌在他的教導中大量使用比喻。

因此,比喻揭示、澄清、強調屬靈的真理並將其應用于心靈、良心。比喻的性質使它們能夠在人們的腦海和良心上留下深刻的印象,遠比僅僅陳述觀點更有影響、更有效、更持久—比如不懈的寡婦和不義的官(路18:1-8),或者法利賽人和稅吏的禱告(路18:9-14)。

因此,比喻的本質是真實的簡短故事,將相似的情況、人和事件與另外一個情況、人或事件比較,從而解釋、闡明和教導一個不熟悉或者不被知道但卻很重要的屬靈真理。本質上說,比喻是間接的,需要聽者做出回應。

5.理解和解釋比喻。比喻就是資訊。講比喻是為了抓住或引起聽眾注意,讓他們簡單瞭解自己的行為或者讓他們對耶穌的事工做出某種回應。正是這個特點,使得解釋比喻很困難,因為就像解釋一個玩笑—如果你必須解釋它,它就不再有趣和直觀。就像笑話的直接感染力一樣,比喻的聽眾也會立即與他們所明白的點產生共鳴。

由於我們與比喻的時間、文化和語言相距甚遠,我們可能無法立即明白這一點,因此它們對我們的作用與對原聽者的作用不同。然而通過對比喻進行解釋,我們有可能明白當時聽眾所理解的。

.一般來說,對故事解釋和應用會出現在故事結尾,與故事本身區分開來。比如路7:40-42,三個主要人物是:債主和兩個欠債的。聽眾立即會明白:(1)神就像這個債主;(2)妓女和西門就像兩個欠債的。這個比喻是一個審判,呼籲西門悔改。這個比喻的力量在於西門不可能錯過要點。需要注意的是,涉及到的人物本身並不構成比喻。他們只是為了把聽者吸引到故事中,使聽者能從中找到認同。這個故事的重點在於有意識的回應。在這個例子中,是對西門和他朋友的審判,對這個女人的接納和饒恕。

請記住,在某種程度上,耶穌的所有比喻都是耶穌選擇用來宣講天國的方式。因此,我們必須非常熟悉耶穌事工中天國的意義。

6.研究和解釋比喻的準則。當這些比喻第一次被說出來的時候,很少需要解釋,因為它們的意思對聽眾來說是直觀的。但由於我們當時不在現場,而且它們只有書面形式,我們缺乏對原始聽眾所擁有的一些相關點的直接理解。然而,通過解經過程,我們可以高度準確地發現它們的點。我們需要做的是把那個點應用到我們的背景下(如馬太——18:10-14;20:1-16)。你可以通過在講道中插入(從上下文和釋經上來說)適合的與當代相關的點,從而做到這一點。

雖然在上下文背景下研究比喻,所有正常的傳統的工具、程式和原則都必須應用上,以便於能夠推斷理解作者的意圖,但是比喻的體裁本身非常流暢、多樣,並包含多個層次的意義,給講道留下了很大的靈活性。我們應該記住,我們今天的聽眾喜愛比喻故事,並像最初的聽眾一樣認為它們很迷人一樣。這凸顯了故事的力量。

黃金法則(就像所有準備講道的解經研究一樣)是不要讓比喻表達它們所沒有的意思。這是解釋比喻的常見錯誤—即,試圖使比喻的每一個細節都有一個相對的意義(也就是寓意化你的解釋)。寓意化作為一種​​解釋方法,其問題在於它太過主觀。十個不同的人可以為每個細節想出十個不同的含義。理解和傳講比喻的一般規則是,正如我的一位牧師朋友曾經說過的,我們不應該試圖“讓比喻四肢著地行走”——即不要試圖為每一個小細節賦予意義,除非比喻本身顯明。

此外,寓意化試圖為每一個小細節賦予意義,往往會錯過比喻的整體要點。一些學者為了反駁寓意化的解釋方法,聲稱每個比喻只有一個要點,細節只是敘事的裝飾。但這無疑過於簡單化了。比如浪子的比喻中,兒子、父親、哥哥不都代表不同的人嗎?比喻可以有一個也可以有多個點,就像它們可以有多種目的、形式和應用一樣。然而,雖然一個比喻可能涉及到多個點,但每個比喻(就像任何其他聖經段落一樣)只有一個神學要點或它所傳達的原則。

7. 一種平衡的解釋比喻的方法(改編自 Craig Blomberg,引自 Duval 和 Hays,260f)。

(a)為每個主角找到要點。所有其他的細節只是增強了故事情節。例如,在浪子的比喻中(路15:11-32),浪子清楚地代表了悔改和相信神的罪人。父親代表神願意施憐憫和寬恕。哥哥代表宗教人士——也就是耶穌這個比喻所指向的物件,法利賽人和文士(路15:2), 認為只有他們才配得神的恩典。

再比如在好撒瑪利亞人的比喻中(路10:29-37)。被強盜毆打的人代表有需要的鄰舍(這是耶穌所講的主題,路10:29)。祭司和利未人代表宗教領袖,你希望他們無條件地愛他們的“鄰居”,但他們可能不會真正這樣做。撒瑪利亞人代表那些你不會期望他們來愛具有不同宗教和文化背景的“鄰居”,但實際上可能以實際和公開的方式這樣做的人。

(b)確定最初聽眾所理解的要點。不要將比喻從上下文發生的事中孤立出來去閱讀或解釋。仔細查看它們的文學背景。耶穌的比喻總是說明在前面的問題或情況中發生了什麼。

在試圖確定比喻的要點時,問自己一些問題會很有幫助,例如:(1)這個比喻要求或產生什麼樣的反應? (2) 敘述中是否有驚喜、轉折、震撼? (3) 這個比喻直接或間接地教導我們關於神國的什麼?或者如何教導? (4) 基督論和神學的重點和教導是什麼? (5) 它是什麼類型的比喻——真正的比喻、明喻還是隱喻? (6) 比喻有哪些不同的場景和動作? (7) 聽眾是誰? (8) 誰是主要人物,他們代表誰? (9) 神學的中心論點是什麼?

8.解釋比喻的一些進一步提示

(1)一遍又一遍地聽這個比喻。找到耶穌的聽眾可能會聯想到的點。試著確定最初的聽眾會如何理解這個故事——他們會聽到什麼以及他們會如何解釋和應用它。有時,含義在比喻被明確說明了;有時,出現在應用中(參考 太 5:13; 18:21, 35; 29:1-16; 22:14; 25:13; Lk. 12:15-21; 15:7, 10; 18:1, 9; 19:11)。

(2)仔細查看上下文。就像所有可靠的解經方法一樣,從作者選擇呈現素材的角度,仔細查看每個比喻的上下文。比如,葡萄園工人的比喻(太20:1-16),緊跟在富有的少年人的故事之後(太19:16-22)。在指出財富可能是進入天國的一大障礙之後,彼得說:“看哪,我們已經撇下所有的跟從你,將來我們要得什麼呢?”(太19:27。 耶穌向彼得保證他們會得到應有的獎賞(太19:28-30),但是緊接在這個保證之後是這個“家主清早出去,雇人進他的葡萄園做工”的比喻(太20:1).在這個比喻中,耶穌責備彼得的自義“看看我們為你做了多少,耶穌,我們為你放棄了多少…”。彼得說話就像葡萄園裡的工人,他們認為自己比那些工作時間不長的人配得更多的工錢,而不是出於對基督的愛,滿足於服事基督。這就是作者所選擇呈現這個比喻的角度。

首先,看歷史和文化的背景—它特殊的設定。比如,耶穌講了浪子的比喻,專門責備那些發怨言的文士和法利賽人,“這個人接待罪人,又同他們吃飯”(路15:1-2。接著,耶穌講述了一個比喻,其中法利賽人和文士被描繪成“當一個罪人‘被找到’時,他們會抱怨而不是歡喜……欣賞的重點是大兒子的角色,他唯一的弟兄,不是一百個中的一個也不是十個中的一個,迷失了。這個大兒子代表抱怨的法利賽人,他們似乎無法分享天堂裡神和天使的喜悅” (Moises Silva, 112-113)。

瞭解文化背景要求我們研究一世紀的習俗,以便我們瞭解經文中所說和所做的影響。例如,當浪子要求他的父親將他的那部分遺產分給他時,他要求的是通常在父親去世之前不會發生的事情。這樣做,說明了他希望他的父親死去。明白這一點,使父親接納這個兒子回來的愛和恩典更加顯著。

II.加強聖經化領導
“和好的職分,第四部分(繼續):呼籲神的百姓與神的執事和好”(哥後6:11-7:16)

我們在本期的牧師網路雜誌中再次繼續這段經文。上次,我們介紹了 哥後 6:11-18這段經文的前兩節:

1.一個牧者愛的呼籲(6:11-13)

2.一個牧者警告的呼籲(6:14-18)

現在我們繼續第三部分…

3.. 牧者呼籲的應用(7:1-4).“因此…”(從剛才所說的得出結論,),基於舊約的應許(6:16-18),(注意這個應許是有條件的)如果他們將自己與惡(外邦人的宗教行為,尤其指偶像敬拜)分別出來,神要做他們的父,恢復他的百姓與他應有的關係,然後保羅勸告:“親愛的弟兄,我們既有這等應許,就當潔淨自己,除去身體、靈魂一切的污穢,敬畏神,得以成聖”(7:1

對保羅而言,神的百姓最重要的聖潔原則是,我們“和不信的不要同負一軛”(6:14,而在神百姓中實踐這樣的聖潔就是要“潔淨自己,除去身體、靈魂的一切污穢”(7:1。原則是“不義的人不能承受神的國”(哥前6:9-10)。神的百姓 “奉主耶穌基督的名,並借著我們神的靈,已經洗淨、成聖、稱義了”(哥前6:11

這個原則必須在他們的行為中明顯表現出來,對他們才會是真實的。換句話說,地位上成聖必須在行為的成聖中表現出來。我們已經被神分別為聖—這是地位上的成聖(例如徒 26:18; 來 10:14; 13:12; 1 彼 1:2; 弗 5:26; 約 17:17)——我們也必須潔淨自己—這是逐漸的、行為上的成聖(哥前1:18;彼前3:15),以至於我們與基督的聯合在我們的生活中變得越來越明顯和真實。已經從罪中得自由(羅6:11-18)並且能夠不再犯罪(1約3:9),神在我們裡面做工(帖前5:23;多2:14)以至於我們越來越像基督(哥後3:18;羅8:29;來13:20-21;1約2:6;3:7)。特別是聖靈,在我們成聖的過程中活躍作用(帖前4:3;帖後2:13;加5:16-18,22-23)。

被動成聖和主動成聖這兩個概念在這裡沒有衝突。成聖是神在我們裡面的工作,我們被潔淨,被分別出來、被稱為聖徒和聖潔的(哥前1:2;哥後1;1),神在基督裡使我們成為聖潔(羅1:30;帖後2:13),並且我們也潔淨自己,努力不犯罪(哥前6;18;哥後7:1;1約3:6:19),尋求去實踐神對我們所說的真理(哥前7:34;帖前4:3-8;羅6:19),渴慕更像基督(羅8:13;來12:1;腓2:12;3:13-14;彼後1:5ff)。

因為與“不信的人同負一軛”而導致的 “不潔淨”(污穢、骯髒)是完全的,污穢我們的“身體、靈魂”。因此,“潔淨”也是完全的,既需要“身體”的潔淨(身體上的、外面的潔淨—從外面看我們是誰),也需要“靈魂”的潔淨(靈魂,內在的—從裡面看我們是誰)。

“成全聖潔”意味著我們的成聖是逐步的,我們在這個世上努力成聖,但同時也明白只有在我們得榮耀的時候,我們的聖潔才會完全。雖然,成聖過程的完全要在世界末了的時候(帖前. 3:13; 猶 24; 哥後 11:2),但不管怎樣,我們現在仍然繼續向著完全努力。另外“成全聖潔”也意味著這是我們必須為自己做的事情。就像哥林多教會,他們必須完全他們的聖潔,把自己與不潔淨的分開、不與不信的人相交—特別是,但不完全限於,偶像崇拜。

正如“敬畏神”是保羅事工的動力之一(5:11;參考哥前2:3;哥後7:11),所以這也應該成為神百姓追求聖潔的動力—“潔淨自己,除去身體、靈魂的一切污穢”。我們生活在神無所不知的注視之下。我們無法逃脫他的審查和審判。

跟隨著他在6:11-12節的思想,保羅繼續一個牧者對哥林多人的呼籲。“你們要心地寬大收納我們。我們未曾虧負誰,未曾敗壞誰,未曾占誰的便宜”(7:2。他呼籲他們“心地寬大”收納他。他首先將福音的好消息傳給他們,他們的心應該向他敞開,向假使徒(正在影響他們的人)關閉(David E. Garland, 哥後, 344)。畢竟,保羅沒有做過任何事情使他們有理由這樣對待他。儘管他嚴厲斥責和強烈指示,但他沒有冤枉任何人,沒有腐蝕任何人,也沒有欺騙任何人。那麼,他們為什麼要這樣對待他?他們為什麼要把他拒之門外?

“我說這話,不是要定你們的罪。我已經說過,你們常在我們心裡,情願與你們同生同死”(7:3。保羅想要確保他們不要誤解他在7:2中的辯護。讀它的人,尤其是哥林多人的屬靈狀況,可能會認為保羅不是在為自己辯護,而是在指責他們。因此他澄清他的辯護,“我說這話,不是要定你們的罪。我已經說過,你們常在我們心裡,情願與你們同生同死”。他不想他們對這有任何的誤會。

“情願與你們同生同死”可以被譯為“因此我們同死是為了(“εις 希臘語)能夠同生”。因此保羅這個陳述是有目的的,他在這裡要麼指他和他們作為基督徒的經歷和奉獻(也就是和基督同死,並與他並為他而活),要麼指他們作為基督徒死後的共同未來,一起復活與基督一同在天上。他們之間有這樣親密的關係,這是他想向他們表達的。

“我大大地放膽,向你們說話。我因你們多多誇口,滿得安慰。我們在一切患難中分外地快樂”(7:4。這節經文可以作為2:14-7:4這部分的最後一句,或者作為下一部分7:4-16的第一句。7:4-16可以看做2:3關於找到提多並聽提多報告的繼續。與其試圖決定這節經文的位置,不如考慮把7:4作為一個樞紐節,結束上一節,開始下一節,因為它與這兩節都很好地相關。7:4保羅強調了他對他們的積極態度,同時介紹了他對提多報告的積極回應,反過來,這又回到了書信開頭(2:2-3 參考 7:4, 13)。

他以前對他們的大膽講話(在各種問題上糾正他們)帶來了他想要和需要的敬虔悔改和改正(7:9-10)。因此,他對他們直率的責備和糾正達到了它的預期結果,現在使得他為他們感到“自豪”。他的放膽講論有可能永久斷絕他們的關係(因為沒有人喜歡被糾正),而事實上,通過他們的積極回應,他得到了很好的結果,所以現在他能夠並且高興地因他們誇口。確實,他“滿得安慰分外地快樂”,儘管“在一切患難中”。他所指的患難顯然是他在馬其頓尋找提多時所遇到的(7:5).

III. 講道大綱

題目:基督的福音(太7:13-14)

主旨:通向永生的兩條路

主題:如果你想要進入天國,你必須選擇窄的、難走的真理之路。

要點1:一條路容易走但結局艱難(7:13).

1a)它開始容易,因為入口是寬的,路是大的

1b).他結局艱難因為他的目的地是永恆的毀滅。

要點 2:另一條路難走但結局容易(7:14).

2a)它開始難因為入口窄,路難走

2b)它結局容易因為它的目的地是永生

Related Topics: Pastors

Q. Based on Genesis 16:6 are we to blame Sarah for Hagar’s running away?

Based on Genesis 16:6 are we to blame Sarah for Hagar’s running away? If Sarah acted like a loving Christian could there have been a good solution?

Answer

Dear Brother,

Your question is a good one, because it should help us greatly as we read the Old Testament. To put it plainly, the Old Testament saints – men and women – were not “saintly,” they were rascals. All too often we read the Old Testament in such a way as to paint these saints as pious saints, thereby overlooking their flaws, even their sins. What you have asked about Sarah, also applies to Abraham, who as a matter of policy, presented his wife, the future mother of the Messianic seed, as his sister, a woman eligible for marriage (see Genesis 12:10-20; chapter 20, especially verse 13). David acquired Bathsheba as his wife through horribly sinful means, and yet she, too, would produce the Messianic seed (Matthew 1:6). Jonah preached the most successful revival in his ministry, but with all the wrong motives. Even Moses lost his temper and thereby showed irreverence toward God, and thus was not allowed to enter the land (Numbers 20:1-12).

All of this is entirely consistent with the message of the Bible, Old Testament and New, and that is that God has chosen to deal with us (particularly believers) in grace, not as a result of our good works, but as a manifestation of His mercy and grace. This theme is highlighted in Exodus 32-34, and especially in 34:6-7:

Then the LORD passed by in front of him and proclaimed, “The LORD, the LORD God, compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in lovingkindness and truth; 7 who keeps lovingkindness for thousands, who forgives iniquity, transgression and sin; yet He will by no means leave the guilty unpunished, visiting the iniquity of fathers on the children and on the grandchildren to the third and fourth generations” (Exodus 34:6-7, NAU).

The grace of God is the consistent basis for man’s appeal for mercy and grace throughout the Old Testament (see, for example, Numbers 14, see especially verses 10-24).

The fact is that God’s gracious acts are always the overflow of His mercy and grace. God does not need our good deeds in order to bless. Indeed, God’s gracious purposes often are the result of His grace in spite of our sins. Joseph’s betrayal by his brothers is but one example:

When Joseph’s brothers saw that their father was dead, they said, “What if Joseph bears a grudge against us and pays us back in full for all the wrong which we did to him!” 16 So they sent a message to Joseph, saying, “Your father charged before he died, saying, 17 ‘Thus you shall say to Joseph, “Please forgive, I beg you, the transgression of your brothers and their sin, for they did you wrong.”’ And now, please forgive the transgression of the servants of the God of your father.” And Joseph wept when they spoke to him. 18 Then his brothers also came and fell down before him and said, “Behold, we are your servants.” 19 But Joseph said to them, “Do not be afraid, for am I in God’s place? 20 As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good in order to bring about this present result, to preserve many people alive. 21 So therefore, do not be afraid; I will provide for you and your little ones.” So he comforted them and spoke kindly to them (Genesis 50:15-21).

So, now, back to Sarah. Sarah was wrong to seek an offspring through Hagar, for God was going to produce the Messianic seed through Abraham and Sarah, not Abraham and Hagar. Both Abraham and Sarah were wrong in this matter (see Genesis 15:1-6; 16:1-2; 17:10-22). We should note that while Hagar fled, this first time, from Sarah, God instructed her to return to Sarah’s abuse, promising to bless her son, Ishmael. In the end, God used Sarah’s hatred of Hagar and her son, Ishmael, to get them away, so that Isaac, yet to be born, would be the sole heir of Abraham. Sarah’s hatred toward Hagar and her son was used of God to overcome Abraham’s affection for Ishmael, and his reluctance to send him away.

Now Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, whom she had borne to Abraham, mocking. 10 Therefore she said to Abraham, “Drive out this maid and her son, for the son of this maid shall not be an heir with my son Isaac.” 11 The matter distressed Abraham greatly because of his son. 12 But God said to Abraham, “Do not be distressed because of the lad and your maid; whatever Sarah tells you, listen to her, for through Isaac your descendants shall be named. 13 “And of the son of the maid I will make a nation also, because he is your descendant.” 14 So Abraham rose early in the morning and took bread and a skin of water and gave them to Hagar, putting them on her shoulder, and gave her the boy, and sent her away. And she departed and wandered about in the wilderness of Beersheba (Genesis 21:9-14).

Now, Abraham had no “backup son,” who would become the father of the promised Messianic seed when God instructed him to go up on the mountain and sacrifice his son (Genesis 22).

The underlying truths which make this possible are that God is both gracious, and sovereign, and thus man’s sin cannot prevent Him from fulfilling His purposes. Because God’s mercy is bestowed out of His grace, our good performance is not the essential element which is the basis for His blessings. In the end, it is God who rightly gets the glory.

Bob

Related Topics: Character of God, Christian Life, Hamartiology (Sin), Suffering, Trials, Persecution

Join The Theology Program's Mission Through Your Support

Why support The Theology Program at bible.org?

The primary mission of TTP is to reclaim the mind for Christ by equipping people and churches to understand and defend the Christian faith. We believe that the Church is in desperate need of theological renewal where people can understand, defend, and articulate their faith. Without truth, the Church does not stand a chance. We live in a world that is denying the very existence of truth. While there are many ministries and organizations that have a like-minded goal, we seek to accomplish this mission in a unique way—by focusing our concentration, purposes, and confidence in the theological education of lay people and making it available for free online. Our vision and mission are clear and aggressive . . . nothing less than a reclaiming of the mind for Christ across the world.

There are over 18,000 members of TTP. This has occurred in the last six months. The need for theological renewal could not be more evident. Please consider donating. By making a donation you will help support the ministry and staff of bible.org as we work continually on this mission of bringing theological training to laypeople all over the world.

Click on this link to donate by credit card. Or to donate by mail, send all donations to the address listed on the contact page. Please remember to place TTP in the memo of your check or money order.

Pages