An Introduction To The Book Of JamesRelated Media
I. AUTHORSHIP: Most probably James, the Lord’s half-brother
A. External Evidence: Though not decisive, there is good evidence for the epistle of James:
1. James is the first of the “Catholic” or “general” epistles which gain their name because they lack any specific address
2. Except for 1 Peter and 1 John the Catholic epistles have played more of a part in molding the Christian church than Paul’s letters
4. It is not mentioned in the Muratorian Canon, but this may have been to the corrupt state of this cannon (Hebrews and the Petrine Epistles are also missing).
5. Eusebius cites James among his disputed books (Antilegomena), but he refers to it as if it were genuine3
6. M. Mayor claims to find quotations or allusions to James in Didache, Barnabas, The Testaments of the Xii Patriarchs, Ignatius, Polycarp, Hermes and some later second-century Fathers4
7. Guthrie writes, “On the whole it is not altogether surprising that this brief Epistle of James was not much quoted in the earliest period, for it did not possess such wide appeal as the more dynamic Epistles of Paul. It is the kind of letter which could easily be neglected as, in fact, the treatment of it in the modern Church abundantly shows and, once neglected, a fertile soil was provided for future doubts, especially at the time when spurious productions were being attributed to apostolic names”5
B. Internal Evidence: Though one cannot not be dogmatic, it seems reasonable to identify the author of this letter with James, the Lord’s half-brother.
1. The author identifies himself as James 1:1
a. Only two (2) NT people6 could fulfill this title of James and the half-brother of the Lord Jesus is the more reasonable choice:
1) James, the son of Zebedee, of the Twelve Apostles--but he is most probably ruled out since he was martyred in AD 44 by Herod, and the epistle seems to have been written after that
2) James, the half-brother of Jesus, who became the leader of the Jerusalem church
a) This is support by the simplicity of the description (e.g., a well known James)
b) In Church history it seems to have the Lord’s half-brother James who made a significant impact on the early church in Jerusalem (Acts 15; 21).
3) Some believe that the name is only a pseudonym attached to the letter to add authority and others see the salutation as a later addition, but these are not necessary conclusions7
2. If the half-brother of the Lord is the more reasonable of the two possible choices, than other internal evidence supports this conclusion:
a. The author has a Jewish background:
1) He draws upon the Hebrew Scriptures (1:2; 2:8, 11, 23, 25; 3:9; 4:6; 5:2, 11, 17, 18)
2) He employs Hebrew Idioms and style behind the Greek
3) He is concerned with the Jewish Diaspora and uses Jewish terms (cf. 5:4--”Lord of Sabaoth”)
b. There are similarities between James and the speech and letter attributed to James in Acts 158
c. There are similarities with James and the teaching of Jesus. Guthrie writes, “there are more parallels in this Epistle than in any other New Testament book to the teaching of our Lord in the Gospels”9
d. The rest of the NT supports James as a prominent figure who could have written this letter with authority:10
1) Yes, he was an unbeliever in the Gospels (Mr. 3:21; Jn. 7:5)
2) But James is among the brethren in Acts (1:14)
3) James was specially singled out for a resurrection appearance (1 Cor. 15:7)
4) James was the leader whom Paul met in Jerusalem (Gal. 1:19)
5) James held a authoritative position in the church at the Jerusalem council (Acts 15:13ff)
6) James spoke with Paul on his return to Jerusalem at the end of his third missionary journey and Paul agrees to James’ request (Acts 21)
e. The community appears to belong to the period before the fall of Jerusalem:
1) Rich land owners who preyed upon the needy was the case before the fall of the Jerusalem11
2) Guthrie writes, “In fact, in addition to the social surroundings of the community, the internal conditions of quarrelsomeness among the Christians may well point to an early stage in the history of the community before much maturity had been reached”12
3) The reference to ‘wars and fightings’ in 4:1 may have a context before the siege of Jerusalem by Titus
4) The “thoroughly Jewish background of the letter is evidenced by the absence of any allusion to masters and slaves and by the omission of any denunciation of idolatry, both of which would have been inappropriate in an epistle attributed to such a devoted Jewish Christian as James”13
II. DATE: Most likely c. AD 45-4914
A. As an ending date Josephus15 states that James was martyred in AD 62
B. There is no mention of the fall of Jerusalem16
C. There is no mention of the Jewish-Gentile controversy which arose in AD 49-50 with the Jerusalem council
D. The primitive character of church order17 suggests an early date
E. This letter was not mentioned in the Jerusalem Council (AD 50?) where James played a prominent role
F. Therefore, it may be appropriate to date this letter shortly before the Jerusalem Council (e.g., AD 45-49). This would make James the first NT book which was written.
III. RECIPIENTS OF JAMES: Probably Christian Jews who fled Jerusalem during the persecution of Stephen in Acts 7--8
A. James identifies his audience as the “twelve tribes who are dispersed abroad” (1:1)
1. The designation “twelve tribes” suggests a Jewish audience
a. This could be unconverted Jews
b. This could be Christian Jews
c. This could be Hellenistic Jews
d. This could even be Christians generally (both Jews and Gentiles--if one understands the church to replace Israel [which this writer does not])18
2. The following evidence suggests limiting the audience to Christian Jews:
a. The congregation’s meeting is a synagogue (2:2)
b. The Hebrew title “Lord Sabaoth” ( κυρίου Σαβαὼθ ) is Jewish (5:4)
c. The author identifies his readers as Christians (2:1; 5:7,8)
3. It is difficult to identify the exact location of these recipients:
a. The fact that they are “dispersed abroad” implies that they are not in one location
b. One possible reconstruction is that these believers fled during the persecution which came upon the heals of Stephen’s death in Acts 7--8.19
1) Acts reports that the Jewish Christians spread out over Judea and Samaria (Acts 8:1), Phoenicia, Cyprus, and Syrian Antioch (Acts 11:19) as a result of the persecution of Stephen
2) If this is the case, than James would have felt responsible as their former pastor to offer instruction to them at this time
IV. THE THEOLOGY OF JAMES:
A. The character of the Lord is sovereign and good:
1. The Lord is the Sovereign of James (1:1)
2. The Lord cannot be tempted with evil or tempt anyone to do evil; He is holy (1:14)
3. The Lord is righteous (1:20)
4. God’s name is “fair” (2:7)
5. The Lord is the consistent source of every good thing in life with out variation in accordance with His will(1:17-18)
6. God is not partial in His judgments against the poor (2:1,5)
7. God is one (2:19)
8. God is to be blessed by men (3:9a)
9. God has made men in his own image (3:9b)
10. God is the Lord of Hosts who fights for those oppressed by others (5:4)
11. The Lord is coming full of mercy and compassion for those who patiently endure hardship (5:11)
12. The Lord will heal suffering that has come due to sin, when his people repent (5:13-16, 20)
B. The Lord acts on behalf of his people for good when they trust and obey Him:
1. The Lord tries men (1:2-3, 13)
2. The Lord gives men wisdom under trials (1:5-7)
3. The Lord will reward those who persevere under trials (1:12)
4. The Lord has implanted His word of deliverance in believers to preserve the lives of believers (1:21).
5. The Lord bless those who obey His word (1:25)
6. The Lord delights in the works of help and purity by his people (1:27)
7. God’s friends are those who obey Him (2:23)
8. God is the source of all wisdom for those who make peace (3:18)
9. As God’s people submit and draw near to Him, He comes to help them (4:7-10, 15a)
C. The Lord will not give wisdom to his people who do evil, but will pursue them with discipline and judge their evil works:
1. The Lord does not give wisdom to those who doubt in their asking (1:6-7)
2. The Lord will judge us in accordance with the mercy we show to others (2:12-13; He will judge teachers more strictly 3:1; He is the Lawgiver who judges 4:12)
3. The Lord does not give wisdom to men who only ask from God with wrong motives (4:2b-3)
4. God’s people become His enemies when they identify with the world against Him (4:4, 6b)
5. The Lord pursues His people, even when they are in rebellion (4:5-6a)
6. God is able to save and destroy (4:12)
7. God is the Lord of Hosts who fights for those oppressed by others (5:4)
8. The Lord is coming to judge those who are oppressive (5:7-9)
V. PURPOSES OF JAMES:
A. To unfold New Testament wisdom for living and not doctrinal issues so much20
B. The epistle is practical and designed to correct certain known tendencies in behavior21
C. James exhorts in a reasoned, cause and effect pastoral, manner his readers who are under trials to continue in obedient faith before the Lord so that they might receive blessing and help from Him rather than discipline in their disobedience
1 See his commentary on the Gospel of John 19:6 which mentions James with the following formula: “ὡς ἐν τῃ φερομένη ᾿Ιακώβου ἐπιστολῆ ἀνέγνωμεν.”
2 Cf. Ad Rom. 4:1; Hom. in Lev. 2:4; Hom. in Josh. 7:1.
3 See Guthrie, NTI, 737.
4 Guthrie, NTI, 738.
5 Guthrie, NTI, 739.
6 Although the NT makes mention of James, the son of Alphaeus (Mk. 3:18), and James, the father of Judas (not Iscariot; Lk. 6:16), neither have been historically considered as a possible author.
7 See Guthrie, NTI, 740, 753ff.
8 See Guthrie, NTI, 742-743.
9 Guthrie, NTI, 743-44. This may suggest that James is producing reminiscences of oral teaching which he previously heard for himself.
10 Burdick writes, “The authoritative tone of the epistle (forty-six imperatives) agrees well with the authority exercised by James in Acts 15:13ff.; 21:18” (“James,” in EBC, 12:161).
11 Guthrie, NTI, 746.
12 Guthrie, NTI, 746; cf. Acts 6?
13 Guthrie, NTI, 747.
14 Those who hold to the traditional view of authorship are split in their dating of this epistle. They either hold to an early date (before AD 50) or a date closer to the end of James’ life (e.g., AD 62). Those who do not hold to the traditional view of authorship date the epistle about AD 125.
15 Antiquities 20.9.1. Hegesippus states James death to have occurred in AD 68, but this is less probable (Eusebius, HE 2.23.28).
16 This would of been of particular interest to a Jewish-Christian audience. The social conditions of the letter also reflect a date prior to the fall of Jerusalem after which landowning Palestinian Jews ceased to exist (Guthrie, NTI, 763).
17 Elders are referred to (5:14, 16) as well as teachers (3:1) and the regular meeting-place of those addressed is identified as a “synagogue” (2:2).
18 See 1 Peter 1:1 where the term διασπορᾶς is also used. There it probably refers to both Jews and Gentiles. But James identifies those who have been scattered as “the twelve tribes” unlike Peter.
19 See Burdick, “James,” EBC, 12:162-163; Doerksen, James, EBC, 13-14.
20 Actually James has much in common with Matthew’s Sermon on the Mount (cf. James 5:12 with Matthew 5:34-37; James 3:10-12 with Matthew 7:16-20; James 3:18 with Matthew 5:9; James 2:5 with Luke 6:20). It also has some in common with wisdom literature (cf. James 1:5 with Prov. 2:6; 1:19 with Prov 29:20; 3:18 with Prov 11:30; 4:13-16 with Prov 27:1; 5:20 with Prov 10:12).
21 Guthrie, NTI, 764.
Related Topics: Introductions, Arguments, Outlines
An Argument Of The Book Of JamesRelated Media
When Believers Are Under Trials, An Obedient And Faithful Response (Quick To Hear, Slow To Speak, Slow To Anger) Toward The Lord And Other Believers Will Move The Lord In His Goodness To Provide Wisdom And Blessing For Their Needs Rather Than Necessary Discipline For Their Evil
I. An Introduction of Greeting: James1 as a servant ( δοῦλος ) of God and the Lord Jesus Christ sends greetings to the twelve tribes2 who are scattered among the nations3 (1:1)
II. An Exhortation to Face Trials in a Godly Way: James urges his readers to adopt a good attitude toward trials and not to incriminate God but to recognize themselves as the fountain of death because He is separate from evil and only gives forth life (1:2-18)
A. A Good Response to Trials: James encourages those under trials to be joyful with the knowledge that the testing of their faith produces endurance, to let endurance have its perfecting work in them, and to ask God for wisdom in faith, because they will be rewarded by Christ for their perseverance 1:2-12
1. Be Joyful: James encourages his readers to be joyful when they encounter trials with the knowledge that the testing of their faith produces endurance 1:2-3
a. Exhortation--Consider Trials Joy: James urges his readers, as his brethren, to consider it all joy ( Πᾶσαν χαρὰν ) when they encounter various trials 1:2
b. Reason--Testing Produces Endurance: The reason his readers should consider their trials to be joy is because they know that ( γινώσκοντες ο῞τι ) the testing of their faith produces endurance ( ὑπομονήν ) 1:3
2. Let Endurance Work: James affirms that his readers ought to let endurance have its perfect work in them in order that they may be mature and lacking in nothing 1:4
a. Exhortation--Let Endurance Have Its Perfect Work: James urges his readers to let endurance have its perfect result (work) 1:4a
b. Purpose--That They May Be Mature: The purpose of letting endurance have its perfect work is in order that (ι῞να ) the readers might be mature (perfect) and complete, lacking in nothing 1:4b
3. Ask God for Wisdom with Faith: The writer urges his readers to ask for wisdom from God when facing trials and He will give it to those who believe that He will help them as they do not doubt but reflect on the spiritual perspective of persecution in their lives 1:5-11
a. Ask God for Wisdom and He Will Give It: James urges any of his readers who lack wisdom (when faced with trials) to ask for it from God--who gives it to all men generously and without reproach--and God will give it to him 1:5
b. Ask In Faith without Doubting: James urges his readers who ask for wisdom to ask for it in faith without doubting because those who doubt are unstable and will not receive wisdom from God 1:6-7
1) Exhortation--Ask for Wisdom In Faith without Doubting: James urges his readers who ask for wisdom to ask for it in faith without any doubting4 1:6a
2) Reason I--The Doubting Man is Unstable: The reason that James urges his readers who ask for wisdom to ask for it in faith without doubting is because the one who doubts is unstable (like the surf of the sea driven and tossed by the wind) 1:6b
3) Reason II--The Doubting Man Will Not Receive Wisdom: The reason that James urges his readers who ask for wisdom to ask for it in faith without doubting (that He will help) is because the one who doubts should not expect to receive anything from the Lord because he is double minded and unstable ways 1:7-8
c. The Spiritual Perspective of Persecution:5 In contrast to doubting that God will help the one who asks for wisdom, James urges his readers to reflect accurately on the spiritual perspective of persecution in their life 1:9-11
1) The Perspective of Persecution for the Poor: In contrast to doubting that God will help the one who asks for wisdom, James urges his readers to let the brother of humble circumstances (poor) glory in his high position (before God)6 1:9
2) The Perspective of Persecution for the Rich:7 In contrast to doubting that God will help the one who asks for wisdom, James urges his readers to let the rich man glory in his humiliation8 because he like the flowering grass will pass away in the midst of his pursuits9 1:10-11
4. He One Who Perseveres Will Be Honored: James proclaims that the one who perseveres under trail is blessed he will be rewarded by the Lord as He promised 1:12
a. One Who Perseveres Is Blessed: James proclaims that the one who perseveres under trail is blessed 1:12a
b. Reason--He Will Be Rewarded: The reason that James proclaims that the one who perseveres under trail is blessed is because (*ti) once he is approved, he will receive the crown of life which the Lord has promised to those who love Him 1:12b
B. Impute Yourself and Not God: James urges those being tempted to recognize themselves as the fountain of death rather than God who is separate from evil and only gives forth life 1:13-18
1. Do Not Accuse God: James affirms that no one should accuse God of tempting them with evil when they are tempted with evil 1:13a
2. Reasons Temptation Does Not Come from God: James affirms that temptation does not come from God who is completely separate from evil and only gives good gifts, but comes from ourselves 1:13b-18
a. Reason I--God Is Not Tempted Nor Tempts with Evil: The reason God should not be accused of tempting the readers is because He cannot be tempted by evil, let alone tempt others (with evil)10 1:13b
b. Reason II--Temptation Comes from Ourselves Not God: James affirms that the reason God should not be accused of tempting the readers is because temptation which leads to death comes from ourselves rather than from our good and consistent God who gives us life 1:14-18
1) Temptation from Self: James affirms that each one is tempted when he is enticed by his own desires which lead to sin and which ends in death11 1:14-15
2) Don’t Be Deceived, Be Confirmed in God’s Goodness: James affirms that rather than being deceived the readers should be confirmed in knowing that God in His consistency only gives good things concerning which our salvation is proof 1:16-18
a) Exhortation--Stop Being Deceived: James affirms that his readers are to stop being deceived12 1:16
b) Giver of Good Gifts: James affirms that (instead of sending temptation) every good and perfect gift comes from our consistently good Father13 1:17
c) An Example: James affirms that his readers (us) existence as born-again believers is an example of God being the enlightening source of good14 1:18
III. A Summary Exhortation to Action for Those Under Trials:15 In view of God’s regenerative work through His word, believers under trials are exhorted to receive without opposition God’s sanctifying word (be quick to hear, slow to speak, and slow to anger) 1:19-20
A. Readers Know of the Work of God’s Word: James affirms that his dear brethren know this (the regenerating work of the Word in their lives)16 1:19a
B. Readers Are Exhorted to Respond Well to God’s Word: James urges everyone to receive God’s sanctifying word (be quick to hear) and not to oppose it (be slow to speak, and slow to anger) when in trials 1:19b-20
1. Be Quick to Hear: James urges everyone to be quick to hear (the word when in trials)
2. Be Slow to Speak: James urges everyone to be slow to speak (when in trials)
3. Be Slow to Anger: James urges everyone to be slow to anger (when in trials) because ( γὰρ ) the anger of man does not achieve the uprightness of God 1:19b-20
IV. Obedience to the Word of God Yields an Experience of Salvation:17 James affirms that believers who are under trials need to remain obedient to the word of God in order to experience salvation in their lives by being quick to obey God’s word, by being wise in their speech, and by asking God to help them with their struggles rather than becoming angry and lashing out (1:21--5:12)
A. QUICK TO HEAR--James urges his readers to be quick to hear through obeying the inner witness of the word, not showing favoritism, and expressing their faith through good works which are helpful to others 1:21--2:26
1. Hearing Through Obeying the Inner Witness of the Word: When a believer is under trials, he hears the word of God when he obeys the inner witness of the word in the realms of guarding his heart, service and personal purity all of which yield blessing in life (1:21-27)
a. Receive the Inner Witness of the Word of God: When under trials, believers are to put aside all filthiness and wickedness18 and to receive the word of God which is active within them, and which will lead to present deliverance in life19 (1:21)
b. Do Not Forgetfully Neglect the Word of God: When under trials, one is quick to hear when he does not respond to the word of God with forgetful neglect but with obedience leading to the blessing of salvation in life (1:22-25)
1) Exhortation to Do the Word: James urges his readers to be doers of what the word says and not only hearers of the word who delude themselves (by false reasoning)20 1:22
2) Reason I--Not Doing the Word Is Inconsistent: The reason James urges his readers to do what the word says is because ( ο῞τι ) to not do so is to be inconsistent like someone who would forget who he is after looking in a mirror21 1:23-24
3) Reason II--Doing the Words Brings Blessing: The reason James urges his readers to do what the word says (the perfect law, the law of liberty)22 is because this is how they will be enriched (blessed) in what they do23 1:25
c. Examples--Valuable Religious Activity: When under trials, one is quick to hear when his religious activity is of value--as he guards his heart (controls his own tongue which leads his heart astray) and serves those in need with personal purity (1:26-27)
1) Fruitless Religious Activity: James describes as fruitless the religion of one who thinks himself to be religious and yet does not bridle his tongue, but misleads his own heart 1:26
2) Fruitful Religious Activity: James describes pure and undefiled religion in the sight of our God and Father as to visit orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself unstained by the world 1:27
2. Hearing Through Not Showing Favoritism: When a believer is under trials, he hears the word of God when he does not show favoritism toward the wealthy in order to prosper, but is committed to all people as the Lord was toward him (us) (2:1-13)
a. Prohibition Stated--Stop Showing Favoritism: James urges his readers stop holding their faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ with an attitude of favoritism24 (2:1)
b. Hypothetical Illustration that Partiality is Evil: James illustrates his prohibition against showing favoritism by affirming through a hypothetical situation that to show partiality to those who are rich (and may thus benefit the church) against those who are poor is to do what is evil (judge with evil motives) 2:2-4
c. Favoritism is Contrary to The Work of Christ: To show partiality toward the rich is wrong because it is contrary to the work of Christ toward men, it dishonors the poor man, and it honors those who are opposed to the Lord (2:5-7)
1) Favoritism Is Against the Work of Christ: James affirms that favoritism is wrong because it is contrary to the work of Christ toward men who honored the poor in that he chose the poor of this world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom which he promised to those who love him 2:5
2) Favoritism Dishonors the Poor: James affirms that favoritism is wrong because it dishonors the poor man 2:6a
3) Favoritism Honors the Rich Man Who Is Opposed to the Lord: James affirms that favoritism is wrong because it honors the rich man who opposes them, personally drags them into court, and blasphemes the fair name of Christ by which they have been called 2:6b-7
d. Favoritism Will Lead to Judgment: James explains that for his readers to show partiality is for them to transgress against the ethical Law of the Lord which will result in future judgment [at the Judgment Seat of Christ] (2:8-13)
1) It is Well to Love: James proclaims that if his readers are fulfilling the Royal Law of Love,25 then they are doing well 2:8
2) Favoritism is Sin: James proclaims that if his readers are showing favoritism they are committing sin and are convicted by the Law as transgressors 2:9
3) Explanation: The reason those who show favoritism are convicted by the Law is because (γὰρ) one is guilty of all of the Law even if he keeps the whole Law and stumbles in only one point because it all comes from the same God26 2:10-11
4) Act As Those to Be Judged: James exhorts his readers to so speak and to so act27 as those who are to be judged28 by the Law of liberty because judgment will be merciless to the one who has shown no mercy, and mercy triumphs over judgment 2:12-13
3. Hearing Through Good Works: When a believer is under trials, he hears the word of God when he expresses his faith through good works to bring about deliverance in life for others (2:14-26)
a. The Effect of Faith Without Good Works: James affirms that faith which is not expressed in good works will not bring about deliverance in life29 (2:14)
b. The Uselessness of Faith Without Good Works:30 For James the uselessness of faith which is not expressed in good works is demonstrated in the one who speaks encouraging words to another in physical need, but does not act to relieve their distress (2:15-17)
c. An Objection:31 One objects that there is no necessary connection between good works and faith (2:18-19)
d. An Answer to the Objection:32 James answers this objection, by demonstrating that there is a connection between good works and faith in that together they benefit other men in life (2:20-26)
1) There Is a Connection Between Faith and Good Works: James responds that there is a connection between faith and good works if one is willing to recognize it, namely, that personal faith is useless to other men if it is not expressed in good works (2:20)
2) Illustration I--Abraham:33 Abraham demonstrated to himself and before men that he had faith in the Lord when he offered Isaac on the alter (2:21-24)
3) Illustration II--Rahab: Rahab demonstrated before men that she had faith in the Lord when she received and delivered the spies out of Jericho (2:25)
4) Illustration III--The Body: The connection between faith and works is that works make one’s faith useful just as a spirit makes one’s body useful in life (2:26)
B. SLOW TO SPEAK--Hearing Through Wise Speech: Those under trials (especially teachers) need to be wise in their speech so that they do not destroy others with their words in an expression of natural wisdom, but so that they sow the seeds of life with inner purity and the external deeds of love in accordance with God’s wisdom (3:1-18)
1. Not Many Should Be Teachers: James instructs his readers that not many should be teachers because of everyone’s tendency to stumble in their speech which affects their whole lives and because only the mature are able to control their speech 3:1-5a
a. Exhortation: James exhorts his readers, as brethren, that not many of them should become teachers because they know that as teachers they shall incur a stricter judgment 3:1
b. Reason--All Stumble: The reason James exhorts not many of his readers to be teachers is because they all stumble (sin)34 in many ways 3:2a
c. Affirmation--The One Who Does Not Stumble Is Mature: James affirms that one who does not stumble in what he says is mature (perfect) and is able to control all of his life (body)35 3:2b
d. Support: Through the analogy of horses and ships James supports his thesis that one who controls a small part (his tongue) is able to control his whole body 3:3-5a
2. Tongue is destructive: James affirms that the tongue is destructive like fire because it cannot be tamed, but this should not be the case 3:5b-12
a. The Tongue Is Like a Destructive Fire: James notes that just as a great forest is set aflame by a small fire, so is it that the tongue is a fire--the very world of iniquity--which is set among the body parts defiling the whole person and setting the course of one’s life on fire by hell (the devil) 3:5b-6
b. Reason--It Cannot Be Tamed: The reason the tongue is like a destructive fire is because it, unlike beasts, birds, reptiles and sea creatures, cannot be tamed since we use it to bless God on one hand and to curse men who are made in God’s image on the other hand 3:7-9
c. Conclusion: James concludes that the same mouth should not bring forth both blessing and cursing because this is unnatural (as with water from a fountain, figs from a fig tree and salt water) 3:10-12
3. Speak in Wisdom: James urges those who are teachers (wise and understanding) to demonstrate this by their good behavior and their deeds in the self-control of God’s wisdom which is not characterized by bitter jealousy and selfish ambition, but is characterized by an internal purity which manifests itself in acts of love which sow the seed of righteousness in peace 3:13-18
b. Not False Wisdom: James exhorts those who have bitter jealousy and selfish ambition in their heart not to be arrogant and thus lie against the truth because this kind of wisdom is not from God, but is earthly, natural and demonic 3:14-16
2) Reason--Not From God: James explains that harboring jealousy and selfish ambition is arrogant because this wisdom is not that which comes from the Lord (above),40 but is that which is earthy, natural and demonic because wherever jealousy and selfish ambition exist there is disorder and every evil thing41 3:15-16
c. True Wisdom: In contrast to false wisdom James affirms that the wisdom from God is characterized by inner purity which flows into external manifestations of love because the seed of righteousness is sown by peacemakers 3:17-18
1) Characteristics of Wisdom from God: In contrast to false wisdom ( δὲ ) James affirms that the wisdom from God (above) is characterized by purity which flows out into external manifestations of love--it is:
a) Internal Characteristic: first pure ( ἀγνή )42
b) External Characteristics which are expressions of love:
(1) then peaceable ( ε῞πειτα εἰρηνική )
(2) gentle ( ἐπιεικής )
(3) reasonable ( εὐπειθής )
(4) full of mercy and good fruits ( μεστὴ ἐλέους καὶ καρπῶν ἀγαθῶν )
(5) unwavering ( ἀδιάκριτος )
(6) without hypocrisy ( ἀνυπόκριτος) 3:17
2) Seed of Righteousness Is Sown by Peacemakers: James also proclaims that the seed whose fruit is righteousness is sown in peace by those who make peace43 3:18
C. SLOW TO ANGER--Hearing Through Remaining in Relationship with God: James exhorts those who are under trials to become slow to anger by ask God to help them with their desires, and patiently waiting for future judgment upon evil doers rather than seeking illegitimate resolutions like becoming angry and lashing out at one another (4:1--5:12)
1. Resolve Struggle: James explains that the source of quarrels and conflicts among his readers is in their attempts to resolve their desires in illegitimate, godless, external ways rather than repenting of their sinful responses and submitting themselves to God’s work in their lives 4:1-17
a. The Source of Struggle: James explains that the source of quarrels and conflicts among his readers is their desires (lust, passions)44 which wage war ( στρατευομένων ) in their members 4:1
b. The Lack of Resolution--An External Focus: James explains that his readers lack true resolution to their struggles because they attempt to resolve them through external efforts, approaching God with wrong motives, and committing spiritual adultery by becoming friends with the world, but God is graceful to the humble 4:2-6
1) An Attempt to Resolve the Internal through the External: James explains that his readers try to resolve their inner struggle through external quarrels and conflicts against one another rather than asking God for help: 4:2
a) Lust: They lust and do not have so they commit murder45 4:2a
b) Envious: They are envious and cannot obtain so they fight and quarrel 4:2b
c) They Do Not Ask: James explains that they do not have because they do not ask (God for what they need)46 4:2c
2) They Do Not Receive Because of Wrong Motives: James explains that his readers ask for help from God but they do not receive from Him because they are asking with the wrong motives--that they may spend it on their pleasures 4:3
3) Their Pursuit of the World Alienates Them From God, But He Is Graceful: James explains that as his readers have sought after their desires by making friendship with the world they have committed spiritual adultery against God who is jealous for their love and will give grace to those who are humble 4:4-6
a) Friend of the World/Enemy with God: James identifies his readers as being spiritually unfaithful (adulteresses)47 since their desire for friendship with the world makes them an enemy of God 4:4
b) God’s Jealous Longing: In view of the spiritual adultery which the readers are committing James explains that Scripture speaks with a purpose when it states that God jealously longs for his people’s love48 4:5
c) God Gives More Grace: James explains that even though God jealously longs for his people’s love He gives more grace (than his longing deserves) as one who is opposed to the proud, but gives grace to the humble49 4:6
c. Resolution to Struggle: James announces that the resolution to struggle is in his readers deeply repenting and submitting themselves to God’s work in their lives and not in constantly denying their real need through focusing on externals like judging others or arrogant self-planning 4:7-17
1) Moving toward God and Away from Illegitimate Demonic Satisfaction: James urges his readers to find resolution to their struggles by moving toward God with repentance and resisting the devil 4:7-10
a) Submit to God: James urges his readers to find resolution to their struggles by submitting to God50 4:7a
b) Resist the Devil: James urges his readers to find resolution to their struggles by resisting (standing against) the devil with the promise that he will flee from them51 4:7b
c) Draw Near to God: James urges his readers to find resolution to their struggles by drawing near to God whereupon He will draw near to them 4:8a
d) Become Pure:52 James urges his readers to find resolution to their struggles by ceasing from doing evil (cleansing their hands) and plotting evil (purifying their hearts as double minded (double-lifed, δίψυχοι ) people 4:8b
e) Repent: James urges his readers to find resolution to their struggles by repenting of their evil:
(1) Be miserable and mourn and weep 4:9a
(2) Let your laughter be turned into mourning and your joy be turned into gloom 4:9b
f) Humble Yourselves: James urges his readers to find resolution to their struggles by humbling themselves53 in the presence of the Lord whereupon He will exalt them 4:10
2) Do Not Focus on Externals: James urges his readers not to illegitimately meet their desires (4:1) by focusing on external things like exalting themselves as God and judge over others or proclaiming positive, arrogant self-planning rather than dealing with their own sin and dependence upon God 4:11-17
a) Do Not Exalt Yourselves Over Others: James urges his readers not to illegitimately meet their desires (4:1) by exalting themselves as God and judge over others rather than dealing with their own lives as sinners 4:11-12
(1) Do Not Speak Against One Another: James urges his readers to stop speaking against one another54 4:11a
(2) The reason James urges his readers not to speak against one another is because by doing so they are speaking against the Law55 and are setting themselves up inappropriately as God and judge and there is only one Law Giver and Judge (e.g., the One who is able to save and destroy--the Lord) 4:11b-12
b) Do Not Proclaim Positive, Arrogant Self-Planning: James urges his readers not to illegitimately meet their desires (4:1) by proclaiming positive, arrogant self-planning rather than dealing with their dependence upon God 4:13-16
(1) Stop the Arrogant Self-Planning: James urges those who proclaim positive, arrogant self-sufficiency to not do this because they do not know what their life will even be like tomorrow 4:14a
(2) You Are Finite: James reminds his readers that they are finite (just a vapor that appears for a little while and then vanishes away) 4:14b
(3) Recognize Your Dependence Upon the Lord: James instructs his readers that in stead of their arrogant self-planning they should recognize their dependence upon the Lord's will in their life as they plan56 4:15
(4) Arrogant Boasting is Evil: James informs his readers that they are presently boasting in arrogance which is evil 4:16
3) To Deal with Desires Externally Rather than Internally with God is Sin: James concludes (ου῏ν) that if his readers know the right thing to do (do not deal with desires externally but with God [4:1-16])57 and do not do it, then they are sinning58 4:17
2. Wait Patiently and Do Not Attack One Another: Because God will one day hold the rich accountable for their evil to Christians, James exhorts hurting believers to wait patiently and not to attack one another because they will be held accountable 5:1-12
a. The Rich Will Be Held Accountable for their Evil:59 James tells the rich to mourn greatly because they will be held accountable for the evil which they have done to others in obtaining their temporal things 5:1-6
1) Greatly Mourn: James tells the rich to greatly mourn because their perception of that which endures is wrong since material things will disappear (corrode) and even testify against them in the last days when eternal things will be weighed60 5:1-3
2) Reason to Mourn--Their Evil is Waiting to Testify Against Them: The reason James tells the rich to mourn is because their evil toward others (such as not paying workers, living luxuriously on the loss of others, and using their authority to kill upright people who do not resist them) will be stored up and waiting for them 5:4-6
b. Persecuted Believers Should Wait Patiently Upon God: (Through the technique of interchange,) James exhorts persecuted believers to wait patiently upon God’s timing and not to attack one another because they will be held accountable 5:7-12
1) Wait As A Farmer: Because the rich are going to be held accountable when the Lord returns for the evil they do, James exhorts persecuted believers to wait patiently (strengthen your hearts) just at a farmer waits for the seasonal rains61 5:7-8
4) Don’t Manipulate by Lying:66 James exhorts believers not to manipulate by lying because they will be held accountable 5:12
V. Restoration Through the Community: In order to continue under sever trials, James exhorts believers to express their hearts to God and each other, always with the stronger helping the weak with sin so that life may be preserved (5:13-20)
A. Express Your Hearts: James exhorts each person to express their hearts to God and to each other in order to continue under severe trials 5:13-15
1. The Suffering Should Pray: James exhorts those who are suffering to pray67 5:13a
2. The Courageous Should Sing: James exhorts those who are courageous to sing praises 5:13b
3. The Spiritually Sick Should Seek Intervention:68 James exhorts those who are spiritually sick to seek intercession by the elders 5:14-15a
a. Call for the Elders: James exhorts the one who is spiritually weak to call for the elders 5:14a
b. Pray Over the Spiritually Sick: James exhorts the elders to pray over the one who is spiritually sick 5:14b
c. Anoint the Spiritually Sick: James exhorts the elders to anoint the one who is spiritually sick with oil signifying God’s blessing 5:15a
4. Results in Restoration and Forgiveness: James notes that the results of the prayer for the spiritually sick are restoration and forgiveness of sins 5:15b
B. Prayer Can Bring About Healing and Preservation: James instructs his readers that when they are involved in helping one another with sin in their lives through prayer, they can bring about healing and preserve others’ lives 5:16-20
1. Confess Your Sins to One Another: James exhorts his readers to confess their sins to one another in order to be healed 5:16a
2. James instructs his readers that prayer by upright people can do much as is illustrated by Elijah’s prayers 5:16b-18
3. James explains to his readers that their involvement with one another when they help one another with sin preserves life and covers over sins 5:19-20
1 See the introduction on his identity. He was the half brother of Jesus and a leader of the Jerusalem church (Acts 15:13ff; 21:18).
2 This description identifies the readers as Jewish.
3 These readers do not seem to be residents of Palestine but a scattered people. In view of 2:1, “believers in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ” it seems that this audience is limited in its reference to believing Jews. Perhaps they were members of the Jerusalem church who were driven out of Jerusalem at the time of Stephen’s martyrdom (Acts 8:1, 4; 11:19-20). If this is correct, then James was once their spiritual leader (Acts 15) and now he writes with spiritual authority and knowledge of their needs.
4 The doubting not only relates to the existence of God, but to His willingness to help in our need. Doerksen writes, “It is a deep conviction that God’ is, and that He is a rewarder of those who seek Him’ (Heb. 11:6), coupled with an acknowledgment of our need for help. We must believe not only in God’s ability to respond to our petition, but also His willingness to do so in conformity to His nature and will” (James, Everyman’s Bible Commentary, 21). Later he says, “‘Doubting’ speaks not of uncertainty but of internal indecision. It is wavering between two competing desires: self-interests and God’s interests. That doubting suggests a reluctance to commit oneself wholly to God’s care.... One may doubt because his is not fully assured that God will respond, or because he is not sure he wants God to answer (Ibid.).
5 James Burdick writes, “These are sobering thoughts that tend to reduce the rich to the level of men in general, just as the privilege of suffering for Christ lifts the poor man to a new plane of dignity and worth” (“James,” in Expositor’s Bible Commentary, 12:170).
6 This high position relates to his position in Christ and possibly the honor which he will receive for suffering for the name of Christ (cf. Acts 5:41).
7 Donald Burdick writes concerning the persecution being described here, “The very same treatment that exalts the poor man and gives him a new sense of worth also humbles the rich man. Suffering shows him that, instead of having a lasting lease on life, his life on this earth is no more permanent that ‘a wild flower’ (cf. Isa 40:6-8)” (“James” in EBC, 12:170).
8 Perhaps this humiliation relates to the trials which he is experiencing.
9 James makes allusion here to Isaiah 40:6-7; see also Psalm 102:4, 11; 1 Peter 1:24.
10 Burdick writes, “That is, he cannot be successfully tempted. His omnipotent, holy will fully resists any invitation to sin. Furthermore, in him there is not the slightest moral depravity to which temptation may appeal. Therefore, it is inconsistent to think that God could be the author of temptation” (“James,” EBC, 12:172)
As Doerksen says, “There are certain passages that speak of God’s testing. He tested Abraham (Gen. 22:1) and Israel (Ex. 16:4; Judg. 2:22), but that was to build character, not to solicit evil” (James, EBC, 30).
11 Burdick writes, “A chronological order is suggested by the words ‘then’ and ‘after.’ First, temptation comes (v. 14); then desire, like a human mother, conceives and ‘gives birth to sin.’ In this graphic manner the author portrays the experience of yielding to temptation. Than sin, the child of evil desire, develops till it ‘is full-grown’ and ready to produce offspring. When it conceives, it ‘gives birth to death.’ James is not suggesting that only when sin has reached its full development does it result in death. The details of the illustration must not be pressed too far. The author’s intention is simply to trace the results of temptation when one yields to it. The order is evil desire, sin, death” (“James,” EBC, 12:172).
12 The construction is a prohibition with a present tense imperative ( Μὴ πλανᾶσθε ) which has the sense of stopping what you are doing (Dana and Mantey, § 290).
13 Burdick writes, “The context seems to indicate that the lights referred to are the stars and planets. ‘Father’ probably has the twofold significance, pointing on the one hand to the creation of the lights and on the other to God’s continuing sovereignty over them.
Unlike the ‘shifting shadows’ that are caused by the sun, moon, and stars, God ‘does not change’” (“James,” EBC, 12:173).
14 This birth is said to come “through the word of truth” and therefore, probably refers to spiritual birth rather than physical birth. This was accomplished by his choice ( βουληθεὶς ). These early Christians were to be the first portion of the harvest (firstfruits) of the many people (his creatures) who would believe in later centuries.
15 Doerksen writes, “The mention of regeneration through the Word (v. 18) fittingly introduces new thoughts concerning the Word. As the Word produces regeneration, so it is also a means of sanctification. After writing of the experience of the new birth, James continues with the challenge to live out the new life by means of the word” (James, EBC, 39).
Perhaps what follows is the “wisdom of God” offered in 1:6 for dealing with trials! These two verse seem to be programmatic for the next major unit of this book. The outline of the passage is given in 1:19-20. Then the next major section unfolds as follows: (1) Those under trials need to remain obedient to the Word for true life [1:21--2:26], (2) Those under trials need to be wise in their speech to give life [3:1-18], and (3) Those under trials need to ask God to help them with their inner struggles rather than becoming angry and lashing out [4:1--5:12].
The larger structure of this book may be as follows: (1) Introduction to People with Problems [1:1], (2) Basis for trusting God with Problems [1:2-18], (3) How to Go on with Your Faith in the Midst of Problems [1:19--5:12], and (4) People Helping People for Restoration in Life [5:13-20].
16 This is translating the term for “know” ( ῎Ιστε from οἰδε ) as an indicative rather than an imperative. If it is an imperative it refers to what follows (‘My dear brothers, take note of this:’) but if it is an indicative it refers to what has just preceded it.
17 James now unfolds his exhortation above in 1:19-20 in the context of particular issues which his readers are experiencing. His thesis is that by obeying God’s word when they are under pressure, they will experience salvation in their daily lives. God’s word not only offers salvation from the penalty of sin, but salvation from the effects of sin in this life. The tone of what follows is very similar to wisdom literature. By heeding the advise of James, the readers will find skill for living a more profitable life.
18 The readers are to strip off this moral filth like dirty clothes in preparation for the word (cf. Hebrews 12:1).
19 Burdick writes, “That the Word is described a ‘planted in you’ suggests the readers were believers who already possessed the truth. The phrase ‘which can save you’ simply describes the truth as saving truth. James is not calling for an initial acceptance of that message, but for a full and intelligent appropriation of the truth as the Christian grows in spiritual understanding” (“James” in EBC, 12:175).
Doerksen understands “saved” in the final eschatological sense (James, EBC, 44). One wonders, however, why this conclusion is drawn. It seems that the context emphasizes the present aspect of salvation rather than the past or future. They are experiencing trials and James is writing to offer help in this present situation.
20 See Colossians 2:4 ( παραλογιζόμενοι ). James is exhorting his readers to put into practice what the word says to them and thus what they profess to believe.
21 James does not want them to forget who they are (firstfruits for all that God has created [1:18]). Any failure to respond cannot be blamed on lack of understanding because this look is described as an intense observation.
22 This law is probably the ethic of the Mosaic law (cf. James 2:8, 12) where “law” is also used.
23 Could this be parallel to the wisdom of Psalm 1 (a wisdom/Torah psalm).
24 Literally this reads, “μὴ ἐν προσωπολημψίαιας ε῎χετε τὴν πίστιν ....” “Stop having the faith in favoritism ....” Burdick writes, “To say that practicing favoritism contradicts one’s profession of faith is another way of saying that one’s action does not measure up to the truth he professes to believe” (“James” in EBC, 12:177).
25 Again, this Law is the ethical code of Moses (Exodus 10; Deuteronomy 5 cf. w/ Leviticus 19:18; see also Matthew 19:19; 22:39; Mark 12:31; Luke 10:27; Romans 13:9; Galatians 5:14). It is the law to love one another--all men be they rich or poor.
26 This may support the concept that the ethical Law is a reflection of the very character of God. Therefore to break any of the commandments is to rebel against God in his very person. To not commit adultery, but to commit murder is to not love one made in the image of God and thus to not love God Himself! What we do to one another we do to God (Psalm 51).
27 This is a literal rendering of the Greek which reads, “Ου῞τως λαλεῖτε καὶ ου῞τως ποιεῖτε.”
28 Since this audience is identified as being believers (see above), then this judgment must be referring to the Judgment Seat of Christ (cf. 1 Cor. 3:12; 2 Cor. 5:10; Luke 19:11-27).
29 A major theological issue in James is the meaning of this verse. One may work with the problem in the following logical manner:
The field of meaning of the term for “save” ( σῴζω) is as follows: (1) To “preserve or rescue fr. natural dangers and afflictions” as in from death, mortal danger, disease, ill condition, (2) To “save or preserve from eternal death” and (3) One and two above at the same time (BAG, p. 798-799):
If the message of this unit is that when a believer is under trials, he hears the word of God when he expresses his faith through good works to bring about deliverance in life for others (2:14-26) ...,then the “force or sense” of this question is in reference to the first denotation of σῴζω : “to preserve or rescue from natural dangers” and not those senses of two and three above. This meaning is further supported by the contextual placement of this unit: This statement falls in a unit addressed to believers--”my beloved brethren” (1:19), exhortations in 1:19 outline this unit for believers under trials, “the word implanted” is a new covenant description (1:21 cf. Jer. 31:33), reception of the word implanted is able to save the lives of those who are already brethren (1:19-21). Therefore, since they are already brethren (1:19), the eternal aspect of σῴζω is no longer an issue.
The analogy which follows (of words and food to a hungry man as faith and words is to deliverance) is temporal. A man is born once physically but is sustained by daily food. A man is born once spiritually but must be sustained by works.
One might illustrate James teaching in the following way: A car going down the street is about to hit you. You say to the Apostle Paul, “Faith will deliver me right?” Paul says, “Yes, you will go to heaven.” But James says, “Faith and works will let you live and have a productive life now--sooo get out of the street!”
Faith alone will not win approval at the judgment seat of Christ where our works are judged (1 Cor.3; Luke 19:11-27).
30 The example is designed to illustrate the proposition in 2:14 that faith which is not expressed in good works will not bring about deliverance in life (2:14).Therefore, the uselessness of faith which is not expressed in good works is demonstrated in the one who speaks encouraging words to another in physical need, but does not act to relieve their distress (2:15-17). The words are words of ‘faith,’-- “go in peace, be warmed and be filled,” --but the actions of “not giving them what is necessary for their bodies” are in no way useful for their needs. Therefore, the example demonstrates that faith which is not expressed in good works is useless since it does not bring about deliverance in life (σῴζω ).
Another important question is what is meant by the statement “faith by itself, ... is dead”? 2:17
The field of meaning of the important terms is as follows--for the term “πιστίς:” (1) That which causes trust and faith, (2) Trust, confidence, faith in the active sense = believing, and (3) That which is believed, body of faith or belief, doctrine: (BAG, pp. 662-664).
For the term “νεκρά “ (1) Dead as in living persons falling dead, lifeless, morally depraved, separated, useless, and (2) The dead person (BAG, pp. 534-535)
If the message of this unit is that the uselessness of faith which is not expressed in good works is demonstrated in the one who speaks encouraging words to another in physical need, but does not act to relieve their distress (2:15-17) ...,then the faith described is an active sense of believing and not a body of faith or belief. Likewise if the message of this unit is that the uselessness of faith which is not expressed in good works is demonstrated in the one who speaks encouraging words to another in physical need, but does not act to relieve their distress (2:15-17)..., then “dead” is descriptive of a separation which is lifeless, or useless. Therefore, the sense of “faith by itself, ... is dead” is not that of “a body of doctrine which is not sufficient for eternal life,” but that “it is the act of believing which is useless in that it does not preserve life in the present as in 1:21.”To only express one’s faith without the necessary accompanying good works to help someone in their distress, is to express a faith which is not helpful to others; it is separated from life in its effects.
31 One might ask, “what is the meaning of the objector in 2:18-19?” It seems that he is arguing that there is no necessary connection between faith and good works:
“you have faith
and I have works
You show me your faith apart from works
and I will show you my faith by my works
You believe that God is one. You do what is right.
Demons also believe and shudder.”
The objection is that faith and good works need not be correlated with one another since they can be demonstrated to exist apart from one another. This misses James’ point concerning the profit of faith when expressed alone as opposed to with good works.
Therefore, the objector is arguing that faith must not necessarily be correlated with works to prove its existence, but James is arguing concerning the necessary correlation of faith with works in order for there to be any present benefit in the trials of life.
32 James offers evidence for the profit of combining works with faith through two illustrations: (1) the father of faith--Abraham, and (2) the epitome of a Gentile who had faith--Rahab.
Abraham’s good works of obeying God as he offered up his son who was to fulfill the promise already given to him, demonstrated to himself and others the justifying faith of the patriarch with God. Abraham’s works demonstrated the growth of Abraham’s faith to himself (2:22) as well as the truth of God’s earlier declaration of righteousness (2:23a). Abraham’s works demonstrated to others that he was God’s friend (2:23b).
Rahab the harlot’s faith also demonstrated to others that she had expressed believing faith in the Lord when she received the messengers of the Lord and then delivered them from her people who were under the judgment of God by sending them out another way (2:25).
In both cases, the works of the one who had faith in the Lord was a profit in present life trials. This fits well with the message for this unit: “when one is under trials, one hears the word of God when he expresses his faith through good works to bring about deliverance in life for others (2:14-26)”
33 One might ask, “how do we harmonize James’ ‘justified by what he does and not by faith alone’ (2:24) with Paul in Romans 4:1-3?
It seems that the harmonization lies in the emphasis of the two passages. In Romans the emphasis is “before God” where in James the emphasis is “before men.” For Paul, justification is to declare a sinner righteous in the sight of God: “For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about: but not before God.” (Rom. 4:2). For James, justification is to vindicate or show that a person is righteous before men. In Genesis 22, Abraham demonstrates the reality of Genesis 15:6 (cf. also 2 Chronicles 20:7 where Abraham is called by men, “Thy friend forever;” Isa. 41:8; and John 15:14 where the disciples are told that they will be Jesus’ friends if they do what he commands them to do).This distinction of “before God” and “before men” is consistent with the message of James 2:14-26 where the emphasis is that: When one is under trials, one is a hearer of the word of God when he expresses his faith through good works to bring about deliverance in life for others (2:14-26). When faith is combined with good works, it brings about deliverance for others, and thus leads them to declare that one is righteous before God.
34 This term does not merely describe “mistakes” so much as acts of sin (cf. 2:10).
35 Burdick writes, “If anyone could be found who never sins with his tongue, he would never sin in any other way, either. Since sins of the tongue are hardest to avoid, anyone who could control his tongue would surely be able to ‘keep his whole body in check’ --keep it from being used as an instrument of sin” (“James” in EBC, 12:187)
36 In other words, those who are teachers among the Jews--the scribe and the rabbi (TDNT 7:505).
37 The term is πραῦτητι describes a strength under control. This is the gentleness which comes from wisdom.
38 This is a first class condition which assumes that this is true.
39 The prohibitions are both in the present tense with μὴ thus demanding the activity to cease.
Burdick writes, “James’s readers may have been priding themselves in their partisan defense of the truth--a defense that was to their own advantage and advancement. Through such bitter and partisan defense, they were in reality denying the very truth they were attempting to defend” (“James,” EBC, 12:190).
40 See John 3:3, 7.
41 Braudick writes, “James is no doubt speaking of disturbance and turmoil in the church. The ‘evil practice’ refers specifically to worthless activity, to deeds that are bad because they are good for nothing and cannot produce any real benefit...” (“James,” EBC, 12:191).
Doerksen suggests that these may be false teachers, “‘Truth’ may refer to the facts in a case, the truth; or it may speak of the truth of the gospel. If the second meaning is the case, the so-called wise teachers were actually living a lie against the gospel” (James, 88).
42 This is the absence of sinful attitudes and motives (in contrast to the self-seeking motives mentioned in 3:14-16).
43 Burdick writes, “James concludes his discussion of ‘the wisdom that comes from heaven’ by reiterating the second quality listed in v. 17. To ‘raise a harvest of righteousness’ demands a certain kind of climate. A crop of righteousness cannot be produced in the climate of bitterness and self-seeking. Righteousness will grow only in a climate of peace. And it must be sown and cultivated by the ‘peacemakers.’ Such persons not only love peace and live in peace but also strive to create conditions of peace” (“James,” EBC, 12:191-92).
44 The term is ἡδονῶν meaning pleasures from which we get the term “hedonism.” Burdick writes, “Pleasure is the overriding desire of their lives. Nothing will be allowed to stand in the way of its realization” (“James,” EBC, 12:192).
45 Burdick appropriately writes, “Some, insisting that the word must be taken literally, say that James is not referring to any specific occurrences but is indicating what happens when men desire pleasure rather than God (Ropes, p. 255). This interpretation, however, does not do justice to the pointed accusation ‘You Kill.’ In the context of forceful words such as polemoi (‘wars’) and machai (‘battles’), it seems better to take phoneuete (‘you kill’) as hyperbole for hatred” (“James,” EBC, 12:193). See also Matthew 5:21-22; 1 John 3:15 where hatred is identified with murder.
46 Question--is what they are asking for what it is that they need? Or are they asking for symptoms of the deeper issues? Are the real issues tied to the original sins of lust and their envy? And are lust and envy the core issue? They are expressions of the heart’s longing which is met illegitimately (cf. 1:14-15). James will move in this direction with the next verses.
47 See Jeremiah 31:32; Hosea 2:2-5; 3:1-5; 9:1; Ezekiel 16.
48 This is probably the gist of passages like Exodus 20:5 and 34:14.
49 The last part of this verse comes form Proverbs 3:34. Burdick writes, “The reference to the gift of grace looks back to God’s demand for loyalty (vv. 4-5). God in grace gives his people the help they need to resist the appeal of the world and to remain loyal to him. The reference to ‘the humble’ constitutes the theme for vv. 7-10, where James pleads for submission to God. ‘The humble’ are the people who willingly submit to God’s desire for them rather than proudly insisting on satisfying their own desires for pleasure (cf. vv. 1-3) (“James,” EBC, 12:194).
Therefore, the difficulty which these readers may be finding themselves as God does not answer their prayers is in part due to his resisting the proud!
50 The term is ὑποτάγητε and is the logical response to 4:6 so that they might receive grace rather than God’s resistance. The writer is urging his readers to not flee from God under the fuel of their desires, but to remain in relationship to Him (submit).
51 The term for resisting describes a face to face confrontation ( ἀντίστητε ) as in Paul’s face to face confrontation of Peter in Galatians 2:11. Perhaps the Devil is brought in at this point because it is his “world system” which the readers are going toward as they seek resolution of their desires apart from God (cf. 4:4).
52 These words describe ceremonial cleansing as in Psalm 51:7-9; 16-17.
53 This is again an allusion to Proverbs 3:34 cited above in verse 6. Burdick writes, “Here the specific form of humbling is that of repentance for the sin of transferring affections from God to pleasures of the world” (“James,” EBC, 12:195). See also Matthew 23:12; Luke 14:11; 18:14; Philippians 2:5-11; 1 Peter 5:6).
54 This is another prohibition with the present imperative with the sense that they are already doing this.
James does not seem to be speaking against evaluating whether someone is murdering or doing evil in this exhortation. We are supposed to do such things (cf. 1 Cor. 5; Luke 6:32). Rather, it seems that he is addressing those areas which are “questionable” (cf. Rom. 14) wherein people place themselves up as God instead of really dealing with their own sin!
55 Again this is probably the ethic of the Moral Law (cf. Lev. 19:18 “Love your neighbor as yourself”).
56 See Paul’s use of this phrase in Acts 18:21; 1 Corinthians 4:19; but note that he does not use it mechanically (Acts 19:21; Romans 15:28; 1 Corinthians 16:5, 8). Whether stated or not, Paul knew his life and plans were conditioned upon the will of God.
57 It seems that the right thing to do was explicitly stated as repentance in 4:7-10. James is exhorting his readers not to ignore their desires by doing evil (pointing their fingers at others and proclaiming arrogant autonomy). Positive thinking is not the button which moves God to resolve our lusts during hard times. God desires for us to be in touch with our real needs and to ask Him for help rather than just our wants.
58 Burdick writes, “It is like saying, ‘Now that I have pointed the matter out to you you have no excuse.’ Knowing what should be done obligates a person to do it” (“James,” EBC, 12:198).
59 “There is good reason to believe that the persons referred to in this section are not believers. It might be argued that they are personally addressed in the same way other groups are addressed in previous sections (3:1; 4:13). Since the epistle in general is written to Christians, it might be assumed that the rich of 5:1-6 are Christians just as the rich of 1:9-11 are. However, there are significant differences between 5:1-6 and the rest of the epistle. These individuals are not addressed as ‘brothers’ (cf. 1:2, 16, 19; 2:1, 5, 14, 3:1, 10, 12; 4:11; 5:7, 9, 10, 12). Furthermore, they are not called on to repent and change their ways but only to ‘weep and wail’ because of the judgment they are going to undergo. It is, therefore, more reasonable to understand the section as similar to OT prophetic declarations of coming judgment against pagan nations. It will be noted that the latter also are interspersed among sections addressed to God’s people (e.g., Isa 13-21, 23; Ezek 25-32)” (Burdick, “James,” EBC, 12:199).
These are those who are probably persecuting the readers. James is encouraging his readers that God will one day deal with the evil of these men by judging them.
60 Burdick writes, “The tarnish was indication of how long the hoarded wealth had lain idle. He warns the rich, ‘their corrosion will testify against you’” (“James,” EBC, 12:199).
61 Burdick writes, “In Palestine the early rains came in October and November soon after the grain was sown, and the latter rains came in April and May as the grain was maturing. Both rainy seasons were necessary for a successful crop. Knowing this, the farmer was willing to wait patiently until both rains came and provided the needed moisture” (“James,” EBC, 12:201).
62 A prohibition with the present imperative.
63 Burdick writes, “And the Judge is represented as ‘standing at the door,’ as if his hand is on the latch, ready to enter at any time” (“James,” EBC, 12:202).
64 Probably Jeremiah is an outstanding example of this--He was put in stocks (Jer. 20:2), throne into prison (Jer. 32:2), lowered into a cistern (Jer. 38:6).
65 See Job 1:21-22; 2:10; 13:15; 19:25-27; 42:10-17.
66 See Matthew 5:34-37.
67 The term for suffering ( κακοπαθεῖ ) was used above (v. 10) in its noun form for the prophets.
68 The purpose of this passage does not seem to be to give the reader a formula or pattern to follow when he or another believer is sick in a physical way. This view has been a traditional interpretation of the passage by evangelicals such as Doerksen (James, EBC, 13:29-134), Tasker (The General Epistle of James, INTC, 129) and Burdick (“James,” EBC, 12:203-204).
However, Daniel Hayden notes that, “If James 5:13-18 is a reference to special healing of physical illness, then it is totally unique to the teaching of the New Testament Epistles and disruptive to the argument of the Book of James” (“Calling the Elders to Pray” Bibliotheca Sacra 138:551 [July-September 1981]:258). He goes on to point out that nowhere else in the Epistles is there a special divine healing of the sick through the ministry of the elders. Timothy was told to take wine for his stomach (1 Tim. 5:23), Trophimus was left sick in Miletus (2 Tim. 4:20), Paul’s infirmity was the work of God (2 Cor. 12:7-10), believers are encouraged to view physical distresses as working toward a spiritual benefit (Rom. 8:18-25; 2 Cor. 4:16-18) and as completing and perfecting them (James 1:4) (Ibid., 259). This segment, if on physical healing, also does not seem to fit into the flow of the preceding context concerning injustice (5:1-12) or the confession of sin following it (5:15ff). Therefore it seems that a different design must be sought which takes into consideration all of the elements of the text. True this could be the only text which addresses this doctrine of healing but a better explanation is possible.
It seems that the design of James 5:13-20 is to encourage his Christian readers, who are suffering persecution, to support and restore one another through the ministry of the strong praying for the weak.
This design can be supported through the specifics of the text as follows: (1) James has been arguing that trials and temptations are going to come and how the believer reacts to them is important (1:2-18). Then in 1:19--5:12 James shows how faith should respond to such trials. Finally, in 5:13-20 James provides specific instructions on how to restore those who are or have not reacted well and thus are discouraged. Therefore, this unit can and does fit well into the logic of the book.
(2) Two groups are addressed in summary form in verse 12 who will be developed throughout this segment. Those who are suffering from the hardship of persecution, not sickness (cf. κακοπαθεω, 2 Tim. 2:9; 4:5) and those who are able to keep up their courage during these persecutions (cf. ευθυμεω, Acts 27:22, 25). The latter will need to strengthen the former.
(3) Although some terms allow for a lexical meaning of ‘sick,’ they also allow for meanings which better fit into the context of the book, (e.g., ‘sick’ in 5:14 (ἀσθενεω). This term generally means weak and is used to describe a weakness due to persecutions, convictions, insults, and distress (cf. 2 Cor. 12:10; Rom. 14:2; 1 Cor. 8:11). To anoint (ἀλειφω) with oil has many expressions with those not physically sick (Lk. 7:38, 46; Jn. 12:3; 11:2; Mk. 16:1) and although Mark 6:13 could be used to support the traditional view, it seems that the concept of anointing the head with oil as a sign of blessing and refreshment from God better fits the passage in light of eastern, Old Testament culture (cf. Ruth 3:3; 2 Sam. 12:20; 14:2; Ps. 23:5; 45:7; 92:10; Amos 6:6; Matt. 6:17). The term in verse 15 for ‘the one who is sick’ ( καμω) specifically is used to describe one who is weary of enduring trials which God has set before him in Hebrews 12:3. The term ‘restore’ in verse 15 (ἐγειρω) does not necessitate physical healing (Matt 12:11) and may be a figurative way of describing the restoration of one discouraged. Also the term for ‘healed’ (ιἀομαι) clearly can have the sense of spiritual healing as in Hebrews 12:12-13 where those who are spiritually weak (weak hands and feeble knees) are said to be healed from their struggle with sin (cf. Heb 12:3-4).
(4) The movement from the work of the elders (v. 14) to the forgiveness and confession of sin (vv. 15, 16) is light of the above design is logically relating sin to one who is not persevering during persecution and the spiritual healing which comes from confession which enables the believer to then live a Spirit enabled life.
(5) the illustration of Elijah (vv. 17-18) is an appropriate one because Elijah demonstrated the possibility of effective prayer (1 Ki. 17:1; 18) even through he became discouraged under persecution (1 Ki. 19). It is also interesting to note that if prayer for physical sickness were in view, James could have used Elijah’s prayer for healing of the widow’s son (1 Ki. 17:17-24).
(6) The concluding verse of the book (5:19-20) are an encouragement for believers to minister restoration to one another for their physical and spiritual prosperity.
In light of the above the passage should probably not be used to support an obligation on God’s behalf to heal a believer who is physically sick because the doctors have applied medicine or the elders have applied oil and prayed. This passage does not support the Catholic doctrines of ‘extreme unction’ or ‘confession of sins to priests.’
Rather this passage is very similar in application to Galatians 6:1; John 13; and Hebrews 10:24-25. It is the responsibility of those who are strong in their Christian faith (e.g., elders) to support and encourage those weak believers who during difficult times become weary and are willing to apostasize in the sense of Hebrews. The weak believer has the responsibility to confess these types of sins (discouragement in their Christian faith etc) to those who seem to be doing well, and the strong have the responsibility to uphold the weak through the ministry of intercessory prayer. The Christian life is not to be that of independence but interdependence. The body of Christ is to care for itself. When believers are discouraged, they are to be encouraged. When there is sin in a believer’s life, there is to be restoration through confession and prayer.
This passage does not necessarily teach that there should be public confession of sin because in such a confession the weak would be present with the strong (which violates the set pattern) and because the purpose is for the strong to pray for the needs of the weak--not just to ventilate. However, there is to be a sharing of areas of sin and personal need for the purpose of a stronger brother to help (v. 19) and pray for the weaker.
God desires the body of Christ to work towards strengthening, restoring, and rejuvenating the spiritually weak. Perhaps oil might be placed upon the head of one who is physically sick because of sin (1 Cor. 11), but the oil was actually a sign of the ending of mourning and the entrance into life and festivity.
Related Topics: Introductions, Arguments, Outlines
An Introduction To The Book Of HebrewsRelated Media
I. AUTHORSHIP:1 It is not possible to be certain about who authored the Book of Hebrews:
A. External Evidence: The external evidence offers some support for Pauline authorship, but it is not unanimous nor definitive:
1. Marcion Canon (c. AD 140): It was excluded from Marcion’s Canon, but he would not have liked the continuity between the OT and the NT
2. Muratorian Canon (c. 170): It was omitted from the Muratorian Canon, but this may be due to the corrupt state of the of the text of that Canon; but it was not included with the Pauline epistles
3. In The East: In the East the epistle was regarded as Pauline:
a. Clement of Alexandria (c. AD 150-215)2
b. Origen (c. AD 185-254)3
c. Chester Beatty Papyrus (c. AD 200): In the Chester Beatty papyrus (P46) places the letter among the Pauline Epistles after Romans4
4. In The West: The epistle was generally considered to be Pauline
a. Tertullian: Tertullian (c. AD 150-220) attributed it to Barnabas5
b. The Roman Church: The Roman Church disputed Pauline authorship, and this led others to reject the Epistle (Muratorian Canon, Roman Canon; African Canon)
c. Hilary: Hilary considered Hebrews to be canonical, but not Pauline
d. The Western Church: The later Western Church was influenced by the Eastern Church in that although they were not convinced of Pauline authorship, they compromised and proclaimed Pauline authorship in a unanimous way until the time of the Reformation6
e. Reformation: In the Reformation Erasmus, Luther, and Calvin all questioned Pauline authorship of Hebrews7
B. Internal Evidence: Although there are several things which can be known about the author of Hebrews, and several have been suggested as possible candidates for author of this book, it is not possible to draw any definitive conclusion about who the author of Hebrews is
1. What Is Known: Several things are known about the author of Hebrews, but these are not enough to identify this person:
a. The book makes no direct reference to the author
b. The author was probably a Jew:
1) The author was very familiar with the Old Testament Scriptures
2) The author was familiar with the practices of First Century Jews
3) The author may have been familiar with the hermeneutics of the first century (midrash and pesher)
2. Various Suggestions: Many have been suggested as possible authors of the book of Hebrews, but it is not possible to be definitive in one’s conclusion:
a. Paul: While many of the arguments could be weighed either way, it seems unlikely that Paul was the writer of Hebrews in view of Hebrews 2:3-4:8
1) Anonymity: Nowhere in the letter does the writer identify himself as Paul; this is very unlikely in view of Paul’s other letters. Apostolic authority is not mentioned either
2) Difference in Style: The Greek style is not typical of Pauline abruptness and digressions; it is more classical9
3) Absence of Pauline Spiritual Experience: The author does not place his experience into the letter as Paul is noted for doing in his writings
4) Theological Similarities and Differences:
a) There are theological similarities in this letter with Paul’s other writings:
(1) Faith is an important topic
(2) The use of Habakkuk 2:4 is only by Paul elsewhere in the New Testament10
b) There are theological differences11 in this letter with Paul’s other writings:
(1) The exaltation of Christ rather than resurrection is emphasized
(2) The redemptive aspects of Christ's work rather than the sanctifying aspects of Christ's work are emphasized
(3) The high priesthood of Christ is nowhere else emphasized by Paul12
5) Historical Difference: Unlike Paul who emphasizes that he did not receive the gospel from men (Gal. 1--2), this writer seems to have received the gospel from others13
6) Outside of Apostolic Circle: The writer of Hebrews seems to place himself outside of the Apostolic circle14
b. Barnabas:15 While there is some early support for Barnabas as the author of this epistle and some corresponding evidence in favor of Barnabas, the evidence is not determinative:
1) Early Support: Other than the suggestion of Paul, Barnabas is the only other suggestion which has early ecclesiastical support, but this is primarily restricted to the Western Church
2) A Levite: Some consider the fact that Barnabas was a Levite (Acts 4:36) to be support for his having written so much in the letter which concerns temple ritual16
3) Son of Encouragement: It is possible that a literary motif is being offered with the correlation that Barnabas was called the “Son of Consolation” (Acts 4:36) and the author notes that this work is a work of “consolation” (Heb. 13:22)17
4) Hellenistic Characteristic: Because of the Hellenistic character of the letter, some question whether Barnabas with his connections with Jerusalem and Cyprus would have been able to write with such an “Alexandrian slant;” but this may be saying too much since Hellenism had penetrated Cyprus by this time
5) Hebrews 2:3: Some question whether Barnabas would have described his introduction to the gospel they way which he did in Hebrews 2:3; but this is not determinative since 2:3 need not describe a second generation, and the Acts narrative does not specifically state how Barnabas learned about the gospel
6) Pauline Association: Some of the Pauline concepts and phrases could be explained on the basis of Barnabas’ close relationship to Paul (Acts 11; 13--14)
c. Luke: Although there are some early ascriptions which connect Luke with this book and literary affinities which may show a connection, it is not possible to be certain of Lucan authorship in view of the present evidence:
1) Early Ascriptions: Some in Origen’s day considered Luke to be the author of the epistle; Clement of Alexandria thought that Luke translated the epistle from Paul’s Hebrew18
2) Literary Affinities: Some have considered Hebrews to have literary affinities with Luke’s writing (e.g., Acts and especially Stephen’s Speech in Acts 7),19 however, it may also be that the author was aware of Luke’s writings and was influenced by them
3) Nationality: Some have suggested that Luke was a Jew, however, this is not possible to know for sure; he may well have been a Gentile who was familiar with Jewish thought through his relationship with the Apostle Paul
d. Clement: The parallels with Clement’s epistle have led to the notion that he was either author or translator of the work; but the differences outweigh the similarities; also, the similarities may be accounted for by Clement being aware of this epistle
f. Apollos: The positive evidence can not be argued against, but it is not determinative, and the negative evidence consists of mostly arguments from silence, but they bare consideration; this not an impossible hypothesis:
1) Luther has been very influential in affecting the opinion of others concerning this view
2) Support for Apollos as author of Hebrews:22
a) Apollos’ close acquaintance with Paul, thus accounting for the Pauline influences
b) His connection with Alexandria, which would account for the Alexandrian coloring
c) His knowledge of the Scriptures, which would explain the biblical content of the argument and the use of the LXX version
d) His eloquence, which well suits the oratorical form of the Epistle
e) His contacts with Timothy
f) His considerable influence in various churches
3) Weakness for Apollos as author of Hebrews:
a) There is no early tradition to support this theory
b) There is no evidence of literary activity on his part
g. Philip: Although Ramsay considered this letter to have been written by Philip the deacon to commend Paulinism to the Jewish Christians in Jerusalem, there is no certain evidence, this does not explain the Hellenistic approach in the letter as well as why there is not a greater emphasis upon Pauline thought in the letter
h. Priscilla: Harnack considered Priscilla to have been the author of the epistle23 and supported it in view of its anonymity since a woman would not have been regarded will as an authority source, her association with Paul, her instruction of Apollos, the inclusion of women in Hebrews 11, as well as other supposed signs of femininity, but these points are not determinative24
i. Jude: Dubarle25 considered Jude to be the author because of the similarities of vocabulary, syntax, stylistic processes, mentality and culture between Hebrews and the Epistle of Jude, but these may be due to the two author’s common Jewish Christianity
II. DATE OF THE BOOK: Sometime Between AD 68 and 95 (probably AD 68-69)26
A. Hebrews is known and cited by Clement of Rome in 1 Clement (AD 95)27
B. Hebrews bares no mention of the destruction of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem by Titus in AD 7028
C. The writer of Hebrews seems to regard the sacrificial system of the Old Testament to still be in operation29
D. Hebrews was written during the lifetime of Timothy whom the author knew30
III. RECIPIENTS OF THE BOOK: Although the recipients were most probably Jewish, it is not possible to be absolutely certain about which particular community of Jews the letter was written; Perhaps it was to those in the Palestine area
A. Jewish: All understand that this letter was probably written to Jews;31the question is what kind of Jews were they and where did they live.
B. Support for a Particular Community:32
1. Hellenistic Jews: Some believe that it was sent to Hellenistic Jew because all of the quotations came from the LXX and related texts, but this is not a strong argument because the LXX was in common use at this time throughout the Greek speaking world--including Palestine
2. North Africa or Cyprus:33
a. The Alexandrian coloring has suggested an Alexandrian destination, but the church at Alexandria never laid claim to the letter; rather, they assumed that it was addressed to the Hebrew people of Palestine by Paul
b. It has been suggested that the people lived in North Africa or in Cyprus, people who had an ascetic lifestyle similar to the Qumran community’s lifestyle. Evidence from Qumran suggests that the Qumran community had a highly developed doctrine of angels which would fit in very nicely with the thought of the author of Hebrews34
a. The letter seems to have been first known in Rome (since it was probably there for a while before Clement cited it in his Corinthian Epistle in AD 95
b. The closing Salutation in 13:24 ( οἰ ἀπὸ ᾿Ιταλίας) describes those who are away from Italy sending greetings home rather than those from Italy (in say Palestine) sending greetings to others; yet, it could go either way
c. Timothy (13:24) was known to the Roman Christians (Col. 1:1; Philemon 1--both of which are written from Rome)
d. The description of the leaders in 13:7, 17, 24 is similar to that in 1 Clement 1:3
e. The generosity of the readers in 6:10ff; 10:32ff would match that which was true of the Romans
f. The reference to meats in 13:9 my be similar to Romans 14 (hard to be sure)
g. The spoilation of goods referred to in 10:32 could be explained by either Claudius’ edict in AD 59, or Nero’s persecution (which would probably be too late)
h. But 2:3 would be difficult, the particular troubles in 10:32 are difficult to pin point, and there is no mention of Gentiles (yet this could have been to a group of Jews in Rome)35
a. This would be in the area of Palestine and possibly Jerusalem in particular
b. This is supported by the existence of the temple
c. The sense that the crisis is imminent thereby suggesting the coming siege of Jerusalem (1:2; 3:13; 10:25; 12:27)
d. The former suffering (10:32; 12:4) would relate to the persecution of the Jerusalem Jews in the Acts account (Acts 5; 7; 12)
e. There is no mention of the Gentile-Jewish controversy
f. The objections to this position (the way the author addressing them in 2:3; the discrepancy between generosity of 6:10; 10:34; 13:6 and the poverty of Jerusalem, the use of the LXX, the statement that the church had not yet suffered martyrdom in 12:4) are removed if the destination was Palestine rather than Jerusalem in particular
C. Spiritual Condition of the Community--Two Main Views:
1. A Mixed Audience: Some maintain that the recipients were Jews who were a mixed group. There were true believers and there were “professors”--those who said that they were really believers, but were not. The warning sections in this view would be to those who were not really believers in that a lapse back into Judaism would show that they really did not have faith in Jesus Christ (2:3; 3:12-14; 4:1; 10:25, 26, 29).
2. Believers: Some maintain that these are believers who are being tempted to go back under the umbrella of Judaism. The various warning sections would then be to refrain from putting themselves back under the bondage of Judaism (3:1; 4:6; 5:12; 6:4; 10:19, 32; 12:7; 13:1, 20-22)
IV. THEOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTIONS:
A. The Incarnation
B. Jesus’ Substitutionary Death
C. Jesus’ Priesthood
D. The Relationship between the New Covenant and the Old Covenant
E. The Interpretation of the Old Testament in the New Testament
F. The Life of Faith
V. PURPOSES OF THE BOOK:36
A. Positive: To provide a “word of exhortation” (encouragement) to his readers to go on in maturity in their faith in Christ (13:22)
B. Negative: To warn his readers against the dangers of lapsing back into Judaism37
C. To instruct his readers about the superiority of Christ38
D. To instruct his readers through a letter (or better a sermon or homily)39
1 While this kind of background information is helpful, it’s absence does not impede the interpreter’s ability to understand the meaning of the Book of Hebrews since meaning resides in the words of the text in their context and not behind the text in the author’s mind.
2 Eusebius, HE, 6.14.
3 Although Origen considered the contents to be Pauline, he was not actually certain about who penned the book. He thought that one of Paul’s pupils might have written the book, yet mentions that some thought that Clement of Rome, or Luke might have been the author. His famous quote is significant, “But who wrote the Epistle God only knows certainly” (Guthrie, NTI, p. 686).
4 Bruce M. Metzger, The Text of the New Testament, second edition, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1968), pp. 37-38. Guthrie writes, “IN the majority of early Greek manuscripts it is placed after 2 Thessalonians and before the personal letters of Paul (NTI, p. 686).
5 De pudicitia, 20.
6 Guthrie, NTI, p. 687.
7 Luther relegated Hebrews to the end of his NT with the other books which he deemed questionable (e.g. after 3 John with James, Jude and Revelation). His own theory was that Apollos wrote it.
8 Nevertheless, Childs may have made an important canonical observation when he writes concerning the conclusion of Hebrews that, “The ending does not propose a direct link with Paul by attributing to him the authorship. Rather, it offers an indirect relationship through Timothy with whom the unknown writer shares a common ministry.” Later he writes, “The effect of the canonical ending, which has greatly influenced the usual positioning of the letter within the New Testament either before the Pastorals or after Philemon, is not to propose an easy harmonization with Paul, but to establish a context in which the different approaches to the great theological issues, shared by these authors, are viewed together as comprising the truth of the one gospel” (The New Testament as Canon, p. 417-418).
9 There is less of a burning passion and more of a literary control in the style of the letter. This is a weak and subjective argument, however. It is also possible that Paul employed an emanuencis.
10 See Galatians 3:11 and Romans 1:17.
11 Note that these are not disagreements but differences with Paul’s other writings.
12 Nevertheless, there is no necessary contradiction implied.
13 See Hebrews 2:3, “It was declared at first by the Lord, and it was attested to us by those who heard him, ....”
15 See Zane Hodges, “Hebrews” in BKC, pp. 777-778 for a fuller discussion of this option
16 Guthrie makes a very important point, however, when he writes, “Nevertheless this detail must not be overstressed since the author’s main obsession seems to be the biblical cultus rather than contemporary ritual procedure” (NTI, p. 691).
17 The common work is παρακλήσεως.
18 Guthrie, NTI, p. 603.
19 “both contain reviews of Hebrew history; both stress the call of Abraham and mention Abraham’s non-possession of the land; both describe the tabernacle as divinely ordered; and in both the tradition that the law was mediated by angels finds a place” (Ibid.).
20 Acts 15:22, 27, 32, 40.
21 1 Peter 5:12 reads, “By Silvanus, a faithful brother as I regard him, I have written briefly to you, exhorting and declaring that this is the true grace of God;” (RSV). Nevertheless, it is difficult to be sure of the precise part which Silvanus played in 1 Peter.
22 The following comes directly from Guthrie, NTI, p. 695.
23 ZNTW 1 (1900): 16-41.
24 See a fuller discussion in Guthrie, NTI, pp. 696-697.
25 Revue Biblique, XLVIII (1939): 506-529.
26 For a more detailed discussion involving several options see Guthrie who concludes, “In view of all the data available, it would seem reasonable to regard this Epistle as having been sent either just before the fall of Jerusalem, if Jerusalem was the destination, or just before the Neronic persecutions if it was sent to Rome” (NTI, p. 718).
27 Hebrews 11:7 (cf. 1 Clement 9:4; 11:1); Hebrews 1:3f (cf. 1 Clement 36:1f). Therefore, it must have been written at least by this date.
28 This would have supported his thesis that the “old cultus” has passed away, and something better has been inaugurated.
29 See 8:4, 13; 9:6-9; 10:1-3.
30 “Take notice that our brother Timothy has been released, with whom, if he comes soon, I shall see you” 13:23. We know that Timothy was still alive when Paul was about to be martyred in AD 68 (cf. 2 Timothy 4:9ff), but we do not know the later history of Timothy.
Hebrews 2:3 does not need to be understood to be referring to a second generation.
31 Note that some of them were inclined to remain in Judaism (13:13), and that they were well acquainted with the Old Testament and with rituals (cf. 7:11; 9:15; 13:13).
Not only this, but the title “ΠΡΟΣ ΕΒΡΙΑΟΥΣ” speaks of the book’s destination even though it may be late in nature (e.g., second to early third Century). It may have been added as part of the canonical process of joining the letter to the larger corpus. Further, as Childs suggests, “The title does not therefore refer to any specific historical referent, whether aramaic- or Greek-speaking Jews, but to those of the old covenant who form the major subject-matter of the epistle in contrast to those of the new covenant. In other words, the term is a theological construct in which an historical anachronism functions as a theological referent” (Brevard S. Childs, The New Testament as Canon: An Introduction (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984), p. 414; For another discussion of this topic see Guthrie, NTI, pp. 698-703).
32 The reason one moves toward a particular community is because the book writes to a people who seem to have a definite history (2:3; 6:9-10; 10:32-34; 11:4; 13:7), a definite link with the writer (13:18, 19, 23) and are a section of a larger community (5:12; 10:25). See Guthrie, NTI, pp. 698-700 for a more detailed discussion.
33 See Zane Hodges, “Hebrews” in BKC, pp. 779-780 for a fuller discussion of this option.
34 See Herb Bateman’s ThD dissertation soon to be placed in Turpin Library at DTS.
35 Guthrie says it best when he writes, “All that can safely be claimed, however, is that we know that it was used in Rome in the first century, but insufficient literature is preserved from other districts to enable us to pronounce more confidently on any alternative theory” (NTI, pp. 714-715).
36 See Guthrie for some other proposed purposes of the book of Hebrews (NTI, pp. 704-710).
37 It seems that a central issue revolves around the atonement. The Jewish system would say that Christ is not the atonement, whereas the Christian system would say that Christ is the atonement. Therefore, going back to the Jewish system is to say that Christ is not the atonement but that the “lamb” is your atonement.
38 The term “better” is used thirteen times in the book. Also, Childs is correct when he writes, “The canonical significance of the interchange between doctrinal and paraenetic sections is in reminding the reader that the christological discussions of the letter have an immediate effect on the believer” (The New Testament as Canon, p. 416).
39 Note that even though there is a conclusion and there are personal allusions, there is no introductory greeting and address as is the case with the form of letters in the NT. It has been suggested that this letter was originally a spoken sermon which was then written down (see Guthrie, NTI, pp. 725-727; Childs, The New Testament as Canon, p. 415).
Related Topics: Introductions, Arguments, Outlines
An Argument Of The Book Of HebrewsRelated Media
Because Christ Is Greater In His Person Than Those Of The Old Mosaic Covenant (Angels, Moses & Aaron) And Greater In His Ministry Than Those Of The Levitical Priesthood, The Writer Urges His Readers Not To Persist In Their Sinful Identification With Judaism But To Persevere In Faithfulness Toward Jesus Knowing That God Will Honor Them When He Returns To Fulfill His Promises
I. PROLOGUE--THE SUPERIOR REVELATION OF GOD’S SON:1 God’s Son is qualified to be the superior One through whom God Spoke his final word being revelation from God, the wisdom of God who is creator and sustainer of all things, the revealer of God, and the one who after making purification for sin was exalted above the angels to sit in honor as ruler over all things 1:1-4
A. The Revelation from God’s Son: Although in the past God spoke to the fathers in many portions and in many ways, in the present God has spoken to men in His Son 1:1
1. Past: In the past God spoke to the Fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways 1:1
B. The Work of God’s Son: God appointed His Son to be heir of all things and created the world through His Son 1:2b-c
1. Heir: God appointed His Son to be heir of all things5 1:2b
C. The Nature of God’s Son: God’s Son fully reveals God in His glory and nature, and upholds all things by the word of his might 1:3
1. Reveals God: The Son is the radiance (reflection)8 of God’s glory and the exact representation ( χαρακτὴρ ) of God’s nature 1:3a
2. Upholds All Things:9 The Son upholds ( φέρων ) all things by the word of his power 1:3b
D. The Exalted Position of God’s Son: After God’s Son had made purification for sins, he sat down to rule on high in honor above the angels with the inheritance of a more excellent name than they have 1:4
II. A MOVEMENT TO THE HEART OF THE OLD COVENANT--CHRIST IS GREATER IN HIS PERSON AND HIS MINISTRY THAN THE OLD COVENANT: The writer exhorts his readers to not turn away from Christ because He is greater in His person than those of the old Mosaic covenant (angels, Moses, & Aaron) and greater in his priestly ministry than the Levitical priesthood (being the mediator of a better covenant, the source of eternal salvation and superseding the inadequate Mosaic provisions for sin) 1:5--10:18
A. Christ Is Greater in His Person Than Those of the Old Covenant: The writer exhorts his readers to not turn away from Christ because he is greater in His exaltation than the angelic mediators of the Old Covenant, he is greater as God’s son than God’s servant Moses, and he is greater as a Melchizedekian priest than the Levitical priesthood 1:5--7:28
1. Christ Is Greater Than The Mediators Of The Old Covenant--Angels: The reason that Christ (in his exaltation) has become greater than the angels is because he is their King who was appropriately humiliated below them for a time to die for mankind and then was exalted above them to be the heir of all things, therefore, requiring the readers to pay close attention to the salvific revelation which comes through Him 1:5--2:18
a. Exposition: Because He Is Their King:14 The reason that Christ (in his exaltation) has become greater than the angels is because he is in an exalted relationship with God as the eternal, unchangeable Davidic Son (heir/King) who is to be worshiped by angels, and angles are the transitory, changeable servants of mankind 1:5-14
1) Son vs. Angels: The reason that Christ has become greater than the angels is because he was in an exalted relationship with the Father as the Davidic Son who was chosen and to be worshiped by angels 1:5-6
a) Exalted Name (Relationship):15 The reason that Christ has become greater than the angels is because ( γὰρ ) He is in a father-son relationship with God 1:5
(1) Called His Son: God never called angles His Son whom he has chosen as he did Jesus (Psalm 2:7)16 1:5a
(2) Father to Him: God never told angels that he would be a Father to them and they would be a Son to Him as he did to Jesus (2 Sam. 7:14) 1:5b
b) Exalted Position: The reason that Jesus is greater than the angels is because he is the chosen one whom the angels are to worship 1:6
(1) Chosen One: Jesus is the chosen one (first born)17 brought into the (heavenly) world 1:6a
(2) Worshiped by Angels: All of the angles of God were to worship the chosen one (first born) 1:6b
2) Angels as Ministers vs. Son as Heir:18 Angels are God’s transitory, changeable ministers whereas God’s Davidic heir is eternal and upon an eternal throne 1:7-12
a) Assertion--Angels Are Ministers: God describes angels as His ministers much like the wind and fire19 1:7
b) Argument--Son Is the Eternal, Davidic Heir: In contrast to the angels God’s throne is declared to be eternal as well as His anointed one who will sit on that throne 1:8-12
3) Son--King vs. Angels--Ministering Spirits: In contrast to the Son who is invited to share in God’s rule, angels are ministering spirits sent to serve mankind (those who will inherit salvation) 1:13-14
a) Davidic King:25 God never told any of the angels to sit at his right hand until he makes his enemies are made to be a footstool for his feet as he told Messiah 1:13
b) Exegetical Comment: God never told the angels to be seated as king because they are all ministering spirits sent to render service for those who will inherit salvation 1:14
b. Exhortation/Warning26--Pay Closest Attention to the Revelation through the Son: Because Christ is greater than the angels the writer exhorts himself and the community to pay closest attention to the greater revelation which they have received through Him because they will not escape an appropriate recompense for disobedience in view of that which was paid by those who disobeyed the lessor revelation through angels 2:1-4
1) Exhortation: Because Christ is greater than the angels the writer therefore ( Διὰ ) exhorts himself and his readers that they must pay closest attention to what they have heard27 lest they drift off course28 2:1
2) Reason: The reason ( γὰρ ) they must pay closest attention to what they have heard is because they have a greater salvation through a greater revelation than that which was revealed in the OT and there were severe consequences to those who disobeyed the lesser revelation 2:2-4
b) Present Revelation through the Lord: The community will not escape a just recompense31 if they neglect so a great a salvation which was first spoken (by God) through the Lord Himself and was confirmed (guaranteed) to the community by those32 who heard it from the Lord with God endorsing their witness according to His own will by signs & wonders,33 various miracles,34 and by the distribution of gifts of the Holy Spirit35 2:3-4
c. Exposition--Because of His Ministry in His Humiliation:36 The reason that Christ (in his exaltation) has become greater than the angels is because God did not subject the world to come to the rule of angels but to Jesus, the Son of Man, who was appropriate in his humiliation below the angels for a time to die for all men, and then was exalted over all things 2:5-18
1) Humiliation and Glory of the Son:37 God did not subject the world to come to the rule of angels but to Jesus, the Son of Man, who was humiliated by being made for a time lower than the angels and tasting of death for all men, but was thus exalted as ruler over all things 2:5-9
b) Rule by the Son of Man: Although the Son of Man (Jesus) was humiliated by being temporarily lower than the angels and tasting death for everyone, God exalted him as ruler over all things 2:6-9
(1) Humiliation:40 One wonders why God remembers man or is concerned about the Son of Man (Messiah) since God made him for a little while lower than the angels 2:6-7a
(2) Exaltation: God exalted (the Son of Man--Messiah) by crowning him with glory and honor, appointing Him over the work's of God's hands, and putting all things in subjection under his feet 2:7b-8
(3) Human Experience: Although all things are truly subject to Messiah, believers do not presently see this reality, but they do see Jesus who was humiliated that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone41 and who was crowned with glory and honor 2:9
2) The Identification of the Son with the Human Family Is Appropriate: Jesus is not ashamed to call those whom He consecrates his brethren because He shared their humanity in order that he might deliver them from death by becoming a merciful and faithful high priest who made propitiation for the sins of his people by suffering the test of death so that he might help those who are tested 2:10-18
a) Statement of Solidarity: As the One whom God made perfect through salvific suffering, Jesus does not blush to call those whom he consecrates his brothers as from the same Father 2:10-11
(1) Perfection through Suffering: It was appropriate that God, for whom and through whom everything exists,42 should make perfect43 through suffering the Champion44 who secured the salvation of the many sons being brought to glory45 2:10
(2) All of One Origin--Brothers: The one who consecrates46 human beings and those whom He consecrates are all of one origin (Father),47 therefore, Jesus does not blush to call those whom he consecrates his brothers 2:11
b) Illustrations of Solidarity: The writer of Hebrews proclaims Jesus’ solidarity with men through the images of Davidite and Prophet in that men are his brethren and children 2:12-13
(1) The Davidite to His Brethren: As the Suffering Davidite who has been delivered by the Lord (Psalm 22:22) Jesus promises to praise the Lord to His brethren48 2:12
(2) The Prophet and His Children: As the Lord's prophet (Isa.8:17-18) Jesus proclaims His trust in the Lord along with the children whom God has given to Him49 2:13
c) Implications of Solidarity: Jesus shared the humanity of his brethren in order that He might deliver them from death by becoming a merciful and faithful high priest who made propitiation for the sins of his people by suffering the test of death so that he might help those who are tested 2:14-18
(1) Shared Humanity for Deliverance: Just as children share a mortal human nature, Jesus shared in the humanity of his brethren (unlike angels) in order that He might break the power of the devil who holds death50 and liberate those who were held in slavery all their lives by their fear of death 2:14-16
(2) A Transitionary Conclusion--A Tested High Priest:51 It was essential for Christ to be made like His brethren in every respect in order that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest to make propitiation (satisfaction) with regard to the sins of the people suffering the test of death in order that He might help those who are being tested52 2:17-18
2. Christ Is Greater Than the Servant--Moses:53 The writer exhorts the readers to consider Jesus as more glorious than Moses because He is God’s Son who is over the readers, therefore, they are not to become rebellious in their unbelief as Israel was under Moses, but to be diligent to enter into God’s sabbath rest through faith in Jesus understanding that Jesus, their high priest, can sympathize with their weakness and give them mercy and grace to help them in their time of need 3:1--4:16
a. Exposition54--Christ is a Faithful Ruler Over Moses: The author exhorts those who are holy and partakers of a heavenly calling to consider Jesus, the Apostle and High Priest of their confession as One who was faithful to God as Moses was, and yet more glorious than Moses because he is the Son over God’s house (tabernacle) which is the readers if they continue in their confidence and hope until the end 3:1-6
1) Introduction of the Comparison Between Moses and Jesus: The author exhorts those who are holy and partakers of a heavenly calling to consider Jesus, the Apostle and High Priest of their confession as One who was faithful to God as Moses was in all of God’s house 3:1-2
a) Consider Jesus--Apostle and High Priest: The author exhorts those who are holy brethren and partakers of a heavenly calling to consider Jesus--the Apostle and High Priest55 of whom their confession speaks 3:1
b) Faithful to God as Was Moses: The author exhorts his readers to consider that Jesus was faithful to God who appointed Him as Moses also was in all of God’s house56 3:2
2) Assertion and Explanation of Jesus’ Superiority to Moses: The reason the brethren should consider Jesus is because He has been counted worthy of more glory than Moses who was a faithful servant in the house while was the Son over God’s house 3:3-6a
a) Assertion of Jesus’ Superiority: The reason the brethren should consider Jesus is because He has been counted worthy of more glory than Moses just as the builder of the house has more honor than the house, or God has more honor than the universe He created57 3:3-4
3) Relevance of Jesus’ Superiority to Moses for the Congregation: The relevance of Jesus’ superiority to Moses for the congregation is that they are the house60 which He is over if they continue in their confidence and hope until the end61 3:6b
b. Warning/Exhortation Based Upon Israel’s Rebellious Response to God Under Moses--Be Faithful:62 Through the inspired text of Psalm 95 the writer warns the readers against a rebellious unbelief towards God lest they be like rebellious Israel who died without entering into their eschatological rest, and encourages them, in view of the continuing possibility to enter into God’s sabbath rest, to be diligent to enter into it by faith because the word of God will expose their deep (rebellious) motives 3:7--4:13
1) Israel’s Rebellious Unbelief Under Moses: Through the inspired text of Psalm 95 the writer warns the congregation against a rebellious unbelief towards God and exhorts them to encourage each other lest they be like rebellious Israel in Numbers 14 who died without entering into their eschatological rest 3:7-19
a) The Primary Text--Psalm 95:63 Introducing Psalm 95 as that which the Holy Spirit says, the Psalmist warns the congregation against unbelief such as that which prevented their fathers in the wilderness from entering the rest 3:7-11
(1) Introduction:64 The author introduces his text as that which the Holy Spirit says 3:7a
(2) Warning Against Unbelief:65 The psalmist warns the congregation against unbelief such as that which prevented their fathers in the wilderness from entering the rest 3:7b-11
b) An Application and Warning from the Psalm: The writer warns his readers as brothers to take care that they do not have an evil, unbelieving heart, and exhorts them to encourage each other so that they do not become hardened and fall away from the Lord noting that redeemed Israel provoked the Lord with an unbelieving heart and died in the wilderness rather than entering the land 3:12-19
(2) Exhortation to Encourage: the author exhorts them to encourage each other69 ( ἐαυτούς ) in the present time so that they will not be hardened noting that they have become partakers (partners, μέτοχοι ) of Christ if70 they (we) hold fast until the end71 3:13-15
(3) Israel's Evil:72 The writer clarifies that those who provoked the Lord were all who came out of Egypt led by Moses who sinned against Him, whose bodies fell for forty years in the wilderness, and who did not enter the land because of unbelief73 3:16-19
2) Exhortation:74 The writer encourages his readers in view of the continuing possibility to enter into God’s sabbath rest to be diligent to enter into it by faith rather than following Israel’s disobedience because the word of God will expose their deep (rebellious) motives 4:1-13
a) Enter God’s Rest:75 The writer encourages his readers that it is still possible to enter God’s sabbath rest, and that they should be diligent to enter into it by faith rather than following Israel’s example of disobedience 4:1-11
(1) Entering the Rest is Still Possible: In view of Israel's unbelief and her inability to enter into God's rest the writer concludes that they (we) should all fear lest any of them (you) should seem (suppose) to have come short of the promise (to have missed it) because they like Israel had good news76 preached to them but it did not profit Israel because it was not united by faith, but those who have believed77 enter78 into the rest which began after God completed His work of creation 4:1-5
(2) Exhortation to Pursue the Future Rest: The author affirms to his readers that David in Psalm 95 supports the contention that there is still a sabbath rest from one's work to enter into because it was not fulfilled when Joshua entered the land with Israel, thus, they should be diligent to enter that rest and not follow Israel's example of disobedience 4:6-11
b) Reason for Diligence: The reason one should be diligent to enter God’s sabbath rest through faith in Christ is because the word of God79 which pierces deeply into our innermost person is able to judge the thoughts and intentions of our hearts laying all things open80 to God (Christ?) 4:12-13
c. Conclusion/Transition--Hold Fast/High Priest:81 The writer exhorts his readers to hold fast to their confession82 with the understanding that Jesus, their high priest, can sympathize with their weakness, and to draw near to His throne of grace in order that they may receive mercy and find grace to help them in their time of need 4:14-16
1) Hold Fast to Our Confession: The writer exhorts his readers to hold fast to their (our) confession since they have Jesus, the Son of God, as a great high priest who has passed through the heavens 4:14
2) Reason To Hold Fast--Sympathetic High Priest: The writer exhorts his readers to hold fast to their confession because ( γὰρ ) their high priest is not one who cannot sympathize with their weaknesses, but is one who can sympathize in that he has been tempted in all things as they (we) are, yet without sin 4:15
3) Draw Near to the Throne of Grace: Therefore ( ου῏ν) the author exhorts his readers to draw near to the throne of grace in order that ( ι῞να) they may receive mercy and find grace to help in the time of need83 4:16
3. Exposition--Christ is Greater than the Human Priest Aaron: In the context of warning his readers to be responsible as adults and not to fall away from Jesus, the writer demonstrates that Jesus is not only qualified as a high priest, but is a greater high priest in accordance with the priesthood of Melchizedek than those of the Levitical priesthood 5:1--7:28
a. Exposition84--Christ is Qualified as One Similar to the Earthly High Priest: Christ is qualified as a high priest similar to the earthly high priest because he was one in solidarity with people, chosen by God and provided salvation for people from their sins 5:1-10
1) Man As High Priest: In the human order of high priest a man does not take the honor of the office to himself but is chosen by God from among men, and appointed as one beset with weaknesses to deal gently with the people and offer gifts and sacrifices for sins of the people and himself 5:1-4
a) Old Office--Source of Temporal Salvation: Every high priest must be taken from among men and appointed on behalf of men in things pertaining to God in order to offer gifts and sacrifices for sins 5:1
(1) A Man from Men: The reason ( γὰρ ) one may find help from Jesus as a high priest is because85 every high priest must be taken from among men and be appointed on behalf of men in things pertaining to God 5:1a
(2) Purpose: Every high priest is taken and appointed to offer gifts and sacrifices for sins86 5:1b
b) Solidarity with People: Since the high priest is beset with weaknesses, he can deal gently with the ignorant and misguided sins of the people and is obligated to offer sacrifices for the people and himself 5:2-3
(1) Beset with Weaknesses: Since the high priest is beset with weaknesses he can deal gently with the ignorant and misguided87 5:2
(2) Offers Sacrifices for Sins: Because of their mutual sin, the high priest is obligated to offer sacrifices for the sins of the people and for himself88 5:3
c) Humility--Called by God: No one takes the honor of high priest to himself, but receives it when he is called by God even as Aaron was89 5:4
2) Christ As High Priest:90 As with the human priest Christ did not glorify Himself but was called by God, was in solidarity with the people as One who prayed to God and learned obedience through suffering, and became the source of salvation for all those who obey him as a priest according to the order of Melchizedek 5:5-10
a) Humility--Called by God: As with the human high priest, Christ did not glorify Himself as high priest but was called by God in accordance with Psalm 110 where God proclaimed Him to be His chosen Son and a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek 5:5-6
(1) Did Not Glorify Himself: As with the human high priest, Christ did not glorify Himself so as to become high priest 5:5a
(2) God Chose Christ: Christ was chosen by God to be high priest in accordance with Psalms 2 & 110 where God proclaimed Him to be His Son whom He has chosen (begotten)91 and where he proclaimed him to be a priest92 forever according to the order of Melchizedek 5:5b-6
b) Solidarity with People:93 During the time of Jesus’ incarnation he earnestly prayed to God and was heard by God because of his piety and learned obedience, even though a Son of God, from the things which He suffered 5:7-8
(1) Prayed During His Earthly Life: During the time of Jesus' incarnation (His flesh) He offered up both prayers and supplications with loud crying and tears to the One able to save him from death and was heard because of his piety 5:7
(2) Learned Obedience through Suffering: Although Jesus was a Son to God, he learned obedience from the things which He suffered94 5:8
c) New Office--Source of Eternal Salvation: When Jesus became perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation for all those who obey Him as a priest which God designated according to the order of Melchizedek 5:9-10
(1) Perfect Source of Salvation: When Jesus became perfect,95 he became the source of eternal salvation to all those who obey Him 5:9
(2) Melchizedekian Order: Jesus was designated by God as a high priest according to the order of Melchizedek 5:10
b. Warning--Inability to Hear of Melchizedek Due to Immaturity: Though the writer shames his readers to assume responsibility as adults and to not fall away from Christ, he urges them to press on to maturity (and is confident that they will) through holding fast to the certain hope of salvation through Jesus as they look toward their reward from God who is faithful to His promise 5:11--6:20
1) Exhortation--The Peril of Spiritual Immaturity:96 Although the writer shames his readers to assume responsibility as mature adults to leave the essentials about Christ standing and to press on to maturity knowing that it is impossible for them to repent once that have fallen away from Christ and that they will experience severe consequences for their rebellion, he is convinced of better things from them as they look toward their reward for their diligent work which they should continue 5:11--6:12
a) Shaming to Assume Responsibility: The writer affirms that there is much to say concerning the priesthood of Christ and it is difficult to explain because the readers have become sluggish in understanding being like children who need to have the basics given to them again rather than like the adults who understand moral righteousness 5:11-14
(1) Sluggish in Understanding: There is much to say concerning the priesthood of Christ in its totality and it is a difficult (complex) matter to explain because the readers have become sluggish in understanding 5:11
(2) A Rebuke through Irony: The reason the writer identifies the readers as being sluggish in understanding is because by this time in their Christian lives they ought to be teachers but they need again for someone to explain the elementary principles (ABCs) of the oracles of God like children who need milk rather than adults who need solid food in that they are not accustomed to moral righteousness (the word of righteousness)97--they are not trained to discern good and evil 5:12-14
b) Warning: The writer urges the readers to leave the foundational elements about Christ standing and to press on to maturity knowing that it is impossible for them to repent once that have fallen away from Christ and that they will experience severe consequences for their rebellion; nevertheless the writer is convinced of better things from them as they look toward their reward for their diligent work which they should continue 6:1-12
(1) Press On to Maturity: Therefore ( Διὸ) the author urges the readers to leave standing the ABCs about Christ98 and to press on to maturity--not laying again a soteriological foundation, not teaching again about washings, laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment99 6:1-2
(2) They Will Press On: The writer affirms that they will press on to maturity (with the discussion about Christ's Melchizedekian priesthood) if the Lord allows them to (with His blessing) 6:3
(3) The Impossibility of Repentance: The reason the writer says that they will press on to maturity if the Lord allows them to is because it is impossible100 for those who have once101 been enlightened, tasted of the heavenly gift, been made partakers of the Holy Spirit, tasted102 of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, and then who have fallen away,103 to renew them again to repentance because they again crucify to themselves the Son of God and put Him to public humiliation104 6:4-6
(4) Sever Judgment as Upon the Ground: The writer explains ( γὰρ) his warning about the impossibility of repentance through the imagery of ground which receives God's blessing of rain and then receives either blessing from God for bringing forth useful vegetation or a burning that is close to being cursed105 for yielding thorns and thistles (cf. Gen. 3:17-18) 6:7-8
(5) Convinced of Better Things: Although the writer is speaking of possible sever judgment for apostasy, he affirms that they are convinced of better things concerning them (cf. 6:1-3)--those things that accompany salvation106 6:9
(6) God Will Not Forget Their Diligent Work Which They Should Continue:107 The writer affirms--in view of the certainty that God will not forget their work and love which they have shown toward His name in having ministered and still ministering to the saints108--that he desires for each of them to show the same diligence unto the end so as to realize their future hope, not being sluggish (cf. 5:11b), but being imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises (cf. 6:13-20; 13:7) 6:10-12
2) Exposition of the Promise--A Basis for Steadfastness: Because God made a certain promise to Abraham by swearing by Himself, Abraham obtained it by patiently waiting, and believers should also hold fast to the certain hope of salvation which is placed before them in Jesus 6:13-20
a) Abraham’s Faith in the Promise: An explanation ( γὰρ ) of “those who through faith and patience inherit the promises” is found in Abraham because when God made the promise to Abraham that He would bless and multiply him, He swore by Himself109 and Abraham obtained the promise by patiently waiting110 6:13-15
b) Relevance of Abraham’s Faith for Readers:111 The relevance of Abraham’s faith is that God’s oath is even more certain than that made by men resulting in a the certainty of hope of salvation in Jesus which believers should hold fast to 6:16-20
(1) The Nature of Human Oaths: The writer explains ( γὰρ) the reliability of oaths in that men swear by someone greater than themselves,112 and the oath serves as confirmation and puts an end to all argument 6:16
(2) The Certainty of God's Oath: Because God wanted to make especially plain to the heirs of his promise the irrevocable character of his resolve, he confirmed it by means of an oath,113 so that by two irrevocable facts114 in which it is impossible for God to lie, the readers (we) who had fled (to God) for refuge might have strong incentive to hold fast to the hope which is placed in front of them 6:17-18
(3) The Certainty of the Hope of Salvation: The readers (we) have this hope which is placed in front of them as a safe and secure anchor for life which (hope)115 enters the inner sanctuary behind the curtain116 where Jesus has entered on their behalf as forerunner, having become a priest forever, just like Melchizedek117 6:19-20
c. Exposition--Order of Christ (Melchizedek) Is Greater Than Levi: The new priesthood of Christ in accordance with the order of Melchizedek is greater than the old priesthood through Levi both in its inception in Genesis 14:17-20 and in its prophetic expression through Psalm 110:4 in that Melchizedek was greater than Abraham, and Jesus as the eternal Son has brought about a new, permanent and effective priesthood able to bring men close to God 7:1-28
1) An Interpretation of Genesis 14:17-20:118 The writer of Hebrews introduces his readers to Melchizedek, the king of righteousness and peace who met Abraham, received a tenth from Abraham and blessed Abraham as his superior thereby showing that he was a superior priest than the Levitical priesthood which came from Abraham 7:1-10
a) An Introduction of Melchizedek who Blessed Abraham:119 Melchizedek--the king of righteousness and peace--met Abraham as Abraham was returning from the defeat of the kings and blessed him whereupon Abraham gave one tenth of his spoils of war to this one who was not part of the genealogical line of blessing, but like the son of God, remains a priest continuously 7:1-3
(1) The Meeting and Blessing: Melchizedek--king of Salem, priest of the Most high God, met Abraham as he was returning from the slaughter of the kings and blessed him 7:1
(2) The Tithe: Abraham gave one tenth of his spoils from war to Melchizedek120 whose name means king of righteousness and whose title (king of Salem) means king of peace and who is without a genealogical tie in Genesis,121 but being like the Son of God, he remains a priest continuously122 7:2-3
b) The Significance of Melchizedek’s Encounter with Abraham--A Superior Priesthood to Levi: The writer urges the readers to consider the greatness of Melchizedek in that he was greater than Levi because he received the tenth from Abraham without being a descendent of Abraham and without the commandment of the Law, he blessed Abraham as the one greater than Abraham, he lives on whereas the Levitical priesthood is mortal, and Levi paid tithes to Melchizedek through Abraham 7:4-10
(1) Consider His Greatness: The writer urges the readers to consider how great this man (Melchizedek) was to whom Abraham, the patriarch,123 gave a tenth of the choicest spoils 7:4
(2) Received a Tenth: Although those of the sons of Levi receive the priest's offering of a tenth in accordance with the commandment in the Law from the people (their brethren who are descended from Abraham, Melchizedek, who is not a descendent, collected a tenth from Abraham 7:5-6a
(3) Blessed Abraham: Melchizedek blessed Abraham even though he was the one with the promises in accordance with the undisputed fact that the lesser is bless ed by the greater 7:6b-7
(4) Lives On: In the case of the Levitical priests mortal men (with a series of successors) receive tithes, but in the case of Melchizedek and his priesthood he lives on124 7:8
(5) Levi Paid Melchizedek: One might also say125 that even Levi, who received the tenth, paid the tenth through Abraham, because Levi was still in the body of his ancestor when Melchizedek met Abraham 7:9-10
2) The Significance of Psalm 110:4:126 The rising of a new priesthood according to Melchizedek (Ps. 110:4) through Jesus demonstrates that the old Levitical priesthood was insufficient to bring about perfection, but that the new, permanent and effective priesthood through Christ is a better hope for drawing near to God 7:11-28
a) The Insufficiency of the Levitical Priesthood and System: The rising of a new priesthood according to Melchizedek through Jesus (of the line of Judah) demonstrates that the old Levitical priesthood was insufficient to bring about perfection, but the new priesthood brings about a better hope for drawing near to God 7:11-19
(1) The Replacement of the Levitical Priesthood by Jesus: The writer of Hebrews affirms that the rising of a priest according to the order of Melchizedek demonstrates that the Levitical priesthood was not sufficient to bring about perfection, and that Jesus has become such a replacement priesthood because he is not a priest according to Levi (being from Judah),127 but became a priest forever according to Melchizedek (Psalm 110:4) in accordance with His indestructible life128 7:11-17
(2) The New Hope with the New Priesthood: The writer explains that while there is on the one hand a replacement of a former (priestly) commandment (cf. 7:16) because of its weakness and uselessness to make anything perfect, there is a bringing in of a better hope through which they (we) draw near to God129 7:18-19
b) The Permanence and Effectiveness of the New Priesthood: Jesus is shown to be a superior priest than the Levitical priests because God made an oath to Him, he holds his priesthood permanently, he has an upright character, he has achieved a final sacrifice for sins, and he has been appointed a Son made perfect forever 7:20-28
(1) The Superiority of Priesthood Illustrated: Jesus is demonstrated to have a better priesthood than the Levitical priesthood because God has made an oath to him (Psalm 110:4) and because he holds his priesthood permanently (as one who lives forever) begin able to save those forever who draw near to God through him 7:20--25
(2) The Character, Achievement, and Status of the Son as Eternal and Final High Priest: The writer explain that it is fitting for them (we) to have such an exalted high priest with an upright character (holy, innocent, undefiled, separated from sinners, exalted above the heavens), who achieved a permanent sacrifice (when he once for all offered up Himself for sins), and who was appointed a Son made perfect forever 7:26-28
B. Christ’s Ministry Is Greater Than the Ministry of the Old Covenant--Aaron:130 The writer demonstrates Christ’s singular qualification as high priest in the heavenly sanctuary because He is a ministering priest and mediator of a better covenant through His death and exaltation being the source of eternal salvation for those who obey him thereby superseding the inadequate Mosaic provisions for sin 8:1--10:18
1. Christ as Ministering Priest and Mediator of a Better Covenant--Introduced:131 Christ is a superior high priest to the earthly priests because he has taken his seat of authority in heaven, is a ministering priest of the heavenly sanctuary, and is the mediator of a new and better covenant which will unite God and man and cause the obsolete and dated (Mosaic) covenant to disappear * 8:1-13*
a. Christ the Ministering Priest: Unlike earthly priests who offer gifts and sacrifices in a sanctuary which is a shadow of the heavenly sanctuary, the writer affirms that Christ is a superior high priest in that He has taken his seat of authority in heaven and is a ministering priest of the heavenly sanctuary in the true tabernacle which the Lord pitched 8:1-5
1) A New Ministry by the King-Priest in Heaven:132 The crowning affirmation of what the writer (we) has been saying (about the superiority Christ’s Priesthood) is that they have a high priest who has taken his seat of authority133 in heaven Who is the ministering priest of the sanctuary of the true tabernacle which the Lord pitched, not man 8:1-2
2) A Ministry In Opposition to the Old: Since a high priest is appointed to offer both gifts and sacrifices, Christ too had to necessarily have something to offer as high priest, but he is not priest on earth since earthly priests offer gifts prescribed by the Law in a sanctuary which Moses made to the pattern shown him as a suggestion of the heavenly sanctuary 8:3-5
a) The Necessity to Offer Something: The writer affirms that since every high priest is appointed to offer both gifts and sacrifices, therefore, Christ too had to necessarily have something to offer134 8:3
b) Not an Earthly Ministry: If Christ were on earth he would not be a priest since earthly priests offer gifts prescribed by the law serving in a sanctuary that is a shadowy suggestion135 of the heavenly sanctuary136 even as Moses made it in accordance to the pattern shown to him on the mountain137 8:4-5
b. Christ the Mediator of the New Covenant: The ministry which Jesus has attained is superior to that of the earthly priests because he is the mediator of a superior covenant which is drawn up on better promises that were not contingent upon Israel’s obedience, but His word to make the Law internal, to be in close relationship with them, that all will know Him as gracious causing the obsolete and dated (Mosaic) covenant to disappear 8:6-13
1) The New Ministry Is Associated with a better Covenant: The ministry which Jesus has attained is superior to that of the earthly priests in the same way as the covenant which he is the mediator is superior to the old one (Mosaic) being drawn up on the basis of better promises 8:6
2) The Better Covenant in Opposition to the Old:138 The writer affirms that the first covenant was not found faultless because God said He would establish a new covenant with them unlike the one where they were unfaithful and He turned away, but one where He will make the Law internal, where they will be in close relationship with Him, and where all will know him as a gracious God causing the obsolete and dated one to disappear 8:7-13
a) First Covenant Not Faultless: The writer affirms that if the first covenant had not been irreproachable, there would have been no occasion sought for a second 8:7
b) Reason God Found Fault: God finds fault with the first covenant when he says to Israel that he will establish a new covenant with them unlike the one where they were unfaithful and He turned away from them, but one where He will put His laws in their heart and mind, where they will be in close relationship with Him, and where all will know the Lord who is gracious 8:8-12
(1) Establish a New Covenant: God finds fault with the first covenant when he says to Israel that the time is coming when he will establish a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah 8:8
(2) Israel Was Unfaithful and God Turned Away: God finds fault with the first covenant when he says to Israel that the new covenant will not be like the covenant He made with their forefathers when He led them by the hand out of Egypt because they did not remain faithful to His covenant and He turned away from them 8:9
(3) Laws in Their Hearts and Minds: God finds fault with the first covenant when he says to Israel that this new covenant which he will make with them after that time is one where He will put His laws in their minds and inscribe them on their hearts, where he will be their God and they will be His people 8:10
(4) All Will Know the Lord Who Is Gracious: God finds fault with the first covenant when he says to Israel that in this new covenant no one will any longer teach his fellow-citizen or his brother to "know the Lord" because they will all know him because He will be gracious toward their iniquities and will never again remember their sins 8:11-12
c) Obsolete and Will Disappear: When the Lord calls this covenant “new” he treated the first covenant as obsolete, meaning that it will soon disappear as obsolete and outdated139 8:13
2. Christ as Ministering Priest and Mediator of a Better Covenant--Developed: While the earlier covenant was shown to be unable to bring decisive purgation through its repeated cultic worship, the New Covenant, though ratified in kind with the Old Covenant, was heightened in that Christ offered Himself in the heavenly sanctuary as the definitive sacrifice on behalf of us to bring about absolute purgation so that we may worship God and He may return as Savior rather than eschatological judge for those who eagerly wait for him 9:1-28
a. Cultic Worship--Developed: The first covenant had an earthly sanctuary with a Holy place where the priests ministered, and a Most Holy Place where the High Priest ministered but through this the Holy Spirit was showing that the way into the real sanctuary had not yet been disclosed illustrating that the present gifts and sacrifices were unable to bring decisive purgation to the worshiper with respect to his conscience but only continued cultic service 9:1-10
1) Introductory Statement: The first covenant had regulations for cultic worship and an earthly sanctuary140 9:1
2) Arrangement of the Tabernacle: In the front compartment of the tabernacle, called the Holy Place, were the lampstand and the table with the consecrated bread and in the back compartment of the tabernacle, called the Most Holy Place, were the golden alter of incense, the gold-covered ark of the covenant in which were the gold jar containing the manna, Aaron’s rod that had blossomed and the stone tablets of the covenant, with the cherubim of the Glory overshadowing the place of atonement, concerning which things the writer is not able to speak in detail 9:2-5
b) Back Compartment: In the back compartment of the tabernacle behind the second curtain, called the Most Holy Place
( ῞Αγια ῾Αγὶων ), were the golden altar of incense,143 the gold-covered ark of the covenant144 in which were the gold jar containing the manna, Aaron’s rod that had blossomed, and the stone tablets of the covenant,145 with cherubim of the Glory overshadowing the place of atonement146 9:3-5a
c) Transition:147 The writer is not able to speak in detail about these things 9:5b
3) Regulations for Cultic Worship: When the tabernacle was arranged as was described above, and the priests and High Priest ministered the Holy Spirit was showing that the way into the real sanctuary had not yet been disclosed illustrating that the present gifts and sacrifices were unable to bring decisive purgation to the worshiper with respect to his conscience but only continued cultic service 9:6-10
a) Functions of the Priest and High Priest: When the tabernacle was arranged as it was described above, the priests continually entered the front compartment performing their ritual functions, but the High Priest entered the rear compartment only once a year with blood for himself and the sins of the people which were committed in ignorance 9:6-7
(1) The Priests: When the tabernacle was arranged as it was described above, then the priests continually entered the front compartment as they performed their ritual functions148 9:6
(2) The High Priest: Only the High Priest entered the rear compartment and that was only once a year, and never without blood which he offered first for himself and also for the sins the people had committed in ignorance149 9:7
b) Undisclosed Way, Indecisive Purgation: Through the ministry of the priests and the High Priest the Holy Spirit was showing that the way into the real sanctuary had not yet been disclosed illustrating that the present gifts and sacrifices were unable to bring decisive purgation to the worshiper with respect to his conscience but only continued cultic service 9:8-10
(1) Way in to the Real Sanctuary--Not Disclosed: The Holy Spirit was showing through the ministry of the priests and High Priest that the way into the real sanctuary had not yet been disclosed while the first compartment had cultic status 9:8
(2) Present Gifts and Sacrifices Do not Purge: This desert sanctuary is an illustration demonstrating that the present gifts and sacrifices being offered are unable to bring decisive purgation to the worshiper with respect to his conscience, but only continued cultic service (food and drink, various ceremonial washings, regulations pertaining to the human order) imposed until the time of correction 9:9
b. New Covenant--Developed: Although the New Covenant was ratified in kind with the pattern of the Old Covenant, the degree of ratification was heightened in that Christ offered Himself in the heavenly sanctuary as the definitive sacrifice on behalf of us to bring about absolute purgation so that we may worship God and he may return as Savior rather than eschatological judge for those who eagerly wait for him 9:11-28
1) The Character of the New Cultus: In contrast to the arrangements under the old cultus Christ appeared as high priest of eschatological redemption entering into the most holy place of the heavenly sanctuary not with the blood of goats and bulls which brought fleshly purgation, but with His own blood which brought a cleansing of the conscience so that we may worship God 9:11-14
a) Secures Eschatological Redemption: In contrast to the arrangements under the old cultus ( δὲ ) Christ appeared as high priest of eschatological redemption (the good things that have now come) entering into the most holy place of the heavenly sanctuary bringing eternal redemption by means of his own blood (rather than that of the old cultus [goats and calves]) 9:11-12
b) Provision of a Purged Conscience: If the blood of the old cultus (goats and bulls) provided a fleshly purgation, the blood of Christ purges the conscience from sins that lead to death so that we may worship God 9:13-14
(1) Purging of the Flesh: The blood of goats and bulls, and the sprinkled ashes of a heifer those who have been ceremonially defiled to the extent of the purging of the flesh150 9:13
(2) Purging of the Conscience: The blood of Christ151 purges our conscience152 from the acts that lead to death, so that we may worship the living God seeing that Christ offered Himself through the eternal Spirit153 as an unblemished sacrifice to God 9:14
2) The Basis of Christ’s High Priestly Achievement: Because of Christ’s high priestly work whereby he entered heaven as the definitive sacrifice for our sins He ratified the New covenant in order that those who are called might not experience Him as eschatological judge, but Savior who brings the promised eternal inheritance 9:15-28
a) Christ vs. Old Cultus: Because of Christ’s high priestly work through His death (which was necessary to ratify the New Covenant as with the Mosaic Covenant) He is mediator of a New Covenant in order that those who are called might receive the promised eternal inheritance 9:15-22
(1) Conclusion--Mediator of a New Covenant: Because of Christ's high priestly work through His death He is the mediator of a New Covenant in order that those who are called might receive the promised eternal inheritance154 9:15
(2) Parenthetic Explanation of the Necessity of Christ's Death--Basic Principle: The author explains (γὰρ) that it was necessary for Christ to die because where there is a covenant, it is necessary for the death of one who ratifies it to be brought forward155 because a covenant is made legally secure on the basis of the sacrificial victims (sacrifices), and is never valid while the ratifier lives156 9:16-17
(3) Principle Operative in Former Covenant: The writer affirms that even the former covenant (Mosaic) was confirmed by blood (death) when Moses157 took the blood of calves together with water, crimson wool and sprigs of hyssop and sprinkled the book of the Law (covenant), all the people, the tabernacle, and all the cultic vessels with blood because everything is purged with blood according to the Law and without the application of blood there is no definitive purgation 9:18-22
b) Christ’s Heavenly Priestly Ministry: Just as the earthly suggestions required purgation, so did the heavenly things, but through a greater sacrifice of Christ Himself who entered heaven with His definitive sacrifice with the result that he will not come as eschatological Judge but Savior for those who eagerly wait for Him 9:23-28
(1) A Better Sacrifice for Heavenly Things: In view of the need for definitive purgation through the application of blood it was necessary, therefore, for the earthly suggestions of the heavenly things to be purged by these things (the blood of calves and goats) but the heavenly things required better sacrifices158 9:23
(2) Christ Entered Heaven with His Definitive Sacrifice: The writer explains the heavenly things and Christ's better sacrifice as Christ entering the Sanctuary of heaven itself to appear in the presence of God on our behalf with an offering which was not for Himself as is repeatedly done by the high priest, but with His once for all sacrifice at the climax of the ages 9:24-26
(3) Not Eschatological Judge but Savior: Just as it is reserved for men to die once and then to experience judgment, so also will Christ appear a second time, after having been offered once to bear the sin of many,159 not as judge (for sin) but to bring [the consummation of] salvation to those who are eagerly waiting for Him160 9:27-28
3. The Subjective Benefits of Christ’s Sacrifice--Its efficacy for Christians: The writer explains that the benefits of Christ’s sacrifice are that it supersedes the inadequate Mosaic Provisions for sin because He yielded His body in place of sacrifices, His sacrifice was definitive, and because the New Covenant (inaugurated through Jesus’ sacrifice) rendered a sacrifice for sin no longer necessary since the Lord no longer deals with His people according to their sins and transgressions 10:1-18
a. Mosaic Provisions for Repeated Sacrifices Are Inadequate: The writer explains that the Mosaic provisions for repeated sacrifices are inadequate because they are only a foreshadowing of the good things to come, they are a continual reminder of sins, and they cannot take away sins 10:1-4
1) Law Cannot Decisively Purge: The writer explains that the Law can never decisively purge those who draw near by repeated sacrifices since it posses only a foreshadowing of the good things which are to come and is not the actual form of those realities161 10:1
2) Law is a Reminder of Sins: The writer explains that since the legal sacrifices did not cease to be offered with the sense that the worshipers were once cleansed having no consciousness of sins,162 these sacrifices are really a reminder of sins year after year163 10:2-3
3) Cultic Sacrifices Cannot Take Away Sins: The writer explains that the sacrifices do not provide a decisive purgation is because ( γὰρ ) it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins 10:4
b. Repeated Sacrifices Have Been Superseded by the One Sacrifice of Christ: The writer explains that the repeated sacrifices have been superseded by the one sacrifice of Christ in that He yielded His body in place of sacrifices which resulted in a doing away with Mosaic sacrificial system and a consecration of believers 10:5-10
1) Yields His Body in Place of Sacrifices: Speaking as the Davidite Jesus fulfills David’s words when He comes into the world by proclaiming from Psalm 40 that God preferred His body to sacrifice and that He yielded His life to do the will of the Lord 10:5-7
a) Jesus Speaks As the Davidite: The writer identifies Jesus as the Davidite who fulfills David’s words when He comes into the world (incarnation)164 and speaks Psalm 40:6-8 10:5a
b) God Preferred His Body to Sacrifice: Jesus as the Davidite proclaims that God preferred his body to sacrifice (offering, whole burnt offerings, sin offerings) 10:5b-6
c) Jesus as the Davidite yields his life to do the will of the Lord 10:7
(1) Dedicates His Body: Jesus dedicates His body to Lord
(2) Direction from the Scroll: Jesus receives direction from the volume of the book
(3) Jesus desires to do the will ( θέλημά ) of the Lord
2) Jesus’ Sacrifice Does Away with Mosaic Sacrifices: The writer explains that through Jesus’ identification with the words of Psalm 40 that the Mosaic sacrificial order was done away with in order to confirm (judicially) the validity of His bodily sacrifice165 10:8-9
3) Jesus’ Sacrifice Consecrates: By Christ doing the will of God (“that will, θελήματι”) the writer affirms that they have been consecrated (sanctified, ἡγισμὲνοι ) through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all 10:10
c. Levitical Priests Have Been Superseded by the One Priest Enthroned at God’s Right Hand: The writer explains that the Levitical priests who continue in their ineffective ministry are superseded by Jesus who offered a definitive sacrifice, is enthroned at God’s right hand, and decisively purged those who are being consecrated 10:11-14
1) Continual ineffective Ministry of Levitical Priests: Every Priest continually performs his priestly service and offerings of sacrifices which can never remove sin utterly 10:11
2) Effective Ministry of Jesus: In contrast to the Levitical priests, Jesus, as priest, offered for all time once sacrifice for sins, sat down166 at God’s right hand waiting until his enemies are forced to submit (made his footstool),167 and decisively purged forever those who are being consecrated 10:12-14
d. New Covenant Provisions Render a Sacrifice for Sins No Longer Necessary: The writer confirms that the Holy Spirit testifies that the New covenant provisions render a sacrifice for sins no longer necessary because part of the new covenant is that the Lord will no longer deal with His people according to their sins and transgressions 10:15-18
1) Holy Spirit Testifies: The writer notes that the Holy Spirit testifies168 concerning the decisive purging through Jeremiah 31:33-34 10:15
2) New Covenant Provisions: The Holy Spirit testifies through Jeremiah 21:33-34 that the Lord will make a new covenant with His people after that time wherein He will internalize His Law and not deal with them (remember) any longer according to their sins and transgressions169 10:16-17
3) The writer explains that were there is a decisive putting away of sins and transgressions (“these”) that an offering for sin is no longer necessary170 10:18
III. EXHORTATIONS IN VIEW OF THE SUPERIORITY OF CHRIST AND HIS MINISTRY TO THE OLD COVENANT:171 In view of the superiority of Christ and His ministry when compared to that of the Old Covenant, the writer urges his readers not to persist in sin but to persevere in faithfulness to God by loving one another, being personally pure, obeying their leaders and leaving Judaism, because the past shows that God honors such faithfulness and will honor them when He returns to fulfill His promises 10:19--13:21
A. Warning--Exhortation to Endure:172 In view of their privileged status with God and their earlier faithfulness under persecution, the writer exhorts his readers not to persist in sin so that they must experience the avenging hand of God, but to persevere in faithfulness to God so that they might receive their promised reward of eschatological salvation rather than rejection when the Lord returns 10:19-39
1. A Reminder of Privileged Status and Its Implications for Practice: The privileged status of believers to have free access to the heavenly sanctuary and to have Christ as the great priest in charge of their church leads to the implications that they should draw near to God, hold fast to their hope of future salvation and not forsake one another, but encourage one another to love and good works, especially as they see the approaching of the time when the Lord will return in salvation and judgment (the Day of the Lord) 10:19-25
a. Basis for the Appeal: The writer is about to make an appeal to the readers based upon two conclusions from the above discussion: (1) believers have free access to the Heavenly Sanctuary through Christ’s death, and (2) Jesus is High Priest in charge of God’s household 10:19-21
1) Authorization for Free Access to the Heavenly Sanctuary: The writer affirms as a conclusion to the above discussion that the brethren have authorization for free access to the heavenly sanctuary through a way that is new and leads to life which Jesus made available to us by means of His death 10:19-20
2) Great Priest in Charge of God’s Household: The writer affirms that believers have a great high priest in charge of God’s household (the Church)173 10:21
b. The Appeal:174 In view of the brethren’s access to the heavenly sanctuary and Jesus as the great priest in charge of the church the writer exhorts the community to draw near to God, hold fast to their hope of eschatological salvation and to keep on caring for one another by stimulating love and good works 10:22-24
1) Draw Near:175 The writer exhorts the community (let us) to draw near to God with a sincere heart,176 in fullness of faith, and seeing that they have been completely cleansed (internally and externally)177 10:22
2) Hold Fast: The writer exhorts the community (let us) to hold fast the hope (of eschatological salvation) without wavering because the One who gave the promise is faithful 10:23
3) Keep on Caring: The writer exhorts the community (let us) to keep on caring for one another so as to stimulate love and good works178 10:24
c. Transitional Warning: The writer warns the community against discontinuing their meeting together (as some are regularly doing), but to encourage one another especially as they see the approaching of the time when the Lord will return in salvation and judgment (the Day of the Lord) 10:25
2. A Severe Warning Concerning Apostasy and Its Divine Punishment:179 The writer warns his readers that if they deliberately persist in sin against the Lord by violating Christ that He, as the avenging God, will bring severe punishment upon them as His people 10:26-31
a. Deliberate Persistence in Sin Yields Judgment: The writer explains that he desire for them to heed his admonitions because ( γὰρ ) if they (we) deliberately persist180 in sin after their (we) having received the full knowledge of the truth (of salvation), then there is no longer any sacrifice for sins,181 but only an inevitable terrifying expectation of judgment and of raging fire ready to consume God’s adversaries182 10:26-27
b. Severe Punishment for Violating Christ: The writer notes that while those who violated the law of Moses died, those who Violate Christ will deserve a severer punishment 10:28-29
2) Violation of Christ Deserves Severer Punishment: The writer notes (through a question) that the one who rejects Christ and His provision for him (trampled upon the Son of God,185 treated as defiled the blood of the covenant by which he was consecrated,186 and insulted the Spirit of grace187) will deserve a severer punishment188 10:29
c. The Lord Will Bring Vengeance upon His People:189 The writer explains that the Lord will bring a severe judgment upon those who reject Christ and His provisions for them because He is a God of vengeance who will repay evil--even of His people, and it is terrifying to fall into the hands of the living God 10:30-31
3. Pastoral Encouragement and an Eschatological Appeal: Reminding the readers of their earlier faithfulness under persecution, the writer urges them not to throw away their faithfulness but to endure so that they might receive the promise of eschatological salvation when the Lord returns rather than rejection 10:32-35
a. Pastoral Encouragement:190 The writer reminds his readers of their earlier days when they endured sufferings with cheerfulness knowing that they had better and permanent rewards and thus urges them not to throw away their boldness since it has great reward 10:32-35
1) Situation: The writer urges his readers to remember those earlier days (of their faith) after they received the light191 when they endured a hard contest192 with sufferings--sometimes publicly exposed to ridicule by insults and persecutions and showing solidarity with those who were treated in this way 10:32-33
2) Call to Rejoice: The writer explains to his readers what he means by their showing solidarity with those who were treated in this way by reminding them of how they shared the sufferings of those in prison and cheerfully accepted the seizure of their property 10:34a
3) Reason (Promise of Reward): The reason the readers cheerfully accepted the seizure of their property was because they knew that they themselves had better and permanent possessions, therefore, they should not throw away their boldness193 seeing that it has a great reward 10:34b-35
b. Eschatological Appeal:194 The writer exhorts his readers to endurance that they may receive the promise of eschatological salvation noting that they Lord is coming and they should live by faithfulness rather than drawing back and being rejected, whereupon, the writer expresses his confidence that His readers are those who are faithful 10:36-39
1) An Exhortation to Endurance: The author exhorts the readers that they need endurance ( ὑπομονή ) so that after they have done the will of God they may receive the promise (of eschatological salvation)195 10:36
2) The Lord is Coming; Live by Faithfulness: The writer affirms that the reason they must endure is because ( γὰρ ) the Coming One will come in a little while196 and he will not delay, but in the mean time His righteous one will live by faithfulness197 and if he draws back the Lord Himself will reject him 10:37-38
3) Not Those Who Draw Back, But Are Faithful: The write assures his readers that they (we) are not of those who draw back leading to destruction, but of those who are faithful, culminating in the acquisition of life 10:39
B. Means of Endurance--Faith:198 Because of the value of faith the writer affirms that men in the past received attestation from God in Scripture and thus urges his readers to recognize that this standard of persevering faith is worthy of emulation based upon hope in God’s promise 11:1-40
1. A Recommendation of Faith: Because faith represents the objective reality of blessings for which we hope and the demonstration of events as yet unseen, men of the past received attestation from God; and this faith is demonstrated in our understanding of the unseen creative activity of God behind the visible universe 11:1-2
a. The Recommendation of Faith:199 Faith is (represents) the assurance (objective reality) of things [blessings] for which we hope, and the conviction (demonstration) of things (events) as yet unseen 11:1
b. The Effect of Faith: Because ( γὰρ ) of this character of faith (above) men of the past ( πρεσβύτεροι ) received attestation (approval, ἐμαρτυρήθησαν ) from God 11:2
c. Creation:200 The writer affirms that by faith we understand201 that the universe was ordered by the word (ῥήματι) of God202 so that what is seen was not brought into being from anything observable 11:3
2. The Example of Faithfulness in Those Who Have Preceded Them: The writer urges his readers to recognize in those who acted upon God’s promises, even though fulfillment was not in sight, a standard of persevering faith worthy of emulation based upon hope in God’s promise 11:4-40
a. Events and Personages Drawn from Scripture in Chronological Order from Genesis 1--Joshua 6:203 11:3-31
1) Triumphs of Perseverance in the Antediluvian Era:204 The writer affirms the triumphs of perseverance in faith in Abel’s sacrifice, Enoch’s translation, and Noah’s building of the ark all of which brought pleasure to God and attestation by God205 11:4-7
a) Abel:206 The writer affirms that by faith Abel offered a more acceptable sacrifice to God than Cain by which he received attestation by God as a righteous person God Himself approving of his gifts; and by faith he is still speaking, although he died207 11:4
b) Enoch:208 The writer affirms that by faith Enoch was approved by God as pleasing and was translated emphasizing that faith is necessary to please God 11:5-6
(1) Translated: The writer affirms that by faith Enoch was translated (taken away, μετέθηκεν) by God so that he did not experience death 11:5a
(2) Approved by God: The writer affirms that before Enoch's translation he had been approved ( μεμαρτύρηται ) as one who had been pleasing (εὑαρεστηκέναι)209 to God 11:5a
(3) Faith is Necessary to Please God: The writer explains that without faith it is impossible to begin to please God because ( γὰρ ) it is necessary ( δεῖ ) for the one approaching God to believe that He exists210 and that He becomes a rewarder of those who seek Him out211 11:6
c) Noah:212 The writer affirms that by faith Noah constructed an Ark, condemned humanity, and became an heir of the righteousness according to faith 11:7
(1) Constructed an Ark: The writer affirms that by faith Noah paid attention to God's instruction about things as yet unseen213 and constructed an ark for the safety of his household 11:7a
(2) Condemned Humanity:214 The affirms that by faith Noah condemned humanity 11:7b
(3) Became and Heir of Righteousness:215 The writer affirms that Noah became an heir of the righteousness according to faith 11:7c
2) The Triumphs of Perseverance in the Patriarchal Era:216 Faith was demonstrated in God’s promise by the self-sacrificing acts of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph in hopes of God’s future promises 11:8-22
a) Abraham and God’s Promise Considered:217 Faith was demonstrated in God’s promise by Abraham obeying God’s call and migrating to the land of promise, Sarah believing God and conceiving Isaac, all dying in the land without receiving the fulfillment of the promises, and Abraham’s offering of Isaac even though the promise said that his descendants would come through Isaac 11:8-19
(1) Abram's Call and Migration: When Abraham was called it was by faith that he obeyed by going out, not knowing where he was going, to a place which he was to receive for an inheritance, living in tents in the land of promise with Isaac and Jacob, fellow heirs of the promise, looking for a city which has foundations,218 whose architect and builder is God 11:8-10
(2) The Conception of Isaac:219 When Sarah herself received ability to conceive so late in life it was by faith in the Lord220 who had promised and fulfilled His promise to make many descendants from Abraham221 who was as good as dead222 11:11-12
(3) The Deferment of the Fulfillment of the Promise:223 All these died in faith without receiving the fulfillment of the promises, but welcoming them from a distance, they confessed that they were strangers and exiles on the earth seeking a country of their own--not their birth country, but a better, heavenly one; therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God for He has prepared a city for them 11:13-16
(4) The Command to Sacrifice Isaac: By faith Abraham, who had received the promises that his descendants would come through Isaac, offered up Isaac, his only begotten son, when he was tested because he considered God able to raise him from the dead; whereupon he received Isaac back as a type [of what was to occur]224 11:17-19
b) Isaac and God’s Promise:225 By faith Isaac blessed Isaac and Esau even with respect to their future 11:20
d) Joseph and God’s Promise:228 By faith Joseph, while coming to the end of his life made mention of the departure of the Israelites from Egypt and gave instruction concerning the burial of his bones 11:22
3) The Triumphs of Perseverance in the Mosaic Era:229 By faith Moses endured persecution during his youth, he led the people in their exodus from Egypt, and those who followed him later took the city of Jericho whereupon Rahab was saved because she had welcomed the Israelite spies in peace 11:23-31
a) Portrait of a Young Prophet: By faith Moses endured persecution at his birth, in his identification with Israel, and in his exile from Egypt because he was looking toward his reward, and keeping the one who is invisible before his eyes 11:23-27
(1) Hidden: By faith Moses was hidden by his parents for three months when he was born because they saw he was a beautiful young child and because they were not afraid of the king's edict 11:23
(2) Reproach of Christ: By Faith Moses disdained to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter having chosen to endure hardship with the people of God rather than to enjoy the temporary pleasure of sin because he regarded abuse incurred for the sake of the Christ greater wealth than the treasures of Egypt because he was looking ahead to the reward 11:24-26
(3) Left Egypt: By faith Moses left Egypt not fearing the kings rage because he kept the one who is invisible continually before his eyes 11:27
b) The Prelude to the Exodus:230 By faith Moses kept the Passover so that they did not lose their first born and the people crossed the Red Sea as if on dry land while the Egyptians were drowned 11:28-31
(1) Kept the Passover: By faith Moses kept the Passover and the spreading of the blood, so that the destroying angel might not touch their firstborn 11:28
(2) Crossed the Red Sea: By faith the people crossed the Red Sea as if on dry land; but when the Egyptians attempted to do so, they were drowned 11:29
c) The Taking of Jericho:231 By faith the walls of Jericho fell when they encircled them for seven days, and Rahab the prostitute did not perish with the unbeliever because she had welcomed the spies 11:30-31
(1) Taking of Jericho:232 By faith the walls of Jericho fell when they had been encircled for seven days 11:30
(2) Rahab Did Not Perish: By faith Rahab the prostitute did not perish with the unbelievers, because she had welcomed the spies 11:31
b. The Triumphs of Perseverance in Subsequent Eras: In view of the writer’s limited time and space he transitions from his exemplary list to a rapid catalogue of those who by faith received attestation from God whether they triumphed or experienced hardship under persecution noting that they did not receive what had been promised because God had provided something better with his readers in mind so that they should not reach perfection except with them (the readers) 11:32-40
1) Those Who Experienced Triumph and Deliverance from Death: In view of the writer’s limited time and space he transitions from his exemplary list to a rapid catalogue of triumphs by faith from the time of the judges through the time of the kings 11:32-35a
b) The writer presents an abbreviated catalogue of triumphs by faith from the time of the judges through the time of the kings 11:33-35a
(1) An Abbreviated Discussion: The writer affirms that time would fail him if he spoke about the following persons and events235 11:32b
(2) A Catalogue of Triumph from the Judges through Kings:236 The author notes that through faith Gideon,237 Barak,238 Samson,239 Jephthah,240 David,241 Samuel,242 and the prophets conquered kingdoms, practiced justice, attained the promised blessings,243 shut up the mouths of lions,244 extinguished the fury of the flames,245 escaped the edge of the sword,246 became strong after weakness,247 were mighty in war, routed foreign armies248 and women received their dead through resurrection249 11:32c-34
2) The Unnamed Not Delivered from Hardship, Suffering, and Death:250 In contrast to those who experienced triumph and deliverance in their faith the writer now provides a catalogue of unnamed others who were not delivered from hardship, suffering, and death 11:35b-38
a) A Contrast in Effects: In contrast to those who experienced triumph and deliverance in their faith the writer now moves to talk about others who were not delivered from hardship, suffering, and death 11:35b
b) Tortured: The writer notes that others were tortured after refusing to accept the offered release in order that they might attain a better resurrection 11:35c
c) A Catalogue of Hardship, Suffering and Death: The writer notes that others experienced jeering and lashing, chains and prison, were stoned,251 sawn in two, were murdered by the sword, went about in sheepskins and goatskins, were destitute, oppressed, mistreated, (humanity was not worthy of them), and they wandered aimlessly in uninhabited regions and on mountains, in caves and crevices in the ground
3) Conclusion:252 The author notes that even though all of those above had received attestation from God through faith, they did not receive what had been promised because God had provided something better with his readers in mind so that they (above) should not reach perfection except with them (the readers) 11:39-40
a) Received Attestation But Not the Promise: The author notes that even though all of those above had received attestation from God [in Scripture] because of their faith, they did not receive what had been promised253 11:39
b) The writer notes that God had provided something better with his readers (us) in mind so that they should not reach perfection254 except with them (us) 11:40
C. Perspective for Endurance:255 In view of the great host of witnesses about the readers the author exhorts them to run with endurance renewing their commitment to finish the race with the perspectives that their suffering is a sign and proof of sonship, and that they are coming to a wonderful God of the New Covenant who will judge those who are indifferent to His word 12:1-29
1. The Display of Necessary Endurance: In view of the great host of witnesses about the readers the author exhorts them to run with endurance, not loosing heart, but seeing their suffering as a sign and proof of sonship from a Father over all realms who is acting for their good; thus they should renew their commitment and finish the race 12:1-13
a. Exhortation--Run with Endurance: In view of the great host of witnesses about the readers the author exhorts them to lay aside their sin and to run with endurance focusing on Jesus as an example of faith so that they will not become worn down before their race is over 12:1-3
1) Lay Aside Sin & Run with Endurance: In view of the great host of witnesses256 about the readers (us) the author exhorts them (let us) to lay aside257 all excess weight and the sin that so easily distracts, and to run with endurance the race prescribed for them 12:1
2) Focus on Jesus as an Example: The author exhorts them to run with their eyes fixed upon Jesus who is the champion258 in the exercise of faith and the one who brought faith to complete expression in that rather than the joy set before him endured a cross disregarding the disgrace and has now taken his seat at the right hand of the throne of God 12:2
3) Consider Jesus Not to Become Weary: The author exhorts his readers to by all means consider the one who endured such opposition against himself so that they (you) may not become weary and lose heart 12:3
b. Exposition--The Meaning of the Sufferings to Be Endured: Reminding his readers that they have not resisted those sinning against them as far as Jesus did, he urges them not to loose heart but to regard their discipline as a sign and proof of sonship from a Father over all realms who is acting for their good 12:4-11
1) Sonship and Discipline: Reminding the readers that they have not resisted those sinning against them as far as Jesus did, the author also encourages his readers not to loose heart but to regard their discipline as a sign and proof of sonship 12:4-8
b) Discipline is An Act of Love: Asking his readers if they have forgotten the encouragement which speaks to them as sons, the writer notes from Proverbs that they should not loose heart because discipline is an act of love and corrective behavior from God as upon a favorable son 12:5-6
(1) Question: The writer asks the readers if they have completely forgotten the encouragement which speaks to them as sons 12:5a
(2) Citation of Proverbs 3:11-12: The writer cites the wisdom of Proverbs to affirm to his readers that they should not regard lightly the discipline of the Lord nor loose heart when they are corrected by Him because the Lord disciplines the one whom He loves and bestows corrective punishment upon every son whom he receives favorably 12:5b-6
c) Endure Trials As Divine Discipline: The writer exhorts his readers to endure their trials as divine discipline understanding that God is disciplining them as Sons 12:7
d) Discipline is a Sign of Sonship: The writer explains that fathers as fathers discipline their sons and that if they are left without discipline, then they are illegitimate children rather than true sons 12:8
2) Parental and Divine Discipline: As the writer compares the discipline of natural fathers with that of God, the Father over all realms, he emphasizes the supremacy of the latter’s urging them to submit to Him, realize that even though it is unpleasant now, God disciplines for our advantage yielding peace and righteousness 13:9-11
a) Submit to the Father of Spirits: The writer argues that since his readers (we) respected their natural fathers who disciplined them, they (we) should submit themselves much more to the Father of spirits261 so that they (we) should live 12:9
b) He Disciplines for Our Advantage: The reason they should submit themselves to the Father of Spirits is because He disciplines to their (our) advantage unlike their (our) fathers who disciplined for a short time at their discretion (what seemed best to them) 12:10
c) Though Unpleasant, It Yields Peace and Righteousness: The writer notes that all discipline at the actual time seems not to be pleasant but painful, but later it yields the fruit of peace and righteousness for those who have been trained by it 12:11
c. Exhortation--Renewed Commitment to Complete the Race:262 In view of God’s work of discipline the writer therefore ( Δὶο ) urges his readers to renew their commitment (strengthen their drooping hands and weakened knees, and move in a straight direction with your feet) so that they might have more difficulty (be dislocated), but rather complete the race (be healed) 12:12-13
2. The Final Warning--The Peril of Refusing God’s Gracious Word--Pilgrimage and Covenant Obligation:263 The writer urges his readers to be responsible for those of their own who are prone to apostasy because they are coming to a wonderful God of the New Covenant who will discipline those who are indifferent to His word; thus they should respond with thankful worship 12:14-29
a. Exhortation--The Responsibility of the Community For Their Own Prone to Apostasy: The writer urges the community to pursue peace and holiness and to watch out for those who might struggle by forfeiting God’s gracing, developing a defiling bitter root, and/or become apostate with no opportunity for repentance 12:14-17
1) Pursue Peace and Holiness: The writer urges his readers to pursue peace with everyone264 and holiness--without which no one will see the Lord 12:14
2) Watch For Forfeiting God’s Grace and A Defiling Bitter Root: The writer urges his readers to watch that no one forfeits the grace of God and that no bitter root grows up265 to cause trouble and defile the whole community 12:15
3) Watch for the Apostate and Secular Who Will Have No Opportunity for Repentance: The writer urges his readers to watch that no one becomes immoral (apostate) or secular like Esau because like Esau there will be no opportunity for repentance266 12:16-17
a) Watch for the Apostate and Secular: The writer urges his readers to watch that no one becomes apostate or secular like Esau who gave up his inheritance rights as the older son rather than one dish of food 12:16
b) No Opportunity for Repentance: The reason the writer urges his readers to watch that no one becomes apostate or secular like Esau is because ( γὰρ ) they know that when he desired to inherit the blessing later on he was rejected because he found no opportunity for repentance even though he had diligently sought the blessing with tears 12:17
b. Exposition--A Recital of What the Christian Stands to Lose Through Spiritual Indifference or Carelessness:267 The writer explains that his readers that they need to be responsible for those of their own prone to apostasy because they are not coming to the terrifying God of the Mosaic Covenant, but to the wonderful God of the New Covenant 12:18-24
1) Not to the God of the Mosaic Covenant: The writer explains to his readers that they have not come to the God of the Mosaic Covenant (a [mountain] that may be touched, blazing fire, darkness, gloom, whirlwind, a trumpet blast, a sound of words that made the hearers beg that no further message be given to them for they were not able to bear the command, a place where any animal will be stoned if it touches the mountain and a place that terrified Moses) 12:18-21a
2) To the God of the New Covenant: The writer explains to his readers that in contrary to the God of the Mosaic Covenant they have come to the God of the New Covenant (to Mount Zion, the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, innumerable companies of angels, a festal gathering, the assembly of the firstborn, a Judge who is God of all, the spirits of righteous persons made perfect, Jesus, mediator of a New Covenant, sprinkled blood speaking more effectively than the blood of Abel 12:21b-24
c. Exhortation--A Concluding Demand to Respond Appropriately to God: The writer urges his readers not to disregard Christ’s words because that will bring about certain discipline, but to respond to Him who is giving them an unshakable kingdom with thankful worship 12:25-29
1) Respond to Christ’s Words or Face Discipline: The author urges his readers to respond to Christ’s words because there will be no escape from his future purification where he will destroy what can be shaken to set up what cannot be shaken 12:25-27
a) Do Not Disregard Christ’s Words: The writer warns his readers not to disregard the one (Christ) who is speaking to them 12:25a
b) No Escape from His Warning:268 The writer explains that they should not disregard Christ who is speaking to them because ( γὰρ ) there is no escape (from discipline) from the one who warns them from heaven just as there was no escape from the one who warned Israel before from on earth (the voice of God)269 12:25b
c) A Future Purification: The writer explains that although the one who spoke before shook the earth at that time,270 the one from heaven promises to shake the earth and the heavens271 once again removing what can be shaken so that what cannot be shaken may remain 12:26-27
2) Worship God with Thanksgiving: Since the readers are receiving a kingdom which cannot be shaken the writer therefore ( Δὶο ) urges his readers to be thankful and to worship God in an acceptable manner with fear and awe for their (our) God is a consuming fire272 12:28-29
D. Words of Endurance--Life Within the Confessing Community:273 The writer urges his readers to love one another, be personally pure, and to obey their leaders by leaving Judaism, whereupon he prays that God will make them complete with everything good to do His will 13:1-21
1. Pastoral Precepts:274 The writer exhorts his readers to love others, to be morally pure in the realm of marriage, and to be content with what they have because God has promised to provide for their life 13:1-6
a. Exhortations to Love: The writer exhorts his readers to be deeply committed to others by continuing to love the brethren, showing hospitality to strangers, and remembering with empathy those who are prisoners and who have been mistreated 13:1-3
1) Love the Brethren: The writer urges that his readers must continue in brotherly love 13:1
2) Show Hospitality to Strangers: The writer urges his readers not to neglect hospitality to strangers (φιλοξενίας) because ( γὰρ ) by this means some persons have entertained angels without knowing it275 13:2
3) Remember Prisoners and the Mistreated: The writer urges his readers to continue to remember with empathy the prisoners and those who are mistreated 13:3
b. Exhortations to Martial Purity: The writer affirms the purity of marriage as something to be respected and undefiled because God will judge those who are sexually immoral and adulterers 13:3-4
1) The Purity of Marriage: The writer affirms that marriage must be respected by everyone and that the marriage bed must be undefiled 13:3a
2) Judgment of The Sexually Immoral and Adulterers: The reason that the marriage bed must be undefiled is because God will judge those who are sexually immoral and adulterers 13:4
c. Exhortations to Contentment: The writer urges his readers to be content with what they have because God has promised to provide for their lives 13:5-6
1) Be Content with What You Have: The writer urges his readers to have their lives free from the love of money and to be content with what they have 13:5
2) The Lord Will Provide for Life: The reason the writer urges his readers to be content with what they have is because the Lord has promised to provide for their lives276 13:6
2. Communal Directives: The writer urges his readers to follow the examples of their leaders, and to obey and submit to them by leaving Judaism, bearing Christ’s disgrace and through their high priest, Jesus, offering the sacrifices of praise and good deeds 13:7-19
a. Setting--Remember Your Leaders: The writer urges his readers to follow the example of their leaders who first spoke the unchanging gospel of Jesus Christ and not to be led astray by the fluid and changing configurations of the strange [Jewish] teachers 13:7-9
1) Remember, Consider and Imitate Leaders: The writer urges his readers to continue to remember their leaders as those who spoke277 the Word of God to them, to consider the accomplishment of their conduct and to imitate their faith 13:7
2) The Gospel of Jesus Christ Does Not Change:278 The writer affirms the consistency of Jesus Christ (he is the same yesterday, today, and forever) 13:8
3) Don’t Be Led Astray:279 The writer exhorts his readers not to be led away with various strange teachings because it is good for the heart to be strengthened through grace rather than through regulations (foods)280 which do not benefit those who adhere to them 13:9
b. Hortatory Exposition: In view of the false Jewish teachers the writer affirms that his readers have an altar from which those who serve the tabernacle do not have a right to eat because Jesus fulfills the requirement of the Day of Atonement; therefore they should leave Judaism, bear Christ’s disgrace and through their high priest, Jesus, offer the sacrifices of praise and good deeds 13:10-16
1) Exposition: In view of the false, Jewish teachers (above) the writer affirms that his readers have an altar from which those who serve the tabernacle do not have a right to eat because Jesus fulfills the requirement of the Day of Atonement 13:10-12
a) Believers Have an Altar: The writer affirms that they (we) have an altar from which those who serve the tabernacle do not have a right to eat 13:10
b) The writer explains ( γὰρ ) that believers have an alter from which those who serve the tabernacle do not have a right to eat because Jesus fulfills the requirement of the Day of Atonement 13:11-12
(1) Day of Atonement: The writer explains that on the Day of Atonement the blood of the sacrificial animals was brought into the Most Holy Place by the high priest for sin, but the bodies of the animals were burned outside the camp281 13:11
(2) Jesus: The writer explains that as with the animals on the Day of Atonement so was it with Jesus who suffered death outside the city gate in order to consecrate the people through his own blood282 13:12
2) Exhortation: The writer concludes that his readers should leave Judaism (the camp and city), bear Christ’s disgrace and offer the sacrifices of praise and good deeds 11:13-16
b) Do Not Have a Permanent City: The writer explains that his readers should go outside the camp and bear the disgrace that Jesus bore because ( γὰρ ) they do not (presently) have a permanent city (Jerusalem?), but are intently expecting the city which is to come285 13:14
c) Offer Sacrifices of Praise and Good Deeds: The writer concludes that his readers should offer to God the sacrifices of verbal praise and acts of kindness and generosity because God is pleased with such sacrifices 13:15-16
(1) Praise His Name: The writer concludes (Δὶο) that his readers (we) should through Jesus (as through the high priest) continually offer to God a sacrifice consisting of verbal praise to His name286 13:15
(2) Acts of Love: The writer also urges his readers not to neglect acts of kindness and generosity because God is pleased with such sacrifices 13:16
c. Conclusion--Obey Your Leaders: The writer urges his readers to continue to obey their leaders, to submit to their authority and to let them lead with joy because they keep watch over their eternal life; also he urges them and to pray for him in his difficult situation and that he might be restored to them sooner 13:17-19
1) Obey and Submit to Your Leaders: The writer urges his readers to continue to obey their leaders and to submit to their authority because they keep watch for their eternal life as those who intend to give an account and should be able to do so with joy and not groaning 13:17
a) Exhortations--Obey and Submit: The writer urges his readers to continue to obey their leaders and to submit to their authority 13:17a
b) Reason--They Keep Watch Over Your Eternal Life: The writer explains that they should continue to obey and submit to their leaders because they keep watch for their (your) eternal life as those who intend to give an account 13:17b
c) Exhortation--Let Them Lead With Joy: The write urges his readers to let their leaders keep watch with joy and not groaning because the latter would be unprofitable for them (you) 13:17c
2) Prayer for the Writer: The writer urges his readers to continue to pray for them in their difficult situation where they have been falsely accused, and that they pray that he be restored to them sooner 13:18-19
a) Continue to Pray for The Writer: The writer urges his readers to continue to pray for them because they (we) are convinced that they have a clear conscience because they strive to act commendably in every way 13:18
b) Pray for Restoration Sooner: The writer urges his readers to pray so that he might be restored to them sooner 13:19
3. Prayer--God’s Provision for the Readers to Do His Will: The writer prays that the God of peace Who should be given glory forever and Who led our Lord Jesus--the great Shepherd of the sheep--out from the dead by virtue of the blood of the eternal covenant,-- that this God would make his readers complete with everything good to do His will accomplishing in them (us) what is pleasing to Him through Jesus Christ 13:20-21
a. Prayer for God’s Provision: The writer prays that the God of peace who led287 our Lord Jesus--the great Shepherd of the sheep--out from the dead288 by virtue of the blood of the eternal covenant,289 that God would make his readers complete with everything good to do His will accomplishing in them (us) what is pleasing to Him through Jesus Christ 13:20-21a
b. Prayer For God to Be Glorified: The writer prays that glory would be given to the Lord forever. Amen. 13:21b
IV. CONCLUSION--AN APPENDED PERSONAL NOTE: The writer closes his letter by urging his readers to listen to this letter of exhortation, passing on information about Timothy’s release and his plans to visit them, conveying greetings to all in the church and praying that God’s grace would be with them 13:22-25
A. Commendation of the Sermon: The writer urges his readers, as brothers to willingly listen to this letter of exhortation which he has briefly written to them 13:22
B. Passing On of Information: The writer informs his readers that Timothy has been released and that if he comes very soon that he will visit the readers with Timothy 13:23
C. Conveying Greetings: The writer conveys greetings to the leaders of the church and all of the saints and from those in Italy 13:24
1. Greetings to Leaders and the Saints: The writer greets the readers’ leaders and all of the saints 13:24a
2. The writer conveys greetings from Italy 13:24
D. Blessing: The writer prays that grace would be with all of his readers 13:25
1 In this unit Christ is related to God, creation, man and angels and represents God as the prophet who has spoken, the priest who has cleansed from sin, and the king who has sat down in majesty! These themes (of revelation, sacrifice and greatness) will be developed throughout the epistle.
Literally this unit may be in a chiastic pattern:
A Revelation through Prophets and Son
B Heir of Everything (Ps. 2:8)
C (Wisdom) as Agent of Creation
C’ (Wisdom) as Sustainer of Creation
B’ Seated Ruler (Ps. 110:1)
A’ Revelation through Angels and Son
“The framing statements (A A’) enunciate emphatically the theme of supreme revelation through the Son. The core of the exordium (B C C’ B’) describes Jesus in an arresting way as the royal Son, divine Wisdom, and the royal Priest (see William Lane, Hebrews, Word Biblical Commentary, 47A, [Dallas, Word Books Publisher, 1992], pp. 6-7).
2 Literally, “in these last days” ( ἑπ ῾ ἐσχάτου τῶν ἡμερῶν ). The last days begin from the time of Christ onward. He inaugurates the last days because he is the one through whom fulfillment comes.
3 As Hugh Montefiore says, “This writer’s contrast is not between natural and revealed religion or between general and special revelation, but between God’s word of promise spoken by the prophets and his final word of fulfilment (sic) spoken by his Son” (A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews [London: Adam & Charles Black, 1964], p. 34). This is supported in the next portion of verse two where he is the heir of all things because he made all things.
4 This term Son is probably descriptive of the Hebrew concept of Messiah (2 Sam. 7).
5 See Psalm 2:8
6 This is tied to Jewish wisdom literature which exalts divine Wisdom as the agent of creation, revelation and reconciliation: “I learned both what is secret and what is manifest, for wisdom, the fashioner of all things, taught me. For in her there is a spirit that is intelligent, holy, unique, manifold, subtle, mobile, clear, unpolluted, distinct, invulnerable, loving the good, keen, irresistible, beneficent, humane, steadfast, sure, free from anxiety, all-powerful, overseeing all, and penetrating through all spirits that are intelligent and pure and most subtle. For wisdom is more mobile than any motion; because of her pureness she pervades and penetrates all things. For she is a breath of the power of God, and a pure emanation of the glory of the Almighty; therefore nothing defiled gains entrance into her. For she is a reflection of eternal light, a spotless mirror of the working of God, and an image of his goodness. Though she is but one, she can do all things, and while remaining in herself, she renews all things; in every generation she passes into holy souls and makes them friends of God, and prophets (Wisdom of Solomon 7:21-27). Likewise Wisdom of Solomon 9:2 reads, “an by thy wisdom hast formed man, to have dominion over the creatures thou has made” (The Oxford Annotated Apocrypha, pp. 110, 112).
7 Literally this reads, “τούς αἰῶνας“ meaning more than just the earth, but all that exists through time--the entire created universe, both physical and spiritual.
8 See John 1:14.
9 The Son reveals God because he is God which is substantiated by the work of God which he does--he sustains all things by the actively spoken word (ῥήματι). This is a gain an allusion to wisdom.
10 Here the Son is both priest and victim as on the Day of Atonement (cf. Ex. 30:10). See also 10:11-14.
11 This was the seat of honor (1 Ki. 2:19) and Davidic kings sat in the presence of God (1 Sam. 7:18; cf. Ps. 110:1). See Hebrews 8:1; 10:12; 12:2.
12 There are several views with respect to what is occurring here with the mention of angels: (1) the writer is attacking an undue deference to angels [cf. Col. 2:18], (2) the writer is attacking those who equate the Son with one of the “principalities and powers” which ruled the universe [cf. 1 Cor. 15:24; Eph. 3:10; Col. 2:15], (3) the writer is demonstrating that the one whom God addresses in heaven is not an angel [note the following testimonia from the OT), and (4) the writer is speaking to Christians who were in danger of lapsing into Judaism whereby they would identify Christ neither with God nor man, but with an angel (Montefiore, Hebrews, pp. 40-42).
The angels were the heavenly mediators of the word of God.
13 This is emphasizing his exaltation.
14 This unit is identified through the literary technique of an inclusio:
1:5 “To which of the angels did God every say ...?”
1:13 “to which of the angels has God ever said ...?”
The chain of OT passages demonstrating the superiority of the Son to the angels is expository in character and lays the foundation for the exhortation which follows in 2:1-4.
Lane notes that a synthetic parallelism exists between the opening confession of the Son and the string of quotations which follow since the OT citations were selected to support the declarations made in verses 2b-3c (Hebrews, p. 22):
A Appointment as Royal heir (2b, 5-9)
B Mediator of the creation (2c, 10)
C Eternal nature (3a,b, 11-12)
D Exaltation to God’s right hand (3c, 13)
This paragraph unfolds through three paragraphs which unfold the antithetical nature of the Son with the angels. This is done through a series of OT citations which allow the church to hear words spoken by God to the Son.
15 Note that Psalm 2:7 and 2 Samuel 7:14 are Davidic promises. Jesus is a son in accordance to the promises given to David.
In addition there is a chiasm:
A You are my Son
B today I have become your Father
B’ I will be his Father
A’ and he will be my Son.
16 See Matthew 3:17a.
17 Exodus 4:22; Numbers 11:12; Hos. 2:1; 11:1, 3-4; Jer. 31:9.
18 As Lane writes, “Their function is to serve; his is to rule. They are subject to constant change; he does not change, and his rule reflects a commitment to righteousness, which explains why God has crowned him with joy” (Hebrews, p. 30).
19 See the LXX of Ps. 103:4 (English/Hebrew 104:4). God exercises his will through angels.
20 This is a μὲν…δὲ beginning with verse 7. Now he argues for the exalted position of the Son as opposed to the servant position of angels.
21 See the LXX of Psalm 44:6-7 (English/Hebrew 45:6-7).
22 Lane writes, “The attribute of permanence in the Creator corresponds to the durability of his throne and serves to reinforce the contrast between the mutability of the angels and the stable, abiding character of the Son” (Hebrews, p. 30). “Heaven and earth, the realm of the angels, both belong to the created order, which will change and decay” (Ibid., p. 31).
This is a reference to the LXX of Psalm 101:25-27 (cf. English/Hebrew Psalm 102:25-27).
23 See 1:2.
24 The correlation of Messiah and God were made above in verses 8-9. This is carried on with the “you” in verse 10.
25 This verse begins with words which form an inclusio with verse 5 thereby tying the paragraph together. Note that in verse 5 Psalm 2:7 was employed and in verse 13 Psalm 110 is employed. This matches the allusions in the prologue (1:2, 3). Psalm 110:1 is employed here.
26 Whereas 1:5-14 and 2:5-18 are paragraphs of exposition, this is a paragraph of exhortation. This is a formal rhetorical technique.
27 This implies that the community was growing “lax in their commitment to Christ and were neglecting the Christian message” (Lane, Hebrews, p. 37). If the readers were unbelievers one would have expected the writer to exhort them to believe or receive what they have heard, and not to include himself in the exhortation. Also, note that the original witnesses were said to have “heard” the same word (2:3). This means more than an auditory response. It is inclusive of responding appropriately to what is said (Deut. 6:4, “Hear, O Israel!”); in this case that would have included belief.
28 This term, παραρρεῖν , describes “drifting away from one’s course.” Lane writes, “If it is proper to recognize (with Teodorico, Revist B 6  33-39) a nautical overtone in προσέχειν, ‘to hold a ship toward port, or to fasten the anchors to the sea bed,’ the image of a drifting ship, carried by the current beyond a fixed point, furnished a vivid metaphor for the failure to keep a firm grip on the truth through carelessness and lack of concern. In Prov 3:21 (LXX) παραρρεῖν signifies to lose sight of advice and wisdom. The writer warns his readers that they are in danger of losing sight of the reality of Christian salvation” (Hebrews, p. 37). He is not saying that something is drifting away from them (i.e., their salvation), but that they are in danger of drifting away from something (e.g., the revelation they have received).
Toussaint rightly understands this salvation to be eschatological, but then he concludes that it cannot have any correlation with reward since the judgment seat of Christ will have no “remembrance of sin” (Stanley D. Toussaint, “The Eschatology of the Warning Passages in the Book of Hebrews.” Grace Theological Journal 3 (1982): 69-70). His theological conclusion does not necessarily follow. Therefore, it can relate to believers in an eschatological sense.
29 This is the protasis of a first class conditional clause which assumes the truth of the statement (If, and its true,...). This message which was delivered through angels is precisely matched by the message which was delivered by the Lord in the apodosis.
The mention of a revelation which was spoken by God through angels draws the reader to tie the concern here with Judaism.
30 Although they are not mentioned in Exodus 19--20, Deuteronomy 33:2 notes that God came “from the midst of ten thousand holy ones,” and the LXX adds, “angels were with him at his right hand” (cf. Ps. 68:17). Later Jewish thought developed the thought that angels played a mediatorial role in the transmission of the Law (Book of Jubilees 1:27; 2:1, 26-27) then the NT also confirms this understanding (Acts 7:38; cf. v. 53; Galatians 3:19)
31 It is possible that the just recompense would be the persecution of Jews and destruction of Jerusalem by Titus in AD 70) if this is to Palestinian Jews who are returning to Judaism from Christianity.
32 This supplies a hint that the author was probably neither one of the Twelve nor Paul himself (cf. Galatians 1--2). Lane affirms that “those who heard” need not be a reference to the apostles since “apostle” is only used of the Lord in 3:1 (Hebrews, p. 39), but who would be “those who heard” him in the fullest sense but the apostles? While this may not necessarily describe the office of apostles, it certainly describes the apostles in a full sense.
33 These were the redemptive activities on behalf of Israel in the LXX and thus the vehicle for revelation (Ex. 7:3; Deut. 4:34; 6:22; 7:19; 29:2; cf. Mark 16:20).
34 The term is “power” ( δυνάμεσιν ) by which God breaks into the community to confirm his word.
35 The manifestations of power were meant to validate the message delivered to the community!
“Since the purpose of this evidence is the validation that God has spoken definitively in Christ, unbelief and carelessness can only be regarded as the expression of an utterly incomprehensible hardness of heart (cf. 3:7-8, 12, 15; 4:7)” (Lane, Hebrews, p. 40).
36 This unit is identified through the literary technique of an inclusio:
2:5 “For it is not to angels that he has subjected the world to come.”
2:16 “For surely it is not angels that he helps”
When one gets to 2:17-18 one has an introduction to the next subject. The introduction of other “characteristic terms” than angels in these verse are a clue that the author is about to introduce another line of thought.
37 That which people today use to prove that Christ is not God, the writer of Hebrews uses to prove that he is God.
38 The objection might have been that since Jesus assumed a condition inferior to angels--especially by tasting of death-- that the angels were superior to Christ. Therefore the writer asserts that God did not entrust the administration of the heavenly world to come to angels (as he may have with this present world [Deut. 32:8]), but to the exalted Messiah. This clarified perspective will then allow the writer to unfold Jesus’ solidarity with mankind in 2:10-18.
39 This no doubt has reference to the eschatological kingdom of God in which Salvation is worked out (cf. Ps. 92:1; 95:10; Heb. 1:66:5; 13:14)
40 This citation comes from Psalm 8:4. Note the correlation of Psalm 8 with Psalm 110 in the New Testament (Hebrews 1:13; 1 Cor. 15:25-27; Eph. 1:20-22; cf. Phil. 3:21; 1 Pet. 3:22).
While the Psalm has a reference to man in general (who was designed to rule over the earth [Genesis 1:26-28]), it specifically points to messiah, the Son of Man (cf. Dan. 7:13). Could this also be an allusion to the second Adam? Jesus as the second Adam (a representative man) fulfills the ruling vocation intended for humankind.
41 The scope of this “everyone” is found below in 2:10 where it says “many sons.”
42 In view of 2:9 the writer begins by explaining that the death which Jesus died was consistent with God’s known character and purpose. Therefore, Lane writes, “god who creates and preserves all things is precisely the one who is able to act in such a way that his design for humankind will be achieved” (Hebrews, p. 55).
43 The sense of τελειῶσαι is one of becoming fully equipped for one’s office as the priests were consecrated for their office (cf. LXX of Ex. 29:9, 29, 33, 35; Lev. 4:5; 8:33; 16:32; 21:10; Num. 3:3). The sufferings of Jesus permitted Him to come before God with his redemptive mission. “The expression ‘perfected through suffering’ thus anticipates the full development of the paragraph, which moves from the champion motif of vv 10-16 to the presentation of Jesus as high priest in vv 17-18” (Lane, Hebrews, p. 58).
44 This term, ἀρχηγός, which might be translated “leader,” “author,” “guide,” or “pioneer” may also be an allusion to Hellenistic image of Hercules--the “divine hero” who descends from heaven to earth to rescue humankind” (Lane, Hebrews, pp. 56-57, 61; cf. also Knox, Harvard Theological Review : 234-235, 245-247; Somon, Hercule et le Christianisme, Galinsky, The Herkles Theme, Tiede, Charismatic Figure,pp. 71-100). It is also possible that the “champion” concept could come from the OT (cf. Isa. 42:13; 49:24-26; 59:15b-20; Eph. 4).
45 This is it he goal of salvation (cf. 2:7 above).
46 The cultic character of “perfect” above is made evident in this verse with “consecrates” or “sanctifies ( ἀγιάζων ). This is how the people of Israel were admitted into God’s presence (cf. Procksch, TDNT, I:89-97). Here Jesus (cf. 13:12) is like God of the OT who sanctified His people (Ex. 31:13; Lev. 20:8, 21:15; 22:9, 16, 32; cf. Ezk. 20:12; 37:28)
47 One can interpret the term for “one” ( ἐνὸς ) in three possible ways: (1) if it is neuter in gender it could refer to a common human nature, (2) if it is masculine it could refer to “one man” (i.e., Adam or Abraham), and (3) if it is masculine it could also refer to God. The latter may be the best choice in view of the contextual references to God in 2:10 and the family relationship in 2:11. “Both the Son and those who are sons share a common familial relationship that is rooted in the gracious determination of God to bring his children to their destiny through the redemptive mission of the Son” (Lane, Hebrews, p. 58).
48 This has an eschatological tone.
49 Lane writes, “The prophet was persecuted and rejected by the people, but he became a rallying point for faith .... Jesus is now the representative head of a new humanity which is being led to glory through suffering ...” (Hebrews, p. 60).
50 The difference between Jesus and mankind is that our death was connected with disobedience to God whereas Jesus’ was connected with doing the will of God. Therefore, the devil had no claim upon Jesus (cf. 2 Timothy 1:10).
51 These verses bring this first major unit (1:5--2:16) to a conclusion (“for this reason, *hen”) and they announce the subject to be developed in the next unit (e.g., the purpose of the Son’s solidarity with the human family was that he might become a “merciful and faithful high priest in the service of God” (v. 17)
52 Lane writes, “common to the concepts both of champion and of high priest are the elements of representation and solidarity with a particular people. The presentation of Jesus in 2:10-18 provided assurance that the exalted Son continues to identify himself with the oppressed people of God exposed to humiliation and testing in a hostile world” (Hebrews, p. 67).
53 In the previous section there was a concentration on Christ made human. Now, by comparing Christ with a man such as Moses, the author is trying to show how great a man Jesus is. He is a faithful man. This takes up one of the two themes in 2:17, “a merciful and faithful high priest.”
Verse 14 probably does not take up a new paragraph, but is a conclusion to the paragraph begun here at 3:1. The terms which tie these units together are Jesus, high priest, and confession (cf. 3:1-2a with 4:14). Lane writes, “the hearers are urged to find in the faithfulness of Jesus an incentive for their own fidelity as Christians (Hebrews, p. 69). The actual theme of high priest is not picked up until 4:15ff.
There is a logical reason for the placement of Jesus’ superiority of Moses after his superiority over angels. Moses had a higher privilege and rank than the ministering angels (cf. Numbers 12:6-8; Lane, Ibid., p. 73-74).
54 The key terms in this section are “faithful” and “house.” The writer uses the latter to demonstrate that Jesus is superior to Moses.
Moses is only designated a priest once in the OT (Ps. 99:6), but he qualifies as a priest with his Levitical background (Ex. 2:1-10), his ministry of the word and privileged vision of God (Ex. 33:12--34:35; Num 12:7-8), and his service at the alter (Ex. 24:4-8). Perhaps this is the priestly tie with 2:17. Jesus is a faithful high priest. He is even more faithful than the priest Moses.
55 These terms sum up 1:1--2:18. Jesus is the one who proclaimed God’s word of salvation (apostle) and made propitiation for the sins of the people (High Priest). Note that Moses was “sent” (ἀπόστείλω) to Pharaoh as a messenger from God (LXX Ex. 3:10). Lane writes, “The coordination of the phrase ‘apostle and high priest’ indicates that the writer is concerned to emphasize the indivisibility of the two offices. The revelation accomplished in Jesus is characterized neither by the word alone nor by the priestly office alone, but by both in conjunction” (Hebrews, p. 76).
56 See Numbers 12:7 (Moses); 1 Chronicles 17:14 (the Davidite).
57 Lane suggests that there is a chiastic structure here:
A Jesus is worthy of more glory than Moses
B as the house-builder receives more honor than the house
B’ for every house is built by someone
A’ but God is the builder of everything
“Jesus is worthy of more glory than Moses in the same measure as God has more honor than the universe he created” (Hebrews, p. 77).
58 Here God’s house may have reference to the people of God (Num. 12:7), or more specifically the tabernacle of God. Zane Hodges writes, “The reference to Moses being faithful in all God’s house was drawn from Numbers 12:7 in which the tabernacle furnished the backdrop. Hence God’s ‘house’ in the Old Testament situation would be the tabernacle itself which Moses had constructed in strict obedience to the divine directions. It was a prophetic testimony ‘to what would be said in the future’ (Heb. 3:5) (“Hebrews” in BKC, NT, p. 786).
59 Jesus rules over God’s house as Son--one enthroned, acclaimed, and worshiped by angels (cf. 1:3-6).
60 As with Moses’ house, the readers are now being described as the house that the Son is over.
61 Hodges writes, “As the context and the Old Testament background show, the author was thinking in priestly terms. He was also thinking functionally. The exalted Son presides over a priestly apparatus which is an operative reality. As long as the readership held firmly to their Christian commitment, they also functioned within this priestly arrangement. But just as one who was a true Levite by birth could withdraw from participation in the tabernacle of Moses’ day, so too one who is truly a Christian by new birth may withdraw from his priestly role within the functioning household. It was precisely this danger which concerned the writer, in the present warning passage as well as in later ones” (BKC, 786).
62 The two main terms which set off this unit are see (βλέπειν) and unbelief (ἀπιστία) as they set up an inclusio in verses 12 and 19. The significance of these terms is that the response to the word of God can be unbelief. Therefore, they are being admonished to maintain the basic position of faith (cf. v. 14).
63 LXX Psalm 94:7-11.
64 This is a good text to support inspiration.
65 Note that the author teats his readers as a redeemed people (e.g., their “fathers”).
Historically, Ross affirms that the “incident referred to here is the people’s murmuring at Rephidim (Ex. 17; Num. 20:1-13). The names given to the place reflect the incident. Meribah (cf. Pss. 81:7; 106:32) means ‘strife’ and Massah means ‘testing,’ for the people strove with the Lord and tested Him. So God swore that they could not enter the land, but must perish in the wilderness. The younger generation would enter the Promised Land” (Allen P. Ross, “Psalms” in BKC, OT, p. 864). This is based upon verse 8 of the MT.
However, Probably Numbers 13--14 are particularly in view in the LXX where the particular place names are replaced by the “rebellion” and the “testing.” Israel camped at Kadesh in the Desert of Paran and refused to enter when the “spys” brought back their report (cf. Hebrews 3:16-19).
Concerning the concept of “rest” here and in Hebrews 3:11 Ross writes, “This passage is quoted in Hebrews 3:7-11 as a warning for Christians who through unbelief (Heb. 3:12) were in danger of not receiving the promised rest (cf. comments .... In its fullest sense, that rest signifies the Lord’s coming kingdom on earth, when believers will experience spiritual and temporal rest in the Lord. Believers, of course, enter that rest positionally when they cease from their works and trust Him” (Ibid.). This rest has its root expression in the goal of creation--the sabbath rest.
66 The writer extends his warning to every member of the congregation (τινὶ ὑμῶν meaning “even one among you” [cf. 3:13; 4:1, 11; 6:12; 12:15]).
67 Lane notes that this “unbelief” “is not a lack of faith or trust. It is the refusal to believe God. It leads inevitably to a turning away from God in a deliberate act of rejection” (Hebrews, p. 86; cf. Numbers 14:11; Deut. 1:32; 9:32; Ps. 106:24). This sin is a refusal to obey God and to act upon His promise. The Christian community is not immune from the rebellious spirit expressed by the generation in the desert.
68 He is comparing his readers to the wilderness generation (LXX of Numbers 14:9) where God’s people were commanded not to depart (ἀποστάται). But they did and thus did not enter the land (their rest). Therefore, this description of “falling away” can have reference to believers. F. F. Bruce writes, “And for Christians to repudiate the Apostle and high priest of their confession, similarly appointed by God, would be if possible an even more outrageous revolt against the living God. It has indeed been questioned whether a relapse from Christianity into Judaism would be comparable to the action of the Israelites when they ‘turned back their hearts unto Egypt;’ it would not be a mere return to a position previously occupied, but a gesture of outright apostasy. A complete break with God (The Epistle to the Hebrews. The New International Commentary [Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1964], p. 66).
69 Had the writer doubted the salvation of his readers it would make more sense for him to exhort them to believe or receive Christ rather than to encourage each other daily (3:12).
70 This resumes the if in 3:6 (ἐάνπερ).
71 Lane appropriately writes, “The appeal to hold firmly to the basic position held at the beginning in v 14 presents the antithesis to the ἀποστῆναι, ‘turning away,’ in v 12 .... It draws its emotional force from the disposition of Israel at Kadesh, where the people determined to elect new leadership and return to Egypt (Num 14:3-4) rather than to maintain their position and to act on the promise of God .... The readers are reminded that perseverance until the time of the actual realization of the promise and entrance into the eschatological rest prepared for the people of God is required of those who are ‘partners with Christ.’ The community is called to expectant waiting” (Hebrews, p. 88). If they do not hold on to the end they will not be acting as partners with Christ and will be expressing rebellion against him.
72 The writer uses the rhetorical devise of questions with answers supplied to drive home his point. This is called subiectio (Lane, Hebrews, p. 84).
Israel’s evil was defiant unbelief in that they rebelled against God (v. 16), sinned against God (v. 17), and refused to obey God (v. 18).
73 Lane writes, “When the Israelites realized their folly, they sought to repent. In their presumption they decided they would enter Canaan after all, in spite of the divine oath. The mission was abortive and they were soundly defeated (Num 14:39-45; cf. Deut 1:41-44). The oath of God was final. It is this epilogue to the transactions at Kadesh that is involved with the statement, ‘they were unable to enter because of unbelief’ .... The conclusion thus introduces the motif of the impossibility of a second repentance after apostasy, in anticipation of a fuller treatment later in the sermon (6:4-8; 10:26-31; ...). The hearers are left with the overwhelming impression that unbelief would expose them to the same precarious situation as Israel at Kadesh” (Hebrews, p. 89).
74 In addition to the continued development of Psalm 95 (LXX 94), the writer of Hebrews also includes Genesis 2:2 in this warning. The two passages are connected to one another by the Greek cognate for “rest” (Gen. 2:2 “κατέπαυσεν,” Ps. 94:11 “κατάπαυσις“). This is based upon reading these OT passages in Greek because the MT uses different terms. The rest which Israel did not enter into in Psalm 95:11 is tied to the goal of creation--the sabbath rest.
75 This unit is marked off by an inclusio formed by hortatory subjunctives and the phrase “to enter that rest (vv. 1, 11). Also the thought of “entering into God’s rest” is repeated throughout the unit (vv. 1, 3a, 3b, 5, 6, 10, 11). This is all based upon the expression used in Psalm 95:11 (LXX 94:11), “I swore in My wrath, ‘They shall not enter My rest.”
76 This “good news” is the term usually used for the gospel (εὐηγγελισμένοι). Yet here it probably relates to the good news concerning God’s rest (as with Israel in Numbers 14) rather than the specific message about redemption.
77 This is an aorist participle in 4:3 ( οἱ πιστεύσαντες).
78 This is a present tense (Εἰσρχόμεθα) emphasizing a present aspect of the rest which those who have believed have already entered into. This present aspect no doubt includes the benefits of spiritual rest or salvation (cf. Luke 4). The writer is concerned about entering into the future rest as well.
Another explanation of this present tense is that it is a futuristic present (Matt. 17:11; Jn. 14:3; 1 Cor. 16:5) asserting in a confident (present) way the imminent fulfillment in the future (Toussaint, “Warning Passages in Hebrews” GTJ, 3::71).
79 This probably has reference to Psalm 95 contextually which is also the speaking of the Holy Spirit (3:7). Perhaps this will occur at the future Judgment Seat of Christ.
80 In other words God’s word (Ps. 95) will expose the motives of the readers in their move away from Christianity back to Judaism. It will be seen as an act of rebellion in a threatening situation rather than an act of faith. It will parallel Israel’s rebellion in the face of “giants in the land” rather than their faith to follow God’s command to take the land which He was giving them. These are the rebellious “thoughts and intentions of our hearts” which will be exposed (cf. 4:11b).
81 While this unit is the concluding section to what was begun in 3:1, it is also transitional in that it reintroduces the concept of Jesus as high priest (2:17-18) which will be developed in the following unit. Lane writes, “Jesus’ high priestly ministry is the guarantee that God’s people will celebrate the Sabbath in his presence” (Hebrews, p. 103).
82 The statement that Jesus is the “Son of God” may well be the confession ( ὁμολογίας ) that they are being exhorted to hold fast to.
83 Contextually, this “time of need” seems to be more than any general need in a person’s life. It seems to be a need to remain faithful when one is tempted to deny Christ and thus be rebellious.
84 Lane notes a concentric symmetry to these verses:
A The old office of high priest (5:1)
B The solidarity of the high priest with the people (5:2-3)
C The humility of the high priest (5:4)
C’ The humility of Christ (5:5-6)
B’ The solidarity of Christ with the people (5:7-8)
A’ The new office of the high priest (5:9-10)
This structure emphasizes the similarities between Jesus and the high priest until verse 9-10 which unfold the differences that separate the unique priesthood of Christ from the Levitical priesthood (Hebrews, p. 111). These differences will then be developed in 7:1--10:18.
85 The movement is from Jesus (4:14-16) to Aaron (5:1-4) to Jesus (5:5-10).
86 Lane writes, “The bloody offerings for the Day of Atonement are in the foreground of the discussion of the sacrificial ministry of the Levitical high priest here and elsewhere in Hebrews (cf. 7:27; 10:4, 12, 26) [Hebrews, p. 116].
87 This seems to match the OT pattern of offering for sins of ignorance or error (cf. 9:7; Lev. 4:2, 13, 22, 27; 5:2-4), and not sins committed intentionally which would result in exclusion from Israel (Num. 15:30-31).
88 See Leviticus 4:3-12; 9:7; On the Day of Atonement he was expected to make atonement for himself, his household and for the congregation of Israel (Lev. 16:6, 11, 15-17). See also the Mishnah Yoma 3:8; 4:2--5:7.
89 See Exodus 28:1; Numbers 3:10; 18:1. This emphasizes the humility of the high priest who is dependent upon divine appointment.
90 Although the writer implies through these comparisons that Christ is greater than Aaron, the specific statements are differed until 7:1-25.
91 Note that “Son” is not descriptive of parentage, but of appointment (cf. 1:5).
92 This was implied in 1:3 as the one who made “purification of sins.” Now it is explicitly stated. “Son” was emphasized in 1--4; priest will be emphasized in 5--10.
93 Unlike the counterpart to this category above, Jesus is not united with the people through evil. Rather, he is united with the people through suffering and dependence upon God. Lane writes, “Jesus is able to feel the weakness of others because he was exposed to testing even as they are” (Hebrews, p. 116).
94 The term for suffering is ε῎παθεν which in Hebrews speaks of Jesus’ death as a part of his priestly duty (cf. 2:9, 10; 9:26; 13:12). The learning probably related to learning God’s will from the Scripture. As Lane writes, “From Scripture, and especially from the Psalms, Jesus learned that his passion was grounded in the saving will of God and could not be severed from his calling. Thus in the declaration that Jesus ‘learned obedience from what he suffered,’ the term τὴν ὑπακοήν, ‘obedience,’ has a very specific meaning: it is obedience to the call to suffer death in accordance with the revealed will of God.... Jesus freely accepted the suffering of death because Scripture, and through it God, appointed him to this sacrifice for the sake of his office....” He does not cling to the privileged status that his unique sonship implies but receives it from the Father only after he has suffered the humiliation of death on the cross (cf. 12:2). Jesus learned experientially what obedience entails through his passion in order to achieve salvation and to become fully qualified for his office as eternal high priest (2:10; 5:9-10)” (Hebrews, p. 121).
95 Lane writes, “Through his sufferings and the accomplishment of his redemptive mission, Jesus has been perfected by God as the priest of his people and exalted to the divine presence ....” (Hebrews, p. 122).
96 Although most divide this unit into two paragraphs with a “severe warning” in 5:11--6:8 and then an “encouragement” in 6:9-20, Lane seems to be correct when he identifies an inclusio with in 5:11 and 6:12 through the term “sluggish” (νωθροί). He writes, “This word occurs only here in Hebrews, and nowhere else in the NT. Its literary function corresponds to the use of ἀπιστία in 3:12 and 3:19 to indicate the limits of a paragraph of comment on the biblical citation of Ps 95:7b-11...” (Hebrews, p. 134).
With insight Lane writes, “It is commonly assumed on the basis of 5:11--6:3 that the community addressed had failed to mature in faith and understanding, and consequently required rudimentary instruction rather than the advanced exposition of Christ’s priesthood and sacrifice presented in 7:1--10:18. the problem with this reconstruction of the situation is that it is not supported by the detail of the text. The biblical interpretation and the presentation of Christology in 1:1--5:10 presuppose advanced Christian instruction and a level of understanding that corresponds to the adult consumption of solid food and not to a diet of milk. In addition, the writer shows no inclination to review with his hearers the foundational elements of the Christian faith. He clearly regarded the hearers as mature. He reminds them that they have ingested over a considerable period of time the instruction that qualified them to be the teachers of others (5:12). Consequently, the portrayal of them as infants who have to be nurtured with milk is not an actual description of some or of all of the members of the community. It is irony, calculated to shame them and to recall them to the stance of conviction and boldness consonant with their experience (6:4-5, 10) and hope (6:9-12). The community has deviated from its earlier course (cf. 10:32-34) by becoming sluggish in understanding (5:12). Their regression to infancy must represent a quite recent development. It was apparently an attempt to sidestep their responsibility in a world that persecuted them and held them in contempt, but it threatened their integrity. The purpose of 5:11--6:12 is to preserve the community from such aberration by reminding them of what they have experienced and what they posses through the gospel ...” (Hebrews, p. 135, cf. p. 145-146).
97 See Lane Hebrews, p. 138.
98 The foundation has already been laid (cf. 2:3-4; 6:1, 4).
99 Each of the six items listed here may well have reference to the high priestly ministry of Christ: dead works=regulations associated with the Levitical priesthood (9:10), washings, appointment of priests through the laying on of hands et cetera (see Lane Hebrews, p. 140).
100 This term ( ᾿Αδύνατον) is placed emphatically at the head of these verses in the Greek text.
Lane writes, “The assertion ‘it is impossible to restore them to repentance’ is parallel to the notion of laying again the foundation concerning repentance in v 1. There the primary word concerning Christ was the foundation, which had to be left standing and which could not be recast. This thought is reiterated precisely in v 6; it is impossible to seek to lay another foundation than the one that has been laid and is sustaining the people of God .... In the eschatological perspective of Hebrews, there is no other repentance than that provided by God through Jesus Christ. There is no salvation apart from the purification for sins accomplished by the divine Son in the final period of God’s redemptive activity (1:1-3). The ἀδύνατον, which is used absolutely and without qualification in v 4, expresses an impossibility because the apostate repudiates the only basis upon which repentance can be extended .... To repudiate Christ is to embrace the ‘impossible’” (Hebrews, p. 142).
101 This term (α῞παξ) has the sense of definite occurrence (TDNT 1:382). The writer will now describe the event of salvation which the readers have experienced in terms of its different aspects and manifestations (Lane, Hebrews, p. 141).
102 This “taste” is to fully experience something (cf. 2:9).
103 This is an aorist participle (parapes*ntaY) indicating a decisive moment of commitment to apostasy. When this term is used in the LXX it describes an attitude “reflecting deliberate and calculated renunciation of God (Ezek 20:27; 22:4 ...” (Lane, Hebrews, p. 142). This is similar to the apostasy noted in 3:12 which Israel expressed at Kadesh.
104 Lane writes, “This could entail a return to Jewish convictions and practices as well as a public denial of faith in Christ under pressure from a magistrate or a hostile crowd, simply for personal advantage (cf. Mark 8:34-38; Herm. Sim. 8.8.2; 9.19.1) [Hebrews, p. 6].
105 Lane identifies this consequence as being part of the cursing sanctions of the covenant (Hebrews, p. 143). But one wonders where these are for those who are part of the New Covenant. The New Covenant only describes blessing for its partakers. The covenant which includes “cursing sanctions” is the Mosaic covenant and that is not applicable for those who have believed in Christ (6:4-5). Note that the words are “close to being cursed.” This is different than actually being cursed. The description here is one of severe consequences for their rebellion, but not eternal consequences (cf. 1 Cor. 5:5).
106 Again, this is another affirmation that he is speaking to those who are saved! Toussaint identifies this term with future salvation (GTJ 3 : 75), but this is not a necessary or natural conclusion in this passage.
Note also that he calls them “beloved” (ἀγαπητοί). This is a term reserved for the household of faith.
107 This is an exhortation to continue their diligent ministry because God will reward them for their work in the future.
108 Perhaps that specifics of this ministry may be found in 10:32-34.
109 Genesis 22:16.
110 Lane writes, “Abraham received the definitive confirmation of the divine promise after having been severely tested both in faith and endurance (v 15; cf. Gen 22:1, 15-18). The fulfillment of the promise he had received from God (Gen 12:2; 15:5) depended upon Isaac. The steadfast trust in God’s word of promise that he displayed when he was commanded to offer up his son is precisely the quality of commitment appropriate to those who are currently the heirs to the divine promise” (Hebrews, p. 151).
111 Lane writes, “the focus of the exposition shifts sharply from the patriarch to Christians, who are designated ..., ‘the heirs of the promise’ (cf. v 12). As those who have inherited the promises through Christ, they are to appreciate the relevance of the biblical account to them. What is recorded in Scripture is intended to strengthen them in their conviction that God’s purpose for them is also unalterable. The sworn assurance of God is extended to them ...” (Hebrews, p. 152).
112 This someone greater was YHWH (Deut. 6:13; 10:20). An oath is calling God to bear witness in a disputed matter (see Philo, On the Special Laws 2.10).
113 Genesis 22:16-17.
114 Although this is not specified in this passage, its most logical referent, textually, is the promise and the oath in Genesis 22:16-17.
115 It is most likely not the anchor which has entered behind the curtain, but hope. The antecedent to the participle is the relative pronoun ûn which is the complement of the immediately preceding word hope (ἐλπίδος, v. 18; see also the RSV and NASB which translate the passage in this way). See its later reference in 7:19 as “a new hope by which we draw near to God.”
116 This refers to the OT model where the inner curtain separated the sanctuary of God from the holy place in the tabernacle where the high priest could enter on the Day of Atonement (Lev. 16:2, 12, 15; cf. Ex. 26:31-35; Lev. 21:23; 24:3; Heb. 9:3). Now Jesus is the eternal high priest who has offered made his self-offering as a ground of Christian hope. He has opened for believers the true presence of God (cf. 10:19, 22).
117 The Abrahamic promise (6:13-16) was insured by the mediation of the real high priest like Melchizedek (6:17-20).
118 An inclusio establishes this section--”Melchizedek met Abraham” (7:1,10; cf. Gen. 14:17).
Hebrews 7:1-10 explains the comparison of Christ to Melchizedek: (1) His attributes are the same as Jesus--the Son of God: “King of righteousness” “King of peace,” “blesser of Abraham” (7:1-2). (2) His claim on the office of High priest is not on heredity (7:3). (3) Christ does what Melchizedek did--he blesses Israel (Abraham) 7:4-10.
119 The Melchizedek of Psalm 110:4 (Hebrews 6:20) is now identified through a discussion of Genesis 14:17-20. As Lane writes, “The exegesis presupposes that an antecedent revelation is the pledge of a future eschatological fulfillment. In 7:1-10 the revelation in Ps. 110:4 is understood to have confirmed the eschatological implications of Gen. 14:17-20 ....” He rightly adds, “In Hebrews Melchizedek is not a redeemer, and he performs no saving act. He is a historical figure who serves as a precedent for a priesthood not based on lineage or law. It is possible that the writer of Hebrews was aware of and stood critically against some of the traditions concerning Melchizedek, but is now impossible to specify which traditions the writer may have known. His development of Melchizedek is essentially independent from extrabiblical ideas. It is derived from Gen. 14:17-20, which has been approached typologically from the perspective of Ps 110:4” (Hebrews, 159, 162-63).
Concerning the typological nature of Melchizedek Baylis astutely writes, “as the covenant was reflected in Abraham’s life, so would it be in the future nation. Therefore as Melchizedek interacted with Abraham, he too represented a future One who would come. That future One would bless Israel `just like’ Melchizedek had blessed Abraham .... Genesis intended Melchizedek to represent an ultimate Melchizedek” (“The Author of Hebrews’ Use of Melchizedek from the Context of Genesis,” ThD dissertation [Dallas, TX: Dallas Theological Seminary, 1989], 162-63).
120 Melchizedek “offers confirmation to Abraham that the covenant’s benefits ([Gen.]12:3a) have been reflected in the defeat of the enemies. He then turns and offers praise to God on behalf of Abraham for this covenantal deliverance. Abraham confirms Melchizedek’s superior status by offering him a tithe. Melchizedek is thus a priest who acts as a mediator between Abraham and God” (“The Author of Hebrews’ Use of Melchizedek from the Context of Genesis,” 161-62).
121 By examining the toledot motifs in Genesis one can see that Melchizedek did not have the correct matriarch or patriarch, was presented nowhere as having a part in the genealogical line of blessing, and actually was not reported to have been born or died. Thus he has no place in genealogical blessing. Hebrews 7:3 is not affirming that Melchizedek had no lineage, but that lineage was not the basis of his priesthood. He was not related to the national genealogical requirements for priesthood.
The mediatory role of Melchizedek is supported by the “bridge” motif in Genesis which began with Babel (Gen. 11) where man tried to bridge the gap between the “gods” and their nation with the man made tower. Continuing in this thought Baylis writes, “Following its failure, God provided a nation in Abraham instead of Babel [Gen. 12:2], and a chosen mediator between heaven and earth instead of a tower. god reconfirmed the national promise and the God-made `bridge’ to Jacob in `Jacob’s ladder’” (“The Author of Hebrews’ Use of Melchizedek form the Context of Genesis,” 162).
In view of the above comparison Jesus becomes both parts of the channel of blessing--national and mediatory. He is Israel from Abraham (Matthew 1--4) and He is Melchizedek (Hebrews 7). In addition Jesus is confirmed to be the One who mediates between God and man as the true Bethel (Jn. 1:51; cf. Gen. 28:10-22). Jesus is the God-Man--the mediator between God and Man!
Lane writes, “Melchizedek’s sudden appearance and equally sudden disappearance from recorded history evoked the notion of eternity, which was only prefigured in Melchizedek but was realized in Christ. Consequently, Melchizedek foreshadows the priesthood of Christ at that point where it is most fundamentally different from the Levitical priesthood ...” (Hebrews, p. 166).
122 “He abides a priest perpetually” speaks of Melchizedek’s influence through his successor Jesus just as Abel still speaks concerning his faith (11:4) and Abraham still lives in his seed (6:14) [Baylis, “The Author of Hebrews’ Use of Melchizedek from the Context of Genesis,” 173, 176-86).
123 Lane writes, “By using the term ‘patriarch,’ the writer prepares for the conclusion of vv 9-10 that Levi paid a tithe to Melchizedek through his father (πατήρ), Abraham ...” (Hebrews, 168).
124 Lane writes, “So far as the record of Scripture is concerned, Melchizedek has no end of life and his unique priesthood has no successor. But what is true of Melchizedek in a limited and literary sense is true absolutely of the one who serves his people as high priest in the presence of God ...” (Hebrews, p. 170).
125 Lane writes, “the statement that Levi had himself paid the tithe was true in an important sense, indicated by the expression δι ᾿ ᾿Αβραάμ , ‘through Abraham,’ which immediately follows. The corporate solidarity that bound Israel to the patriarch implied that Levi was fully represented in Abraham’s action. Therefore, Levi’s status relative to Melchizedek was affected by Abraham’s relationship to that personage. Consequently, the superiority of Melchizedek over the Levitical priesthood is not merely theoretical but has a basis in history ...” (Hebrews, p. 170).
126 Lane understands this unit to be built about typological exegesis where the priesthood of Aaron is typical of Jesus’ priesthood which fulfills all that Aaron’s priesthood could not do (Hebrews, 177).
127 The change of law in this unit is not referring to all of the Mosaic Law but to that code of the Law which referred to code: legal descent, standards of bodily qualification and ritual purity (cf. 7:14, 26; Lane, Hebrews, 182-5).
128 Lane writes, “although Jesus’ human life had been exposed to κατάλυσις, ‘destruction,’ through crucifixion, his life was not destroyed by the death suffered on the cross. The phrase δύναμιν ζωῆς ἀκαταλύτου describes the new quality of life with which Jesus was endowed by virtue of his resurrection and exaltation to the heavenly world, where he was formally installed in his office as high priest ...” (Hebrews, 184).
129 Lane writes, “Through this ‘better hope’ the new people of God have secured the assurance of a quality of access to and a relationship with God that were not possible under the Levitical institution” (Hebrews, 186).
130 Lane writes, “The christological significance of Melchizedek, however, is limited because in the biblical account he has nothing to do with sacrifice. For that reason, in 7:26-28 the writer builds a bridge to the subsequent exposition in that reason, in 7:26-28 the writer builds a bridge to the subsequent exposition in 8:1-10:18, where the sacrificial aspect of Jesus’ office as high priest is elaborated” (Hebrews, 2:257).
131 This unit is an introduction, or transition, to the exposition that follows in Hebrews 9.
132 Lane writes, “The writer’s statement in 8:1-2 is the summit of his case. The `crowning affirmation’ is not simply that Christians have a high priest who has taken his seat at God’s right hand (v 1) but that he is the ministering priest in the heavenly sanctuary (v 2)” (Hebrews, p. 204).
133 Literally, “taken his seat at the right hand of the throne of Majesty ....” This recalls 1:3 and the writer’s use of Psalm 110:1. This may also be an allusion to Zechariah 6:13 (LXX) where the one who is seated at God’s right hand is the anointed priest, “And he shall receive power, and shall sit and rule upon his throne; and there shall be a priest on his right [καὶε῎σται ἰερεὺς ἐκ δεξιῶν αὐτοῦ] hand, and a peaceable counsel shall be between them both.”
134 Although he does not state it here, the writer has in mind Christ’s presentation of Himself as a sin offering (cf. 7:27; 9:14).
135 The writer is not saying that the earthly sanctuary was not real, or was false, but that it was a symbol, and was imperfect. Lane writes that, “the contrast between the earthly and heavenly sanctuary is not an expression of Alexandrian metaphysics, but the writer’s way of presenting the typological relation between the old and new covenants; the heavenly liturgy is the eschatological reality that the OT institutions only foreshadowed, and the relationship between the two sanctuaries is basically a temporal one ...” (Hebrews, p. 206).
136 Some believe that there is a true spiritual heavenly tabernacle in which Christ entered and sprinkled his blood (Heb. 8:2,5; 9:11, 23, 24). Philo felt that this was in agreement with Plato. But this is not a reflection of the Platonic idea that the immaterial is the real realm and this is not earthy. In Hebrews 9:5 it talks of the mercy seat (ἱλαστήριον) and the only other occurrence of this term is in Romans 3:25 where it speaks of Christ as our propitiation. In Hebrews it is not so much that act of propitiation but the place of propitiation. Therefore in Romans 3:25 the heavenly, holy-place would have been Calvary! It was probable that the “tabernacle” was a blueprint and not a model. If Christ has to take His blood into a heavenly temple, then it was not “finished” on the cross. The mercy seat of the Spiritual reality was Calvary (John A. Witmer, class notes of student in 444 History of Philosophy, Dallas Theological Seminary, Spring 1983).
137 See Exodus 25:9, 40; 26:30; 27:8; Numbers 8:4.
138 These verses are based upon Jeremiah 31:31-34.
139 This first covenant which is passing away has the cultic regulations in view. This can be especially seen in the next unit where the first covenant is developed.
140 These two topics will now be discussed in inverse order.
141 This Menorah (λυχνία) was placed on the south side of The Holy Place (Ex. 26:35; cf. 25:31-39; 27:20-21).
142 This stood at the north side of the front compartment (Ex. 25:23-30; 26:35; Lev. 24:6).
143 Although the golden alter of incense may well have been placed just before the second curtain at the rear of the front chamber (cf. Ex. 30:1-10). Some, such as Pentecost, understand this alter to be in the Most Holy Place between the veil and the mercy seat as it is placed in this verse (cf. Ex. 30:6; 40:26; 1 Ki. 6:20-22; Lev. 16:8; For another view see Lane, Hebrews, 2:220). In any case this is the place where Gabriel and Zechariah met in Luke 1:8-11.
144 Exodus 25:10-22; 37:1-5.
145 The manna and Aaron’s rod are thought to be before the Ark in the Hebrew Scriptures, and the stone tablets are thought to be the only thing within the Ark, but the writer of Hebrews seems to know otherwise (Exodus 16:32-34; 25:16, 21; Deuteronomy 10:1-2;cf. 1 Kings 8:9; 2 Chron. 5:10; Numbers 17:10-11).
146 Exodus 25:17-22 (cf. Lev. 16:14-15); 37:7-9; Numbers 7:89.
147 This summarizing statement transitions the reader into the next topic in 6-10. Lane writes, “In verses 2-5 his attention is attracted by the division of the Mosaic tabernacle into two compartments, which is simply accentuated by the enumeration of the furnishings” (Hebrews, 221).
148 These responsibilities included: trimming of the lamps of the Menorah (Ex. 27:20-21), burning of incense on the golden altar (Ex. 30:7-8) in the morning and evening of each day, and replacing the fresh ‘loaves’ of the unleavened, consecrated bread on the table once each week (Lev. 24:8-9).
149 This is a reference to the day of atonement (Lev. 16).
150 Lane writes, “The ritual of the red heifer aptly illustrates the external nature of the cultic provisions of the old covenant. It also demonstrates that a state of defilement is a hindrance to worship (Num 19:13, 20). By grouping ‘the blood of goats and bulls’ and ‘the sprinkled ashes of a heifer,’ the writer implies that all the sacrifices of the old covenant were to provide merely an external and symbolic removal of defilement. They sanctify ..., ‘to the extent of the purging of the flesh’” (Hebrews, 2:239).
151 The blood is a synonym for the death of Christ in its sacrificial significance.
152 Lane appropriately says, “‘Conscience’... is the human organ of the religious life embracing the whole person in relationship to God .... It is the point at which a person confronts God’s holiness” (Hebrews, 2:240).
153 As the Suffering Servant Jesus was qualified for his task by the Spirit of God (cf. Isa. 42:1; 61:1).
154 This includes eternal salvation (cf. 1:14; 3:1; 5:9; 10:36).
155 Lane notes well that for a covenant to be ratified the death of the ratifer needed to be represented symbolically when he writes, “In the OT, ratification of a covenant based on sacrifice frequently entailed a self-maledictory procedure. The ratifying party invoked a curse upon himself when he swore commitment to comply with the terms of the covenant. In the transaction the ratifying party was represented by animals designated for sacrifice. The bloody dismemberment of representative animals signified the violent death of the ratifying party if he proved faithless to his oath (e.g., Gen 15:9-21; Exod 24: 3-8; Ps 50:5; Jer 34:17-20 ...)” (Hebrews, 2:242-43).
Continuing he writes, “The writer’s choice of the term φέρεσθαι, ‘to be introduced,’ ‘to be brought forward’ ... was probably influenced by the cultic use of φέρειν in the LXX, where it is associated with the representative act of offering a sacrifice. The offer is represented in and by the sacrifice he brings.... In terms of OT covenant procedure, the death of sacrificial animals was brought forward on behalf of the one ratifying the covenant ...” (Ibid).
156 “The formulation accurately reflects the legal situation that a covenant is never secured until the ratifier has bound himself to his oath by means of a representative death ...” (Ibid.).
157 Exodus 24:3-8.
158 Lane writes, “That the effects of sin also extend to the heavenly world is a corollary of the solidarity that the writer perceives between ultimate reality in heaven and its reflection on earth. The cultus on earth is inseparably linked to the situation in heaven (cf. 8:5; 9:7, 11-12, 23; 12:18-24). As defilement reaches beyond the individual to taint society and the earthly cultus, it also pollutes heavenly reality” (Hebrews, 2:247; cf. Lev. 21:15 with Heb. 12:15-16; Lev. 16:16; 20:3; 21:23; Num. 19:20, 21).
159 See Isaiah 53:12.
160 The image behind this statement is again the day of atonement where the people waited anxiously outside the sanctuary until the high priest emerged from the Most Holy Place after he had fulfilled his ministry (Lev. 16:17).
161 This is not to say that the Law was not real as in Platonic idealism, but that it pointed forward to that which was perfect or complete--a past witness to a future reality.
162 Lane writes, “As long as this sense of sin and transgression with respect to God remained, there could be no effective service of God. A decisive cleansing of the conscience is a prerequisite of unhindered access to God (10:22), and this has been achieved only through the sacrifice of Christ ...” (Hebrews, 2:261).
163 “The Day of Atonement was designated as a day for fasting (Lev 23:26-32) and the confession of sins (Lev 16:20-22). The elaborate ritual was intended to accentuate a consciousness of sins. The solemn entrance of the high priest into the Most Holy Place dramatized the fact that sin separates the congregation from God. From this perspective, the sacrifices really provided ἀνάμνησις ἀμαρτιῶν, ‘a reminder of sins,’ which brought to the consciousness of the worshipers the reality of their sins as an obstacle to fellowship with God” (Ibid.).
164 Lane writes, “The writer [of Hebrews] understands the cited passage as a word addressed by the Son to the Father on the occasion of the incarnation,...” (Ibid., 2:263).
165 Jesus’ bodily sacrifice was the “will” of God “I have come ... to do Your will, O God.”
166 Jesus is contrasted to the Levitical priests who “stands” in verse 11. Lane writes, “Jesus sits because his sacrifice requires no repetition. His heavenly session attests that the benefits of his sacrificial death endure perpetually. The sacrificial phase of his priestly ministry is completed” (Hebrews, 2:267).
167 Psalm 110 cf. Hebrews 8:1-2. “The session at the right hand puts Christ in a position where he may provide assistance to his people without having to offer sacrifices. The allusion to Ps 110:1 in vv 12-13 insists on the established firmness of his position. For the future he has only to wait for the complete subjugation of every power that resists the gracious redemptive purposes of God. Jesus’ place in the presence of God enables him to exercise in heaven the ministry of the new covenant” (Hebrews, 2:267).
168 The present tense for testifies, Μαρτυρεῖ, indicates that through the quotation of the prophetic oracle the Holy Spirit is presently speaking.
169 In light of the preceding argument, the fulfillment of Jeremiah’s oracle is tied directly to the new situation introduced by the sacrificial death of Jesus” (Lane, Hebrews, 2:269).
170 “The basis for speaking about a decisive putting away of sins is the efficacy of the sacrifice offered by Christ on the cross ...” (Hebrews, 2:269).
171 Lane writes, “The shift in literary genre from exposition to exhortation that occurs in 10:19-25 takes account of the perspectives developed in 8:1-10:18 and clarifies their relevance for the faith and life of the community addressed” (Hebrews, 2:257).
172 This unit is marked off in a kind of inclusio through the term παρρησίαν (“authorization”/ “boldness”) 10:19,35. The structure of this warning section is very similar to 5:11--6:20--Exhortation/Warning/Encouragement. Lane considers this to be the “climactic parenetic section of the sermon” (Hebrews, 2:280, 282).
173 Since this is a recapitulation of 3:1-6 and in 3:6a this household is identified as the church, then the reference in 10:21 is to the Church and more specifically, to the community addressed. In view of this Lane writes, “This statement enriches the conception of the relationship Christ sustains to his people and assures them that their worshipful approach to God will be welcomed ...” (Hebrews, 2:285).
174 Lane notes, “the exhortation is organized around three chortatives: ‘let us continue to draw near’ (v 22), ‘let us continue to hold fast’ (v 23), and ‘let us keep on caring’ (v 24). Each of these verbs is qualified by reference to the triad of Christian virtues: ‘fullness of faith’ (v 22), ‘the hope we profess’ (v 23), and ‘the stimulation of love’ (v 24)” (Hebrews, 2:281-82).
175 See Hebrews 4:16.
176 This phrase invokes the imagery of Jeremiah 31:33 where Jeremiah envisioned a new heart.
177 This imagery was anticipated in 9:18-22 where Moses sprinkled the people with blood. This sprinkling is to be associated with Jesus’ inauguration of the new covenant through his sacrificial death. Likewise, the external washing of the bodies probably has reference to Christian baptism which replaces all previous cleansing rites (see Lane, Hebrews, 2:287).
178 Lane astutely writes, “The entire community must assume responsibility to watch that no one grows weary or becomes apostate. This is possible only when Christians continue to exercise care for one another personally ...” (Hebrews, 2:290).
179 This paragraph is limited by the key terms φοβερά, φοβερόν in verses 27 and 31. It is also very similar to the warning in 6:4-8 with the following four elements: (1) the experience of Christian life [6:4-5/10:26], (2) the fact of apostasy [6:6/10:29], (3) the recognition that renewal is impossible [6:4, 6/10:26], and (4) the imposition of the curse sanctions of the covenant [6:8/10:27]. Therefore, these are complementary declarations with the difference being in the formation of the argument. Central to this unit is the cultus mentioned above in 9:11--10:18. There is no cultus in 6:4-8 (Lane, Hebrews, 2:296-297).
Continuing Lane writes, “That the writer appeals in 10:26-31 to the new cultic action of Christ indicates that these verses provide the counterpoint to 10:19-22. The earlier passage sets forth the appropriate response to the sacrifice of Christ and his entrance as high priest into the heavenly sanctuary. The provision of access to God invites sincere and earnest worship. In the present passage the inappropriate response of those who fail to appreciate their continuing need for Christ’s redemptive action commands the writer’s attention” (Hebrews, 2:291-292).
180 See verse 29 below for a definition of this persistence. This probably also has significance in view of Numbers 15:29-31 which speaks against sins of presumption.
181 Lane writes, “This follows because the only sacrifice that can remove defilement has been repudiated, and the sufficient sacrifice of Christ cannot be repeated (10:10, 12, 14)” (Hebrews, 2:293). Therefore, this does not mean that their sins are not covered, but that there is nowhere else to go to have them covered than to Christ.
182 The apostate is regarded as an adversary of God. This judgment through consuming fire recalls the what occurred to the followers of Korah (Num. 16:35; 26:10).
183 See Hebrews 2:2-3 where this logic was first expressed.
184 Deuteronomy 17:6; cf.13:8.
185 Lane writes, “The designation of Jesus as ‘the Son of God’ almost certainly has reference to the formal confession of faith which the community had openly acknowledged .... The repudiation of the confession is tantamount to a scornful rejection of the Son of God. The paradoxical notion of treating with disdain one who possesses transcendent dignity commands attention” (Hebrews, 2:294). This trampling is to treat Christ as unnecessary or useless (cf. Matt. 5:13; 7:6).
186 Lane writes, “The phrase in v 29 corroborates that 10:26-31 is descriptive of the Christian who has experienced the action of Christ upon his life. With biting irony, the writer envisions such a person as regarding Christ’s blood as ... (‘defiled,’ ‘disqualified for sacrifice’). The juxtaposition of considering defiled blood which consecrates is rhetorically forceful. A deliberate rejection of the vital power of the blood of Christ to purge sins decisively is indicated ...” (Hebrews, 2:294).
187 This may have reference to Hebrews 9:14 or the Spirit who was poured out at Pentecost (cf. Zech. 12:10 LXX; Acts 2; Heb. 2:4; 6:4).
No doubt these three actions together add up to no less than a complete rejection of the Christian faith. Lane writes, “Apostate are those who embrace the worldliness in preference to the community. They have chosen to return to the world from which they had been separated by the blood of Christ. In their lives the sacred has been collapsed into the profane. Their denial of their need for the life of the community reflects a willful hardening of their hearts (cf. 3:12-15). Apostasy reaffirms the values of the world, which permit those who stand outside the community to regard Jesus Christ with contempt (cf. 6:6). Consequently, those who once were cleansed and consecrated to God become reinfected with a permanent defilement that cannot be purged.... They experience an absolute loss, which is deserved ...” (Hebrews, 2:295).
188 This severer punishment need not be “eternal loss in hell” as Toussaint affirms (GTJ 3:77).
As a description of this severer punishment Sartarelli writes, “It cannot be considered as hell for these readers are ‘sanctified’ and ‘made perfect forever [10:10, 14].’ Rather, the imagery of judgment and fire sounds much like the believer’s discipline mentioned in chapter 6. However, that this judgment is worse than that which was given for high-handed sinning in the Old Covenant means that it must include at least death (for that was the judgment in the Old Covenant). That believers can suffer such judgment from God is a clear New Testament teaching (cf. 1 Cor. 11:30; Jas. 5:20; 1 Jn. 5:16-17). This judgment may also include subjection to the judgment on Jerusalem which was soon coming (cf. v. 25 ‘you see the day drawing near’). Thus, in abandoning Christianity and reverting back to Judaism they would become subject to the judgment that would fall on that nation (i.e., A.D. 70). Finally, this judgment may also include some loss of rewards as the author writes in verse 35 “do not throw away your confidence, which has a great reward” (“Theology and Purpose of Warning Passages in Hebrews,” 13-14).
Concerning this severe punishment Hodges writes, “Many forms of divine retribution can fall on a human life which are worse than immediate death. In fact, Jeremiah made just such a complaint about the punishment inflicted on Jerusalem (Lam. 4:6, 9). One might thing also of King Saul, whose last days were burdened with such mental and emotional turmoil that death itself was a kind of release” (BKC, NT, 806).
189 See Deuteronomy 32:35a, 36a; Psalm 135:14a.
190 Lane writes, “The remembrance of past performance provides a powerful incentive for renewed commitment and fidelity in the present and for the future” (Hebrews, 2:282).
These four verse are in what some call a “persecution-form” which includes a pronouncement of a blessing, a situation of persecution, a call to rejoice, and the reason to rejoice in the promise of reward (cf. Matt. 5:11-12; Luke 6:22-23; 1 Pet. 4:13-17) (cf. Lane, Hebrews, 2:281, 96-97).
191 See 6:4.
192 The term is α῎θλησις describing intense athletic efforts (cf. 12:1-2). Lane writes, “For them, as for the writer of Hebrews, the image of the contest was an acceptable way of giving a positive interpretation of an experience of abuse ...” (Hebrews, 2:298).
193 This is the confident attitude of the person of faith before God and the world. Because of his relationship with God he can acknowledge his faith before the world (cf. also Heb. 3:6).
194 Lane notes the transitional nature of this unit when he states, “The final paragraph (vv 36-39) concludes the exhortation by introducing the key terms to be developed in the next major division of the sermon, ‘endurance’ (v 36) and ‘faith’ (v 39).
195 See Hebrews 9:15
196 Lane notes the following concerning this allusion to Isaiah 26:20: “If the brief excerpt from Isa 26:20 LXX is intended to recall the entire verse, it may indicate that there were Christians in the house church who sought to justify a lifestyle characterized by withdrawal and concealment on the basis of this text. The writer cites enough of the verse to show that he is aware of their position but refuses to accept its validity. The mode of endurance they championed was incompatible with the courageous and joyful endurance of adversity celebrated in vv 32-36 ...” (Hebrews, 2:304).
197 This reference to Habakkuk 2:3b-4 is the writers answer to the reclusive view of those who followed Isaiah 26:20.
198 Chapter 11 draws continuity between the Old and New covenants by citing those of the Old Covenant who demonstrated faith just as those of the New Covenant are to demonstrate faith. One should only emulate their faith, not their limitations.
Lane writes, “In 11:1 the writer turns from exhortation to exposition, signaling a distinct break with the preceding discussion. A smooth transition to this new unit of thought is achieved by the introduction of the motif of faithfulness in 10:38-39. The key word is πίστις, ‘faithfulness,’ supplied by the citation from Hab 2:4, furnishes a linking term to the characterization of the correlative word πίστις, ‘faith,’ in 11:1. The word then becomes the characteristic term of the first section, where it is repeated with variation twenty-four times. The opening and close of the section are indicated by an inclusio, which serves to bracket the exposition:” [11:1-2/39] (Hebrews, 2:313).
“The faith celebrated in 11:1-40 is characterized by firmness, reliability, and steadfastness. It is trust in God and in his promises (cf. 4:1-3; 6:1; 11:6, 17-19, 29). The context shows that what these attested witnesses affirm is the reliability of God, who is faithful to his promise (11:11)” (Ibid., 2:315).
199 More than a definition of faith, this is a recommendation of faith which results in life (cf. 10:39).
200 Lane writes, “The logical connection of this assertion is not with the acts of faith of the attested witnesses but with v 1, for it is a statement about faith itself. The discernment of the unseen creative activity of God behind the visible universe exemplifies the capacity of faith to demonstrate the reality of that which cannot be perceived through sense perception, which is celebrated as the essence of faith in v 1b ...” (Hebrews, 2:330).
201 This understanding comes through the written word of God.
202 Genesis 1:1, 3-21.
203 “In vv 3-31 the development is distinguished by anaphora, the rhetorical repetition of a key word or words at the beginning of successive clauses to give unity, rhythm, and solemnity to a discourse (BDF §491 ...) (Lane, Hebrews, 2:320).
204 This unit is marked off with an inclusio through the term “seen” (βλεπομένων) and a negative qualifier in verses 1 and 7 (“not seen”/ “unseen”).
205 Lane writes, “The exemplars of faith to whom reference is made in the pages of the OT ‘enjoyed the approving testimony of Scripture, and consequently of God himself, who speak by His Spirit through the written word’ ...” (Hebrews, 2:330).
206 Genesis 4:3-5.
207 Note that the writer does not affirm that Abel’s blood continues to speak to us (cf. Gen. 4:10), but that his faith is still speaking. Lane writes, “The writer affirms that Abel’s faith continues to speak to us through the written record of his action in Scripture, which transmits to us the exemplary character of his offering ...” (Hebrews, 2:335).
208 Genesis 5:21-24.
209 The LXX speaks of pleasing God rather than walking with God.
210 This is a confessional statement found in Judaism. One must believe in the basic confession of the faith.
211 This is also an expression of faith. It is unwavering hope in the promises of the God who controls the future.
212 Genesis 6.
213 This is a play off of 11:1 (τῶν μηδέπω βλεπομένων).
214 Genesis 6:1-7; see 2 Peter 2:5.
215 Genesis 6:9; Ezekiel 14:14, 20.
216 The term “heir” (κληρονόμος) ties this paragraph with the one which preceded it (cf. 11:7, 8, 9).
217 Lane writes, “11:8-19 is not merely a summary of Abraham’s life, character, and faith. It is also a succinct history of the promise of God considered in terms of Abraham’s call and migration to Canaan (11:8-10), the conception of Isaac (11:11-12), the deferment of the fulfillment of the promise (11:13-16), and the command to sacrifice Isaac (11:17-19)” (Hebrews, 2:319).
218 This describes a city firmly founded, unlike the land of Abraham’s tents. It is to be unshakable and abiding.
219 Genesis 15:1-6; 17:15-22; 18:9-15.
220 Lane notes well, “In spite of initial incredulity, in which they both shared (Gen 17:17; 18:10-12), both achieved the ability to believe that parenthood was possible” (Hebrews, 2:353).
221 Genesis 15:5; 22:17; 32:12.
222 Genesis 18:11-12; Romans 4:19; Hebrews 11:12.
223 These comments separate verses 11-12 and 17-19 which are similar in style and theme. Lane writes, “The writer placed at the center of the paragraph his most important affirmations, in order to emphasize the eschatological perspective from which the entire unit (vv 8-22) is to be understood” (Hebrews, p. 255).
224 When Abraham received Isaac from the altar of sacrifice there was a foreshadowing of the future resurrection from the dead ...”(Lane, Hebrews, 2:363).
225 Genesis 27.
226 Genesis 48.
227 Jacob is described as submitting to God’s will. It took a long time for him to get to this point (cf. Gen. 25ff).
228 Genesis 50:24-25; Exodus 13:19; Joshua 24:32. “Joseph’s concern for burial in the land of Canaan expressed a desire informed by faith to be associated with those who through faith became the heirs of the promises (cf. 6:12)” (Lane, Hebrews, 2:366).
229 The mention of the anticipated departure of the Israelites from Egypt in v 22 prepares literarily for the third paragraph concerning Moses and the events he set in motion with the exodus from Egypt (vv 23-31) (Lane, Hebrews, 2:321).
230 Lane writes, “The catalogue of exemplary witnesses to faith turns suddenly fro the early phase of Moses’ career to the final act in the dramatic sequence of events that were the prelude to the Exodus. Although Moses remains the subject of the main verb (‘by faith he celebrated the Passover’), there is a subtle transition in v 28 from exemplary persons to exemplary events, and this shift in emphasis is reflected in vv 29-30 as well as in the enumeration of the accomplishments of faith in vv 33-38” (Hebrews, 2:376).
231 Lane notes, “The writer had earlier referred to the faithlessness of the wilderness generation in 3:16-19. It is not surprising that in a catalogue of exemplary persons and events he passes over in silence the forty-year period during which those who had experienced the celebration of the Passover, the exodus from Egypt, and the miraculous crossing of the Red Sea wandered aimlessly in the wilderness. Not until the entrance into Canaan can a recital of the acts of faith be resumed” (Hebrews, 2:378).
232 Joshua 2:1.
233 Through this rhetorical question the writer transitions from one version of the exemplary list to the next version of an enumeration of names in rapid succession followed by an abstract of the accomplishments of faith that extend the historical survey into the Maccabean period.
234 Lane notes, “This is a common homiletical and literary idiom for indicating that time and space are limited ...” (Hebrews, 2:382).
235 By answering in this way the writer is noting that he is going to abbreviate the matter under discussion.
236 Note that these names are not given in chronological order. Perhaps this list of judges comes from 1 Samuel 12:11 (LXX).
237 Judges 6--8.
238 Judges 4--5.
239 Judges 12--16.
240 Judges 11--12.
241 1 Samuel 16--2 Samuel 24.
242 1 Samuel 1--15.
243 Perhaps the writer has Gideon (Judges 6:12-16; 7:7), Barak (Judges 4:6-7, 14), Samson (Judges 13:5), and David (2 Samuel 7:11) as those who obtained specific blessings that had been promised by God.
244 Perhaps this refers to Samson (Judges 14:5-6), David (1 Samuel 17:34-37) and/or Daniel (Dan. 6:23-24).
245 Perhaps Daniel’s three friends, Hananiah, Azariah, and Mishael (Dan. 3:19-28, 49-50).
246 David (1 Sam. 17:45-47; cf. Ps. 144:10), Elijah from Jezebel (1 Kings 19:1-3), Elisha from Jehoram (2 Kings 6:26-32), Jeremiah from Johoiakim (Jer. 26:7-24).
247 See 1 Sam. 2:4 (LXX); Perhaps Samson is in view (Judges 16:17-21, 25-30; cf. Judges 15:19).
248 This was true of Gideon, Barak, Jephthah, David and even Samuel (cf. 1 Sam. 7:5-14) and others.
249 Widow at Zarephath of Sidon (1 Ki. 17:71-24), the Shunemite woman (2 Ki. 4:18-37). Lane writes, “In the latter case, the mother’s haste in going to Elisha on Mount Carmel despite her own deep distress, and her quiet response to inquiry, ‘Everything is all right’ (2 Kgs 4:22-26), were expressions of her own firm faith that she would indeed receive her son from the dead ‘by resurrection’” (Hebrews, 2:388).
250 For these people deliverance only came through suffering and martyrdom. Lane offers some helpful descriptions of the kinds of events which occurred after the close of the Hebrew canon (Hebrews, 2:388-90).
251 2 Chronicles 24:20-21; Matthew 23:27; Luke 13:34.
252 Lane writes, “The summarizing statement in vv 39-40 serves to conclude the paragraph and the section as a whole. The new feature in these verses is the focus upon the relevance of the recital for the Christian community in v 40. There the writer speaks of God’s provision for something better ‘with us in mind’ (περὶ ἡμῶν), namely, that these attested exemplars should not reach perfection ‘without us’ (χωρὶς ἡμῶν). The introduction of the plural pronouns in the first person provides a point of transition to the following section, which calls attention to the necessary endurance that must characterize the Christian community in its own struggle with hostility and adversity ...” (Hebrews, 2:322).
253 The realization of particular promises (11:11, 33) is not the same of definitive fulfillment of the promise. They did not receive the promise of the eternal inheritance (cf. 9:15).
254 The purging of sin with the consequence that believers are consecrated to the service of God (cf. 10:14; cf. 9:9; 10:1). This is the ultimate realization of salvation--the entrance into the promised inheritance.
255 This unit is set off by a shift in genre from historical recital to pastoral exhortation. This theme of endurance, ὑπομονή, was introduced in 10:36.
256 The imagery which is being used is that of an athletic contest in a stadium or arena. The witnesses are the men and women in chapter 11 who have received acknowledgment from God because of their constancy of faith (11:2, 4, 5, 39). They are unified, like a cloud, in their witness to the integrity of faith. Lane writes, “The emphasis in v 1 ... falls on what Christians see in the host of witnesses rather than on what they see in Christians” (Hebrews, 2:408).
257 This too comes out of the metaphor of a race where those who would participate would strip their clothing before running so that nothing could impede them during the race.
258 See Hebrews 2:10.
259 Paul now moves from the running metaphor to a boxing one involving bloodshed and even death (cf. 1 Cor. 9:24, 26).
260 Lane writes, “The expression is drawn from the games, in which the most dangerous contest was the armed boxing match. Boxing was the supreme test of the pentathalon, and bloody wounds were commonplace.... According to the writer’s contemporary, the stoic philosopher Seneca, the true athlete was the man who ‘saw his own blood’ .... IN the immediate context the allusion is to the violent death of Jesus who endured crucifixion .... Jesus had to suffer more degrading shame and deeper hostility than anything yet experienced by the congregation. On this understanding the writer’s intention is to say that the community had not yet given the fullest measure in their struggle against sin” (Hebrews, 2:418). This may well have its reality in the realm of persecution. Perhaps the “sin” to be overcome is an enemy and that is why it is personified.
261 Lane writes, “The designation of God as ὁ πατὴρ πνευμάτων, ‘the Father of spirits,’ reflects the influence of the Septuagint, where the notion of transcendence is integral to the expression (Num 16:22; 27:16; LXX: ‘the Father of spirits and of all flesh’; cf 2 Macc 3:24: ‘Sovereign of spirits and all authority’). The divine title is to be interpreted in terms of the two-sphere thinking characteristic of Hebrews. ‘The Father of spirits’ is the transcendent God to whom the heavenly world is also subject .... As the sovereign Lord of heaven and earth, God’s right to discipline us and to demand our devotion proceeds from the highest authority” (Hebrews, 2:424).
262 The writer again moves into the athletic metaphor urging his readers to follow divine wisdom (Proverbs 4:26, LXX) for their direction.
263 Lane notes that in the absence of clear literary indices, the limits of this section must be determined thematically with the shift from the response of the community as it experiences suffering to the peril of rejecting the God who continues to speak in to the church through his Son and through the Scriptures (Hebrews, 2:445).
264 Lane writes, “In this context ‘peace’ is an objective reality that results from the redemptive accomplishment of Christ in his sacrificial death on the cross. It is a gift of eschatological salvation as well as a sign that points to the presence of the new age and to the future perfection.... Peace denotes the objective reality of the community. It also is exhibited in the solidarity of responsibility for the welfare of one another (cf Rom 14:9; 1 Pet 3:11 in the context of 3:8-12 for similar emphasis)” (Hebrews, 2:449).
265 See Deuteronomy 29:17. This image is of a root that grows up and produces poisonous fruit. The stubborn disposition displays itself in unbelief and apostasy--arrogant unbelief (cf. Heb. 3:7-19).
266 See Genesis 25; 27.
267 This is done through contrasting Israel’s encounter with God at Sinai and the new covenant encounter that takes place at Zion, the city of the living God (Lane, Hebrews, 2:449).
268 See Hebrews 2:1-4.
269 Toussaint writers, “The writer is looking back to Mount Sinai where God spoke to Israel through Moses. The voice came from Mount Sinai, so it was ‘on earth’ as v 25 states” (“The Eschatology of the Warning Passages in the Book of Hebrews” GTJ 3(1982):79).
As Toussaint describes this ‘judgment’ he relates it correctly to the wilderness generation writing, “It could be the judgment of death fro flagrant disregard of the law or it may be the failure to enter the promised land. Probably it is the latter alternative since the entire generation failed in this regard” (Ibid.). If this is so, than the judgment is not one of retribution, but of discipline (unless one is willing to say that the entire generation which died in the wilderness was not redeemed (Ex. 12)!
270 Exodus 19:18; cf. Judges 5:4-5; Psalm 68:8; 77:18.
271 Haggai 2:6. No doubt, this will occur after the millennium as described in Revelation 21. Nevertheless, the term in verse 27 (“being shaken,” τῶν σαλευομένων) is present tense viewing the final shaking as already started and in process. This again may be a reference to the immanent judgment of Jerusalem. Toussaint argues correctly that this is not descriptive of the judgment seat of Christ (GTJ 3 (1982):80), but that does not mean it could not be descriptive of a disciplinary aspect.
272 Deuteronomy 4:24; cf. 9:3. This imagery is meant to recall the severity of the judgment the apostate can anticipate. Deuteronomy 4:24 provides a fitting conclusion for Hebrews in light of the larger context of Deuteronomy, since the people are on the verge of entering the promised land [Deuteronomy 4:21] and are at the end of their pilgrimage (Lane, Hebrews, 2:487-88). Anything short of reverence before God by a believer will incur God’s discipline. Therefore, the purpose of this final warning is to admonish the readers to heed reverently to God’s revelation lest they invoke God’s consuming discipline upon themselves.
273 For a discussion concerning the integrity of the book of Hebrews and chapter 13 see Lane who notes that those who argue against integrity argue that chapter 13 begins too abruptly, has no parallel from with chapters 1--12, and is without continuity in content. Nevertheless, the integrity can be affirmed with confidence in light of the evident links between this material and the preceding chapters both in content and thrust, the vocabulary, lines of argumentation, sustained appeal to texts from the Pentateuch and the Psalms, recurrence of key concepts, the structure of the chapter, and literary style of the writer (Hebrews, 2:495-97).
The transition into chapter 13 occurs in 12:28-29 where they writer urges his readers to “show gratitude by which we may offer to God an acceptable service with reverence and awe for our God is a consuming fire.” As Lane writes, “What this entails demands the specification that is provided in 13:1-21” (Hebrews, 2:496; cf. Hebrews 13:15-16, 21).
274 Hebrews 13:1-6 is a summons to the anxious members of the church to assume their place within the ranks of the confessing community. They are to affirm their trust in God’s pledge to be constantly present out of His covenant loyalty.
275 This allusion almost certainly refers to the three visitors Abraham and Sarah showed hospitality to in Genesis 18:1-21. Lane writes, “It throws into bold relief the element of surprise that is sometimes stressed in the biblical accounts, when mysterious strangers become guests, revealing to their hosts the promise they are carrying with them.... The emphasis in Hebrews was calculated to stir within the community a disposition to welcome strangers in the expectation that they will be bearers of God’s abundance” (Hebrews, 2:513).
276 The passages which are alluded to are Moses’ exhortation to Israel as they are about to enter the land in Deuteronomy 31:6, 8 (cf. Genesis 28:15) and Psalm 117:6 (LXX) [118:6 English].
277 The word for spoke is in the aorist tense (ἐλάλησαν) giving the sense that the former leaders are now deceased. Their preaching belongs to the community’s past.
278 Lane writes, “Accordingly, v 8 is not to be interpreted as an acclamation of Jesus’ timeless ontological immutability, corresponding to the assertion that the Son remains ὁ αὐτός, ‘the same,’ in 1:10-12 .... This reference is rather to the immutability of the gospel message proclaimed by the deceased leaders in the recent past .... Although the preachers change, the preaching must remain the same. The unchangeableness of the revelation is a consequence of the transcendent dignity of Jesus Christ, the originator of the preaching (2:3) ...” (Hebrews, 2:528). Jesus is declared to remain the object of faith for the assembly now (‘today’) as he was formerly (‘yesterday’) and will be forever (‘unto the ages’).
279 This verse is transitional to the next section of exhortation (13:10-14). Nevertheless it is to be tied to 13:7 as part of a unit. Lane makes the following helpful comparison with 13:7 and 13:9 to demonstrate their correspondence:
Exhortation (v 7)
Warning (v 9)
Do not allow yourselves to be led away
your former leaders
strange [itinerant preachers]
the [one] word of God
diverse [human] teachings
Consider the accomplishment of their conduct
their adherents are not benefited
280 See Psalm 104:14-15: “You bring forth food from the earth... and bread to strengthen the human heart.” It seems that this acclamation was evoked in the blessing pronounced before every Jewish meal (Lane, Hebrews, 2:534) identifying every meal as cultic in character. Also the plural of “foods” was used in the OT to distinguish pure from impure foods (Lev. 11:34). Thus lane writes, “This, then, is the background to the ‘strange teachings’ that the heart must be strengthened with food, resulting in power to praise God for the food as well as for the grace experienced in redemption. The consumption of foods, it was urged, can bring us into the presence of God and actualize his lordship because it provides an occasion for the giving of thanks ....
The evidence shows an extensively prepared biblical and Jewish conception that the people of God should eat and drink in order to praise him. In the eating of prescribed foods were experienced the goodness and grace of God that rejoices the heart and strengthens it for the praise of God. Every meal time provided the faithful Jew with strength and an occasion to acknowledge the grace of God. At the same time it was a sober reminder that ultimately one can thank God fully for redemption only through the thank offering and the fellowship meal in the presence of the altar in Jerusalem.
The writer in Hebrews rejects this line of argumentation. He declares that the grace of God was not mediated through the celebration of cultic meals. It was useless to imitate the sacrificial meals in Jerusalem, as the Jews of the Diaspora sought to do. The church will not find its security in such earthly assurances. On the contrary, the grace of God is bestowed through the word of promise concerning the redemptive efficiency of the death of Jesus (2:9) and through prayer (4:16). At their altar (13:10) Christians participate in a sacrifice far superior to the Jerusalem sacrifices” (Hebrews, 2:534-35).
281 Leviticus 16:27.
282 Lane writes, “The writer’s interest is not, however, merely historical. That is clear from the explicit comparison with Lev 16 in vv 11-12. He is concerned to show that Jesus fulfilled the Levitical requirement that the carcass of the bull and the goat sacrificed on the Day of Atonement be conveyed ‘outside the camp’ and there be incinerated. This ordinance was fulfilled when Jesus, as the sin offering of the new covenant, died ‘outside the city gate, ‘i.e. outside the holy city and the sacred precincts ...” (Hebrews, 2:542).
283 This is similar to the Gospels’ exhortation to deny oneself (but not to deny Jesus) by taking up his cross and following Him. Historically God was considered to dwell inside the camp and those who were impure were to go outside the camp because God was unwilling to look on any shamefulness or defilement (Deut. 23:14). Nevertheless, after the incident with the golden calf God chose to demonstrate his presence outside the camp (Exodus 33:7-8). Lane writes, “The erection of the golden calf signified the rejection of God. Consequently, God departed from the formerly sacred enclosure and displayed his presence only at the tent pitched ‘outside the camp’ (Exod 33:7-10). An attractive proposal is that the play on the phrase ‘outside the camp’ in v 11-13 was designed to call to mind the occasion when God manifested his presence outside the wilderness encampment. The humiliation of Jesus and his death as an outcast show that God has again been rejected by his people. His presence can be enjoyed only ‘outside the camp,’ where Jesus was treated with contempt. Anyone who seeks to drew near to God must go ‘outside the camp’ and approach him through Jesus .... This is the character of genuine discipleship and the condition for the acceptable worship of God” (Hebrews, 2:544).
284 There are three basic interpretations to this verse: (1) bearing the disgrace of worldliness--the place of Christians is not in holy places with the security which is offered in cultic performances but in the uncleanness of the world, (2) a call to leave earthly assurances and to pursue the heavenly world where Jesus completed his redemptive action at the heavenly altar, and (3) an exhortation to sever the emotional and social ties with the Jewish community that continue to characterize the members of the house church. The immediate context commends this interpretation best (see Lane, Hebrews, 2:545-46).
285 See again 11:8-10, 13-16; 12:18-24 for this pilgrimage theme. Lane writes, “Discipleship may be described in terms of the pilgrimage of faith not merely from the sacred precincts of the wilderness camp (v 13) but from the city that lacks permanence (v 14a)” (Hebrews, 2:546).
286 See Hosea 14:13. This is a praise of thanksgiving.
287 Lane writes, “The ‘leading out’ is the fundamental redemptive action of God under both the old and new covenant. Upon it are based the exclusive claims of God to his people’s allegiance, on the one hand, and, on the other, the ground for trust in God’s power and readiness to stand by his covenant people. The intervention of God in leading his people from Egypt in the Torah (e.g., Exod 6:7; 20:1-2; Lev 19:36; 25:38; 26:13; Num 5:31; Deut 5:6) and in the Prophets (e.g., Isa 64:11-14) and from the realm of the dead in the Psalter (e.g., Ps 30:3; 71:20; 86:13) prefigured his decisive action in raising Jesus from the dead” (Hebrews, 2:561).
288 This is an allusion to Moses who is the model for the great Shepherd, Jesus (Isaiah 63:11-14 [LXX]).
289 Jeremiah 31:31-34; Zechariah 9:11; Exodus 24:8
Related Topics: Introductions, Arguments, Outlines
An Introduction To The Book Of PhilemonRelated Media
I. AUTHOR: THE APOSTLE PAUL
A. External Evidence: Paul is strongly affirmed to be the author of Philemon:
1. Individuals: It is named as authentic by the following individuals:
a. Ignatius makes allusions to it (c. AD 110)
b. Cyril of Jerusalem (c. AD 315-386)
c. Eusebius (c. AD 325-340)
d. Jerome (c. AD 340-420)
e. Augustine (c. AD 400)
2. Canons: It is named as authentic by the following canons:
a. Marcion (c. AD 140)
b. The Muratorian Fragment (c. AD 170)
c. Apostolic (c. AD 300)
d. Cheltenham (c. AD 360)
e. Athanasus (c. AD 367)
B. Internal Evidence: Even though some of the most radical critical scholars2 did question Pauline authorship of Philemon, it is maintained by most to this day
II. PLACE OF ORIGIN AND DATE: From ROME in AD 60-61
A. Place of Origin: Paul’s (first) Roman Imprisonment:
1. Paul clearly writes as a prisoner in Philemon (1,9,10,23)3
2. Paul’s imprisonment seems to be from the same location as that in Colossians:
a. Names: When one compares the names in Philemon 1,10,22-24 with those in Colossians 4:7-17 it becomes evident that they were written from the same location:
8) Paul and Timothy
b. Messengers: In Colossians 4:7-9 Tychicus was entrusted with the letter with Onesimus as a companion; this Onesimus is the same one of Philemon
3. If the location is the same as that for Colossians, than Paul’s first Roman imprisonment seems to be the best choice for the following reasons:
a. Until recently, Rome was considered by most to be the location from which Paul wrote4
b. Caesarea: Some5 understand Caesarea to be the location of writing, but this is unlikely for the following reasons:
1) It is unlikely that a runaway slave (Philemon) would have fled to Caesarea to escape detection and would have found access to Paul like he would have in Rome (where Paul was under house-arrest)
2) Paul expects to be released in the near future since he requests Philemon to prepare him lodging (Phm. 22) and this probably would not have been the case at Caesarea where Paul knew that his only hope was to appeal to Caesar
3) It is unlikely that Caesarea was the home of active missionary work requiring such a large staff of Paul’s co-workers of Gentile origin for Philemon to seek refuge, and it does not seem that this small harbor city was the center of vigorous propaganda suggested in Colossians 4:3,46
1) No evidence exists to affirm that Paul was imprisoned in Ephesus (Acts 19)9
2) It is unlikely that a runaway slave (Philemon) would have fled to Ephesus and remained there long enough to know Paul since it was no more than 100 miles away from Colossae
3) The “we” sections of Acts do not allow for Luke to have been with Paul while he was in Ephesus (Acts 16:10ff; 20:6,13ff; cf. Col. 4:14)
d. Rome:10 The most probably location of writing was probably Rome for the following reasons
1) This is a known imprisonment of Paul’s which allows for the events reflected in Colossians and Philemon
2) Acts supports Luke’s presence in Rome with Paul (the “we” sections; Acts 27:2ff)
3) Paul was under house-arrest in Rome which would have allowed him visitors such as co-workers and Onesimus
4) The imperial capital would have allowed the run-away slave Onesimus to seek anonymity and then asylum in Paul’s presence there
5) No other imprisonment in Acts seems to be a real alternative (Philippi in Acts 16:23-40; Caesarea in Acts 24:27
6) Travel between Rome and the east was frequent and not too formidable a task to make the communications between the prison epistles possible
7) Although not determinative, the doctrinal outlook of Colossians seems to belong to a later rather than to an earlier period supporting a Roman origin over one in Ephesus11
8) It is very probable that Aristarchus accompanied Paul to Rome (Acts 27:2; cf. Col. 4:10) and thus shared in his imprisonment
9) Even though Paul intended to go on to Spain from Rome (Rom. 1:10ff; 15:19ff) it is not possible to know with certainty what he did upon his release. He could have changed his mind, or at least changed his immediate plans and thus gone to Colossae
B. Date: If the Roman hypothesis is accepted, then it is likely that Paul wrote Philemon early12 in his (first) Roman imprisonment (i.e., AD 60-61)
III. THE OCCASION OF THE LETTER AND ITS RECIPIENT:
A. The Occasion:13
1. Runaway: A slave named Onesimus from Colossae wronged his Christian owner Philemon (and then ran off (or by running off)14
2. Meeting: Onesimus then somehow came into contact with Paul in prison15
3. Conversion: Paul took an interest in him, Onesimus was converted to Christianity, and ministered to Paul (10-13)
4. Return: Paul returned Onesimus to his master in Colossae in accordance with Roman law and Christian fellowship with a letter requesting Philemon to receive Onesimus as a beloved brother in the Lord (10,16), perhaps with the hope that Philemon will return Onesimus to him for ministry (21)
B. Its Recipient: Philemon [Apphia, Archippus, and the church in Philemon’s house]16
1. Philemon: Paul’s convert and fellow-worker who lived in Colossae and ministered to the saints
a. Paul’s Convert: Philemon became a convert through Paul (Phil. 3,8-9,19) perhaps through his ministry in Ephesus (Acts 19:9-10)17
b. Fellow-worker: Philemon is described as Paul’s fellow-worker (Phil. 1) who loves the saints (Phil. 5,7)
c. From Colossae: He seems to have lived in Colossae since Colossians says that Onesimus (4:9) and Archippus (4:17) belong to the church at Colossae and Archippus is addressed by Paul in Philemon (v. 2)
2. Other Names: Apphia, Archippus, and the church in Philemon’s house
a. Apphia the sister (who may have been Philemon’s wife) [Phil. 2]
b. Archippus the fellow-soldier (who may have been the son of Philemon and Apphia) [Phil. 2]
c. The community assembled in Philemon’s house (Phil. 2)18
IV. THE PURPOSES OF PHILEMON:
A. To ask Philemon of Colossae to pardon his slave Onesimus
B. To ask Philemon of Colossae to not only pardon his slave Onesimus, but to give him a warm welcome as a fellow believer
C. To indirectly request of Philemon to send Onesimus back to Paul so that he can go on helping Paul as he had already begun to do
D. To provide a canonical example of Paul’s teaching of the transformation of human society into Christ’s image with reference to slaves and masters (cf. 1 Cor. 7:17ff.; Gal. 3:28)
E. To provide a concrete opportunity/example of what it means to sacrificially love/forgive as Christ has loved/forgiven believers (19)
F. To provide a concrete example of substitutionary forgiveness (18)
G. To emphasize the nature of redemption as God makes that which is “useless” to be “useful” again (10-11)
H. “To awaken mercy in Philemon by reflecting upon the implications of the gospel toward the runaway slave”19
V. PHILEMON AND THE QUESTION OF SLAVERY
A. Household Tables: The question of slavery is perhaps more specifically addressed in what are known as the “household tables” in Colossians 3:18--4:1; Ephesians 6:5-9; 1 Corinthians 7:21-23; 1 Timothy 6:1-2; Titus 2:9-10; 1 Peter 2:18-21 which emphasize the following:20
1. Owners have a “master in heaven”
2. Slaves are involved in “serving Christ”
3. God deals impartially with master and slave
4. Both slaves and masters are bond-servants of Christ
5. One may still continue in a functional relationship of master and slave after conversion, but must relate to one another on a higher level of unity
B. Slavery Not Addressed: In the letter to Philemon Paul does not directly take up the issue of slavery
C. Brotherly Love: Paul does deal with the issue of brotherly love in Philemon (vv. 16-17), and its significance is as follows:
1. Paul does not insist that Philemon free Onesimus21
2. If a master and slave are brothers one has the foundation for the collapse of slavery with its intimated hierarchy22
3. The terms of “slave” and “master” are transcended through their joint participation in the body of Christ
4. No one truly owns anyone; all believers are equal in Christ23
1 Much of what follows is adapted from the following: F. F. Bruce, Paul: Apostle of the Heart Set Free, pp. 393-406; Brevard S. Childs, The New Testament as Canon: An Introduction, pp. 396-399; Norman L. Geisler and William E. Nix, A General Introduction to the Bible: Revised and Expanded, pp. 289-295; Donald Guthrie, New Testament Introduction, pp. 635-642; Peter O’Brien, Philemon, Word Biblical Commentary, pp. 265-270.
2 The authenticity of Philemon was disputed by the Tübingen school under Baur due to its correlation with Colossians, and by the W. C. van Manen of the Dutch school who rejected the authenticity of all thirteen of the Pauline corpus, but such reasoning is consigned to the “eccentricities of NT scholarship” (O’Brien, Philemon, p. 269).
3 Even though Paul identifies himself as a prisoner, he does not inform the reader where his imprisonment is located.
4 Although the Marcionite Prologue had the opinion that the Epistle was written from Ephesus [“The apostle already in fetters writes to them from Ephesus”] even though the Prologue to Philemon claimed that the letter was written from Rome (Guthrie, NTI, p. 555).
The “subscript” which was added at a later date asserts: “written from Rome by Tychicus and Onesimus.” Also Eusebius reports that Paul was brought to Rome and that Aristarchus was with him (History, 2.22.1; see O’Brien, Colossians. p. l.).
5 Lohmeyer, Dibelius-Greeven, Reicke, J. J. Gunther, Goguel, deZwaan.
6 O’Brien, Colossians, p. lii.
7 For a more thorough discussion see Guthrie, NTI, pp. 472-478.
8 Deissmann, Michaelis, Duncan.
9 Even though Aristarchus was seized by mob-violence in Ephesus (Acts 19:29), there is no specific mention of arrest for him or for Paul.
10 See O’Brien for counter view (Colossians, p. li).
11 See O’Brien, Colossians, p. liii; Guthrie, NTI, p. 557; Childs, The NT as Canon, 346-349; Bruce, Paul, The Apostle of the Heart Set Free, pp. 411-412.
12 Philemon 9 suggests that Colossians-Philemon may have been written early in the imprisonment, “yet for love’s sake I prefer to appeal to you--I, Paul, an ambassador and now a prisoner also for Christ Jesus--.” The term for “now” (nuniv) is more emphatic than nu'n and suggests that Paul’s imprisonment had only just begun at the time he wrote (O’Brien, Philemon, p. 290).
13 Knox offered a completely different reconstruction of the occasion for the letter identifying the master as Archippus who was the host of the church mentioned in verse one, and Philemon as the one to plead reinstatement of Onesimus. He considers the epistle of Philemon to be the letter from Laodicea in Colossians 4:16, and the exhortation for Archippus to “fulfill his God-given ministry” (Col. 4:17) to be the request of Paul concerning Philemon (see John Knox, “Philemon” in The Interpreter’s Bible, vol. xi [New York, 1955], pp. 555ff; Knox, Philemon among the Letters of Paul: A New View of its Place and Importance; Guthrie, NTI, pp. 635-638; Bruce, Paul: Apostle, p. 401-406; O’Brien, Philemon, pp. 267-268).
14 There is some discussion about whether there were two events or one. O’Brien suggests that his running away may have caused him to owe his master the value of the work that he should have done (cf. verse 18; Philemon, p. 266).
15 The possible historical reconstructions are numerous: (1) he was taken prisoner in Rome, (2) he met Epaphras of Colossae who was on a visit to Paul and brought him to Paul because he knew Paul could help him, (3) he sought refuge in Paul’s company having heard of him in his master’s house, (4) the master sent Onesimus to Paul and Onesimus outstayed his leave (see F. F. Bruce, Paul: Apostle, pp. 339-400).
16 This would argue against the epistle merely being a private letter to Philemon. O’Brien strongly objects to this due to the pressure it would place upon Philemon to do what Paul was requesting. He explains the inclusion of Apphia, Archippus, and the church as, “due to Paul’s courtesy” since the bulk of the letter is addressed to an individual (Philemon, p. 268, 306; see also Bruce, Paul: Apostle, p. 405), but this does not seem to be dealing with the evidence well. Paul even closes the letter in the plural (diaV tw'n proseucw'n uJmw'n, “through your prayers,” v. 22, and metaV tou' pneuvmato" uJmw'n, “with your spirit”).
As Childs writes, “Paul’s use of all the same formal literary conventions which appear in his larger letters - the naming of the senders and addressees, greetings, and thanksgiving - cautions against categorizing it immediately as a private letter qualitatively different from his other epistles” (The New Testament as Canon, p. 399). It is the inclusion of the local church as recipients which may best explain the epistle’s inclusion in the Pauline corpus. Again Child’s notes that “Paul’s teaching regarding slaves and masters (I Cor. 7.17ff.; Gal. 3:28) was now instanced by the apostle by means of a concrete example of the effect of Christ’s transformation of human society in his image” (Ibid.).
Child’s discussion may be more convincing than that through the Chicago school of Goodspeed and Knox who suggested that the epistle to Philemon was included in the canon because Onesimus added it to the formation of the Pauline corpus when he was bishop of Ephesus at the end of the first century AD (see Bruce, Paul: Apostle, pp. 401-406).
17 See Bruce’s discussion in Paul: Apostle, p. 406, n. 37.
18 Knox understood it to be in Archippus’ house, but it is most naturally understood to refer to the house of the one first mentioned (even through it could relate to Archipipus; see Bruce, Paul: Apostle, p. 404).
19 Elliott E. Johnson, “Principle of Recognition” (unpublished class notes in 315 Advanced Hermeneutics, Dallas Theological Seminary, Spring 1979).
20 See O’Brien, Philemon, p. 269.
21 Guthrie writes, “There is no thought of denunciation even in principle. The apostle deals with the situation as it then exists. He takes it for granted that Philemon has a claim of ownership on Onesimus and leaves the position unchallenged” (NTI, p. 640).
22 As Bruce writes, “What this letter does is to bring us into an atmosphere in which the institution could only wilt and die. When Onesimus is sent to his master ‘no longer as a slave, but as a dear brother’, formal emancipation would be but a matter of expediency, the technical confirmation of the new relationship that had already come into being” (Paul: Apostle, p. 401). As Guthrie says, “Christianity removed the main moral evils of the system” (NTI, p. 640-641, n. 2).
23 Guthrie writes, “It is clearly incongruous for a Christian master to ‘own’ a brother in Christ in the contemporary sense of the word, and although the existing order of society could not be immediately changed by Christianity without a political revolution (which was contrary to Christian principles), the Christian master-slave relationship was so transformed from within that it was bound to lead ultimately to the abolition of the system” (NTI, p. 640).
Related Topics: Introductions, Arguments, Outlines
An Argument Of The Book Of PhilemonRelated Media
Being Encouraged By The Reports Of Spiritual Effectiveness In Philemon’s Life, Paul Requests Of Him To Graciously Receive His Runaway Slave, Onesimus, As A Fellow Believer And Partner In The Gospel Ministry In Accordance With The Love That He Has Shown To Other Believers And The Grace Which He Has Received From Christ
I. Introductory Greetings: After introducing himself as a prisoner of Christ Jesus and Timothy as a brother in Christ to Philemon, Apphia, Archippus and the church in Philemon’s house, Paul prays that they all might experience grace and peace from God their Father and their Lord Jesus Christ 1-3
A. Paul: Paul introduces himself as a prisoner of Christ Jesus1 1a
B. Timothy: Paul introduces Timothy as their brother (in Christ)2 1b
C. Recipients: Paul writes to Philemon whom he identifies as a beloved fellow worker, to Apphia whom he describes as their sister, to Archippus whom he describes as a fellow soldier, and to the church in Philemon’s house 1c-2c
1. Philemon: Paul writes to Philemon their beloved fellow worker3 1c
2. Apphia: Paul writes to Apphia their sister (in Christ)4 2a
3. Archippus: Paul writes to Archippus their fellow soldier5 2b
4. The Church: Paul writes to the church in the house (of Philemon) 2c
D. Prayer: Paul prays that they all might experience grace (unmerited favor) and peace from God their Father and their Lord Jesus Christ 3
II. Thanksgiving and Intercession for Philemon:6 Paul regularly gives thanks to God for Philemon because he has heard of Philemon’s love for the saints and faith toward God, prays that Philemon’s generosity will lead him into a deeper, experiential knowledge of God, and informs Philemon that his acts of love have brought joy and comfort to Paul himself 4-7
A. Thanksgiving: Paul regularly gives thanks to God for Philemon because he has heard of Philemon’s love for all of the saints and his faith toward the Lord Jesus 4-5
1. Statement of Thanksgiving: When Paul regularly remembers Philemon in his prayers, he gives thanks to his God 4
2. Reason for Thanksgiving: The reason Paul gives thanks to God for Philemon is because he has heard of Philemon’s love for all of the saints and his faith toward the Lord Jesus7 5
B. Intercession: Paul prays that the Philemon’s generosity (fellowship), which arises from his faith, will effectively lead him into a deeper, experiential understanding (ἐπίγνοσις) of every blessing (all the good) that belongs to believers in Christ (εἰς Χριστόν) 6
C. Transition:8 Paul informs his brother Philemon that he gives thanks for him because he has received much joy and comfort from Philemon’s love because the hearts of the saints have been deeply refreshed through him 7
1. Paul informs his brother Philemon that the reason he gives thanks for him (vv 4-5) is because (γάρ) he (too) has received much joy and comfort from Philemon’s love 7a
2. The reason Paul has received joy and comfort from Philemon’s love is because (ο῞τι) the hearts (τὰ σπλάγχνα) of the saints have been deeply refreshed through him9 7b
III. Paul’s Plea for Onesimus: Paul appeals to Philemon on the basis of his loving treatment of the saints and on behalf of Onesimus who has undergone a significant spiritual transformation in Christ that Philemon would receive Onesimus as a fellow believer and Paul’s partner in the ministry 8-20
A. An Appeal Based Upon Love: In view of the loving deeds of Philemon10 Paul does not command him to do what is required with Onesimus, but as an ambassador11 of Christ who is now12 His prisoner13 appeals14 to Philemon for love’s sake15 on behalf of16 his (spiritual) child17 Onesimus whom he begot while in prison 8-10
B. A Commendation of Onesimus: Paul commends Onesimus as being one who has been transformed from being useless to useful, as being Paul’s very heart, as being helpful with the gospel during Paul’s imprisonment, and as being transformed from Philemon’s slave to Philemon’s and Paul’s brother in the Lord 11-16
1. Paul’s Love for Onesimus: Paul affirms that Onesimus has been transformed from being useless to useful to both Philemon and Paul and that he is Paul’s very heart 11-12
a. He Is Useful: Paul affirms that Onesimus was previously useless to Philemon, but now he has become useful to both Philemon and to Paul18 11
b. He is Dear to Paul: Paul affirms that Onesimus, whom he is sending back to Philemon, is Paul very heart19 12
2. God’s Plan for Onesimus: Paul affirms that he would have liked to have kept Onesimus to have helped him with the gospel during his imprisonment, or that perhaps Onesimus was separated from Philemon for a short time in order that he might be re-united with him forever, not as a slave, but as a brother in Christ 13-16
a. A Desire For Onesimus’ Help: Paul affirms that he would have liked20 to have kept Onesimus so that he could have helped21 him with the gospel during his imprisonment as Philemon’s representative,22 but that he would not do such a thing without his consent so that Philemon’s favor might be spontaneous and not forced 13-14
b. A Transformation from Slave to Brother: Paul suggests that perhaps the reason (γὰρ) that Onesimus was separated from Philemon for a short time was in order that23 he might have him back forever, not as a slave, but as a beloved brother24 as he is to Paul and much more to Philemon25 15-16
C. A Request to Philemon:26 Paul requests of Philemon to welcome Onesimus as he would Paul, to charge Onesimus’ debt to Paul’s account, and to thus provide some benefit in the Lord by refreshing his heart through the good reception of Philemon 17-20
2. Charge Onesimus’ Debt to Paul:30 Paul urges Philemon to charge any debt which Philemon may owe him to Paul’s account31 knowing that he will pay it32 and that Philemon owes33 Paul his very life besides34 18-19
IV. Conclusion--Final Remarks and Greetings: After Paul declares his confidence that Philemon will not only obey God in this request, but will do even more than what is requested, He urges Philemon to prepare for his coming visit, sends greetings from those with him, and prays that they will experience God’s grace 21-24
C. The Sending of Greetings:41 Paul sends greetings from his fellow-prisoner Epaphras, and from his co-workers Mark, Aristarchus, and Luke 23
1. Epaphras: Paul sends greetings from Epaphras his fellow-prisoner42 in Christ 4:23a
2. Mark: Paul sends greetings from Mark his co-worker43 23b
3. Aristarchus: Paul sends greetings from Aristarchus his co-worker 23c
4. Luke: Paul sends greetings from Luke his co-workers 23d
D. Benediction: Paul prays that the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ will be with spirit of Philemon and those with him44 24
1 Paul is truly a prisoner as he writes for the gospel, and especially for Christ’s sake. Paul does not include his apostolic title in this letter because he does not intend to appeal to that authority in his request (vv. 8-9). Rather he intends to touch his friends heart--thus, a prisoner.
2 See Colossians 1:1. Timothy was with Paul during much of the Ephesian ministry (Acts 19:22; 2 Cor. 1:1) and thus may have been acquainted with Philemon there.
3 He was a co-worker with Paul commissioned by God for the task of missionary preaching.
4 She may have been Philemon’s wife.
5 Paul often used this term to describe himself and his co-workers (cf. Epaphroditus in Phil. 2:25). Perhaps he had been an important assistant in missionary labors and have even walked through persecutions and trials (cf. Col. 4:17).
6 O’Brien notes well that “This whole passage prepares the ground for the request that is to follow, a point that may be discerned not only in its general emphasis, but also in the repetition of specific words from the thanksgiving throughout the rest of the letter (Wlies, Prayers, 219). As Knox (Philemon, 19) has aptly remarked: ‘It is the overture in which each of the themes, to be later heard in a different, perhaps more specific, context is given an anticipatory hearing.’ Terms (or their cognates) such as prayer (προσευχή, v 4,cf. v 22), and love (ἀγάπη, v 5, cf. v 9), fellowship (κοινωνιά, v 6, cf. v 17), good (ἀγαθός, v 6, cf. v 14), heart (σπλάγχνα, v 7, cf. vv 12, 20), refresh (ἀναπαύω, v 7, cf. v 20) and brother (ἀδελφέ, v 7, cf. v 20) reappear in the body of the letter” (Philemon, p. 276).
7 Verse 5 may be an example of chiasmus, an a b b a pattern:
8 With the use of “my brother” Paul is not longer reporting his intercessory prayer, but speaking directly to Philemon through a direct address. This emphasis upon Philemon’s love is a transition from the thanksgiving paragraph to the main purpose of the letter set forth in verse eight--to love Onesimus.
O’Brien notes that, “In this simple transition important ideas from both the thanksgiving and the body of the letter are mentioned (or anticipated), e.g. “love” (vv 5, 9), “comfort” (cf. vv 9, 10), “heart” (vv 12, 20), “saints” (v 5), “refreshed” (v 20), and “brother” (v 20).
9 Paul has met some of those who were refreshed by Philemon, and can identify with those whom he had not met (cf. Col. 2:2).
Because the hearts of the saints have been refreshed by Philemon Paul will latter urges Philemon to refresh his heart in Christ (v. 20).
10 The conjunction is “therefore” (Διὸ) probably referring to the reason for thanksgiving which Philemon has given above (e.g., his love).
11 The term is πρεσβύτης which could be a reference to Paul’s age (an old man), or could be a reference to Paul’s ministry as an “envoy”, or “ambassador” (see 2 Cor. 5:20 and Eph. 6:20, “for which [gospel] I am an ambassador [πρεσβύτης] in chains”).
12 The term employed for “now” (νυνί) is a more emphatic adverb than (νῦν) and might suggest that Paul’s imprisonment has only just begun at the time he wrote. This would place Philemon early in Paul’s first Roman imprisonment.
13 Paul’s point is that he is appealing as one who has also been asked by the Lord to suffer loss for his faith. His request to Philemon is in congruence with the outworking of service to Christ.
14 The term is παρακαλῶ.
15 Again this love probably points to the love previously referred to (esp. due to its article, διὰ τὴν ἀγάπην; cf. vv. 5-7).
16 The preposition used is περί meaning “on behalf of” (cf. 1 Cor. 16:12; 2 Cor. 12:8; 2 Thess. 2:1) rather than “about,” or “with reference to”. Paul is interceding on Onesimus’ behalf rather than making a request about him.
17 Here Paul uses the a term to emphasize descendency (τέκνος). Paul is identifying Onesimus as a spiritual child, but not with the idea of a legal, adopted son, but as though he were Paul’s own flesh and blood. This is a strong emotional tie. Paul often uses this imagery with the entire community (1 Cor. 4:15; cf. Gal. 4:19), with Timothy (1 Cor. 4:17; 2 Tim. 1:2), and with Titus (Titus 1:4).
It is significant that if Onesimus was Paul’s “son” than that made him Philemon’s brother. Paul will make this explicit later.
18 This contrast is parallel with Paul’s earlier description of himself:
Paul--ambassador to prisoner
Onesimus--useless to useful (α῎χρηστον--ευ῎χρηστον).
This is also a play upon Onesimus’ name which itself means “profitable” or “useful” (cf. BAG, p. 570).
19 O’Brien suggests that “my heart” could be rendered “my very self.” Therefore, Paul’s sending of Onesimus is like sending back himself (Philemon, p. 293).
20 This is an expression of Paul’s personal preference.
21 This help was ministry (διακονέvω).
22 “on your behalf”. Here Paul assumes that Philemon would have liked to have performed this service for him had it been possible.
23 O’Brien writes, “God’s activity is implied in the passive εχωρίσθη (‘he was separated from’) and therefore the purpose *ñÿ clause which follows signifies the divine intention” (Philemon, p. 286).
24 This is the same description which Paul uses of Philemon (ἀδελφὸν ἀγαπητόν, vv 7,20).
25 God’s providence has made these wrongs work for good (cf. Gen. 45:4-8; Rom. 8:28).
26 Paul mentioned the fact of his request of Philemon for Onesimus in verse 10. Only here does he actually spell out its content ...” (O’Brien, Philemon, p. 298).
27 With the “therefore” Paul is returning to the main theme of the letter after parenthetical remarks about Onesimus.
28 The term is κοινωνόν referring to their fellowship with God’s son, Jesus Christ, into which they have both been called (cf. Col. 1:9).
29 See verse 12 again. Onesimus should at least be treated as a fellow Christian and perhaps as Paul’s colleague or partner.
30 Here Paul guards against the possible hindrances which Philemon might have to properly receiving Onesimus.
31 Paul is saying, “Put it on my bill.”
32 When Paul writes, “I, Paul, write this in my own hand, I will repay it,” he is presenting a signed IOU.
33 Paul is making a play on words: προσοφείλεις (“you owe [besides]”) corresponds to ὀφείλει (“[if] he owes,” v 18).
34 The strength to do what is right is discovered in our own need of grace. Therefore, to forget is to destroy others, and to remember is to give life to others. Forgiveness is the reflex of redemption!
35 Or in a Christian way.
36 Paul is requesting that Philemon act in accordance with his past acts for the saints, but this time on his behalf (see verse 7).
37 The term is ὑπακοή meaning “obedience” rather than “readiness” or “willingness” (cf. the cognate in Col. 3:20, ὑπακούω). The sense is not that Philemon will obey Paul (cf. vv. 8-9), but that he will obey God (cf. Heb. 5:8; Rom. 5:10).
There is a play on thoughts here; Philemon, the master, is being asked to receive Onesimus by obedience to his Master--God (cf. Rom. 6:16; Col. 4:1).
38 Perhaps the “more” is that Philemon will return Onesimus to Paul for the ministry of the gospel as Paul mentioned before (cf. v. 17). There is not good evidence of manumission since the legal side of slavery is never brought up in the letter.
39 Obviously, this will enable Paul to see for himself how Philemon chooses concerning Onesimus.
40 The “your” is plural, προσευχῶν ὑμῶν.
41 See the parallel list in Colossians 4:10-14.
42 Although this could be a figurative description of one taken captive by Christ, it is probably descriptive of one who is in prison with Paul. It seems that Epaphras is sharing Paul’s confinement.
43 This term, συνεργοί, for fellow-workers was already used of Philemon himself (v. 1). These are those involved in the task of proclaiming Christ as those commissioned by God (O’Brien, Philemon, pp. 307-308).
44 Note that they “your” is plural (ὑμῶν). This probably has specific reference to those whom he greeted in verses 1-2 above.
Related Topics: Introductions, Arguments, Outlines
New Testament Backgrounds, Histories, and Introductions-- BibliographyRelated Media
Aharoni Yohanan, and Michael Avi-Yonah. The Macmillan Bible Atlas. Revised Edition. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1968.
The Babylonian Talmud. Translated into English with Notes, Glossary, and Indices under the editorship of I. Epstein. 18 vols. London: Soncino Press, 1959.
Billerbeck, P. Kommentar zun Neuen Testament aus Talmud und Midrasch. 4 vols., 1922-1928.
Bruce, F. F. New Testament History. Garden City: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1980.
________. Paul: Apostle of the Heart Set Free. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1977.
Childs, Brevard S. The New Testament as Canon: An Introduction. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984.
Deissman, Adlof. Light from the Ancient East. New York: Hodder and Stoughton, 1910.
Guthrie, Donald. New Testament Introduction. Third edition. Revised in on volume. Downers Grove: Inter-Varsity Press, 1970.
Hammond's Atlas of the Bible Lands. Edited by Harry Thomas Frank. Maplewood, New Jersey: Hammond Incorporated, 1977, 1984.
House, Wayne H. Chronological and Background Charts of the New Testament, Grand Rapids: Academie Books, 1981.
Johnson, Elliott E. Expository Hermeneutics: An Introduction. Grand Rapids: Academic Books, 1990.
Josephus. 9 vols. With an English Translation by H. St. Thackerary, Ralph Marcus, and Louis H. Feldman. Loeb Classical Library. London, 1926-65.
Lolatch, Alfred J. Who's Who in the Talmud. Middle Village NY: Jonathan David Publishers Inc., 1984.
The Literary Guide to the Bible. Edited by Robert Alter and Frank Kermode. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1987.
Metzger, Bruce M. The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968.
________. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament: A Companion Volume to the United Bible Societies' Greek New Testament. Third edition. United Bible Societies, 1975.
Mishnayoth: Edited by Philip Blackman. Second edition. New York: The Judaica Press, 1963.
New Testament Interpretation: Essays on Principles and Methods. Edited by I. Howard Marshall. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1977.
The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. 2 vols. Edited by James H. Charlesworth. Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1983.
The Oxford Annotated Apocrypha of the Old Testament. Expanded edition containing the Third and Fourth Books of the Maccabees and Psalm 151. Revised Standard Version. Edited by Bruce M. Metzger. New York: Oxford University Press, 1965.
Ramsay, W. M. St Paul the Traveller and the Roman Citizen. 3rd ed. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1897. Repr. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1949.
Ryken, Leland. Words of Life: A Literary Introduction to the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1987.
________. The Literature of the Bible. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1974.
________. How to Read The Bible as Literature. Grand Rapids: Academic Books, 1984.
Schürer, Emil. The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ. III.2 vols. Revised and Edited by Geza Vermes, Fergus Millar, and Matthew Black. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark Ltd., 1973.
Unger, Merrill F. Archaeology and the New Testament: A Companion Volume to Archaeology and the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1962.
Related Topics: Introduction to Theology
An Argument Of The Book Of TitusRelated Media
Paul Writes Titus As His Representative In Crete To Aid The Churches In A Prophylactic Way Against Jewish False Teachers By Appointing Those In Leadership Who Are Able To Manage God’s Household Well And Stand Against The False Teachers, And By Exhorting All Believers To Excel In Good Works So That They Might Reach Those Outside Of The Church With The Gospel
I. OPENING GREETING--SALUTATION: Paul, a bond-servant and apostle of Christ Jesus in order to help the elect come to faith and to have a deep knowledge of the truth writes to his true son in the faith, Titus, and prays that he might receive grace and peace from God the Father and their Savior Christ Jesus 1:1-4
A. The Writer: Paul writes as a bond-servant of God and an apostle of Jesus Christ in order to help the elect come to faith and a deep knowledge of the truth which is in keeping with godliness based upon the hope of eternal life which God promised and brought to light in Paul’s gospel 1:1-3
2. Purpose of Paul’s Apostleship:3 Paul affirms that his apostleship is for the purpose of the (coming to) faith of the elect and their deep knowledge of the truth which is in keeping with godliness based upon the hope of eternal life which God promised and brought to light in Paul’s gospel 1:1b-3
b. The Goal--Deep Knowledge of the Truth: Paul affirms that his apostleship is for the elect’s deep knowledge (ἐπίγνωσιν) of the truth which is in keeping with godliness based upon the hope of eternal life which God promised and brought to light in the gospel entrusted to Paul 1:1c-3
1) Deep Knowledge of the Truth: Paul affirms that his apostleship is for the elect’s deep knowledge (ἐπίγνωσιν) of the truth which is in keeping with godliness (κατ᾿ εὐσέβειαν)6 1:1c
2) The Foundation of the Truth--Hope: Paul affirms that the truth which is in keeping with godliness rests on the hope (ἐπ᾿ ἐλπίδι) of eternal life which God truthfully promised7 before all time8 and manifested (now)9 in the gospel which Paul entrusted10 1:2-3
B. The Reader: Paul writes to Titus as his true son in a common faith11 1:4a
II. SETTING THE CHURCH IN ORDER AGAINST FALSE TEACHERS: Paul left Titus in Crete to set the churches in order by appointing elders who are qualified to manage God’s house and to defend the faith against false teachers who must be silenced so that they (the false teachers/congregation) may be sound in the faith because the false teachers are defiled unbelievers 1:5--16
A. Setting the Church in Order--The Appointment of Elders:14 Paul left Titus in Crete to complete the unfinished task for which he was instructed of setting the church in order and appointing elders in all of the churches who are blameless and above reproach in their households because they will be God’s household managers and defenders of the faith who are not to be identified with vices but with virtues 1:5-9
1. The Task--to Set in Order and Appoint: Paul left Titus in Crete15 to complete the unfinished task, just as he instructed Titus, of setting the church in order and appointing elders16 in all the churches 1:5
2. The Qualifications for Elders: The content of Paul’s instruction to Titus for appointing leaders in the church is that they are to be blameless, above reproach, in their households because they will be God’s household managers and defenders of the faith 1:6-9
b. Private Qualifications--Household Matters:19 Paul affirms that Titus is to appoint elders in every city if they are the husband of one wife, and have children who believe (are faithful) and not unruly or rebellious 1:6b-d
1) Husband of One Wife: Paul affirms that Titus is to appoint elders in every city if they are the husband of one wife (μεᾶς γυναικὸς ἀνήρ)20 1:6b
2) Children Who Believe: Paul affirms that Titus is to appoint elders in every city if they have children who believe (or are faithful, τέκνα ε῎χων πιστά) 1:6c
3) Children Not Accused of Dissipation or Rebellion: Paul affirms that Titus is to appoint elders in every city if their children are not accused of a lack of self-control, or of rebellion (μὴ ἐν κατηγορίᾳ ἀσωτίας η῎ ἀνυπότακτα21) 1:6d
c. Public Qualifications--Negative and Positive: The reason why the church leader must be “blameless” as a husband and father is because he must be above reproach as God’s household manager (steward) and defender of the faith by not being tied to vices, but to virtues 1:7-9
1) Five Vices to Be Avoided: The reason why the church leader must be “blameless” as a husband and father is because he must be above reproach as God’s household manager (steward) by not being tied to vices 1:7
a) God’s Steward Above Reproach: The reason why the church leader (ἐπίσκοπον here, “overseer”) must be “blameless” as a husband and father (1:6) is because (γὰρ) he must be (δεῖ) above reproach as God’s household manager (steward) 1:7a
d) Not Fond of Sordid Gain: It is necessary that the church leader not be fond of sordid gain (μὴ αἰσχροκερδῆ)26 1:7f
2) Six Virtues to Be Sought: In contrast to the above vices the church leader must be “blameless” as a husband and father by being virtuous because he is God’s household manager and defender of the faith 1:8-9
a) Hospitable: It is necessary that the church leader be hospitable (φιλόξενον)27 1:8a
b) Loving Good: It is necessary that the church leader be one who loves good (φιλάγαθον)28 1:8b
c) Sensible: It is necessary that the church leader be sensible (σώφρονα)29 1:8c
e) Holding Forth the Word:32 It is necessary that the church leader hold firmly to the trustworthy message just as it has been taught in order that he may exhort in sound doctrine and refute those who contradict sound doctrine33 1:9
B. Warnings Against False Teachers: The reason that Titus must appoint worthy elders is because there are many false teachers who must be silenced so that they (the false teachers/congregation) may be sound in the faith because the false teachers are defiled unbelievers 1:10-16
1. Reason to Appoint Worthy Elders--False Teachers: The reason that Titus must appoint worthy elders is because there are many false teachers who must be silenced 1:10-13a
a. Many False Teachers: The reason that Titus must appoint worthy elders (1:5-9) is because (γὰρ) there are many false teachers 1:10
1) Rebellious Men: The reason that Titus must appoint worthy elders is because there are many rebellious34 men 1:10a
2) Empty Talkers and Deceivers: The reason that Titus must appoint worthy elders is because there are many empty talkers and deceivers especially (in particular) of the Jews (circumcision)35 1:10b
b. Who Must Be Silenced: The reason that Titus must appoint worthy elders is because there are many false teachers who must be silenced because they are upsetting whole families with their teaching for self-interest (a judgment of Cretans which is supported by a Cretan prophet and confirmed by Paul) 1:11
1) Statement: The reason that Titus must appoint worthy elders is because there are many false teachers who must be silenced 1:11a
3) Support: Paul supports and confirms his accusation that the false teachers are acting out of self-interest by citing a Cretan poet/religious-teacher who indicts the Cretans as being liars, beasts, and idle sensualists 1:12-13a
a) The Testimony of a Cretan: Paul supports his judgment of the Cretan false teachers as being consumed with self-interest when he cites the Cretan poet/religious teacher38 who describes his own people as being always liars,39 evil beasts, and lazy gluttons40 1:12
b) The Confirmation of Paul: Paul confirms the Cretan teacher as being true in his description of the Cretan false teachers 1:13a
2. The Response to the Situation: Because there are many false teachers who need to be silenced Paul urges Titus to rigorously correct them in order that they (the false teachers/church) may be sound in the faith 1:13b-14
a. Exhortation to Reprove False Teachers: Because there are many false teachers who need to be silenced Paul urges Titus to severely reprove (rigorously correct)41 them 1:13b
b. Purpose in Reproving False Teachers: Paul urges Titus to severely reprove false teachers in order that (ι῞να) they42 may be sound in the faith by which he means not paying attention to Jewish myths43 and commandments of men44 who turn away from the truth45 1:13c-14
3. The Condemnation of False Teachers: Paul condemns the false teachers as being defiled in their mind and conscience and denying their profession of knowing God because through their evil actions 1:15-16
a. They Are Defiled:46 Unlike that pure for whom all things are pure, the false teachers are defiled and unbelieving in their mind and conscience and are thus defiled 1:15
1) The Pure: Paul affirms that all things are pure47 when one is pure 1:15a
2) The Defiled: In contrast to those who are pure nothing is pure when one is (morally) defiled and unbelieving--their mind and their conscience are defiled48 1:15b
III. WHAT GOD WANTS BY WAY OF GOOD WORKS:51 Paul instructs Titus to exhort different groups of believers to consider Christ’s redemption of them and thus to avoid the evil works of the false teachers and to live in such a way that those outside of the church may be attracted to the gospel 2:1--3:11
A. Instructions for Different Groups of Believers: In contrast to the false teachers Titus is instructed to speak to the congregation the things which are in accord with sound doctrine, namely, that the Cretan believers live in such a way that those outside of the church may be attracted to the gospel by their behavior 2:1-10
1. Instructions to Titus: In contrast (Σὺ δὲ) to the false teachers (1:10-16) Titus is instructed to speak to the congregation the things which are in accord with sound doctrine (upright living) 2:1
2. Instructions to Different Age Groups:52 Paul exhorts Titus to urge older men and women, young women and men, and bondslaves to live in such a way that those outside of the church may be attracted to the gospel by their behavior 2:2-10
a. Older Men: Titus instructs older men53 to be respectable in every way and especially exemplary of the cardinal Christian virtues of faith towards God, love towards all, and endurance to the End 2:2
1) Respectable: Older men should be respectable in every way 2:2a
a) Sober: Older men should be temperate/or sober (νηφάλιους)54
b) Respect: Older men should be worthy of respect/or dignity (σεμνούς)
c) Sensible: Older men should be sensible (σώφρονα)55
2) Cardinal Christian Virtues: Older men should be exemplary of the cardinal Christian virtues of faith, love and endurance 2:2b
a) Hope: Older men should be sound in faith (τῇ πίστει) [towards God]
b) Love: Older men should be sound in love (τῇ ἀγάπῃ) [towards one another]
c) Perseverance: Older men should be sound in perseverance (ὑπομονῇ) to the End56 2:2
b. Older Women: Paul instructs Titus to teach older women to be reverent, not slanderers or those addicted to wine, but teachers of what is good 2:3
1) Reverent: As with older men (ὡσαύτως), Paul instructs Titus to teach older women (Πρεσβύτιδας) to be reverent57 in the way that they live 2:3a
2) Not Slanderers: Paul instructs Titus to teach older women not to be slanderers (malicious gossips (διαβόλους) 2:3a
3) Not Addicted to Much Wine: Paul instructs Titus to teach older women not to be slaved to much wine58 2:3b
4) Teaching Good: Paul instructs Titus to teach older women to teach what is good59 2:3c
c. Younger Women: Paul exhorts the older women to advise the younger women with respect to their responsibilities as wives 2:4-5
2) Self-Controlled and Pure: Paul exhorts the older women to advise the younger women with respect to their being virtuous and chaste62 2:5a
3) Keepers of the Home and Kind: Paul exhorts the older women to advise the younger women with respect to being workers at home and kind (to servants?) 2:5b
4) Subject to Husbands: Paul exhorts the older women to advise the younger women with respect to being subject to their own husbands in order that (ι῞να) the word of God may not be dishonored (βλασφημῆται)63 2:5c
d. Young Men: As with the above (ὡσαύτως) Paul urges Titus to in instruct younger men (νεωτέρους) to be sensible (σωφρονεῖν)64 in all respects 2:6-7a
e. Titus (as a Younger Man): Paul urges Titus to fulfill the Apostolic role of modeling genuine Christian behavior in order that the opponent might be won over (not have a reason to accuse him) 2:7b-8
1) An Example of Good Works:65 Paul urges Titus to put himself forward as an example of good works66 with integrity and seriousness in teaching,67 sound in speech which is beyond contradiction (ἀκατάγνωστον) 2:7b-8a
2) Purpose of Good Works: The purpose of Titus’ good works in the community is so that (ι῞να) the opponent68 may be put to shame69 having nothing bad (evil) to say about Christian leaders (Paul and Titus and Christians in general)70 2:8b
f. Bondslaves: Paul exhorts Titus to urge bondslaves to subject themselves to their own masters in everything so that will make the teaching about God our Savior attractive 2:9-10
1) Subject Themselves to Masters: Paul exhorts Titus to urge bondslaves to subject themselves (ὑποτάσσεσθαι; middle voice) to their own masters in everything--to be well-pleasing, not argumentative, not pilfering, but showing good faithfulness 2:9-10a
2) Purpose of Subjection: Paul exhorts Titus to urge bondslaves to be subject to their own masters in everything in order that (ι῞να) they may wear (in an attractive way; κοσμῶσιν) the teaching of God their Savior in every respect 2:10b
B. The Theological Basis for Christian Living:71 Paul affirms that Titus should instruct believers that they should exhibit good works as a proper response to Christ’s redemption and out of a concern for the lost for whom salvation has appeared 2:11-15
1. Concern for the Outsider: The reason that God’s people should live as commanded in 2:2-10 is because (γὰρ) God’s grace has appeared bringing salvation to all men 2:11
2. The Grace of Salvation Instructs Behavior:72 Paul affirms that Christ’s redemption of believers was to result in good works as they renounce what is evil and cling to what is good in expectation of Christ’s glorious return 2:12-14
b. Positively:76 Paul affirms that the grace of God instructs believers to live sensibly (σωφρόνως), righteously (δικαίως) and godly (εὐσεβῶς) in the present age as they look for the hope that brings blessing, namely, the appearing of the glory of their great God and Savior,77 Christ Jesus78 2:13
c. Basis: The basis of Christian behavior is Christ Himself who gave Himself for believers79 in order that he might redeem them from every lawless deed, and purify them for himself as a people for his own possession--zealous for good works80 2:14
C. Good Works for the Sake of the Outsider--Instructions for Living in State and Society:83 Paul urges Titus to remind the Cretans to do good works with respect to civil authorities and all people because God saved them from their fallen state that they might be heirs of eternal life and share this with others 3:1-8
1. A Reminder to Good Works: Paul urges Titus to remind the Cretans that they are to be subject and obedient to civil authorities, and ready for every good work by not maligning anyone, not being quarrelsome, being conciliatory, and showing humility toward all men 3:1-2
b. All Man: Paul urges Titus to remind the Cretans that they are to malign no one,86 to be uncontentious (not quarrelsome), gentle (conciliatory), and showing consideration (true humility) for all men 2:2
2. A Theological Basis for Good Works: The reason Paul appeals for the believing Cretans to do good works toward outsiders is because God saved them from their fallen state in order that they might be heirs according to the hope of eternal life 3:3-7
a. The Former State of Believers--Fallen: The reason Paul appeals for the believing Cretans to do good works toward outsiders is because (γάρ) of their former falleness 3:3
1) Foolish: Believers were once foolish87 themselves 3:3a
2) Disobedient: Believers were once disobedient (to God)88 3:3b
3) Deceived: Believers were once deceived89 3:3c
4) Enslaved: Believers were once enslaved90 to various lusts and pleasures spending their lives in malice and envy, hateful, and hating one another 3:3d
b. God’s Response to the Human Condition--Salvation:91 Even through believers were in their fallen state God saved them in accordance with His mercy in order that they might be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life 3:4-6
1) God Saved Rebellious Man: Even though believers were in their fallen state (δὲ) God saved them when the Savior’s kindness and love appeared92 3:4-5a
2) God’s Salvation Was According to Mercy:93 God saved believers according to His mercy by the washing94 of regeneration95 and (that is the) renewal (ἀνακαινώσεως)96 by the Holy Spirit97 Whom He richly poured out upon them98 through Jesus Christ their Savior and not by works of righteousness which they had done99 3:5b-6
3) God’s Justification Was Designed For Heirship: The purpose of God’s justification100 (ι῞να) was in order that they might be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life 3:7
3. Desire for Others: Because of the trustworthiness of God’s merciful work among believers Paul urges Titus to confidently speak of God’s gracious work so that those who have believed may be careful to do good works for the profit of all men 3:8
a. God’s Salvation is Trustworthy: Paul confirms that the above affirmation of God’s merciful work among believers is trustworthy101 3:8a
b. Speak the Above Confidently: Paul urges Titus to speak of God’s merciful salvation102 confidently 3:8b
c. The Goal--Good Works: Paul desires for Titus to speak of God’s merciful salvation confidently so that those Cretan’s who have believed in God may be careful to enter into good works (because) good works are good and profitable103 for men 3:8c
D. Good Works in Contrast to False Teachers--Final Exhortations and Warnings against Errors:104 In a negative contrast to the good deeds which are exhorted above Paul exhorts Titus to urge the Cretan believers to avoid the evil works of the false teachers and to reject them if they persist in being divisive 3:9-11
1. Do Not Argue Over the Law: In a negative contrast to the good deed which are exhorted above (δὲ) Paul exhorts Titus to urge the Cretan believers to avoid unprofitable disputes concerning the Law 3:9
a. Cretan believers are to avoid foolish controversies105 3:9a
b. Cretan believers are to avoid genealogies106 3:9b
c. Cretan believers are to avoid strife and disputes about the Law107 3:9c
d. Reason: The reason Cretan believers are to avoid unprofitable disputes concerning the Law is because they are unprofitable and worthless 3:9d
2. Reject a Divisive Person: Paul urges Titus to instruct the Cretan believers to reject a factious108 man after a second warning109 with the knowledge that such a man has become perverted110 and is continuing in his sinning111 thus bringing self-condemnation112 3:10-11
IV. CONCLUSION--PERSONAL INSTRUCTIONS AND GREETINGS: Paul closes with some concluding instructions for Titus to come to him after his replacement arrives and to help Zenas and Apollos on their way, whereupon, he sends greetings, and prays that they might all receive God’s grace 3:12-15
A. Concluding Instructions: Paul concludes his instructions by urging Titus to come to him at Nicopolis, to help Zenas and Apollos on their way, and to help their people to learn to engage in good works (for others) in order that they (others) might be fruitful 3:12-14
1. Come to Nicopolis: Paul urges Titus to make every effort to come to him at Nicopolis where he has decided to spend the winter after Paul sends either Artemas or Tychicus to him113 3:12
3. Help Believers to Be Fruitful: Paul urges Titus to help their people to also learn to engage in good works117 and to meet pressing needs (of others) in order they (others) may not be unfruitful 3:14
B. Personal Greetings: Paul sends greetings from all of those who are with him to Titus and to all who love them in the faith 3:15a-b
1. Paul Sends Greetings Titus: Paul sends greetings from all of those who are with him to Titus 3:15a
2. Paul Gives Greetings to Believers: Paul greets all of those who love him and those with him118 in the faith 3:15b
C. Closing Benediction: Paul closes by praying that grace might be with all of them 3:15c
1 See the similar identifications in Romans 1:1; Philippians 1:1; Galatians 1:10. Paul is “God’s Agent” (cf. Josh. 1:2; Jer. 7:25; Amos 3:7).
2 This latter description expresses Paul’s authority.
3 This emphasis upon the “purpose of Paul’s apostleship” is an expansion which emphasizes the purpose of this letter. Titus did not need this explanation. The letter was no doubt meant to confirm Titus who represented Paul so that the message might be extended in accordance godliness in daily life (D. Edmond Hiebert, “Titus,” Expositors Bible Commentary, 11:427).
4 Here it is with the sense of goal of purpose (BAGD, II,4).
5 Here Paul is describing the believers as God’s people in continuity with OT language (cf. Ps. 105:43; Isa. 65:9, 15). Perhaps this is for the benefit of the false teachers who require a Jewish approach to salvation (see 1:10, 14; 3:8-9).
6 This is “truth and its visible expression in correct behavior” (Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, p. 66). See 1 Timothy 2:2 and 3:16; 4:7-8).
7 See Numbers 23:19 (cf. Heb. 6:18).
8 This does not just refer to OT prophecy, but the eternal counsels of God (cf. 1 Cor. 2:7-10; 2 Tim. 1:9; Eph. 1:4)
9 Romans 16:25-26; Col. 1:25-26.
10 Again, Paul is probably writing so that the purity of this message might be preserved.
11 This is very similar to 1 Timothy 1:2a and probably is an authentication of Titus as a legitimate one to carry on Paul’s ministry. Perhaps the emphasize upon “common” is to stress the unity of Jew (Paul) and Gentile (Titus; Gal. 2:3).
Titus is never found in the book of Acts and is only noted in the following scriptures (Gal. 2:1, 3; 2 Cor. 2:13; 7:6, 13, 14; 8:6, 16, 23; 12:18; 2 Tim. 4:10). In view of Galatians 2 it seems probable that Titus was from Syrian-Antioch and was converted as a Gentile during the early ministry of Paul and Barnabas there (cf. Acts 11:25-26). Later, Paul brought Titus to Jerusalem as an example of how a Gentile does not have to follow the code of the Mosaic Law (be circumcised) for him to be a Christian (Galatians 2:1-3; cf. Acts 11).
The next time Titus is mentioned is in the writings of 2 Corinthians. This was during Paul’s third missionary journey while Paul was in Ephesus. On Paul’s third missionary journey Ephesus became his base of operations for three years (Acts 18:23; 19:1--20:1, 31). From Ephesus Paul made a visit to Corinth which was not recorded in the book of Acts. Paul then wrote an epistle which the church does not now possess (cf. 1 Cor. 5:9, “I wrote you in my letter ....”). Paul later sent Timothy to Corinth by way of Macedonia (1 Cor. 4:17; 16:10-11; Acts 19:22). It is doubtful whether Timothy reached Corinth before the writing of 2 Corinthians. After the sending of Timothy, news of conflicts in the Church at Corinth reached Paul through “Chloe’s people” (Stephanas, Fortunatus, and Achaicus) (1 Cor. 1:11-12; 16:17). Paul wrote 1 Corinthians in response to the reports from “Chloe’s people” and probably sent it by Titus (cf. 1 Cor. “περὶ δὲ,” and 2 Cor. 7:12-15). Either Titus, or whoever delivered 1 Corinthians, probably told the Corinthians of Paul’s intention to visit the Corinthians twice as is reported in 2 Corinthians 1:15--2:4. Paul seemed to have agreed with Titus to meet him in Troas when Titus returned from delivering the letter of 1 Corinthians to Corinth to report on the response to the Corinthian church to Paul’s severe letter of correction (2 Cor. 2:13). But Paul could not find Titus and thus went on to Macedonia (2 Cor. 2:12-13). Paul found Titus in Macedonia (2 Cor. 7:5-6) and when he heard of the response of the church to 1 Corinthians, he wrote 2 Corinthians from Macedonia (2 Cor. 7:5-16; 8:1; 9:2-4) and sent it back with Titus and two other men (2 Cor. 8:6, 7, 13-15, 18-20) to administer the love gift for the Jerusalem church.
When Paul later came to Corinth and wrote the book of Romans, it does not appear that Titus is still present since his name does not appear in the greetings to the Romans in Romans 16:21-23.
Titus is not heard of again until the Pastoral Epistles. Paul left him on the island of Crete (Titus 1:5). He had probably been working there for quite a while when this letter arrived and was to leave when a replacement arrived and to join Paul in Nicopolis (Titus 3:12) where apparently Paul had further Plans for Titus. Finally, Paul writes to Timothy in 2 Timothy 4:10 that Titus had gone to Dalmatia. Therefore, it may be assumed that he was with Paul during his second imprisonment, and had gone to Dalmatia on Christian service.
As Hiebert writes, “These scanty references to Titus reveal that he was a trustworthy, efficient, and valued young co-worker. He possessed a forceful personality, was resourceful, energetic, tactful, skillful in dealing with difficult situations, and effective in conciliating people” (“Titus”EBC, 11:422).
12 As with 1 Timothy, so is it in Titus that Paul begins without a word of thanksgiving. He moves directly to business. This is not exactly a personal letter to Titus. No doubt the church would read this aloud.
13 Note Paul’s high Christology by interchanging “our Savior” with God and then Christ Jesus (1:4; 3:4, 6).
14 It seems that Titus is more in line with preventative measures than with prescriptive measures (as with 1 Timothy). In these young churches the best offense against false teachers is a good defense by appointing leaders in the church who can stand against the false teachers. Perhaps that is why Paul begins here with the appointing of elders rather than with addressing the false (Jewish teachers, cf. 1:10) as in 1 Timothy.
In the list that follows many similarities exist with 1 Timothy 3:1-7 (five qualities are identical and five or six have points of correspondence). But there are some significant differences: (1) Titus is to appoint elders and these are qualifications for that appointment, (2) one item of duty is spelled out in this list [that they be teachers of the truth able to refute error, v.9], and (3) the list has a more orderly progresses [household matters, followed by five vices to avoid, and six virtues to be sought].
15 It is difficult to know when this was accomplished. It does not seem probable that this occurred during Paul’s trip to Rome in Acts 27:7-8. Therefore, this probably was after his first Roman imprisonment and before his second. It seems that he came to Crete with Titus, began to set things in order, and then had to leave. But he had Titus remain to continue the task which he had started (note the terms, “left,” “remains,” “directed”).
16 The term is πρεσβυτέρους. Acts 20:17, 28 and Titus 1:5 and 7 indicate that the terms for “overseers” (ἐπισκοποι--Acts 20:28; Titus 1:7) and “elders” (πρεσβυτεροι--Acts 20:17; Titus 1:5) are interchangeable. Therefore, these “elders” are probably also church leaders, “overseers.”
17 The first of the guidelines given in verse six are not in the imperative mood, but are actually indirect questions and might better read, “Is a man blameless?” (ει῎ τίς ἐστιν ἀνέγκλητος ).
18 This term describes one as being above reproach in that he cannot be “called against,” “called to account,” he is “unreprovable,” “unaccused,” and thus, “blameless” (cf. 1 Cor. 1:8; Col. 1:22; 1 Tim. 3:10; Thayer,s.v.” ἀν-έγκλητος,” p. 44).
19 This category is also present in the list in 1 Timothy 3:4-5. The way which one acts in one’s home is an indication of how one will act with the church (the household of God).
20 There are several views as to the meaning of this character quality: (1) a church leader must be married, (2) a prohibition against polygamy, (3) a prohibition against all second marriages (especially in the case of widowhood), (4) an exhortation to marital fidelity to one’s wife, and (5) a prohibition against divorce and remarriage (e.g., a one-woman man).
Meanings 1-3 above are unlikely: (1) 1 Corinthians 7:25-38 argues against the suggestion that Paul would be insisting that one must be married. It is possible that Timothy himself was not married, (2) the use of the same phrase in 1 Timothy 5:9 for widows argues against the probability that Paul is addressing polygamy since widows were not known to have multiple husbands, and (3) Romans 7:1-2 and Paul’s exhortations to widows in 1 Timothy 5:14ff make it unlikely that Paul would restrict marriage for widowers.
Therefore meanings 4 and 5 above are the most likely interpretations of the options. Also meaning four may be inclusive of meaning 5 since one’s divorce and remarriage would not demonstrate one to be a one-woman man. Our culture seems to want to work the conclusion in just the opposite direction (e.g., all one needs to be is a “one-woman” man in the relationship which one is presently engaged). Such an understanding seems to miss the overall characteristic of “above reproach.”
In any case Paul’s concern is for church leaders to lead an exemplary life in the realms of their marriage.
21 This term for rebellion is used of the false teachers in 1:10 (rebellious men, “ἀνυπότακτοι”). See also the LXX of 1 Sam. 10:27 with respect to Eli’s sons.
22 The household manager is to be a servant (cf. Mk. 10:41-45; 1 Cor. 3:5-9; 4:1-2).
24 See 1 Timothy 3:3.
25 The term literally means, “alongside of wine.” Paul is not affirming that the church leader is to necessarily be a total abstainer (cf. 5:23), but that he is not to be addicted to wine or a drunkard (cf. 3:8; Titus 1:7). Jesus himself turned the water into true wine at the Wedding in Cana (John 2). Reasons for abstaining from alcoholic beverages relate more to one’s love for others than to a biblical prohibition (Romans 12:10;14; 1 Cor. 8). Nevertheless, one is not to be addicted to strong drink, or to be drunk (cf. M. & M. p. 496).
26 See 1 Timothy 3:8; Titus 1:11 of the false teachers. Clearly, this list has special application in view of the false teachers in Crete (1:10-13).
27 This is one who loves strangers and thus welcomes them into his home. See 1 Timothy 3:2.
28 Perhaps especially good people.
29 This is descriptive of one who is thoughtful and self-controlled; he has his “wits about him”. See 1 Timothy 3:2; Titus 2:2, 5.
30 See the fruit of the Spirit in Galatians 5:23.
31 Together these three terms may describe one’s relationship with (1) other people, (2) with God [cf. Luke 1:75; Eph. 4:24; 1 Thess. 2:10] and then (3) with one’s self.
32 This verse is transitionary in that this qualification is a duty which has particular significance in the next unit which deals with false teachers.
33 It is of some interest to note that the thirteenth-century MS 460 includes the following addition: “Do not appoint those who have been married twice, nor make them deacons; nor may they have wives from a second marriage; neither let them approach the altar for divine service. As a servant of God, rebuke the rulers who are unjust, swindlers, liars, and merciless” (Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 176 n. 1:9; the Greek reads as follows: μη ζειροτονειν διγαμους μηδε διακονους αυτους ποιειν μηδδε γυναικας εχειν εκ διγαμιας, μηδε προσερχεσθωσαν εν τω θυσιαστηριω λειτουργειν το θειον. τους αρχοντας τους αδικοκριτας και αρπαγας δαι ψευστας και ανελεημονας ελεγχε ως θεου διακονος.”
34 This term was used in 1:6.
35 See Acts 10:45; 11:2; Galatians 2:7-9, 12. While these false teachers may not have been promoting the same error as the Jews in Galatians, they do seem to be promoting Jewish themes (1:14-16).
36 The early church met in the homes of people (cf. Philemon 1:2). As Fee writes, “The picture that emerges is one of a somewhat less than cohesive church structure in which a lot of the teaching activity takes place in various households. In some cases, whole households are being overturned by the false teachers, rather than, as some have suggested, some families being upset by the defection of one or two within them” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 178).
37 See 1:7.
38 Epimenides--c. 600 BC.
39 These are mere talkers, and deceivers (ψεῦσται; see 1:10).
40 In other words the actions of the false teachers is very “Cretan.”
41 This term, ε῎λεγχε, is used in 1:9 as a necessary qualification for an elder (e.g., “refute those who contradict;” see also 1 Tim. 5:20; 2 Tim. 3:16; Titus 2:15).
42 Contextually, Paul probably has the false teachers in view here (cf. 2 Tim. 2:25-26), but he may also have the congregation as a whole in view (e.g., correct the false teachers so that the congregation may be sound in the faith).
43 See 1 Tim. 1:4; 4:7. Perhaps, they were an attempt by the Jews to emphasize physical heritage (e.g., pedigrees of the patriarchs) or “far-fetched minutiae of rabbinical exegesis to the detriment of the gospel” (cf. Book of Jubilees, or Philo’s Questions and Answers on Genesis, or Pseudo-Philo’s Book of Biblical Antiquities; J. N. D. Kelly, A Commentary on the Pastoral Epistles, pp. 44-45; Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 7).
44 See Isaiah 29:13; Mark 7:7 = Matt. 15:9; Col. 2:22.
45 The “truth” is the truth of the Gospel which emphasizes salvation by grace rather than by religious rules and regulations.
46 This may well be speaking of Jewish food laws. They believed that some foods would defile one (cf. Acts 11).
47 See Romans 14:20; Mark 7. All things are ritually pure.
48 Paul’s point is that when one is unclean, all that one touches is unclean (cf. Hag. 2:10-14; Philo, On the Special Laws 3.208-209). Since the false teachers are unclean within, their “ritual law” does not cleanse anything. The problem is an internal one, not an external one.
As Fee writes, “his devastating punch is that, instead of becoming or keeping themselves pure by eating only pure things, they very fact that they consider anything impure and therefore need regulations for their own purity is the demonstration that the false teachers are themselves corrupted. They are so precisely because they also do not believe, that is, they do not put their trust in Christ. Thus in the Age of the Spirit, everything is new. The one who seeks purity by obedience to regulations, that is, human commandments, turns out not to be one of God’s people at all, but among the unbelieving” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 181).
49 This need not be a reference to the gnostics. The Jews are in view here, and they claimed to know God (1 Thess. 4:5; 2 Thess 1:8; Galatians 4:8; Romans 2:17-18; 1 John 2:4; James 2:14-16).
50 They find abominations everywhere, but they are an abomination; they obey human commands, but they disobey God, therefore, they are unqualified for any good work.
Paul will now describe the good which which God wants in 2:1--3:11.
51 It seems that the logical progression between chapters one and two is one of contrast. Fee writes, “the concern throughout the passage is on observable behavior, obviously in contrast to that of the ‘opponents’ described in 1:10-16, who are finally judged as unqualified for any good work. The language used is quite general and very much that which was current in pagan philosophical and religious circles, here adapted to Christian life. One gets the feeling, therefore, that the passage does not so much address ad hoc problems in Crete as it does in a more general way call for good works and a lifestyle in the part of Christians that will make the teaching about God our Savior attractive (v. 10) [1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 184]. Likewise Hiebert writes, “Paul here stresses the importance of building up the inner life of believers as the best antidote against error. Sound doctrine must lead to ethical conduct in the lives of all the groups in the congregations. Emphasis falls on the family groups; the false teachers there had apparently done their greatest damage (1:11) [“Titus,” EBC, 11:435].
52 These instructions are similar to the groupings found in 1 Timothy 5:1-2. This material may be distinct from the “house codes” in Colossians 3:18--4:1, Ephesians 5:21--6:9, and 1 Peter 2:18--3:7 because these instructions are not as concerned with relationships as with character and conduct in general for the sake of the gospel’s reputation with outsiders (see Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 184, 191).
53 These are those from among whom elders would have probably been chosen (Πρεσβύτας). This explains the correlation of character traits with those of elders and overseers.
54 This term describes one who is “temperate in the use of alocholic beverages”--sober (1 Tim. 3:2,11; Tit. 2:2; BAGD, p. 538). Figuratively, it may have the sense of being free from spiritual drunkenness, excess, passion, rashness, or confusion (e.g., well balanced; cf. νήφω; 2 Tim. 4:5).
55 This is descriptive of one who is thoughtful and self-controlled; he has his “wits about him”; he is sound minded. See 1 Timothy 3:2; Titus 2:5.
56 This last term may be a variation of the triad “faith, love, and hope” as in 1 Thessalonians 1:3; 1 Timothy 6:11 (cf. 2 Timothy 3:10).
57 The term describes one as fitting for temple service since one is holy (ἱεροπρεπεῖς; cf. 4 Macc. 9:25; 11:20).
58 The passage reads, “μὴ οι῎νῳ πολλῷ δεδουλωμένας.” See 1 Timothy 3:8, 11.
59 The term is unique in all Greek literature, “καλοδιδασκάλους.” This may be a teaching by word and example.
60 The term is σοφρονίζωσιν which occurred in 2:2 above meaning “sensible,” or “to bring one to one’s senses.” Paul may be urging the older women to “wise up” the younger women with their responsibilities as wives.
61 In the culture of Paul’s day most younger women would be married.
62 As Fee writes, “The next work, self-controlled, is identical to what was said of the older men in verse 2. However, this is one of the most frequent words used by contemporary writers to describe a good wife, and most often it intends to describe her as a virtuous woman .... Therefore, in this context self-controlled and pure probably mean ‘virtuous and chaste” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 187).
63 This presents the first of several statements that good works are for the sake of nonbelievers (cf. 2:10, 11, 14; 3:2, 8, 14).
64 See 2:2, 4, 5 above. This is descriptive of one who has his wits about him.
65 These good works are probably related to Titus’ responsibilities in the community.
66 This is in contrast to the false teachers in 1:16, “worthless for any good work.” Titus is to set himself along side of the young men as “type,” “shadow,” “example” of good works (σεαυτὸν παρεχόμενος τύπον καλῶν ε῎ργων).
67 This is in contrast with the false teachers of 1:10-16.
68 The word is singular not plural as in the NIV (ὁ ἑξ ἐναντίας). Suggestions of identity have been Satan, those within the church (1:10-16), either of the above, and those outside of the church. It is difficult to know for certain.
69 Two senses are possible here: (1) that the opponent might be ashamed in a judgment [e.g., disgraced], or (2) that the opponent might be shamed into repentance (cf. 2 Thess 3:14; Rom. 12:17-21). The latter is the more probable contextually. Paul is not so concerned with sending people to judgment as with winning them over to the truth.
70 As Fee writes, “Paul’s point is not that the opponent should not be able to point out evil in Titus’ doctrine--although that would follow--but in his conduct, which in turn would also implicate Paul (about us).
71 This section provides the theological basis for the imperatives given in 1:10--2:10. Note that Fee writes, “It should be noted that this concern for ‘good works’ is not non-Pauline, as some suppose. Paul avoids this language in the earlier controversial letters because his opponents were trying to establish a righteousness based on ‘works of Law.’ But from the beginning Paul expected the encounter with grace to issue in proper behavior, which only later he calls ‘good woks’ (cf. Eph. 2:8-10) [1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 199].
72 Paul often speaks in negative and positive ways about Christian behavior (Rom. 6:5-14; Gal. 5:16-26; Col. 3:8-14).
73 This statement corresponds with the first goal of Christ’s redemption of believers in 2:14.
74 See Romans 1:18. The term is ἀσέβειαν which is the opposite of εὐσεβεια.
75 These are passions or desires (ἐπιθυμίας) which are enticed by the world-system (κοσμικὰς) which is opposed to God (cf. 1 John 2:15-17).
76 This corresponds with the second goal of Christ’s redemption of believers in 2:14.
77 This is one person, Christ Jesus. The article before great controls both God and Savior (τοῦ μεγάλου θεοῦ καὶ σοτῆρος ἡμῶν). The Father is nowhere else said to be joining the Son in the Second Coming.
78 Christ is the manifestation of God’s glory.
79 See Galatians 1:4; Mark 10:45.
80 Paul is adapting language for the people of God in the OT to NT saints (cf. Ps. 130:8; Ezk. 37:23; Ex. 19:5; Deut. 7:6; 14:2; 26:18).
81 This is with the authority which Titus has in his relationship with Paul.
82 This may be similar to 1 Timothy 4:12 only Titus’ youth is not mentioned. Perhaps he was older than Timothy.
83 As Fee writes, “This section, however, makes a decided turn in the argument. In 2:1-14 the concern for ‘good works’ had to do largely with relationships between believers, which when seen by outsiders would keep them from ‘maligning the gospel’ (2:5) and perhaps would even attract them to it (2:10). Now the interest centers in the effect of Christian behavior upon outsiders (3:1-2, 8).
84 See Romans 13:1-8; Acts 4:19; 1 Timothy 2:2; Revelation 6:9-11; 12:11; 13-14.
85 See the false teachers in 1:16. This good work may not only be a reference to that which is civic duty. It could also be transitionary to the list that follows in verse 2.
86 Note that the term is βλασφημεῖν (to insult). This is unlike the false teachers (3:9).
87 Without understanding (ἀνόητοι).
88 See 1:16.
89 Or misguided (πλανώμενοι) as by Satan (cf. 1 Tim. 4:1-2; 2 Cor. 4:4).
90 The term is δουλεύοντες.
91 This sentence (verses 4-7) is creedal presenting Pauline soteriology in a highly condensed form (Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 203).
92 While there is a historical time when God’s kindness appeared in the incarnate Christ, this appearance may better be understood to be an individual experience of His kindness and love at the time of their rebirth and renewal (3:5).
93 Note that the trinity are involved in this salvation--God the Father, Son and Spirit.
94 The washing is probably more in line with spiritual cleansing than with baptism. But if baptism is in view it is the baptism of the Holy Spirit.
95 Rebirth (παλιγγενεσίας; cf. Matt. 19:28).
96 Romans 12:2; cf. also 2 Cor. 5:14-17.
97 Three basic view are held to regarding the meaning of this larger phrase: (1) The washing refers to conversion (or baptism) and renewal refers to the coming of the Spirit referring to two realities (a Holiness-Pentecostal view), (2) The washing refers solely to baptism and “regeneration and renewal” are controlled by it in that the Spirit effects these things at baptism (baptismal regeneration), and (3) the washing alludes to baptism but is a metaphor for spiritual cleansing and emphasizes the cleansing, regenerative work of the Holy Spirit (e.g., “through the washing by the Holy Spirit that brings rebirth and renewal) (Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, pp. 204-205). This third view is correlates best with Pauline theology elsewhere (1 Cor. 2:6-16; Rom. 6--8) and conforms to the emphases of the sentence itself.
98 See Joel 2:28-30; Acts 2:17-18.
99 Ephesians 2:8-9; Phil. 3:9; 2 Timothy 1:9.
100 The term is δικαιωθέντες--a very Pauline expression.
101 See also 1 Timothy 1:15; 3:1; 4:9; 2 Timothy 2:11. This is the second instance where the saying follows the point (cf. 1 Tim. 4:9). The “statement” is verses 4-7 since they are one complete sentence in Greek.
102 And possibly all of 3:1-7.
103 They are profitable not only because of the good impact they have upon people, but because they lead them to the gospel.
104 Fee discusses the argument of this unit well with the following observations: “With these final exhortations Paul brings the ‘argument’ of the letter, which began in 1:5, to its fitting conclusion. Actually these verses do not so much form a new paragraph as bring the paragraph begun in 3:1 to a conclusion, by way of some contrasts with verse 8 (through the motif of profitable and unprofitable deeds). At the same time, however, the contrasts in verse 9 also reach back to 1:10-16, thus bringing the whole letter to conclusion.
The net result is that the argument form 1:10 (which hinges on 1:9) to 3:11 forms a kind of chiasmus:
a 1:10-16--warnings against the false teachers, with their ‘false works’
b 2:1-14--specific ‘good works’ for specific believers, with the outsider in view, plus their theological basis
b’ 3:1-8--once again, ‘good works’ for outsiders, this time directed toward them, and again with their theological basis
a’ 3:9-11--final warning against the false teachers and their ‘false works’” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 210).
105 See 1 Timothy 6:4; 2 Tim. 2:23. Perhaps these are questions, word battles resulting in division in the community (see the warnings in Galatians 5:21 and Romans 1:29).
106 See 1 Timothy 1:4. They were probably some kind of Jewish discussions about origins. It is not possible to be specific beyond this. Perhaps, they were an attempt by the Jews to emphasize physical heritage (e.g., pedigrees of the patriarchs) or “far-fetched minutiae of rabbinical exegesis to the detriment of the gospel” (cf. Book of Jubilees, or Philo’s Questions and Answers on Genesis, or Pseudo-Philo’s Book of Biblical Antiquities; J. N. D. Kelly, A Commentary on the Pastoral Epistles, pp. 44-45; Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 7).
107 This is an important clue that the false teachers were in some way related to Judaism. These disputes were related to the Law!
108 This term (αἱρετικὸν) became transliterated and later identified with the concept of a heretic! But this may be saying too much because the issue was one’s behavior (e.g., divisiveness), and not simply one’s theology. Therefore, the issue is not so much whether one agrees with another as much as whether one is dividing the body with their views. Fee’s words may be appropriate, “Unfortunately, all too often in the church the ‘orthodox,’ in ferreting out ‘heretics’ (i.e., people who hold different views from mine), have become the divisive ones!” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 211).
109 These warnings are to be admonishments.
110 This is a perfect tense, ἐξέστραπται.
111 This is a present tense, ἁμαρτάνει.
112 In other words, “by his very persistence in his sinful behavior he has condemned himself, thus putting himself on the outside, hence to be rejected by Titus and the church” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 212). This is not necessarily speaking of his eternal state. Note that there is a similar warning at the end of Romans (16:17-20).
113 It seems that either Artemas or Tychichus was to be a replacement for Titus in Crete. Nothing is known about Artemas, but Tychichus is mentioned in Acts 20:4; Colossians 4:7 and Ephesians 6:21). Fee writes, “On the basis of Paul’s eventually having sent Tychicus to Ephesus (2 Tim. 4:12) and of Titus’ departure for Dalmatia (2 Tim. 4:10), up the coast from Nicopolis, we may safely conjecture that the plan eventually materialized with the sending of Artemas” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 214.
114 Perhaps an expert in Roman law (e.g., a jurist).
115 He is the well known Alexandrian preacher/teacher (Acts 18:24--19:1; 1 Cor. 1:12; 3:4-22; 16:12).
116 Perhaps they are the ones who have delivered the letter to Titus from Paul. Such assistance was a common Christian practice (Acts 15:3; 21:5; Rom. 15:24; 1 Cor. 16:6, 11; 2 Cor. 1:16; 3 John 6).
117 See 3:8.
118 Probably some of the Cretans have been disloyal to Paul and his companions with the gospel.
Related Topics: Introductions, Arguments, Outlines
An Argument Of The Book Of 2 TimothyRelated Media
Paul Writes As A Man Whose Life And Ministry Is Nearly At An End To Not Only Request That Timothy Join Him In Rome, But To Encourage Timothy To Be Loyal To The Lord, Paul And Especially The Gospel Ministry Under Any And All Circumstances As He Gently, But Firmly Resists The False Teachers In Ephesus Knowing That The Lord Will Reward Him For Faithfulness Just As He Is About To Reward Paul
I. INTRODUCTION: As a chosen apostle with an eye to his future life Paul writes to his dear son Timothy, prays that he might receive grace, mercy and peace from God, and thanks God for the faith which is within him 1:1-5
A. Salutation: As a chosen apostle with an eye to the future Paul writes to his dear son Timothy and prays for grace, mercy and peace from the father and Christ Jesus their Lord 1:1-2
2. The Reader: Paul writes to Timothy his dear son4 1:2a
3. The Greeting: Paul prays for Timothy to receive grace mercy and peace from the Father and Christ Jesus their Lord 1:2b
B. Thanksgiving:5 In a spirit of continuity in the faith and with a longing to see him again Paul regularly gives thanks to God for Timothy because of his genuine faith(fulness) 1:3-5
1. Paul Gives Thanks for Timothy: Paul, as one who serves God with a clear conscience as his forefathers did,6 gives thanks to God for Timothy as he constantly remembers him in his regular times (day and night) of prayer 1:3
3. Reason for Thanksgiving--Timothy’s Faith: The reason Paul gives thanks for Timothy is because he knows of the genuine faith9 within him which was first10 in his grandmother Lois and his mother Eunice11 1:5
II. APPEALS TO LOYALTY (STEADFASTNESS) IN THE MINISTRY: Paul urges Timothy to not be like many in Asia who are disloyal, but to be loyal to the Lord, Paul, and especially the gospel ministry, which has been given to him by investing it in faithful men who will teach it to others because the Lord will certainly reward him (and all faithful believers) in the eschatological future for his willingness to endure suffering 1:6--2:13
A. An Appeal to Loyalty Despite Hardship: Paul urges Timothy to fan into flame the Spiritual gift of his ministry of the gospel and to thus join Paul in suffering for the gospel without personal shame because it is the message of salvation which they are already partakers of through Christ Jesus and Paul is certain that God will guard their lives until that End day 1:6-14
1. Empowering of the Holy Spirit: Because of the genuine faith that Paul is persuaded that Timothy has, he urges him to kindle afresh (fan into flame) the Spiritual gift which is in him through the laying on of Paul’s hands because that gift will enable him to stand against the false teachers with power, love, and soundmindedness 1:6-7
a. Exhortation: Because (Δι ᾿) of the genuine faith that Paul is persuaded that Timothy has, he urges him to kindle afresh the gift12 of God which is in him through the laying on of Paul’s hands 1:6
b. Reason: The reason (γὰρ) Paul urges Timothy to kindle afresh the gift of God which is in him is because God has not given to them a spirit13 of timidity, but a spirit of power,14 love,15 and discipline (or soundmindeness)16 1:7
2. Appeal--Do Not Be Ashamed But Join in Suffering: Because the Spirit has given to them power, love and soundmindness Paul concludes that Timothy should not be ashamed of the testimony of their Lord, or of Paul, the Lord’s prisoner, but that Timothy should join Paul in suffering for the gospel according to the power of God 1:8
a. Do Not Be Ashamed: Because the Spirit has given to them power, love and soundmindnesses Paul concludes, therefore (ου῏ν), that Timothy should not be ashamed of the testimony of their Lord, or of Paul, the Lord’s prisoner 1:8a
b. Join in Suffering: In contrast to being ashamed of their Lord, or of Paul, Timothy is exhorted to join Paul in suffering for the gospel17 according to the power of God 1:8b
3. Basis of Appeal--The Gospel [First Loyalty]: Paul urges Timothy to join him in suffering for the gospel because it is the message of God’s salvation and calling of believers to holiness in accordance with God’s own purpose and grace which were hidden in eternity past but are now revealed in Christ Jesus who is their savior and has overcome death with life of which they are presently a part (to light) 1:9-10
a. Salvation and Calling: God has saved believers (leaders, Paul and Timothy specifically) and called them with a holy life18 1:9
b. Not According to Works, But God’s Purpose and Grace: God has saved and called believers not according to their (good) works, but according to His own purpose and grace granted in Christ Jesus from all eternity (past)19 1:9b
c. The Revealed Christ: God’s salvation and calling are realized through the appearing of the savior of believers, Christ Jesus, who abolished death, and brought life and immortality to light20 through the gospel 1:10
4. Paul’s Example [Second Loyalty]: Paul affirms that the gospel is that for which he was appointed a preacher/apostle/teacher and that he suffers as a fulfillment of his commission resulting in no personal shame, but confidence in God’s ability to guard his life until the End 1:11-12
a. Appointed for the Gospel: Paul affirms that the gospel (described above) is that for which he was appointed a preacher, an apostle and a teacher 1:11
b. Suffers Because of the Gospel: Paul affirms that it is because he fulfills his commission (as a preacher/apostle/teacher) for the gospel that he suffers21 and is not suffering personal shame because he knows Christ in whom he has trusted, and is convinced that His is able to guard what he has entrusted to Him (his life)22 until that day23 1:12
5. Timothy’s Ministry [Third Loyalty]: Paul urges Timothy to retain and guard by the help of the Holy Spirit the standard of sound teaching which he has heard from Paul with the modeling of faithfulness and love which are in Christ Jesus 1:13-14
a. Retain Sound Teaching: Paul urges Timothy to retain the standard of sound teaching (words) which he has heard from Paul in the (modeling of) faith(fulness) and love which are in Christ Jesus 1:13
B. Examples of Disloyalty and Loyalty: Paul encourages Timothy not to be ashamed of Paul’s imprisonment and to seek to share in his sufferings for the gospel by describing those who from Asia who have been disloyal to Paul, especially mentioning Phygelus and Hermogenes, and by praying that the Lord would be merciful to Onesiphorus who shared in Paul’s suffering by seeking Paul out in Rome and refreshing him while he was in prison 1:15-18
1. Disloyalty--Phygelus and Hermogenes: Paul reminds Timothy of that which he knows, namely, that all who are in Asia turned away from Paul among whom are Phygelus and Hermogenes26 1:15
2. Loyalty--Onesiphorus: Paul prays that the Lord would grant mercy to the house of Onesiphorus because of his loyal ministry to Paul in Rome as well as his services in Ephesus 1:16-18
a. May God Grant Present Mercy:27 Paul prays that the Lord would grant present mercy to the house of Onesiphorus 1:16a
b. Reasons: The reason that Paul prays that the Lord would grant mercy to the house of Onesiphorus is because he not only refreshed Paul, but eagerly searched for Paul and found him not being ashamed of Paul’s chains 1:16b-17
1) Refreshed Paul: The reason that Paul prays that the Lord would grant mercy to the house of Onesiphorus is because he refreshed28 Paul 1:16b
2) Searched For and Found Paul: The reason that Paul prays that the Lord would grant mercy to the house of Onesiphorus is because he was not afraid of Paul’s chains29 but eagerly searched him out and found him 1:16c-17
c. May God Grant Future Mercy: Paul prays that Onesiphorus would find mercy from the Lord at the future judgment (on that day)30 emphasizing that Timothy knows the services (ministries) Onesiphorus rendered at Ephesus 1:18
C. The Appeal Renewed:31 In contrast to those in Asia who have deserted Paul and in congruence with Onesiphorus who was loyal to Paul, Timothy is urged to fulfill his ministry by passing the gospel on to faithful men who can teach others, and by suffering hardship through perseverance which will yield future reward 2:1-7
1. Fulfill Your Ministry: In contrast to those in Asia who have deserted Paul and in congruence with Onesiphorus who was loyal to Paul Timothy is urged to be strong in the gospel and to pass it on to faithful men who will be able to teach others 2:1-2
a. Be Strong in the Gospel: In contrast to those in Asia who have deserted Paul and in congruence with Onesiphorus who was loyal to Paul Timothy is urged32 to be strong in the gospel (the grace that is in Christ Jesus) 2:1
b. Pass the Gospel On to Faithful Men: Paul urges Timothy to entrust33 the gospel (the things which he has heard from Paul34 through [the attestation of] many witnesses35) to faithful men who will also be able to teach others 2:2
2. Suffer Hardship:36 Paul urges Timothy to carefully consider his exhortation to suffer hardship as a good soldier of Christ who needs to persevere, as an athlete who follows the rules (of suffering) to receive a victor’s crown, and as a hardworking farmer who will receive reward for his labor 2:3-7
a. As a Soldier Who Needs to Persevere: Paul urges Timothy to suffer hardship as a good soldier of Christ Jesus in that he perseveres by not entangling himself in the affairs of everyday life37 so that he may please the one who enlisted him 2:3-4
1) Exhortation: Paul urges Timothy to suffer hardship as a good soldier of Christ Jesus 2:3
2) Illustration: Paul urges Timothy to suffer hardship as a good soldier of Christ in that he perseveres by not entangling himself in the affairs of everyday life so that he may please the one who enlisted him as a soldier (e.g., the Lord) 2:4
c. As a Farmer Who Receives Reward for His Labor: Paul urges Timothy to suffer hardship as a good farmer in that he ought to be the first to receive his share of the crops 2:6
d. Paul urges Timothy to reflect on what he is saying (in the above three metaphors) because the Lord will give him understanding in everything40 2:7
D. The Theological Basis for the Appeal to Loyalty:41 Through the examples of Jesus who received eschatological reward for his endurance, and Paul who presently endures hardship for the sake of the saints, Paul exhorts Timothy (and all believers) to endure suffering knowing that eschatological reward awaits them for faithfulness, there will be negative consequences for not enduring, and that Jesus is faithful to bring about the future even if they are not faithful 2:8-13
1. Remember Jesus Christ--the Gospel: Paul encourages Timothy to remember Jesus Christ who is the prime example of eschatological victory after death in that he is risen from the dead42 and is an example of God fulfilling his promises since he is of David’s seed43 according to Paul’s gospel44 2:8
2. Remember Paul’s Imprisonment: Paul affirms that he suffered hardship, even to the point of imprisonment as a criminal for the gospel, but God’s word is not imprisoned, therefore, he endures for the salvation of those who are chosen 2:9-10
a. Suffered Hardship: Paul affirms that he suffered hardship even to the point of imprisonment as a criminal for the gospel entrusted to him 2:9a
b. God’s Word is Not Imprisoned: Paul affirms that even though he suffered imprisonment for the gospel, God’s word is not imprisoned 2:9b
c. Conclusion--Paul Endures for the Sake of Others: Since God’s word is not imprisoned Paul affirms that he endures all things for the sake of those who are chosen, namely, that they may also obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus and eternal glory 2:10
3. A Faithful Saying Which Encourages Endurance:45 Paul writes a trustworthy statement encouraging Timothy (and all believers) to endurance, warning all against the lack of endurance, and affirming God’s faithfulness to the future even if believers are unfaithful 2:11-13
a. A Trustworthy Statement: Paul affirms that what follows is a trustworthy statement46 2:11a
b. An Encouragement to Endurance: Paul encourages Timothy (and all believers) to endurance by affirming that if believers suffer (die, endure) with Jesus they will also find eschatological reward (live, reign) with Jesus 2:11b-12a
1) Conversion--Death and Resurrection: Paul affirms that if believers (we) die with Jesus they will also live with Jesus47 2:11b
2) Perseverance--Endurance and Reigning: Paul affirms that if believers endure with Jesus they shall also reign with Jesus 2:12a
c. A Warning Against the Lack of Endurance: Paul affirms that if believers deny Jesus,48 he will also deny them 2:12b
III. EXHORTATIONS IN VIEW OF FALSE TEACHERS: Paul exhorts Timothy to correct the false teachers in their error, yet with a spirit of kindness so that they may repent and be saved all of the while being sure to keep himself separate from them and their teachings, as an honorable vessel, because they are a part of the difficulties connected with the last days in that they are religious charlatans who subvert weak women and oppose the truth even though they will not ultimately triumph 2:14--3:9
A. Exhortation to Resist False Teachers: Paul exhorts Timothy as one who is to do his best to present himself approved to God to remind and charge the false teachers as though they are in the presence of the Lord not to dispute about words because this infectious talk overturns some in their faith even though the church overall will not capitulate because it is known by God and will abstain from the teaching of the false teachers 2:14-19
1. Exposure of the False Teachers and Teaching: Paul exhorts Timothy to remind and charge false teachers as before the presence of the Lord not to dispute about words because this only ruins its hearers 2:14
a. Exhortation: Paul exhorts Timothy to remind false teachers before the Lord not to dispute about words51 2:14a
b. Reason: The reason the false teachers should not dispute about words is because rather than doing good, this only ruins the hearers 2:14b
2. An Appeal to Resist: Paul exhorts Timothy to do his best to present himself to God as one approved by avoiding the infectious talk of the false teachers which overturns some in their faith 2:15-18
a. Present Oneself Approved: Paul exhorts Timothy to do his best to present himself to God as one approved--a workman who has no need to be ashamed rightly handling the word of truth 2:15
b. Avoid The Infection Talk of the False Teachers: Paul urges Timothy to avoid the infectious talk of the false teachers like Hymenaeus and Philetus whose false teaching about the resurrection is overturning the faith of some 2:16-18
1) Avoid Godless Chatter:52 Paul exhorts Timothy to avoid godless chatter because it will lead to further ungodliness and the teaching (ὁ λογος) of the false teachers will spread (or eat away) like infectious gangrene 2:16-17a
2) The Talk of the False Teachers: Paul identifies Hymenaeus53 and Philetus as men among the false teachers who have gone astray from the truth saying that the resurrection has already taken place,54 thus, upsetting (overturning) the faith of some 2:17b-18
3. The Church Will Not Capitulate: Even though there are some defections, nevertheless (μέντοι), Paul affirms that the church (the firm foundation of God)55 stands as those who are recognized (having this seal)56 by the Lord knowing them57 and who abstain from wickedness58 (of the false teachers) 2:19
B. A Supporting Analogy from Household Vessels:59 As a large house has expensive vessels meant for honorable use and inexpensive vessels meant for dishonorable use, so is it that if a person cleanses himself from the false teachings of the false teachers then he will be a vessel for honor which is useful for the Master 2:20-21
1. The Facts of the Analogy: Paul affirms that in a large house60 there are not only expensive vessels (gold and silver), but also inexpensive vessels (wood and pottery), and that the more expensive ones were used for honor (public functions and meals) and the less expensive ones were used for dishonor (garbage or excrement)61 2:20
2. The Application of the Analogy: Paul concludes (ου῏ν) from this analogy of two kinds of vessels that if a man cleanses himself from the teachings62 of the false teachers (cf. 2:19), then he will be a vessel for honor,63 sanctified, and useful for the Master (τῳ δεσπότῃ) being prepared for every good deed 2:21
C. Timothy’s Responsibilities in Light of the False Teachers:64 Paul urges Timothy to flee from those youthful desires and to pursue what is upright as all of God’s people do, thereby resisting foolish and ignorant speculations yet without a quarreling spirit, but with a spirit of kindness so that the false teachers who are captives of Satan used for his will might be saved 2:22-26
1. Flee Youthful Desires: Paul urges Timothy to flee from youthful passions65 of the false teachers 2:22a
2. Pursue Righteousness, Faith, Love and Peace: Rather than pursuing youthful desires, Paul urges Timothy to pursue righteousness, faith, love and peace66 along with all of those who call on the Lord from a pure heart67 2:22b
3. Resist Foolish and Ignorant Speculations: Paul urges Timothy not to have anything to do with foolish and ignorant speculations68 knowing that they produce quarrels 2:23
4. Dealing with False Teachers: Paul urges Timothy as the Lord’s bondservant to not be quarrelsome in his correction of error, but to be kind to all, and able to teach with a good spirit those who are in opposition to him with the hope that the Lord might grant them repentance leading to salvation 2:24-26
a. Do Not Be Quarrelsome: Paul exhorts Timothy as the Lord’s bondservant to not be quarrelsome69 2:24a
b. Be Kind to All: Paul exhorts Timothy as the Lord’s bondservant70 to be kind to all (even opponents), able to teach, patient when wronged and correcting with gentleness those who are in opposition71 2:24b-25a
c. Purpose--Salvation: Paul exhorts Timothy to be kind to all when correcting in order that the Lord might grant them repentance leading to the knowledge of the truth72 and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil who has held them captive to do his will73 2:25b-26
D. Final Indictment of the False Teachers:74 Even though Paul exhorts Timothy to be kind when he corrects the false teachers with the hope that they will repent, Paul also exhorts Timothy to have nothing to do with them because they are a part of the difficulties connected with the last days in that they are religious charlatans who subvert weak women and oppose the truth even though they will not ultimately triumph 3:1-9
1. Avoid the False Teachers Who Are a Part of the Last Days: Even though Paul exhorts Timothy to be kind when he corrects the false teachers with the hope that they will repent, Paul also exhorts Timothy to realize that the false teachers are a part of the last days because they partake in many evil vices, therefore, Timothy should have nothing to do with them 3:1-5
a. Statement--The Last Days Will Be Difficult: Even though Paul exhorts Timothy to be kind when he corrects the false teachers with the hope that they will repent, Paul also exhorts Timothy to realize that the false teachers are a part of the last days75 in which difficult times will come 3:1
b. Reason: The reason (γὰρ) Paul affirms that the false teachers are a part of the last days in which difficult times will come is because they partake in many evil vices 3:2-4
1) Lovers of Self and Money: The characteristics of men in the last days include that they will be lovers of self and lovers of money 3:2a
2) Boastful and Proud: The characteristics of men in the last days include that they will be boastful and arrogant 3:2b
3) Revilers: The characteristics of men in the last days include that they will be revilers (or abusive, βλάσφημοι) 3:2c
4) Disobedient to Parents: The characteristics of men in the last days include that they will be disobedient to Parents76 3:2d
5) Ungrateful, Unholy, Unloving, Unforgiving:77 The characteristics of men in the last days include that they will be ungrateful, unholy, unloving, and unforgiving 3:2e-3a
6) Malicious Gossips: The characteristics of men in the last days include that they will be slanderous 3:3b
7) Without Self-Control: The characteristics of men in the last days include that they will be without self-control 3:3c
8) Brutal: The characteristics of men in the last days include that they will be brutal 3:3d
9) Haters of Good: The characteristics of men in the last days include that they will be those who hate what is good 3:3e
10) Treacherous and Reckless: The characteristics of men in the last days include that they will stop at nothing to gain their ends (e.g., treacherous and rash) 3:4a
11) Conceited: The characteristics of men in the last days include that they will be conceited78 3:4b
12) Lovers of Pleasure: The characteristics of men in the last days include that they will be misdirected in their love (lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God) 3:4c
c. Avoid Such Men: Paul exhorts Timothy to have nothing to do with such men81 as those described above 3:5
2. Religious Charlatans: The reason Paul urges Timothy to have nothing to do with such men is because (γὰρ) they are religious charlatans who subvert weak women and oppose the truth as the Egyptian magicians did Moses, but who will not ultimately triumph 3:6-9
a. Subverting Weak Women:82 Paul exhorts Timothy to have nothing to do with the false teachers because there are those among them who creep into homes83 and captivate84 weak women85 weighed down with sins,86 lead on by various desires (ἐπιθυμίαις) who are always learning but never coming to the knowledge of the truth 3:6-7
b. Opposing the Truth--Like Egyptian Magicians: Paul exhorts Timothy to have nothing to do with false teachers who lack clear mindedness (depraved) and are rejected as far as the faith is concerned because they oppose the truth with deceptions like the Egyptian magicians Jannes and Jambres87 opposed Moses88 3:8
c. Will Not Ultimately Triumph: In contrast to the progress that the false teachers appear to be making with weak women and their deceptions, Paul affirms to the contrary (ἀλλα) that they will not advance very far because (γὰρ) their folly will be obvious to all89 as was that of Jannes and Jambres came to be90 3:9
IV. A FINAL APPEAL TO LOYALTY IN THE MINISTRY: Even though persecution will come, Paul exhorts Timothy to keep to his ministry of the apostolic gospel under any and all circumstances because Paul senses that his own life and ministry are about to end 3:10--4:5
A. Another Appeal to Loyalty and Endurance91 Paul urges Timothy to follow Paul’s example in teaching and conduct by keeping the apostolic gospel knowing that godly living will lead to persecution, and that the Scriptures are reliable since they come from reliable sources, lead to Salvation in Christ Jesus, and are profitable as God’s revelation for all matters of ministry 3:10-17
1. Recall the Past--Paul’s Teaching and Example: Paul urges Timothy to follow his example in teaching and conduct realizing that he will experience persecution as all will who desire to live a Christian life, but that the false teachers, who appear to be triumphing, will actually move from bad to worse--even future destruction 3:10-13
a. Follow Paul’s Example:92 In contrast to the false teachers (Σὺ δὲ) Paul urges Timothy to follow Paul’s teaching, conduct,93 purpose,94 faith,95 patience, love,96 perseverance,97 persecutions, and sufferings which happened to him at Antioch,98 Iconium99 and at Lystra100 which he endured and out of which the Lord delivered him101 3:10-11
b. All the Godly Will Be Persecuted: Paul affirms that all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will be persecuted102 3:12
c. Evil Men Will Proceed From Bad to Worse: Paul affirms that evil men and impostors (charlatans, who appear to be succeeding) will proceed from bad to worse (future destruction) both deceiving and being deceived 3:13
2. Give Heed to the Scriptures: In contrast to the false teachers, Paul exhorts Timothy to continue in the things which he has learned and become convinced because he learned them from reliable people, they made him wise unto salvation through faith in Christ Jesus, and they are from God and thus are profitable for instruction 3:14-17
a. Continue in the Things You Have Learned: In contrast to the false teachers (Σὺ δὲ) Paul exhorts Timothy to continue in the things which he has learned and become convinced (the Apostolic Gospel) 3:14a
b. Reasons To Continue in the Scriptures: The reasons that Paul urges Timothy to continue in the things that he has learned is because he learned them from reliable people, they made him wise unto salvation through faith in Christ Jesus, and because they are profitable for instruction 3:14b-17
1) Learned from Reliable People: The reason Paul urges Timothy to continue in the things that he has learned is because he knows the reliable people103 from whom he has learned these things 3:14b
2) Provide Wisdom Which Led to Salvation: The reason Paul urges Timothy to continue in the things that he has learned is because from childhood he has known the sacred writings which were able to give him the wisdom that leads to salvation through faith in Christ Jesus104 3:15
3) Provide Instruction: The reason Paul urges Timothy to continue in the things which he has learned is because All Scripture is of divine origin--God-breathed (inspired by God)105--and profitable for tasks of ministry--teaching,106 reproof,107 correction,108 and training in righteousness109 in order that the man of God may be adequate (to meet all demands), equipped for every good work110 3:16-17
B. The Final Charge to Timothy:111 Paul solemnly charges Timothy before God to stay by his ministry under any and all circumstances even through many believers will not endure sound teaching, but will turn from the truth toward teachers who will satisfy their curiosity with myths 4:1-5
1. The Charge--Stay By Your Ministry Under Any and All Circumstances: Paul solemnly charges Timothy in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus112 who is the judge of the living and the dead,113 and by his appearing and His kingdom114 to preach the word,115 to be ready (stand by it, keep at it) in season and out of season, to reprove (those in error), rebuke (or warn those who do not heed the correction), and exhort (them all) with great patience and instruction 4:1-2
2. Reason for the Charge: The reason Paul exhorts Timothy to stay by his Ministry under any and all circumstances is because (γὰρ) believers will not endure sound teaching, but will turn from the truth toward teachers who will satisfy their curiosity with myths 4:3-4
a. Believers Will Not Endure Sound Teaching: The reason Paul exhorts Timothy to stay by his ministry under any and all circumstances is because (γὰρ) the time will come (and is)116 when believers117 will not endure sound teaching but will accumulate teachers in accordance to their own desires desiring to have their ears tickled118 4:3
b. Believers Will Turn From the Truth: The reason Paul exhorts Timothy to stay by his Ministry under any and all circumstances is because (γὰρ) believers will turn away from hearing (their ears) the truth119 and to myths120 4:4
3. The Charge Renewed: In contrast (Σὺ δὲ)121 to the response of believers to the truth Timothy is to be sober in all things,122 endure hardship,123 do the work of an evangelist,124 and fulfill his ministry 4:5
C. The Reason for the Charge--Paul’s Final Testimony:125 The reason Paul solemnly charged Timothy to stay by his ministry under any and all circumstances is because he senses that the time of his death has come, his ministry is over, and the eschatological prize awaits him and all of those who have loved his appearing 4:6-8
1. The Time of Paul’s Death Has Come: The reason Paul solemnly charged Timothy to stay by his ministry under any and all circumstances is because (γὰρ) Paul senses that the time of his death has come (he is already being poured out as a drink offering,126 and the time of his departure127 has come) 4:6
2. Paul’s Ministry is Over: The reason Paul solemnly charged Timothy to stay by his ministry under any and all circumstances is because (γὰρ) Paul’s knows that his ministry is over (he has fought the good fight,128 he has finished the course,129 he has kept the faith130) 4:7
3. The Eschatological Prize Awaits Paul: The reason Paul solemnly charged Timothy to stay by his ministry under any and all circumstances is because (γὰρ) he knows that his eschatological prize awaits him (in the future there is laid up for him the crown of righteousness,131 which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will award to him on that day) as it awaits all of those who have loved His appearing132 4:8
V. CONCLUSION:133 Paul closes his letter by exhorting Timothy to come to him by Winter because he is without all of his co-workers except for Luke, and then sends personal greetings to those in Ephesus and from those in Rome before he closes with a prayer for Timothy and those in Ephesus 4:9-22
A. Personal Words and Instructions: Paul exhorts Timothy to make every effort to come to him soon because he is without all of his co-workers except Luke, and desires for Timothy to bring along Mark as well as his cloak and books all the while watching out for Alexander and informing him that God has delivered from his preliminary hearing as he will ultimately deliver him from all evil 4:9-18
1. Exhortation to Come: Paul urges Timothy to make every effort to come to him soon134 4:9
2. Reason He Wants Timothy to Come--He is Alone: The reason why Paul desires for Timothy to make every effort to come to him soon is because (γὰρ) he all of his co-workers are gone except for Luke who is with him (Demas135 deserted him and has gone to Thessalonica136 out of a love for this present world, Crescen has gone to Galatia, and Titus has gone to Dalmatia)137 4:10-11a
3. Who and What to Bring: Paul urges Timothy to pick up Mark and bring him along because he is useful for service, reminding Timothy that he has sent Tychicus to Ephesus, and urges him to bring the cloak, books and parchments 4:11b-13
4. Whom to Watch Out For: Paul warns Timothy to watch out for Alexander142 the coopersmith who did him much harm for he vigorously opposed their teaching, re-affirming that the Lord will repay him according to his deeds 4:14-15
5. Information As To How Things Are Going: Paul informs Timothy that at his first defense everyone abandoned him except the Lord who stood with him, strengthened him in order that the gospel might be fully accomplished by him, and delivered him as he will deliver him and bring him safely to his heavenly kingdom, to Whom belongs the glory for ever and ever 4:16-19
a. First Defense--Abandoned Except for the Lord: Paul informs Timothy that no one supported him during his first defense143 (all deserted him, nevertheless, he prays that it might not be held against them144) but the Lord who stood with him and strengthened him in order that the gospel (proclamation) might be fully accomplished through him, namely that all the Gentiles might hear 4:16-17a
b. First Defense--Delivered by the Lord: Paul informs Timothy that he was delivered, during the first defense, as from the mouth of a lion145 by the Lord who will deliver him from every evil deed, and bring him safely to his heavenly kingdom146 to Whom belongs the glory forever and ever147 4:17b-19
B. Final Greetings: Paul closes his letter with greetings to Prisca & Aquilla and the household of Onesiphorus, reports personal news about Erastus and Trophimus, requests that Timothy make every effort to come to him before winter, sends greetings from Eubulus, Pudens, Linus, Claudia and all the brethren, and closes with a prayer for the Lord to be with Timothy’s spirit, and grace to be with all of those in Ephesus 4:19-22
2. Personal News of Friends: Paul reports that Erastus150 remained at Corinth, but that Paul left Trophimus sick at Miletus 4:20
3. A Final Request: Paul urges Timothy to make every effort to come to him before winter151 4:21a
4. Greetings from Specific Persons: Paul sends greetings from Eubulus, Pudens, Linus, Claudia152 and all the brethren 4:21b
1 This may be to make Paul’s readers more sympathetic to him and his Gospel. Also, Paul is writing so that his gospel ministry could be continued by Timothy.
2 Paul did not choose to suffer as an apostle, but was made an apostle by God’s will.
3 Paul probably has his own future in view since he is about to lose his earthly life.
4 Here Paul calls Timothy “beloved” rather than true and faithful. This may be because 2 Timothy is more of a letter to Timothy than first Timothy which affirms Timothy to the congregation.
5 As with Paul’s other letters, this thanksgiving is in keeping with the major theme of this letter--loyalty to God, Paul, and the gospel message. This major theme is woven throughout this thanksgiving and naturally moves toward the first major section of the letter after the greeting.
6 Paul is emphasizing continuity with the Old Testament. The false teachers did the same, no doubt. Here Paul is affirming his continuity against that which was proclaimed by the false teachers (cf. 1:9-10; 2:8, 19; 3:8, 14-17). This also relates to the large exhortation to remain loyal to the ministry.
7 Although this is a kind of aside from the main logic of the thanksgiving given in verses 3 and 5, it is no doubt another reason for the letter. This is an expression of “Paul’s loneliness in his final vigil and his desire for Timothy to join him, despite the unfinished work in Ephesus ...” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 222-223).
8 This may be that which was referred to in 1 Timothy 1:3 when he left Ephesus to Macedonia (“As I urged you upon my departure from Macedonia, remain in Ephesus ...”).
9 This may carry the idea of “faithfulness” too. Paul constantly thanks God for the faithfulness of others (1 Thess. 1:3; 3:6-7; 2 Thess. 1:3; Rom. 1:8; Col. 1:4; Philemon 5; Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 223).
10 Note that the theme of continuity comes through again. Paul desires for Timothy to carry on this faithfulness (to God, Paul, and the ministry of the gospel) which has been passed on by others. As Fee writes, “That is ‘Don’t lose heart, because just as my ministry has continuity with my forebears (v. 3), so does yours. Don’t forget your roots; they go way back, and your own faith is like that of your mother and grandmother’ “(1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p.223).
11 Perhaps Paul emphasizes the female lineage not only because they became Christians, but because Timothy’s mother was Jewish and his father was a Gentile. Therefore, Paul is emphasizing that Jewish continuity of Timothy’s faith (cf. Acts 16:1).
12 His gift as pastor-teacher (?) through which he is to overcome the false teachers. The term is χάρισμα--the grace gift. See 1 Timothy 1:18; 4:14. Unlike 4:14 where the emphasis is upon the laying on of hands by the elders to authenticate Timothy before the church, here the emphasis is upon Paul alone--it is much more personal.
13 Commentators are split on the meaning of “spirit” in this verse. Is it descriptive of one’s inner qualities or “spirit” brought about in one by the Holy Spirit (D. Edmond Hiebert, Second Timothy, EBC, p. 36) or is it the Holy Spirit Himself (Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, pp. 226-227)? While there is a difference in meaning, there may not be any difference in result. Even if it is descriptive of the Holy Spirit, the point is that Timothy should let the Holy Spirit work these qualities in his life. As Fee finally paraphrases this verse he writes, “For when God gave us his Spirit, it was not timidity that we received, but power, love, and self-discipline” (p. 227).
Paul begins by reminding Timothy of his gift in the ministry which gives him the necessary power, love and wisdom to carry out that ministry.
14 See Acts 1:8; Romans 15:13, 19; 1 Corinthians 2:4 (δυνάμεως).
15 Galatians 5:22; Romans 5:5.
16 The term is σωφρονισμοῦ. One needs to be wise in the face of the false teachers and the coming persecution from Rome.
17 See the following passages for a history of suffering for the gospel (2:9; 3:12; 1 Thess. 1:6; 2:14; 3:4; 2 Cor. 4:7-15; Rom. 8:17; Col. 1:24; Phil. 1:12, 29).
There was humiliation with being associated with Christ (a state “criminal”) and Paul His “political prisoner”). Timothy is urged to join with Paul in suffering that will be by his association with the gospel and by his own activities in its behalf (1:6). Therefore there are three loyalties (1) Christ (and His gospel), (2) Paul, and (2) his own ministry. These three loyalties will be developed below: (1) the gospel in verses 9-10, (2) Paul in verses 11-12, and (3) his ministry (“the deposit”) in verses 13-14 (cf. 1 Tim. 6:20).
18 While “a holy calling” could be a dative of means describing the kind of calling which God made, it may better be understood to be a dative of interest, “to a holy life,” or to be a “holy people” (cf. 1 Thess. 4:7; 1 Cor. 1:2).
19 Titus 1:2.
20 As Fee writes, “So his word to Timothy is plain: ‘Be steadfast; rekindle your gift; take your part in the suffering; for we are already among those who have overcome death through Christ’” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 230).
21 Paul is no doubt speaking of his imprisonment (2:9).
22 While many understand this deposit to be the sound teaching of verse 13 which God entrusted to Paul (v. 12) and Paul entrusted to Timothy (v. 14; cf. 1 Tim. 6:20) who was to entrust it to others (2:2), it is more probable that the deposit was Paul’s own life, or his commitment to Christ and his gospel which God will guard until the End.
23 Paul has a sense of his personal vindication (Pss. 31:1-5; 69:9).
24 See 1 Timothy 6:20. This is probably the “sound teaching” of the gospel.
25 The Holy Spirit is to be the One who aids Timothy in his responsibilities.
26 There are two basic views to understanding what Paul is saying here: “Either this means that some Asians, including Onesiphorus, had come to Rome, and all but Onesiphorus had deserted him and returned home (so Bernard), or else (more likely) it means that the defections in Asia have been so staggering (Kelly, ‘the exaggeration [of] depression’) that even friends (presumably) from whom he would have expected more--including [perhaps led by] Phygelus and Hermogenes--have deserted him.
If this is how we are to understand ‘who’ and ‘where,’ then ‘when’ probably has to do with events since the writing of 1 Timothy, perhaps a general ‘abandoning ship’ at the news of Paul’s arrest (cf. Kelly). Paul himself would have been informed of it by Onesiphorus” (Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 235-236).
27 Fee writes with insight, “This sudden bursting out in a wish-prayer (hardly intercession, as Kelly, but an expression of Paul’s desires for them; cf. 2 Thess. 3:16; Rom. 15:5) for the household of Onesiphorus (cf. 4:19) means that he is not now with them (otherwise Paul would have said ‘to Onesiphorus and his household’). The fact that Paul should begin his reminder about Onesiphorus in this way, by asking for present mercy for his household, and that at the end (v. 18a) he should ask for future mercy (on that Day) for Onesiphorus himself, suggests very strongly that Onesiphorus had died in the meantime. If so, it could only have increased Paul’s present pain and loneliness” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 236).
28 This may have included food and cheering up.
29 Paul was a state prisoner and soon to die.
30 No doubt this refers to the second advent of the Lord (begun at the Rapture--John 14). This may not be an intercessory prayer for the dead so much as a recognition that even Onesiphorus only has God’s mercy to appeal to.
31 Fee writes, “After a brief ‘digression’ in 1:15-18 that reminded Timothy of the disloyalty of ‘everyone in Asia,’ with the noteworthy exception of Onesiphorus, Paul resumes the appeal to Timothy. With an emphatic, you then, in contrast to those in verse 15, Paul repeats the urgencies of 1:6-14: that he fulfill his trust and ministry (reflecting 1:6-7 and 13-14), in this instance by entrusting it to others (v. 2), and that he be ready to endure hardship (v. 3, reflecting the main concern of 1:8-12)” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 239).
32 Note the emphatic position of the Greek, “Σὺ ου῏ν.” The “therefore” probably goes back to the imperatives of 1:13-14.
33 This may be emphasized because Timothy is being asked to leave Ephesus to join Paul in Rome (cf. 4:9, 21).
34 See 1:13.
35 The Greek is διὰ πολλῶν μαρτύρων. While this could mean, “in the presence of” it could also mean “though many witnesses”--not in that Paul’s teachings were mediated to Timothy through many witnesses, but in that Paul’s teaching was attested to by many witnesses (cf. 3:14).
36 As Barrett writes, “Beyond warfare is victory, beyond athletic effort a prize, and beyond agricultural labour a crop” (The Pastoral Epistles, p. 102).
37 As Fee writes, “The analogy does not negate ‘civilian affairs;’ rather, it disallows ‘looking back’ (cf. Luke 9:61-62) or hankering for an easier path (in this case defecting, as have so many others)” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 242).
38 See 1 Corinthians 9:24-27.
39 The rules in this case seem to involve suffering for the gospel (cf. 1 Tim. 6:12; 1:18).
40 That is the strength to stand in grace and to share in suffering.
41 Fee writes, “the basic themes of the whole section are reiterated: Christ and his gospel, Paul’s present suffering, and an appeal with a warning, for Timothy himself (and now including God’s people) to endure despite the suffering” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 245).
42 This reflects on 2:5-6 and thus encourages one who is suffering (see also 2:11-12a). Fee writes, “(i.e. he who conquered death through resurrection will ‘strengthen you’ for your task and endurance). Furthermore, it also anticipates the exposure of the false teachers in verses 14-18, who, by arguing that the ‘resurrection [of believers] has already taken place,’ are in effect denying the eschatological future that Paul is affirming (vv. 5-6, 10)” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 246).
43 The point here is that Jesus is the fulfillment of God’s promises providing continuity with the past. This too has been a them which Paul has been stating in 2 Timothy to encourage Timothy to endure with the ministry (cf. 1:3, 5; 3:14-17).
44 This is the gospel which was entrusted to Paul (cf. 1 Tim. 1:11; Rom. 2:16; 16:25) to which Timothy is to be steadfast.
45 This was probably a four line hymn or poem which was written by Paul or those very close to him. The “for” (γὰρ) in verse 11 probably refers to all of 2:1-10 where Paul has urged Timothy to endure in suffering and to keep their risen Lord in mind.
46 See 1 Timothy 1:15; 3:1; 4:10; Titus 3:8.
47 This may well be the same sense as in Romans 8.
48 Contextually, this is probably best understood in terms of one’s response when placed under trial by those who are hostel to Jesus (cf. 1:15; Matthew 10:33).
49 There are two disparate views as to the meaning of this verse: (1) if one is faithless in that one commits apostasy (cf. 1:15), then God must be faithful to Himself and mete out judgment. This is possible, but could have been plainly said; also, there is no future verb but the present tense (ἐκεῖνος πιστὸς μένει), (2) if one is faithless this will not affect God’s faithfulness to his people meaning that he will either override one’s infidelity with His grace or that he will overcome faithlessness with his gift of eschatological salvation for his people. Perhaps the latter is the better choice contextually. Even though some have been unfaithful, God’s faithfulness has not been diminished. This is an exposition which focuses upon Salvation.
50 For Paul his future salvation is rooted in the character of God.
51 See 1 Timothy 2:8; 6:4-5; cf. Titus 3:8-9.
52 Now Paul moves back to those who are not approved because they do not correctly handle the word of truth.
53 See 1 Timothy 1:20 where Paul delivered him over to Satan.
54 See 2 Thessalonians 2:2 which is similar, e.g., “the Day of the Lord has come.” See also 1 Timothy 4:3. There is some from of over-realized eschatology in that the fullness of the resurrection has already been realized in a believers spiritual dying and rising with Christ (cf. v. 11; Rom. 6:1-11; Col. 2:20--3:4). There is a dualism which denies the value of the body, and exalts the value of the spiritual. By contrast see Paul’s discussion in 2:10-13.
55 It is difficult to be certain about this building metaphor. It could be referring to Christ or the apostles as the foundation of the church (1 Cor. 3:10-12; Eph. 3:20), but Fee writes, “it is altogether likely that he does not ‘intend’ some specific point of reference. The emphasis, as the rest of the verse shows, is on God’s proprietary ownership, on the certainty of eschatological triumph for those who are his. Since the metaphor stands in sharp contrast to the fact that the faith of some is being overturned, Paul clearly intends it to affirm the opposite: what God is doing in Ephesus, saving a people of his own (cf. Titus 2:14) for eternal glory, cannot be thwarted by the activity of the false teachers. In that sense, of course, the implied ‘building’ refers to the church in Ephesus, his chosen people (v. 10) [1 and 2 Timothy, p. 257].
56 As in the seal inscribed on the foundation stone of a building which would indicate the architect or the owner.
57 See the LXX of Numbers 16:5 from Korah’s rebellion.
58 See the following passages for portions of this verse (LXX of Lev. 24:16; Isa 26:13; Ps. 34:14; Prov. 3:7).
59 This analogy further elaborates the second portion of the inscription in 2:19 (“Let everyone who names the name of the Lord abstain from wickedness”) and leads in to the next imperatives to Timothy about his own personal responsibilities toward false teachers and teachings (2:22-26).
60 As belonged to the wealthy.
61 See other passages that play on this imagery such as Jeremiah 18:1-11; Wisdom of Solomon 15:7; Romans 9:19-24. With insight Fee writes, “as verse 21 and the context make clear, Paul’s point is neither that of 1 Corinthians 12:21-24 (though of differing kinds and uses, both vessels are useful to the master of the house) nor that of the parable of the wheat and tares (Matt. 13:24-30, 36-43, where the church is pictured as containing both the elect and false teachers, who will be separated at the End), interpretations that are often given to this passage” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 261).
62 See 2:14, 16, 19b.
63 “In applying this imagery, Paul has thus moved from the house that contains all sorts of vessels to the good vessels themselves and argues that only these, with their ‘honorable’ purposes, count (although it is not the value of the vessels, but their contents, i.e., purpose, that is the reason for ‘cleansing oneself’ of the others). In particular Paul is anticipating what he will say to Timothy in verses 22-26, in light of verses 14-19, so he must therefore cleanse himself from all such false teachings and behavior” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 261).
64 Fee unfolds the argument well, “The commands introducing this section flow directly from the application of the analogy of verses 20-21, but all the time in the context of the concerns that began in verse 14. In ‘cleansing himself from these things’ (v. 21), Timothy is again urged to avoid the foolish arguments of the false teachers, which only lead to quarrels. On the contrary--and this is a new theme--he is to try to rescue people from their entrapment by error.
The entire paragraph is directed toward Timothy and his responsibilities in view of the presence of the false teaching. The dominating theme is peace. The false teachers revel in arguments that breed quarrels (cf. 1 Tim. 6:4); Timothy, by contrast, should pursue peace. He must not quarrel but be kind toward all, and he must gently correct, with the desire that his correction and gentleness may lead some to repentance” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 263).
65 Rather than thinking of sexual passions, Paul probably has in mind youthful desires (νεωτερικὰς ἐπιθυμίας) such as a love for novelties, foolish discussions, and arguments that all too often lead to quarrels.
66 See 1 Timothy 6:11.
67 See 2:10; Titus 2:14 for these OT descriptions of God’s people.
68 See 1 Timothy 1:7 where these terms describe the false teachers.
69 See the qualifications for overseers/elders in 1 Timothy 3:3; Titus 1:7. This may not mean that Timothy is to let error go without addressing it, but that he must be kind in his confrontations rather than quarrelsome.
70 See 2:21.
71 This may include those who have been ensnared by the false teachers and even the false teachers themselves.
72 Could this be salvation (cf. 1 Timothy 2:4; 4:3)?
73 See 1 Timothy 4:1-2.
74 Even though Paul hopes that the false teachers might come to repentance, he also knows that they are truly captives of Satan to do his will; therefore, he enters into a final indictment of them in 3:1-9. This final indictment is placed in the context of eschatological fulfillment which began with the coming of Christ.
75 See 1 Corinthians 7:26; 1 John 2:18; 2 Peter 3:3; Jude 17-18; Acts 2:16-21; Hebrews 1:2.
76 Perhaps this describes not caring for parents (cf. Mark 4; 1 Timothy 5:8).
77 These next four words all begin with the negative prefix a (ἀχάριστοι, ἀνόσιοι, α῎στοργοι, α῎σπονδοι).
78 See 1 Timothy 3:6; 6:4.
79 The term is εὐσεβείας. This is probably descriptive of their external expressions of religion (e.g., ascetic practices, endless discussions of religious trivia). As Fee writes, “thinking themselves to be obviously righteous because they were obviously religious” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 270).
80 Evidence that they denied the power of godliness is in the vice-catelogue above--they practiced “irreligious” attitudes and actions that characterized the pagan world. See also Titus 1:6 for the opposite.
81 This imperative demonstrates that Paul did not only have the future in mind with the above list.
82 This verse may provide background for many of the passages in the Pastoral Epistles (cf. 1 Timothy 2:9-15; 3:11; 4:7; 5:3-16). As Fee writes, “the false teachers and these women feed on one another. The women are given ‘religious training’ --of the worst kind, destined to feed their curiosity but not bring them to the freedom of the gospel--and they in turn undoubtedly pay the false teachers handsomely (1 Tim. 6:3-10). No wonder that Paul forbade the women to teach, encouraged submission to their husbands (1 Tim. 2:9-15), and wanted the younger widows, who had given themselves to pleasure (5:6) and had already turned away to follow Satan (5:15), to marry (5:14).
83 The Greek is τὰς οἰκίας, “the houses” implying that Timothy already knows about which households they have entered. This may have been more possible with respect to younger widows than with wives of ordinary tradesmen; thus, 1 Tim. 5:3-16?
84 As through misleading or deceiving (cf. Judith 16:9; Ignatius Philadelphians 2:2).
85 The term is actually descriptive of little women, women who are “easy prey” (γυνναικάρια).
86 Either present or from a sinful past.
87 See B. M. Metzger, “Names for the Nameless in the New Testament: a Study in the Growth of Christian Tradition,” in New Testament Studies: Philological, Versional, and Patristic (Leiden: Brill, 1980), pp. 23-43; Damascus Document 5:18; Targum Ps-Jonathan 1.3 (on Exod. 1:15) and 7.2 (on Exod. 7:11); Menahoth 85a; Midrash Rabbah Exodus 9:7; Pliny, Natural History 30.1.11.
88 Exodus 7:11-12, 22; 8:7.
89 In other words truth will win out. Truth and time walk hand and hand together.
90 Perhaps Exodus 9:11.
91 Here Paul renews his appeal to Timothy to “continue in what you have learned” (3:14), but in full view of what has been said about the false teachers and Timothy’s responsibilities regarding them, thereby bringing together the first two sections of the letter (e.g., 1:6--2:13; 2:14--3:9). This paragraph also serves as a preparation for the final charge in 4:1-5 (Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 275). Both of the subunits of this paragraph begin with “but you” (Σὺ δὲ; 3:10, 14).
92 Paul’s examples of suffering go back to before the time that Timothy was a partner with Paul in the ministry. This is curious because one would have expected Paul to cite his more recent experiences at Philippi (Acts 16:19-34), or Ephesus (2 Cor. 1:1-11), or even Rome (Phil. 1:1, 12-18). Fee offers a good suggestion for the reasoning when he writes, “The answer to this lies in what we noted as early as the thanksgiving (1:3-5), namely, that part of the appeal to loyalty made in this letter is to remind Timothy of his origins. It is Paul’s way of saying: ‘Look, you were there in Lystra when I was stoned. You recall that such sufferings were visible to you from the time you began your Christian walk. So don’t bail out now in the midst of the present--and coming-distress’” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 277).
93 These first two are foundational.
94 Paul’s resolve, his single-minded commitment to Christ.
95 Toward God.
96 Both patience and love are to be towards others.
97 To the End especially in view of the sufferings that did follow for Paul and will follow for Timothy and all who seek to live a godly life.
98 Persecution and driven out (Acts 13:50).
99 Jews and Gentiles attempted to mistreat and to stone Paul so he fled (Acts 14:2-6).
100 This was Timothy’s hometown (16:1-2). Here Paul was stoned and left for dead (Acts 14:19-20).
101 See Psalm 34:19 which may be alluded to.
102 Suffering is the lot of righteousness (cf. Mark 8:34; Matt. 5:11-12; 1 Thess. 3:4; 2 Cor. 12:9-10; Rom. 8:17; Phil. 1:29).
103 This may refer to the many witnesses of 2:2, Paul (3:10-11), and Timothy’s own mother and grandmother (1:5).
104 Salvation is not in the Scriptures themselves, but in the One to Whom they point (cf. Jn. 5:39).
105 The Greek says, “πᾶσα γραφὴ θεόπνευστος.” As Fee writes, “he is not offering a theory of inspiration; he is rather, reflecting the common tradition of Judaism (cf. 2 Pet. 1:21) [1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 279].
106 Sound instruction.
107 Exposing the errors of the false teachers and their teachings.
108 This is tied to reproving and emphasizes the behavioral, ethical side of things (Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 280).
109 This is the positive side of correcting.
110 This may especially look forward to 4:1-5.
111 This appeal was begun in 1:6, was picked up in 3:10, and now is given as a solemn charge in 4:1 to be followed by nine imperatives--five in verse 2 and four in verse 5.
In addition Fee sees the grammatical connection of 4:1-5 with 4:6-8 (γὰρ) and thus writes, “This charge, therefore, though made against the backdrop of the situation in Ephesus, looks far beyond that. Here we have a kind of changing of the guard, the work of a dying man to his heir apparent. To use the athletic metaphor of verses 7-8, it is the passing of the baton. The whole paragraph needs to be read with this reality in view” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 283). Continuing he says, “This set of imperatives, in serving as an introduction to verses 6-8, ‘draws a contrast between Timothy, still in the thick of the fight, and Paul who has fought the grand fight’” (Fee,1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p.287 citing Hendriksen, Exposition of the Pastoral Epistles, NTC (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1965), p. 312).
112 This is emphasizing the present reality of one’s relationship with God. One lives one’s life in the very presence of God. See also 1 Timothy 5:21.
113 He who appeared once to save will appear again to judge (see Acts 10:42; 17:31; 2 Cor. 5:10 1 Peter 4:5). The first part of this appearing will be to gather his own where they will be judged at the Judgment Seat of Christ (Jn. 14:1; 1 Cor. 3; 1 Thess. 4).
114 These are eschatological realities which are presented as a motivation to Timothy.
115 The Greek reads, “κήρυξον τὸν λόγον.” This word probably has reference to the gospel message (cf. 1 Tim. 4:5) not only in its evangelistic sense, but in its full sense (e.g., the Scriptures above in 3:14-15).
116 This future tense does not negate the present reality as Paul writes (cf. 3:1-5, esp. v. 5; 1 Tim. 4:1-2). The present mirrors the future. The future will only be even more intense.
117 Even though believers are described as deceived elsewhere (1 Tim. 4:1-2; 5:15; 6:5; 2 Tim. 3:6-7, 13), here they shoulder some of the blame.
118 That is they cannot receive enough bits of interesting and spicy information.
119 That is the gospel.
120 See 1 Timothy 1:4; 4:7; Titus 1:14.
121 See 2:1; 3:10, 14; 1 Timothy 6:11.
122 In other words do not be taken in by the false teachers and their false teachings.
123 See 1:8; 2:2; 3:12. This is especially in relationship to the gospel.
124 This term, εὐαγγελιστοῦ recalls the original charge in 4:2, “Κηρυζον τὸν λόγον,” “preach the message.
125 Fee writes with insight when he says, “This final testimony, then, with its announcement of his impending death, serves first of all as a the primary reason for the foregoing charge (vv. 1-5). At the same time, as before, it serves as one more model for Timothy to follow. (See 1:11-12; 2:9-10; 3:10-11)” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 288).
126 This metaphor was already used in Philippians 2:17. Both pagan and Jewish sacrifices were usually accompanied and completed by a libation of wine poured out either on top of the sacrifice or at the foot of the altar to honor the deity (cf. Numbers 15:5, 7, 10; 28:7; 2 Kings 16:13; Jer. 7:18; Hos. 9:4). The wine probably replaced the blood libations of pagans (Ps. 16:4). Paul sees his life as being part of a sacrifice for God (cf. Rom. 12:1-2). See Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, pp. 288-289, Hawthorne, Philippians, p. 105).
127 This term, ἀναλύσεώς, means to let loose from as one might break up a camp or loose a ship from its moorings.
128 Contested the noble contest (τὸν καλὸν ἀγῶνα ἠγώνισμαι) with the sense of a race rather than a boxing match.
129 Not only is Paul’s live over, but his ministry, which he likens to a race, is over.
130 This statement either means that he has kept the “faith” (e.g., the sound doctrine) in tact, or he has been loyal to his trust. The latter seems to be more close to the sense here.
131 This statement picks up the race metaphor again in that he is going to win the overcomers crown (στέφανος).
132 Perhaps Demas is an example of one who loved this present age rather than the coming of Christ (4:10).
133 This is now Paul’s second reason for writing 2 Timothy--he is lonely in his imprisonment and desires for Timothy to join him (cf. 1:4). Tychicus who carried the letter will probably replace Timothy in Ephesus. The whole paragraph is full of personal, private concerns--each verse has a first person pronoun in it.
134 Or before winter (cf. 4:21).
135 See Colossians 4:14; Philemon 24.
136 Perhaps his home town?
137 These latter two have probably gone out of ministry obligations. Fee writes, “That means, since Erastus stayed in Corinth, Trophimus had been left in Miletus (v. 20), and Tychicus was dispatched to Ephesus (v. 12), that of his co-workers only Luke (cf. Col. 4:14; Philem. 24) is with me” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 294).
138 Implying that he is not in Ephesus, but stating where he is.
139 See Acts 13:13; 15:36-41. This service, διακονίαν, may be personal service or have the broader sense of ministry. Perhaps Mark will fulfill the role of Tychicus with Paul.
140 As Fee writes, “The most likely reconstruction (understanding, of course, the hypothetical nature of much that is said) is that on his way back to Ephesus, Paul had been arrested, either in Miletus (v. 20, en route from Nicopolis through Corinth?) or Troas itself. There, at the house of Carpus (presumably a believer in that city), he had left his cloak, the heavy woolen garment used by travelers in cold or rainy weather. Now he wants Timothy to bring it (apparently in anticipation of winter; v. 21) and my scrolls” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 295).
141 This could mean that Paul desires for Timothy to bring him two things (e.g., the books [OT?] and parchments (documents of various kinds), or the books--I mean by that the parchments notebooks [OT?]).
142 This may have been: (1) Alexander who, with Hymenaeus, had been excommunicated by Paul in 1 Timothy 1:19-20, (2) the Jew by that name who tried to quiet the riot at Ephesus (Acts 19:33-34), (3) one and the same person with 1 and 2 above, or (4) someone whom we do not know. If it was the first one, he may have gone after Paul when he was excommunicated from the church due to Paul’s exhortations (note the change of partnership with Hymenaeus and Philetus in 2 Tim. 2:17).
143 This is probably not Paul’s first Roman imprisonment (e.g., Acts 28; Colossians, Philemon, Philippians), but to the Roman juridical practice of a preliminary hearing before the emperor or a magistrate to be followed by an actual trial during Paul’s second Roman imprisonment.
144 See Luke 23:34; Acts 7:60.
145 Could this be an allusion to Psalm 22?
146 What the Lord has begun he will complete.
147 See Philippians 4:20.
148 Having been in Rome with a house church (Romans 16:3-4), they are now back in Ephesus.
149 Again, if Onesiphorus had died (1:16-18) than this personal greeting makes sense.
150 Romans 16:23 or Acts 19:22?
151 Not only because Paul would need his coat, but because the Mediterranean was closed to shipping from November to March.
152 These are all Latin names, therefore, they are probably Roman believers. If they are not only acquaintances of Timothy’s they may be leaders. It is of interest that a woman’s name is included among them. Later Irenaeus identified Linus as the bishop of Rome (Against Heresies 3.3).
153 The “your” is singular here (cf. 1 Timothy 6:21), and thus is very personal.
154 Here the “you” is plural once again. Paul is concerned with the Ephesian church. As Fee writes, “It is altogether fitting that the very last words from Paul should be a benediction, a desire for God’s grace to be with all his people” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 302).
Related Topics: Introductions, Arguments, Outlines
An Argument Of The Book Of 1 TimothyRelated Media
In View Of The Corrupting Influence Of The False Teachers Paul Exhorts Timothy To Fulfill His Designated Ministry To The Church At Ephesus By Correcting False Teachers, Protecting The Church From Their Influence, Appealing To Those Who Are In Sin, And Pursuing Godliness With An Attitude Of Contentment Rather Than With A Desire For Personal Gain
I. INTRODUCTORY GREETING: Paul greets his spiritual child, Timothy, with the authority of an apostle who is called by God, and with a prayer for Timothy’s experience of grace, mercy, and peace from Christ their Lord 1:1-2
II. A CHARGE TO INSTRUCT FALSE TEACHERS: Paul charges Timothy to remain in Ephesus in order that the might exhort false teachers in the church not to teach false doctrines which lead to speculations rather than God’s saving plan through faith, and cites himself as an example of how God’s grace can reach a false teacher 1:3-20
A. The Charge: Paul urges Timothy to remain in Ephesus in order that he might charge certain persons not to teach false doctrines which promote speculations rather than God’s saving plan through faith because they do not teach love, but righteousness through the code of the Law which is not a lawful use of the Law for the righteous 1:3-11
1. The Charge: Paul urges Timothy to remain in Ephesus9 just as he requested when he was going to Macedonia 1:3a
2. The Purpose of the Charge: Timothy is to remain in Ephesus in order that he10 might charge certain persons not to teach false doctrines such as interminable fables and genealogies which promote speculations rather than God’s saving plan which is through faith 1:3b-4
b. Specific Statement: Timothy is to instruct certain persons to not give their minds to relentless fables (legends) and genealogies14 which promote speculations15 rather than God’s (saving) plan16 which works through faith 1:4
3. The Reason for the Charge: Unlike the object of the instruction from Paul and his co-workers which is love, the false teachers are teaching the Law without understanding by making the code of the Law necessary for the righteous rather than the ethic of the Law necessary for the evil 1:5-11
b. Negative Concern--Teachers of Law: Paul affirms that some20 have turned away from “a pure heart, clear conscience, and genuine faith” and have lost their way in foolish discussions by desiring to be ‘teachers of the Law’ even though they do not understand what they are saying or the matters about which they are being so dogmatic 1:6-7
1) Statement: Paul affirms that some have turned away from “love” and have lost their way in foolish discussions 1:6
2) Examples: Those who have turned away from “a pure heart, clear conscience, and genuine faith” desire to be ‘teachers of the Law’21 even though they do not understand that which they are saying or the matters about which they are speaking so confidently 1:7
c. Proper Instruction Concerning the Law:22 Paul affirms that the Law is good if it is used as it should be--not for the righteous, but for lawbreakers who are opposed to the sound teaching in the Gospel 1:8-11
1) Law is Good: Paul affirms that the Law is good if one uses it as it should be used (lawfully, “νομίμως”) 1:8
2) Not for the Righteous: Paul affirms that law is not made for righteous people (δικαίῳ)23 1:9a
3) For Lawbreakers:24 Paul affirms that Law is for lawbreakers--for those who are: 1:9b-11
THE FIRST TABLE OF THE DECALOGUE
(THE LAWLESS AND INSUBORDINATE)
a) Lawless (ἀνόμοις)
b) Rebellious (ἀνυποτάκτοις)
(THE IMPIOUS, SINFUL, AND PROFANE)
c) Ungodly (ἀσεβέσι)
d) Sinners (ἁρμαρτωλοῖς )
e) Unholy (ἀνοσίοις)
f) Profane (βεβήλοις)
THE SECOND TABLE OF THE DECALOGUE
g) Who kill their fathers or mothers (πατρολῴαις καὶ μητρολῴλοῖς )
h) Murders (ἀνδροφόνοις)
i) Immoral men (πόρνοις)
j) Homosexuals (ἀρσενοκοίταις)
k) Kidnappers (ἀνδραποδισταῖς )
(SINS OF SPEECH)27
l) Liars (ψεύσταις)
m) Perjurers (ἐπιόρκοις)
CONTRARY to OLD TESTAMENT / GOSPEL28
n) And whatever else is contrary to sound teaching which is also found in the gospel29 that was entrusted to Paul to announce--the Good News from the glorious and blessed God 1:10b-11
B. The Reason for Hope: Paul cites himself as a prime example of how God in his grace can deliver a false teacher by giving thanks to Christ for His gracious work with him, and by affirming that God works in such a way with all men who believe in Him to the glory of God 1:12-17
1. Paul Gives Thanks: Paul gives thanks to Christ Jesus their Lord who has given him strength for his work 1:12a
2. The Significance of Paul’s Thanksgiving: Paul gives thanks to the Lord for graciously considering him in his rebellion to be worthy and appointing him to serve Him affirming that God’s grace with him is a model of His work with all men who believe in Him to the glory of God 1:12-17
b. Context From Which Paul was Chosen: Paul gives thanks to the Lord for choosing to use him even though in the past he spoke evil of Him, persecuted, and insulted Him32 1:13a
c. God’s Gracious Work: Paul proclaims God’s gracious work with him in his rebellion and affirms that it as an illustration of God’s gracious work to all men who believe in Him to the glory of God 1:13b-17
1) God’s Gracious Work with Paul: In Paul’s rebellious state God was merciful to him as one without faith and in ignorance,33 by pouring out His abundant grace upon him and giving him faith and love34 which belong to all believers in union with Christ Jesus35 1:13b-14
2) Paul Displays God’s Gracious Work for All: Paul affirms the saying as true that “Christ came into the world to save sinners” and affirms that he is an example par excellence of God’s mercy in order that Christ might show His full patience in dealing with him, the worst of sinners36 as an example for all who would later believer in Him and receive eternal37 life 1:15-16
3) Doxology to God: Paul concludes his discussion of God’s gracious work with a doxology which ascribes honor and glory forever and ever to the King of ages,38 immortal,39 invisible,40 the only God41 1:17
C. The Charge Restated: Paul entrusts the command to resist the false teachers to Timothy in accordance with his own calling from God and in order that he might faithfully complete it against the false teachers 1:18-20
1. The Command to Timothy: Paul entrusts this command to Timothy, his son, in accordance with the previous prophecies made concerning Timothy42 1:18a
2. The Purpose of the Command: Paul entrusts this command to Timothy in order that he may fight the good fight43 keeping faith and a good conscience with some like Hymenaeus and Alexander who have rejected and suffered shipwreck in regard to the faith (τὴν πίστιν),44 and whom Paul has delivered over to Satan45 in order that they might be taught not to blaspheme 1:18b-20
III. THE MEANS OF PROTECTING AGAINST FALSE TEACHERS:46 In view of the corrupting influence of false teachers upon the church Paul offers specific exhortations concerning prayer, church leadership, and personal example to Timothy and the church (at Ephesus) in order for the church to continue its ministry of the truth with effectiveness 2:1-13
A. The Proper Objects of Prayer--All Men:47 Paul urges that prayers be made on behalf of all men including those in authority over men because God sees this as good and acceptable since He desires for all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth in accordance with the mediation made by Christ between God and man concerning which Paul was appointed a preacher and an apostle 2:1-7
1. Prayers for All Men: As a conclusion (ου῎ν) to Paul’s exhortation for Timothy to remain in Ephesus to stop false teachers48 he urges of most urgency49 that entreaties, prayers, petitions and thanksgivings be made on behalf of all men50 2:1
2. Specific Examples:51 Paul specifically urges that prayers be made on behalf of governing authorities in order that the church may live an upright life 2:2
a. Prayers for Rulers: Paul urges that prayers be made on behalf of kings and all who are in authority52 2:2a
b. Purpose: Paul urges that prayers be made on behalf of rulers in order that the church may lead a tranquil and quiet life in all godliness and dignity53 2:2b
3. Reason for Prayers for All Men: Paul urges that the church pray for all men because God sees this as good and acceptable since He desires for all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth in accordance with the mediation made by Christ between God and man concerning which Paul was appointed a preacher and an apostle 2:3-7
a. God’s Sees Prayer for All as Good: Paul urges for prayers for all men (“this”) because God our Savior54 sees this as good and acceptable 2:3
b. God Desires all to Be Saved: Paul affirms that God views prayer for all men as good because he desires for all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth in accordance with the mediation between God and man made by Christ Jesus concerning which Paul was appointed a preacher and apostle as a teacher of the Gentiles 2:4-7
2) The Evidence--Christ Jesus: The evidence that God desires for all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth is the Man57 Christ Jesus who gave His life as a ransom for all58 and thus became the one mediator between God and men at the right time in history (at the proper time) 2:5-6
B. The Proper Demeanor for Prayer:61 As a conclusion to Paul’s discussion of prayer on behalf of all mankind, he exhorts men in every church to pray without the dissensions of the false teachers, and women to do likewise as is reflected in their dress and submission to the instruction of men 2:8-15
1. Men--Pray without Strife: As a conclusion to Paul’s discussion of prayer on behalf of all mankind (ου῎ν),62 Paul exhorts for the men in every place (ἐν παντὶ τόπῳ)63 to pray lifting up holy hands,64 without anger (ὀργῆς) and arguing (διαλογισμοῦ)65 2:8
2. Women’s Role in the Church: Paul exhorts women to adorn themselves in a modest, Godly manner, and not to exercise authority over a man against the design of creation, but to find deliverance through child bearing in faith, love, sanctity, and self-restraint 2:9-15
a. Exhortations Concerning Adornment--Modesty & Godliness: Just as Paul exhorts men, so does he exhort women to adorn themselves in a modest, discrete way with proper clothing and good works as befit a godly woman 2:9-10
b. Exhortations Concerning Leadership--Not Over Men: Paul exhorts women to quietly receive instruction and not to exercise authority over men in accordance with the order of creation, but to find the salvation of sanctification through bearing children in faith, love, sanctity, and self-restraint 2:11-15
2) Do Not Exercise Authority Over Men: Paul does not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet because of the created order and because of the effect of the reversal of the created order when she was deceived and initiated the fall 2:12-14
b) Reason One--Created Order: The reason Paul does not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man is because (γὰρ) the order of creation in Genesis 2 supports (or is in harmony with) the female submission to male authority (for it was Adam who was first created, then Eve)76 2:13
c) Reason Two--The Initiator in the Garden: The reason Paul does not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man is also because (καὶ) it was the woman who was deceived77 and thus led the fall into transgression78 2:14
3) In contrast to women exercising authority over men (δὲ), they are preserved through the bearing of children, if they remain in faith, love, and sanctity with self-restraint79 2:15
C. Qualifications for Church Leadership:80 Paul affirms that church leadership is an excellent work, and that it is thus necessary for overseers and deacons to be above reproach so that the gospel ministry might not be hindered and so that their own faith may be strengthened 3:1-13
1. Qualifications for Overseers (ἐπίσκοπος):81 Paul affirms that church leadership is an excellent work, and that it is necessary, therefore, for church leaders to be those who are considered to be above reproach so that the gospel ministry of the church among unbelievers might not be hindered by the devil 3:1-7
a. An Affirmation of Church Leadership: Paul affirms that if anyone desires to be a church leader, he desires to do an excellent work82 3:1
b. Characteristics of Church Leaders: Because church leadership is an excellent work, Paul therefore (ου῎ν) affirms that it is necessary (δεῖ ) for a church leader to be above reproach (ἀνεπίλημπτον ει῎ναι)83 by being the husband of one wife, temperate, prudent, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not addicted to wine, or pugnacious, but gentle, uncontentious, free from the love of money, one who manages his household well, one who is not a new convert, and one who has a good reputation with unbelievers 3:2a
1) Overall Characteristic--Above Reproach: An overseer must be (δεῖ ) above reproach (ἀνεπίλημπτον ει῎ναι)84 3:2a
2) Husband of One Wife: In order to be above reproach one must be the husband of one wife (μεᾶς γυναικὸς α῎νδρα)85 3:2b
3) Temperate: In order to be above reproach one must be temperate/or sober (νηφάλιον)86 3:2c
4) Prudent: In order to be above reproach one must be prudent (σώφρονα)87 3:2d
5) Respectable: In order to be above reproach one must be respectable (κόσμιον)88 3:2e
6) Hospitable: In order to be above reproach one must be hospitable (φιλόξενον)89 3:2f
7) Able to Teach: In order to be above reproach one must be able to teach (διδακτικόν)90 3:2g
8) Not Addicted to Wine: In order to be above reproach one must not be addicted to wine (μή πάροινον)91 3:3a
9) Not Pugnacious: In order to be above reproach one must not be pugnacious (μὴ πλήκτην), but gentle, and uncontentious (ἀλλὰ ἐπιεικῆ α῎μαχον)92 3:3b
10) Free from the Love of Money: In order to be above reproach one must be free from the love a money (ἀφιλάργυρον)93 3:3c
11) Manage Household Well: In order to be above reproach one must manage94 his own household well by keeping his children under control with all dignity95 because otherwise it does not seem probable that he will be able to manage the church of God well 3:4-5
12) Not a New Convert: In order to be above reproach one must not be a new convert (and thus be mature in one’s faith)96 in order that (ι῞να) he may not become conceited and fall into judgment as the devil did97 3:6
2. Qualifications for Deacons (διάκονος):100 As with overseers, so is it that Paul sees the Christian leadership as a good work, and thus affirms that deacons are to be men of respect and dignity because they will obtain for themselves a high standing (in the Christian community) and great confidence in their Christian faith 3:8-13
a. Overall Characteristic--Respect: Because church leadership is an excellent work, Paul likewise (ὡσαύτως) affirms that deacons are to be men of respect/or dignity (σεμνοίς)101 3:8a
b. Negatively: In order to be a person of respect one is not to be characterized by false speech, drinking, or greed 3:8b-d
1) False Speech: In order to be a person of respect one is not be double tongued (μὴ διλόγους)102 3:8b
2) Drinking: In order to be a person of respect one is not to be addicted to much wine (μὴ οι῎νῳ πολλῷ προσέχοντας)103 3:8c
3) Greed: In order to be a person of respect one is not to pursue dishonest gain (μὴ αἰσχροκερδεῖς ) 3:8d
c. Positively: In order to be a person of respect a deacon is to hold to the revealed truth of the faith with a clear conscience, to have been demonstrated to be beyond reproach, to have women helpers who are of good character, to be the husband of one wife, and to manage their own household well 3:9-10
2) First Tested: In order to be a person of respect one is first to be tested to be seen as “beyond reproach before they serve as deacons 3:10
4) Husbands of One Wife: In order to be a person of respect a deacon is to the husband of one wife (διάκονοι ε῎στωσαν μιᾶς γυναικὸς α῎νδρες)108 3:12a
5) Mangers of Their Households: In order to be a person of respect one is to be a good manager of one’s children and their own household109 3:12a
d. Reason: The reason (γὰρ) deacons are to be men of respect/or dignity is because they will obtain for themselves a high standing (in the Christian community, if not with God) and great confidence in their Christian faith 3:13
D. Purpose of The Letter:110 Although Paul hopes to come soon to Timothy, he is writing the things in this letter in order that Timothy might know how to conduct himself in the church which protects the truth of Christ’s earthly and continuing ministry 3:14-16
1. How to Conduct Oneself in the Church--the Guardian of Truth: Although Paul hopes to come soon to Timothy, he is writing the things in this letter in order that Timothy might know how to conduct himself in the household of God111--the church of the living God which is to be the pillar and support112 of the truth113 3:14-15
2. The Truth Is Summarized--A Hymn: Paul unfolds the essence of the truth which the church is to protect as the mystery of religion, namely, the earthly and continuing ministry of Jesus Christ 3:16
a. Affirmation--The Truth is Great: Paul affirms that the revealed truth (mystery) of religion is great 3:16a
b. Demonstration--Jesus Christ: Paul demonstrates that the revealed truth of religion is great as he proclaims Christ in his earthly ministry and his continuing ministry 3:16b-f
1) Christ’s Earthly Ministry--Humiliation, Exaltation, and Glorification: Jesus was manifested in the flesh, vindicated in the Spirit at His resurrection and then glorified at his ascension by angels 3:16b-d
a) Incarnation: Jesus was manifested in the flesh114 3:16b
b) Resurrection: Jesus was justified (ἐδικαιώθη) in the Spirit115 3:16c
c) Glorification: Jesus was beheld by angels116 3:16d
2) Christ’s Continuing Ministry--Gospel Proclaimed and Glorification: Jesus was preached among the Gentiles and believed in throughout the world leading to glory 3:16d-f
a) Preached: Jesus was preached among the nations (Gentiles)117 3:16d
b) Believed In: Jesus was believed in throughout the world 3:16e
c) Taken: Jesus was taken up in glory118 3:16f
E. False Doctrine Censured: In view of the corrupting consequences of demon-influenced false-teachers upon those in the church, Paul urges Timothy to be a good servant of God by developing godliness through personal discipline, by prescribing and teaching the truth about godliness, and by paying close attention to his personal life in the realms of his spiritual gift, his personal progress, and his teaching because this will provide present aspects of salvation for him and those who hear him 4:1-16
1. The Influence of False Teachers: In contrast to the church which is the defender of the faith, Paul affirms that the Spirit explicitly says that in latter times some will fall away from the faith by means of paying attention to deceitful spirits with their demonic doctrines and by means of hypocritical men who claim that they know the truth, but restrict believers from enjoying aspects of God’s good creation through a legalism 4:1-5
a. Statement--The Spirit’s Prediction: In contrast (δὲ) to the church which is the defender of the faith (3:16), Paul affirms that the Spirit explicitly says119that in latter times120 some will fall away from the faith 4:1a
b. The Means of Falling Away--Demonic Work Through False Teachers: Paul affirms that some will fall away from the truth by means of paying attention to deceitful spirits with their demonic doctrines and by means of hypocritical men who claim that they know the truth, but restrict believers from enjoying aspects of God’s good creation through a legalism 4:1b-5
2) Sourced in Hypocritical Men: Paul affirms that some will fall away from the truth by means of the hypocrisy of liars who they claim that they know the truth, but restrict believers from enjoying aspects of God’s good creation through a legalism 4:2
a) Speakers of Falsehood: The hypocrisy comes from men who speak falsehoods123 4:2
b) Seared in Their Conscience: The hypocrisy comes from men who are seared (branded) in their own conscience as with a branding iron124 4:2b
c) Forbid Marriage: The hypocrisy comes from men who forbid marriage125 4:3a
d) Abstain from Foods: The hypocrisy comes from men who advocate abstaining from foods which God has created to be gratefully shared in by those who believe and know the truth
2. Timothy’s Personal Responsibilities in Light of the False Teachers:130 In view of the corruption of the false teachers, Paul urges Timothy to be a good servant of God by developing godliness through personal discipline, by prescribing and teaching the truth about godliness, and by paying close attention to his personal life in the realms of his spiritual gift, his personal progress, and his teaching because this will provide present aspects of salvation for him and those who hear him 4:6-16
a. Be a Good Servant of God: Paul urges Timothy to be a good servant of Christ by exposing the errors of the false teachers, not becoming involved with their “worldly fables,” and by developing godliness through the personal discipline of word of God because of godliness’ comprehensive value 4:6-8
1) Point Out the Errors of False Teachers: Paul affirms that Timothy will be a good servant131 of Christ by pointing out the errors of the false teachers which he has just described132 to the brethren133 4:6a
2) Be Nourished on the Word through Personal Discipline: Paul urges Timothy not to be caught up in “worldly fables” but to be nourished on the word through personal discipline leading to godliness since is offers hope for one’s present life and for one’s future life as a motivation for one’s labor 4:6b-10
a) Nourished on the Word: Paul affirms that Timothy will be a good servant of Christ as he is nourished134 on the words of faith and on excellent teaching (διδασκαλίας) which he has been following 4:6b
b) Rejecting Worldly Fables: In contrast to being nourished on faith and sound doctrine Paul warns Timothy not to have anything to do with worldly fables135 only fit for old women 4:7a
c) Being Disciplined for Godliness: Paul exhorts Timothy to discipline himself136 for the greater value of godliness137 since it holds promise for one’s present life and for one’s future life thereby motivating ministers to labor with their hope of salvation fixed upon God 4:7b-10
(1) Discipline Yourself: In contrast to being enmeshed in “worldly fables” Paul urges Timothy to discipline himself for the purpose of godliness 4:7b
(2) Godliness vs. Physical Discipline: Paul affirms that although physical discipline138 has some value,139 it is a trust worthy statement that godliness has a surpassing value since it holds promise for one’s present life and for one’s future life 4:8-9
(3) Fix Your Hope: Because godliness holds the promise of life Paul affirms that He and those like him in ministry140 labor141 and strive with a fixed hope on the living God who is the savior of all men--especially believers142 4:10
b. Prescribe and Teach Truth: Paul urges Timothy to prescribe and teach the truth about godliness in such a way that he does not give others an opportunity to discredit him, but in fact becomes an example of a true believer 4:11-13
1) Statement: Paul urges Timothy to prescribe and to teach the above truths about godliness (as opposed to those errors taught by the false teachers) 4:11
2) Personal Integrity:143 Paul urges Timothy not to provide an opportunity for people to look down upon him because he is young, but to be an example to those who believe through his speech, conduct, love, faith, and purity144 4:12
3) Prescriptive Ministry: Paul urges Timothy to give attention to (public) reading of the Scripture, to exhortation, and to teaching145 until Paul comes to him 4:13
c. Pay Attention to Yourself: Paul urges Timothy to pay close attention to himself in terms of his spiritual gift, his personal progress at godliness, and his teaching because this work will provide present salvation for both himself and those who hear him 4:14-16
1) Do Not Neglect Your Gift: Paul urges Timothy not to neglect his spiritual gift146 which was bestowed upon him through the prophetic utterance (prophecies) with the laying on of hands by the elders147 4:14
2) Work at Your Progress: Paul urges to take pains at developing godliness so that his progress148 may be evident to all 4:15
3) Pay Attention: Paul urges Timothy to pay close attention to himself and to his teaching by persevering because this work will provide (present experiences of) salvation for himself and for those who hear him149 4:16
IV. INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING VARIOUS GROUPS: After a general charge to Timothy concerning how to appeal to believing men and women who are sinning, Paul exhorts Timothy to care for true widows but not to place younger ones on the list, to care for elders but to reprove and replace those who are sinning, and to instruct slaves to honor their masters 5:1--6:2
A. Instructions Regarding Relating to Men and Women as Believers:150Paul exhorts Timothy not to sharply rebuke a man or a woman, but is to appeal to them as one would to one’s own father/mother or brother/sister with all purity151 5:1-2
1. Men: Paul exhorts that no one is to sharply rebuke a man, but to appeal to him as one would to a father or to brothers 5:1
a. An Older Man: Paul exhorts Timothy not to sharply rebuke (ἐπιπλήξῃς) an older man,152 but to appeal to (or come along side of, παρακάλει) him as one would appeal to a father 5:1a
b. Younger Man: Paul exhorts Timothy not to sharply rebuke a younger man, but to appeal to him as one would to brothers 5:1b
2. Women: Paul exhorts Timothy not to sharply rebuke a women, but is to appeal to her as one would to a mother or to a sister, namely, in all purity 5:2
a. Older Women: Paul exhorts Timothy not to rebuke an older woman, but to appeal to her as one would to a mother153 5:2a
b. Younger Women: Paul exhorts Timothy not to rebuke a younger woman, but is to appeal to her as one would to a sister, by which he means, in all purity154 5:2b
B. Instructions Regarding Widows:155 Paul urges Timothy to care for true widows by placing them upon a list--if they have no living family to care for them and have certain qualifications of age and good works--and not to put younger widows on the list since they may not model the qualities of the older widows; Paul also urges those women in the church who are caring for true widows to continue so that the church may be free to care for other true widows 5:3-16
2. General Qualities for Identifying True Widows:158 In view of the fact that a widow who has living family should be cared for by that family lest they be perceived as being worse than unbelievers in their behavior, Paul identifies real widows as those who have no one to care for them and are dependent upon God rather than being self-indulgent and thus spiritually dead 5:4-8
a. Words to Relatives--They Should Care for Their Widows: Paul urges children or grandchildren of widows to practice piety and to make some return to their family because this pleases God 5:4
1) Practice Piety: Paul exhorts children or grandchildren of widows to practice piety in regard to their own family 5:4a
2) Make Some Return: Paul exhorts children or grandchildren of widows to make some return to their parents 5:4b
3) This Pleases God: The reason Paul exhorts children or grandchildren of widows to practice piety and make some return to their parents is because such activity please God159 5:4c
b. Words to Widows--Be of Godly Character: Hope in God’s Care: Paul identifies a true widow as one who has been left without family to care for her, so is fixed in her hope upon God which is expressed through continued prayers to Him for care 5:5
1) Fixed Her Hope on God: Paul identifies a true widow as one who has been left alone and has fixed her hope on God 5:5a
2) Prays: Paul identifies a true widow as one who continues in entreaties and prayers all of the time (night and day)160 5:5b
c. Words to Disobedient Widows--Judgment for Being Disobedient: Paul exhorts Timothy to instruct widows to place their hope in God and against being self-indulgent because this latter state describes spiritual deadness even though they are physically alive 5:6-7
1) Self-indulgent: In contrast to a widow whose hope is in God is one who is self-indulgent (given to wanton pleasure)161 because she is spiritually dead even through she is physically alive 5:6
2) Prescribe these Things: Paul urges Timothy to give the instructions of verses 5-6 to the self-indulgent widows so that they might be blameless (above reproach)162 5:7
d. Words to Relatives--Judgment for Disobedience:163Paul warns that if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household164 that he has denied the faith and is worth than an unbeliever165 8:8
3. Specific Qualities for Identifying and Prescribing Direction for Widows: Paul urges widows to be placed upon a list by the church if they meet certain qualifications of age and good works, but not to put younger widows on the list since they may not model the qualities of the older widows, and urges those women in the church who are caring for true widows to continue so that the church may be free to care for other widows 5:9-16
a. Qualified to Be Put on a List: A widow is to be placed upon a list166 by the church if she meets the following qualification--she is sixty or older, not divorced and remarried, and known for good works: 5:9-10
1) Sixty or Older: A widow is to be placed upon a list by the church if she is not less than sixty years old167 5:9a
2) Not Divorced and Remarried: A widow is to be placed upon a list by the church if she is the husband of one man168 5:9b
3) Is Known for Good Works:169 A widow is to be placed upon a list by the church if she known for good works such as raising up her children, showing hospitality, being spiritually active in believers’ lives, assisting those in distress, and in general being devoted to good works 5:10
a) Affirmation: Paul affirms that a widow is to be placed upon a list by the church is she is known for good works 5:10a
b) Examples of Good Works: Paul then lists some specific examples of good works which a widow is to be known for such as raising up her children, showing hospitality, being spiritually active in believers’ lives, assisting those in distress, and in general being devoted to good works 5:10b-f
(1) Brought Up Her Children: A widow is to be placed upon a list by the church if she has brought up her children 5:10b
(2) Shown Hospitality: A widow is to be placed upon a list by the church if she has shown hospitality to strangers 5:10c
(3) Been Spiritually Active in Believers’ Lives: A widow is to be placed upon a list by the church if she been spiritually active in believers’ lives (e.g., washed their feet)170 5:10d
(4) Assisted Those in Distress: A widow is to be placed upon a list by the church if she has assisted those in distress 5:10e
(5) Summary--Devoted to Good Works: A widow is to be placed upon a list by the church if she has devoted herself to every good work 5:10f
b. Detailed “Exposure of” and “Instruction for” The Self-Indulgent: Paul exhorts Timothy to refuse to put younger widows on the widows’ list because they become self-indulgent and do not model godliness, therefore, Paul exhorts them to re-invest themselves in family ministries 5:11-15
1) Younger Widows Not to Be On List: Paul exhorts Timothy to refuse to put younger widows on the list 5:11a
2) Reasons Younger Widows Are Not On List: Because younger widows become self-indulgent and do not model godliness Paul does not permit them to be placed upon the widows’ list, but exhorts them to re-invest their lives in family ministries once again 5:11-15
a) Reasons Stated: The Reasons Paul does not desire for younger widows to be placed upon the list is because they become self-indulgent and do not model godliness 5:11-13
(1) They Become Self-Indulgent--They Break Their Commitment: The reason why younger widows should not be place on the list is because they become moved by their sensual desires in disregard to their commitment to Christ and desire to get married incurring condemnation because they have set aside their previous faith171 5:11-12
(2) They Do Not Model Godliness--They Become Idle Speakers of Nonsense: The second reason172 why younger widows should not be place on the list is because they learn to be idle speakers of nonsense and busybodies as they go from house to house (church?) talking about things not proper to mention173 5:13
b) Conclusion Drawn: Paul concludes in view of the above reasons that younger widows should invest their lives in family ministry again (e.g., emulate the good work of the older widows)--get married, bear children, keep house and give the enemy no occasion for reproach as some have by turning aside to follow Satan174 5:14-15
c. Genuine Concern for Widows: Paul urges any believing woman175 who has dependent widows to continue in their assistance of them so that the church may be free to assist true widows 5:16
C. Instructions Regarding Elders:176 Paul urges Timothy to care for the financial needs and the reputation of those elders who work in the church, to reprove those elders who are sinning, and to be careful in the reappointment of other elders who are to replace those who are sinning 5:17-25
1. The Care of Elders: Paul urges Timothy (and thus they church) to care for those elders who work among them in the community by providing for their needs financially and by protecting them against false accusations which have no confirmation 5:17-19
a. Double Honor: Paul urges Timothy (and thus the church) to honor those elders177 who rule well with double honor178--especially those who work hard at giving instruction (preaching and teaching) 5:17
b. The Reasoning for Provision: The reason (γὰρ) the church should provide for those elders who work hard among them is because Scripture confirms179 that they should care for those in their community (as an ox should be allowed to eat while he is threshing, so is the one who works worthy of receiving wages) 5:18
c. Protections Against Accusations: Paul urges Timothy (and thus the church) not to receive an accusation against an elder unless it is confirmed with two or three witnesses180 5:19
2. The Impartial Reproof of Sinning Elders: Paul urges Timothy with a solemn charge before all of heaven to impartially reprove those elders who continue in sin in order that the remaining elders may be fearful of sinning 5:20-21
b. A Solemn Charge to Impartiality: Paul solemnly charges Timothy before all of heaven (in the presence of God, Christ Jesus, and chosen angels)184 to maintain these principles of reproof without bias or partiality 5:21
3. The Replacements for Sinning Elders: Paul urges Timothy (and thus the church) to keep themselves from true sin (and not the false definitions imposed by the false teachers) by not appointing replacement elders too quickly because their sinfulness is not always easy to detect even though it will eventually show itself 5:22-25
a. Their Selection: Paul urges Timothy (and thus the church) to keep themselves free from sin by not appointing (replacement) elders too hastily since this would cause them to share responsibility for the elder’s sins 5:22
b. The Reasons for Careful Selection: After Paul is sure that Timothy can distinguish between what would be a true entanglement with sin (5:22) and a false accusation of sin by the false teachers (e.g., partaking of wine, 4:3), Paul supports his affirmation that Timothy should be careful when choosing replacement elders because their sinfulness, which will eventually be revealed, is not always immediately evident 5:23
1) Related Digression: Paul urges Timothy against a total asceticism as taught by the false teachers (4:3) by urging him to no longer drink water exclusively,185 but to take a little wine when necessary for medicinal reasons (your stomach and your frequent ailments)186 5:23
2) Negative Reason: Paul reasons that Timothy should be careful in his selection of replacement elders because not all men’s sins are immediately manifest (e.g., some men’s sins go before them to judgment,187 while other men’s sins follow after them188) 5:24
3) Positive Affirmation: In a positive contrast with verse 24 Paul also affirms that the good deeds of men are very evident and the evil deeds of men will not be able to be concealed 5:25
D. Instructions Regarding Slaves:189 Paul urges Timothy to preach and teach to believers who are slaves to regard their masters of worthy honor and especially if they are Christians to be respectful of them so that God may be honored because believing Masters are their beloved brothers 6:1-2
1. Attitudes Towards Pagan Masters: Paul urges believers who are slaves190 to regard their masters as worthy of honor191 in order that (ι῞να) the character of God and Christian teaching may not be spoken against192 6:1
2. Attitudes Towards Christian Masters:193 Paul urges believers who are slaves not to be disrespectful194 to them, but to serve them all the more because they are believers who are loved (by God and us) 6:2a
3. Exhortation to Teach: Paul urges Timothy to teach and preach these principles about how slaves should treat their masters 6:2b
V. INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING GODLINESS: In view of the false teachers who have abandoned the gospel and perverted godliness for personal gain leading to many sorrows Paul urges Timothy to remain faithful to his ministry until the Lord returns, and exhorts those who are wealthy to not focus their hope upon their riches but upon God thereby generously investing their riches in good deeds and thus laying up for themselves reward for their future life 6:3-19
A. Final Exposure and Indictment of the False Teachers--A Warning Against the Love of Money:195 Paul exposes the false teachers as those who abandoned the Gospel and perverted godliness for personal gain, affirms the value of godliness when it is accompanied by contentment with one’s financial state, and indicted the false teachers as being those whose greed has resulted in a downward spiral, spiritually, piercing them with many sorrows 6:3-10
1. A Final Exposure of Prideful Self-interest: Paul affirms that because the false teachers have abandoned the gospel from Christ, they have a morbid interest in disruptive controversy leading to depraved minds which desire to achieve financial gain through religion. 6:3-5
a. Abandonment of the Gospel: Paul affirms196 that the false teachers advocate a different teaching which does not agree with the gospel which comes from our Lord Jesus Christ Himself which leads to godliness 6:3
b. Morbid Interests in Controversy and Financial Gain: The results of the false teachers’ abandonment of the gospel is that they have a morbid, prideful craving for controversy (questions, word battles resulting in division in the community197) leading to depraved minds which are deprived of the truth and thus desire to achieve financial gain (εὐσέβειαν) through godliness (religion)198 6:4-5
2. A Contrasting Attitude Toward Godliness: In contrast to the false teachers’ perversion of godliness for financial gain, Paul affirms that godliness (religion) in itself is of great value when one is content in one’s financial circumstances because a discontentment out of greed is illogical since one can not take things with one, and since the essentials of life (food and clothing) are all that are truly necessary in this life for contentment 6:6-10
a. The Gain of Godliness: In contrast to the false teachers’ perversion of godliness Paul affirms that godliness (religion) does provide great gain (μέγας ἡ εὐσέβεια)199 when it is accompanied by contentment200 6:6
b. Reason I--the Future: The first reason that godliness brings great gain when it is accompanied by contentment is because material things are finite having no continuity with life beyond this world201 6:7
c. Reason II--the Present: The second reason that godliness brings great gain when it is accompanied by contentment is because provisions for our present needs (food and clothing) should be enough to make one content (ἀρκεσθησόμεθα)202 6:8
3. A Contrasting Look at the False Teachers Who Want to Get Rich: In contrast to the value of godliness (religion) when it is accompanied by contentment Paul affirms that those who desire to get rich enter into a downward spiral, spiritually, and cites the false teachers as specific examples of those who have pierced themselves with many sorrows 6:9-10
a. In General--The Downward Effect of Loving Money: In contrast (δὲ) to being content Paul affirms that those who out of greed desire to get rich fall into a downward spiral of being tempted, followed by being trapped with many foolish and harmful desires which pull people down (plunge them) into ruin and destruction 6:9
b. In Specific--The False Teachers: In accordance with the proverb that the love of money is the source of all sorts of evil Paul affirms that some (the false teachers) have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many sorrows because of their love for money 6:10
1) A Proverbial Support: Paul supports (γὰρ) his contention that loving money leads to a downward spiritual effect by affirming the proverb that “the love of money is the source of all sorts of evil” 6:10a
2) A Historical Illustration: Paul affirms that by longing for money some (the false teachers) have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves (as with a sword) with many sorrows 6:10
B. Final Exhortation to Timothy--Remain Faithful:203 Through specific imperatives and a solemn charge Paul exhorts Timothy to remain faithful to his ministry in the face of false teachers until the sovereign Lord Jesus Christ returns who is unique in his lordship 6:11-16
1. Four Imperatives: Paul exhorts Timothy to flee form the patterns of the false teachers, strive for virtues and behavior which reflect the gospel, and to persevere in the contest until he receives the prize of eternal life 6:11-12
b. Strive for Virtues: In contrast (δὲ) to the patterns of the false teachers Paul urges Timothy to strive for virtues and behavior which reflect the gospel (e.g., uprightness in conduct [righteousness], godliness, faith, love, steadfastness, and gentleness) 6:11b
c. Keep the Athletic Contest: Paul urges Timothy to keep contending in the athletic contest of the faith206 6:12a
d. Take Hold of Eternal Life: Paul urges Timothy to take hold of the eternal life to which he was called by God when he publicly confessed the Lord before many witnesses207 6:12b
2. A Solemn Charge: In the solemn setting of God who maintains all life, and Christ Jesus who made a good profession before Pontius Pilate Paul charges Timothy to remain faithful to his ministry in all purity until the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ 6:13-14
a. The Sacredness of Paul’s Charge: Paul sets the scene for his summary charge to Timothy as being in the presence of God who maintains all life, and in the presence of Christ Jesus who made a good confession before Pontius Pilate 6:13
b. The Charge to Obey Orders: Paul charges Timothy to keep the commandments208 in a way which is unstained and free from reproach until the coming (appearing) of our Lord Jesus Christ 6:14
3. A Doxology: After mentioning Christ’s return, Paul confirms that this will occur at the proper time when the Lord determines it to occur, and then praises the Lord through a series of character qualities which describe Him as unique in his sovereignty 6:15-16
a. A Certain/Sovereign Second Advent: In view of the mention of Christ’s return Paul affirms that this will occur at the proper time when the sovereign God decides for it to occur209 6:15a
b. Praise to the Lord: Paul praises the Lord through a series of epithets about His uniqueness as Ruler: 6:15b-16
1) He is the only Sovereign One210
2) He is the King of kings and Lord of lords211
3) He is the only one having immortality212
4) He lives in light which is unapproachable213
5) He is invisible214
6) He is the recipient of honor and eternal dominion, Amen215
C. Instruction to the Rich:216 Paul commands Timothy to charge the rich in this world not to be proud or to set their hopes on uncertain riches, but to hope in God and to use their money in generous, liberal ways to do good so that they may lay up reward for themselves in the future 6:17-19
1. One’s Focus for Hope: Paul commands Timothy to charge the rich217 in this world not to be proud or to set their hopes on uncertain riches,218 but on God who richly furnishes us with everything to enjoy219 6:17
2. One’s Use of Money: Paul charges the rich to use their money in a generous way for doing what is good because by doing so they will lay for themselves a good foundation for the future 6:18-19
a. Use Money for Good: Paul charges the rich to use their money in a generous, liberal way for doing what is good 6:18
1) Paul charges the rich to do what is good 6:18a
2) Paul charges the rich to be rich in good deeds220 6:18b
3) Paul charges the rich to be liberal 6:18c
4) Paul charges the rich to be generous 6:18d
b. An Eschatological Motivation: The reason Paul charges the rich to use their money for what is good is because by doing so they will lay for themselves a good foundation for the future so that they may participate (take hold of) the life which is truly life221 6:19
VI. CONCLUSION--A FINAL CHARGE:222 In a final charge Paul urges Timothy to guard his ministry against the false teachers and to avoid their false-knowledge because it has led many away from the faith, whereupon he prays for them all to receive God’s grace 6:20-21
A. Admonition to Timothy: In a final charge Paul urges Timothy to guard his ministry against the false teachers which has been deposited with him and to avoid their false knowledge because it has led many away from the faith 6:20-21a
1. Guard Your Ministry: Paul once again exhorts Timothy to guard his ministry (e.g., that which has been entrusted to him)223 6:20a
3. Reason: The reason Paul exhorts Timothy to avoid the false-knowledge of the false teachers is because some who have professed it have missed the mark (lost the way)226 with regard to the faith227 6:21a
B. Prayer for Grace: Paul prays that God’s grace might be with Timothy and all who are with him in Ephesus228 6:21b
1 Paul is emphasizing his authority with this title. This was probably not for Timothy so much as for “ill-wishers” who would hear this in the congregation when it was read aloud (see J. N. D. Kelly, A Commentary on the Pastoral Epistles, p. 39).
2 Paul is a man under orders from God (cf. Acts 9:15-16). As Fee says, “in this letter is going to charge Timothy to ‘order’ the church, or the errorists, to do or refrain from doing certain things. Thus he who gives orders is himself under orders” (Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, pp. 1-2).
3 See 1 Timothy 2:3; 4:10; Titus 1:3; 2:10; 3:4,6; Philemon 3:20; Ephesians 5:23; 2 Timothy 1:10). The reference need not be an allusion to emperor worship since it has roots in the OT (cf. Deut. 32:15; Psalm 24:5; 25:5; 27:1; 9; 42:5; Habakkuk 3:18; Isaiah 12:2; Luke 1:47; Jude 25).
4 As “Savior” Christ has inaugurated a redemptive process which he will consummate when he returns for believers (cf. 1 Tim. 6:14), therefore, he is also their “Hope” of redemption (cf. Titus 2:13).
5 The emphasis upon “true” (γνσίῳ τέκνῳ) may also reflect an authority motif. Perhaps Paul is assuring that the church does not reject Timothy (Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 2).
6 The phrase “in the faith” actually does not have an article (ἑν πίστει) and thus may well refer to Timothy as being faithful.
7 Even in this greeting there is an emphasis upon Timothy as that half-way house between Judaism and the Greeks. Grace and peace were typical elements of Paul’s letters, but when he adds in mercy he is emphasizing Jewish roots. As Fee writes, “Thus in the final letters the salutation has become complete” (Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 3).
8 This combination of names almost becomes like a full proper name for the Lord in the Pastorals.
9 This implies that the church is an actor in this event (Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 4).
10 Timothy is not the pastor but Paul’s representative authorized to oppose the deceivers and their followers (Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 5).
11 Paul seems to omit his usual section of thanksgiving before jumping into the heart of this letter. Oddly enough, the only other letter where he does this is Galatians where he was also concerned with false teachers. This may well be another indication that this letter is for the church more than for Timothy.
12 The meaning for “charge” is “to give strict orders” (παραγγείλῃς ).
13 The term is ἑτεροδιδασκαλεῖν which literally means “other teachings” or “teachings of a different kind” (cf. 2 Cor. 11:4; Gal. 1:6). These are clear perversions of the pure gospel which Timothy is to clear up.
14 These have been understood in different ways: (1) the “myths” were ways which the Gnostic thinkers sought to solve the the problem of evil (J. N. D. Kelly, A Commentary on the Pastoral Epistles, p. 44); the genealogies were “speculative cosmologies of the later Gnostics with their systems of aeons (spiritual beings) that emanate from God (the Father of All), such as one finds in Valentinus” (Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 6; C. K. Barrett, The Pastoral Epistles, p. 40; see the paraphrase of the Living Bible, “Their idea of being saved by finding favor with an endless chain of angels leading up to God”). However, the Gnostic system of aeons were never called genealogies, the genealogies are lumped in with the Law in 3:9, and the “fables” were explicitly labeled Jewish (cf. Titus 1:14)
(2) They were descriptions which appeared in Hellenism and Hellenistic Judaism to refer to traditions about peoples’ origins. “Μύθοις” was used in a pejorative sense to contrast the legendary character of the stories to historical truth. They were some kind of Jewish (v. 7) discussions about origins. It is not possible to be specific beyond this (Ibid., pp. 6-7). Perhaps, they were an attempt by the Jews to emphasize physical heritage (e.g., pedigrees of the patriarchs) or “far-fetched minutiae of rabbinical exegesis to the detriment of the gospel” (cf. Book of Jubilees, or Philo’s Questions and Answers on Genesis, or Pseudo-Philo’s Book of Biblical Antiquities; J. N. D. Kelly, A Commentary on the Pastoral Epistles, pp. 44-45; Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 7).
15 “Tis a tale full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” Shakespeare, Macbeth. Kelly writes that Paul is concerned about, “the condemning the mass of pseudo-problems which the heretics’ exegesis engenders. The end of Bible study should be an apprehension of god’s saving plan” (J. N. D. Kelly, A Commentary on the Pastoral Epistles, p. 45).
16 See Ephesians 1:10; 3:2,9; cf. 1 Corinthians 9:17; Colossians 1:25.
17 The sense of “command” or “charge” here is probably wider in meaning than that implied in verse 3. It is descriptive of the requirement disclosed in the Gospel (C. K. Barrett, The Pastoral Epistles, p. 41).
18 Kelly writes, “The ultimate object of Paul’s charge, as of all Christian moral preaching, is not merely negative. If its initial purpose is to check error, it has the further and more positive aim of establishing love in the Ephesian congregation in place of the spirit of contentiousness which the errorists have sown there” (J. N. D. Kelly, A Commentary on the Pastoral Epistles, p. 46).
Fee relates this to the context even more when he writes, “This is probably not a general statement about the gospel, in contrast to the errors; rather, Paul is specifically giving the reason for Timothy’s involvement, namely, to arouse the love that comes from a pure heart (Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p 7).
19 These characteristics are to be contrasted with those of the false teachers who are deceived and deceitful (4:1-2; 5:24; 2 Tim. 2:26; 3:13; cf. 1 Tim. 2:14; 5:15; 2 Tim. 3:5-7), have “branded” consciences (4:2) and “have made a ruin of their faith” (1:19) [Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 8).
20 These may well have been elders in the church. Remember Paul’s prophetic warning to the elders of Ephesus in Acts 20:28-30! Other support that elders are in view is that Paul also discusses the responsibility of the elders (5:17; cf. 3:2), the naming and excommunicating of two by Paul (1:19-20, Hymenaeus and PHiletus), qualifications for elders (3:1-7), as well as disciplining and the apparent replacement of elders (5:19-25) [Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, pp. 5-6; C. K. Barrett, The Pastoral Epistles, p. 40].
21 An honorable title in the OT (cf. Luke 5:17, Gamaliel in Acts 5:34). Paul throws it back upon them in irony.
22 It seems that the false teachers may have been imposing the code of the Law rather than the ethic of the Law. The code was the negative aspect of the Law which the false teachers were insisting was necessary for believers to be pleasing to God. Here Paul affirms that the ethic of the Law should be the negative aspect which is imposed because it constrains people from doing evil to one another. Barrett writes, “Love is repeatedly praised...no doubt also because he was aware of perversions of Christianity which made a show of piety, but were loveless” (C. K. Barrett, The Pastoral Epistles, p. 42).
23 An imposition of code of the Law for the righteous to be accepted by God. Kelly does not see the issue as being similar to the Judaizers in Galatians who impose the full ceremonial law upon Christians because of the discussions of myths and genealogies above and the ascetic descriptions in 4:5 (J. N. D. Kelly, A Commentary on the Pastoral Epistles, p. 48). Likewise, Barrett understands the teachers to spin out of the Law allegorical meanings which bear no relation to the original sense, and to make it the basis of an ascetic system of morals (C. K. Barrett, The Pastoral Epistles, p. 43), but these emphases do not necessarily negate Judaizers.
24 An imposition of the ethic of the Law which exposes evil (see Jesus’ use of the Law in the Sermon on the Mount (Matt. 5--7; Luke 6). Even Kelly notes that, “What is interesting in the present list is that it is largely based on the Decalogue” (J. N. D. Kelly, A Commentary on the Pastoral Epistles, pp. 49-50; see also Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, pp. 10-11).
25 The sixth commandment
26 The seventh and eigth commandments.
27 The ninth commendment.
28 See Romans 13:9; Galatians 5:21.
29 This is an affirmation that the ethic of the Law is found in the Gospel.
30 The point is not that God appointed Paul because he thought so highly of him, but that it is amazing that He considered him at all trustworthy.
31 Paul is not appointed here as an apostle, but as a servant (διακονίαν).
32 This certainly speaks of Paul’s persecution of the church (cf. Acts 8:3; 9:1-2; 22:4-5; 26:9-11; cf. Gal. 1:13).
33 Paul is not saying that his state made him less culpable, but that his ignorance is why God was gracious to him. His sin was not highhanded (cf. Num. 15:22-31). This was true for those who crucified the Lord as well (1 Cor. 2:8; Luke 23:34). God’s grace in Israel’s ignorance is why Peter could remake an offer of the Kingdom in Acts 3. Likewise, Stephen’s grace in the ignorance of those who stoned him (in Paul’s presence) is why Paul later became the recipient of grace on the road to Damascus (Acts 9).
34 Faith is the response of grace, and faith acts then in love.
35 The particulars of this verse are to be contrasted with Paul’s earlier discussion of the gospel in contrast with the teaching of the false teachers (1:8-10; cf. 1:5). God’s grace brings with it “faith” and “love” and “eternal life” (see Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, pp. 15, 17-20).
36 Paul does not use the past tense, but the present tense, “ω῞ν πρῶτός εἰμι ἐγώ !” Paul always recognizes that he has the status of a sinner redeemed (Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 18).
37 Eternal life is not only life with an endless longevity, but life in the coming age with Him (cf. 6:12-15; 2 Tim. 4:6-8; Titus 2:11-14).
38 The eternal King (βασιλεῖ τῶν αἰώνων ) picks up the theme of eternal life in verse 16.
39 God is “incorruptible”. This may be a term from Hellenistic Judaism.
40 This may be an OT theme (cf. Rom. 1:20; Col. 1:15).
41 This is the essence of the OT view of God (Deut. 6).
42 Paul’s seems to have Timothy’s commission or ordination in view when he was recognized to have received the gift of the Spirit for ministry and there was a clarification made through some words of prophecy (cf. 4:14; 2 Tim. 1:6). Therefore, Paul is entrusting this command to him in accordance with Timothy’s divine commission. The exhortation is one higher than from Paul--it’s from the Spirit of God.
43 Paul uses a military metaphor as one engages against the enemies of the gospel (cf. 2 Tim. 2:3-4; 2 Cor. 10:1-6; Philemon 1 [Col. 4:17]; Eph. 6:10-17).
44 By rejecting their complete trust in God’s grace they are at the same time bringing the faith to ruin.
45 See 1 Corinthians 5:5. Paul seems to be placing these men outside of the protective umbrella of the church and its fellowship into Satan’s sphere.
46 Some see chapters two and three as an early church manual such as was needed for setting a church in order (although Paul has already done this in Acts 19--20). Barrett writes in this vein when he says, “After the opening chapter, which strikes a personal note, the Epistle turns to more general regulations for the ordering of the Christian life, with special reference to the life of the community” (C. K. Barrett, The Pastoral Epistles, p. 48). The connections between chapters 1 and 2 & 3 are lost because there is not specific reference to false teachers in the latter.
However, there is a logical connection made between chapter one and what follows with the textual marker, “Therefore” (ου῞ν) implying a result or inference from what has preceded it. As Fee writes, “That means that these instructions are best understood as responses to the presence of the wayward elders, who were disrupting the church by the errors and controversies. In fact, Paul does not suggest at any point that Timothy is to set the church in order, as for the first time. In each case the activities seem already to be present. What Paul is doing, rather is correcting abuses of various kinds. For example, it may be assumed that men pray, and do so with raised hands (v. 8). The instruction here is that they do so with ‘holy’ hands, not ‘soiled’ by anger or argument” (see Gordon D. Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 25).
47 This paragraph is not so much about prayers for rulers or a Christian attitude for the state so much as about the gospel that is for all people (cf. 2:1, 4-6,7). Verse two is a sort of a meaningful digression to the central point. Fee discusses this emphasis when he writes, “The best explanation for this emphasis lies with the false teachers, who either through the esoteric highly speculative nature of their teaching (1:4-6) or through its ‘Jewishness’ (1:7) or ascetic character (4:3) are promoting an elitist or exclusivist mentality among their followers. The whole paragraph attacks that narrowness” (Gordon D. Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 26).
48 See 1:3, 18-20.
49 The phrase “first of all” (πρῶτον πάντων) is describing that which is of most urgency rather that the first thing to be discussed. It is urgent that prays be made for all people.
50 These are to be prayers of all kinds are to be made for all people.
51 While some such as Barrett see these verse as the center of this discussion and verses 4-7 as a digression (C. K. Barrett, The Pastoral Epistles, p. 49), it is probably just the opposite. These verse are the digression by way of example.
52 This would include the emperor, provincial officials, and local magistrates. There is a long history of this in Judaism (Ezra 6:9-10; 1 Macc. 7:33; Letter of Aristeas 44-45; Pirke Aboth 3.2; Josephus Wars 2.196; Philo In Flaccum, 49; see Gordon D. Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 31; C. K. Barrett, The Pastoral Epistles, p. 49). See also Romans 13:1-5 for a passage with a similar attitude toward the state.
53 Paul’s concern does not seem to be so much that the church not have any kind of turmoil or unrest (cf. 2 Tim. 1:8; 3:12) as that it not come under oppression due to the evil affects of false teachers (cf. 6:1). As Fee writes, “it probably reflects the activities of the false teachers, who are not only disrupting (‘disquieting’) the church(es) but apparently are also bringing the gospel and the church into disrepute on the outside (see esp. 3:7; 5:14; 6:1; cf. Titus 2:5, 8; 3:1-3)” (Gordon D. Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 27).
54 This is God the Father who is the originator of our salvation (Phil. 1:28; 1 Thess. 5:9).
55 Paul does not say that God “wills” but that God desires (θέλει σωθῆναι). The point is not that God’s desire is frustrated since all will not be saved but to emphasize the, “universal scope of the gospel over against some from of heretical exclusivism or narrowness” (Gordon D. Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 28).
56 Perhaps this is the cognitive side in response to the error of the false teachers.
57 Paul uses the term for mankind (α῎νθροπος Χριστὸς ᾿Ιησοῦς) to emphasize that Jesus is the one human being of which this can be said. He is the second Adam (see Mark’s temptation account, Paul’s discussion in Romans 5).
58 Literally it reads “in behalf of,” “in the place of” (ὑπὲρ πάντων) all. There does not seem to be any indication that Jesus only died for the elect in this context (limited atonement).
59 This again emphasizes the universal scope of the gospel. Paul emphasizes this with “I am telling the truth, I am not lying!”). This suggest some form of Jewish exclusivism lying at the heart of the problem (cf. Titus 1:10-16).
60 This is a combination of “faith” and “truth” as a kind of nominal hendiadys. The true faith is over against the exclusivism of the false teachers.
61 If in 2:1-7 Paul has been describing the objects of prayer, namely all men, in 2:8-15 he now discusses the proper demeanor on the part of those who pray.
The false teachers are again central to this section. The mention of men (2:7) no doubt relates to those who were raising controversies and strife (1:4). It seems that the emphasis upon women (2:8-15) may well relate to them as those upon whom the false teachers are finding their most fruitful hearing (cf. 5:3-16; and especially 2 Tim. 3:5-9). It is also possible that some of the discussion could relate to women who were in the Artemis cult.
62 See 2:1-7 above.
63 This could refer to every church service, or to any place where the believers gathered (e.g., perhaps the house churches; see Gordon D. Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 34,39).
The identification of this phrase gains significance as one attempts to identify the limitations upon the exhortations given to women in the next unit (2:9, “I also want women ...”). If it refers to the church service, than it has specific application to the local church. If it refers to the “everywhere” (NIV), than it may have application to any gathering of believers beyond the confines of the local assembly. The phrase is more generic than specific, and thus may well refer to the latter meaning--e.g., any place where believers are gathered together. Nevertheless, Fee does have a point when he affirms that Paul usually identifies the sense of “the churches universally” when he means for this broader sense as in 1 Corinthians 11:26; 14:33 (Ibid., 39). The more narrow sense would also match the particular problem with the false teachers in the Ephesian church. Therefore, it may be best to understand Paul’s sense to be in the local church.
In support of this conclusion Barrett writes, “this is no mere literlism for in Jewish usage ‘place’ meant ‘meeting-place’, ‘place of prayer’, and there is evidence (especially 1 Cor. 1:2; 1 Thess. 1:8) that is become Christian usage too. The author means ‘in every Christian meeting-place’. Cp. also Mal. 1:10f.” (C. K. Barrett, The Pastoral Epistles, p. 54).
64 This seems to have been a common practice in Judaism (cf. 1 Ki. 8:54; Pss. 63:4; 141:2; 2 Macc. 14:32; Philo, Flaccus 121; Jos. Antiquities 4.40; and in early Christianity see Tertullian, On Prayer 17).
65 The imagery is that of ritual purity through hands which are cleansed before praying. Here the sense is that they are not soiled by anger or arguing which are the specific sins of the false teachers (Gordon D. Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 34).
66 Although the term for “women” (γυναῖκας) could be understood to refer to “wives” when placed alongside of the term used for men (ἀνηρ), it does not have an article before it so it probably has reference to a broader group than “wives.”
67 With “good judgment,” or “decency” (σωφροσύνης) (BAG, p. 802).
68 It may be that they act of “dressing up” was understood to be an attempt to be provocative for the sake of attaining a husband, or an expression of wifely insubordination, or even unfaithfulness. Some support is in the following:
“Juvenal’s Satire 6: “There is nothing that a woman will not permit herself to do, nothing that she deems shameful, when she encircles her neck with green emeralds and fastens huge pearls to her elongated ears.... So important is the business of beautification; so numerous are the tiers and storeys piled one upon another on her head!... Meantime she pays no attention to her husband” (Loeb, pp. 121ff).
1 Enoch 8:1-2: “And Azaz’el taught the people (the art of) making swords and knives, and shields, and breastplates; and he showed to their chosen ones bracelets, decorations, (shadowing of the eye) with antimony, ornamentation, the beautifying of the eyelids, all kinds of precious stones, and all coloring tinctures and alchemy. And there were many wicked ones and they committed adultery and erred, and all their conduct became corrupt” (Charlesworth, 1:16).
Fee also notes Testament of Rueben 5:1-5; Ps-Phintys 84-86; Perictione 135;l Seneca, To Helvia 16:3-4; Plutarch 26.30-32; Sentences of Sextus 235 and writes, “the words fancy hair styles and gold ornaments or pearls may go together and have to do with tiered hair decorated with gold and pearls. See J. B. Hurley, Man and Woman in Biblical Perspective, pp. 198-199” (Gordon D. Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 39, n. 2:9-10).
In view of the above descriptions, it may be that Paul was dealing with some women who were acting out in this cultural framework (cf. 2 Tim. 3:6-7 which reads, “For among them are those who enter into households and captivate weak women weighed down with sins, led on by various impulses, always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth” NASB). See also 1 Peter 3:3.
69 Some examples of such good works in 1 Timothy 5:10 are: bring up her children well, showing hospitality to strangers, washing the saints’ feet, and assisting those in distress.
70 Fee suggests that the women were, “being ‘up front,’ talking foolishness, or being a ‘busybody’ (5:13)” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 35). Perhaps they were doing this in response to false teaching which they were receiving.
71 The term is ἡσυχίᾳ meaning in a “quiet demeanor,” and not necessarily “in silence” or “without speaking” (cf. 2:2 “quiet life”). There is a sort of inclusio involved with this word since it is the first thing said here and the last thing mentioned in 2:12 (“ἐν ᾿῾συχίᾳ”).
72 To be “submissive in every way” (ἐν πάσῃ ὑποταγῇ). While this may have reference to their husbands, the implication of Πάσῃ suggests a larger realm which may include the conduct of younger widows and their going from house to house (house-churches) and talking about things that they should not (5:13).
73 This may correspond to “receive instruction” above in verse 11. It seems that teaching was where the problem lay in the church in Ephesus (1:3; 6:3; in contrast see 2:7; 5:17). It seems that this teaching had to most likely do with instruction in the Scriptures including the gospel (cf. 2 Tim. 3:15-17).
74 This may correspond with “entire submissiveness” above in verse 11. The term has the sense of “to domineer” (αὐθεντεῖν ἀνδρός). Perhaps the women were advancing the errors which they were receiving from the false teachers.
75 This is the same term that was used above in verse 11. The women are not to be domineering, or boisterous in the affirmations of the heresies of the false teachers, but are to receive instruction in a quiet manner.
76 Allen P. Ross writes, “What the apostle is doing in this section, it seems to me, is making an analogical application from the text. At creation God had an order, the man was created first and then the woman. The implication is that this order of creation should be preserved in the church, the new creation as it were, especially now when there is so much need for order. He is not saying that Genesis is teaching the superiority of the male over the female, nor that his instruction on women not teaching is in Genesis. It is an application by analogy. His ruling would stand as authoritative whether he connected it to creation or not” (“The Ministry of Women in the Seminary”, unpublished paper presented to the faculty of DTS, Faculty Retreat, 1990), p. 16.
77 This is based upon Eve’s statement in Genesis 3:13, “The serpent deceived me, and I ate.” In Romans 5:12, 19 the man (Adam) is the representative one through whom the fall of the race came, here it is the woman. In the case of 1 Timothy, there seems to have been a parallel with the Genesis account in that the deceptions of false teachers who had the “doctrines of demons” (4:1) were influencing some of the women to turn away from the truth and “to follow Satan” (5:15).
78 Ross writes, “Again it seems to me that Paul is connecting Genesis by an analogy to make an application. He uses the word “deceived” as the link between the contexts, but such usages of the Old Testament are from broader than prooftexting--they draw the entire context into the discussion. In Genesis the woman was tempted by the serpent in to a discussion about the word of God. When it appeared that she did not know the wording precisely, he deceived her by setting aside the penalty of death. Consequently, she ate of the fruit and gave some to her husband. The sum of it all is that she was beguiled, and that beguiling caused her to lead the man into sin rather than remain as a spiritual equal. Because of that the oracle gives the man domination over the woman. Paul is saying that that scene must not be worked out in the Church. A woman must not take the lead and have the man obey--that is how we got into this mess in the first place. Rather, Paul maintains the order laid out in the oracle, only without the sting of the curse. When teaching the word of God in the assembly is to be done, the qualified overseer or elders are to do it. The analogy is a good one, and certainly applies to the Pauline instruction--do not relive the temptation and the fall” (“The Ministry of Women in the Seminary”, p. 17).
79 Ross writes, “In Genesis God created male and female, the male first, and then the female. He place them together as His image, to form a complementary union. But in the temptation the woman was beguiled and sinned, and then prompted the man to sin. The oracle of God announced the curse for the man’s sin, and in talionic justice the woman would have pain and domination by the man. And yet under the announcement of death, Adam and Eve by faith see the blessing of the LORD--they interpret childbirth as evidence of redemptive blessing. They cannot do anything about the oracle--that is the way life will be. But they can take what God gives them and serve Him with it, for it is a token of His favor. So too do we find the steps in Paul’s analogy. By analogy with creation and the fall, the ruling is that the woman must not teach or have authority. Nevertheless (I take this verse to be almost a parenthesis or an aside in the discussion before he gets to the bishop) she shall be saved in childbearing. The work σωθήσεται, I am sure we would all agree, cannot mean “she shall be saved” in the sense of conversion. It must refer to Christian levels of the meaning of σωζω, sanctification, deliverance, blessing, glorification, or the like. The apostle might be saying--especially in that culture when bearing and rearing children was the primary and constant activity of women--that even though there is this prohibition on the woman, she should not think that there is no service or reward for her in the faith. She, like Eve, can see God’s provision of children as a token of blessing and an avenue of service that will be equally rewarding and rewarded” (“The Ministry of Women in the Seminary”, p. 18).
80 Paul has addressed concerns related to worship and corrected abuses by erring elders. Now he turns to the qualifications for the office of elders. This may well be motivated out of providing a safe-guard against the influx of false teachers into the leadership of the church.
In 1 Timothy Paul is not charging Timothy to appoint elders as in Titus 1:5 because there were probably already elders appointed (cf. Acts 20). Paul’s concern is that those who are elders (or will be becoming elders) live according to their appointment.
Fee offers the following reasons as to why these qualifications have false teachers in view: “First, most of the items in the list stand in sharp contrast to what is said elsewhere in the letter about the false teachers. Second, the list itself has three notable features: It gives qualifications, not duties; most of the items reflect outward, observable behavior; and none of the items is distinctively Christian (e.g., live, faith, purity, endurance; cf. 4:12; 6:12); rather, they reflect the highest ideals of Hellenistic moral philosophy. Since the whole passage points toward and concludes with verse 7, that is, concern for the overseer’s (and the church’s) reputation with outsiders, this suggests that the false teachers were, by their behavior, bringing the gospel into disrepute. Therefore, Paul is concerned not only that the elders have Christian virtues (there are assumed) but that they reflect the highest ideals of the culture as well” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 42).
81 Acts 20:17, 28 and Titus 1:5 and 7 indicate that the terms for “overseers” (ἐπισκοποι--Acts 20:28; Titus 1:7) and “elders” (πρεσβυτεροι--Acts 20:17; Titus 1:5) are interchangeable. Therefore, these church leaders are probably also church elders.
82 Paul is affirming that being a church leader is a good task to which one might aspire. He is probably emphasizing the task more than the aspiration of the person.
83 See also this character quality with widows (5:7) and with Timothy himself (6:14). This is probably the overall, general category under which the rest are to be subsumed. One is to be irreproachable in his observable conduct (BAG, p. 65). An example of this in the Koine period is where this description is given as a condition of a decree of amnesty for offenses τὰς παρακειμένας ὑπ᾿ αὑτοῦ συγγραφὰς ἀνεπιλήπτους ει῎ναι (P Tor I. i.vii.15 (M. & M. p. 41).
84 This term refers to “irreproachable observable conduct” (cf. 5:7; 6:14). This leader is to be “not apprehended,” “not laid hold of,” “not open to censure,” or irreproachable” (Thayer, s.v. “ἀν-επ-ληπτος,” p. 44).
85 There are several views as to the meaning of this character quality: (1) a church leader must be married, (2) a prohibition against polygamy, (3) a prohibition against all second marriages (especially in the case of widowhood), (4) an exhortation to marital fidelity to one’s wife, and (5) a prohibition against divorce and remarriage (e.g., a one-woman man).
Meanings 1-3 above are unlikely: (1) 1 Corinthians 7:25-38 argues against the suggestion that Paul would be insisting that one must be married. It is possible that Timothy himself was not married, (2) the use of the same phrase in 1 Timothy 5:9 for widows argues against the probability that Paul is addressing polygamy since widows were not known to have multiple husbands, and (3) Romans 7:1-2 and Paul’s exhortations to widows in 1 Timothy 5:14ff make it unlikely that Paul would restrict marriage for widowers.
Therefore meanings 4 and 5 above are the most likely interpretations of the options. Also meaning four may be inclusive of meaning 5 since one’s divorce and remarriage would not demonstrate one to be a one-woman man. Our culture seems to want to work the conclusion in just the opposite direction (e.g., all one needs to be is a “one-woman” man in the relationship which one is presently engaged). Such an understanding seems to miss the overall characteristic of “above reproach.”
In any case Paul’s concern is for church leaders to lead an exemplary life in the realms of their marriage--espceially in view of the low view of marriage which the false teachers are affirming (4:3 “men who forbid marriage”).
86 This term describes one who is “temperate in the use of alocholic beverages”--sober (1 Tim. 3:2,11; Tit. 2:2; BAGD, p. 538). Figuratively, it may have the sense of being free from spiritual drunkenness, excess, passion, rashness, or confusion (e.g., well balanced; cf. νήφω; 2 Tim. 4:5).
87 This is descriptive of one who is thoughtful and self-controlled.
88 This describes one as respectable and honorable.
89 This is one who loves strangers and thus welcomes them into his home.
90 This is a characteristic which implies duties. It describes one who is able to teach the truth and refute error (cf. 2 Tim. 2:24; Titus 1:9).
91 Paul is not affirming that the church leader is to necessarily to be a total abstainer (cf. 5:23), but that he is not to be addicted to wine or a drunkard (cf. 3:8; Titus 1:7). Jesus himself turned the water into true wine at the Wedding in Cana (John 2). Reasons for abstaining from alcoholic beverages relate more to one’s love for others than to a biblical prohibition (Romans 12:10;14; 1 Cor. 8). Nevertheless, one is not to be addicted to strong drink, or to be drunk (cf. M. & M. p. 496).
92 These three qualities may well go together in order to contrast the church leader’s treatment of others with that of the false teachers’ (cf. 6:3-5; 2 Tim. 2:22-26; Titus 3:9). One is not to be bully (BAGD, p. 699) a violent, or fierce man (cf. L. & S. p. 1418), but gentle (or kind) and peaceful (“not quarrelsome”).
93 Greed is one severe sin of the false teachers (6:5-10).
94 The term for manage (προῖστημι) has the sense of “directing,” “conducting,” “guiding,” or “ruling” (as with church elders in 5:17; 1 Thess. 5:12), and “being concerned about,” “caring for,” “giving aid” (as with Titus 3:8; Rom. 12:8). Insight in to the sense here is with the verb for taking care of the church in 3:5 (ἐπιμελέομαι). This latter term implies both leadership (guidance) and caring concern. This is how one is to “manage” the home and the church--with guidance and concern.
95 Literally it reads, “τέκνα ε῎χοντα ἐν ὑποταγῇ, μετὰ πάσης σεμνότητος). It does not say that he is to make his children obey him but that he has children in submissiveness (cf. 2:11). The phrase, “with all dignity” may not be descriptive of the way in which they will express their submissiveness. The sense of submissiveness is in itself descriptive of a voluntary act by the one doing the submission. Rather, it probably describes their generally good behavior for which they would be known.
As Fee writes, “There is a fine line between demanding obedience and gaining it. The church leader, who must indeed exhort people to obedience, does not thereby ‘rule’ God’s family. He takes care of it in such a way that its ‘children’ will be known for their obedience and good behavior” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 44).
96 He is not to be “newly planted” (μὴ νεόφυτον; cf. 5:22).
97 This is the exact description of the false teachers in 6:4 (cf. 2 Tim. 3:4). Perhaps they were recent converts whose “sins followed them” (5:4). It was through arrogance that the Devil also fell in to condemnation.
98 Fee writes, “this concern is what puts the foregoing list into perspective. That list has to do with observable behavior of a kind that will be a witness to the people outside the church” (1 and 2 Timoty, Titus, p. 46).
99 For the church leaders to fall into a bad reputation with those outside of the church would be for their gospel message to also become closed to the world. This fits all to well with the schemes of the devil. When the character of church leaders becomes a scandal, the enemy has laid a trap to prevent the progress of the gospel.
100 Although “elders” and “deacons” are certainly distinguished from one another through two lists of qualifications, it is difficult to clearly identify the differences. In the list for deacons the qualification of “able to teach” is not included. But if one looks to Acts 6:1-6 where some where chosen to assist the Apostles with the serving of tables (διακονεῖν ; 6:2), their “serving” was no less ministry than that of the apostles whose ministry was also described as “serving” (τῇ διακονίᾳ λόγου προσκαρτερήσομεν). Actually those chosen in Acts 6 included significant ministers such as Stephen (Acts 7) and Philip (Acts 8), and they became known as the “Seven” (Acts 21:8; cf. also Paul’s usage of the term in 1 Cor. 3:5-2; Rom. 16:1; Col. 1:23; 4:7; 1 Tim. 4:6). Both elders and deacons were involved in significant ministry in the church. The elders may have been responsible for the broader oversight of the church, and the deacons the more specific care of the church, but their responsibilities may have at times overlapped. Likewise, many of their qualifications are similar.
Although the term for deacons may at times refer to the function of certain people (cf. Rom. 16:1; Acts 6), it may at times also refer to the position as in Philippians 1:1. Here it probably refers to those who are in the position of deacon.
101 This is also probably a summary description for what follows with the sense of proper conduct and respect (cf. 2:2; 3:4).
102 The sense is that one does not have two sets of words, or truth, or accounts--one for one group, and another for the other group--a kind of “double-talk.” One is not to “say something twice” or in “two ways” (BAGD, p. 198). One is to be genuine, truthful, sincere (e.g., not full of wax).
103 More literally it means, not “paying attention to” or “giving heed to,” “caring for” much wine (BAGD, p. 714). Again this does not demand abstinence, but focuses upon abuse, addiction, obsession (cf. 3:3).
104 For the mystery as revealed truth about the church see 1 Cor. 2:1,7; 4:1; Eph. 3:3-9). This is a truth which was once hidden in God, but is now revealed by the Holy Spirit. The mystery does not seem to be the existence of the church so much as the nature of the church (e.g., equality of Jews and Gentiles). Perhaps this was an issue with the false teachers in their wrangling over the Law (1:4,7; cf. Titus 1:14).
105 See the descriptions of the false teachers in view of their “conscience” (1:5-6, 19-20). These men were to be those who were “approved” (cf. 1 Cor. 16:3; 2 Cor. 13:5. This is similar to 3:6. As Fee writes, “Paul is saying, therefore, that when you find men ‘who hold to the revealed truth of the faith with a clear conscience,” that is, people whose behavior is above reproach, then let such ‘approved’ men serve ....” (1 and 2 Timoty, Titus, p. 50).
106 There is some question as to whether this is a description of the wives of deacons or of women who assist deacons in the ministry of the church. The latter seems to be the better choice: (1) If this is to be “wives” of deacons, one wonders why there is no mention of ‘wives of elders’, (2) γυναῖκας does not just mean “wives”; it can mean widow, bride, or any adult woman, (3) ὡσαύτως usually displays a distinction from one class to another, (4) there is no possessive linking γυναῖκαις with διακόνους; (5) it would limit those who could help deacons to deacons wives, (6) if it is a deacon’s wife, then they are to “both” be elected to office, and (7) Romans 16:2 describes Phoebe as one who has served the church [διάκονον] and specifically as a “helper” [προστάτις]. Therefore, these women are probably unmarried women who assist the deacons in the functions of the church (see Robert M. Lewis, “The ‘Women’ of 1 Timothy 3:11,” Bib Sac 136 (April-June 1979): 167-170).
107 The term is σεμνάς, the feminine form of the same term which heads up the description of deacons in 3:8 σεμνούς.
108 See 3:2 above.
109 See 3:4 above for specifics.
110 After Paul has exhorted Timothy to remain in Ephesus in order to combat false teachers, and given some specific prescriptions for dealing with the infiltration of false teachers, he then concludes this section of the letter with a further statement of its purpose.
111 As in 3:4-5 this image suggests the family of God where the Lord is Father, believers are brothers and sisters, and the apostles were “stewards” or house managers.
112 This description suggests the image of the church as a temple (1 Cor. 3:16-17; 2 Cor. 6:6; Eph. 2:21).
113 The false teachers have abandoned the truth (cf. 6:5; 2 Tim. 2:18; 3:8; 4:4). As Fee writes, “It is extremely important that Timothy not only stop the false teachers (1:3-11) but get people back in touch with the truth” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 54).
114 This probably refers to Jesus incarnation; cf. John 1:14; Rom. 1:3. The verb “manifested” implies pre-existence (ἐφανερώθη).
115 See Romans 1:3-4; cf. 1 Peter 3:18.
116 This may well refer to the worship which angels gave to Jesus at his resurrection (cf. 1 Peter 1:12).
117 This probably refers to the early apostolic preaching (Acts).
118 Although Fee understands this to be a reference to be descriptive of Jesus’ exaltation (e.g., glorious, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 56), Barrett seems to offer a better suggestion that this refers to Christ’s final enthronement when all his foes have been defeated (1 Cor. 15:23). This is eschatological of the final victory of Christ which will come after this time of preaching is concluded (The Pastoral Epistles, p. 66). Nevertheless, the past tense may argue against a future orientation.
119 One does not know how the Spirit has said this. Was it a revelation spoken in the church (Barrett, The Pastoral Epistles, pp. 66-67), or one spoken to Paul as in Acts 20? Fee affirms that this formula was never used by Paul to refer to the OT (1 Timothy and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 60). It is difficult to be certain how this was known.
120 This time period (ἐν ὑστέροις καιροῖς ) seems to refer to the time from the advent of Christ and especially the Holy Spirit onward. It was, and is, inclusive of the present time of the church (2 Tim. 3:1; Matt. 24:12 (?); Jude 17-18; 2 Pet. 3:3-7). It not only speaks of imminence, but of the now aspect of the end times (e.g., the inauguration of the Kingdom through the ministry of the Holy Spirit. The consummation of the Kingdom is yet to occur.
121 These are probably believers--those who are presently part of the “household of faith.”
122 See 2 Corinthians 4:4; 11:3,13-14.
123 The term is ψευδολόγων --false words.
124 This may mean that they have the seat of their moral judgments seared (δεδαυστησιασμένων), or it may describe the false teachers as having been branded in their conscience with Satan’s brand (e.g., “to burn in as with a branding iron” [Thayer, s.v., “καυστηριάζω” , p. 342]).
125 This may have been a form of Jewish or Gentile asceticism wherein there was a dim view of sex (cf. 1 Corinthians 7:1-7; Matt. 22:30; cf. Col. 2:16-20). In terms of Jewish asceticism this may be related to the mergabah mysticism which consisted of “religious exercises designed to facilitate entry into the vision of the heavenly chariot ( מֶרְכָּבָה) with God visibly enthroned above it--the vision granted to Ezekiel when he was called to his prophetic ministry (Ezek. 1:15-28)” [F. F. Bruce, “The Colossian Heresy,” Bib.Sac. 141 (1984): 201-202]. See my introductory notes on Colossians p. 9.
126 Romans 14:14.
127 See Mark 7:19; Acts 10; 1 Corinthians 10:23-33; Romans 14:1-23; Colossians 2:16,21.
128 The truth of the Gospel message which affirms that there are not food laws, or perhaps an allusion to Genesis 1 where all of God’s creation is declared to be “good.”
129 As Fee rightly says, “Implied in this is not that the prayer in itself makes it acceptable to God, but that the prayer of thanksgiving has inherent in it the recognition of God’s prior creative action. It is thus the believer’s response to God as Creator, and the work of God and the prayer together make it acceptable (lit, ‘sanctify it,’ keeping the ritual imagery)” [1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 62].
130 Fee writes, “The instructions in the first paragraph are clearly given vis-à-vis the false teachers. In contrast to these false teachers, who have been deceived by Satan and in turn are deceiving others, Timothy must guard his own life and teaching of the truth with great care” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 64). Therefore, in the second paragraph Timothy is urged to function as a model for both godly living and ministry for the sake of his hearers.
131 The term is διὰκονος as in 3:8. Here it is descriptive of the act rather than the office.
132 This is probably inclusive of a larger section from 2:1--4:5.
133 This is probably the community as a whole (cf. Phil. 4:1). Paul’s concern is for the church in Ephesus!
134 If he will feed himself (ἐντρεφόμενος) spiritually. This is the image of child rearing.
135 This is a contrast to excellent teaching in 4:6b (e.g., the false kind of teaching). The contrast is emphasized because the imperative comes last. Literally, these are “godless and old womanish myths or legends” (τοὺς δὲ βεβήλους καὶ γραώδεις μύθους)--”wives’ tales.” Fee affirms that this terminology (old wives’ legends) is, “a sarcastic expression often used in philosophical polemic comparing an opponent’s position to the tales perpetuated by the old women of those cultures as they would sit around weaving and the like” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 65).
136 Paul now moves to the image of athletics--”keep yourself in training” (Γύμναζε).
137 This is “truth and its visible expression in correct behavior” (Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, p. 66). See 2:2 and 3:16).
138 The term is γυμνασία.
139 It his helpful for the present age.
140 See Colossians 1:29.
141 This is a continuation of the athletic metaphor--e.g., to struggle--”contest.”
142 This is very similar to Paul’s affirmations in 2:4-6. Christ is the savior of all men (σωτὴρ πάντων ἀνθρώπων)--”especially,” “above all,” “chiefly,” “most of all”) of the believing (μάλιστα πιστῶν) (see Thayer, s.v. “μάλιστα,” p. 387). As Fee writes, “Our hope rests in him, because he is the Savior of all, that is, he would save (give life to) all people (see disc. on 2:4-6), but his salvation is in fact effective only for those who believe. The latter addition makes it clear that the universal scope of salvation argued for so strongly in 2:4-6 is not as the same time an expression of universalism” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 67).
143 In addition to a personal encouragement to Timothy who may have been age 30-35 among older elders, Paul is also affirming Timothy’s authority as Paul’s authority.
144 These are all in contrast to the false teachers, e.g., not involved in arguments (speech), good behavior (conduct), love and faith (cf. 1:5-6), and purity (in contrast to false asceticism; cf. 4:3; 5:22-23).
145 Fee affirms, “Rather than providing an example of the pastor’s specific duties in worship, these three items basically refer to the same thing--reading, exhortation, and exposition of Scripture--and such are to be Timothy’s positive way of counteracting the erroneous teachings (cf. 2 Tim. 3:14-17)” [1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 69].
146 His gift as pastor-teacher (?) through which he is to overcome the false teachers.
147 Paul is emphasizing the authority of Timothy’s teaching against the false teachers. Timothy has been confirmed by God (prophecies) and men (elders).
148 Fee writes, “The evidence from 2 Timothy 2:16 and 3:9 suggests that progress was one of the slogans of the false teachers, perhaps as a kind of elitist appeal to those who wanted to ‘advance’ into ‘deeper truths’ by engaging in their speculative nonsense .... If so, then this is a bold counterstatement to kind of progress, which in 2 Timothy 2:16 is ironically labeled ‘progress in ungodliness [asebeia].’ by Timothy’s being a faithful minister of the word of the gospel, the people will be able to see the real thing” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 70).
149 Fee understands Paul to have a future salvation in hand (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 70). It need not be either/or. Salvation could well be a present preservation as in 2:15 above with a view to future reward.
150 The placement of this very specific unit into the argument of the book is as follows: (1) this flows out of the specific exhortations which Paul has been giving to Timothy in 4:6-16--especially in view of his youthfulness, (2) here, however, Paul writes 5:1-2 as an introduction to what follows concerning widows, elders, and servants.
151 Leaders are to appeal to those in the congregation as they would to family (assuming the ideal of difference and respect in the home).
152 The term is Πρεσβυτέρῳ which no doubt includes the leaders as in 4:14 and 5:17-25, but may be more general describing all older men.
153 See Romans 16:13.
154 Perhaps this was an area of special concern with some in the community (cf, 5:11; 2 Tim. 3:6-7).
155 This is probably one of the two primary issues in the church. Here Paul is more specific with “men and women” as he deals with the younger widows and then in the next unit with the elders in the church.
Although older widows are addressed in this unit, it is the activity of the younger ones that Paul has specifically in focus. The descriptions of the “real widows” (5:5-7,9-10) are to stand in contrast with the activities of the younger ones (5:11-15). Probably, the difficulty with these younger widows lies with the influence which they are receiving from the false teachers. 2 Timothy 3:6-7 specifically says, “For among them are those who enter in to households and captivate weak women weighed down with sins, led on by various impulses, always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.” Therefore, this unit on widows makes prefect sense in view of the infectious activity of the false teachers throughout the rest of the letter.
156 Literally the exhortation is to “honor” (τίμα) which not only implies respect, but also remuneration (cf. 5:17; Mark 7:10-16).
157 Literally it reads, “Honor widows who are being widows” (Χήρας τίμα τὰς ο῎ντως χήρας). This is a major theme in the OT (Ex. 22:22; Deut. 24:17, 19-21; Job 29:13; Ps. 68:5; Isa. 1:17) and in the NT (Acts 6:1-6; 9:36,39,41; James 1:27).
It seems that one who is really a widow is one who is all alone (without family to care for her as in 5:4-8, 16), sixty years of age or older (5:9), and one who is godly and given to prayer (5:5,10).
158 There may be some true insight by Fee (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 79) when he identifies a chiastic structure (ab ba) in 5:4-6:
a words to relatives (v. 4)
b words to the widows (v.5)
b judgment on disobedient widows (vv. 6-7)
a judgment on disobedient relatives (v.8)
159 This probably is an allusion to the fifth commandment, “Honor your father and your mother ....” (Ex. 20:12; Deut. 5:16).
160 The order reflects a Jewish concept of a day (Gen. 1; cf. 1 Thess. 2:9). This sounds much like Anna in Luke 2:36-38.
161 The term is σπαταλάω describing one who lives luxuriously or voluptuously, in indulgence (cf. James 5:5).
162 See 3:2.
163 The “but” probably goes back to verse 4.
164 This may be those living under his own roof. Perhaps some were neglecting or turning over to the church a widowed mother or grandmother.
165 Again, Paul seems to be concerned with how those outside of the faith are evaluating the church through its members. He is saying that Christian behavior is to be, “circumspect before the outsider and therefore at least be ethically equal to theirs--although obviously more is expected as well. Paul is not condemning unbelievers; on the contrary, he is saying that they do in fact take care of their own widows. To do less is therefore to be less than an unbeliever; it equals a denial of the faith, since it is to act worse than a person who makes no profession of faith (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 79).
166 The exhortation to add a widow to a list (Χήρα καταλεγέσθω) is to literally “write down” with the sense of “counting among” or “enrolling” in some kind of official list for the church’s care of widows.
167 This may have been the cultural norm for old age as will as an age beyond which one would not expect her to be remarried.
168 See the discussion of this phrase above in 3:2.
169 This list is probably representative and not descriptive of all of her good works.
170 See John 13.
171 The order of events in this verse may well be the clue to its meaning. It does not seem that their desire to remarry is tantamount to abandoning their faith, but that their desire to remarry overshadows their devotion to Christ to the point that they will allow their sensual desire to supersede their devotion to Christ. Therefore, this may well be descriptive of a remarriage fueled out of a passion which abandons one’s faith (πίστιν) because it is a remarriage to an unbeliever (cf. 1 Cor. 7:39).
Therefore, “commitment” and “previous pledge” are terms which describe a widow’s faith, rather than (1) a specific vow of “celibacy” that a widow would make to the church as a widow, or (2) her “faithfulness” to her first husband concerning which remarriage would have been abandoning the ideal of being married only once (5:9).
The latter two options see remarriage as the difficulty rather than the widow’s move away from her faith. Paul understands proper remarriage as being the means of redemption for these widows (5:14), and is thus concerned about redeeming them for the “faith”, rather than getting them to see the fault of remarriage (Fee, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 82.
172 The Greek reads, “α῞μα δὲ καὶ” (“along with that they also”).
173 They are not doing what they should be doing (prayer [v. 5], and the good works of verse 9-10). Rather than investing themselves in their own houses as above, they go from house to house. Fee suggests that this could be descriptive of the disruption of the different house churches as they go from house to house (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p.82). He supports this through the term used for “gossips” (φλύαροι) which is not so descriptive of “idle talk about the affairs of others” as of “nonsense” or “foolishness” in regards to the truth (cf. the verb φλυαρέω with the sense of “making empty charges” or to accuse one falsely” [Thayer, p. 655]). Therefore, he writes, “Thus, the young widows are described in terms very much like the false teachers whose talk is foolish (1:6) and empty (6:20), and who are also talking about things they should not (cf. 1:6-7; 4:7; 6:3-4). It is probably as the ‘idle’ purveyors of the false teachings that they are busybodies, and thus this becomes one of the reasons they are to be in all submissiveness and not to teach (2:11-12) [1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 83].
174 See 4:1-2 above. Some of the younger widows have turned away under the influence of the false teachers who speak for Satan.
175 Perhaps these were women like Lydia (Acts 16:14-15) or Cloe (1 Cor. 1:11).
176 Fee offers a fine discussion of the argument in the following discussion: “The structure of the argument has some interesting similarities to the foregoing section on widows. Just as the concern there was twofold (genuine care for widows, in the context of some who have rejected faith), so here Paul begins with a genuine concern for the care of the elders (vv.17-19) but then moves on to the greater urgency--the impartial reproof of those who are sinning (vv. 20-21). Replacements for the sinning elders are to be selected with great care (v. 22), because some people’s sins, unfortunately, are not always immediately evident (v. 24). But never one to leave a matter on such a negative note, Paul adds that the same is often true of good deeds as well. Verse 23, the great puzzler, is a slight digression, prompted by what is said in verse 22 but expressed in light of both the asceticism of the false teachers (4:3) and Timothy’s personal health.
But why is all of this said here, and not after chapter 3, for example, or 4:1-5? The answer to that probably lies in the overall argument of the letter. After the charge in chapter 1, Paul began with the conduct in the community vis-à-vis the false teachers (chaps. 2-3) then moved to an exposure of the false teaching itself--and its source (4:1-4). After a renewed charge to Timothy and his own responsibilities in the situation (4:6-5:2), Paul gives instructions about how to deal with the two specific groups who are the problem element--some young widows (5:3-16) and their ‘captors,’ the straying elders (this section). Thus its location in the argument is related in part to the relationship of the false teachers to the younger widows and in part to the need finally to deal with the elders specifically (good and bad, but prompted by the bad)” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, pp. 87-88).
177 This term (Πρεσβύτεροι) does not seem to be a reference to older men so much (cf. 5:1) as to those who are leaders in the church (cf. 3:1-7; Titus 1:5-7; Acts 14:23; 15:4; 20:17,28).
178 Honor (τιμῆς) probably refers to pay (at least; cf. 5:18). It is difficult to identify what “double” has reference to--twice that of other elders, twice that of widows? Perhaps it refers to honor and remuneration. These leaders are to be well cared for by the community (see also 1 Cor. 9:7-14; 1 Thess. 2:7; 2 Cor. 11:8-9).
179 This Scripture is located in Deuteronomy 25:4. It is interesting that this placement of the verse in Deuteronomy is between two other discussions: (1) resolving disputes in Deuteronomy 25:1-3, and (2) levirate marriage in Deuteronomy 25:5-10. Clearly, the verse is to be illustrative of care for those who are a part of the community. Paul uses it in a similar way in this passage. Here the care is to be for those who work among them--the elders. It is also interesting that Paul places this verse between two issues: (1) financial remuneration, and (2) protection against false accusations. The overall point is that the community is to care for its own (cf. 1 Cor. 9:9,14; Lk. 10:7).
180 See Deuteronomy 19:5; Matthew 18:16.
181 The phrase literally reads, “before (the face of) all” (ἐνώπιον πάντων).
182 The present, active participle emphasizes that these elders are in sin (Τοὺς ἁμαρτάνοντας). Church discipline is not for those who have been caught in a sin and have thus repented. When that occurs, restoration is the issue at hand (Gal. 6:1). Here they are still sinning, therefore, church discipline is in view.
183 his could have reference to the remaining elders or the rest of the congregation.
184 Fee calls this a “heavenly tribunal” (1 and 2 Timothy, p. 91).
185 The Greek reads, “drink water only” (Μηκέτι ὑδροπότει).
186 Perhaps the logical connection with verses 22 and 23 is that in verse 22 Timothy is urged to keep himself free from sin, but in verse 23 Paul reminds Timothy that it is not sin for him to care for himself with a little wine as is needed. Such limitations are really tied to the asceticism of the false teachers as in 4:3 where it reads, “men who forbid marriage and advocate abstaining from foods, which God has created to be gratefully shared in by those who believe and know the truth” (NASB). As Fee says, “If he does not want Timothy sharing in their sins, neither does he want him to get caught up in the false teachers’ view of purity, namely abstaining from certain foods (4:3), which apparently included wine” (1 and 2 Timothy, p. 92).
187 Fee writes, “That is, when judgment finally comes on some people, it will be no surprise because of their evident sins” (1 and 2 Timothy, p. 92).
188 Perhaps these “hidden” sins are given in 6:5-10, namely, pride, arguing, jealousy, and covetousness.
189 The place of this paragraph in the argument of the book is somewhat problematic. Fee offers a plausible reconstruction which aids the interpreter here: “One wonders, therefore, whether the false teachings being propagated in this part of the world were putting considerable tension on the master/slave relationship in the church.
One cannot be sure that such was the case here, but it is altogether likely in view of the position of this section in the argument. Furthermore, as with the two preceding sections, the concern seems to be with the second item taken up, namely, the attitudes among believers. If so, then perhaps problems have arisen among some Christian slaves and their attitudes toward Christian masters similar to those among the younger widows. Has an over-realized eschatology or an elitist spirituality caused them to disdain the old relationships that belong to the age that is passing away?” (1 and 2 Timothy, p. 96).
190 Fee offers a helpful discussion on the nature of slavery in the first century. He emphasizes that it was not like American slavery in that it was not enforced on the basis of race, but on the basis of financial and political expedience (e.g., economic necessity, overtaking other nations, birth). Although a slave was at the bottom of the social ladder, some would stay there because of the security (1 and 2 Timothy, pp. 93-94).
This is not to approve of slavery. Scripture never promotes men becoming slaves to men (especially for indebtedness--e.g., the year of Jubilee in Leviticus 25). Nevertheless, Paul does unfold the significance of Christianity as one must walk though a fallen reality. Even though these slaves may be free in their relationship with Christ, they are still under the yoke in their earthly society.
191 Fee writes, “What if their orders violated conscience? Why not speak out against slavery? But Paul’s instruction is quite in keeping with the entire NT understanding of Christian behavior as essentially reflecting servanthood (cf. Mark 10:43-45; 1 Cor. 9:19; Gal. 5:13; Eph. 5:21; 1 Pet. 2:16-17) and of Christian existence as basically eschatological--the form of this world is passing away; as an eschatological people, or present status is irrelevant (1 Cor. 7:17-24, 29-31). Therefore, precisely because it is essentially irrelevant, one may live one’s present status in loving obedience” (1 and 2 Timothy, pp. 96-97).
192 See 2:2; 3:7; 5:14; cf. also “blaspheme” in Romans 2:24; Isa. 52:5.
193 This may well be where the problem of the church lies.
194 See 4:12.
195 As in chapter one, Paul once again exposes and indicts the false teachers in this unit. Here Paul completes the portrait which he began in chapter one. These teachers are the reason for the difficulties in the church, and thus the presence of Timothy in Ephesus and the writing of this letter. It seems that they are driven by pride and ultimately greed (cf. Acts 19:23-41). Paul will finally pronounce their sentence of destruction!
196 This is through a first class condition which assumes the premise to be true.
197 See the warnings in Galatians 5:21 and Romans 1:29.
198 See 1 Thessalonians 2:4-9; Galatians 1:10. It seems that the false teachers were trying to receive people’s favor through their teaching and thus also their money. Many of the counterparts to these verses are found in the qualifications for elders.
199 As Fee puts it, “The point is clear enough. godliness is not something to make material gain in or from (v. 5); rather, it is itself the greatest gain (v. 6) [1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 103].
200 The term is αὐταρκείας describing contentment whether one is in want or in abundance (cf. Phil. 4:13).
201 See Job 1:21.
202 See Jesus’ discussion of this very thing in Luke 12:22-32 and Matthew 6:25-34.
203 Just as the other exposures of the false teachers led to an exhortation to Timothy (cf. 1:3-7, 18-20; 4:1-5) so does the pattern follow here. As Fee writes, “Even though Paul has yet a further word on riches, to the already wealthy (vv. 17-19), the final exposure and indictment of the false teachers calls forth an immediate final exhortation to Timothy (1 and 2 Timothy,Titus, p. 107).
In the context of an eschatological future Paul urges Timothy through four imperatives (6:11-12), proclaims a solemn charge (6:13-14), and then expresses a final doxology (6:15-16).
204 See Moses (Deut. 33:1; Josh. 14:6), David (Neh. 12:24), and the prophets (1 Sam. 9:6; 1 Kings 17:18; 2 Kings 4:7). Timothy is probably being placed in contrast to the false teachers with this title.
205 This would include their greed (6:6-10), their different doctrines (6:3; cf. 1:4; 4:3,7) and their divisive and destructive controversies (6:4-5).
206 This exhortation, ἀγονίζου τόν καλὸν ἀγῶνα τῆς πίστεως, speaks of perseverance whether its referent is that of running (cf. 2 Tim. 4:7, “finishing the course”) or with boxing/wrestling (cf. 1 Cor. 9:25-27) is not certain. But there is the sense of remaining in the event, the game, the competition.
207 Although it is difficult to be certain about the specific event which Paul has in mind here, this may have reference to Timothy’s baptism rather than to his call into ministry.
This “eternal life” (τῆς αἰωνίου ζωῆς) seems to be eschatological is likened in the athletic metaphor as the prize. Therefore, it may well have reference to reward in the future kingdom. This eternal life, nevertheless, is the life unto which God called Timothy. Therefore, there is a sense of certainty in the event, which he is to now also run for. It is within his grasp to do so (4:8).
208 There are many views as to the meaning of this term: (1) the exhortations given in 6:11-12, (2) an alleged baptismal charge from the allusion in 6:12, (3) the whole Christian faith, (4) Timothy’s own faith and ministry. Number four may be the best choice in view of 4:16 (“Take heed to yourself and to your teaching; hold to that, for by so doing you will save both yourself and your hearers”), 6:20 (“O Timothy, guard what has been entrusted to you.”) and Paul’s words in 2 Timothy 4:7 (“I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith”).
209 Just as was the case with Jesus’ first coming (Galatians 4).
210 The term is δυνάστης (cf. Ecclus. 46:5; 2 Macc. 12:15) describing God as sovereign Ruler.
211 This title was used of Persian emperors (Ezek. 26:7; Dan. 2:37; Ezra 7:12) and of God (2 Maccabees 13:4). Lord of lords emphasizes God’s sovereignty over all other “deities” (Deut. 10:17; Ps. 136:2-3). God is sovereign over all powers be they human or divine (cf. 1 Enoch 9:4; Rev. 17:14; 19:16).
212 The term is ἀθανασίαν. He is not-dying.
213 This has reference to His blinding glory (cf. Ps. 104:2; Ex. 14:15-17; 34:29-35; 1 Ki. 8:11; Jn. 1:7-9; 3:19-21; 1 Jn. 1:5-7).
214 Literally it reads, “whom no one has ever seen nor is able to see” (ο῞ν ει῎δεν οὐδεὶς ἀνθρώπων οὐδὲ ἰδεῖν δύναται)
215 See Revelation 5:13; 1 Peter 4:11; Revelation 1:6.
216 The placement of this unit into the argument of the book is somewhat problematic at first glance, but need not be. Fee’s excellent discussion is worth citing in full: “Paul was bringing the letter to its close with a final word against the false teachers, a word that turned out to be such a strong judgment against their greed that it included a warning to “all those who want to get rich” (v. 9). But there would have been some in the church who were already rich in the things of this life (v. 17), especially those in whose homes the church met (cf. also 5:16). However, since Paul’s first concern was with the false teachers and Timothy’s own role in combating them, he followed his words about them with an immediate final exhortation to Timothy--to keep contending in the noble contest until the End. Now, having given that noble charge to Timothy, he returns to say a few words for the already rich, lest they feel condemned by verses 6-10” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 114).
217 As Fee writes, “This paragraph is actually a single sentence in Greek that makes a considerable play on the word ‘riches’ and related ideas. The word itself occurs four times in four different forms.... Thus ‘the rich’ are not to trust in riches, but in God who ‘richly’ gives all things, and therefore are to be rich in good deeds, which then, to extend the metaphor, is their way to store up ... a treasure for the future” (Ibid., p. 117).
218 See Proverbs 23:4-5.
219 This statement demonstrates that Paul is not borrowing from Stoic ideas (cf. Phil. 4:10-13).
Although Paul often champions the poor, here he affirms that God also blesses those who are well-off financially (cf. Philemon 1-2, 5-7, 22). Nevertheless, he expects those who have to be generous with those who do not have (cf. Rom. 12:8, 13:2; 2 Cor. 9:6-15). He does not affirm greedy, self-indulgent living. He affirms that one can enjoy one’s wealth as a gift from God, but one must also be responsible with one’s wealth. Life is more than now.
220 Perhaps contextually this has reference to good works related to giving.
221 For similar New Testament discussions see Matthew 6 and Luke 16. See also Ecclesiastes 5:8-20. That which is “won” will most probably be reward in the Millennial kingdom. This will express itself in terms of ruling with Christ during the Millennium.
222 After completing Paul’s thoughts concerning riches in 6:6-19, Paul now brings his letter to a conclusion. This could have occurred after the charge and doxology in 6:16, but Paul wanted to be sure that the rich in the community did not misinterpret his words to the false teachers as a rebuke of them.
Paul will now conclude by repeating his charge to Timothy in view of the false teachers. As with Galatians, Paul does not offer any greetings at the conclusion of this letter. He has been dealing with serious business, therefore, he simply summarizes it and closes.
223 Keep the deposit! Fee writes, “The imperative ... is a metaphor, drawn from common life, reflecting the highest kind of sacred obligation in ancient society, namely, being entrusted with some treasured possession for safe-keeping while another is away” (1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, p. 118). In specific this deposit was probably Timothy’s ministry against the false teachers in Ephesus (cf. 4:11-14; 5:22-23; 6:2, 11-12, 20-21).
224 See 4:7.
225 See also 1:6 and 2 Timothy 2:22.
226 The term is ἡστόχησαν from ἀστοχέω meaning to miss the mark, deviate or depart from something (cf. 2 Tim. 2:18; BAGD, s.v. “ἀστοχέω,” p. 118).
227 Has this concern been Paul’s driving issue throughout the letter (1:3-7, 19-20, 4:1-2; 5:15, 20; 6:10; cf. 2:14; 3:6-7; 5:5-6, 24-25)?
228 The “you” is plural (ὑμῶν). This is evidence that Paul probably intended for this letter to be read aloud to the church(es).
Concerning the term “grace” Fee writes, “The grace itself is a typically Pauline feature. The standard ‘good-bye’ in ancient letters was errosthe (lit., ‘be strong’), found in the letter of James (Acts 15:29) and the letters of Ignatius (cf. 2 Macc. 11:21, 33; Jos. Life 227, 365). But as with the salutation ..., Paul ‘Christianizes’ all the formal elements of the ancient letter” (Ibid., p. 120).
Related Topics: Introductions, Arguments, Outlines